alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14.1

 

INTERACTIVE MOTORSPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

 

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

 

The following code shall apply to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp., an Indiana Corporation, and shall be followed by its employees, officers and directors:

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. 

 

The company prohibits conflicts of interest. Any conflict of interest that occurs should be reported directly to the Company’s CEO. A “conflict of interest” occurs when an individual’s private interest interferes in anyway - or even appears to interfere - with the interests of the Company as a whole. A conflict situation can arise when an employee, officer or director takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her Company work objectively and effectively. Conflicts of interest also arise when an employee, officer or director, or a member of his or her family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position in the Company. Loans to, or guarantees of obligations of, such persons are of special concern.

 

CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES. 

 

Employees, officers and directors are prohibited from (a) taking for themselves personally opportunities that are discovered through the use of Company property, information or position; (b) using Company property, information, or position for personal gain; and (c) competing with the Company. Employees, officers and directors owe a duty to the Company to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.

 

CONFIDENTIALITY. 

 

Employees, officers and directors must maintain the confidentiality of information entrusted to them by the Company or its customers, except when disclosure is authorized or legally mandated. Confidential information includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors or might be harmful to the company or its customers, if disclosed.

 

FAIR DEALING. 

 

Each employee, officer and director shall endeavor to deal fairly with the Company’s customers, suppliers, competitors and employees. 

 

PROTECTION AND PROPER USE OF COMPANY ASSETS. 

 

All employees, officers and directors should protect the Company’s assets and ensure their efficient use.  Theft, carelessness and waste have a direct, negative impact on the Company’s profitability. All Company assets should be used for legitimate business purposes.

 

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS (INCLUDING INSIDER TRADING LAWS).

 

Each employee, officer and director must comply with laws, rules and regulations, including insider trading laws. Insider trading is both unethical and illegal, and will be dealt with decisively.

 

REPORTING ANY ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR. 

 

The Company encourages ethical behavior. The Company encourages employees to talk to supervisors, managers or other appropriate personnel when in doubt about the best course of action in a particular situation. Additionally, employees should report violations of laws, rules, regulations or this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to appropriate personnel. No retaliation for such reports made in good faith will be permitted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sheffield Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap Wing Khai



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

November 12, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1870        Hayden Survey 1870 Wyoming in camp at Red Buttes

Historical        December 31, 1964        Two buildings on hillside

newsletter        November 30, 2014      Earth Science Matters - Volume 1, Fall 2014
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T.Z.F. International Investments Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xin Chen, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Xin Chen
Xin Chen
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

August 19, 2003

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of T.Z.F. International Investments Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rui Rong Zhang, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Rui Rong Zhang
Rui Rong Zhang
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

August 19, 2003
Michael J. GILES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 5, 2019

Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. *See* *Partridge v. Moore* , 768 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. *See* *Valentine v. State* , 98 So.3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50693

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS ECHEVERRI-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a

Carlos Enrique Echeverri-Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-97-CR-059

- - - - - - - - - -

April 30, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Carlos Echeverri-Rodriguez has appealed his conviction and

sentence for illegally reentering the United States after being

previously deported. Echeverri contends that the evidence

introduced by the Government was insufficient to show that he was

previously deported as alleged in the indictment. The evidence was

sufficient for a reasonable trier of fact to conclude that the

Government had proved the fact of deportation beyond a reasonable

doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979).
Echeverri also contends that his 100-month term of imprisonment,

imposed under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), violated due process because the

Government failed to allege the prior felony conviction element of

a § 1326(b) offense. This argument is foreclosed by the Supreme

Court’s opinion in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 118 S. Ct.

1219, ____, 1998 WL 126904, *8 (Mar. 24, 1998). The conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit        32.1 **

**Certification        required by Rule 13a-14(b) or**

**Rule        15d-14(b) and Section 906 of**

**the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (1) | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                                                                               |                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| May                7,                2007 | By:                                                                                                      |                         /s/ John H. Homier |
|                                      |                               John H. Homier |
|                                      | President                and                Chief Executive Officer                                                |

----
# C_2020433EN.01003401.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 2 October 2020 — Philips Orăștie S.R.L. v Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

(Case C-487/20)

(2020/C 433/42)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Philips Orăștie S.R.L.

Defendant: Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Question referred

May the provisions of [the first paragraph of] Article 179 and [the first paragraph of] Article 183 of Directive 112/2006/EC (1), regard being had to the principles of equivalence, effectiveness and neutrality, be interpreted as precluding national legislation or practices in accordance with which the amount of VAT to be refunded is reduced by including in the calculation of the VAT due amounts representing additional liabilities established in a notice of assessment that has been annulled by a judgment that is not yet final, where such additional liabilities are guaranteed by a bank guarantee and the national tax procedure rules recognise that such a guarantee has the effect of staying enforcement in the case of other taxes and duties?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,523 & AP-76,524

EX PARTE OMAR CARAVEO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. CR08-0502 & CR08-0503 IN THE 415TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM PARKER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts

of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment on each count. The Eleventh

Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Caraveo v. State, Nos. 11-09-00082-CR & 11-09-00083-

CR (Tex. App.–Eastland July 22, 2010, no pet.). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he

failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed. We remanded these
2

applications to the trial court and directed it to order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s

claim.

On remand, appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit,

the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to

timelynotifyApplicant that his convictions had been affirmed.The trial court recommends that relief

be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petitions for discretionary review of the

judgments of the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Cause Nos. 11-09-00082-CR and 11-09-00083-CR

that affirmed his convictions in Case Nos. CR08-0502 and CR08-0503 from the 415th Judicial

District Court of Parker County. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionary review with the

Eleventh Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: March 30, 2011

Do not publish
# C_2022171EN.01000501.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS)

(Case C-171/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Request for assistance - Claim for damages - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 24, paragraphs 1 and 2 - Article 90(1) and (2) - Review of an administrative measure which has become final)

(2022/C 171/05)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: WV (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, abogado, and F.-M. Hislaire, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders WV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders WV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
EX PARTE Larry G. COKER

CR-16-0869

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - (-)oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        September 21, 2015        El Niño and La Niña will Exacerbate Coastal Hazards Across Entire Pacific

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1446

___________

Dawn R. Rolph, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States 

v. * District Court for the District

* of Minnesota.

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the *

Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 22, 1999

Filed: October 28, 1999 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LAY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dawn R. Rolph appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming

the Commissioner's decision to deny Rolph disability insurance and supplemental

security income benefits. For reversal, Rolph contends the record supports a finding

that there are no other jobs in the national and regional economy that Rolph could

perform and the administrative law judge improperly discredited Rolph's limitations and

subjective complaints of pain. Having reviewed the administrative record and the

parties' briefs, we conclude that Rolph's arguments lack merit. We find substantial

evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision of the Commissioner that
-2-

Rolph is not disabled for social security purposes. Because the controlling legal

principles are well established and an extended discussion would serve no useful

purpose in this fact-intensive case, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's

order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Terri Lewis STEVENS and Jennifer Fruchnicht, Wife of/and Craig Rivera v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT

NO. 2018-C-2062

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
# C_2020201EN.01000801.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/8

---

Appeal brought on 14 January 2020 by Neoperl AG against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 14 November 2019 in Case T-669/18, Neoperl AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-14/20 P)

(2020/C 201/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Neoperl AG (represented by: H. Börjes-Pestalozza and G. Schultz, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 23 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) refused the request that the appeal be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
Order entered December 23 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 01073 - CV IN RE RENT SPACE MGMT LLC , Relator O r iginal Proceeding from the County Court a t Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 21 - 04670 - A

O RDER Before Justices Myers, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle Before the Court is relator ’ s December 9, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus . We request that real part y in interest and respondent file a response, if any, to the petition for writ of mandamus by January 5 , 202 2

. /s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE
Exhibit 8.1  The table below presents our significant subsidiaries and investees, the places of incorporation and our effective ownership interests therein as of December 31, 2016.  Subsidiary

Accounting   Method

Ownership   Interest

Place of   Incorporation/   OrganizationRussian Telephone Company

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaMTS Ukraine

Consolidated

100.0%

UkraineMTS Turkmenistan

Consolidated

100.0%

TurkmenistanSibintertelecom

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaNVision Group

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaSitronics Telecom Solutions

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaNvision Czech Republic

Consolidated

100.0%

Czech RepublicSputnikovoe TV

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaStream LLC

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaDega Retail Holding Limited

Consolidated

100.0%

British Virgin IslandsStream Digital LLC (1)

Consolidated

100.0%

RussiaMetro-Telecom

Consolidated

95.0%

RussiaMGTS

Consolidated

94.7%

RussiaK-Telecom

Consolidated

80.0%

ArmeniaNavigation Information Systems Group

Consolidated

77.7%

RussiaMTS International Funding(2)

Consolidated

SE

IrelandMTS Belarus

Equity

49.0%

BelarusMTS Bank

Equity

26.6%

RussiaZifrovoe TV

Equity

20.0%

RussiaOZON

Equity

10.8%

Cyprus  
 (1)A wholly owned subsidiary, through which we repurchase our own shares.  (2)A private limited company organized and existing under the laws of Ireland for the sole purpose of financing a loan to MTS. The company is a structured entity of the Group.  See also Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements.