alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lazay Cartuz MASON v. STATE

CR-16-0644

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Clinical Trials of Mind and Body Interventions (MB).                    

*Date:*                         February 27-28, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.                     

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         BAILA S Hall, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-9285,                         *baila.hall@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 27, 2024. 

David W Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-31478 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to November 9, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
# C_2020045EN.01009601.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/96

---

Action brought on 18 December 2019 — easyCosmetic Swiss v EUIPO — U.W.I. Unternehmensberatungs- und Wirtschaftsinformations (easycosmetic)

(Case T-858/19)

(2020/C 45/82)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: easyCosmetic Swiss GmbH (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Terheggen und S.E. Sullivan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: U.W.I. Unternehmensberatungs- und Wirtschaftsinformations GmbH (Bad Nauheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark easycosmetic — EU trade mark No 13 801 675

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 in Case R 973/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 162ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 21st day of July, 2017, the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D. AND

PLANO ORTHOPEDICS SPORTS MEDICINE AND SPINE CENTER, P.A., Appellants

No. 05

- 16

- 01124

- CV V.

CHRISTEL PENNINGTON,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR

AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF STEVEN PAUL PENNINGTON, DECEASED, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 03386. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Francis and Schenck participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s November 4, 2016

order is REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is ORDERED that appellants STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D. AND PLANO ORTHOPEDICS SPORTS MEDICINE AND SPINE CENTER, P.A. recover their costs of this

app eal from appellee CHRISTEL PENNINGTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STEVEN PAUL PENNINGTON, DECEASED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behal f, and have it duly obeyed and executed.– 2

–

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 31st day of January, 2018. 

# S L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
STATE of Louisiana v. Issa L. LAMIZANA, Jr.

No. 2017-K-1490

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 30, 2019

Hon. Leon A. Cannizzaro, Jr., District Attorney, Donna R. Andrieu, Kyle C. Daly; for appellant.

Sherry Watters ; for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Defendant was found guilty of the aggravated rapes of his two stepchildren, La. R.S. 14:42, and the district court sentenced him to two terms of life imprisonment without parole eligibility. The court of appeal reversed the convictions and sentences because it found the district court erred in quashing the subpoena of a Department of Children and Family Services investigator, who was the first person to interview the victims and their mother, and in refusing to allow the defense to call this investigator to testify at trial. *State v. Lamizana* , 16-1017 (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/31/17), 222 So.3d 58. The court of appeal found that, although it could not "discern whether the testimony of [the investigator] or the records relating to her interview would undermine the credibility of the victims' testimony and, if so, the extent to which the absence of [the investigator's] testimony or records relating to her interview contributed to the verdict," the trial court's action nonetheless "undermines our confidence in the verdict." *Lamizana* , 16-1017, pp. 7-8, 222 So.3d at 63.

We granted the State's application to examine the correctness of that ruling. Upon additional review, however, it became apparent that the record is inadequate to make that determination. No ruling by the district court judge regarding the subpoena appears in the record, and the circumstances under which the investigator appeared but was not permitted to testify are disputed. The investigator's file also does not appear in the record. Although the defense made a general statement in the district court as to what the defense believed her testimony would prove, she was not called and her testimony was not proffered to the district court. Given these deficiencies in the record, we are unable to determine whether this witness was improperly excluded and what affect her exclusion had on the verdicts. *See generally**State v. Vaughn* , 431 So.2d 358, 371 n.8 (1982) (on reh'g) ("[T]he appellate court, when reviewing an erroneous ruling that improperly excludes evidence, must be convinced that the excluded evidence would not have affected the jury's determination.").

During oral argument, the State agreed that the record was inadequate, and the State proposed in the interest of fairness and economy that the matter be remanded to the district court to conduct an evidentiary *873hearing, at which the investigator can be called to testify and the parties can present additional evidence pertinent to the district court's ruling. In light of the State's reasonable proposal, we reverse the court of appeal, and remand to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing consistent with the views expressed here. After the district court conducts the evidentiary hearing, defendant can again appeal his convictions and sentences.

**REVERSED AND REMANDED**
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-58298 and therelated Prospectus (2000 Stock Option Plan) of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. onForm S-8, and in the Registration Statement No. 333-129152 and the relatedProspectus (2004 Stock Option Plan) of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. on Form S-8,of our reports dated March 3, 2006, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orient-Express HotelsLtd. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| London,  England               |
| March  3, 2006                 |

 

1

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1870        Hayden Survey 1870 Wyoming in camp at Red Buttes

Historical        December 31, 1964        Two buildings on hillside

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!
Chad Brian BALENTINE v. STATE

CR-16-0265

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Jamerio HUDSON

CR-16-1033

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Shelby Cir. Ct.
# C_2020161EN.01002401.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia (Italy) lodged on 14 January 2020 — MC v U.T.G. — Prefettura di Foggia

(Case C-17/20)

(2020/C 161/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MC

Defendant: U.T.G. — Prefettura di Foggia

Question referred

Are Articles 91, 92 and 93 of Decreto Legislativo 6 settembre 2011, n. 159 (Legislative Decree No 159 of 6 September 2011), in so far as they do not provide for the person in respect of whom the Administration intends to issue a prohibitory antimafia disclosure to make an internal appeal, compatible with the principle of an adversarial process, as reconstructed and recognised as a principle of EU law.

---
|Household Finance Corporation             |             |               
|----------------------------------------- | ----------- | --------------
|Household Automotive Trust V     (2000-2) |             |               
|                                          |             |               
|                                          |             |               
|Original Principal Class A                |             |               
|Class A-1                                 | 143,000,000 |               
|Class A-2                                 | 157,000,000 |               
|Class A-3                                 | 172,000,000 |               
|Class A-4                                 | 183,211,000 |               
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)           |             |               
|Class A-1                                 | 143,000     |               
|Class A-2                                 | 157,000     |               
|Class A-3                                 | 172,000     |               
|Class A-4                                 | 183,211     |               
|                                          |             |               
|                                          |             |               
|Distribution Date                         |             | 2001 Totals   
|Days                                      |             |               
|                                          |             |               
|CLASS A                                   |             |               
|Class A-1 Principal Distribution          |             | 48,735,532.39 
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution           |             | 620,866.95    
|                                          |             |               
|Class A-2 Principal Distribution          |             | 133,003,904.91
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution           |             | 8,206,826.12  
|                                          |             |               
|Class A-3 Principal Distribution          |             | 0.00          
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution           |             | 12,624,800.04 
|                                          |             |               
|Class A-4 Principal Distribution          |             | 0.00          
|Class A-4 Interest Distribution           |             | 13,612,577.28
##### 



EXHIBIT 31(A)
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
By Principal Executive Officer
              /s/ Daniel GreenbergDaniel GreenbergChief Executive Officer
Larry RIVERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2214

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cesar A. CONTRERAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3317

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent ofIndependent Auditors**

 

The Boardof Directors and Shareholders

AdvancedPower Technology, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-49800 and 333-81376) of Advanced Power Technology, Inc.of our report dated January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balancesheets of Advanced Power Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flowsfor each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report onForm 10-K of Advanced Power Technology, Inc.

 

 
|                | KPMG LLP |
|---------------------|----------|
|                |
| Portland, Oregon    |
| March 24, 2003 |

 

----
Boykin JONES v. STATE

CR-16-0631

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1143 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-927, K2025-928.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31111 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-165092) and in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8(No. 333-58298, No. 333-129152, No. 333-147448 and No.333-161459), of our report dated June 7, 2010 relating to the financialstatements of Hotel Ritz Madrid S.A., which appears in this Form 10-K/AAmendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orient-ExpressHotels Ltd. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Madrid,Spain

June 17,2010

 

----
EX PARTE Dustin GOODSON

CR-16-1128

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Markee D. FELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 17, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jamal L. BLAKELY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4811

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Johnny E. CASAIGNE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. The issue identified by the petitioner is being addressed by the circuit court.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Julius ROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (a)

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of Northland Cable Properties
      Eight Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period
      ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, John Whetzell, Chief
      Executive Officer of Northland Communications Corporation, the General
      Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and

            (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.

Date: 3-30-06

/S/ JOHN S. WHETZELL
John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Properties Eight Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties Eight Limited Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.