alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Christopher M. Lee 

State Bar No. 24041319 

Jim Morrison 

State Bar No. 14519050 

LEE LAW FIRM, PLLC 

8701 Bedford Euless Rd, Ste 510 

Hurst, TX 76053 

469-646-8995 Phone 

469-694-1059 Fax 

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

IN RE: § 

 § 

ELEISIA ROYMONICA WAITES § CASE NO. 24-40042-MXM-13

§ 

Debtors § CHAPTER 13

§ 

 

NOTICE OF DESIGNATING NEW LEAD COUNSEL 

TO THE HONORABLE BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: 

 COMES NOW, the law firm of Lee Law Firm, PLLC and would respectfully 

provide the Court notice of the following: 

I. 

 Eric A. Maskell was an employee of Lee Law Firm, PLLC. Eric A. Maskell is 

designated as lead counsel on numerous cases assigned to the Northern District of the United States 

Bankruptcy Court. All cases assigned to Eric A. Maskell will be transferred to Christopher M. Lee 

of Lee Law Firm, PLLC. Lee Law Firm PLLC request the Court terminate Eric A. Maskell as lead 

counsel and designate Christopher M. Lee, located 8701 W Bedford Euless Road, Ste 510, Hurst, 

Texas 76053, as the lead counsel.

Case 24-40042-mxm13 Doc 42 Filed 05/19/24 Entered 05/19/24 20:22:20 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
 Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 By: /s/ Christopher M. Lee 

 Christopher M. Lee 

 State Bar No. 24041319 

 Jim Morrison 

State Bar No. 14519050 

LEE LAW FIRM, PLLC 

 8701 Bedford Euless Rd, Ste 510 

 Hurst, TX 76053 

 469-646-8995 Phone 

 469-694-10591123 Fax 

 ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S) 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that on this May 19, 2024, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was sent via electronic mail or first-class U.S. mail to: 

 

DEBTOR: 

Eleisia Roymonica Waites 

4112 Tobin Drive 

Crowley, TX 76036 

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE: 

Tim Truman 

6851 N.E. Loop 820, Suite 300 

North Richland Hills, TX 76180 

U.S. TRUSTEE 

Rm. 960 

1100 Commerce Street 

Dallas, TX 75242 

 /s/ Christopher M. Lee 

 Christopher M. Lee 

 State Bar No. 24041319 

 ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR 

Case 24-40042-mxm13 Doc 42 Filed 05/19/24 Entered 05/19/24 20:22:20 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF
                                 PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NanoSignal
Corporation, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Scott A.
Ervin, President of NanoSignal Corporation, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



     1.       Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
              September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and


     2.       The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
              for the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of NanoSignal Corporation, Inc.

Dated:  December 30, 2004

NANOSIGNAL CORPORATION, INC.


By    /s/  Scott A. Ervin
      ---------------------
          Scott A. Ervin
             President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FCStone Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the
fiscal 1st Quarter 2005 ending November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson   
|Paul G. Anderson       
|Chief Executive Officer

May 25, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION OF HARRY KIRSCH, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Novartis AG (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/  HARRY   KIRSCHName:
Harry KirschTitle:
Chief   Financial Officer  Date: January 25, 2017
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                       |   |                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |   |                                          |   |
| Date:  November 13,      2009.    |   | /s/ Ernest E. Staggs Jr                  |   |
|                                                       |   | Ernest E. Staggs Jr., Chief Executive Officer |   |

|         |   |                                              |
|--------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|         |   |                                              |   |
|    |   | /s/ Ernest E. Staggs Jr                      |   |
|         |   | Ernest E. Staggs Jr., Principal Financial Officer |   |
Jerome J. FERRIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3882

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

Jerome Ferrier, pro se, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
ederal Aviation
dministration

>

Memorandum

Date: October 23, 2009
To: NTSB
From: Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center

Subject: INFORMATION: Partial Transcript
NORDO Aircraft NWA188
Goodland, KS, October 21, 2009

This transcription covers the Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) 30
R position for the time period from October 21, 2009, 2334 UTC, to October 21,
2009, 2351 UTC.

Agencies Making Transmissions Abbreviations
NORTHWEST ORIENT AIRLINES INC., NWA188 NWA188
Denver Center Sector 30 Radar Controller ZDV30R

I hereby certify that the following is a true transcription of the recorded
conversations pertaining to the subject NORDO Aircraft involving NWA188.

Kenneth J. Ashworth
Staff Support Specialist
Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center

2334

(2335-2338)

2339

2339:16 NWA188 denver center northwest one eighty eight's with you
three seven zero

2339:19 ZDV30R northwest one eighty eight denver center roger

2340

(2341-2344)

2345

2345:49 ZDV30R northwest one eighty eight contact denver center one
three four point one two

2345:56 NWA188 three four one two northwest one eighty eight

2346

(2347-2350)

2351


NORDO-AIRCRAFT
NWA188

Page 2 of 2

End of Transcript
# C_2022024EN.01002901.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — KV v Commission

(Case T-430/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition - Eligibility criterion related to professional experience - Compliance of the criterion used by the selection board with the competition notice)

(2022/C 24/36)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: KV (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, T. Lilamand and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment first, of the decision of the selection board of 19 September 2019 refusing the applicant’s request for reconsideration of the decision not to admit him to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 and, second, of the decision of the appointing authority of 31 March 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the selection board of 19 September 2019 rejecting the request for review of KV’s exclusion from Competition EPSO/AD/371/19; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the selection board of 19 September 2019 rejecting the request for review of KV’s exclusion from Competition EPSO/AD/371/19;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. P-14581-002]

                    On December 13, 2024, the Turlock & Modesto Irrigation District submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the California State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board), in conjunction with the above captioned project. The submittal also included a response from the Water Board stating that it received the application on the same day. Pursuant to section 5.23(b) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify the Water Board of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     December 13, 2024                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     December 13, 2025.                

If the Water Board fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: December 30, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 5.23(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-31650 Filed 1-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Accellent Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ron Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
May 9, 2005

/s/
Ron Sparks

Ron
Sparks
Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
# C_2021431EN.01003502.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — QB v ECB

(Case T-555/20) (1)

(Civil service - ECB staff - Appraisal report - 2015 appraisal exercise - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Article 266 TFEU - Duty of impartiality - ECB staff appraisal guide - Manifest errors of assessment - Liability)

(2021/C 431/42)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: QB (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: B. Ehlers and F. Malfrère, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for the 2015 appraisal period and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have sustained as a result of that document.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders QB to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders QB to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 26.10.2020.

---
# C_2021110EN.01002902.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LICHTYOGA)

(Case T-157/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark LICHTYOGA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 110/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gabriele Bachmann (Bad Grönenbach, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 December 2019 (Case R 2317/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign LICHTYOGA as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gabriele Bachmann to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gabriele Bachmann to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
Tavares Survell EVANS Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroSignal Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2003            /s/  Mr. Matthew G. McConaghy
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Mr. Matthew G. McConaghy, President and CEO


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 28, 2004



/s/ STEPHEN G. KASNETStephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2022294EN.01002402.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission (Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty)

(Case T-440/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India - Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T-301/16 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive anti-dumping duty - Legal basis - Non-retroactivity - Legal certainty - Article 266 TFEU - Proportionality - Right to effective judicial protection - Article 103 of the Union Customs Code - Registration Regulation - Plea of illegality - Admissibility)

(2022/C 294/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Jindal Saw Ltd (New Delhi, India), Jindal Saw Italia SpA (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/527 of 15 April 2020 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India as regards Jindal Saw Limited following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-301/16 (OJ 2020 L 118, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
# C_2021490EN.01003701.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — JK v Commission

(Case T-219/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Commission staff working for the EEAS - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Implied decision rejecting the request - Decision rejecting the complaint - Article 90 of the Staff Regulations - Competent Appointing Authority - Principle of sound administration)

(2021/C 490/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: JK (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 5 June 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the implied decision of the European Commission of 5 June 2019 rejecting JK’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the implied decision of the European Commission of 5 June 2019 rejecting JK’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by JK. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by JK.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
Tony Moore HICKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3235

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 23, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti III, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*88Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation raising multiple issues on appeal. We affirm all issues. However, we remand with instructions for the trial court to correct the written revocation order to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement, which found two grounds for revocation: felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of ammunition. *See* *Walker v. State* , 243 So.3d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). We also remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a corrected written order, consistent with the trial court's oral pronouncement, finding that appellant poses a danger to the community. *See* *Arnone v. State* , 204 So.3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

*Affirmed and remanded with instructions.*

Gross, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.