alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 416 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 416

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Sullivan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2023

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Sullivan.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Sullivan, Cr. No. 21-078, pending in 
        the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of United States v. Sullivan, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager, and any current or former officer or employee of the 
Secretary's office, in connection with the production of evidence 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Career Development for Clinicians/Health Professionals Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 10-11, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mariel Jais, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 594-2614,                         *mariel.jais@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 26, 2024.

Victoria E. Townsend,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-31441 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
*

RPA P1 Overview – NAPTF

FY 2016 Accomplishments

Research Goals

Funding Requirements 
        - Research Goals
        - Better prediction of pavement service life
        - Accurate assessment of aircraft-pavement compatibility
        - Validation of performance prediction model for HMA Overlays
        - Milestones
        - Complete CC7 Traffic Tests by end of FY 2016
        - Complete Reconstruction of CC8 Phase 2 by end of FY 2016
        - Complete Phase 5 of the Reflective Cracking Project by end of FY 2016
        - Deliverables
        - Reports and Technical Papers as required.
        - Construction and near completion of testing for Phase 1 of CC8.  
        - 25,000 passes complete on CC7-North, 13,000 passes complete on CC7-South
        - 4 new bogie wheel sets where purchased and installed
        - Full conversion of hydraulic control system motion controllers

Need

	The National Airport Pavement Test Facility (NAPTF) provides full-scale test data needed to support new FAA design procedures for rigid & flexible pavements.
        - Provide a chart (shown below) of out year funding showing contract dollar requirements. Include information for five years, FY 2015 through FY 2018.

	RPA P1 funds operations and construction cycles for the NAPTF.  It also funds the Reflective Cracking Project.
| FY 2015               | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY-18 |
|-----------------------|---------|---------|-------|
| Funding Target ($000) | $2.9M   | $2.9M   | $3.5M | $3.605 |

          - *
PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

Bar No.01344800

860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

Hurst, TX 76054

Phone: (817) 916-4710

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: CASE NO.: 24-41622-MXM-13

ANTHONY LOYD ROPER

512 W BALL ST

WEATHERFORD, TX 76086

SSN/TIN: XXX-XX-5644

ELIZABETH ANNE ROPER

ELIZABERH ANNE BODDIE

512 W BALL ST

WEATHERFORD, TX 76086

SSN/TIN: XXX-XX-0170

DEBTORS HEARING: NOVEMBER 21, 2024 at 8:30 AM 

NOTICE OF CONTINUED HEARING ON CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN

A previously scheduled hearing for this matter has been continued. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright, Staff Attorney

 Bar No. 24068273

 PAM BASSEL STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

 Bar No. 01344800

 860 Airport Freeway, Ste 150

 Hurst, TX 76054

 (817) 916-4710 Phone

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on or before the date of filing. Service was 

accomplished electronically on Debtors' attorney and all parties entitled to electronic notice and by first class mail on 

the Debtors and the parties listed below, if any. 

By: /s/ Ethan S. Cartwright

 Ethan S. Cartwright

ANTHONY LOYD ROPER

ELIZABETH ANNE ROPER

512 W BALL ST

WEATHERFORD, TX 76086
David BAITY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1826

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

David Baity, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.
Roger Allen CALHOUN v. STATE

CR-16-0915

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1139** 

In re: JOSE PEREZ MALDONADO , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 1:12

- cv - 00357

- WO

- JLW; 1:09

- cr - 00125

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : June 1 6 , 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jose Perez Maldonado , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circui t.PER CURIAM: Jose Perez Maldonado petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court denied Maldonado’s § 2255 motion on April 6, 2015 **.** Accordingly, because the district court has decided Maldonado ’s case, we deny as moot the amended mandamus petition . We grant leave to proceed in forma paup eris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
      Wilen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:November
                14, 2007
              
              
              By:/s/ Ronald WilenRonald
                      Wilen
                    Chief
                      Executive
                      Officer
# C_2021019EN.01001501.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 22 July 2020 — Prokuratura Rejonowa Łódź-Bałuty v D.P.

(Case C-338/20)

(2021/C 19/19)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Prokuratura Rejonowa Łódź-Bałuty

Defendant: D.P.

Questions referred

Does the service on a sentenced person of a decision imposing a financial penalty, without providing a translation into a language which the addressee understands, entitle the authority of the enforcing State to refuse to enforce the decision on the basis of the provisions implementing Article 20(3) of Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA (1) on the grounds of a breach of the right to fair trial?

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (OJ 2005 L 76, p. 16–30).

---
LICENSING OPTION AGREEMENT
                           --------------------------

      THIS LICENSING OPTION AGREEMENT (hereinafter this "AGREEMENT") is made and
entered into as of November 12, 2003 (hereinafter "EFFECTIVE DATE"), by and
among JACKIE BROWN, (hereinafter "LICENSOR"), and NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, INC., a
Nevada corporation (hereinafter "LICENSEE").

                             SUBJECT MATTER RECITALS

      WHEREAS, LICENSOR is the owner of the rights, title, interest, and
ownership properties in and to certain technologies represented by, United
Stated Patents No's: 5,087,533; 6,118,204; 6,238,812 see attachments(3)

                                LICENSING OPTION

      1. Licensing Option. LICENSOR hereby grants to LICENSEE a one (1) year
option, commencing on the Effective Date of this Agreement, to acquire a
worldwide, perpetual right and license to all of the rights, title, interest,
and ownership properties in and to the technologies referred to in this
Agreement for use, improvement, and exploitation by LICENSEE without reserve.

      2. Right of First Refusal. LICENSOR hereby grants to LICENSEE a right of
first refusal, exclusive to LICENSEE, with reference to the use and exploitation
of the technologies referred to in this Agreement, for a term of Six (6) months
upon expiration of the one (1) year option referred to above in paragraph "1"
(the right of first refusal shall commence one (1) year after the Effective Date
of this Agreement, and shall expire six (6) months after the Effective Date of
this Agreement). If LICENSEE exercises this right of first refusal, LICENSOR is
barred, without exception, from licensing the technologies referred to in this
Agreement to any other party, person, or entity.

      3. CONSIDERATION. In consideration for the payment of One Hundred Thousand
shares of Nuclear Solutions, Inc. common stock (100,000) herein acknowledged
LICENSOR grants to LICENSEE both Option and Right of First Refusal herein
identified. Further, it is herein agreed, that LICENSEE shall tender in
consideration for said


                                       1
<PAGE>

acquisition of said exclusive/perpetual license herein stated, for 7% of the
after tax income that the company receives based upon the revenue generated by
the said patents, which shall constitute full and sufficient consideration for
the grant of the subject license.


/s/ Jackie Brown
-----------------------------------
Jackie Brown

ASSIGNOR

DATED:



-----------------------------------
NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, INC.
ASSIGNEE

DATED:


                                       2
DADE MARINE INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. Elias RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2588

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Sanchez-Medina, Gonzalez, Quesada, Lage, Gomez & Machado and Peter A. Gonzalez and James C. Kellner, for appellant.

Scott Jay Feder, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Bryan Kenyon, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trycera Financial, Inc..;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date: November 15, 2010
/s/ Bryan KenyonBryan KenyonChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


Board of Directors
Trend Mining Company
(Formerly Silver Trend Mining Company)
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

                   CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of our audit report dated December 15, 2000 (except for
Notes 14 and 15, as to which the date is May 17, 2001), on the financial
statements of Trend Mining Company (an explorations stage company) as of
September 30, 2000, for the filing with and attachment to the Form 10-KSB/A
for the period ended September 30, 2000.


/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.

Williams & Webster, P.S.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Spokane, Washington

May 21, 2001
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - nebraska(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(3)
              - virginia(1)
              - (-)washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)

## By Year

Project        January 6, 2004        GW/SW Interactions

Project        December 20, 2017        Navy Investigations and Technical Oversight

Project        January 7, 2011        Linking Sources to the Sound
Ladale Airosteve HOLLOWAY v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-01455-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: January 11, 2019 Closed: February 21, 2019

Certiorari - Dismissed.

Mandate, Stay or Recall - Dismissed as Moot.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James McKeever,
Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 13, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/ James McKeeverJames McKeeverInterim Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick C. Shutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jim McDevitt, the Chief
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2008



By:

/s/ Patrick C. ShuttName:

Patrick C. ShuttTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Jim McDevittName:

Jim McDevittTitle:

Chief Financial and Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is
being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



40