alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - (-)washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Robert V. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: January 16, 2007



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Robert V. Johnson        
|Robert V. Johnson            
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)



36.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Gary Carson, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00170

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 14F0102

- 102 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, * Chief Justice Morriss and

Justice Burgess participating. *Justice Moseley

, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant, Gary Carson, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 9, 2019

BY ORDER O F THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2022318EN.01000201.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — CC v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt

(Case C-576/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 - Article 44(2) - Scope - Old-age pension - Calculation - Taking into account of child-raising periods completed in other Member States - Article 21 TFEU - Free movement of citizens)

(2022/C 318/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CC

Defendant: Pensionsversicherungsanstalt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 44(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems must be interpreted as meaning that, where, for the purpose of granting an old-age pension, the person concerned does not fulfil the condition of pursuing an activity as an employed or self-employed person imposed by that provision in order to have taken into account, by the Member State responsible for payment of that pension, child-raising periods completed by that person in other Member States, that Member State is required to take account of those periods pursuant to Article 21 TFEU, provided that that person worked and paid contributions exclusively in that Member State, both before and after transferring that person’s place of residence to another Member State where the person carried out those child-raising periods.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.

---
Cornelius Deunte WEBSTER v. STATE

CR-16-0496

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract                               ( print page 105645)                            1124 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-905, K2025-906.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31007 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Manuel LEBRON-JIMENEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 99(a)
                                                              Form 10-K for 2000
                                                              File No. 333-74847

                                                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors
The CIT Group, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion that Capita Corporation (the "Company")
maintained effective controls over servicing leases and loans subject to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2000 for the CIT Equipment
Collateral 2000-1 (the "Servicing Agreement") for the period from April 1, 2000
through December 31, 2000. This assertion is included in the accompanying report
by management titled "Capita Corporation Management Assertion". Management is
responsible for its controls over its lease and loan servicing. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the controls over Capita Corporation's lease and
loan servicing, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
those controls, and such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any control, errors or fraud may occur and
not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the controls over the
lease and loan servicing to future periods are subject to the risk that the
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the controls may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Capita Corporation maintained
effective controls over lease and loan servicing as required under the Servicing
Agreement for the period from April 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000, is fairly
stated in all material respects, based upon the stated criteria set forth in
Exhibit I "Capita Corporation Stated Lease/Loan Servicing Control Criteria" of
management's report.

S/KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
April 13, 2001
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 40 Filed 06/20/24 Entered 06/20/24 18:28:38 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 40 Filed 06/20/24 Entered 06/20/24 18:28:38 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 40 Filed 06/20/24 Entered 06/20/24 18:28:38 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
# C_2020201EN.01001701.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/17

---

Action brought on 16 March 2020 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-139/20)

(2020/C 201/25)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Siekierzyńska and A. Armenia, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by implementing a law which grants an exemption from excise duty for energy products used by energy-intensive businesses covered by the EU Emissions Trading System, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17(1)(b) and Article 17(4) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by implementing a law which grants an exemption from excise duty for energy products used by energy-intensive businesses covered by the EU Emissions Trading System, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 17(1)(b) and Article 17(4) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity; (1)

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Republic of Poland has introduced into its national legislation an exemption from excise duty for energy products used by energy-intensive businesses covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (‘the EU ETS’).

In the Commission’s view, this constitutes a failure to fulfil obligations under Article 17(1)(b) and Article 17(4) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity. According to those provisions, exemption from or reduction of the level of taxation applied to energy products used by energy-intensive businesses is possible only where agreements are concluded with undertakings or associations of undertakings, or where tradable permit schemes or equivalent arrangements are implemented, as far as they lead to the achievement of environmental protection objectives or to improvements in energy efficiency. The EU ETS cannot, in the Commission’s view, be regarded as a ‘tradable permit [scheme]’ for the purposes of those provisions.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.

---
ZALE CORPORATION and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Appellants, v. Lidia PINEDA, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, L. Scott Biar, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary
and Chief Compliance Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  August 7, 2012



| | /s/ L. Scott Biar                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | L. Scott Biar                                                              
| | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, 
Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer
IN RE: Daniel J. HUNTER

NO. 2019-B-0158

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent mismanaged his client trust account. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rules 1.15(a)(f) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Daniel J. Hunter, Louisiana Bar Roll number 30561, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent's successful completion of a two-year period of probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
# C_2020262EN.01001701.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 May 2020 — A Oy

(Case C-221/20)

(2020/C 262/22)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: A Oy

Other party: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 4 of Directive 92/83/EEC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State which applies reduced rates of excise duty to beer brewed by independent small breweries pursuant to that provision must also apply the provision on the joint taxation of small breweries contained in the second sentence of Article 4(2) of that directive, or is the application of the latter provision left to the discretion of the Member State concerned? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 4 of Directive 92/83/EEC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State which applies reduced rates of excise duty to beer brewed by independent small breweries pursuant to that provision must also apply the provision on the joint taxation of small breweries contained in the second sentence of Article 4(2) of that directive, or is the application of the latter provision left to the discretion of the Member State concerned?

| 2. | Does the second sentence of Article 4(2) of Directive 92/83/EEC have direct effect? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the second sentence of Article 4(2) of Directive 92/83/EEC have direct effect?

---

(1)  Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 21).

---
Robert Stanley POGG, Appellant, v. Shane Marie POGG, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1406

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019

Robert S. Pogg, Jasper, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN and LAMBERT, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - (-)documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 22, 2006
 Volkswagen Public Auto Loan Securitization, LLCVolkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2
  Delaware
    
    333-103709
    
    83-0349353333-103709-02
    
    43-6903059(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (Registrants IRS
Employer Id. Nos.)
 3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326
   
    o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01     Other Events.Item 9.01     Financial Statements and Exhibits.EXHIBIT INDEXVALET 2003-2 Servicer Certificate for the Collection Period Ended 04/29/06    Table of Contents  
   
  
 Exhibit 99.1
    
    Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2 Servicer
Certificate for the Collection Period ended April 29, 2006
provided to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.
(Filed with this report.)
  Dated: May 22, 2006
    Volkswagen Public Auto Loan Securitization, LLCBy:

/s/
Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant TreasurerVolkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2 By:  VW Credit, Inc. as AdministratorBy:

/s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant Treasurer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of ExhibitExhibit 99.1
    
    Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2 Servicer
Certificate for the Collection Period ended April 29, 2006
provided to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.
(Filed with this report.)
# 5.1

Page 5 - &P