alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 6, 2011

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

RANDALL D. SPEER,

Petitioner–Appellant, No. 11-6067

v. (D.C. No. 5:05-CV-00691-R)

MARTY SIRMONS, Warden,

Respondent–Appellee.

(W.D.Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before O’BRIEN, McKAY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of

appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his “Motion to Reopen

Original Habeas Petition for the Non-Adjudicated Constitutional Claims.” 

Petitioner’s original § 2254 habeas petition was denied by the district court in

2005, and we denied a certificate of appealability as to that denial in 2006. See

Speer v. Sirmons, No. 05-6272 (10th Cir. Feb. 16, 2006). In his motion to reopen,

Petitioner argued there were numerous constitutional violations in his trial and 
-2-

the federal courts had erroneously failed to consider his habeas claims on the

merits based on incorrect procedural rulings. The district court concluded, to the

extent it had authority to treat Petitioner’s motion to reopen as a Rule 60(b)

motion for relief from the judgment, that the motion should be denied as untimely

and without merit. 

After thoroughly reviewing the record and Petitioner’s filings on appeal, we

conclude that reasonable jurists would not debate whether Petitioner’s claims

stated a valid basis for Rule 60(b) relief. See Spitznas v. Boone, 464 F.3d 1213,

1216 (10th Cir. 2006). For substantially the same reasons given by the district

court, we DENY Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability and

DISMISS the appeal. We GRANT Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 23.3





PWC — Gaveglio, Aparicio y Asociados S. Civil de R. L.





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-215029) and Form S-8 (No.333-58298, No.333-129152, No.333-147448, No.333-161459, No.333-168588 and No.333-183142) of Belmond Ltd. and subsidiaries of our report dated June 26, 2018 relating to the financial statements of Ferrocarril Transandino S.A., which appears in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Belmond Ltd.








Gaveglio, Aparicio y Asociados S. Civil de R. L.


Lima, Peru


June 26, 2018








Countersigned by:/s/ Francisco PatiñoFrancisco PatiñoPeruvian Certified Public AccountantRegister No. 01-25611
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In   connection  with  the  Annual  Report   of   AquaCell
Technologies,  Inc. (the "Company") on  Form 10-KSB for the  year
ended  June  30, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  (the  "Report"),  each of  the  undersigned,  in  the
capacities  and  on the dates indicated below,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   the   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: September 28, 2004       By: /s/ James C. Witham
                                 --------------------------------
                                     James C. Witham
                                     Chief Executive Officer



Date: September 28, 2004       By: /s/ Gary S. Wolff
                                 --------------------------------
                                     Gary S. Wolff
                                     Chief Financial Officer &
                                     Principal Accounting Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S
KENNET H L EE DOUD S VS. CAUSE NUMBE R PD-0857-14 THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### ORDER The a bove styled and number ed ca use is befor e this Court in Cause No. 180270 from County Court at L aw No. 1 of

Br azoria County
. The Court is of the opinion the following exhibi t should be inspected: 1. Def ense Exhibit # 1 ( DVD rec ording )

Pursuant to Tex. R . App. 34.6(g )(2) , the County Clerk of B razoria County is ordere d to file this exhibi t with the Clerk of this Court on or befor e the 29 day of May , 2015. t h I T I S SO ORDERED THI S THE 15 DAY OF MAY, 2015 t h

PER C URI AM EN B ANC DO NOT PUBL I SH
**Exhibit 13.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (the “Company”) hereby certifies,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)                           theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 25, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Vsevolod Rozanov    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Vsevolod Rozanov        |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Em



# Fourth Court o **f Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 24, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00215

- CV

METHODIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO, LTD., L.L.P.

d/b/a Methodist Children’s Hospital of South Texas, Robert Gonzalez, and Rodney Sheffield,

Appellants

v.

Emily BE

Emily BELDEN

, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial Distric t Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 18164

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O RAL 

### A RGUMENT 

### A DVISORY

The panel assigned to hear oral argument in this appeal requests that the parties be

prepared to address this court’s decision in Jones v. King , 255 S.W.3d 156 (Tex. App.

— San

Antonio 2008, pet. denied).

It is so ORDERED on September 24, 2014

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Eddie Raymond MCCALL v. STATE

CR-16-1144

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Pedro Andres BRAVO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-5208

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 5, 2019

Pedro Andres Bravo, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Ray, and Jay, JJ., concur.
fwfh_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2
 
CONSENT OF THE MAJORITY OF THE SHAREHOLDERS
OF
DOCASA, INC.
(f/k/a FWF Holdings, Inc.)
 
The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Consent of the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this 1st day of September, 2016;
 
WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to ACCEPT the Acquisition Agreement as between the Company and the Department of Coffee and Social Affairs Limited and all terms therein, including the naming resignation of the current Director and the naming of new Directors, to Wit; 
 
STEFAN ALLESCH-TAYLOR CBE as CHAIRMAN of the BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
MATTHEW GILL as VICE CHAIRMAN of the BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders (having 115,000,000, or 75.8%); having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that: 
 
The above-named Directors are hereby officially named as such on behalf of the Company.
 
Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.  
 
	/s/ Pankaj Rajani
		
	Pankaj Rajani, 
	 	 
	on behalf of 
		
	Atlantik LP, 
	 
	 
	Majority Holder of DOCASA, INC.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID, a/k/a Rodney Buchanan,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Hakim Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order 

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct an alleged 

error in the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. Although the 

district court correctly construed the motion as a motion for 

reconsideration, cf. Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 (“After giving any 

notice it considers appropriate, the court may . . . correct a 

clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the 

record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight 

or omission.” (emphasis added)), because the district court 

lacked authority to reconsider its order granting Rashid’s 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 

235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s order. 

See United States v. Rashid, No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1 (D.S.C. 

July 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid in the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amended annual report of SINO ASSURANCE INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Guokang Tu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. By: /s/ Guokang Tu, CEO and Chairman Date: August 9, 2011
A.B. v. V.R.

2160270

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to****Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Richard P. Brown, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Casino & Entertainment PropertiesLLC (the “Registrant”) for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisReport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe Registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:                                                      /s/ RICHARD P. BROWN    Richard P. Brown    *President and Chief Executive Officer ofAmerican Casino & EntertainmentProperties LLC*   Date:August 9, 2007
22
DESTIN POINTE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, Petitioner, v. DESTIN PARCEL 160, LLC, Destin Guardian Corporation, Destin Pointe Holdings, Inc., and Destin Parcel B, LLC, Respondents.

No. 1D18-1533

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(6)
              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(27)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - virginia(1)

## By Year

              - 2021(1)

staff profileWilliam Leith
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - (-)oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Presentations and Events        March 9, 2015        Climate Vulnerability Assessment for Threatened Bull Trout

Presentations and Events        March 11, 2021        Managing Post-Fire, Climate-Induced Vegetation Transitions

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments

Presentations and Events        September 22, 2022        PubTalk-09/2022 - You Can be Powered by ShakeAlert®️ - Earthquake Early Warning for All!
Anthony GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021044EN.01004103.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/41

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Badajoz — Spain) — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Caja Almendralejo Sociedad Cooperativa de Credito

(Case C-15/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/57)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
Ryan E. CHENEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the AnnualReport of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")on Form  10–K for the period ending December  31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Bret Cloward, asChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and forthe purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant toSection  906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

March 30, 2005

/s/   BRETCLOWARD            Bret ClowardChiefExecutive Officer

----
H. Res. 603 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 29, 2014. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr. 

Kelly of Pennsylvania, to rank immediately after Mr. Heck 

of Nevada. 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Duffy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.