alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021028EN.01004701.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Group v EUIPO — Iliev (GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL)

(Case T-57/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL - Earlier unregistered national figurative marks GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2021/C 28/72)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Group EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: D. Dragiev and A. Andreev, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and P. Angelova Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Kosta Iliev (Sofia)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2019 (Case R 2059/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Group and Mr Iliev.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2019 (Case R 2059/2018-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2019 (Case R 2059/2018-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.

---
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry K. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Operations of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|/s/GARRY K. MCGUIREGarry K. McGuire Chief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice President, Operations | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|May 14, 2003                                                                                      | 

64

---

QuickLinks
# C_2022095EN.01002901.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 –EFFAS v EUIPO — CFA Institute (CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst)

(Case T-369/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst - Earlier EU word mark CFA - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2022/C 95/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Federation of Financial Analysts’ Societies (EFFAS) (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Merico, G. Macías Bonilla and F. Miazzetto, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Villani, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: CFA Institute (Charlottesville, Virginia, United States) (represented by: G. Engels and W. May, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 March 2020 (Case R 1082/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between CFA Institute and EFFAS.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 March 2020 (R 1082/2019-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 March 2020 (R 1082/2019-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by European Federation of Financial Analysts’ Societies (EFFAS); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by European Federation of Financial Analysts’ Societies (EFFAS);

| 3. | Orders CFA Institute to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders CFA Institute to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
Exhibit 10.1   PROMISSORY NOTE   $15,000.00April 17, 2009   THE UNDERSIGNED promises to pay to the order of Ray Smith at P.O. Box 2363, Pasadena, CA 91102, or at such other place as the holder hereof may designate in writing, the sum of Fifteen Thousand dollars ($15,000.00), with interest thereon at the rate of 10% per annum from the date hereof.  Principal and interest shall be due and payable upon demand.  Prepayment of this note may be made at any time without penalty.  In the event of commencement of suit to enforce payment of this note, the undersigned agrees to pay such additional sum as attorney's fees as the court may adjudge reasonable.  Trycera Financial, Inc.   By:  /s/ Ronald N. Vance Ronald N. Vance, Chairman
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive
officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 16, 2005

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - (-)kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        September 1, 1996        Maps showing petroleum exploration intensity and production in major Cambrian to Ordovician reservoir rocks in the Anadarko Basin
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LUIS CARDONA
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 3737

[ December 20, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 007355CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assista nt Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant, Luis Cardona, challenges his conviction and sentence on one of five counts of sexual battery on a child less than 12 years old. Appellant

contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on Count I because there was no evidence of a crime committed on the dates in question. Because the evidence was insufficient to

establish that the incident that formed the basis for Count I occurred during the time period specified in the information, we reverse appellant’s

conviction and sentence on Count I and remand with instructions to grant
the motion for judgment of acquittal as to Count I only

. See McLean v.

State , 165 So. 3d 737 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); Ramo s v. State , 75 So. 3d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Reversed and Remanded.

W ARNER
, T AYLOR and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *2 Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(11)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(49)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)california(2)
              - hawaii(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - montana(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2013        Geology of the Anza-Terwilliger Area, California

Charts or Graphs        June 10, 2016        Potential Marine Benthic Habitats of Monterey Canyon and Vicinity
# C_2021028EN.01002802.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/28

---

Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order brought on 11 November 2020 — Silvana Moro and Others v European Commission

(Case C-593/20 SA)

(2021/C 28/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Silvana Moro, Isabella Venturini, Stefania Venturini, Mario Matta, Marzio Francesco Matta, Massimo Matta, Paola Cotozzoni (represented by: S. Colledan, avvocato)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | The applicants request the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with and for the purposes laid down in Article 1 of Protocol 7 on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2016 C 202, 07.06.2016, p. 268), to grant them authorisation to seize all the funds allocated, and/or to be allocated, by the European Commission to the Republic of Serbia until the debt owed to them is discharged in full. |
| --- | --- |

—

The applicants request the Court of Justice of the European Union, in accordance with and for the purposes laid down in Article 1 of Protocol 7 on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2016 C 202, 07.06.2016, p. 268), to grant them authorisation to seize all the funds allocated, and/or to be allocated, by the European Commission to the Republic of Serbia until the debt owed to them is discharged in full.

---
ex105.htm












Kelvin Medical, Inc.


 SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT







The Investor named below, by payment of the purchase price for such Common Shares, by the delivery of a check payable to Kelvin Medical, Inc., hereby subscribes for the purchase of the number of Common Shares indicated below of Kelvin Medical, Inc., at a purchase of $0.02 per Share as set forth in the Prospectus.







By such payment, the named Investor further acknowledges receipt of the Prospectus and the Subscription Agreement, the terms of which govern the investment in the Common Shares being subscribed for hereby.







A. INVESTMENT:               (1) Number of Shares:












(2) Date of Investor's check: __________







B. REGISTRATION:







(3) Registered owner: __________







Co-Owner: __________________________________







(4) Mailing address: _________







City, State & zip:__________







(5) Residence Address (if different from above):







=================================================







(6) Birth Date: ______/______/__







(7) Employee or Affiliate: Yes ______ No ______







(8) Social Security: #: ______/____/______







U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]







Co-Owner Social Security:







#: ______/______/______







U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]







Corporate or Custodial:







Taxpayer ID #: ______/______/______







U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]







(9) Telephone (H) ________







(10) *email address:_______


*Please note that by providing your email address, you accept that all further communications between you and the Company shall be by email, unless otherwise required by law and/or the rules and regulations of any governing body of traded securities.














  





  











  






C. OWNERSHIP:







[ ] Individual Ownership                                           [ ] IRA or Keogh







[ ] Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship







[ ] Trust/Date Trust Established_______________







[ ] Pension/Trust (S.E.P.)







[ ] Tenants in Common                                           [ ] Tenants by the Entirety







[ ] Corporate Ownership                                           [ ] Partnership







[ ] Other_____________________







D. SIGNATURES


Registered Owner: _______________







Co-Owner: _____________________________







Print Name of Custodian or Trustee: _____________________________







Authorized Signature: _______________







Date: _____________







Signature: _______________







MAIL TO:                                Kelvin Medical, Inc.


 10930 Skyranch Place, Nevada City CA 95959


____________________________________________________________________


FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:


Date Received: _______ _________________________________________


Date Accepted/Rejected ___


Subscriber's Check Amount:


Check No. ___________________ Date Check _
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 416 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Sullivan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Sullivan. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Sullivan, Cr. No. 21- 

078, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the 

production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a former 

employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:08 Oct 19, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR416.ATS SR416
2 

SRES 416 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized 

3 to provide relevant testimony in the case of United States 

4 v. Sullivan, except concerning matters for which a privi5 lege should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Schwager, and any current or former officer 

8 or employee of the Secretary’s office, in connection with 

9 the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 

10 resolution. 

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60728 Summary Calendar CARTER C. HART, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. Petition for Review of Agency Order Promulgated by the United States Department of Transportation

(RSPA-98-3783) October 3, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * ENFORCED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - (-)new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1966        Aeroradioactivity and generalized geologic maps of parts of New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

publication        March 1, 2018        Freshwater mussel salvage and relocation at the Pond Eddy Bridge, Delaware River, New York and Pennsylvania

publication        January 1, 1985        Hydrogeology of the Clifton Park area, Saratoga County, New York

publication        January 1, 1950        Chloride content of water from wells screened in the Lloyd sand member of the Raritan formation on Long Island, New York

publication        January 1, 1950        Piezometric levels from 1948 through 1950 for wells screened in the Lloyd sand member of the Raritan formation on Long Island, New York

Program        May 25, 2017        NWIS - the USGS Data Archive

Program        May 27, 2017        Long Island Water Availability

Project        August 6, 2015        Regionalization of Channel Geomorphology Characteristics for Streams of New York State, Excluding Long Island
Keavin A. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021242EN.01004201.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Sweden; Covid-19)

(Case T-379/20) (1)

(State aid - Swedish air transport market - Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic - Guarantee - Decision not to raise any objections - Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market - Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence - Freedom of establishment - Free provision of services - Equal treatment - Duty to state reasons)

(2021/C 242/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, S. Rating, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis and V. Blanc, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Tomat, D. Zukowska, L. Flynn and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier and P. Dodeller, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, H. Shev, H. Eklinder, R. Shahsavan Eriksson, O. Simonsson and J. Lundberg, acting as Agents), SAS AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: F. Sjövall, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 2784 final of 24 April 2020 on State Aid SA.57061 (2020/N) — Sweden — Compensation for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to Scandinavian Airlines.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden and SAS AB to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden and SAS AB to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---