alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020068EN.01005001.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/50

---

Action brought on 27 December 2019 — Kerangus v EUIPO (ΑΠΛΑ)

(Case T-882/19)

(2020/C 68/59)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Kerangus Holdings Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: A.-E. Malami, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration in the European Union of the figurative mark ΑΠΛΑ! — Application for registration No 15 554 918

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2019 in Case R 1035/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the present action; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present action;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | grant trade mark application No. 015554918/17.06.2016‘ΑΠΛΑ! and representation’ for all the goods and services in Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 43 |
| --- | --- |

—

grant trade mark application No. 015554918/17.06.2016‘ΑΠΛΑ! and representation’ for all the goods and services in Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 43

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs pursuant to Article 190(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs pursuant to Article 190(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equal treatment with respect to all EU applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equal treatment with respect to all EU applicants.

---
John Dwight SMITH v. STATE

CR-16-0906

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2023007EN.01002002.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — JS v SRB

(Case T-271/20) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Time limit for complaints - Admissibility - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Rejection of the request - Absence of prima facie evidence - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Liability)

(2023/C 7/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: L. Forestier and H. Ehlers, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 14 June 2019 rejecting his request for assistance submitted on 2 May 2019 and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of the SRB of 23 January 2020 rejecting his complaint against the decision of 14 June 2019 and, second, compensation for the harm which he claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders JS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 20

Housing Starts and Sales (SAAR, Thous. Units)Housing Starts 986 1,156 1,156 1,135 1,151 1,160 1,206 1,235 1,285 1,330 1,361 1,371 1,1 Single-Family (1 Unit) 643 709 745 755 790 762 785 800 850 900 936 951 7 Percent Change: Year-over-Year 10.3 Multifamily (2+ Units) 343 447 411 380 361 397 421 435 435 430 425 420 3New Single-Family Home Sales 521 493 487 508 529 579 562 571 590 610 623 634 5 Percent Change: Year-over-Year 14.6Total Existing Home Sales (Single-Family, Condos and Co-Ops) 5,050 5,280 5,403 5,200 5,300 5,503 5,551 5,365 5,424 5,584 5,601 5,585 5,2

 Percent Change: Year-over-Year 6.3Total Home Sales (New + Existing) 5,571 5,773 5,890 5,708 5,829 6,082 6,113 5,936 6,014 6,194 6,225 6,219 5,7 Percent Change: Year-over-Year 7.0Home Prices (NSA, Thous. $)Median New 293 290 301 305 305 305 317 321 320 319 331 335 2Median Total Existing 203 228 227 221 216 239 239 232 226 250 250 243 2FHFA Purchase-Only Index (% Change: Quarterly YoY, Annual Q4/Q4) 5.3% 5.6% 5.7% 5.9% 5.7% 5.6% 5.4% 5.3% 5.0% 4.7% 4.7% 4.7% 5.9Mortgage Rates (Percent)30-Year Fixed Rate Mortgage 3.7 3.8 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 35-Year Adjustable Rate Mortgage 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 2Single-Family Mortgage Originations (NSA, Bil. $, 1-4 Units)Mortgage Originations 394 508 434 374 336 509 496 420 334 429 421 372 1,7 Purchase 165 269 271 211 181 290 294 249 181 289 293 256 9 Refinance 229 239 164 163 155 219 202 171 153 139 128 115 7Refinance Share (%) 58% 47% 38% 44% 46% 43% 41% 41% 46% 33% 30% 31% 46

August 10, 2016Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from July 29, 2016.Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.Sources: Actuals: Census Bureau, National Association of REALTORS®, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Freddie Mac, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic & Strategic Research Group

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business 

prospects or expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group 

bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.

 Housing Forecast: August 2016

 --------------- 2015 --------------- --------------- 2016 --------------- --------------- 2017 ---------------
---

**China Development Bank** **Loan
Certificate**

|Date: June 13, 2011 | Contract No.:4403236012009020660
|------------------- | --------------------------------
|                    |                                 



|Applicant                                    | Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd          |                                                        |                     
|-------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------
|Currency                                     | RMB                                    | Amount                                                 | 45,605,800.60       
|Loan Term                                    | From June 13, 2011 to February 9, 2016
|Usage                                        | Constructing BAK Battery R&D Centre   
|Annual rate                                  | 7.14%                                 
|Loan Account of
      China Development Bank | 1044300028                             | Deposit Account of Applicant in China Development Bank | 44301560040217970000
|Stamp of Applicant                           |                                        | Stamp of China Development Bank                        |                     

The above loan has been transferred to the applicants account.



---
# C_2020137EN.01003002.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 9 January 2020 — VS v Hauptzollamt Münster

(Case C-7/20)

(2020/C 137/42)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VS

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Münster

Question referred

Is the second subparagraph of Article 71(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) to be interpreted as meaning that Article 87(4) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 establishing the EU Customs Code (2) can be applied mutatis mutandis to the recovery of VAT (import turnover tax)?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 415 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 415

 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Samsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2023

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Samsel.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Samsel, Cr. No. 21-537, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of United States v. Samsel, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager, and any current or former officer or employee of the 
Secretary's office, in connection with the production of evidence 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
IN RE: Craig T. BROUSSARD

NO. 2019-B-0340

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition to Revoke Probation and for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Craig T. Broussard, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the probation of Craig T. Broussard, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26217, is hereby revoked. It is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.
Exhibit 99.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification


                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
David Blechman, the Treasurer and acting Chief Financial Officer of IBX Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

 The Company's Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2003                    /s/ David Blechman
                                        David Blechman, Treasurer
V.G., Father, Appellant, v. In the Matter of the Adoption of J.C.G., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3253

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap Wing Khai



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

September 1, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(18)
              - multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(8)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - (-)news_news-149250(4)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(4)
              - (-)florida(4)
              - georgia(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maryland(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Story        September 2, 2019        USGS deploying about 150 storm-tide sensors in the Carolinas

Featured Story        October 21, 2016        Post Hurricane Matthew: USGS Continues Efforts to Document How High Floodwaters Reached

Featured Story        May 31, 2018        USGS Hurricane Response Met Challenges in 2017, Prepares for 2018

Featured Story        November 8, 2017        Eyes on the Coast—Video Cameras Help Forecast Coastal Change
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLC., Sovereign Healthcare of Orlando, LLC., Southern Healthcare Management, LLC., Sovereign Healthcare Disbursements, LLC., Tristan S. Mohadeo, et al., Appellants, v. The ESTATE OF Maria M. RAMOS-CRUZ BY AND THROUGH Odemaris JIMENEZ, Personal Representative, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-652

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Douglas Marshall JACKSON a/k/a Ben Yahweh Abiyah-Mosheh and Andrew Rolle a/k/a Ben Yahweh Solomon, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DESOTO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020279EN.01002401.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 7 April 2020 — ‘Grossmania’ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

(Case C-177/20)

(2020/C 279/33)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Grossmania’ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft.

Defendant: Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

Question referred

Must Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that, where the Court of Justice of the European Union, in a decision given in preliminary ruling proceedings, has declared a legislative provision of a Member State to be incompatible with EU law, that legislative provision cannot be applied in subsequent national administrative or judicial proceedings either, notwithstanding that the facts of the subsequent proceedings are not entirely identical to those of the previous preliminary ruling proceedings?

---
# C_2021481EN.01002202.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO — Krasnyj Octyabr (Representation of a lobster)

(Case T-254/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a lobster - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Right to be heard - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2021/C 481/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: I. Lukauskienė, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard Monguiral and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyj Octyabr’ (Moscow, Russia)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 March 2020 (Case R 1916/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ and PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyj Octyabr’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Garuda Capital
  Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
  30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, C. Robin Relph, Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:

|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        and                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|By: | /s/
      C. Robin Relph    | 
|--- | --------------------------- | 
|    | C. Robin Relph,             | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer and | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer     | 
|    | December 14, 2005           | 

---
HAAS PETROLEUM ENGINEERING

2100 ROSS AVENUE
SUITE 1450
CityDALLAS, StateplaceTEXAS 75201
PHONE (214) 754-7090
FAX (214) 754-7092

April 19, 2007

The Board of Directors of Enterra Energy Corp.

as Administrator of Enterra Energy Trust ("Enterra")

RE: Consent of Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc.

Dear Sirs:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of our report "Appraisal of Oil and Gas Reserves Owned by Enterra Energy Trust in Various Counties, Oklahoma" as of December 31, 2006 dated March 2, 2007, included in the 2006 Annual Information Form of Enterra Energy Trust (the "AIF"), and to the references to our firm in the AIF.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of references to our firm and of information derived from our report entitled, "Appraisal of Oil and Gas Reserves Owned by Enterra Energy Trust in Various Counties, Oklahoma" as of December 31, 2006 dated March 2, 2007, appearing in the annual report on Form 40-F of Enterra Energy Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, into the registration statement on Form F-10 Registration Statement (No, 333-129601), the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120996) and the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-113609 and 333-115318).

Sincerely,

HAAS PETROLEUM ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

[haasconsentletter002.gif]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

BRADLEY ADAM WINNICK,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2723 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C3

- 20

- 223

(Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas

, No. CP

- 22

- CR

- 4918

- 2019)

Attorney Reg. No. 78413

(Dauphin County )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd d ay of May, 2020, the Joint Petition for Temporary

Suspen sion is granted, Bradley Adam Winnick is placed on temporary suspension, see

Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(5), and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s right to petition for dis solution or amendment of this Order and to

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order are specifically

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).