N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C HRISTOPHER

D. SC HNEIDER , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. AM A DOR

C O UNTY; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16387 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-03242-TLNEFB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Troy L. Nunle y , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2015 * * B e fore : SILVERM AN, B ER ZON, a nd WA TFORD, C i rc uit Judge s . C hristophe r D. Sc hne ide r a ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging fe de ra l a nd sta te la w c la im s re lating to de fe nda

nts’ e nforc e m e nt of the i r outsidestora g e ordina nc e s. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Guatay C h ristian 

# FIL ED OCT 29 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Fe llow

ship v . C ounty of San Die

go , 670 F.3d 957, 970 (9th C ir. 2011) (ripe ne ss); N . C ty . C mty . Allianc e

, Inc . v . Salazar , 573 F.3d 738, 741 (9th C ir. 2009) (dism i ssa l unde r Fe d. R . C iv. P. 12(b)(6)); P l anne d Pare nthood of S. Ariz. v . Law all , 307 F.3d 783, 786 (9th C ir. 2002) (c onstitutiona lity of a sta tute ). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Sc hne ide r’ s e qua l prote c tion a nd proc e d ura l due proc e ss c la im s a s unripebe c a use the y are not y e t fit for judic ia l re vie w a n d the ha rdship to Sc hne ide r is re lative ly m inor. Se e Alask

a Right to Life Politic al Ac tion C

omm. v . Fe ldman , 504 F.3d 840, 849 (9th C ir. 2007) (e le m e nts of prude ntia l ripe n e ss). The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Sc hne ide r’ s First Am e ndm e nt re ta lia tion c la im a s ba rre d by the sta

tue of limita

tions be c a u se Sc hne ide r file d his a c tion m ore tha

n two y e ars a fte r his c la im s a c c rue d a n d Sc hne ide r did not show any ba s is for e q

uita ble e stoppe l. Se eC a l. C iv. Proc . C ode § 335.1 (two-y e ar sta tute of limita

tions for persona l injury

a c tions); K

nox v . Dav is , 260 F.3d 1009, 1012-13 (9th C ir. 2001) (fe de ra l c ourts a pply the forum

sta te ’ s pe rsona l injury sta tute of limita

tions for § 1983 c la im s, a nd a § 1983 c la im

a c c rue s whe n the pla i ntiff knows or ha s re a s on to know of the injury tha t form s the ba sis of the a c tion); Hone

y w e ll v . W

ork e r s’ C omp. Appe als Bd. , 105 P.3d 544, 550 (C a l. 2005) 1 3 - 1 6 3 8 7 2(C a lifornia

sta nda rd for e quita

ble e stoppe l ). The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Sc hne ide r’ s othe r First Am e n dm e nt c la im s be c a

use Sc hne ide r fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t the ordina nc e s we re unc onstitutiona l a s a pplie d to him , im

pe rm issiblere s tric tions on e xpre s sive c onduc t, or unc onstitutiona lly va gue or ove rbroa d. Se e Me m b e rs of C ity C o unc il v . Tax

pay e rs for Vinc e nt , 466 U.S. 789, 805 (1984) (fra m e work for e va luating a s-a

pplie d First Am e ndm e nt c ha lle n ge to ordina nc e ); Foti v . C

ity of Me n lo Park

, 146 F.3d 629, 635 (9th C ir. 1998) (e le m e nts of fa c ia l c ha l le nge to a n ordina nc e ). The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Sc hne ide r’ s dorm ant C om m e rc e C la use c la im be c a use Sc hne ide r fa ile d

to a lle ge fa c ts suffic i e nt to show tha t the ordina nc e s ha d a

signific ant im

pa c t on inte rstate c o m

m e rc e . S e e N at’l Ass’n of Optome t rists & Optic ians v . Harris , 682 F.3d 1144, 1155 (9th C ir. 2012) (plaintiff m ust first show tha

t the sta tute im pose s a signific a nt burde n on intersta

te c om m e rc e to e s ta

blish a dorm ant C om

m e rc e C la

use c la im). The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d Sc hne ide r’ s sta te la w c la im s be c a

use Sc hne ide r fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts suffic i e nt to show tha t he prope rly

e xha u ste d his c la im s. Se e C a l. Gov’ t

C ode § 945.4 (plaintiff m ay not suea public e ntity

for

“ m one y or da m a ge s” until he ha s pre se nte d the c l a im to tha t e ntity); C a l. Gov’ t 1 3 - 1 6 3 8 7 3C ode § 911.2(a) (“ A c l a im re lating to a

c a use of a c tion for . . . injury to pe rson . . . sha l l be pre se nte d . . . not la te r tha n six m onths a fte r the a c c rua l of thec a use of a c tion.” ). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny ing Sc hne ide r le ave to am e nd be c a

use am e ndm e nt would ha ve be e n futile . Se eC

e rv ante s v . C ountryw ide HomeLoans, Inc . , 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th C ir. 2011) (se tting forth sta nda rd of re vie w a n d e xpla i ning tha

t distric t c ourt m ay

dismiss without le ave to a m e n d whe re am e n dm e nt would befutile ). Sc hne ide r’ s c ha lle nge s re lating to the de nia l of a

te m pora ry re stra i ning orde r or a pre lim ina

ry injunc tion a

re m oot. Se eMt. Graham Red Squirre l v . Madigan , 954 F.2d 1441, 1450 (9th C ir.1992) (whe n unde rly ing c la im s ha

ve be e n de c ide d, the re ve rsa l of a

de nia l of pre lim ina

ry injunc t ion would ha

ve no pra c tic a l c onse q ue nc e s, a n d the issue is the re fore m oot). W e re je c t Sc hne ide r’ s c onte ntion tha t the distric t c ourt did not ade quate ly notify him of his c om

pla int’ s de fic ie nc ie s or how to fix those de fic ie nc ie s . W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in theope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a p pe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ).

1 3 - 1 6 3 8 7 4Sc hne ide r’ s m o tion for judic ia l notic e , file d on Fe b ruary 10, 2014, is denie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 3 8 7 5