alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 7 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 1 1

- 00 71 0

- CV

____________ _

MICHAEL A. POKLAR , Appellant

V.

ARTHUR BROWN, M.D., PH.D. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 125 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 64368



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 14 , 2011. On May 30

, 20 12

, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The
motion is granted

.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and McCally.
K.C.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020095EN.01002201.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Attunda Tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 21 January 2020 — Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System SAS

(Case C-28/20)

(2020/C 95/26)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Attunda Tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Airhelp Limited

Defendant: Scandinavian Airlines System SAS

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a strike by airline pilots who are employed by an air carrier and who are needed to carry out a flight constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, (1) when the strike is not implemented in connection with a measure decided upon or announced by the air carrier but of which notice is given and which is lawfully initiated by workers’ organisations as industrial action intended to induce the air carrier to increase wages, provide benefits or amend employment conditions in order to meet the organisations’ demands? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a strike by airline pilots who are employed by an air carrier and who are needed to carry out a flight constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, (1) when the strike is not implemented in connection with a measure decided upon or announced by the air carrier but of which notice is given and which is lawfully initiated by workers’ organisations as industrial action intended to induce the air carrier to increase wages, provide benefits or amend employment conditions in order to meet the organisations’ demands?

| 2. | What significance, if any, is to be attached to the fairness of the workers’ organisations’ demands and, in particular, to the fact that the wage increase demanded is significantly higher than the wage increases which generally apply to the national labour markets in question? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What significance, if any, is to be attached to the fairness of the workers’ organisations’ demands and, in particular, to the fact that the wage increase demanded is significantly higher than the wage increases which generally apply to the national labour markets in question?

| 3. | What significance, if any, is to be attached to the fact that the air carrier, in order to avoid a strike, accepts a proposal for settlement from a national body responsible for mediating labour disputes but the workers’ organisations do not? |
| --- | --- |

3.

What significance, if any, is to be attached to the fact that the air carrier, in order to avoid a strike, accepts a proposal for settlement from a national body responsible for mediating labour disputes but the workers’ organisations do not?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
EX PARTE Robin Zak ARMSTRONG and Timothy-Brian Armstrong

CR-15-1337

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Petition for writ of prohibition transferred to Marshall Cir. Ct.
Francine Patricia RYAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bettina Lorraine McMahon, Appellant, v. RUBIN LAW ASSOCIATES, P.A. d/b/a Rubin & Rubin, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1364

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Eugene BRITT, Appellant, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5393

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 11, 2024

NO. 03-22-00539-CR

Brian Scott Sharp, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING --

OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Brian Scott Sharp

has filed an amended motion for rehearing, and having reviewed the motion, the record, and the 

parties’ arguments, we deny the motion for rehearing. The Court therefore withdraws its opinion 

and judgment from December 20, 2023. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, 

the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s judgments requiring reversal. However, 

there was error in the judgments that require correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial 

court’s judgments as follows: the judgment of conviction for Count II, attempted capital murder 

of a peace officer, is modified to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “15.01/19.03 Penal 

Code” and the judgment of conviction for Count III, aggravated assault against a public servant,

is modified to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “22.02(b)(2)(B) Penal Code.” The 
judgments, as modified, are affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 6, 2006
 AMERICAN PHYSICIANS CAPITAL, INC.
  000-32057
 Michigan
(State of Incorporation)
    
    38-3543910
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 1301 North Hagadorn Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48823
 (517) 351-1150
 Not Applicable
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other EventsItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESINDEX OF EXHIBITSPress Release dated April 6, 2006    Table of Contents  
 Item 8.01 Other Events.
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
   
 SIGNATURES
   AMERICAN PHYSICIANS CAPITAL, INC.
(Registrant)By: /s/ R. KEVIN CLINTONR. Kevin ClintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX OF EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated April 6, 2006
# C_2020423EN.01002001.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 12 August 2020 — VR v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-381/20)

(2020/C 423/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VR

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Question referred

Does a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
2026.

#### Jackson *v.*The State.

Indictment for burglary, from Bibb superior court — Judge Felton. July 10, 1909.

Submitted October 4, —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*W. D. McNeil,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter J. Grace, solicitor-general,*contra.

Powell, J.

No error of law appears. The defendant, under the testimony, is clearly guilty. *Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2021079EN.01003101.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/31

---

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2021 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission

(Case T-34/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Software solutions for universities - Tax advantages and public funding - Formal investigation procedure - Decision classifying the implemented measures as existing aid - Lack of individual concern - No regulatory act - Inadmissibility)

(2021/C 79/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/391 of 20 September 2019 on the measure SA.34402 — 2015/C (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Germany for Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH (OJ 2020 L 74, p. 22).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | The application by the Federal Republic of Germany for leave to intervene in support of the European Commission has become devoid of purpose. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The application by the Federal Republic of Germany for leave to intervene in support of the European Commission has become devoid of purpose.

| 3. | Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.

---
EX PARTE Michael Wayne GEORGE

CR-16-0924

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sup. Ct.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of James River Coal Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samuel M. Hopkins, II, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.

|November   ___, 2005 |                                   
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                     | /s/ Samuel M. Hopkins, II         
|                     |                                   
|                     | Samuel M.   Hopkins, II           
|                     | Title:    Chief Accounting Officer

---
Garrett M. KERN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

Board of Directors 

    BearingPoint, Inc. 

 

We have issued our reports dated August 6, 2002, except for Note 2, under the subheading“Stock-Based Compensation”, as to which the date is September 29, 2003 and Note 21, as to which the date is April 12, 2004, accompanying the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements and Schedule II, of BearingPoint, Inc. (formerlyKPMG Consulting, Inc.), which are included in this transition report on Form 10-K for the period from July 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in BearingPoint, Inc.’s RegistrationStatements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-55354, effective February 9, 2001, File No. 333-55380, effective February 9, 2001 and File No. 333-55378, effective February 9, 2001). We consent to the use of our name as it appears under the caption“Selected Financial Data” in this transition report on Form 10-K. 

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

New York, New York 

April 15, 2004
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 22, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0065. ARROWHEAD PAWN SHOP, INC. v. LAWANA WAITERS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV00739
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

s0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137540 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137540 

 COA: 278093 

Macomb CC: 2006-003972-FC 

BYRON WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Freddie WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021490EN.01003401.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — IB v EUIPO

(Case T-22/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Suspension of the invalidity procedure during the disciplinary proceedings - Removal from post - Invalidity procedure which has become devoid of purpose following removal from post - Action for annulment - Act adversely affecting an official - Admissibility - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Manifest error of assessment)

(2021/C 490/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IB (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 14 March 2019 in so far as, first, it removes the applicant from his post without reducing his entitlement to a pension and, second, it definitively closes the applicant’s invalidity procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 March 2019 in so far as it definitively closes IB’s invalidity procedure; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 March 2019 in so far as it definitively closes IB’s invalidity procedure;

| 2. | Dismisses the application as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the application as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
Charles Kelly SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2533

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 4, 2019

Charles Kelly Smith, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. Mancino*, 705 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 1998) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Waiter v. State*, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Vonador v. State*, 915 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; *Pitts v. State*, 832 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; *Simms v. State*, 949 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ; *Labadie v. State*, 840 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      required by Rule 13a-14(b) or**


**Rule
      15d-14(b) and Section 906 of**


**the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
      K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)  The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




(2)  The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





August
      8, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Stephen K. GardnerStephen
                K. GardnerChief
                Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                Secretary







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 616 

Condemning the treatment of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu by the Government of 

Azerbaijan and urging his immediate release, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2024 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. KAINE, and Mr. 

FETTERMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the treatment of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu by the 

Government of Azerbaijan and urging his immediate release, and for other purposes. 

Whereas Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu, a respected academic and 

economist, and his wife, Irada Bayramova, were arrested 

by Azerbaijani authorities on July 23, 2023, and severely 

beaten while in police custody; 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu was dubiously accused by Azerbaijani 

authorities of multiple criminal acts without evidence; 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu remains imprisoned at the Baku Detention Center in extremely poor conditions while awaiting trial; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 616 IS 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu’s health has deteriorated significantly 

since his initial arrest, and he has not received adequate 

medical treatment for his medical condition; 

Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu has been repeatedly denied access to 

his legal counsel and a fair trial while in custody; 

Whereas the Department of State and the United States Embassy in Baku, along with United States academic institutions and respected international organizations, have 

expressed deep concerns regarding Dr. Ibadoghlu’s health 

and have demanded his immediate release; 

Whereas Azerbaijan’s ties with the community of democracies 

has been undermined by a troubling record of wrongfully 

detaining those involved in human rights, journalism, and 

peaceful freedom of expression, including Bakhtiyar 

Hajiyev, Avaz Zeynalli, and Elchin Sadigov; 

Whereas the wrongful detention of Dr. Ibadoghlu is a serious 

affront to human rights and academic freedom: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) condemns— 

3 (A) the treatment of Dr. Ibadoghlu by the 

4 Government of Azerbaijan; 

5 (B) such government’s practice of wrongful 

6 detention; and 

7 (C) such government’s suppression of aca8 demic freedom; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 616 IS 

1 (2) calls for the immediate and unconditional 

2 release of political prisoners in Azerbaijan, including 

3 Dr. Ibadoghlu; and 

4 (3) urges the Secretary of State to continue 

5 prioritizing Dr. Ibadoghlu’s well-being and release in 

6 all engagements with the Government of Azerbaijan. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Greg D. MCFARLANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael Preston HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Nasra M. ARAFAT (Ibrahim), Appellant, v. Michael SURDIS, Jr., Chiropractor, M.D., Appellee.

No. 4D18-737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 27, 2018]

Nasra M. Arafat (Ibrahim), Coral Springs, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Conner and Kuntz, JJ., concur.