alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020255EN.01001901.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/19

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — Industrias Afrasa v Commission

(Case T-77/20 RII)

(Application for interim measures - Plant protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 - Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency - Serious and irreparable harm - None)

(2020/C 255/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Industrias Afrasa, SA (Paterna, Spain) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, P. Sellar, lawyers, and G. McElwee, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, F. Castilla Contreras and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 of 10 January 2020 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2020 L 7, p. 11).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Jarrod Wayne KLINGENSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 30, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed. See**P.J.A. v. State* , 152 So.3d 805 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
Donald Lawrence LASTRINA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2023235EN.01002901.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Mainova v Commission

(Case T-320/20) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity market - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - No standing to bring proceedings - No active participation - Admissibility)

(2023/C 235/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mainova AG (Frankfurt, Germany) (represented by: C. Schalast and H. Löschan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, assisted by F. Haus and F. Schmidt, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 — RWE/E.ON Assets) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Mainova AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mainova AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and RWE AG;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
Lee EAKINS v. Mark WILSON, Dolores Johnson, and Jefferson County Department of Public Health

2160398

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EX PARTE James BEAMON-BEY

CR-16-0634

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
DRAFT FAA REDAC Subcommittee on Environment & Energy 

Spring 2021 Meeting Agenda

Virtual Meeting

Purpose: 

 Review the R&D portfolio developed based on strategic guidance from Fall 2020 E&E 

 FAA to brief the portfolio with a focus on FY + 2 

 E&E REDAC to provide recommendations on R&D portfolio and direction

Remote Participation:

Web Browser:

https://faavideo.zoomgov.com 

• Click the JOIN button; enter Meeting ID: 161 398 3327

• Passcode: 934684

• If prompted, accept the Zoom application as instructed. 

Phone Audio Only:

• Call 1‐888‐924‐3239; enter Meeting ID: 161 398 3327

• Passcode: 934684

• Unmute or mute yourself by pressing *6.

Read Ahead Materials: 

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/redac/
Tuesday, March 9, 2021

Time Duration Title Presenter

10:30 0:05 Welcome J. Hileman

10:35 0:10 Chair opening statement & Introductions I. Redhead

10:45 0:05 Introduction L. Wildgoose

10:50 0:15 AEE Update K. Welsh

11:05 0:10 Update on ICAO and CORSIA implementation D. Williams

11:15 0:15 Industry Perspective S. Alterman

11:30 0:30 FY21/FY22 Budget Update Beth Delarosby

12:00 0:30 Responses to REDAC Recommendations &  J. Hileman

Actions

12:30 0:30 Lunch

13:00 0:15 FAA R&D Update S. Yak

13:15 0:15 COVID impacts & Aviation Industry directions  I. Redhead

and challenges

13:30 1:00 Environment and Energy Research &  J. Hileman

Development Portfolio Overview 

14:30 0:30 NASA Update B. Esker

15:00 0:30 Break

15:30 1:30 National Environmental Survey & Noise  D. Scata

Research, Briefing and Discussion

17:00 0:30 Discussion on Findings & Recommendations I. Redhead

17:30 End of Day‐1
Wednesday, March 10, 2021

10:30 1:00 Emissions Research, Briefing and Discussion R. Iovinelli & D. 

Jacob

11:30 0:45 Sustainable Aviation Fuels Resarch, Briefing and  N. Brown & A. 

Discussion Oldani

12:15 0:15 Discussion on Findings & Recommendations I. Redhead

12:30 0:30 Lunch

13:00 1:00 Analysis & Tool Development (including AEDT),  F. Grandi, M. 

Briefing and Discussion Majeed & J. 

DiPardo

14:00 1:00 Aircraft Technology Research & Discussion,  L. Ileri & A. Orton

Briefing and Discussion

15:00 0:30 Research on Operational Procedures, Briefing  C. Dorbian

and Discussion

15:30 0:30 Break

16:00 1:30 Discussion on Findings & Recommendations I. Redhead

17:30 End of Day‐2
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, RAJIV DHAR, CERTIFY THAT: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 30, 2005
Dave JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4960

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Mathew MCCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2745

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2021278EN.01007101.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/71

---

Order of the General Court of 28 May 2021 — Poupart v Commission

(Case T-376/20) (1)

(2021/C 278/95)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 721 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 721

 Congratulating the Grace College Lancers women's basketball team for 
   winning the 2024 National Christian College Athletic Association 
                   Division I National Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

  Mr. Young (for Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Young)) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the Grace College Lancers women's basketball team for 
   winning the 2024 National Christian College Athletic Association 
                   Division I National Championship.

Whereas, on March 23, 2024, the Grace College Lancers women's basketball team 
        (referred to in this preamble as the ``Lancers'') won the 2024 National 
        Christian College Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as 
        ``NCCAA'') Division I National Championship in Winona Lake, Indiana;
Whereas, junior Peyton Murphy was named to the all-tournament team for her 
        performance in the 2024 NCCAA Division I tournament;
Whereas senior Maddie Ryman was named the tournament Most Outstanding Player;
Whereas head coach Dan Davis has excelled during his 6 seasons with the Lancers;
Whereas head coach Dan Davis has been aided by assistant coaches and staff;
Whereas the Lancers are supported by members of the Grace College Athletics 
        Department;
Whereas the 2024 National Championship victory marked the first national title 
        for the Lancers;
Whereas the Lancers emerged from the semi-finals with a dramatic and close 
        victory over the Oakland City University Mighty Oaks;
Whereas the 2024 National Championship victory was the final game of the 15-year 
        span of the role of Grace College as host of the NCCAA Division I 
        National Championship; and
Whereas the tradition of the Lancers of excelling in both athletics and 
        academics continues to advance the sport of women's basketball and 
        provide inspiration for future generations of young athletes: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the Grace College Lancers women's 
        basketball team for its victory in the National Christian 
        College Athletic Association Division I National Championship; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the dedication, perseverance, and hard work 
        of the players and coaches of the Grace College Lancers women's 
        basketball team, and students, alumni, administration, and 
        support staff that directly contributed to the victory of Grace 
        College in the National Christian College Athletic Association 
        2024 Division I National Championship.
                                 <all>
```
Order issued Octoher2 , 2012

In The Ltntrt 

## ufAppraI fiffli Jitrirt 

## nf Lrxa at Da11a No. 05-10-01 646-CV LG INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.P., LG BENEFIT PARTNERS, INC.,

THOMAS J GEORGE AND ELIZABETH W WILMER, Appellants/Cross-Appellees V. ARVII) LEICK, Appellee/Cross-Appellant ORDER The Motion for Rehearing filedby appellee is hereby DENIED.
LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: May 24, 2004



CCI Group, Inc.



/s/ Fred W. Jackson, Jr.
Fred W. Jackson, Jr.

President, and

Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Mark C. Casolo

Mark C. Casolo

Chairman, and

Chief Financial Officer







#
Exhibit 10.3


 





BIOSCRIP, INC. AMENDMENT ONE TO


THE STOCK GRANT CERTIFICATE UNDER


THE BIOSCRIP/CHS 2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN


FROM THE COMPANY TO BRIAN STIVER


 


WHEREAS, BioScrip,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) granted restricted Common Stock of the Company (the “Stock”)
to Brian Stiver (the “Awardee”) under the BioScrip/CHS 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time
(the “Plan”), as evidenced by the Stock Grant Certificate dated March 28, 2013 (the “Stock Grant Certificate”);


 


WHEREAS, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) has the authority to determine the
terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, of any Award granted thereunder;


 


WHEREAS, the
Committee desires to amend the Stock Grant Certificate to provide for immediate vesting of the Restricted Stock if the Awardee’s
employment is terminated by the Company without cause before March 31, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Committee has authorized, empowered and directed the undersigned to take all action to implement this amendment to the Stock Grant
Certificate.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
effective as of the date set forth below, the Stock Grant Certificate is amended as follows:


 


1.Section 2(c)
Stock Grant Certificate is amended by deleting the final three paragraphs of that section (beginning with “Vesting of”
and continuing through the end of the section) and replacing them with the following:


 


“If the Awardee’s
employment with the Company and all Affiliates (as defined in the Plan), is terminated without “Cause” (as defined
below) before March 31, 2017, any unvested Restricted Stock shall vest as to 100% of the then unvested and non-forfeited shares
of Restricted Stock. For these purposes, “Cause” shall mean “Cause” as defined in any offer letter or employment
agreement between the Company and the Awardee, as may be amended from time to time.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company
has executed this Amendment One to the Stock Grant Certificate, to be effective on this 8th day of September 2016,
with the consent of the Awardee as noted below.


 


 





	 	Company: 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Richard M. Smith
	 	 	 
	 	Name:	Richard M. Smith
	 	 	 
	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED
TO:
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Brian
    Stiver
	 	Brian Stiver, Awardee 




 






    1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 2587-066]
 On December 30, 2022, Northern States Power Company filed a relicense application for the 1.65-megawatt Superior Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2610. The project is located on the Montreal River in Gogebic County, Michigan and Iron County, Wisconsin. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on October 10, 2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to relicense the project.[1] The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. 
 
 The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or 
                    *OPP@ferc.gov.* The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
December 23, 2025.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Nicholas Ettema by telephone at (312) 596-4447 or by email at 
                    *nicholas.ettema@ferc.gov.* Dated: December 23, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1734709056. 40 CFR 1501.5(c)(4) (2024). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-31434 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-81,532-01

EX P ARTE BERNHARDT TIE DE, II, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1997-C-103- A IN THE 123 DISTRICT COURT R D F ROM P ANOLA COUNTY
Per curiam . A L C A L A , J., fi led a concurring opin ion in wh ich P R I C E , J O H N S O N , and C O C H R A N JJ., joined. K E L L E R , P .J., fi led a dis senting opi nion in w hich KE A S L E R and H E R V E Y , JJ., joined. M E Y E R S , J., wou ld f ile and s et. O P I N I O N Pur s u an t t o t he provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. C ri m . Ap p . 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonm ent. The Twelfth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Tiede v. State , No. 12-99-00182- CR (Tex. App.—Ty ler, de livered N ovember 20, 2002, pet. re f’d)
. Applicant alleg es there is newly available rele vant scienti fi c evidenc e that contra dicts the scientific evidenc e relied upon by the State at trial, and that false evidenc e was prese nted at trial thus2

undermining confide nce in the ve rdict at sente ncing
. The trial court, afte r conducting a live hear ing and based upon an extensive re co rd, has
rec ommended that Applicant be g rante d relief in the form of a new punishment hear ing. The State agr ee s that Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte W

einstein , 421 S.W .3d 656 (Tex. C ri m . Ap p . 2014). Relief is g rante d. The sentenc e in Cause No. 1997-C-103-A in the 123rd District Court of Panola County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Panola County
so that a new punishment hear ing may be conducte d. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench
war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of th is o p in io n s h a ll b e s e n t to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Novembe r 26, 2014 Publis h
# C_2022359EN.01006401.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/64

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — Delifruit v Commission

(Case T-629/20) (1)

(Plant protection products - Active substance chlorpyrifos - Determination of maximum residue levels for chlorpyrifos in or on bananas - Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 - Scientific and technical knowledge available - Other legitimate factors)

(2022/C 359/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Delifruit, SA (Guayaquil, Ecuador) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, P. Sellar and S. Abdel-Qader, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, A. Dawes and M. ter Haar, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Delifruit, SA, seeks the partial annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/1085 of 23 July 2020 amending Annexes II and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl in or on certain products (OJ 2020 L 239, p. 7, corrigendum OJ 2020 L 245, p. 31) (‘the contested regulation’), in so far as it sets the maximum residue level (‘MRL’) for chlorpyrifos in or on bananas at 0.01 mg/kg.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Delifruit, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Delifruit, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---