alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, David H. Kirske, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Helix
BioMedix, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
June 30, 2006.

Date: August 10, 2006

                                    /s/ David H. Kirske
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    David H. Kirske
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.333-58298 and the related Prospectus (2000 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8, and inthe Registration Statement No. 333-129152 and the related Prospectus (2004Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8, of our reports dated March 1, 2007, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the restatement discussed in Note 2 appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |
| London, England                          |
| March 1, 2007                            |

 

1

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2015

No. 04-15-00674-CV

Edgar MARKWARDT,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-11416

Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due November 13, 2015, but was not filed. On November 24, 

2015, the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s record was not filed because 

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and 

appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before 

December 12, 2015 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to 

the clerk have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk’s record 

without prepayment of the clerk’s fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 35.3(a). If appellant fails to file 

such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the district clerk, the 

court reporter, and all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Jeffrey F. NYLAND, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

Jeffrey F. Nyland, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
# C_2022222EN.01002402.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/24

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court, acting as President of the Ninth Chamber of 4 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG

(Case C-164/20) (1)

(2022/C 222/35)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 13.7.2020.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.10
                             As of February 8, 2006

Globis Overseas Fund, Ltd.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY  10004
Attn: Paul Packer

Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 4,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $100.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Rudy Wilson
Rudy Wilson


For Asia Development Capital LLC


Agreed to:
Globis Overseas Fund, Ltd.



By: /s/ Paul Packer
   -------------------
    Name: Paul Packer
    Title: by Globis Capital Management L.P.,
           by Globis Capital LLC, by
           Paul Packer, Managing Member
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)

November 15, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my
report of November 15, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Nuclear
Solutions, Inc. (formerly Stock Watch Man, Inc.) for the nine months
ending September 30, 2001, in any filings which are necessary now or
in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA


<PAGE>
Carlton SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020287EN.01003003.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — KS v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-292/20)

(2020/C 287/49)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Koln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KS

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Question referred

Is a strike by an air carrier’s own employees, which is called by a trade union, an extraordinary circumstance for the purpose of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 30 July 2020.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
Ronnie K. HONGO v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-0051

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 
  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Giordano, Jr., President
(Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|Date: March 29, 2005 | /s/ Joseph Giordano, Jr.           
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------
|                     |                     
|                     | Joseph Giordano, Jr.               
|                     | President (Chief Executive Officer)

---
Annabelle BUGGAGE v. TOURO INFIRMARY

Grace Buggage, Rodney Buggage, and Gail Holmes on Behalf of Their Deceased Mother, Annabelle Buggage v. American Home Assurance Company, Healthcare Casualty Insurance Limited, Aggreko, LLC and Touro Infirmary

NO. 2018-C-1832

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

*433Denied.
Jontez Torrell HOLT v. STATE

CR-16-0150

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EX PARTE Timothy Wayne WILLIAMS

CR-16-0597

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50838 Conference Calendar

KEITH ALLAN ANGEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; LEPHER JENKINS, Regional Director; JEFFERY JEFFCOAT, Assistant Warden; DAYTON J. POPPELL, Warden; MICHAEL B. DAVIS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CV-912

- - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Keith Allan Angel, Texas prisoner #621419, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to prosecute and to comply with the district court’s order. He has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED.No. 96-50838 - 2 - Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), we assess no initial partial filing fee against Angel. However, Angel henceforth shall make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The agency having custody of Angel is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the appellate filing fee of $105 is paid. Id. Angel has not challenged the basis of the district court’s dismissal. We have reviewed the record and found no error. Angel’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
##### 



CONTACT:
    
    Kent GriffinChief Financial Officer(858) 485-9840
 BIOMED REALTY TRUST SIGNS AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE MARYLAND
PORTFOLIO FOR $425 MILLION
  Acquires Cambridge Property for $13.2 Million 
 SAN DIEGO, CA  May 2, 2006 




---



##### 



Earnings Guidance
  About Human Genome Sciences
 www.hgsi.com




---



##### 



About BioMed Realty Trust
 www.biomedrealty.com
 This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 based on current expectations, forecasts
and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and
results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation:
risks that the Human Genome Sciences portfolio acquisition will not be completed on the
terms described in this release, or at all; risks associated with the availability and terms
of financing and the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments; failure to manage
effectively the companys growth and expansion into new markets, or to complete or integrate
acquisitions successfully; general risks affecting the real estate industry (including,
without limitation, the inability to enter into or renew leases, dependence on tenants
financial condition, and competition from other developers, owners and operators of real
estate); adverse economic or real estate developments in the life science industry or the
Boston or California regions; risks and uncertainties affecting property development and
construction; risks associated with downturns in the national and local economies, increases
in interest rates, and volatility in the securities markets; potential liability for
uninsured losses and environmental contamination; risks associated with the companys
potential failure to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
and possible adverse changes in tax and environmental laws; and risks associated with the
companys dependence on key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed. For a
further list and description of such risks and uncertainties, see the reports filed by the
company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the companys most recent
annual report on Form 10-K. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
CERTIFICATE OF
                                 PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NanoSignal
Corporation, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Ernie Bartels,
President of NanoSignal Corporation, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



     1.       Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
              September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and


     2.       The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
              for the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of NanoSignal Corporation, Inc.

Dated:  December 30, 2004

NANOSIGNAL CORPORATION, INC.


By    /s/  Scott A. Ervin
      ---------------------
          Scott A. Ervin
             President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

Illustrations        January 26, 2015        USGS SIM 3250: Geologic Map of the Agnesi Quadrangle (V–45), Venus

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
NO. 07-03-0267-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 6, 2003

______________________________ IN RE GLEND A MARNEY , RELATOR

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBE LL, JJ. ON MOTION F OR EMERGEN CY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR MANDAMUS Relator Glenda Marney

has submitted apetition for writ of mandamus addressed to the 99th Distr ict Co urt, Lubb ock Co unty, thatwould dir ect the court to disquali fy counsel for real party

in interest

United Supermarkets, Ltd., et al . from Cause No. 2 002-517,191 pending in that court . Relator al so moves for a stay of proceedings in that cause, which is set for trial on June 16, 2003. Finding that relator has not presente d a record on which the requested r

elief can be gr

an ted, we overru le the motion for a stay, and deny the petition for writ of mandam us. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d). Per Cu riam
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUAN DE DIOS BURGOS-MUNGUIA,

a.k.a. Juan de Dios Burgos-Monguia,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 13-10600

 13-10601

D.C. Nos. 4:10-cr-00631-JGZ

 4:13-cr-00167-JGZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted December 9, 2014*** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Juan de Dios Burgos-Munguia appeals from

the district court judgments and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 36-

FILED

DEC 16 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, United States District Judge for

the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and

his revocation of supervised release and four-month sentence imposed upon

revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), BurgosMunguia’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal with

respect to the revocation of supervised release or the conviction. We, therefore,

affirm the revocation of Burgos-Munguia’s supervised release in Appeal No. 13-

10600, and his conviction in Appeal No. 13-10601.

The district court, in a consolidated sentencing proceeding, failed to address

Burgos-Munguia personally to ask if he wanted to speak before sentencing. See

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(4)(A)(ii), 32.1(b)(2)(E). Because the court could have

imposed a lower sentence than the one it imposed, this omission was plain error. 

See United States v. Daniels, 760 F.3d 920, 925-26 (9th Cir. 2014). Accordingly,

we vacate and remand for resentencing in both appeals.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied without prejudice to renewal in the

district court if counsel does not wish to represent Burgos-Munguia at his

resentencing.

2 13-10600 & 13-10601
Appeal No. 13-10600: AFFIRMED in part; SENTENCE VACATED

and REMANDED.

Appeal No. 13-10601: AFFIRMED in part; SENTENCE VACATED

and REMANDED.

3 13-10600 & 13-10601
Exhibit 10.2


 


AGREEMENT


 


THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE:


The Company: "Boxxy Inc" 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway 500S Las Vegas, USA NV 89169


The Supplier: SIA “Glancebox” Auces nov, Auce, Lauku iela3, Latvia, LV-3708


 


THE SUPPLIER WISHES TO DISTRIBUTE TO
THE COMPANY BEAUTY PRODUCTS THROUGHOUT COMPANY NETWORK.


 


THE COMPANY AND SUPPLIER AGREE TO FOLLOW AND BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS.


1. The supplier will supply the company with beauty products samples.


2. The company will sell beauty
samples as beauty box subscription service.


3. Compensation for distributing the beauty products will be commission.
Commission will be 10% of proceed from subscription services cost.


 


2. COMPANY RESPONSIBILITIES: The Company will remit
compensation commission within sixty days after the subscription service was paid.


 


3. MARKETING SERVICE PROVIDER
RESPONSIBILITIES: Marketing service provider will distribute beauty products via Company network.


 


4. TERM AND TERMINATION:
This Agreement shall continue in effect for the longer of one (1) year following the Effective Date. Company may terminate
this Agreement at any time for any reason by giving the Supplier notice of such termination. The expiration of the Term shall
not in any way affect the purchaser's usage of the product or service, or Company’s obligation to honor the terms of
the sale.


 


5. The Parties are independent contractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create a joint venture,
partnership, franchise, or an agency relationship between the Parties. Neither Party has the authority, without the other
Party's prior written approval, to bind or commit the other Party in any way.


 


This agreement constitutes the whole agreement between the parties and any alteration must be in
writing and signed by both parties. This Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into effect this 28th day of
April 2016.


 


/s/ Andrejs Bekess                                  


“Boxxy Inc” (“Company”)/ ANDREJS BEKESS


 


/s/ Dagnis Samausks                                


SIA “Glancebox (“Supplier”) DAGNIS SAMAUSKS