Research, Engineering, and Development Advisory Committee (REDAC)

National Airspace System (NAS) Operations Subcommittee| MINUTES

Date: March 26-27, 2019

Location: Washington, D.C. (Conference Room, varies by date)

Purpose: Review of FY20-21 Proposed Portfolio; Provide Guidance and 

Recommendations; Program Deep Dives

Chairperson: Leo Prusak

Designated Federal Officer (DFO): Francisco Bermudez

Note Takers: Sadaf Alam

Brian Powers

Upcoming Meetings: 

 Full REDAC April 11, 2019, Washington, D.C

 Fall REDAC NAS Ops August 13th – 14th, 2019

Day 1 – March 26th, 2019 (Veracity)

Review of REDAC Recommendations, Responses, and Open Actions

Presenters Leo Prusak/Francisco Bermudez

Summary:

Mr. Leo Prusak, the NAS Ops Subcommittee Chair opened the meeting with a review of 

Prior Closed Action Items, Current Action Items, and Findings and Recommendations 

(F&Rs) that the Subcommittee provided at the last Fall 2018 REDAC meeting.

Reviewing the recommendations provided on the topics of Human Factors (HF) and 

Commercial Space Transportation (CST), the members expressed concern regarding 

the Commercial Space Program. They questioned that considering the Commercial 

Space launch and reentry operations were rapidly increasing, if the program would be 

sustainable. Following that discussion, the Subcommittee indicated a desire for 

additional information to be presented at the Fall 2019 REDAC NAS Ops meeting. Mr. 

Prusak informed the Subcommittee that the Air Traffic Management-eXploration (ATMX) presentation would be rescheduled for the next REDAC NAS Ops Subcommittee 

meeting scheduled for August 2019.

Presentation Budget Briefing

Presenter Mike Gallivan, ABP-330, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Gallivan began the budget briefing by providing an overview of the FY19 Research, 

Engineering and Development (R, E&D) budget. He highlighted that the House 

Appropriations Committee funded the FAA at $180M and the Senate Appropriations 
Committee funded the FAA at $191M. Mr. Gallivan pointed out that it was rare for the 

funding numbers to come in higher than projected and credited the FAA researchers 

with doing a good job providing budget justification. He pointed out that the Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems (UAS), and Advanced Material/Structural Safety received significant 

plus ups. Mr. Gallivan noted that the Senate conferees provided $24M for UAS 

research, including $12M for the UAS Center of Excellence (COE) in UAS research, 

while Advanced Material/Structural Safety received $14M. Mr. Gallivan informed the 

Subcommittee that the FAA will deliver a budget to Office of Secretary of Transportation 

(OST) in June 2019, and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) would receive their 

budget submission in September 2019. The expectation was that the budget targets 

would change starting in FY22, since they were, at the time, baselined at $120M. 

Fortunately, the funding level was higher than the $74M requested in FY19, however, it 

was also noted that the funding level in the out-years were not at the $180M-$190M 

range that was received for FY19.

In response to the Subcommittee’s request for the enacted budget numbers for FY17-

FY18, Mr. Gallivan provided a copy of the previous year’s budget information to the 

NAS Ops Subcommittee prior to the upcoming full REDAC meeting. 

During the briefing, Subcommittee member, Mr. Zellweger, Consultant, requested that 

the FAA share the UAS Traffic Management (UTM) Report with the Subcommittee 

members when available. Mr. Gallivan indicated that report would be available to the 

Subcommittee when it is submitted to Congress.

Presentation Strategic Research & Development (R&D) Landscape 

Presenter Maureen Molz, R&D Management Division Manager, FAA

Summary: 

Ms. Maureen Molz began the presentation by reminding the Subcommittee of the

introduction of the R&D Strategic Landscapes during the Fall 2018 REDAC session. 

She further reiterated the change to the Annual Modal Research Plan (AMRP), led to

the decision to reorganize research activities into domain area groupings as directed by 

the Department of Transportation (DOT). 

An emphasis was placed on better identifying potential research areas as well as the 

gaps where research is not being performed. R&D landscapes are defined as a “list of 

drivers for research” that provide information about the potential impacts to the aviation 

industry. 

Ms. Shelley Yak (Director, William J. Hughes Technical Center) explained that in 

January 2018 during the partial government shutdown, all of the FAA’s Facilities & 

Equipment (F&E) employees were furloughed, which impacted the FAA’s ability to 

compile a list of research drivers and challenges, and develop draft landscapes prior to 

the early REDAC Subcommittee meetings. Ms. Yak stated that a decision was made 

to re-direct the focus of the spring REDAC Subcommittee meetings to talk about the 

landscapes and requested that the REDAC NAS Ops Subcommittee members provide 

feedback on the research driver list contained in the workbook that was provided to the 
Subcommittee members. She stressed that the landscapes were a key source of input 

for the FAA and help to define where the focus should be on the research. The key 

was to determine in which areas of the research should the FAA be participating in, and 

where should the FAA be leading the research effort. Ms. Molz further elaborated that 

the research landscapes would be a live document that is updated on an annual basis. 

The FAA expected to produce the Research Landscape for the National Airspace 

System document by June 30th, 2019. Ms. Molz and Ms. Yak reaffirmed that the 

Subcommittee members examine the list of research drivers and identify potential gaps 

or missing research activities that the FAA should be focusing on in terms of the 

aviation industry direction. The Subcommittee members agreed to provide feedback to 

the FAA by April 11, 2019, before the full REDAC meeting. 

Presentation 1A09D NextGen – New Air Traffic Management Requirements

Presenter Steve Bradford, Chief Scientist & Technical Advisor, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Bradford briefed the Subcommittee on the New Air Traffic Management 

(ATM) Requirements program. His presentation explained that this program 

was needed to identify new opportunities to improve the efficiency and 

effectiveness of air traffic operations. Mr. Bradford explained that the 

programs’ activities include the research and development of procedures, 

tools, and systems in support of operational improvements. These 

developments support NextGen’s goal of expanding capacity and improving 

the strategic management of operations in the NAS.

Mr. Bradford then outlined the FY19 New ATM Requirements Program’s 

accomplishments, specifically with activities such as evaluating safety 

performance requirements for Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS 

Xu), a spectrum reallocation study, continued work on the synchronization of 

Air/Ground procedures and evolving a development plan for the northeast 

corridor for the initial Trajectory Based Operations (iTBO) implementation 

strategy to name a few.

Mr. Bradford provided a high-level overview of the projects within the New 

ATM program such as Future Collision Avoidance Systems (Future CAS), 

Weather Transition, Synchronization of Air/Ground procedures, Advanced 

Air/Ground Communication, Command and Control in the Cloud, Next 

Generation Automation Input Devices, and Internet Protocol (IP) Based 

Command and Control Data Links.

Mr. Zellweger inquired about how the FAA decided what projects to focus on. 

Mr. Bradford responded that the FAA collaborates with the industry and 

MITRE to decide on focus areas. He also expressed hope that 

Subcommittee member’s input on the FAA R&D Landscape workbook will 

provide additional guidance on future research areas. 
Presentation 1A11A Enterprise Concept Development

Presenter Steve Bradford, Chief Scientist & Technical Advisor, FAA 

Summary: 

Mr. Bradford briefed on the Enterprise Concept Development presentation. He focused 

on the benefits, research goals, past accomplishments, and future plans for this topic. 

He briefly introduced some of the Enterprise research concepts such as Vertical 

Conformance Verifications (VCV), Urban Air Mobility (UAM), Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) 

Modernization, Space Vehicle Operations, and Class E Upper Airspace Management 

Concept Development (ETM). Mr. Bradford gave an overview of the Enterprise Concept 

Development activities and how they would benefit the FAA. Validated operational 

concepts and feedback from stakeholders have led to the advancements in research 

and pre-implementation work to determine the feasibility of advanced concepts and 

maximized benefits and flexibility for NAS users. Additionally, he explained how work in 

this program satisfies research requirements to validate new concepts and generate 

information supporting the validity of identified capability shortfalls, future service needs, 

and capability requirements that will foster increased system capacity, efficiency, and 

throughput. 

When discussing the topic of UAM, a Subcommittee member inquired on the status of 

the UAS Research Plan. The DFO reminded the members that the UAS Research Plan 

was provided to the Subcommittee per their request at the last REDAC meeting in Fall 

2018. Per the Subcommittee chairperson, Mr. Leo Prusak, indicated that the members 

would like to revisit the UAS Research Plan, but also confirmed that the UAS open 

action item from the last REDAC NAS Ops Meeting is complete.

Presentation 1A01A Runway Incursion Reduction Program (RIRP) 

Presenter Amrit Choudhri, Program Manager, FAA

Summary:

Mr. Choudhri briefed the Subcommittee on the Runway Incursion Reduction program

(RIRP). He began the presentation by explaining the objective of RIRP was to reduce 

the risk to people and property caused by collisions in the runway environment, 

emphasizing that the programs’ primary concern was providing safety benefits for the 

FAA, and not performance. He also mentioned that Technology Transfer is another 

focus area for RIRP. Mr. Choudhri provided a synopsis of the Small Airport Surface 

Surveillance (SASS), explaining that this was a low-cost option for secondary

surveillance at small airports. The program is currently working on a proof of concept,

which is expected in FY20, followed by refactoring the software in preparation for 

technical transfer to industry. 

Mr. Choudhri introduced the Surface Taxi Conformance Monitoring (STCM) technology

and that its’ primary focus was to research capabilities needed to digitize taxi route 

instructions, and research airport surface database requirements for taxi conformance 
monitoring. He mentioned that MITRE is currently working on creating a set of 

standards for how to develop a runway map, with turn by turn directions. Mr. Steve 

Bradford added that there was a lot of human factors involvement in support of this 

initiative. The Subcommittee questioned on when the standards will be developed for 

STCM and if there would be an internal study, to which Mr. Choudhri responded that he 

would discuss it with his peers and get back to the Subcommittee with a response. 

Presentation 1A01C Operations Concept Validation & Infrastructure (ATDP)

Presenter Guillermo Sotelo, Physical Scientist, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Sotelo began the briefing with an overview of Advanced Technology Development 

and Prototyping (ATDP) for the Operations Concept Validation and Infrastructure 

program. The ATDP program investigates specific concept elements and drives 

operational and technical requirements and implications for human factors, training, and 

procedures. 

Mr. Sotelo introduced the Time-Based Flow Management (TBFM) – Traffic Flow 

Management System (TFMS) operational integration and stated that in FY19 the FAA 

completed assessment of on-going NASA research for the use of the current TFMS 

toolset to precondition demand into TBFM. TBFM -TFMS operational integration 

identifies capabilities and/or data exchange between the two systems to optimize 

integrated strategic tactical flow management initiatives. Mr. Prusak questioned if the 

TBFM-TFMS integration had been delayed due to the other Northeast Corridor (NEC) 

initiatives, to which Mr. Sotelo responded that there was a delay due to the partial 

government shutdown and the re-baselining of other programs, since there were only a 

limited number of Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) that were allocated to the FAA. Mr. 

Sotelo, then emphasized on the upcoming research activities in FY20 such as 

operational integration analysis, advanced rerouting, time-based management 

operations, and trajectory-based operations. Some expected research products include 

identification of operational opportunities and challenges as emerging concepts evolve, 

simulation activities, maturation of Concept Operations, risk mitigation recommendation, 

and technology transfer packages. He further listed the emerging FY21 focal areas,

which include the enhanced synchronization of strategic and tactical capabilities to 

optimize Time-Based Management. 

Presentation Deep Dive – Aviation Weather Research Program 

Requirements Definition Process

Presenter Bill Bauman, Supervisory Meteorologist, FAA

Summary: Per the NASOPS Subcommittee request from Fall 2018, Mr. Bauman, in 

lieu of Mr. Randy Bass, presented the Aviation Weather Division’s new requirements 

development and validation process. The Policy and Requirements Branch in Aviation 

Weather Division serves as the clearinghouse for all FAA weather requirements. This 

branch acquires aviation weather needs and requests from the field (FAA, airlines, 

organizations, etc.) and validate those requests as formal requirements. The

Requirements Branch then collaborates with the National Weather Service (NWS) to 
determine if capabilities already exist to meet the request (government or industry 

capabilities may be appropriate depending on the request or need), and if not, a gap 

analysis is conducted to see if research is needed. If research is required, the

information is sent to the Weather Program and will be prioritized, developed and 

conducted. If/when the research is complete and the solution meets the need, the 

Policy and Requirements Branch will work with the transition phase with appropriate 

entities (FAA PMO, NWS, etc.). Aviation Weather Division Requirements Service is a 

repeatable process by which weather requirements are developed, validated, allocated 

and transmitted to FAA or NWS.

Presentation A11.k Weather Program 

Presenter Bill Bauman, Supervisory Meteorologist, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Bill Bauman began his presentation defining the benefits of the Weather Program 

for the FAA, and the factors determining its success. He then outlined the Weather 

Program’s accomplishments in FY19 specifically with activities such as Convective 

Weather, Turbulence, Ceiling and Visibility (C&V), In-Flight Icing, Advanced Weather 

Radar Techniques (AWRT), Modeling Development and Enhancement (MDE), Quality 

Assessment (QA), Aviation Weather Demonstration and Evaluation (AWDE) Services, 

Terminal Area Icing Weather Information for NextGen (TAIWIN), High Ice Water 

Content (HIWC), and Weather Requirements for Wake Mitigation. Mr. Bauman

highlighted the expected and planned research activities anticipated in FY19 and FY20,

such as the completed In-Cloud and ICing Large drop Experiment (ICICLE) field 

program to collect aircraft measurements of in-flight icing environments to use for 

development and validation of high-resolution diagnostic and forecast capabilities,

including drop size. Mr. Bauman informed the Subcommittee of the FY19 

accomplishments for Convective Weather stating that the government and industry 

feedback on Offshore Precipitation Capability collected is to be used in future upgrades. 

He also mentioned that there was a completed assessment of Convective Weather 

Avoidance Model (CWAM) algorithms compared to NextGen Weather Processor 

(NWP). Mr. Bauman also mentioned that currently there is a tech push for upgrading 

CWAM for a redesigning of the model to incorporate machine learning techniques and 

optimize use for strategic time frames (2-8-hour forecasts).

Presentation A12.c NextGen – Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WITC)

Presenter Gary Pokodner, General Engineer, FAA

Summary:

Mr. Pokodner began the briefing by identifying the purpose of the WTIC 

program, which is to identify casual factors in weather-related General 

Aviation safety risks and hazards. Mr. Pokodner explained how the WTIC 

program benefited the FAA, stating that enhanced NAS efficiency and 

increased capacity resulting from consistent and predictable pilot adverse 

weather decision-making due to the established cockpit minimum weather 
services. These services include reduced emissions due to enhanced 

efficiency, reduction in flight delays, and enhanced flight routing in and 

around adverse weather conditions. He then outlined the program’s 

accomplishments in FY19, specifically with activities such as Remote 

Oceanic Meteorological Information Operational (ROMIO), Nulling NEXRAD 

Latency, Pilot Reports (PIREP) Modernization, Augmented Reality, ADS-B 

Turbulence Study, and completed a wind study assessment of wind lexicon. 

Mr. Pokodner further explained the purpose of the wind study was to address 

the issue of identical terms used for different wind data, and the inclusion of 

slang terms. Moving forward there will be an effort to eliminate same terms

from wind lexicon. The Subcommittee expressed interest in whether the 

WTIC research was addressing Simplified Vehicle Operations, and if 

something was being done to assess the minimum weather service criteria. 

The subcommittee agreed to address this question as a Finding and 

Recommendation and will wait on the FAA’s official response. 

Presentation A11.n Commercial Space Transportation (CST)

Presenter Ken Davidian, Aerospace Engineer, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Davidian began the briefing by providing an overview of the Office of 

Commercial Space Transportation (AST) portfolio structure and mission. 

AST’s mission is to ensure the protection of the public, property, national 

security, and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial 

launch and reentry, and to encourage, facilitate, and promote United States 

commercial space transportation. He further summarized that in 2018, AST’s 

Research and Development (R&D) priorities were realigned to provide low 

cost access to cutting-edge capabilities in commercial space, and to better 

meet the National Space Council (NSpC), DOT, FAA’s strategic objectives. 

The new approach is designed to address REDAC findings and 

recommendations. 

The Office of Research delivers cutting-edge studies and center of 

excellence expertise in support of the AST and FAA mission. The four major 

Focus Areas of AST are Systemic Safety, Regulatory Streamlining, 

Deployment of Innovation, and Spaceport Infrastructure Research. Mr. 

Davidian highlighted the importance of the AST research initiatives and its

contribution to the nation. Some of the benefits derived from this program are

advances in safety and efficiency of the NAS, maintaining AST’s expertise,

and understanding of a complex commercial space sector with its role in 

advancing the US economy and global competitiveness. 
Presentation 1A07A0 Enterprise Human Factors

Presenter Bill Kaliardos, Scientific and Technical Advisor, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Bill Kaliardos started the presentation by providing an overview of the 

program, stating that The Enterprise Human Factor Development program 

provides integrated guidance on human performance considerations to 

concept development, validation, and implementation teams. He then 

mentioned the research activities that were focused on identifying and 

mitigating systemic human factors considerations that may yield several 

benefits such as increasing the utilization rate of concepts and systems 

among controllers, ensuring controller acceptance of concepts and systems, 

increasing safety through the mitigation of known human factors risks, and 

decreasing controller workload through improved tools and techniques. 

Subcommittee member, Jim Kuchar, inquired if the projects within Enterprise 

Human Factors were visible to other programs, if there was a repository for 

the data to which Mr. Kaliardos explained that the current work being 

performed was updated on the Enterprise Human Factors website, and if the 

focal goal of the HF program is to identify the need to involve others and 

bring more visibility to these projects. 

Presentation ATM-X Program Overview

Presenter NASA

Summary: 

Deferred until the next NAS OPS meeting in Fall 2019.

Presentation Findings and Recommendations (F&R) Discussion

Presenter Subcommittee

Discussion – The Subcommittee Chairperson, Mr. Prusak, decided that the 

NASOPS REDAC will postpose the Subcommittee discussion on F&Rs until 

Day 2 of the REDAC NASOPS meeting. 
Day 2 – March 27th, 2019 (Veracity)

Presentation Review Findings and Recommendations/ New Actions

Presenter Subcommittee

Discussion – The Subcommittee decided that, based on their review of the potential 

topics for F&Rs, they would provide an official F&R response to the DFO and the FAA 

prior to the Full REDAC meeting on April 11th, 2019.

Presentation Strategic R&D Landscape 

Presenter Maureen Molz, R&D Management Division Manager, FAA

Summary: 

Leo Prusak recommended that this discussion would be delayed until 

members of the REDAC NAS Ops subcommittee have reviewed the 

landscape document. Mr. Prusak’s instructions were for all Subcommittee 

members to review this document and list the biggest challenges for each 

research category. Leo Prusak also agreed to add the following as standard 

items to the form:

Time Frame till maturity, Entities, Procedures

Topics to be Combined: 

1

st Research Category – Emergent Operations

Combine 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 The first 8. Keep #4 and include subsets of 

the first 8. 

2

nd Research Category – Infrastructure

Combine 9, 12, 16, 20, 22, 24 (#20: Add “Spectrum” in the language)

3

rd Research Category - Data

Combine 21, 19, 18, 17, 23 and IOT

Presentation A11.i Air Traffic Control/Technical Operations Human Factors

Presenter Dan Herschler, Scientific and Technical Advisor for HF, FAA

Summary: 

Mr. Herschler started the briefing by providing an overview of the purpose of 

the Air Traffic Control/Technical Operations Human Factors program. He 

mentioned the purpose is to provide technical sponsors with timely and 

appropriate R&D products and consultation services, as identified by the 

ATO Human Factors R&D Roundtable and ANG-C management. Additionally, 

it's also to provide support to human factors efforts for FAA acquisition 

programs through In-Service Review Checklist Human Factors approval 

responsibility, and Acquisition Management System (AMS) Policy updates. 
Mr. Herschler then outlined how research activities performed by the program 

benefits the FAA, such as improving the safety and efficiency of complex 

ATC systems by the application of R&D to address factors affecting human 

performance in air traffic control operations and ATC system, by 

recommending and testing improvements to design, procedures, training, 

selection, and placement as well as developing mitigations to address human 

performance shortfalls. 

Subcommittee member, Mr. Joe Bertapelle, inquired if the ATC/Tech Ops 

Human Factors research addressed Notice to Airmen (NOTAMs) in any way. 

Mr. Herschler responded that at this time there was no human factor 

involvement with NOTAMs, as the need for research in that area has not yet 

been identified. The Subcommittee was informed that the program was open 

to suggestions and if there was a gap in the research or an opportunity for 

improvement, the ATC/Tech Ops Human Factors group would be receptive of 

an official F&R in this area. Subcommittee member, Mr. Akbar Sultan, stated 

that NASA built a tool for identifying the true state of fatigue (by means of 

cognitive tests), he inquired if the FAA was leveraging that tool for use by the 

ATC personnel. 

Mr. Herschler acknowledged that although it’s a great idea, there has not 

been any research centered on the collection of that type of cognitive data.

Our research is guided by ATO, and that any suggestions by the 

Subcommittee are welcome. 

Presentation A12.a Wake Turbulence and 1A05C Wake Turbulence ReCategorization

Presenter Jillian Cheng, Program Manager, FAA

Summary: 

The Wake RE&D and Wake Turbulence programs were briefed by the 

Program Manager, Ms. Jillian Cheng, with the support of Technical Lead, Mr. 

Jeff Tittsworth. Ms. Cheng began the briefing with a broad overview of the 

two Wake programs, highlighting the research in this area satisfied the 

NextGen objective to safely increase capacity during peak demand periods. 

She mentioned that Wake RE&D had increased access to airport runways 

and airspace while maintaining or enhancing the safety of the NAS. Wake 

RE&D and Re-CAT research matures wake turbulence standards, 

procedures, and operational concepts to the point they can be directly 

implemented by the FAA. Ms. Cheng further elaborated that the requirements 

for new or existing systems of NAS Infrastructure enhancements was 

required to implement the standards, procedures, and operational concepts.

Mr. Zellweger inquired about the level of collaboration on wake research with 

Eurocontrol, to which Ms. Cheng stated that the program coordinates with 

Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) and Eurocontrol, and attends 
semiannual meetings. All FAA’s Wake Research activities is collaborative 

with Eurocontrol. 

Presentation Commercial Space Launch Research on NAS Integration (CST)

Presenter Francisco Bermudez, DFO

Summary: 

A summary for the Commercial Space Launch Research on NAS Integration 

(CST) briefing is currently not available.

Presentation Subcommittee Discussion Recap & Closing

Presenter Leo Prusak

Discussion – Mr. Prusak concluded the meeting by summarizing the actions 

for the Subcommittee members, pointing out the briefing topic findings and 

recommendations discussed earlier. Mr. Prusak informed the members that 

he will be reaching out to the NASOPS DFO at the FAA, with action items 

and recommendations prior to the full REDAC, which will be held on April 11, 

2019. 
NASOPS SUBCOMMITTEE

WINTER/SPRING 2019

MARCH 26, 2019 MARCH 27, 2019

Name Affiliation Name Affiliation

Steve Summer FAA Jim Kuchar MIT Lincoln Lab

Mark Huberdeau MITRE Akbar Sultan NASA

Lidiya Gavrilenko FAA Emily Stelzer MITRE

Brian Powers A3 Tech Maureen Molz FAA

Mark Weber NOAA Steve Summer FAA

James Wetherby FAA Mark Huberdeau MITRE

Guillermo S. FAA Lara Schmidt FAA

Chinita Roundtree-Coleman FAA Dan Herschler FAA

Sadaf Alam A3 Technology Natee Wongsangpaiboon FAA

Gary Pokodner FAA HQ Jillian Cheng FAA

Bill Bauman FAA Jeff Tittsworth FAA

Dres Zelleweger Consultant Bruce J. Holmes Smartsky Network

Joe Bertepelle Jetblue Joe Bertapelle Jetblue

Bruce J. Holmes Smartsky

Networks

Dres Zelleger Consultant

Steve Bradford FAA Mark Weber NOAA

Leo Prusak PASSUR Brian Powers A3 Technology

Maureen Molz FAA Sadaf Alam A3 Technology

Emily Stelzer MITRE Francisco Bermudez FAA

Jm Kuchar MIT Lincoln Lab Leo Prusak PASSUR

Shelli Brunswick Space 

Foundation

Chinita RoundtreeColeman

FAA

Nina Mohleji MITRE

Ken Davidson FAA

Bill Kaliardos FAA