alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 526 

Repealing standing orders relating to flowers in the Senate Chamber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Repealing standing orders relating to flowers in the Senate 

Chamber. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON FLOWERS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Senate Resolution 284 (58th Con4 gress), agreed to February 24, 1905, is repealed. 

5 (b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Senate Resolution 221 

6 (98th Congress), agreed to September 15, 1983, is re7 pealed. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EX PARTE Christopher THORNTON

CR-16-0891

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American IR Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) for the year end period ending December 31st, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ron
Ryan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and R.
A. Moss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, thAT:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.


/s/    RON RYAN
===============================

Ron Ryan
Chief Executive Officer
August 27, 2002



/s/   R. A. MOSS
===============================

R. A. Moss
Chief Financial Officer
August 27, 2002


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 11.1

Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Earnings per Share


                                                                  2002
        Basic:

        Net loss                                             $(2,189,220)
                                                             ============

        Average shares:
             Common shares issued                              61,300,000
                                                               ----------
             Average shares outstanding                        61,300,000
                                                               ==========

        Net loss per common share, basic                           $(0.04)
                                                                  =======


        Diluted:

        Net loss                                              $(2,189,220)
                                                              ============

        Average shares:
             Common shares issued                              61,300,000
                                                               ----------
             Average shares outstanding                        61,300,000
                                                               ==========

        Net loss per common share, basic                           $(0.04)
                                                                  =======


All warrants on common stock and all 4,745,456  shares of convertible  preferred
stock issued were  excluded  from 2002 diluted  earnings per share  because they
were anti-dilutive.
Giovanni VELEZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0927

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

Giovanni Velez, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE Terrance Lavon GASTON

CR-16-0744

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit 10.4



JOINDER AGREEMENT



The undersigned hereby agrees, effective as of the date hereof, to become a party to that certain Operating Agreement (the Agreement)
dated as of April 12, 2004 by and among Pioglobal First Russia, LLC (the Company), its Board of Directors, Pioglobal Omega, LLC, Andrei Uspensky, and any other unit holder, warrant holder or option holder who from time to time
becomes a party to the Agreement by execution of a Joinder Agreement. The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the undersigned will be included within the meaning of the term Restricted Unit Holder as defined and used in the
Agreement.



As a condition to accepting the undersigned as a
Member and Restricted Unit Holder, as those terms are defined and used in the Agreement, the Company and the undersigned agree that Section 8.7(b) of the Agreement shall be amended with respect to the undersigned as follows:



The reference to January 1, 2003 in Section 8.7(b) shall be
replaced with the date of the grant of such Call Securities.



|            |  |  |  |            |  |                                                                                   |  | 
|----------- |  |  |  | ---------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|            |  |  | 
|May 19,2004 |  |  |  |            |  | /s/    DMITRY LARIN                                                              
|Date        |  |  |  | Name:      |  | Dmitry Larin Sign name on signature line and print name legibly below signature.)
|            |  |  | 
|            |  |  |  | Address:   |  | 119415 Moscow Leninsky Prospekt 116-1-47                                         
|            |  |  | 
|            |  |  |  | Telephone: |  | 7-095-784-1036                                                                   
|            |  |  |  | Facsimile: |  | 7-095-960-2905                                                                   



Acknowledged and agreed to:



|                            |  |                             
|--------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|PIOGLOBAL FIRST RUSSIA, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/    DONALD H. HUNTER     
|Name:                       |  | Donald H. Hunter            
|Title:                      |  | Vice President and Treasurer
Simeon Paul HOWARD v. STATE

CR-16-0542

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23
- 0138 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF JACQUELINE STEINMANN,

Petitioner and Appellee, and BRETT STEINMANN,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Anna M.**  **Williams,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P. , 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this March 20, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Karl Knuchel, Christopher J. Gillette, Anna M. Williams 03/20/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0138
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAY 30 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MONDRAY JEFFERSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

ROBERT FURLONG, ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

COLORADO,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-1278

(D.C. No. 95-D-3256)

(Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Petitioner Mondray Jefferson filed an application for a writ of habeas

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that he had been denied his constitutional

rights to due process, equal protection, and effective assistance of counsel by the

delay in his right to appeal his underlying state conviction. Upon recommendation of the magistrate judge, the district court dismissed the action without

prejudice for failure of Mr. Jefferson to exhaust state remedies. The court then

denied Mr. Jefferson’s request for a certificate of appealability. The district court

also denied leave to file an appeal without payment of fees under 28 U.S.C. §

1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, because Mr. Jefferson

failed to submit a certified trust account statement.

We grant Mr. Jefferson’s request to proceed on appeal without payment of

fees. As we held recently in United States v. Simmonds, No. 96-3287, 111 F.3d

737 (10th Cir. 1997), a section 2254 habeas corpus action is not a civil action as

contemplated by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and Mr. Jefferson is not

required to submit a certified statement of his trust account.

After reviewing the record in light of Mr. Jefferson’s contentions, however,

we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability. For the reasons set forth in

the district court’s Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, we agree

with the district court that Mr. Jefferson has failed to exhaust available state court

remedies, a prerequisite to bringing this action. Since Mr. Jefferson may obtain
-3-

relief in state court, he has not yet made a “substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253. 

Accordingly, we DENY Mr. Jefferson’s application for a certificate of

appealability and we DISMISS the appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Lawrence Madoff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of MicroSignal
Corporation

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):


                                       12
<PAGE>


a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: January 6, 2003
                  /s/ Dr. Lawrence Madoff
                  -----------------------------
                  Dr. Lawrence Madoff
                  Chief Executive Officer




                                       13
# Sheet1

Type III Construction Project Waivers Open for Comment (as of May 21, 2024)	

Page &P of &N
Diana DERUISE-PIERCE, Surviving Spouse of Roy T. Pierce v. UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.C. d/b/a Tubane University Hospital and Clinic, University Medical Center Management Corporation d/b/a/ University Medical Center New Orleans, Davis Wendell Ogitani, M.D., Brian Conkerton, R.N. and Danielle Williams-Johnson, R.N.

NO. 2018-C-1886

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.
Austin Daniel ELLISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4725

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman,certify that:

 

1.                 I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2007-A (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                 Based on my knowledge, theExchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on my knowledge, all ofthe distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in theExchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                 I am responsible for reviewingthe activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and thecompliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statementrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.                 All of the reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated party: Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

 

----

 

March 28, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Bierman                                           |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven C. Bierman                                               |
|   | Title: | President (senior officer  in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
Larry GADSDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2357

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018

Larry Gadsden, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Gutierrez v. State*, 854 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) ; *Edwards v. State*, 743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) ; *Barnes v. State*, 634 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
** **

**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2010-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

 

March 29, 2011

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman                                          |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman                                              |
|   | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Tyrone BIENEMY

NO. 2018-KH-2033

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Exhibit 10.2










SPEEDEMISSIONS, INC.

CALABRIA ADVISORS, LLC




CONVERSION NOTICE AND AGREEMENT




This Conversion Notice and Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into effective this 16th day of June, 2004 by and between Speedemissions, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Speedemissions" or the "Company") and Calabria Advisers, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company ("Calabria" or the "Holder").




WHEREAS, Calabria is the holder of seven (7) promissory notes (each a "Note" and collectively the "Notes") as follows:





	
Date of Note
	 	
Principal Amount 
	 	
Accrued Interest
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
10/24/03
	 	
$
	
40,000.00 
	 	
$
	
1,288.89 
	 
	
10/30/03
	 	
$
	
50,000.00 
	 	
$
	
1,569.44 
	 
	
11/7/03
	 	
$
	
100,000.00 
	 	
$
	
3,041.67 
	 
	
12/26/03
	 	
$
	
75,000.00 
	 	
$
	
1,770.83 
	 
	
1/2/04
	 	
$
	
25,000.00 
	 	
$
	
569.44 
	 
	
1/4/04
	 	
$
	
10,000.00 
	 	
$
	
225.00 
	 
	
1/30/04
	 	
$
	
15,000.00 
	 	
$
	
283.33 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Total
	 	
$
	
315,000.00 
	 	
$
	
8,748.61 
	 






WHEREAS, the principal and accrued interest on the Notes is currently due on dates ranging from April 21, 2004 to July 28, 2004 (the "Due Dates");




WHEREAS, the principal and accrued interest on the Notes may currently be converted into common stock of the Company at the bid price of the stock on the date each respective Note became due and payable;




WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to extend the Due Dates until the date of this Agreement, and Holder desires and the Company agrees to convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest due under the Notes into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.35 per share.




NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder agree as follows:




1.  The Due Dates for the Notes is hereby extended to June 16, 2004.




2.  The outstanding principal and accrued interest on the Notes are convertible into common stock of the Company at a rate of $0.35 per share.



	  
	 	Page 1 of 3	 
	





	 



 

3.  The Holder hereby irrevocably elects to exercise the right, represented by the Notes, copies of which are attached hereto, to convert a total of $323,748.61 in principal and accrued interest, as set forth above, into 924,996 shares (the "Shares") of common stock of the Company, and upon issuance of the Shares hereby waives any further accrued but unpaid interest on the Notes. The Holder requests that certificates for such Shares be issued in the name of Calabria Advisers, LLC, 106 North Cove Drive, Peachtree City, Georgia 30269.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first written above.





	
Speedemissions, Inc.,
	 	
Calabria Advisers, LLC,

	
a Florida corporation
	 	
a Georgia Limited Liability Company

	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
/s/ Bahram Y usefzadeh
	 	
/s/ Richard Parlontieri

	
By: Bahram Yusefzadeh
	 	
By: Richard Parlontieri

	
Its: Director
	 	
Its: Managing Member








	  
	 	Page 2 of 3	 
	





	 



Exhibits A-G




Calabria Notes



	  
	 	Page 3 of 3