alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(10)
              - products_publications(19)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        October 3, 2019        Outstanding in the Field (Ep 5): Fish in the Grand Canyon
Order entered June 13 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 00845

- CR

BILLY BOB BOWEN , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Ju di c i al District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 20

- 54570

- N

O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. We abated because appellant ’s brief , originally due o n January 29, 2022, had
not been filed. On June 9, 2022, a hearing was held , and th e trial cou rt found that appellant desires to appeal, his appointed counsel has not abandoned the appeal, and counsel repre sented she would file appellant ’ s brief by June 20, 2022. We
ADOPT those findings.We ORDER appellant ’ s brief due by June 20, 2022. We caution that the failure to file a brief by that date will result in the C o urt taking w h a tever action it deems appropriate to ensure this appeal proceeds in a more timely fashi on.
W e DI RECT the Cl erk to send copi es of th is order to t h e Hon orable Hect or
Garza , Pre sidi ng Judge, 195th Judicial Dist rict Court; and to counsel for all par ties.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
# C_2020297EN.01003801.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/38

---

Appeal brought on 23 July 2020 by easyJet Airline Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 13 May 2020 in Case T-8/18, easyJet Airline v Commission

(Case C-343/20 P)

(2020/C 297/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (represented by: J. Rivas Andrés, avocat, A. Manzaneque Valverde, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal and/or annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 (1) of 29 July 2016 on State Aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports from public service obligations (SGEI), to the extent that it concerns the appellant; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal and/or annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 (1) of 29 July 2016 on State Aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports from public service obligations (SGEI), to the extent that it concerns the appellant;

| — | in the alternative, set aside the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the General Court for reconsideration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, set aside the judgment under appeal and refer the case back to the General Court for reconsideration; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those in first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the present proceedings and those in first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the judgment under appeal should be set aside on the following four grounds:

First, the judgment under appeal erred in law by mixing the assessment of two conditions for the existence of State aid (state resources and advantage).

Second, the judgment under appeal erred in law by considering that the MEO test could not be applied in the present case. The General Court erred in concluding that the airport operators did not contribute significant amounts of their own funds and did not act as private market economy operators. Furthermore, the reasoning in the judgment under appeal as to the non-application of the MEO test, infringed Article 345 TFUE, the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination as well as easyJet's rights of defence.

Third, the judgment under appeal erred in law by concluding that the airport operators acted as mere intermediaries of the Region of Sardinia.

Fourth, the judgment under appeal erred in law regarding the identification of: (i) the final beneficiaries of the regional scheme; (ii) the indirect advantage; and (iii) the secondary effects of the scheme.

---

(1)  OJ 2017, L 268, p. 1.

---
# C_2020279EN.01003902.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/39

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 30 June 2020 — EL and CP v Ryanair Designated Activity Company

(Case C-287/20)

(2020/C 279/53)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: EL, CP

Defendant: Ryanair Designated Activity Company

Questions referred

Does the trade-union-organised strike by the staff of an operating air carrier constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

Is it relevant in this regard whether negotiations were held with the employees’ representative(s) in advance of the strike?

---

(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PAGE 1

Matthew T. Taplett 

State Bar No. 24028026 

Pope, Hardwicke, Christie, Schell, 

 Kelly & Taplett, L.L.P. 

500 W. 7th Street, Suite 600 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Telephone No.: (817) 332-3245 

Facsimile No.: (817) 877-4781 

E-mail: mtaplett@popehardwicke.com

Attorneys for SOUTHSIDE BANK 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

IN RE: § 

 § CASE NO. 24-41512 

DAVID LYN LUTTRELL, § 

 § CHAPTER 13 

DEBTOR. § 

 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR SERVICE OF PAPERS

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, pursuant to Rules 2002 and 9010(b) of the Federal Rules 

of Bankruptcy Procedure, SOUTHSIDE BANK, a creditor and party-in-interest herein, requests that 

all notices given or required to be given in this case and all papers served or required to be served in 

this case be given to and served upon the following: 

Matthew T. Taplett, Esq. 

Pope, Hardwicke, Christie, Schell, Kelly & Taplett, L.L.P. 

500 West 7th Street, Suite 600 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Case 24-41512-mxm13 Doc 12 Filed 05/07/24 Entered 05/07/24 12:45:21 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PAGE 2

Date: May 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

POPE, HARDWICKE, CHRISTIE, SCHELL, 

 KELLY & TAPLETT, L.L.P. 

By: ___/s/ Matthew T. Taplett

 Matthew T. Taplett 

 State Bar No. 24028026 

 

500 W. 7th Street, Suite 600 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Telephone No. (817) 332-3245 

Facsimile No. (817) 877-4781 

E-mail: mtaplett@popehardwicke.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR SOUTHSIDE BANK 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that on this 7th day of May 2024, a true and correct copy of this document 

was served via the ECF system or by U.S. first class mail, postage prepaid, on the following: 

U.S. Trustee's Office 

1100 Commerce Street, Room 976 

Dallas, TX 75202 

Tim Truman, Chapter 13 Trustee 

6851 N.E. Loop 820, Suite 300 

North Richland Hills, TX 76180 

Warren V. Norred 

Norred Law PLLC 

515 E. Border Street 

Arlington, TX 76010 

By: s/Matthew T. Taplett 

 Matthew T. Taplett 

P:Southside\Lutrell\Bankrutpcy 2024.docx 

Case 24-41512-mxm13 Doc 12 Filed 05/07/24 Entered 05/07/24 12:45:21 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 20, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00576

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.J. JR., A CHILD,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA0 1036 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental rights to his child, the reporter’s record was due on September 10, 2018. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.1(b).

On September 17, 2018, court reporter Angelita Rangel Jimenez filed a notification of late reporter’s record. She indicated her other duties p reclude her from working on the record, and she expects to file the record by September 24, 2018.

The reporter’s motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED. The reporter’s record must be filed with this court by September 24, 20 18. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an accelerated appeal to ten days).

The child’s “need for permanence is the paramount consideration for the child’s present and future physical and emotional needs.” See Dupree v. Tex. Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs.

, 907 S.W.2d 81, 87 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1995, no writ). This court must render its decision “with the least possible delay,” and any further delays in obtaining the reporter’s record will hinder this court in its duty. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 3 5.3(c); In re J.L. , 163 S.W.3d 79, 82 (Tex. 2005) (quoting T EX

. F AM . C ODE A NN . § 263.405(a) (West 2014)). Any further requests for extension of time to file the reporter’s record will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha ve hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
TAS-15-01 Models for Advanced Flight Simulators For Advanced Maneuvers
Charles FICAROTTA, Merry Ficarotta and Dania Cut Annex, LLC, Appellants, v. James S. PRENTICE and Dania Cut Holdings, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-0309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

William R. Amlong, Karen Coolman Amlong and Jennifer Daley of Amlong & Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants Charles Ficarotta and Merry Ficarotta.

Diane G. DeWolf, A. Rodger Traynor, Jr. and Ashley A. Sawyer of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee and Miami, for appellee Dania Cut Holdings, Inc.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 8-K
 
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 22, 2006
Date of Report
(Date of earliest event reported)
 
 FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
  
 Washington
    
    000-22439
    
    91-0222175(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File No.)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 100 Fourth Avenue N., Suite 510, Seattle, Washington 98109
 (206) 404-7000
  
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Principal Officers
    -2-




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Dated: June 28, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Judith A. EndejanJudith A. EndejanSenior Vice President
General Counsel -3-
DO NOT PACK your SPARE BATTERIES in your 

CHECKED BAG.

SPARE BATTERIES must be carried IN CARRY-ON BAGGAGE

only and battery terminals must be PROTECTED from 

short circuit. 

Some accessories such as CAMERAS and SPEAKERS

may contain lithium batteries.

See FAA’s PackSafe page to 

make sure you travel safely 

with your Drone (UAS).

faa.gov/go/packsafe

If shipping your Drone (UAS), 

check the resources on SafeCargo 

to ensure you ship safely. 

faa.gov/go/safecargo

YOUR DRONE 

MIGHT BE A

DANGEROUS 

GOOD!

Some PARACHUTE SYSTEMS may contain 

pyrotechnics, CO2 cartridges, batteries or other 

materials that are considered DANGEROUS GOODS.

QUESTIONS? email hazmatinfo@faa.gov
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                 OF

                      EMISSION CONTROL DEVICES, INC.
                 **************************************
         *****************************************************

       Pursuant to Sec. 55-2-02 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the
undersigned does hereby submit these Articles of Incorporation for the
purpose of forming a business Corporation.

                              ARTICLE I

       The name of the Corporation is Emission Control Devices, Inc.

                              ARTICLE II

       The Corporation is authorized to issue one hundred thousand shares.
These shares shall be all on one class, designated as common stock.

                              ARTICLE III

       The street address and county of the initial registered office is 19425-
G Liverpool Parkway, Cornelius, North Carolina 28031, Mecklenburg County.

                              ARTICLE IV

       The mailing address of the initial registered office is 19425-G
Liverpool Parkway, Cornelius, North Carolina 28031.

                              ARTICLE V

       The name of the initial registered agent is John F. Hanzel.

                              ARTICLE VI

       The name and address of the incorporator is John F. Hanzel, 19425-G
Liverpool Parkway, Cornelius, North Carolina 28031.

                              ARTICLE VII

       These Articles are effective upon filing.

       This the 27th day of October, 2000.
                                               /s/ John F. Hanzel
                                               ---------------------
                                               JOHN F. HANZEL, Incorporator
Ricky W. TYLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 15, 2019

Jason T. Forman, of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE James Calvin FRAZIER

CR-16-0670

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Michael Stefan WHITE

No. 2018-KH-0531

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - montana(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea, showing generalized distribution of lava...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1972        Generalized geologic map of the Eocene Absaroka volcanic field

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea with generalized surface distribution of ...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2018        Nantucket and Marthas Vineyard geologic illustrations

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2013        Geology of the Anza-Terwilliger Area, California

Charts or Graphs        April 1, 2023        Geologic map of the Timber Hill basalt Sweetwater Hills, Montana

Charts or Graphs        July 11, 2021        Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        Map shows hill-shaded bathymetric, backscatter, and photographic data

Charts or Graphs        June 15, 2018        Kilauea Volcano -- Lower East Rift Zone lava flows and fissures

Charts or Graphs        June 10, 2016        Potential Marine Benthic Habitats of Monterey Canyon and Vicinity

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        IMMeRSS Cruise expedition area

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2012        Acoustic Backscatter Intensity

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
STATE of Louisiana v. Michael WITHERS

NO. 2018-KH-2051

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED, Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Exhibit 10.13

                              TREND MINING COMPANY
                     401 Front Avenue Suite 1, Second Floor
                             Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814
               Telephone (208) 664-8095 * Facsimile (208) 667-9616
                               www.trendmining.com



September 6, 2001



RE:  Short term loan agreement





Kurt J. Hoffman hereby agrees to loan Trend Mining Company $14,000
(fourteen-thousand dollars) for use in operating capital and to cover
maintenance fee payments. Said loan will be repaid within 14 days of the date of
this agreement with funds that are to be wired to Trend Mining Company's account
from an insider stock sale.



Accepted,                                        Agreed,


/s/ John P. Ryan                                 /s/ Kurt J. Hoffman
John P. Ryan                                     Kurt J. Hoffman
CFO-Sec/Treas
Trend Mining Company
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31415]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 30, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Executive 
Vice President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. River Run Bancorp, MHC, Newburyport, Massachusetts; to merge 
with Rollstone Bancorp, MHC, and thereby indirectly acquire Rollstone 
Bank & Trust, both of Fitchburg, Massachusetts.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-31415 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
EX PARTE Willie Otis JAMES

CR-16-0745

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
# Sheet1

# Sheet1 (2)

# Sheet2

# Sheet3