alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021128EN.01001102.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 24 December 2020 — Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank, Y v X, Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

(Case C-713/20)

(2021/C 128/16)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank, Y

Respondents: X, Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 11(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a worker who resides in a Member State, and works in the territory of another Member State on the basis of a temporary agency contract, under which the employment relationship ends as soon as the temporary assignment ends and is then resumed again, remains subject to the legislation of the latter Member State during the intervening periods, so long as he has not temporarily ceased that work? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 11(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a worker who resides in a Member State, and works in the territory of another Member State on the basis of a temporary agency contract, under which the employment relationship ends as soon as the temporary assignment ends and is then resumed again, remains subject to the legislation of the latter Member State during the intervening periods, so long as he has not temporarily ceased that work?

| 2. | What factors are relevant for assessing whether or not there is a temporary cessation of activity in such cases? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What factors are relevant for assessing whether or not there is a temporary cessation of activity in such cases?

| 3. | How much time must elapse before a worker who is no longer in a contractual employment relationship is to be regarded as having temporarily ceased his activity in the country of employment, unless there are concrete indications to the contrary? |
| --- | --- |

3.

How much time must elapse before a worker who is no longer in a contractual employment relationship is to be regarded as having temporarily ceased his activity in the country of employment, unless there are concrete indications to the contrary?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 266 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the relationship between certain 

obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty and constitutional declarations of war by Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2023 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. BRAUN, Ms. LUMMIS, and Mr. 

LEE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the relationship 

between certain obligations under the North Atlantic 

Treaty and constitutional declarations of war by Congress. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that, pur2 suant to article 11 of the North Atlantic Treaty, done at 

3 Washington, District of Columbia, on April 4, 1949 (63 

4 Stat. 2241; 34 U.N.T.S. 243), if the President determines 

5 it necessary to engage United States forces in hostilities 

6 in order to restore or maintain the security of the North 

7 Atlantic area as stated in article 5 of such treaty, such 

8 action does not supersede the constitutional requirement 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 266 IS 

1 that Congress declare war or authorize the use of military 

2 force prior to the United States engaging in hostilities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2021148EN.01001602.xml

| 26.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2021 — Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation v EUIPO (Heartfulness)

(Case T-48/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Heartfulness - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 148/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation (Manapakkam, India) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2019 (Case R 1266/2019-4), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark Heartfulness.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.

---
Deshawn GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020359EN.01000201.xml

| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/2

---

Appeal brought on 11 May 2020 by Gamma-A SIA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-352/19, Gamma-A v EUIPO — Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss

(Case C-199/20 P)

(2020/C 359/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Gamma-A SIA (represented by: M. Liguts, advokāts)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 3 September 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):July 26, 2006
 
 TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
 
   
  001-31970
    
    81-0597059(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 12001 Tech Center Drive, Livonia, Michigan
    
    48150(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 
   
 see
 o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



TABLE OF CONTENTS




---



##### 



ITEM 1.01. ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
  -3-




---



##### 



TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.Dated: July 28, 2006
    By:
    /s/ David L. BialoskyDavid L. BialoskyExecutive Vice President and
General Counsel -4-
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SOUTHERN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC

, Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and VICTOR A. GARCIA, ET AL.,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 15

- 786

[ November 18, 2015 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Eli Breger , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2012CA004804XXXXMB

.

Anthony A. Arsali, Lantana, for appellant.

David F. Knobel and Jeremy W. Harris of Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock

& Kennedy, C HTD, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Arsali v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, 38 Fla. L. Weekly

S562 (Fla. July 11, 2013).

G ROSS

, M AY and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                             |   |                                                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:                May 14,                2007 | By:    | /s/ Matthew              S.              Kerper                  |   |
|                                             |   | Matthew              S. Kerper                                        |   |
|                                             |   | President                (Principal                executive officer) |   |
|                                             |   |                                                                  |   |
# C_2021462EN.01001802.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — XY v Hauptzollamt B

(Case C-100/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Directive 2003/96/EC - Article 17(1)(a) - Tax reductions on the consumption of energy products and electricity in favour of energy-intensive businesses - Optional reduction - Arrangements governing the repayment of tax levied in breach of provisions of national law adopted on the basis of a power granted to the Member States in that directive - Payment of interest - Principle of equal treatment)

(2021/C 462/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: XY

Respondent: Hauptzollamt B

Operative part of the judgment

EU law must be interpreted as requiring that, in the event of refund of the amount of electricity tax wrongly levied on account of the incorrect application of a national provision adopted on the basis of a power granted to the Member States by Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, interest be paid on that amount.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2144
MELVIN LEWIS COSELY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-1022-3) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Lewis Cosely, Appe llant Pro Se. Dana Lewis Rust, Maria Christine Klein, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cosely v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Co., Inc. , No. CA-96-1022-3 (E.D. Va. July 24, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FAA REDAC Subcommittee on Environment and Energy 

Summer 2014 Meeting Agenda 

Airlines for America - 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1100 - Washington DC 

Dial‐in Information: 

Telephone number: 1-888-850-4523 (US and Canada); 1-719-234-7800 (International) 

Passcode: 566565 

Read Ahead Materials: https://redacdb.faa.gov/browse.cfm

Day 1 - Tuesday, August 26, 2014 

Time Duration Title Presenter 

8:00 0:30 Check-In / Continental Breakfast 

8:30 0:05 Welcome N. Young 

8:35 0:10 Chair opening statement & Introductions M. Joshi 

8:45 0:15 What's new in FAA & AEE C. Holsclaw 

9:00 0:30 Responses to REDAC Recommendations & Actions J. Hileman 

9:30 0:15 Budget Update M. Gallivan 

9:45 0:15 Industry Perspective S. Alterman 

10:00 0:15 Break 

10:15 0:30 AEE Research Update (including COE update) J. Hileman 

10:45 0:15 NextGen EMS - Update on Website D. Scata 

11:00 0:15 Discussion - Pose Questions for Consideration J. Hileman 

11:15 0:30 Noise Research - Roadmap and Update R. Cointin 

11:45 0:30 Emissions Research - Roadmap and Update R. Iovinelli 

12:15 1:00 Lunch 

13:15 0:30 CLEEN Aircraft Technology Maturation - Update L. Ileri 

13:45 0:30 NASA Update J. Dryer 

14:15 0:30 Operations Research - Roadmap and Update J. Marks & 

C. Dorbian 

14:45 0:15 Alternative Jet Fuel - Overview of Efforts A. Jardines 

15:00 0:15 National Alt Jet Fuel Strategy - Update M. Gupta 

15:15 0:15 Break 

15:30 0:30 National Jet Fuel Combustion Program M. Gupta 

16:00 0:30 ICAO Update L. Maurice (via 

phone) 

16:30 0:30 Modeling & Tools Update J. Hileman 

17:00 0:15 Fuel Efficiency Metric Development Efforts L. Windhoffer 

17:15 0:15 Goals Analysis C. Dorbian 

17:30 End of Day-1 

 
Day 2 - Wednesday, August 27, 2014 

Time Duration Title Presenter 

8:00 0:30 Continental Breakfast 

8:30 1:45 Priorities - small group discussion All 

10:15 0:15 Break 

10:30 1:30 Continued... Priorities - small group discussion All 

12:00 0:45 Lunch 

12:45 1:15 Synthesize priorities discussion M. Joshi 

14:00 1:00 Identify topics for subcommittee report M. Joshi 

15:00 End of Day-2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - new mexico(1)
              - rhode island(1)

## By Year

General        August 2, 2018        370.410.1 - Training - General Provision

General        December 29, 2023        Science Information Service (SIS)

General        July 11, 2019        Giuseppina Mattietti

General        July 11, 2019        Madalyn Blondes

General        July 11, 2019        Sally Sennert

General        May 1, 2019        General Questions To Pose While Exploring Topographic Maps

General        July 11, 2019        Alanna Simpson

General        July 11, 2019        Geoff Gilleaudeau

General        July 11, 2019        Jacob Richardson

General        July 11, 2019        William F. Hoover

General        July 11, 2019        Jess Rodysill

General        January 24, 2023        Don't Take It for Granite

General        August 3, 2018        429.1 - Space Management

General        March 1, 2018        Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer: Clifford I. Voss

General        July 30, 2020        New Mexico Water Science Center Sediment Laboratory
Certificate Number: 17572-TXN-DE-038367590

Bankruptcy Case Number: 24-41245

17572-TXN-DE-038367590

CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION

I CERTIFY that on April 10, 2024, at 4:09 o'clock PM PDT, Randy Jones

completed a course on personal financial management given by internet by Dollar

Learning Foundation, Inc., a provider approved pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 111 to

provide an instructional course concerning personal financial management in the

Northern District of Texas.

Date: April 10, 2024 By: /s/Benjamin E Wunsch

Name: Benjamin E Wunsch

Title: Counselor

Case 24-41245-mxm7 Doc 8 Filed 04/10/24 Entered 04/10/24 19:20:20 Desc

Page 1 of 1
RPA S1 – Airport Planning $1,400,000.00

S1.1 - Runway Simulator

 S1.2 - Capacity Simulation

RPA S2 - Airport Design $1,600,000.00

S1.1 - Safety and Operations

S2.2 - Runway Incursion Mitigation

RPA S3 – Airport Safety Data Mining $500,000.00

RPA S4 – Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting $3,000,000.00

S4.1 - ARFF Technologies

S4.2 - Composite Material Firefigthing

S4.3 - New Large Aircraft Firefighting

RPA S5 – Wildlife Hazard Mitigation $2,500,000.00

S5.1 - Habitat Management

S5.2- Wildlife Srike and Surveillance Data

S5.3 - Heliport/Vertiport Visual Aids

RPA S6 – Visual Guidance $1,500,000.00

S6.1 - Signs, Lights and Markings

S6.2- NAS Visual Aids

S6.3 - Detection and Deterrent Technologies

RPA S7 – Runway Surface Technology and Aircraft Braking $1,100,000.00

S7.1 - Aircraft Arresting Systems

S7.2 - Airport Surface Safety and Maintenance

S7.3 - Aircraft Braking and Airport Winter Operations

RPA S8 – Airport Safety and Surveillance Sensors $1,500,000.00

S8.1 - Low Cost Surveillance 

S7.2 - Emerging Sensor Technologies

S7.3 - Aiport Perimeter Security

RPA S9 - Noise Programs $750,000.00

RPA S10– Airport Research Taxiway $450,000.00

Total Safety RPA's $14,300,000.00

RPA P1 – NAPTF $3,000,000.00

RPA P2 – NAPMRC $1,200,000.00
RPA P3 – Field Instrumentation & Testing $900,000.00

RPA P4 – Improved Paving Materials $2,308,000.00

P6.1 Heated Pavements

P6.2 Advanced Materials

RPA P5 – Pavement Design and Evaluation $1,200,000.00

RPA P6 - NDT Technology $1,600,000.00

RPA P7 – Software Programs $900,000.00

RPA P8 – Extending Pavement Life $1,000,000.00

Total Pavement RPA's $12,108,000.00

RPA E1 – Airport Environmental Research $1,000,000.00

Total RPA's $27,408,000.00
OLD-RPD#

$600,000.00 RPD 139

$800,000.00 RPD 132

$850,000.00

$750,000.00 RPD 142

$500,000.00 RPD 141

$1,750,000.00 RPD 152

$750,000.00 RPD 140

$500,000.00 RPD 134

RPD 150

RPD 151

$600,000.00 RPD 148

$500,000.00 RPD 147

RPD 149

RPD 153

RPD 138

RPD 135
RPD 137

$800,000.00 RPD 155

$1,508,000.00 RPD 136

RPD 145 + 144

RPD 143

RPD 156

RPD 154

RPD 157
Maurice Alexander JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-950

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Stephen K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  November
9, 2010




/s/ Stephen K. GardnerStephen
      K. GardnerChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
STATE of Louisiana v. Leon WILLIAMS

No. 2018-KH-0658

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEBSTER**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Applicant's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.