## NUMBER S 13

- 1 6

- 00 081

- CR & 13

- 16

- 00124

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

DAVID WILLS
A/K/A DAVID K. WILLS

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214 th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Justice s Benavides, Perkes and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant David Wills appeals from the trial court’s denial of two pretrial

applications for writ of habeas corpus seeking reasonable bail and bond conditions.2

Appellant has filed a motion to “allow the appeals to proceed without the trial court’s

certifications of the defendant’s rig ht to appeal.”

Rule 25.2(a)(2) governs the defendant's right to appeal in a criminal case:

A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under Code of
Criminal Procedure article 44.02 and these rules. The trial court shall enter
a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. In a plea bargain

case

— that is, a case in which defendant's plea is guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishme nt recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Rule 25.2(d) requires that the trial court certify whether the defendant has a right

of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). Id. R. 25.2(d). Rule 25.2(a)( 2), in turn, requires that

the trial court enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which

it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. Id. R. 25.2(a)(2). The appeal

must be dismissed if a certification showing the defendant has the right of appeal has not

been made part of the record under the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Id. R. 25.2(d).

An order denying a pretrial writ of habeas corpus is an appealable order. Ex Parte

Lovings , 480 S.W.3d 106, 110 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015 , no pet. h. ) (citing

Ex parte Smith , 178 S.W.3d 797, 80 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (per curiam) )

. Rule 25.2’s

certification requirements extend to habeas corpus proceedings. See Maydon v. State,

141 S.W.3d 851, 853 n.2 (Tex. A pp.

— Corpus Christi 2004 , no pet. ) ( a pplying certification

requirements to appeal from denial of habeas corpus ); Ex parte Tarango, 116 S.W.3d3

201, 203 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2003, no pet.) (same). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s

motion to proceed without the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal.

The record before us does not contain a certification of appellant’s right of appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2( d ) (“If the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the

trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2).”)

. The

Clerk of this Court has contacted the trial court clerk, who has informed us that no

certification exists in the record. We therefore abate this case and instruct the trial court

to prepare and send to this Court a certification of defendant’s right of appeal. See id.

R. 25.2(a)(2); Maydon , 141 S.W.3d at 853 n.2 ; see also Dominguez v. State , No. 03

- 14

-

00086

- CR, 2014 WL 1285877, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Mar. 28, 2014 , no pet. )

. The

trial court's certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court

is directed to cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with th e Clerk of this Court

within ten days of the date of this order. Should the trial court require more time to

comply with the directions of this Court, it shall request an extension prior to the expiration

of this deadline.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the
11th day of April, 201 6

.