alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: November 20, 2006 | By: | */s/ William R. Donaldson* |
|-------------------------|-----|----------------------------|

*-----------------------------------------------*

William R. Donaldson

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
# C_2022191EN.01002602.xml

| 10.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (MOOD MEDIA)

(Case T-615/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark MOOD MEDIA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Proof of genuine use)

(2022/C 191/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mood Media Netherlands BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A.M. Pecoraro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tailoradio Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Franzosi, A. Sobol, F. Santonocito and S. Bernardini, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2020 (Case R 1767/2019-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Tailoradio and Mood Media Netherlands.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 July 2020 (Case R 1767/2019-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 July 2020 (Case R 1767/2019-1);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mood Media Netherlands BV; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mood Media Netherlands BV;

| 4. | Orders Tailoradio Srl to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Tailoradio Srl to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 390, 16.11.2020.

---
Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee 

Member Affiliation

Consumers

Mr. Joseph Bertapelle Director, Strategic Airspace, JetBlue

Mr. Christopher Oswald Vice President, Safety & Technical Operations, Airports,

Council International – North America

Mr. Ian Redhead Deputy Director, Operations and Maintenance/COO, Kansas 

City International Airport 

Corporations 

 Dr. Barbara Holder Chair, Crew Interface Technology/Human Performance and 

 Cognition, Honeywell Aerospace 

Mr. Leo Prusak Vice President, Air Traffic Management Products and 

Strategy, PASSUR Aerospace 

Government Agencies

Dr. Jaiwon Shin Associate Administrator, Aeronautics Research Mission 

 Directorate, National Aeronautics & Space Administration

Universities and Research Centers

Dr. John Hansman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts

Institute of Technology 

April 2018
Lendell L. GLENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3636

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021028EN.01003001.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division made on 16 November 2020 — SS v MCP

(Case C-603/20)

(2021/C 28/48)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SS

Defendant: MCP

Question referred

Does Article 10 of Brussels 2 (1) retain jurisdiction, without limit of time, in a member state if a child habitually resident in that member state was wrongfully removed to (or retained in) a non-member state where she, following such removal (or retention), in due course became habitually resident?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003, L 338, p. 1).

---
Economic Forecast: December 2016

16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 2015 2016 2017 2018

National Income and Product Accounts (Chained 2009$)

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 0.8 1.4 3.2 1.9 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7

 Personal Consumption Expenditures 1.6 4.3 2.8 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.0 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.3 2.0

 Residential Fixed Investment 7.8 -7.7 -4.4 13.2 5.2 1.3 2.6 2.9 4.2 4.7 3.9 3.7 13.1 1.9 3.0 4.1

 Business Fixed Investment -3.4 1.0 0.1 1.7 2.9 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.6 0.8 -0.2 2.7 2.5

 Government Consumption & Investment 1.6 -1.7 0.2 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 -0.6 1.0 1.2 1.2 2.2 0.4 0.6 0.7

Billions of Chained 2009$

 Net Exports -566 -559 -521 -560 -579 -596 -624 -643 -654 -664 -689 -710 -540 -551 -610 -679

 Change in Business Inventories 41 -10 8 22 37 40 49 45 48 48 50 51 84 15 43 49

Price Indices

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

GDP Price Index 0.5 2.3 1.4 1.7 1.4 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.5 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.5

Consumer Price Index -0.3 2.5 1.6 3.5 2.2 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.0 0.4 1.8 2.3 2.1

Consumer Price Index excl. Food & Energy 2.7 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.0

Employment

Unemployment Rate (Percent) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.6

Employment, Total Nonfarm (% Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4) 1.9 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.9

Interest Rates (Percent)

Federal Funds Rate 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.3

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8

10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.1 1.8 2.5 2.7

December 12, 2016

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from November 30, 2016.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic and Strategic Research

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating 

Fannie Mae's business prospects or expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend 

on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided 

in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. 

The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views 

of Fannie Mae or its management.

 --------------- 2016 --------------- --------------- 2017 --------------- --------------- 2018 ---------------
Douglas J. SMYTH III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

newsletter        November 30, 2014      Earth Science Matters - Volume 1, Fall 2014
James Lee HILL v. STATE

CR-16-0610

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Francisco J. PLACENCIA, Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report
      of Trycera Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  August
      14, 2007








Bryan
      Kenyon, COO & CFO


(Principal
      Executive and Principal Financial Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - (-)2023(2)
              - 2022(17)

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
Casey SEAMAN, Appellant, v. Allison L. SEAMAN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

Michael V. Laurato, of Austin & Laurato, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Cheri A. Russell, of Cheri A. Russell, P.A. Ocala, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Casey Seaman, appeals the trial court's order finding him in indirect civil contempt, arguing, *inter alia* , that the trial court failed to comply with Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615(c)(2)(B). Appellant asserts that because *1266he was not present at the contempt hearing, the trial court erred when it found that he had a present ability to pay and that his failure to pay was willful. We agree and note that Appellee properly concedes error on this point.

We therefore reverse the order finding Appellant in indirect civil contempt and remand for the trial court to consider Appellant's present ability to pay and willfulness in compliance with the procedure set forth in rule 12.615(c)(2)(B).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Michael Tashun HOLLOWAY v. STATE

CR-16-0259

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.8

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JeanVezina, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | /s/JEAN VEZINAJean Vezina Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer January 21, 2005
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
STATE of Louisiana v. Sevon Lemeir MOORE

No. 2018-KH-0484

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF BIENVILLE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Ex parte State

(In re: STATE v. Charles Stephen OWENS II)

CR-16-0599

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. granted.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-3, of our reports dated March 14, 2006, relating to the financial
statements, management's assessment on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting, which appear in Annual Report on Form 10-K of Loudeye Corp.
for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 15, 2006
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Inyx, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year
ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John Hamerski, Chief Financial Officer of the small business issuer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the small business issuer. /s/ John Hamerski John Hamerski
Chief Financial Officer April 15, 2005
STATE of Louisiana v. George SMITH

NO. 2018-K-0273

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2010-2011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31619]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of Minority Health, Organizational Structure

AGENCY: Office of Minority Health, Office of the Secretary, Department 
of Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides an update to the organizational structure 
for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the 
Secretary (OS), Office of Minority Health (OMH). OMH has changed the 
name of the Division of Information and Education (DIE acronym), as 
noted in an April 11, 1995 Federal Register Notice, to the Division of 
Strategic Communication and Community Engagement (DCE acronym). This 
name change better aligns with the functions of the division and 
provides for a more socially acceptable acronym. The functions of the 
division are unchanged from the April 11, 1995 Federal Register Notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMH develops policies and programs for the 
improvement of the health status of racial and ethnic minority 
populations and coordinates minority health activities across HHS. The 
establishment of OMH is noted in 50 FR 50847-48 (December 12, 1985). 
OMH's organization, functions, and delegations of authority are noted 
in 60 FR 18418-19 (April 11, 1995), as amended in 78 FR 59699-700 
(September 27, 2013).
    This notice provides an update to Part A, Office of the Secretary, 
Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for 
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services at Chapter AC, to 
change the name of the OMH Division of

[[Page 2011]]

Information and Education (DIE acronym), as noted at 60 FR 18418-19 
(April 11, 1995), to the Division of Strategic Communication and 
Community Engagement (DCE acronym). This name change better aligns with 
the functions of the division and provides for a more socially 
acceptable acronym. The functions of the division are unchanged from 
the April 11, 1995 Federal Register Notice.

Vivianna P. Cowl,
Paperwork Reduction Act Reports Clearance Officer, Health and Human 
Service, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31619 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Angelo Celedonio Santos, * From the 90th District

 Court of Stephens County,

 Trial Court No. F34081.

Vs. No. 11-14-00173-CR * October 31, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (the “Company”) hereby certifies,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)                           theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 25, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Leonid Melamed      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Leonid Melamed          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
STATE of Louisiana, THROUGH ORLEANS PARISH CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, Clerk of Court, Arthur Morrell v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, THROUGH the CITY COUNCIL

NO. 2018-CC-1785

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Denied.
Govanny ALVARADO-RUIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1766

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
James Hunter CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2092

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Mary M. Casper et al., *Appellants,*v. William P. Bonbright, et al., *Appellees.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed January 9, 1928.

Petition for Eehearing Denied February 24, 1928.

*Shepard & Wahl,*Attorneys for Appellants;

*Wideman & Wideman,*Attorneys for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order made on a motion to quash the process, the motion being made on a purported special appearance.

Without deciding whether or not the process was fatally defective as to any of the defendants, we must hold that the first ground of the motion to quash constituted in effect a general appearance by solicitors for the defendants, notwithstanding the attempted special appearance. This ground of the motion was in the following language:

“There is no justiciable matter authorizing the obtaining of service or other predicate laid in the facts as set forth in the bill of complaint.”

By such ground of the motion to quash going as it does *1238to the merits of the cause, the defendants were brought within the jurisdiction of the Court in the cause so pending. See Smith v. Bulkley, 15 Fla. 64; Oppenheimer v. Guckenheimer, 34 Fla. 13, 15 Sou. 670; Ray v. Trice, 48 Fla. 297, 37 Sou. 582; Garner v. Garner, 83 Fla. 143, 90 Sou. 819.

The order of the chancellor should be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.