alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### ASCENT COE Notice of Funding Opportunity (COE-2016-47)

**Project Title**: Background Noise Evaluation

**FAA Project Manager**: Mehmet Marsan (mehmet.marsan@faa.gov)

**Nominal Funding Level**: $50,000 

**Period of Performance**: One year

**Deadline for notice of Funding Opportunity**: April 15, 2016

**Project Description**

The objective of this research project is to improve our understanding of influence of ambient and background noise on public perception to aircraft noise. In this NFO *Ambient* means environmental noise without any identifiable man made source, and *Background* means any noise other than aircraft noise of interest.

Fields (1998) found no evidence that background noise level has a strong or important effect on reactions to a noise source. This conclusion is derived from meta-analysis of survey data. Only a small amount of evidence was available at that time about reactions in rural areas. Since that time additional studies have been conducted overseas with varying results.

However, attitudes towards aircraft noise may have changed.  If overseas research is a good indicator, data from the ongoing community noise survey would be very likely to provide strong evidence on the effect of background noise (e.g., road traffic) on reactions to aircraft noise. It may also be possible to compare reactions to distant aircraft noise in remote suburban and urban environments (i.e., different ambient noise levels).

The purposes of this research are to answer to the following questions using  existing data sources. An updated meta-analysis of background/ambient noise studies could also be conducted which would also include an attempt to locate information about reactions in rural areas.

1. Is there a relationship between the Dose-Response (as measured in annoyance as a function of noise exposure, i.e., Schultz curve), and background noise?  If there is a relationship, should there be a consideration of background noise when considering the threshold (i.e., DNL 65 dB) and level of significance (1.5 dBA change)? 

2. Are there differences between responses to aircraft noise in low ambient noise vs high ambient noise environments? 

Responses received before April 15, 2016 will be evaluated and a team of universities or organizations, one of which will be identified as leading the coordinated effort, will be requested to provide a full-length proposal for further evaluation and possible funding to carry out the work.
EX PARTE Calvin MAYS, Jr.

CR-16-0490

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Petition for writ of prohibition dismissed.
Shannon Ray JOHNSON v. STATE

CR-16-0481

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with this amendment to Quarterly Report of RibapharmInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William M. Comer, Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/  WILLIAM M. COMER, JR.                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                      |   |
| **William M. Comer, Jr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer** |   |
| **Dated:  August 14, 2003**                                |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ribapharm Inc. andwill be retained by Ribapharm Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin J. Kennedy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|/S/    KEVIN J.
KENNEDY                                                             
|Kevin J. Kennedy President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

May 13, 2010
Operation of New Large Aircraft

(RPD134)

Outcomes
        -    Improved and updated guidance material 

for meeting critical ARFF and airport design

safety requirements specific to NLA.

Contract Funds ($K)

TOTAL:

Rationale
        -    Current guidance material needs to be

updated to incorporate larger frame, two-level

aircraft such as the Airbus A-380 and the 

Boeing B-747-8.

Projects

New Methods for Calculating Agent Quantities

Adequacy of ARFF Service Strategies

Adequacy of Specialized ARFF Vehicles and Equip.
Albert M. ROBINSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SECTION 23 PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Samuel SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3356

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATE
      ELIMINATING**




**REFERENCE
      TO THE**




**SERIES
      C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK**




**FROM
      THE**




**CERTIFICATE
      OF INCORPORATION**




**OF**




**MILLENNIUM
      CELL INC.**










Pursuant
      to the provisions of Section 151(g) of the General Corporation Law of the State
      of Delaware, it is hereby certified that;





1.  The
      name
      of the Corporation  is
      “Millennium Cell Inc.” (the “Corporation”).





2.  The
      designation of the series of shares of stock of the Corporation to which this
      certificate relates is the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value
      $0.001 per share (the “Series C Stock”).





3.  The
      designations, preferences and rights of the Series C Stock were provided for
      in
      resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to
      authority expressly vested in it by the provisions of the Certificate of
      Incorporation of the Corporation. A Certificate of Designations, Preferences
      and
      Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Millennium Cell Inc. (the
      “Series C Certificate of Designations”) was filed with the Secretary of State of
      the State of Delaware on April 25, 2005, pursuant to the provisions of Section
      151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





4.  The
      Board
      of Directors of the Corporation has adopted the following
      resolutions:





**RESOLVED** ,
      that
      none of the authorized shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the
      “Series C Stock”) of the Corporation designated pursuant to the Certificate of
      Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
      of
      Millennium Cell Inc. (the “Series C Certificate of Designations”) remain
      outstanding, and





**RESOLVED** ,
      that no
      further shares of Series C Stock of the Corporation will be issued pursuant
      to
      the Series C Certificate of Designations, and





**RESOLVED** ,
      that
      the President or any Vice President of the Corporation be, and each hereby
      is,
      authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the Corporation and to cause
      to
      be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate
      Eliminating Reference to the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock from the
      Certificate of Incorporation of Millennium Cell Inc. to eliminate reference
      to
      the Series C Stock and that all such shares designated as Series C Stock under
      the Series C Certificate of Designations, filed with the Secretary of State
      of
      Delaware on April 25, 2005, shall be restored to their original status of
      authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock of the
      Corporation.





5.  The
      effective date of this Certificate shall be upon filing.








Signed
      on
      July 7, 2005.








MILLENNIUM
      CELL INC.








By: /s/
      John D. Giolli


Name:  John
      D.
      Giolli


Title:   
      Chief Financial Officer and


Corporate
      Secretary
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EDWARD ALAN GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30058

D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00125-RSL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2012** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Edward Alan Garcia appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30058

Garcia contends that the district court procedurally erred because it failed to

explain adequately the sentence imposed. The record belies this contention. The

district court considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, and sufficiently explained its decision to impose an

above-Guidelines sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir.

2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2021382EN.01002301.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 June 2021 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-345/20) (1)

(2021/C 382/29)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

---
Murray Harold DAVIDSON v. STATE

CR-16-0301

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DELLAREESE YOUNG,

Respondent

v.

DAVID YOUNG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 52 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Review is DENIED.
# C_2020348EN.01001101.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 11 August 2020 — B v Udlændingenævnet

(Case C-379/20)

(2020/C 348/16)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: B

Defendant: Udlændingenævnet

Question referred

Does Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 (1) on the development of the Association, which is linked to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed at Ankara on 12 September 1963 by the Republic of Turkey, on the one hand, and by the Member States of the EEC and the Community, on the other, and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC (2) of 23 December 1963, preclude the introduction and application of a new national measure under which family reunification between an economically active Turkish national who is lawfully resident in the Member State in question and that person’s child who is 15 years of age is subject to the condition that very specific grounds, including the consideration of family unity and the consideration of the best interests of the child, support such reunification?

---

(1)  Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the application of the social security schemes of the Member States of the European Communities to Turkish workers and members of their families (OJ 1983 C 110, p. 60).

(2)  64/732/EEC: Council Decision of 23 December 1963 on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ 1964 217, p. 3685).

---
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1385

___________

Charles Lewis X. Shannon, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Frank Sancegraw; Michael J. Layden; *

Craig Hufford; Sharon Rhodes, C.O.; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Brenda Gibson; Morgan Warren, * 

C.O. I; Kim Ratcliff, C.O.; Extraction *

Team, John Doe, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 5, 2003

Filed: December 11, 2003

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Charles Lewis X. Shannon appeals the district court’s1

preservice dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

comply with the court’s order. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude
-2-

the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Edgington v. Mo. Dep’t of Corrs.,

52 F.3d 777, 779-80 (8th Cir. 1995) (district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing prisoner’s pro se complaint without prejudice where prisoner failed to

comply with court’s order to plead specifically how each defendant violated his

rights).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Shannon’s

pending motion. 

______________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive
officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 15, 2004

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
Wesley Alan MCHENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3036

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Wesley Alan McHenry, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1110 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-889 K2025-890.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30993 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1113 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-892 K2025-893.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30996 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Derrick JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Patrick R. VALENTI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Christopher Lamar REESE v. STATE

CR-16-0895

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Michael M. Lee, as interim chief
financial officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|3. | This 10-K report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Exchange Act; and                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                       
|4. | The information contained in this 10-K report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      AlphaRx, Inc.

/s/ Michael M. LeeMichael M. Lee Interim Chief
Financial Officer December 31, 2010

---
# C_2021368EN.01001501.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/15

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud — Croatie) — I.D. v Z b. d.d.

(Case C-474/20) (1)

(2021/C 368/15)

Language of the case: Croatian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.

---
Matthew HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.