alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023127EN.01000301.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 February 2023 — European Commission v Italian Republic, Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-635/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Rules on languages - Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators’ functions as investigators and team leaders - Knowledge of languages - Restriction of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German - Language of communication with the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) - Regulation No 1 - Staff Regulations - Article 1d(1) - Difference in treatment based on language - Justification - Interests of the service - Requirement to recruit administrators who are ‘immediately operational’ - Judicial review - Standard of proof required)

(2023/C 127/03)

Languages of the case: Spanish and Italian

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, T. Lilamand, D. Milanowska and N. Ruiz García, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz and A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agents), Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of Spain and the Italian Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of Spain and the Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
# C_2022340EN.01002902.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — JP v Commission

(Case T-179/20) (1)

(Civil service - Open competition - Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Composition of the selection board - Stability - Manifest error of assessment - Liability)

(2022/C 340/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JP (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand, D. Milanowska and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 10 December 2019 by which the selection board for Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 refused, after review, to include her name on the reserve list of successful candidates in that competition and, second, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders JP to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders JP to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70-71]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31443]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-226-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone 55; Application for Subzone; Century Arms, 
Inc.; Georgia, Vermont

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation, grantee of FTZ 
55, requesting subzone status for the facility of Century Arms, Inc., 
located in Georgia, Vermont. The application was submitted pursuant to 
the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 
81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It 
was formally docketed on December 26, 2024.
    The proposed subzone (2.30 acres) is located at 236 Bryce 
Boulevard, Georgia, Vermont. A notification of proposed production 
activity will be submitted and published separately for public comment. 
The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit 
of FTZ 55.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Juanita Chen of the 
FTZ Staff is the designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
[email protected]. The closing period for their receipt is February 11, 
2025. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted

[[Page 71]]

during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-
day period to February 26, 2025.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at 
[email protected].

    Dated: December 26, 2024.
Juanita Chen,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31443 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
Felix PERNETT, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and TWU Local 568 Miami, Florida, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1696

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ramone ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-0658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

Robert Wesley, Public Defender and Sarah Moore, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the January 25, 2019 order regarding Petitioner's motion for postconviction relief, filed in Case No. 2013-CF-9835, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Michael Rameil PATTERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4788

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!

newsletter        November 30, 2014      Earth Science Matters - Volume 1, Fall 2014
E.R., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
LALLY ORANGE BUICK PONTIAC GMC, INC. and IYFRD Holdings, Inc. n/k/a Orange Buick GMC, Inc., Appellants, v. Simi SANDHU, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

Jennifer S. Eden, and Christina Y. Taylor, of Latham, Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP, Orlando, for Appellants.

Jennifer R. Dixon, Richard Dellinger, and Melody B. Lynch, of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this second appeal, we have before us the same issue raised by the parties in their first appeal. In that appeal, we held that the trial court erred when it valued Appellee's interest in a closely-held corporation at $1.9 million dollars. *See**413*Lally Orange Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Sandhu* , 207 So.3d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (" *Lally I* "). Specifically, we held that "the trial court's valuation figure is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, and the court abused its discretion in adopting that figure." *Id.* at 985.

On remand, the trial court once again valued Appellee's interest in that same closely-held corporation at $1.9 million dollars. Appellants correctly assert that we did not remand the case to obtain an explanation from the trial court of how it determined that valuation figure. We once again hold that the trial court's valuation figure of $ 1.9 million was not, is not, and cannot be supported by the evidence presented below, regardless of the trial court's explanation of how it arrived at that figure. The trial court abused its discretion in adopting that figure the first time and apparently misunderstood our earlier opinion in *Lally I* .

As before, we note that the trial court may appoint independent appraisers to recommend a fair value, it may credit one expert's method of computing value over another's, and it may utilize an expert's valuation methodology as applied to competent, substantial evidence to reach its own valuation figure. *See**id.* at 986. We again observe that if the valuation figure is within the range suggested by the competent, substantial evidence at trial, it will not result in reversible error if it rests upon the credibility and methodology employed by the witnesses. However, Appellee's initial statement of value in the appraisal rights form she prepared and her testimony at trial, which provided no documentation and no detail of valuation methodology, are not competent, substantial evidence of the corporation's value or of her interest in the corporation. *See**id.* at 985.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to adopt a valuation that is supported by competent, substantial evidence, and for any further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
OFFICE OF THE STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

6851 N.E. Loop 820, Suite 300

North Richland Hills, TX 76180-6608

(817) 770-8500

Fax (817) 770-8511

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE:

NICHOLAS ROBERT VINCENT

MARY ELLEN ROBINSON

Case No: 24-42011-ELM

Court Hearing:

Time & Date: 8:30 AM on

Debtors, Thursday, September 5, 2024

TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

TO THE HONORABLE EDWARD L MORRIS, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

Now comes Tim Truman, the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, and files this his "Trustee's Objection to 

Confirmation" of the Plan heretofore filed herein by Debtors, and for the same would respectfully show the 

Court as follows:

The Plan fails to meet the "feasibility" requirements of 11 U.S.C. Section 1325 (a) (6) of the Bankruptcy 

Code. In this regard, the Trustee would show that the Debtors' proposed Plan provides for the following plan 

payments: 

DEBTOR PAY SCHEDULE NO. 1 (NICHOLAS ROBERT VINCENT)

PAYMENTS BEGINNING: 07/10/2024 FOR 60 MONTHS IN THE AMOUNT OF: $570.00 

The Debtors' monthly surplus per Schedules I and J is $-474.96. Therefore, the Plan does not appear to be 

feasible for that reason, and for the following reason(s) if any:

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Trustee prays that said Plan not be confirmed unless 

and until it has been modified to cure all objections set forth hereinabove, and for general relief.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Angela D. Allen

Tim Truman, Bar # 20258000

Standing Chapter 13 Trustee

Angela Allen, Bar # 007869700

Staff Attorney
24-42011-ELM NICHOLAS ROBERT VINCENT & MARY ELLEN ROBINSON

Trustee's Objection to Confirmation Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing "Trustee's Objection to Confirmation" was 

served on all parties listed below in the manner listed below on or before July 26, 2024.

 /s/ Angela D. Allen

Tim Truman, Angela Allen

BY FIRST CLASS MAIL:

NICHOLAS ROBERT VINCENT, MARY ELLEN ROBINSON, 1217 CAMDEN YARD DR, BURLESON, TX 76028-0000

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE:

LEE LAW FIRM PLLC, 8701 BEDFORD EULESS RD STE 510, HURST, TX 76053

BARRY AND SEWART, 4151 SOUTHWEST FWY #680, HOUSTON, TX 77027

TOGETHER CREDIT UNION, 423 LYNCH ST, ST LOUIS, MO 63118

United States Trustee, 1100 COMMERCE STREET, ROOM 976, DALLAS, TX 75242
# C_2021297EN.01004102.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 –Riviera-Airport v EUIPO — Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (RIVIERA AIRPORT)

(Case T-398/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark RIVIERA AIRPORT - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 297/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Aeroporto di Villanova d’Albenga SpA (Riviera-Airport) (Villanova d’Albenga, Italy) (represented by: G. Casucci, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur (Nice, France) (represented by: Y. Bizollon, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2020 (Case R 2174/2019-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Riviera-Airport and Aéroports de la Côte d’Azur.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aeroporto di Villanova d’Albenga SpA (Riviera-Airport) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aeroporto di Villanova d’Albenga SpA (Riviera-Airport) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.

---
Ronnie HOPSON v. LILLY, LLC, and Chae H. Bucz

2150836

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
# C_2021044EN.01004203.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/42

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta — Spain) — XV v Cajamar Caja Rural S.C.C.

(Case C-268/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/61)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong Yuk Ping, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong Yuk Ping



Eppie Wong Yuk Ping,

 CFO and a director

September 1, 2006
Federal Aviation
Administration

Memorandum

Date: October 23, 2009
To: NTSB
From: Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center

Subject: INFORMATION: Partial Transcript
NORDO Aircraft NWA188
Goodland, KS, October 21, 2009

This transcription covers the Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) 18
R position for the time period from October 22, 2009, 0000 UTC, to October 22,
2009, 0032 UTC.

Agencies Making Transmissions Abbreviations
Denver Center Sector 18 Radar Controller ZDV18R

I hereby certify that the following is a true transcription of the recorded
conversations pertaining to the subject NORDO Aircraft involving NWA188.

fornely pllawdh

Kenneth J. Ashworth
Staff Support Specialist
Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center

0000

(0001-0004)

0005

0005:31 ZDV18R northwest one eighty eight contact denver center one two
seven point zero two

0005:53 ZDV18R northwest one eighty eight contact denver center one two
seven point zero two

0006

(0007-0025)

0026

0026:05 ZDV18R northwest one eighty eight denver

0027

(0028-0031)

0032

End of Transcript
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 3240-040; Project No. 6689-018; Project No. 3342-025] New 

      ( print page 107131)    
*Date of Receipt of the Certification Requests:*                     November 4, 2024.                

Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Requests: One year, November 4, 2025.

If the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification requests on or before the above date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: December 23, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-31431 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 645 

Requesting that the President of the United States transmit to the House 

of Representatives copies of any emails in the possession of the Executive 

Office of the President that were transmitted to or from the email 

account(s) of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations 

Division Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2014 

Mr. STOCKMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting that the President of the United States transmit 

to the House of Representatives copies of any emails 

in the possession of the Executive Office of the President 

that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) 

of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director Lois Lerner between January 

2009 and April 2011. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives request 

2 that the President of the United States transmit to the 

3 House of Representatives, no later than 14 days after the 

4 date of the adoption of this resolution, copies of any elec5 tronic communication in the possession of the President 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 645 IH 

1 or the Executive Office of the President that was trans2 mitted to or from any electronic mail account(s) used by 

3 former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations 

4 Division Director Lois Lerner at any time between Janu5 ary 1, 2009, and April 30, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2839

JOYCE EDWARDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BROADWAY SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-

2224-MJG)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joyce Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Warren Malcolm Davison, LITTLER,

MENDELSON, FASTIFF & TICHY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s orders are marked as “filed”

on November 23, 1998, and December 21, 1998, the district court’s

records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on November

24, 1998, and December 22, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the the order

was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date

of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d

1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Joyce Edwards appeals from the district court’s orders (1)

granting summary judgment to the defendant in her employment discrimination action and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration.

Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Edwards v. Broadway Servs., Inc., No.

CA-98-2224-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 24 & Dec. 22, 1998).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

| Subsidiaries      of Enterra Energy Trust  |        Jurisdiction of    Incorporation |   |
|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |                                         |   |
| Enterra      Energy Commericial Trust      |        Alberta, Canada                  |   |
| Enterra      Energy Corp.                  |        Alberta, Canada                  |   |
| Enterra      Energy Partner Corp           |        Alberta, Canada                  |   |
| Enterra      Energy Production Partnership |        Alberta, Canada                  |   |
| Enterra      US Acquisition Inc.           |        Delware, U.S.A.                  |   |
| Enterra      Acquisitions Corp.            |        Delware, U.S.A.                  |   |
| Altex      Energy Corp.                    |        Delware, U.S.A.                  |   |
| Enterra      ExchangeCo Ltd.               |        Alberta, Canada                  |   |

----