alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Star TRIBBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, April L. Marino, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinecrest
Services, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 11, 2005         /s/ April L. Marino
                           ____________________________________________
                           April L. Marino, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1   Silvergraph International, Inc  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officers of Silvergraph International, Inc. certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  * the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  * the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  April 15, 2008





Date:  April 15, 2008/s/ James R. Simpson
James R. Simpson
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Gary Freeman
Gary Freeman
Principal Financial Officer
15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 2015 2016 2017

National Income and Product Accounts (Chained 2009$)

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 0.6 3.9 2.0 1.4 0.8 2.1 2.1 1.8 2.0 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.8

 Personal Consumption Expenditures 1.8 3.6 3.0 2.4 1.9 3.1 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.7 2.3 1.9

 Residential Fixed Investment 10.1 9.3 8.2 10.1 17.1 8.3 3.0 6.2 6.2 4.3 2.5 3.3 9.4 8.5 4.1

 Business Fixed Investment 1.6 4.1 2.6 -2.1 -6.2 0.8 3.1 3.1 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.5 0.1 1.8

 Government Consumption & Investment -0.1 2.6 1.8 0.1 1.2 1.1 1.6 0.8 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0

Billions of Chained 2009$

 Net Exports -541 -535 -546 -552 -561 -568 -584 -588 -592 -607 -609 -614 -543 -575 -606

 Change in Business Inventories 113 114 86 78 70 51 56 46 44 46 49 51 98 56 48

Price Indices

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

GDP Price Index 0.1 2.1 1.3 0.9 0.6 1.5 1.6 1.4 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.1 1.3 2.0

Consumer Price Index -2.9 2.4 1.4 0.8 -0.3 2.6 3.0 1.4 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.1 0.4 1.7 2.1

Consumer Price Index excl. Food & Energy 1.7 2.3 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.0

Employment

Unemployment Rate (Percent) 5.5 5.4 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 5.3 4.8 4.7

Employment, Total Nonfarm (% Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4) 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 0.9 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 2.0 1.4 1.2

Interest Rates (Percent)

Federal Funds Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.4 0.9

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.3 0.7 1.1

10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.0

June 8, 2016

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from May 31, 2016.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic & Strategic Research Group

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or expected results, 

are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other 

views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views 

could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie 

Mae or its management.

 Economic Forecast: June 2016

 --------------- 2015 --------------- --------------- 2016 --------------- --------------- 2017 ---------------
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by such this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 28, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41558

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN HONORIO ESPARZA-CANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-597-ALL

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Honorio

Esparza-Cano raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

                     Pinecrest Services, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned officer of Pinecrest Services, Inc. certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   March 12, 2004               /s/ April L. Marino
                                     _________________________________________
                                     April L. Marino
                                     Principal Executive and Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive
officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2005

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
# C_2021278EN.01001701.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/17

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — F. v Stadt Karlsruhe

(Case C-47/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Transport - Driving licences - Withdrawal of the licence in the territory of a Member State other than the issuing Member State - Renewal of the licence by the issuing Member State after the withdrawal decision - No automaticity of mutual recognition)

(2021/C 278/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: F.

Defendant: Stadt Karlsruhe

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) and the second subparagraph of Article 11(4) of Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State, in the territory of which the holder of a driving licence in categories A and B issued by another Member State has been deprived of the right to drive on account of unlawful conduct, which occurred during a temporary stay in that territory after the issue of the licence, from subsequently refusing to recognise the validity of that driving licence, after that licence has been renewed, pursuant to Article 7(3) of that directive, by the Member State where the holder of that licence normally resides, within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 12 of that directive. It is, however, for the referring court to examine whether, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, the rules, provided for by the legislation of the first Member State, laying down the conditions with which the holder of the driving licence must comply in order to recover the right to drive in its territory, do not exceed the limits of what is appropriate and necessary to attain the objective pursued by Directive 2006/126, consisting in improving road safety.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
Fannie Mae

2022 California Consumer Request Metrics

To comply with the requirements of the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Cal. Civ. Code

§§ 1798.100 – 1798.199 (“CCPA”), and its related regulation, 11 CCR § 7102, Fannie Mae

provides the following metrics related to California consumer requests received in calendar

year 2022 under the CCPA.

Request Type Number of

Requests

Resolution

Total Number of California

Consumers Submitting Requests  

3   

 Requests to know 0 N/A

 Requests to delete 2 Both requests were complied with.

 Requests to opt‐out 1 The request was complied with.

Median number of days for

substantive response

25 days
Erick Jose ARRIETA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-763

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.8


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Axcan Pharma Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 40-F for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Vezina, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.



/s/ Jean Vezina
--------------------------
Jean Vezina
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
February 20, 2004
# C_2022073EN.01003902.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — OI v Commission

(Case T-705/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition - Obligation to state reasons - Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings - No communication of the intermediate marks or the weighting of the elements of a test specified in the competition notice)

(2022/C 73/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OI (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the selection board for the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD 6) — Administrators of 25 March 2020 rejecting the applicant’s request for review of the decision of that selection board of 16 December 2019 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for that competition.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the selection board for the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD6) — Administrators of 25 March 2020 not to include OI on the reserve list for the recruitment of administrators at grade AD 6 in the field of development cooperation and neighbourhood policy; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the selection board for the internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD6) — Administrators of 25 March 2020 not to include OI on the reserve list for the recruitment of administrators at grade AD 6 in the field of development cooperation and neighbourhood policy;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In RE: JERRY WAYNE CROWLEY § Case Number: 24-41543-MXM-7

§

Debtor(s) § Chapter: 7

REQUEST FOR NOTICE UNDER BANKRUPTCY RULE 2002

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC hereby gives notice as follows:

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §342(f)(1), AIS Portfolio Services, LLC hereby requests that:

(i) all notices given or required to be given in the case; and

(ii) all pleadings and correspondence served or required to be served in this case,

regarding Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC should be directed to AIS Portfolio Services, LLC at the following mailing

address effective immediately:

Attn: Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC Department

AIS Portfolio Services, LLC

Account: XXXX5113

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

This request encompasses all notices, copies and pleadings referred to in Rules 2002, 9007 or 9008 of the

Bankruptcy Rules, including, without limitation, notices of any Orders, Motions, Demands, Complaints, Petitions,

Pleadings, Requests, Applications, Schedules, Statements, Plans, and any other documents brought before this court

in this case, whether formal or informal, written or oral, or transmitted or conveyed by mail, delivery, telephone,

telecopier, telex, or otherwise which affects or seeks to affect the above case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Amitkumar Sharma

Amitkumar Sharma

Claims Processor

Bankruptcy Servicer for Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC

AIS Portfolio Services, LLC

4515 N Santa Fe Ave. Dept. APS

Oklahoma City, OK 73118

(817)277-2011, Fax (817) 461-8070

ECFNotices@aisinfo.com

File # 1624819

Case 24-41543-mxm7 Doc 8 Filed 05/08/24 Entered 05/08/24 05:14:44 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# C_2020297EN.01002401.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 4 June 2020 — WD v job-medium GmbH in liquidation

(Case C-233/20)

(2020/C 297/33)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: WD

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: job-medium GmbH in liquidation

Questions referred

| 1 | Is a provision of national law under which no allowance in lieu of annual leave is payable in respect of the current (last) working year, where the worker unilaterally terminates (‘withdraws from’) the employment relationship early without cause, compatible with Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2010/C 83/02) and Article 7 of the Working Time Directive (Directive 2003/88/EC)? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1

Is a provision of national law under which no allowance in lieu of annual leave is payable in respect of the current (last) working year, where the worker unilaterally terminates (‘withdraws from’) the employment relationship early without cause, compatible with Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2010/C 83/02) and Article 7 of the Working Time Directive (Directive 2003/88/EC)? (1)

| 2. | If the answer to that question is in the negative:






  2.1. | Is it necessary to verify additionally if the worker was unable to use up his annual leave? |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to that question is in the negative:

2.1.

Is it necessary to verify additionally if the worker was unable to use up his annual leave?

| 2.2. | If so, what are the criteria for that verification? |
| --- | --- |

2.2.

If so, what are the criteria for that verification?

---

(1)  Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).

---