alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4859-4530-2191 

Aaron M. Kaufman (TX Bar No. 24060067) 

GRAY REED 

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 954-4135 

Facsimile: (214) 953-1332 

Email: akaufman@grayreed.com

Counsel to Exceptional Healthcare, Inc. 

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

In re: 

DANIELLE VERONICA SAVOY 

 Debtor. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 24-30209-mvl-13 

 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR ALL DOCUMENTS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby enters their appearance on behalf 

of Exceptional Healthcare, Inc., and requests that all notices given or required to be given in this 

case and any cases consolidated herewith, and all papers served or required to be served in this 

case, and any cases consolidated herewith be given to and served upon: 

Aaron M. Kaufman 

GRAY REED 

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 954-4135 

Facsimile: (214) 953-1332 

Email: akaufman@grayreed.com

This request encompasses all notices, copies, and pleadings referred to in Section 1109(b) 

of title 11 of the United States Code, or in Rules 2002, 3017 or 9007 of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure, including without limitation, orders and notices of any application, motion, 

petition, pleading, request, complaint, or demand, whether formal or informal, whether written or 

Case 24-30209-mvl13 Doc 27 Filed 04/01/24 Entered 04/01/24 12:33:20 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

4859-4530-2191 

oral, and whether transmitted or conveyed by mail, courier service, hand-delivery, telephone, 

facsimile transmission, electronically, or otherwise that effect or seek to effect the above-captioned 

proceeding. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that neither this notice nor any prior or later 

appearance, pleading, claim, or suit shall waive any right (1) to have final orders in non-core 

matters entered only after de novo review by the District Court judge, (2) to trial by jury in any 

proceeding so triable in this case or any case, controversy, or proceeding related to this case, (3) 

to have the District Court withdraw the reference in any matter subject to mandatory or 

discretionary withdrawal, or (4) any other rights, claims, actions, defenses, setoffs or recoupments, 

under agreements, in law, or in equity, or otherwise, all of which rights, claims, actions, defenses, 

setoffs and recoupments are expressly reserved. 

Respectfully submitted this 1st day of April, 2024. 

By: /s/ Aaron M. Kaufman 

Aaron M. Kaufman

 Texas Bar No. 24060067 

GRAY REED

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 954-4135 

Facsimile: (214) 953-1332 

Email: akaufman@grayreed.com 

Counsel to Exceptional Healthcare, Inc.

Certificate of Service 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 1st day of April, 2024, he caused a true and 

correct copy of the foregoing document to be served via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Aaron M. Kaufman 

Aaron M. Kaufman 

Case 24-30209-mvl13 Doc 27 Filed 04/01/24 Entered 04/01/24 12:33:20 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Roger Anthony DIXON v. STATE

CR-15-0152

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , Plaintiff-Appellee ,
v. D A M I E N Z E P E D A , Defendant-Appellant

. No. 10-10131 D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01329- ROS-1 O RDER

F iled Aug ust 20, 2013 B efore: F erdinand F . F ernandez , Richard A. Paez , and Paul J . W atford, Circuit J udg es.

ORDER The opinion in this case filed on J anuary 18, 2013, a nd reported at 7 05 F .3d 1 052 is hereby w ithdrawn. The opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. The court will file a new opinion in due c ourse. A s the court’s opinion is w ithdra w n , the g overnment’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is moot.
EX PARTE Jack Harold WILSON

CR-16-1016

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. denied.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”),as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1,2008 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by andamong NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2008-B, doeshereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale andServicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the IndentureTrustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Saleand Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period from the trust’sinitial cutoff date, April 30, 2008, to and including December 31,2008 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has beenmade under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the period from the trust’s initial cutoff date, April 30,2008, to and including December 31, 2008.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March 2009.

 

----

 

March 30, 2009

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Bierman |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven C. Bierman     |
|   | Title: | President             |

 

----
Exhibit 10.1


 










By E-mail



 


September 16, 2016


 


Dr. Geoffrey F. Cox


480 Beacon St., #1


Boston, MA  02115


 


Dear Geoff:


 



	
Re:

	
Employment Agreement Amendment







 


Further to our recent discussions, this letter confirms our agreement to amend your Employment Agreement dated October 23, 2014 and amended April 21, 2015, October 8, 2015, April 7, 2016 and June 17, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


Paragraph 1.1 of your Employment Agreement currently provides for a 24 month term of employment ending on October 22, 2016.  We agree to amend your Employment Agreement to extend the term of your Employment Agreement to 30 months from the Commencement Date.


 


The capitalized terms that are not defined in this letter have the same meaning as the same capitalized term in your Employment Agreement.


 


Except as and only to the extent amended by this letter, your Employment Agreement will continue to apply to your employment with QLT Inc. and all remaining terms of the Employment Agreement will remain unchanged.


 


This amendment of your Employment Agreement is effective as of the date of this letter.


 


Please confirm your agreement to this amendment to your Employment Agreement by signing where indicated below and returning to us a copy of this letter.


 


If you have any questions, please contact me.


 


Yours truly,


 


	
QLT Inc.

	 
	 	 
	/s/ Mr. Jeffrey Meckler	 
	
Mr. Jeffrey Meckler

	 
	
Director

	 








I confirm that I have agreed to the amendments to my Employment Agreement dated October 23, 2014 and amended April 21, 2015, October 8, 2015, April 7, 2016 and June 17, 2016 on the terms as set out above.







	/s/ Dr. Geoffrey F. Cox	 	
September 16, 2016


	
Dr. Geoffrey F. Cox
# C_2021182EN.01002502.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 21 December 2020 — Municipality of Wieliszew v Administrator in the insolvency of Spółdzielczy Bank Rzemiosła i Rolnictwa in Wołomin, in liquidation

(Case C-698/20)

(2021/C 182/36)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Municipality of Wieliszew

Respondent: Administrator in the insolvency of Spółdzielczy Bank Rzemiosła i Rolnictwa in Wołomin, in liquidation

Question referred

Must Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, (1) in particular Article 2(5), Articles 3 and 4, Article 57(1), and Articles 70 and 80 thereof, and, currently, Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, (2) in particular Article 2(15), Article 37(1), Article 66, Article 67(1), Article 74(1) and Article 89(1) thereof, be interpreted as precluding national legislation which prevents an entity that has received resources from the budget of the European Union from effectively seeking in court proceedings that those resources be excluded from the insolvency estate where they have been paid into a bank account held at a bank which was subsequently declared insolvent, or national legislation which does not exclude those resources from the insolvency estate of the insolvent bank?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 210, p. 25.

(2)  OJ 2013 L 347, p. 320.

---
<PAGE>

        MPOWER HOLDING CORPORATION CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
                SARBANES/OXLEY ACT - FILED AS AN EXHIBIT TO 10-Q
                        FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2003

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rolla
P. Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Rolla P. Huff

Rolla P. Huff
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003


31
# C_2022237EN.01000601.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

(Case C-319/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 80 - Representation of the data subjects by a not-for-profit association - Representative action brought by a consumer protection association in the absence of a mandate and independently of the infringement of specific rights of a data subject - Action based on the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, the infringement of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions)

(2022/C 237/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, formerly Facebook Ireland Limited

Defendant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 80(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which allows a consumer protection association to bring legal proceedings, in the absence of a mandate conferred on it for that purpose and independently of the infringement of specific rights of the data subjects, against the person allegedly responsible for an infringement of the laws protecting personal data, on the basis of the infringement of the prohibition of unfair commercial practices, a breach of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions, where the data processing concerned is liable to affect the rights that identified or identifiable natural persons derive from that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 26.10.2020.

---
# C_2021088EN.01001202.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/12

---

Appeal brought on 25 August 2020 by Brands Up OÜ against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 25 June 2020 in Case T-651/19 Brands Up OÜ v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-404/20 P)

(2021/C 88/15)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Appellant: Brands Up OÜ (represented by: M. Welin, asianajaja and J. Kaulo, luvan saanut oikeudenkäyntiavustaja)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 17 December 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) refused to grant leave to appeal and to order Brands Up OÜ to bear its own costs.

---
Barry HABER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

Chuck Hobbs, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Thad Matthew QUINLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1031

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kasey Lacey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-75866), Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-58808), and Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 23, 2000 of
Key3Media Group, Inc. (previously known as ZD Events) of our report dated April
12, 2000, except for the tenth paragraph of Note 3 and Note 16, for which the
dates are April 13, 2000 and June 7, 2001, respectively, relating to the
combined financial statements of ZD Events, as of December 31, 1999 and for the
year ended December 31, 1999, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
# C_2023134EN.01000701.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry v Commission

(Case T-301/20) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain woven or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in China and Egypt - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492 - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Calculation of the normal value - Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Manifest error of assessment - Injury - Calculation of the undercutting margin)

(2023/C 134/08)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE (Ain Sokhna, Egypt), Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE (Ain Sokhna) (represented by: B. Servais and V. Crochet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Tech-Fab Europe eV (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Ruessmann and J. Beck, lawyers)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492 of 1 April 2020 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China and Egypt (OJ 2020 L 108, p. 1), in so far as it concerns them.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Tech-Fab Europe eV to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Tech-Fab Europe eV to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
Arthur MORRIS v. Joel CHAISSON, II, et al., District Attorney

NO. 2018-CP-1987

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X, § 5.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
Exhibit 99.9

[RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON LOGO]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As
independent public accountants to Axcan Pharma Inc., we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form F-10
No. 333-104275) pertaining to the resale of Axcan Pharma Inc.'s $125,000,000 41/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2008 (the "Notes") and the common shares
issuable upon conversion of the Notes and in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-97879) pertaining to the Axcan Pharma Inc. Stock Option Plan as
Amended and Restated on December 19, 2000 and in the related prospectus of our report dated November 10, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Axcan
Pharma Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Form 40-F for the year ended September 30, 2004.

|/s/ RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORTONRAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON
Chartered accountants
General Partnership                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Montreal, Quebec
January 21, 2005                                                                                                          | 
|Suite 1900
National Bank Tower
600 De La Gauchetiere Street West
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4L8
Telephone: (514) 878-2691
Internet: www.rcgt.com | 
|Member of Grant Thornton International                                                                                                     | 

---



QuickLinks
Lacorey WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Jr., Sheriff, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5043

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) S.C.A.-Shipping Consultants Associated Ltd. ) ASBCA No. 61567 ) Under Contract No. N68171-l7-P-0054 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: Mr. Carlos A.I. Murialdo
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Director Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Scott E. Miller, Esq.

Trial Attorney Fleet Logistics Center Sigonella Naples, Italy ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: August 8, 2018
RJC~llEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61567, Appeal ofS.C.A.-Shipping Consultants Associated Ltd., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Michael E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1349

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(31)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)nebraska(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - south dakota(13)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 3, 2010        USGS monitor ice jams in Nebraska, a possible source of flooding this spring

Podcasts        November 8, 2012        The Effects of the 2012 Drought in Nebraska

Podcasts        May 24, 2010        Social Media and the USGS Nebraska Water Science Center