alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Golusin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of August 19, 2002.

/s/ Patricia Robinson
-------------------------------------
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1983

JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, now known as Wells Path, LLC; JOHN 

RANCY; ALAN RHOADES; REBEKAH DIXON; AMANDA JENNINGS,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

K. ADAMS; OFFICER ADAMS; OFFICER ADONJI; S. CALDWELL; OFFICER 

JOHN DOE 4; OFFICER CARTER; NURSE JOHN DOE 1; OFFICER JOHN DOE 

5; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 6; FORSYTH COUNTY; WILLIAM 

T. SCHATZMAN; SCHUTT; OFFICER HOMMEL; WENDY HOGAN; A. 

SWALLIE; K. TURPIN; TWONDA WHITE, 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00353-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: March 23, 2021 Decided: March 26, 2021

Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Torrey Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Torrey Duncan seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing 5 of the 18 named defendants in his 

civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); 

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Duncan

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2021310EN.01000901.xml

| 2.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/9

---

Appeal brought on 16 December 2020 by Eleanor Sharpston against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2020 in Case T-180/20, Sharpston v Council and Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States

(Case C-684/20 P)

(2021/C 310/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Eleanor Sharpston (represented by: N. Forwood, Barrister-at-Law, J. Robb, Barrister, J. Flynn QC and H. Mercer QC)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States

By order of 16 June 2021, the Court of Justice (First Chamber) decided that the appeal is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellant to bear her own costs.

---
# C_2022148EN.01000701.xml

| 4.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG, VF

(Case C-595/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Law applicable to contractual obligations - Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) - Consumer contracts - Choice of applicable law - Article 6(4)(c) - Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property - Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profits)

(2022/C 148/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UE

Defendants: ShareWood Switzerland AG, VF

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (‘Rome I’) must be interpreted as meaning that a contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted on leased land for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit, does not constitute a ‘contract relating to a right in rem in immovable property or a tenancy of immovable property’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 1.2.2021.

---
Denied and Opinion Filed April 2, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00200-CV IN RE LE-VEL BRANDS, LLC, Relator Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-06772-2018



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Whitehill In this original proceeding, rela tor complains of the trial cou rt’s February 14, 2019 temporary restraining order. The temporary restraining order w as dissolved and replaced by a temporary injunction signed on March 21, 2019. No live controv ersy remains between the parties as to the temporary restraini ng order. Accordingly, we deny re lator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

190200F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:  November 14, 2005 |   |   | By:                           | /s/ Brian King |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|----------------|
|                           |   |   | Brian King Chief Executive Officer |

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

26

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Michael C. Kearney, Chief Financial Officer of Hydril Company, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby
certify, to my knowledge, that:



(1) the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  | /s/ Michael C. Kearney 
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | Michael C. Kearney     
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), in accordance with the procedures provided for by the Securities
and Exchange Commission in Release No. 33-8212 for treatment as a document accompanying the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This
certificate shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall this certificate be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be
set forth by specific reference in such a filing.



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Helen Hussey TERRY v. STATE

CR-16-0749

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  _______________________
Eppie Wong, CFO and a director November 14, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FRANTZ MICHEL, a/k/a John Doe, a/k/a Freon,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:00-cr-00141-HEH-4)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dawn Elise Murphy-Johnson, Barry Joel Pollack, MILLER & 

CHEVALIER, CHARTERED, Washington, DC, for Appellant. John 

Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, 

Virginia; Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frantz Michel seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Michel has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

****

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Sea Sun Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2005, the undersigned, Greg Heller, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and		      - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		    Dated:  July 15, 2005                                       /s/ Greg Heller            			                                                                        Greg Heller			                                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Carol Darlene Himelright, Appellant

No. 06-13-00246-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

1 of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR1300550). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Carol Darlene Himelright, has adequately indicated her

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 16, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3769

___________

George Brown, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Lonnie Salts, Lt.; Joe Rosenburg, Sgt.; * Appeal from the United States

Michael Bowersox, Supt.; Bradley W. * District Court for the

Gibson, Sgt.; Greg Conway, Lt.; * Eastern District of Missouri. 

Timothy E. Pettus, Sgt.; Charles *

Chandler, Officer; Mark S. Browers, * [UNPUBLISHED]

CO 1; Robert Rector; Marilyn *

Rosenberg; Cindy Brewer, also known *

as Cindy Aldridge, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 27, 1999

 Filed: June 10, 1999 

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________
1The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

George Brown appeals the district court’s1 order granting summary judgment to

defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he claimed that various defendants

conspired to assault him, used excessive force in moving him to another cell, failed to

take corrective action, and were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. Upon de

novo review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude summary judgment was

proper. We also reject as meritless Mr. Brown’s additional arguments on appeal that

the district court erred by considering his deposition, refusing to appoint him counsel,

not ordering him to amend his complaint, and refusing him a continuance to obtain

affidavits.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2021019EN.01004801.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Staszewski (K7)

(Case T-21/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark K7 - Earlier EU word mark k7 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 19/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Miłosz Staszewski (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: E. Gryc Zerych, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2019 (Case R 401/2019 1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Staszewski and LG Electronics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LG Electronics, Inc., to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LG Electronics, Inc., to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(14)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(36)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(5)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(7)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(8)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - (-)puerto rico(5)
              - south carolina(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Hurricanes increase future flood risk in Puerto Rico and Florida, 1

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Hurricanes increase future flood risk in Puerto Rico and Florida, 2

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Social and economic benefits of coral reef restoration: Puerto Rico 2

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Social and economic benefits of coral reef restoration: Puerto Rico 1

Charts or Graphs        January 1, 2020        Puerto Rico Coral Reefs and Coastal Hazard Risk Reduction
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 535 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 535

      Recognizing January 30, 2024, as ``Help America Vote Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Recognizing January 30, 2024, as ``Help America Vote Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes January 30, 2024, as ``Help America Vote 
        Day'';
            (2) recognizes the need for, and appreciation of, the 
        service of poll workers;
            (3) encourages eligible people to help American citizens to 
        vote in the 2024 elections by serving as poll workers; and
            (4) encourages voters to contact or visit the website of 
        their local election office for accurate and up-to-date 
        information on voter registration and casting a ballot.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7171

LESLIE ALLEN ACHTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director; JAMES N. CROSS, Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (2:10-cv-00025-REM-JSK)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leslie Allen Achter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Leslie Allen Achter, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Achter v. Lappin, No. 

2:10-cv-00025-REM-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Carlos Y. PIEDAD a/k/a Carlos Y. Fleita-Speidad, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3682

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.