alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Aviation
Administration

Memorandum

Date:
To:
From:

Subject:

October 23, 2
NTSB

Denver Air Rot
INFORMATION:

NORDO Aircraf
Goodland, KS,

009

ute Traffic Control Center

Partial Transcript
t NWA188
October 21, 2009

This transcription covers the Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC)
R position for the time period from October 22, 2009, 0019 UTC, to October 22,
2009, 0032 UTC.

Agencies Maki

Denver Center

Minneapolis 0

Denver Center
Controller

Denver Center
Desk

ng Transmissions Abbreviations
Sector 9 Radar Controller ZDVO9R
"Neil High Sector ZMP

Sector 8 Radar Associate

ZDVO08D
Area 5 Front Line Manager's

FLMS

I hereby certify that the following is a true transcription of the recorded
conversations pertaining to the subject NORDO Aircraft involving NWA188.

Lomb Mbnub ff

Kenneth J. Ashworth
Staff Support Specialist
Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center

0019

(0020-0023)

0024

0024:16 ZDVO9R
0024:25 ZDVO9R
0024:32 ZDVO9R
0024:47 ZDVO9R

northwest one eighty eight contact minneapolis center
one two four point eight seven see ya

northwest one eighty eight contact minneapolis center
one two four point eight seven

northwest one eighty eight radio check

oneil high nine on three

09


NORDO-AIRCRAFT

NWA188
Page 2 of 3

0024:51

0024:52

0024:53

0024:54

0024:55

0025:00

0025:04
0025:05
0026

0026:05

0026:07

0026:13

0026:14

0026:35

0026:39

0026:40

0026:42

0026:43
0027

ZMP

ZDVO9R

ZMP

ZDVO9R

ZDVO8D

ZDVO9R

ZDVO8D.

ZDVO9R

FLMS

ZDVO9R

FLM5S

ZDVO9R

ZDVO9R

ZMP

ZDVO9R

ZMP

ZDVO9R

oneil

did northwest one eighty eight come over

no he didn't

i'll go find him

sector eight

this is nine can you try northwest one eighty eight for
me please

(unintelligible) wilco

thanks

area five supervisors desk

hey could you go to uh uh company and get northwest one
eighty eight and and one and got to twenty four eighty
seven that's minneapolis center

twenty four eighty seven for northwest i'll do it

eighty seven for northwest one eighty eight thanks

and oneil high nine on the three went to company on
northwest one eighty eight should be over like in a few
minutes

oneil say again

went to company on northwest one eighty eight should be
over in a few minutes

(unintelligible) b

(unintelligible)


NORDO-AIRCRAFT
NWA188

Page 3 of 3

(0028-0031)
0032

End of Transcript
EX-4.5



 Exhibit 4.5 

HERCULES INCORPORATED 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR 
 STOCK
ACCUMULATION PLAN 
 AMENDMENT 2002-1 

WHEREAS, Hercules Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called the “Company”), maintains the Hercules Incorporated
Non-Employee Director Stock Accumulation Plan (hereinafter called the “Director Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.1
the Company’s Board of Directors has reserved the right to amend the Director Plan and now desires to do so in order to extend the term of the Director Plan for another ten years and to convert a portion of the remaining authorized shares so
that they will be available to be issued as restricted stock; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Director Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Article II is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“II. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM 

This Plan expired on April 30, 2001. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term of the Plan shall be continued beyond that
expiration date, effective as of the date the extension is approved by the holders of at least a majority of the shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the 2002 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders (“Effective Date”). Upon such stockholder approval the Plan shall have a new expiration date of June 27, 2012.” 

2. Section 5.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“5.2 Subject to adjustments as provided in Section 5.4, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock for which options may be
granted under Article VI (“Options”) shall be fifty-one thousand (51,000) shares and the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be exchanged pursuant to Section 7.4 for director fees under Article VIII (“Deferral
Exchanges”) shall be fifty thousand (50,000) shares plus the shares that were authorized and available for Deferral Exchanges on April 30, 2002.” 

3. This Amendment 2002-1 shall be effective upon its approval by the holders of at least a majority of the shares of the Company’s issued
and outstanding common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Upon such effective date, all of the other terms and conditions of the Director Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 

TO RECORD the adoption of this Amendment 2002-1 by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Chairman has caused this document to be executed
on this 13th day of May, 2002. 







 
			
	HERCULES INCORPORATED
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ William H. Joyce

		 	William H. Joyce
		 	Chairman
# C_2023296EN.01002601.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — Puigdemont i Casamajó and Comín i Oliveres v Parliament

(Case T-115/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Member of the Parliament - Refusal of the President of the Parliament to accede to a request for privileges and immunities to be defended - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 296/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó (Waterloo Belgium), Antoni Comín i Oliveres (Waterloo) (represented by: P. Bekaert, G. Boye, S. Bekaert, lawyers, and by B. Emmerson KC)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and J.-C. Puffer, acting as Agents,

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by A. Gavela Llopis and J. Ruiz Sánchez, acting as Agents),

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decision of the President of the European Parliament allegedly contained in his letter of 10 December 2019, sent in response to the request that the Parliament, on the basis of Rule 9 of its Rules of Procedure, defend their parliamentary immunity.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Mr Antoni Comín i Oliveres to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian King, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                         |                    |  |                          
|------------------------ | ------------------ |  | -------------------------
|Dated:
  August 14, 2006 | By: /s/ Brian King
|                         |                    | 
|                         |                    |  | Brian King               
|                         |                    |  | Chief
  Executive Officer

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1870        Hayden Survey 1870 Wyoming in camp at Red Buttes

Interviews        June 1, 2022        Landers Rupture — Jonathan Fieldwork

Interviews        November 17, 2010        Completion of Continent - Wide Soil Survey

Historical        December 31, 1964        Two buildings on hillside

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!

Interviews        September 15, 2010        Making Waves: Hypoxia in U.S. Coastal Waters

Interviews        August 30, 2009        The Water Beneath Our Feet: New Study on California's Central Valley Groundwater Level Decline

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet

Interviews        November 30, 2009        Urban Hydrology: Restoration and Monitoring of Johnson Creek in Portland, Oregon

Interviews        April 18, 2011        USGS Hydrologic Investigation of West Africa's Congo River (part 3)

Interviews        September 6, 2011        Stranger than Fiction: The Secret Lives of Freshwater Mussels

Interviews        August 24, 2009        Pharmaceuticals in Urban Streams in Northwest Oregon
J.E. v. JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

2016-CT-01566-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: December 4, 2018 Closed: March 7, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Certiorari

Certiorari-Denied
Cristobal A. ALBA Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019

Cristobal A. Alba Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Herrera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Jerry E. Vaughn, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IWO Holdings, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
# C_2021263EN.01003703.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/37

---

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2021 — MP v Commission

(Case T-588/20) (1)

(2021/C 263/49)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.

---
Jeffrey GABRIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3119

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Matthew J. TULENKO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Bryant CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Keziah CAMPBELL, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2909 5D17-3155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Donmonique H. COCKRUM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

Donmonique H. Cockrum, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*388The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
A.L.P. v. STATE

CR-16-0569

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2005


/s/ Matthew S. Kerper
--------------------------------------
Matthew S. Kerper, President
(Principal executive officer)
2062.

#### Baker *v.*The State.

Indictment for hog stealing, from Liberty superior court— Judge Seabrook. June 18, 1909.

Submitted October 5, —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*Donald Fraser,*for plaintiff in error.

N. *J. Norman, solicitor-genteral,*contra.

Powell, J.

No error of law is complained of. There is evidence to support the verdict, and it is approved by the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Billy Wayne HANBACK v. Cheryl Ann HANBACK

2160337

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Federal Aviation

Administration

March 9, 2016

UAS Strategic 

Plans and Near 

Term 

Opportunities

For REDAC NAS Ops
Federal Aviation

Administration 2

333/336 Ops; 

Segregated Operations

By Waiver/Exemption

Segregated Operations

By Rule 107; 

VLOS Class G

Segregated Operations; 

VLOS Over People / 

Low Density

Segregated Operations 

VLOS Over People /

High Density

Functionality 

Over Time

Integrated Operations

By Full Performance-Based 

Rules

(Class A/B/C/D Ops)

UAS OMB Briefing Materials

Complexity

Registration

Notification

Collaborative 

UTM

Transit Class B 

Airspace (UTM)

Integrated

Class A,B,C,D 

Airspace

Ops

Implementation

F&E

Implementation

Information

Systems

Information Systems &

ATC Systems
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  May 16, 2005

/s/ Bryan Kenyon
Bryan Kenyon, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                [Letterhead of Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP]

July 12, 2006

Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc.
3450 Monte Villa Parkway
Bothell, WA 98021

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We are acting as counsel to Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration
statement on Form S-8, File No. 333- (the "Registration Statement"), as filed by
the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"), of 2,350,000 shares (the "Shares") of the Company's common stock, par
value $0.006 per share, for delivery under the Nastech Pharmaceutical Company
Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), which Registration
Statement, pursuant to Rule 429 under the Securities Act, also constitutes (i)
post-effective amendment number 2 to the Company's registration statement on
Form S-8, File No. 333-118206, and includes 600,000 shares of Common Stock
previously registered under the Securities Act pursuant to such prior
registration statement, and (ii) post-effective amendment number 1 to the
Company's registration statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-126905, and includes
750,000 shares of Common Stock previously registered under the Securities Act
pursuant to such prior registration statement.

      We are qualified to practice law in the State of New York. We express no
opinion as to, and, for the purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have
conducted no investigation of, and do not purport to be experts on, any laws
other than the laws of the State of New York, the Delaware General Corporation
Law and the laws of the United States of America.

      We have examined such documents as we considered necessary for the
purposes of this opinion. Based on such examination, it is our opinion that the
Shares have been duly authorized and, upon issuance in accordance with the Plan,
will be legally issued, fully-paid and non-assessable under the laws of the
State of Delaware.

      We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement. This opinion is furnished in connection with the Registration
Statement.

      This opinion may not be relied upon by you for any other purpose, or
furnished to, quoted to, or relied upon by any other person, firm or corporation
for any purpose, without our prior written consent.

                                     Very truly yours,

                                     /s/ Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP
Exhibit
10.2


 


[LOGO] IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS, INC.


 


 


March 30, 2004


 


Offer
of Restricted Stock in Exchange for Certain Stock Options Previously Granted


 


Offer
Made to Paul Devermann


 


ImageWare’s Board has authorized management
to offer you the ability to receive restricted stock in consideration under the
2001 Equity Incentive Plan in exchange for certain out of the money options
which had been previously granted to you under various option plans.


 


This proposal will not only provide you with
what can be considered greater equity incentives, it also results in increased
option pools for future grants to all employees.


 


Attached is a spreadsheet which summarizes
the proposed option surrender / restricted stock grant.


 


Based upon an exchange ratio of three shares
of restricted stock for five options, 32,640 shares of restricted stock would
be granted out of the 2001 plan in exchange for the surrender of options
covering 54,401 shares (from the 1999 and 1994 plans) with a net of 21,780 of
those options going back into the option pool for future grants to employees.


 


The restricted stock will vest over three
years on a quarterly basis (one twelfth per quarter) and will fully vest upon
any of the following:


 


•                  a change in control,


•                  the sale of the company,


•                  termination of employment
unless such termination was for cause.


 


By vesting in small increments on a quarterly
basis, you will be able to plan and time tax implications (ordinary income on
the entire value of vested stock on the date it vests).  Certificates will be issued to you quarterly
as they vest (or upon the occurrence of one of the events listed above).  The shares will be fully registered when
issued.


 


Please indicate your agreement to accept the
offer presented above by signing below where indicated.  Return the signed original along with the original
option grants covering the options being exchanged.


 


 


	
  /s/  Patrick J. Downs

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Patrick Downs 

  Member of Board of Directors and

  Compensation Committee Chairman

  Imageware Systems, Inc

  	
   

  	
  Paul Devermann