alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
Exhibit 23.2





BDO — Pazos, López de Romaña, Rodriguez  S. Civil de R.L.





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-188355) and in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-58298, No. 333-129152, No. 333-147448, No. 333-161459, No. 333-168588 and No. 333-183142), of our report dated June 23, 2015 , relating to the financial statements of Perurail S.A., which appears in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Belmond Ltd. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2014 .





Pazos, López de Romaña, Rodriguez S. Civil de R.L.


Lima, Peru


June 23, 2015








Countersigned by:/s/ Liliana Córdova MejíaLiliana Córdova MejíaCertified Chartered Public AccountantRegister No. 01-17661
Instrument Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-15B) Addendum B:

False Courses

November 2019

The following will replace the content found on page 9-40 under “ILS Errors”:

2. False courses. In addition to the desired course, glideslope (GS) facilities inherently produce 

additional courses at higher vertical angles. These false courses occur at angles between 

approximately 6° and 12°. Some false courses (false null) resemble a normal 3° GS, but are 

at a steeper angle or at the wrong location and may result in a high descent rate if followed,

while other false courses (signal reversal) occur when the signal is reversed (i.e., signal 

transitions from a “fly-down” command to a “fly-up” command) and depending on the GS 

capture logic, may result in the aircraft pitching up. The type of false course is dependent on 

the GS antenna type, but in general, signal reversals will occur at 9°, false nulls will occur at 

12°, and both may occur around 6°. Although indications of an abnormal condition may be 

present, flight crews should be aware that there may be no warning prior to crossing a false 

GS. Specific airplane indications and autoflight responses when approaching or capturing a 

false GS are aircraft-dependent; therefore, operating and/or training manuals should be

referenced for additional information regarding the consequences of capturing a false GS 

and for guidance to detect and prevent false GS captures.

Note that, if the approach is conducted at the altitudes specified on the appropriate approach 

chart (GS captured from below), these false courses are not encountered. Intercepting the 

GS from above increases both the possibility of a non-stabilized approach and the risk of 

capturing a false GS. Flight crews should also maintain flight path awareness (i.e., altitude 

vs. distance crosschecks) during the approach to ensure false GSs are not encountered or

followed.
Misty Nichole MELVIN v. STATE

CR-16-0433

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 8, 2004



/s/ DONALD H. HUNTERDonald H. Hunter Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
1720.

#### McKenzie v. Miller & Company.

Hill, C. J.

1. A suit against a broker to recover profits actually realized from a completed sale of personal property can not be amended by alleging that the profits would have accrued but for his negligent failure to execute an order to sell. The original suit is based on an implied *829assumpsit for money liad' and received by him for the benefit of the plaintiff. The amendment is to recover damages measured by the profits that the plaintiff would have made, if the broker had executed the order to sell.

Attachment, from city court of Atlanta — Judge R.eid. December 12, 1908.

Argued April 13, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

*Tye, Peeples, Bryan & Jordan, D. W. Blair,*for plaintiff.

*Smith & Hastings,*for defendants.

2. An original petition alleged a contract of purchase from the defendant as vendor. An amendment alleged a contract of purchase, made through the defendant as agent. *Held,*that the amendment was properly stricken, as it alleged a new and distinct cause of 'action. A suit upon one contract can not be changed by introducing, through amendment, a different contract. *Anderson*v. *Pollard,*62 *Ga.*46; *Lamar*v. *Lamar,*118 *Ga.*850 (45 S. E. 671); *Chapman*v. *Americus Oil Co.,*117 *Ga.*881 (45 S. E. 268).

3. The court did not err in excluding testimony offered by the plaintiff, at variance with the allegations of his petition, and which was pertinent and relevant only to allegations contained in the amendments thereto that had been properly stricken on demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2021289EN.01001302.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — ‘BalevBio’ EOOD v Teritorialna direktsia Severna morska, Agentsia ‘Mitnitsi’

(Case C-76/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common customs tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Goods made of different materials - Plant fibres - Melamine resin - Headings 3924 and 4419 - Goods described as ‘bamboo beakers’)

(2021/C 289/18)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘BalevBio’ EOOD

Defendant: Teritorialna direktsia Severna morska, Agentsia ‘Mitnitsi’

Intervener: Okrazhna prokuratura — Varnenska

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016, must be interpreted as meaning that goods described as ‘bamboo beakers’, made up of 72,33 % plant fibres and 25,2 % melamine resin, must, subject to the referring court’s assessment of all the facts available to it, be classified under heading 3924 of that nomenclature, in particular under subheading 3924 10 00.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 23 Consent of Auditor

BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, RC.
Certified Public Accountant

1582 TULITA DRIVE
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89123


To Whom It May Concern:

OFFICE (702) 361-8414 FAX NO. (702) 896-0278


October, 17 2000

The firm of Barry L. Friedman, P.C., Certified Public Accountant
consents to the inclusion of my report of October, 17 2000, on the
Financial Statements of Garden Bay International, Ltd., as of September 30,
2000, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,


//Barry L. Friedman//
Certified Public Accountant
Charles Henry MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0017

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT        32**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|         |                                                                        |                                    |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                   |                               |
|         |                                                                   | /s/ Lee                  Wiskowski |
|         | Lee                  Wiskowski, Co-Chief Executive                  Officer |

|         |                                                                             |                                       |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                        |                                  |
|         |                                                                        | /s/ Douglas                    Stukel |
|         | Douglas                    Stukel, Co-Chief Executive                    Officer |

|         |                                                        |                                        |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                   |                                   |
|         |                                                   | /s/ Derry                      L. Behm |
|         | Derry                      L. Behm, Chief Financial Officer |
|         |                                                        |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AAMPRO Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Stephen Farkas,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of the best of my
knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.


Date: August 20, 2004                     /s/ Stephen Farkas
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Stephen Farkas
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Richard Warren LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1747

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 387 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 387

       Designating October 12, 2023, as ``National Loggers Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 29 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. King) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating October 12, 2023, as ``National Loggers Day''.

Whereas the logging industry has served as an economic driver and cultural 
        tradition in the United States for centuries;
Whereas the logging industry creates rural jobs and provides revenue for local 
        and State governments and National forests;
Whereas loggers provide renewable material for products used by people in the 
        United States every day;
Whereas loggers are the first link in the $300,000,000,000 domestic forest 
        products supply chain;
Whereas loggers are the means by which healthy forest management plans are 
        accomplished;
Whereas logging provides for healthy forests, which--

    (1) maintain vital animal habitats;

    (2) protect watersheds;

    (3) sequester carbon;

    (4) provide public recreational opportunities; and

    (5) reduce loss of life and property from wildfires; and

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests through regeneration, including by 
        planting 2,500,000,000 trees annually: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 12, 2023, as ``National Loggers 
        Day''; and
            (2) encourages the President to officially designate 
        October 12th as ``National Loggers Day''.
                                 <all>
```
______________________________________________________________________________

FAA FACTS

Oct. 2023

pressoffice@faa.gov

Putting Sustainable Aviation Fuels to the Test

If we want to achieve America’s goal of net-zero aviation emissions by 2050, sustainable 

aviation fuel (SAF) will carry us for a large part of the way. But what emissions do we create 

when SAF is burned in a jet engine? 

During October, the FAA is participating in an environmental project that will measure aircraft 

emissions and ice crystal formation from a Boeing aircraft flying with 100 percent sustainable 

aviation fuel derived from vegetable oils and waste oils. The FAA is providing more than $2.5

million in funding to purchase the SAF for the aircraft and for the work of scientists and 

academic researchers.

Gaining knowledge about the effect of sustainable aviation fuels on our environment will 

accelerate the use of SAF and the development of low-emission aviation technology.

This supports the FAA’s $300 million in funding for infrastructure projects aimed at producing 

more sustainable aviation fuel and building up regional SAF supply chains.
The SAF emissions and contrail measurement flights will operate with GE LEAP 1B engines on 

a Boeing 737 Eco-Demonstrator aircraft owned by United Airlines. A B737 crew will operate 

multiple flights from Paine Field in Seattle throughout this month using 100 percent sustainable 

aviation fuel. A NASA jet aircraft will trail the B737 to measure the size and composition of 

emissions and analyze any contrails created. Here is information about SAF emissions, contrail 

analysis, and on contrails in general.

Co-participants in the initiative are the FAA, Boeing, NASA, GE Aerospace, United Airlines, the 

German Aerospace Centre, World Energy Fuel, Aerodyne Research, the Massachusetts Institute 

of Technology, and Missouri University Science & Technology (MS&T).

The FAA has purchased the SAF from World Energy for both aircraft and is funding the work of 

the science and academic analysts and researchers from Aerodyne, M.I.T. and MS&T.

Find more information about the FAA and its sustainability efforts at its Sustainability Gateway 

Page. 

A NASA jet aircraft will trail the B737 Eco-Demonstrator plane to measure the size and 

composition of emissions and analyze any contrails created. The FAA is funding the purchase of 

the sustainable aviation fuel and its researchers will provide the post-flight analysis.
Bud Christopher CHATMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2941

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

s0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

139990

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139990 COA: 294201 Wayne CC: 79-929795-FM RONALD BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
______________________________________________________________________________

July 2023

Contact: pressoffice@faa.gov

Eliminating Lead Emissions in Aviation

Fuel development is a rigorous process. A great deal of new FAA research and industry development 

is required, and the FAA must be assured that unleaded fuels are safe for piston engines in more than 

200,000 aircraft. 

EAGLE Initiative

The government-industry backed Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions (EAGLE) initiative

began in February 2022. Its goal is to transition to lead-free fuels for piston-engine aircraft in the 

United States no later than the end of 2030. Implementation requires the participation of many across 

the industry, including pilots; airport managers; airport fixed-based operators; industry associations; 

fuel suppliers; and aircraft engine, propulsion, and airframe manufacturers. FAA funding associated 

with EAGLE efforts totals $10 million during 2023 for fuel testing and evaluation.

In the Pipeline

We have authorized several unleaded fuels (GAMI G100UL, Swift UL94, Air BP UL91) already. 

Additionally, we are working with other companies (Afton/Phillips 66, Lyondellbasell) who are 

developing fleet-wide unleaded fuel and unleaded fuels for engines that need specific octane levels.

Infrastructure Needs

To achieve our goal, oil producers and refineries (part of EAGLE) need to increase production and 

distribution of already approved fuels. The FAA currently is authorized to provide limited 

entitlement funding and BIL allocated funds for aircraft fueling systems, such as fuel tanks, at nonprimary general aviation airports.

The FAA also has proposed as part of the FAA Reauthorization to allow airports to use Airport 

Improvement Program grants to construct and purchase additional fuel delivery and storage systems.

Safe Transition

Additionally, the Airport Cooperative Research Program within the Transportation Research Board is 

developing a project to collect data and create best practices focused on the safe transition to 

unleaded fuels for the country's fleet of piston aircraft. We anticipate that Reid-Hillview Airport and 

San Martin Airport in Santa Clara County, Calif., will participate in the project. The county has 

agreed to address airfield safety and land-use issues under an agreement signed with the FAA.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 11 , 202 4

NO. 03

- 22

- 00539

- CR

Brian Scott Sharp , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRN E, J USTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment s of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Brian Scott Sharp

has filed a n amended motion for rehearing, and having re v iewed the m otion, the record, and the

part ies’ arguments, we de ny the motion for rehearing. The Court therefore withdraws i t s opinion

and judgment from December 20 , 2023

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments,

the Court ho lds that there w as no error in the court’s judgment s req uiring reversal

. However,

there was error in the judgment s that require correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial

court’s judgment s as follows: the ju dgment of conviction for Count II

, attempted capital murder

of a peace officer, is modified to reflec t that the “ Statute for Offe nse ” is “ 15.01/19.03 Penal

Code ” and the judgment of conviction for Count I I I, aggravated assault against a public servant,

is modified to reflect tha t the “ Statute for Offense ” i s “ 22.02(b)(2 )(B) Pena l Code

. ” Thejudgment s , as modified

, are a ffirmed

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - (-)south dakota(1)

## By Year

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy
Jaroslav SZABO, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, Series 2007-BC1, and Lucie Szabo, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1652

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.