alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
            32.2**
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO
 18
            U.S.C.
            SECTION 1350,
 AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
            906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
            connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Distributors Holding Inc.
            (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
            Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
            Agress, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
            18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
            the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
                  the
                      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                      or 15(d) of
                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
                  the
                      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                      material
                      respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                      of the
                      Company.
  
 Date:
            March 29, 2007
 
 
 /s/
            Stephen Agress
 --------------------------------------
 Stephen
            Agress
 Executive
            Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
wenty six
for him

we wight have

to
N
te

S

body
Lis we may have
for a minute

minnea

8412228 2bpve okay if we i hink hear him * (bu
gS 4}
R29

OL12:35 R28 hey this is twenty nine that north

m3 va
0112238 R29 might ha om twent
wer centex
Olias4l B13 hwanty Six

Rag

Lligible)

clear, but this

clroumstance

“this po

best interpreta

on ©.

we'li te

we

mite the


Subject: INFORMATION:
Pi viat

on NWA
» UN,

vers the Minn
for t. time
Alig ura,

UNK
NWALIS

BLD

oliowing
to the subject

Davi

Hone uel (

T

: Manager

o'neili high nine on th

nect hwe ighty eight come



~GL~C- MP
RWAL ES

Page 2 of 4 ae
GO242 RIG no he didnt

iNe2 4254 EDV ifil go find

C024; UNK aleighty

O024:53 R29 one eighty eight

een out here

o025100 NWALIS ya got a northwest o

BL

any behine
should b

ya northwest

you one eigh

be Follow.

0026134 (unintelligible? o'tneill hig! heee wernt to
company or ene eigh sould be
(unintelii few minut

OO28: Rae

Ob26:40 BDV hee

209

R29 northwest one eighty eight

eight

0037
0038

ean

mumbe

nordo

twenby nine northwest

G038 217 RLS okay


P-GL-C-ZMP-0
NWALBS

Page 3 of 4 we

going through a £14 and then

nord

supe

hrough ah company and he's

6038223 Ris still norda okay

O0038:24 R29 geod luck (aunintelligible}

RIS alright thanks {unintelligible

nort

nest one eight

eight

ainneapolis cer

one

ene niner po

odo

(o041-0110)

OLLL

Olli 4s R29 hey denver nine on
DLLLi4e BDV denver rine

OUR1349 R29 were nore
Was

st sat down let me check just a

O121:58

20V9 ah neqative ah
nit worked

OLl2:03

aleight um

O1d2:04

apolig at

ya he’s

would have coma throv

a
nN

and ah i words

dast talked to us on

=
Ab

a) ya nine gave him to me
what freq he might have

it would have

a1ta:18 2RVS ah ik woule
# C_2022198EN.01003601.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Zardini v Commission

(Case T-511/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition - Criterion to assess professional experience - Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice)

(2022/C 198/50)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Alessandro Zardini (Marano di Valpollicella, Italy) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of, first, the decision of the Selection Board of 31 October 2019 rejecting the request for a review of the refusal to admit the applicant to the next phase of Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19, and, second, the decision of the appointing authority of 7 May 2020 rejecting the complaint of the applicant against that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of 31 October 2019 rejecting the request for a review of the exclusion of Mr Alessandro Zardini from Competition EPSO/AD/371/19; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of 31 October 2019 rejecting the request for a review of the exclusion of Mr Alessandro Zardini from Competition EPSO/AD/371/19;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

          - [NPS-PWR-GOGA-37445; PS.SPWLA0133.00.1]

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notification of boundary revision.

# SUMMARY:

The boundary of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (Park) is modified to include 211.7 acres of land located in in San Mateo County, California, immediately adjoining the Park boundary. The National Park Service intends to purchase the properties in fee from the Peninsula Open Space Trust, a non-profit land trust.

      ( print page 107162)    

# DATES:

The effective date of this boundary revision is December 31, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

The boundary revision is depicted on Map No. 641/180428, dated February 14, 2024. This map is on file and available for inspection at the following locations: National Park Service, Land Resources Program, Interior Regions 8, 9, 10 and 12, 555 Battery Street, Suite 121, San Francisco, CA 94111, and National Park Service, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief Realty Officer, Truda Stella, National Park Service, Interior Regions 8, 9, 10 and 12, Land Resource Program Center, 555 Battery Street, Suite 121, San Francisco, CA 94111, telephone (206) 561-7978.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

16 U.S.C. 460bb-1 authorizes that, after advising the House Committee on Natural Resources and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Secretary of the Interior may make minor revisions to the boundaries of the Park, when necessary, by publication of a revised drawing or other description in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The Committees have been notified of this boundary revision. The inclusion of these tracts in the Park boundary will address operational and management issues, provide preservation, and protect key natural resources in addition to expanding visitor recreational opportunities.                

David Szymanski,

Regional Director, Interior Regions 8, 9, 10, and 12.

[FR Doc. 2024-31387 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
# C_2021110EN.01001801.xml

| 29.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 21 December 2020 — B. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w. W.

(Case C-696/20)

(2021/C 110/18)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: B.

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w. W.

Question referred

Do Article 41 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) and the principles of proportionality and neutrality preclude the application, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, of a national provision such as Article 25(2) of the ustawa z dnia 11 marca 2004 r. o podatku od towarów i usług (Law of 11 March 2004 on Value Added Tax) to an intra-Community acquisition of goods by a taxable person

| — | if that acquisition has already been taxed in the territory of the Member State in which dispatch ends, by the persons acquiring the goods from that taxable person |
| --- | --- |

—

if that acquisition has already been taxed in the territory of the Member State in which dispatch ends, by the persons acquiring the goods from that taxable person

| — | where it has been established that the taxable person’s actions did not involve any tax fraud, but that they were the result of an incorrect designation of supplies in chain transactions and that that taxable person’s Polish VAT identification number was provided for the purposes of a domestic rather than an intra-Community supply? |
| --- | --- |

—

where it has been established that the taxable person’s actions did not involve any tax fraud, but that they were the result of an incorrect designation of supplies in chain transactions and that that taxable person’s Polish VAT identification number was provided for the purposes of a domestic rather than an intra-Community supply?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
#### The State of Florida, *Appellant,*v. Fort Pierce Inlet District, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Opinion Filed December 20, 1927.

*1158
      *Angus Sumner,*for Appellant;

*F. L. Hemmings,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.-

This appeal is from a decree validating an issue of $650,000.00 of bonds of the Fort Pierce Inlet District, pursuant to Chapter 12031, Acts of 1927.

It is contended that the validating decree should be reversed because Chapter 9980, Acts of 1923, which created the Fort Pierce Inlet District, authorizes a tax levy without definite limitations and is unconstitutional under the principles stated in the ease of Stuart v. Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District, decided at this term of this Court.

Even if it should in appropriate proceedings be adjudged that Chapter 9980, *supra,*unlawfully attempts to delegate the legislative power to tax, that may not affect the existence of the district as created by the statute, and as the authority to levy taxes conferred by Chapter 12031 is limited to the payment of the principal and interest of the $650,000.00 of bonds authorized by the latter Act, the principles announced in the case of Stuart v. Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District are not applicable here.

The decree of the chancellor should be affirmed, and it is so ordered..

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Tavares Survell EVANS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7610

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS BURSTON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00371-F-2; 5:08-cv-00087-F)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Burston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals from a district court
order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion
for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the district
court’s order and the record and affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Burston , No. 5:04-cr00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
NGP Capital Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Bernardy, Secretary, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |                                                 
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|August 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard A. Bernardy                         
|                |  | Richard A. Bernardy,                            
|                |  | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
R.P., Father of J.P. and C.P., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1824.

#### Kaigler *v.*The State.

Accusation of sale of liquor, from city court of Ashbum— Judge Hawkins. March 15, 1909.

Submitted May 4, —

Decided June 15, 1909.

*B. L. Tipton,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. A. Comer, solicitor,*contra.

Russell, J.

Tlie evidence of the defendant’s guilt of the offense of selling intoxicating- liquors upon a specified occasion being manifest and demanding the verdict rendered, it was not error to refuse a new trial, even if certain opinionative evidence as to a mere circumstance concerning an entirely different transaction was improperly admitted.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          36,385
<SECURITIES>                                    50,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,088
<PP&E>                                          34,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,343
<SALES>                                          9,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,228
<CGS>                                           10,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,345
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,515
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69


</TABLE>
Economic Forecast: July 2019

18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 2018 2019 2020

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 2.2 4.2 3.4 2.2 3.1 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 3.0 2.1 1.6

 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) 0.5 3.8 3.5 2.5 0.9 3.3 2.7 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.6 2.3 1.9

 Residential Fixed Investment -3.4 -1.3 -3.6 -4.7 -2.0 0.5 1.8 3.7 2.9 -0.4 -0.2 -0.4 -3.3 1.0 0.5

 Business Fixed Investment 11.5 8.7 2.5 5.4 4.4 1.1 -0.3 2.2 3.0 1.1 1.6 -0.4 7.0 1.8 1.3

 Government Consumption & Investment 1.5 2.5 2.6 -0.4 2.8 2.0 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.5 2.1 1.6

Billions of Chained 2012$

 Net Exports -902 -841 -950 -956 -905 -926 -927 -938 -948 -959 -975 -980 -912 -924 -966

 Change in Business Inventories 30 -37 90 97 123 88 74 56 43 49 43 50 45 85 46

Percent Change: Quarterly YoY, Annual Q4/Q4

 Consumer Price Index 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.8

 Core Consumer Price Index (ex. Food & Energy) 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.2

 PCE Chain Price Index 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.4 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.9 2.1 1.8

 Core PCE Chain Price Index (ex. Food & Energy) 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Change: Quarterly Mo. Avg., Thous., Annual Mil.

 Employment, Total Nonfarm 214 232 222 216 206 153 154 154 131 121 111 104 2.7 2.0 1.4

 Percent Change: Q4/Q4 1.8 1.3 0.9

Percent

 Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.3 3.9 3.7 4.0

 Federal Funds Rate 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.3 1.9

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.3 2.1 1.6

10-Year Treasury Bond Yield 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.9 2.3 2.1

 --------------- 2018 --------------- --------------- 2019 --------------- --------------- 2020 ---------------

July 10, 2019

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from June 28, 2019.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic and Strategic Research

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or 

expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, 

analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. 

Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the 

views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 16, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-985 Lower Tribunal No. F93-25452

________________ 

### Herman Minor , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge. Herman Minor, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Silvergraph International, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gray Freeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Gary Freeman Gary Freeman Chief Financial Officer Date:  April 16, 2007