alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 643 

Recognizing the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military 

Children and expressing support for the designation of April 2024 as 

the ‘‘Month of the Military Child’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. 

HICKENLOOPER, and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children and expressing support for 

the designation of April 2024 as the ‘‘Month of the 

Military Child’’. 

Whereas brave men and women serve in the Armed Forces 

and protect the security and freedom of the United 

States; 

Whereas over 1,300,000 active-duty members and nearly 

1,000,000 ready-reserve members serve in the Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas there are more than 1,540,000 military-connected 

children and youth who move, on average, 6 to 9 times 

during their educational career; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 643 IS 

Whereas they encounter unique educational challenges when 

these children and youth move between public and Department of Defense Education Activity schools; 

Whereas the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity 

for Military Children was developed in 2007 by the Department of Defense and the Council of State Governments to ease the educational transitions of military-connected students attending public schools and Department 

of Defense schools worldwide; 

Whereas the Compact helps military children and youth stay 

on grade level and facilitates on-time graduation; 

Whereas, while it is not exhaustive in its coverage, the Compact addresses key issues encountered by military families: eligibility, enrollment, placement, and graduation; 

Whereas the Compact uses a comprehensive approach to provide a consistent policy in every school district and member State; 

Whereas the Compact Commission, which includes the 50 

States and District of Columbia, works tirelessly to recognize that our military-connected children and youth 

serve too and to pay tribute to their commitment and 

service to the country; and 

Whereas April is the Month of the Military Child, and a 

month-long salute will encourage our country to support 

military-connected children and youth: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate encourages— 

2 (1) citizens to ‘‘Purple Up!’’ and wear purple to 

3 express our appreciation and celebrate the unsung 

4 heroes of the Armed Forces; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 643 IS 

1 (2) all citizens, communities, and business and 

2 government leaders across the United States to 

3 honor, support, and show appreciation for military4 connected children and youth. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Order entered June 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00704-CR

JEROME JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F01-53637-JH

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 25, 2022 motion to access the 

supplemental clerk’s record. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of 

this Court to send a copy of the May 31, 2022 supplemental clerk’s record to 

Jerome Johnson, TDCJ #01198301, Estelle Unit, 264 FM 3478, Huntsville, TX 

77320-3320. This case is at issue and will be submitted in due course.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
# C_2021338EN.01002001.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Frommer v EUIPO — Minerva (I-cosmetics)

(Case T-205/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark I-cosmetics - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 338/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Angela Frommer (Unterschleißheim, Germany) (represented by: F. Remmertz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Minerva GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Dissmann, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 (Case R 675/2019-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Minerva and Ms Frommer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Angela Frommer to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Angela Frommer to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Minerva GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Minerva GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Brian J. O’Keane, certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Kof CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.               Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered bythis report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.               I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based onmy knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicercompliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodicreports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement; and

5.               Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliancewith servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation ABand Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included asan exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonablyrelied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties:  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. andBank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

Date:  March 29, 2007
|        | By:                                     | /s/ Brian J. O’Keane |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |
|   | Brian J. O’Keane                   |
|   | Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer) |

** **

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreement to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreement are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201443.                

*Agreement Name:*                     Maersk/Network Shipping Ltd. Ad Hoc Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Maersk A/S; Network Shipping, Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne Rohde, Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement authorizes the parties to charter space to/from one another on an ad hoc basis in the trades between ports in Costa Rica, Ecuador and Guatemala on the one hand and ports in California on the other hand.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     02/03/2025.                

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​88588.*

Dated: December 26, 2024.

Alanna Beck,

Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-31454 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
Luis PACHECO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4098

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00387-CR

EX PARTE Franklin Jose VELASQUEZ MARTINEZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10369CR

Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED January 11, 2023.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas A. Michels               
|Douglas A. Michels                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|May 7, 2008
Exhibit 10.23

TO:  Kurt Hoffman

FM:  John P. Ryan

SUBJ:  Amended Employment Agreement

DATE:  September 1, 2002

This letter amends my employment agreement with Trend Mining Company of July 1,
2001.

From September 1, 2002 my compensation per month shall be $3000 in cash. If the
Company cannot pay such sums in cash, then, at my option, I may convert the
compensation owed to restricted shares at the prevailing rate at which shares
are or were most recently sold.

This compensation is a retainer and is in exchange for my services as Secretary
and Treasurer of the Company. I will undertake these duties to the best of my
abilities and will be available for consultation, meetings, conference call,
advice and support as needed.

This agreement may be cancelled by you or by the action of the Board upon thirty
days notice. Similarly, it may be cancelled by me with thirty days notice.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Ryan
John Ryan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Kurt Hoffman, President of Trend Mining, hereby confirm the terms of Mr.
Ryan's agreement as outlined above.

/s/ Kurt Hoffman
Kurt Hoffman, President
# C_2022051EN.01001101.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Amper Metal Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-334/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2 - Transaction subject to VAT - Concept - Article 168(a) and Article 176 - Right to deduct input VAT - Refusal - Advertising services categorised as excessively expensive and not beneficial by the tax authority - Lack of turnover generated by the taxable person)

(2022/C 51/13)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Veszprémi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Amper Metal Kft

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

Article 168(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a taxable person may deduct input value added tax (VAT) paid for advertising services where such a supply of services constitutes a transaction subject to VAT within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2006/112, and has a direct and immediate link with one or more taxable output transactions or with the taxable person’s economic activity as a whole, by way of overheads, without it being necessary to take into account the fact that the price charged for such services is excessive in relation to a reference value defined by the national tax authorities or that those services have not given rise to an increase in the taxable person’s turnover.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.

---
# C_2020191EN.01000402.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2020 — E v Finanzamt N

(Case C-45/20)

(2020/C 191/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: E

Defendant: Finanzamt N

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 168(a), read in conjunction with Article 167 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) conflict with national case-law precluding the right to deduct VAT in cases in which the trader is entitled to choose the allocation of a supply at the time of purchase if the tax authorities have not adopted a decision on its allocation on expiry of the statutory deadline for submission of the annual VAT return? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 168(a), read in conjunction with Article 167 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) conflict with national case-law precluding the right to deduct VAT in cases in which the trader is entitled to choose the allocation of a supply at the time of purchase if the tax authorities have not adopted a decision on its allocation on expiry of the statutory deadline for submission of the annual VAT return?

| 2. | Does Article 168(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax conflict with national case-law whereby allocation to private assets is assumed or presumed in the absence of (sufficient) evidence for allocation to the assets of the business? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 168(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax conflict with national case-law whereby allocation to private assets is assumed or presumed in the absence of (sufficient) evidence for allocation to the assets of the business?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
Nydia PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 14, 2019

Nydia Perez, Brooksville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
# C_2020359EN.01000501.xml

| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 31 July 2020 — IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien

(Case C-357/20)

(2020/C 359/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: IE

Defendant: Magistrat der Stadt Wien

Questions referred

| 1. | How is the term ‘breeding site’ within the meaning of Article [12(1)(d)] of the Habitats Directive (1) to be understood, and how is a ‘breeding site’ to be differentiated spatially from other locations? |
| --- | --- |

1.

How is the term ‘breeding site’ within the meaning of Article [12(1)(d)] of the Habitats Directive (1) to be understood, and how is a ‘breeding site’ to be differentiated spatially from other locations?

| 2. | Which factors determine whether, and, if so, for how long, the existence of a breeding site is limited in time? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Which factors determine whether, and, if so, for how long, the existence of a breeding site is limited in time?

| 3. | Which factors determine whether deterioration or destruction of a breeding site has been caused by a particular act or omission? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Which factors determine whether deterioration or destruction of a breeding site has been caused by a particular act or omission?

| 4. | Which factors determine whether a ‘resting place’ within the meaning of Article [12(1)(d)] of the Habitats Directive has been caused to deteriorate or to be destroyed? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Which factors determine whether a ‘resting place’ within the meaning of Article [12(1)(d)] of the Habitats Directive has been caused to deteriorate or to be destroyed?

---

(1)  Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7) as last amended by Council Directive 2013/17/EU of 13 May 2013 adapting certain directives in the field of environment, by reason of the accession of the Republic of Croatia (OJ 2013 L 158, p. 193).

---
EXHIBIT 99(c)

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to

Household Finance Corporation ("HSBC" Finance")

HOUSEHOLD AUTO RECEIVABLES CORPORATION

HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOTIVE TRUST V, SERIES 2000-2

 

 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of HSBC Finance (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 4.10 of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2000 among Household Automotive Trust V, as Issuer, Household Auto Receivables Corporation, as Seller, the Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (successor to Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Trustee, (the "Agreement") that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through     December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement throughout such Year. Based on such review, the Master Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance  of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth below.

				NONE

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 1st day of March, 2005.

 

					HSBC Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith				 
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer

 

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to

Household Finance Corporation ("HSBC" Finance")

HOUSEHOLD AUTO RECEIVABLES CORPORATION

HOUSEHOLD AUTOMOTIVE TRUST V, SERIES 2000-2

 

 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of HSBC Finance, as Master Servicer, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.9 of the Indenture dated as of June 1, 2000 among Household Automotive Trust V, (the "Issuer") and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (successor to Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Indenture Trustee, that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Issuer from January 1 through December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Indenture has been made under my supervision; and

To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under this Indenture and each Series Supplement throughout such year. Based on such review, the Issuer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Indenture throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth below.

				NONE

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 1st day of March, 2005.

 

					HSBC Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith				 
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer