alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Paul G. Anderson, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FCStone Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation: and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 19, 2006



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul G. Anderson         
|Paul G. Anderson             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)



27
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00414 - CV IN RE STEVE FIELDER, RELATOR OPINION DISMISSING ORIGINAL PROCEEDING



### November 19 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Relator, Steve Fielder , filed an application for a writ of mandamus in the above referenced cause without paying the requisite filing fee. By letter dated November 4 , 2015, this court directed Fielde r to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence, and if indigent, to comply with Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Fielder was also informed that the proceeding would be dismissed if he did not comply. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 3(c) . The fee has not been paid to date, n or has Fielder filed an affidavit of indigency or sought leave to proceed without the payment of fees. Because Fielder has failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the court, we dismiss the proceeding pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). Per Curiam
# C_2022418EN.01002001.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KL v EIB

(Case T-651/20) (1)

(Civil service - Personnel of the EIB - Unjustified absences - Failure to report for medical examination - Action for annulment and for damages)

(2022/C 418/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KL (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

By his action, based on Article 270 TFEU read in conjunction with Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 February 2020 to the effect that his absences from the medical examinations of 23 December 2019, 3 and 28 February 2020 were unjustified absences under Article 3.6 of the Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB's Staff Regulations, and, secondly, compensation for the damage he suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 February 2020 that KL's absences from medical examinations on 23 December 2019, 3 and 28 February 2020 were unjustified absences under Article 3.6 of Annex X to EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 February 2020 that KL's absences from medical examinations on 23 December 2019, 3 and 28 February 2020 were unjustified absences under Article 3.6 of Annex X to EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the EIB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EIB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 443, 21.12.2020.

---
# C_2023007EN.01002201.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — LE v Commission

(Case T-475/20) (1)

(Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Debit notes issued by the Commission for the recovery of grants awarded by contract - Enforceable decision - Article 299 TFEU)

(2023/C 7/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LE (represented by: M. Straus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André, J. Estrada de Solà and S. Romoli, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 3988 final of 9 June 2020 relating to the recovery of a principal amount of EUR 275 915,12 from it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LE to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LE to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 30.11.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 686 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 686

          Designating May 18, 2024, as ``Kids to Parks Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2024

  Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. King, Ms. Collins, Ms. 
     Hirono, Mr. Daines, and Mr. Heinrich) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Designating May 18, 2024, as ``Kids to Parks Day''.

Whereas the 14th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated on May 18, 2024;
Whereas the goals of Kids to Parks Day are to--

    (1) promote healthy outdoor recreation and responsible environmental 
stewardship;

    (2) empower young people; and

    (3) encourage families to get outdoors and visit the parks and public 
land of the United States;

Whereas, on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural, suburban, and urban areas 
        of the United States can be reintroduced to the splendid national, 
        State, and neighborhood parks located in their communities;
Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety of natural 
        resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals 
        seeking outdoor recreation;
Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, should be encouraged to 
        lead more healthy and active lifestyles;
Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to take a break from 
        their busy lives and enjoy a day of active, wholesome fun; and
Whereas celebrating Kids to Parks Day will--

    (1) broaden an appreciation for nature and the outdoors in young 
people;

    (2) foster a safe setting for independent play and healthy adventure in 
neighborhood parks; and

    (3) facilitate self-reliance while strengthening communities: Now, 
therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 18, 2024, as ``Kids to Parks Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recreation and the 
        preservation of open spaces in promoting the health and 
        education of the young people of the United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Kids to Parks Day with safe family trips to parks.
                                 <all>
```
1

Filed 5/14/13 P. v. Combs CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

GARY CHRISTOPHER COMBS,

Defendant an d Appellant. C071811

(Super. Ct. No. 11F0002250)

Appointed counsel for defendant Gary Christopher Combs asked this court to

review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People

v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ).) Finding no arguable error that would result in

a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.

I

In December 2011, defendant pleaded no contest to grand theft of personal

property and was sentenced to three years in count y jail, two years of which were

suspended subject to mandatory supervision, in accordance with his plea. Defendant also

was ordered to pay restitution to his victim in the amount of $41,933.38. Defendant did

not appeal from that order.2

On August 10, 201 2, the trial court held a restitution hearing on the People's

motion to add another $3,687.96 to the order for restitution. The court ordered the

additional restitution amount over defendant's objection. Defendant appeals from that

order.

II

Appointed counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and

asking this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable

issues on appeal. ( Wende

, supra , 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of

the right to f

ile a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing the opening brief.

More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

BLEASE , Acting P. J.

We concur:

MURRAY , J.

HOCH , J.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 5

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS                       [RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON LOGO]
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
Member Firm of
Grant Thornton International


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

As independent public accountants to Axcan Pharma Inc., we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-97879)
pertaining to the Axcan Pharma Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated on
January 9, 2002 and in the related Prospectus and in Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-75200) pertaining to the Axcan Pharma Inc. Stock Option Plan
as Amended and Restated on December 19, 2000 and in the related prospectus of
our report dated November 12, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Axcan Pharma Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Form 40-F for
the year ended September 30, 2002.


/s/ Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton
-------------------------------------
RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON
Chartered accountants
General Partnership



Montreal, Quebec
January 27, 2003



Suite 1900
National Bank Tower
600 de La Gauchetiere Street West
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4L8
Telephone: (514) 878-2691
James Bernard PLEAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Deitrick JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3518

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed,*
Lisa Meshelle PERRY v. STATE

CR-15-1051

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ELOISA M AR ISOL R E SENDIZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-71130 Age n c y No. A076-688-423 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Eloisa M arisol R e se ndiz , a

native and c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing he r a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s re m ova l orde r. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § § § § 1252. W e re vie wde novo c onstitutiona l c la i m s a nd que s tions of la

w. P e c he nk

ov 

# FIL ED MAY28 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).v . Holde r , 705 F.3d 444, 449 (9th C ir. 2012). W e dism iss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the p e tition for re v i e w B e c a use R e se ndizis re m ova

ble unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a )(2)(B )(i) ba se d on he r c onvic tion for a

n offe n se re lating to a

c ontrolle d substa

nc e , a nd unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a )(2)(A)(iii) ba s e d on he r c onvic tion for a n a ggravate d fe lony , our jurisdic tion is lim

ite d to c olora

ble c onstitutiona

l c la im s or que stions of la w. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(C )-(D). R e se ndiz ’ s c o n te ntion tha t the a ge nc y

a buse d its disc re tion in de te rm ining tha t she ha d be e n c onvic t e d of a pa rtic ula rly se rious c rim e doe s not ra ise a

c onstitutiona

l c la im or c olora ble que s tion of la

wtha t would invoke our jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a )(2)(D). Se e Pe c he nk ov , 705 F.3d at 447-49 (holding tha

t § 1252(a)(2)(C ) barre d re vie w of the a ge nc y ’ s finding tha t pe titione r’ s a ggravate d fe lony c onvic tion wa s a

pa rtic ula rly se rious c rim e whe re pe titione r sought only “ a

re -we ighing of the fa c tors involve d in tha t disc re tiona

ry de te rm i nation” ). W e are not pe rsua de d tha t the B IA e rre d in noting the drug involve d

and the loc ation of thetra

n s a c tion in its dete rm ination tha t R e se ndizdid not e sta

blish tha t he r drug c onvic t ion is not a pa rtic ula rly se rious c rim e . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 2 - 7 1 1 3 0 2
Joseph WEITZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 104603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30572]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12613]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Jose Maria Velasco'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Jose Maria Velasco'' at the 
Minneapolis Institute of Art, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-30572 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1/03/24 2:55PM

B2030 (Form 2030) (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of Texas

In re Stringer Farms, Inc,. Case No. 24-20001-11

Debtor(s) Chapter 11

DISCLOSURE OF COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR(S)

1. Pursuant to 11 U .S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. Bankr. P. 2016(b), I certify that I am the attorney for the above named debtor(s) and that

compensation paid to me within one year before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, or agreed to be paid to me, for services rendered or to

be rendered on behalf of the debtor(s) in contemplation of or in connection with the bankruptcy case is as follows:

For legal services, I have agreed to accept $ 10,000.00

Prior to the filing of this statement I have received $ 10,000.00

Balance Due $ 0.00

2. The source of the compensation paid to me was:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

3. The source of compensation to be paid to me is:

 Debtor  Other (specify):

4.  I have not agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with any other person unless they are members and associates of my law firm.

 I have agreed to share the above-disclosed compensation with a person or persons who are not members or associates of my law firm. A

copy of the agreement, together with a list of the names of the people sharing in the compensation is attached.

5. In return for the above-disclosed fee, I have agreed to render legal service for all aspects of the bankruptcy case, including:

a. Analysis of the debtor's financial situation, and rendering advice to the debtor in determining whether to file a petition in bankruptcy;

b. Preparation and filing of any petition, schedules, statement of affairs and plan which may be required;

c. Representation of the debtor at the meeting of creditors and confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

d. [Other provisions as needed]

Negotiations with creditors; exemption planning; preparation and filing of Disclosure Statement and Plan and

applications as needed; preparation and filing of motions. Representation of Debtor in motions for relief from

stay and in any other actions.

6. By agreement with the debtor(s), the above-disclosed fee does not include the following service:

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a complete statement of any agreement or arrangement for payment to me for representation of the debtor(s) in

this bankruptcy proceeding.

January 3, 2024 /s/ Max R. Tarbox

Date Max R. Tarbox 19639950

Signature of Attorney

Tarbox Law, P.C.

2301 Broadway

Lubbock, TX 79401

(806) 686-4448 Fax: (806) 368-9785

tami@tarboxlaw.com

Name of law firm

Case 24-20001-rlj11 Doc 11 Filed 01/03/24 Entered 01/03/24 14:59:43 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### Holgate et al., *Appellants,*v. F. A. P. Jones, *Appellee.*

Division B.

Decision Filed July 13, 1927.

Petition for Rehearing Denied October 3, 1927.

*John M. Murrell,*for Appellants;

*B. F. Burdine*and *Edward E. Fleviing,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a deficiency decree predicated upon a decree foreclosing a purchase money *204mortgage. As. the foundation decree has been this day reversed, the decree herein in reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.