alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Feasibility Trials of the NIH Music-based Interventions Toolkit for Brain Disorders of Aging (R34 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         February 14, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Baila S. Hall, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-9285,                         *baila.hall@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2024.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-31209 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Natalie Wall FOWLKES v. Justin David FOWLKES

NO. 2018-CJ-1989

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Jerry E. Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jerry E. Vaughn    
|                       
|Jerry E. Vaughn        
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 27, 2004
# C_2022284EN.01002502.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Condor; rescue aid)

(Case T-577/20) (1)

(State aid - German air transport market - Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty - Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group - Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself - Risk of disruption to an important service)

(2022/C 284/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Birnstiel and S. Blazek, lawyers)

Re:

By its action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 7429 final of 14 October 2019 on State aid SA.55394 (2019/N) — Germany — Rescue aid to Condor (OJ 2020 C 294, p. 3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs, and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs, and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Condor Flugdienst GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Condor Flugdienst GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.

---
Fletcher L. MCKINNEY & Nancy McKinney, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1959        General geology and structural features of the Birmingham red iron ore district, Alabama

publication        February 15, 2023        Generalized additive model estimation of no-flow fractions and L-moments to support flow-duration curve quantile estimation using selected probability distributions for bay and estuary restoration in the Gulf States

publication        September 21, 2020        Methods for estimating selected low-flow frequency statistics and mean annual flow for ungaged locations on streams in Alabama

publication        April 8, 2015        Revised hydrogeologic framework of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and parts of Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina

publication        January 1, 2000        Sources, instream transport, and trends of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment in the lower Tennessee River basin, 1980-96

publication        January 1, 1979        Biological and microbiological assessment of the upper Chattahoochee River basin, Georgia

publication        September 4, 2012        Radioisotopic data of sediment collected in Mobile and Bon Secour Bays, Alabama

publication        March 10, 2010        Geomorphology of mesophotic coral ecosystems: Current perspectives on morphology, distribution, and mapping strategies
# C_2021502EN.01002102.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Intis v EUIPO — Televes (TELEVEND)

(Case T-112/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark TELEVEND - Earlier EU word mark TELEVES - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 502/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Intis d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: T. Nagy, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Televes, SA (Santiago de Compostela, Spain) (represented by: F. Peña López, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2019 (Case R 1923/2019 5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Televes and Intis.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Intis d.o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Intis d.o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
P-G
NWALES

Cn EMP-O9=03

O1Z1306 NWALSS

2
=

RE

alze354

OLZ33¢ NWALES

Ob24:19

23 NWALS&

NWALGE

RAG

BT108 RS

Giztsas RIG

heading northw one eighty

when you're able clearec

@ arciva

okay direct to gollf five arrival

northwest one eight

eight a1 gopher

for the gopher

scretion

arn oh nercthwest ane

one eighty @ig

zero heading for northwest one eighty eight

there anyway you can

just dealing
ail ah that
time

this is sector thirteen

aixte ren northwest
sight we

couple of



8

an
ww

Ra

ad

a2

a4

9256

a

ith you out of

nerthwest one eighty genter roger a
¥

how much fuel do you

we *{igot) plenty of fuel
I B Y

two hours of fuel

eleven the

northwest one

okay two eight zero

northwes
and the

t one eighty eight
gopher five arrival

eighty eig

northw ane @i¢
orief explanati

ah * (just)

minneap

northwes

one

*itwe @

direct to

ah you want us to qo

noel hwes
expect

one eighty ah fly bh

i ading two eight zero
direct olise in about ah four

ere miles



“OAL

Page 6 of .
NWALES ght

0127347 RL ah

G27: 50 NWALEB

8128

G128:02 RL northwest heading two

O1Z8214 R16

ene

NWALEG

Ris



Federal Aviation
Administration

Aix Route Traffi
od from October

iption c
6 R posit
22, 2009, O1

RLS

RIS
NWALSIO

WELBE
eyex High Controller R13

on of the

m invalying HWALSB.

Manager

mah hand
axpand
take him or

watching him you wanna

to ke him



L-C=ZME~

Be
NWALBS

RIG take him

RL a lot

RIG minneapolis

Ri6 nor minneapolis

Ris £ en ten min is

MWALS read northwes t

BiG northwest fifteen if you would tra on ah

and

o1i4:20 NWALSIG want um thir OTe

¥ @lahe to c

BIG

on that

NWAISIO *

RL6 sixteen
OlL4s49 RLL
RLL you talking to that y eight now
or funinatelligi
Gh Ri6 nope

0114258 R1G

OL14

ight



P-GL-C~EMP-03-011

NWA1S8

Page 3 a

O1L5:01

O1E5:30

=
i
fo)

8116355

RIS

NWALS10

RLG

Rig

DLs

oh ya you're right maybe son

ah i broad

chat. about

tw

nty three

net
ast 4

ten

two

be on your frequency

thank you

sommunicat Lone

ty

an altitude

ah give

hi

three two

ading and a what wou

ah

two

contact

hing is

minne.

ike them going

Ehirty two thousand and two ten on the

affirmat

northwe.

t

ow in

heac

aa

iappenin

thirty

how

ng

EL

ve

he

for
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4109** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ROBERT TAM , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Sout h Carolina , at Charleston
. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 2:09

- cr - 01343

- SB

- 1 )

Submitted : July 19, 2011 Decided: August 5, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Cameron J. Blazer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Nettles, United States Attorney, M. Rhett DeHart, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Tam pleaded guilty to embezzlement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. A. § 657 (West Supp. 20 11 ). The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2009) called for a sentencing range of thirty

- three to forty

- one mont hs, and Tam received a thirty

- month sentence. Tam now appeals, claiming that the district court imposed a procedurally unreasonable sentence because it failed to provide an adequate explanation for the sentence imposed. We affirm. We review a sentence for reasonableness under an abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). A sentence is procedurally reasonable where the district court properly calculated the defendant’s advisory Guidelines range, considered the 18 U.S .C. § 3553(a) (2006) sentencing factors, analyzed any arguments presented by the parties, and sufficiently explained the selected sentence. Id. at 49

- 50. The district court is not required to “robotically tick through § 3553(a)’s every subsection.” Uni ted States v. Johnson , 445 F.3d 339, 345 (4th Cir. 2006). However, the district court “must place on the record an ‘individualized assessment’ based on the particular facts of the case before it. This individualized assessment need not be elaborate or le ngthy, but it must provide a rationale tailored to the particular case at hand and adequate to permit ‘meaningful appellate review.’”3 United States v. Carter , 564 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir. 2009) (quoting Gall , 552 U.S. at 50) (internal footnote omitted). Upon review, we conclude that the district court provided an adequate individualized assessment, taking into account counsel’s arguments for a below

- Guidelines sentence, and did not abuse its discretion in imposing Tam’s thirty

- month
sentence. See Unite d States v. Lynn , 592 F.3d 572, 576, 578 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing standard of review for properly preserved procedural sentencing error); see also Gall , 552 U.S. at 46. We accordingly affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Barry YAMPOL, Appellant, v. TURNBERRY ISLE SOUTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D17-2752

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2022171EN.01000401.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS)

(Case C-162/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 60, first paragraph - Unauthorised absence - Scope - Deduction from annual leave - Withholding of salary - Official who has failed to fulfil his or her obligations under Articles 21 and 55 of the Staff Regulations)

(2022/C 171/04)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: WV (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, abogado, and F.-M. Hislaire, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 29 January 2020, WV v EEAS (T-471/18, not published, EU:T:2020:26); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 29 January 2020, WV v EEAS (T-471/18, not published, EU:T:2020:26);

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 27 November 2017 to impose a deduction from salary amounting to 72 calendar days and the decision of the EEAS of 2 May 2018 rejecting the appellant’s complaint lodged on 3 January 2018; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 27 November 2017 to impose a deduction from salary amounting to 72 calendar days and the decision of the EEAS of 2 May 2018 rejecting the appellant’s complaint lodged on 3 January 2018;

| 3. | Orders the EEAS to repay to the appellant the amounts wrongly deducted from her remuneration, amounting to 71,5 days, together with interest at the rate of 5 % per annum from the date on which they were deducted; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EEAS to repay to the appellant the amounts wrongly deducted from her remuneration, amounting to 71,5 days, together with interest at the rate of 5 % per annum from the date on which they were deducted;

| 4. | Orders the EEAS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by WV at first instance and in the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the EEAS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by WV at first instance and in the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
Jovontai Qudrius DICKERSON v. STATE

CR-15-1510

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied August 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis J. D’Ambrosio,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to my knowledge, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ LOUIS  J. D’AMBROSIO           |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Louis J. D’Ambrosio                |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| August 9, 2006                     |

 

----
# C_2022171EN.01001001.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo no 1 de Pontevedra — Spain) — UN v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedra

(Case C-409/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals - Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) - National legislation providing for the imposition, in the event of illegal stay, of a fine together with an obligation to leave the territory - Possibility of regularising the stay within a prescribed period - Article 7(1) and (2) - Period for voluntary departure)

(2022/C 171/12)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo no 1 de Pontevedra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UN

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedra

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, in particular Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) of that directive, read in conjunction with Article 6(4), and Article 7(1) and (2) of that directive, must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which penalises a third-country national staying illegally in the territory of that Member State, in the absence of aggravating circumstances, initially by a fine together with an obligation to leave the territory of that Member State within a prescribed period unless, before the expiry of that period, that third-country national’s stay is regularised and, subsequently, if that third-country national’s stay is not regularised, by a decision ordering his or her compulsory removal, provided that that period is set in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 7(1) and (2) of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 12, 2009   /s/ Ray A. Smith Ray A. Smith, President (Principal Executive Officer)
Louie WISE, Appellant, v. 623 RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC, as assignee of Seaside National Bank and Trust, and Classic Auto Holdings, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellees.

No. 4D18-659

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.