alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - hawaii(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - montana(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea, showing generalized distribution of lava...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1972        Generalized geologic map of the Eocene Absaroka volcanic field

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea with generalized surface distribution of ...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2018        Nantucket and Marthas Vineyard geologic illustrations

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2013        Geology of the Anza-Terwilliger Area, California

Charts or Graphs        April 1, 2023        Geologic map of the Timber Hill basalt Sweetwater Hills, Montana

Charts or Graphs        July 11, 2021        Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        Map shows hill-shaded bathymetric, backscatter, and photographic data

Charts or Graphs        June 15, 2018        Kilauea Volcano -- Lower East Rift Zone lava flows and fissures

Charts or Graphs        June 10, 2016        Potential Marine Benthic Habitats of Monterey Canyon and Vicinity

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        IMMeRSS Cruise expedition area

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2012        Acoustic Backscatter Intensity
ex10-a.htm


Exhibit 10.a

 

Last Reviewed June 23, 2016

 

TWIN DISC, INCORPORATED

 

 

DIRECTOR TENURE AND RETIREMENT POLICY

 

This Director Tenure and Retirement Policy of Twin Disc, Incorporated (the “Corporation”) replaces all prior tenure and retirement policies and is effective January 21, 2011. Such prior policies shall remain applicable only to previously retired Directors. This policy shall be reviewed periodically by the Directors’ Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Committee”), and any proposed changes shall be subject to approval of the full Board of Directors (the “Board”).

 

1. Director Independence. The Corporation requires that each of the Board’s outside Directors be and remain for his/her entire tenure independent from any conflicts of interest in representing the interests of the shareholders. Accordingly, no outside Director shall be elected or nominated for election to the Board if such person, a member of such person’s family or his/her employer has a material or significant business relationship with the Corporation, its affiliates or major suppliers. The Committee will review and confirm on an annual basis the independence of the outside Directors, pursuant to the applicable standards then in effect.

 

2. Director Tenure. No outside Director or candidate shall be considered or allowed to stand for election to the Board if he/she shall have reached 72 years of age at the time of such election.

 

Any outside Director whose employment status materially changes, through retirement or otherwise, may, subject to Committee review, remain on the Board until his/her current term expires and, provided he/she has not reached 72 years of age upon expiration of his/her current term, will be eligible for nomination for election to one or more additional three-year term(s).

 

Any inside Director whose employment by this Corporation terminates for any reason is expected to resign from the Board effective as of the commencement of the next regular or special meeting of the Board following said termination. However, any Director who retires from the Corporation as its Chief Executive Officer may remain on the Board until his/her current term expires and will be eligible, for nomination for election to one or more additional three-year term(s).

 

3. Director Retirement. Provided that he/she serves at least one complete three-year term, an outside Director who retires from the Board, resigns from the Board, or decides not to stand for re-election to the Board (i.e. reaches “retirement”) shall be entitled to annual retirement pay equal to the cash portion of the annual Director’s retainer (exclusive of any committee chair fees) last paid to the Director prior to his/her retirement.

 

Retirement payments shall be payable quarterly, between the first and fifteenth days of each December, March, June and September (commencing on the first such quarterly date following the effective date of retirement), and shall continue for the number of quarters equivalent to the period of his/her service as a Director or until his/her death, whichever occurs first.
STATE of Louisiana v. Leopold "Chuck" LACOSTE, II

No. 2018-KP-1084

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated an application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Weimer, J., recused.
# C_2021502EN.01002402.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2021 — Jiruš v EUIPO — Nile Clothing (Racing Syndicate)

(Case T-356/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Racing Syndicate - Earlier international word mark SYNDICATE - Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2021/C 502/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Václav Jiruš (Vitín, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Zedníková, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nile Clothing AG (Sutz-Lattrigen, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Raßmann, M. Suether and F. Adinolfi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 March 2020 (Case R 1488/2019-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Nile Clothing and Mr Jiruš.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Václav Jiruš to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Václav Jiruš to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SYNAVANT Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford A. Farren, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/CLIFFORD A. FARREN, JR.Clifford A. Farren, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

March      ,
2003

---

QuickLinks
1389.

#### GARBUTT LUMBER CO. *v.*WILCOX *&*PARSONS.

The only question in this ease is fully' controlled by the decision of this court in *Bass Dry Goods Go.*v. *Roberts Goal Go.,*4 *Ga. App.*520 (01 S. E. 1134).

Action on contract, from city court of Abbeville — Judge Nicholson. August 20, 1908.

Submitted November 25, 1908.' —

Decided April 15, 1909.

*Hal Lawson,*for plaintiff in error. *Haygood & Quits,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

Wilcox *&*Parsons brought suit against the Garbutt Lumber Company for a balance claimed to be due on a contract. The defense filed was that there had been full settlement of all demands arising out of the contract sued on. The jury found a verdict for the full amount, with interest; and the defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled. The case made by the evidence is *53substantially as follows: There was a dispute between the parties as to the correct amount clue under the contract ; Wilcox *&*Parsons contending that the amount was $135, and the Garbutt Lumber Company insisting that it was $75. After some correspondence between the parties on the subject, without an agreement as to the amount due, Wilcox & Parsons drew a draft on the Garbutt Lumber Company for $125, and delivered it to Wilkinson, cashier of the Citizens Bank of Abbeville, for collection. Wilkinson notified the lumber company by letter that he held the draft for collection, and received a reply from the lumber company denying the indebtedness of $125, but stating' that it was willing to send check for $75, if this was satisfactory. Wilkinson notified Wilcox *&*Parsons that the lumber company would not pay the $125, but would pay $75. Wilcox & Parsons thereupon drew another draft through the bank on the lumber company for $75, and this draft was promptly paid. When Parsons, a member of the firm of Wilcox & Parsons, was informed by Wilkinson that the lumber company refused to pay the draft for $125, and would pay only $75 in settlement of the matter, he (Parsons) drew the draft for $75, and said that he would “see about the balance.”

We think that Wilkinson was the agent of Wilcox & Parsons, and the information that he had, that the lumber company refused to pay the $125 in settlement, was information received by them. But this is immaterial, as Parsons, a member of the firm- of Wilcox & Parsons, admitted that he had actual knowledge that the lumber company denied owing the $125, and would pay only $75, in full settlement. With this knowledge, Wilcox & Parsons drew the draft for the $75, and received and kept the money. The dispute as to the amount due was settled, and the debt was paid in full. If Wilcox *&*Parsons did not intend that the payment of the $75 by the lumber company should be in full payment of the debt, they should have refused the $75 and not have drawn the draft for this amount when it was offered by the lumber company in full settlement, and collected and retained the money. *Bass Dry Goods Co.*v. *Roberts Coal Co.,*4 *Ga. App.*520 (61 S. E. 1134). The verdict to the contrary was wholly unauthorized by the evidence and the law, and the judgment refusing a new trial must be *Reversed.*
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Canate, Elvia, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>GEICO Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered October 27, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>For the reasons stated in<i> Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Serv.; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Mathurin, Rebecca v GEICO Ins. Co.</i> (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-2886 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><br>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.<br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 10, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Darrick L. MCFADDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# Email Protection

## You are unable to access this email address www.fanniemae.com

The website from which you got to this page is protected by Cloudflare. Email addresses on that page have been hidden in order to keep them from being accessed by malicious bots. **You must enable Javascript in your browser in order to decode the e-mail address**.

If you have a website and are interested in protecting it in a similar way, you can sign up for Cloudflare.

                  - How does Cloudflare protect email addresses on website from spammers?
                  - Can I sign up for Cloudflare?

Cloudflare Ray ID: **87450023fc594e5a**•      Your IP:      Click to reveal68.60.74.180•Performance & security byCloudflare
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Ray Smith, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trycera Financial, Inc..;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 23, 2010
/s/ Ray SmithRay SmithChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - new mexico(1)
              - rhode island(1)

## By Year

General        August 2, 2018        370.410.1 - Training - General Provision

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

General        December 29, 2023        Science Information Service (SIS)

General        July 11, 2019        Giuseppina Mattietti

General        July 11, 2019        Madalyn Blondes

General        July 11, 2019        Sally Sennert

General        May 1, 2019        General Questions To Pose While Exploring Topographic Maps

General        July 11, 2019        Alanna Simpson

General        July 11, 2019        Geoff Gilleaudeau

General        July 11, 2019        Jacob Richardson

General        July 11, 2019        William F. Hoover

General        July 11, 2019        Jess Rodysill

General        January 24, 2023        Don't Take It for Granite

General        August 3, 2018        429.1 - Space Management

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

General        March 1, 2018        Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer: Clifford I. Voss

General        July 30, 2020        New Mexico Water Science Center Sediment Laboratory
David JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

David Jimenez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.