alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Barbara A. Ras, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Distributors
Holding Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: May 5, 2006

                                              /s/ Barbara A. Ras
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Barbara A. Ras
                                              Chief Financial Officer/Principal
                                              Financial & Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6291
KEITH WILLIAM DEBLASIO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-3162-JFM) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 17, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith William DeBlasio, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on October 22, 1996; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on February 20, 1997, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Advanced Airport Pavement Designs (RPD 144)

Contract Funds ($K)

*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  May 15, 2007

/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7853** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CHESTER LEE BARNES, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:07

- cr - 00351

- BO

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 00052

- BO )

Submitted : February 8, 2013 Decided: February 13, 2013

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Chester Lee Barnes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ch ester Lee Barnes, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Un ited States v. Barnes , Nos. 5:07

- cr - 00351

- BO

1; 5:12

- cv - 00052

- BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 17, 2014 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Li Fushen          
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Li Fushen              
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - hawaii(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - montana(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea, showing generalized distribution of lava...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1972        Generalized geologic map of the Eocene Absaroka volcanic field

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1997        Geologic map of Mauna Kea with generalized surface distribution of ...

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2018        Nantucket and Marthas Vineyard geologic illustrations

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2013        Geology of the Anza-Terwilliger Area, California

Charts or Graphs        April 1, 2023        Geologic map of the Timber Hill basalt Sweetwater Hills, Montana

Charts or Graphs        July 11, 2021        Geologic block-diagram and conceptual model of Mammoth Hot Springs

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        Map shows hill-shaded bathymetric, backscatter, and photographic data

Charts or Graphs        June 15, 2018        Kilauea Volcano -- Lower East Rift Zone lava flows and fissures

Charts or Graphs        June 10, 2016        Potential Marine Benthic Habitats of Monterey Canyon and Vicinity

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        IMMeRSS Cruise expedition area

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2012        Acoustic Backscatter Intensity

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(15)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - (-)2022(2)

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileMichelle Guy
STATE EX REL. Aaron Orlando RICHARDS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-2016

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Reconsideration granted; relief denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant reconsideration and grant relief.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
Janie R. EMERY and James S. Emery v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC. D/B/A Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, Dwayne Anderson, M.D., Radiology Associates, L.L.C., April Adler, R.N., Kellie Schneller, R.N., Cheryl Small, R.N. and Paula N. Vaughn, R.N.

NO. 2018-CC-1853

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

*792Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Chayse Alec JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 13, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Claire V. Madill, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-2314

_____________________________

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER LEE PERKINS,

Appellee.

___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

Richard B. Davis, Jr., Acting Circuit Court Judge.

April 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and JAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Virginia Chester Harris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
2

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q accompanying this statement.

The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of XM Satellite Radio Inc. (Inc.), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q of Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inc.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    HUGH PANERO                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Hugh Panero                                         
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER                          
|                   |  |  |  | Joseph J. Euteneuer                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inc. and will be
retained by Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

****

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Sea Sun Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, the undersigned, Graham Millington, the President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and		      - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		        Dated:              August 22, 2005                                             /s/ Graham Millington              			                                                                                              Graham Millington			                                                                                              President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Terry JONES

No. 2018-KP-1225

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
----

Exhibit No. 32 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American LorainCorporation (Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),I, Si Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

Dated: February 20, 2008 

/s/ Si Chen             Si Chen Chief Executive Officer 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American LorainCorporation (Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),I, Huanxiang Cheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

Dated: February 20, 2008 

/s/ Jing Wu            Jing Wu Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by American LorainCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

----
Approved by:  AFS­200

InFO

Information for Operators

U.S. Department InFO 06001

of Transportation DATE: 10/30/06

Federal Aviation

Administration Flight Standards Service

Washington, DC

http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/info

An InFO contains valuable information for operators that should help them meet certain administrative, regulatory, or operational requirements with relatively low urgency or impact on safety.

Subject: Introducing InFOs.

Background: FAA Order 8000.91, Information for Operators (INFO), dated October 20, 2006, establishes the authority for the InFO process and describes some of the features of the process. The purpose of Order 8000.91 compares to that of the Safety Alert for Operators (SAFO). Much 

like SAFOs, which contain critical safety information, an InFO message contains valuable 

information for operators that should help them meet certain administrative, regulatory, or

operational requirements with relatively low urgency or impact on safety. InFOs contain 

information or a combination of information and recommended action to be taken by the 

respective operators identified in each individual InFO.

Discussion: An InFO does not burden FAA inspectors or operators with requirements. Instead,

an InFO exploits the power of electronic mail and the Internet to share important information 

broadly and quickly. Besides helping air carriers in meeting their administrative and safety 

related obligations, InFOs should be valuable in promoting their performance and, hence, their

business interests.

Recommended Action: Besides FAA inspectors, air carrier certificate holders ­ particularly 

directors of safety (DOS) and directors of operations (DO) ­ fractional ownership program 

managers, and training center managers should know of the InFO process and should pay 

particular attention to any InFO bearing directly on their operations. Operators should consider 

immediate implementation of any applicable action recommended in an InFO.

The FAA strives to notify the appropriate contact person for each operator affected by a new 

InFO. However, DOS, DO, fractional ownership program managers, training center managers, and any other person involved in operations of transport category airplanes should make a habit 

of regular visits to the InFO Web site.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-3510

Lower Tribunal No. CF 23-243

_____________________________

OSCAR DANIEL SANCHEZ,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County.

Angela J. Cowden, Judge.

August 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and NARDELLA and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED