alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 22, 2006
 Volkswagen Auto Lease Underwritten Funding, LLC
VW Credit Leasing, LTD.Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust 2005-A
  Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
    
    333-121824
333-121824-01
333-121824-02
    
    11-365048-3
38-6738618
20-6418328(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (Registrants I.R.S.
Employer Identification
Nos.)
 3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326
   
  
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01. Other Events.Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESExhibit indexVALT 2005-1 Servicer Certificate for the Collection Period Ended 04/29/06    Table of Contents  
 Item 8.01. Other Events.
  
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
     ExhibitNo.
    
    Document Description99.1
    
    Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust 2005-A Servicer Certificate for the
Collection Period ended April 29, 2006 provided to JP Morgan Chase
N.A., as indenture trustee. (Filed with this report.)




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Dated: May 22, 2006
    Volkswagen Auto Lease Underwritten Funding, LLCBy:
    /s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant Treasurer VW Credit Leasing, LTD.By:
    VW Credit, Inc. as Servicer By:
    /s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant Treasurer Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust 2005-ABy:
    VW Credit, Inc. as Administrator By:
    /s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant Treasurer




---



##### Table of Contents



ExhibitNo.
    
    Document Description99.1
    
    Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust 2005-A Servicer Certificate for the
Collection Period ended April 29, 2006 provided to JP Morgan Chase
N.A., as indenture trustee. (Filed with this report.)
2106.

#### Kelly *v.*The State.

Accusation of gaming, from city court of Monroe — Judge Dean. August *12,*1909.

Submitted October 6, —

Decided October 13, 1909

*Joseph E. Felker,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. S.*Upshaw, *solicitor, Eal G.*Nowell, contra.

Powell, J.

1. The evidence was legally sufficient to authorize a conviction. There was no error in the charge of the court.

2. Affidavits not a part of the record can not be considered by this court.

*■Judgment affirmed.*
EX PARTE Aaron Lamont JOHNSON

CR-16-0694

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Jefferson Cir. Ct.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing owner ofCampbell Alternative Asset Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
E 2

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:    /s/ Bruce L. Cleland    Bruce L. Cleland    Chief Executive Officer
# C_2020087EN.01002002.xml

| 16.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/20

---

Action brought on 11 December 2019 — Multi-Service v Commission

(Case T-873/19)

(2020/C 87/25)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Multi-Service S.A. (Kwidzyn, Poland) (represented by: P. Jankowski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision ARES (2019) 6103796 of 3 October 2019 concerning registration in the registry in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661, Registry ID 9920, and re-registration of the undertaking in the registry; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision ARES (2019) 6103796 of 3 October 2019 concerning registration in the registry in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661, Registry ID 9920, and re-registration of the undertaking in the registry;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | admit as evidence the letter of 23 October 2019. |
| --- | --- |

—

admit as evidence the letter of 23 October 2019.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.

The applicant alleges that the defendant infringed Article 17 of Regulation No 517/2014, in conjunction with Article 6 of Implementing Regulation 2019/661, in so far as it wrongly removed the registration of the applicant undertaking from the registry for hydrofluorocarbons (HFC).

---
# C_2023024EN.01000401.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Överklagandenämnden för studiestöd — Sweden) — MCM v Centrala studiestödsnämnden

(Case C-638/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for persons - Article 45 TFEU - Equal treatment - Social advantages - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(2) - Financial aid for higher education studies in another Member State - Residence requirement - Alternative requirement of social integration for non-resident students - Situation of a student who is a national of the State granting the aid, residing since birth in the State of studies)

(2023/C 24/04)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Överklagandenämnden för studiestöd

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MCM

Defendant: Centrala studiestödsnämnden

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union

must be interpreted as meaning that those provisions do not preclude legislation of a Member State by which the grant of financial aid for the pursuit of studies in the host Member State, to the child of a person who has left the host Member State in which that person worked in order to return to live in the first Member State, of which he or she is a national, is made subject to the requirement that the child have a connection with the Member State of origin, in a situation where, first, the child has lived since birth in the host Member State and, second, the Member State of origin makes other nationals not satisfying the residence requirement and who apply for such financial aid to study in another Member State subject to the requirement of the existence of a connection.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
Exhibit 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Brian C. Woolf, Chief Financial Officer of Rubicon Medical
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal
                  year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d));
                  and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2005                                 /s/ Brian C. Woolf
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Brian C. Woolf
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Rubicon Medical Corporation and will be
retained by Rubicon Medical Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Mia MCDANIEL v. STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., and Marcia Daniel And Horace Mann Property and Casualty and Insurance Company and Dusty Treat Agency, LLC and XYZ Insurance Company

NO. 2018-CC-1840

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Inyx, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year
ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Jack Kachkar, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the small business issuer. /s/ Jack Kachkar Jack Kachkar
Chief Executive Officer April 15, 2005
Larry Darnell CARGILL v. STATE

CR-16-0485

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021278EN.01002402.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 11 September 2020 — A.K. v Skarb Państwa

(Case C-428/20)

(2021/C 278/34)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A.K.

Defendant: Skarb Państwa

Question referred

Under Article 2 of Directive 2005/14/EC of 11 May 2005 amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, (1) is a Member State, which has established a transitional period within which to adapt minimum guarantees, under an obligation to increase guarantees to at least a half of the amounts provided for in Article 1(2) of Directive 84/5/EEC, as amended, within 30 months of the expiry of the time limit for implementing that directive:

| — | in respect of all motor insurance contracts in force after the expiry of those 30 months, including contracts concluded before 11 December 2009 but still in force after that date — in cases of damage occurring after 11 December 2009, |
| --- | --- |

—

in respect of all motor insurance contracts in force after the expiry of those 30 months, including contracts concluded before 11 December 2009 but still in force after that date — in cases of damage occurring after 11 December 2009,

| — | or only in respect of new motor insurance contracts concluded after 11 December 2009? |
| --- | --- |

—

or only in respect of new motor insurance contracts concluded after 11 December 2009?

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 14.

---
# C_2020161EN.01004001.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/40

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 27 February 2020 — Republic of Poland v PL Holdings Sàrl

(Case C-109/20)

(2020/C 161/52)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant and cross-respondent: Republic of Poland

Appellant and cross-respondent: PL Holdings Sàrl

Question referred

Do Articles 267 and 344 TFEU, as interpreted in Achmea, (1) mean that an arbitration agreement is invalid if it has been concluded between a Member State and an investor — where an investment agreement contains an arbitration clause that is invalid as a result of the fact that the contract was concluded between two Member States — [despite the fact that] the Member State, after arbitration proceedings were commenced by the investor, refrains, by the free will of the State, from raising objections as to jurisdiction?

---

(1)  Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 March 2018 (Case C-284/16, Achmea, EU:C:2018:158).

---
State of Louisiana, MILITARY DEPARTMENT and Department of Public Safety, Office of State Police v. EXPLO SYSTEMS, INC., Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, and Seneca Specialty Insurance Company

NO. 2018-CC-2006

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 10a0016n.06 No. 08-4595 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
C LA R EN C E B O G A

N , III , Pla int if f- Ap pe lla nt,
v. KEVI N MCDONOUG H, et al., De fe nd ants -A

pp e lle e s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P E AL F ROM THE UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STRI CT CO UR T F OR

T H EN O RT HE RN D IS T R IC T O F O H IO

B EF ORE: ME RRI TT , G I B B ON S, a nd RO GE RS, C ir c uit

Judg e s. ROGERS, Ci rcuit Judge. In this appea l, Plaintiff Clarenc e Bog an, I I I challeng es the district court’s dismissal of his c ivil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) . On September 28, 2009,
a ft e r th e a p p e a l w a s d o c k e t e d , B o g anm o v e d t o d i s m i s s h i s a

p p e a l
. A c c o r d i n g l y , th e c o urtgr ants B og an’ s mo tio n to dis mis s th e a pp e a l.
EX PARTE Bradget JORDAN

CR-16-0948

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Nicholas Steve MALAMATOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1247

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Stephania A. Gournaris, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Blain A. Goff, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Malamatos appeals from the order revoking his probation. We affirm the order without comment based on the trial court's finding that Malamatos willfully and substantially violated condition 5 of his probation. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the finding that Malamatos violated condition 8 of his probation and to enter a corrected revocation order. *See* *King v. State*, 915 So.2d 764, 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (concluding that the State failed to meet its burden of proving a willful and substantial violation of the community service hours condition of probation, affirming the revocation of probation, and remanding for the trial court to strike the finding that appellant violated the community service hours condition); *see also* *Bryant v. State*, 931 So.2d 251, 253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("Bryant's failure to submit documentation of his community service hours cannot support a finding that he violated condition 27 of his probation, which requires only actual performance of the work itself.").

Affirmed but remanded for entry of a corrected probation revocation order.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(6)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        October 3, 2019        Outstanding in the Field (Ep 5): Fish in the Grand Canyon
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - (-)documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
##### 



Exhibit 3.1
   
 Registered Office
 Other Offices
 Books
 
 Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings and Adjourned Meetings; Waivers of Notice
 1




---



##### 



Quorum
 Voting
 2




---



##### 



Action by Consent
  Organization
 Order of Business
 3




---



##### 



General Powers
 Number, Election and Term Of Office
 Quorum and Manner of Acting
  Action By The Board
 4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meeting
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Committees
 6




---



##### 



Action by Consent
 Telephonic Meetings
 7




---



##### 



Resignation
 Vacancies
 Removal
 Compensation
 
 Principal Officers
 8




---



##### 



Election, Term of Office and Remuneration
 Subordinate Officers
 Removal
 Resignations
 Powers and Duties
 
 Fixing the Record Date
 9




---



##### 



Dividends
 Year
 Corporate Seal
 10




---



##### 



Voting of Stock Owned by the Corporation
 Certain Definitions
 CVC
ENTITIES CVC ENTITIES
 FP
 INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER
 PERSON
 SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT
 SUBSIDIARY
 INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER
 Amendments.
 11
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        August 23, 2019        Outstanding in the Field (Ep 4): Amphibian Surveys – Call of the Frog
# C_2021088EN.01001201.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/12

---

Appeal brought on 17 August 2020 by HZ, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of etc-gaming GmbH, and OX, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH, against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 16 June 2020 in Case T-803/19, etc-gaming GmbH and Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-390/20 P)

(2021/C 88/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellants: HZ as liquidator in the insolvency of etc-gaming GmbH, OX as liquidator in the insolvency of Casino-Equipment Vermietungs GmbH (represented by: A. Schuster, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 28 January 2021, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.

---