alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 321 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 321

 Expressing the sense of the Senate relating to nuclear power and the 
commitment of the Senate to embracing and promoting nuclear power as a 
 clean baseload energy source necessary to achieve a reliable, secure, 
                     and diversified electric grid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mr. Budd (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Brown, Mr. Cramer, 
   Ms. Sinema, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Booker, Mr. 
     Wicker, Mr. Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Warner, Mr. Graham, and Mr. 
 Whitehouse) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate relating to nuclear power and the 
commitment of the Senate to embracing and promoting nuclear power as a 
 clean baseload energy source necessary to achieve a reliable, secure, 
                     and diversified electric grid.

    Resolved, That--
            (1) in order to maintain geopolitical energy leadership, 
        reduce carbon emissions, and enhance the energy security of the 
        United States, the Senate is committed to embracing and 
        promoting nuclear power as a clean baseload energy source 
        necessary to achieve a reliable, secure, and diversified 
        electric grid; and
            (2) it is the sense of the Senate that--
                    (A) among allies and partners of the United States, 
                nuclear energy presents an advantageous export 
                opportunity for United States advanced manufacturing 
                and technical expertise; and
                    (B) to realize the benefits of next-generation 
                nuclear deployment--
                            (i) a robust domestic production base of 
                        low-enriched uranium and high-assay, low-
                        enriched uranium needs to be established;
                            (ii) the domestic nuclear supply chain and 
                        the associated workforce needs to be further 
                        established, and a highly trained and capable 
                        workforce of scientists, engineers, operators, 
                        regulators, and trades workers needs to be 
                        cultivated; and
                            (iii) robust public-private financing 
                        mechanisms should be pursued.
                                 <all>
```
K.M., Natural Mother of C.R.D.M., N.M.M., J.E.M., and M.I.Z.M., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Trend Mining Company (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ryan,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        that,
        to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 Date:
        June 6, 2007
 
 
 /s/
        John P. Ryan
 John
        P. Ryan
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 This
        certificate accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not incorporated by reference
        into any filing of Trend Minding, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,
        as
        amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
        before
        or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
        language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. B. Lipham, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 6, 2009




/s/ H.B. Lipham, III


H.B. Lipham, III


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
James Dewayne BRIGGS v. STATE

CR-16-0524

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Ronald Cory LINKE

CR-16-1026

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Shirley STELLY, et al. v. CITY CLUB AT RIVER RANCH, LLC, et al.

No. 2019-C-0062

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE**

Writ denied.

CLARK, J., would grant and reinstate the ruling of the trial court.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

*1204In this parking lot trip and fall case, defendants assert that the court of appeal erred in reversing the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Noting that plaintiff had visited the site on prior occasions and nothing prevented her from seeing the curb or appreciating its height, the district court held that the height of the sidewalk was an open and obvious condition and, as such, the defendants did not owe a duty to the plaintiff. Accordingly, I would grant this writ application and reinstate the district court's dismissal of this case. *See**Williams v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.* , 16-0996, p. 9 (La. App. 1 Cir. 3/13/17), 217 So.3d 421, 427 ("An accident, alone, does not support the imposition of liability, particularly considering the normal hazards pedestrians face while traversing sidewalks and parking lots in this state. A pedestrian has a duty to see what should be seen and is bound to observe his course to see if his pathway is clear.").
# C_2021431EN.01003402.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — Eos Products v EUIPO (Shape of a spherical container)

(Case T-489/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a spherical container - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2007/1001))

(2021/C 431/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Eos Products Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Stolzenburg-Wiemer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and M. Eberl, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2020 (Case R 2017/2019-4), relating to an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign constituted by the shape of a spherical container as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Eos Products Sàrl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eos Products Sàrl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: June 17, 2008 | By: | */s/ William R. Donaldson* |
|---------------------|-----|----------------------------|

*-----------------------------------------------*

William R. Donaldson

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
# C_2021329EN.01002902.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Wolf Oil v EUIPO — Rolf Lubricants (ROLF)

(Case T-531/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ROLF - Earlier international mark Wolf - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard)

(2021/C 329/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Wolf Oil Corporation NV (Hemiksem, Belgium) (represented by: T. Heremans and L. Depypere, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Kompari and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rolf Lubricants GmbH (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and S. Sullivan, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2020 (Case R 1958/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Wolf Oil Corporation and Rolf Lubricants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Wolf Oil Corporation NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wolf Oil Corporation NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.

---
Jacob CLEFA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4038

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 19, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for petitioner's failure to respond to this court's order of October 17, 2018.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31168]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 31, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 563 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-972, K2025-971.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31168 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Randy C. MARSHALL

No. 2018-KH-1984

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Crichton, J., recused.
IN RE: William Christopher BEARY

NO. 2019-B-0262

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, William Christopher Beary, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that William Christopher Beary, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22253, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.
# C_2022011EN.01000701.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 November 2021 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission

(Case C-106/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Common agricultural policy - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic - Conformity clearance procedure - Plea raised for the first time during the oral proceedings at first instance - Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 - Article 2(2) - Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Article 4(1)(h) - Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ - Distortion of evidence - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 - Article 12(4) - One-off correction - Conditions - Burden of proof)

(2022/C 11/08)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Tsaousi, E. Leftheriotou and A. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - (-)indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

publication        July 1, 1998        Hydrology and geochemistry of a slag-affected aquifer and chemical characteristics of slag-affected ground water, northwestern Indiana and northeastern Illinois

publication        December 10, 2014        Water quality in Indiana: trends in concentrations of selected nutrients, metals, and ions in streams, 2000-10

publication        March 14, 2009        Processing, Analysis, and General Evaluation of Well-Driller Logs for Estimating Hydrogeologic Parameters of the Glacial Sediments in a Ground-Water Flow Model of the Lake Michigan Basin

publication        January 1, 1980        Quality of surface water in the coal-mining region, southwestern Indiana, March and May 1979

publication        January 1, 1985        Effects of land use and surficial geology on flow and water quality of streams in the coal-mining region of southwestern Indiana, October 1979 through September 1980

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
# C_2022237EN.01000302.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — Yieh United Steel Corp. v European Commission, Eurofer, Association européenne de l’acier, ASBL

(Case C-79/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429 - Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 2 - Calculation of the normal value - Calculation of the production cost - Production losses - Refusal to deduct the value of recycled scrap - Determination of the normal value on the basis of sales of the like product intended for domestic consumption - Exclusion from the basis of calculation used to determine the normal value of sales on the domestic market of the exporting country where those sales concern products intended for export)

(2022/C 237/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Yieh United Steel Corp. (represented by: D. Luff, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented: initially by J. F. Brakeland, M. França and A. Demeneix, and subsequently by J.F. Brakeland and G. Luengo, acting as Agents), Eurofer, Association européenne de l’acier, ASBL (represented by: J. Killick and G. Forwood, avocats, and by G. Papaconstantinou, dikigoros)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Yieh United Steel Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Eurofer, Association européenne de l’acier, ASBL. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Yieh United Steel Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Eurofer, Association européenne de l’acier, ASBL.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.

---
Roland DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Quinton Lee KNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3240

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2842

HARTWELL E. EDWARDS; MYRA R. EDWARDS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

CHARLES BREW, Detective, Badge #1376,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-1704-DKC, CA-95-3094-DKC)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hartwell E. Edwards, Myra R. Edwards, Appellants Pro Se. Sean

Daniel Wallace, Crystal Renee Mittelstaedt, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S

OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying relief on their

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Brew, Nos. CA95-1704-DKC; CA-95-3094-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1996). Appellants'

motion to stay proceedings is denied as moot. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED