alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2130.

#### Sims *v.*City of Atlanta.

Powell, J.

The plaintiff in error was eonvioted in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta, and sought certiorari to the superior court. His petition was dismissed because the bond' was not in accordance with the act passed December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105), the conditions of the bond as given being that the defendant should pay the eventual condemnation money and all costs. Within three months the defendant *803gave a new bond in the terms of the statute and attempted to renew the certiorari. The judge of the superior court declined' to sanction it, and the defendant excepted. The ease is controlled by *Johns*v. *Tifton,*122 *Ga.*734 (50 S. E. 941); *McDonald*v. *Ludowici,*3 *Ga. App.*654 (60 S. E. 337); *Simon*v. *Savannah,*4 *Ga. App.*171 (60 S. E. 1036); Hill *v*. *State,*115 *Ga.*833 (42 S. E. 286); *Sou. Ry. Co.*v. *Goodrum,*115 *Ga.*689 (42 S. E. 49). *Judgment affirmed.*

Certiorari, from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. May 27, 1909.

Submitted October 6, —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*Samml D. Hewlett,*for plaintiff in error.

*James L. May son, W. D. Ellis Jr.,*contra.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2754

_____________________________
K HEN T ANG , Appellant,

v.

H ONG P. L Y , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. W. Gregg McCaulie , Judge

. May 31, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and W INOKUR and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Khen Tang, pro se
, Appellant.

Corrine A. Bylund
, Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.
Amendment No. 2 to Restricted Stock Plan



 EXHIBIT 10(cc) 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC. 
 1999 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN 
  
 The American Dental Partners, Inc. 1999 Restricted Stock Plan, as previously amended (collectively, the “Plan”), is hereby amended pursuant to the following provisions: 
  

	 	1.	Definitions 

  
 All capitalized terms used in this amendment which are not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan.

  

	 	2.	Definition of Subsidiary 

  
 Section 17 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  

	 	§17.	Definition of Subsidiary. 

  
 The term “subsidiary” when used in the Plan or any Restricted Share Agreement made pursuant to the Plan shall mean (a) any
subsidiary corporation of the Company as defined in §424(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (b) any limited liability company in which the Company or any such subsidiary corporation is the sole member, and (c) any limited
partnership (i) in which the Company or one of its subsidiaries owns 50 percent or more of the combined voting power of all classes of equity, and (ii) which has elected to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. 
  

	 	3.	Effective Date; Construction 

  
 The effective date of this amendment is July 30, 2004, and this amendment shall be deemed to be a part of the Plan as of such date. In the event of any
inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall control. Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without change.
Exhibit










AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF 
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., AS AMENDED


The Amended and Restated Bylaws of Impax Laboratories, Inc., as amended (the “Bylaws”) are hereby amended as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 14 of Article III shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“SECTION 14. NUMBER.  The authorized number of directors shall be no less than one nor more than seven. Within the foregoing limits, the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board. (Del Code Ann., tit. 8, §§ 141(b)).”
2.Except as expressly modified hereby, the Bylaws and all the provisions contained therein shall remain in full force and effect.
This Amendment No. 4 to the Bylaws was adopted by the Board of Directors of Impax Laboratories, Inc., effective May 17, 2016.


/s/ Mark A. Schlossberg
Name: Mark A. Schlossberg
Title:   Senior VP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Isiah TURNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# 4.1

Page 4 - &P
Joseph Dewayne MAZE v. STATE

CR-16-0465

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017 Reh. denied August 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Ralph T. WEST v. STATE

CR-16-0754

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Marcus Travell RAYFORD

CR-16-0451

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Decory KNIGHT v. STATE

CR-16-0640

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EX PARTE Michael E. STEVENSON

CR-16-1024

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Jefferson Cir. Ct.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 24, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 24, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0115. CHARLES F. DEJOURNETTE v. 55 PHARR ROAD CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV300509
FAGAN ALLIGATOR FARM, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SOUTHERN OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4039

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Maxcom Telecomunicaciones S.A. de C.V. (the "Company") for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Annual Report"), I, Rene Sagastuy Ferrandiz, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 30, 2003

                                                 /s/ RENE SAGASTUY FERRANDIZ
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Rene Sagastuy Ferrandiz
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022257EN.01000802.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu — Poland) — W.J. v L.J. and J.J., legally represented by A.P.

(Case C-644/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations - Determination of the applicable law - Hague Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations - Article 3 - Habitual residence of the creditor - Point in time when habitual residence is to be determined - Wrongful retention of a child)

(2022/C 257/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: W.J.

Respondents: L.J. and J.J., legally represented by A.P.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of the Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2009/941/EC of 30 November 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of determining the law applicable to the maintenance claim of a minor child removed by one of his or her parents to the territory of a Member State, the fact that a court of that Member State has ordered, in separate proceedings, the return of that child to the State where he or she was habitually resident with his or her parents immediately before his or her removal is not sufficient to prevent that child from acquiring habitual residence on the territory of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
Erin LABOR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 05, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 DELAWARESEAL 2006 CORPORATE Novan, Inc. PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TRANSFER
AGENT AND REGISTRAR (Brooklyn, NY) AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC BY: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by its duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. DATED NOVAN,
INC. FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF is the owner of THIS CERTIFIES THAT SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NOVAN, INC. 







 



 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT
UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) ASWRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. X X Dated to transfer the said shares of Common Stock on the books of the Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. attorney of Common
Stock of the Corporation represented by this Certificate and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint shares (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING
NUMBER OFASSIGNEE HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS FOR VALUE RECEIVED, AND TRANSFERS UNTO Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. (State) (Cust) (Minor) Act under Uniform Gifts to Minors as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN
ACT– Custodian as tenants by the entireties as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-51273

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE MARQUEZ-APODACA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-512-1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Marquez-Apodaca appeals the 46-month within-guidelines 

sentence imposed in connection with his conviction for illegal reentry following 

deportation. Marquez-Apodaca challenges the substantive reasonableness of 

his sentence, arguing that his sentence is greater than necessary to accomplish 

the sentencing objectives of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). In support of his argument, 

he challenges the application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, the illegal reentry guideline, 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 7, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-51273 Document: 00513106676 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2015
No. 14-51273

2

in calculating his guidelines range, asserting that the guideline double counts 

his prior conviction and overstates the seriousness of his offense, which he 

asserts is an “international trespass.” Also, Marquez-Apodaca contends that 

the district court failed to account for his personal circumstances and the 

circumstances of this offense. Specifically, he notes that he returned to the 

United States to earn income for his family in Mexico.

We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence under an abuseof-discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Although 

Marquez-Apodaca challenges the application of the presumption of 

reasonableness as applied to his within-guidelines sentence under § 2L1.2, he 

acknowledges that the issue is foreclosed and raises it only to preserve it for 

possible future review. See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 

357, 366-367 (5th Cir. 2009). We have rejected Marquez-Apodaca’s “double 

counting” argument. See United States v. Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-30 (5th 

Cir. 2009). Similarly, we have rejected the argument that the Guidelines 

overstate the seriousness of illegal reentry because it is simply an international 

trespass. See United States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 212 (5th Cir. 2008).

The district court considered Marquez-Apodaca’s arguments for a 

sentence below the guidelines range but found that a sentence within the 

guidelines range was appropriate. His contention regarding his benign motive 

does not rebut the presumption of reasonableness. See United States v. Cooks, 

589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 

554, 565-66 (5th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-51273 Document: 00513106676 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2015
FCMS-15-02 Preventing Loss of Control in Part 23 by Safer Automation using Envelope Protection
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Real-time Data        May 20, 2017        WaterWatch - View streamflow data using maps, graphs, and tables.
Exhibit No. 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, 
as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Lorain Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jing Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2008





/s/ Jing WuJing Wu 
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
# Chart12

Chart 122015 Day/Night Hours Flown by Aircraft Type

Aircraft Type

Day/Night Hours Flown (Millions)

# Chart13

Chart 13

2015 Cumulative Percentage of Hours Flown by Day/Night and Aircraft Type

# Chart14

Chart 142015 Hours Flown under VMC & IMC Conditions, by Aircraft Type

Aircraft Type

VMC/IMC Hours Flown (Millions)

# Chart15

Chart 15

2015 Cumulative Percentage of Hours Flown under VMC & IMC Conditions, by Aircraft Type

# 4.1

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.2

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.3

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.4

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.5

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.6

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.7

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.8

Page 4 - &P	

# 4.9

Page 4 - &P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

                                 ADDENDUM NO. 1
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS ADDENDUM to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") entered
into on January 1, 2004, by and between TelePlus Inc. (the "Company") and Claude
Buchert the "Employee" ("Consultant") shall modify the terms and conditions of
the Agreement as follows:

         Employee " Consultant" shall have the option to receive
         Consultant/Management fees in lieu of base compensation. In this event,
         the Company shall not be held responsible of any applicable withholding
         taxes and customary deductions.

         All other provisions of the Agreement remain the same.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum No. 1 to
the Employment Agreement as of February 1, 2004, at Los Angeles, California.

COMPANY:                                                     EMPLOYEE:

TELEPLUSPLUS Inc.,
A California corporation
                                                             /s/ Claude Buchert
                                                             ------------------
                                                             Claude Buchert
By: /s/ Helene Legendre
    -------------------
Helene Legendre
Title: Executive Vice President
Arthur DEBOSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2372

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Jay Gelman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Alliance Distributors
Holding Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


            Date: March 30, 2005


                                          /s/ Jay Gelman
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Jay Gelman
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION OF JOSEPH JIMENEZ, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Novartis AG (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/  JOSEPH   JIMENEZName:
Joseph JimenezTitle:
Chief   Executive Officer  Date: January 25, 2017
Fred Lee BRYANT v. STATE

CR-16-0772

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.