alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1572

___________ James F. Newport, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the * Department of Labor United States Department of Labor; * Administrative Review Board. Siemens Generation Services Company; * Michael McCormick, President, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondents. *

___________ Submitted: December 20, 2010 Filed: December 30, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James Newport petitions for review of a final order of the Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) dismissing his administrative appeal for failure to prosecute. Having carefully revi ewed the record, we conclude that the ARB’s decision is not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to the law, or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. See 49 U.S.C. § 42121(b)(4)(A) (this court reviews ARB’s decision pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act); 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (reviewing court shall hold unlawful and set aside agency decisions if they are found to be arbitrary, capricious , abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in-2- accordance with law, or if unsupported by subs tantial evidence in record as whole); see also Allen v. Admin. Review Bd. , 514 F.3d 468, 476 (5th Cir. 2008) (ARB’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo ). Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all pending motions.

______________________________
# C_2021028EN.01002501.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 28 October 2020 — BV v Direction départementale des finances publiques de la Haute-Savoie

(Case C-570/20)

(2021/C 28/39)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: BV

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Direction départementale des finances publiques de la Haute-Savoie

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the requirement of the clarity and the foreseeability of the circumstances in which concealments in returns relating to VAT payable may be the subject of a duplication of proceedings and penalties of a criminal nature satisfied by national rules such as those described [in the request for a preliminary ruling]? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the requirement of the clarity and the foreseeability of the circumstances in which concealments in returns relating to VAT payable may be the subject of a duplication of proceedings and penalties of a criminal nature satisfied by national rules such as those described [in the request for a preliminary ruling]?

| 2. | Is the requirement of the necessity and the proportionality of the duplication of such penalties satisfied by national rules such as those described [in the request for a preliminary ruling]? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the requirement of the necessity and the proportionality of the duplication of such penalties satisfied by national rules such as those described [in the request for a preliminary ruling]?

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on
Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Michael M. Lee, as interim chief
financial officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|3. | This 10-K/A report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Exchange Act; and                                                           
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   
|4. | The information contained in this 10-K/A report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.

/s/ Michael M. LeeMichael M. Lee Interim Chief
Financial Officer January 4, 2010

---
ACM FATZ VII LLC 08/25/2023 (f)

23-42511-ELM

Page No: 1

Date Filed (f) or Converted (c):

Trustee Name: Roddrick B. Newhouse

Case Name:

Case No.:

FORM 1

INDIVIDUAL ESTATE PROPERTY RECORD AND REPORT

ASSET CASES

Asset Description

(Scheduled and

Unscheduled (u) Property)

1 2

 Petition/

Unscheduled

Value

3

Estimated Net Value

(Value Determined by

Trustee,

Less Liens, Exemptions,

and Other Costs)

Property

 Abandoned 

OA =§ 554(a) abandon.

4 5

Sales/Funds

Received by 

the Estate

6

Asset Fully Administered (FA)/

Gross Value of Remaining Assets

For the Period Ending: §341(a) Meeting Date: 

Claims Bar Date:

7/20/2024 09/20/2023

12/19/2023

Ref. #

1 Overpayment/Refund $0.00 $0.00 $8,340.39 $0.00

2 Accounts Receivable (scheduled) $0.00 $0.00 $8,172.38 $0.00

TOTALS (Excluding unknown value) Gross Value of Remaining Assets

Major Activities affecting case closing:

07/20/2024 Counsel is working with NC Department of Revenue to obtain funds belonging to the bankruptcy estate.

07/03/2024 Trustee is still in the process of reviewing the value/status of scheduled assets.

01/11/2024 Trustee is in the process of reviewing value/status of scheduled assets. Trustee has hired counsel to assist him.

$0.00 $0.00 $16,512.77 $0.00 

Initial Projected Date Of Final Report (TFR): 06/01/2024 Current Projected Date Of Final Report (TFR): 12/31/2024

RODDRICK B. NEWHOUSE

/s/ RODDRICK B. NEWHOUSE

Case 23-42511-elm7 Doc 54 Filed 07/20/24 Entered 07/20/24 18:12:46 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commissiontransition instructions]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by such this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 11, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  November 15, 2004

/s/ Matthew S. Kerper
Matthew S. Kerper, President
(Principal executive officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

IN RE § 

§ 

JEMORRIS VENTURES, LLC § CASE NO. 24-41590-ELM-11

§

§ 

Debtor § 

ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO RATIFY 

POST-PETITION PAYMENT OF PRE-PETITION DEBTS 

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION the Motion to Ratify Post-Petition Payment of PrePetition Debts filed by Debtor herein on or about July 16, 2024. It appears to the Court that 

adequate notice of the Motion was provided to all creditors and parties in interest. It further 

appears that no response or objection to the Motion was filed by any party in interest. It further 

appears that adequate cause exists to grant the relief requested in the Motion. Upon the 

foregoing, it is therefore 

ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO RATIFY POST-PETITION PAYMENT OF PRE-PETITION 

DEBTS Page 1 of 2

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed October 3, 2024

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 90 Filed 10/03/24 Entered 10/03/24 14:47:39 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR'S MOTION TO RATIFY POST-PETITION PAYMENT OF PRE-PETITION 

DEBTS Page 2 of 2

ORDERED that the Motion to Ratify Post-Petition Payment of Pre-Petition Debtors be 

and it hereby is GRANTED. 

# # # # # END OF ORDER # # # # # 

Prepared by:

/s/ Marilyn D. Garner 

Law Office of Marilyn D. Garner 

Marilyn D. Garner

SBOT 07675550 

2001 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 200 

Arlington, TX 76006 

(817) 505-1499 Telephone

(817) 549-7200 Telecopier

Email: mgarner@marilyndgarner.net

COUNSEL FOR DEBTOR

Case 24-41590-elm11 Doc 90 Filed 10/03/24 Entered 10/03/24 14:47:39 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfect Health Care Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Antoine
Jarjour, as Principal Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April  5, 2004

Signed:

/s/Antoine Jarjour
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Acting Chief Executive Officer
# In the Court of Criminal

Appeals of Texas

══════════ No. WR

- 94,371

- 01

══════════

EX PARTE CORY ALEXANDER ROSS ,

Applicant

═══════════════════════════════════════ On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. W12657

- 1 in the 355th District Court

F rom Hood County

═══════════════════════════════════════

Y EARY , J., filed a concurring opinion , in which S LAUGHTER , J., joined.

Applicant was convicted in 2014 of possession of a controlled
substance and sentenced to twelve months ’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction. In October of 2022, Applicant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC . art. 11.07. In his application, he alleges that he wasROSS

– 2

denied his right to an appeal because his counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal

. Today, the Court remands this application to the trial court to further develop the record. I join the Court’s remand order. But I write separately to address my thoughts concerning the doctrine of laches and its possible application to this case. See Ex p arte Smith , 444 S.W.3d 661 , 663 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to
sua sponte consider the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Bazille , ___ S.W.3d ___, No. WR

- 89,851

- 02, 2022 WL 108348 , at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 12, 2022) (Yeary , J., concurring). The doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this one. Applicant’s trial occurred in 2014 , but this writ application was not filed until eight years later. 1 The record is also silent regarding circumstances that may excu se Applicant’s delay, and at least some explanation for the long delay in filing should be provided. Consistent with this Court’s precedent, the trial court “ may sua sponte consider and determine whether laches should bar relief.” Smith , 444 S.W.3d at 667. If the trial court does so, it must give Applicant the opportunity to explain the reasons for the delay and give the State’s prosecutors and/or former counsel for Applicant an opportunity to state whether Applicant’s delay has caused any prejudice to their ability to defend against Applicant’s claims. Id. at 670. And ultimately, the trial court

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the diminished memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of the State’s evidence, both of which may often be said to occur beyond five years after a conviction becomes final.” Ex parte Perez , 398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe , 132 S.W.3d 434, 437

– 39 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)).ROSS

– 3

may include fin dings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the doctrine of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order. With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED : December 14, 2022 DO NOT PUBLISH
EX PARTE Bobby STANLEY

CR-16-0551

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 445 

Recognizing the importance of the economic relationship between the United 

States and Israel and affirming that trade facilitated by the United 

States-Israel Free Trade Agreement is a tool to support the economy 

of Israel during the conflict with Hamas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. TILLIS, 

Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. 

YOUNG, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

KENNEDY, Mr. BUDD, Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. 

BRITT, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. SULLIVAN, 

Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. BENNET, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. 

WARNOCK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

DECEMBER 6, 2023 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of the economic relationship between the United States and Israel and affirming that 

trade facilitated by the United States-Israel Free Trade 

Agreement is a tool to support the economy of Israel 

during the conflict with Hamas. 

Whereas, on October 7, 2023, Hamas launched violent and 

deadly attacks on Israel by air, land, and sea; 

2 

SRES 445 ATS 

Whereas the United States and Israel have a longstanding 

economic and security relationship; 

Whereas the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement was 

signed into law in June 1985 and was the first free trade 

agreement entered into by the United States; 

Whereas, since the signing of the Agreement, total trade between the United States and Israel has grown more than 

sevenfold; 

Whereas the United States is Israel’s single largest trading 

partner; 

Whereas the United States exported $14,200,000,000 in 

goods and $5,800,000,000 in services to Israel in 2022; 

Whereas the United States imported $21,400,000,000 in 

goods and $9,200,000,000 in services from Israel in 

2022; 

Whereas the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement also 

underpins the robust exchange of capital between the 

United States and Israel; 

Whereas Israeli companies directly invested $10,600,000,000 

in the United States during 2022, supporting more than 

20,000 United States jobs; and 

Whereas, following Hamas’s atrocious attacks on Israel, 

maintaining and expanding trade and investment between 

the United States and Israel is paramount: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that the economic relationship 

3 between the United States and Israel is strong and 

3 

SRES 445 ATS 

1 has benefitted both countries and the peoples of both 

2 countries; 

3 (2) expresses support for the people of Israel 

4 and the economy of Israel in the face of Hamas’s at5 tacks against Israel; and 

6 (3) affirms that— 

7 (A) the United States-Israel Free Trade 

8 Agreement set the stage for robust growth in 

9 trade and investment between the United States 

10 and Israel; and 

11 (B) the Agreement can similarly serve as a 

12 tool for supporting the economy of Israel during 

13 the conflict with Hamas. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald H. Spair, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald H. Spair                                
|Ronald H. Spair                                    
|Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                   
|May 7, 2008
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Grigoriy SARKISOV, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2019

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha R. Herrera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur; B.L. Thomas, C.J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #12-2003 Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| August 14, 2014                                |
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0004

_____________________________

ELLIS DALE FORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County.

Timothy Register, Judge.

April 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Henry Mark Sims, Public Defender, Marianna, for Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Terri Michelle NIXON v. William Thomas NIXON

2160264

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

August 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(7)
              - products_publications(14)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - (-)nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments