alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022237EN.01001102.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v DSAB Destination Stockholm AB

(Case C-637/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/112/EC - Common system of value added tax - Article 30a(1) - Concept of ‘voucher’ - Article 30a(3) - Concept of ‘“multi-purpose” voucher’ - Sale of a card entitling the cardholder to a number of tourist services for a limited period)

(2022/C 237/14)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Skatteverket

Respondent: DSAB Destination Stockholm AB

Operative part of the judgment

Article 30a of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive (EU) 2016/1065 of 27 June 2016, must be interpreted as meaning that an instrument which gives the bearer thereof the right to benefit from various services at a given place, for a limited period and up to a certain amount, may constitute a ‘voucher’ within the meaning of Article 30a(1) of that directive, even if, on account of the limited validity period of that instrument, an average consumer cannot benefit from all the services offered. That instrument constitutes a ‘multi-purpose voucher’ within the meaning of Article 30a(3) of that directive, since the value added tax due on those services is not known at the time of issuance of that instrument.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, John M. Alston, President and Chief Executive Officer of Carmina Technologies Inc., and Glen R. Alston, Chief Financial Officer of Carmina Technologies Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Carmina Technologies Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Carmina Technologies Inc.



|Dated: May 26, 2004 |  |                                       
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                    |  |                                       
|                    |  |                                       
|                    |  |                                       
|                    |  | John M. Alston                        
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer,
|                    |  | Carmina Technologies Inc.             
|                    |  |                                       
|                    |  |                                       
|                    |  |                                       
|                    |  | Glen R. Alston                        
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer,              
|                    |  | Carmina Technologies Inc.
Lyndon Bruce JOHNSON Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0640

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Federal Aviation 

Administration

Memorandum 

Date: July 13, 2007 

From: Orlando International ATCT 

To: Aircraft Accident File MCO-ATCT-0088 

Subject: INFORMATION: Partial Transcript 

 Aircraft Accident; N501N 

 Sanford, FL., July 10, 2007 

This transcription covers the Orlando International ATCT Satellite Radar North Position for the 

time period from July 10, 2007, 1223 UTC, to July 10, 2007, 1239 UTC. 

Agencies Making Transmissions Abbreviations

 Cessna N501N N501N 

 Orlando International Satellite Radar North STN 

 Daytona International DAB 

I hereby certify that the following is a true transcription of the recorded conversations pertaining 

to the subject aircraft accident involving N501N. 

William Mitchell 

Support Specialist 

Orlando International ATCT 

1223 

(1224-1226) 

1228 

1228:32 DAB north satellite daytona 

1228:37 STN (unintelligible) orlando 
 

MCO-ATCT-0088 

N501N 

Page 2 of 3 

1228:39 DAB five zero one november climbing to six e b 

1228:40 STN (unintelligible) 

1228:42 STN you sounded like linda hello e b 

 

 

1228:45 DAB hello 

1229 

1230 

1230:04 N501N orlando twin cessna five zero one november out of fifty two hundred for 

 six thousand 

 

1230:08 STN five zero one november orlando approach altimeter three zero one four 

1230:12 N501N thirty fourteen zero one november 

1230:13 STN and zero one november what is your destination 

1230:15 N501N lakeland l a l 

1230:17 STN thank you 

1231 

1232 

1232:35 STN zero one november fly heading of two five zero 

1232:38 N501N ah zero one november 

1232:49 N501N zero one november declaring an emergency we need ah smoke in the 

 cockpit we need ah to land at sanford 

1232:54 STN zero one november roger proceed direct to ah sanford descend v 

 correction descend to two thousand 
 

MCO-ATCT-0088 

N501N 

Page 3 of 3 

1232:59 N501N two thousand zero one november 

1233:12 STN november zero one november you can proceed direct Sanford report it in 

sight 

1233:15 N501N zero one november *(has set up already would like) 

1233:18 STN november zero one november you can land any runway at sanford they 

 know you are coming 

1234 

(1235-1238) 

1239 

End of Transcript 

*This portion of the re-recording is not entirely clear, but represents the best interpretation 

possible under the circumstances.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-20218

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Chacathron Cahee, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-658-1

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Chacathron 

Cahee has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cahee has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 4, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-20218 Document: 00516496444 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2022
No. 22-20218

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-20218 Document: 00516496444 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2022
# C_2020061EN.01005701.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/57

---

Action brought on 23 December 2019 — Bende v EUIPO — Julius-K9 (K-9)

(Case T-878/19)

(2020/C 61/72)

Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Gábor Bende (Beloinannisz, Hungary) (represented by: R. Tóth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Julius-K9 Zrt. (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘K-9’ — Application for registration No 12 040 382

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2019 in Case R 560/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(d) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(d) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.ss.1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bravo Resource Partners Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Tyrone R. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer and Ernest Staggs,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  December 9, 2005
                                By:    /s/ Tyrone R. Carter
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Tyrone R. Carter, Chief Executive Officer



                                By:  /s/ Ernest Staggs
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                      Ernest Staggs, Principal Financial Officer
# C_2020209EN.01001401.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Portugal) lodged on 12 March 2020 — MV v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA

(Case C-137/20)

(2020/C 209/20)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MV

Defendant: SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA

Question referred

Must an event such as that which occurred on 6 June 2016, in which a flight was cancelled due to the meteorological conditions at the destination airport — that is to say, because at the time of the flight’s departure the minimal horizontal visibility limits, and also the minimum vertical visibility limits for the runway, were not ensured and, therefore, the required safety conditions not guaranteed in that airport and for the aircraft in question for the landing manoeuvre, it even being forecast that the atmospheric conditions would deteriorate in the following hours — be characterised as an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) which relieves the air carrier of the obligation to pay compensation?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
James WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2773

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joshua Carlton BELL, Appellant, v. BREVARD COUNTY, Florida, Brevard County Sheriff's Office and Melbourne Police Department, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

Joshua Carlton Bell, Tampa, pro se.

Thomas W. Poulton, of DeBevoise & Poulton, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee, Brevard County Sherriff's Office.

Patricia Rego Chapman and Eric J. Netcher, of Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Melbourne Police Department.

No Appearance for Appellee, Brevard County, Florida.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Tyrone M. FROST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-45

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Anthony William RITZ, Jr., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 20, 2019

Anthony William Ritz, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of order to be appealed); *Palm v. State* , 982 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) ("Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction.").

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Adam GWARA, Appellant, v. Nicole SARDINA, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Company.


Dated:   3/15/04                        /s/  Jonathon  Ricker
       ----------------                --------------------------------------
                                       Jonathon Ricker
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

This  certification accompanies the Report pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of 18 of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.


<PAGE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 101 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 555 

[Report No. 113–422] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4414) to clarify the treatment 

under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of health plans 

in which expatriates are the primary enrollees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2014 

Mr. BURGESS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4414) to clarify 

the treatment under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of health plans in which expatriates are 

the primary enrollees, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 4414) to clarify the treatment under the Patient Protec4 tion and Affordable Care Act of health plans in which ex5 patriates are the primary enrollees, and for other pur6 poses. All points of order against consideration of the bill 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 555 RH 

1 are waived. The amendment printed in the report of the 

2 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 

3 considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be con4 sidered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

5 the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

6 shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, 

7 and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 

8 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

9 divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

10 member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) 

11 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 101 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 555 

[Report No. 113–422] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4414) 

and for other purposes. in which expatriates are the primary enrollees, tection and Affordable Care Act of health plans to clarify the treatment under the Patient ProAPRIL 28, 2014 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2021228EN.01001102.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/11

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék — Hungary) — Koppány 2007 Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

(Case C-523/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Social security - Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 - Applicable legislation - A1 certificate - Article 1 - Extension of A1 certificate to nationals of third countries residing legally in the territory of a Member State - Legal residence - Concept)

(2021/C 228/14)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Győri Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Koppány 2007 Kft.

Defendant: Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

Operative part of the order

Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality, must be interpreted as meaning that nationals of third countries who reside temporarily and have a residence permit in a Member State, and who have a document stating their place of accommodation issued by the immigration authority and work in different Member States for an employer established in that Member State, may rely on the coordination rules laid down by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation No 883/2004, in order to determine the social security legislation to which they are subject, provided that they are legally residing and working in the territory of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

newsletter        November 30, 2014      Earth Science Matters - Volume 1, Fall 2014