alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

       STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                                  PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

The undersigned, Martin A. Thomson, is the Chief Executive Officer of First
Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company
of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2006 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          B)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
               covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


May 15, 2006                            /s/ Martin A. Thomson
Dated                                   ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin A. Thomson
Bruce Paul Douglas STODDART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2779

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - (-)georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
IN RE: Justice of the Peace Terri M. CROSBY

NO. 2019-O-0232

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 13, 2019

ORDER

Considering the motion for interim disqualification filed by Justice of the Peace Terri M. Crosby, and the concurrence thereto by the Judiciary Commission of Louisiana,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Justice of the Peace Terri M. Crosby, Ward 6, Tangipahoa Parish, State of Louisiana, be and she hereby is disqualified from exercising any judicial function during the pendency of further proceedings in this matter, pursuant to La. Const. art. V, § 25 (C) and Supreme Court Rule XXIII, § 27. This order shall be effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion for expedited consideration be and hereby is granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 14, 2022        Landslide susceptibility in Minnesota: Insight from landslide inventory mapping and lidar change detection

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1078 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-842, K2025-843.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30820 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Mitchell Scott SURRATT v. STATE

CR-16-0261

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020191EN.01000901.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2020 — ZM in his capacity as liquidator in the insolvency proceedings relating to Oeltrans Befrachtungsgesellschaft mbH v E.A. Frerichs

(Case C-73/20)

(2020/C 191/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: ZM in his capacity as liquidator in the insolvency proceedings relating to Oeltrans Befrachtungsgesellschaft mbH

Defendant in the appeal on a point of law: E.A. Frerichs

Question referred

Are Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (1) and Article 12(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (‘Rome I’) (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the law applicable to a contract under the latter regulation also governs the payment made by a third party in performance of a contracting party’s contractual payment obligation?

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2008 L 177, p. 6.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132435 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132435 COA: 259358 Wayne CC: 90-003165 DARYLE ANTHONY STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoSignal Corporation, Inc (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date: July 23, 2004                /s/ Mr. Scot Ervin
                                -----------------------------
                                   Mr. Scot Ervin, CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 432 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 432

 Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the unification of the Island of 
Crete with the Hellenic Republic and expressing support for designation 
             of December 1, 2013, as ``Cretan Enosis Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2013

   Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Grimm, Ms. Titus, Mrs. Carolyn B. 
  Maloney of New York, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Tsongas, and Mr. Bilirakis) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the unification of the Island of 
Crete with the Hellenic Republic and expressing support for designation 
             of December 1, 2013, as ``Cretan Enosis Day''.

Whereas December 1, 2013, has been recognized as the 100th anniversary of the 
        1913 unification (ENOSIS) of the Island of Crete with the Hellenic 
        Republic, by communities, citizens, and organizations around the United 
        States and the world;
Whereas the unification of the Island of Crete with the Hellenic Republic on 
        December 1, 1913, resulted from over 267 years of struggle by the brave 
        and resolute Greek people of Crete against the harsh occupation of the 
        Ottoman Empire beginning in 1669;
Whereas the knowledge of this relentless struggle for freedom by the people of 
        Crete, culminating in the signing of the Treaty of London which unified 
        Crete with the Hellenic Republic, is an inspiration to freedom-loving 
        people everywhere;
Whereas the memory of thousands of brave Cretans who sacrificed their lives 
        following the creed ``Freedom or Death'' in order to gain freedom and 
        unification with Greece, its motherland, should be remembered and 
        revered; and
Whereas December 1, 2013, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Cretan 
        Enosis Day'' in recognition of these brave deeds and sacrifices by the 
        people of the Island of Crete: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the unification of 
        the Island of Crete with the Hellenic Republic; and
            (2) supports the designation of ``Cretan Enosis Day'' in 
        recognition of these brave deeds and sacrifices by the people 
        of the Island of Crete.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Troy TAYLOR

No. 2018-KH-1317

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

**ON RECONSIDERATION**

Reconsideration Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Hughes, J., would grant reconsideration.

Respectfully, given the odyssey this case has taken, the trial court is in the best position to determine whether defendant was properly re-indicted after his original convictions were overturned.
Joseph Leroy JONES-EL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Rhonda DUNCAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4762

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 01, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Michael OLSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Floyd Olson, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 2019

David C. Reeves, Robert B. Parrish and Jeffrey A. Yarbrough of Moseley, Prichard, Parrish, Knight & Jones, Jacksonville; Jason T. Burnette and Stephanie E. Parker of Jones Day, Atlanta, Georgia; Charles R.A. Morse of Jones Day, New York, NY, for Appellant.

Gary Paige of Gordon & Doner, P.A., Davie; Celene H. Humphries, Maegen Peek Luka and Thomas J. Seider of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa; Charles Farah and Eddie Farah of Farah & Farah, Jacksonville; Randy Rosenblum of Dolan Dobrinsky & Rosenblum, LLP, Miami; Richard J. Lantinberg, Norwood S. Wilner and Jay Plotkin of The Wilner Firm, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Because the circuit court's September 28, 2018, "Order Denying Defendant's renewed Motion for a Directed Verdict or Alternatively for a New Trial," was final, the notice of appeal filed on November 28, 2018, was untimely. Accordingly, this is appeal is dismissed. Appellant may seek relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540.

Bilbrey, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)

## By Year

Science Animations        November 30, 2018        Shaking of Atwood Building, Mw 7.0 November 30, 2018, Anchorage quake

Infographics        June 1, 2001        Screenshot of "Biological Soil Crusts — Webs of Life in the Desert" Fact Sheet

Science Animations        March 30, 2016        Shaking in the Atwood Building in Anchorage, Alaska

Infographics        December 31, 2010        Terms to describe the measurement of tsunamis

Infographics        July 24, 2020        Kīlauea summit crater lake growth July 25, 2019 to July 25, 2020
STATE of Louisiana v. Otis BEDWELL

NO. 2018-KH-0862

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
William B. ENGLERT and Toni A. Englert, Appellants, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR the DEUTSCHE ALT-A SECURITIES, INC., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-OA1 and Pebble Persico, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2019

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, and Anthony N. Legendre, II, of Law Offices of Legendre & Legendre, PLLC, Maitland, for Appellants.

Nancy M. Wallace and Ryan D. O'Connor, of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, William P. Heller, of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Paul W. Ettori, of Akerman, LLP, Orlando, for Appellee, HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

No Appearance for other Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure in all respects, except for the award of legal fees, attorney's fees, and inspection costs. Because no evidence was introduced at trial to substantiate the award of $ 40,376.38 in legal fees, $ 2647.50 in attorney's fees, $ 915 in inspection costs, and $ 157.50 in other costs, we reverse the award of said fees without remand.1*See**Mkt. Tampa Invs., LLC v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. for Novastar Mortg. Funding Tr., Series 2007-I*, 216 So.3d 783, 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ("[W]e reverse the attorney's fee award in the foreclosure judgment without remand because the award is not supported by competent, substantial evidence." (citing *Michel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon*, 191 So.3d 981, 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ) ).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

1

We commend Appellee's counsel for conceding error on this point at oral argument.
Jason TOUSSAINT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1020

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1839.

#### Castleberry *v.*The State.

Indictment for carrying concealed weapon, from Butts superior court — ’Judge Reagan. March *22,*1909.

Submitted May 4, —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*O. M. Duke,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. W. Wise, solicitor-general,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

The assignments of error are wholly without merit, and the evidence, except in a strictly juridie sense, demanded the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2021044EN.01002401.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 28 October 2020 — ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego

(Case C-563/20)

(2021/C 44/29)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o

Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 30(2)(e) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (1) be interpreted as conferring on a railway undertaking which uses or intends to use railway infrastructure the right to participate in the procedure conducted by a regulatory body for setting the level of charges for access to railway infrastructure by the railway infrastructure manager? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 30(2)(e) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (1) be interpreted as conferring on a railway undertaking which uses or intends to use railway infrastructure the right to participate in the procedure conducted by a regulatory body for setting the level of charges for access to railway infrastructure by the railway infrastructure manager?

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the negative, must Article 30(5) and (6) of Directive 2001/14/EC be interpreted as conferring on a railway undertaking which uses or intends to use railway infrastructure the right to challenge the decision of the regulatory body approving the level of charges for access to railway infrastructure set by the railway infrastructure manager? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the negative, must Article 30(5) and (6) of Directive 2001/14/EC be interpreted as conferring on a railway undertaking which uses or intends to use railway infrastructure the right to challenge the decision of the regulatory body approving the level of charges for access to railway infrastructure set by the railway infrastructure manager?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 75, p. 29.

---
Kenneth S. COURTNEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0630

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Demetrice WINSTON v. STATE

CR-15-1422

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.