alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00603-CR

Kurt Conrad MILLER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of TexasAppellee

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR8700

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 9, 2013

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, appellant Kurt Conrad Miller pleaded nolo 

contendere to the offense of credit card abuse. The trial court imposed sentence in accord with the 

plea agreement and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant 

has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. 

The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) 

certification, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a 
04-13-00603-CR

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”

Id.

This court gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended 

trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record 

within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 

2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed 

a written response, stating he has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After 

reviewing the record and counsel’s notice, we agree that appellant does not have a right to appeal. 

See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should 

review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore 

dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

- 2 -
# C_2021035EN.01003302.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 13 November 2020 — UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG and VF

(Case C-595/20)

(2021/C 35/46)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: UE

Respondents: ShareWood Switzerland AG, VF

Question referred

Is Article 6(4)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a contract for the purchase of teak and balsa trees between an undertaking and a consumer, which is intended to confer ownership of the trees, which are then managed, harvested and sold for profit, and which includes for that purpose a lease agreement and a service agreement, is to be regarded as ‘a contract relating to a right in rem in immovable property or a tenancy of immovable property’ within the meaning of that provision?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 177, p. 6.

---
# C_2023024EN.01001402.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/14

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Pazardzhik — Bulgaria) — SF v Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite — Plovdiv

(Case C-49/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive (EU) 2015/849 - Scope - National legislation requiring payments exceeding a certain limit to be made only by bank transfer or by deposit into a payment account)

(2023/C 24/19)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Rayonen sad — Pazardzhik

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SF

Defendant: Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite — Plovdiv

Operative part of the order

Legislation of a Member State which provides that payments on the national territory of an amount which is equal to or greater than a fixed threshold are only to be made by bank transfer or deposit into a payment account and which has no interest in the person and in the reason for paying in cash and at the same time covers all payments in cash among natural and legal persons does not fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/89 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert P. Atwell , Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: April 20, 2010








/s/ Robert P. Atwell


Robert P. Atwell,


Chief Executive Officer and President
----

EXHIBIT 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. onForm 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financialofficer and principal accounting officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge: 

1.

This 10-QSB report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and 
2.

The information contained in this 10-QSBreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of AlphaRx, Inc. 
 

/s/ Marcel Urbanc                   Marcel Urbanc Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer August 14, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

 TERRIE LIVINGSTON

JUSTICES

 LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

 ANNE GARDNER

 SUE WALKER

 BOB McCOY

 BILL MEIER

 LEE GABRIEL

TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.2ndcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CLERK 

 DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

 LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

 CLARISSA HODGES

February 6, 2014

Timothy T. Mitchell

4422 Ridgeside Dr

Dallas, TX 75244-7521

Hon. Susan H. McCoy

Judge, 153rd District Court

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap St.

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0225

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Scott M. Garelick

McElree & Smith, P.C.

600 N. Pearl St., Ste. 1600

Dallas, TX 75201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Jeff Walker

Regional Presiding Judge

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 5th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Civil District Clerk, Tarrant County

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap St., 3rd Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Arjana Muhametaj

2221 Murphy Dr., Apt. 2115

Bedford, TX 76021

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-13-00398-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 153-265909-13

Style: Arjana Muhametaj, d/b/a Little Brothers Family Restaurant, a/k/a Family

Restaurant;

v.

Northern Trust Bank of California, N.A. and Bruce R. McAllister et al.

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the

above-referenced cause. 

A copy of the opinion and judgment can be viewed on our Court’s

webpage at: http://www.2ndcoa.courts.state.tx.us/.

Respectfully yours,

FILE COPY
02-13-00398-CV

February 6, 2014

Page 2

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

FILE COPY
Frederick C. LEONARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.
# C_2020175EN.01000601.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/6

---

Appeal brought on 21 February 2020 by Bruno Gollnisch against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 10 December 2019 in Case T-319/19 Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament

(Case C-122/20 P)

(2020/C 175/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Bruno Gollnisch (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| — | set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 10 December 2019 in case number T-319/19; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 10 December 2019 in case number T-319/19;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union for a fresh judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union for a fresh judgment;

| — | also order that the sum of EUR 5 000 be paid to the appellant in respect of the costs incurred in the present appeal proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

also order that the sum of EUR 5 000 be paid to the appellant in respect of the costs incurred in the present appeal proceedings;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

If the Court of Justice considers that it has sufficient information, the appellant claims further that the Court of Justice should:

| — | rule on the substance of the case itself; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule on the substance of the case itself;

| — | annul the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 10 December 2018 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 10 December 2018 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament;

| — | rule on the form of order sought by the appellant at first instance, without prejudice to the claims made against the order under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule on the form of order sought by the appellant at first instance, without prejudice to the claims made against the order under appeal;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

It is alleged that the order wrongly held that the decision at issue did not individually concern the appellant, that, consequently, his complaint of 27 February 2019 did not constitute a pre-litigation procedure and that, since that complaint was not taken into account, the time limits for the judicial proceedings must be regarded as having expired.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 661 

Designating the week of April 15 through April 21, 2024, as ‘‘National 

Osteopathic Medicine Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. HEINRICH, Mrs. CAPITO, and 

Mr. RISCH) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of April 15 through April 21, 2024, 

as ‘‘National Osteopathic Medicine Week’’. 

Whereas there are more than 148,000 osteopathic physicians 

and 38,000 osteopathic medical students in the United 

States ; 

Whereas osteopathic physicians and medical students train at 

high-caliber schools of osteopathic medicine across the 

United States, including in rural communities; 

Whereas osteopathic physicians have made significant contributions to the healthcare system of the United States 

since the founding of osteopathic medicine in 1892; 

Whereas the number of osteopathic physicians in the United 

States has increased by more than 30 percent in the past 

5 years; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 661 ATS 

Whereas osteopathic medicine emphasizes a whole-person, patient-centric approach to healthcare, and osteopathic physicians play an important role in the healthcare system 

of the United States; 

Whereas osteopathic physicians play a critical role in public 

health preparedness and work on the front lines treating 

patients; 

Whereas osteopathic physicians train and practice in all medical specialties and practice settings; 

Whereas osteopathic physicians and medical students in the 

United States are dedicated to improving the health of 

their communities through efforts to increase education 

and awareness and by delivering high-quality health services; and 

Whereas osteopathic physicians practice in every State: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of April 15 through 

3 April 21, 2024, as ‘‘National Osteopathic Medicine 

4 Week’’; 

5 (2) recognizes the contributions of osteopathic 

6 physicians to the healthcare system of the United 

7 States; and 

8 (3) celebrates the role that colleges of osteo9 pathic medicine play in training the next generation 

10 of physicians. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**  **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**  **AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**  **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald Wilen,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
            February
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Ronald WilenRonald WilenChief Executive Officer
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 437 

Condemning antisemitism at institutions of higher education in the United 

States and encouraging college and university leaders, administrators, 

and faculty to speak out against antisemitism. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2023 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. VAN

HOLLEN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning antisemitism at institutions of higher education 

in the United States and encouraging college and university leaders, administrators, and faculty to speak out 

against antisemitism. 

Whereas, in the aftermath of the terrorist attack on Israel by 

Hamas on October 7, 2023, there has been a rise in incidents of antisemitism, including hate speech and intimidation, on college campuses and universities in the 

United States, creating an atmosphere of fear for Jewish 

students and faculty; 

Whereas the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance 

has developed a widely accepted working definition of 

antisemitism which can serve as a helpful tool for eduVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:51 Oct 27, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR437.ATS SR437

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 437 ATS 

cation administrators and faculty to identify antisemitism; 

Whereas acts of hate, discrimination, and violence based on 

religion or ethnicity have no place at institutions that 

exist to further education and understanding between diverse student bodies; and 

Whereas freedom of speech and expression are foundational 

principles of institutions of higher education in the 

United States, but when these principles are used to promote violence, hatred, or discrimination on the basis of 

religious beliefs, national origin, or ancestry, higher education leaders have the right and an obligation to respond: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) strongly condemns any instances of anti3 semitism occurring at colleges and universities in the 

4 United States; 

5 (2) encourages higher education leaders, includ6 ing presidents, deans, and administrators, to pub7 licly condemn speech that incites or celebrates vio8 lence against any people based on religious beliefs, 

9 national origin, or ancestry; and 

10 (3) encourages institutions of higher education 

11 to engage with Jewish student organizations and en12 sure that Jewish students, faculty, and staff can 

13 pursue their academic and personal aspirations with14 out fear. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



1301 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019-6092
TEL 212 259-8000 FAX 212 259-6333
 EXHIBIT 8.1
 
 
 
 Registration Statement on Form S-3 File No. 333-[___]
  FCF Corp. Registrants Registration Statement Commission Act Notes Series Indenture Indenture Trustee Trust Trust
Agreement Owner Trustee Indenture
Supplement Agreements
 Prospectus Prospectus Supplement




---



#####
Motion granted, appeal dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18, 

2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-24-00175-CR

____________

MARCO ANTONIO LEIJA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1776682

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A written request to dismiss the appeal, personally signed by appellant, has 

been filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not 

delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court 

to issue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Christopher SCOTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L. P., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4084

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Grady C. LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1630

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 1, 2019

Grady C. Love, pro se.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

*1183Grady C. Love appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. In his motion, Love raised a claim of newly discovered evidence. The postconviction court denied the motion on the ground that Love's claim was successive. However, the court did not attach to its order any documents-such as Love's previous motion and the order denying it-to demonstrate the successiveness of Love's claim. *See* Fla R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2) (providing that an order denying a postconviction motion as successive shall be accompanied by "a copy of that portion of the files and records necessary to support the court's ruling"); *Bryant v. State*, 944 So.2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("[W]here a trial court denies a motion on account of successiveness, the documents demonstrating successiveness must be attached to the trial court's order."). Accordingly, we must reverse and remand for the postconviction court either to attach documents demonstrating the successiveness of Love's claim or to consider Love's motion on its merits.

Reversed and remanded.

KELLY and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Harold RUDISILL and Patricia Rudisill, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.

No. 1D18-271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(16)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - (-)texas(1)
              - utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        September 1, 1996        Maps showing petroleum exploration intensity and production in major Cambrian to Ordovician reservoir rocks in the Anadarko Basin