alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CLEANGOAL ENERGY, CORP.


 SUBSCRIPTION
AGREEMENT


 


 


The Investor named below, by payment
of the purchase price for such Common Shares, by the delivery of a check payable to CleanGoal Energy, Corp., hereby subscribes
for the purchase of the number of Common Shares indicated below of CleanGoal Energy, Corp., at a purchase of $0.05 per Share as
set forth in the Prospectus.


 


By such payment, the named Investor further
acknowledges receipt of the Prospectus and the Subscription Agreement, the terms of which govern the investment in the Common Shares
being subscribed for hereby.


 


A. INVESTMENT:               


 


(1) Number of Shares ___________________________


 


(2) Date of Investor's check _______________________


 


B. REGISTRATION:


 


(3) Registered owner: __________________________


 


Co-Owner: __________________________________


 


(4) Mailing address: ___________________________


 


City, State & zip: _________________________


 


(5) Residence Address (if different from
above):


 


_________________________________         


 


(6) Birth Date: ______/______/______


 


(7) Employee or Affiliate: Yes ______
No ______


 


(8) Social Security: #: ______/______/______


 


U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ] __________________________


 


Co-Owner Social Security:


 


#: ______/______/______


 


U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]


 


Corporate or Custodial:


 


Taxpayer ID #: ______/______/______


 


U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ] ___________________________


 


(9) Telephone (H) ( ) ______________________


 


(10) *email address:__________________________




    	 



    	 



    

*Please note that by providing your email address, you accept
that all further communications between you and the Company shall be by email, unless otherwise required by law and/or the rules
and regulations of any governing body of traded securities.


 


 C.
OWNERSHIP


 


[ ] Individual Ownership                                           [
] IRA or Keogh


 


[ ] Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship


 


[ ] Trust/Date Trust Established_______________


 


[ ] Pension/Trust (S.E.P.)


 


[ ] Tenants in Common                                             [
] Tenants by the Entirety


 


[ ] Corporate Ownership                                           [
] Partnership


 


[ ] Other_____________________


 


D. SIGNATURES


 


Registered Owner: _____________________________


 


 


Co-Owner: _____________________________


 


 


Print Name of Custodian or Trustee: _____________________________


 


 


Authorized Signature: _____________________________


 


 


Date: _____________________


 


 


Signature: ___________________________________


 


 





	MAIL TO:	 	CleanGoal Energy, Corp.
	 	 	1717 N Bayshore Dr. #2831
	 	 	Miami FL, 33132



 


 



 


FOR CLEANGOAL ENERGY, CORP., OFFICE USE ONLY:


 


Date Received: ________________________________________________


 


Date Accepted/Rejected ________________________________________


 


Subscriber's Check Amount: _______________________


 


Check No. ___________________ Date Check ________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2021

No. 04-20-00594-CV

Judy FREEMAN,

Appellant

v.

Kundu JOHNSON, as Independent Administrator of the Estate James Phillip Johnson,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV01100

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 28, 2020, appellee Kundu Johnson, as Independent Administrator of the 

Estate of Phillip P. Johnson, Deceased, filed a motion to dismiss, arguing this court should 

dismiss this appeal because appellant Judy Freeman filed an untimely notice of appeal. Johnson 

argues that Freeman’s notice of appeal was due by September 25, 2020, and was untimely 

because Freeman did not file it until November 13, 2020. Johnson further argues that because 

findings of fact and conclusions of law cannot be considered in appeals from summary judgment 

orders, Freeman’s request for findings and conclusions did not extend her notice of appeal 

deadline. See IKB Indus. v. Pro-Line Corp., 938 S.W.2d 440, 442 (Tex. 1997). 

In general, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. If a party timely files a motion for new trial, then the deadline to file the 

notice of appeal is extended to ninety days from the date of the judgment. See id. R. 26.1(a)(4). 

A review of the clerk’s record shows the trial court signed its summary judgment and severance 

orders on August 26, 2020. Freeman then filed a request for findings and conclusions and a 

motion for new trial on August 28, 2020. Although Johnson is correct that Freeman’s request for 

findings and conclusions did not extend the appellate deadline to file her notice of appeal, her 

motion for new trial did. See id.; IKB Indus., 938 S.W.2d at 442. Accordingly, Freeman’s notice 

of appeal, which was filed within ninety days of the judgment, was timely filed. 

Johnson’s motion to dismiss is therefore DENIED. 

FILE COPY
_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
# C_2020045EN.01009501.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/95

---

Action brought on 13 December 2019 — X-cen-tek v EUIPO — Altenloh, Brinck & Co. (PAX)

(Case T-847/19)

(2020/C 45/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: X-cen-tek GmbH & Co. KG (Wardenburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hillers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Altenloh, Brinck & Co. GmbH & Co. KG (Ennepetal, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark PAX — Application for registration No 16 487 803

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2019 in Case R 2324/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Official Form 202

Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury for Non-Individual Debtors 12/15 

Fill in this information to identify the case and this filing:

Debtor Name

United States Bankruptcy Court for the:

Case number

(if known)

Refugee Services of Texas, Inc.

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

An individual who is authorized to act on behalf of a non-individual debtor, such as a corporation or partnership, must sign and 

submit this form for the schedules of assets and liabilities, any other document that requires a declaration that is not included 

in the document, and any amendments of those documents. This form must state the individual's position or relationship to 

the debtor, the identity of the document, and the date. Bankruptcy Rules 1008 and 9011.

WARNING -- Bankruptcy fraud is a serious crime. Making a false statement, concealing property, or obtaining money or 

property by fraud in connection with a bankruptcy case can result in fines up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 20 years, or 

both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152, 1341, 1519, and 3571.

Declaration and signature

X

Signature of individual signing on behalf of debtor

Executed on

MM / DD / YYYY



I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.



Schedule A/B: Assets--Real and Personal Property (Official Form 206A/B)

Schedule D: Creditors Who Have Claims Secured by Property (Official Form 206D)





Schedule E/F: Creditors Who Have Unsecured Claims (Official Form 206E/F)

Schedule G: Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases (Official Form 206G)





Schedule H: Codebtors (Official Form 206H)

A Summary of Assets and Liabilities for Non-Individuals (Official Form 206-Summary)





Amended Schedule

Other document that requires a declaration

Printed name

Position or relationship to debtor

 Chapter 11 or Chapter 9 Cases: List of Creditors Who Have the 20 Largest Unsecured Claims and Are Not Insiders

(Official Form 204)

Omar Khan

Board President

I am the president, another officer, or an authorized agent of the corporation; a member or an authorized agent of the partnership; 

or another individual serving as a representative of the debtor in this case.

I have examined the information in the documents checked below and I have a reasonable belief that the information is true and 

correct:

Official Form 202 Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury for Non-Individual Debtors

08/03/2023

Case 23-31689-mvl7 Doc 4 Filed 08/04/23 Entered 08/04/23 09:27:27 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7595
MARCUS D. KELLY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Col umbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-95-3799-3-23BC) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus D. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Kelly v. South Carolina , No. CA-95-3799- 3-23BC (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Starquineshia D. PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE 354TH DISTRIC T COURT OF HUNT COUN TY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th day of December, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

In the Interest of R.T.M. and I.M., Children No. 06

- 14

- 00063

- CV
Trial Court No. 79,495

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant s have adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we wai ve payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, wi th the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 19th day of February , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, L. Scott Biar, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary
and Chief Compliance Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   May 9, 2013



| | /s/ L. Scott Biar                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | L. Scott Biar                                                                     
| | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary
        and Chief Compliance Officer
Joe Nathan JAMES, Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-0229

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
# C_2021062EN.01001501.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 25 November 2020 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v TC Medical Air Ambulance Agency GmbH

(Case C-633/20)

(2021/C 62/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: TC Medical Air Ambulance Agency GmbH

Question referred

Is an undertaking which maintains, as the policyholder, foreign travel medical insurance and insurance covering foreign and domestic repatriation costs as a group insurance policy for its customers with an insurance undertaking, distributes to consumers memberships entitling them to claim insurance benefits in the event of illness or accident abroad and receives a fee from recruited members for the insurance cover purchased an insurance intermediary within the meaning of Article 2(3) and (5) of Directive 2002/92/EC (1) and Article 2(1)(1), (3) and (8) of Directive (EU) 2016/97? (2)

---

(1)  Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation (OJ 2003 L 9, p. 3).

(2)  Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution (recast) (OJ 2016 L 26, p. 19).

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - (-)rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        March 23, 2016        Surface water-quality activities of the U.S. Geological Survey in New England

publication        January 1, 2002        Lithogeochemical character of near-surface bedrock in the New England coastal basins

publication        December 31, 2014        Quaternary geology of the Boston area: Glacial events from Lake Charles to Lake Aberjona
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 14, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0060. RODERICK ALLEN AYCOX, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TEMPORARY 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LESLIE VAIL AYCOX v. LEE 

KENNETH PARTISS, III.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Probate Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

PC2022001427
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Fluid Dynamics

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(73)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(25)
              - multimedia_video-149194(15)
              - multimedia_video-149195(7)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

## By Year

Photography        August 9, 2018        GPS time series from station NRWY, near Norris Geyser Basin, as of November 15,
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 411 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, the following shall constitute the majority 

2 party’s membership on the following committees for the 

3 One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, or until their succes4 sors are chosen: 

5 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mrs. Murray 

6 (Chair), Mr. Durbin, Mr. Reed, Mr. Tester, Mrs. Shaheen, 

7 Mr. Merkley, Mr. Coons, Mr. Schatz, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 

8 Murphy, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. 

9 Peters, Ms. Sinema 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 411 ATS 

1 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN

2 AFFAIRS: Mr. Brown (Chair), Mr. Reed, Mr. Menendez, 

3 Mr. Tester, Mr. Warner, Ms. Warren, Mr. Van Hollen, 

4 Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Smith, Mr. Warnock, Mr. 

5 Fetterman, Ms. Butler. 

6 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: 

7 Mr. Manchin (Chair), Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 

8 Sanders, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Hirono, Mr. King, Ms. Cortez 

9 Masto, Mr. Hickenlooper, Mr. Padilla. 

10 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOV11 ERNMENTAL AFFAIRS: Mr. Peters (Chair), Mr. Carper, 

12 Ms. Hassan, Ms. Sinema, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Ossoff, Mr. 

13 Blumenthal, Ms. Butler. 

14 SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE: Mr. Warner 

15 (Chair), Mr. Wyden, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. King, Mr. Bennet, 

16 Mr. Casey, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Ossoff, Mr. Kelly, Mr. 

17 Reed (ex officio), Mr. Schumer (ex officio). 

18 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Durbin (Chair), 

19 Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Coons, Mr. 

20 Blumenthal, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Booker, Mr. Padilla, Mr. 

21 Ossoff, Mr. Welch, Ms. Butler. 

22 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Ms. 

23 Klobuchar (Chair), Mr. Schumer, Mr. Warner, Mr. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

SRES 411 ATS 

1 Merkley, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Ossoff, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Welch, 

2 Ms. Butler. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald K. Peterson,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.

<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>
/s/ DONALD K. PETERSON
-------------------------------------------
Donald K. Peterson
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
</Table>

August 14, 2002
Demetrias BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Brandy Spear BROWN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.