alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_maps(4)
              - products_publications(47)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(14)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(25)
              - colorado(10)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(7)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(35)
              - maine(13)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(15)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(13)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(6)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(30)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - (-)utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(21)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(12)

## By Year

Photography        August 17, 2021        Pack Creek at Pack Creek Road Bridge river gage
JORDAN, LYNCH & CANCIENNE PLLC

Michael Cancienne (SBN 24055256)

Joseph W. Golinkin II (SBN 24087596)

1980 Post Oak Blvd., Ste. 2300

Houston, Texas 77056

Telephone: 713.955.4025

Counsel for Steven Zakharyayev

And Evelina Pinkhasova

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE; and 

GNET ATC, LLC

Plaintiffs,

v.

18920 N 11th, LLC; JAMES 

GOODMAN; JAMES FRINZI; 

STEVEN ZAKHARYAYEV; 

EVELINA PINKHASOVA; PEOPLE 

NQ INC.; JJC & PEOPLE LLC; 

GDMN FAMILY INVESTMENTS 2, 

LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 22-31641-mvl-7

Adversary Proceeding No. 

23-03072-mvl

NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Court on has scheduled a hearing on 

April 24, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. to consider Defendants Steven Zakharyayev and Evelina 

Pinkashova’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint [Docket No. 

28].

Case 23-03072-mvl Doc 29 Filed 03/06/24 Entered 03/06/24 10:58:47 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

The hearing will be held in person before the Honorable Michelle V. 

Larson, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, 1100 

Commerce Street, 14th Floor, Courtroom No. 2, Dallas, Texas 75242. 

Respectfully submitted,

JORDAN, LYNCH & CANCIENNE PLLC

By: s/ Michael Cancienne

Michael Cancienne

State Bar No. 24046330

Joseph (“Jeb”) W. Golinkin II

State Bar No. 24087596

1980 Post Oak Blvd., Ste. 2300

Houston, Texas 77056

713-955-4020 (Telephone)

713-955-9644 (Fax)

mcancienne@jlcfirm.com

jgolinkin@jlcfirm.com

ATTORNEYS FOR STEVEN 

ZAKHARYAYEV AND EVELINA 

PINKASHOVA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 6th day of March, 2024, I electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of this filing to all counsel of record in this case.

/s/ Michael Cancienne

Michael Cancienne

Case 23-03072-mvl Doc 29 Filed 03/06/24 Entered 03/06/24 10:58:47 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry K. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|                                                                                                                             |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/GARRY K. MCGUIREGarry K. McGuire Chief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice President, Corporate DevelopmentFebruary 8, 2005 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by such this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
ICE LEGAL, P.A., Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Mallory Cheron a/k/a Cheron Mallory, Chrismene St. Louis Cheron, Carmel Financial Corporation, Inc., The Greens at Carolina Homeowners Association, Inc., and Carolina Maintenance Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-2047

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 27, 2019]

Max Utzschneider of Ice Appellate, Lake Worth, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Ice Legal, P.A. appeals a $ 1,000 sanction imposed against it for litigation misconduct. We reverse the sanction because the order to show cause setting a hearing on the sanction was directed to an individual attorney, not to Ice Legal, P.A. The order indicated that copies were provided to the attorney and to opposing counsel, but contained no address for service. Not properly put on notice of a potential sanction against it, the law firm did not appear at the sanction hearing. "Florida has consistently required notice and an opportunity to be heard before sanctions are imposed upon counsel."

*210*Clare v. Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc.* , 928 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

*Reversed and remanded* .

Gross, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.
# C_2020161EN.01003301.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2020 — Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil) v Ms C.

(Case C-68/20)

(2020/C 161/43)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

Defendant: Ms C.

Questions referred

| 1. | Is a remedy, provided by domestic law to asylum seekers who have been requested to have their applications for international protection examined in another Member State, which does not have suspensory effect and may acquire such effect only if the asylum seeker is deprived of liberty with a view to his imminent transfer an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 27 of the Dublin III Regulation? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is a remedy, provided by domestic law to asylum seekers who have been requested to have their applications for international protection examined in another Member State, which does not have suspensory effect and may acquire such effect only if the asylum seeker is deprived of liberty with a view to his imminent transfer an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 27 of the Dublin III Regulation? (1)

| 2. | Must the effective remedy prescribed in Article 27 of the Dublin III Regulation be interpreted as precluding only the implementation of a measure of enforced transfer while an action brought against that transfer decision is being examined or as prohibiting any measure preparatory to removal, such as relocation to a centre which establishes return paths for asylum seekers who have been requested to have their asylum applications examined in another European country? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the effective remedy prescribed in Article 27 of the Dublin III Regulation be interpreted as precluding only the implementation of a measure of enforced transfer while an action brought against that transfer decision is being examined or as prohibiting any measure preparatory to removal, such as relocation to a centre which establishes return paths for asylum seekers who have been requested to have their asylum applications examined in another European country?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).

---
Kenakil Chuka Charles GIBSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2858

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Acusphere, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Sherri C. Oberg, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and John F. Thero, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Sherri C. Oberg     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Sherri C. Oberg         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ John F. Thero       |   |
| John F. Thero           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

August 9, 2006

 

This certification isbeing submitted solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not tobe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor will thecertification be deemed incorporated by reference in to any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to theextent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
Exhibit
32.2





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


KERYX
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James F. Oliviero, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:




1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 25, 2010
                /s/ James F.
      OlivieroJames
      F. Oliviero
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
Christopher VINAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-460

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019.

Christopher Vinas, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2016

a0321 

# Order

Clerk March 29, 2016

151440

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151440

COA: 325501

Wayne CC: 03

- 001458

- FC

ANTONIO RAMON STAPLETON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because th e defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Nathaniel R. BRAZILL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Leandre SCOTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4808

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Stuart J. Doshi, certify that:

 

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof GeoPetro Resources Company;

 

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 8, 2009 | /s/ Stuart J. Doshi         |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                   | Stuart J. Doshi,  President |
|                   | and                         |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer     |

 

----
# C_2021329EN.01002202.xml

| 16.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE BARCELONA)

(Case T-227/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark BIOVÈNE BARCELONA - Earlier EU word mark BIORENE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 329/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biovene Cosmetics, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Estella Garbayo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Eugène Perma France (Saint-Denis, France) (represented by: S. Havard Duclos, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2020 (Case R 1661/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Eugène Perma France and Biovene Cosmetics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Biovene Cosmetics, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Biovene Cosmetics, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - documents_file-149220(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

## By Year

Infographics        April 1, 2024        DSAS v6.0 Infographic

Infographics        August 9, 2021        3DEP Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) Process