alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

***Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of ÆternaZentaris Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Juergen Engel, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**Dated: March 30, 2009**

 

 
| /s/ Juergen Engel                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Prof. Dr. Juergen Engel          |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: September 12, 2005



/s/ DONALD H. HUNTERDonald H. HunterChief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
----

| 1. | The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   9/14/2010 | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Ricker          |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   | Jonathan Ricker              |   |
|                              |   | Chief Executive Officer,     |   |
|                              |   | Chief Financial Officer and  |   |
|                              |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |

----
23-80016-sgj11 Impel Pharmaceuticals Inc. Appearances for April 1, 2024 at 9:30 hearings

ID Name: Firm: Party you represent:

1 Jeriad Paul Omni Omni

2 Brandon Smith Teneo CRO of the Debtors

3 Jackson Garvey Sidley Sidley

4 Rakhee Patel Sidley Sidley

5 Sam Newman Sidley Sidley

6 Nate Elner Sidley Sidley

7 Chelsea McManus Sidley Debtors

8 Parker Embry Sidley Debtors

9 Benjamin Beller Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Oaktree Fund Administration 

10 Jonathan Lozano Bracewell LLP Oaktree Fund Administration 

11 Benjamin Beller Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Oaktree Fund Administration

Case 23-80016-sgj11 Doc 312 Filed 04/01/24 Entered 04/01/24 11:26:08 Desc

Main Document Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 12, 2005
Exhibit 32.1





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen K. Gardner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 6, 2011





/s/ Stephen K. GardnerStephen K. GardnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7300

ERIC DONNELL SAUNDERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-01-340-2)

Submitted: November 26, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Donnell Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric D. Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An

appeal may not be taken from a final order denying relief under

this section unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here,

a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural

grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the

petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.)

(quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)), cert. denied, 122

S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for

the reasons stated by the district court that Saunders has not made

the requisite showing. Saunders v. Angelone, No. CA-01-340-2 (E.D.

Va. Aug. 22, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Saunders’

motion to compel the Appellee to file a brief. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Glen R. Alston, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Carmina Technologies Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control over financial reporting; and.

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

---



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.



Date: May 26, 2004





/s/ GLEN R. ALSTON

Glen R. Alston,

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and 
Principal Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-304-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

V.

ROBERT VALDEZ APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered the “State’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

It is further ordered that the State shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which

let execution issue. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(f) (Vernon Supp.

2004-05).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
DELIVERED: April 22, 2010
# C_2020279EN.01001802.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 24 February 2020 — Siebenburgisches Nugat Srl, Hans Draser Internationales Marketing v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală a Vămilor — Direcția Regională Vamală Brașov — Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu

(Case C-99/20)

(2020/C 279/25)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Siebenburgisches Nugat Srl, Hans Draser Internationales Marketing

Defendants: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală a Vămilor — Direcția Regională Vamală Brașov — Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu

Question referred

Is the combined nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation No 2658/87 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that goods generically described as ‘rail components for hanging curtains and drapes, or finished tubes (painted, nickel-plated, chromed)’, such as those at issue in the present case, fall under tariff subheading 8302 41 90 or under subheading 7306 30 77 of the combined nomenclature?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1, Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 02 Volume 004 P. 3).

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(4)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(3)
              - hawaii(25)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - (-)missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

Photography        May 31, 2015        Low-Level Flights in Southeast Missouri Will Look at Geology and Mineral Resources
Jose Enrique GONZALEZ, DOC #C11749, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3167

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BADALAMENTI, Judge.

Jose Enrique Gonzalez appeals his jury convictions and concurrent life sentences for first-degree murder and sexual battery with actual physical force likely to cause serious personal injury. Gonzalez argues that the July 11, 2018, amended judgment does not indicate that Gonzalez was found guilty by a jury. The State concedes this scrivener's error.1 Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court correct the scrivener's error contained in the amended judgment to reflect that Gonzalez was found guilty by a jury. *See**Newson v. State*, 867 So.2d 603, 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (affirming judgment and sentence but remanding with directions that an error in the judgment be corrected where the error was "not the result of a judicial determination, but rather a scrivener's error in the preparation of the written document"); *Taylor v. State*, 242 So.3d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) ("We also remand for the trial court to correct the scrivener's error in the judgment, which failed to indicate that Taylor was tried by a jury and found guilty."). We affirm Gonzalez's jury convictions and concurrent life sentences in all other respects.

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

KHOUZAM, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

1

While this appeal was pending, Gonzalez filed a motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The trial court granted that motion and ordered that the judgment be amended to comport with the court's oral pronouncement. That amended judgment, however, neglects to indicate that Gonzalez was convicted after a jury trial.
Kevin L. CHRISTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2779

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

Kevin L. Christy, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.
Littlejoe J. GARCIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jennifer RODRIGUEZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4851

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Walter LICHTENBERG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Darcy O'BERRY-HIGBEE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
----

Exhibit No. 32 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American LorainCorporation (Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),I, Si Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1) 

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 14,2007  

/s/ Si Chen                                Si Chen Chief Executive Officer 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American LorainCorporation (Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),I, Huanxiang Cheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

(1) 

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November14, 2007  

/s/ Huanxiang Cheng                Huanxiang Cheng Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will beretained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
Godfrey T. FAGOT v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, The, et al.

NO. 2018-C-1976

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Denied.
# C_2020414EN.01002201.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) of 3 September 2020 — Viasat UK Ltd, Viasat Inc. v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT), État belge, Inmarsat Ventures SE

(Case C-417/20)

(2020/C 414/30)

Language of the case: French

Referring Court

Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Viasat UK Ltd, Viasat Inc.

Defendants: Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT), État belge, Inmarsat Ventures SE

By order of 8 October 2020, the President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---