alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1111 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-890, K2025-891.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30994 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1 

4854-4486-5208, v. 2

Randall A. Pulman 

State Bar No. 16393250 

Leslie Sara Hyman 

State Bar No. 00798274 

W. Drew Mallender 

State Bar No. 24118450 

Anna K. MacFarlane 

State Bar No. 24116701 

PULMAN CAPPUCCIO & PULLEN, LLP

2161 NW Military Hwy., Suite 400 

San Antonio, Texas 78213 

Telephone: (210) 222-9494 

Facsimile: (210) 892-1610 

rpulman@pulmanlaw.com 

lhyman@pulmanlaw.com 

amacfarlane@pulmanlaw.com 

COUNSEL FOR UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE: 

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC., 

DEBTOR. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 22-31641-MVL-7 

 

CHAPTER 7 

SCOTT M. SEIDEL, TRUSTEE, 

 

PLAINTIFF

V. 

UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES, INC. 

DEFENDANT

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ADVERSARY NO. 23-03088-MVL

DEFENDANT UNIFIED FIELD SERVICES, INC.’S ADVISORY TO THE COURT REGARDING 

TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT’S RESPONSES 

TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION AND INTERROGATORIES 

[RELATING TO ADV. DKT. NO. 10] 

COMES NOW Defendant Unified Field Services, Inc. (“UFS”) and files this, its Advisory 

to the Court (the “Advisory”) regarding Trustee’s Motion to Compel Unified Field Services, Inc.’s 

Case 23-03088-mvl Doc 12 Filed 04/24/24 Entered 04/24/24 11:05:26 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2 

4854-4486-5208, v. 2

Responses to Requests for Production and Interrogatories [Adv. Dkt. No. 10] (the “Motion to 

Compel”), to advise the Court that it has, on this 24th day of April, 2024, provided Defendant’s 

Responses to the Requests for Production and Interrogatories propounded by the Trustee to counsel 

for the Trustee. 

Dated: April 24, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

PULMAN, CAPPUCCIO & PULLEN, LLP 

2161 NW Military Highway, Suite 400 

San Antonio, Texas 78213 

www.pulmanlaw.com

(210) 222-9494 Telephone 

(210) 892-1610 Facsimile 

By: /s/ Randall A. Pulman 

Randall A. Pulman 

Texas State Bar No. 16393250 

rpulman@pulmanlaw.com

Leslie Sara Hyman 

Texas State Bar No. 00798274 

lhyman@pulmanlaw.com 

W. Drew Mallender 

Texas State Bar No. 24118450 

dmallender@pulmanlaw.com 

Anna K. MacFarlane 

Texas State Bar No. 24116701 

amacfarlane@pulmanlaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT UNIFIED FINANCIAL 

SERVICES, INC.

 

Case 23-03088-mvl Doc 12 Filed 04/24/24 Entered 04/24/24 11:05:26 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
3 

4854-4486-5208, v. 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on April 24, 2024, the foregoing will be electronically mailed 

to the parties that are registered or otherwise entitled to receive electronic notices in this case 

pursuant to the Electronic Filing Procedures in this District. 

Via CM/ECF drukavina@munsch.com, 

tberghman@munsch.com, and 

cwhite@munsch.com 

Davor Rukavina 

Thomas D. Berghman 

Conor P. White 

Munsch, Hardt, Kopf & Harr 

500 N. Akard Street, Ste 3800 

Dallas, TX 75201-6659 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TRUSTEE

/s/ Randall A. Pulman 

Randall A. Pulman 

Case 23-03088-mvl Doc 12 Filed 04/24/24 Entered 04/24/24 11:05:26 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
Jimmy K. BONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2024-N-0846]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy Survey” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Amber Sanford, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,                         *301-796-8867,**PR**AStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 15, 2024, the Agency submitted a proposed collection of information entitled “National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy Survey” to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0855. The approval expires on November 30, 2027. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the internet at                     *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: December 16, 2024.

P. Ritu Nalubola,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-31298 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 23, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 04-30636

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CALVIN W. PENNYWELL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana,

USDC No. 5:03-CR-50124-1

_________________________________________________________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In United States v. Pennywell, No. 04-30636 (Jan. 7,

2005), this court affirmed Calvin W. Pennywell’s conviction for

possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine

base, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possession of

firearms in relation to drug trafficking, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 924(c)(1). Pennywell then filed a petition for writ of

certiorari, for the first time challenging his sentence under

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The Supreme Court
2

vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Booker.

See Pennywell v. United States, 125 S. Ct. 2278 (2005). We

requested and received supplemental letter briefs addressing the

impact of Booker.

Because Pennywell raised a Booker-like challenge to his

sentence for the first time in his petition for writ of certiorari,

he must demonstrate “extraordinary circumstances” for us to

consider his Booker challenge. United States v. Taylor, 409 F.3d

675, 676 (5th Cir. 2005). Because Pennywell concedes that he

cannot meet even the Fifth Circuit’s plain error standard, “it is

obvious that the much more demanding standard for extraordinary

circumstances, warranting review of an issue raised for the first

time in a petition for certiorari, cannot be satisfied.” See id.

at 677. 

Pennywell identifies no evidence in the record suggesting

that the district court “would have reached a significantly

different result” under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory

one. United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir. 2005),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). He correctly acknowledges that

this court has rejected the argument that a Booker error is a

structural error or that such error is presumed to be prejudicial.

See Mares, 402 F.3d at 520-22; United States v. Malveaux, 411 F.3d

558, 561 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 194 (2005).

He desires to preserve these arguments for further review.
3

Because nothing in the Supreme Court's Booker decision

requires us to change our prior decision in this case, we adhere to

our prior determination and therefore reinstate our judgment

AFFIRMING Pennywell’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED.
# Chart 1

# Chart 2

# Chart 3

# 1.1

# 1.2

# 1.3

# 1.4

# 1.5

# 1.6

# 1.7

# 1.8
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Caroline Dorsa,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ CAROLINE  DORSA                                                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Caroline Dorsa                                                                     |   |
| *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)* |   |

 

May 8, 2007

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - (-)multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - (-)south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1988        1988 LAS Land Analysis System

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1973        EROS Data Center Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS)

Presentations and Events        December 31, 1992        1992 December Don Lauer First All Hands

How to's and trainings        March 31, 2017        Getting Started with MODIS Version 6 Vegetation Indices Data Part 2

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
Enoch T. ROBINSON Sr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3285

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Enoch T. Robinson Sr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *Baker v. State* , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
Travis Lee MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3342

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy
# a • riNNAL Uil
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA22-0601

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, 

### NOV 2 2 2022
Bowen Greenwood c - , of Supreme Court 4,:tnin or Montana

v. ORDER K.A.B., Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant K.A.B. moves this Court for appointment ofcounsel in this appeal. As grounds, K.A.B. states that "[o]n November 15, 2004, the First Judicial District Court ordered that a hearingwould takeplace on Youth's K.A.B.'sMotion to Correct orModify Judgment." K.A.B. provides that being "unable to take an appeal while the motion remainedpending,"any appealwouldbepremature. K.A.B. furtherstatesthat"theDistrict Court formally gave notice that the hearingwould not take place[,]" on August 22, 2022. This Court observes that K.A.B. provided no copy of the court's notice or order when K.A.B. submitted his Notice ofAppeal. We requested and reviewed a copy ofthe August 22, 2022 Order as well asthe register ofactions. K.A.B.'s original youth court proceeding commenced in 2003. The court record indicates thatYouthCourt supervision was transferred to adult court onMay 11,2004. On October 11, 2011, the District Court ordered that the records in the case be sealed, and on September 11, 2014, upon motion, the District Court entered an order to destroy the court files. K.A.B. filed a "Defendant's Pro Se Notice of Issue" with the District Court on August 18, 2022. The District Court denied his Notice of Issue on August 22, 2022, wherein the Judge hand-wrote that "(1) Sentence/disposition expired long ago and (2)Juvenile file destroyed Denied." K.A.B. has not presented a proper final judgment from the District Court. "An appealmay be takenby the defendant only from a finaljudgment ofconviction and orders 11/22/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0601

### afterjudgmentwhich affect the substantial rights ofthe defendant." Section 46-20-104(1),

MCA. The court sentenced K.A.B. years ago and sealed the court's records in 2011. K.A.B. cannot revive a closed proceeding upon filing a notice ofissue in the District Court
more than a decade later. As such, his appeal is not properly before this Court. M. R. App. P. 4(5)(b)(i). Furtherrnore, K.A.B. is not entitled to appointment ofcounsel. There is no right to the appointment of counsel in a postconviction proceeding. Section 46-8-104, MCA. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that K.A.B.'s appeal is DISMISSED sua sponte and with prejudice for the reasons listed above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that K.A.B.'s Motion for Appointrnent ofCounsel is DENIED as moot. The Clerk ofthe Suprerne Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to: the Honorable Kathy Seeley, First Judicial District Court; Angie Sparks, Clerk of District Court, Lewis and Clark County, under Cause No. DJ 2003-02; counsel of record and K.A.B. personally. The Clerk is furthergirected to close this case ofthis Order's date. DATED this 2--day ofNovember, 2022.

ChiefJustice



# xLi 44 4.1•L

2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

s0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140368 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140368 

 COA: 285636 

Livingston CC: 07-016851-FH 

KEITH RUSSELL MOGG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 24, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Robert BROWN v. STATE

CR-16-0543

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Anderson CLARK

No. 2018-KH-1978

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Case 23-32655-11    Doc 1    Filed 11/13/23    Entered 11/13/23 12:28:26    Desc MainDocument      Page 1 of 6

Case 23-32655-11    Doc 1    Filed 11/13/23    Entered 11/13/23 12:28:26    Desc MainDocument      Page 2 of 6

Case 23-32655-11    Doc 1    Filed 11/13/23    Entered 11/13/23 12:28:26    Desc MainDocument      Page 3 of 6

Case 23-32655-11    Doc 1    Filed 11/13/23    Entered 11/13/23 12:28:26    Desc MainDocument      Page 4 of 6

Case 23-32655-11    Doc 1    Filed 11/13/23    Entered 11/13/23 12:28:26    Desc MainDocument      Page 5 of 6

Case 23-32655-11    Doc 1    Filed 11/13/23    Entered 11/13/23 12:28:26    Desc MainDocument      Page 6 of 6
# C_2021228EN.01002702.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EZ v Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana, Sociedad Unipersonal

(Case C-606/20) (1)

(2021/C 228/37)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

---