# C_2021028EN.01001801.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 19 October 2020 — Koppány 2007 Zrt. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

(Case C-523/20)

(2021/C 28/27)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Győri Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Koppány 2007 Zrt.

Defendant: Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the expression ‘are legally resident’ contained in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 (1), extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2) and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (3) to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these regulations solely on the ground of their nationality, be interpreted as meaning that it is also applicable to nationals of third countries who reside and have a residence permit in the Member State concerned and have a document stating their place of accommodation issued by the immigration authority? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the expression ‘are legally resident’ contained in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 (1), extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2) and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (3) to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these regulations solely on the ground of their nationality, be interpreted as meaning that it is also applicable to nationals of third countries who reside and have a residence permit in the Member State concerned and have a document stating their place of accommodation issued by the immigration authority?

| 2. | May the expression ‘are legally resident’ be applied to nationals of third countries who have a certified place of accommodation at the registered office of their employer? |
| --- | --- |

2.

May the expression ‘are legally resident’ be applied to nationals of third countries who have a certified place of accommodation at the registered office of their employer?

| 3. | When interpreting the expression ‘are legally resident’, should account be taken of the concept of ‘residence’ within the meaning of Article 1(j) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems or of the concept of ‘residence’ as defined in the national legislation of the Member State in question? |
| --- | --- |

3.

When interpreting the expression ‘are legally resident’, should account be taken of the concept of ‘residence’ within the meaning of Article 1(j) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems or of the concept of ‘residence’ as defined in the national legislation of the Member State in question?

| 4. | What meaning should be given to the expression ‘are legally resident’ as a uniform concept of EU law? |
| --- | --- |

4.

What meaning should be given to the expression ‘are legally resident’ as a uniform concept of EU law?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality (OJ 2010 L 344, p. 1).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1),

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2009 L 284, p. 1).

---