alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1




Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


Keryx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated March 31,
2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Keryx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ (deficiency)
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report
on Form 10-K of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.:





-
            Form
      S-8 dated February 5, 2001 (File No.
333-55006)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated December 12, 2003, as amended (File No.
    333-111143)


-
            Form
      S-8 dated September 29, 2004 (File No.
  333-119377)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated March 16, 2004, as amended (File No.
  333-113654)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated April 19, 2004 (File No.
333-114593)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated September 29, 2004 (File No.
  333-119376)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated July 11, 2005 (File No.
333-126494)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated December 30, 2005 (File No.
  333-130809)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated April 6, 2006, as amended (File No.
  333-133051)


-
            Form
      S-8 dated April 6, 2006, as amended (File No.
  333-133052)


-
            Form
      S-3/A dated June 21, 2006 (File No.
333-133051)


-
            Form
      S-8 dated July 31, 2007 (File No.
333-145003).





Our
report dated March 31, 2009 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that
the Company has incurred substantial recurring losses from operations, a
deficiency in equity, limited cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investment
securities, and illiquid investments in auction rate securities that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.





Our
report also refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” in
2008 and SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” in
2006.





/s/ KPMG
LLP





New York,
New York


March 31,
2009
Lloyd Dale SHANNON Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5401

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. PERRY COUSINS, a/k/a Pzo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. ( 4:10

- cr - 00047

- RBS

- TEM

1 ; 4:16

- cv - 00060

- RBS )

Submitted : August 20, 2019 Decided: August 30, 2019

Before MOTZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Perry Cousins , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Perry Cousins seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as time

- barred his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion
states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cousins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Cousins’ motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
1

Filed 10/18/13 P. v

. Tygenhof CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado)

----

THE PEOP LE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RYAN RAYMOND TYGENHOF,

Defendant and Appellant. C072039

(Super. Ct. No. P09CRF0256)

Appointed counsel for defendant Ryan Raymond Tygenhof asked this court to

review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People

v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ).) Finding no arguable error, we affirm the judgment. Defendant pled no contest to child endangerment. (Pen. Code, 1 § 273a, subd. (a).)

A count of lewd and lascivious acts wi th a child (§ 288, subd. (a)) and an allegation of
substantial sexual conduct (§ 1203.066, subd. (a)(8)) were dismissed in the interest of justice. Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was granted probation for
four years. He was ordered to pay various fines and fees and victim restitution.

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.2

At the restitution hearing, the mother submitted a claim for mental health counseling expenses, family law attorney fees, relocation expenses, and lost wages. Due to the emotional stress caused by def endant’s behavior with the child victim, the child’s

mother missed hundreds of hours of work between March 2008 and December 2010. The mother missed 471.5 hours of work in 2008, at $17.78 per hour; 987 hours of work in 2009, at $18.67 per hour; and 11 mon ths of work in 2010, at $1,355 every two weeks. For the 11 months of 2010, the mother received $948 in state disability payments every two weeks, resulting in a net loss of $814 per month.
Following the restitution hearing, the trial court ordered defendant to pay victim restitution in the amount of $37,004.56 plus a 10

- percent collection fee. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening

brief . More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION The judgment is af

firmed.

HOCH , J.

We concur:

HULL , Acting P. J.

BUTZ , J.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
Heather Marie Coomey SHIRAH v. STATE

CR-16-0494

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017 Reh. denied September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

## By Year

Supporting material        January 18, 2023        How StreamStats Works

Supporting material        July 19, 2018        Web Services in the U.S. Geological Survey StreamStats Web Application

Supporting material        July 19, 2018        StreamStats: The Past, Present, Future

Supporting material        July 19, 2018        Stream-Network Navigation in the U.S. Geological Survey StreamStats

Supporting material        July 1, 2016        River Restoration in Milwaukee, WI
Raymond Raphael FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2528

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2019399EN.01008302.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/83

---

Action brought on 26 September 2019 — Brands Up v EUIPO (Credit24)

(Case T-651/19)

(2019/C 399/102)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Brands Up OÜ (Tallin, Estonia) (represented by: M. Welin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘Credit24’ — Application for registration No 17 941 316

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 July 2019 in Case R 465/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | register the European Union trade mark No 17 941 316; |
| --- | --- |

—

register the European Union trade mark No 17 941 316;

| — | order that the word ‘doubtful’ be deleted from the EUIPO Examiner’s decision of 20 December 2018, p. 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the word ‘doubtful’ be deleted from the EUIPO Examiner’s decision of 20 December 2018, p. 1;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001;

| — | Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and consistency of case law. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and consistency of case law.

---
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James McKeever,
      Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                James McKeeverJames
                McKeeverInterim
                Chief Financial Officer
BROOKLAWN DISPOSAL INDUSTRY, LLC and Brooklawn Disposal, Inc. v. LOUISIANA LAND ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Gordon Burr, Jr. and Earnest Mathis

NO. 2018-CC-2087

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

*426Stay denied. Writ denied.
# C_2021028EN.01001401.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — NTS Network SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

(Case C-479/20)

(2021/C 28/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: NTS Network SpA

Respondent: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?

| 2. | Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?

---
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/    DONALD H.
HUNTERDonald H. Hunter Chief
Financial Officer





August 8, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract                               ( print page 106619)                            1185 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-980, K2025-979.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31163 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

October 19, 2006
# C_2021028EN.01001902.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 19 October 2020 — PJ v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-527/20)

(2021/C 28/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PJ

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Question referred

Does a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
# C_2021053EN.01002001.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 10 November 2020 — Landkreis Northeim v Daimler AG

(Case C-588/20)

(2021/C 53/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Landkreis Northeim

Defendant: Daimler AG

Interveners: Iveco Magirus AG, MAN SE, MAN Truck & Bus SE, MAN Truck & Bus Deutschland GmbH

Question referred

Must the decision of the European Commission of 19 July 2016 (1)– C(2016) 4673 final — relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA agreement (Case AT.39824 — Trucks) be interpreted as meaning that special-purpose/specialised vehicles, in particular refuse collection vehicles, are also covered by the findings of that Commission Decision?

---

(1)  Notified under document C(2016) 4673 final, summary notice in OJ 2017 C 108, p. 6.

---