alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John F. Thero, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Acusphere, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Not applicable;

c)                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

| Date:  | March 20,  2006           | /s/ JOHN F. THERO |
|--------|--------------------------------|-------------------|
|   | John F. Thero                  |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer       |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.21


                 AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

         The AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made as of the 16th day of February 2004
and amended the 21st day of April, 2004, by and between Melling Consultancy
Design (MCD), a sole proprietorship operating under the laws of the United
Kingdom, and Viper Motorcycle Company (the "Company") is hereby changed by this
Amendment this 27th day of July, 2004.

         WHEREAS, the Agreement shall be modified as follows:

         No. 2 Melling Property Purchase, the $157,500 payment shall be due the
         earlier of (i) September 24, 2004 or (ii) within ten days of the
         effective date of the Company's pending IPO.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force.

                                          IN WITNESS OF, the parties hereto have
                                          executed this amendment to the
                                          Agreement as of the day and year first
                                          above written.



Melling Consultancy Design                Viper Motorcycle Company
Al Melling




/s/ AL MELLING                            /s/ JOHN LAI
---------------------------------         ---------------------------------
Exhibit 10.24

                              TREND MINING COMPANY
                              1519 Main Street #169
                              Hilton Head, SC 29926
               Telephone (843) 682-2023 * Facsimile (843) 682-2024




October 1, 2002

Mr. Thomas Kaplan
New York, NY

Dear Mr. Kaplan:

         By mutual agreement of the parties it is hereby acknowledged that the
single outstanding preferred share held in your name is hereby cancelled
effective on the date first written above. It is also agreed that all rights,
duties and obligations of either party related to such share being issued and
outstanding shall also terminate and be of no further effect as of the same
date.

On Behalf of the Company,



/s/ John P. Ryan
John P. Ryan
Chief Financial Officer
Trend Mining Company


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed and Accepted,



/s/ Thomas Kaplan
Thomas Kaplan
James WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2629

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2022109EN.01001101.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — DS v Koch Personaldienstleistungen GmbH

(Case C-514/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 31(2) - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Article 7 - Annual leave - Working time - Overtime - Calculation of working time on a monthly basis - No overtime pay when taking annual leave)

(2022/C 109/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DS

Defendant: Koch Personaldienstleistungen GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, read in the light of Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as precluding a provision in a collective labour agreement under which, in order to determine whether the threshold of hours worked granting entitlement to overtime pay is reached, the hours corresponding to the period of paid annual leave taken by the worker are not to be taken into account as hours worked.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 577 

Recognizing and honoring Burnsville, Minnesota, law enforcement and first 

responders for their heroic actions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring Burnsville, Minnesota, law 

enforcement and first responders for their heroic actions. 

Whereas Burnsville Police Officers Paul Elmstrand and Matthew Ruge and Firefighter/Paramedic Adam Finseth died 

in the line of duty on February 18, 2024, while responding to a domestic situation in Burnsville, Minnesota; 

Whereas Officer Paul Elmstrand dedicated over 6 years of 

service to the Burnsville Police Department, joined the 

department in 2017 as a Community Service Officer and 

was promoted to Officer in 2019, and served as part of 

the department’s mobile command staff, peer team, 

honor guard, and field training unit; 

Whereas Officer Matthew Ruge dedicated over 3 years of 

service to the Burnsville Police Department, joining the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 577 ATS 

department in 2020, where he was a physical evidence officer and a member of the crisis negotiation team; 

Whereas Firefighter/Paramedic Adam Finseth dedicated 5 

years of service to the Burnsville Fire Department, 

served as a water rescue trainer and on Burnsville’s 

Health and Wellness Committee, and was an Army veteran serving during Operation Iraqi Freedom; 

Whereas Officers Paul Elmstrand and Matthew Ruge and 

Firefighter/Paramedic Adam Finseth will be remembered 

as heroes who protected their community and loved their 

families and friends; 

Whereas Police Sergeant Adam Medlicott was injured and 

hospitalized while responding to the call; and 

Whereas Sergeant Adam Medlicott has served with the 

Burnsville Police Department since 2014 in various roles, 

including as a patrol officer, drug recognition specialist, 

and field training officer, and was promoted to sergeant 

in 2022: Now therefore be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses deep condolences to the families 

3 and colleagues of Burnsville, Minnesota, Police Offi4 cers Paul Elmstrand and Matthew Ruge and Fire5 fighter/Paramedic Adam Finseth, who made the ulti6 mate sacrifice in the line of duty and whose sacrifice 

7 will not be forgotten; 

8 (2) honors the bravery of Police Sergeant Adam 

9 Medlicott; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 577 ATS 

1 (3) recognizes all of the countless selfless and 

2 heroic actions carried out by local law enforcement 

3 and first responders; 

4 (4) expresses strong support for law enforce5 ment and first responders in Minnesota and across 

6 the United States who protect and serve their com7 munities; and 

8 (5) acknowledges the importance of honoring 

9 and remembering fallen law enforcement and first 

10 responders killed in the line of duty. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 410 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 410

       Designating October 12, 2023, as ``National Loggers Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2023

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. King, Mr. Risch, and Mr. 
 Boozman) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating October 12, 2023, as ``National Loggers Day''.

Whereas the logging industry has served as an economic driver and cultural 
        tradition in the United States for centuries;
Whereas the logging industry creates rural jobs and provides revenue for local 
        and State governments and National forests;
Whereas loggers provide renewable material for products used by people in the 
        United States every day;
Whereas loggers are the first link in the $300,000,000,000 domestic forest 
        products supply chain;
Whereas loggers are the means by which healthy forest management plans are 
        accomplished;
Whereas logging provides for healthy forests, which--

    (1) maintain vital animal habitats;

    (2) protect watersheds;

    (3) sequester carbon;

    (4) provide public recreational opportunities; and

    (5) reduce loss of life and property from wildfires; and

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests through regeneration, including by 
        planting 2,500,000,000 trees annually: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates October 12, 2023, as 
``National Loggers Day''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**LISTOF SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of Organization** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                     |       |                              |
| Subsidiaries of the  Registrant:                         |       |                              |
| China  Unicom Corporation Limited                        |       | People’s Republic of  China  |
| Unicom  New World (BVI) Limited                          |       | British Virgin Islands            |
| China  Unicom International Limited                      |       | Hong Kong SAR                     |
| China  Unicom (Macau) Company Limited                    |       | Macau SAR                         |
|                                                     |       |                              |
| Subsidiary of Unicom  New World (BVI) Limited:           |       |                              |
| Unicom  New World Telecommunications Corporation Limited |       | People’s Republic of  China  |
|                                                     |       |                              |
| Subsidiary of China  Unicom International Limited        |       |                              |
| China  Unicom USA Corporation                            |       | California, U.S.A.                |

 

----
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

      Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management
Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 08, 2006


                                    By: /s/ Jim Karlak
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Jim Karlak
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer








                                     Page 12
Demarcus Lashawn BAKER v. STATE

CR-16-0787

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - documents_file-149220(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 17, 2021        Tule Goose Migration Tracks, 2019 and 2020
Federal Aviation
Administration

Memorandum

Date:

fober 30, 2009

To:

: Control Cenber

INFORMATION: Parti
tion NWA
, UN, &

the Mi
or the ti

Approach, Departure

ot

A. hom aes

Aotim
Minn

Manager

O1a014)

aut
inne

Ra/4

e eighty eight peint ont approy
Lligible)


NWALRS

G230:50 ROS
0330252 RLG
130254 ROG
O130°85 NWAISE

NWA

NWA

a

RE

=

H439244
o140
G14h

lai:

R

one eighty eight with
cliee and we're at twenty four
ah six
ten poink out north of eau a one
eight landing minneapol
one y eight elligible}
one ts at two four ara

northwest.
now Cleared di
cress ollee inte
thousand minneapel

one

okay ollee gopher five and ah
expect x

northwest beliave t what you
can exp ah runway

eight dix

ae ure

ome eighty
il show



ligiblei

okay lunint

thank you

© one

Wwe

twent,

at. Feeder

to geo

ah di

said he

igible}

gopher

northweat

im

nts

good slaght

eighty eigh

eighty eight
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Role of tau in non-neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Related Disorders (RD).                    

*Date:*                         February 5, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nesar Uddin Akanda, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 2E405, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 594-8984,                         *nesar.akanda@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 17, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30560 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2020222EN.01002001.xml

| 6.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 24 April 2020 — VYSOČINA WIND a.s. v Česká republika — Ministerstvo životního prostředí

(Case C-181/20)

(2020/C 222/22)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VYSOČINA WIND a.s.

Defendant: Česká republika — Ministerstvo životního prostředí

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 13 of Directive 2012/19/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) be interpreted such that it prevents a Member State from imposing the obligation to finance the costs of the collection, treatment, recovery, and environmentally sound disposal of WEEE coming from photovoltaic panels placed on the market prior to 1 January 2013 on their users, rather than their producers? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 13 of Directive 2012/19/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) be interpreted such that it prevents a Member State from imposing the obligation to finance the costs of the collection, treatment, recovery, and environmentally sound disposal of WEEE coming from photovoltaic panels placed on the market prior to 1 January 2013 on their users, rather than their producers?

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the evaluation of the conditions for the liability of a Member State for damage caused to an individual due to a breach of EU law influenced by the fact — which was at issue in the original proceedings — that the Member State itself regulated the method of financing of waste from photovoltaic panels prior to the adoption of the directive, which newly included photovoltaic panels in the scope of EU regulation and imposed the obligation to finance the costs on producers, including in relation to panels placed on the market prior to the expiry of the directive’s implementation period (and the adoption of regulation at European Union level)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the evaluation of the conditions for the liability of a Member State for damage caused to an individual due to a breach of EU law influenced by the fact — which was at issue in the original proceedings — that the Member State itself regulated the method of financing of waste from photovoltaic panels prior to the adoption of the directive, which newly included photovoltaic panels in the scope of EU regulation and imposed the obligation to finance the costs on producers, including in relation to panels placed on the market prior to the expiry of the directive’s implementation period (and the adoption of regulation at European Union level)?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 197, p. 38.

---