alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP,Independent Accountants**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statements No. 333-54106 and No. 333-61984 of Valicert, Inc. on Form S-8, and in Registration Statement No. 333-74664 of Valicert, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated January 23, 2003 (February 18, 2003 as to the secondparagraph of Note 14 and May 19, 2003 as to the first paragraph of Note 14) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs regarding (a) the uncertainty about Valicert, Inc.’s ability to continue as a goingconcern and (b) a change in the method of accounting for goodwill), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Valicert, Inc. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

June 4, 2003
# C_2020329EN.01001204.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Schwechat — Austria) — JU v Air France Direktion für Österreich

(Case C-93/20) (1)

(2020/C 329/26)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millennium Quest, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Dimitri Cocorinis and Terry Cononelos, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.



Date: August 16, 2005             /s/ Dimitri Cocorinis
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                  Dimitri Cocorinis, Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 16, 2005             /s/ Terry Cononelos
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                  Terry Cononelos, Chief Financial Officer
** **

**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Fred J. Krupica, Chief Financial Officer ofFastclick, Inc., certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Fred J. Krupica       |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                       |   | Fred J. Krupica           |
|                       |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Tyrone MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Arthur LITTLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5014

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Christian John RYBURN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 03, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Maternal Nutrition and Aging.                    

*Date:*                         February 4, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 594-7945,                         *kaitlyn.hardell@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 19, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30881 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2020329EN.01000801.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/8

---

Appeal brought on 7 August 2020 by Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 28 May 2020 in Case T-574/18, Agrochem-Maks v Commission

(Case C-374/20 P)

(2020/C 329/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. (represented by: S. Pappas and A. Pappas, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Kingdom of Sweden

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court;

| — | order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay the costs of the appellant in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay the costs of the appellant in the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court misinterpreted and misapplied the requirements of the procedure regarding requests for additional information in the context of the renewal of the approval of the active substance.

The General Court committed an error of law by holding that the complaint (relating to the seven non-finalised issues) that the existence of disagreements between EFSA’s assessments and that of the rapporteur Member State requires in-depth reasoning on that question must be rejected as unfounded in relation to the fourth issue and as ineffective with relation to the other issues.

The General Court committed an error of law by failing to take into account all the relevant elements in order to examine the appellant’s legitimate expectations.

The General Court erroneously qualified the facts and infringed Article 6(f) of Regulation No 1107/2009 (1), point 2.2 of Annex II to that regulation and the principle of proportionality.

The General Court committed an error of law by incorrectly interpreting and applying the precautionary principle.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009, L 309, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Mass Megawatts Wind Power, Inc.
(the 'Company') on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbaenes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
     Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

     In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.

                                    MASS MEGAWATTS WIND POWER, INC.

Date: December 11, 2006             By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
                                         -------------------

                                         Jonathan Ricker
                                         Title: Chairman, Chief Executive
                                         Officer Chief Financial Officer and
                                         Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick C. Shutt, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Capital Growth Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 15, 2008



By:

/s/ Patrick C. ShuttName:

Patrick C. ShuttTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 473 

Designating October 2023 as ‘‘National Principals Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 27, 2023 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KING, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. HIRONO, 

and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 2023 as ‘‘National Principals Month’’. 

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National Association of Elementary School 

Principals, and the American Federation of School Administrators have declared October 2023 to be ‘‘National 

Principals Month’’; 

Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional 

and assessment leaders, community builders, budget analysts, facilities managers, and administrators of legal and 

contractual obligations; 

Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and 

parents to develop and implement clear missions, high 

curriculum standards, and performance goals; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 473 ATS 

Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate 

great teaching and learning and continuous school improvement; 

Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing force behind any school improvement 

effort; and 

Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would 

honor elementary school, middle school, and high school 

principals and recognize the importance of principals in 

ensuring that every child has access to a high-quality 

education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 2023 as ‘‘National Prin3 cipals Month’’; 

4 (2) honors the contributions of principals in ele5 mentary schools, middle schools, and high schools in 

6 the United States; and 

7 (3) supports the goals and ideals of National 

8 Principals Month. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - new mexico(1)
              - rhode island(1)

## By Year

General        August 2, 2018        370.410.1 - Training - General Provision

General        December 29, 2023        Science Information Service (SIS)

General        July 11, 2019        Giuseppina Mattietti

General        July 11, 2019        Madalyn Blondes

General        July 11, 2019        Sally Sennert

General        May 1, 2019        General Questions To Pose While Exploring Topographic Maps

General        July 11, 2019        Alanna Simpson

General        July 11, 2019        Geoff Gilleaudeau

General        July 11, 2019        Jacob Richardson

General        July 11, 2019        William F. Hoover

General        July 11, 2019        Jess Rodysill

Historical        December 31, 1870        Hayden Survey 1870 Wyoming in camp at Red Buttes

General        January 24, 2023        Don't Take It for Granite

General        August 3, 2018        429.1 - Space Management

General        March 1, 2018        Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer: Clifford I. Voss

General        July 30, 2020        New Mexico Water Science Center Sediment Laboratory

Historical        December 31, 1964        Two buildings on hillside
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7215** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID, a/k/a Rodney Buchanan , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:10

- cr - 00941

- RBH

- 1 )

Submitted : November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Hakim Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct an alleged error in the district court’s order granting his 1 8 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. Although the district court correctly construed the motion as a motion for reconsideration , cf. Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 (“After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may
. . . correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission.” (emphasis added) ) , because the district court lacked authority to reconsider its order granting Rashid’s
§ 3582(c)(2) motion , s ee United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010) , we affirm the district court’s order.
See United States v. Rashid , No. 4:10

- cr - 00941

- RBH

- 1 (D.S.C. July 28, 2015 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the first amended Annual Report of Perfect Health Care
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report), Antoine Jarjour, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2004

Signed:

/s/ Antoine Jarjour
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer