alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022024EN.01003301.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — Amigüitos pets & life (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect)

(Case T-616/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect - Earlier EU word mark ONE - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court - Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Res judicata)

(2022/C 24/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Amigüitos pets & life, SA (Lorca, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2020 (Case R 424/2020-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Société des produits Nestlé and Amigüitos pets & life.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 July 2020 (Case R 424/2020-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 July 2020 (Case R 424/2020-5);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Société des produits Nestlé SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Société des produits Nestlé SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the General Court;

| 3. | Orders Amigüitos pets & life, SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Amigüitos pets & life, SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.

---
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Marcel Urbanc, chief financial officer of AlphaRx, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of AlphaRx, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
  this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
  registrant and have:

> designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
>       material information relating to the registrant, including its
>       consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
>       entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
>       being prepared;
>       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
>       and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
>       this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
>       presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
>       of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
>       Evaluation Date;

1. We have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
  persons performing the equivalent functions):

> all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
>       controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
>       process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
>       registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
>       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
>       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
>       controls; and

1. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
  changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation,
  including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
  material weaknesses.

Date: December 9, 2004

/s/ Marcel Urbanc

Marcel Urbanc, Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 6, 2003



/s/         STEPHEN G. KASNETStephen G. KasnetChief Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Each of the
undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The Princeton Review, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date:  March 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL J.
PERIK   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | Michael J. Perik       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|Date:  March 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    STEPHEN C. RICHARDS
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | Stephen C. Richards    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Princeton Review, Inc. and will be retained by The Princeton Review, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2021053EN.01002002.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 17 November 2020 — Interporto di Trieste SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA — GSE

(Case C-608/20)

(2021/C 53/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Interporto di Trieste SpA

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Gestore dei Servizi Energetici SpA — GSE

Question referred

Does EU law preclude the application of a provision of national law, such as that in Article 26(2) and (3) of Decree-Law No 91/2014, as converted by Law No 116/2014, which significantly reduces or delays the payment of incentives already granted by law and defined on the basis of corresponding agreements concluded by undertakings generating electrical energy by means of photovoltaic conversion with Gestore dei servizi energetici SpA, a public company responsible for that process?

In particular, is that provision of national law compatible with the general principles of EU law relating to legitimate expectation, legal certainty, sincere cooperation and effectiveness, with Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, with Directive 2009/28/EC (1) and with the rules governing support schemes laid down in that directive, and with Article 216(2) TFEU, in particular in relation to the European Energy Charter Treaty?

---

(1)  Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ 2009 L 140, p. 16).

---
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (the Company)
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  (i)the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and  (ii)the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 26, 2009
  /s/ MIKHAIL V. SHAMOLINMikhail V. ShamolinChief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136293 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHAEL GEROW,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136293 

 COA: 269112 

Saginaw CC: 98-025691-CZ 

CITY OF SAGINAW,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0716 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 23, 2008 

 Clerk
Wendy Michelle GILBERT v. STATE

CR-15-0894

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
# C_2023296EN.01003201.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/32

---

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2023 — Thunus and Others v EIB

(Case T-666/20) (1)

(Civil service - Staff of the EIB - Remuneration - Annual salary adjustment - Plea of illegality - Res judicata - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Staff consultation - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

(2023/C 296/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Vincent Thunus (Contern, Luxembourg) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, A. García Sánchez and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and P.-E. Partsch, lawyer)

Re:

By their action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicants seek, first, annulment of the decisions of the European Investment Bank (EIB), contained in their pay slips for March 2020 and subsequent months, setting the annual adjustment of the basic salary at 0,7 % for the year 2020 and, secondly, compensation for the material damage they claim to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is rejected as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is rejected as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Mr Vincent Thunus and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Vincent Thunus and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB).

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
Christopher M. Lee 

State Bar No. 24041319 

LEE LAW FIRM, PLLC 

8701 Bedford Euless Rd, Ste 510 

Hurst, TX 76053 

469-646-8995 Phone 

469-694-1059 Fax 

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

IN RE: § 

 § 

JORIS LYNN DIXON § CASE NO. 24-42307-MXM-13

LACHEKA CHONTA WINFREY § 

Debtor § CHAPTER 13

§ 

 

 

DEBTOR'S WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 

ORDER AND REINSTATE CHAPTER 13 CASE

TO THE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

 NOW COMES Debtor, Joris Lynn Dixon and Lacheka Chonta Winfrey and notifies the 

Court that they withdraw their Motion to Vacate Dismissal Order and Reinstate Chapter 13 Case. 

 

Dated: August 8, 2024 

 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 By: /s/Christopher Lee 

 Christopher M. Lee 

 State Bar No. 24041319 

 LEE LAW FIRM, PLLC 

 8701 Bedford Euless Rd, Ste 510 

 Hurst, TX 76053 

 469-646-8995 Phone 

Case 24-42307-mxm13 Doc 24 Filed 08/08/24 Entered 08/08/24 15:02:15 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
469-694-1059 Fax 

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 The undersigned hereby certifies that on August 8, 2024, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was served on all parties in interest below and on the attached matrix. 

DEBTOR: 

Joris Lynn Dixon 

6721 Morning Crest Court 

Arlinton, Texas 76002 

STANDING TRUSTEE: 

Pam Bassel 

7001 Blvd 26, Ste 150 

North Richland Hills, TX 76180 

U.S. TRUSTEE 

1100 Commerce Street 

Room 976 

Dallas, TX 75242 

 /s/ Christopher Lee 

 Christopher Lee 

 

Case 24-42307-mxm13 Doc 24 Filed 08/08/24 Entered 08/08/24 15:02:15 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acusphere, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Sherri C. Oberg,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John F. Thero, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Sherri C. Oberg     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Sherri C. Oberg         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| /s/ John F. Thero       |   |
| John F. Thero           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| May 12, 2005            |

 

This certification is being submitted solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode. This certification is not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section, nor will the certification be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates itby reference.

 

1

----
# C_2020161EN.01003102.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/31

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa lodged on 5 February 2020 — VAS ‘Latvijas dzelzceļš’ v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija

(Case C-60/20)

(2020/C 161/41)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā apgabaltiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VAS ‘Latvijas dzelzceļš’

Defendant: Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 13(2) and (6) of Directive 2012/34 (1) (Article 15(5) and (6) of Regulation 2017/2177) (2) apply in such a manner that the regulatory body can impose on the owner of an infrastructure, who is not the owner of the service facility, the obligation to ensure access to the services? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 13(2) and (6) of Directive 2012/34 (1) (Article 15(5) and (6) of Regulation 2017/2177) (2) apply in such a manner that the regulatory body can impose on the owner of an infrastructure, who is not the owner of the service facility, the obligation to ensure access to the services?

| 2. | Must Article 13(6) of Directive 2012/34 (Article 15(5) and (6) of Regulation 2017/2177) be interpreted as meaning that it permits the owner of a building to end a lease agreement and reconvert a service facility? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 13(6) of Directive 2012/34 (Article 15(5) and (6) of Regulation 2017/2177) be interpreted as meaning that it permits the owner of a building to end a lease agreement and reconvert a service facility?

| 3. | Must Article 13(6) of Directive 2012/34 (Article 15(5) and (6) of Regulation 2017/2177) be interpreted as requiring the regulatory body to ascertain only whether the operator of the service facility (in the present case, the owner of the service facility) has in fact decided to reconvert that facility? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Must Article 13(6) of Directive 2012/34 (Article 15(5) and (6) of Regulation 2017/2177) be interpreted as requiring the regulatory body to ascertain only whether the operator of the service facility (in the present case, the owner of the service facility) has in fact decided to reconvert that facility?

---

(1)  Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 32).

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2177 of 22 November 2017 on access to service facilities and rail-related services (OJ 2017 L 307, p. 1).

---
BTXN 176 (rev. 12/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Michael Aaron Pritchard 

Joi Lynn Pritchard 

 Case No.: 24−42560−mxm13

 Chapter No.: 13

Debtor(s)

NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO FILE A STATEMENT OF COMPLETION OF

COURSE IN PERSONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(Official Form 423)

Notice is hereby given that, subject to limited exceptions, a debtor must complete an instructional course in personal

financial management in order to receive a discharge under chapter 13 (11 USC § 1328) . Pursuant to Rule 1007(b)(7)

of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the debtor(s) must complete and file Debtor's Certification of Completion of

Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management (Official Form 423)* as described in 11 U.S.C. §

111.

Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that Official Form 423 must be filed before a discharge can

be entered. Debtor(s) and/or debtor(s)' attorney is/are hereby notified that the debtor(s) must file Official Form 423 no

later than the date when the last payment was made by the debtor as required by the plan or the filing of a motion for

a discharge under § 1141(d)(5)(B) or § 1328(b) of the Code. Failure to file the certification will result in the case

being closed without an entry of discharge. If the debtor(s) subsequently file(s) a Motion to Reopen the Case to allow

for the filing of the Official Form 423, the debtor(s) must pay the full reopening fee due for filing the motion.

DATED: 10/28/24 FOR THE COURT:

Stephen J Manz, Clerk of Court

*NOTE: Official Form 423 (Debtor's Certification of Completion of Instructional Course Concerning Personal Financial Management) must be

filed in all individual chapter 13 and chapter 7 cases even if the U.S. Trustee has not approved any credit counseling agency or financial

management course for the applicable district. See Rule 1007(b)(7).

Case 24-42560-mxm13 Doc 22 Filed 10/28/24 Entered 10/28/24 18:25:14 Desc Ntc

of req to file FM cert Page 1 of 1
# C_2022119EN.01005802.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/58

---

Order of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Senseon Tech v EUIPO — Accuride International (SENSEON)

(Case T-724/20) (1)

(2022/C 119/83)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

---