alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
        23.1**
   **Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
  
 The
        Board
        of Directors and Stockholders
 First
        Northern Community Bancorp and Subsidiary
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
        on Form
        S-8 of First Northern Community Bancorp and Subsidiary (No. 333-37874 and
        333-136977) of our report dated March 15, 2007 with respect to the consolidated
        balance sheet of First Northern Community Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December
        31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the year ended December
        31,
        2006, and in our same report, with respect to First Northern Community Bancorp
        and Subsidiary, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
        over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
        financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  /s/ **MOSS
        ADAMS LLP**
  Stockton,
        California
 March 15,
        2007
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS REA DY ON E I

ND UST RI ES, I

NC ., F /K /A NATI ONAL

CENTER FOR EMPL OYMENT O F TH E DI SABL ED, Ap pe lla nt,
v. ROBERT E. JONES and ROBERT E. J O N E S , T R

U S T E E O F J O N E S F A M ILY TRUST, Appellee
. § § § § § § § No . 0 8- 07 -0 02 65 -C V

Appea l from the 210th J udicial District Court of El Pa so County , T e xas (TC# 2007-4192)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pending be fore the Court is Appellant’s agree d motion to vol untarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 42.1(a ). Appe llant has moved to dismiss t he appea l as moot since the par ties have r esolved their dispute r eg ardingthe three proper ties at issue in J ones’ unde rlying suit and subjec t of this appeal, a nd Appellee agree s. The Court conc ludes that the motion should be gr anted. The ref ore, w e dismiss the appea l with costs tax ed ag ainst the Appellant since there is no agree ment otherwise. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1 (d).
Fe bruar y 20, 2009 DAVID WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice Be fo re C h ew , C
. J
. , M cC l ure , J
. , an d Ab l es , J u d ge Ab l es , J u d ge ( S i tt i n g b y

As s i gnm en t )( No tP art i ci p at i n g)
Robert BUTLER v. CITY OF MOBILE

CR-16-0592

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Airvana, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Not applicable];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 6, 2008
    /s/ Randall S. BattatRandall S. BattatPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32



XENOGEN CORPORATION



Section 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xenogen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification
has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                                                     |  | 
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ DAVID W. CARTER                                                                                
|                        |  |     |  | David W. Carter                                                                                    
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board                                                  
|                        |  |    
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  |     |  | /s/ WILLIAM A. ALBRIGHT, JR.                                                                       
|                        |  |     |  | William A. Albright, Jr. Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Chief Financial Officer
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 612 

Recognizing the importance of maple syrup production to the State of Maine 

and designating March 24, 2024, as ‘‘Maine Maple Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. KING (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of maple syrup production to 

the State of Maine and designating March 24, 2024, 

as ‘‘Maine Maple Sunday’’. 

Whereas the art of making sugar and syrup from the sap of 

the maple tree (also known as acer saccharinum) was developed by Native Americans of the Northeastern United 

States; 

Whereas the production of maple syrup in the State of Maine 

has a seasonal window between January and May, which 

is when temperatures drop below freezing at night and 

rise above freezing during the day; 

Whereas the State of Maine accounts for 17 percent of production of maple syrup in the United States and is the 

third largest producer among the States; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 612 ATS 

Whereas maple syrup producers in the State of Maine make 

more than 470,000 gallons of syrup annually, generating 

more than $55,000,000 for the economy of the State of 

Maine; 

Whereas maple syrup production in the State of Maine supports more than 560 full-time and part-time jobs that 

generate more than $17,300,000 in wages; 

Whereas Maine Maple Sunday has been observed for 41 

years, with more than 100 sugarhouses participating 

from Aroostook to York County, Maine, and attracting 

thousands of visitors annually; 

Whereas Maine Maple Sunday is always observed on the 

fourth Sunday in March; and 

Whereas on March 24, 2024, maple syrup producers in the 

State of Maine will host the 41st annual Maine Maple 

Sunday: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 24, 2024, as ‘‘Maine 

3 Maple Sunday’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the contribution and importance 

5 of maple syrup producers and their families in the 

6 State of Maine. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Anthony BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2156

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O R D E R G RANTING R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Lacey West Fowler v. Julie Ann Badia and James Francis Badia

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00632

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 45747C

Tria l court: 308th Dist rict Court of Harris County

On January 30, 2020, this appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. On February 13,

2020, appellant, Lacey West Fo w l er, filed a motion for rehearing. We grant appellant ’ s request

for rehearing, withdraw o ur opinion and judg ment dismissing the appeal , and reins tate this case

on the Court’s active do cket.

Appellant ’ s brief is due A pril 12 , 2020.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__________ /s/ Julie Countiss

______________________ Acti n g for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes

, Goodman, and Countiss

.

D a te: March 10, 2020
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  
as adopted Pursuant to Section 906  
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Lorain Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Si Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2010

/s/ Si Chen 
Si Chen 
 Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 20,   2016By:
/s/ Alexey V.   KornyaAlexey V. KornyaChief Financial   Officer
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


     This  Amendment  Consulting Agreement (this "Amendment"), is made effective
as of August 12, 2004, by and between Rapidtron, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  and  Mark  Adair  Financial  Consulting Services ("Consultant"), in
connection with that certain Consulting Agreement, dated effective as of January
1,  2004  (the  "Master  Agreement"):

     FOR  GOOD  AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is  hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  agree  as  follows:

1.     Extension  of  Filing S-8 Registration.  The Company and Consultant agree
       --------------------------------------
that  Section  3 of the master Agreement is hereby amended to extend the date by
which  the Company has to undertake to file a registration statement on From S-8
until  October  29,  2004.

2.     Waiver.  Consultant  hereby  waives  any  claim  Consultant  may have for
       ------
breach  of  contract  or  otherwise related to the Company's failure to file the
registration  statement  on  Form  S-8  prior  to  October  29,  2004.

3.     Non-Impairment.  Except  as  expressly  modified  herein,  the  Master
       --------------
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, and the parties hereby ratify
and  reaffirm  the  Master  Agreement  as  modified  herein.

4.     Defined  Terms.  All  capitalized  terms  used  in this Amendment and not
       --------------
otherwise  defined  herein  shall  have  the  meaning given to such terms in the
Master  Agreement.

5.     Inconsistencies.  In  the  event  of  any  inconsistency,  ambiguity  or
       ---------------
conflict  between  the  terms and provisions of this Amendment and the terms and
provisions  of  the Master Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Amendment
shall  control.

6.     Counterparts.  This  Amendment  may  be  executed  in  any  number  of
       ------------
counterparts,  each of which when executed will be deemed an original and all of
which,  taken  together,  will  be  deemed  to  be  one and the same instrument.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have executed this Amendment as of the date
first  written  above.

RAPIDTRON, INC.,
a Nevada corporation

By:     /s/ John Creel
     ----------------------------------
     John Creel, President



/s/ Mark Adair
---------------------------------------
MARK ADAIR, an individual, d/b/a
Mark Adair Financial Consulting Services


<PAGE>
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Joseph Jimenez, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novartis AG;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 25, 2017   By:
/s/  JOSEPH   JIMENEZJoseph JimenezChief   Executive Officer
# FILED

January 12, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 1998 SESSION

GEORGE EDWARD FRENCH, ) ) Appellant, ) No. 01C01-9801-CR-00022

) ) Davidson County v. ) ) Honorable J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., J udge ) RICKY BELL, Warden, ) (Habeas Corpus) and STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellees. ) For the Appellant : For the Appellee : George Edward French, Pro se John Knox Walkup T.D.O.C. No. 107854 Attorney General of Tennessee R.M.S.I., U-6-B-117 and 7475 Cockrill Bend Road Elizabeth B. Marney Nashville, TN 37209-1010 Assistant Attorney Gener al of Tennessee 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Victor S. Johnson, III District Attorney General and Elizabeth B. Marney Assistant District A

ttorney General Washington Sq., 222 2nd Ave. N. Nashville, TN 37201-1649

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO R ULE 20 Joseph M. Tipton Judge2 O P I N I O N

The petitioner, George Edw ard French, pro se , appeals as of right from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by the Davidson County Criminal Court. He is presently

in prison serving

an eighty-year s

entence, as a Range II offender, upon his conviction i n 1983 for armed robbery. He c ontends (1) that the sentencing court did not hav e the authority to sentence h im as a Range II, persis tent offender because he did not have a sufficient number of prior felony conv ictions to qualify as such and (2) that insufficient evidence existed to show beyond a reasonable doubt that he qualified as a Rang e II, persistent offender. Also, h e seeks the appointment of counsel and oral arg ument.

A petition for the writ o

f habeas corpus relative to a person imprisoned pursuant to a judgment of convi ction may be brought to co ntest confinement if the judgment is void or th e sentence has expired. Archer v. State , 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993). However, if the claimed illegality renders the judgment or sentence voidable, rather than v

oid, no relief can be granted. Id . at 161. Moreover, cl aims based upon factual disputes that wer e already resolved a

t the sentencing hearing, such as the petitioner’s sentencing

range, are not subject to relitigation in a habeas corpus proceeding. See State ex rel. Holbrook v. Bomar , 211 Tenn. 243, 247, 364 S.W. 2d 887, 889 (1963). Also, absent th ere being a colorable cl aim for a writ, there is no need to appoint counsel. Similar ly, there is no need for or al argument.

After a full consideration of the re cord, the briefs, and the law governing the issues presented, we are of the opinion that no error of law exists that would require a reversal and that no pr ecedential value woul d be derived from the renderi ng of an3

opinion. Therefore, we concl ude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tenn. Ct. C rim. App.

_____________________________ Joseph M. Tipton, Judge CONCUR:

____________________________ John H. Peay, Judge

_____________________________ Norma Ogle, Judge