alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO
THE DOLLAR TREE, INC.
OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
As Established March 17, 2011 
The definition of “Performance Criteria” in Section 2.1(ee) of the Dollar Tree, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows effective June 16, 2016:


(ee)    “Performance Criteria” means one or more criteria that the Committee shall select and define for purposes of setting performance goals for a Performance Period.  The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish such performance goals may be based on any one of, or combination of, the following relating to a Member Company or an Affiliate or any combination of one or more Member Companies or Affiliates:  (i) earnings per share; (ii) earnings (including EBIT or EBITDA); (iii) net earnings; (iv) total shareholder return; (v) return on equity; (vi) return on assets; (vii) return on investment; (viii) return on capital employed; (ix) operating margin; (x) gross margin; (xi) operating income; (xii) pre-tax profit; (xiii) operating cash flow; (xiv) revenue; (xv) revenue growth; (xvi) expenses; (xvii) improvement in or attainment of expense levels; (xviii) improvement in or attainment of working capital levels; (xix) economic value added; (xx) market share; (xxi) cash flow per share; (xxii) share price performance; and (xxiii) debt reduction.  Performance goals may be stated in terms of an improvement in any of the foregoing. Partial achievement of the specified criteria may result in the payment or vesting corresponding to the degree of achievement only as specified in writing by the Committee.


To record the adoption of this Amendment Number One to the Plan, Dollar Tree, Inc. has caused its authorized representative to sign this document this 16th day of June, 2016.
DOLLAR TREE, INC.
By: /s/ Bob Sasser
Its: Chief Executive Officer






48
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(15)
              - products_publications(43)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(3)
              - hawaii(25)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

              - 2022(6)

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - (-)connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONSI, Gary Freeman, being the Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1.     I have reviewed the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Silvergraph International, Inc.;2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)not applicablec)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)disclosed in the report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.November 19, 2007/s/ Gary FreemanDateGary Freeman, Chief Financial Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Scottie Dwayne BOWIE

NO. 2018-K-1099

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
John MOORE, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jamie GEER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0453

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
##### 



U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
 July 31, 2006
 Commission File No. 333-128127
 BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
  State of OrganizationMichigan
    
    IRS Employer Identification20-1132959
 
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



ITEM 8.01. OTHER EVENTS AND REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE.
  ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
 (a)
    
    Financial Statements of Business Acquired.Not applicable(b)
    
    Pro Forma Financial Information.Not applicable(c)
    
    Exhibits. The following exhibit is filed herewith:
 99.1
    
    Press release, dated July 31, 2006, titled Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares Completes
First Phase of Initial Public Offering.
 SIGNATURE
  Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc.July 31, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Robert FarrRobert FarrPresident




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press release, dated July 31, 2006, titled Birmingham Bloomfield
Bancshares Completes First Phase of Initial Public Offering.
Exhibit








AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED WHOLESALE FINANCING PLAN
    
This Amendment No. 4 to the Amended and Restated Wholesale Financing Plan (the “Amendment”) is entered into effective as of August 31, 2016 by and between Titan Machinery, Inc., (“Debtor”) and DLL Finance LLC (f.k.a. Agricredit Acceptance LLC) (“Secured Party”) (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”).  


Debtor and Agricredit Acceptance LLC, as predecessor in interest to Secured Party, entered into the Amended and Restated Wholesale Financing Plan dated October 31, 2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Wholesale Financing Plan dated April 1, 2015, Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Wholesale Financing Plan dated September 1, 2015, and Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Wholesale Financing Plan dated April 1, 2016 (as amended, the “Agreement”), and Debtor and Secured Party now desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth below. 


NOW THEREFORE, INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Integration.  Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail.  Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




		
	2.
	Amendment.  The Agreement shall be amended as follows:




The Total Amount of Uncommitted Credit Facility at Approval, as indicated on the first page of the Agreement, shall be deleted and replaced with Ninety Million Dollars ($90,000,000.00). Debtor waives receipt of written notice from Secured Party regarding the foregoing.
    
		
	3.
	Miscellaneous.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, including facsimile counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, but which collectively will form one and the same instrument.  This Amendment constitutes the final agreement between the Parties and is the exclusive expression of the Parties’ agreement on the matters contained herein.  All earlier and contemporaneous negotiations and agreements between the Parties on the matters contained herein are expressly merged into and superseded by this Amendment.  Any modification or additions to the terms of this Amendment must be in a written agreement identified as an amendment and executed by both Parties.  






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date set forth above.
Arthur Lee KIRKSEY v. STATE

CR-16-0909

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32
 
    /s/ Patrick L. BeachPatrick L. BeachPresidentGP4 Asset Acquisition, LLCAugust 11, 2006
 20
Julie LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3981

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 502 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 502

 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Antonio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2023

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Antonio.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Antonio, Cr. No. 21-497, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of United States v. Antonio, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager, and any current or former officer or employee of the 
Secretary's office, in connection with the production of evidence 
authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Kenneth GRADY, Appellant, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, Not Individually But as Trustee for Hilldale Trust, Appellee.

No. 1D18-864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Kenneth D. Grady, pro se, Appellant.

Shawn Taylor of DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7812
DAVEY JAMES REEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE ALLEN, Governor; JAMES S. GILMORE, III; RONALD J. ANGELONE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-1359-AM) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davey James Reedy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of an allegation of harm and an order denying reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's "Motion for Supplement" and dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - (-)michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1994        Hydrogeology of Pleistocene glacial deposits and Jurassic "red beds" in the central lower peninsula of Michigan

publication        January 1, 2004        Arsenic, nitrate, and chloride in groundwater, Oakland County, Michigan

publication        January 1, 1998        Arsenic, nitrate, and chloride in groundwater, Oakland County, Michigan

publication        March 14, 2009        Processing, Analysis, and General Evaluation of Well-Driller Logs for Estimating Hydrogeologic Parameters of the Glacial Sediments in a Ground-Water Flow Model of the Lake Michigan Basin

publication        January 1, 1980        Instrument specifications and geophysical records for airborne electromagnetic survey of parts of Iron, Baraga, and Dickson Counties, Michigan

publication        January 1, 1980        Description and preliminary map of airborne electromagnetic survey of parts of Iron, Baraga, and Dickinson Counties, Michigan

publication        January 1, 1981        Geology and hydrology for environmental planning in Marquette County, Michigan
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

Science Animations        November 30, 2018        Shaking of Atwood Building, Mw 7.0 November 30, 2018, Anchorage quake

Science Animations        March 30, 2016        Shaking in the Atwood Building in Anchorage, Alaska
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1134 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-917, K2025-918.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31102 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```