alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald K. Peterson, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avaya Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 10, 2005 |                                   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| * *                | /s/ DONALD K. PETERSON                 |
| * *                | Donald K. Peterson                     |
| * *                | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
# C_2020279EN.01002901.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 May 2020 — C.E. Roeper GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg

(Case C-216/20)

(2020/C 279/40)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: C.E. Roeper GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the Explanatory Notes to subheading 1521 9099 (1) of the Combined Nomenclature (2) applicable in so far as the word ‘geschmolzen’ [melted] is used? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the Explanatory Notes to subheading 1521 9099 (1) of the Combined Nomenclature (2) applicable in so far as the word ‘geschmolzen’ [melted] is used?

| 2. | If the first question referred is answered in the negative, is the term ‘raw’ within the meaning of subheading 1521 9091 of the Combined Nomenclature to be interpreted as meaning that beeswax which has been melted down in the exporting country and from which foreign bodies have been mechanically separated during the process of melting it down, whereby some foreign bodies still remain in beeswax, must be classified under that subheading? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question referred is answered in the negative, is the term ‘raw’ within the meaning of subheading 1521 9091 of the Combined Nomenclature to be interpreted as meaning that beeswax which has been melted down in the exporting country and from which foreign bodies have been mechanically separated during the process of melting it down, whereby some foreign bodies still remain in beeswax, must be classified under that subheading?

---

(1)  Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (OJ 2019 C 119, p. 1).

(2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1776 of 9 October 2019 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2019 L 280, p. 1).

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Dionte Eugene DAUGHERTY

No. 2018-KH-0781

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

GENOVESE, J., recused
STATE of Louisiana v. Jermaine Christopher OBRIEN a/k/a Jermaine Christopher O'Brien

NO. 2018-KO-0663

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
Matthew PATTERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2021471EN.01004401.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Global Translation Solutions v Parliament

(Case T-7/20) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Translation services - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Award criteria - Format in which a file submitted in a test is to be uploaded)

(2021/C 471/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Global Translation Solutions ltd. (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: C. Mifsud-Bonnici, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and K. Wójcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision contained in the Parliament’s letter of 28 October 2019 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant for Lot 15 in tendering procedure TRA/EU19/2019 and of the decision contained in the Parliament’s letter of 4 December 2019 awarding the contract to another tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Global Translation Solutions ltd. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Global Translation Solutions ltd. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.

---
# C_2021502EN.01002501.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Yadex International v EUIPO — Sütas Süt Ürünleri (PINAR Süzme Peynir)

(Case T-559/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark PINAR Süzme Peynir - Earlier international figurative mark Süzme Peynir - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 502/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: N. Johnson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sütas Süt Ürünleri AS (Bursa, Turkey) (represented by: O. Ruhl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2020 (Case R 2127/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Sütas Süt Ürünleri and Yadex International.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Yadex International GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Yadex International GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.

---
null

45.154877
Khristy Goins RISMILLER, TUTRIX FOR Daniel Edwards GOINS v. GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-2089

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF CONCORDIA

PER CURIAM

Granted. In their application to this court, relators ask us to pass on the constitutionality of La. Civ. Code arts. 2315.1 and 2315.2 insofar as the court of appeal found those articles do not provide a right of action for adopted children to assert wrongful death and survival actions following the death of a biological parent. Because relators did not raise this claim in the district court, it is not properly before this court. *See**Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc.,* 94-1238 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 859, 864 ("[t]he long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is: a statute must first be questioned in the trial court, not the appellate courts ...").

However, without expressing any opinion on the merits of relators' constitutional arguments, we find it appropriate to remand this case to the district court to allow relators to amend their petition in an attempt to remove the objection presented *1146by the exception of no right of action. *See* La. Code Civ. P. Art. 934 ; *Reeder v. North* , 97-0239 (La. 10/21/97), 701 So.2d 1291, 1299.

Accordingly, the writ is granted for the sole purpose of remanding the case to the district court to allow relators to amend their petition in an attempt to state a right of action. In all other respects, the writ is denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18of the United States Code**

 

The undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Axcelis Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation,hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 oftitle 18 of the United States Code (as implemented by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) as follows:

 

This Form 10-Qquarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andthe information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certification as of May 12, 2010.

 
|     | /s/ MARY G. PUMA                                                                      |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                  |
|     | Mary G. Puma                                                                          |
| * * | *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of  Axcelis Technologies, Inc.* |

 

1

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 13.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003, of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the "Company") as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the
date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Antonio Garces,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



     Date: July 13, 2004

                                                      /s/ Antonio Garces
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Antonio Garces
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and will be retained by Grupo
Financiero Galicia S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon
request.
BTXN 117a (rev. 10/02)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Jacob Cannon Jr.

Debtor(s)

 Case No.: 24−40553−elm7

 Chapter No.: 7

Roddrick B. Newhouse 

Plaintiff(s) Adversary No.: 24−04032−elm

 vs.

Cannon Legacy Builders, LLC

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

To the above−named defendant:

You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Kenneth A. Hill, Plaintiff's attorney (or if Plaintiff is not

represented by counsel, upon Plaintiff), whose address is Quilling, Selander, et al

2001 Bryan St., Suite 1800

Dallas, TX 75201−4240 , either a motion or an answer to the complaint which is now served upon you. If you elect

to respond first by motion, as you may pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012, that governs the time within which your

answer must be served. Otherwise, you are required to serve your answer upon Plaintiff's attorney (or upon Plaintiff if

Plaintiff is not represented by counsel) within 30 days of the date of issuance of this summons by the clerk (or by the

following date prescribed by the court: N/A) except that the United States or an office or agency thereof shall serve

an answer to the complaint within 35 days after the date of issuance of the summons.

{If this summons and complaint is served in a foreign country} Service of your answer must be made by the following

date prescribed by the court N/A.

The motion or answer served by you must be filed with this court before service or within a reasonable time after

service. IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUMMONS, JUDGMENT BY

DEFAULT WILL BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU FOR THE RELIEF DEMANDED IN THE COMPLAINT.

DATED: 5/6/24 FOR THE COURT:

Kevin Bartlett Mcnatt, Clerk of Court

by: /s/Karyn Rueter, Deputy Clerk

Case 24-04032-elm Doc 2 Filed 05/06/24 Entered 05/06/24 10:01:48 Desc Summons

in an Adversary Procee Page 1 of 2
In Re: Newhouse v. Cannon Legacy Builders, LLC

Case No. 24−40553−elm7 −7

Adv. No. 24−04032−elm

SUMMONS SERVICE EXECUTED

I,___________________________________________________________________________

of**_________________________________________________________________________

certify:

 If service was made by personal service, by residence service, or pursuant to state law, I further certify that I am,

and all times during service of process was, not less than 18 years of age and not a party to the matter concerning

which service of process was made;

 That on the __________ day of ____________________________________,_______ I served a copy of the

within summons, together with the complaint filed in this proceeding, on

the defendant in this proceeding, by {describe here the mode of service}

the said defendant at

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on ___________________ _____________________________

(Date) (Signature)

**____________________________________________________________________

State mailing address

Case 24-04032-elm Doc 2 Filed 05/06/24 Entered 05/06/24 10:01:48 Desc Summons

in an Adversary Procee Page 2 of 2
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 649 

Raising awareness of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2024 

Mr. WELCH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

RESOLUTION 

Raising awareness of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). 

Whereas lake sturgeon are one of the largest North American 

freshwater fish and can live for 150 years or longer; 

Whereas lake sturgeon are considered living fossils, as their 

lineage dates back to the time of dinosaurs, making them 

one of the oldest fish species still in existence; 

Whereas lake sturgeon are slow to reproduce as they may not 

spawn until they are 15 to 25 years old and they only 

spawn every 4 years on average; 

Whereas lake sturgeon are found across the Great Lakes, 

northeastern United States, and southeastern Canada; 

Whereas lake sturgeon are bottom-dwelling fish that require 

extensive areas of shallow water to feed on a wide variety 

of organisms; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 649 IS 

Whereas historical overfishing, invasive species, and habitat 

degradation have caused declines in the population of 

local lake sturgeon; 

Whereas many States list lake sturgeon as an endangered, 

threatened, or otherwise protected species; 

Whereas lake sturgeon serve an important role as an indicator of ecosystem health; 

Whereas lake sturgeon attract the attention of the public because of their large size and prehistoric body; 

Whereas many Federal agencies, States, Tribes, and local 

communities are collaborating on lake sturgeon management programs that are reestablishing healthy lake sturgeon populations; and 

Whereas lake sturgeon have cultural importance for many indigenous communities, representing a traditional food 

source: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate encourages— 

2 (1) continued collaboration among Federal, 

3 State, Tribal, and other partners to manage and in4 crease lake sturgeon populations across their exten5 sive range; 

6 (2) continued efforts to identify, protect, and 

7 restore the habitat of lake sturgeon; 

8 (3) continued efforts to prevent and control 

9 invasive species and restore the reproductive habitat 

10 of lake sturgeon; 

11 (4) increased public awareness of lake sturgeon; 

12 and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 649 IS 

1 (5) education of anglers and local communities 

2 on the proper ways to handle lake sturgeon if acci3 dentally caught. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.4 Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the "Company"), herby certify that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated April 14, 2003.                            By:  /s/ Patrick Herda
                                                       -----------------
                                                           V.P. and CFO
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135971 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135971 COA: 271840 St Clair CC: 05-002902-FH ANTHONY ROBERT HILDEBRANT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
# C_2021035EN.01002101.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Portugal) lodged on 16 July 2020 — VO and Others v SATA International — Azores Airlines SA

(Case C-316/20)

(2021/C 35/31)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: VO, ZO, ML, NB, KE, JE, PI, VY

Defendant: SATA International — Azores Airlines SA

Question referred

Does the concept of travel at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public cover passengers who paid part of their fare, the remainder being borne by the airline, in the context of sponsorship of a sports competition?

By order of 26 November 2020, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held:

Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)
  of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that that regulation does not apply to passengers travelling on tickets issued at a preferential fare by an air carrier in the context of an event sponsorship transaction, the benefit of which is restricted to certain specific persons and the issuing of which presupposes prior individual authorisation on the part of the air carrier.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

---