alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| 1. | Name of Company: Radview Ltd. |
|----|-------------------------------|

|   | In English: Radview Ltd. |
|--------|--------------------------|

| 2. | The goals for which purpose the Company was established: |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | The development, manufacture and marketing of products in the field of electronics in general and computer communications in particular. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | The members' liability is limited. |
|----|------------------------------------|

| 4. | The authorized and registered share capital of the Company is NIS 18,750,000 (eighteen million, seven hundred and fifty thousand), divided into (i) 1,500,000,000 (one billion, five hundred million) Ordinary Shares; (ii) 225,000,000 (two hundred and twenty five million) Series A Preferred Shares, nominal value NIS 0.01 each; and (iii) 150,000,000 (one hundred and fifty million) Series B Preferred Shares, nominal value NIS 0.01 each. (amended October 2007 and December 2009) |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Witness to the above signatures: |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |                             |   |   |
|   |  /s/ Nehama Sneh       |   |
|   | Nehama Sneh, Attorney-at-law     |   |

----

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 14, 2006
# C_2020433EN.01002201.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 21 September 2020 — Flightright GmbH v Ryanair Designated Activity Company

(Case C-442/20)

(2020/C 433/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Flightright GmbH

Defendant: Ryanair Designated Activity Company

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a trade union-organised strike by an operating air carrier’s own staff constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a trade union-organised strike by an operating air carrier’s own staff constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004? (1)

| 2. | Is it of any significance that the strike was held in connection with staff demands not previously agreed by contract between the staff and the operating air carrier? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it of any significance that the strike was held in connection with staff demands not previously agreed by contract between the staff and the operating air carrier?

| 3. | Is it of any significance that the strike in question was triggered by the operating air carrier’s conduct during negotiations with the trade union? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is it of any significance that the strike in question was triggered by the operating air carrier’s conduct during negotiations with the trade union?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 31

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.        Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, James B. Sherwood, Chairman of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd., certify that:



|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/JAMES B. SHERWOODJames B. Sherwood Chairman
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

86

---

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I,
Simon M.C. Sherwood, President of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd., certify that:



|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/SIMON M.C. SHERWOODSimon M.C. Sherwood President
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

87

---

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I,
James G. Struthers, Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd., certify that:



|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/JAMES G. STRUTHERSJames G. Struthers Vice
PresidentFinance
and Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

88

---

QuickLinks
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Fluid Dynamics

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(8)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(2)
              - (-)illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

publication        November 7, 2022        Dynamic estimates of geologic CO2 storage resources in the Illinois Basin constrained by reinjectivity of brine extracted for pressure management
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Ribapharm Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William M. Comer, Jr., Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    WILLIAM M. COMER,
JR.                                                         
|William M. Comer, Jr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Dated:  May 22, 2003



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ribapharm Inc. and will be retained by Ribapharm Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>





                              Consent of KPMG LLP


The Board of Directors
MediChem Life Sciences, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of MediChem Life Sciences, Inc. of our reports dated March 1, 2001
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MediChem Life Sciences, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive
income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000 and related schedule, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of MediChem Life Sciences, Inc.


                                 /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 23, 2001
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(5)
              - products_publications(80)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(7)
              - (-)multimedia_webcam-141785(5)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)georgia(5)
              - south carolina(10)

## By Year

webcam        September 23, 2021        Flint River at Albany (02352500)

webcam        September 23, 2021        Savannah River at Savannah (021989773)

webcam        September 23, 2021        Withlacoochee River at Skipper Bridge Rd. near Bemiss (023177483)

webcam        September 23, 2021        Sweetwater Creek 0.05 miles US RR Bridge, Austell (02336910)

webcam        September 23, 2021        Chattahoochee River at 14th St, at Columbus (02341460)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas A. Michels               
|Douglas A. Michels                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|November 6, 2008
STATE of Louisiana v. Kyron HUNTER

NO. 2018-KH-1633

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Writ not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00296-CV

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Appellant

v.

Public Citizen, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-09-003426, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellee Public Citizen, Inc., as part of its motion to dismissthis interlocutoryappeal

as moot, has asked in the alternative that this Court remand for the limited purpose of allowing

Public Citizen to voluntarily dismiss its claims against appellant Texas Commission on

Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in the trial court. TCEQ opposes the motion. However, it is not

apparent that Public Citizen needs permission from this Court to dismiss its own case. Under the

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, “[a]t any time before the plaintiff has introduced all of his evidence

other than rebuttal evidence, the plaintiff may dismiss a case, or take a non-suit, which shall be

entered in the minutes.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 162. Rule 162 is applicable here because this is an

interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of TCEQ’s plea to the jurisdiction. See University

of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2006) (per
curiam). Because the trial court generally does not have discretion to refuse to dismiss a suit, Public

Citizen has the absolute right to dismiss its claims. See CTL/Thompson, LLC v. Starwood

Homeowner’s Ass’n, 390 S.W.3d 299, 299 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam).1

Nevertheless, because Public Citizen has sought permission from this Court to 

dismiss its suit below, we abate this appeal for thirty days for the sole purpose of allowing Public

Citizen to dismiss its claims against TCEQ in the trial court. Public Citizen shall file in this Court

proof of its dismissal or nonsuit on or before August 15, 2013. If such proof is not filed in this Court

by that date, this appeal will be reinstated. Having decided to abate this appeal, we do not reach

Public Citizen’s motion to dismiss at this time. Tex. R. Civ. P. 47.1.

Before Justices Rose, Goodwin, and Field

Abated

Filed: July 16, 2013

Although a nonsuit may not prejudice the rights of an adverse party to be heard on its 1

pending claims, TCEQ’s plea to the jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity is not a claim for

affirmative reliefthat survives nonsuit. See CTL/Thompson, LLC v. Starwood Homeowner’s Ass’n,

390 S.W.3d 299, 300–01 (Tex. 2013) (per curiam); University of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston

v. Estate of Blackmon, 195 S.W.3d 98, 100 (Tex. 2006) (per curiam).

2
Gary R. RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Douglas A. LIVELY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2114

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 15, 2019

Douglas A. Lively, Jr., Malone, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Lively appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds One, Two, Three, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, and Thirteen. However, because Lively should have been given the opportunity to amend Ground Four1 to state a facially sufficient claim, we reverse the summary denial of that claim and remand with instructions that he be given the opportunity to do so. *See**Spera v. State*, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007) ; *see also**McGill v. State*, 157 So.3d 433, 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (noting earlier motions denied as too long, and interpreting *Mancino v. State*, 10 So.3d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), as drawing distinction between rejections for form and rejections *368for insufficiency). Additionally, because the trial court failed to consider Grounds Fourteen and Fifteen, we remand for consideration of those claims as well. *See**Purse v. State*, 185 So.3d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (reversing and remanding where trial court failed to address claim raised in rule 3.850 motion); *Hatcher v. State*, 114 So.3d 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) ; *Bridges v. State*, 81 So.3d 616, 618 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1

We note that the trial court attached virtually the entire trial transcript to its order denying relief. However, in denying Ground Four, the trial court did not make any reference to any page specifically refuting Lively's allegations. It was the lower court's burden to do so, or to do so in the future after remand. *See, e.g.*, *Hoffman v. State*, 571 So.2d 449, 450 (Fla. 1990) (reversing denial of postconviction relief because lower court attached entire record without articulating reasons for denial, or specifying parts of record directly refuting raised claims).
Marcus Travell RAYFORD v. STATE

CR-16-0459

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021320EN.01001001.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/10

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux — France) — Criminal proceedings against ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL, EP, FQ

(Case C-88/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Fundamental rights - Ne bis in idem principle - Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts - Cold calling - Misleading commercial practice - Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 320/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux

Criminal proceedings against

ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL, EP, FQ

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux (Criminal Court, Bordeaux, France), by decision of 12 December 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John H. Homier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|August 7, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ John H.
Homier                   
|               |  |     |  | John H. Homier                       
|               |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NGP Capital
Resources Company and will be retained by NGP Capital Resources Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021297EN.01001201.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — VI v KRONE — Verlag Gesellschaft mbH & Co KG

(Case C-65/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Liability for defective products - Directive 85/374/EEC - Article 2 - Concept of ‘defective product’ - Copy of a printed newspaper containing inaccurate health advice - Exclusion from the directive’s scope)

(2021/C 297/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VI

Defendant: KRONE — Verlag Gesellschaft mbH & Co KG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, as amended by Directive 1999/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 1999, read in the light of Articles 1 and 6 thereof, as amended by Directive 1999/34, must be interpreted as meaning that a copy of a printed newspaper that, concerning paramedical matters, gives inaccurate health advice relating to the use of a plant which, when followed, has proved injurious to the health of a reader of that newspaper, does not constitute a ‘defective product’ within the meaning of those provisions.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: 

JUDGE MARK X MULLIN

CHAPTER 13

CASE NO: 23-43558-MXM

WAEL SAMIR FALTS

§

§

§

§

§

§

DEBTOR

AT FORT WORTH IN SAID DISTRICT: 

On July 18, 2024 came on for hearing Confirmation of Debtor's Plan and Motion for Valuation 

("Debtor's Plan") filed on or about 05/14/2024 [Docket#57]. The Court finds that notice was and is 

appropriate under the circumstances. 

ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION

The Court is of the opinion that confirmation should be DENIED based on the Debtor's announcement 

of no opposition to DENIAL of confirmation at or prior to the hearing. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that confirmation of the Debtor's Plan be and the same is hereby 

DENIED.

# # # End of Order # # #

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Signed July 22, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

____________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 23-43558-mxm13 Doc 66 Filed 07/22/24 Entered 07/22/24 15:03:47 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.29 West Georgia Bank Letterhead May 10, 2004 W. Steven J. Haack
2375 Grant Place
Villa Rica, Georgia 30180 Re:     Employment Letter Agreement Dear Steve: The purpose of this letter is to amend that certain letter agreement entered into between you
and West Georgia National Bank (WGNB) dated August 31, 2000, as amended by that certain letter
agreement between you and WGNB dated April 11, 2002 (together, the Agreement). This letter shall
be treated as an amendment to the Agreement pursuant to the Miscellaneous section of the
Agreement. The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except as explicitly amended
below: The paragraph of the Agreement entitled Term shall be replaced
with the following: Term. This Agreement shall be effective for a term of three (3)
years beginning on May 10, 2004, and automatically shall be extended
for one additional year if neither party gives notice of termination
more than 90 days before the expiration of the three-year term. If you agree with the terms of this letter, please signify by
signing below. Sincerely,West Georgia National BankBy:
    
    L. Leighton AlstonIts:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 Agreed to and accepted, this  day of , 2004. Steven J. Haack