alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sanford
M. Kimmel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:   February 13, 2002               By: /s/ Sanford M. Kimmel
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Sanford M. Kimmel
                                             Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7638

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL JUNIOR MCNEIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00406-WO-1; 1:13-cv-00718-

WO-LPA)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Junior McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Junior McNeil, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal 

the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. Parties in a civil action in which the United States is 

a party have 60 days following entry of judgment in which to 

file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

Because McNeil is incarcerated, the notice of appeal is 

considered filed on the date it was properly delivered to prison 

officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); 

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). The record does not 

conclusively reveal when McNeil delivered the notice of appeal 

to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the 

case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to 

obtain this information from the parties and to determine 

whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and 

Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be 

returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - (-)connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        March 23, 2016        Surface water-quality activities of the U.S. Geological Survey in New England

publication        March 19, 2012        Watershed scale response to climate change--Pomperaug River Watershed, Connecticut

publication        January 1, 1923        The shapes of beach pebbles

publication        January 1, 2002        Lithogeochemical character of near-surface bedrock in the New England coastal basins
A99A1177.

#### CLARK v. THE STATE.

(523 SE2d 388)

Miller, Judge.

Graham Clark was convicted of violating a Cherokee County ordinance that required him to control soil erosion on his property. He appeals, contending that the county ordinance was not properly proven.

Because this court cannot take judicial notice of a county ordinance, the State must introduce the ordinance into evidence, normally by certified copy.1 But Clark did not include a transcript of the trial in the appellate record so we could determine whether the ordinance was properly admitted into evidence. The burden is on the appellant to show the alleged error by the record, and “where the proof necessary for determination of the issues on appeal is omitted from the record, an appellate court must assume that the judgment below was correct and affirm.”2

Because Clark omitted the trial transcript from the record, we are unable to consider the merits of his claim and must affirm.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, P. J., and Eldridge, J., concur.*

*304Decided October 7, 1999.

*James D. Rogers, Kris K Skaar,*for appellant.

*G. Charming Ruskell, Solicitor,*for appellee.

1

*Poole v. State,*229 Ga. App. 406, 409 (2) (494 SE2d 251) (1997); see *Owens v. State,*153 Ga. App. 525, 526 (1) (265 SE2d 856) (1980) (physical precedent only).

2

 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Regency Exec. Plaza Unit Owner’s Assn. v. Wilmock, Inc.,*237 Ga. App. 193, 194 (514 SE2d 446) (1999); see *Brown v. Frachiseur,*247 Ga. 463, 464 (277 SE2d 16) (1981).
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31182]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Fellowships in Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition.
    Date: February 13-14, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, 
Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7011, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-7799, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31182 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(24)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(5)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(4)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(3)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(7)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

National News Release        April 10, 2015        Researchers Test Smartphones for Earthquake Warning
# C_2022119EN.01000702.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — ET acting as insolvency administrator of Air Berlin PLC & Co. Luftverkehrs KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-165/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 3e - Inclusion of aviation activities - Directive 2008/101/EC - Allocation and issue of allowances free of charge to aircraft operators - Cessation, by such an operator, of its activities due to insolvency - Decision of the competent national authority refusing to issue allowances to the insolvency administrator of the company in liquidation)

(2022/C 119/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ET acting as insolvency administrator of Air Berlin PLC & Co. Luftverkehrs KG

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3e of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2392 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2017, must be interpreted as meaning that the number of greenhouse gas emission allowances allocated free of charge to an aircraft operator must, in the event of cessation of that operator’s aviation activities during the period of greenhouse gas emission allowance trading in question, be reduced in proportion to the part of that period during which those activities are no longer carried out.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0614

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GARY HANSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

AMENDED ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 1, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2021

03/26/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0614
STATE of Louisiana v. David BRIGNAC

NO. 2018-K-0564

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

*895Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Rashid Joncar STRODE v. STATE

CR-16-0537

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
# C_2020329EN.01000701.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/7

---

Action brought on 27 July 2020 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-345/20)

(2020/C 329/09)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and C. Vrignon, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court of Justice should:

| — | declare that, in failing to carry out the interconnection of its national electronic register to the new version of the European Register of Road Transport Undertakings (ERRU), the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/480 of 1 April 2016 establishing common rules concerning the interconnection of national electronic registers on road transport undertakings and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1213/2010; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, in failing to carry out the interconnection of its national electronic register to the new version of the European Register of Road Transport Undertakings (ERRU), the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 and 4 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/480 of 1 April 2016 establishing common rules concerning the interconnection of national electronic registers on road transport undertakings and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1213/2010; (1)

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

The interconnection of national electronic registers to the new version of the ERRU, which the Member States are required to carry out in accordance with the procedures and technical requirements laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/480, as required under Article 3 of that regulation, was to have taken place by no later than 30 January 2019.

---

(1)  OJ 2016 L 87, p. 4.

---
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stephen Durland, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ocean Resources, Inc.

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     A) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
     B) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "evaluation date"); and
     C) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our  evaluation as of the
evaluation date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     A) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     B) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October  14, 2003

/s/ Stephen Durland
-----------------------
Stephen Durland
Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(27)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(1)
              - (-)west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Interactive Map        August 21, 2023        Interactive Map: West Virginia Public Water System Drought Risk
# C_2021044EN.01004202.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/42

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Laudamotion GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

(Case C-189/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/60)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN RE: 

JUDGE MARK X MULLIN

CHAPTER 13

CASE NUMBER: 23-42283-MXM

SHERRY LYNN FRANCIS

DEBTOR

§

§

§

§

§

§

ORDER DISMISSING CHAPTER 13 CASE PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 2023-04

(14 DAY NOI-$)

Came on for consideration the "Trustee's Notice of Intent to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case Pursuant to General Order 

2023-04 (14 Day NOI-$)" ("Notice") filed on or about 05/30/2024 [Docket #49]. The Court finds that notice was and is 

appropriate under the circumstances.

The Court is of the opinion that the Chapter 13 Case should be DISMISSED based on the Debtor's announcement of 

no opposition to DISMISSAL of the Chapter 13 proceeding at or prior to the hearing.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to General 

Order 2023-04 paragraph 3e PROVIDED that if, within 14 days of entry hereof, a creditor in this case files a motion to 

amend this order and seeks a dismissal with prejudice, sanctions or other relief deemed appropriate by the Court, this 

Order may be amended by the Court, after notice and a hearing, to grant the relief sought in said motion in whole or in 

part. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all debts due and owing creditors as of this date are NOT DISCHARGED or 

affected in any manner by this Order.

THE ABOVE STYLED AND NUMBERED CASE WILL BE CLOSED 21 DAYS AFTER THE ENTRY OF 

THIS ORDER PROVIDED THAT IT IS A SINGLE DEBTOR CASE OR A JOINT DEBTOR CASE AND 

BOTH DEBTORS ARE DISMISSED.

# # # End of Order # # #

APPROVED:

/s/ Tim Truman

Tim Truman, Trustee/State Bar # 20258000

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Signed August 22, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

____________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 23-42283-mxm13 Doc 58 Filed 08/22/24 Entered 08/22/24 15:50:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1