alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**ASCENT COE Notice of Funding Opportunity (COE-2016-46)**

**Project Title:**Surface Analysis to Support AEDT APM Development

**FAA Project Manager:**Chris Dorbian (christopher.dorbian@faa.gov)

**Nominal Funding Level:**$150,000

**Period of Performance:**One Year

**Deadline for response to this NFO:**April 15, 2016

**Project Description**: 

Taxiing aircraft at airports produce emissions and noise impacts. In the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT), modeling of the taxi phase is driven by default or user-specified taxi times coupled with engine idle fuel and emissions assumptions from the ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank. Thrust is not calculated, and consequently neither are noise impacts. This simplified approach reduces the accuracy of performance modeling for taxi in AEDT. At the same time, radar data on the airport surface can be highly detailed, particularly at airports equipped with ASDE-X. It would be desirable to have a performance model in AEDT that can accommodate this kind of data rich sensor path feed. 

The need to enhance taxi performance modeling and the desire to accommodate surface movement data can both be potentially addressed through the development of a taxiway “drive cycle” that better accounts for aircraft thrust profiles during taxi. The objective of this research project is to identify and evaluate methods for improving taxi performance modeling in AEDT towards this goal. The research team will need to investigate methods for building thrust profiles given a surface trajectory (whose geometry can vary) for a variety of aircraft types. This may require securing access to aircraft flight data for comprehensive statistical analysis. Throttle setting for the taxi “states” of stopped (idle), accelerating, and constant speed will likely need to be estimated. The estimated thrust values should be compared to the nominal ICAO assumption of 7% of available thrust for taxi. The research methodology should be demonstrable on actual surface radar data; i.e., given an ASDE-X taxi pathway, the methodology will derive the thrust profile for the taxi segments in the surface data. Recommendations should also be made on how the outcomes of this research can be combined with existing research—e.g., ACRP projects 02-45 and 02-27—to inform development of the Aircraft Performance Model (APM) in AEDT towards improved taxi performance modeling.

Responses to this NFO received before COB April 15, 2016 will be evaluated and selected university or team of universities will be requested to provide a full length proposal for further evaluation and possible funding to carry out the work.
Jeffrey MARTIN v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-01112-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: January 8, 2019 Closed: March 21, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

The
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Advanced Power Technology, Inc.:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-49800 and 333-81376) of Advanced Power
Technology, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Power Technology, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Power Technology, Inc.



Portland,
Oregon
March 27, 2002

---

QuickLinks
# C_2022303EN.01000301.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — Leistritz AG v LH

(Case C-534/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Second sentence of Article 38(3) - Data protection officer - Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks - Legal basis - Article 16 TFEU - Requirement of functional independence - National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause)

(2022/C 303/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Leistritz AG

Defendant: LH

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 38(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides that a controller or a processor may terminate the employment contract of a data protection officer, who is a member of his or her staff, only with just cause, even if the contractual termination is not related to the performance of that officer’s tasks, in so far as such legislation does not undermine the achievement of the objectives of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
Victor LOPEZ ORTIZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4112

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 13, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied without prejudice. Cf. Sumner v. Sumner, 707 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

KELLY, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
# C_2021490EN.01003801.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+)

(Case T-436/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ - Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 490/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sedus Stoll AG (Dogern, Germany) (represented by: M. Goldmann and J. Thomsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, D. Hanf and M. Eberl, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wolfgang Kappes (Bochum, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneiders, N. Gottschalk and B. Schneiders, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2020 (Case R 2194/2018-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Kappes and Sedus Stoll.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 March 2020 (Case R 2194/2018-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 March 2020 (Case R 2194/2018-1);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sedus Stoll AG for the purposes of the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sedus Stoll AG for the purposes of the proceedings before the General Court;

| 4. | Orders Wolfgang Kappes to bear his own costs and to pay the expenses necessarily incurred by Sedus Stoll for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Wolfgang Kappes to bear his own costs and to pay the expenses necessarily incurred by Sedus Stoll for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 645 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 645

  Requesting that the President of the United States transmit to the 
House of Representatives copies of any emails in the possession of the 
Executive Office of the President that were transmitted to or from the 
      email account(s) of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt 
 Organizations Division Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 and 
                              April 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2014

Mr. Stockman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Requesting that the President of the United States transmit to the 
House of Representatives copies of any emails in the possession of the 
Executive Office of the President that were transmitted to or from the 
      email account(s) of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt 
 Organizations Division Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 and 
                              April 2011.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives request that the 
President of the United States transmit to the House of 
Representatives, no later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 
of this resolution, copies of any electronic communication in the 
possession of the President or the Executive Office of the President 
that was transmitted to or from any electronic mail account(s) used by 
former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director 
Lois Lerner at any time between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as chief executive officer of ViaCell, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

   (1) the Company's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) the information contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the period ended
      December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 31, 2005

                                /s/ Marc D. Beer
                             -----------------------
                                  Marc D. Beer
                             Chief Executive Officer
1 NO.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. 01-13-00851-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLEE § V. § § ERIC SANTANA GUANCHE § APPELLANT

APPEAL FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT AT LAW NO. 7 HOUSTON, TEXAS TRIAL COURT NO. 1869024
APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES, ERIC SANTANA GUANCHE, Appellant in the above

entitled and numbered cause, by and through his attorney of record, Rick Soliz,

and submits this Motion for Extension of Time to file Appellant's Petition for

Discretionary Review until April 18, 2015. For good cause, Appellant

shows as follows.

1. This Court issued its opinion on December 16, 2014. On January 5,

2015, Appellant’s motion for rehearing was filed and it was overruled on January PD-0190-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/17/2015 5:23:02 PM Accepted 2/19/2015 1:21:27 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2

15, 2015. This petition for discretionary review i s due to be filed on or about

February 17, 2015. This motion for extension of ti me may be filed until the

deadline of March 1, 2015. This is Appellant's fir st request for an extension of

time to file Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review.

2. The last thirty days, Appellant's counsel has h ad an extremely heavy

workload and out of town court business.

3. Furthermore, Appellant’s counsel was at a conti nuing education

seminar in Austin, Texas from January 16, through J anuary 18, 2015.

4. This Motion is not made for delay, but to see t hat justice is done.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that the

deadline for filing of Appellant's Petition for Dis cretionary be extended to April

18, 2015, or a similar date this court deems approp riate.3

Respectfully submitted,

/w/ Rick Soliz

Rick Soliz T.B.C. No. 00785013 PO Box 4051 Houston, Texas 77210 713-228-1900 jrsoliz@att.net ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the attached and foregoing

document has been served on the Harris County Distr ict Attorney’s Office on this

the 17 th day of January 2015.

/s/ Rick Soliz

Rick Soliz
# C_2020414EN.01002401.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 24 September 2020 — Advania Sverige AB, Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB

(Case C-461/20)

(2020/C 414/34)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Advania Sverige AB and Kammarkollegiet

Defendant: Dustin Sverige AB

Question referred

Does the circumstance that a new contractor has taken over the initial contractor’s rights and obligations under a framework agreement, after the initial contractor has been declared insolvent and the insolvency estate has transferred the agreement, mean that the new contractor will be deemed to have succeeded into the position of the initial contractor under conditions such as those referred to in Article 72(1)(d)(ii) of the Public Procurement Directive (1)?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

---
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION OF HARRY KIRSCH, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Novartis AG (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/  HARRY   KIRSCHName:
Harry   KirschTitle:
Chief Financial Officer  Date: January 29, 2014
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00089-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF G.O.R., 

JR.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-MH-0403

Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State has filed a motion to abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. 

The motion asserts the trial court’s order refers to section 574.106(a-1)(2) of the Texas Health 

and Safety Code as the basis for its order compelling administration of psychoactive medication, 

while the trial court’s verbal ruling and the petition seeking the order refer to section 574.106(a1)(1). The State requests this court to direct the trial court to clarify the basis for its ruling. 

Appellant’s attorney is ORDERED to file a response to the State’s motion no later than ten days 

from the date of this order.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(25)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(22)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)
              - multimedia_video(43)
              - multimedia_video-149194(15)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)hawaii(22)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

Photography        May 23, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Lava Berm

Photography        May 16, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano - Lava Spattering

Photography        May 24, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano —

Photography        May 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Aerial of Fissure 22

Photography        May 14, 2018        Fissure 17 — early morning view

Photography        June 27, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Lava Channel

Photography        June 22, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Lava Fountain

Photography        June 28, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Early Morning View

Photography        June 18, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Lava Channels

Photography        May 30, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano —

Photography        June 9, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Lava Fountain

Photography        June 30, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8

Photography        June 1, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Near Kapoho Crater

Photography        May 27, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Pāhoehoe Lava Advancement

Photography        May 22, 2018        Kilauea Volcano — Ocean Entry

Photography        July 8, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Overflight

Photography        June 12, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Lava Fountain

Photography        July 10, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Looking Uprift Past Halekamahina

Photography        June 25, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Cone Changes (GIF)

Photography        June 16, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8

Photography        May 20, 2018        Lava Haze (Laze) from Fissure 20

Photography        June 10, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Eruption
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - (-)district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 5, 2019        New U.S. Geological Survey Report Assesses Risk of Once-Per-Century Geomagnetic Superstorm to the Northeastern United States
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong Yuk Ping, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong Yuk Ping



Eppie Wong Yuk Ping,

 CFO and a director

October 19, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(60)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(2)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - (-)north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(4)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(7)
              - texas(12)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

State News Release        October 2, 2015        Media Advisory: USGS Deploys Crews in Advance of Storm and Inland Flooding

State News Release        March 14, 2016        New Maps of 2015 Floods Help S. Carolina Plan for the Future

State News Release        November 13, 2018        USGS: Florence set at least 28 flood records in Carolinas
Bruce Edward DUKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.