alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(750)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - north carolina(1)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Screenshots        April 11, 2024        QR code for Alaska Flood Observation Facebook Group

Screenshots        April 11, 2024        QR code for DGGS Photo Database of Flooding in Alaska

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        May 15, 2011        USGS Measures Flooding at Morganza Spillway and Across Louisiana

Podcasts        March 26, 2009        USGS Crews Measure Historic Flooding in Fargo, ND

Podcasts        October 14, 2009        Streamgages: The Silent Superhero

Podcasts        May 10, 2011        Connecting People and Urban Streams

Podcasts        April 6, 2008        Science as it Happens--Glen Canyon Dam High Flow Experiment

Podcasts        July 27, 2011        Climate Connections: Questions from North and South Carolina
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

Amendment No. 8 

International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan 

Pursuant to Article X of the International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, as subsequently amended
from time to time (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2013, unless an alternative effective date is specified in the manner set forth below. 

1. Article II relating to “Definitions” is amended by modifying Section 2.27(a)(4) by removing the word “or” at the end thereof. 

2. Article II relating to “Definitions” is amended by modifying Section 2.27(a)(5) by replacing the period at the end thereof with the phrase
“; or”. 
 3. Article II relating to “Definitions” is amended by adding Section 2.27(a)(6) which shall read as follows: 

“(6) effective as of January 1, 2013, any Employee who is not employed pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement
between Employee representatives and the Employer.” 
  

	4.	Article IV is amended by restating Section 4. 10(a) to read as follows: 

 “(a) A
Participant may change the amount of his Pre-Tax Contributions and/or Post-Tax Contributions as soon as is practicable after giving notice to the Plan Administrator (in the manner prescribed by the Plan Administrator).” 

 

	5.	Article V is amended by restating Section 5.3(c)(2) to read as follows: 

 “(2)
Frequency. A Participant may make a change as soon as is practicable after giving notice to the Plan Administrator. The change will be made effective as soon as administratively possible.” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Amendment has been executed on this      day of
            , 2012 
  

			
	INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
		
	BY:	 	/s/ Susan B. Esler
	ITS:	 	Authorized Representative



  
 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 26, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 26, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A0313. GREG STAFFINS v. JOSEPHINE DONEHEW.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-1979

_____________________________

LAWRENCE WEST,

Appellant,

v.

NICOLE WEST,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Stephen A. Pitre, Judge.

September 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Lawrence West, pro se, Appellant.

Charles F. Beall, Jr. of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A.,

Pensacola, for Appellee.
E.R. v. T.S.

NO. 2018-CJ-1843

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.
Herbert MICHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3206

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2021422EN.01001202.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — FF IP v EUIPO — Seven (the DoubleF)

(Case T-23/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark the DoubleF - Earlier EU word mark THE DOUBLE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Relevant public - Similarity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2021/C 422/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: FF IP Srl (Mantua, Italy) (represented by: M. Locatelli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: D. Sindico and E. Tonello, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2019 (Case R 2588/2018-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Seven and FF IP.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Dismisses Seven SpA’s application for refusal of registration of the European Union figurative mark the DoubleF for goods in Class 18 and services in Class 35; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses Seven SpA’s application for refusal of registration of the European Union figurative mark the DoubleF for goods in Class 18 and services in Class 35;

| 3. | Orders FF IP Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders FF IP Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
# C_2020359EN.01000602.xml

| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 29 July 2020 — Boriss Cilevičs and Others v Latvijas Republikas Saeima

(Case C-391/20)

(2020/C 359/10)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Satversmes tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Boriss Cilevičs, Valērijs Agešins, Vjačeslavs Dombrovskis, Vladimirs Nikonovs, Artūrs Rubiks, Ivans Ribakovs, Nikolajs Kabanovs, Igors Pimenovs, Vitālijs Orlovs, Edgars Kucins, Ivans Klementjevs, Inga Goldberga, Evija Papule, Jānis Krišāns, Jānis Urbanovičs, Ļubova Švecova, Sergejs Dolgopolovs, Andrejs Klementjevs, Regīna Ločmele-Luņova, Ivars Zariņš

Institution whose act is contested: Latvijas Republikas Saeima

Questions referred

| 1. | Does legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings constitute a restriction on the freedom of establishment enshrined in Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or, in the alternative, on the freedom to provide services guaranteed in Article 56 [of that treaty], and on the freedom to conduct a business recognised in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings constitute a restriction on the freedom of establishment enshrined in Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or, in the alternative, on the freedom to provide services guaranteed in Article 56 [of that treaty], and on the freedom to conduct a business recognised in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

| 2. | What considerations should be taken into account when assessing whether the legislation in question is justified, suitable and proportionate with regard to its legitimate purpose of protecting the official language as a manifestation of national identity? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What considerations should be taken into account when assessing whether the legislation in question is justified, suitable and proportionate with regard to its legitimate purpose of protecting the official language as a manifestation of national identity?

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - (-)georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
# C_2021278EN.01001402.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2021 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-11/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market - Article 108(2), second subparagraph, TFEU - Adverse weather conditions - Losses suffered by farmers - Compensation aid - Obligation of recovery - Duty to provide information - Non-implementation)

(2021/C 278/19)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and T. Ramopoulos, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Tsaousi, E. Leftheriotou and A. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take, within the prescribed periods, all the measures necessary to implement Commission Decision 2012/157/EU of 7 December 2011 concerning compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) in 2008 and 2009, and by failing to sufficiently inform the European Commission of the measures taken pursuant to that decision, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 to 4 of that decision and under the TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take, within the prescribed periods, all the measures necessary to implement Commission Decision 2012/157/EU of 7 December 2011 concerning compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) in 2008 and 2009, and by failing to sufficiently inform the European Commission of the measures taken pursuant to that decision, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 to 4 of that decision and under the TFEU;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 12, 2009   /s/ Bryan Kenyon Bryan Kenyon, CFO (Principal Financial Officer)
Robert SAGER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2019

Robert Sager, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
# C_2020348EN.01002703.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/27

---

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2020 — IF v Parliament

(Case T-36/20) (1)

(2020/C 348/40)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 6.4.2020.

---
Naim STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021263EN.01002001.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Yongkang Kugooo Technology v EUIPO — Ford Motor Company (kugoo)

(Case T-324/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark kugoo - Earlier EU and national word marks KUGA and earlier EU word mark KUGA ENERGI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2021/C 263/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Yongkang Kugooo Technology Co. Ltd (Yongkang, China) (represented by: P. Pérot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ford Motor Company (Dearborn, Michigan, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2020 (Case R 65/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ford Motor Company and Yongkang Kugooo Technology.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Yongkang Kugooo Technology Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Yongkang Kugooo Technology Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileClaudia Flores
# C_2021079EN.01002601.xml

| 8.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 December 2020 — CT, Ferme de la Sarte SPRL v Région wallonne

(Case C-726/20)

(2021/C 79/32)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: CT, Ferme de la Sarte SPRL

Defendant: Région wallonne

Question referred

Is Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (1) to be interpreted as excluding from its scope the production of turf or of green roofs?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 347, p. 487.

---
**EXHIBIT
          32.1**
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO
 18
          U.S.C.
          SECTION 1350,
 AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
          connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Distributors Holding Inc.
          (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay
          Gelman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
          U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
          the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
                the
                    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                    or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
                the
                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                    the
                    Company.
 
 
  Date:
          March 29, 2007
 
 /s/
          Jay
          Gelma
 -------------------------------------
 Jay
          Gelman
 CEO
          and
          Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Wayne Norris, certify that:

1. I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  MicroSignal
Corporation

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 18, 2003

/s/ Wayne Norris
----------------------------------
Wayne Norris
Chief Financial Officer