alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022303EN.01004501.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/45

---

Order of the General Court of 7 June 2022 — Daimler v Commission

(Case T-509/20) (1)

(Environment - Regulation (EU) 2019/631 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 - Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 - Carbon dioxide emissions - Testing methodology - Passenger cars - Amendment of the contested decision as regards the applicant - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 303/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Wimmer, C. Arhold and G. Ollinger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By application lodged at the General Court Registry on 14 August 2020, the applicant brought the present action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1035 of 3 June 2020 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2018 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2020 L 227, p. 37).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Daimler AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Daimler AG.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
Brittany CHOQUETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 18-0628

DONALD DAVIS

v.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

September 14, 2018

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 25th day of October, 2018.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31556]

[[Page 320]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice-MA-2025-02; Docket No. 2024-0002, Sequence No. 51]

Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) Mileage 
Reimbursement Rates; CY 2025 Standard Mileage Rate for Moving Purposes

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide Policy (OGP), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GSA is updating the mileage reimbursement rate for privately 
owned automobiles (POA), airplanes, and motorcycles as required by 
statute. This information will be available in FTR Bulletin 25-04, 
which can be found on GSA's website at https://gsa.gov/ftrbulletins.

DATES: Applicability date: This notice applies to travel and relocation 
performed on or after January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, please 
contact Mrs. Autumn King, Policy Analyst, Office of Government-wide 
Policy, Office of Asset and Transportation Management, at 803-944-6487, 
or by email at [email protected]. Please cite Notice of FTR Bulletin 
25-04.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GSA is required by statute to set the 
mileage reimbursement rate for privately owned automobiles (POA) as the 
single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue 
Service (IRS). The IRS mileage rate for medical or moving purposes is 
used to determine the POA rate when a Government-furnished automobile 
is available and authorized and also represents the privately owned 
vehicle (POV) standard mileage reimbursement rate for official 
relocation.
    Finally, GSA conducts independent reviews of the cost of travel and 
the operation of privately owned airplanes and motorcycles on an annual 
basis to determine their corresponding mileage reimbursement rates. 
These reviews evaluate various factors, such as the cost of fuel, 
depreciation of the original vehicle cost, maintenance and insurance, 
state and Federal taxes, and consumer price index data. FTR Bulletin 
25-04 establishes and announces the new CY 2025 POV mileage 
reimbursement rates for official temporary duty and relocation travel.
    This notice is the only notification to agencies of revisions to 
the POV mileage rates for official travel and relocation, in addition 
to the changes posted on GSA's website at https://gsa.gov/mileage.

Mehul Parekh,
Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31556 Filed 1-2-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
```
Stacy TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment. 

NO. 07-02-0426-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

DECEMBER 31, 2002

______________________________

AMANDA S. HOBGOOD, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2001-438167; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

Appellant Amanda Sue Hobgood appeals a conviction for manufacture/delivery of

a controlled substance. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
2Further references to a Rule of Civil Procedure will be by reference to “TRAP

____.”

2

BACKGROUND

Amanda Sue Hobgood was convicted of manufacture/delivery of a controlled

substance, to wit: methamphetamine PG1 less than 200 grams but at least 4 grams. On

September 6, 2002, she was sentenced to 17 years in the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice-Institutional Division. On October 8, 2002, she filed a notice of appeal. 

LAW

In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a notice of appeal. TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a).2 The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence

is imposed or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order, unless a timely

motion for new trial is filed. TRAP 26.2(a). A motion for new trial may be filed by a criminal

defendant no later than 30 days after the date sentence is imposed in open court. TRAP

21.4(a). The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended for 15 days under certain

circumstances. TRAP 26.3. If the time for filing a notice of appeal is to be extended, both

a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time which complies with TRAP 10.5(b)

must be filed within the 15 day period. TRAP 26.3; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523-

25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). 
3

An untimely-filed notice of appeal will not invoke the jurisdiction of the court of

appeals. See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). Thus, if an

appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v.

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523-25.

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. A motion to extend time to file the

notice of appeal was not filed. Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction over the

appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523. 

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. TRAP 39.8, 40.2, 43.2. 

Phil Johnson

 Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Anthony J. Massetti, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|/s/    Anthony J. Massetti                                                                         
|Anthony J. Massetti Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 16, 2010
Order entered January 2 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01667 - CV IN THE MATTER OF VAN E MONYENCHE FRASURE AND JAMES ANDREWS FRASURE On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. CV13 - 00376 

### O RDER W e GRANT court reporter Deborah M. Slovak’s January 21, 2014 request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record and ORDER the record be filed by February 21, 2014
. We note the clerk’s record is overdue. Accord ingly, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Gary Fitzsimmons to file the clerk’s record by February 21, 2014
. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to Deborah M. Slovak, Dallas County District Clerk Ga ry Fitzsimmons , and all parties
.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
# C_2022165EN.01001801.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Romania) — SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca

(Case C-582/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 167 and 168 - Right to deduction - Refusal - Tax evasion - Evaluation of evidence - Suspension of examination of an administrative complaint relating to a notice of assessment refusing a right to deduction, pending the outcome of criminal proceedings - Procedural autonomy of the Member States - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Right to good administration - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

(2022/C 165/20)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Cridar Cons SRL

Defendants: Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which permits national tax authorities to suspend the examination of an administrative complaint against a notice of assessment refusing a taxable person the right to deduct input VAT on account of the involvement of that taxable person in tax evasion, with a view to securing additional objective evidence concerning that involvement, provided that, first, such suspension does not delay the outcome of that administrative complaint procedure beyond a reasonable time, second, that the decision ordering that suspension includes reasons both in law and in fact and may be subject to judicial review and, third, that, if it ultimately transpires that the right to deduction was refused in breach of EU law, that taxable person may secure the repayment of the corresponding amount within a reasonable time as well as, where relevant, the corresponding late payment interest. In those circumstances, it is not necessary that, during that suspension, that taxable person enjoy a suspension of enforcement of that notice, except, in case of serious doubt as to the lawfulness of that notice, if granting the suspension of enforcement of the same notice is required to avoid serious and irreparable harm to the interests of the taxable person.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
# C_2020287EN.01003001.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2020 — GC, WG v Société Air France SA

(Case C-286/20)

(2020/C 287/47)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: GC, WG

Defendant: Société Air France SA

This case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 15 July 2020.

---
# C_2021009EN.01000901.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 September 2020 — XXXX v HR Rail, SA

(Case C-485/20)

(2021/C 9/14)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XXXX

Opposing party: HR Rail, SA

Question referred

Is Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an employer has an obligation, in relation to a person who, due to his disability, is no longer capable of performing the essential functions of the post to which he was assigned, to assign him to another post, for which he has the requisite skills, capabilities and availability, where such a measure would not impose a disproportionate burden on the employer?

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31199]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the Optional Peg Rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate 
is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities 
similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base 
rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will 
be 4.38 percent for the January-March quarter of FY 2025.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any Third Party Lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the 
cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New 
York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted 
by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate 
will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given 
State.

David Parrish,
Chief, Secondary Market Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-31199 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - (-)kentucky(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1953        Coal beds of the Troublesome quadrangle, Breathitt, Knott, and Perry Counties, Kentucky
**Exhibit 10.15****Compensation of Directors****Nonemployee Directors****:**Compensation of Nonemployee Directors, aside from that providedpursuant to the Company’s incentive plans, is as follows:     **Retainer:**Base: $33,000 per yearServing as a committee chair: Additional $15,000 per year     **Compensation for Attendance at Meetings:**$1,100 for each Board meeting$1,100 for each Committee meeting     **Deferred Share Units:**The Hydril Company 2000 Incentive Plan provides for an automatic annualnonqualified stock option award to each non-employee director for 3,000 shares of common stock. In2005, the non-employee directors waived the automatic grant and, in lieu of the options, eachnon-employee director was awarded 2,000 deferred share units. The awards will vest and becomepayable in full on June 1, 2008. Upon vesting, the deferred share units are settled in cash at thethen fair market value of the common stock on a one-for-one basis. As the deferred share unitscannot result in the issuance of shares of Hydril common stock, they are not issued in connectionwith any Hydril incentive plan. See the form of deferred share unit agreement filed as an exhibitto the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for more information.**Employee Directors****:**As Chairman of the Board, Richard Seaver is regarded as an employee ofHydril and was paid $154,167 by Hydril. Directors who are employees of Hydril receive no additionalcompensation for serving on the Board of Directors. See the Company’s other disclosures in itsreports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and exhibits filed therewith regarding executivecompensation for a description of compensation.**Reimbursement of Expenses****:**All directors are reimbursed for transportation, lodging, mealsand other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors orcommittees thereof, including for their spouse for one meeting each year, and for other expensesincurred in their capacity as directors.
Adrian B. WYNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mark W. BAXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Nutrition Obesity Research Centers (P30-P2C).                    

*Date:*                         March 12-13, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW, Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         In Person and Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas A. Tatham, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm. 7021, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-3993,                         *tathamt@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 26, 2024.

Victoria E. Townsend,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-31445 Filed 12-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Corey BOWICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3950

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.