alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of


the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Stephen K. Gardner, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




June
24, 2010




/s/ Stephen K.
      GardnerStephen
      K. GardnerChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 631 

Supporting the designation of April 2024 as the ‘‘Month of the Military 

Child’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2024 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. CORNYN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of April 2024 as the ‘‘Month 

of the Military Child’’. 

Whereas millions of brave United States servicemembers and 

veterans have demonstrated their courage and commitment to freedom by serving the Armed Forces of the 

United States of America in active-duty posts around the 

world; 

Whereas there are more than 1,560,000 children connected to 

the military across the United States; 

Whereas it is only fitting that the people of the United States 

take time to recognize the contributions of 

servicemembers and veterans, celebrate their spirit, and 

let the men and women of the United States in uniform 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 631 IS 

know that while they are taking care of us, the people of 

the United States are taking care of their children; 

Whereas the recognition of a ‘‘Month of the Military Child’’ 

will allow the people of the United States to pay tribute 

to military children for their commitment, struggles, and 

unconditional support of United States troops; 

Whereas, when a servicemember joins the military, it is a 

family commitment to the United States, and military 

children are heroes in their own way; and 

Whereas a month-long salute to military children will encourage the United States to provide direct support to military children and families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of April 2024 as 

3 the ‘‘Month of the Military Child’’; and 

4 (2) urges the people of the United States to ob5 serve the Month of the Military Child with appro6 priate ceremonies and activities that honor, support, 

7 and show appreciation for military children. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - documents_file-149220(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        February 5, 2002        Crater Lake, Oregon, Fly-by Animation

Science Animations        April 3, 2020        Unified Geologic Map of the Moon

Science Animations        June 26, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Eruption Lava Flow Timelapse
William ROBSHAW, Appellant, v. Scott J. ISRAEL, Sheriff of Broward County, Appellee.

No. 4D18-926

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 13, 2018]

Bruce H. Little of Bruce H. Little, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

David L. Ferguson, Joshua R. Levine and Seth Haimovitch of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Conner, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, J.Chris Steinhauser, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof GeoPetro Resources Company;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 14,  2008 | /s/ J. Chris  Steinhauser |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                          | J. Chris Steinhauser,     |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
Jonas Tramell GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-698

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Michael J. P. Baker of Michael J.P. Baker Law Office, Cape Coral, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Brandon R. Christian, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                      PROXY
                          FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MORGAN
                         SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                               _____________, 2006
               PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned appoints ____________ and _____________, or either one of them,
with full power of substitution, as a true and lawful attorney and proxy to
vote, as designated in this proxy, all of the shares of common stock of First
National Bank of Morgan that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting of Shareholders of First National Bank of Morgan to be held on
___________, ______________, 2006, or any adjournment or postponements thereof.
This proxy revokes all prior proxies given by the undersigned.

IF SIGNED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IF NO SPECIFIC DIRECTION IS
GIVEN, THIS PROXY, IF SIGNED, WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2. IF ANY OTHER
BUSINESS IS PROPERLY PRESENTED AT THE MEETING, THIS PROXY MAY BE VOTED BY THE
ABOVE NAMED PROXIES IN THEIR DISCRETION.

 UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, THE FAILURE TO VOTE WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE
                              AGAINST THE MERGER.

 PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED
                               PREPAID ENVELOPE.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1.

1.   Approval of the Plan and Agreement of Merger, dated as of May 31, 2006,
     among Glacier Bancorp, Inc., First National Bank of Morgan and New First
     National Bank of Morgan.

                            FOR   AGAINST   ABSTAIN
                            [ ]     [ ]       [ ]

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 2.

2.   To adjourn the meeting, if necessary, to permit the solicitation of
     additional proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes to
     approve the merger as of the date of the meeting.

                            FOR   AGAINST   ABSTAIN
                            [ ]     [ ]       [ ]


SIGNATURE                                DATE
          ----------------------------        ---------------


SIGNATURE                                DATE
          ----------------------------        ---------------

NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears above. Joint owners each should sign.
Fiduciaries should add their full title to their signature. Corporations should
sign in full corporate name by an authorized officer. Partnerships should sign
in partnership name by an authorized person.
# C_2021481EN.01001401.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Commerzbank AG v E.O.

(Case C-296/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments - Civil and commercial matters - Lugano II Convention - Article 15(1)(c) - Jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Transfer of the consumer’s domicile to another State bound by the convention)

(2021/C 481/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Commerzbank AG

Defendant: E.O.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1)(c) of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed on 30 October 2007, the conclusion of which was approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2009/430/EC of 27 November 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that that provision determines jurisdiction where the parties to a consumer contract — the consumer and the professional counterparty — were, at the time that contract was concluded, domiciled in the same State bound by that convention, and where an international element in the legal relationship emerged only after that contract was concluded, on account of the subsequent transfer of the consumer’s domicile to another State bound by that convention.

---

(1)  OJ C 348, 19.10.2020.

---
Anthony B. JONES a/k/a Benjamin Johnson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3343

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
FAA DroneZone

Password Recovery

 

Go to htps://faadronezone.faa.gov 

Click LOG IN at the upper right. 

1

2
FAA DroneZone

Password Recovery

Click I Agree. 

Click Forgot Password? 

3

4
FAA DroneZone

Password Recovery

 

5 Enter your email address and press Send Email.

6

7

Go to your email and click on the blue link in the 

message we send. 

Follow directions to create a new password. At least 

8 characters, with upper case, lower case, numbers, 

and a special character. Example BEechwood45789! 
FAA DroneZone

Password Recovery

Log on with your email and password, go to recreational dashboard. 

Click Renew. 

8

9

Give us a call if you need any further help at (844)FLY-MY-UA (844-359-6982)
NUMBER 13-14-00605-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

DANNY LEE DUBBERLY, Appellant,

v.

CATHRYN JOY DUBBERLY, Appellee.

On appeal from 105th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on October 31, 2014, and the parties were 

ordered to mediation. This cause is before the Court on an agreed motion to reverse 

and set aside the trial court judgment without regard to the merits and remand for 

disposition in accord with the agreement of the parties. Accordingly, this appeal is 

hereby REINSTATED.
2

The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the 

matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to agreement, the parties request this Court to 

reverse and set aside the trial court’s July 7, 2014 judgment without regard to the merits, 

and to remand the case to the trial court for disposition in accordance with the agreement 

of the parties. 

We REVERSE and set aside the trial court’s July 7, 2014 judgment without regard 

to the merits, and REMAND this cause to the trial court for disposition in accord with the 

agreement of the parties (the entry of an agreed judgment as negotiated by the parties). 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). In accordance with the agreement of the 

parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

The parties request immediate issuance of our mandate. See TEX. R. APP.

P.18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the 

mandate immediately.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 15th

day of January, 2015.
Sport Pilot Examiners Issued on 09/14/2020 Page 1 of 1

Specialty Aircraft Examiner Branch, AFS-610

FAA

Specialty Aircraft Examiner Branch

Experimental Pilot Examiners

The Specialty Aircraft Examiner Branch, AFS-610 designates Experimental Pilot 

Examiners nationwide. Many of these examiners are also authorized to test for 

private, commercial, and ATP pilot certificates as well as instrument and Flight 

Instructor ratings. To find an examiner in your area go to the Designee

Management System website at: https://designee.faa.gov/#/designeeLocator

• From the dropdown menu, select “SAE.”

• Select the “Locations Search” radio button.

• Under the country dropdown menu, select “United States.”

• Select your state. Note that there is not an examiner in every state. If you 

do not select a state, you will see all of the examiners in the United States 

for the aircraft selected. Do not select “Unknown.”

• Go down the page to “Experimental Aircraft Examiners (EAE)” and select 

EAE-EAA-XXXX for an initial authorization test or EAE-PPE-XXXX for a 

61.58 pilot proficiency check.

• In the drop down menu, choose the aircraft for which you would like to be 

tested.

• At the bottom of the page, select the “Search” button, which will display a 

listing of the examiners authorized to test in the aircraft you have 

requested.

• You may contact these examiners by telephone or email.

There may be no examiner available for some aircraft. If you are unable to locate 

an examiner for your aircraft, please contact the Specialty Aircraft Examiner 

Branch at 405-954-6400 for assistance.
# C_2021357EN.01002401.xml

| 6.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — Rochefort v Parliament

(Case T-171/20) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid - Burden of proof - Duty to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Error of law - Error of assessment - Proportionality)

(2021/C 357/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Robert Rochefort (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Stasi, J.-L. Teheux and J.-M. Rikkers, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, T. Lazian and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 17 December 2019 on the recovery from the applicant of a sum of EUR 27 241 unduly paid by way of parliamentary assistance and of the corresponding debit note of 22 January 2020.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Robert Rochefort to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Robert Rochefort to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
Exhibit 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                    AND
                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cygni Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Carl Suter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 14, 2002
Certifications

I, Carl Suter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2007, of Cygni Investments, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2007


/s/ Carl Suter
Carl Suter, President
(Principal executive officer)