alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 574 

Expressing support for starting and growing a family through in vitro 

fertilization. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for starting and growing a family 

through in vitro fertilization. 

Whereas in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a type of assisted reproductive technology developed and used for infertility 

treatment in adult women; 

Whereas the first successful birth of a child conceived 

through the IVF process occurred in 1978, and since 

that time, millions of children worldwide have been conceived using IVF; 

Whereas, according to a 2015 report from the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 

1,000,000 children have been born in the United States 

between 1987 and 2015 through the use of assisted reproductive technologies, including IVF; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 574 IS 

Whereas, according to the CDC, in the United States— 

(1) about 1 in 5 women with no prior births are unable to get pregnant after 1 year of trying to conceive a 

child, leading to a diagnosis of infertility; 

(2) about 1 in 4 women experiencing infertility have 

difficulty carrying a pregnancy to term; and 

(3) in 2021, more than 97,000 children were born 

using assisted reproductive technologies, including IVF: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) affirms the desire of parents trying to con3 ceive a child to start or grow a family; 

4 (2) expresses sympathy for the millions of par5 ents experiencing infertility issues as they strive to 

6 start or grow a family and recognizes the immense 

7 physical, emotional, and psychological toll of pur8 suing medical assistance for infertility, including in 

9 vitro fertilization; 

10 (3) cherishes the millions of children born 

11 through the use of medical assistance to overcome 

12 infertility, including through in vitro fertilization; 

13 (4) recognizes that medical assistance for infer14 tility, including in vitro fertilization, is, and remains, 

15 legal in all States and territories of the United 

16 States; 

17 (5) affirms that laws enacted by Congress 

18 should promote the sanctity of human life and supVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:19 Mar 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR574.IS SR574

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 574 IS 

1 port the development and growth of families in the 

2 United States; 

3 (6) encourages further clinical research to im4 prove outcomes for parents seeking medical assist5 ance to overcome infertility as they strive to start or 

6 grow a family; and 

7 (7) supports State legislative and regulatory ac8 tions to establish health, safety, and ethical stand9 ards for medical facilities offering assisted reproduc10 tive technologies, including in vitro fertilization. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
  **Certification
pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a)**
  I,
Douglas Stukel, certify that:
  1.  I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Capital Growth Systems,
Inc.;
  2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and
  5.  The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
  Dated:
May 16, 2005
  By: /s/
Douglas Stukel
 Name:  Douglas
Stukel
 Title:  Co-Chief
Executive Officer
Steven C. FUSTOLO, Petitioner, v. OLD HILL PARTNERS INC. and John C. Howe, Respondents.

No. 1D18-1751

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2020077EN.01003501.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/35

---

Action brought on 17 January 2020 – European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-24/20)

(2020/C 77/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, J. Norris and I. Naglis, Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul article 3 of Council Decision 2019/1754 (1) of 7 October 2019 on the accession of the European Union to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul article 3 of Council Decision 2019/1754 (1) of 7 October 2019 on the accession of the European Union to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications;

| — | annul Article 4 of Decision 2019/1754 to the extent that it contains references to the Member States, or, in the alternative, to annul Article 4 entirely if references to the Member States cannot be severed from the rest of the Article; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of Decision 2019/1754 to the extent that it contains references to the Member States, or, in the alternative, to annul Article 4 entirely if references to the Member States cannot be severed from the rest of the Article;

| — | maintain the effects of the parts of Decision 2019/1754 which have been annulled, in particular any use of the authorisation granted under Article 3, implemented before the date of the judgment by the Member States which are currently parties to the 1958 Lisbon Agreement, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which should not exceed six months from the date of delivery of the judgment, of a decision of the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

maintain the effects of the parts of Decision 2019/1754 which have been annulled, in particular any use of the authorisation granted under Article 3, implemented before the date of the judgment by the Member States which are currently parties to the 1958 Lisbon Agreement, until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which should not exceed six months from the date of delivery of the judgment, of a decision of the Council of the European Union;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

First plea: breach of Article 218(6) and 293(1) TFEU, of the principle of conferral of powers laid down in Article 13(2) TEU and of the principle of institutional balance and the Commission’s right of initiative, in that the contested Decision has been adopted without a proposal of the Commission.

Second plea: in the alternative, breach of Articles 2(1) and 207 TFEU and lack of motivation, as the Council exceeded its power by granting an authorisation which is general, permanent and not duly justified.

---

(1)  OJ 2019, L 271, p. 12.

---
Scott M. Seidel 

State Bar No. 17999450

SEIDEL LAW FIRM

6505 W. Park Blvd., Ste. 306

Dallas, Texas 75093

Telephone: 214-234-2500

Chapter 7 Trustee

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE:

GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC.

§

§

§

§

 

 CASE NO. 22-31641-mvl-7

 

 Debtor § Chapter 7

Scott Seidel, Chapter 7 trustee 

§

§

§

§

________________________________

 Plaintiff

V.

Hudson Clean Energy Enterprises, LLC

Alliance Texas Holdings, LLC

Neil Z. Auerbach

Judith Auerbach

Auerbach Partners, L.P.

James Goodman 

James Frinzi

Goodman Investment Holdings, LLC

Genesis Networks Global Services, LLC

Auerbach Childrens Dynasty Trust u/a/d 

 October 9, 2012, Auerbach Trust 1

Auerbach Family Dynasty Trust u/a/d 

 October 9, 2012, Auerbach Trust 2

 Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 ADV. NO: 23-03090-mvl

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST 

FOR SERVICE OF ALL PLEADINGS AND FILINGS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Scott M. Seidel, chapter 7 Trustee for case number: 

Case 23-03090-mvl Doc 33 Filed 05/01/24 Entered 05/01/24 16:33:10 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
22-31641-mvl-7 in re: Goodman Networks, Inc., enters this notice of appearance and 

requests that all notices given or required to be given in this case and all papers served or required to 

be served in this case be given to and served upon the undersigned at the addresses and telephone 

numbers set forth below, pursuant to Rule 2002, 9007 and 9010 of the Bankruptcy Rules of 

procedure.

Respectfully submitted, 

SCOTT M. SEIDEL

/s/ Scott M. Seidel__________

State Bar No. 17999450

 SEIDEL LAW FIRM

6505 West Park Blvd., Suite 306

Plano, Texas 75093

Telephone: (214) 234-2500

scott@scottseidel.com

Case 23-03090-mvl Doc 33 Filed 05/01/24 Entered 05/01/24 16:33:10 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
# C_2020262EN.01001402.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 15 May 2020 — VA v Prosecutor of the regional prosecutor’s office in Ruse, Bulgaria

(Case C-206/20)

(2020/C 262/18)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: VA

Respondent: Prosecutor of the regional prosecutor’s office in Ruse, Bulgaria

Question referred

Where surrender is sought in order to prosecute a requested person, and where the decision to issue an underlying national arrest warrant (‘NAW’) and the decision to issue a European arrest warrant (‘EAW’) are both taken by a public prosecutor, without any involvement of a Court prior to surrender, does a requested person receive the dual level of protection envisaged by the Court in Bob-Dogi C-241/15, (ECLI:EU:C:2016:385) if:

| a) | the effect of the NAW is limited to detaining the individual for a maximum of 72 hours for the purpose of bringing him before a Court; and |
| --- | --- |

a)

the effect of the NAW is limited to detaining the individual for a maximum of 72 hours for the purpose of bringing him before a Court; and

| b) | on surrender, it is solely a matter for the Court whether to order release, or to continue detention, in light of all the circumstances of the case? |
| --- | --- |

b)

on surrender, it is solely a matter for the Court whether to order release, or to continue detention, in light of all the circumstances of the case?

---
Harriett HOLLOWAY v. STATE

CR-16-0299

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 60 

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 

Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack 

at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 

14, 2018. 

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that took 

the lives of 17 teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

the individuals who were affected by this tragedy; 

Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity over the past 5 years; and 

Whereas February 14, 2023, marks 5 years since the horrific 

attack: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 60 ATS 

1 (1) honors the memories of the victims of the 

2 senseless attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High 

3 School on February 14, 2018, and offers heartfelt 

4 condolences and deepest sympathies to the families, 

5 loved ones, and friends of the victims; 

6 (2) honors the survivors of the attack and 

7 pledges continued support for their recovery; 

8 (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the 

9 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School community; 

10 and 

11 (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency med12 ical and health care professionals of the Parkland 

13 community for their efforts in responding to the at14 tack and caring for the victims and survivors. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 587 

Designating the third week of March 2024 as ‘‘National CACFP Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. BOOZMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the third week of March 2024 as ‘‘National 

CACFP Week’’. 

Whereas the third week of March is annually recognized as 

‘‘National CACFP Week’’ to raise awareness of the Child 

and Adult Care Food Program (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘CACFP’’) of the Department of Agriculture; 

Whereas the Department of Agriculture has reaffirmed— 

(1) the vital role positive nutritional habits play in 

the healthy growth of children in the United States; and 

(2) the importance of nutritional education for the 

most vulnerable and youngest children, as well as adults, 

through centers and homes throughout the United States; 

Whereas, in 2022, the CACFP provided daily meals and 

snacks to more than 4,700,000 children and more than 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 587 ATS 

113,000 adults in child care centers, adult day care 

homes, and after-school programs, providing almost 

1,800,000,000 meals and snacks in total; 

Whereas the CACFP not only provides nutritional meals and 

education but also increases the quality of child care in 

general, especially for children in low-income areas; 

Whereas the innovative approach to oversight of the CACFP, 

which pairs child care centers, adult day care homes, and 

after-school sites with either a non profit sponsoring organization or a State agency, highlights a unique publicprivate partnership that supports working families and 

small businesses; 

Whereas, although child care can be expensive in many locations throughout the United States, the CACFP increases the effectiveness and viability of child care centers and adult day care homes for many providers, especially in rural areas; and 

Whereas an increasing number of studies demonstrate that 

access to the CACFP can measurably and positively impact the cognitive, social, emotional, and physical health 

and development of children, leading to more favorable 

outcomes, such as— 

(1) a decreased likelihood of being hospitalized; 

(2) an increased likelihood of healthy weight gain; 

and 

(3) an increased likelihood of a more varied diet: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning on March 10, 

3 2024, as ‘‘National CACFP Week’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 587 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the role of the Child and Adult 

2 Care Food Program in improving the health of the 

3 most vulnerable children and adults in child care 

4 centers, adult day care homes, and after-school care 

5 in the United States by providing nutritious meals 

6 and snacks. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40347

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Heber Centeno, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-81-10 

Before Smith, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Heber Centeno, federal prisoner # 65426-179, appeals the denial of his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), which 

was based on his contention that harsh prison conditions; his obesity, 

hypertension, and depression, which put him at greater risk of hospitalization 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40347 Document: 00516464815 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/08/2022
No. 21-40347

2

and death from COVID-19; and his lengthy sentence were extraordinary and 

compelling reasons warranting early release. 

We decline to reach the Government’s argument that Centeno failed 

to exhaust his administrative remedies given that the Government did not 

appeal the district court’s order finding that exhaustion was satisfied. See

Greenlaw v. United States, 554 U.S. 237, 244-45 (2008); United States v. 

Ibarra-Luna, 628 F.3d 712, 715 & n.16 (5th Cir. 2010). 

We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for an 

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th 

Cir. 2020). Contrary to Centeno’s contention, the district court did not 

misapply the relevant factors when it denied relief, given that it considered 

his age and that his current health conditions were being managed by 

Centeno and the Bureau of Prisons. See United States v. Rodriguez, 27 F.4th 

1097, 1099-1101 & n.2 (5th Cir. 2022); United States v. Thompson, 984 F.3d 

431, 433-35 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2688 (2021). 

Accordingly, Centeno has failed to show that the district court abused

its discretion in denying his motion for compassionate release. See Rodriguez, 

27 F.4th at 1100-01; Thompson, 984 F.3d at 433-35; Chambliss, 948 F.3d at 

693. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 21-40347 Document: 00516464815 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/08/2022
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

READYONE INDUSTRIES, INC., F/K/A

NATIONAL CENTER FOR

EMPLOYMENT OF THE DISABLED,

 Appellant,

v.

ROBERT E. JONES and ROBERT E.

JONES, TRUSTEE OF JONES FAMILY

TRUST, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

 §

No. 08-07-00265-CV

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2007-4192) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s agreed motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a). Appellant has moved to dismiss the

appeal as moot since the parties have resolved their dispute regarding the three properties at issue

in Jones’ underlying suit and subject of this appeal, and Appellee agrees. The Court concludes

that the motion should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with costs taxed against the

Appellant since there is no agreement otherwise. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1 (d).

February 20, 2009

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, J., and Ables, Judge

Ables, Judge (Sitting by Assignment)(Not Participating)