Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations 1903 

Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (known as the 

Congressional Review Act) (5 U.S.C. 801 

et seq.), the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs designated this rule 

as not satisfying the criteria under 5 

U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects 

38 CFR Part 36 

Condominiums, housing, individuals 

with disabilities, loan programs— 

housing and community development, 

loan programs—Veterans, manufactured 

homes, mortgage insurance, reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, 

Veterans. 

38 CFR Part 42 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, claims, fraud, penalties. 

Signing Authority 

Denis McDonough, Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs, approved and signed 

this document on December 31, 2024, 

and authorized the undersigned to sign 

and submit the document to the Office 

of the Federal Register for publication 

electronically as an official document of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Consuela Benjamin, 

Regulation Development Coordinator, Office 

of Regulation Policy & Management, Office 

of General Counsel, Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Department of Veterans 

Affairs amends 38 CFR parts 36 and 42 

as set forth below: 

PART 36—LOAN GUARANTY 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 36 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501 and 3720. 

§ 36.4340 [Amended] 

■ 2. In § 36.4340, amend paragraphs 

(k)(1)(i) introductory text and (k)(3) by 

removing ‘‘$27,894’’ and adding in its 

place ‘‘$28,619’’. 

PART 42—STANDARDS 

IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAM 

FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 42 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Pub. L. 99–509, secs. 6101– 

6104, 100 Stat. 1874, codified at 31 U.S.C. 

3801–3812. 

§ 42.3 [Amended] 

■ 4. In § 42.3, amend paragraphs 

(a)(1)(iv) and (b)(1)(ii) by removing 

‘‘$13,946’’ and adding in its place 

‘‘$14,308’’. 

[FR Doc. 2025–00094 Filed 1–8–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0863; EPA–R03– 

OAR–2023–0179; FRL–12161–03–OAR] 

RIN 2060–AW38 

Excess Emissions During Periods of 

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction; 

Partial Withdrawals of Findings of 

Failure To Submit State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of adverse 

comment, the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the 

November 26, 2024, direct final rule to 

partially withdraw two final actions 

finding that 13 States and/or local air 

pollution control agencies failed to 

submit State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revisions required by the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) in a timely manner to address the 

EPA’s 2015 findings of substantial 

inadequacy and ‘‘SIP calls’’ for 

provisions applying to excess emissions 

during periods of startup, shutdown, 

and malfunction (SSM). The EPA will 

address all comments received in a 

subsequent final rule for which the EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period. 

DATES: Effective January 10, 2025, the 

EPA withdraws the direct final rule 

published at 89 FR 93187 on November 

26, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

General questions concerning this 

document should be addressed to, 

Sydney Lawrence, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards, Air Quality 

Policy Division, 109 T.W. Alexander 

Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 

27711; by telephone (919) 541–4768; or 

by email at lawrence.sydney@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 26, 2024, the EPA published 

a direct final rule (89 FR 93187) to 

partially withdraw two final actions 

finding that 13 States and/or local air 

pollution control agencies failed to 

submit SIP revisions required by the 

CAA to address the EPA’s 2015 findings 

of substantial inadequacy and ‘‘SIP 

calls’’ for provisions applying to excess 

emissions during periods of SSM. In the 

proposal for the direct final rule 

published on the same day (89 FR 

93243), the EPA stated that written 

comments must be received on or before 

December 26, 2024. The EPA stated that 

if any relevant adverse comments are 

received on the proposal, the EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register. 

On December 22, 2024, an adverse 

comment dated December 18, 2024, was 

posted in the docket that the EPA 

interprets as relevant and adverse. 

Therefore, the EPA is withdrawing the 

direct final rule and will publish a 

subsequent final rule wherein the EPA 

will address all comments received. The 

EPA will not institute a second 

comment period on the subsequent final 

rule. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Approval and 

promulgation of implementation plans, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, and 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Joesph Goffman, 

Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2025–00433 Filed 1–8–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0349; FRL–12130– 

02–R9] 

Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Maricopa 

County Air Quality Department 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is finalizing a limited 

approval and limited disapproval of 

revisions to the Maricopa County Air 

Quality Department (MCAQD or 

‘‘County’’) portion of the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern emissions of volatile 

organic compounds (VOCs) from 

loading of organic liquids and gasoline. 

Under the authority of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or ‘‘Act’’), this action 

simultaneously approves local rules that 

regulate these emission sources and 

directs Arizona to correct rule 

deficiencies. We are also finalizing a 

disapproval of MCAQD’s reasonably 

available control technology (RACT) 

demonstration for the source categories 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
1904 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations 

1See 40 CFR 63.11126 and Table 3 to Subpart 

CCCCCC. For example, Subpart CCCCCC requires 

annual reporting related to malfunctions 

(malfunction of process equipment and air 

associated with these rules for the 2008 

8-hour ozone national ambient air 

quality standard (NAAQS) in the 

Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment 

area. 

DATES: This rule is effective February 

10, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket No. 

EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0349. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. If 

you need assistance in a language other 

than English or if you are a person with 

a disability who needs a reasonable 

accommodation at no cost to you, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 

94105. By phone: (415) 947–4129; email 

at sherman.donnique@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On November 8, 2024 (89 FR 88690), 

the EPA proposed a limited approval 

and limited disapproval of the following 

rules that were submitted for 

incorporation into the Arizona SIP. 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted 

MCAQD ........ 352 Gasoline Cargo Tank Testing and Use ............................................................ 11/18/2020 12/03/2020 

MCAQD ........ 353 Storage and Loading of Gasoline at a Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) ... 11/18/2020 12/03/2020 

We proposed a limited approval 

because we determined that these rules 

improve the SIP and are largely 

consistent with the relevant CAA 

requirements. We simultaneously 

proposed a limited disapproval because 

some rule provisions conflict with 

section 110 and part D of the Act. In 

addition, we proposed a disapproval of 

MCAQD’s RACT demonstration for the 

source categories listed in Table 2 for 

the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the 

Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment 

area. 

TABLE 2—APPLICABLE SOURCE CATEGORIES

CTG Title/source category Applicable 

MCAQD rule 

EPA–450/2–78–051 ................................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor

Collection Systems.

Rule 352. 

EPA–450/R–75–102 ................................ Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems—Gasoline Service Stations .......... Rule 353. 

The following provisions of Rule 352 

preclude full approval of the rule: 

1. In addition to the annual 

certification test required by Section 

301.1, Sections 502 and 503 of Rule 352 

outline ongoing monitoring tests to 

perform to detect potential leaks. 

However, the rule does not identify any 

enforceable requirements to monitor 

using these tests on a periodic basis or 

any recordkeeping and reporting 

associated with this requirement. 

2. Section 103.3(a) requires that an 

‘‘owner or operator of a gasoline cargo 

tank provides documentation from the 

gasoline cargo tank testing company to 

the Control Officer that certifies that the 

gasoline cargo tank was tested and 

verified vapor tight using test methods 

at least as stringent as those in Section 

501.1 (Maricopa County Vapor 

Tightness Test).’’ This provision allows 

the Control Officer authority to approve 

another test method, and without 

further specificity regarding how this 

authority will be exercised, it could 

functionally allow for a revision of the 

SIP without complying with the process 

for SIP revisions required by the CAA. 

The following provisions of Rule 353 

preclude full approval of the rule: 

1. Rule 353 requires that control 

equipment or spill containment 

equipment at a stationary GDF or on a 

gasoline cargo tank be leak free and 

vapor tight, requiring weekly 

inspections. Rule 353 generally requires 

a facility to determine if there is a 

‘‘potential vapor leak’’ prior to being 

required to conduct a more stringent 

vapor tightness determination. Section 

501 of Rule 353 allows for four different 

options to identify potential vapor leaks. 

Section 501.1 allows for the ‘‘use of 

sight, sound, or smell’’ as an acceptable 

method for identifying potential vapor 

leaks. Although using sight, sound, or 

smell can play a role in identifying 

potential vapor leaks, allowing for that 

to potentially be the only method used 

could functionally allow for potential 

leak identification to be left solely to the 

operator’s discretion and sensory 

inputs. Therefore, without a provision 

to periodically utilize methods beyond 

sight, sound, or smell, this provision 

undermines the enforceability of the 

rule’s requirement for vapor tight 

compliance. 

2. Section 500 of Rule 353 contains 

ongoing monitoring and recordkeeping 

requirements but does not specifically 

contain any requirements to report 

compliance information. However, 

reporting requirements are contained 

within Section 301 of the rule because 

it incorporates the applicable 

requirements from the National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline 

Dispensing Facilities at 40 CFR part 63, 

subpart CCCCCC (‘‘Subpart CCCCCC’’), 

which includes reporting requirements.1


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations 1905 

pollution control equipment), requires all 

performance tests reports to be submitted, and 

requires advanced notification of performance tests. 

2See 40 CFR part 63.11111(g). 3 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). 

However, Subpart CCCCCC is not 

applicable to the loading of aviation 

gasoline into storage tanks at airports 

and the subsequent transfer of aviation 

gasoline within the airport.2 Rule 353 

does apply to loading of aviation 

gasoline at airports, but it does not 

elsewhere require periodic reporting for 

these facilities. Given this framework, 

Rule 353 has a reporting gap, because 

there is no periodic compliance 

reporting required for loading of 

aviation gasoline at airports. Due to the 

lack of adequate reporting requirements 

(or some alternative means of ensuring 

enforceability) during loading of 

aviation gasoline into storage tanks, this 

provision undermines the enforceability 

of the rule’s requirement for vapor tight 

compliance, constitutes a SIP 

deficiency, and is inconsistent with the 

requirements of CAA Section 110. 

Our proposed action contains more 

information on the basis for this 

rulemaking and on our evaluation of the 

submittal. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

The EPA’s proposed action provided 

a 30-day public comment period. During 

this period, we received one anonymous 

comment in support of EPA’s November 

8, 2024 proposed action. We thank the 

commenter for the comment. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted that 

change our assessment of the rules as 

described in our proposed action. 

Therefore, as authorized in sections 

110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA 

is finalizing a limited approval of the 

submitted rules. This action 

incorporates the submitted rules into 

the Arizona SIP, including those 

provisions identified as deficient. As 

authorized under sections 110(k)(3) and 

301(a), the EPA is simultaneously 

finalizing a limited disapproval of the 

rules. The EPA is also finalizing a 

disapproval of the RACT 

demonstrations for the 2008 ozone 

NAAQS for the sources covered by the 

CTGs listed in Table 2. 

As a result, the EPA must promulgate 

a federal implementation plan (FIP) 

under section 110(c) unless we approve 

subsequent SIP revisions that correct the 

rule deficiencies within 24 months. 

In addition, the offset sanction in 

CAA section 179(b)(2) will be imposed 

18 months after the effective date this 

action, and the highway funding 

sanction in CAA section 179(b)(1) will 

be imposed six months after the offset 

sanction is imposed. A sanction will not 

be imposed if the EPA determines that 

a subsequent SIP submission corrects 

the identified deficiencies before the 

applicable deadline. 

Note that the submitted rules have 

been adopted by the MCAQD, and the 

EPA’s final limited disapproval does not 

prevent the local agency from enforcing 

them. The limited disapproval also does 

not prevent any portion of the rules 

from being incorporated by reference 

into the federally enforceable SIP as 

discussed in a July 9, 1992 EPA memo 

found at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/ 

production/files/2015-07/documents/ 

procsip.pdf. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of MCAQD 

Rule 352, ‘‘Gasoline Cargo Tank Testing 

and Use,’’ revised on November 18, 

2020, which regulates VOC emissions 

during loading and unloading of 

gasoline to any gasoline cargo tank 

within Maricopa County. The EPA is 

also incorporating by reference MCAQD 

Rule 353, ‘‘Storage and Loading of 

Gasoline at a Gasoline Dispensing 

Facility,’’ revised on November 18, 

2020, which regulates VOC emissions 

during storage and loading of gasoline at 

a gasoline dispensing facility. Therefore, 

these materials have been approved by 

EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been 

incorporated by reference by EPA into 

that plan, are fully federally enforceable 

under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA 

as of the effective date of this final 

rulemaking, and will be incorporated by 

reference in the next update to the SIP 

compilation.3 The EPA has made, and 

will continue to make, these documents 

available through www.regulations.gov 

and at the EPA Region IX Office (please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 

this preamble for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the 

EPA’s role is to review state choices and 

approve those choices if they meet the 

minimum criteria of the Act. 

Accordingly, this final action is 

finalizing a limited approval and 

limited disapproval of state law as 

meeting federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. 

Additional information about these 

statutes and Executive orders can be 

found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders. 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a significant 

regulatory action and was therefore not 

submitted to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

PRA because this action does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

I certify that this action will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the RFA. This action will not 

impose any requirements on small 

entities beyond those imposed by state 

law. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

(UMRA) 

This action does not contain any 

unfunded mandate as described in 

UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does 

not significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. This action does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. 

Accordingly, no additional costs to 

state, local, or tribal governments, or to 

the private sector will result from this 

action. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination 

With Indian Tribal Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175, because the SIP is not 

approved to apply on any Indian 

reservation land or in any other area 

where the EPA or an Indian tribe has 

demonstrated that a tribe has 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
1906 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations 

jurisdiction, and it will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 

apply to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 as applying only to those 

regulatory actions that concern 

environmental health or safety risks that 

the EPA has reason to believe may 

disproportionately affect children, per 

the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory 

action’’ in section 2–202 of the 

Executive Order. Therefore, this action 

is not subject to Executive Order 13045 

because it is merely finalizing a limited 

approval and limited disapproval of 

state law as meeting federal 

requirements. Furthermore, the EPA’s 

Policy on Children’s Health does not 

apply to this action. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, because it is not a 

significant regulatory action under 

Executive Order 12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTAA) 

Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs 

the EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. The EPA believes that this 

action is not subject to the requirements 

of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations and Executive 

Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation’s 

Commitment to Environmental Justice 

for All 

Executive Order 12898 (Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) directs Federal 

agencies to identify and address 

‘‘disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects’’ 

of their actions on communities with 

environmental justice (EJ) concerns to 

the greatest extent practicable and 

permitted by law. Executive Order 

14096 (Revitalizing Our Nation’s 

Commitment to Environmental Justice 

for All, 88 FR 25251, April 26, 2023) 

builds on and supplements Executive 

Order 12898 and defines EJ as, among 

other things, ‘‘the just treatment and 

meaningful involvement of all people, 

regardless of income, race, color, 

national origin, Tribal affiliation, or 

disability, in agency decision-making 

and other Federal activities that affect 

human health and the environment.’’ 

The State did not evaluate EJ 

considerations as part of its SIP 

submittal; the CAA and applicable 

implementing regulations neither 

prohibit nor require such an evaluation. 

The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis 

and did not consider EJ in this action. 

Consideration of EJ is not required as 

part of this action, and there is no 

information in the record inconsistent 

with the stated goal of Executive Orders 

12898 and 14096 of achieving EJ for 

communities with EJ concerns. 

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) 

This action is subject to the CRA, and 

the EPA will submit a rule report to 

each House of the Congress and to the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ 

as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

L. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by March 11, 2025. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: December 19, 2024. 

Martha Guzman Aceves, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA amends part 52, 

chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart D—Arizona 

■ 2. Amend § 52.119 by removing and 

reserving paragraph (c)(1). 

■ 3. In § 52.120: 

■ a. In paragraph (c), amend table 4, by 

revising the entries for ‘‘Rule 352’’ and 

‘‘Rule 353’’; and 

■ b. In paragraph (e), amend table 1, 

under the subheading ‘‘Part D Elements 

and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix 

and Tucson Areas,’’ by revising the 

second entry for ‘‘Analysis of 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS) State Implementation Plan 

(RACT SIP)’’ that appears just before the 

entry for ‘‘Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) Analysis, Negative 

Declaration and Rules Adoption.’’ 

The revisions read as follows: 

§ 52.120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (c)—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS

County 

citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date Additional explanation 

*******

Post-July 1998 Rule Codification 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations 1907 

TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (c)—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS—Continued 

County 

citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date Additional explanation 

*******

Regulation III—Control of Air Contaminants 

*******

Rule 352 ............................. Gasoline Cargo Tank 

Testing and Use.

November 18, 2020 .......... 1/10/25, [INSERT FIRST 

PAGE OF FEDERAL 

REGISTER CITATION].

Submitted electronically on 

December 3, 2020, as 

an attachment to a letter 

dated November 24, 

2020. 

Rule 353 ............................. Storage and Loading of 

Gasoline at a Gasoline 

Dispensing Facility 

(GDF).

November 18, 2020 .......... 1/10/25, [INSERT FIRST 

PAGE OF FEDERAL 

REGISTER CITATION].

Submitted electronically on 

December 3, 2020, as 

an attachment to a letter 

dated November 24, 

2020. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * (e) * * * 

TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NON-REGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES

[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] 1

Name of SIP provision 

Applicable geographic 

or nonattainment area 

or title/subject 

State submittal date EPA approval date Explanation 

The State of Arizona Air Pollution Control Implementation Plan 

*******

Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas 

*******

Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technology for 

the 2008 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) 

State Implementation Plan (RACT 

SIP).

Maricopa County portion of PhoenixMesa nonattainment 

area for 2008 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS.

June 22, 2017 ............ February 26, 2020, 85 

FR 10986 (conditionally approved); 

and December 9, 

2024, 89 FR 97543.

Only those portions of the document beginning with ‘‘Gasoline Bulk Plants, Fixed 

Roof Petroleum Tanks, External Floating 

Roof Petroleum Tanks, And Gasoline 

Loading Terminals’’ on page 33 through 

the first full paragraph on page 34, and 

Appendix C: CTG RACT Spreadsheet, the 

rows beginning with ‘‘Gasoline Bulk 

Plants’’ on page 60, through ‘‘Gasoline 

Loading Terminals’’ on pages 64–65. 

* * * * * * * 

1Table 1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements (excluding Part D Elements and 

Plans), Part D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas. 

* * * * * 

■ 4. Amend § 52.124 by adding 

paragraph (b)(2)(ii) to read as follows: 

§ 52.124 Part D disapproval. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(ii) The RACT demonstration titled 

‘‘Analysis of Reasonably Available 

Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) State 

Implementation Plan (RACT SIP),’’ only 

those portions of the document 

beginning with ‘‘Gasoline Tank Trucks 

And Vapor Collection System Leaks’’ on 

page 34 through the first full paragraph 

on page 35, and Appendix C: CTG 

RACT Spreadsheet, the rows beginning 

with ‘‘Gasoline Tank Trucks And Vapor 

Collection System Leaks’’ on page 65, 

through ‘‘Service Stations—Stage I’’ on 

pages 67–69. This demonstration 

represents the RACT requirement for the 

following source categories: Control of 

Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from 

Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor 

Collection Systems (EPA–450/2–78– 

051) and Design Criteria for Stage I 

Vapor Control Systems—Gasoline 

Service Stations (EPA–450/R–75–102). 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2024–31028 Filed 1–8–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES