alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(750)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - (-)documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

## By Year

Screenshots        April 11, 2024        QR code for Alaska Flood Observation Facebook Group

Screenshots        April 11, 2024        QR code for DGGS Photo Database of Flooding in Alaska

Presentations (PowerPoint)        August 28, 2018        Flood Inundation Types Science Overview

Presentations (PowerPoint)        November 6, 2018        Post-Wildfire Playbook

Presentations (PowerPoint)        August 28, 2018        FIM Program Overview Presentation

Presentations (PowerPoint)        August 28, 2018        Links between FIM and USGS Mission Areas
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Witnet  International  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002,  Jason Chung
hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

         1. The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information  contained in the quarterly  report fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date:  November 19, 2002.



                                             /s/ Jason Chung
                                             ------------------------
David D. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4636

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 7, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00335-CV

In re Carroll Glenn Scott

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. The petition

for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: June 29, 2007
Pam BROWN, as Beneficiary of the Shirley M. Brown, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sarah Kathryn B. ROWE, AS TRUSTEE OF the Shirley M. BROWN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1943

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00402-CV

In re Verlee Albert Jr. §

§

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F-2007-0838-C)

January 7, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court conditionally grants mandamus relief in part. We direct the trial 

court to rule, whether favorably or unfavorably to Relator, on Relator’s request for 

a free trial record and alternative request for the loan of the trial record. Only if 

the trial court fails promptly to rule will the writ of mandamus issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
James BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

James Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*401DISMISSED . *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FIL ED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JARRETT C. BUCKLEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5429 ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed October 5, 2016.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130
from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Karl B. Grube, Senior Acting Circuit Judge.

Michael P. Fuino of Weidner Law, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Wm. David Newman, Jr. of Choice Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

MORRIS, Judge.

Jarrett C. Buckley appeals a nonfinal order entered on Novemb er 13,

2015, vacating a final order of d ismissal entered on September 8, 2015. See Fla. R.

App. P. 9.130(a)(5). Buckley c ontends that the trial court imp roperly vacated the order

of dismissal, and JP Morgan Ch ase Bank, N.A., concedes error. See generally

Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co . v. Freeman, 884 So. 2d 164 (Fl a. 2d DCA 2004).- 2 - Accordingly, we reverse the nonf inal order and remand for the t rial court to reinstate the

order of dismissal enter ed on September 8, 2015.

Reversed and remanded.

BLACK and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Scott BISHOP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul N. Saleh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 14, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ PAUL N. SALEH      
|Paul N. Saleh          
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Aberdene Mines Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-2 for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cameron Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 10th day of June, 2004.

| | /s/ Cameron Reynolds
Cameron Reynolds
Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------













---
STATE of Louisiana v. Edward W. JOHNSON

No. 2018-OK-1542

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the *440procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - hawaii(22)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - (-)south dakota(4)

## By Year

Photography        June 2, 2008        Outreach at Geology Camp 2008

Photography        June 19, 2012        USGS Outreach at South Dakota School of Mines Field Affair Class

Photography        December 31, 2013        Rhoads Fork Near Rochford, SD

Photography        June 19, 2012        USGS Outreach at South Dakota School of Mines Field Affair Class
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David Barnard, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Design Within Reach, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2004 |  |                                      
|                       |  | /s/ DAVID BARNARD                    
|                       |  | David Barnard Chief Financial Officer
Interim Decision 

### #1369

MATTER OF Lux
In SECTION 245 Proceedings

A-12975895


### Decided by Regional Commissioner January 23,1968
An alien who entered this country as a member of the United States Coast Guardis statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status under section 245, Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, because he was not inspected, admitted, or paroled into the United States.

This ease has been certified to 

### me by the District Director at Portland, Oregon, for review of his decision denying the application under section 245 of the I. & 

### N.Act, as amended. The record relates to a 23-year-old male, native and citizen of the Philippines. He is presently married to a United States citizen and a petition according him nonquota status under section 101(a) (27) (A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act was approved June 

### 26, 1961 Ho last arrived in the United States on February 18, 1959, as a member of the United States Coast Guard on the USNS "General Barret". On the occasion of this arrival, he was not inspected by an Immigration officer. The record 

### does not disclose any prior entries where the applicant was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States. On June 22, 1959, he appeared at the Service office in San Francisco, California, and was registered and fingerprinted as an alien and was issued Form 1-94 as evidence thereof. His enlistment in the United States Coast Guard expires on June 22, 1963. One of the requisites for adjustment of status to that of a permanent resident is that the applicant be inspected and admitted or paroled intothe United States. The applicant has not met this requirement. Accordingly, the application must be denied and the decision of the District Director is proper. 

### ORDER : It is ordered that the application be and the same is hereby denied.

653
Uri TAL, Appellant, v. CITY OF LAUDERHILL, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1285

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2019

Robert C. Buschel of Buschel Gibbons, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Laura K. Wendell, Brett J. Schneider, and Milton R. Collins of Weiss, Serota, Helfman, Cole & Bierman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 445 

Recognizing the importance of the economic relationship between the United 

States and Israel and affirming that trade facilitated by the United 

States-Israel Free Trade Agreement is a tool to support the economy 

of Israel during the conflict with Hamas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. TILLIS, 

Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. 

YOUNG, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. CORNYN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of the economic relationship between the United States and Israel and affirming that 

trade facilitated by the United States-Israel Free Trade 

Agreement is a tool to support the economy of Israel 

during the conflict with Hamas. 

Whereas, on October 7, 2023, Hamas launched violent and 

deadly attacks on Israel by air, land, and sea; 

Whereas the United States and Israel have a longstanding 

economic and security relationship; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 445 IS 

Whereas the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement was 

signed into law in June 1985 and was the first free trade 

agreement entered into by the United States; 

Whereas, since the signing of the Agreement, total trade between the United States and Israel has grown more than 

sevenfold; 

Whereas the United States is Israel’s single largest trading 

partner; 

Whereas the United States exported $14,200,000,000 in 

goods and $5,800,000,000 in services to Israel in 2022; 

Whereas the United States imported $21,400,000,000 in 

goods and $9,200,000,000 in services from Israel in 

2022; 

Whereas the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement also 

underpins the robust exchange of capital between the 

United States and Israel; 

Whereas Israeli companies directly invested $10,600,000,000 

in the United States during 2022, supporting more than 

20,000 United States jobs; and 

Whereas, following Hamas’s atrocious attacks on Israel, 

maintaining and expanding trade and investment between 

the United States and Israel is paramount: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that the economic relationship 

3 between the United States and Israel is strong and 

4 has benefitted both countries and the peoples of both 

5 countries; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 445 IS 

1 (2) expresses support for the people of Israel 

2 and the economy of Israel in the face of Hamas’s at3 tacks against Israel; and 

4 (3) affirms that— 

5 (A) the United States-Israel Free Trade 

6 Agreement set the stage for robust growth in 

7 trade and investment between the United States 

8 and Israel; and 

9 (B) the Agreement can similarly serve as a 

10 tool for supporting the economy of Israel during 

11 the conflict with Hamas. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50408 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS HERIBERTO VEGA-ARVIZU, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-2001-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Heriberto Vega-Arvizu appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Vega-Arvizu contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Vega-Arvizu maintains that heNo. 03-50408 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Vega-Arvizu acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financial
officer and principal accounting officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.

This 10-KSB report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

2.

The information contained in this 10-KSB
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.

/s/ Marcel UrbancMarcel Urbanc 
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer 
December 19, 2007

46

---