alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF ( NOT HELD) SECTION 341 MEETING

AND TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING CONFIRMATION

Case No. 23-43569-MXM

IN RE: 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOSEPH IMAD YAMMINE

DEBTOR(S),

Meeting Information: Meeting Date: January 10, 2024 Time: 1:30 pm

Original Date: January 10, 2024

1. Debtor(s) Appeared? D1:

ID Checked:

SS Checked:

YES

 NO

 NO

2. Debtor(s) attorney/paralegal appeared? Debtor(s) attorney\firm: 

representing PRO SE

3. Creditors Appeared: NONE representing 

4. 341 Meeting: NOT HELD

5. Payment Information:

Current monthly payment per Plan: $0.00 First Payment due: 12/21/2023

$ rec'd as of 1/12/2024 $500.00 Length of Plan: 0 months 

Base Amount per Plan: $0.00

Confirmation Issues: REFER TO LEGAL: NO

The tests for Confirmation have/have not been met, as follows:

N 6. Disposable Income(monthly): $0.00 x 0 ACP = Unsecured Pool per Trustee: $0.00

N 7. Base Amount is sufficient. UCP per Plan: $0.00

N 8. Debtor is Eligible (Unsecured & Priority under $419,275.00; Secured under $1,257,850.00.)

9. Best Interest: Exemptions: Federal: NO State: 

N

Non-exempt Property Description and Equity in 

each item: 

 Total Equity in non-exempt prop. $ Total Non-Exempt Equity per Plan: $0.00

11. Exemptions Proper: If no, explain: 

N 12. Feasibility: Surplus per I & J: $2,603.99 

Step Balloon Unemployed Negative Surplus/ 

Insuff Surplus

_ _ _ _ _ Projected Income Other:

Plan Payments:

N 13. Good Faith Petition and Plan: 

a. Plan Payment at least 90 % I minus J $ $2,253.59

b. Plan does not contain non-standard language. 

c. Other:

14. Domestic Support Obligation: Debtor testified that all post-petition DSO have been paid.

N 15. Debtor testified that previous 4 years tax returns have been 

 filed with the IRS. If no, year(s) not filed: 

Year(s) not provided to Trustee's office: 

16. Business Case Meeting Required? 

17. Debtor Attorney Fees meet Guidelines.

Case 23-43569-mxm13 Doc 45 Filed 01/12/24 Entered 01/12/24 15:29:14 Desc

Page 1 of 2
Debtor(s): JOSEPH IMAD YAMMINE Page 2

Case No. 23-43569-MXM 

By: 

Tim Truman

Presiding Officer

/s/ Tim Truman

18. Legal Department Notes: Trustee recommends confirmation based on the above representations except:

Objection to be Filed?: NO

Objection Type: No Objection Needed

By: Tim Truman

 Attorney for Trustee / Trustee

Case 23-43569-mxm13 Doc 45 Filed 01/12/24 Entered 01/12/24 15:29:14 Desc

Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SYNAVANTInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Clifford A. Farren, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Clifford A. Farren,  Jr. |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |
|                         |
| Clifford A. Farren, Jr.      |
| Chief Financial Officer      |
| May 15, 2003                 |
# C_2021138EN.01005301.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/53

---

Order of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament

(Case T-188/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/71)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
David Allen DENNEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida and State of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4498

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - new mexico(1)
              - rhode island(1)

## By Year

General        August 2, 2018        370.410.1 - Training - General Provision

General        December 29, 2023        Science Information Service (SIS)

General        July 11, 2019        Giuseppina Mattietti

General        July 11, 2019        Madalyn Blondes

General        July 11, 2019        Sally Sennert

General        May 1, 2019        General Questions To Pose While Exploring Topographic Maps

General        July 11, 2019        Alanna Simpson

General        July 11, 2019        Geoff Gilleaudeau

General        July 11, 2019        Jacob Richardson

General        July 11, 2019        William F. Hoover

General        July 11, 2019        Jess Rodysill

General        January 24, 2023        Don't Take It for Granite

General        August 3, 2018        429.1 - Space Management

General        March 1, 2018        Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer: Clifford I. Voss

General        July 30, 2020        New Mexico Water Science Center Sediment Laboratory

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
# Chart13

Chart 13

2020 Cumulative Percentage of Fuel Consumption by Fuel Type and Aircraft Type

# 5.1

Page 5 - &P
|   | (a) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended      March 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange      Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/ EDWARD W. MARTIN,III                               |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|            | Edward      W. Martin, III                             |
|            | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer of          |
|            | American      Casino & Entertainment PropertiesLLC |

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - (-)maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 5, 2019        New U.S. Geological Survey Report Assesses Risk of Once-Per-Century Geomagnetic Superstorm to the Northeastern United States
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Artavis Jamar MALLARY, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3246

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Cordell Kendrick WILLIAMS

NO. 2017-KP-1385

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap Wing Khai



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

September 1, 2006
1466.

#### Horn *v.*Mound City Paint & Color Co.

Em, O. J.

1. Under the act creating the city court of Bainbridge (Acts 1900, p. 112, see. 36), the judge has the discretion, in a .proper case, to open a default and allow a plea filed. But this default must be opened before final judgment, or, if a final judgment has been rendered in the ease, this final judgment must be vacated. *Bass*v. *Doughty,*5 *Ga. App.*458 (63 S. E. 516).

2. Where judgment was duly entered by default, and subsequently, during the same term, there was a docket entry as follows: “Default opened on motion June T/ 08,” but no order was taken vacating the judgment rendered on the default, this docket entry was not sufficient for that purpose. *Dixon*v. *Minnesota Lumber Co.,*132 *Ga.*347 (64 S. E. 71).

*134Complaint, from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Harrell. October 13, 1908.

Argued December 10, 1908. —

Decided May 4, 1909.

*Donalson & Donalson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Biclcetson & Hale,*contra.

3. In a suit on account, where the defendant is in default, the plaintiff is not required to make out his ease by proof. Civil Code, §5078; Norman v. *Great Western Tailoring Co.,*121 *Ga.*813 (49 S. E. 782).

*Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30703]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Advisory Committee on Minority Health; Notice of Meeting 
Cancellation

    The Office of Minority Health (OMH) published a notice in the 
Federal Register concerning a meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Minority Health. The meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 7, 2025 at 
2 p.m. to 3 p.m. (EST) is cancelled. The notice for the January 7 
meeting was published in the Federal Register on Monday, December 9, 
2024 in FR Doc. 2024-28823, at 89 FR 97629-97630.
    For further information contact: Violet Woo, Designated Federal 
Officer, OMH's Advisory Committee on Minority Health, OMH, HHS, Tower 
Building, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Telephone: (240) 453-6816; Email: [email protected].

Violet Woo,
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Minority Health.
[FR Doc. 2024-30703 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-29-P
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-30158 Summary Calendar

__________________

GEORGE PROBST, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus C. MARTIN LENSING, WARDEN Respondent-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Louisiana

(94-2608-A)

______________________________________________

September 5, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * George Probst, #304494, seeks relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254, from his conviction of forcible rape. His argument that
there was insufficient evidence to support hi s conviction is

n othing more than a challenge to the jury’s credibility2

determinations and the weight given to adverse evidence. These are
factual matters to which the presumption of corre ctness of
§ 2254(d) applies, since Probst has failed to establish the applicability of any of the exceptions to the presumption. S ee 28

U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) through (8); Knox v. Butler , 884 F.2d 849, 851 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied , 110 S.Ct. 1828 (1990). The district court did not err in denying relief on this claim.

Nor did the district court err in finding that the prosecutorial remarks during closing arguments did not violate
Probst’s due process rights. Even assuming a violation of D oyle v. Ohio , 426 U.S. 610 (1976), it was harmless error under the standard
of review set forth in Brecht v. Abrahamson , 507 U.S. 619 (1993).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2023063EN.01003301.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v Commission

(Case T-143/20) (1)

(Subsidies - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 - Definitive countervailing duty - Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 - Price undercutting - Price pressure - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Causal link - Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution - Less than adequate remuneration - Income or price support - Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Benefit - Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Direct transfer of funds - Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 - Calculation of the amount of the benefit - Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Threat of material injury - Rights of the defence)

(2023/C 63/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri (Medan, Indonesia), PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo (Medan) (represented by: F. Graafsma, J. Cornelis and E. Rogiest, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Kienapfel, G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M.-S. Dibling and L. Amiel, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 of 28 November 2019 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia (OJ 2019 L 317, p. 42), in so far as that regulation concerns them.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.

---
# C_2022276EN.01002401.xml

| 18.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/24

---

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2022 — Satabank v ECB

(Case T-563/20) (1)

(2022/C 276/34)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1140 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-923, K2025-924.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31109 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Opinion issued May 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00220-CR

———————————

STEVEN ANDRUE ACUNA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1536202

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Steven Andrue Acuna, pleaded guilty to the reduced class A 

misdemeanor assault charge, with an agreed punishment recommendation of sixty 

days in county jail.

1

In exchange for appellant’s plea, the State had agreed to reduce 

 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(a)(1), (b)(1) (West 2013).
2

the charge from the third-degree felony offense of assault—bodily injury of a public 

servant to class A misdemeanor assault.

2

In accordance with his plea bargain with 

the State, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at sixty 

days’ confinement in county jail. The trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain 

case and that appellant had no right of appeal, but appellant timely appealed.

3

 See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a). The trial court appointed counsel for appellant, 

who filed a notice in this Court stating that we lack jurisdiction. We dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 1977); TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the clerk’s record and states 

that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615. The record confirms that 

 

2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.21(2) (West 1994).

3 Appellant’s notice of appeal from trial court cause number 1525069 has been 

assigned to appellate cause number 01-17-00219-CR.
3

appellant pleaded guilty to the reduced class A misdemeanor assault charge and, 

thus, supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2003) (noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for State’s reduction of 

charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)). Because appellant has no right of 

appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R. APP.

P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 13(a)(2)

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Vasant Mistry, the chief financial officer of Concordia Bus AB (publ), certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Concordia Bus AB (publ).

Date:
June 27, 2003

|/s/VASANT MISTRYVasant Mistry
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concordia Bus AB (publ) and will be retained by Concordia Bus AB (publ) and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,
Christopher T. Seaver, Chief Executive Officer of Hydril Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

         (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
         December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:   March 11, 2004                        /s/ Christopher T. Seaver
                                               --------------------------
                                               Christopher T. Seaver
                                               Chief Executive Officer