alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 603 

Designating April 2024 as ‘‘National Native Plant Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Ms. HIRONO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 2024 as ‘‘National Native Plant Month’’. 

Whereas native plants are indigenous species that have 

evolved and occur naturally in a particular region, ecosystem, and habitat; 

Whereas there are more than 17,000 native plant species in 

the United States, which include trees, shrubs, vines, 

grasses, and wildflowers; 

Whereas native plants help prevent flooding, drought, and 

erosion and can help restore damaged ecosystems; 

Whereas native plants provide shelter as well as nectar, pollen, and seeds that serve as food for native butterflies, insects, birds, and other wildlife in ways that non-native 

plants cannot; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 603 ATS 

Whereas more than 200 of the native plant species in the 

United States are estimated to have been lost since the 

early 19th century; 

Whereas habitat loss and degradation, extreme weather 

events, and invasive species have contributed to the decline of native plants in the United States; and 

Whereas native plants are essential components of resilient 

ecosystems and the natural heritage of the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 2024 as ‘‘National Native 

3 Plant Month’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the benefits of native plants to 

5 the environment and economy of the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# Table 1.6
Travius M. CATO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3411

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 8, 2006
 AMERICAN PHYSICIANS CAPITAL, INC.
  Commission File Number 000-32057
 Michigan
    
    38-3543910(State of Incorporation)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)1301 North Hagadorn Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48823(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(Registrants telephone number, including area code): (517) 351-1150Not Applicable(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESINDEX OF EXHIBITSInvestor Presentation, dated March 8, 2006    Table of Contents  
 Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
   
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    
    Investor Presentation of American Physicians Capital, Inc., dated
March 8, 2006
 
 SIGNATURES
   AMERICAN PHYSICIANS CAPITAL, INC.(Registrant)By: /s/ R. KEVIN CLINTONR. Kevin ClintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX OF EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Investor Presentation of American Physicians Capital, Inc.,
dated March 8, 2006
Samuel H. SANFORD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tryinda PRIDE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 433 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the practice 

of using gas chambers to euthanize stray cats and dogs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2013 

Mr. BARLETTA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the practice of using gas chambers to euthanize 

stray cats and dogs. 

Whereas approximately 3,400,000 animals are euthanized in 

the United States each year; 

Whereas approximately three percent of all cats and dogs in 

the United States are euthanized in gas chambers each 

year; 

Whereas 23 States have banned the use of gas chambers to 

euthanize animals; 

Whereas several States are currently considering legislation 

banning the use of gas chambers to euthanize animals; 

maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 433 IH 

Whereas the American Veterinary Medical Association does 

not consider euthanasia through the use of gas chambers 

an unconditionally acceptable method of euthanasia; 

Whereas gas chambers cause stress in dogs and cats and cannot guarantee a humane death especially for ill, young, 

or old dogs and cats; 

Whereas gas chambers pose great dangers of significant psychological and physical harm to staff and volunteers in 

shelters, including bites and scratches while transporting 

animals and injuries from leaks or misuse of noxious gasses; 

Whereas euthanasia by injection has been proven to be more 

safe, cost effective, and humane in numerous studies; 

Whereas many cats and dogs run away from their owners 

each year; and 

Whereas many lost cats and dogs with owners are among 

those euthanized in gas chambers each year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses its dissatisfaction that the practice of using gas 

3 chambers to euthanize stray cats and dogs continues in 

4 the United States in the 21st century. 

Æ 

maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Robert MCKINNON, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Randall Benjamin OTEY v. STATE

CR-16-0839

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

         Set forth below are the bases for the computation of earnings per share
for the periods shown.

                                                 Year Ended December 31,
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                         2001             2000          1999
                                       --------         --------      ----------
Earnings Per Common Share:
     Basic                             $   1.16         $   1.04        $   0.17
     Average Shares Outstanding         960,099          779,256         742,028


     Diluted                           $   1.12         $   1.01        $   0.17
     Average Shares Outstanding         995,420          804,394         750,952
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. and R.J. ) REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3877 ) JOHN A. BROWN, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Maria ) Joyce Brown, ) ) Appellee. ) ) ) Opinion filed December 7, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas H. Minkoff, Judge. Geoffrey J. Michael of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC; and Scott A. Chesin of Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY, for Appellant Philip Morris USA Inc. Charles R.A. Morse of Jones Day, New York, N.Y; and Marie A. Borland and Troy A. Furman of Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa; and Stephanie E. Parker and John M. Walker of Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, for Appellant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. David A. Sales and Daniel R. Hoffman of David J. Sales, P.A., Sarasota; and- 2 -

Eric D. Roslansky and Steven C. Ruth of The Ruth Law Team, St. Petersburg; and Brent Bigger of Knoph Bigger, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2019406EN.01003601.xml

| 2.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/36

---

Action brought on 27 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v Commission

(Case T-661/19)

(2019/C 406/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sasol Germany GmbH (Hamburg, Germany), SI Group - Béthune (Béthune, France), BASF SE (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Mereu, P. Sellar and S. Saez Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul the Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1194 of 5 July 2019 on the identification of 4-tert-butylphenol (PTBP) as a substance of very high concern pursuant to Article 57(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2019, L 187, p. 41); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1194 of 5 July 2019 on the identification of 4-tert-butylphenol (PTBP) as a substance of very high concern pursuant to Article 57(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2019, L 187, p. 41);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-640/19, Sasol Germany and Others v ECHA.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31174]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior 
Integrated Review Group; Biobehavioral Medicine and Health Outcomes 
Study Section.
    Date: January 27-28, 2025.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Mark A. Vosvick, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3110, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
402-4128, [email protected].

    Name of Committee: Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; 
Cellular Signaling and Regulatory Systems Study Section.
    Date: January 30-31, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: David Balasundaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5189, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1022, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31174 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Ridder Williams CROCKER, Individually and on Behalf Her Deceased Son, Jerry Lee Sheppard v. BATON ROUGE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER-MID CITY and its Staff, Including but Not Limited to the Behavioral Health Unit, William T. Elliot, M.D. and Joseph Thomas, Jr., M.D.

NO. 2018-C-1911

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant for reasons assigned by Judge McDonald.
**EXHIBIT
        23.2**
   **Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
   The
        Board
        of Directors
 First
        Northern Community Bancorp:
  We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
        333-37874) on Form S-8 of First Northern Community Bancorp of our report
        dated
        March 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of First
        Northern Community Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2005, and the
        related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and
        comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
        period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the
        December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of First Northern Community
        Bancorp.
   /s/ **KPMG
        LLP**
  Sacramento,
        California
 March
        15,
        2007
Shannon Lee VALRIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.2


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


     I, Nathanael Lineham, the chief executive officer of Verb Exchange Inc.,
certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F
financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Verb Exchange Inc.



                                                   /s/  Nathanael Lineham
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 NATHANAEL LINEHAM,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Date:  July 11, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Verb Exchange Inc. and will be retained by Verb Exchange Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




<PAGE>



              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




         I, David Ebert, the chief financial officer of Verb Exchange Inc.,
certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F
financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Verb Exchange Inc.



                                                   /s/  David Ebert
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 DAVID EBERT,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Date:  July 11, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Verb Exchange Inc. and will be retained by Verb Exchange Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023015EN.01001001.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB

(Case C-646/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility - Divorce - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 2(4) and Article 21 - Concept of ‘judgment’ - Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State - Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’)

(2023/C 15/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht

Defendant: TB

Intervening parties: Standesamt Mitte von Berlin, RD

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000,

must be interpreted, in particular for the purpose of the application of Article 21(1) of that regulation, as meaning that a divorce decree drawn up by a civil registrar of the Member State of origin, containing a divorce agreement concluded by the spouses and confirmed by them before that registrar in accordance with the conditions laid down by the legislation of that Member State, constitutes a ‘judgment’ within the meaning of Article 2(4).

---

(1)  OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Robert W.
Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert W. Piper
-------------------------------------
Robert W. Piper
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003
# C_2020297EN.01003401.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 30 June 2020 — IB v FA

(Case C-289/20)

(2020/C 297/45)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: IB

Respondent: FA

Question referred

Where, as in the present case, it is apparent from the factual circumstances that one of the spouses divides his time between two Member States, is it permissible to conclude, in accordance with and for the purposes of the application of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, (1) that he or she is habitually resident in two Member States, such that, if the conditions listed in that article are met in two Member States, the courts of those two States have equal jurisdiction to rule on the divorce?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

---
Radames VELAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Larodis Vintrell WILSON v. STATE

CR-16-0315

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 24-0048

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN DOUGLAS SHAW,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2024

03/19/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0048
Patrick LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3008

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Reginald SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

Reginald Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

B.L. thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.
# Chart 9

# 6.1