alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H.S., Father, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0585

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALVIAN ERREVY MARQUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant

and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 2 2020

11/02/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0585
extr-ex1030_655.htm



                                                                                                                                                                                                 Exhibit 10.30

 


	
Notice of Grant of Stock Option

(For U.S. Participants)
	
 
	
Extreme Networks, Inc.

ID:  77-0430270

145 Rio Robles

San Jose, CA  95134




 


	
Participant:
	
 
	
Plan:  2005 Equity Incentive Plan

	
%%FIRST_NAME%-% %%LAST_NAME%-%
	
 
	
Option Number:   %%OPTION_NUMBER%-%

	
%%ADDRESS_LINE_1%-%
	
 
	
Date of Grant:  %%OPTION_DATE%-%

	
%%ADDRESS_LINE_2%-%
	
 
	
Option Expiration Date:  %%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD1%-%

	
%%CITY%-% % %STATE%-%  %%ZIPCODE%-%
	
 
	
 




 


	
	
 




 

Effective on the Date of Grant, you have been granted a %OPTION_TYPE%-% Stock Option (the “Option”) to buy %%TOTAL_SHARES_GRANTED%-% shares (the “Number of Option Shares”) of the common stock of Extreme Networks, Inc. at price of $%%OPTION_PRICE%-%  per share.

Vested Shares:  Provided that your Service does not terminate prior to the applicable date, shares will initially vest and become exercisable on the first date set forth below (the “Initial Vesting Date”) and thereafter will vest and become exercisable at rates determined as follows:

 


	
Shares
	
 
	
Vest Type
	
 
	
Full Vest
	
 
	
Expiration Date

	
%%SHARES_PERIOD1%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_TYPE_PERIOD1%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_DATE_PERIOD1%-%
	
 
	
%%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD1%-%

	
%%SHARES_PERIOD2%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_TYPE_PERIOD2%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_DATE_PERIOD2%-%
	
 
	
%%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD2%-%

	
%%SHARES_PERIOD3%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_TYPE_PERIOD3%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_DATE_PERIOD3%-%
	
 
	
%%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD3%-%

	
%%SHARES_PERIOD4%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_TYPE_PERIOD4%-%
	
 
	
%%VEST_DATE_PERIOD4%-%
	
 
	
%%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD4%-%




 


					
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 




 

By the Company’s authorized signature below and the Participant’s electronic acceptance in a form authorized by the Company, the Company and the Participant agree that the Option is governed by this Grant Notice and by the provisions of the Stock Option Agreement and the Plan, both of which are made a part of this document, and by the Superseding Agreement, if any is set forth above, the terms of which shall supersede any inconsistent provision of the Stock Option Agreement to the extent intended by the Superseding Agreement.  The Participant acknowledges that copies of the Plan, the Stock Option Agreement and the prospectus for the Plan are available on the Company’s internal web site and may be viewed and printed by the Participant for attachment to the Participant’s copy of this Grant Notice.  The Participant represents that the Participant has read and is familiar with the provisions of the Stock Option Agreement and the Plan, and hereby accepts the Option subject to all of their terms and conditions.

 


		
	
 

	
Extreme Networks, Inc.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000821 17-SEP-2013 09:08 AM
Brian CASEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-289

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1984        Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, 1946-1984
# C_2021053EN.01001601.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo No 1 de Pontevedra (Spain) lodged on 2 September 2020 — UN v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedra

(Case C-409/20)

(2021/C 53/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso Administrativo No 1 de Pontevedra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UN

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Pontevedra

Questions referred

Must Directive 2008/115/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (Articles 4(3), 6(1), 6(5) and 7(1)) be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation (Articles 53(1)(a) and 55(1)(b), Article 57 and Article 28(3)(c) of Ley Orgánica 4/2000, de 11 de enero, sobre derechos y libertades de los extranjeros en España y su integración social (Basic Law 4/2000 of 11 January 2000 on the rights and freedoms of foreign nationals in Spain and their social integration)) that penalises illegally staying foreign nationals in the absence of aggravating circumstances, initially, with a fine together with a request to return voluntarily to the country of origin followed, thereafter, by the penalty of removal if the foreign national neither regularises his situation nor returns voluntarily to his country?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

---
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-838880

NO. 2019-BA-0181

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 7, 2019

Granted. Petitioner is allowed to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination. Upon satisfactorily passing the examination, petitioner may apply to this court for the appointment of a commissioner in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 9, to take evidence and report to this court as to whether petitioner has the appropriate character and fitness to be admitted to the bar and allowed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “report”) of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 556 

To provide for the printing of the Senate Manual for the One Hundred 

Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2024 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To provide for the printing of the Senate Manual for the 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, That a revised edition of the Senate Manual 

2 for the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress be prepared 

3 by the Committee on Rules and Administration and print4 ed as a Senate document, and that 1,500 additional copies 

5 shall be printed and bound for the use of the Senate, 

6 bound and delivered as may be directed by the Committee 

7 on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2021028EN.01001301.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Codere Network SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-477/20)

(2021/C 28/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Codere Network SpA

Respondents: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?

| 2. | Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?

---
# C_2022294EN.01000701.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Silistra, Bulgaria) — DB, LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsia na Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti — Silistra

(Case C-520/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) - Decision 2007/533/JHA - Articles 38 and 39 - Alert on an object sought - Objectives of the alert - Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings - Execution - Measures to be taken and action based on an alert - Surrender of the object seized to the Member State issuing the alert - National legislation not permitting a refusal to execute the alert)

(2022/C 294/08)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Silistra

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: DB, LY

Defendant: Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsia na Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti — Silistra

Operative part of the judgment

Article 39 of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation pursuant to which the competent authorities of the executing Member State are required to execute an alert on an object entered in the second generation Schengen Information System, even though those authorities have doubts regarding the reasons, set out in Article 38(1) of that decision, for the entry of that alert.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
Exhibit 1.3  APPROVEDBYGENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS   OF MOBILE TELESYSTEMSPUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANYAUGUST 25, 2015, MINUTES NO.36  ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF MOBILE TELESYSTEMS PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY  Add the subparagraph to paragraph 1.9 of the Charter of Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company Information about the Companys reorganization and legal successions as follows:  (62)The Company is a legal successor of all rights and obligations to Joint Stock Company Penza-GSM (registered with the Administration of the Oktiabrskii District of Penza city on June 27, 1997 under No. 116 and entered into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities on August 12, 2002 by the Russian Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Oktiabrskii District of Penza city under Primary State Registration Number 1025801201062), reorganized by way of merger with Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company.  (63)The Company is a legal successor of all rights and obligations to Joint Stock Company SMARTS-Ivanovo (registered with the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Leninskii District of Samara city on August 24, 2012 and entered into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities on August 24, 2012 by the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Leninskii District of Samara city under Primary State Registration Number 1126315004694), reorganized by way of merger with Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company.  (64)The Company is a legal successor of all rights and obligations to Joint Stock Company SMARTS-Ufa (registered with the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Leninskii District of Samara city on August 24, 2012 and entered into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities on August 24, 2012 by the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Leninskii District of Samara city under Primary State Registration Number 1126315004727), reorganized by way of merger with Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company.  Presidentof Mobile TeleSystemsPublic Joint Stock   Company
A.A. Dubovskov
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sanford
M. Kimmel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:   December 2, 2003              By: /s/ Sanford M. Kimmel
                                           ----------------------------
                                               Sanford M. Kimmel
                                               Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 526 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 526

  Repealing standing orders relating to flowers in the Senate Chamber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2024

 Mrs. Fischer (for herself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Repealing standing orders relating to flowers in the Senate Chamber.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON FLOWERS.

    (a) In General.--Senate Resolution 284 (58th Congress), agreed to 
February 24, 1905, is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Repeal.--Senate Resolution 221 (98th Congress), 
agreed to September 15, 1983, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      MILLENNIUM QUEST, INC.

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Millennium
Quest, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


November 13, 2003                /s/ Dimitri Cocorinis
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Dimitri Cocorinis, Chief Executive Officer



November 10, 2003                 /s/ Terry Cononelos
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Terry Cononelos, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Millennium Quest, Inc. and will be retained by Millennium Quest,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.