alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of COL China
Online International Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, I, Chi Keung Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated:  September 30, 2009               /s/ Chi Keung Wong
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Chi Keung Wong,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                                         Officer)
BTXN 060 (rev. 10/19)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

Financial Strategies Acquisition Corp. Case No.: 23−32655−swe11

 Chapter No.: 11

Debtor(s)

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

The Debtor(s), having been given notice that this case would be dismissed upon the failure to timely file:

Pay the required filing fee in installments as directed in the Order regarding the

Application to Pay Filing Fee in Installments, or Order denying/revoking the

Application for Waiver of the Chapter 7 Filing Fee.

List of creditors required to be filed with the petition by N.D.TX L.B.R. 1007−1(a)

within 48 hours from the issuance of the Notice of Deficiency

Schedules A/B−H pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(c) within 14 days of the filing of

the Petition

Declaration for Electronic Filing III(B)(3) within 7 days of the filing of the Petition.

Declaration About an Individual Debtor's Schedules (Official Form 106Dec) within 14

days of the date of the filing of the petition.

Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury for Non−Individual Debtors (Official Form 202)

within 14 days of the date of the filing of the petition.

Statement of Financial Affairs pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(c) within 14 days of

the filing of the Petition

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed November 28, 2023

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.

Case 23-32655-swe11 Doc 12 Filed 11/28/23 Entered 11/28/23 11:19:13 Desc

Page 1 of 2
page 2

Plan/Plan Summary pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3015 within 14 days of the filing of

the Petition

List of twenty largest unsecured creditors within 48 hours of the date of the filing of

the Petition

Social Security/Tax ID number within 48 hours from the issuance of the Notice of

Deficiency

Form 121 within 48 hours of the date of the Petition

Summary of Assets and Liabilities (Official Form 106Sum/206Sum) within 14 days of

the date of the filing of the Petition

A complete original petition was not filed within 3 days from the issuance of the

Notice of Deficiency

Certificate of completion from an approved credit counseling course completed within

180 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Copies of employee income records within 14 days of the date of the filing of the

Petition

Statement of Current Monthly Income within 14 days of the date of the filing of the

Petition

Chapter 15 Service List within 14 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Cash Flow Statement within 7 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Balance Sheet within 7 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

Statement of Operations within 7 days of the date of the filing of the Petition

All required documents pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 521 within 45 days of the filing of the

Petition

Other: Matrix coversheet

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED that this Order shall not be deemed a bar to refiling under 11 U.S.C. §109(g).

# # # End of Order # # #

Case 23-32655-swe11 Doc 12 Filed 11/28/23 Entered 11/28/23 11:19:13 Desc

Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - (-)products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - (-)south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1998        Development and testing of a contamination potential mapping system for a portion of the General Separations Area, Savannah River Site, South Carolina

publication        April 8, 2015        Revised hydrogeologic framework of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and parts of Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina

publication        May 19, 2007        Morphology and textures of modern sediments on the inner shelf of South Carolina's Long Bay from Little River Inlet to Winyah Bay

publication        January 1, 1996        Assessment of scour-critical data collected at selected bridges and culverts in South Carolina, 1990-92

publication        March 10, 2010        Geomorphology of mesophotic coral ecosystems: Current perspectives on morphology, distribution, and mapping strategies
1

 
     Section 2. Miscellaneous.     (a) All of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement are incorporated herein by referencewith the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. Except as expressly amended hereby,the Loan Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.     (b) This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with thelaws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of law.     (c) Borrower hereby (1) unconditionally ratifies and confirms, renews and reaffirms all of itsobligations under the Loan Agreement and all of the terms, covenants and conditions thereunder(except for conditions precedent and any representations or warranties made as of a specific date),(2) acknowledges and agrees that such obligations remain in full force and effect, binding on andenforceable against it in accordance with the terms, covenants and conditions of the LoanAgreement, without impairment and (3) represents, warrants and covenants that it is not in defaultunder the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents beyond any applicable notice and cureperiods, and there are no defenses, offsets or counterclaims against the Indebtedness.[Signatures Appear on Following Page]
2

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged and agreed, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of thedate first hereinabove set forth.             **BORROWER****:**               W2007 ACEP NINTH MEZZANINE A    BORROWER, L.P., a Delaware limitedpartnership               By: W2007 ACEP Ninth Mezzanine A Gen-    Par, L.L.C., its general partner                 By: /s/ David Gutstadt                 Name: David Gutstadt        Title: Vice President               W2007 ACEP NINTH MEZZANINE B    BORROWER, L.P., a Delaware limitedpartnership               By: W2007 ACEP Ninth Mezzanine B Gen-    Par, L.L.C., its general partner                 By: /s/ David Gutstadt                 Name: David Gutstadt        Title: Vice President  [Signatures continue on following page]Stratosphere
The SILVA FAMILY TRUST UTD 2/15/05; Robert M. Silva; and Norma Silva, Appellants, v. NAPLES ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Oregon Limited Partnership, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 18, 2019.

Donald E. Christopher of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Orlando, for Appellants.

J. Allen Bobo and Jody B. Gabel of Lutz, Bobo & Telfair, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Hugo CONTRERAS and Marie N. Contreras, Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee.

No. 3D18-36

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

Hugo Contreras and Marie N. Contreras, in proper persons.

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, and Curtis A. Wilson (Orlando), for appellee.

Before LAGOA, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding: "When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal. The trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.") *See also* *New England Ins. Co. v. Int'l Bank of Miami, N.A.*, 537 So.2d 1025, 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (holding: "Even though it consists only of citations of authority without further explanation, a per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court's opinion or not.")
Tammi FITZGERALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3413

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Tyler C. HALE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

Tyler C. Hale, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Fred J. Krupica, Chief Financial Officer of Fastclick, Inc., certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 13, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Fred J. Krupica       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Fred J. Krupica           |
|                    |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6220

DENARD DARNELL NEAL,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

J. C. STREEVAL, Warden, U.S.P. Lee; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 

District of Arizona-Phoenix; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Eastern 

District of California; OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

United States Department of Justice; OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF THE 

TREASURY, United States Department of the Treasury,

 Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:21-cv-00380-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 23, 2022

Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denard Darnell Neal, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6220 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Denard Darnell Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 

U.S.C. § 2241 petition. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil 

case, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district 

court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on November 17, 2021. Neal filed his notice of 

appeal, at the earliest, on February 15, 2022. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 

(1988) (establishing prison mailbox rule). Neal claimed that he did not receive a copy of 

the district court’s order until February 15, 2022, and there is some evidence in the record 

supporting his assertion. Because Neal filed his notice of appeal on the last day of the 

excusable neglect period and because he claimed that he did not receive a copy of the 

court’s order until February 15, 2022, we construe Neal’s notice of appeal as a motion to 

extend or reopen the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(5) or (6), respectively, and remand to 

the district court to determine whether the appeal period should be extended or reopened. 

The record, as supplemented, will be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6220 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2021189EN.01000402.xml

| 17.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Attunda tingsrätt — Sweden) — Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System SAS

(Case C-28/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Pilots’ strike organised within a legal framework - Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity - Articles 16, 17 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - No impairment of the air carrier’s freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right of negotiation)

(2021/C 189/05)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Attunda tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Airhelp Ltd

Defendant: Scandinavian Airlines System SAS

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that strike action which is entered into upon a call by a trade union of the staff of an operating air carrier, in compliance with the conditions laid down by national legislation, in particular the notice period imposed by it, which is intended to assert the demands of that carrier’s workers and which is followed by a category of staff essential for operating a flight does not fall within the concept of an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 23.3.2020.

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00432

- CR

Hugo Cardenas Flores

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarran t County (1360208D )

January 29, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered t hat the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corillian Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), Alex P. Hart, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul K. Wilde, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: March 16, 2006

/s/ ALEX P. HART

Alex P. Hart
Chief Executive Officer and President

/s/ PAUL K. WILDE

Paul K. Wilde
Chief Financial Officer