alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
  **Certification
pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a)**
  I, Lee
Wiskowski, certify that:
  1.  I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Capital Growth Systems,
Inc.;
  2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and
  5.  The small
business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
  Dated:
May 16, 2005
  By: /s/
Lee Wiskowski
 Name:  Lee
Wiskowski
 Title:  Co-Chief
Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or
 Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, L. Scott Biar, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  November 14, 2011
 
 /s/ L. Scott BiarL. Scott BiarChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
# C_2023235EN.01002602.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Naturstrom v Commission

(Case T-316/20) (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German electricity market - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - No standing to bring proceedings - No active participation - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 235/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Naturstrom AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by T. Funke and A. Dlouhy, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Grave, C. Barth and D.-J. dos Santos Goncalves, lawyers), RWE AG (Essen) (represented by: U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 — RWE/E.ON Assets) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Naturstrom AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and by RWE AG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Naturstrom AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, E.ON SE and by RWE AG;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.

---
# C_2021062EN.01001001.xml

| 22.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued in respect of L (C-354/20 PPU), P (C-412/20 PPU)

(Joined Cases C-354/20 PPU and C 412/20 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Article 1(3) - Article 6(1) - Surrender procedures between Member States - Conditions for execution - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Second paragraph of Article 47 - Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal - Systemic or generalised deficiencies - Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ - Taking into consideration of developments after the European arrest warrant concerned has been issued - Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine specifically and precisely whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person concerned will run a real risk of breach of his or her right to a fair trial if he or she is surrendered)

(2021/C 62/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

L (C-354/20 PPU), P (C-412/20 PPU)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) and Article 1(3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, where the executing judicial authority, which is called upon to decide whether a person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued is to be surrendered, has evidence of systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning the independence of the judiciary in the Member State that issues that arrest warrant which existed at the time of issue of that warrant or which arose after that issue, that authority cannot deny the status of ‘issuing judicial authority’ to the court which issued that arrest warrant and cannot presume that there are substantial grounds for believing that that person will, if he or she is surrendered to that Member State, run a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial, guaranteed by the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, without carrying out a specific and precise verification which takes account of, inter alia, his or her personal situation, the nature of the offence in question and the factual context in which that warrant was issued, such as statements by public authorities which are liable to interfere with how an individual case is handled.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

OJ C 378, 9.11.2020.

---
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Ribapharm Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William M. Comer, Jr., Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/    WILLIAM M. COMER,JR.        

**William M. Comer, Jr.**

**Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**

**Dated:  May 15, 2003**

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ribapharm Inc. and will be retained by Ribapharm Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 14, 2022        Landslide susceptibility in Minnesota: Insight from landslide inventory mapping and lidar change detection

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
Zachary LINVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3719

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

Zachary Linville, Lake City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
[Cite as Bogan v. Hall, 121 Ohio St.3d 608, 2009-Ohio-1930.]

B OGAN , A PPELLANT , v. H ALL , W ARDEN , A PPELLEE . [Cite as Bogan v. Hall, 121 Ohio St.3d 608, 2009-Ohio-1930.] Habeas corpus — Failure to attach c opies of commitment papers to petition — Dismissal of petition affirmed. (No. 2008-2331

— Submitted April 21, 2009

— Decided April 30, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 08-CA-94, 2008-Ohio-5708.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, James C. Bogan, for a writ of habeas corpus. Bogan failed to attach copies of his co mmitment papers to his petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies
, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692,¶ 14; R.C. 2725.04(D). Judgment affirmed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ James C. Bogan, pro se. Richard Cordray, Attorney Genera l, and Samuel Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

______________________
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

KenexaCorporation

Wayne, Pennsylvania

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-136486,333-129475) on Form S-8 and 333-137662 on Form S-3of Kenexa Corporation and subsidiaries, our reports dated March 16, 2007,relating to the consolidated financial statements of Kenexa Corporation andsubsidiaries and effectiveness of Kenexa Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006.

BDOSeidman, LLP

Philadelphia, PA

March 16,2007

----
REDAC Fall 2019 Agenda

1

REDAC / NAS Operations Subcommittee Meeting Agenda

Date: August 13 – 14th, 2019

Location: SAIC, 400 Virginia Avenue SW Washington, DC.

Purpose: Review the R&D portfolio developed based on the subcommittee’s strategic guidance from Spring. 

The FAA briefs the proposed R&D FY+3yrs.

Tuesday, August 13th

Location: 400 Virginia Avenue SW Washington, DC.

Conference Room: Suite 800 (8th floor)

Time Topic Presenter(s)

0800-0815 Welcome/ Review of REDAC Recommendations, Responses and 

Open Actions

Leo Prusak/Philip 

Yeung

0815-0845 Budget Briefing Mike Gallivan

0845-0945 1A01C Operations Concept Validation & Infrastructure (ATDP) Guillermo Sotelo/Jim 

Wetherly

0945-1000 Break

1000-1030 1A09D NextGen – New Air Traffic Management Requirements Steve Bradford

1030-1100 1A11A Enterprise Concept Development Steve Bradford

1100-1130 1A01A Runway Incursion Reduction (RIRP) Ben Marple/Jim Fee

1130-1200 1A11B0 Enterprise Human Factors Tara Holmes

1200-1300 Lunch

1300-1330 A11.k Weather Program Randy Bass

1330-1400 A12.c NextGen – Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) Gary Pokodner

1400-1430 FAA Landscape Update Steve Summer

1430-1500 A11.n Commercial Space Transportation (CST) Paul Wilde

1500-1515 Break

1515-1615 ATM-X (Air Traffic Management – Exploration) Program Overview Dr. Akbar Sultan/NASA

1615-1645 F&R Discussion Subcommittee

1700 Dinner – location TBD
REDAC Fall 2019 Agenda

2

Wednesday, August 14th

Location: 400 Virginia Avenue SW Washington, DC.

Conference Room: Suite 800 (8th floor)

Time Topic Presenter(s)

0800-830 Review Findings and Recommendations Subcommittee

0830-0930 Deep Dive - 5G capabilities, the use of Big Data and the use of Speech 

Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (AI) MITRE

0930-0945 Break

0945-1015 A12.a Wake Turbulence Natee Wongsangpaiboon 

/Chris Lawler

1015-1045 1A05C Wake Turbulence Re-Categorization Natee Wongsangpaiboon 

/Chris Lawler

1045-1115 A11.i Air Traffic Control/Technical Operations Human Factors Dan Herschler

1115-1200 Recap and Closing Leo Prusak

 

Legend Key: 

Deep Dives
REDAC Fall 2019 Agenda

3

REDAC NASOPS CONFERENCE INFORMATION

REDAC NASOPS Meeting Day 1

Please join this meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone:

Join by computer, tablet or smart phone

Meeting Link: https://a3-technology-inc.my.webex.com/a3-technologyinc.my/j.php?MTID=m07b48b62dbba7793ece00e59f1bada3b

Meeting Number: 624 935 825

Password: djiQEp36

REDAC NASOPS Meeting Day 2 

Join by phone

+1-510-338-9438 USA Toll

Access code: 620 462 338

Join by computer, tablet or smart phone

Meeting Link: https://a3-technology-inc.my.webex.com/a3-technologyinc.my/j.php?MTID=m8e92cd5b3af8cf63a100407cdb9871cd

Meeting Number: 620 462 338

Password: qArJz4pP

Join by phone

+1-510-338-9438 USA Toll

Access code: 624 935 825
4865-8396-3822\1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION

In re:

ROBERT WYATT CONTRACTING, 

LLC,

1

Debtor.

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 24-40747-11-ELM

CHAPTER 11 CASE

§ 

ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO REINSTATE

BANKRUPTCY CASE

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION the Emergency Motion to Reinstate Bankruptcy Case (the 

“Motion”), filed by Robert Wyatt Contracting, the above-captioned debtor (the “Debtor”). Upon 

consideration of the Motion, the Court finds that there are sufficient grounds to grant the Motion.

It is therefore: 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. The Motion is granted.

1 The Debtor’s federal identification number is: 82-1413471.

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed April 22, 2024

______________________________________________________________________

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.
4865-8396-3822\1

2. The Order Dismissing Case [Docket No. 65] be and is hereby VACATED and

this case is reinstated to the Court's active docket. 

3. The Debtor shall immediately file its Declaration of Electronic Filing following

the entry of this Order. 

####END OF ORDER####
Donnie Lamar KELLY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1

Steve Wilcox

From: Marcus Leinart <marcus@leinartlaw.com>

Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 5:07 PM

To: Kim Raudry; Steve Wilcox

Subject: Mark Rice Declaration

See below.  

Marcus Leinart

Managing Attorney

t: 469.232.3328 |  Fax: 214.221.1755

e: marcus@leinartlaw.com |  w: www.LeinartLaw.com

DALLAS | 10670 N Central Expwy, Suite 320 | Dallas | TX | 75231

FORT WORTH | 5601 Bridge St, Suite 400 | Fort Worth | TX | 76112

INFORMATION CONTAINED IN AND TRANSMITTED WITH THIS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL AND INTENDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PERSON TO WHOM ADDRESSED. ANY

DISCLOSURE, DISTRIBUTION, FURTHER TRANSMISSION OR USE OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ANY INFORMATION HEREIN BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS UNAUTHORIZED

AND PROHIBITED. ANYONE OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR HIS/HER AGENT WHO RECEIVES THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR SHOULD IMMEDIATELY DELETE, ERASE AND PERMANENTLY

REMOVE IT FROM HIS/HER ELECTRONIC MAILBOX, COMPUTER DRIVES AND ALL OTHER ELECTRONIC STORAGE AREAS, DESTROY ANY PRINTED COPIES, AND NOTIFY LEINART LAW FIRM

469.232.3328. (v 1.1.1) 

From: mark rice <ricemark39@gmail.com>  

Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 5:04 PM

To: Miguel Serrano‐Urdaz <MiguelS@leinartlaw.com>

Subject:  

I, Mark Rice, single, of legal age, and resident of Alvarado, Texas, declare under penalty of 

perjury that the units that serve a collateral for RV Depot are located at 8700 E US 67, Alvarado, 

TX 76009.

Case 23-42473-elm13 Doc 33-2 Filed 09/15/23 Entered 09/15/23 13:39:13 Desc

Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
STATE of Louisiana v. Karrell NORA

No. 2018-KP-0707

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Relator has now fully litigated an application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The District Court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
R.S.B. VENTURES, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Jeffrey Scott BERLOWITZ, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2607

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

Litigation Lawyers Professional Association, and Stephen Rakusin (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Thomas E. Scott and Melinda S. Thornton, for appellees.

Before LOGUE and MILLER, JJ., and SUAREZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

*1053On the specific record before us, we agree with the trial court that Appellees withdrew from the underlying case leaving adequate time for replacement counsel to meet the applicable trial and appellate deadlines. *Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A.*, 616 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ; *Maillard v. Dowdell*, 528 So.2d 512, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ; *Frazier v. Effman*, 501 So.2d 114, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - (-)multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(3)
              - hawaii(25)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

              - 2022(15)

Infographics        December 31, 2010        Terms to describe the measurement of tsunamis

Infographics        July 24, 2020        Kīlauea summit crater lake growth July 25, 2019 to July 25, 2020

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Current page            4