alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
	  // table icon & sort logic
		var th = $("table thead th");
		if (th.length > 0) {
			th.each(function(i) {
				var a = $(this).find("a");
				if (a.length) {
					if (!$(this).hasClass('sortable')) {
						$(this).addClass('sortable');
					}
					if (!a.find(".tablesort").length) {
						var appendToElem = a;
					}
					$("<span>", {
							class: "sortable",
						})
						.append(
							$("<span>", {
								class: "visually-hidden",
								html: "Sortable column",
							})
						)
						.appendTo(appendToElem);
				}
			});
			th.on("click", function() {
				var a = $(this).find("a");
				var href = a.attr("href");
				if (href !== undefined) {
					window.location.href = href;
				}
			});
		}
	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));

(function ($, Drupal) {
  $(document).ready(function () {
    "use strict";
    var $sidecontent = $(".sidecontent");
    $sidecontent.responsiveDom({
      appendTo: ".subcontent",
      mediaQuery: "screen and (max-width: 768px)",
      // callback: function(mediaMatched) {
      // This callback is called when the DOM is updated
      // if (mediaMatched) {
      //   $sidecontent.text('I was moved to the bottom!');
      // }
      // else {
      //   $sidecontent.text('I moved back to my original block.');
      // }
      // }
    });
    // Let our CSS know the JS is done
    $sidecontent.addClass("js-complete");
  });
})(jQuery, Drupal);

(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
		$(window).scroll(function() {
			if ($(this).scrollTop() > 1) {
    		$('.sticky-top').addClass("sticky-top-shrink");
			}
  		else {
				$('.sticky-top').removeClass("sticky-top-shrink");
			}
		});
	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));

(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
	  $(window).resize(function() {
	    var $checkWidth = $(window).width();
	    // $(".width-indicator").text('	Current width - ' + $checkWidth + 'px.');
	    if ($checkWidth > 768) {
	      $("aside .wrapper__sidenav").css("display", "block");
	    } else {
	      $("aside .wrapper__sidenav").css("display", "none");
	    }
	  });
	  $("aside .sidenav-header").click(function() {
	    if ($(window).width() < 992) {
				$('h1').not(this).removeClass('active');
				$(this).toggleClass('active');
	      $(this).next(".wrapper__sidenav").slideToggle();
				$(".wrapper__sidenav").toggleClass('d-block');
	    }
	  });
	});
}(jQuery, Drupal));

(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';

		$('table.tablefield').removeClass('tablesaw tablesaw-stack table-striped').addClass('table-bordered');

	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));

(function($, Drupal) {
	$(document).ready(function() {
	  'use strict';
		//508 Fixes for iFrame elements
		$("iframe").attr("title","Embedded Media");

		//Width Fixes for iFrame elements
		$(".embedded-field iframe").attr("style", "width:100%;border:none;");

	})
}(jQuery, Drupal));
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems Public Joint Stock Company (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 20,   2016By:
/s/ Andrey   A.DubovskovAndrey   A.DubovskovChief Executive   Officer
# C_2020095EN.01002101.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Rennes (France) lodged on 21 January 2020 — PF and QG v Caisse d’allocations familiales d’Ille-et-Vilaine (CAF)

(Case C-27/20)

(2020/C 95/25)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Rennes

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: PF and QG

Defendant: Caisse d’allocations familiales d’Ille-et-Vilaine (CAF)

Question referred

Is EU law, in particular Articles 20 and 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 4 of Regulation No 883/2004 (1) and Article 7 of Regulation No 492/2011, (2) to be interpreted as precluding a provision of national legislation, such as Article R 532-3 of the code de la sécurité sociale (French Social Security Code), which defines the reference calendar year, for the purposes of calculating family allowances, as the year before that preceding the payment period, and results, in a situation where the income of the person claiming the allowance has risen substantially in another Member State, and then fallen [following] his or her return to his or her Member State of origin, in that person being deprived, unlike residents who have not exercised their right of free movement, of part of his or her family allowance rights?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

(DALLAS DIVISION)

IN RE:

GLORIA WILSON ) CASE NO. 24-31238

Debtor )

)

CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS )

Movant )

) Hearing Date: November 5, 2024

vs. ) Hearing Time: 1:30 p.m.

)

GLORIA WILSON )

Debtor/Respondent )

ORDER MODIFYING AUTOMATIC STAY

ON THIS DAY, the Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay brought on behalf of

CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS. came before the Court for hearing and determination. Movant

appeared by and through its attorney of record and all other parties in interest, including the Debtor,

although properly notified of the Motion filed, made default. The Court is of the opinion that the

relief requested in the Motion presented should be granted and it is, therefore, 

ORDERED, that the Automatic Stay in effect in this case be, and the same is hereby

Default Order

01016156.WPD Page 1 of 2 #24-72519

United States Bankruptcy Judge

______________________________________________________________________

Signed November 5, 2024

The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.
modified to permit CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS to foreclose upon, take possession of, and resell

the 

One (1) 2016 Ford Edge, VIN 2FMPK3J99GBB91753 applying the proceeds of sale to 

the loan balances secured thereby.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Rule 4001(a)(3) is waived and that this Order may 

be enforced immediately.

All other relief requested, not specifically granted herein, is denied.

###End of Order###

Prepared by:

Tom W. Sharp

BLALACK & WILLIAMS, P.C.

4851 LBJ Freeway, Ste. 750

Dallas, TX 75244

214/630-1916; 214/630-1112 (fax)

Attorneys for Credit Union of Texas

Default Order

01016156.WPD Page 2 of 2 #24-72519
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - documents_file-149220(5)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

              - north dakota(1)

## By Year

State News Release        September 11, 2014        tsunami hazard evacuation GIS model elevation Vertical Evacuation pedestrian
---

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into by and between BAK International Limited and Shenzhen Branch, China Citic Bank (the Creditor) Dated May 6, 2011

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: (2011) Shenyinsun Zuibaozi 004;
- BAK International Limited undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities
for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Obligor)s indebtedness towards China Citic Bank, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 105 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including the
creditor declares the debt becomes mature in advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyers fee,
notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Termination and explanation
- Payment on demand
- Declaration and guaranty of BAK International Limited
- Rights and Obligations of BAK International Limited
- Rights and Obligations of the Creditor
- Obligations succession
- Effectiveness and Disputation settlement
- Effectiveness, modification and termination of Contract
- Validity

---
Exhibit No. 31.1



Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Si Chen, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of American Lorain Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated: February 20,2008







/s/ Si Chen

Si Chen

Chief Executive Officer



---
Marktavios MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.2





REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





Board of Directors


AmSouth Bank





We have examined managements assertions, included in the accompanying Officers Certificate of Servicer that AmSouth Bank, as Servicer (the
Company), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmSouth Bancorporation, has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under Sections 4.1 through 4.9, 5.1(a) and (c), 5.2, 5.4, 5.5(a) and (b), 5.6 and 5.7 of the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of October 1, 2000, as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys
compliance based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with specified requirements.





In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned requirements for the year ended December 31, 2001 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.





This report is intended solely for the information and use of the board of directors
and management of the Company and should not be referred to or distributed for any other purpose to anyone who is not authorized to receive such information as specified in the Agreement or in the Exhibits attached. However, this report is a matter
of public record as a result of being included as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 10-K prepared by the Company and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of AmSouth Auto Receivables, LLC and its distribution is not
limited.


| | LOGO | 
| | ---- | 

Birmingham, Alabama


March 25,
2002
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Kevin J. Kennedy, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Avaya Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 13, 2010
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50408

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS HERIBERTO VEGA-ARVIZU,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-2001-ALL-PM

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Jesus Heriberto Vega-Arvizu appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Vega-Arvizu contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Vega-Arvizu maintains that he
No. 03-50408

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Vega-Arvizu acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 10.10


 


 


 


Hutchison
Telecommunications Lanka (Pvt) Ltd.


 


#234,
Galle Road, Colombo 04, Sri Lanka


(Local)
                   (From Overseas)


Tel:
078 8632 632     +
94 (0) 788632632 


Fax:
078 8632 188    +94
(0) 78 8632 188



 


	Purchase
    Order	Purchase
                                         Order Number 

        Purchase
        Req. Number

        Date
        
	PO0000000004301

        PR00000004717

        Mar
        09, 2016

	Name
    and Address of Supplier :	 	 
	Duo
    Software Private Limited	 	 
	06th
    Floor NO 403,Galle Rd,	 	 
	Colombo
    03.	 	 
	Sri
    Lanka	 	 
	 	 	 
	Our
                                         Reference:

         

        Please
        supply the following items:
	Your
    Quotation No:	

    

    Feb 26, 2016


 


 


	Qty.
    Ordered	 	Description	 	Drop

    Ship	 	Unit
    Cost	 	UOM	 	Extended
    Price
	3	 	DUO
                                         CC & CRM AMC 2016 Q1 Renewal

        DUO
        CC & CRM AMC Renewal 2016 Q1 Period: 21st December 2015 to 20th March 2016
	 	No	 	16500.000
    	 	Each	 	49,500.00


 


	 	Tax
    Summary:	 	 	 	 
	 	VAT
    USD	0.00	 	Less:
    included tax	0.00
	 	 	 	 	Subtotal	49,500.00
	 	 	 	 	Total
    tax	0.00
	 	 	 	 	Total
    purchase order USD	49,500.00


 


FOR
TERMS & CONDITIONS, PLEASE SEE OVERLEAF.


 


Please
quote Order Number on all Delivery Notes, Invoices and other related correspondence.




 


	 	Hutchison
    Telecommunications Lanka (Pvt) Ltd


 


	Remark	Payment
    Terms: monthly payment
	 	Duration:
    21st December 2015 to 20th March 2016


 


	 	/s/
    Bandunath De Alwis
	 	Authorized
    Signatory


 


SUPPLIER’S
COPY
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 23, 2011 | By:  |  /s/ Christopher F. Tirotta                             |   |
|---------------------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           |      | Christopher  F. Tirotta                            |
|                |      | Chief Executive Officer                                      |
|                |      | (principal executive officer and principalfinancial officer) |

----