alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**ChristopherDineen, Chief Financial Officer**

I, Christopher Dineen,certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RadView SoftwareLtd.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)            allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
| Date: June 26, 2006 | /s/ CHRISTOPHER DINEEN                      |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                     | Christopher Dineen  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2022084EN.01001601.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/16

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EP, GM v Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Taşımacılık A.Ş.

(Case C-395/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights - Article 2(l) - Article 5(1) - Change in the departure time of a flight - Departure postponed by approximately three hours - Passengers notified nine days before departure - Concepts of ‘cancellation’ and ‘delay’)

(2022/C 84/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: EP, GM

Defendant: Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Taşımacılık A.Ş.

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2(l) and 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, must be interpreted as meaning that a flight is not regarded as ‘cancelled’, within the meaning of those provisions, in the case where the operating air carrier postpones the time of departure of that flight by less than three hours, without making any other change to that flight.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.

---
EX PARTE Tammy Michelle KEEL

CR-16-0810

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Charles S. SULLIVAN, Jr. v. CITY OF DADEVILLE

CR-16-0415

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael Dewayne JACKSON v. STATE

CR-16-0407

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017 Reh. denied September 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 17, 2015

Order 

February 17, 2015

150510(57)

TAMARA FILAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 150510

COA: 316822

Wayne CC: 12-016693-NF

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the plaintiff-appellant for leave to file 

a reply brief in excess of the page limit restriction of MCR 7.302(E) is GRANTED. The 

19-page reply brief submitted on February 3, 2015, is accepted for filing.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - (-)south dakota(1)

## By Year

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy
# C_2020137EN.01003302.xml

| 27.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/33

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Badajoz (Spain) lodged on 15 January 2020 — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Liberbank S.A.

(Case C-16/20)

(2020/C 137/46)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Badajoz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables)

Defendant: Liberbank, S.A.

Questions referred

The questions referred for a preliminary ruling are identical to those in referred in Case C-224/19. (1)

---

(1)  OJ 2019 C 246, p. 4.

---
# C_2020191EN.01000802.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 4 February 2020 — DBKAG v Finanzamt Linz

(Case C-59/20)

(2020/C 191/11)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DBKAG

Defendant: Finanzamt Linz

Question referred

Must Article 135(1)(g) of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of the tax exemption provided for by that provision, the term ‘management of special investment funds’ also includes the granting by a third-party licensor to an investment management company (‘IMC’) of a right to use specialist software specifically designed for the management of special investment funds where, as in the case in the main proceedings, that specialist software is intended exclusively to perform specific and essential activities in connection with the management of the special investment funds but runs on the technical infrastructure of the IMC and can perform its functions only subject to the minor participation of the IMC and subject to ongoing recourse to market data provided by the IMC?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (b)

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of Northland Cable Properties
      Eight Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period
      ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Gary Jones, President
      of Northland Communications Corporation, the General Partner, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and

            (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.

Date: 3-30-06

/S/ GARY S. JONES
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Properties Eight Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties Eight Limited Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYLVIA PAOLA ROSALES VELIZ,

AKA Sylvia Rosales De Aquino,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73551

Agency No. A095-789-046

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2015** 

Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Sylvia Paola Rosales Veliz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

MAY 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.

2006), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the finding that Rosales Veliz established

extraordinary circumstances to excuse her untimely asylum application. See 8

C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5); see also Toj-Culpatan v. Holder, 612 F.3d 1088, 1091-92

(9th Cir. 2010). We reject Rosales Veliz’s contentions that the agency’s analysis

was insufficient and improper. Thus, we deny the petition for review as to her

asylum claim. 

Rosales Veliz testified that she and her husband were the victims of a

carjacking in Guatemala and she fears further harm if returned. Substantial

evidence supports the agency’s determination that even if Rosales Veliz

established she is a member of a particular social group of women in Guatemala,

she did not establish past persecution or clear probability of future persecution on

account of a protected ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 741

(9th Cir. 2009) (“[T]o demonstrate that a protected ground was ‘at least one central

reason’ for persecution, an applicant must prove that such ground was a cause of

the persecutors’ acts.”); Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010)

(petitioner’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or

2 12-73551
random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus,

Rosales Veliz’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Dinu v. Ashcroft, 372 F.3d

1041, 1045 (9th Cir. 2004).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Rosales

Veliz’s CAT claim because she failed to establish it is more likely than not she

would be tortured if returned to Guatemala. See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d

1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013). We reject Rosales Veliz’s contention that the

agency did not analyze her claim sufficiently.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-73551
**Exhibit10.26**

 

**PROMISSORY NOTE**

 
| Amount  $100,000 |   | June 18,  2009 |
|------------------|--------|---------------------|

 

Forvalue received, the undersigned, GeoPetro Resources Company (“Payor”), herebypromises to pay on demand to Stuart J. Doshi (“Holder”) the principal sum ofOne Hundred Thousand ($100,000) with interest from June 18, 2009 at a rateof eight percent (8%) per annum, payable upon repayment of the loan.

 

 
| Signed  by:                     |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| **GeoPetro  Resources Company** |   |
|                            |   |
|                            |   |
| /s/  J. Chris Steinhauser       |   |
| J.  Chris Steinhauser           |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer        |   |

 

----
Exhibit 12

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES        Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges        (Dollars in thousands, except ratios)

|                                                                                |  | Year ended December 31, |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------
|
|Earnings before minority interests and income taxes                             |  | $                       | 45,965
|Equity in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated companies                    |  |                         | (2,995
|Add back dividends received                                                     |  |                         |      
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Total earnings before income taxes                                              |  | $                       | 42,970
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Fixed charges:                                                                  |  |                         |       
|Interest                                                                        |  | $                       | 23,770
|Amortization of finance costs                                                   |  |                         | 892   
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Total interest                                                                  |  |                         | 24,662
|Interest factor of rent expense                                                 |  |                         | 336   
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Total fixed charges                                                             |  |                         | 24,998
|Capitalized interest                                                            |  |                         | 331   
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest)                                  |  | $                       | 24,667
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Earnings before fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest) and income taxes |  | $                       | 67,637
|                                                                                |  |                         |       
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                              |  |                         | 2.7   
|                                                                                |  |                         |       

80

---

QuickLinks
Darius Q. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Demetrice Paul SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# Sheet3

# Sheet4

# Sheet5
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-31235

Summary Calendar

____________________

KAY E. WALTHALL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

E-Z SERVE CONVENIENCE STORES, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants,

E-Z SERVE CONVENIENCE STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(No. 96-CV-3520)

June 3, 1998

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kay Walthall appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of E-Z Serve Convenience Stores in this slip-andfall personal injury, diversity action. Walthall contends that the

district court, in granting summary judgment, erroneously relied on

White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 699 So. 2d 1081 (La. 1997); and

that the she submitted evidence creating material fact issues as to
- 2 -

each element of her claim, thus precluding the entry of summary

judgment.

Of course, we review a grant of summary judgment de novo,

applying the same standard as the district court. See, e.g.,

Bodenheimer v. PPG Indus., Inc., 5 F.3d 955, 956 (5th Cir. 1993).

Such judgment is proper where there is no material fact issue and

the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id.; see

FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c). And, needless to say, because this is a

diversity action, Louisiana law applies. See Erie R.R. Co. v.

Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). 

Based upon our review of the record and briefs and

notwithstanding the district court’s not referencing the warning

cone/actual notice issue, we AFFIRM the summary judgment for

essentially the reasons stated by the district court. See Walthall

v. E-Z Serve Convenience Stores, Inc., 988 F. supp. 996 (E.D. La.

1997).

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
Wilen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 12, 2004                 By: /s/ Ronald Wilen
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ronald Wilen
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.5

                        CONSENT OF HOVDE FINANCIAL, INC.

     We hereby consent to the use of our opinion letter to the Board of
Directors of First National Bank of Morgan included as Appendix C to the Proxy
Statement-Prospectus which forms part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4
relating to the proposed acquisition by First National Bank of Morgan by Glacier
Bancorp, Inc. and to the references to such opinion therein.

     In giving such consent, we do not admit that we come within the category of
persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission thereunder, nor do we hereby admit that we are experts with respect
to any part of such Registration Statement within the meaning of the term
"experts" as used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

                                         HOVDE FINANCIAL, INC.


                                         By: /s/ R. A. McKinney
                                             -----------------------------------
                                         Name: Rory A. McKinney
                                         Title: Vice President

Dated: June 23, 2006