alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Economic Forecast: August 2019

18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 2018 2019 2020

Percent Change: Quarterly SAAR, Annual Q4/Q4

 Gross Domestic Product 2.5 3.5 2.9 1.1 3.1 2.1 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.4 2.5 2.2 1.7

 Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) 1.7 4.0 3.5 1.4 1.1 4.3 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 2.6 2.7 1.8

 Residential Fixed Investment -5.3 -3.7 -4.0 -4.7 -1.0 -1.5 0.2 1.2 0.8 0.0 -0.5 -1.2 -4.4 -0.3 -0.2

 Business Fixed Investment 8.8 7.9 2.1 4.8 4.4 -0.6 0.6 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.7 0.4 5.9 1.6 1.6

 Government Consumption & Investment 1.9 2.6 2.1 -0.4 2.9 5.0 1.0 2.2 3.1 3.1 2.0 1.6 1.5 2.8 2.5

Billions of Chained 2012$

 Net Exports -884 -850 -962 -983 -944 -979 -993 -1005 -1018 -1031 -1043 -1047 -920 -980 -1035

 Change in Business Inventories 40 -28 87 93 116 72 65 46 39 28 30 35 48 75 33

Percent Change: Quarterly YoY, Annual Q4/Q4

 Consumer Price Index 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 1.9 1.9

 Core Consumer Price Index (ex. Food & Energy) 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0

 PCE Chain Price Index 1.9 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8

 Core PCE Chain Price Index (ex. Food & Energy) 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

Change: Quarterly Mo. Avg., Thous., Annual Mil.

 Employment, Total Nonfarm 214 232 222 216 206 147 153 140 131 121 111 104 2.7 2.0 1.4

 Percent Change: Q4/Q4 1.8 1.3 0.9

Percent

 Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.3 3.9 3.7 4.0

 Federal Funds Rate 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.2 1.6

1-Year Treasury Note Yield 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.2 1.8

10-Year Treasury Note Yield 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.9 2.3 2.1

 --------------- 2018 --------------- --------------- 2019 --------------- --------------- 2020 ---------------

August 09, 2019

Note: Interest rate forecasts are based on rates from July 31, 2019.

Note: Unshaded areas denote actuals. Shaded areas denote forecasts.

Sources: Actuals: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board. Forecasts: Fannie Mae Economic and Strategic Research

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or 

expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR group bases its opinions, 

analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current or suitable for any particular purpose. 

Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR group represent the 

views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of WGNB Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, L. Leighton Alston, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 22, 2005/s/ L. Leighton AlstonL. Leighton AlstonPresident, Chief Executive Officer andDirector (Principal Executive Officer)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1458. CHARLES WILLIAMS v. THE STATE.

Charles Williams was convicted of kidnapping and other crimes, and we

affirmed his convictions on appeal in an unpublished opinion. See Williams v. State,

Case No. A19A0836 (Oct. 28, 2019). Back in the trial court, Williams filed a motion

to set aside and re-enter our opinion, claiming that he had not received notice of it in

sufficient time to seek further appellate review. On December 20, 2019, the trial court

entered an order dismissing Williams’s motion on the ground that it lacked authority

to set aside an opinion of this Court. Williams sent a letter to the trial court, which it

construed as a motion for reconsideration and denied. Williams also filed a formal

motion for reconsideration, which the trial court likewise denied. On February 3,

2020, Williams filed a notice of appeal. The State has moved to dismiss this appeal

as untimely. We agree with the State that the appeal was not timely filed. 

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the trial

court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal

is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.” Perlman

v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012) (punctuation omitted).

The filing of a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for filing a notice

of appeal, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not itself a directly

appealable order. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510-511 (536 SE2d 187)

(2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). Here, 

May 14, 2020
Williams’s notice of appeal was filed 45 days after entry of the order dismissing his

motion to set aside. The notice of appeal is thus untimely.

For these reasons, the State’s motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/14/2020
Leron Devonte GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2322

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - (-)massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 18-PDB-053

NO. 2018-OB-1900

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Leave to appeal denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(8)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - (-)oregon(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Interviews        November 30, 2009        Urban Hydrology: Restoration and Monitoring of Johnson Creek in Portland, Oregon

Interviews        August 24, 2009        Pharmaceuticals in Urban Streams in Northwest Oregon
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION


I, Christopher F. Tirotta, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Scientific Resources, Incorporated;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





April 14, 2011


By:
/s/ Christopher F. TirottaChristopher F. TirottaChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive

Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 6 2 DB 2022 (No. 29 RST 2022)

:

CURT W. SCHULZ : Attorney Registration No. 204209

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30 th day of June

, 202 2 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 20 , 2022

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

CURT W. SCHULZ

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth,

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
Dominique M. BARTEET, Appellant, v. The RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C., a Maryland Corporation, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3443

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Simon R. PEARSALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jermaine Antronell HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mary HOOPER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, an Agency of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4783

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 00 6- CR J ohn B. HA YE S , Appellant
v . The STA TE of Texas, Appellee Fr om the 399th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CR-5289 Honora ble J uanita Va squez-Gar dner, Judge Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Febr uary 3, 2010 DI SMI SSED J ohn B. H ay es plea ded n o l o co ntender e to ag g rava ted assault with a de adly wea pon and pleade d true to an enhanc ement allegation pursuant to a plea barg ain ag ree ment. As part of his plea barg ain, Hay es si g ned a separ ate wa iver of a ppeal. The trial court imposed sente nce in a ccor dance with the ag ree ment and sig ned a c ertificate stating that this “is a plea- barg ain ca se, and the defe ndant has NO r ight of

appea l.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)( 2). Hay es t imely filed a notice of appea l. The04
- 10
- 00 00 6- CR

- 2- cler k’s re cord, w hich includes the pl ea b ar gai n ag ree ment and the tria l court’s Rule 25.2(a )(2)
cer tification, has bee n filed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dis miss an appea l “if a
cer tification that shows the def endant ha s the rig ht of appe al has not been made part of the re cord.” Id. The c o u r t g a v e H a y e s n o ti c e th a t t h e a p p e a l w o u ld

b e d is mi s s e d

u n le s s a n a me n d e d

tr ial
c ou rt c e rt if

ic a tio n sh ow ing he ha s the ri g ht to a pp e a l w e re ma de pa

rt of the a pp e lla te re c or d w ith in thirty day s. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( d) ; 37 .1 ; Da nie ls v . S tat e , 110 S.W .3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order) , dis

p. on me rit

s , No
. 04 -0 3- 00 17 6- CR, 20 03 WL 21 50 83 47 (Jul y 2, 20 03 , p e t. ref ’d) (not desig nated for publ ication). Hay es’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written re sponse, stating she has revie wed the rec ord and can find no rig ht of appea l. After revie wing the re cord a nd counsel’s notice , we a gre e t h at Ha y es does not have a rig ht to appeal. Se e De ar s v . S tat e , 154 S.W. 3d 61 0 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 05 ) ( ho ldi ng that c ou rt of a pp e a ls s ho uld

re vie w c le rk ’s re c or d to deter mine whether

trial court’ s cer

tification is acc urate ). W e ther efor e dismiss thi s appea l. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). PER C URI AM Do no t pu bli sh
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 22 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00356

- CV

SANDRA ROONEY , Appellant

V.

JAMES ROONEY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 08

- DCV

- 162786

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed January 17, 2014 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On June 18, 2014 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s
i ntention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2 appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
Nelson Eaton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
----

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |
| (2)             | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                registrant. |

| August              9,              2006 |                                         |                                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                    |                                                                                   |
|                      |                                    | /s/ Samuel              M. Hopkins, II         |
|                                     | Samuel                  M. Hopkins, II       |
|                                     | Title:              Chief Accounting Officer |
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, José Luis Ronsini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 28, 2017



/s/ Jose Luis RonsiniJosé Luis RonsiniChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Grupo
Financiero Galicia S.A. and will be retained by Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2021431EN.01003301.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — SBG v EUIPO — VF International (Geographical Norway)

(Case T-460/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Geographical Norway - Absolute ground for refusal - Absolute ground for invalidity - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Bad faith - Obligation to state reasons)

(2021/C 431/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Super Brand Licencing (SBG) (Villeurbanne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and A. Sion, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland) (represented by: T. van Innis and A. Van der Planken, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 (Case R 662/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between VF International and SBG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 April 2020 (Case R 662/2019-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 April 2020 (Case R 662/2019-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO and VF International Sagl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO and VF International Sagl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, 
as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Lorain Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Si Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2008

/s/ Si ChenSi Chen 
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Lorain Corporation and will be retained by American Lorain Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---