alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jeremy Scott GRAINGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Trycera Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  May 25, 2006

/s/ Matthew S. Kerper
Matthew S. Kerper, President
(Principal executive officer)
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman JESSE A. REYES

United States Air Force

ACM S32314

6 January 2016

Sentence adjudged 3 March 2015 by SPCM convened at Lajes Field, 

Azores, Portugal. Military Judge: Donald R. Eller.

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-1.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Lucy H. Carrillo 

and Major Thomas A. Smith.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Katherine E. Oler and 

Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

MITCHELL, DUBRISKE, and BROWN

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent 

under Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court
Krista Marie TAYLOR, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Ruth Ann TEUTON, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020279EN.01002102.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 March 2020 — DF v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-149/20)

(2020/C 279/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DF

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Questions referred

Is Directive (EU) 2016/681 (1) compatible with Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) in relation to the following points:

| (1) | Are the PNR data to be transferred under the directive sufficiently specified, having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter? |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Are the PNR data to be transferred under the directive sufficiently specified, having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter?

| (2) | In view of its scope and having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, does the directive provide for sufficient objective differentiation when PNR data are collected and transferred, in relation to the type of flights and the threat level in a particular country and in relation to the comparison against databases and patterns? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of its scope and having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, does the directive provide for sufficient objective differentiation when PNR data are collected and transferred, in relation to the type of flights and the threat level in a particular country and in relation to the comparison against databases and patterns?

| (3) | Is the blanket, indiscriminating retention period for all PNR data compatible with Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter? |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Is the blanket, indiscriminating retention period for all PNR data compatible with Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter?

| (4) | Having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, does the directive provide for adequate procedural protection of passengers in respect of the use of retained PNR data? |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, does the directive provide for adequate procedural protection of passengers in respect of the use of retained PNR data?

| (5) | Having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, does the directive adequately safeguard the level of protection of European fundamental rights when PNR data are transferred to third country authorities by third countries? |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Having regard to Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, does the directive adequately safeguard the level of protection of European fundamental rights when PNR data are transferred to third country authorities by third countries?

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 132).

---
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc, a
      Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
      June
      30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
      we, Robert P. Atwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and George Jackson,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      ROBERT P. ATWELL


**Robert
      P. Atwell**


**President
      and Chief Executive Officer**


August
      15, 2005















/s/
      GEORGE JACKSON


**George
      Jackson**


**Chief
      Financial Officer**


August
      15, 2005
Robert Bryan LUKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4588

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 2, 2019

Robert Bryan Luke, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Shawn Lamar LESLIE v. STATE

CR-16-0732

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Rolla P. Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and S.
Gregory Clevenger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Rolla P. Huff

Rolla P. Huff
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003

/s/ S. Gregory Clevenger

S. Gregory Clevenger
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003

31
Jonathan LABRADA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

Jonathan Labrada, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - (-)idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 11, 2021        Managing Post-Fire, Climate-Induced Vegetation Transitions

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
EX PARTE Morgan WILLIAMS

CR-16-0863

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report ofInternational Luxury Products, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”), I, David Lazar, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: September 9, 2020 | By: | /s/ David Lazar                                                                                       
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | David Lazar                                                                                           
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer                                                                               
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer and
        Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 99

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.    Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification

The undersigned hereby certify that this Form 10-K annual report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.

|/s/J.B. SHERWOODJ.B. Sherwood
Chairman
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)          |  | /s/J.G. STRUTHERSJ.G. Struthers
Vice PresidentFinance
and Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/S.M.C. SHERWOODSimon M.C. Sherwood
President
(Co-Chief Executive Officer) |  |                                                                                   

Dated:
March 28, 2003



[A
signed original of this written certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd.
and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

79

---

QuickLinks
# C_2020433EN.01002202.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 21 September 2020 — Flightright GmbH v Ryanair Designated Activity Company

(Case C-443/20)

(2020/C 433/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Flightright GmbH

Defendant: Ryanair Designated Activity Company

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a trade union-organised strike by an operating air carrier’s own staff constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a trade union-organised strike by an operating air carrier’s own staff constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)?

| 2. | Is it of any significance that the strike was held in connection with staff demands not previously agreed by contract between the staff and the operating air carrier? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it of any significance that the strike was held in connection with staff demands not previously agreed by contract between the staff and the operating air carrier?

| 3. | Is it of any significance that the strike in question was triggered by the operating air carrier’s conduct during negotiations with the trade union? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is it of any significance that the strike in question was triggered by the operating air carrier’s conduct during negotiations with the trade union?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

s0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

141095

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141095 COA: 286416 Antrim CC: 07-004133-FH RUSSELL STEVEN MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 23, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
STATE of Louisiana v. Otis BEDWELL

NO. 2018-KH-0863

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District Of Texas

In re Derek Layne Mills

Debtor(s)

Case No. 23-42530-13

Chapter 13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Debtor’s(s’) Notice of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy was served on the following entities either by

Electronic Service or by First Class Mail, Postage Pre-paid on the 26th day of September , 20 23 :

(List each party served, specifying the name and address of each party)

Dated: 09/26/2023 /s/ Derek Layne Mills

Derek Layne Mills

Debtor or Debtor’s(s’) Counsel

Case 23-42530-mxm13 Doc 16 Filed 09/26/23 Entered 09/26/23 11:17:05 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Dawn Whiting

5001 Roslyn Drive

Fort Worth, TX 76148

Dealers First Automotive LLC

1127 Flores De Avila

Tampa, FL 33613

Hillsborough Cty Florida Cir. Ct

800 E Twiggs St

Tampa, FL 33602

Tarrant County JP Court Pct 4

c/o Clerk of the Court

100 E Weatherford St

Ste 450

Fort Worth, TX 76196

The Martini Law Firm, PC

10440 N Central Expwy

Ste 1240

Dallas, TX 75231

Tom Mills

9303 Mineral Wells Hwy

Weatherford, TX 76088-5603

Wetherington Hamilton, PA

Attn: Kalei McElroy Blair, Esq.

812 W Dr. MLK Jr Blvd

Suite 101

Tampa, FL 33603

Case 23-42530-mxm13 Doc 16 Filed 09/26/23 Entered 09/26/23 11:17:05 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
EX PARTE Carl Edward PURYEAR

CR-16-0883

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 30, 2017 Reh. denied September 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JOSE L. ARRIBAS-RIVERA,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

PETER O'ROURKE, ACTING SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-1830

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 15-4083, Senior Judge Bruce E. 

Kasold. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant. 

 ISAAC B. ROSENBERG, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by CLAUDIA BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD 

KIRSCHMAN, JR., CHAD A. READLER; AMANDA BLACKMON,
Y. KEN LEE, Office of General Counsel, United States 

Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 July 10, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry K. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|/s/GARRY K. MCGUIRE SR.Garry K. McGuire Sr. Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President, Corporate DevelopmentFebruary 10, 2004 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    ADELENE Q.
PERKINS                                                                         
|                      |  |  |  | Adelene Q. Perkins Executive Vice President & Chief Business Officer (Principal financial
officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1776.

#### Johnson *v.*Douglas Grocery Company.

Complaint, from city court of Douglas — Judge Roan. February 36, 1909.

Submitted May 6, —

Decided October 5, 1909.

*Levi O’Steen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lankford & Dickerson,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

None of the assignments of error in this case can be intelligently determined without a consideration of the evidence. There is no proper brief of the evidence, but what purports to be a brief consists of the oral and documentary evidence in full, extensively interspersed with objections to testimony, and with statements and arguments of counsel, colloquies between court and counsel, and' motions to nonsuit and to direct a verdict, with the rulings of the court, etc., etc. The imperfections above indicated’ were not corrected by a motion to strike from the brief “everything- contained therein except the oral and documentary testimony,” made and allowed before the motion for a new trial was filed, when in fact no change in the brief was made, but the mass of immaterial matter remained as the brief. According to repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, the judgment must be affirmed. *Hirsch*v. *Dozier Lumber Co.,*2 *Ga. App.*520 (58 S. E. 786); *Wright*v. *State,*3 *Ga. App.*663 (60 S. E. 329); *Hathcock*v. *McGouirk,*119 *Ga.*980 (47 S. E. 563); *Carmichael*v. *State,*111 *Ga.*653 (36 S. E. 872).

*Judgment affirmed.*
Isaac Isahas WASHINGTON v. STATE

CR-16-0571

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Jesaiah MCNULTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-481

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.