alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022418EN.01000201.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against HN

(Case C-420/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 47 and 48 - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Article 6 - Directive (EU) 2016/343 - Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings - Article 8 - Right to be present at the trial - Return decision accompanied by an entry ban of five years - Conditions for holding a trial in the absence of the person concerned - Obligation to be present at the trial provided for under national law)

(2022/C 418/02)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski Rayonen sad

Parties in the main proceedings

HN

Intervening party: Sofiyska rayonna prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings
  must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which imposes an obligation on suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings to be present at their trial. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings

must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which imposes an obligation on suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings to be present at their trial.

| 2. | Article 8(2) of Directive 2016/343
  must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which permits a trial to be held in the absence of the suspect or accused person, where that person is outside that Member State and is unable to enter its territory because of an entry ban imposed on him or her by the competent authorities of that Member State. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 8(2) of Directive 2016/343

must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which permits a trial to be held in the absence of the suspect or accused person, where that person is outside that Member State and is unable to enter its territory because of an entry ban imposed on him or her by the competent authorities of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.

---
# C_2021320EN.01000901.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 June 2021 — WD v European Food Safety Authority

(Case C-167/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to reclassify - Lack of appraisal reports - Decision not to renew the contract)

(2021/C 320/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: WD (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Food Safety Authority (represented by: D. Detken and F. Volpi, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck, C. Dekemexhe and A. Duron, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders WD to bear her own costs relating to the appeal and pay those incurred by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders WD to bear her own costs relating to the appeal and pay those incurred by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.

---
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Callwave, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, 2000Stock Incentive Plan, 2004 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated August 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Callwave, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

 

Los Angeles, California 

September 15, 2005
# C_2022109EN.01001102.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 January 2022 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-683/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2002/49/EC - Assessment and management of environmental noise - Major roads and major railways - Article 8(2) - Action plans - Article 10(2) - Annex VI - Summaries of action plans - Failure to communicate to the Commission within the prescribed period)

(2022/C 109/16)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal and M. Noll-Ehlers, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing, first, to draw up action plans for the major roads and major railways referred to in the annex to this judgment, and, secondly, by not communicating to the European Commission summaries of those action plans, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(2) and under Article 10(2) of Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, read in conjunction with Annex VI thereto, respectively; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing, first, to draw up action plans for the major roads and major railways referred to in the annex to this judgment, and, secondly, by not communicating to the European Commission summaries of those action plans, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(2) and under Article 10(2) of Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, read in conjunction with Annex VI thereto, respectively;

| 2. | Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.

---
1997.

#### Empire Investment Company *v.*Sullivan.

Certiorari, from Chatham superior court — ■ Judge Charlton. May 5, 1909.

Argued July 20, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

*G. B. Whatley,*for plaintiff.

Powell, J.

The only question in the ease having heen certified to the Supreme Court for instruction, and the decision of that court being adverse to the contentions of the plaintiff in error, the judgment is

*Affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, J.Chris Steinhauser, certify that:

 

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof GeoPetro Resources Company;

 

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.           The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.           The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 8, 2009 | /s/ J. Chris  Steinhauser |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | J. Chris Steinhauser,     |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
Eddie Donnell THOMAS v. STATE

CR-16-0429

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Katrell Montan HUBBARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1461

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# C_2020209EN.01001001.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Gliwicach (Poland) lodged on 5 March 2020 — D. Spółka Akcyjna v W. Zrt

(Case C-127/20)

(2020/C 209/16)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Gliwicach

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: D. Spółka Akcyjna

Defendant: W. Zrt

Questions referred

Must Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 ..., (1) be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier whose aircraft has suffered a bird strike is obliged, as part of the reasonable measures that it must take, to provide, in its rotation-based flight planning system, for sufficient reserve time for a required safety check to be made?

and, in the event that this question is answered in the negative:

Must Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 ..., be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier whose aircraft has suffered a bird strike is obliged, as part of the reasonable measures that it must take, to establish crew rosters or staffing levels in such a way that crews are ready for flight duties immediately after a required safety check is made, regardless of the limits on flight time and duty time and the rest period requirements laid down in Annex III to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October 2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations ...? (2)

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2012 L 296, p. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 375 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 375

 Supporting the designation of September 21, 2023, as ``National Teach 
   Ag Day'' and celebrating 75 years of the National Association of 
                        Agricultural Educators.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

 Mr. Boozman (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
Brown, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Fetterman, Mrs. Fischer, 
 Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, 
Mr. Kaine, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. King, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Lujan, Ms. Lummis, 
Mr. Moran, Mr. Risch, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Smith, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Warnock, 
 Mr. Welch, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Ricketts, and Mrs. Blackburn) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the designation of September 21, 2023, as ``National Teach 
   Ag Day'' and celebrating 75 years of the National Association of 
                        Agricultural Educators.

Whereas agricultural education and the National FFA Organization change lives 
        and prepare students for premier leadership, personal growth, and career 
        success;
Whereas, in the United States, more than 11,000 agricultural educators across 
        all 50 States, Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin Islands teach 
        students about agriculture, food, and natural resources;
Whereas teacher recruitment and retention continues to be a significant 
        challenge, with a significant teacher shortage during the 2022-2023 
        school year;
Whereas the National Association of Agricultural Educators advances agricultural 
        education and promotes the professional interests and growth of 
        agricultural educators, and recruits and prepares students who have a 
        desire to teach agriculture;
Whereas the National Association of Agricultural Educators was established in 
        1948; and
Whereas current and future agricultural educators will celebrate ``National 
        Teach Ag Day'' on September 21, 2023: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of September 21, 2023, as 
        ``National Teach Ag Day'';
            (2) recognizes the important role of agricultural education 
        and the National FFA Organization in developing the next 
        generation of agricultural leaders who will change the world; 
        and
            (3) celebrates the 75th anniversary of the National 
        Association of Agricultural Educators.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020161EN.01003001.xml

| 11.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/30

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 28 January 2020 — F. v Stadt Karlsruhe

(Case C-47/20)

(2020/C 161/39)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: F.

Defendant: Stadt Karlsruhe

Question referred

Do Article 2(1) and Article 11(4), second subparagraph, of Directive 2006/126/EC (1) preclude a Member State, within the sovereign territory of which the holder of an EU driving licence for vehicles in categories A and B issued by another Member State had his right to drive vehicles in the first Member State under that driving licence withdrawn because of drink-driving, from refusing to recognise a driving licence for those categories which was issued to the person concerned in the second Member State, after that right had been withdrawn, through renewal of the licence pursuant to Article 7(3), second subparagraph, of Directive 2006/126/EC?

---

(1)  Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences (OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18).

---
exhibit101-2016employmentagr.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



BENEFIT AND COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


 


 


This BENEFIT AND COMPENSATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made
by and between Image Sensing Systems, Inc. ("ISS") and Richard Ehrich
("Ehrich") on this date, August 25, 2016 ("Effective
Date").


 


RECITALS:


 


A.    
ISS’ Board of Directors has
approved Ehrich as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer with an annual
compensation of $180,000.


 


B.    
ISS wishes to extend a severance
benefit to Ehrich.


 


C.     ISS and Ehrich have negotiated the severance terms and have memorialized those terms in this Agreement.


 


AGREEMENT:


 


1.     
Severance upon Termination of Employment.


(a)                          
Voluntary Termination.
Should Ehrich terminate his employment for any reason, ISS shall pay Ehrich all earned
and unpaid amounts
due to him for salary
through the termination date.


(b)                          
Termination by
ISS "With Cause".  Should ISS terminate Ehrich's employment for any of the
following reasons, Ehrich shall not be entitled to any severance:


(i)                
Conviction of, or
a plea of "guilty" or "no contest" to, a felony under the
laws of the United States or any state thereof or conviction of, or a plea of "guilty" or "no contest" to, any act involving moral turpitude;


(ii)              
Breach of fiduciary duty involving personal
profit;


(iii)            
Willful and material misconduct in the performance of duties assigned
to Ehrich as the Chief
Financial Officer of ISS;


(iv)            
Consistent failure
to perform the reasonable stated duties assigned
to Ehrich under this Agreement; or


(v)              
Illegal or
unethical business practices, including but not limited to the commission of fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement in connection
with ISS's business.


 


Ehrich shall
have thirty (30) days to cure any alleged breach, failure, or misconduct under Subsection (iv) above, if such
alleged breach, failure or misconduct is curable, after ISS provides Ehrich
written notice of the actions or omissions constituting such breach, failure,
or misconduct.


 


 


 





 

 


(c)                          
Termination by ISS "Without Cause." Should ISS terminate Ehrich's employment


for
any reason other than (1) those
reasons set forth in subparagraph (b) above, or


(2) because of Ehrich's inability to perform his duties because
of death or disability, Ehrich shall be entitled to six (6) months of salary continuation,


without eligibility for bonus, upon entry into a release agreement provided by ISS. ISS and Ehrich have the
ability, however, at any time, to terminate this Agreement by mutual written
agreement, with or without the severance benefit.


 


 


 


 


  Image Sensing Systems, Inc.


 


	
  Date: September
  2, 2016

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: /s/
  Andrew T. Berger

  	
   

  	
  By: /s/
  Richard A. Ehrich

  
	
   

  	
  Its: Executive
  Chairman

  	
   

  	
  Its: Chief
  Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of First Northern Community
Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Louise A. Walker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge,





(i)        the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)        the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
            May
      9, 2008
            
            /s/  Louise
      A. WalkerLouise
      A. Walker, Sr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 106479-106480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31253]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD

Notice of Appointment of Board Member to the Federal Accounting 
Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that David Vaudt has been appointed to 
the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB or ``the 
Board''). Mr. Vaudt's five-year term will begin on January 27, 2025.

[[Page 106480]]

ADDRESSES: The news release is available on the FASAB website at 
https://www.fasab.gov/news-releases/. Copies can be obtained by 
contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call 
(202) 512-7350.
    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. 1001-1014.

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-31253 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
```
Michael SHUGART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

Michael Shugart, Graceville, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
1765.

#### Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad Co. *v.*Allegood.

Action for damages, from city court of Moultrie — Judge McKenzie. February 3, 1909.

Hill, C. J.

The exceptions of law are without substantial merit. This is the second verdict for the plaintiff, and it is fully supported by the evidence. No reason appears for a third trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*681Argued May 5, —

Decided October 5, 1909.

*Rosser & Brandon-, Colquitt & Conyers, J. A. Wilkes,*for plaintiff in error. *Shipp & Kline,*contra.
# Schedule