alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021471EN.01000801.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Proceedings brought by UM

(Case C-277/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Succession - Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 - Article 3(1)(b) - Concept of ‘agreement as to succession’ - Scope - Contract transferring ownership mortis causa - Article 83(2) - Choice of applicable law - Transitional provisions)

(2021/C 471/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UM

Interested parties: HW, as administrator of the estate of ZL, Marktgemeinde Kötschach-Mauthen, Finanzamt Spittal Villach

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession must be interpreted as meaning that a contract under which a person provides for the future transfer, on death, of ownership of immovable property belonging to him or her to other parties to the contract is an agreement as to succession within the meaning of that provision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession must be interpreted as meaning that a contract under which a person provides for the future transfer, on death, of ownership of immovable property belonging to him or her to other parties to the contract is an agreement as to succession within the meaning of that provision;

| 2. | Article 83(2) of Regulation No 650/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to the examination of the validity of a choice of applicable law, made before 17 August 2015, to govern only an agreement as to succession within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of that regulation, in respect of a particular asset of the deceased, and not the latter’s succession as a whole. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 83(2) of Regulation No 650/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to the examination of the validity of a choice of applicable law, made before 17 August 2015, to govern only an agreement as to succession within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of that regulation, in respect of a particular asset of the deceased, and not the latter’s succession as a whole.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.

---
# C_2021053EN.01002602.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 1 December 2020 — VA, ZA v TP

(Case C-645/20)

(2021/C 53/35)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: VA, ZA

Defendant: TP

Question referred

Must Article 10(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession (1) be interpreted as meaning that, where the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death is not located in a Member State, the court of a Member State in which the deceased had not established his habitual residence but which finds that the deceased had the nationality of that State and held assets in it must, of its own motion, examine whether it has subsidiary jurisdiction under that article?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 201, p. 107.

---
THANH-THUY THI LE, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. Trust 2006-WMC2 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WMC2, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2959

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 24, 2019

Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se.

Melissa A. Giasi and Richard S. McIver of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se, challenges (1) the trial court's order denying her motion *1008for relief from a 2014 foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company in August 2014, (2) the trial court's order denying rehearing of its denial of the motion for relief from judgment, and (3) the trial court's order granting the bank's motion to reset the foreclosure sale. We affirm the denials of the motion to vacate and the motion for rehearing without further comment. And we dismiss the portion of this appeal that attempts to challenge the order resetting the foreclosure sale as it is not an appealable order. *See**Pridgen v. First Union Bank*, 879 So.2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order. Rather, it is a purely administrative, interlocutory step in the judicial sales process.").

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 269 

Designating July 22, 2023, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2023 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. ROUNDS, 

Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. THUNE, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. CORNYN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 22, 2023, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 269 IS 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 22, 2023, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald Wilen, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                  August 14, 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  Ronald WilenRonald
                  WilenChief
                  Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 6, 2003
Joshua ARENS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-0198

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Petition is denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Xiangqian Li, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.   The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
9th day of August, 2011.

/s/ Xiangqian
LiXiangqian Li 
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will be retained by China BAK Battery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 14.1    PricewaterhouseCoopers AG
  St. Jakobs-Strasse 25
  Postfach 3877
  4002 Basel
  Switzerland
  Phone +41 58 792 51 00
  Fax +41 58 792 51 10
  www.pwc.ch  CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements on Form F-3ASR (No. 333-153696
and No. 333-157707), Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-60712
and No. 333-81862) and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-137112,
No. 333-119475 and No. 333-162727) of Novartis AG of our report dated
January 25, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 20-F.  PricewaterhouseCoopers
AG   /s/ Michael P. Nelligan
  
  /s/ Peter M. KartscherMichael P. Nelligan
  
  Peter M. KartscherGlobal Engagement Partner
  
  Audit expert
  Auditor in charge   Basel,
January 26, 2010  With offices in Aarau,
Basel, Berne, Chur, Geneva, Lausanne, Lugano, Lucerne, Neuchâtel, Sitten, St.
Gallen, Thun, Winterthur, Zug and Zurich, PricewaterhouseCoopers AG is a
provider of auditing services and tax, legal and business consultancy services. PricewaterhouseCoopers
AG is a member of a global network of companies that are legally independent of
one another; the network is represented in some 150 countries throughout the
world.
# C_2020230EN.01001802.xml

| 13.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — XC

(Case C-195/20)

(2020/C 230/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: XC

Other party to the proceedings: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof

Question referred

Is Article 27(2) and (3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, (1) as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the specialty rule does not preclude a measure involving deprivation of liberty for an offence committed prior to surrender other than that on which the surrender is based if the person voluntarily left the territory of the issuing Member State after the surrender, was subsequently surrendered again by another executing Member State to the territory of the issuing Member State pursuant to a new European arrest warrant, and the second executing Member State gave its consent to prosecution, sentencing and execution in respect of that other offence?

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2009 L 81, p. 24.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 616 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 616

 Condemning the treatment of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu by the Government of 
  Azerbaijan and urging his immediate release, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2024

 Mr. Tillis (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Kaine, and Mr. 
 Fetterman) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Condemning the treatment of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu by the Government of 
  Azerbaijan and urging his immediate release, and for other purposes.

Whereas Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu, a respected academic and economist, and his wife, 
        Irada Bayramova, were arrested by Azerbaijani authorities on July 23, 
        2023, and severely beaten while in police custody;
Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu was dubiously accused by Azerbaijani authorities of 
        multiple criminal acts without evidence;
Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu remains imprisoned at the Baku Detention Center in 
        extremely poor conditions while awaiting trial;
Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu's health has deteriorated significantly since his initial 
        arrest, and he has not received adequate medical treatment for his 
        medical condition;
Whereas Dr. Ibadoghlu has been repeatedly denied access to his legal counsel and 
        a fair trial while in custody;
Whereas the Department of State and the United States Embassy in Baku, along 
        with United States academic institutions and respected international 
        organizations, have expressed deep concerns regarding Dr. Ibadoghlu's 
        health and have demanded his immediate release;
Whereas Azerbaijan's ties with the community of democracies has been undermined 
        by a troubling record of wrongfully detaining those involved in human 
        rights, journalism, and peaceful freedom of expression, including 
        Bakhtiyar Hajiyev, Avaz Zeynalli, and Elchin Sadigov;
Whereas the wrongful detention of Dr. Ibadoghlu is a serious affront to human 
        rights and academic freedom: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) condemns--
                    (A) the treatment of Dr. Ibadoghlu by the 
                Government of Azerbaijan;
                    (B) such government's practice of wrongful 
                detention; and
                    (C) such government's suppression of academic 
                freedom;
            (2) calls for the immediate and unconditional release of 
        political prisoners in Azerbaijan, including Dr. Ibadoghlu; and
            (3) urges the Secretary of State to continue prioritizing 
        Dr. Ibadoghlu's well-being and release in all engagements with 
        the Government of Azerbaijan.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020247EN.01000301.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/3

---

Appeal brought on 30 January 2020 by K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 21 November 2019 in Case T-527/18, K.A. Schmersal Holding v EUIPO — Tecnium (tec.nicum)

(Case C-52/20 P)

(2020/C 247/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: A. Haudan, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 28 May 2020 the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and that K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 106514-106515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-4597]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Shortages Data Collection

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing 
that a collection of information entitled ``Shortages Data Collection'' 
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Sanford, Office of Operations, 
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10 a.m.-12 p.m., 
11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-8867, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 20, 2024, the Agency submitted a 
proposed collection of information entitled ``Shortages Data 
Collection'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An 
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a collection of

[[Page 106515]]

information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0491. The approval expires on October 31, 2027. A 
copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is 
available on the internet at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: December 13, 2024.
P. Ritu Nalubola,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31025 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                      18 U.S.C 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Mass Megawatts Wind
Power,  Inc.  (the  Company) for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jonathon
Ricker,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Company.


Dated:     3/11/05                      By:  /s/ Jonathan Ricker
        --------------                     ---------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Ricker
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                           Accounting Officer


<PAGE>