alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Infographics        June 1, 2001        Screenshot of "Biological Soil Crusts — Webs of Life in the Desert" Fact Sheet

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples

Infographics        December 31, 2010        Terms to describe the measurement of tsunamis

Infographics        July 24, 2020        Kīlauea summit crater lake growth July 25, 2019 to July 25, 2020
[f994commentsforusreaders003.gif]

KPMGLLP

Chartered Accountants

Telephone

(403) 691-8000

2700-205 5th Avenue SW

Fax

(403) 691-8008

Calgary AB  T2P 4B9

Internet

www.kpmg.ca













COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR US READERS ON CANADA  US REPORTING DIFFERENCES

To the Board of Directors of Enterra Energy Corp., as administrator of Enterra Energy Trust



In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles that has a material effect on the comparability of Enterra Energy Trusts financial statements, such as the change described in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the years then ended. Our report to the unitholders dated March 31, 2008 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in the auditors' report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.



In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report to the unitholders dated March 31, 3008 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors' report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.







Signed KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

March 31, 2008









KPMG LLP, a Canadian owned limited liability partnership, is the Canadian 
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss association
Agrait ALVARADO-CINTRON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2020423EN.01002701.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg

(Case C-415/20)

(2020/C 423/40)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the requirement under EU law for Member States to repay, with interest, duties levied in breach of EU law also apply where the reason for the repayment is not a finding by the Court of Justice of the European Union that a provision of EU law has been breached, but that the Court of Justice has interpreted a (sub)heading of the Combined Nomenclature? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the requirement under EU law for Member States to repay, with interest, duties levied in breach of EU law also apply where the reason for the repayment is not a finding by the Court of Justice of the European Union that a provision of EU law has been breached, but that the Court of Justice has interpreted a (sub)heading of the Combined Nomenclature?

| 2. | Do the principles relating to a claim to interest established by the Court of Justice of the European Union also apply to the payment of export refunds refused by the Member State authority in breach of EU law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do the principles relating to a claim to interest established by the Court of Justice of the European Union also apply to the payment of export refunds refused by the Member State authority in breach of EU law?

---
Page 2 of 3 1522:28 SWA13808 this is captain (unintelligible) seven seven two 1522:33 LCW foxtrot twenty one that's the captain there go ahead 1522:35 SWA1380 yes sir (unintelligible) captain's side is where we had the damage and that's the engine that went out 1522:42 F21 uh yeah we're we're we're (unintelligible) ah is there any injuries inside the aircraft itself and also we have no signs of any smoke or fire from outside right now 1522:55 SWA1380 okay we do have injured inside so as soon as ah we can get those taken care of it would be great 1523 1523:11 F21 ah we're gonna get you back to the gate but first we want to make sure (unintelligible) 1523:26 SWA1380 uh we're putting we're putting our flaps down in case because we've been have some smoke initially up here 1524 1524:12 F21 foxtrot twenty one (unintelligible) command to (unintelligible) seven three seven southwest 1524:30 F21 philly tower foxtrot twenty one 1524:31 LCW foxtrot twenty one tower 1524:34 F21 can we talk to the pilot again 1524:40 SWA1380 go ahead for southwest thirteen eighty 1524:45 SWA1380 southwest thirteen eighty is up on thirty five one 1524:51 LCW foxtrot twenty one that's the pilot there go ahead 1524:55 F21 ah how many injuries do you have on the aircraft 18-001-ZNY SWA1380 ***
Page 3 of 3 1524:58 SWA1380 we tried to we're trying to figure that out right now 1525 1525:20 F21 (unintelligible) we're gonna have (unintelligible) come over four eight and we're gonna deplane the uh and have some paramedics come on and take away some patients 1525:36 F21 pilot copy that information 1525:38 SWA1380 say again for the pilot 1525:39 F21 truck coming over and we're gonna board the plane and take a look at the passengers (unintelligible) 1525:46 SWA13808 uh board on the (unintelligible) left hand side 1525:55 F21 are we able to board on the are one 1526 1526:02 SWA1380 we can if you need that yes 1527 1527:25 LCW everybody waiting to depart runway two seven left we have an emergency in progress going to be ten fifteen minutes stand by 1527:59 SWA1380 and this is uh thirteen eighty we need e m s on board is there a way to get them up here 1528 1528:11 LCW foxtrot twenty one did you copy that 1528:24 F21 foxtrot twenty one 1528:25 LCW yeah they wanna know if they can get e m s on the aircraft 1528:39 F21 we are in the process of bringing e m s on 1529 (1530-1558) 1559 End of Transcript 18-001-ZNY SWA1380 ***
# C_2022095EN.01002902.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Datax v REA

(Case T-381/20) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - HELP and GreenNets grant agreements - OLAF’s investigation - Personnel costs - Burden of proof - Reliability of timesheets - Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary - Request for recovery - Debit notes - Limitation - Reasonable time - Proportionality)

(2022/C 95/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Datax sp. z o.o. (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: J. Bober, lawyer)

Defendant: European Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 272 TFEU seeking, first, a declaration of eligibility of the personnel costs relating to the researcher, second, a declaration that the obligation to pay liquidated damages is unfounded and, third, an order that the REA take no further action against the applicant as regards the personnel costs of the researcher relating to the HELP and GreenNets grant agreements.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Datax sp. z o.o. to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Datax sp. z o.o. to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of James River
Coal Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Samuel M. Hopkins, II, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and(2)
            The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of the
registrant.









August 5,
2008




/s/    
      Samuel M. Hopkins, IISamuel M. Hopkins, IITitle:  Chief Accounting
      Officer
Eddie SEAGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Cliff MALBROUGH

No. 2018-KH-0112

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations *764period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
# C_2022418EN.01001802.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — DD v FRA

(Case T-470/20) (1)

(Civil service - Temporary staff - Disciplinary regime - Removal from post - Opening of an administrative investigation - Initiation of disciplinary proceedings - Requirement for impartiality - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Articles 11, 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations - Duty of loyalty - Legal certainty - Freedom of expression - Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Principle of sound administration - Duty of care - Presumption of innocence - Right to be heard - Reasonable period of time - Proportionality of the sanction)

(2022/C 418/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DD (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, DD, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) of 12 November 2019 by which it imposed on him the disciplinary sanction of removal from post (‘the decision to remove from post’) and of the decision of 15 April 2020 rejecting the complaint against the decision to remove from post (‘the decision rejecting the complaint’) and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage which he has suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DD to pay, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DD to pay, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.

---
----

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                registrant. |

|   | /s/                    Peter T.                Socha                           |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter                T. Socha                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
|   | Title:                 Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
ERNIE MORRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. CONTRAX FURNISHINGS, LLC, Meteor Education, LLC, and Greg S. Cave, Respondents.

No. 1D19-0001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2019

J. Robert McCormack and Lara J. Peppard of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Tampa, for Petitioner.

Seldon J. Childers and James W. Kirkconnell of Childers Law, LLC, Gainesville, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Robert Edward GODERSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 107151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31183]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition C Study Section DDK-C Mentored Career Development 
Applications in Digestive Diseases and Nutrition.
    Date: March 19-20, 2025.
    Time: 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Peter J. Kozel, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Diseases, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7009, Bethesda, MD 20892-
5452, (301) 594-4721, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 20, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-31183 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
# C_2021138EN.01003101.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-259/20) (1)

(State aid - French air transport market - Deferral of payment of civil aviation tax and solidarity tax on airline tickets due on a monthly basis during the period from March to December 2020 in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic - Decision not to raise any objections - Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence - Free provision of services - Equal treatment - Criterion of holding a licence issued by the French authorities - Proportionality - Article 107(2)(b) TFEU - Duty to state reasons)

(2021/C 138/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F. C. Laprévote, S. Rating and I. G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier, C. Mosser, A. Daniel and P. Dodeller, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 2097 final of 31 March 2020 on State Aid SA.56765 (2020/N) — France — Covid-19 — Deferral of the payment of airline taxes in favour of public air transport undertakings.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.

---
Shronda Sue MYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3045

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to *Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error in the order of revocation. The order of revocation erroneously states Appellant violated special condition 1 of the order of probation. Appellant was found not guilty of this allegation.

*1151AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Alicia TONDREAU-LEVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4190

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.