alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 2, 2005



/s/ DONALD H. HUNTERDonald H. Hunter Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or otherwise subject
to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**EXHIBIT
        32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick
      C. Shutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Darin P. McAreavey,
      the
      Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best
      of my knowledge, pursuant to l8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                August 13, 2007By:
            /s/
                Patrick C. ShuttName: Patrick
                C. Shutt
                Title: Chief
                  Executive Officer


By:
            /s/
                Darin P. McAreaveyName: Darin
                P. McAreavey
                Title: Chief
                  Financial and Accounting
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-574115

NO. 2019-BA-0234

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 13, 2019

Granted. Petitioner is allowed to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination. Upon satisfactorily passing the examination, petitioner may apply to this court for the appointment of a commissioner in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 9, to take evidence and report to this court as to whether petitioner has the appropriate character and fitness to be *1154admitted to the bar and allowed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.
No. 99-60720

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60720

Summary Calendar

 

ALBERT EDMOND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID TURNER, Superintendent, Southern Mississippi Correctional

Institute; FLORENCE JONES, ADOS, Southern Mississippi

Correctional Institute; HUBERT JORDAN, Disciplinary Committee;

DONALD WEST, Lieutenant; JERRY WALLEY, Lieutenant; KEITH DUNNAM,

Sergeant; THOMAS MATHIAS, Sergeant; JAMES JOHNSON; REGINA

HANCOCK; TERRI KILPATRICK; JAMES ANDERSON, Commissioner; LAQUINTA

WRIGHT, Correctional Officer II, Area II; MICHAEL SUMNER,

Captain, Warden, Area II Infirmary; MARIA SERAPIO, SMCI Medical

Dir., Medical Director of Southern Mississippi Correctional

Institute,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:99-CV-134-PG

--------------------\

April 27, 2000

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Albert Edmond, Mississippi prisoner # 30523, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for

failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 
No. 99-60720

-2-

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). He argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his claims for denial of due process in his

disciplinary proceedings; retaliatory transfer and job

assignment; a violation of his right to privacy; failure to

train; inadequate mental health care; deliberate indifference;

and harassing statements. We have reviewed the record, the

district court's opinion, and Edmond’s brief, and we find that

the district court did not err in dismissing Edmond’s complaint

for failure to state a claim. Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732,

733-34 (5th Cir. 1998). Further, we hold that Edmond’s appeal is

without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Edmond is hereby informed that the dismissal of this appeal

as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g), in addition to the strike for the district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a claim. See Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Edmond that once

he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
# C_2021044EN.01001201.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/12

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 — Archimandritis Sarantis Sarantos, Protopresvyteros Ioannis Fotopoulos, Protopresvyteros Antonios Bousdekis, Protopresvyteros Vasileios Kokolakis, Estia Paterikon Meleton, Christos Papasotiriou, Charalampos Andralis v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-84/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - EU citizenship - Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement - Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 - Action for annulment - Legal standing - Lack of individual concern - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Obligation for a party to be represented by a lawyer - Applicant, also a lawyer, acting in his own name by signing the application himself, without engaging the services of a third-party lawyer to represent him - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2021/C 44/17)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellants: Archimandritis Sarantis Sarantos, Protopresvyteros Ioannis Fotopoulos, Protopresvyteros Antonios Bousdekis, Protopresvyteros Vasileios Kokolakis, Estia Paterikon Meleton, Christos Papasotiriou, Charalampos Andralis (represented by: C. Papasotiriou, dikigoros)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal brought by Mr Christos Papasotirou as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal brought by Mr Christos Papasotirou as inadmissible;

| 2. | Dismisses the appeal brought by Mr Sarantis Sarantos, Mr Ioannis Fotopoulos, Mr Antonios Bousdekis, Mr Vasileios Kokolakis, Mr Estia Paterikon Meleton and Mr Charalampos Andralis as manifestly unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the appeal brought by Mr Sarantis Sarantos, Mr Ioannis Fotopoulos, Mr Antonios Bousdekis, Mr Vasileios Kokolakis, Mr Estia Paterikon Meleton and Mr Charalampos Andralis as manifestly unfounded;

| 3. | Orders Mr Sarantis Sarantos, Mr Ioannis Fotopoulos, Mr Antonios Bousdekis, Mr Vasileios Kokolakis, Mr Estia Paterikon Meleton, Mr Christos Papasotirou and Mr Charalampos Andralis to pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Sarantis Sarantos, Mr Ioannis Fotopoulos, Mr Antonios Bousdekis, Mr Vasileios Kokolakis, Mr Estia Paterikon Meleton, Mr Christos Papasotirou and Mr Charalampos Andralis to pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
Jonathan MATHIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Kurt A. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer ofFastclick, Inc., certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Kurt A. Johnson       |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                       |   | Kurt A. Johnson           |
|                       |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

381 

KA 12-01782 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JERMAINE NOWELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (KRISTEN MCDERMOTT OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (MARIA MALDONADO

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E.

Fahey, J.), rendered April 3, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant,

upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Melvin ROBINSON, Appellee.

No. 4D18-459

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 24, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 15.1





REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





To the Board of Directors and


Stockholders of Ribapharm Inc:





We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet
of Ribapharm Inc. as of September 30, 2002 and the related condensed statements of income for each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 and the condensed statements of cash flows for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.





We conducted
our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries
of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.





Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any
material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





We previously audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, and
the related statements of income, of stockholders equity and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated March 8, 2002, except for Note 1 as it relates to the recapitalization, as to which the
date is April 10, 2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.





/s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Los Angeles, California


November 4, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(751)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - (-)connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - texas(1)

## By Year

              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)

Reference Materials        September 18, 2018        USGS Flood Inundation Mapping Program Information Sheet

Reference Materials        August 28, 2018        Flood Inundation Mapping Program Information sheet - Print Quality

social mediaTexas Flood Watch

Reference Materials        August 30, 2018        Flood Inundation Mapping Program poster of information sheet

social mediaFloods News

Reference Materials        July 17, 2018        FIM Project Published References

Reference Materials        October 18, 2018        Projection shapefile for FIM report

Reference Materials        January 26, 2023        USGS StreamStats: Hydrologic and Geospatial Data Integrated to Support Water Science and Management
Lemuel L. COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

September 1, 2006
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the
Annual Report of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year
ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Giordano, Jr., President (Chief
Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
  The Report fully complies with the
  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and(2)
  The information contained in the Report
  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request Date: 
March 30, 2004
  /s/ Joseph Giordano, Jr.Joseph Giordano, Jr.President (Chief Executive Officer)
Wilbert MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 18, 2019

Wilbert Moore, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General; Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General; and Robert Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*386Appellant challenges the trial court's summary denial of his 3.850 motion. We agree with Appellant that the court failed to attach portions of the record that conclusively establish that Appellant is not entitled to relief. We reverse the trial court's order and remand for the court to hold an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's ineffective assistance claim, or to attach portions of the record (not merely the State's response to the motion) that conclusively refute Appellant's claims. *Morrison v. State* , 860 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ; *see**Skellie v. State* , 849 So.2d 1220, 1221 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Darryl SCHNEIDER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CHART INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Raynald L. DOLISCA, Appellant, v. Fritz J. DOLISCA and Igenette Dolisca, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0323 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RANDY VAUGHN SNEED ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2022

06/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0323