alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - (-)virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        May 23, 2011        An evaluation of traditional and emerging remote sensing technologies for the detection of fugitive contamination at selected Superfund hazardous waste sites

publication        July 26, 2018        Rating stability, and frequency and magnitude of shifts, for streamgages in Virginia through water year 2013

publication        January 1, 1988        Hydrogeologic framework of the Virginia coastal plain

publication        December 18, 2008        Organic compounds in Potomac River water used for public supply near Washington, D.C., 2003-05
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32(b)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Form 10-Q of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, I, Richard I. Linhart, Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies
             with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
             Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
             March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
             financial condition and results of operations of James Monroe
             Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Richard I. Linhart
---------------------------------------
Richard I. Linhart
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 670 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 670

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 17, 2014.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4719) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 to permanently extend and expand the charitable deduction for contributions 
of food inventory. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113-51 
shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and 
(2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105639-105640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30801]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage [supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service TM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service [supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.

[[Page 105640]]

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage [supreg] Contract 536 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-833, K2025-834.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30801 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Trend Mining Company (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Ryan,
      Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: September 20, 2005/s/
                John P. RyanJohn
                P. RyanPrincipal
                  Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

October 19, 2006
Elias GUNN v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00753-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: January 22, 2019 Closed: February 14, 2019

Certiorari - Dismissed.
Exhibit 4.16



 





Exhibit 4.16




AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




     THIS AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made as of this
29th day of June 2004 between THE PROVIDENT BANK (“Lender”) and SHOPSMITH,
INC., an Ohio corporation (“Borrower”), under the following circumstances:




     A. Pursuant to a Promissory Note dated July 17, 2003 from Borrower in
favor of Lender (the “Note”), Lender extend Borrower a line of credit in
the principal amount of $1,400,000 (the “Maximum Credit”).




     B. Lender and Borrower now desire to amend the Note as set forth
below.



     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Lender and Borrower amend the Note
as follows:




	1.	 	The Maximum Credit is hereby reduced to $1,000,000.00.
	 
	2.	 	The Maturity Date is hereby extended to June 30, 2005.
	 
	3.	 	Except as modified by this Amendment, the Note remains in full
force and effect.
	 
	4.	 	The Note, as modified by this Amendment, is ratified and
confirmed.




WITNESS the execution hereof as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE PROVIDENT BANK

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Timothy Egloff
 	 
	 	Name:  Timothy Egloff 	 
	 	Title:  Officer 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SHOPSMITH, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Robert Folkerth
 	 
	 	Name:   Robert L. Folkerth 	 
	 	Title:  President and COO 	 
	 





Page 14
Michael Lee JACOBS, DOC #T21384, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-966

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 14, 2018

Michael Lee Jacobs, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 99.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPEC Holdings Inc.. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick W.
Wakelin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ FREDERICK W. WAKELIN, JR.
--------------------------------------------------
Frederick W. Wakelin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - (-)north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7610

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CURTIS BURSTON, JR., 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:04-cr-00371-F-2; 5:08-cv-00087-F) 

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Curtis Burston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals from a district court 

order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion 

for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the district 

court’s order and the record and affirm on the reasoning of the 

district court. See United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 17, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Chang Xiaobing     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Chang Xiaobing         
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Exhibit  32.b





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








As required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kevin A. Nowlan, hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report of Meritor, Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meritor, Inc.
















/s/ Kevin A. NowlanKevin A. NowlanSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Date:  December 12, 2014
*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5

th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

 The proper name of Defendant-Appellee is Dillard Texas Operating Limited Partnership.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 99-10160 

Summary Calendar

__________________________

MILAGROS C. ALVARADO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DILLARD’S DEPARTMENT STORES,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(98-CV-204-A)

___________________________________________________

July 12, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this employment discrimination case, Plaintiff-Appellant Milagros C. Alvarado seeks

reversal of the district court’s denial of her motion to amend her complaint and grant of summary

judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Dillard Department Stores,1dismissing Alvarado’s action.

We affirm.
2

Following the termination of her employment for the purported reason that she had violated

company rules by conducting personal business while “on the clock,” Alvarado filed this lawsuit

against Dillard’s, advancing retaliationclaims under Title VII and national origin discrimination claims

under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Alvarado now concedesthat such grounds are not actionable under § 1981.

We have now carefully considered the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on January

15, 1999 by the district court, and have independently reviewed the summary judgment record on

appeal and the law as set forth in the district court’s opinion and the appellate briefs of counsel, both

of whom advised in their respective briefs that oral argument would not be helpful in this case. As

a result of our review, we are convinced that the district court was correct in its grant of Dillard’s

motion for summary judgment dismissing Alvarado’s lawsuit. Therefore, for the reasons given by

the district court, its judgment is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.
Cyana SCOTT, Appellant, v. Leonard WILLIAMS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Caliber  Energy,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David Naylor,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     David Naylor
David Naylor
Treasurer, CFO and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


March 30, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020061EN.01005301.xml

| 24.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/53

---

Action brought on 17 December 2019 – AI and Others v ECDC

(Case T-864/19)

(2020/C 61/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: AI, HV, HW and HY (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the ECDC of 11 February 2019 rejecting their request for compensation of 11 October 2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the ECDC of 11 February 2019 rejecting their request for compensation of 11 October 2018;

| — | annul, if need be, the decision of 10 September 2019 rejecting their complaint of 10 May 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, if need be, the decision of 10 September 2019 rejecting their complaint of 10 May 2019;

| — | order compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

order compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicants;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants, having specified their individual factual situations, then set out their allegations of the fault committed by the defendant, the damage suffered, and the link between the fault and the damage.

---