alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Section 1350 Certification

Theundersigned hereby certify that this report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. forthe periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periodspresented in the report.

| /s/ S.M.C. Sherwood      |   | /s/ P.M. White                |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Simon M.C.  Sherwood     |   | Paul M. White                 |
| President and            |   | Vice President -  Finance and |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   | Chief Financial  Officer      |

 

Dated: May 10, 2007

[Asigned original of this written certification has been provided to Orient-ExpressHotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished tothe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

----
Andrelle Dion TILLMAN v. STATE

CR-15-1293

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350







In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report of First Northern Community
Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the “Report”), I, Owen J. Onsum, the chief executive officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United
States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,





(i)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Owen J.
      OnsumOwen
      J. Onsum





March 14,
2008
Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street

Denver, Colorado 80257

(303) 844

- 3157

March 30, 2010 Douglas E. Cressler

Chief Deputy Clerk

Michael Wayne Thomas

FCI

- El Reno

P.O. Box 1500

El Reno, OK 73036

#15707

- 064

RE: 09

- 6189, United States v. Thomas

District docket: 5:04

- CR

- 00082

- R

- 1

Dear Mr. Thomas :

Enclosed is a copy of the order and judgment.

Please contact this office if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court

cc: Sanford C. Coats

Sue Tuck Richmond

EAS/ao
Jurvis M. SPELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.2

      Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management
Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SMS for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of SMS.

Dated: November 3, 2006


                                        By: /s/ Morris Kunofsky
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                Morris Kunofsky
                                                Chief Financial Officer
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF S.M., Jr.

NO. 2019-CK-0112

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Reconsideration denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

h0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

144982

JH BUSINESS CONSULTANTS, INC.

and SADHU AUTO PARTS PVT LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 144982

COA: 304592

Oakland CC: 2009-100692-CZ

TOWER AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS

USA III, LLC and TOWER AUTOMOTIVE

OPERATIONS USA I, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Michael George YOUNG, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2019399EN.01010002.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/100

---

Action brought on 7 October 2019 – Euroapotheca v EUIPO – General Nutrition Investment (GNC LIVE WELL)

(Case T-686/19)

(2019/C 399/119)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Euroapotheca UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: R. Žabolienė, and E. Saukalas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Nutrition Investment Co. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark GNC LIVE WELL – European Union trade mark No 940 981

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2019 in Case R 2189/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Pre-Requisites To Determining the Need To Prepare an EA

CEQ regulations require EAs to take no longer that one year to complete from beginning to issuance of 

the Final EA or FONSI. The CEQ regulations therefore effectively require a documented date of an 

Agency’s decision to prepare an EA. For the FAA Office of Airports, Southwest Region, the following 

applies to make that decision.

• The decision is a discrete step in the EA process and must be documented to the file. The 

decision must document:

o Project planning is sufficiently mature to allow meaningful evaluation of the 

environmental effects,

o There is sufficient information and analysis (see below) to support a decision that an EA 

is appropriate, and

o It is appropriate for the EA to begin (sufficient funds available for the EA and all direct 

FAA actions).

• Completed Planning

o Confirm the scope of the LOB/SO’s proposed action (e.g., making any necessary 

determination regarding the FAA’s authority under Section 163 of the FAA 

Reauthorization Act of 2018);

o Identify any connected actions;

o Identify any Lead, Cooperating and Participating agencies;

o Develop a preliminary purpose and need for the project and coordinating the purpose 

and need statement with any cooperating or participating agencies;

o Develop a preliminary project description and range of alternatives;

o Identify potentially significant environmental issues;

o Conduct screening activities such as desktop and field assessment to identify potentially 

impacted environmental resources; and

o Identify potential mitigation strategies for any potentially significant effects.

• Also needed.

o Identify project points of contact;

o Develop and coordinating a schedule, including milestones for all environmental reviews 

and authorizations required for implementation of the action, in consultation with 

cooperating/participating agencies, as applicable, to ensure agreement with proposed 

milestone dates and proposed actions (for “complex” EAs);

o Determine the type and extent of public involvement;

o Identify community and stakeholders affected; and

o Determine the extent of additional technical analysis needed.

Once all of the above have been completed, the ADO EPS will issue a dated memo to the file 

documenting completion of the above and a decision to prepare an EA. The date of the memo 

effectively starts the EA process and begins the regulatory (one year) timeline.
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 21,   2017/s/ Alexey V.   KornyaAlexey V. KornyaChief Financial   Officer
SCPW-22-0000484

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

IN THE MATTER OF DE WITT LAMAR LONG,

Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Cataldo, in place of Wilson, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the September 10, 2022 

submission by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and the

September 12, 2022 submission by the Lawyers’ Fund for Client 

Protection (the Fund), filed under seal pursuant to Rules 

2.22(a) and 10.8(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the 

State of Hawai‘i (RSCH), respectively, the August 3, 2022 letter 

from the Petitioner, and the record in this matter, we find no 

abuse of discretion in the deliberations of either ODC or the 

Fund (see In re Disciplinary Board of Hawaiʻi Supreme Court, 91 

Hawai‘i 363, 370, 984 P.2d 688, 695 (1999)), find the record 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-22-0000484

19-SEP-2022

12:11 PM

Dkt. 16 ODDP
2

demonstrates adequate communication was provided to Long, and 

note that the Fund recognizes its duty, pursuant to RSCH Rule 

10.5(e), to provide an applicant with written notice of the 

trustees’ determination of a claim. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 19, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa W. Cataldo
Angelia WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4791

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Angelia Walker, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
In the Court of Criminal 

Appeals of Texas

══════════

No. WR-94,371-01

══════════

EX PARTE CORY ALEXANDER ROSS,

Applicant

═══════════════════════════════════════

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Cause No. W12657-1 in the 355th District Court

From Hood County

═══════════════════════════════════════

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which SLAUGHTER, J., 

joined. 

Applicant was convicted in 2014 of possession of a controlled 

substance and sentenced to twelve months’ imprisonment. Applicant did 

not appeal his conviction. In October of 2022, Applicant filed an 

application for writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction. TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. In his application, he alleges that he was 
ROSS – 2

denied his right to an appeal because his counsel failed to timely file a 

notice of appeal. 

Today, the Court remands this application to the trial court to 

further develop the record. I join the Court’s remand order. But I write 

separately to address my thoughts concerning the doctrine of laches and 

its possible application to this case. See Ex parte Smith, 444 S.W.3d 661, 

663 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (holding a trial court has the authority to 

sua sponte consider the doctrine of laches); Ex parte Bazille, ___ S.W.3d 

___, No. WR-89,851-02, 2022 WL 108348, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 12, 

2022) (Yeary, J., concurring).

The doctrine of laches ought to be considered in a case like this 

one. Applicant’s trial occurred in 2014, but this writ application was not 

filed until eight years later.1 The record is also silent regarding 

circumstances that may excuse Applicant’s delay, and at least some 

explanation for the long delay in filing should be provided. Consistent 

with this Court’s precedent, the trial court “may sua sponte consider and 

determine whether laches should bar relief.” Smith, 444 S.W.3d at 667.

If the trial court does so, it must give Applicant the opportunity to 

explain the reasons for the delay and give the State’s prosecutors and/or 

former counsel for Applicant an opportunity to state whether 

Applicant’s delay has caused any prejudice to their ability to defend 

against Applicant’s claims. Id. at 670. And ultimately, the trial court 

1 “Our revised approach will permit courts to more broadly consider the 

diminished memories of trial participants and the diminished availability of 

the State’s evidence, both of which may often be said to occur beyond five years 

after a conviction becomes final.” Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206, 216 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2013) (citing Ex parte Steptoe, 132 S.W.3d 434, 437–39 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2004) (Cochran, J., dissenting)). 
ROSS – 3

may include findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the 

doctrine of laches in its response to this Court’s remand order.

With these additional thoughts, I join the Court’s order.

FILED: December 14, 2022

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Texxon, Inc. Corporation (the "Company")hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed"
for any purpose whatsoever.

May 17, 2006                     Name:  /s/ Benjamin Hansel
                                       ------------------------------
                                        Benjamin Hansel
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
Georgeta MILLER, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2628

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - (-)california(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 29, 2019        PubTalk 08/2019 — Pliocene World
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00432-CR

Hugo Cardenas Flores

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1360208D)

January 29, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
In the INTEREST OF L.M., a child.

P.M., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-3126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph HICKEY, Appellant, v. Kenneth JERKINS, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 17, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Kenexa Corporation 

Wayne, Pennsylvania 

We have issued our reports dated March 16, 2009,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Kenexa Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Kenexa Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-137662, effective January 5, 2007) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136486, effective August 10, 2006 and FileNo. 333-129475, effective November 4, 2005). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 16, 2009
Corey Lamar FALCONER v. STATE

CR-15-1339

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - new mexico(1)
              - rhode island(1)

## By Year

General        August 2, 2018        370.410.1 - Training - General Provision

General        December 29, 2023        Science Information Service (SIS)

General        July 11, 2019        Giuseppina Mattietti

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments

General        July 11, 2019        Madalyn Blondes

General        July 11, 2019        Sally Sennert

General        May 1, 2019        General Questions To Pose While Exploring Topographic Maps

General        July 11, 2019        Alanna Simpson

General        July 11, 2019        Geoff Gilleaudeau

General        July 11, 2019        Jacob Richardson

General        July 11, 2019        William F. Hoover

General        July 11, 2019        Jess Rodysill

General        January 24, 2023        Don't Take It for Granite

General        August 3, 2018        429.1 - Space Management

General        March 1, 2018        Birdsall-Dreiss Distinguished Lecturer: Clifford I. Voss

General        July 30, 2020        New Mexico Water Science Center Sediment Laboratory
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - (-)north carolina(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Real-time Data        May 20, 2017        WaterWatch - View streamflow data using maps, graphs, and tables.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Infographics        June 1, 2001        Screenshot of "Biological Soil Crusts — Webs of Life in the Desert" Fact Sheet

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

Infographics        December 31, 2010        Terms to describe the measurement of tsunamis

Infographics        July 24, 2020        Kīlauea summit crater lake growth July 25, 2019 to July 25, 2020
Jahi Amadi HASANATI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jason WOOD, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 09, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed. Denied.