alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

 

```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
```

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enterra Energy Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Reg J.Greenslade, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, solely for the purpose ofcomplying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

> 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

```
 /s/ Reg J. Greenslade
					   	 																Reg J. Greenslade
                                           			 														Chief Executive Officer
													                                            				August , 2002
```
John HUNSINGER, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Alexander KAPLAN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

<TABLE>
<S>                                <C>                                     <C>
P.H. Tang & Co.                    Main Office                             Corporate Reconstruction & Insolvency Office
Certified Public Accountants       3rd Floor, Rammon House,                8th Floor, Gold & Silver Commercial Building
                                   101 Sai Yaung Choi Street South,        12-18 Mercer Street,
                                   Mongkok, Kowloon,                       Central, Hong Kong
                                   Tel: 2398 1138                          Tel: 2815 5823
                                   Fax: 2398 1289                          Fax: 2815 5987
</TABLE>

1 July 2001

Deloitte, Haskins & Sells
Mumbai
India

Dear Sirs,

Re: SKY CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

We consent Silverline Technologies Limited to include our opinion related to Sky
Capital International Limited's audited financial statements for the year ended
31 December 2000 and 31 March 2001 for the F-3 with the SEC.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ P.H. Tang & Co.

P.H. Tang & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
----

EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, Michael Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAlphaRx, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of AlphaRx, Inc.; 
2. 

Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. 

I am responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a)     designed such disclosure controlsand procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c)     presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the EvaluationDate; 

5. 

We have disclosed,based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

a)     all significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data andhave identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. 

I have indicatedin this annual report whether there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date:December 19, 2007 

/s/ Michael Lee 

Michael Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer 

43
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): March 10, 2006
 Citizens Banking Corporation
  
 000-10535
(Commission File Number)
    
    38-2378932
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 328 South Saginaw Street, Flint, Michigan
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    48502
(Zip Code)
 
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.05. Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities.SIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.05. Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities.
 Strategic Business Alliance Relating to the Companys Mortgage Operations, Secondary Marketing
and Title Services Functions
     Estimate of Charges  2006First
    
    Second
    
    Third
    
    FourthMajor
Cost Category
    
    Quarter
    
    Quarter
    
    Quarter
    
    Quarter
    
    TotalEmployee Separation
    
    $0.2
    
    $0.2
    
    - 0 -
    
    - 0 -
    
    $0.4Other
    
    - 0 -
    
    - 0 -
    
    $0.1
    
    $0.2
    
    $0.3Total
    
    $0.2
    
    $0.2
    
    $0.1
    
    $0.2
    
    $0.7
  Consolidation of the Companys Consumer and Commercial Loan Operations Functions




---



##### Table of Contents



Estimate of Charges  2006First
    
    Second
    
    Third
    
    FourthMajor
Cost Category
    
    Quarter
    
    Quarter
    
    Quarter
    
    Quarter
    
    TotalEmployee Separation
    
    
    $0.2
    
    
    
    $0.1
    
    
    
    - 0 -
    
    
    
    $0.1
    
    
    
    $0.4Other
    
    
    $0.1
    
    
    
    $0.1
    
    
    
    - 0 -
    
    
    
    - 0 -
    
    
    
    $0.2Total
    
    
    $0.3
    
    
    
    $0.2
    
    
    
    - 0 -
    
    
    
    $0.1
    
    
    
    $0.6
  Forward Looking Statements




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  CITIZENS BANKING CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Thomas W. GallagherThomas W. GallagherIts:
    General Counsel and Secretary
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GWRP

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149196(4)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - maine(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(3)
              - nevada(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - tennessee(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(4)

Project        July 5, 2017        Ozark Plateaus Groundwater Availability Study

Data Release        February 4, 2019        Streamflow, Runoff and Baseflow Estimates for Gaged Basins in the Northwest Volcanic Aquifer Study Area, USA, 1904 to 2015

Project        September 15, 2016        Ozark Groundwater Availability Study

Photography  Middle Dam (Maine) Well Drilling

Science Animations        December 11, 2008        The Mississippi embayment — a look underground

Photography  Minnesota River at Jordan

Photography  Old Water Pump

Photography  Beach of the Great Lakes

Project        May 29, 2018        Coastal Lowlands Regional Groundwater Availability Study

Podcasts        March 30, 2011        Waves Rippling Through Groundwater

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Shallow Aquifer

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Deep Aquifer

Science Animations        January 6, 2009        The Mississippi embayment — Where Does the Water Come From?

Research        February 23, 2018        Fiber-Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts

Project        January 21, 2009        Digital Hydrogeologic Surface and Thickness of the Mississippi Embayment Regional Aquifer Study (MERAS)
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105561-105562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4108-000]

City of St. Cloud, Minnesota; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    The license for the St. Cloud Hydroelectric Project No. 4108 was 
issued for a period ending November 30, 2024.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 4108 is issued to 
the City of St. Cloud for a period effective December 1, 2024, through 
November 30, 2025, or until the issuance of a new license for the 
project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first.
    If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take 
place on or before November 30, 2025, notice is hereby given that, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) 
of the FPA is renewed

[[Page 105562]]

automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless 
the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that the City of St. Cloud is authorized to continue 
operation of the St. Cloud Hydroelectric Project under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until the issuance of a subsequent 
license for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever 
comes first.

    Dated: December 19, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-31046 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1038 CA 12-02139 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

MARK A. LICCIARDI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A CITY OF ROCHESTER FIREFIGHTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF ROCHESTER, CITY OF ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT, JOHN CAUFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CITY OF ROCHESTER FIRE CHIEF, SALVATORE MITRANO, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTIVE DEPUTY CHIEF, MARTIN MCMILLIAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LINE DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, RICHARD YACKEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS BATTALION CHIEF, KEVIN CADY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A CITY OF ROCHESTER FIRE LIEUTENANT, MAUREEN HOPE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS FIRE DEPARTMENT CASE MANAGER, AND SUSAN WALZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS VICE PRINCIPAL OF NORTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN THE FAIRPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

EMMELYN LOGAN-BALDWIN, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

THE LAW FIRM OF FRANK W. MILLER, EAST SYRACUSE (J. RYAN HATCH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT SUSAN WALZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS VICE PRINCIPAL OF NORTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN THE FAIRPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered June 11, 2012. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to renew or reargue the motion of defendant Susan Walz, individually and as Vice Principal of Northside Elementary School in the Fairport School District, to dismiss the complaint against her and seeking to compel disclosure from Walz.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to renew or reargue the motion of defendant Susan Walz, individually and as Vice Principal of Northside Elementary School in the Fairport School District, to dismiss the complaint against her and seeking to compel disclosure from Walz. Plaintiff offered no new facts in support of that part of the motion seeking leave to renew or reargue, but merely argued that Supreme Court had misapprehended the-2- 1038 CA 12-02139
law and therefore reached the wrong conclusion with respect to the prior motion. That part of the motion, therefore, was in fact only a motion for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable ( see Mugabo v City of Buffalo , 94 AD3d 1577, 1577). Inasmuch as the complaint against Walz had been dismissed, the court properly denied as moot that part of the motion seeking to compel disclosure from her ( see Kinney & Kinsella, Inc. v NEI Fashions, LLC , 85 AD3d 514, 515).

Entered: November 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

 

Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Earnings per Share 

 

 

|                                 |   | **2006**    |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-------------|
| **Basic:**                           |   |        |
|                                 |   |        |
| Net Loss                             |   | $(593,744)  |
|                                 |   |        |
| Average shares:                      |   |        |
| Common shares issued                 |   | 96,397,506  |
| Average shares outstanding           |   | 94,378,209  |
|                                 |   |        |
| Net income per common share, basic   |   | $(0.01)     |
|                                 |   |        |
|                                 |   |        |
| **Diluted:**                         |   |        |
|                                 |   |        |
| Net Loss                             |   | $(593,744)  |
|                                 |   |        |
| Average shares:                      |   |        |
| Common shares issued                 |   | 107,289,006 |
| Average shares outstanding           |   | 94,378,209  |
|                                 |   |        |
| Net income per common share, diluted |   | $(0.01)     |
|                                 |   |        |
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(10)
              - products_publications(19)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - (-)colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
# C_2019413EN.01006001.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/60

---

Action brought on 14 October 2019 – Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v EUIPO (Moins de migraine pour vivre mieux)

(Case T-696/19)

(2019/C 413/72)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Moins de migraine pour vivre mieux – Application for registration No 17 942 393

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 August 2019 in Case R 778/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2021289EN.01001601.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ZN v Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania

(Case C-280/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Determination of international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State - Article 5(1) - Employee residing in a Member State - Contract concluded with a consular representation of that Member State in another Member State - Functions of the employee - No exercise of public powers)

(2021/C 289/22)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski Rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ZN

Defendant: Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction with recital 3 of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that it applies for the purposes of determining the international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to hear and rule on a dispute between an employee from a Member State who does not carry out duties involving the exercise of public powers and a consular authority of that Member State situated in the territory of another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-20491

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JULIO CESAR GARCIA-LONGORIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-210-2

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Garcia-Longoria has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Garcia-Longoria has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 13, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-20491 Document: 00515268199 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2020
No. 19-20491

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-20491 Document: 00515268199 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2020
Exhibit  23.e





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 30, 2014, relating to the financial statements of Master Sistemas Automotivos Ltda. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, appearing in Item 15 of Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Meritor, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2014 in the following Registration Statements:








FormRegistration No.PurposeS-3333-200858Registration of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities and guaranteesS-8333-192458Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-171713Amended 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1643332010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1411862007 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-107913Meritor, Inc. Savings PlanS-8333-123103Meritor, Inc. Hourly Employees Savings PlanS-8333-496101997 Long-Term Incentives PlanS-3333-43116Meritor, Inc. 1998 Stock Benefit PlanS-3333-43112Meritor, Inc. Employee Stock Benefit PlanS-8333-42012Employee Stock Benefit Plan, 1988 Stock Benefit Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Benefit Plan





/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu


Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes


Porto Alegre, Brazil


June 17, 2015