alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - (-)south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        March 31, 2017        Getting Started with MODIS Version 6 Vegetation Indices Data Part 2

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
STATE of Louisiana v. Darryl GRIFFIN

NO. 2018-KP-0641

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported) April 10, 2006
 NORTH POINTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
  Michigan
    
    000-51530
    
    38-3615047(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 28819 Franklin Road, Southfield, Michigan
    
    
    48034(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (248) 358-1171
  o
    
    Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act.o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-2 under the Exchange Act.o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act.o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act.




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 4.01. Changes in Registrants Certifying AccountantItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXLetter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    Table of Contents  
 Item 4.01. Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant.
     ·
 ·
  2




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (a)
    
    None.(b)
    
    None.(c)
    
    None.(d)
    
    The following document is furnished as an Exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K pursuant
to item 601 of Regulation S-K:
 16.1
    
    Letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
 3




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Dated: April 14, 2006
    
    NORTH POINTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION(Registrant)By:
    
    /s/ James G. Petcoff

James G. PetcoffIts: Chief Executive Officer
 4




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit Number
  16.1
    
    Letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
 5
STATE EX REL. Kenneth P. JONES aka Kenneth Paul Jones v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1910

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FORTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF DESOTO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
# C_2020027EN.01006101.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/61

---

Action brought on 12 November 2019 — CAPA and Others v Commission

(Case T-777/19)

(2020/C 27/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Coopérative des artisans pêcheurs associés (CAPA) (Le Tréport, France) and 10 other applicants (represented by: M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well founded;

and, consequently:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2019)5498 final of 26 July 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2019)5498 final of 26 July 2019;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the parties’ procedural rights under Article 108(2) TFEU, in that the circumstances in which the contested decision was adopted and the content thereof demonstrate that the Commission was objectively faced with doubts that should have resulted in the formal investigation procedure being opened. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the parties’ procedural rights under Article 108(2) TFEU, in that the circumstances in which the contested decision was adopted and the content thereof demonstrate that the Commission was objectively faced with doubts that should have resulted in the formal investigation procedure being opened.

| 2. | Second plea in law, based on infringement of the obligation to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, based on infringement of the obligation to state reasons.

---
# C_2021138EN.01002901.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 18 January 2021 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-227/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/36)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles GUIDRY, Jr.

NO. 2018-KH-1940

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Jerry D. Chase, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.







Date: September 28, 2009
By:
/s/ JERRY D. CHASEName: Jerry D. Chase
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer









I, Reagan Y. Sakai, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Lantronix, Inc







Date: September 28, 2009
By:
/s/ REAGAN Y. SAKAIName: Reagan Y. Sakai
Title:   Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the annual report of Texxon,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gifford M. Mabie III,
Chief  Executive  Officer  (and  principal  financial  officer) of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


April 2, 2004                     /s/ Gifford M. Mabie III
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Gifford M. Mabie III, Chief
                                  Executive Officer and principal
                                  financial officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00427
- CV

E. B., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2017
- 1044D, THE HONORABLE KARIN E. BONICORO, J UDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant E. B. filed his notice of appeal on June 19, 2018. The appellate record requested by appellant’s prior counsel was complete July 13, 2018 , making appellant’s brief due August 2, 2018

. On July 16, 2018 , cou nsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to
file appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s counsel also seeks an order from this Court directing the trial court to supplement the appellate record. If appellant’s counsel believes that the clerk’s recor d lacks relevant items, counsel is instructed to file a record request with the trial court clerk specifically describing the requested items so that the clerk can readily identify them , if counsel has

not already done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5 (b)(2 ) (“The clerk will disregard a general designation, such as one for ‘all papers filed in the case.’”), (c)(1) (“If a relevant item has been2

omitted from the clerk’s record, . . . any party may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item.”)

.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days
fo r court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion in part and order counsel to file appellant’s
brief no later than August 22, 2018. If the brief is n ot filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on July 18, 2018

.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Marquelle Dominque WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3029

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Kevirent BRUNODAGE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2021349EN.01001201.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV

(Case C-362/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Regulation (EU) No 1071/2012 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 7307 11 10, 7307 19 10 and 7307 19 90 - Scope - Tariff classification resulting from a Court judgment - Definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron - Whether definitive anti-dumping duties are applicable on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of spheroidal graphite cast iron)

(2021/C 349/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Openbaar Ministerie, Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën

Defendants: Profit Europe NV, Gosselin Forwarding Services NV

Operative part of the judgment

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1071/2012 of 14 November 2012 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Thailand and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Thailand and terminating the proceeding with regard to Indonesia, in the version prior to the amendments made to the latter by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/262, of 14 February 2019, must be interpreted as meaning that the provisional and definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by those regulations apply to threaded tube or pipe cast fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron, originating in China.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 23.11.2020.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_data(2)
              - (-)products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - (-)oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1992        Geohydrologic framework of the Snake River plain regional aquifer system, Idaho and eastern Oregon

publication        January 1, 1902        The Geology and Petrography of Crater Lake National Park

publication        January 1, 1994        Ground Water Atlas of the United States: Segment 7, Idaho, Oregon, Washington

publication        March 19, 2012        Watershed scale response to climate change--Sprague River Basin, Oregon

publication        January 1, 2004        Spatial and temporal variation of Cenozoic surface elevation in the Great Basin and Sierra Nevada

publication        January 1, 1979        Ground water in Myrtle Creek - Glendale area, Douglas County, Oregon

publication        October 30, 2007        Geological studies of the Salmon River suture zone and adjoining areas, west-central Idaho and eastern Oregon

publication        January 1, 1964        Geology and ground-water resources of the upper Grande Ronde River basin, Union County, Oregon
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(751)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - (-)news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - (-)other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

About        February 5, 2024        California's History of Large Storms & Floods

Technical Announcement        October 13, 2016        Assessing the Magnitude of Missouri’s 2016 New Year's Flood

Technical Announcement        March 28, 2018        The 3D Elevation Program – Flood Risk Management

About        November 15, 2023        2023 Quarter 4 USGS Stream Discharge and National Snow and Ice Data Center Data

About        June 9, 2023        River and Coastal Processes Team

Technical Announcement        January 4, 2023        USGS Releases Spanish Version of National Water Dashboard

Technical Announcement        August 16, 2017        Collaboration in a Disaster
Vencil THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0739

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Edgar ZUNIGA-MEJIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is transferred.
Richard ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019

Richard Andrews, Miami, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Richard Andrews (the defendant) appeals the trial court's order granting in part, and denying in part, his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred by granting relief but failing to conduct a resentencing proceeding. We agree and reverse.

The defendant filed the present rule 3.800(a) motion in which he asserted two grounds for relief. In ground two, the defendant challenged the habitual felony offender designation as to count one, burglary of a dwelling. The trial court denied ground one but granted relief on ground two. Without conducting a resentencing hearing, the trial court struck the habitual felony offender designation as to count one and reimposed a life term.

A defendant is entitled to be present and represented by counsel at any resentencing proceeding unless the resentencing involves only a ministerial act. *See* *Thompson v. State*, 208 So.3d 1183, 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). The relief granted by the trial court altered the total sentence points on the defendant's scoresheet and, under the sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of the offense, the court had discretion as to the new sentence it imposed upon the defendant. Thus, resentencing the defendant to a life term on count one did not involve a purely ministerial act. *See* *Burgess v. State*, 182 So.3d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Accordingly, the trial court was required to hold a full, *de novo* resentencing hearing before imposing a new sentence on count one, and the trial court's failure to hold such a hearing was error. *See* *Branton v. State*, 187 So.3d 382 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for a formal resentencing hearing wherein the defendant is represented by counsel.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.