alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Form 10-KSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2003, I, John R. Maxwell, President and Chief Executive
Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


 /s/ John R. Maxwell
-------------------------------------
John R. Maxwell

President and Chief Executive Officer
G.L., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1954

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Edward James MCKINNEY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1181

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

*429Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - (-)georgia(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Real-time Data        May 20, 2017        WaterWatch - View streamflow data using maps, graphs, and tables.
# C_2021138EN.01002803.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 27 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía, Ceuta y Melilla — Spain) — ZP v Delegación del Gobierno en Melilla

(Case C-38/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.

---
Exhibit
      32.2





Chief
      Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18U.S.C.,SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Kenneth Faith, the undersigned Chief Financial
      Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the
      best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
      the
      period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. A signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated
                August 15, 2008
            /s/
                Kenneth FaithCFO
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(14)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - (-)utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1980        Map showing general chemical quality of surface water in the Richfield Quadrangle, Utah

map        January 1, 1972        Map showing general availability of ground water in the Salina quadrangle, Utah

map        January 1, 1972        Map showing general chemical quality of ground water in the Salina quadrangle, Utah

map        January 1, 1982        Map showing general availability of ground water in the Alton-Kolob coal-fields area, Utah

map        January 1, 1979        Maps showing generalized structure contours on the tops of the Wasatch and Green River Formations, geologic sections, and contours of thickness of the Green River Formation, southeastern Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado

map        January 1, 1981        Map showing general chemical quality of ground water in the Richfield Quadrangle, Utah

map        January 1, 1980        Map showing general chemical quality of surface water in the Alton-Kolob coal-fields area, Utah

map        January 1, 1977        Map showing general availability of ground water in the Kaiparowits coal-basin area, Utah

map        January 1, 1979        Map showing general chemical quality of surface water in the Kaiparowits coal-basin area, Utah

map        January 1, 1981        Summary appraisal of water resources in the Redmond Quadrangle, Sanpete and Sevier counties, Utah

map        January 1, 1977        Map showing general chemical quality of ground water in the Kaiparowits coal-basin area, Utah

map        January 1, 1981        Map showing general chemical quality of ground water in the Alton-Kolob coal-fields area, Utah

map        January 1, 1981        Surface-water resources in the Tooele 2° quadrangle, Utah

map        January 1, 1974        Map showing the thickness of loosely packed sediments and the depth to bedrock in the Sugar House quadrangle, Salt Lake County, Utah
James HARRIS, DOC #R63924, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET and LUCAS JJ., Concur.
Tanya L. CAIRNS, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM and Aaron Evans, Appellees.

No. 1D18-443

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019

Tanya L. Cairns, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Revenue.

Per Curiam.

Tanya Cairns appeals a final order denying the Department of Revenue's proposed order to modify an administrative child support order. She contends the administrative law judge incorrectly calculated the father's child support obligation and effectively modified the parents' time-sharing arrangement by finding that the father had visitation with the child eighty percent of the time. Cairns' arguments appear to be based on a misreading of the child support guidelines worksheet. In calculating the child support obligation, the judge multiplied the father's basic support obligation by eighty percent, which represents the percentage of the *other parent's* overnight stays with the child. *See* § 61.30(11)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The judge did not find that the father had visitation eighty percent of the time. Nor did the order modify, in any way, the existing time-sharing plan. Because the judge's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm.

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 21-1940

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Samuel D. Nelson

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

____________ 

Submitted: March 08, 2022

Filed: March 11, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Samuel D. Nelson appeals after he pled guilty to wire fraud and aggravated 

identity theft, and the district court1 imposed an aggregate prison sentence to run 

consecutively to a state sentence for an offense that was not relevant conduct to this 

1

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Missouri.
-2- 

offense. See USSG § 5G1.3. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court 

affirms. 

Nelson does not dispute that the district court had discretion to impose his 

federal sentence consecutively to his undischarged state sentences. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3584(a) (“[I]f a term of imprisonment is imposed on a defendant who is already 

subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment, the terms may run concurrently or 

consecutively.”). Rather, he asserts that the decision to run the sentence 

consecutively to his undischarged state sentences was substantively unreasonable 

because the district court gave insufficient weight to the fact that he would not 

receive federal credit for the time he spent in temporary federal custody prior to 

being sentenced.

 The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Nelson’s federal 

sentence to run consecutively to his undischarged state sentences. See United States 

v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62, 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of 

review). The record reflects that the district court recognized its discretion to order 

the sentences to run concurrently, considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and 

Nelson’s argument in favor of running his federal sentence concurrently, and 

exercised its discretion to order that the sentence run consecutively. See id. at 461-

62 (abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives 

significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of 

judgment in weighing appropriate factors); United States v. McDonald, 521 F.3d 

975, 980 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court has “wide discretion” to order sentence to be 

served consecutively to undischarged sentence); see also United States v. Hall, 825 

F.3d 373, 376 (8th Cir. 2016) (no abuse of discretion where district court considered 

§ 3553(a) factors and recognized its discretion to run sentences concurrently but 

declined to do so).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 12, 2002


/s/    STEPHEN G.
KASNETStephen G. Kasnet Chief
Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Wayne Norris, certify that:

1. I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  MicroSignal
Corporation

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 18, 2003

/s/ Wayne Norris
--------------------------------------------
Wayne Norris
President and Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Infographics        June 1, 2001        Screenshot of "Biological Soil Crusts — Webs of Life in the Desert" Fact Sheet

Infographics        December 31, 2010        Terms to describe the measurement of tsunamis

Infographics        July 24, 2020        Kīlauea summit crater lake growth July 25, 2019 to July 25, 2020
Amanda BRUMFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1609

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 19, 2018

Seth E. Miller, of Innocence Project of Florida, Inc., Tallahassee; and Kathrine H. Judson, of Wisconsin Innocence Project, Madison, WI, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Amanda Brumfield appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court's order without discussion, except as to a portion of claim two.

In claim two, Brumfield alleged, in part, that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call Dr. Chris Van Ee, a biomechanical engineer, and Dr. Mark Shuman, a forensic pathologist and associate medical examiner. To assert a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to call a witness, the defendant must: (1) identify the prospective witness, (2) describe the substance of the witness's testimony, (3) state the witness was available to testify, and (4) describe the prejudice resulting from omitting the witness's testimony. *See**Nelson v. State*, 875 So.2d 579, 582-83 (Fla. 2004). Here, Brumfield adequately pled her claim as to Dr. Van Ee and Dr. Shuman, and the records attached to the trial court's order do not conclusively refute Brumfield's allegations.

Brumfield further alleged in claim two that two additional unidentified pathologists performed a preliminary review of the autopsy slides. As Brumfield's counsel properly concedes, the claim as to these two unidentified pathologists, as filed, was facially insufficient under *Nelson*. The trial court should have granted Brumfield an opportunity to amend. *See**id.* at 583-84.

Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of that portion of claim two concerning the failure to call Dr. Van Ee, Dr. Shuman, and the two unidentified pathologists. We remand for attachment of records or an evidentiary hearing regarding *987the failure to call those witnesses, after Brumfield has had an opportunity to amend her motion, if she can do so in good faith. As to all other claims, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Andre PIERRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1104

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Damien Lee YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 31, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Damien Lee Young, Okeechobee, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.