alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_publications(21)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(48)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - (-)tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, April L. Marino, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinecrest
Services, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: August 8, 2005           /s/ April L. Marino
                              __________________________________________
                              April L. Marino, Principal Financial Officer
# C_2020045EN.01008801.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/88

---

Action brought on 10 December 2019 – Koopman International v EUIPO – Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products Import & Export (Fluid distribution equipement)

(Case T-838/19)

(2020/C 45/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: B. van Werven, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) and Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Tinnus Enterprises

Design at issue: European Union design No 1431 829-0006

Contested decision: Interim Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 September 2019 in Case R 1005/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision to suspend the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal and decide that said proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall continue; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision to suspend the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal and decide that said proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall continue;

| — | to join the current case before the General Court with the cases before the General Court in cases R 1006/2018-3, R 1008/2018-3, R 1010/2018-3 and R 1009/2018-3 lodged by Koopman International simultaneous with this action; |
| --- | --- |

—

to join the current case before the General Court with the cases before the General Court in cases R 1006/2018-3, R 1008/2018-3, R 1010/2018-3 and R 1009/2018-3 lodged by Koopman International simultaneous with this action;

| — | order Tinnus Enterprises to pay Koopman International’s costs and fees. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Tinnus Enterprises to pay Koopman International’s costs and fees.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘legal certainty’; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘legal certainty’;

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘economy of proceedings’; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘economy of proceedings’;

| — | The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘sound administration’; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘sound administration’;

| — | The Board of Appeal did not correctly balance the interests of all parties. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal did not correctly balance the interests of all parties.

---
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of The Princeton Review, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses:


|(1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-116821) and related
prospectus dated December 28, 2004,
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-63638 and Form S-8 No.
333-104136) pertaining to The Princeton Review, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-77016) pertaining to The
Princeton Review, Inc. 401(k) Employee Savings Plan
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated April 28, 2005, with respect to The Princeton Review, Inc.
managements assessment of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The
Princeton Review, Inc. included in this Form 10-K/A.



/s/ ERNST & YOUNG
LLP


New York, New York April 29, 2005

---
Subsidiaries of The Medicines Company
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation or OrganizationMDCO Holdings C.V.
    
    NetherlandsTarganta Development, L.P.*
    
    Cayman IslandsTarganta Holdings, Inc.*
    
    DelawareTarganta Netherlands B.V.*
    
    NetherlandsTarganta Research, LLC*
    
    DelawareTarganta Securities Corporation*
    
    MassachusettsTarganta Therapeutics Corporation*
    
    DelawareTarganta Therapeutics Inc.*
    
    CanadaTarganta Therapeutics (Ontario), Inc.*
    
    CanadaThe Medicines Company France SAS
    
    FranceThe Medicines Company Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareThe Medicines Company (Deutschland) GmbH
    
    GermanyThe Medicines Company (Italy) S.r.l.
    
    ItalyThe Medicines Company (Leipzig) GmbH
    
    GermanyThe Medicines Company (NL) B.V.
    
    NetherlandsThe Medicines Company (Schweiz) GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandThe Medicines Company UK Limited
    
    England and Wales
 
 *
    

Acquired
in February 2009 in connection with The Medicines Companys
acquisition of Targanta Therapeutics Corporation
Kenneth Brian WEAVER v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00255-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: December 14, 2018 Closed: February 28, 2019

Certiorari - Denied.
Maximo REYES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1716

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Maximo Reyes, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kurt Bordian, Chief Financial Officer of Copper Canyon Corp.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   



| | By:    | /s/ Kurt Bordian       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | October 13, 2006       



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00599

- CV

Nita Winkler v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3 of Bell County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 75,824

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
M arch 27, 2014
EXHIBIT 2.2

          Statement Under Oath of Principal Executive Officer Regarding
            Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the "Company") as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on July 1, 2002
and as amended by Form 20-F/A on the date hereof (collectively, the "Report")
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Abel Ayerza, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                         /s/ Abel Ayerza
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Abel Ayerza
                                         Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 26, 2002
STATE of Louisiana and Vermilion Parish School v. The LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLORATION CO., et al.

BOARD NO. 2018-CC-2110

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
# C_2020010EN.01004802.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/48

---

Action brought on 14 November 2019 – Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO – Sakkari (Sakkattack)

(Case T-788/19)

(2020/C 10/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Labesius, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maria Sakkari (Nicosia, Cyprus)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Sakkattack in the colours black, red, yellow and white – Application for registration No 16 603 318

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 August 2019 in Case R 2562/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 37(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 37(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of the rule of equal treatment and sound administration; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the rule of equal treatment and sound administration;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council

---
Talise Cherer CHERY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and ADC Delivery, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Gordan MATTESON, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 1D17-5377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 27, 2018

William H. Rogner and Scott B. Miller of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, & Waranch, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Craig O. Stewart of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Paul MARCHESE, Jr., Appellant, v. SARASOTA COUNTY GENERAL CONTRACTORS LICENSING & EXAMINING BOARD, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5123

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 21, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Erin SCHLAGEL, Appellant, v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, d/b/a UF Health Shands Davis Cancer Center, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5303

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020348EN.01000602.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/6

---

Appeal brought on 14 July 2020 by Wonder Line, SL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2020 in Case T-284/19, Wonder Line v EUIPO — De Longhi Benelux (KENWELL)

(Case C-322/20 P)

(2020/C 348/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Wonder Line, SL (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

By order of 26 August 2020 of the Vice-President, the Court of Justice held that the appeal is dismissed as inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
IN RE: Brian P. QUIRK

NO. 2018-B-1857

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent submitted phantom billing entries to his law firm for work not performed but not billed to clients. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that his conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 8.4(a) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Brian P. Quirk, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19748, be and he hereby is disbarred. His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Sherry BOOTHE and Barry Boothe Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Children, Amber and Amanda Boothe v. State of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT and Parish of East Baton Rouge

NO. 2018-C-1746

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 585,216, Division D; Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2018 CA 0120.

Granted.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case: and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
EX PARTE James ROBINSON

CR-16-0766

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Aeterna Zentaris Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Juergen Engel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated: March 31, 2011

/s/ JUERGEN ENGEL Prof. Dr. Juergen Engel
President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Order entered May 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01658-CR

CEDRIC JERMAINE LEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-61116-R

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Mary Snider to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit nos. 1A, 30, 75, 78, and 79, 

CDs and DVDs.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Mary 

Snider, official court reporter, 265th Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE