alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(105)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(42)
              - multimedia_image-141771(42)
              - multimedia_video(17)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(12)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(7)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - (-)texas(3)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(3)

staff profileJennifer A Trevino

staff profileKara M Garvin

staff profileJennifer T Wilson
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 518 

Expressing support for designation of March 2014 as ‘‘Multiple System Atrophy Awareness Month’’ to increase public awareness of this progressive 

neurodegenerative disorder that affects the autonomic functions of the 

body. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2014 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. MCCOLLUM, and Mr. NOLAN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of March 2014 as ‘‘Multiple System Atrophy Awareness Month’’ to increase public awareness of this progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects the autonomic functions of the body. 

Whereas Multiple System Atrophy is a fatal neurological disease diagnosed in approximately 15,000 patients in the 

United States; 

Whereas as many as 35,000 more patients in the United 

States with Multiple System Atrophy are misdiagnosed 

with other more recognizable neurodegenerative disorders; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 518 IH 

Whereas patients with Multiple System Atrophy lose the ability to walk, talk, chew, swallow, and even breathe over 

the course of a few years; 

Whereas the incidence of Multiple System Atrophy in the 

United States has increased in recent years; 

Whereas no specific risk factors or causes of Multiple System 

Atrophy have been identified; 

Whereas there is currently no cure for Multiple System Atrophy; 

Whereas the lack of awareness about Multiple System Atrophy has hindered research and the ability of researchers 

to obtain funding for their work; 

Whereas public support and greater awareness of the need 

for research funding can aid in the discovery of the cause 

of and a cure for Multiple System Atrophy; and 

Whereas March 2014 would be an appropriate month to designate as ‘‘Multiple System Atrophy Awareness Month’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Multiple System Atrophy Awareness 

3 Month’’ to increase public awareness of this progressive 

4 neurodegenerative disorder that affects the autonomic 

5 functions of the body. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - (-)mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
Ciaran L. TEMPLAROBRIEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The appellee's motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is dismissed as moot.

LaROSE, C.J., and SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Keefer Lamar EAGLIN

No. 2018-KH-0463

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining *1203claims, the applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(6)
              - products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - (-)new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
# C_2020068EN.01004401.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/44

---

Action brought on 16 December 2019 – Albéa Services v EUIPO – dm-drogerie markt (ALBÉA)

(Case T-852/19)

(2020/C 68/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Albéa Services (Gennevilliers, France) (represented by: J.-H. de Mitry, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark ALBÉA – International registration designating the European Union No 1 210 553

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2019 in Case R 1480/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul partially the contested decision which annulled the first decision of the Board of Appeal to the extent that the opposition No B002522988 against the Applicant’s trademark application in the name of Albéa Services was rejected for all the goods in classes 3, 8 and 21 and for the part of the goods of classes 16 and 20; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul partially the contested decision which annulled the first decision of the Board of Appeal to the extent that the opposition No B002522988 against the Applicant’s trademark application in the name of Albéa Services was rejected for all the goods in classes 3, 8 and 21 and for the part of the goods of classes 16 and 20;

| — | alternatively, annul partially the contested decision which annulled the first decision of the Board of Appeal to the extent that the opposition No B002522988 against the Applicant’s trademark application in the name of Albéa Services was rejected for all the goods in classes 3, 8 and 21 and for part of the goods of classes 16 and 20 and should remit the case to the Board; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, annul partially the contested decision which annulled the first decision of the Board of Appeal to the extent that the opposition No B002522988 against the Applicant’s trademark application in the name of Albéa Services was rejected for all the goods in classes 3, 8 and 21 and for part of the goods of classes 16 and 20 and should remit the case to the Board;

| — | award costs in favour of the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

award costs in favour of the Applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Jenna Rae TANNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-3594

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed January 18, 2019

Blaise Trettis, Public Defender, and Michael Mario Pirolo, Assistant Public Defender, Viera, for Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the October 9, 2018 judgments and sentences rendered in Case Nos. 05-2018-CF-040334-A and 05-2018-CF-043557-A, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, COHEN, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 331 

Designating August 2023 as ‘‘National Catfish Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. WARNOCK, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. 

CRUZ, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating August 2023 as ‘‘National Catfish Month’’. 

Whereas the Catfish Institute recognizes August to be National Catfish Month; 

Whereas the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas recognize August to be National Catfish Month; 

Whereas the States of Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, 

and Tennessee embody the Channel Catfish as their 

State Fish; 

Whereas the farm-raised catfish industry in the United 

States employs over 9,000 people and contributes almost 

$2,000,000,000 to the economy of the United States; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 331 ATS 

Whereas the United States has 55,855 surface water acres 

used for catfish production in 2023, and catfish growers 

in the United States had $447,039,000 in sales during 

2022; 

Whereas the average catfish farmer produces 6,800 pounds 

of catfish per acre; 

Whereas 99 percent of all United States farm-raised catfish 

are grown in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, 

Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, and 

Texas; 

Whereas catfish is the largest farm-raised seafood product, 

by weight, in the United States, representing more than 

50 percent of the food fish produced by the United States 

aquaculture industry; 

Whereas United States farm-raised catfish are consistently 

high quality and, unlike ocean-caught fish, are available 

all year long; 

Whereas United States farm-raised catfish are a sustainable 

and environmentally friendly seafood product; 

Whereas catfish is a lean fish and an excellent source of protein; and 

Whereas catfish is a versatile fish in cuisine of the United 

States, with a myriad of regional and national recipes to 

be enjoyed by all people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates August 2023 as ‘‘National Cat3 fish Month’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 331 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the contributions of all workers, 

2 past and present, that produce, process, and provide 

3 catfish for the people of the United States; and 

4 (3) recognizes that purchasing United States 

5 farm-raised catfish supports farmers, jobs, and the 

6 economy of the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
STATE EX REL. Jose ALFARO v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KP-2150

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant to order an evidentiary hearing.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of EP Global Communicatins, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 16, 2007





/s/ Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.



Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.

President, Chief Executive Officer
Order filed November 13, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00741-CV

____________

CHRISTOPHER SPATES AND PRODIGY SERVICES, Appellants

V.

ENI US OPERATING COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-35849

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 28, 2014. The notice of 

appeal was due August 27, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, 

filed his notice of appeal on September 11, 2014, a date within 15 days of the due 

date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied

when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. Verburgt 

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to 
extend time to file the notice of appeal in this court.

1 While an extension may be 

implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation 

to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 

974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

 

1 There is a motion contained in the clerk’s record.
P.S. Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. L.J.P. & W.M.S., The Alleged Incapacitated Person Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3637

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 22, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The parties' stipulation for dismissal filed January 18, 2019, is treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal and is granted. This appeal is dismissed.
Dennis Michael CREAMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2178

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated August 18,
2004 in the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form S-6 No.
333-117352) and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios,
Series 184.

                                               /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                               ------------------------
                                               GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
August 18, 2004
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Dror Zoreff, Interim Chief Executive Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/  Dror ZoreffDror ZoreffInterim Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This exhibit is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by that Act, be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any document or filed herewith for the purposes of liability under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the case may be.
# C_2022171EN.01000502.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS)

(Case C-172/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Request for assistance - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 90(1) and (2) - Date on which the request was made - Implied decision refusing the request - Complaint - Submission - Time period - Excusable error)

(2022/C 171/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: WV (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, abogado, and F.-M. Hislaire, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders WV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders WV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.

---
# C_2021044EN.01004301.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/43

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — flightright GmbH v SunExpressGünes Ekspres Havacilik A.S.

(Case C-434/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/63)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---