alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50204

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERGIO OLIVEROS-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-388-5

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Sergio Oliveros-Martinez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Oliveros-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that, even if the appeal waiver is not enforced 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 8, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-50204 Document: 00513108433 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2015
No. 14-50204

2

against Oliveros-Martinez, the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-50204 Document: 00513108433 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2015
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(42)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149210(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - connecticut(1)
              - (-)kansas(4)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        1993 Kansas Flood

slideshow        September 23, 2021        1951 Kansas Flood

slideshow        September 23, 2021        May 2007 Kansas Flood

slideshow        September 23, 2021        June-July 2007 Southeast Kansas Flood
Kimberly YOUNG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
# C_2021490EN.01001001.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — Līga Šenfelde v Lauku atbalsta dienests

(Case C-119/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) funding - National Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 - Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 - Article 19(1)(a) - Business start-up aid for young farmers - Aid for the development of small farms - Cumulation of aid - Possibility to refuse the cumulation)

(2021/C 490/07)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Līga Šenfelde

Defendant: Lauku atbalsta dienests

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 19(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 must be interpreted as not precluding a farmer who has received business start-up aid for the development of small farms, provided for in point (a)(iii) of that provision, from cumulating that aid with business start-up aid for young farmers, provided for in point (a)(i) of that provision, in so far as the maximum amount of aid granted, as referred to in Article 19(6), is complied with; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 19(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 must be interpreted as not precluding a farmer who has received business start-up aid for the development of small farms, provided for in point (a)(iii) of that provision, from cumulating that aid with business start-up aid for young farmers, provided for in point (a)(i) of that provision, in so far as the maximum amount of aid granted, as referred to in Article 19(6), is complied with;

| 2. | Article 19(1) of Regulation No 1305/2013 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which the granting of business start-up aid for the development of small farms, provided for in point (a)(iii) of that provision, prevents the recipient from securing business start-up aid for young farmers, as provided for in point (a)(i) thereof. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 19(1) of Regulation No 1305/2013 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which the granting of business start-up aid for the development of small farms, provided for in point (a)(iii) of that provision, prevents the recipient from securing business start-up aid for young farmers, as provided for in point (a)(i) thereof.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6827

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PETERA MICALE CARLTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:09-cr-00073-D-1)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Petera Micale Carlton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6827 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Petera Micale Carlton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Carlton, No. 7:09-cr00073-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6827 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2023007EN.01000402.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State, Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C, B (C-704/20), X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-39/21)

(Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Detention of third-country nationals - Fundamental right to liberty - Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention - Directive 2008/115/EC - Article 15 - Directive 2013/33/EU - Article 9 - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 - Article 28 - Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure - Ex officio review - Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

(2023/C 7/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring courts

Raad van State, Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-704/20), X (C-39/21)

Defendants: C, B (C-704/20), Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-39/21)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(2) and (3) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, Article 9(3) and (5) of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection, and Article 28(4) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, read in conjunction with Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

must be interpreted as meaning that

a judicial authority’s review of compliance with the conditions governing the lawfulness of the detention of a third-country national which derive from EU law must lead that authority to raise of its own motion, on the basis of the material in the file brought to its attention, as supplemented or clarified during the adversarial proceedings before it, any failure to comply with a condition governing lawfulness which has not been invoked by the person concerned.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

---
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

I, James E. Young, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Perfect
Health Care Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 5, 2005

/s/ James E. Young
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EP Global Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James McGinnis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the annual report of Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Enrique Ibarra
Anaya, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DATE: May 14, 2014



|SIGNATURE: | /s/ Enrique Ibarra Anaya       | 
|---------- | ------------------------------ | 
|           | TITLE: Chief Executive Officer | 



This written statement
is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 310 

Recognizing the Motorcycle Safety Foundation for 50 years of safety 

education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2023 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. BUDD, Ms. ERNST, Mr. TILLIS, 

and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the Motorcycle Safety Foundation for 50 years 

of safety education. 

Whereas, in 1973, the Motorcycle Safety Foundation began 

creating the first motorcycle rider safety training curriculum in the United States; 

Whereas the Motorcycle Safety Foundation is a nonprofit organization providing motorcycle rider training and education; 

Whereas the Motorcycle Safety Foundation meets the needs 

of motorcycle riders by continuing to create courses for 

the most popular bikes on the road and on the trail, including the hands-on Adventure Bike Rider Course and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 310 ATS 

the Dirtbike School courses, that enable motorcycle riders 

to get the most out of their bikes; 

Whereas new and experienced riders can benefit from learning basic motorcycle controls, safe-riding habits, and 

street strategies in a comprehensive, research-based curriculum created by the Motorcycle Safety Foundation; 

Whereas 10,000,000 motorcyclists have taken the Basic 

Rider Course taught by Motorcycle Safety Foundation 

rider coaches in the last 50 years; 

Whereas 46 States and the Armed Forces use Motorcycle 

Safety Foundation curriculum as their motorcycle license 

waiver course; 

Whereas nearly 10,000 rider coaches teach Motorcycle Safety 

Foundation curriculum at 2,700 training sites across the 

United States; and 

Whereas the efforts of the Motorcycle Safety Foundation are 

aimed at making the roadways of the United States safer 

for both motorcycle riders and non-riders: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the Motorcycle 

2 Safety Foundation for 50 years of safety education and 

3 improving the ride for motorcycle riders across the United 

4 States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

               Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  I,  the  undersigned  President  and  Chief
Executive  Officer of Nuclear  Solutions,  Inc., (the "Company"),  herby certify
that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated August 21, 2006                              /s/ Patrick Herda
                                                -----------------------
                                                President, CEO
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Supreme Holdings, Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sandra Livney, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Supreme Holdings, Inc.

By: /s/ Sandra Livney
   ---------------------------
Sandra Livney
Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 9, 2003
Jamescy JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4708

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1293

_____________________________

BROUGHTON HOWARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John Jay Gontarek, Judge.

July 3, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Broughton Howard, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 August 7, 2006
 
 
 FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 
  Washington
    
    000-22439
    
    91-0222175(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File No.)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 100 Fourth Avenue N., Suite 510, Seattle, Washington 98109
 
  (206) 404-7000
 
  
  see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREExhibit IndexEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    Press release issued by Fisher Communications, Inc., dated August 7, 2006.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Dated: August 7, 2006
    By
    
    /s/ Jodi A. ColliganJodi A. ColliganVice President Finance
Acting Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 99.1
    
    Press release, dated August 7, 2006.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.11    
    


COASTAL BANCSHARES ACQUISITION CORP. 


August    ,
2004 


Coastal
Acquisition, LLC

9821 Katy Freeway, Suite 500

Houston, Texas 77024 


Gentlemen:



        This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial public offering ("IPO") of the securities
of Coastal Bancshares Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") and continuing (i) until the consummation by the Company of a "Business Combination" (as described in the Company's IPO prospectus),
(ii) 18 months from commencement of the IPO if the Company does not effect a business combination, or (iii) 24 months from the consummation of the IPO if a letter of
intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement has been executed within 18 months of commencement of the IPO and the Company has not effected a business combination, Coastal Acquisition
LLC shall make available to the Company certain office and secretarial services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 9821 Katy Freeway, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024. In
exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Coastal Acquisition LLC the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	

COASTAL BANCSHARES ACQUISITION CORP.
	

 	
 	

By:	

    

	 	 	Name:	W. Donald Brunson
	 	 	Title:	President





AGREED
TO AND ACCEPTED BY: 


COASTAL
ACQUISITION, LLC 



	

By:	
 	

    
	
 	

 
	Name:	 	Cary Grossman	 	 
	Title:	 	President	 	 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.11