alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCPR-20-0000710

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

_________________________________________________________________

IN RE WINIFRED Y. TENNO, Petitioner.

_________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Nakasone,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and

surrender license to practice law in the State of Hawai#i, filed

by attorney Winifred Y. Tenno, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules

of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and the

affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude that

Petitioner Tenno has fully complied with the requirements of RSCH

Rule 1.10. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-20-0000710

02-DEC-2020

07:47 AM

Dkt. 7 OGP
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Tenno, attorney number 5373, from the roll of

attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective with the filing of

this order, though Petitioner shall be permitted to retain the

paper license as a memento, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(b).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 2, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TechTeam Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc J.
Lichtman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2006                      /s/ Marc J. Lichtman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Marc J. Lichtman
                                        Vice President and Chief Accounting
                                        Officer
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00719-CR

Marian Louise CAMPBELL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B09-05

Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 20, 2010

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On September 11, 2009, appellant was placed on community supervision for a period of

seven (7) years. On September 30, 2009, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s community

supervision. On October 9, 2009, the trial court entered an order continuing appellant on community

supervision, but modifying the terms of appellant’s community supervision. Appellant filed a notice

of appeal from the trial court’s order modifying the conditions of her community supervision. This
04-09-00719-CR

-2-

court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order altering or modifying the

conditions of community supervision. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App.

1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.). On

December 18, 2009, this court issued an order for appellant to show cause on or before January 4,

2010, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 26, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 543 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 105109)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-862, K2025-863.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30846 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Talacius Okevian HORNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2943

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50127 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH ADELL DANCER, also known as Keithadell Dancer, and JESSE WILFORD CLARK, JR, also known as Jessie Clark,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Waco

(W-94-CR-2-1)

______________________________________________

December 20, 1995

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appe llants, Keith Adell Dancer (Dancer) and Jesse Wilford

Clark, Jr. (Clark), appeal their convictions of the offense of

conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in2

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. After considering the

record evidence and arguments of counsel for each appellant, we

find no reversible error occurred in the district court proceedings

which would require reversal. We reject each appellant's claim of

error for the reasons set forth below.

1. Dancer's appeal.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting

the complained of out of court statement of James Williams (Patroy)

because the record evidence allows a finding that Patroy was a coconspirator of Dancer; the statement was made during the course of

the conspiracy; and, it was in the furtherance of the conspiracy.

Even were we to assume that the alleged conversation occurred at a

time that Patroy and Dancer were angry with each other, as

suggested by Dancer, such would not establish that Dancer was no

longer a part of the conspiracy. Moreover, even assuming the

complained of evidenc e was erroneously admitted, in light of the

other substantial and overwhelming evidence of Dancer's g uilt we

would find the out of court statement complained of is not

reversible error as it did not have a s ubstantial impact on the

verdict.

2. Clark's appeal.

The district court immediately instructed the jury to

disregard the objectionable testimony and under such circumstances

and in light of the entire record, the refusal to grant a mistrial

was not an abuse of discr etion. S ee United States v. Limones

, 8

F.3d 1004, 1007-08 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S.Ct. 1543,

1562 (1994).3

AFFIRMED.
Heather GOODMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 03, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed because of the appellant's failure to satisfy this court's October 2, 2018, fee order.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
# C_2022340EN.01000901.xml

| 5.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-159/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs - Article 13 - Use of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese produced in Denmark and intended for export to third countries - Article 4(3) TEU - Principle of sincere cooperation)

(2022/C 340/09)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis, I. Naglis and U. Nielsen, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: M.P. Brøchner Jespersen, J. Nymann-Lindegren, V. Pasternak Jørgensen, M. Søndahl Wolff and L. Teilgård, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-E. Krompa, E. Leftheriotou, E. Tsaousi and A.-E. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents), Republic of Cyprus (represented by: V. Christoforou and E. Zachariadou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to prevent or stop the use by Danish dairy producers of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese which does not comply with the product specification for that PDO, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to prevent or stop the use by Danish dairy producers of the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Feta’ to designate cheese which does not comply with the product specification for that PDO, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs and to pay four fifths of the costs of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs and to pay four fifths of the costs of the European Commission;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear one fifth of its costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear one fifth of its costs;

| 5. | Orders the Hellenic Republic and the Republic of Cyprus each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the Hellenic Republic and the Republic of Cyprus each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 14 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 14

   Amending rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to include 
  amendments of the House of Representatives in the requirements for 
          identifying spending items, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2023

Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Budd, and Mr. Daines) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                      on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to include 
  amendments of the House of Representatives in the requirements for 
          identifying spending items, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph 2(a)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``Senate''; and
                            (ii) by inserting ``or a message from the 
                        House of Representatives'' after ``by 
                        committee''; and
                    (B) in clause (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``or joint resolution'' 
                        each place it appears and inserting ``, joint 
                        resolution, or message''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``Senator'' and inserting 
                        ``Member of Congress'';
            (2) in paragraph 3(a)(1), by striking ``Senator'' and 
        inserting ``Member of Congress'';
            (3) in paragraph 5(a), by striking ``Senator'' and 
        inserting ``Member of Congress''; and
            (4) in paragraph 7, by striking ``or conference report'' 
        and inserting ``conference report, or message from the House''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.2


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$1,862.26                                                         March 15, 2004

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Single Source Electronic Transactions,
Inc., of 11242 Playa Court, Culver City, CA 90230 promises to pay to the order
of Brandon Becker, at 11242 Playa Court, Culver City, CA 90230, or such other
place as the holder may designate in writing to the undersigned, the principal
sum of One Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Two Dollars and twenty six cents
($1,862.26), together with interest thereon from date hereof until paid, at the
rate of Eight Percent (8%) per annum as follows: One payment of principal and
interest of Two Thousand Eleven Dollars and twenty-four cents ($2,011.24) on
March 15, 2005. All or any part of the aforesaid principal sum may be prepaid at
any time and from time to time without penalty.

In the event of any default by the undersigned in the payment of principal or
interest when due or in the event of the suspension of actual business,
insolvency, assignment for the benefit of creditors, adjudication of bankruptcy,
or appointment of a receiver, of or against the undersigned, the unpaid balance
of the principal sum of this promissory note shall at the option of the holder
become immediately due and payable and the amount then due shall accrue interest
until payment at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. In the event of a
default, any payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and the balance
to principal.

The maker and all other persons who may become liable for the payment hereof
severally waive demand, presentment, protest, notice of dishonor or nonpayment,
notice of protest, and any and all lack of diligence or delays in collection
which may occur, and expressly consent and agree to each and any extension or
postponement of time of payment hereof from time to time at or after maturity or
other indulgence, and waive all notice thereof.

In case suit or action is instituted to collect this note, or any portion
hereof, the maker promises to pay such additional sum, as the court may adjudge
reasonable, attorneys' fees in said proceedings.

This note is made and executed under, and is in all respects governed by, the
laws of the State of California. Venue for any action or suit under this
promissory note shall be Los Angeles, California.

Single Source Electronic Transaction, Inc.
By its President,


/s/ Arnold F. Sock
---------------------------
Arnold F. Sock, President
Exhibit 32.2

               Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  I,  the  undersigned  Treasurer  and  Chief
Financial  Officer of Nuclear  Solutions,  Inc., (the "Company"),  herby certify
that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated August 21, 2006.                             /s/ Patrick Herda
                                                -----------------------
                                                President, CFO
1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    SIGNATURE:
    
    /s/ Jose Antonio Solbes

TITLE: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021182EN.01004903.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/49

---

Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 5 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — PR, BV v Germanwings GmbH

(Case C-558/20) (1)

(2021/C 182/66)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.

---
Exhibit 15.1   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 filed on October 1, 2004 (File No. 333-119475), on Form S-8 filed on September 5, 2006 (File No. 333-137112), on Form S-8 filed on October 29, 2009 (File No. 333-162727), on Form S-8 filed on January 18, 2011 (File No. 333-171739), on Form S-8 filed on April 8, 2011 (File No. 333-173382), on Form S-8 filed on September 12, 2014 (File No. 333-198706), on Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 filed on March 15, 2017 (File No. 333-198706), and on Form F-3 filed on September 18, 2015 (File No. 333-207004) of Novartis AG of our report dated January 23, 2018 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.  PricewaterhouseCoopers AG  /s/Martin Kennard

/s/Stephen JohnsonMartin Kennard

Stephen JohnsonAudit expert

Global Relationship   PartnerAuditor in charge  Basel, January 23, 2018  PricewaterhouseCoopers AG, St. Jakobs-Strasse 25, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland Telefon: +41 58 792 51 00, Telefax: +41 58 792 51 10, www.pwc.ch  PricewaterhouseCoopers AG is a member of the global PricewaterhouseCoopers network of firms, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
# C_2022084EN.01002001.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021 — P. Krücken Organic GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-586/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Action for damages - Conditions governing the non-contractual liability of the European Union - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Organic production and labelling of organic products - Article 33(3) - Concept of ‘appropriate supervision’ - Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 - Arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries - Private control body for the purpose of equivalence - Attribution of that body’s conduct to the European Commission)

(2022/C 84/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: P. Krücken Organic GmbH (represented by: H. Schmidt, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, B. Hofstötter and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders P. Krücken Organic GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders P. Krücken Organic GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

---