alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(170)
              - products_data(188)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(635)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(23)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(23)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(63)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(17)
              - multimedia_image-141776(24)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(160)
              - multimedia_video-149194(67)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - multimedia_video-149196(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(52)
              - documents_file(17)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149215(2)
              - documents_file-149216(5)
              - documents_file-149220(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(9)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(21)
              - connect_staff_profiles(234)
              - other_basic-42(36)

## By Location

              - california(3)
              - maine(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Photography        November 14, 2014        Tribal GIS participants

Photography        February 11, 2020        Esri Federal GIS Conference 2020 USGS Booth

Photography        December 31, 2014        USGS staff and Tribal GIS workshop participants

Photography        July 13, 2022        2022 SAG Award Recipients-Fall 2022

Photography        September 22, 2017        Colonies of the Bacteria Bacillus Globigii on a Petri Dish

Photography        July 22, 2020        NPS scientist collects imagery of Castle Geyser, Yellowstone

Photography        June 16, 2019        Checking preliminary maps

Photography        July 1, 2014        Supercomputers Map Out Super Endangered Species — In 3-D

Photography        December 31, 1905        A bathymetric contour map of Castle Lake, Mount St. Helens.

Photography        January 20, 2021        Caleb P. Roberts

Photography        May 1, 2023        Lauren Tango staff photo

Photography        January 14, 2018        Montecito after debris flow

Photography        January 14, 2018        Geologists assess scene after debris flow

Photography        January 14, 2018        Pool sign warns first responders

Photography        January 14, 2018        Geologists assess damage after debris-flow event

Photography        May 17, 2021        Daniel Magoulick

Photography        October 4, 2008        Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park repeat photography from about 1945 and 2008 showing channel narrowing
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/s/ Douglas A. Michels                                  
|Douglas A. Michels President and Chief Executive
Officer

August 6, 2008
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S
N O . W R - 8 5 , 5 6 8 - 0 2

E X P A R T E JOSE AG USTIN ALVARADO, A p p l i c a n t
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 14-0672-CR-A-B IN THE 25TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM G UADALUP E COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of three counts of indec ency

with a child and se ntence d to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. On September

25, 2018, this Court remanded this application to the trial court for finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law on a single alleg ation of ineff ective a ssistance of c ounsel. On Dec ember

7, 2018, the trial cour

t signe d finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law whic h addre ss the g round pursua nt to the remand or der, but not Applica nt’s other seve n g rounds. Thetrial court r ecommende d that relief be denie d. Ba sed on the trial c ourt’s finding s of fa ct as we ll as this C ourt’s indepe ndent re view of the entire rec ord, we deny relief
. Filed: January

9, 2019 Do not publish
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

Exhibit 27
Carmina Technologies, Inc.
Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-B
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Article 5 of Regulation S-X
CIK

     Multiplier     1
     Currency      US Currency
     Period Type     12 Months
     Fiscal year end     Dec. 31
     Period start      Jan. 1, 2000
     Period end     Dec. 31, 2000
     Exchange rate     1


     Item Number     Item Description          US Currency
5-02(1)     cash and cash items     $     2,796
5-02(2)     marketable securities     24,414
5-02(3)(a)(1)     notes and accounts receivable-trade     42,921
5-02(4)     allowances for doubtful accounts     0
5-02(6)     inventory     0
5-02(9)     total current assets     54,522
5-02(13)     property, plant and equipment     2,051
5-02(14)     accumulated depreciation     208
5-02(18)     total assets     193,487
5-02(21)     total current liabilities     110,336
5-02(22)     bonds, mortgages and similar debt     0
5-02(28)     preferred stock-mandatory redemption     0
5-02(29)     preferred stock-no mandatory redemption     0
5-02(30)     common stock     1,570,232
5-02(31)     other stockholders' equity     (1,487,081)
5-02(32)     total liabilities and stockholders' equity     193,487
5-03(b)1(a)     net sales of tangible products     0
5-03(b)1     total revenues     0
5-03(b)2(a)     cost of tangible goods sold     0
5-03(b)2     total cost of and expenses applicable to sales and
revenues     0
5-03(b)3     other costs and expenses     1,073,851
5-03(b)5     provisions for doubtful accounts and notes     0
5-03(b)(8)     interest and amortization of debt discounts     0
5-03(b)(10)     income before taxes and other items     (1,073,851)
5-03(b)(11)     income tax expense     0
5-03(b)(14)     income/loss continuing operations     (1,073,851)
5-03(b)(15)     discontinued operations     0
5-03(b)(17)     extraordinary items     0
5-03(b)(18)     cumulative effect-changes in accounting principles     0
5-03(b)(19)     net income or loss     (1,073,851)
5-03(b)(20)     earnings per share--primary     (0.052)
5-03(b)(20)     earnings per share--fully diluted     $     (0.044)
<PAGE>


Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant


Carmina Canada Inc. incorporated under the laws of the Province of Alberta,
Canada and 100% owned by the Registrant is the sole and totally held
subsidiary of the Registrant.


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01***CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER***     I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as managingowner, of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust, certify that (i) the Form 10K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained inthe Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust .         CAMPBELL ALTERNATIVE ASSET TRUSTBy: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing owner           By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland       Bruce L. Cleland      Chief Executive Officer      March 30, 2007  
E 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(1)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(43)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
Johan Eliot CHIRI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Roger J. KELLOGG, DOC #T92685, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Louis H. WALKER, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-BNC1 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, Series 2007-BNC1, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019.

Louis H. Walker, pro se.

W. Bard Brockman of Bryan Cave LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *See**Frier v. Frier*, 13 So.3d 145, 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the trial court's order did not make a determination as to personal jurisdiction).

Dismissed.

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE

STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED

SALARIED EMPLOYEES’ PENSION PLAN




WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the “Employer”) presently maintains the
Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated Salaried Employees’ Pension Plan,
effective as of May 1, 1996 (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Employer, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Plan, has the right
to amend the Plan from time to time subject to certain limitations.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the following manner:



     Effective as of the date of the execution hereof, Section 2.1 of the Plan
is hereby amended to add the following paragraph to read as follows:




     Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, no
employees hired by an Employer on or after June 1, 2004 shall
participate in the Plan. Additionally, notwithstanding anything
in the Plan to the contrary, other than to the extent that it
would violate the break-in-service rules under Section 410(a)(5)
of the Code or Section 202(b) of ERISA, no employees rehired by an
Employer on or after June 1, 2004 shall participate or accrue a
benefit in the Plan with respect to service performed on or after
June 1, 2004.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has executed this Thirteenth Amendment to
the Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated Salaried Employees’ Pension
Plan on the    day of    , 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	
	 	 
	

	 	Name:	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	
	 	 
	

	 	Title:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1539

In Re: LEO LIONEL PAYNE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:07-cv-00614-JRS)

Submitted: June 13, 2008 Decided: July 1, 2008

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leo Lionel Payne, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Virginia inmate Leo Lionel Payne petitions for a writ of

mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to issue a

decision in Payne’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) action. The last

district court action occurred on November 19, 2007, when the

district court granted Payne leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

We find that mandamus relief is not warranted at this

time because the delay since the district court’s last significant

action is not unreasonable. Accordingly, we deny Payne’s mandamus

petition without prejudice to the filing of another such petition

if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
John S. HASKELL, Appellant, v. Unni HASKELL; PCP Group, LLC; Florida Investment Trust Enterprises, LLC; Material Connection Florida, Inc.; and Haskell Textiles Corp., LLC, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-470

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018.

William P. Cassidy, Jr., and Nicole Deese Newlon of Johnson & Cassidy, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Eric R. Maier and Richard C. Alvarez of Older Lundy & Alvarez, Tampa, for Appellee Unni Haskell.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

*551The amended final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed with the exception of the court's determination of entitlement to attorney's fees. We dismiss the appeal as it pertains to this issue because we do not have jurisdiction to review a ruling on attorney's fees that determines entitlement but reserves jurisdiction on amount. *See**Card v. Card*, 122 So.3d 436, 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Joshua VALLO

No. 2018-KP-0304

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEBSTER**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, relator fails to carry his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction *1143procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
# C_2021278EN.01002002.xml

| 12.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — YJ v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

(Case C-130/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Article 4(1) - Discrimination on ground of sex - National legislation providing for a pension maternity supplement to be granted to women who have had a certain number of children - Exclusion from entitlement to that pension supplement of women who have requested early retirement - Scope of Directive 79/7EEC)

(2021/C 278/28)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: YJ

Defendant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security does not apply to national legislation which provides that women who have had at least two biological or adopted children are entitled to a pension maternity supplement in the event of retirement at the statutory age or early retirement on certain grounds laid down by law, but not if the person concerned voluntarily takes early retirement.

---

(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.

---
Third Addendum to Joseph McAdams Employment Agreement 5/28/04



 EXHIBIT 10.13 
  
 THIRD ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS THIRD ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Third Addendum”) is made effective as of the 28 day of May,
2004, by and between Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“Anworth”), and Joseph E. McAdams (the “Executive”). 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H : 
  
 WHEREAS, the Executive and Anworth Mortgage Advisory Corporation (the “Company”) entered into an employment agreement dated January 1, 2002 (as
amended, the “Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Executive,
the Company and Anworth entered into addenda to such employment agreement dated April 18, 2002 and June 13, 2002, respectively. 
  
 WHEREAS, prior to the date hereof, the Company has merged with and into Anworth, and the Agreement and all rights and obligations of the Company
thereunder have been assigned by the Company to and assumed by Anworth. 
  
 WHEREAS, Anworth and the Executive desire to further modify the terms of the Executive’s employment under the Agreement. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 
  

1. Effective Date. This Third Addendum shall become effective on the date hereof. 
  
 2. Compensation (Section 4 of the Agreement). Section 4(a) of
the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows: 
  
 “(a) Base Compensation. The Executive’s Base Salary shall equal Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000) per year. The Base Salary shall be payable in equal installments twice monthly
consistent with Anworth’s regular business practices.” 
  
 3. Remaining Terms Unchanged. The parties agree that all terms and conditions of the Agreement (as modified by this Third Addendum), including, but not limited to, all provisions pertaining to compensation, termination, choice
of law and arbitration, shall remain in full force and effect as modified hereby. 
  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Third Addendum to Employment Agreement is executed as of the day and year first
above written. 
  

	
	Executive
	
	/S/    JOSEPH E.
MCADAMS        
	 Joseph E. McAdams


  

					
	Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation
			
	By:	 	 	 	/S/    THAD M.
BROWN        
	 	 	 Name:
	 	Thad M. Brown
	 	 	 Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MICHAEL SNOWDEN,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent.

____________________

2012

- 3153

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. DC0752100802 -B- 2.

.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID A. B RANCH , Law Office of David A. Branch &

Associates, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for pet itioner.

M ICHELLE M ILBERG , Attorney, Commercial Litigation

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With

her on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY , Principal Deputy

Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Dire ctor, and R EGINALD T. B LADES

, J R

., Assistant Director.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER

, Chief Judge, L OURIE

, and

O'M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges. ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

C lerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
March 1, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-61132

_____________________ UNITY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BELLSOUTH CELLULAR, ETC.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CINGULAR WIRELESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Hattiesburg

USDC No. 2:03-CV-115

_________________________________________________________________ Before JOLLY, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this appeal, in which the primary issue relates to contract

interpretation, we have studied the briefs, the relevant parts of the

record, the cases to whi ch we have been referred, particularly the

Georgia cases, and have heard the well-presented arg uments of

counsel. We are unable to say that the district court erred in its

denial of the motion for summary judgment and in permitting this case

to go forward. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for further

proceedings.