alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 02 90

_____________________________
K. L. H. J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Susanne Wilson Bullard , Judge

.

December 11, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Emmalyn Dalton, Assistant Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dstage.com Inc , a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Robert P. Atwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Albert Golusin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:






(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ ROBERT P. ATWELL


Robert P. Atwell


President and Chief Executive Officer






November 15, 2004






/s/ ALBERT GOLUSIN


Albert Golusin


Chief Financial Officer




November 15, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 898 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-624, K2025-623.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29822 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “report”) of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 18, 2005
Talal Tanweed DONALDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4362

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Renee MCLAWHORN-DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2852

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2.4

                             As of February 8, 2006

Globis Capital Partners, L.P.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Paul Packer

Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 12,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $300.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Vinit Bansal
-------------------------------------
Vinit Bansal


Agreed to by:
Globis Capital Partners, L.P.



By: /s/ Paul Packer
    ---------------------------------
Name: Globis Capital Advisors L.L.C.
      -------------------------------
Title: Managing Member
       ------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(21)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_audio(13)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(13)
              - multimedia_image(30)
              - multimedia_image-141771(29)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(10)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - news_news-149245(7)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(5)
              - alaska(9)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(36)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(4)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(15)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(14)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(11)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(15)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(16)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - (-)south dakota(10)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(17)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(14)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 11, 2019        Image of the Week - 50 Year Flood Flashback

Featured Films and Shorts        September 16, 2019        Image of the Week - Unplanted Acres in South Dakota

Featured Films and Shorts        November 16, 2020        Outreach EROS Overview

Featured Films and Shorts        August 19, 2023        USGS EROS: Celebrating 50 Years of Excellence

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1973        EROS Data Center Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS)

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change

Featured Films and Shorts        October 31, 2018        EROS in Action - CoNED with Dean Gesch and Jeff Danielson

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1985        1985 EDC Walk Through

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1986        1986 NHAP The Sky's The Limit

Presentations and Events        December 31, 2000        2000 NASA TERRA Press Conference Releasing Data From The Satellite
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(2)
              - 2022(2)

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

Infographics        June 1, 2001        Screenshot of "Biological Soil Crusts — Webs of Life in the Desert" Fact Sheet

staff profileRoger Borcherdt

staff profileAdrian M Bender

staff profileMichelle Guy

staff profileMichael Pribil

staff profileClaudia Flores

Infographics        December 31, 2010        Terms to describe the measurement of tsunamis

Infographics        July 24, 2020        Kīlauea summit crater lake growth July 25, 2019 to July 25, 2020
SPIH OAKLAND PARK, LLC, Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND PARK, Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1555

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald Wilen,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Ronald WilenRonald
                WilenChief
                Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 78A19

Filed 28 February 2020

JOY MANN JONES

v. BRUCE RAY JONES

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, 824 S.E.2d 185 (N.C. Ct. App. 2019), affirming orders entered

on 10 August 2016 and 12 October 2017 by Judge Mary H. Wells in District Court,
Lee County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 1 1 December 2019.

Elizabeth Myrick Boone for plaintiff

- appellee

. Wilson, Reives and Silverman, PLLC, by Jonathan Sil v erman, for defendant

appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certifications of**

**Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Design Within Reach, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray Brunner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August 9, 2007 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Design Within Reach, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Hellmann, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. That information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August9, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless ofany general incorporation language in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DesignWithin Reach, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 23, 2019]

Douglas N. Yeargin and Anthony M. Stella, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Sean Fahey of the Office of General Counsel, SBPBC, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Steven L. Brannock of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, for Amicus Curiae Florida Stormwater Association.

Susan M. Seigle of Alvarez Winthrop Thompson & Storey, P.A., Gainesville, and Walter Harvey of Miami-Dade County School Board, Miami, for Amicus Curiae Miami-Dade County School Board.

Per Curiam.

*196*Affirmed.**See**City of Gainesville v. Fla. Dep't of Transp.* , 920 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ; *City of Key West v. Fla. Keys Cmty. College* , 81 So.3d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., and Roby, William, L., Associate Judge, concur.
Patrice KERR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-826

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 11, 2018

Patrice Kerr, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jesse Haskins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 03-4456



# 

T HADDEUS L EE R OSS ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge.

(CR-99-7)

Submitted: October 29, 2003

Decided: December 9, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL
L. Brad Braford, L. BRAD BRAFORD, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION

PER CURIAM: Thaddeus Lee Ross appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release. This Court reviews a district court’s revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Copley
, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992).First, Ross argues the district court deprived him of his constitutional rights by conducting his supervised release revocation hearingbefore the conclusion of related state court criminal proceedings. Second, Ross argues the district court erred by determining the grade of his violation based on its assessment of his offense conduct, asserting the district court should have based its conclusions on Ross’ relatedstate court criminal proceeding. These claims are meritless. A defendant’s violation of supervised release terms allows for revocation,regardless of whether his violation subjects him to state court proceedings. Additionally, the grade of the defendant’s violation is based on his conduct. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.1, comment. (n.1) (2002). Third, Ross argues the district court erred by relying on incredibletestimony to find he violated supervised release through conduct constituting malicious wounding. This claim is meritless. Witness credibility is not subject to appellate review. United States v. Beidler , 110 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1997). Fourth, Ross asserts the district court’s order denying his motion for bond reveals the district court violated his due process rights byadjudging him guilty before conducting his supervised release revocation hearing. This claim is meritless. The record reveals the districtcourt’s order denying bond was appropriate, and Ross fails to establish any violation of his due process rights. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment revoking Ross’ supervised release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. R OSS
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 5, 2015 D-76-15 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

KEITH JOSEPH ROBERTS,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 2881704)

 

Calendar Date: September 21, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Keith Joseph Roberts, Old Tappan, New Jersey, respondent

pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

1998, was suspended by this Court's order dated September 24,

2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration

requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of
-2- D-76-15

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court