alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MI R Z A L OR E NA C AR P I O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73842 A ge nc yN o. A 027- 551- 036 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i rz a L orena C arpi o, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i ons f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e , a nd s pe c i a l rul e c anc e l l a t i on 

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73842 2 o f r e m o v a l u n d e rth e N ic ar a g u an A d ju s tm e n t an dC e n tr a l A m e r ic an R e lie f A c t. O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e di s m i s s the pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. C arpi o’ s onl y argum enti s thather c as e s ho ul d b e r em anded t o the agency f orc ons i de r a t i on of

he rc l a i m , ba s e d on P erdo m o v. H older , 61 1 F . 3d 66 2 (9th C i r. 20 10 ), thatshe has a w el l -f ou nd ed fe arof pers ec ut i on on ac coun tof her m em bers hi p i n the part i cul arsoci algrou p o f G uat em al an w om en. W e l ac k ju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rth is c la im b e c au s e s h e d idn o t r a is e it to th e a g e n c y . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 5 8 F .3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
Exhibit
      32.1




Chief
      Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18U.S.C.,SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Patrick Herda, the undersigned President and
      Chief Executive Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”), herby
      certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of
      the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
      has
      been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated
                May 15, 2007
            /s/
                Patrick HerdaPresident
                and CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 78A19

Filed 28 February 2020

JOY MANN JONES

v.

BRUCE RAY JONES

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, 824 S.E.2d 185 (N.C. Ct. App. 2019), affirming orders entered 

on 10 August 2016 and 12 October 2017 by Judge Mary H. Wells in District Court, 

Lee County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 11 December 2019. 

Elizabeth Myrick Boone for plaintiff-appellee. 

Wilson, Reives and Silverman, PLLC, by Jonathan Silverman, for defendantappellant. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Otis BEDWELL

NO. 2018-KH-0864

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
# C_2022084EN.01001102.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa — Romania) — Euro Delta Danube SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea

(Case C-225/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Common agricultural policy - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 - Area-related aid scheme - Single area payment - Eligibility criteria - Concession agreement for agricultural land - Change of use of that land without the agreement of the grantor - Agricultural use of areas intended for aquaculture use - Difference between the area declared and the area determined - Over-declaration - Administrative penalties)

(2022/C 84/12)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Constanţa

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Euro Delta Danube SRL

Respondent: Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(23) and Article 19(1) and (2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 of 11 March 2014, supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system and conditions for refusal or withdrawal of payments and administrative penalties applicable to direct payments, rural development support and cross compliance, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1393 of 4 May 2016 must be interpreted as not providing for, in the context of the single area payment scheme, the imposition of administrative penalties for over-declaration on an applicant for agricultural aid, on the ground that he or she uses for agricultural purposes areas which have been granted to him or her for aquaculture use, without the agreement of the grantor to such a change of use of those areas, since that applicant enjoys a degree of autonomy with regard to that area sufficient for the carrying-out of his or her agricultural activity.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 6

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                                 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
                                                 900 Rene-Levesque Blvd East
                                                 Suite 500
                                                 Quebec Quebec
                                                 Canada G1R 2B5
                                                 Telephone +1 (418) 522 7001
                                                 Facsimile +1 (418) 522 5663




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F of AEterna Laboratories Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 of
our report dated February 25, 2004, except as to note 25 which is as of March 3,
2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements for the three-years ended
December 31, 2003.



[Signature of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP]

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Quebec, Quebec, Canada
February 25, 2004


PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each
of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Tony GILILEO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2684

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification by the Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of UMeWorld Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Winfield Ding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: February 14, 2022 | By: | */s/ Winfield Ding*            |   |
|-------------------------|-----|--------------------------------|--------|
|                         |     | Name: Winfield Ding            |   |
|                         |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

PORT PENN HUNTING LODGE § 

ASSOCIATION, a Delaware General § 

Partnership, § No. 235, 2019 

 § 

 Petitioner-Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below: 

 § Court of Chancery 

 v. § of the State of Delaware 

 § 

MATTHEW S. MEYER, individually § 

and in his official capacity as the § C.A. No. 2018-0328 TMR 

County Executive for New Castle § 

County, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, § 

a political subdivision of the State of § 

Delaware, TRACY SURLES, § 

individually and in her official capacity § 

as the General Manager of Special § 

Services for New Castle County, § 

MARY A. JACOBSON, individually § 

and in her official capacity as Legal § 

Counsel to the Department of Land Use § 

for New Castle County, RICHARD E. § 

HALL, individually and in his official § 

capacity as the General Manager of the § 

Department of Land Use for New Castle § 

County, § 

 § 

 Respondents-Below, § 

 Appellees. § 

Submitted: November 13, 2019 

Decided: November 18, 2019 

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

 This 18th day of November, 2019, having considered this matter on the briefs and 

oral arguments of the parties and the record below, and having concluded that the same 
should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery 

in its Memorandum Opinion dated May 9, 2019; 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery 

be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.1

 BY THE COURT: 

 

 /s/ Karen L. Valihura 

 Justice 

 

1

 We note that the Court of Chancery rejected Appellant’s regulatory taking argument because of 

Appellant’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Port Penn Hunting Lodge Ass’n v. Meyer, 

2019 WL 2077600, at *7 (Del. Ch. May 9, 2019) (observing that, “Section 40.31.600 of New 

Castle County’s Unified Development Code requires a petitioner pursuing a Takings claim to first 

pursue the administrative remedy of a beneficial use appeal with the New Castle County Board of 

Adjustment.”). In defending the court’s rejection of Appellant’s “takings” claim, the County 

argued to this Court in its brief that, “Port Penn, however, does not allege that it has been denied 

all economically viable use of the land because it cannot – it may unquestionably develop its 

property using septic systems.” Answering Br. at 27. At oral argument, the County raised new 

facts on this issue which contradict these statements in its briefing. For example, it advised this 

Court that it has enacted a moratorium on the installation of septic systems. See Oral Argument 

Video at 19:26–19:38, https://livestream.com/accounts/5969852/events/8882479/videos/198891718

(informing the Court that Appellant cannot currently develop the property with individual septic 

systems because “the County Council has passed a moratorium on those . . . .”). The new facts 

raised at oral argument are not technically part of the record before us, and so we do not consider 

them. They may be relevant in any further administrative proceedings before the New Castle 

Board of Adjustment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; AD and ADRD Research in LMIC's.                    

*Date:*                         February 14, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas John O'Farrell, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 402-8559,                         *tom.ofarrell@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 17, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30566 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2020414EN.01002002.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/20

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — MV v SATA International — Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA

(Case C-137/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Scope - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2020/C 414/26)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MV

Defendant: SATA International — Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Azores District Court, Portugal), by decision of 10 January 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, of
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Pedro A. Richards, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 19, 2018



/s/ Pedro A. RichardsPedro A. RichardsChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Grupo
Financiero Galicia S.A. and will be retained by Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
Curtis Novell YOUNG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAvaya Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Garry K. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer and Senior VicePresident, Corporate Development of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to my knowledge, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ GARRY  K. MCGUIRE                                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Garry K. McGuire                                                             |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice  President,  Corporate Development* |   |
| August 9, 2005                                                          |   |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


KERYX
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James F. Oliviero, Vice
President, Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:




1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 31, 2009
                  /s/ James F.
OlivieroJames
      F. Oliviero
                    Vice
      President, Finance
                    Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 11, 2024 (December 11 notice), in accordance with the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement, providing notice of the tariff-rate quota quantity limitations in calendar year 2025 of originating goods of Australia entering the United States under certain subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). This notice corrects an error in the December 11 notice in paragraph 10 of the Annex.                    

# DATES:

The changes made by this notice are applicable on January 1, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sarah Fasano, Office of Agricultural Affairs, 202.395.6127 or                         *Sarah.E.Fasano@ustr.eop.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In the December 11 notice (89 FR 99959), USTR provided notice of the tariff-rate quota quantity limitations in calendar year 2025 of originating goods of Australia entering the United States under certain subheadings of the HTSUS. USTR became aware of a ministerial error in paragraph 10 of the Annex of the December 11 notice. This paragraph indicates that for purposes of U.S. note 17 to subchapter XXII of chapter 98 of the HSTUS, the aggregate quantity of originating goods of Australia entered under subheading 9822.04.45 shall not exceed 1,355,423 metric tons for calendar year 2025. USTR is correcting this paragraph to indicate that for purposes of U.S. note 17 to subchapter XXII of chapter 98 of the HSTUS, the aggregate quantity of originating goods of Australia entered under subheading 9822.04.45 shall not exceed 1,355 metric tons for calendar year 2025.

Douglas McKalip,

Chief Agricultural Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2024-30657 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3390-F4-P