alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019423EN.01006202.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/62

---

Action brought on 8 October 2019 – ZU v EEAS

(Case T-689/19)

(2019/C 423/78)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority of 30 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s requests of 27 July 2018 (i) for reimbursement of mission costs and (ii) for assistance; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority of 30 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s requests of 27 July 2018 (i) for reimbursement of mission costs and (ii) for assistance;

| — | order the defendant to pay an amount of EUR 70 000, in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, together with interest at the legal rate until payment in full has been made; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay an amount of EUR 70 000, in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, together with interest at the legal rate until payment in full has been made;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, in relation to the rejection of the request for reimbursement of mission costs, alleging manifest error of assessment, violation of the principle of good administration, failure to comply with the principle of proportionality, breach of Article 71 of the Staff Regulations and its derivative provisions as in Annex VII to those Regulations and the Guide to Missions (2008), and irrelevance of the request for the provision of the boarding cards as a pre-condition for the reimbursement of applicant’s mission costs. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, in relation to the rejection of the request for reimbursement of mission costs, alleging manifest error of assessment, violation of the principle of good administration, failure to comply with the principle of proportionality, breach of Article 71 of the Staff Regulations and its derivative provisions as in Annex VII to those Regulations and the Guide to Missions (2008), and irrelevance of the request for the provision of the boarding cards as a pre-condition for the reimbursement of applicant’s mission costs.

| 2. | Second plea in law, in relation to the rejection of the request for assistance, alleging error of assessment, breach of Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations and of Articles 1, 31(2), 41 and 48 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and misuse of powers. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, in relation to the rejection of the request for assistance, alleging error of assessment, breach of Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations and of Articles 1, 31(2), 41 and 48 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and misuse of powers.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - (-)minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1960        Occurrence of ground waters of low hardness and of high chloride content in Lyon County, Minnesota

publication        November 1, 1995        Aquatic communities and contaminants in fish from streams of the Red River of the North basin, Minnesota and North Dakota
IN RE: Christopher G. YOUNG

NO. 2019-B-0006

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent pleaded guilty to accessory after the fact to interstate transmission of obscene and child pornography images. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Christopher G. Young, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22189, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, retroactive to September 28, 2018, the date of his interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00148

- CR

Aaron Lee Robert Flores

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 186th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2014CR1271

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
April 16, 2015.
Lamarte Bre FLYNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1762

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 14, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Donald Gordon BURHANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1072

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23 -- CONSENTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                      330 E. Warm Springs
                                                     Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                             702.528.1984
                                                     425.928.2877 (e-fax)

May 7, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of May 7, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Mercado Industries, Inc. for
the three months ending March 31, 2001, in any filings which are necessary
now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
EX PARTE Timothy Wade WARHURST

CR-15-1514

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - (-)multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - (-)wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 16, 2022        Landslides in Wyoming: Work, challenges, and case studies

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2019        Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Monthly Update: November 1, 2019

Featured Films and Shorts        October 1, 2019        Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Monthly Update: October 1, 2019

Presentations and Events        November 18, 2021        PubTalk-11/2021: Busting Myths About One of the Largest Volcanic Systems in the World - The Top 10 Misconceptions about Yellowstone Volcanism

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Arcadia Resources, Inc.
Southfield, MI

We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting a part of this
Registration Statement of our report dated June 28, 2006, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Arcadia Resources, Inc., which
is contained in that Prospectus.

We also hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting a part of the
Registration Statement of Arcadia Resources, Inc. of our report dated October 6,
2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Critical Home Care,
Inc., which is included in that Prospectus.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
--------------------
BDO Seidman, LLP
Kalamazoo, MI

July 6, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - (-)south dakota(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1988        1988 LAS Land Analysis System

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1973        EROS Data Center Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS)
Jarrell A. MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4164

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 5, 2018

Jarrell A. Morris, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1326Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of July 30, 2018, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Appellant's request for an extension of time to file the initial brief is denied as moot. Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

Lewis, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
# C_2021228EN.01000801.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — ZM, in his capacity as liquidator in the insolvency of Oeltrans Befrachtungsgesellschaft mbH v E.A. Frerichs

(Case C-73/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Insolvency proceedings - Article 4 - Law applicable to insolvency proceedings - Law of the Member State within the territory of which the proceedings are opened - Article 13 - Acts detrimental to all the creditors - Exception - Conditions - Act subject to the law of a Member State other than the State of the opening of proceedings - Act which is not open to challenge on the basis of that law - Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 - Law applicable to contractual obligations - Article 12(1)(b) - Scope of the law applicable to the contract - Performance of the obligations arising from the contract - Payment made in performance of a contract subject to the law of a Member State other than the State of the opening of proceedings - Performance by a third party - Action for repayment of that payment in insolvency proceedings - Law applicable to that payment)

(2021/C 228/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: ZM, in his capacity as liquidator in the insolvency of Oeltrans Befrachtungsgesellschaft mbH

Defendant in the appeal on a point of law: E.A. Frerichs

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings and Article 12(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) must be interpreted as meaning that the law applicable to the contract under the latter regulation also governs the payment made by a third party in performance of a contracting party’s contractual payment obligation where, in insolvency proceedings, that payment is challenged as an act detrimental to all the creditors.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

---
# C_2020399EN.01002201.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/22

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against XC

(Case C-195/20 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Effects of the surrender - Article 27 - Potential prosecutions for other offences - Specialty rule)

(2020/C 399/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Party/parties in the main proceedings

XC

other party to the proceedings: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof

Operative part of the judgment

Article 27(2) and (3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that the specialty rule provided for in Article 27(2) does not preclude a measure involving deprivation of liberty taken against a person referred to in a first European arrest warrant on the basis of a different offence to that which constituted the basis for his or her surrender under that warrant and prior to that offence, when that person’s departure from the Member State which issued the first warrant was voluntary and he or she was surrendered to that Member State under a second European arrest warrant issued after that departure for the purposes of executing a custodial sentence, provided that, under the second European arrest warrant, the executing judicial authority of that Member State gave its consent to extending the prosecution to the offence which gave rise to that measure involving deprivation of liberty.

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 13.7.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 438 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 438

 Congratulating Coco Gauff for her inspiring victory at this year's US 
                       Open Tennis Championships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2023

   Mr. Ossoff (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Warnock, and Mr. Scott of 
 Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Coco Gauff for her inspiring victory at this year's US 
                       Open Tennis Championships.

Whereas, on September 9, 2023, Coco Gauff won her first Grand Slam title at the 
        US Open;
Whereas, on March 13, 2004, Coco Gauff was born in Atlanta, Georgia, and grew up 
        in Delray Beach, Florida, where she still lives today;
Whereas, while still living in Atlanta, Coco Gauff began playing tennis at the 
        age of 6;
Whereas, on June 9, 2018, Coco Gauff won the girls' singles title at Roland-
        Garros;
Whereas, on March 19, 2019, Coco Gauff made her Women's Tennis Association 
        (referred to in this preamble as the ``WTA'') Tour debut at the Miami 
        Open;
Whereas, on July 1, 2019, Coco Gauff shocked the tennis world by defeating Venus 
        Williams at The Championships, Wimbledon at the age of 15 years old;
Whereas, on October 13, 2019, Coco Gauff won her first WTA singles title at the 
        Upper Austria Ladies Linz;
Whereas, on September 9, 2023, Coco Gauff's US Open victory made her the 
        youngest American to win a Grand Slam since Serena Williams won the US 
        Open in 1999;
Whereas, on September 11, 2023, Coco Gauff rose to number 3 in the WTA's world 
        rankings;
Whereas, on September 11, 2023, Coco Gauff became the number 1 ranked doubles 
        player in the world alongside her doubles partner, fellow American, 
        Jessica Pegula;
Whereas Coco Gauff's talent led her to win her first US Open Tennis 
        Championships women's singles title;
Whereas Coco Gauff has won 6 WTA Tour singles titles and 8 WTA Tour doubles 
        titles; and
Whereas Coco Gauff is an inspiration to millions of young girls and boys across 
        the country with her passion for the sport, faith and victories : Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Coco Gauff for her 
inspiring victory at this year's US Open Tennis Championships.
                                 <all>
```
Carlos PARADA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Technical Announcement        April 12, 2016        USGS Continues to Write History

Historical        December 31, 1870        Hayden Survey 1870 Wyoming in camp at Red Buttes

Historical        December 31, 1964        Two buildings on hillside
Curtis Shorts CRUMBLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Rodney Deon CRUMBLEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D18-1516

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Robin Glenn FIKE v. STATE

CR-16-0519

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael Dominique DONSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1000

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.