alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - indiana(6)
              - (-)iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2023(1)

Data Release        May 2, 2022        Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023)

publication        January 1, 2000        Application of GPS and GIS to map channel features in Walnut Creek, Iowa

publication        December 21, 2018        The development of a GIS methodology to identify oxbows and former stream meanders from LiDAR-derived digital elevation models

staff profileEmilia L Bristow

Data Release        December 10, 2020        Bayesian modeling of NURE airborne radiometric data for the conterminous United States: predictions and grids

publication        October 2, 2005        Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Central states: Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana

publication        December 1, 1993        Using a Geographic Information System to determine the relation between stream quality and geology in the Roberts Creek watershed, Clayton County, Iowa

staff profileDaniel E. Christiansen
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - (-)minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

publication        January 1, 1960        Occurrence of ground waters of low hardness and of high chloride content in Lyon County, Minnesota

Presentations and Events        September 14, 2022        Landslide susceptibility in Minnesota: Insight from landslide inventory mapping and lidar change detection

publication        November 1, 1995        Aquatic communities and contaminants in fish from streams of the Red River of the North basin, Minnesota and North Dakota

Photography  Minnesota River at Jordan

Podcasts        October 31, 2010        Endocrine Disruptors and Intersex Fish in Minnesota Lakes

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
Raymond Joseph VALENTINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4040

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Craig R. Atack, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geomagnetic Storm

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(1)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1976        Preliminary residual magnetic map of the eastern Bering Shelf and parts of western Alaska
STATE EX REL. Thomas WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1310

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX § 6.

WEIMER, J, recused.
Tamra FIORITO, Appellant, v. HERITAGE PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-3946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
LICENSING OPTION AGREEMENT
                           --------------------------



     THIS LICENSING OPTION AGREEMENT  (hereinafter this "AGREEMENT") is made and
entered  into as of November 12, 2003  (hereinafter  "EFFECTIVE  DATE"),  by and
among  JACKIE  BROWN,  an  individual  residing  at 30  South  Weatherby  Drive,
Meridian,  ID 83642 (hereinafter  "LICENSOR"),  and NUCLEAR  SOLUTIONS,  INC., a
Nevada corporation (hereinafter "LICENSEE").

                             SUBJECT MATTER RECITALS
                             -----------------------

     WHEREAS,  LICENSOR  is  the  owner  of the  rights,  title,  interest,  and
ownership  properties  in and to certain  technologies  represented  by,  United
Stated Patents No's: 5,087,533; 6,118,204; 6,238,812 see attachments(3)

                                LICENSING OPTION
                                ----------------

     1.  Licensing  Option.  LICENSOR  hereby  grants to LICENSEE a one (1) year
option,  commencing  on the  Effective  Date of this  Agreement,  to  acquire  a
worldwide,  perpetual right and license to all of the rights,  title,  interest,
and  ownership  properties  in and  to  the  technologies  referred  to in  this
Agreement for use, improvement, and exploitation by LICENSEE without reserve.

     2. Right of First  Refusal.  LICENSOR  hereby grants to LICENSEE a right of
first refusal, exclusive to LICENSEE, with reference to the use and exploitation
of the technologies referred to in this Agreement,  for a term of Six (6) months
upon  expiration  of the one (1) year option  referred to above in paragraph "1"
(the right of first refusal shall commence one (1) year after the Effective Date
of this  Agreement,  and shall expire six (6) months after the Effective Date of
this Agreement).  If LICENSEE exercises this right of first refusal, LICENSOR is
barred,  without exception,  from licensing the technologies referred to in this
Agreement to any other party, person, or entity.


     3. CONSIDERATION.  In consideration for the payment of One Hundred Thousand
shares of Nuclear  Solutions,  Inc. common stock (100,000)  herein  acknowledged
LICENSOR  grants to  LICENSEE  both  Option  and Right of First  Refusal  herein
identified.  Further,  it is  herein  agreed,  that  LICENSEE  shall  tender  in
consideration  for said acquisition of said  exclusive/perpetual  license herein
stated,  for 7% of the after tax income that the company receives based upon the
revenue  generated  by  the  said  patents,  which  shall  constitute  full  and
sufficient consideration for the grant of the subject license.






---------------------------------------------------
Jackie Brown

ASSIGNOR

DATED:






---------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, INC.
ASSIGNEE

DATED:
Todd Michael CLAVERIE v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00433-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: October 16, 2018 Closed: January 17, 2019

Certiorari - Denied
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 341 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 341

Recognizing September 19, 2023, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2023

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing September 19, 2023, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes September 19, 2023, as ``National Voter 
        Registration Day''; and
            (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the United 
        States--
                    (A) to register to vote;
                    (B) to verify with the appropriate State or local 
                election official that the name, address, and other 
                personal information on record is current; and
                    (C) to go to the polls on election day and vote if 
                the voting-eligible citizen would like to do so.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30889]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2024-HA-0037]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs 
(OASD(HA)), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
27, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Lucas, (571) 372-7574, or 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: TRICARE DoD/CHAMPUS Medical 
Claim Patient's Request for Medical Payment; DD Form 2642; OMB Control 
Number 0720-0006.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 830,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 830,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 207,500.
    Needs and Uses: The DD Form 2642, ``TRICARE DoD/Civilian Health and 
Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS) Medical Claim 
Patient's Request for Medical Payment'' is used by TRICARE 
beneficiaries to claim reimbursement for medical expenses under the 
TRICARE Program CHAMPUS. The information collected will be used by 
TRICARE to determine beneficiary eligibility, other health insurance 
liability, certification that the beneficiary has the received care, 
and reimbursement for medical services received.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Reginald Lucas.

    Dated: December 18, 2024.
Stephanie J. Bost,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-30889 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
```
Gene Andrew JORDAN, Jr., et al, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 29, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) March 16, 2006
 Targeted Genetics Corporation
 
  Washington
    
    0-23930
    
    91-1549568(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission File
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 1100 Olive Way, Suite 100, Seattle, Washington
    
    98101(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (206) 623-7612
 Not Applicable
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01. Other Events.
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibits.99.1
    
    Press Release of Targeted Genetics Corporation dated March 16, 2006
 SIGNATURES
  Targeted Genetics CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ David J.PostonDavid J. PostonChief Financial OfficerDated: March 16, 2006




---



##### 



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit
    
    DescriptionNumber99.1
    
    Press Release of Targeted Genetics Corporation dated March 16, 2006
1834.

#### Alexander *v.*City of Atlanta.

Certiorari, from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. April. 9, 1909.

Argued May 4, —

Decided June 15, 1909.

*Walter A. Sims, Burton Cloud,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. P. Hill, J. L. Mayson,*contra.

Powell, J,

This case is controlled by *Athens*v. *City of Atlanta,*ante, 244 (64 S. E. 711); *Callaway*v. *Mims, 5 Ga. App*9 (63 S. E. 654); *Sawyer*v. *City of Blakely,*2 *Ga. App.*159 (58 S. E. 399). *Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2019399EN.01009301.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/93

---

Action brought on 1 October 2019 — Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings v EUIPO (sound mark)

(Case T-668/19)

(2019/C 399/112)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co. KG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: S. Abrar, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for an EU sound mark — Registration No 17 912 475

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 in Case R 530/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Distortion of facts (breach of Article 72(2) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council); |
| --- | --- |

—

Distortion of facts (breach of Article 72(2) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council);

| — | Infringement of the duty to state reasons (Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the duty to state reasons (Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council);

| — | Failure to have regard to the relevant case-law; |
| --- | --- |

—

Failure to have regard to the relevant case-law;

| — | Breach of Article 72(2) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 72(2) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Breach of Article 72(2) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 72(2) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Non-observance of the right to be heard (Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Non-observance of the right to be heard (Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
mni2q08exh10-26.htm


    
Exhibit
10.26

     

     

     

    AMENDMENT
NUMBER 1 TO

    THE
MCCLATCHY COMPANY

    LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN

     

     

    The McClatchy Company
sponsors The McClatchy Company Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as amended
and restated as of January 1, 2005.  The Plan is hereby amended,
effective January 29, 2008, subject to approval of the shareholders of the
Company at the next annual shareholders meeting, and set forth
below:

     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Section
      2(n) is amended and restated in its entirety with respect to outstanding
      and future awards as follows:

            


    

     

    “Pre-Tax
Earnings Per Share” means the Company’s consolidated earnings per share
before taxes, as reported in the Company’s audited financial statements, but
adjusted to exclude the gain or loss on the sale of a major asset of the Company
and any extraordinary items.

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              Section
      3(b) is amended with respect to outstanding and future awards by replacing
      the first paragraph as follows:

            


    

     

    Conversion
of Units.  The Units granted to an Executive for a Performance
Period shall be converted into his or her Award as of the March 1 next following
the close of such Performance Period.  The Award shall be equal to the
number of the Executive’s Units times $1 times the number of percentage points
(including fractions but not to exceed 100) by which the Pre-Tax Earnings Per
Share increase from Performance Period to Performance Period.  In no
event shall an Award exceed $3 million for any Performance
Period.

     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              Except
      as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and
      effect.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of United Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James McKeever,
Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      February 14, 2011
                By:
                /s/ James
      McKeeverJames
      McKeeverInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
Willie JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1697

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 26, 2019

Willie Jones, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*402AFFIRMED. *See**Baker v. State*, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004).

ORFINGER, WALLIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
2004.

#### White & Smith *v.*Mercantile Jewelry Co.

Complaint, from city court of Douglas — Judge Roan. May 17, 1909.

Submitted October 26, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

*Lanlcford & Dicherson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*J. W. Quincey',*contra.

Powell, J.

1. An agreement in a contract for the sale of personal property, that the seller would repair or replace any of the articles found unsatisfactory, provided they were returned within a given time, is not an express warranty, although the contract in terms calls it a warranty. Therefore, such a stipulation does not prevent the defendant, when sued for the purchase-price of the goods, from relying upon an implied warranty. *Elgin Jewelry Co.*v. *Estes,*122 *Ga.*807 (50 S. E. 939).

2. Where it appears from the contract sued on that it was in contemplation of the parties that the goods were to be. resold by the purchaser to his customers, testimony tending to show that the good's were of such inferior quality that they could not be sold without driving away the purchaser’s customers, and thereby seriously injuring his business, is admissible under a plea setting up that the goods were wholly worthless.

3. The court did not err in refusing to grant the nonsuit, but did err in directing the verdict for the plaintiff. *Elgin Jewelry Co.*v. *Estes,*supra, *Lovvorn*v. *Eldorado Jewelry Co.,*1 *Ga. App.*349 (57 S. E. 926).

*Judgment reversed.*
FAMILY WORSHIP CENTER CHURCH, INC. On Its Own Behalf and Derivatively on Behalf of Health Science Park, L.L.C. v. Gary N. SOLOMON, Stephen H. Jones, Terry D. Jones, and Health Science Park, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-C-1778

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

*428Denied.