alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - (-)kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

Data Release        May 2, 2022        Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023)

Data Release        December 10, 2020        Bayesian modeling of NURE airborne radiometric data for the conterminous United States: predictions and grids

publication        October 2, 2005        Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Acusphere, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Sherri C. Oberg,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John F. Thero, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Sherri C. Oberg
------------------------------------
Sherri C. Oberg
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ John F. Thero
------------------------------------
John F. Thero
Chief Financial Officer



March 17, 2004
Rocky L. HARVEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, Secretary, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0106

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 15, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2726

___________________________ Tobias Zuniga-Padron lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner

v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States 1

lllllllllllllllllllll Respondent

____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ Submitted: March 11, 2021 Filed: March 18, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.

1 Attorney General Garland is substituted for his predecessor pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).Tobias Zuniga-Padron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen based on the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of the agency’s broad discretion, recognizing that motions to reopen are viewed with disfavor. See Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233, 242 (2010); INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 107 (1988); Caballero-Martinez v. Barr, 920 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir. 2019). After careful review, we conclude that, even assuming counsel’s performance was deficient, the BIA acted within its discretion when it determined Zuniga-Padron did not demonstrate the requisite prejudice because he failed to identify any particular evidence or set forth the legal or factual basis for a new or supplemental claim. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(B); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3); Ortiz-Puentes v. Holder, 662 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2011) (concluding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding petitioners failed to show the requisite prejudice when they did not show what additional evidence witness would have offered or otherwise proffer evidence to support claim); Obleshchenko v. Ashcroft, 392 F.3d 970, 972-73 (8th Cir. 2004) (concluding that petitioners failed to demonstrate prejudice when they argued competent counsel would have submitted corroborating evidence but then failed to file relevant corroborating documents). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 3.1.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                        OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                         CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


     Cricket Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "General Corporation Law"), hereby certifies as follows:


     First:  This Certificate of Amendment amends the provisions of the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed on August 26, 1998, was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law, and was approved by written consent of the sole stockholder of
the Company given in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the
General Corporation Law.

     Second:  The text of Article IV, Section A of the Certificate of
Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          A.   This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to
     be designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock". The
     total number of shares which the corporation is authorized to issue is
     seventy-five million two hundred thousand (75,200,000) shares. Seventy-five
     million (75,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, each having a par value
     of one-hundredth of one cent ($.0001). Two hundred thousand (200,000)
     shares shall be Preferred Stock, each having a par value of one-hundredth
     of one cent ($.0001).

     In Witness Whereof, said Board of Directors of the Company has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer of the
Company.



                                   CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


Dated: June 22, 1999               By: /s/ Thomas J. Bernard
                                      -----------------------------------
                                           Thomas J. Bernard
                                           Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Giordano,
Jr., President (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ JOSEPH GIORDANO, JR.
--------------------------------------
Joseph Giordano, Jr., President
C.H.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2068

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020077EN.01005401.xml

| 9.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/54

---

Action brought on 20 December 2019 – Worldwide Spirits Supply v EUIPO – Melfinco (CLEOPATRA QUEEN)

(Case T-870/19)

(2020/C 77/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Worldwide Spirits Supply, Inc. (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: S. Demetriou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Melfinco S.A. (Schaan, Liechtenstein)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark CLEOPATRA QUEEN – European Union trade mark No 14 027 338

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2019 in Case R 1820/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reverse the invalidity declaring it null and void; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reverse the invalidity declaring it null and void;

| — | alternatively, |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively,

| — | substantially alter the content of the contested decision to the extent that the applicant should be invited to produce evidence of genuine use or invited to reach an amicable settlement with Melfinco S.A. in the context of coexistence. |
| --- | --- |

—

substantially alter the content of the contested decision to the extent that the applicant should be invited to produce evidence of genuine use or invited to reach an amicable settlement with Melfinco S.A. in the context of coexistence.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2020036EN.01003301.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/33

---

Action brought on 5 November 2019 – GY v ECB

(Case T-746/19)

(2020/C 36/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GY (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the ECB’s decision of 28 January 2019 refusing the applicant the household allowance for the year 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the ECB’s decision of 28 January 2019 refusing the applicant the household allowance for the year 2019;

| — | annul further, if need be, the decisions of 24 April 2019 and 26 August 2019 respectively rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review and the applicant’s grievance procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul further, if need be, the decisions of 24 April 2019 and 26 August 2019 respectively rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review and the applicant’s grievance procedure;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of non-discrimination. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of non-discrimination.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of acquired rights. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of acquired rights.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging violation of the ‘effet utile’ of the household allowance and of Article 15 of the Conditions of Employment of the ECB. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging violation of the ‘effet utile’ of the household allowance and of Article 15 of the Conditions of Employment of the ECB.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of the duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of the duty of care.

---
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Bruce Douglas Wilson

, * From the 90th District

Court of Stephens County,

Trial Court No. 29,363

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00022

- CR * February 14, 2014

T he State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Chantelle DAVIS, Appellant, v. Josephine DURDEN and Larry Dean Clardy, Jr., Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-351

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
ST. BERNARD PORT, HARBOR & TERMINAL DISTRICT v. VIOLET DOCK PORT, INC., LLC

St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Violet Dock Port, Inc., LLC

St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Violet Dock Port Inc., LLC

NO. 2018-C-1692

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and docket.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

HUGHES, J., would grant and docket.
Gerald Elicious TOLBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Christopher SUTHERLAND , Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4172

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The mandate in 2D15-1413 having issued October 13, 2016, this petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
``

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual
Report of AlphaRx, Inc.  on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Michael Lee, as chief executive officer of AlphaRx, Inc, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) | This 10-KSB report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
          Exchange Act and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this 10-KSB report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael Lee

Michael Lee

Chief Executive Officer
Jaloni MCGHEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2401

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019

Jaloni McGhee, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL NO. 2018-INT-1244

NO. 2018-OB-1935

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the matter to the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel for review by the Chief Disciplinary Counsel, See Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(A).
Amanda BERTRAND v. PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

NO. 2018-C-2011

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-116600, 333-74976 and 333-107822) of Targeted Genetics
Corporation and the related Prospectuses and to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-03889, 333-28151,
333-58907, 333-61738, 333-78523 and 333-48220) pertaining to Targeted Genetics
Corporation's 1992 Restated Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee
Directors, 1999 Stock Option Plan and Genovo Roll-over Stock Option Plan of our
reports dated March 14, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Targeted Genetics Corporation, Targeted Genetics Corporation
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Targeted Genetics Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2005.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 14, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Fluid Dynamics

Filters

              - products_data(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(8)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(2)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - (-)michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Data Release        September 5, 2019        Measured and Modeled Water Velocities in the Detroit River Near Belle Isle from 2014-2017
# Europos Sąjungos C 327A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 327A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 60 metai2017m. rugsėjo 29d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 327A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

60 metai2017m. rugsėjo 29d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Nuomonės |
| | ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS |
| | Europos Parlamentas |
| 2017/C 327 A/01 | Atrankos procedūra PE/191/S. Laikinasis tarnautojas – direktoriaus referentas (AD 7). Tinkamų kandidatų sąrašas | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

V   Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Europos Parlamentas

2017/C 327 A/01

Atrankos procedūra PE/191/S. Laikinasis tarnautojas – direktoriaus referentas (AD 7). Tinkamų kandidatų sąrašas

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

V Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Europos Parlamentas

| 29.9.2017 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 327/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2017

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 327/1

---

ATRANKOS PROCEDŪRA PE/191/S

Laikinasis tarnautojas – direktoriaus referentas (AD 7)

TINKAMŲ KANDIDATŲ SĄRAŠAS

(2017/C 327 A/01)

| 1. | ROMANOVSKIS |
| --- | --- |

1.

ROMANOVSKIS

Gundars

| 2. | ROHLJE |
| --- | --- |

2.

ROHLJE

Gregor

| 3. | GOMES FALCÃO DE BETENCOURT |
| --- | --- |

3.

GOMES FALCÃO DE BETENCOURT

Miguel Luis

Tinkamų kandidatų sąrašas patvirtintas 2017 m. birželio 14 d.

---
# C_2020010EN.01004701.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/47

---

Action brought on 4 November 2019 – Clouds Sky v EUIPO – The Cloud Networks (Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud)

(Case T-738/19)

(2020/C 10/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Clouds Sky GmbH (Köln, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Cloud Networks Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud –European Union trade mark No 9 436 817

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 September 2019 in Case R 696/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | amend the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---