alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 30, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1114 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-893 K2025-894.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30997 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We have issued our reports dated February 28, 2008(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties* on January 1,2007), with respect to the consolidated financial statements, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Kenexa Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Kenexa Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136486, effective August 10, 2006 and File No. 333-129475,effective November 4, 2005). 

/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

November 24, 2008
**SUBSIDIARIES      OF REGISTRANT**

| Name                                                                                                    |   | Jurisdiction                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                                                                                    |   |                             |
| Inyx                Pharma, Ltd.                                                                        |   | England                and Wales |
|                                                                                                    |   |                             |
| Inyx                Europe, Ltd.                                                                        |   | England                and Wales |
|                                                                                                    |   |                             |
| Ashton                Pharmaceuticals Ltd.(wholly-owned                subsidiary of Inyx Europe, Ltd.) |   | England                and Wales |
|                                                                                                    |   |                             |
| Inyx                Canada, Inc.                                                                        |   | Canada                           |
|                                                                                                    |   |                             |
| Inyx                USA, Ltd.                                                                           |   | Isle                of Man       |
| Exaeris                Inc.                                                                             |   | Delaware                         |

----
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Douglas Gurley, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Erin Tomlinson of counsel), for appellant.Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan and Anish M. Patel of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from judgments of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Elisa S. Koenderman, J.), rendered November 25, 2014. The judgments convicted defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal contempt in the second degree and resisting arrest, respectively, and imposed sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to<i> Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>; <i>Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>WESTON, J.P., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: September 28, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
June 21, 2006
 Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner Trust A
(Issuer of the notes)
 Ford Motor Credit Company
  Ford Credit Floorplan Corporation
    
    Ford Credit Floorplan LLC
  Delaware
    
    Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
    
    (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
 333-132560
    
    38-2973806
    
    333-132560-01
    
    38-3372243(Commission File
Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 Ford Credit Floorplan Corporation
c/o Ford Credit SPE Management Office
c/o Ford Motor Company
World Headquarters  Suite 322-E1
One America Road
Dearborn, Michigan
    
    48126
    
    Ford Credit Floorplan LLC
c/o Ford Credit SPE Management Office
c/o Ford Motor Company
World Headquarters  Suite 322-E1
One America Road
Dearborn, Michigan
    
    48126(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
    
    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (313) 594-3495
    
    (313) 594-3495(Registrants telephone number including area code)
    
    (Registrants telephone number including area code)
 
   o  o  o  o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 9.01. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXUnderwriting Agreement    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01
    
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
  Issuing Entity Notes
 Underwriters Underwriting Agreement Representatives Exhibit 1.1
 
 Item 9.01.
    
    Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.
 (a)
    
    Not applicable(b)
    
    Not applicable(c)
    
    Exhibits:




---



##### Table of Contents



FORD CREDIT FLOORPLAN CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Joseph P. TopolskiName:
    Joseph P. TopolskiTitle:
    Assistant Secretary FORD CREDIT FLOORPLAN LLCBy:
    /s/ Joseph P. TopolskiName:
    Joseph P. TopolskiTitle:
    Assistant Secretary  3




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description1.1
    
    Underwriting Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2006, among the
Registrants, ABN AMRO Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities
Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as representatives of the
Underwriters. Filed with this Report.
 4
Randolph G. WILSON, Jr. v. Teresa L. WILSON

2150259

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Terrie Scott Morgan of Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, for petitioner.

John Olszewski of Minor & Olszewski, L.L.C., Montgomery, for respondent.

*After Remand from the Supreme Court of Alabama*

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by *1210the Supreme Court of Alabama. *Ex parte Wilson*, 262 So.3d 1202 (Ala. 2018). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Pittman, Thomas, Moore, and Donaldson, JJ., concur.
Maria FELICIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 6, 2019]

Hilliard Moldof of Hilliard E. Moldof, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Kelsey Moldof of Moldof Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We reverse the circuit court's order denying postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing and remand for a new trial.

*100Appellant was convicted of one count of lewd or lascivious molestation. The victim was her son. Now an adult, the son testified that his mother fondled him while he bathed between 2004 and 2006 when he was around ten or eleven years old. He also testified that, at a different time, his mother open mouth kissed him. Appellant denied that the incidents occurred and suggested that her son had a motive to fabricate the story-there was family friction and her son had considered trying to become emancipated when he was fifteen. The jury found appellant guilty as charged. The trial judge sentenced appellant to eight years in prison followed by ten years of probation. Appellant's direct appeal was unsuccessful.

Appellant's motion for postconviction relief was based on her lawyer's failure to call two witnesses, appellant's sister and a long-time family friend. Both witnesses had lived with appellant and her children. The testimony of both witnesses was favorable to appellant. The family friend would have directly contradicted the victim's claim in a deposition that appellant had salaciously kissed him in front of the family friend, who then chastised appellant. At trial, the defense lawyer stipulated that the sister should be precluded from testifying for violating the witness sequestration rule; the lawyer did not seek a hearing on the rule violation to determine any prejudice to the state, nor did she argue for a lesser sanction.

At the hearing below, the state commendably stipulated to defense counsel's ineffectiveness for failing to call the two witnesses to testify at trial. We have carefully reviewed the record. This was a credibility case, without any other tangible evidence, and the witnesses would have significantly undermined the victim's testimony and provided a counterpoint to the state's case. Under *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we find counsel's errors to be "so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable." There is a reasonable probability that "but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." *Id.* at 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052.

*Reversed and remanded for a new trial* .

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 12, 2021

NO. 03-19-00840-CV

Ram Kris Netaji, Appellant

v.

Vicki Roberts, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 11, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2021471EN.01001101.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Real Vida Seguros SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-449/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Income tax - Dividends attached to listed shares - Tax advantage reserved for dividends attached to shares listed on the national stock exchange - Difference in treatment - Objective distinguishing criterion - Restriction - Article 65 TFEU - Objectively comparable situations - Justification - Objective of a purely economic nature)

(2021/C 471/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Real Vida Seguros SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63 and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State’s tax practice according to which, for the purposes of determining the basis of assessment of a taxpayer’s income tax, the dividends attached to shares listed on that Member State’s stock exchange account for only 50 % of their amount, whereas dividends attached to shares listed on the stock exchanges of the other Member States are taken into account in full.

---

(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.

---
Keith Douglas JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-703

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 423 

Recognizing the University of Iowa women’s basketball team’s historic 

‘‘Crossover at Kinnick’’ game and the importance of women’s sports. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Mr. GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the University of Iowa women’s basketball 

team’s historic ‘‘Crossover at Kinnick’’ game and the 

importance of women’s sports. 

Whereas, at the Crossover at Kinnick event, the University 

of Iowa Hawkeyes competed against the DePaul University Blue Devils in a charity basketball game to benefit 

the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital; 

Whereas the Crossover at Kinnick event set a National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this resolution 

as the ‘‘NCAA’’) women’s basketball attendance record 

with 55,646 fans filling University of Iowa’s Kinnick Stadium in Iowa City, Iowa; 

Whereas the previous attendance record was set at the 2002 

national championship game between the University of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 423 IS 

Connecticut and the University of Oklahoma, attended by 

29,619 fans; 

Whereas the Crossover at Kinnick event was the first ever 

NCAA women’s basketball game to be played outdoors in 

a football stadium; 

Whereas women athletes at the collegiate level are important 

role models for young athletes, particularly women and 

girls, by serving as examples of what can be achieved by 

pursuing one’s dreams through participation in athletics; 

Whereas participation in sports helps foster confidence, selfdiscipline, leadership, and teamwork in young girls; 

Whereas the achievements of the Iowa women’s basketball 

program are an inspiration for Iowans and women athletes everywhere; and 

Whereas Iowans and University of Iowa alumni across the 

country are proud of the history made at the Crossover 

at Kinnick event: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Iowa wom3 en’s basketball players, coaches, and support staff in 

4 setting the NCAA women’s basketball attendance 

5 record at the Crossover at Kinnick event; 

6 (2) recognizes and celebrates the impact of this 

7 record-setting event on young women athletes across 

8 the country; and 

9 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

10 the Senate send 1 copy of this resolution to the fol11 lowing individuals: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 423 IS 

1 (A) Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds. 

2 (B) University of Iowa President Barbara 

3 Wilson. 

4 (C) University of Iowa Interim Athletic Di5 rector Beth Goetz. 

6 (D) University of Iowa Women’s Basket7 ball Coach Lisa Bluder. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1


                     Pinecrest Services, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Pinecrest Services, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

                               /s/ April L. Marino
Date:   November 7, 2005       ____________________________________
                               April L. Marino
                               Principal Executive Officer
                               Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31****RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Henry R. Mandell certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2006/s/Henry R. Mandell   Henry R. Mandell