alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-1160

NO. 2018-BA-2064

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall continue to comply with the terms of the recovery agreement he signed with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program ("JLAP") on May 30, 2018.

2. The period of this conditional admission shall coincide with the period of petitioner's JLAP agreement. However, petitioner's conditional admission status shall not be terminated until this court so orders.

3. Petitioner shall authorize the Executive Director of JLAP to report any violations of the JLAP agreement to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC").

4. Upon the expiration of the term of petitioner's JLAP agreement, the Executive Director of JLAP shall forward to the ODC (a) a final report of petitioner's progress and participation in JLAP, and (b) a recommendation regarding the need for petitioner's continued participation in JLAP.

*8855. Following receipt of the report from JLAP, the ODC shall file a report in this court in which it shall recommend whether the conditional admission shall be allowed to terminate or shall be extended.

6. Petitioner shall cooperate with JLAP and the ODC, and shall comply with any and all requirements imposed upon him by JLAP and the ODC.

Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

**CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.**

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

NO. 2018-BA-2064

IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR. ADMISSIONS CFN-1160

ORDER

Considering the Motion for Protective Order and Seal filed by petitioner,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is denied as moot. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 1(H), as amended effective February 1, 2014, the records in all bar admission proceedings "shall be maintained under seal."

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this *12th* day of *February*, 2019.

```
FOR THE COURT: ___________________________________ JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties agreed to proceed **

before a magistrate judge.

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

09-35171

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHERYL BLANCHARD; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

MORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-35171

D.C. No. 3:06-cv-05166-JKA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

J. Kelley Arnold, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 25, 2010***

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

The Blanchards appeal pro se from the district court’s order affirming an

administrative decision under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

FILED

JUN 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-35171

(“IDEA”), and granting summary judgment on their claims under the Americans

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error the district court’s

findings of fact and we review de novo its legal conclusions and summary

judgment. Van Duyn ex rel. Van Duyn v. Baker Sch. Dist. 5J, 502 F.3d 811, 818

(9th Cir. 2007) (findings of fact and legal conclusions); Payne v. Peninsula Sch.

Dist., 598 F.3d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir. 2010) (summary judgment). We affirm.

Based on the evidence in the record, the district court properly concluded

that the school district provided the Blanchards’ son with a free appropriate public

education under the IDEA. See Van Duyn, 502 F.3d at 823-25 (no violation of the

IDEA where school district materially implemented the individualized educational

program and plaintiff failed to proffer evidence to the contrary).

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants on the

Blanchards’ ADA and RA claims because they failed to raise a triable issue as to

whether or not the defendants were deliberately indifferent to their disabled son. 

See Duvall v. County of Kitsap, 260 F.3d 1124, 1139 (9th Cir. 2001) (claims for

monetary relief under the ADA and the RA require plaintiff to establish intentional

discrimination based on deliberate indifference).
3 09-35171

This court previously affirmed the dismissal of the Blanchards’ claims under

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, and we decline to reconsider those claims here. See

Leslie Salt Co. v. United States, 55 F.3d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Under law of

the case doctrine, [] one panel of an appellate court will not reconsider matters

resolved in a prior appeal to another panel in the same case.”).

AFFIRMED.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch, as Facility Agent 

for the Lenders party to the Credit Agreement 

referred to below 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Each of the undersigned Lenders (each such Lender, an “Extending Lender”) hereby agrees to extend, effective 1 October
2016, its Commitment and the Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement, dated as of 1 October 2015 (as amended or modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement,” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein
defined), among Philip Morris International Inc. (“PMI”), the Lenders party thereto, Citibank Europe PLC, UK Branch (legal successor to Citibank International Limited), as Facility Agent, and Citibank, N.A., as Swingline Agent, for
an additional one year period to 1 October 2021 pursuant to Section 2.23 of the Credit Agreement. 
 Effective 1 October
2016, and subject to the addition of one or more Assuming Lenders prior to the Maturity Date, Schedule 3 Revolving Credit Commitments and Schedule 4 Swingline Commitments are hereby deleted in their entirety and are replaced with Schedule 3
Revolving Credit Commitments and Schedule 4 Swingline Commitments attached hereto; provided that (i) total aggregate Revolving Credit Commitments shall in no event exceed $3,500,000,000 and (ii) total aggregate Swingline Commitments shall
in no event exceed $800,000,000. 
 Except as expressly provided hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Credit Agreement are and
shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 This Extension Agreement shall be governed by, and construed
in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. This Extension Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the
same agreement. 
 [Signature pages omitted]
---

---

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File No., 333-67086, 333-101321,
333-99237, 333-138719 and 333-153712) pertaining to the Key Employee Share Incentive Plan
(1996), United States Share Incentive Plan (2000) and Employee Share Purchase Plan of
RadView Software Ltd. of our report dated June 30, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of RadView Software Ltd. included in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|                 |                                 
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|June 30, 2009    | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|Tel Aviv, Israel | Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer    
|                 | A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---
Exhibit 4.58
  2011-2013 Comprehensive Service Agreement
 between
    and




---



##### 



Table of Contents
 1. Basic Principles
    
    
    42. The Components of Integrated Services
    
    
    63. Pricing Principle and Payment
    
    
    64. Validity
    
    
    75. Representations, Warranties and Commitments
    
    
    76. Coming Into Force
    
    
    97. Force Majeure
    
    
    98. Confidentiality
    
    
    99. Non Waiver
    
    
    910. Notice
    
    
    1011. Applicable Laws
    
    
    1012. Dispute Resolution
    
    
    1013. Other
    
    
    10Annex I: Lease of Telecommunication Resources
    
    
    12Annex II: Premises Leasing
    
    
    14Annex III: Telecom Value-added Services
    
    
    16Annex IV: Materials Procurement
    
    
    17Annex V: Project Design and Construction
    
    
    19Annex VI: Auxiliary Telecommunication Services
    
    
    21Annex VII: Integrated Services
    
    
    23Annex VIII: Shared Services
    
    
    25
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



1. Basic Principles
    4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



2. The Components of Integrated Services
          3. Pricing Principle and Payment
        6




---



##### 



4. Validity
   5. Representations, Warranties and Commitments
        7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



6. Coming Into Force
  7. Force Majeure
  8. Confidentiality
  9. Non Waiver
   9




---



##### 



10. Notice
  11. Applicable Laws
  12. Dispute Resolution
  13. Other
       10




---



##### 



/s/ Zhao Yujun
   /s/ Tong Jilu
  11




---



##### 



Annex I: Lease of Telecommunication Resources
             12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



Annex II: Premises Leasing
              14




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



Annex III: Telecom Value-added Services
            16




---



##### 



Annex IV: Materials Procurement
   (1)
    
    Procurement of imported telecom materials;(2)
    
    Procurement of domestic telecom materials;(3)
    
    Procurement of domestic non-telecom materials.
          17




---



##### 



18




---



##### 



Annex V: Project Design and Construction
              19




---



##### 



3.
    
    Service payments
        20




---



##### 



Annex VI: Auxiliary Telecommunication Services
     the Price Law of P.R.C.
 the
Price Law of P.R.C.
     21




---



##### 



22




---



##### 



Annex VII: Integrated Services
  Framework Agreement on Leasing of Communication
Resources
         23




---



##### 



24




---



##### 



Annex VIII: Shared Services
            Jitong Network Communications
Company Limited
    25




---



##### 



26
**EXHIBIT
32**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the quarterly report of Capital Growth Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee
Wiskowski, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, I , Douglas Stukel,
the Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company and, I, Derry L. Behm, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
May 16, 2005
  /s/
Lee Wiskowski
 Lee
Wiskowski, Co-Chief Executive Officer
  /s/
Douglas Stukel
 Douglas
Stukel, Co-Chief Executive Officer
  /s/
Derry L. Behm
 Derry L.
Behm, Chief Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Camara JOHNSON v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00313-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: January 18, 2019 Closed: February 14, 2019

Certiorari - Denied.
Frederick Steven MARSHALL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4721

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2











Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of Aeterna Zentaris Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis Turpin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 21, 2013








/s/ Dennis TurpinDennis TurpinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Richard GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3037

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 454 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 454

   Designating November 8, 2023, as ``National Science, Technology, 
     Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Day'' and celebrating the 
  importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in 
           education and the workforce in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 2023

   Ms. Rosen (for herself, Mrs. Capito, and Ms. Smith) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating November 8, 2023, as ``National Science, Technology, 
     Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Day'' and celebrating the 
  importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in 
           education and the workforce in the United States.

Whereas the Bureau of Labor shows that there are currently over 10,000,000 
        Americans employed in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 
        (STEM) occupations in the United States;
Whereas STEM occupations are projected to grow more than 10 percent between 2022 
        and 2032 to nearly 11,500,000 jobs;
Whereas over 821,000 new STEM job openings will become available within the next 
        decade;
Whereas, in 2018, only 20 percent of high school graduates in the United States 
        were fully prepared for college-level STEM curriculum courses;
Whereas women are largely underrepresented in the STEM workforce and hold less 
        than \1/3\ of all STEM jobs;
Whereas the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics shows that, 
        in 2021, Hispanic workers represented only 15 percent of the STEM 
        workforce and Black workers represented only 9 percent; and
Whereas teaching STEM subjects to students in the classroom can help inspire 
        them to consider STEM career paths: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates November 8, 2023, as ``National Science, 
        Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Day'';
            (2) celebrates the importance of science, technology, 
        engineering, and mathematics in education and the workforce in 
        the United States; and
            (3) urges the people of the United States to observe 
        National STEM Day with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(15)
              - products_publications(43)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - hawaii(22)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

              - 2022(6)

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska
# C_2021289EN.01003101.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam — Netherlands) — VG v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

(Case C-121/20) (1)

(2021/C 289/43)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
IV 

House Calendar No. 14 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140 

[Report No. 113–31] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 678) to authorize all Bureau 

of Reclamation conduit facilities for hydropower development under Federal Reclamation law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 678) to authorize all Bureau of Reclamation conduit facilities for hydropower development under Federal Reclamation law, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the State of the Union for consid5 eration of the bill (H.R. 678) to authorize all Bureau of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 140 RH 

1 Reclamation conduit facilities for hydropower development 

2 under Federal Reclamation law, and for other purposes. 

3 The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 

4 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

5 General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 

6 exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair 

7 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Nat8 ural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be con9 sidered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill 

10 shall be considered as read. All points of order against 

11 provisions in the bill are waived. No amendment to the 

12 bill shall be in order except: (1) those received for printing 

13 in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for 

14 that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII dated at least one 

15 day before the day of consideration of the amendment; and 

16 (2) pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. 

17 Each amendment so received may be offered only by the 

18 Member who caused it to be printed or a designee and 

19 shall be considered as read if printed. At the conclusion 

20 of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 

21 shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 

22 amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

23 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

24 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HRES 140 RH 

1 motion except one motion to recommit with or without in2 structions. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 14 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140 

[Report No. 113–31] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 678) 

eral Reclamation law, and for other purposes. facilities for hydropower development under Fedto authorize all Bureau of Reclamation conduit 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2022165EN.01000801.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — CO and Others v MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo

(Case C-283/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) - European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) - Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP - Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) - Status of employer of the mission staff - Article 16(5) - Subrogation)

(2022/C 165/08)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: CO and Others

Defendants: MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service, Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo

Operative part of the judgment

Article 16(5) of Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, Eulex Kosovo, as amended by Council Decision 2014/349/CFSP of 12 June 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that, starting from 15 June 2014, it designates the Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, known as ‘Eulex Kosovo’, referred to in Article 1 of that joint action, as responsible and therefore as defendant in any action relating to the consequences of the implementation of the mission entrusted to it, irrespective of whether the facts underlying such an action occurred before 12 June 2014, the date when Decision 2014/349 entered into force.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
Norman E. CAISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael Wyne MUMFORD, DOC #S42898, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.