alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 324 

Designating the week of August 6 through August 12, 2023, as ‘‘National 

Farmers Market Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself and Ms. ERNST) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of August 6 through August 12, 2023, 

as ‘‘National Farmers Market Week’’. 

Whereas farmers markets accounted for $1,700,000,000 in 

income for farmers of the United States in 2020, demonstrating the crucial role of farmers markets in local 

economies; 

Whereas, according to the Agricultural Marketing Service of 

the Department of Agriculture, the number of farmers 

markets in the United States rose from 1,755 in 1994 

to 8,771 in 2019, an average growth of nearly 7 percent 

per year; 

Whereas farmers markets serve as significant educational 

sites and as bridges between urban and rural communities, contributing to a better public understanding of 

farming and ranching; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 324 ATS 

Whereas the adoption of more sustainable farming practices 

is closely associated with farmer-to-consumer interactions 

facilitated by farmers markets; 

Whereas farmers markets and direct marketing farmers help 

improve the health and wellness of low-income people in 

the United States who receive Federal nutrition benefits; 

and 

Whereas National Farmers Market Week is a time to recognize the unique and indispensable role farmers markets 

play in supporting food access, bolstering local economies, 

promoting healthy communities, and fostering sustainable 

farming: Now, therefore be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of August 6 through 

3 August 12, 2023, as ‘‘National Farmers Market 

4 Week’’; and 

5 (2) recognizes the vital role that farmers mar6 kets play in bringing communities together and in 

7 supporting the livelihoods of millions of people in the 

8 United States, from farmers and food producers to 

9 consumers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Charles Edward DAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Bob DILLINGER, Simone Lennon, Cynthia Bryant, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4156

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
EXHIBIT 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Hugh Panero, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XM Satellite Radio Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

AIRBASE CARPET MART, INC., §

§ No. 27, 2016

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below:

§

v. § Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

AYA ASSOCIATES, INC.

, §

§ C.A. No. N15C

- 03

- 104

Defendant Below, §

Appell ee. §

Submitted: September 14, 2016

Decided: September 16 , 2016

Before STRINE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA , Justices

.

O R D E R

This 16 th day of September 2016 , the Court, having considered this matter on the

briefs of the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for

the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its decision of December 15 , 2015.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
April 30, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE MATTER OF R.A

. NO. 14

- 11

- 00570

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed, June 22, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order R.A. to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Therall Authur WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
*1484.*

#### Richie *v.*DuBose.

Trover, from city court of Miller county — Judge Bush. September 30, 1908.

Submitted December 11, 1908.

Decided July 31, 1909.

*Bush & Stapleton, Park*<£ *Oollins,*for plaintiff.

*W. I. Geer,*for defendant.

.Russell, J.

The evidence showed that the plaintiff had instituted a previous action in trover against the same defendant for the recovery of the personalty involved in the present suit, and had abandoned the first suit,, and instituted the present action without paying the costs of the former one or filing a pauper’s affidavit in lieu thereof as provided by law. Therefore the court did not err in sustaining the defendant’s plea in abate- ' ment and dismissing the action. *Judgment affirmed.*
Rayon Jefter WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3282

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Alecia CELESTINE v. BOYD GAMING CORP. et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1609

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ST. LANDRY**

Writ denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE,J., dissents and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I would grant the writ of defendant, The Old Evangeline Downs, LLC, reverse the district court's ruling on the motion to strike, and remand for a hearing on the motion for summary judgment without consideration of the untimely opposition and affidavit. *See* La. Code Civ. P. art. 966(B)(2) ; *Newsome v. Homer Memorial Medical Center* , 10-0564 (La. 4/9/10), 32 So.3d 800 ; *Buggage v. Volks Constructors* , 06-0175 (La. 5/5/06), 928 So.2d 536

GENOVESE, J., dissents and assigns the following reasons:

Subsequent to defendant's filing of its motion for summary judgment in this matter, plaintiff failed to meet the filing deadline of La.C.C.P. art. 966(B)(2), which states that "[u]nless extended by the court and agreed to by all of the parties ... any opposition **shall** be filed and served ... not less than **fifteen days** prior to the hearing on the motion" (emphasis added). The hearing on defendant's motion occurred on May 11, 2018. Plaintiff filed her opposition seven days prior to the hearing on May 4, 2018, and filed her affidavit four days prior on May 7, 2018. Defendant filed a motion to strike plaintiff's opposition as untimely, which the trial court denied. As the court and the parties did not agree to extend the filing deadline as required by La.C.C.P. art. 966(B), I find the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's affidavit and opposition. The trial court, court of appeal, and the majority of this court disregarded the mandates of La.C.C.P. art. 966(B). The 2015 amendment to the summary judgment article, specifically La.C.C.P. art. 966(B), requires that an opposition be filed not less than fifteen days prior to the hearing on the motion. This was not done in this case. These timelines have meaning and are not mere suggestions. They are mandatory and not to be arbitrarily ignored. A disregard of any of the timelines in the summary judgment article will thwart the efficacy and core of the procedure. I strongly disagree with the majority's indifference in not holding the line on the filing requirements of the summary judgment procedure. I would reverse the trial court's ruling, grant defendants motion to strike, and remand the matter to the trial court to reconsider and rule upon defendant's motion for summary judgment without plaintiff's opposition.
Exhibit
      10.2 

     

    Summary
      of Changes to Compensation Arrangements 

     

    With
      Non-Management Directors

     

    As
      previously disclosed, each non-management Director is currently paid an annual
      retainer, a portion of which is paid in cash and a portion of which is paid
      in
      restricted stock. The cash portion of the annual retainer, which is paid in
      cash
      on a monthly basis, was $50,000 at the beginning of fiscal year 2008 and
      was increased to $70,000 beginning in May 2008. For fiscal 2008, the amount
      of the annual retainer paid in restricted stock was $100,000 and will be
      increased to $115,000 effective as of the Company’s Annual Meeting of
      Stockholders in February 2009. For additional information regarding compensation
      arrangements with the Company’s non-management Directors, please see Exhibit
      10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
      31, 2007, which is incorporated by reference herein.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - (-)documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Illustrations        January 26, 2015        USGS SIM 3250: Geologic Map of the Agnesi Quadrangle (V–45), Venus

Methods, protocols, and procedures        June 26, 2020        Selecting and Conducting Evaluations of Hydrologic Instruments

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
S. B., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 30, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Because S.B. has failed to serve an initial brief as provided by this court's order of November 8, 2018, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Carlos Larome ANDERSON, et al. v. BECHTEL OG & C CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.

NO. 2018-CC-1975

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF CAMERON

PER CURIAM

Granted. Plaintiffs' allegations regarding the validity of the arbitration agreement are intertwined with its arguments relating to the nullity of the underlying agreement. Therefore, the issue is properly presented to the arbitrator, not the court. *See**Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna* , 546 U.S. 440, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 163 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2006) ; *Cambas Electric, Inc. v. McDonnel Group, LLC* , 16-1774 (La. 10/28/16), 208 So.3d 377. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and relators' exception of prematurity is granted.

Hughes, J., would deny the writ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        July 9, 2019        Introduction to DSAS v5.0: Sample Data Workflow
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avaya Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin J. Kennedy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|/S/    KEVIN J.
KENNEDY                                                             
|Kevin J. Kennedy President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

August 11, 2010
Michael VENABLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(11)
              - multimedia_image(47)
              - multimedia_image-141771(47)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(11)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(4)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - utah(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(70)
              - 2023(30)
              - (-)2022(73)
              - 2021(22)
              - 2020(4)
              - 2019(11)
              - 2018(2)

Photography  Mameyes River Flood

Photography  Grand Forks Flooding

Photography  Grand Forks Flooding

Photography  Flooded Cattle Ranch

Photography  Flooded Gaging Station

Photography  Measuring Historic Atlanta Floods on Interstate 20

Photography  Pedernales River at Hamilton Pool Crossing after September 1952 Flood

Photography  USGS Measures Flooding in Louisiana

Photography  Measuring Flow in a Flooded Forest

science explorer topicFloods

social mediaFloods News

partnerPima County Regional Flood Control District

partnerMohave County of Arizona - Flood Control District

partnerYavapai County of Arizona - Flood Control District

Photography  LP Field, 2010

Photography  Little Missouri River at Medora ND Comparison

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  USGS Research on the Red River in Fargo

Photography  Work Continues. . . .

Photography  Washed Out Bridge, Snake Creek Near Whitesburg

Photography  Tandem Tracking

Photography  Devils Lake Basin Flyover

Photography  Kissengen Spring, F

Photography  Yellowstone Tracking Boat

Photography  Deploying Lift Net,  Everglades National Park

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the annual report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for theperiod ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, Michael Lee, as chief executive officer ofAlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of his knowledge: 

- This 10-KSB report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  of the Exchange Act; and   
- The information contained in this 10-KSB report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx,  Inc.

/s/ Michael Lee Michael Lee Chief Executive Officer December 9, 2004 

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000883

07-SEP-2018

08:07 AM
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, Pedro A. Richards, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016



/s/ Pedro A. RichardsPedro A. RichardsChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Grupo
Financiero Galicia S.A. and will be retained by Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
Eduardo CANALES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2039

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018.

Eduardo Canales, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.