alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION OF HARRY KIRSCH, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF NOVARTIS AG PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Novartis AG (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/  HARRY   KIRSCHName:
Harry KirschTitle:
Chief   Financial Officer  Date: January 27, 2016
Justin Lee CHRISTOPHER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 10, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
# C_2019399EN.01010101.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/101 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/101

---

Action brought on 8 October 2019 – inMusic Brands v EUIPO – Equipson (Marq)

(Case T-687/19)

(2019/C 399/120)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: inMusic Brands, Inc. (Cumberland, Rhode Island, United States) (represented by: D. Rose, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Equipson, SA (Silla, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Marq – European Union trade mark No14 585699

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2019 in Case R 1759/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety and maintain the registration in respect of the relevant goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety and maintain the registration in respect of the relevant goods;

| — | order EUIPO and any party involved in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and pay the applicant’s costs of the proceedings before the General Court, the Board of Appeal and the Cancellation Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and any party involved in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and pay the applicant’s costs of the proceedings before the General Court, the Board of Appeal and the Cancellation Division.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in combination with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in combination with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald H. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 6, 2003



/s/        DONALD H. HUNTERDonald H. HunterChief Financial Officer






This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Corey Javon FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeffrey R. VIVERETTE, DOC# 498735, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-621

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(25)
              - multimedia_image-141771(22)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)
              - multimedia_video(43)
              - multimedia_video-149194(15)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149198(22)

## By Location

              - (-)hawaii(22)

## By Year

B-roll        March 14, 2011        Lava Pouring From Fissure

B-roll        June 4, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Lava Entering Kapoho Bay

B-roll        March 14, 2011        Fissure Propagating

B-roll        May 23, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Overflight Video Compilation

B-roll        May 19, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — May 19 Fissure and Flow (LERZ)

B-roll        May 19, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 20 Spattering

B-roll        June 12, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Kapoho Bay

B-roll        May 19, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Spattering at Fissure 20

B-roll        July 1, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Whirlwind Above Fissure 8

B-roll        May 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Overflight of Fissure 20 Complex

B-roll        June 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Lava Boats in Fissure 8 Channel

B-roll        June 5, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Lava Fountaining

B-roll        May 27, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 7 Activity

B-roll        June 29, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Aerial

B-roll        July 10, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Lava Oozing

B-roll        May 22, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — UAS Hovering Near Fissure 22

B-roll        May 21, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure Eruption (Fissure 22)

B-roll        June 19, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Morning Overflight (June 19, 2018)

B-roll        June 17, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8

B-roll        June 3, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Ocean Entry at Kapoho Bay

B-roll        June 14, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano — Fissure 8 Flow: From Vent to Sea

B-roll        May 27, 2018        Kīlauea Volcano - UAS Mission Aid in Rescue
# C_2021217EN.01001501.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Hengstenberg GmbH & Co. KG v Spreewaldverein eV

(Case C-53/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Article 49(3), first subparagraph, and (4), second subparagraph - Article 53(2), first subparagraph - Amendment to a product specification - Spreewald gherkins (Germany) ‘Spreewälder Gurken (PGI)’ - Amendments which are not minor - Opposition procedure - Statement of opposition to the application for amendment - Appeal against the decision granting that application - Concept of ‘legitimate interest’)

(2021/C 217/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hengstenberg GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Spreewaldverein eV

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49(3), first subparagraph, and (4), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, in conjunction with Article 53(2), first subparagraph, thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the procedure applicable to applications for non-minor amendments to the specification of a product covered by a protected geographical indication, any natural or legal person actually or potentially affected economically — without such effect being entirely implausible — by the amendments applied for may be sufficient to establish the ‘legitimate interest’ required to declare an opposition to the application for amendment submitted or to lodge an appeal against the decision granting that application, provided that the risk of harm to the interests of such a person is not purely improbable or hypothetical, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong



Eppie Wong,

 CFO and a director

December 28, 2006
# C_2022165EN.01000601.xml

| 19.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 — Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL v European Commission, HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade

(Case C-226/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine - Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia - Determination of injury - Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country - Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Article 3(4) - Termination of the proceedings without measures - Article 9(2) - ‘Negligible’ imports - De minimis threshold - European Commission’s discretion)

(2022/C 165/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL (represented by: J. Killick and G. Forwood, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented: initially by T. Maxian Rusche and by A. Demeneix, and subsequently by T. Maxian Rusche and G. Luengo, acting as Agents), HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade (represented by: R. Luff, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eurofer, European Steel Association, AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and HBIS Group Serbia Iron & Steel LLC Belgrade.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.

---
Jennifer Elizabeth HEIDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3398

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

O.H. Eaton, Jr., Assistant Regional Counsel, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., and EISNAUGLE, J., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
1357.

#### Huntley Manufacturing Company *v.*Nixon Grocery Company.

Hill, O. J.

There is no brief of the evidence in this ease, as required by the Civil Code, §§5484, 5488. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists of a lengthy correspondence between the parties, the many letters being given in full, with no attempt to brief their contents. This court can not undertake to winnow the wheat from the chaff, or separate the material from the immaterial in the evidence. This work can be better done by the attorneys; and unless the statute is complied with in this respect, an affirmance must result, where the questions to *47be decided, depend upon a consideration of tlie evidence. In this ease the only question presented for decision depends upon the construction of the evidence; and there being no proper brief of the evidence, the. judgment must be affirmed. *Hirsch*v. *Dozier Lumber Co.,*2 *Ga. App.*520 (58 S. E. 786); *Harris*v. *McArthur,*90 *Ga.*217 (15 S. E. 758).

Appeal, from Eichmond superior court — Judge Hammond. • July 27, 1908.

Submitted November 12, 1908. —

Decided April 15, 1909.

*William H. Fleming,*for plaintiff.

*C. H. & B. S. Cohen,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(18)
              - multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(8)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - (-)florida(3)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - montana(4)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Center News        September 7, 2021        Reducing Flood Risks by Restoring Coral Reefs

Center News        August 29, 2023        New Map Demonstrates Hurricane Ian’s Potential Spread of Non-native Aquatic Species

Center News        November 1, 2017        Eyes on the Coast—Video Cameras Help Forecast Coastal Change
Brian L. LOGRECO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 6, 2018]

Brian L. Logreco, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Taylor, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31098]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1125 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-906, K2025-907.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31098 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Kwanell FINNIE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-880

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Kwanell Finnie, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, FERNANDEZ, and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2.2

                             As of February 8, 2006

Globis Capital Partners, L.P.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Paul Packer

Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 12,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $300.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,


/s/ William Herren
-------------------------------------
William Herren


Agreed to by:
Globis Capital Partners, L.P.



By: /s/ Paul Packer
    ---------------------------------
Name: Globis Capital Advisors L.L.C.
      -------------------------------
Title: Managing Member
       ------------------------------
Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States
             Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


In  connection  with  the Annual  Report of World  Wide  Web,  Inc.
("WWW")  on Form 10-KSB for the year  ended December 31,  2003,  as
filed  with  the Securities and Exchange  Commission  on  the  date
hereof   (the  "Report"),  I,  Herb Sider,  President, and Principal
Financial  Officer of World  Wide Web,  Inc.,  certify,  pursuant to
 Title 18,  United  States  Code, Section  1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The  Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report  fairly presents,  in
  all  material respects, the financial  condition and  results  of
  operations of WWW.

Date: April 6, 2004

/s/ Herb Sider
  --------------
Herb Sider
President  and  Principal  Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Banking Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Shields, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of
the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report
or under such Acts.

/s/ Richard A. Shields
-----------------------
Richard A. Shields
Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2006
TRIAL PRACTICES, INC., Appellant, v. HAHN LOESER & PARKS, LLP, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-961

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

G. Donovan Conwell, Jr. of Conwell Business Law, LLLP, Tampa, for Appellant.

Edmond E. Koester of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.