alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Chan Chi Fai



Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO

August 20, 2007
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 141 3 V

UNPUBLISHED

EDUARDO ATJIAN, II

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 14 , 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order
concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On June 1 , 2021

, E duardo Atjian, II, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2

Petitioner alleged that he suffered injuries after receiving human papillomavirus

vaccination s on J u ly 3, 2019 , and September 16 , 2019

. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the pet itioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g ). O n February 7, 2022

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw

the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2 s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
# C_2022244EN.01000401.xml

| 27.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2022 — European Commission v Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others

(Case C-54/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Non-contractual liability of the European Union based on a failure of an institution to fulfil its duty to ensure the protection of its officials - Delegation of the European Commission in Morocco - Murdered official - Non-material damage suffered by the official’s brother and sister - Remedy - Articles 270, 268 and 340 TFEU - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Articles 40, 42b, 55a, 73, 90 and 91 - Concept of a ‘person to whom the Staff Regulations apply’ - Statement of reasons)

(2022/C 244/04)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima, T.S. Bohr and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano (represented by: F. Di Gianni, G. Coppo and A. Scalini, avvocati), Anne Jeanne Cécile Magdalena Maria Sintobin, Carlo Amadeo Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, Giustina Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, Tommaso Missir Mamachi di Lusignano, Filiberto Missir Mamachi di Lusignano

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Ms Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Stefano Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Ms Maria Letizia Missir Mamachi di Lusignano.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.

---
COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, LLC, etc., Appellant, v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D18-972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

Marlene S. Reiss, for appellant.

Shutts and Bowen, LLP and Suzanne Y. Labrit (Tampa), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*286We recognize appellee's confession of error and answer the certified question consistent with the Florida Supreme Court's opinion in *Progressive Select Insurance Company v. Florida Hospital Medical Center*, No. SC18-278, 260 So.3d 219, 2018 WL 6816810 (Fla. Dec. 28, 2018). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with *Progressive*.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30859]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12616]

U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy (ACPD) will 
hold an in-person public meeting with online access. A panel of experts 
will discuss the People's Republic of China's approach to public 
diplomacy and utilizing the information space to advance PRC 
objectives.

DATES: Thursday, January 16, 2025, from 11:00am until 12:30pm.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center, 
First St SE, Washington, DC 20515, Room SVC-203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  This meeting is open to the public, 
including the media and members and staff of governmental and non-
governmental organizations. To attend the event, please register at: 
https://iipstate.my.site.com/CRMEventRegistration/s/registration-page?event=VR10qHSXpuwn44s_d2aGpqubwFigDBWJtQeXEveDMms_. Doors will 
open at 10:30 a.m. Please allow time to pass through security and check 
in at the appointment desk with photo identification. To request 
reasonable accommodation, please contact Kristy Zamary via email 
[email protected] or phone 202-472-8198 by Thursday, December 27, 
2024.
    Since 1948, the ACPD has been charged with appraising activities 
intended to understand, inform, and influence foreign publics and to 
increase the understanding of, and support for, these same activities. 
The ACPD conducts research and public and private symposia that 
provides honest assessments of public diplomacy efforts, and 
disseminates findings through reports, white papers, and other 
publications. The Commission reports to the President, Secretary of 
State, and Congress and is supported by the Office of the Under 
Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs.
    For more information please visit https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/under-secretary-for-public-diplomacy-and-public-affairs/united-states-advisory-commission-on-public-diplomacy/, or contact Executive 
Director Sarah Arkin at [email protected] or Senior Advisor Dan 
Langenkamp at [email protected], both reachable at 202-472-8198.

(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 22 U.S.C. 1469, 5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq., 
and 41 CFR 102-3.150.)

Kristina K. Zamary,
Program Assistant, U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-30859 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-P
```
Exhibit 10.2

           Addendum dated July 27, 2004, to the agreement with Natali

                          Changes in Purchase Agreement

WHEREAS     between the parties a purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement")
            was signed on August 18, 2003; and
WHEREAS     according to item 10.2(1) of the Purchase Agreement the Purchase
            Agreement has terminated; and
WHEREAS     the parties wish to renew the Purchase Agreement subject to the
            changes herein;

Therefore the parties have agreed as follows:
1.    The Purchase Agreement is hereby renewed subject to the changes herein.
2.    In item 1.1, instead of the words "50,000 (fifty thousand)" will come the
      words "10,000 (ten thousand)".
3.    In item 2.1.1 instead of the words "24 months from the date of signature
      of this order" will come the words "until December 31, 2005".
4.    In item 2.1.2 instead of "1,000" will come "200".
5.    In item 2.1.3 instead of "300" will come "50". To avoid any doubt it is
      hereby agreed that as a result of the change Natali will be permitted to
      reduce the order to 50 units per month.
6.    In Item 2.1 instead of the paragraph that starts with the words "for this
      purpose..." and ends with the words "US $3,000,000" will come the
      following paragraph: "For this purpose, the closing date shall be the date
      upon which the seller shall notify the buyer that it had started the
      development work of the Products and that it has the financial and
      engineering resources to develop the products and for their manufacturing
      according to items 2.1.1-2.1.3".
7.    In item 2.2 instead of the words "will be able to raise said amount under
      a prospectus" will come the words "will deliver a notice as per item 2.1".
8.    In item 4.a instead of "10,000" will come "2,500".
9.    In item 4.b instead f the words "prior to the lapse of 24 calendar months
      following the date of this agreement" will come the words "before December
      31, 2005".
10.   Item 10.2(1) of the Purchase Agreement is canceled and in its place will
      come the following: 10.2 (1) until or before December 31, 2004, the seller
      would not have notified the buyer as provided by item 2.1.

IN WITNESS WHEROF, the undersigned have duly executed and delivered this
agreement in Tel Aviv as of the date July 27, 2004.

Natali (the company for emergency medical services in Israel) Ltd

Voice Diary Inc
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 376 

Clarifying the dress code for the floor of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. KELLY, Mr. KING, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

HAGERTY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TILLIS, 

Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. ERNST, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. MARSHALL, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. RUBIO, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. SCOTT of 

South Carolina, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. JOHNSON) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Clarifying the dress code for the floor of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Senate Dress 

4 Code Resolution’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SENATE FLOOR DRESS CODE. 

6 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

7 (1) the term ‘‘Senate floor dress code’’ means 

8 a requirement that business attire be worn on the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 376 ATS 

1 floor of the Senate, which for men shall include a 

2 coat, tie, and slacks or other long pants; and 

3 (2) the term ‘‘Sergeant at Arms’’ means the 

4 Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate. 

5 (b) SENATE FLOOR DRESS CODE REQUIREMENTS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—An individual on the floor of 

7 the Senate shall abide by the Senate floor dress 

8 code. 

9 (2) ENFORCEMENT.—The Sergeant at Arms 

10 shall enforce the requirement of paragraph (1). 

11 (c) PROCESS TO REVISE THE SENATE FLOOR DRESS

12 CODE.—Any change to the Senate floor dress code, or the 

13 enforcement of the Senate floor dress code, that is made 

14 on or after the date of adoption of this resolution shall 

15 have no force or effect unless such change is made pursu16 ant to a resolution agreed to by not less than two-thirds 

17 of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Quentin Shawn POWELL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1708

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**I, Patrick K. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, which thisstatement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of OAK Financial Corporation.Dated: August 9, 2006              /s/ Patrick K. Gill   Patrick K. Gill   Chief Executive Officer   
-25-
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Heung
      Hung Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of Company.


By:
            /s/ *Heung
              Hung Lee**Heung
                Hung Lee*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*




April
      16,
      2007
STATE of Louisiana v. Chadric L. GREEN

NO. 2018-KO-0293

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 3, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, PARISH OF DESOTO**

Writ denied.

GENOVESE,J., would grant in part and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would grant in part for the following assigned reasons:

I would grant this writ solely to correct the trial court's failure to comply with the mandates of La.Code Crim.P. art. 873. Defendant absconded during his jury trial. He was found guilty of a felony (possession of a firearm by a convicted felon) in abstentia by unanimous verdict. He was later apprehended and brought to court for sentencing wherein he represented himself without stand-by counsel. At that appearance and before his sentencing, Defendant made an oral pro se motion for a new trial, which was denied instanter, and the trial court immediately sentenced Defendant (without any delay) to fourteen years at hard labor, without benefits, and imposed a $1,000.00 fine. In denying this writ outright, the majority ignored the trial court's failure to comply with La.Code Crim.P. art. 873 relative to the delay between conviction *581and sentence. Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 873 states in pertinent part: "If a motion for a new trial ... is filed, sentence shall not be imposed until at least twenty-four hours after the motion is overruled." In this case, Defendant was sentenced by the trial court immediately after overruling his oral pro se motion for a new trial. This was legal error in direct contravention of the mandate ("shall") of La.Code Crim.P. art. 873. Thus, I would grant this writ in part for the sole purpose of vacating Defendant's sentence and remanding the matter to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 873. I would deny all other aspects of this writ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Fluid Dynamics

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)california(8)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(2)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)

publication        February 23, 2018        Testing for the ‘predictability’ of dynamically triggered earthquakes in Geysers Geothermal Field

staff profileKyle R. Anderson, Ph.D.

publication        July 1, 2013        Modeling transport of nutrients & sediment loads into Lake Tahoe under climate change

Presentations and Events        October 26, 2017        2017 Oct. Public Lecture — Global Trends in Mineral Commodity Supplies

staff profileJoshua A. Crozier

Presentations and Events        July 29, 2004        PubTalk 7/2004 — Secrets in Stone

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars

Presentations and Events        November 21, 2019        PubTalk 11/2019 —Sea-Level Rise, Extreme Water Levels, Coastal Erosion
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

Board of Directors
Trend Mining Company
(Formerly Silver Trend Mining Company)
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho


                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the use of our review report dated May 17, 2001, on the financial
statements of Trend Mining Company (formerly Silver Trend Mining Company) (an
exploration stage company) as of March 31, 2001, for the filing with and
attachment to the Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2001.


/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.
-------------------------------------
Williams & Webster, P.S.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Spokane, Washington


May 21, 2001
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.61+



To:    Dan Wernikoff, EVP and GM, Consumer Tax
From:    Brad Smith, President and CEO, Intuit Inc. /s/ BDS 
Date:    August 29, 2016
Re:     Commuting Allowance
__________________________________________________________________
In your continuing role as EVP and GM of the Consumer Tax group based in San Diego, California, we appreciate that you will be required to incur additional expenses for travel and accommodations.  We understand that it is inconvenient to relocate your family at this time and therefore you will maintain your home in Portola Valley, California while performing this job.  In order to offset those additional costs, the company will provide you with an expense allowance for those costs that you incur during the company’s 2017 fiscal year in addition to part of the 2016 fiscal year.  This amount will be $13,667 per month.
This amount will be paid to you in monthly installments during the course of the year.   These amounts will be treated as taxable income to you.  The company will expect you to cover the costs of transportation between your home and your primary job location as well as accommodations and local transportation close to your primary job location while you are away from home out of this amount.  Other than this amount, the company will not reimburse you for any expenses of this type that you incur, except that if for any reason you cease to act in this role during the fiscal year (other than on account of your voluntary departure), the company will pay for the cost of any housing lease for any period for which you have not yet received an installment through July 31, 2017.  The company will evaluate during the 2017 fiscal year whether or not to continue this allowance in a future fiscal year.
Thank you for your ongoing commitment to the team and the business.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
            Millennium Cell Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
            ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
            on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen S. Tang, President and
            Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
            1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
            that:

| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                  
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                   operations of the Company.

/s/ Stephen S. TangStephen S. Tang President and Chief
            Executive Officer March 17, 2003

1
Mike BURGESS d/b/a Integraday Investment, Inc., Appellant, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.; Bel-Forest Manor Condominium Association Inc.; Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida; Patricia J. Mallory; Unknown Spouse of Patricia J. Mallory; Re Richards; Robert L. Richards; State of Florida Department of Revenue; Target National Bank/Target Visa, a Corporation; United States of America Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service; Unknown Tenant in Possession 1 n/k/a Kim Mercado; Unknown Spouse of Thomas W. Richards; and Unknown Heirs, Beneficiaries, Devisees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees, and All Others Claiming an Interest by, Through, Under, or Against the Estate of Thomas W. Richards, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, LLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), for Appellant.

Sonia Henriques McDowell of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Promissory Note dated May 31, 2004



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 Promissory Note 
  
 Lender: Banco Internacional de Costa Rica, S.A. 
 Borrower: Corporacion
Pipasa, S.A. 
 Amount: $21,980,720.63 
 Currency: U.S. Dollars

 Interest Rate: 8.50% 
 Date of issuance: May 31, 2004

 Due date: August 31, 2005