alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        February 21, 2022        USGS Capabilities: Fate and Bioremediation

Featured Films and Shorts        January 7, 2022        USGS Capabilities: Geomorphology
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(24)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(24)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(43)
              - arizona(13)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(45)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(4)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(7)
              - georgia(6)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - idaho(11)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(5)
              - iowa(6)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(5)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(6)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(4)
              - nevada(14)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(8)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - (-)south dakota(2)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(16)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(25)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(10)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1972        The EROS Data Center

publication        November 1, 1995        Aquatic communities and contaminants in fish from streams of the Red River of the North basin, Minnesota and North Dakota
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  of our report  dated  March 21,  2003,  on the
financial  statements  of Texxon,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  at December 31, 2002,
included in this Form 10-KSB  Annual  Report of Texxon,  Inc. as of December 31,
2002,  into  the  Company's  Registration  Statement  on Form S-8  (File  number
333-102745).

Our report, dated March 21, 2003, contains an explanatory  paragraph that states
that Texxon, Inc. is an exploration stage company with insufficient  revenues to
fund development and operating  expenses,  which raises  substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going  concern.  The  financial  statements  do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 15, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0197

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RICHARD DENVER HINMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant

and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2021

07/12/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0197
Quendarius Berjuan ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01723-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: December 3, 2018 Closed: February 28, 2019

Certiorari - Denied.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 12 99

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ang el Alex Cu n- Luc

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

v.
Lore tt a E. Ly

nc h, At to rn ey

Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lResp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 16 , 20 16 Fi le d: Feb ru ary 25 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Gua te m al an ci ti zen Ang el Alex Cu n- Luc pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s (BIA) de nyin g hi s se co nd m ot io n to reo pe n pr oc eed in gs

. W e fin d no ab us e of di sc ret io n in th e de ni al of th e m ot io n, se e Mar ti ne z
v. Ly nc h, 78 5 F.3 d 12 62 , 12 64 -6 5 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ) (rev ie win g fo r ab us e of di sc ret io n de ni al of m ot io n to reo pe n) ; Ave ria no va v. Hol de r, 59 2 F.3 d 93 2, 93 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 )(rev ie win g BIA’s de ci si on reg ard in g c h an ge d co un try co nd it io ns un de r hi gh ly

de fere nt ia l ab us e of di sc ret io n st an da rd ). The BIA di d no t err in de t e r mi n in g th at Cu n- Luc ’s se co nd m ot io n to reo pe n was un ti m el y an d nu m be r-b arre d. See 8 U.S.C. § 12 29 a(c) (7 )(A), (C)( i) (g en eral ly pa rty m ay fil e on e m ot io n to reo pe n pr oc eed in gs ;
m ot io n to reo pe n m

us t be fil ed wit hi n 90 da ys o f da te or de r of rem ov al be co m es ad m in is tra ti ve ly fin al ); 8 C.F.R . § 10 03 .23 (b )(1 ) (s am e). Whi le th ere is a ch an ge dco un try-con di ti o n s e x c ep ti on to th e fil in g de ad li ne an d nu m eri cal li m it at io n fo r
m ot io ns to reo pe n, se e 8 U.S.C. § 12 29 a(7 )(A), (C)( ii ); 8 C.F.R. § 10 03 .2(c )(3 )(i )-(i i), 10 03 .23 (b )(4 )(i ), we ag ree wit h th e BIA th at Cu n- Luc fai le d to sh ow he qu al ifi ed fo r t h e e x c e p t io n, se e Zho ng Qin Zhe ng v. Mu ka se y , 52 3 F.3 d 89 3, 89 5- 96 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ) (d is cu ss in g e xc ep ti on ). The p et it io n fo r rev ie w is de ni ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Sydney Lease



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
  
 [LETTERHEAD OF EXECUTIVE CENTRE 133] 
  
 25th
October 01 
  
 Michael Emerson/Malik Helweh 
 Vision Gateway 
  
 Dear Michael and Malik, 
  
 Per our discussions
and your inspection I confirm the following details. 
  

			
	 Suites 102/103:
	  	As discussed $680.00 per week plus GST = $2954.76 plus GST per calendar month.
		
	Suites 206/207:	  	 Suite 206 = $250.00 per week + GST
 Suite 207 =
$350.00 per week + GST


  
 I would be prepared to reduce Suite
206 by $60.00 per week plus GST, which would bring your rental down to $190.00 per week plus GST. The total rental for Suites 206/207 would be $2346.43 plus GST. I am happy to offer you one months free office rental based on a six month commitment
and two weeks free office rental based on a three month commitment. 
  

			
	 	  	Two months rent as bond is required $-4692.86 prior to occupancy. This bond is fully refundable after your account is closed provided your account has been paid in full.
		
	 	  	Month to month. One months notice is required to terminate the account.
		
	Bond:	  	 
		
	 Inclusions:
  
 Terms:
	  	Cleaning, maintenance, electricity, 24 hour access, furniture as specified by yourself (additional furniture in/out of your office after this point will incur a moving fee of $77.00 plus
GST), telephone answering. All conference room use is with our compliments.
		
	Additional Charges:	  	Handset and line rental $45.00 per month per extension plus GST.
		
	 	  	Coffee/tea = $10.00 per month per person plus GST.
		
	Parking:	  	I have 1 x carspace under the building at 565.00 per week plus GST. An external space is $55.00 per week plus GST.

  
  








			
		
	Fax:	  	An additional phone line can be set up for your fax use at line rental only, of $20.00 per month plus GST through our switchboard.
		
	Internet:	  	Our ISP - Accxyss Technologies can assist you with a permanent connection. Prices are at $120.00 set up plus GST and $20.00 per week plus GST per user. He will bill you directly. A surcharge
of $30.00 per month plus GST applies for any Internet option.
		
	Terms of Payment:	  	Our terms are strictly 7 days after receipt of invoice. Payment can be made by credit card, cheque or bank transfer.
		
	 	  	Invoices are distributed the first day of the month for rent, handset and line rental, coffee and parking in advance and we reserve the right to close accounts at 50 days if
unpaid.

  
 Michael, we look forward to supporting
you in our Centre and I stress again that I can give you first refusal on larger window space as it becomes available. 
  
 /s/ Penny Flanagan 
 Penny Flanagan 
 Centre Director 
  
 Yours sincerely.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-01058-CV

IN RE GUADALUPE VALLEY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, and 

Regency IHS of Guadalupe Valley, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 20, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

After considering relators’ petition for a writ of mandamus, real party in interest’s response, 

and relators’ reply, this court has determined relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, 

relators’ petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 22-1070-CV-E, styled James Henry Lenz, Individually and on Behalf of the 

Estate of Irene Mary Lange v. Guadalupe Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation Center and Regency IHS of Guadalupe 

Valley, LLC, pending in the 456th District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Heather H. Wright

presiding.
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Jeffrey Benck, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lantronix, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not
    contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
    report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | September 10, 2018 | /s/
    JEFFREY BENCK                                                                                      
|----- | ------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                    | Jeffrey Benck
        President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
        (Principal Executive Officer)
Tremaine Latroy BAILEM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0511

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Denis Lee HARGROVE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4703

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 20, 2012*

Decided August 20, 2012

Before

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 12‐1909

NORMAN FLICK,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

HECTOR M. GONZALES, et al.,

Defendants‐Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Indiana,

Indianapolis Division.

No. 1:08‐cv‐461‐SEB‐TAB

Sarah Evans Barker,

Judge.

O R D E R

Norman Flick appeals the district court’s dismissal of his second amended complaint

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he alleged that 24 defendants (among them

attorneys, judges, detectives, business people, and a state prosecutor) colluded to steal his

property. First the court dismissed the complaint against two Indiana state‐court judges on

the alternative grounds of judicial immunity and failure to comply with the statute of

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

* After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and record. See FED. R. APP. P.

34(a)(2)(C).
No. 12‐1909 Page 2

limitations. Later the court dismissed the complaint against the remaining defendants for

failure to comply with federal notice‐pleading standards, see FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a).

On appeal Flick does not develop any legal argument challenging the dismissal of

his action, and asserts only generally that “[R]ule 8 has been sufficiently plead” under

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007).

We construe pro se filings liberally, but even a pro se brief must contain more than a general

assertion of error. Anderson v. Hardman, 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001). A brief must

contain “contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of

the record on which the appellant relies.” FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9).

DISMISSED.
[Cite as State v. White , 2014-Ohio-1691.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2013-09-167

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 4/21/2014 : COREY A. WHITE, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2013-04-0539

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee Charles M. Conliff, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018-0424, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam

. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for def endant-appellant, Corey A. White, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by theButler CA2013-09-167 trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists seven potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proc eedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constituti onal rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
-E ki7CTORh’EY @ENEEXAL 

ol? TEXAS 

April 24, 1963 

Hon. Frank Briscoe 

District Attorney 

Harris County 

Houston, Texas 

Oplnion~ No. c-65 

Re: Whether the Texas Liquor 

Control Act prohibits the 

Dear Sir: 

advertising of alcoholic 

beverages by employment of 

handbills where such handbills are delivered on 

prlvately.owned property. 

following 

follows: 

You have requested an opinion of this office on the 

question: 

"Whether the Texas Liquor Control Acts 

prohibits the advertising of alcoholic 

beverages by employment of handbills where 

such handbills tre delivered on privately 

owned property. 

Article 666-50, Vernon's Penal Code, r,eads as 

"It shall be a violation of the law for 

any person to advertise any alcoholic beverage 

or the sale of any alcoholic beverage by the 

employment or use of a sound vehicle, sound 

truck or hand bills on any publit street, 

alley, or highway In this State. 

There are no court decisions or Attorney General's 

opinions contruing,Article 666-50, Vernon's Pentil Code. 

Further, other sections of the Texas Liquor Control Act pertaining to advertising are,not helpful In answering the 

question presented. 

The definition of Public Highway found in Black's 

Law Dictionary, fourth Edition, does not Include privately 

owned property. The definition is as follows: 

"PUBLIC HIGHWAY, One under the control 

of and kept by the public, established by 

regular proceedings for the purpose, or 

generallyused by the public for twenty 

years; or dedicated by the owner of the soil 

-319- 
Hon. Prank Briscoe, page 2 (C- 65) 

and accepted by the proper authorltles and 

for the maintenance of which they ares responsible. State v. Gross, 119 N.C. 868, 26 S.E. 

91. 

"It includes roads, streets, alleys, 

lanes, courts, places, trials, and bridges, 

laid out or erected as such by the public, 

or, if laid out and erected by other, 

dedicated or abandoned to the public, or 

made such in actions for the oartltlon of 

real property. Pattzrson v. Munyan, 93 

Cal. 128, 29 P. 250. 

hit appears that the language of Article 666-50, 

Vernon's Penal Code does not prohibit the advertising of 

alcoholic beverages by employment of hand bills, as long as 

other regulations. pertaining to advertising are complied 

with, where such hand bills are delivered on privately owned 

property. 

SUMMARY 

The Texas Liquor Control Act does not 

prohibit the advertising of alcoholic beverages 

by employment of hand bills when such hand bills 

are delivered on privately owned.property. 

Yours 'very truly, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

-"Irwin R. Salmanson 

Assistant Attorney General 

1RS:cjs 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTRR:~ 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Scott Harrison 

Edward R. Moffett 

Malcolm Quick 

APPROVRD FOR THE A'M'ORNHY GENERAL 

By: Stanton Stone 

-320-
Tammy Lanoria NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 3, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Brad R. Schlesinger, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Ciklin, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Jrokton Dominque WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1004

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(12)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(49)
              - colorado(3)
              - (-)commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(43)
              - idaho(3)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(5)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nevada(5)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(3)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(16)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(8)
              - wyoming(6)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 15, 2015        Resilience Potential of Coral Reefs in the Mariana Islands