alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - (-)maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1965        Aeromagnetic and generalized geologic map of the Bingham quadrangle, Somerset County, Maine

map        January 1, 1964        Reconnaissance bedrock geology of the Wabassus Lake quadrangle, Washington County, Maine
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31002]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1119 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-898, K2025-899.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31002 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1142 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-926, K2025-927.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31118 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - (-)science_science(8)
              - products_publications(21)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(8)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(29)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(4)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(16)
              - georgia(16)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(4)
              - illinois(10)
              - indiana(18)
              - iowa(11)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(13)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(10)
              - massachusetts(10)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(7)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(19)
              - nebraska(5)
              - nevada(8)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(19)
              - new mexico(17)
              - new york(38)
              - north carolina(16)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(10)
              - oklahoma(12)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(14)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(19)
              - south dakota(21)
              - (-)tennessee(8)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(5)
              - vermont(5)
              - virginia(18)
              - washington(30)
              - west virginia(4)
              - wisconsin(18)
              - wyoming(9)

## By Year

Event        February 25, 2019        Spring/Summer 2011 Mississippi River Basin Floods

Event        February 25, 2019        May 2011 Memphis, Tennessee Flood

Program        September 19, 2016        Metro Nashville Flood Monitoring Project

Activity        August 29, 2017        Hydrologist visits 4th-graders at  Baton Rouge public school

Project        June 26, 2017        Tennessee FloodWatch

Project        June 26, 2017        Reservoir and Lake Level Conditions in Tennessee

Project        June 26, 2017        DroughtWatch: Surface Water Conditions in Tennessee

Project        June 26, 2017        Tennessee DroughtWatch
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RxBazaar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce C. Warwick,
Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Bruce C. Warwick
------------------------------------
Bruce C. Warwick
Treasurer


March 28, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to RxBazaar, Inc. and will be retained by RxBazaar, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
# C_2021009EN.01000401.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/4

---

Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by ViaSat, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-734/17, ViaSat v Commission

(Case C-235/20 P)

(2021/C 9/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: ViaSat, Inc. (represented by: P. de Bandt, avocat, M. R. Gherghinaru, avocate, J. Ruiz Calzado, abogado, L. Marco Perpiñà, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Inmarsat Ventures Ltd

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present appeal admissible and well-founded and, consequently, |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible and well-founded and, consequently,

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal and give a final judgment in this case ordering the Commission to provide the access to the documents requested, |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal and give a final judgment in this case ordering the Commission to provide the access to the documents requested,

| — | annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the Commission of 11 January 2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the Commission of 11 January 2018;

| — | order the Commission to pay the appellant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the appellant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

First plea in law: error in law regarding the application of a general presumption of confidentiality to the requested documents and violation of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 (1) relating to the protection of commercial interests and of the duty to state reasons.

Second plea in law: Error in law regarding the existence of an overriding public interest in disclosure and violation of the last clause of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 relating to the protection of commercial interests.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001, L 145, p. 43).

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(11)
              - colorado(10)
              - connecticut(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - (-)missouri(2)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(14)
              - virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1985        Summary geochemical and generalized geologic maps of the Springfield 1° x 2° quadrangle and adjacent area, Missouri

map        January 1, 1986        Seismic-reflection profiles of the New Madrid seismic zone-data along the Mississippi River near Caruthersville, Missouri
EX PARTE Timothy J. MCCARROLL

CR-16-0784

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Arnick Earle FOOTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2975

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
E.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1476

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 11, 2019

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges his adjudication of delinquency for trespassing on school grounds pursuant to section 810.097(1), Florida Statutes. Appellant contends the State failed to present a prima facie case of guilt because there was no evidence appellant was on school grounds for an illegitimate purpose. We agree.

The State presented video surveillance evidence from Rickards High School and GPS data from appellant's electronic monitoring device to show that appellant was on the grounds of Rickards High in a white car that drove by the front office. There was no evidence the car stopped or was anywhere other than the public driveway for a very short period of time. The school's assistant principal testified that appellant was not a registered student and did not check in with the front office. This evidence alone, however, does not prove that appellant was on school grounds for an illegitimate purpose.

Since the State failed to provide evidence of an essential element of the offense, we are required to REVERSE and REMAND with directions for the trial court to vacate appellant's adjudication of delinquency for trespassing on school grounds.

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JUAN DE DIOS B UR GOS-M UNGUIA, a .k.a . Jua n de Dios B urgos-M onguia , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. Nos. 13-10600

13-10601 D.C . Nos. 4:10-c r-00631-JGZ 4:13-cr-00167-JGZ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Tim othy M . B urge ss, Distric t Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 *** B e fore : WALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . In the se c onsolida

te d a ppe a ls, Jua

n de Dios B urgos-M unguia a ppe a ls from the d istric t c o urt judgm e nts a nd c ha lle n ge s his guilty-ple a c o nvic tion a

nd 36- 

# FIL ED D EC 16 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.

** The Honora

ble Tim othy

M . B urge ss, Unite d State s Distric t Judgefor the D istric t of Ala ska , sitting by de signa tion. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry a fte r de porta

tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326, a nd his re voc ation of supervise d re l e a se and four-m onth se nte nc e im pose d upon re voc ation. Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), B urgosM unguia ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a

m o tion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c o rd. Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l with re spe c t to there voc ation of supervise d re le a se or the c onvic tion. W e , the re fore , a ffirm the re v oc ation of B urgos-M unguia ’ s supe rvise d re le a se in Appe a l No. 13- 10600, a nd his c onvic tion in Appe a l No. 13-10601. The distric t c ourt, in a

c onsolida

te d se nte n c i ng proc e e ding, fa i le d to a ddre ss B urgos-M unguia

pe rsona lly

to a sk if he wa

nte d to spe ak be fore se nte nc i ng. Se e Fe d. R . C rim . P. 32(i)(4)(A)(ii), 32.1(b)(2)(E). B e c a use the c ourt c ould ha

ve im pose d a lowe r se nte nc e tha

n the one it im

p ose d, this om

ission wa s pla in e rror. Se eUnite d State

s v . Danie ls , 760 F.3d 920, 925-26 (9th C ir. 2014). Ac c o rdingly , we va c ate and re m and for re se nte nc ing in both a ppe a ls. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is de nie d without pre

judic e to re n e wa l in the distric t c o urt if c ounse l doe s not wish to re pre se nt B urgos-M unguia

at his re se nte nc ing.
13 - 1 06 0 0 & 1 3 - 1 0 6 0 1 2Appe a l No. 13-10600: AFFIRM E D in par t; SE NT E NCE VACAT E D and RE M ANDE D . Appe a l No. 13-10601: AFFIRM E D in par t; SE NT E NCE VACAT E D and RE M ANDE D.

13 - 1 06 0 0 & 1 3 - 1 0 6 0 1 3
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 2 

Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 

assembled. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of 

the Senate is assembled. 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of 

2 Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is assembled 

3 and that the Senate is ready to proceed to business. 

Æ 


DMWilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 8, 2011        2011: The Year of the Flood

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(6)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        October 3, 2019        Outstanding in the Field (Ep 5): Fish in the Grand Canyon
IN the INTEREST OF N.B., S.B., and D.B., children.

E.B., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Catherine CLARK, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D18-0584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Kendatrus Keon-Lashawn SMITH v. STATE

CR-16-0439

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

August 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Roy Edward STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2749

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A0 36 2 . EDDI E GREEN v . CI TY OF ATLANTA et a l

.

On J an u ary 3 1

, 2 0 1 4

, t h e s u p eri o r co urt en t ered a n o r d er g ran t i n g s u m m ary ju d g m en t t o t h e d efen d an t s i n t h i s cas e. On March 7

, 2 0 1 4

, t h e p l ai nt i ff, Ed d ie Green

, fi led a n o t i ce o f ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

. A n o t i ce o f a p p e a l m

u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s aft er t he en try o f t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s o rd er. O CGA § 5-6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro per an d t im el y fi l i n g of a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

i s an ab s o l u t e req u ire m en t t o co n fer ju ri s di ct i o n u p o n t h i s Co urt

. Co u ch v. Un i t ed

Pa p er wo r ker s In t l

. Un i o n , 2 2 4 Ga. Ap p

. 7 2 1 (4 8 2 SE2 d 7 0 4 ) (1 99 7 ). H e r e , G reen

fi led h i s n o t i ce o f ap p eal 35 d ay s aft er en try o f t h e o r d er h e s eek s t o ch al l en ge.

Acco rd in g ly

, we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n to co n s id er t h i s u n t i m el y ap p eal

, an d it i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/20/2014 October 20, 2014
STATE of Louisiana v. Reginald HARRIS

NO. 2018-KH-0164

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Denied. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
Exhibit 6  Statement re computation of per share earnings

|                                       |  | Concordia
Bus Nordic |  | Concordia |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------- | -
|
|Swedish GAAP                           |  |                      |  |           |  
|Net income (loss) (in millions of SEK) |  | 30                   |  | (34       | )
|Number of shares (in millions)         |  | 0.16                 |  | 0.005     |  
|                                       |  |                      |  |           |  
|Net income (loss) per share (SEK)      |  | 188                  |  | (6,730    | )
|                                       |  |                      |  |           |  

|                                       |  | Concordia
Bus Nordic |   | Concordia |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | - | --------- | -
|
|US GAAP                                |  |                      |   |           |  
|Net income (loss) (in millions of SEK) |  | (5                   | ) | (29       | )
|Number of shares (in millions)         |  | 0.16                 |   | 0.005     |  
|                                       |  |                      |   |           |  
|Net income (loss) per share (SEK)      |  | (33                  | ) | (5,828    | )
|                                       |  |                      |   |           |  

---

---



QuickLinks