alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph E. NICHOLS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 14, 2019

Marcella Ann Beeching, Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                                  Subsidiaries

Princeton Review Management, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, a
wholly owned subsidiary

Princeton Review Operations, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, a
wholly owned subsidiary

Princeton Review Products, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, a
wholly owned subsidiary

Princeton Review Publishing, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, a
wholly owned subsidiary

The Princeton Review Canada, Inc., an Ontario corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary

Princeton Review Carolinas, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, a
wholly owned subsidiary
Exhibit 31.01
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing owner ofCampbell Alternative Asset Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland      Bruce L. Cleland Chief Executive Officer March 29, 2005
E-2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 279 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 279

Commemorating the passage of 2 years since the tragic building collapse 
                in Surfside, Florida, on June 24, 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2023

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commemorating the passage of 2 years since the tragic building collapse 
                in Surfside, Florida, on June 24, 2021.

Whereas June 24, 2023, marks 2 years since portions of the Champlain Towers 
        South condominium building in Surfside, Florida, catastrophically 
        collapsed; and
Whereas, in the aftermath of the devastating collapse--

    (1) one of the largest rescue and recovery operations in the history of 
the United States commenced to locate scores of residents who were 
unaccounted for and believed to be in the collapsed building;

    (2) first responders from across Florida immediately answered the call 
of duty, including firefighters, uniformed police officers, rescue and 
recovery crews, emergency medical technicians, physicians, nurses, and 
others rushing to save the lives of individuals trapped in the building;

    (3) international rescue crews and emergency support organizations from 
Israel and Mexico responded to the site to aid in the search and recovery 
efforts;

    (4) National Urban Search and Rescue Response System task forces from 
Florida, Virginia, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, and 
emergency specialists from California, deployed to Surfside, Florida, to 
provide critical support;

    (5) teams worked tirelessly around the clock to rescue survivors and 
recover the remains of individuals killed in the tragic collapse; and

    (6) on June 30, 2021, the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology announced it would launch a formal investigation into the cause 
of the collapse: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the passage of 2 years since the tragic 
        building collapse in Surfside, Florida, on June 24, 2021;
            (2) honors the survivors and the 98 lives lost in the 
        collapse of the Champlain Towers South condominium building and 
        offers heartfelt condolences to the families, loved ones, and 
        friends of the victims;
            (3) commends the bravery and selfless service demonstrated 
        by the local, State, national, and international teams of first 
        responders deployed in the aftermath of the collapse; and
            (4) expresses support for the survivors and community of 
        Surfside, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
Gregory Lanard GUNN, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1135 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-918, K2025-919.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-31103 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Shearman WISHAM

No. 2018-KH-0094

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he was denied access to the courts by an arbitrary and unjustified enforcement of the uniform rules governing the filing of applications in the court of appeal, and thus shows no error in the court of appeal's denial of writs on technical grounds. La.C.Cr.P. art. 912.1(C).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 558 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 558

Prohibiting the use of the Members' Representational Allowance for the 
      payment of the costs of first-class airline accommodations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2014

Ms. Duckworth submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Prohibiting the use of the Members' Representational Allowance for the 
      payment of the costs of first-class airline accommodations.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING USE OF MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCE FOR 
              FIRST-CLASS AIRLINE ACCOMMODATIONS.

    (a) Revision of Regulations Governing the Use of the MRA.--The 
Committee on House Administration shall promulgate revisions to the 
regulations governing the use of the Members' Representational 
Allowance to ensure that the Allowance is not used for the payment of 
the costs of first-class airline accommodations for domestic travel 
except as provided under subsection (b).
    (b) Exceptions.--Under the revisions promulgated by the Committee 
on House Administration under subsection (a), a Members' 
Representational Allowance may be used for the payment of the costs of 
first-class airline accommodations for domestic travel if the Member 
whose Allowance will be used for such payment certifies in writing to 
the Committee that any of the following applies:
            (1) The use of first-class accommodations is necessary to 
        accommodate a medical disability or other special need, as 
        demonstrated by such documentation as the Committee may 
        require.
            (2) No accommodations other than first-class accommodations 
        are reasonably available given the timing of the travel, but 
        only if the travel is urgent and the purpose of the travel may 
        not be carried out on alternative dates.
            (3) The use of first-class accommodations is necessary 
        because of exceptional security circumstances or other 
        exceptional circumstances.
            (4) The use of first-class accommodations will result in an 
        overall cost savings by avoiding additional subsistence costs, 
        overtime, or lost productive time while awaiting coach-class 
        accommodations.
            (5) The length of the flight is 5 hours or greater.
    (c) Domestic Travel Defined.--For purposes of this resolution, 
``domestic travel'' means travel within the continental United States.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, L. Leighton Alston, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 10, 2005 /s/ L. Leighton AlstonL. Leighton AlstonPresident, Chief Executive Officer andDirector (Principal Executive Officer)
 20
Lloyd RICHARD (DOC# 125784) v. Willie J. MARTIN, Jr. - Sheriff, et al.

NO. 2018-CP-1341

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
Exhibit 32.2


Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  Treasurer  and Chief
Financial  Officer of Nuclear  Solutions,  Inc., (the "Company"),  herby certify
that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated May 25, 2005.                                  /s/ John Dempsey
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     V.P. and CFO
Terri L. OLIVER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SEACOAST NATIONAL BANK, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0088

IN THE MATTER OF 

T.H. and N.H.,

Youths in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record, 

and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file a 

response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response 

must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the 

County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this 

Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Appellant at her last known 

address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 28 2021

05/28/2021
Robert Mark GREENE, Appellant, v. WARDEN, Okeechobee Correctional Institute, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2594

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 3, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Loan Revision Agreement for the Note Secured by Deed of Trust



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 LOAN REVISION AGREEMENT 
  
 This Loan Revision Agreement amends the terms of that certain loan (“Loan”) evidenced by a Note Secured by Deed of Trust dated June 3,
2004, in favor of City National Bank, a national banking association (“CNB”) executed by Daily Journal Corporation, a South Carolina corporation (“Borrower”) in the original principal amount of
$3,400,000.00 (“Note”). The Note is secured by that certain Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing dated June 3, 2004 (“Deed of Trust”) executed by Borrower as trustor for the
benefit of CNB, recorded on June 17, 2004, as Instrument No. 04-1547725, in the Official Records of Los Angeles County, State of California, (“Deed of Trust”). 
  
 CNB and Borrower hereby agree that the terms and conditions of the Note shall be amended as follows: 
  
 The second paragraph of the Note is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following: 
  
 “There shall be two advances
hereunder with an initial advance in the amount of $2,856,682.27 and a second advance of $543,317.73 to be made by CNB after the conditions as set forth in that certain letter agreement dated June 3, 2004 by and between Borrower and
CNB have been met. 
  
 Principal and interest together are payable
in initial installments of Twenty-Two Thousand Forty-Five and 94/100 Dollars ($22,045.94) each month commencing on the first day of August, 2004 and continuing thereafter on the same day of each month until maturity as stated
above when all unpaid interest and principal shall be payable. Upon the second advance, CNB shall reamortize the then unpaid principal balance of this Note and recalculate the monthly payment set forth above to an amount equal to an amount that
would be sufficient to repay the unpaid principal amount of this Note based on the remainder twenty year amortization. The new monthly payment shall be due and payable commencing on the first day of the second calendar month following the date of
the second advance. CNB acknowledges that no Prepayment Penalty applies to this Note.” 
  
 This Loan Revision Agreement shall amend the Note only as set forth above. CNB and Borrower agree that all other terms and conditions of the Note, and the Deed of Trust, shall remain in full force and effect.

  
 This Loan Revision Agreement is executed and shall become
effective as of August 1, 2004. 
  

					
	“Borrower”	 	Daily Journal Corporation,
	 	 	 a South Carolina corporation

			
	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Gerald L. Salzman


	 	 	 	 	Gerald L. Salzman, President
		
	 	 	City National Bank, a
	 	 	 national banking association

			
	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Paul Branks


	 	 	 	 	Paul Branks, Senior Vice President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - (-)arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

publication        February 15, 2023        Generalized additive model estimation of no-flow fractions and L-moments to support flow-duration curve quantile estimation using selected probability distributions for bay and estuary restoration in the Gulf States

map        November 6, 2014        Geologic map of the west-central Buffalo National River region, northern Arkansas

publication        January 1, 1978        Water-quality investigation of the Tyronza River Watershed, Arkansas

publication        January 1, 1949        Relations of bauxite and Kaolin in the Arkansas bauxite deposits

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
J.R.E., a Minor Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.