alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Queen MCCARTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Kinship Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Terry Deru,
President and Andrew Limpert, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Terry Deru
--------------
Terry Deru
President
August 7, 2002



/s/ Andrew Limpert
------------------
Andrew Limpert
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
August 7, 2002
Page 2 of 2 1519 1519:06 SWA1380 two seven left cleared to land uh southwest thirteen eighty 1520 1521 1521:17 LCE southwest thirteen eighty right turn when you're able you wanna stop wherever you need to it's fine 1521:23 SWA1380 thanks (unintelligible) we're gonna stop right here by the uh fire truck thanks guys for the help 1522 1522:13 SWA1380 do you have a frequency for the fire chief 1522:16 LCE southwest thirteen eighty if you go over to one three five point one they will be there 1522:21 SWA1380 one three five one 1523 (1524-1552) 1553 End of Transcript 18-001-ZNY SWA1380 ***
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    /s/ W. Douglas ParkerName: W. Douglas ParkerTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: July 27, 2006
 /s/ Derek J. Kerr

Name: Derek J. KerrTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: July 27, 2006
STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald W. DAHLEM

No. 2018-KH-0105

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 25, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

*448Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 30527 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v.
JAMES C. PITRE , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:10

- CR

- 369

- 5

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James C. Pitre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pitre has filed a response. We have re viewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Pitre ’ s response

. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-30527 Document: 00514777070 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/28/2018No. 18

- 30527

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein , and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-30527 Document: 00514777070 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/28/2018
# C_2023015EN.01000701.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 November 2022 — Volotea SA (C-331/20 P), easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (C-343/20 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-331/20 P and C-343/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - European Commission decision on compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations - Existence of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market, granted by the Italian Republic to airlines through airport operators - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Proof of the existence of an advantage - Determination of the amount - Market economy operator principle - Applicability and application - Test of the private acquirer of goods or services - Conditions - Burden of proof)

(2023/C 15/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Volotea SA (represented by M. Carpagnano, avvocato, and M. Nordmann, Rechtsanwalt), easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (represented by A. Manzaneque Valverde and J. Rivas Andrés, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by D. Grespan, S. Noë, L. Armati and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 May 2020, Volotea v Commission (T-607/17, EU:T:2020:180); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 May 2020, Volotea v Commission (T-607/17, EU:T:2020:180);

| 2. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 May 2020, easyJet Airline v Commission (T-8/18, EU:T:2020:182), in so far as that court dismissed the action for annulment of easyJet Airline Co. Ltd as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 May 2020, easyJet Airline v Commission (T-8/18, EU:T:2020:182), in so far as that court dismissed the action for annulment of easyJet Airline Co. Ltd as unfounded;

| 3. | Annuls European Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations (SGEI), in so far as it concerns, first, Volotea SA, and, second, easyJet Airline Co. Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Annuls European Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1861 of 29 July 2016 on State aid SA33983 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) (ex 2011/N) — Italy — Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations (SGEI), in so far as it concerns, first, Volotea SA, and, second, easyJet Airline Co. Ltd;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs related to the proceedings at first instance and to the proceedings on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs related to the proceedings at first instance and to the proceedings on appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 655 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 655

Relating to the application of Article II, section 3, clause 5, of the 
                   Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2014

Mr. Issa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the application of Article II, section 3, clause 5, of the 
                   Constitution of the United States.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Treasury has failed to meet the 
requirement of Article II, section 3, clause 5, of the Constitution of 
the United States to take care that a law be faithfully executed, with 
respect to the policy of the Department of the Treasury pertaining to 
the 1-year delay in the application of the reporting requirements of 
sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (and 
related requirements of section 4980H of such Code), as provided under 
Department of the Treasury Notice 2013-45, as announced by the 
Department of the Treasury on July 2, 2013; and that the House of 
Representatives shall bring a civil action in the United States 
District Court for the District of Columbia for declaratory or 
injunctive relief to challenge the policy of the Department of the 
Treasury.
                                 <all>
```
HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL, LLC and Rubicon, LLC v. PRAXAIR, INC.

NO. 2018-CC-1532

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

Writ denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant rehearing and docket.

CRICHTON, J., would grant rehearing and assigns reasons.

Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

I would grant and docket this application to examine whether Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3(C) provides an additional ground for recusal independent from the grounds enumerated in La. Code Civ. P. art. 151. In my view, the original per curiam, which recused a respected member of the judiciary, will lead to confusion in the trial courts as to the proper standard for judicial recusal in Louisiana.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group; Fellowships in Digestive Diseases and Nutrition.                    

*Date:*                         February 13-14, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jian Yang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7011, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7799,                         *yangj@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 20, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-31182 Filed 12-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 26, 2019

Order 

Clerk

December 26, 2019

160595(48)

DAWN REO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 160595

v COA: 342701

Emmet CC: 06-009259-CK

WILLIAM R. MURPHY, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will 

be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before January 29, 2020.
1634.

#### Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. *v.*Oliver.

Certiorari, from Tift superior court — Judge Mitchell. December 13, 1908.

Submitted February 25, —

Decided June 15, 1909.

*Pulwood & Murray,*for plaintiff in error.

*James II. Price,*contra.

Powell, J.

1. In a suit in a justice’s court for the killing of live stock through the negligence of the employees of a railroad company in the operation of its trains, it is not necessary that the plaintiff should' set out the particular acts of negligence. The strictness of pleading required in superior and city courts does not pertain to justices’ courts. *Ga. So.*& *Fla. Ry. Co.*v. *Barfield,*1 *Ga. App.*203 (58 S. E. 236); *Southern Railway Co.*v. *Oliver,*1 *Ga. App.*734 (58 S. E. 244); *Southern Express Co.*v. *Briggs,*1 *Ga. App.*294 (57 S. E. 1066);*Hendrix*v. *Elliott,*2 *Ga. App.*301 (58 S. E. 495); *Patterson*v. *Same,*2 *Ga. App.*755 (59 S. E. 18); *Jackson*v. *Brothers & Sisters of Promise,*2 *Ga. App.*761 (59 S. E. 11); *Seaboard Air-Line Ry.*v. *Smith,*3 *Ga. App.*644 (60 S. E. 353); *Central Ry. Co.*v. *Crapps,*4 *Ga. App.*550 (61 S. E. 1126).

2. The testimony in support of the plaintiff’s recovery, while not wholly satisfactory, was nevertheless legally sufficient to authorize the judge of the superior court in his discretion to refuse to set aside the verdict of the jury in the justice’s court on the pure issue of fact involved.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XM SATELLITE
RADIO INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF LOSS, CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS,
IN EACH CASE FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         311,302
<SECURITIES>                                    93,404
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               406,130
<PP&E>                                          42,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,250,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,710
<BONDS>                                        262,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     924,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,250,878
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (20,422)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,422)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**SERVICERCOMPLIANCE STATEMENTNew Holland Credit Company, LLC**

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”),as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as ofMarch 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and ServicingAgreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH EquipmentTrust 2006-A, does hereby certify that:

1.               NHCCis Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

2.               The undersigned isduly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement toexecute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

3.               This Certificate isdelivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreementand Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

4.               A review of theServicer’s activities during the period from the trust’s initial cutoff date,February 28, 2006, to and including December 31, 2006 and of itsperformance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision.

5.               To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the period from the trust’s initial cutoff date, February 28,2006, to and including December 31, 2006.

6.               INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29thday of March 2007.
|        | By:    | /s/ Brian J. O’Keane |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brian J. O’Keane     |
|   | Title: | Treasurer                 |

** **

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 370 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 370

To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
  the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
  the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

    Resolved, the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following committees for the One Hundred Eighteenth 
Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Cardin (Chair), Mr. Menendez, 
Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Coons, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Merkley, Mr. 
Booker, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Duckworth.
    Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship: Mrs. Shaheen 
(Chair), Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker, Mr. Coons, 
Ms. Hirono, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Hickenlooper.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      NO. 32.2





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management Solutions, Inc.,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
      ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      AUGUST 06, 2007


By:
            /s/
              MORRIS KUNOFSKYMORRIS
                KUNOFSKYCHIEF
                FINANCIAL OFFICER