alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Thearon SAMPSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-477V

Filed: December 7, 2018

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

RUBEN ABEYTA, * UNPUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

* Transverse Myelitis (“TM”);

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald C. Homer, Esq., Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master:

On April 4, 2017, Ruben Abeyta [“Mr. Abeyta or “petitioner”] filed a petition for 

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

2 Petitioner alleges that 

he developed Transverse Myelitis (“TM”) after receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 

28, 2014. Stipulation, filed Dec. 7, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that any of the

aforementioned immunizations caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

 

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the 

Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-

347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision 

will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s 

inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party 

has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is 

a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes 

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 

privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On December 7, 2018, the parties 

filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

 

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $215,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Ruben 

Abeyta. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available 

under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and 

on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance 

with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth

 Mindy Michaels Roth

 Special Master

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, José Luis Gentile, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2015



/s/ Jose Luis GentileJosé Luis GentileChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Grupo
Financiero Galicia S.A. and will be retained by Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
Christopher George ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 6: STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

|                                |  | Concordia Bus Nordic |  | Concordia | 
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------- | 
|
|
|
|
|Net income/(loss) (in millions) |  | 54                   |  | 30        | 
|Number of shares                |  | 160,000              |  | 160,000   | 
|                                |  |                      |  |           | 
|Net income/(loss) per share     |  | 338                  |  | 188       | 
|                                |  |                      |  |           | 



|                                |  | Concordia Bus Nordic |  | Concordia |  
|------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------- | -
|
|
|
|
|Net income/(loss) (in millions) |  | 52                   |  | (5        | )
|Number of shares                |  | 160,000              |  | 160,000   |  
|                                |  |                      |  |           |  
|Net income/(loss) per share     |  | 325                  |  | (33       | )
|                                |  |                      |  |           |  

---

---

QuickLinks
8739 Research Drive

Charlotte, NC 28288

							WACHOVIA SECURITIES
 

 
**OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

	Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement      dated as of May 12, 2003, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wachovia Bank National Association, as Master Servicer, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2003-C3,Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2003 C3  (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

	Pursuant to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy E. Steward and Clyde         M. Alexander, Directors of the Master Servicer, do hereby certify that:
-   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from May  12, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and of its performance  under the Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision; and
To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under  this  Agreement in all material respects throughout the period May 12, 2003 through  December 31, 2003; and
The Master Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC Pool as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust, from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.

             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of                        the 12th day of March, 2004.

 

*Timothy E. Steward  			***Clyde M. Alexander
Timothy E. Steward, Director 			Clyde M. Alexander, Director

Wachovia Bank National Association		Wachovia Bank National Association	

 

 

 

LB-UBS 2003-C3/Due March 15th******
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jerry
D. Chase, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.








Date: February 8,
      2010
            By:
            /s/ Jerry D.
      ChaseName:
            Jerry D.
    ChaseTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Chief Executive
      Officer)




I, Reagan
Y. Sakai , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.




Date: February 8,
      2010
              By:
              /s/ Reagan Y.
      SakaiName:
              Reagan Y.
      SakaiTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(11)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(49)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)
              - (-)california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        December 14, 2006        PubTalk 12/2006 - Mojave

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 5: Select Search Parameters

How to's and trainings        June 11, 2020        Land Treatment Exploration Tool — Step 6: Compare the LTDL Treatments
Bobbie J. SANDERS, Jr. v. SWIFTSHIPS, INC.

NO. 2018-C-1912

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 13
- 00570
- CV NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

v. VIRGINIA CANAS On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2012
- CCV
- 60799
- 1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring the same

. We further order this decision certified below f or observance. January 29, 2015
Elizabeth CALLAHAN, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AMEDISYS FLORIDA, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0295

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32


       CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                ss.ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bravo Resource Partners Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Tyrone R. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer and Ernest Staggs, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  June 14, 2006
                               By:   /s/ Tyrone R. Carter
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Tyrone R. Carter, Chief Executive Officer



                               By:   /s/ Ernest Staggs
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Ernest Staggs, Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(18)
              - multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(8)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - (-)florida(8)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - south carolina(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Hurricanes increase future flood risk in Puerto Rico and Florida, 1

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Hurricanes increase future flood risk in Puerto Rico and Florida, 2

Charts or Graphs        October 10, 2018        This Flood Event Viewer is a one-stop information source

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Future Flooding Impacts from Projected Coral Reef Degradation in FL, 1

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Future Flooding Impacts from Projected Coral Reef Degradation in FL, 2

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Social and Economic Benefits of Coral Reef Restoration in Florida, 2

Charts or Graphs        August 23, 2021        Social and Economic Benefits of Coral Reef Restoration in Florida, 1

Charts or Graphs        January 1, 2020        Florida Coral Reefs and Coastal Hazard Risk Reduction
# C_2019383EN.01007601.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/76

---

Action brought on 26 September 2019 – Dermavita v EUIPO – Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)

(Case T-643/19)

(2019/C 383/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dermavita Co. Ltd (Beirut, Lebanon) (represented by: D. Todorov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Allergan Holdings France (Courbevoie, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA – European Union trade mark No 6 295 638

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2019 in Joined Cases R 1655/2018-4 and R 1723/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision concerning the dismissal of appeal R 1723/2018-4 and the decision of non-revocation of EUTM No 6 295 638 for the goods in class 5 and; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision concerning the dismissal of appeal R 1723/2018-4 and the decision of non-revocation of EUTM No 6 295 638 for the goods in class 5 and;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant for annulment at every stage of the action for revocation and appeal proceedings, including the cost of the proceedings before EUIPO and the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant for annulment at every stage of the action for revocation and appeal proceedings, including the cost of the proceedings before EUIPO and the Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Erroneous interpretation of the relevant law concerning the assessment of the nature of the goods the trademark has been used for; |
| --- | --- |

—

Erroneous interpretation of the relevant law concerning the assessment of the nature of the goods the trademark has been used for;

| — | Misinterpretation of some of the evidence in the proceedings concerning the use of the trademark by third parties with the consent of the EUTM proprietor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Misinterpretation of some of the evidence in the proceedings concerning the use of the trademark by third parties with the consent of the EUTM proprietor;

| — | Lack of sufficient proofs of the consent of the EUTM proprietor under the meaning of Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lack of sufficient proofs of the consent of the EUTM proprietor under the meaning of Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                     Pinecrest Services, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Pinecrest Services, Inc. certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:  August 2, 2004
                                         /s/ April L. Marino
                                        ____________________________________
                                        April L. Marino
                                        Principal Executive and Financial
                                        Officer
Exhibit 23.11(c)



Amec Foster Wheeler



March 29, 2017



|TO: |  | Seabridge Gold Inc.
                                                                                United States Securities and Exchange Commission
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Re: |  | Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")
                                                                                Consent of Expert
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to the following report:



|· |  | 2016 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study Update and Preliminary Economic
Assessment dated October 6, 2016 (the "Report")
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”), to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, I, Ignacy (Tony) Lipiec, P.Eng, on behalf of myself and Amec Foster
Wheeler, hereby:



|1. |  | consent to the public filing of the Report and the use of any extracts from or a summary
of the Report in the 40-F;
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | consent to the use of my name and Amec Foster Wheeler's name and references to the
Report, or portions thereof, in the 40-F and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report
in the 40-F;
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| |  | Yours truly,                
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  |                             
| |  | /s/ Ignacy (Tony) Lipiec    
| |  | Ignacy (Tony) Lipiec, P.Eng.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edward WESBY, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4246

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 9, 2019]

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The State appeals an order granting the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence. We reverse. Because the defendant is eligible for parole, his sentence is not unconstitutional under *Miller v. Alabama* , 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), or *Graham v. Florida* , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). *See* *Franklin v. State,* 258 So.3d 1239, 2018 WL 5839174 (Fla. Nov. 8, 2018). He is not therefore entitled to resentencing under section 921.1402, Florida Statutes.

In *State v. Michel* , 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018), and *Franklin,* 258 So.3d at 1240-41, the Florida Supreme Court receded from *Atwell v. State* , 197 So.3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). The defendant argues *Michel* does not create binding precedent because only three justices joined in Justice Polston's opinion and Justice Lewis concurred only in the result. *Michel* , 257 So.3d at 3. However, four justices joined the majority in *Franklin* , which recognized that *Atwell* is no longer good law and "improperly applied *Graham* and *Miller* ." *Franklin* , 258 So.3d at 1241.

*Reversed* .

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.