alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K, as amended, (the “Report”) of COL China Online International Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2011, I, Chi Keung Wong, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                         |                                                    
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|                         |                                                    
|Dated: December 21, 2011 | /s/Chi Keung Wong                                  
|                         | Chi Keung Wong,                                    
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                         | (Principal Accounting Officer)
Ashatia WINTERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-1462

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 5, 2018

Ashatia Winders, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the August 31, 2017, judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2012-CF-004925 in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Michael V. SOSA, DOC #T32330, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-615

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 4, 2019.

Michael V. Sosa, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and LUCAS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 329 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Horn. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Horn. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Horn, Cr. No. 21- 

301, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution is seeking the production of testimony from Michael J. Mastrian, Director 

of the Senate Radio and Television Gallery, and Jeffrey 

S. Kent, Director of the Press Photographers’ Gallery, 

departments of the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and 

Doorkeeper of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 329 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the 

admministration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with 

the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Michael J. Mastrian, Director of the 

2 Senate Radio and Television Gallery, and Jeffrey S. Kent, 

3 Director of the Press Photographers’ Gallery, are author4 ized to provide relevant testimony in the case of United 

5 States v. Horn, except concerning matters for which a 

6 privilege should be asserted. 

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

8 represent Messrs. Mastrian and Kent, and any current or 

9 former officer or employee of their offices, in connection 

10 with the production of evidence authorized in section one 

11 of this resolution. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                      [LETTERHEAD OF LAKSHMINIWAS & JAIN]

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation our report dated October 24, 2002 relating to
the balance sheet and the related income statement of SeraNova India Pvt. Ltd.
for the year ended March 31, 2002, in the Annual Report in Form 20-F of
Silverline Technologies Limited for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002.

                                                          Professionally yours,
                                                         For LAKSHMINIWAS & JAIN
                                                          CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Place: Hyderabad
Date: 14th February, 2003                                  /s/ B. Ramesh Kumar
                                                            (B. RAMESH KUMAR)
                                                                 PARTNER
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council

newsletter        November 30, 2014      Earth Science Matters - Volume 1, Fall 2014
STATE of Louisiana v. Dwight HARVEY

NO. 2019-KK-0188

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 4, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

**AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS**

 

May 22, 2003 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

450 Fifth Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners: 

 

We are aware that our report dated May 22, 2003 on our review of interimfinancial information of Ribapharm Inc. (the “Company’) as of and for the period ended March 31, 2003 and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in itsRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-91116). 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Los Angeles, California
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 189 

Commending and congratulating the Quinnipiac University men’s hockey team 

for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division 

I Men’s Hockey National Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2023 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending and congratulating the Quinnipiac University 

men’s hockey team for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Men’s Hockey National Championship. 

Whereas, on Saturday, April 8, 2023, the Quinnipiac University men’s hockey team (referred to in this preamble as 

the ‘‘Quinnipiac Bobcats’’) won the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as 

‘‘NCAA’’) Men’s Hockey Championship with a 3–2 win 

over the Minnesota Golden Gophers, at Amalie Arena in 

Tampa, Florida; 

Whereas the 2023 national championship is the first national 

championship for the Quinnipiac Bobcats; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 189 ATS 

Whereas the Quinnipiac Bobcats have demonstrated remarkably consistent success in the past decade, and have 

made the NCAA Championship tournament in 8 of the 

last 10 seasons; 

Whereas Jacob Quillan was named the Most Outstanding 

Player of the 2023 NCAA Championship tournament, 

finishing the NCAA Championship tournament with 5 

goals and setting a new Quinnipiac University record for 

most goals scored in a single tournament; 

Whereas Rand Pecknold, the head coach of the Quinnipiac 

Bobcats, has led the team for 29 years and transformed 

the Quinnipiac Bobcats from a Division II program to a 

National Division I powerhouse; and 

Whereas the National Championship was played in front of 

20,000 people in Tampa, Florida, and was the most 

watched ‘‘Frozen Four Final’’ game in more than 10 

years: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Quinnipiac University men’s 

3 hockey team for winning the 2023 National Colle4 giate Athletic Association Division I Men’s Hockey 

5 Championship; 

6 (2) congratulates the fans, students, and fac7 ulty of Quinnipiac University; and 

8 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

9 the Senate transmits an enrolled copy of this resolu10 tion to— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 189 ATS 

1 (A) the President of Quinnipiac University, 

2 Dr. Judy Olian; and 

3 (B) the head coach of the Quinnipiac Uni4 versity men’s hockey team, Rand Pecknold. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

t0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

143153 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143153 

 COA: 302144 

Macomb CC: 2009-005484-FH 

JEROME PATRICK TOAL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
STATE EX REL. Jonathan J. FOX v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1926

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ASCENSION**

PER CURIAM:

*778Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(10)
              - products_publications(19)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

staff profileMichelle Guy
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thaddeus
J. Shalek, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thaddeus J.
      ShalekThaddeus
      J. ShalekInterim
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting OfficerApril 15, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.2


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Perfect Line, LLC
d/b/a NASCAR Silicon Motor Speedway
Indianapolis, Indiana

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Interactive  Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. /successor by merger to Pacific
International  Holding,  Inc, on Form S-8  (Registration  No.  333-97323) of our
report dated March 20, 2002 and appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. to be filed for the period ended
December 31, 2002 and appearing in the amended Form 8-K.


/s/ KATZ, SAPPER & MILLER

Indianapolis, Indiana
April 14, 2003
##### 



®
 Investor and Media Contact:
 TARGETED GENETICS AMENDS tgAAC94 CLINICAL PROTOCOL
AND ADVANCES ONGOING TRIAL TO PHASE I/II STATUS
  Amendment potentially accelerates clinical development of therapy
 Seattle, WA
  a




---



##### 



a
 a
 About tgAAC94  a a a a
 11
 About Targeted Genetics




---



##### 



Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:  This release contains forward-looking statements regarding the data to be collected in this
trial, the establishment or determination of efficacy endpoints from the data collected in the
trial, the timely and complete accrual of patients in the trial and our ability to commercialize
tgAAC94, our expected use of these proceeds and other statements about our plans, objectives,
intentions and expectations. These statements, involve current expectations, forecasts of future
events and other statements that are not historical facts. Inaccurate assumptions and known and
unknown risks and uncertainties can affect the accuracy of forward-looking statements. Factors that
could affect our actual results include, but are not limited to, our ability to obtain, maintain
and protect our intellectual property, our ability to raise capital when needed, our ability to
recruit and enroll suitable trial participants, the timing, nature and results of research and
clinical trials, potential development of alternative technologies or more effective processes by
competitors, and, our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory or institutional approvals,, as
well as other risk factors described in the section entitled Factors Affecting Our Operating
Results, Our Business and Our Stock Price in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005. You should not rely unduly on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of
the date of this release. We undertake no duty to publicly announce or report revisions to these
statements as new information becomes available that may change our expectations.
 # # #
Juan Jose SALAZAR DIAZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0055

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2021391EN.01000201.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/2

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 July 2021 — Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova v European Commission

(Case C-717/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Spouse of a Greek diplomat who resided in Brussels prior to the recruitment - Definition of the place of recruitment and the centre of interests - Refusal to grant the appellant the expatriation allowance and related benefits - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2021/C 391/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova (represented by: S. Pappas, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Ms Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova shall bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova shall bear her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

---
BEACH COMMUNITY BANK, a Florida Banking Corporation, Appellant, v. Robert O. BEASLEY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald W. Moore, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4630

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2021502EN.01001001.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Szczecinie — Poland) — A.M. v Dyrektor Z. Oddziału Regionalnego Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

(Case C-373/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Common agricultural policy - Direct support schemes - Common rules - Single payment scheme - Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 - Article 2(c) - Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ - Crop rotation - Natural periodic flooding of meadows and pastures situated in a special environmental protection area)

(2021/C 502/14)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Szczecinie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A.M.

Defendant: Dyrektor Z. Oddziału Regionalnego Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(c) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 of 29 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Title III of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers must be interpreted as meaning that meadows or pasture situated in a special protection area and which are subject to natural periodic flooding or submersion are not excluded from the concept of ‘permanent pasture’, within the meaning of that provision, since such flooding or submersion cannot, in themselves, cause a ‘crop rotation’ on the land concerned, within the meaning of that same provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 423, 7.12.2020.

---
Opinion issued November 1, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00394-CR

———————————

VINCENT L. ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1326606

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Vincent L. Robinson, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of 

delivery of a controlled substance.1 The trial court found appellant guilty, and, in 

 

1

See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.114(a),(c) (West 2010).
2

accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced 

appellant to confinement for three years. Appellant has filed a pro se notice of 

appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea-bargained case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that 

were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after obtaining the 

trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 

2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification 

showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargained case and the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must 

dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an 

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must 

dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the 

appeal.”). 
3

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).