alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 379 

Expressing support for the diplomatic relations required to encourage the 

Government of Mexico to fulfill water deliveries on an annual basis 

to the United States under the Treaty between the United States of 

America and Mexico respecting the utilization of waters of the Colorado 

and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the diplomatic relations required to 

encourage the Government of Mexico to fulfill water deliveries on an annual basis to the United States under 

the Treaty between the United States of America and 

Mexico respecting the utilization of waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. 

Whereas the Treaty between the United States of America 

and Mexico respecting the utilization of waters of the 

Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, 

signed at Washington February 1944 (59 Stat. 1219), 

commits the Government of the United Mexican States to 

deliver to the United States a minimum of 350,000 acreVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:19 Sep 28, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR379.IS SR379

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 379 IS 

feet of water annually, measured in 5-year cycles requiring 1,750,000 acre-feet of water to be delivered; 

Whereas the Government of the United Mexican States has 

repeatedly failed to deliver the required minimum of 

350,000 acre-feet of water annually and 1,750,000 acrefeet of water during each 5-year cycle; and 

Whereas such failures have contributed to water shortages 

for farmers in south Texas: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports relations between United States 

3 diplomats and officials at the United States Section 

4 of the International Boundary and Water Commis5 sion and counterparts in the United Mexican States 

6 to secure compliance by the Government of the 

7 United Mexican States with the Treaty between the 

8 United States of America and Mexico respecting the 

9 utilization of waters of the Colorado and Tijuana 

10 Rivers and of the Rio Grande, signed at Washington 

11 February 1944 (59 Stat. 1219)(referred to in this 

12 resolution as the ‘‘Treaty’’); 

13 (2) encourages the Government of the United 

14 Mexican States to fulfill the commitment to annually 

15 deliver a minimum of 350,000 acre-feet of water to 

16 the United States; 

17 (3) is deeply concerned that farmers in south 

18 Texas are experiencing water shortages; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 379 IS 

1 (4) supports negotiations to ensure more pre2 dictable and reliable water deliveries to the United 

3 States; and 

4 (5) encourages renewed commitments to ensure 

5 that the United States receives annual deliveries of 

6 at least 350,000 acre-feet of water under the Treaty. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Travis Robert WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3456

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed January 25, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Travis Walker appeals the denial of his pre-sentencing motion to withdraw his plea. From a thorough review of the record, we find that Walker established good cause in support of his motion and, therefore, reverse.

When good cause is established, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f) entitles the defendant to withdraw his pre-sentence plea. *Tanzi v. State*, 964 So.2d 106, 113 (Fla. 2007). This "rule should be liberally construed in favor of the defendant because the law inclines toward a trial on the merits." *Johnson v. State*, 947 So.2d 1208, 1210 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Under the unique circumstances of this case, we find the trial court abused its discretion in denying Walker's motion to withdraw his plea. *See**Wright v. State*, 961 So.2d 1036, 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We reverse Walker's conviction and sentence and remand for the trial court to vacate the plea and sentence and to take further actions consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

COHEN, J., dissents without opinion.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - (-)documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

Technical Memos        April 5, 1996        TM96-05 Collection, processing, and analysis of carbon isotope samples
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunrise Solar Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eddie
      D. Austin, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2008




/s/
      Eddie
      D. Austin, Jr.


Eddie
      D.
      Austin, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Principal
      Financial Officer
Scott DUGAN, Appellant, v. Jekaterina FEDOSEJEVA, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2691

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Whitney J. DEROCHE, Jr. v. Roy A. BLANCHARD, Farm Bureau Insurance Company and Teche Airboats, Inc.

No. 2019-CC-0064

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 6, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF LAFOURCHE**

Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

*1196For the reasons assigned by Judges Guidry and Holdridge, I would grant the defendant's writ application, reverse the court of appeal, and remand the matter for a full trial on the merits.
EX-10.28



 Exhibit 10.28 

AMENDMENT TO THE E.L.F. BEAUTY, INC. 

2014 PHANTOM EQUITY PLAN 

September 5, 2016 
 This
Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (f/k/a J.A. Cosmetics Holdings, Inc.) 2014 Phantom Equity Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of the date first set forth above, such amendment having been
approved by the Board of Directors of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Plan. The Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The following will replace Section 4(c) of the Plan in its entirety as follows: 

 “(c)
Settlement of Phantom Shares. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Phantom Shares Award Agreement to the contrary, on, or as soon as administratively practicable following, the vesting of any Phantom Shares, the Company shall settle
the Phantom Shares so vesting by making a payment in the form of either (i) cash denominated in RMB or (ii) shares of Company common stock, as determined by the Company, in its sole discretion. The amount of any such payment shall be
calculated in good faith by the Committee. In the event of the payment in cash denominated in RMB, such payment shall be made by J.A. Cosmetics Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., less any applicable taxes and other withholdings, by check or wire transfer
of immediately available funds or through normal payroll processing within sixty (60) days of the date any payment is owed. In the event of the payment in shares of Company common stock, such Company common stock shall be issued subject to the
satisfaction of any applicable taxes and other withholdings in such form as the Company shall determine is necessary or appropriate and the completion of any regulatory filings or approvals the Company shall determine is necessary or appropriate.
All payments under the Plan are final, and no Participant will have the right to challenge or otherwise to object to the Committee’s calculation of any payment hereunder.” 

 

	 	2.	Except as provided in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 


*    *    *    *    * 







 The undersigned, being the duly elected and acting Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies
that the foregoing amendment was duly approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company, effective as of the date first referenced above. 
  

			
	By:	 	/s/ Scott K. Milsten
		 	 Scott K. Milsten
 Corporate
Secretary



 (Signature Page to Plan Amendment)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 359 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 359

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that tax reform 
    should jointly address corporate and pass-through entities in a 
fiscally responsible manner, and that reform should reduce the current 
tax rate differences between corporate and pass-through entities while 
       maintaining adequate forms of organization for businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2013

Mr. Schneider (for himself, Mr. Carney, Mr. Mulvaney, and Mr. Scalise) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that tax reform 
    should jointly address corporate and pass-through entities in a 
fiscally responsible manner, and that reform should reduce the current 
tax rate differences between corporate and pass-through entities while 
       maintaining adequate forms of organization for businesses.

Whereas pass-through entities such as S corporations, partnerships, limited 
        liability companies, and sole proprietorships account for more than 90 
        percent of all business entities;
Whereas the Internal Revenue Service reports 4.5 million S corporations, 3.5 
        million partnerships and limited liability companies, 23 million sole 
        proprietorships, and less than 2 million C corporations;
Whereas pass-through entities employ 54 percent of the private sector workforce;
Whereas pass-through entities are taxed at individual income tax rates; and
Whereas the top pass-through tax rate is now 39.6 percent for taxable income 
        above $400,000 and the top corporate income tax rate is 35 percent: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
tax reform should jointly address corporate and pass-through entities 
in a fiscally responsible manner, and that reform should reduce the 
current tax rate differences between corporate and pass-through 
entities while maintaining adequate forms of organization for 
businesses.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Chris D. North, Chief Financial Officer of Hydril Company, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter-ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2005 |  | /s/ Chris D. North     
|                        |  | Chris D. North         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Joseph Jimenez, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novartis AG;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 29, 2014   By:
/s/  JOSEPH JIMENEZJoseph JimenezChief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(6)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - (-)arizona(2)
              - california(3)
              - hawaii(25)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(4)

## By Year

Photography        January 1, 2010        Jurassic Rocks in Arizona

Photography        June 3, 2011        Drilling in Cinder Lake, Arizona
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on:
a) Forms S-8 No. 333-49646, No. 33-41527, No. 33-55446, No. 33-55448, No.
33-78848, No. 33-78844, No. 333-44763, No. 333-44765, No. 333-13007, No.
33-78834, No. 33-95270, No. 333-13015, No. 333-76601, No. 333-89271, No.
333-75829; No. 333-58122; and b) Forms S-3 No. 333-42792, No. 333-35434, No.
333-63615, No. 333-00118, of NTL Incorporated (the "Company") and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated April 16, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of the Company included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule, as amended, included in this
Form 10-K/A.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
September 16, 2002
# C_2020027EN.01006402.xml

| 27.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/64

---

Action brought on 21 November 2019 — Govern d'Andorra v EUIPO

(Andorra)

(Case T-806/19)

(2020/C 27/64)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Govern d'Andorra (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Andorra — Application for registration No 16 797 912

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 August 2019 in Case R 737/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Legal uncertainty arising from different EUIPO decisions relating to very similar marks and the need for reasons to be given in decisions. |
| --- | --- |

—

Legal uncertainty arising from different EUIPO decisions relating to very similar marks and the need for reasons to be given in decisions.

---
James Rodger DUKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2494

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Sino Assurance Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report"), I, Guokang Tu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. By: /s/ Guokang Tu, CEO and Chairman Date: May 13, 2011