alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149800) pertaining to the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan, 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 2008 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of CardioNet, Inc. of our reports dated February 22, 2010, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CardioNet, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CardioNet, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
February 22, 2010.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23

STA

          Stark Tinter & Associates, LLC

                                Certified Public Accountants
                                       Financial Consultants








     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Shareholders and Board of Directors
American IR Technologies, Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada



We consent to the use of our report on the December 31, 2000
financial statements in the Form 10-KSB dated May  16,  2001
of American IR Technologies, Inc.








/s/ Stark Tinter & Associates, LLC


May 16, 2001
Denver, Colorado


 7535 East Hampden Avenue, Suite 109  Denver, Colorado 80231
              (303) 694-6700 Fax (303) 694-6761
exv10w2w2



 





EXHIBIT 10.2.2




SECOND AMENDMENT

TO

TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.

1997 DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN




     1. Section 5.2 of Article V of the Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp.
1997 Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended by that certain First Amendment
dated January 14, 1999 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by deleting it in its
entirety and replacing it with the following sentence:




     5.2 Subsequent Grants. On April 30, 2003 through
April 30, 2005, each Eligible Director shall receive
Option grants as follows:




April 30, 2003 – Each Eligible Director shall
receive a grant to purchase shares equal to
the greater of 1) $91,667 divided by the Fair
Market Value or 2) 7,500 shares.




April 30, 2004 – Each Eligible Director shall
receive a grant to purchase shares equal to
the greater of 1) $100,833 divided by the
Fair Market Value or 2) 7,500 shares.




April 30, 2005 – Each Eligible Director shall
receive a grant to purchase shares equal to
the greater of 1) $110,917 divided by the
Fair Market Value or 2) 7,500 shares.



     2. Except as modified by Paragraph 1 above, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect.



     3. The foregoing Second Amendment to the Total Entertainment Restaurant
Corp. 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp. (the “Company”) on April 10,
2002.



	 	 	 
	

	 	/s/ Steven M. Johnson


	

	 	Steven M. Johnson, CEO
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OraSure Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Michels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas A. Michels                                  
|                                                        
|Douglas A. Michels President
and Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2010



-27-
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.3

       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to
Form S-1 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 18, 2004, except for the second,
third and fourth paragraphs of Note 1, which appear in the consolidated
financial statements in the Company's Form S-1 dated February 9, 2005 and are
not presented herein as to which the date is December 13, 2004; and except for
the revisions of classifications disclosed in Note 2 as to which the date is
March 30, 2005; and except for the reclassifications of operating segments in
Note 17 as to which the date is March 13, 2006, relating to the consolidated
statements of operations, of stockholders' equity and of cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2003, which appear in Loudeye Corp.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the
references to us under the headings "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 14, 2006
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th 

day of December, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

In the Interest of R.T.M. and I.M., 

Children

No. 06-14-00063-CV

Trial Court No. 79,495

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellants have adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of 

appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 19th day of February, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
### M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on January 28, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Michael Thomas Paul, Appellant

V.

Greg Abbot Attorney General for the State of Texas, Appellee

No. 04

- 14

- 00791

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2001

- CI

- 16843

was determined, and there in our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this

appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); see also TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(c). Appellant’s motion requesting an extension of time to file his brief and

a waiver of all costs of appeal, which was filed on January 9, 2015, is DENIED

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on April 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 14

- 00791

- CV

Michael Thomas Paul

v.

Greg Abbot Attorney General for the State of Texas

(NO. 2001

- CI

- 16843 IN 225TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD $10.00

$54.75 E

- PAID

EXEMPT MICHAEL PAUL

BEXAR COUNTY

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in**  **this cause shall**  **be paid as**  **per the**  **Judgment issued by**  **this Court.** 

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this April 15, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-K of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2005, I, Richard I. Linhart, Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


 /s/ Richard I. Linhart
-----------------------------------------------------------
Richard I. Linhart
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
**EXHIBIT
23.1**
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-47086 and Form S-8 No. 333-58692 )
pertaining to the Millennium Cell Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option
Plan and in the Registration Statements ( Form S-3
No. 333-92144 , Form S-3
No. 333-101061 , Form S-3
No.  333-103104 , Form S-3
No.  333-105582 , Form S-3
No.  333-108768 , Form S-3
No.  333-112519 , and Form S-3
No. 333-120301 ) of
Millennium Cell Inc. and
in the related Prospectuses , of our
report dated February 11, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Millennium Cell Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
 /s/ Ernst
& Young LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 March 18,
2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Silvergraph International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies: 

|   

   (i) 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

  

   (ii) 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

DATE:   August 13, 2010 

/s/ JAMES R SIMPSON 

  

  

James R. Simpson 

  

  

Chief Executive Officer 

  

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silvergraph International, Inc. and will be retained by Silvergraph International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q. 

   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH and City of Jacksonville Beach Planning Commission, Appellants, v. BCEL 4, LLC, and BCEL 5, LLC, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1280

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 18, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 29, 2019

Michael J. Roper and Dale A. Scott of Bell & Roper, Orlando, for Appellants.

Emily G. Pierce, Cristine M. Russell, and William Michaelis of Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

*836The appellants, City of Jacksonville Beach and City of Jacksonville Beach Planning Commission (the City), appeal an order from the circuit court granting a petition for writ of mandamus and alternatively granting a petition for writ of certiorari filed by the appellees, BCEL 4, LLC, and BCEL 5, LLC (BCEL).

We reverse the portion of the order granting BCEL mandamus relief. *See**Browning v. Young* , 993 So.2d 64, 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (reviewing a circuit court order granting mandamus relief by plenary appeal). BCEL failed to establish the City's decision to approve or deny its concept plan for plat application was a purely ministerial one. *See**Rhea v. Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Santa Fe Coll.* , 109 So.3d 851, 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (mandamus is a remedy to command performance of ministerial act in which there exists no room for the exercise of discretion) (citing *Town of Manalapan v. Rechler* , 674 So.2d 789, 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) ); *see also**Key Biscayne Gateway Partners, Ltd. v. Village of Key Biscayne* , 172 So.3d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (affirming dismissal of mandamus petition where the local government's action was quasi-judicial and not ministerial). The portion of the order granting BCEL's petition for writ of mandamus is reversed.

As to the portion of the order granting BCEL's petition for writ of certiorari, our review is by second-tier certiorari. *See**Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs* , 658 So.2d 523, 530 (Fla. 1995). We deny the City's petition for second-tier certiorari review as the circuit court afforded procedural due process and did not depart from the essential requirements of law. *See id.*

We REVERSE the portion of the order granting mandamus relief. We DENY second-tier certiorari review of that portion of the order granting certiorari.

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Gaspra

Filters

              - products_publications(4)

## By Location

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1994        The Geology of Gaspra

publication        January 1, 1994        Galileo Photometry of Asteroid 951 Gaspra

publication        January 1, 1994        Discovery of Grooves on Gaspra

publication        January 1, 1992        Galileo encounter with 951 Gaspra: First pictures of an asteroid
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 38928 (f rev)

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Tefera M. WORKNEH

Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Upon further review

Decided 18 May 2017

________________________

Military Judge: Brendon K. Tukey (arraignment); Joseph S. Imburgia 

(trial).

Approved sentence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 6 years, 

forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 29 September 2015 by GCM convened at Travis Air Force Base, 

California. 

For Appellant: Kirk Sripinyo, Esquire (argued); Major Michael A. Schrama, 

USAF; Captain Patrick L. Clary, USAF.

For Appellee: Captain Tyler B. Musselman, USAF (argued); Colonel Katherine E. Oler, USAF; Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire; Morgan L. Herrell (civilian intern).1

Before MAYBERRY, HARDING, and C. BROWN, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

 

1 Ms. Herrell was a law student extern with the Air Force Legal Operations Agency 

and was at all times supervised by attorneys admitted to practice before this court. 
United States v. Workneh, No. ACM 38928 (f rev)

2

PER CURIAM:

This case is back before our court for further review because the original 

convening authority’s action contained errors. United States v. Workneh, ACM

No. 38928, 2017 CCA LEXIS 219, at *10 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 24 Mar. 2017). 

On 4 May 2017, the convening authority withdrew the erroneous action in accordance with our original decision and issued a corrected action. A corrected 

court-martial order was also executed.

Having resolved that issue, the approved findings and sentence are correct 

in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER

Clerk of the Court
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 410 

Designating October 12, 2023, as ‘‘National Loggers Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KING, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. 

BOOZMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 12, 2023, as ‘‘National Loggers Day’’. 

Whereas the logging industry has served as an economic driver and cultural tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas the logging industry creates rural jobs and provides 

revenue for local and State governments and National 

forests; 

Whereas loggers provide renewable material for products used 

by people in the United States every day; 

Whereas loggers are the first link in the $300,000,000,000 

domestic forest products supply chain; 

Whereas loggers are the means by which healthy forest management plans are accomplished; 

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests, which— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 410 ATS 

(1) maintain vital animal habitats; 

(2) protect watersheds; 

(3) sequester carbon; 

(4) provide public recreational opportunities; and 

(5) reduce loss of life and property from wildfires; 

and 

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests through regeneration, including by planting 2,500,000,000 trees annually: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 12, 

2 2023, as ‘‘National Loggers Day’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Cheyenne BENTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_maps(5)
              - products_publications(80)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(7)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(5)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(11)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(5)
              - (-)georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - kansas(3)
              - maine(3)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(12)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Real-time Data        October 7, 2016        Hurricane and Flood Response Map Viewer
STATE of Louisiana v. James R. TOWNLEY, Jr.

NO. 2018-KH-1908

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

Denied.