alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “report”) of Harbor Global Company Ltd.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 5, 2019

No. 04-19-00655-CV

Rosaly CANALES d/b/a Marathon Bulk Transport,

Appellant

v.

CAPITOL AGGREGATES, INC.,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI05174

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby MOOT. The 

reporter’s record has not been filed. The appellant’s brief is not due until thirty days after the 

date the appellate record is complete. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
[ EXHIBIT 31.2 ]

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, James Young, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Perfect Health Care
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: February 2, 2005

/s/ James W. Young
-------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020068EN.01005101.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/51

---

Action brought on 27 December 2019 – Gustopharma Consumer Health v EUIPO – Helixor Heilmittel (HELIX ELIXIR)

(Case T-883/19)

(2020/C 68/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gustopharma Consumer Health, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Helixor Heilmittel GmbH (Rosenfeld, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark HELIX ELIXIR – Application for registration No 15 035 991

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2019 in Case R 100/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | allow the present Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the present Appeal;

| — | annul the contested decision; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision; and/or

| — | set aside the contested decision due to erroneous application of Article 8(1)(b) and enter a finding to the effect that there does not exist likelihood of confusion between the confronted trademarks; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision due to erroneous application of Article 8(1)(b) and enter a finding to the effect that there does not exist likelihood of confusion between the confronted trademarks;

| — | issue a new Resolution granting EUTM Application No 15 035 991 HELIX ELIXIR for all the applied goods; and |
| --- | --- |

—

issue a new Resolution granting EUTM Application No 15 035 991 HELIX ELIXIR for all the applied goods; and

| — | order EUIPO (and Intervener, if he enters an appearance in proceedings) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO (and Intervener, if he enters an appearance in proceedings) to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the U.S. **

District Court for Central Illinois, Springfield, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: WELLS FARGO HOME

MORTGAGE OVERTIME PAY

LITIGATION,

JASON MEVORAH; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 v.

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-15355

D.C. No. CV-06-01770-MHP

ORDER*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2009

Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and MILLS, Senior

District Judge.** 

FILED

APR 08 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Pursuant to the stipulation filed by the remaining parties, the pending portion

of this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This Order does not affect

this Court’s published opinion in In re Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Overtime Pay

Litigation, 571 F.3d 953 (9th Cir. 2009). Each side shall bear its own costs on

appeal. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
# C_2022002EN.01000801.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — KAHL GmbH & Co. KG (C-197/20) and C.E. Roeper GmbH (C-216/20) v Hauptzollamt Hannover (C-197/20), Hauptzollamt Hamburg (C-216/20)

(Joined Cases C-197/20 and C-216/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings 1521 90 91 and 1521 90 99 - Interpretation of the Explanatory Notes to subheading 1521 90 99 - Beeswax melted down and solidified prior to import)

(2022/C 2/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: KAHL GmbH & Co. KG (C-197/20) and C.E. Roeper GmbH (C-216/20)

Defendants: Hauptzollamt Hannover (C-197/20) and Hauptzollamt Hamburg (C-216/20)

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014 and from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1754 of 6 October 2015, must be interpreted as meaning that beeswax which has been melted down, and from which foreign bodies have been mechanically removed in part during the melting process, then solidified to form blocks or slabs, falls under subheading 1521 90 99 of that nomenclature, which refers to ‘other’ waxes, and not under subheading 1521 90 91 of that nomenclature, which refers to ‘raw’ waxes.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.

---
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No . 0 4- 09 -0 07 19 -C R Marian L ouise CA M P BELL ,

Appellant
v . The STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 198th J udicial District Court, Ker r County , Texas Trial Court No. B 09-05 Honora ble Robert R. Ba

rton, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: J anuar y 20, 2010 DI SMI SSED FOR WANT OF JURI SDI CTI ON On September

11, 2009, ap p ellant was pla ced on c ommunity supervision for a

period of
se ve n (7) y e ars . O n Se pte mbe r 3 0, 20 09 , th e State fi le d a mot ion to r e vo ke a

pp e lla nt’ s c omm

un ity
su pe rv isi on . O n O c tob e r 9 , 2 00 9, the tr ia l c ourt e nte re d a n o rd e r c on tin

uin g a pp e lla nt o n c omm

un ity supervision, but modify ing the terms of a ppellant’s community

supervision. Appellant filed a notice of a pp e a l f ro m th e tr ia l c ourt ’s or de r m od if yingthe c on dit ion s o f h e r c omm un ity su pe rv isi on . T his04
- 09
- 00 71 9- CR

- 2- court doe s not have jurisdi ct i o n t o consider a n appea l from an or der a ltering or modifying the
co n d i t i o n s of community supervision. Se e Ba sa ldu a v . S tate , 5 5 8 S. W. 2 d

2 , 5 ( T e x. Cr im
. App. 19 77 ); Qu ag lia v . S

tate , 906 S.W .2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.). On Dec ember

18, 2009, this court issued an orde r for appellant to show c ause on or befor e January

4, 2010, why

this appea l should not be dis missed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Acc ording ly , this appeal is dismissed for lac k of jurisdiction. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marcel Urbanc, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AlphaRx Inc. (the
     "registrant");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other information
     included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the registrant, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this
            quarterly report is being prepared;

      b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
            of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)    Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

      a)    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
            identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Dated: August 12, 2003

/s/ Marcel Urbanc
---------------------------------
Marcel Urbanc
Chief Financial Officer
Hector CRUZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Kathie Lee Segarra, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 03, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Calvin C. MONTS, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

Calvin C. Monts, II, Lake City, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Malcolm Jamal STRAGHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 14, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 555 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-902, K2025-903.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-31010 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1919.

#### Kehoe & Sons *v.*Henry.

Action for damages, from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. April 9, 1909.

Argued July 15, —

Decided July 31, 1909.

*O'Byrne, Hartridge & Wright,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Oliver & Oliver,*contra.

Powell, J.

The evidence amply authorizes the verdict. The rulings complained of as to the admission of testimony, even if erroneous, are not of sufficient materiality to justify a reversal. *Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit  31.2

                        CERTIFICATIONS  UNDER  SECTION  302

I,  Barrett  Evans,  certify  that:

    1.  I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  of  Xtreme  Companies,  Inc.;

    2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state a material fact necessary to make the
statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by this report;

    3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

    4.  The  registrant's  other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant and have:

         a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the registrant, including its
consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  report  is  being  prepared;

         b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

         c)  disclosed  in  this  report any change in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred during the registrant's most
recent  fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

    5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on  our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):

         a)  all  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or  operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and

         b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting.


Date:  April  13,  2004


/s/  Barrett  Evans
-----------------
Barrett  Evans
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
Sidney HANDY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-CI-1916

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).