alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS     I, Gary Freeman, being the Chief Financial Officer, certify that:     1. I have reviewed the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of SilvergraphInternational, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) not applicable  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in the report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s first quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     November 13, 2006 /s/ Gary Freeman  Date  Gary Freeman, Chief Financial Officer
Randy A. HART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Ruth KNIGHT, A. P. D., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3981

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 104977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30761]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-47-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 72; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Toyota Material Handling, Inc.; (Forklift Trucks, Work Trucks 
and Automated Guided Vehicles); Columbus, Indiana

    On August 20, 2024, Toyota Material Handling, Inc. submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within FTZ 72, in Columbus, Indiana.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (89 FR 68390, August 26, 2024). On 
December 19, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: December 19, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-30761 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(9)
              - alaska(84)
              - arizona(29)
              - arkansas(5)
              - california(117)
              - colorado(35)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(4)
              - florida(11)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(76)
              - idaho(16)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(7)
              - louisiana(6)
              - maine(8)
              - maryland(9)
              - massachusetts(14)
              - michigan(9)
              - minnesota(6)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(21)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(26)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(23)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(11)
              - (-)ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(19)
              - pennsylvania(11)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(10)
              - south dakota(41)
              - tennessee(4)
              - texas(22)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(42)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(13)
              - washington(31)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(14)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

publication        December 14, 2017        Generalized hydrogeologic framework and groundwater budget for a groundwater availability study for the glacial aquifer system of the United States
Christopher WISE v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00349-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: November 27, 2018 Closed: February 14, 2019

Certiorari - Denied.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 414 

Designating October 8, 2023, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. COONS, and Mr. MURPHY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 8, 2023, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and 

Fuel Cell Day’’. 

Whereas hydrogen, which has an atomic mass of 1.008, is the 

most abundant element in the universe; 

Whereas the United States is a world leader in the development and deployment of fuel cell and hydrogen technologies; 

Whereas hydrogen fuel cells played an instrumental role in 

the United States space program, helping the United 

States achieve the mission of landing a man on the 

Moon; 

Whereas private industry, Federal and State governments, 

national laboratories, and institutions of higher education 

continue to improve fuel cell and hydrogen technologies 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 414 ATS 

to address the most pressing energy, environmental, and 

economic issues of the United States; 

Whereas fuel cells utilizing hydrogen and hydrogen-rich fuels 

to generate electricity are clean, efficient, safe, and resilient technologies being used for— 

(1) stationary and backup power generation; and 

(2) zero-emission transportation for light-duty vehicles, industrial vehicles, delivery vans, buses, trucks, 

trains, military vehicles, marine applications, and aerial 

vehicles; 

Whereas stationary fuel cells are being placed in service for 

continuous and backup power to provide businesses and 

other energy consumers with reliable power in the event 

of grid outages; 

Whereas stationary fuel cells can help reduce water use, as 

compared to traditional power generation technologies; 

Whereas fuel cell electric vehicles that utilize hydrogen can 

mimic the experience of internal combustion vehicles, including comparable range and refueling times; 

Whereas hydrogen fuel cell industrial vehicles are deployed at 

logistical hubs and warehouses across the United States 

and exported to facilities in Europe and Asia; 

Whereas hydrogen is a nontoxic gas that can be derived from 

a variety of domestically available traditional and renewable resources, including solar, wind, biogas, and the 

abundant supply of natural gas in the United States; 

Whereas hydrogen and fuel cells can store energy to help enhance the grid and maximize opportunities to deploy renewable energy; 

Whereas the United States produces and uses approximately 

10,000,000 metric tons of hydrogen per year; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 414 ATS 

Whereas engineers and safety code and standard professionals have developed consensus-based protocols for safe 

delivery, handling, and use of hydrogen; and 

Whereas the ingenuity of the people of the United States is 

essential to paving the way for the future use of hydrogen technologies: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 8, 

2 2023, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
FILED#C70555-99                   CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
---------------                  TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
  MAR 29 2001                              OF
                                   NEVER MISS A CALL, INC.
                                     A Nevada Corporation

         The Articles of Incorporation of Never Miss A Call, Inc., a Nevada
corporation, (the "Corporation") are hereby amended as follows:

         Article IV is deleted in its entirety and substituted by the following:

         AUTHORIZATION OF CAPITAL STOCK: The amount of the total authorized
capital stock of the corporation shall be TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND Dollars
($25,000.00) consisting of TWENTY FIVE MILLION (25,000,000) shares of Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share and the Company shall effect a 3.5 for 1
forward stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock
effective as of April 3, 2001. The 25,000,000 authorized shares shall remain
unchanged.



Dated: March 28, 2001                  \s\ Scott Gershon, Pres. + Secretary
                                       ------------------------------------
                                        Scott Gershon, President and Secretary
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 12
- 002 7 3
- CV



### ________________ IN THE INTEREST OF J
. T. AND J.T.

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 418 th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11
- 05
- 05651 CV

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION V.G. and J.T. appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to the minor
childre n J.T. and J.T. The trial court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that statutory grounds existed for the termination and that termination of the parental rights of
V.G. and J.T. would be in the best interest of the children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann . §
1 61.001(1) (D), (E), (2) (West Supp. 2012).
Court

- appointed appellate counsel for V.G. and J.T. submitted a brief in which counsel concludes that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); In the Interest of L.D.T. , 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief2

presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel served appellants with a copy of the Anders brief, moved to withdraw, and requested that appellants be provided with an opportunity to file a pro se brief. On August 14, 2012, we notified the parties that appellants could file a pro se brief on or before September 4, 2012. Neither appellant
has f iled a pro se brief.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the trial court record. We conclude that no arguable grounds for appeal exist, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw. 1
AFFIRMED.

___________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice

Submitted on September 25, 2012 Opinion Delivered October 18, 2012 Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1 In connection with withdrawing from the case, counsel shall inform appellants of the result of this appeal and that they have the right to file a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 53; In the Interest of K.D. , 127 S.W.3d 66, 68 n.3 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).
# C_2022073EN.01000302.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske — Croatia) — HRVATSKE ŠUME d.o.o., Zagreb, successor in title to HRVATSKE ŠUME javno poduzeće za gospodarenje šumama i šumskim zemljištima u Republici Hrvatskoj p.o., Zagreb v BP Europa SE, successor in title to Deutsche BP AG, in turn successor in title to The Burmah Oil (Deutschland) GmbH

(Case C-242/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 5(3) - Concept of ‘matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’ - Judicial enforcement proceedings - Action for recovery of sums unduly paid based on unjust enrichment - Article 22(5) - Enforcement of judgments - Exclusive jurisdiction)

(2022/C 73/04)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: HRVATSKE ŠUME d.o.o., Zagreb, successor in title to HRVATSKE ŠUME javno poduzeće za gospodarenje šumama i šumskim zemljištima u Republici Hrvatskoj p.o., Zagreb

Defendant and respondent: BP Europa SE, successor in title to Deutsche BP AG, in turn successor in title to The Burmah Oil (Deutschland) GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 22(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an action for restitution based on unjust enrichment does not come within the exclusive jurisdiction provided for by that provision, even though it was brought on account of the expiry of the time limit within which restitution of sums unduly paid in enforcement proceedings may be claimed in the context of the same enforcement proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 22(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an action for restitution based on unjust enrichment does not come within the exclusive jurisdiction provided for by that provision, even though it was brought on account of the expiry of the time limit within which restitution of sums unduly paid in enforcement proceedings may be claimed in the context of the same enforcement proceedings.

| 2. | Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that an action for restitution based on unjust enrichment does not fall within the scope of the ground of jurisdiction laid down in that provision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that an action for restitution based on unjust enrichment does not fall within the scope of the ground of jurisdiction laid down in that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUIS CARDONA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-3737

[ December 20, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-

007355CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven 

Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Luis Cardona, challenges his conviction and sentence on one 

of five counts of sexual battery on a child less than 12 years old. Appellant 

contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of 

acquittal on Count I because there was no evidence of a crime committed 

on the dates in question. Because the evidence was insufficient to 

establish that the incident that formed the basis for Count I occurred 

during the time period specified in the information, we reverse appellant’s 

conviction and sentence on Count I and remand with instructions to grant

the motion for judgment of acquittal as to Count I only. See McLean v. 

State, 165 So. 3d 737 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); Ramos v. State, 75 So. 3d 1277 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Reversed and Remanded.

WARNER, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *
2

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We have issued our reports dated February 28, 2008(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties* on January 1,2007), accompanying the consolidated financial statements, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Kenexa Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Kenexa Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136486, effective August 10, 2006 and File No. 333-129475,effective November 4, 2005). 

/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

February 28, 2008
NO. 07-09-0100-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MAY 5, 2009

______________________________

GRACE EMILY ARCHER, M.D.,

Appellant

V.

PETERSON FARRIS MOSS PRUITT & PARKER, P.C.,

f/k/a PETERSON FARRIS DOORES & JONES, P.C.

and CHARLES E. MOSS,

Appellees

_________________________________

FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 91,411-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

 _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss. Without

passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn

 Chief Justice
Jonathan RAHMING, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4840

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 5, 2019

Jonathan Rahming, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable harm, we dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari for lack of jurisdiction. *See**Bailey v. State* , 245 So.3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TechTeam Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William C.
Brown, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2006                      /s/ William C. Brown
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William C. Brown
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Randall Scott ILES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

NO. 2018-C-2016

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 11, 2019

*1153Denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50135

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERGIO HERRERA-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1681-ALL-EP

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Sergio Herrera-Rodriguez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Herrera complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He

argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. 

Herrera thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the
No. 03-50135

-2-

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Herrera acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.