alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020271EN.01003901.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/39

---

Action brought on 4 June 2020 — HS v Commission

(Case T-848/19)

(2020/C 271/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: HS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 12 March 2019 to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 March 2019 to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period,

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decision of 10 October 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint, |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decision of 10 October 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint,

| — | compensate for the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, to 15 000 Euros, |
| --- | --- |

—

compensate for the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, to 15 000 Euros,

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of non-discrimination on ground of disability and of the duty to provide reasonable accommodation, violation of Article 21 of the Charter, of the United Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and of Article 1(d) of the Staff Regulations and, violation of the duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of non-discrimination on ground of disability and of the duty to provide reasonable accommodation, violation of Article 21 of the Charter, of the United Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and of Article 1(d) of the Staff Regulations and, violation of the duty of care.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging violation of Article 34 of the Staff Regulations: breach of the probationary period proper conditions, lack of guidance and lack and uncertainty of objectives, breach of the right to be heard and, manifest errors of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging violation of Article 34 of the Staff Regulations: breach of the probationary period proper conditions, lack of guidance and lack and uncertainty of objectives, breach of the right to be heard and, manifest errors of assessment.

| 3. | On the request for compensation, the applicant exposes the fault committed by the defendant, the damage suffered and the link between the fault and the damage. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On the request for compensation, the applicant exposes the fault committed by the defendant, the damage suffered and the link between the fault and the damage.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
CERTIFICATIONS
 I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., certify that:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Origen Financial, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(g)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
    
    Dated: May 10, 2006W. Anderson Geater, Jr.,Chief Financial Officer of Origen Financial, Inc.
EXHIBIT 23-ACONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 ofour report dated March 1, 2006 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in Ford Motor Credit Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the reference to us under theheading “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in such Registration Statement./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Michael H. LABIDOU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31044

Conference Calendar

__________________

WILLIE TRIPLETT, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DARRELL WHITE; EAST BATON ROUGE

PARISH PRISON; EAST BATON ROUGE

CITY, POLICE DEPARTMENT,

 Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOE SABELLA,

 Defendant. 

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CV-19

---------------------

April 16, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). In this civil rights action, Willie Triplett filed a
No. 95-31044

-2-

notice of appeal from an order of the district court entered on

August 22, 1995, granting in part the defendants' motion for

summary judgment. 

The district court's order granting partial summary judgment

disposed of fewer than all the parties and claims; thus, it is

not a final order. We discern no basis for appellate

jurisdiction.

Triplett's motion for the appointment of counsel to

represent him at an evidentiary hearing scheduled before the

magistrate judge is DENIED. Triplett should direct this motion

to the district court.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2

               Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the "Company"), herby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated November 20, 2006                         /s/ Ken Faith
                                                -----------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." 

Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50127

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH ADELL DANCER, 

also known as Keithadell Dancer, and

JESSE WILFORD CLARK, JR, also known as Jessie Clark,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Waco

(W-94-CR-2-1)

______________________________________________

December 20, 1995

 

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants, Keith Adell Dancer (Dancer) and Jesse Wilford

Clark, Jr. (Clark), appeal their convictions of the offense of

conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in
2

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. After considering the

record evidence and arguments of counsel for each appellant, we

find no reversible error occurred in the district court proceedings

which would require reversal. We reject each appellant's claim of

error for the reasons set forth below.

1. Dancer's appeal.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting

the complained of out of court statement of James Williams (Patroy)

because the record evidence allows a finding that Patroy was a coconspirator of Dancer; the statement was made during the course of

the conspiracy; and, it was in the furtherance of the conspiracy.

Even were we to assume that the alleged conversation occurred at a

time that Patroy and Dancer were angry with each other, as

suggested by Dancer, such would not establish that Dancer was no

longer a part of the conspiracy. Moreover, even assuming the

complained of evidence was erroneously admitted, in light of the

other substantial and overwhelming evidence of Dancer's guilt we

would find the out of court statement complained of is not

reversible error as it did not have a substantial impact on the

verdict.

2. Clark's appeal.

The district court immediately instructed the jury to

disregard the objectionable testimony and under such circumstances

and in light of the entire record, the refusal to grant a mistrial

was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Limones, 8

F.3d 1004, 1007-08 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1543,

1562 (1994).
3

AFFIRMED.
# C_2019423EN.01007101.xml

| 16.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/71

---

Action brought on 30 October 2019 — Dinamo v EUIPO (Favorit)

(Case T-729/19)

(2019/C 423/84)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dinamo GmbH (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for the European Union word mark Favorit — Application for registration No 17 924 051

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 September 2019 in Case R 985/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105674-105675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30946]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12617]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Edvard Munch: Technically 
Speaking'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Edvard Munch: Technically 
Speaking'' at the Harvard Art Museums, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

[[Page 105675]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-30946 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30794]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE561]

Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public online meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) is hosting an 
informational session on Council practices and procedures for all 
Advisory Body members.

DATES: The online meeting will be held Wednesday, January 22, 2025, 
from 10 a.m. until 12 p.m., Pacific time or until business for the day 
concludes.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held online. Specific meeting 
information, including directions on how to join and system 
requirements will be provided in the meeting announcement on the 
Council's website (see www.pcouncil.org). You may send an email to Mr. 
Kris Kleinschmidt ([email protected]) or contact him at (503) 
820-2280, extension 412 for technical assistance.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Ames, Deputy Director, Pacific 
Council; telephone: (503) 820-2417.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
provide an orientation for new and returning Advisory Body members, 
ensuring they have a clear understanding of the Council's processes, 
procedures, and expectations. The meeting is informational only and the 
Advisory Body members are not expected to develop recommendations or 
report to the Council.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may be discussed, those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues 
specifically listed in this document and any issues arising after 
publication of this document that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the intent to 
take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt 
([email protected]; (503) 820-2412) at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C.1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 19, 2024.
Alyssa Weigers,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-30794 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
Exhibit  23.d





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our report dated December 14, 2015, relating to the financial statements of Meritor WABCO Vehicle Control Systems for the year ended September 30, 2015 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Meritor, Inc. for the year ended September 27, 2015:





FormRegistration No.PurposeS-3333-200858Registration of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities and guaranteesS-8333-192458Amended and Restated 2010 Long Term Incentive PlanS-8333-171713Amended 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1643332010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1411862007 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-107913Meritor, Inc. Savings PlanS-8333-123103Meritor, Inc. Hourly Employees Saving PlanS-8333-496101997 Long-Term Incentives PlanS-8333-42012Employee Stock Benefit Plan, 1988 Stock Benefit Plan, and 1998 Employee Stock Benefit Plan











/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Detroit, Michigan


December 14, 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Nathaniel F. Bradley IV, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Mark A. Redman, Vice President - - Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                               /s/ Nathaniel F. Bradley IV
                               ----------------------------------
                               Nathaniel F. Bradley IV
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               February 24, 2006

                               /s/ Mark A. Redman
                               -----------------------------------
                               Mark A. Redman
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               February 24, 2006
Exhibit 32.1
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of KSign International, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Ki-Yoong Hong, CEO of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report complies with the requirements of section 12(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


August 20, 2004


/s/  Ki-Yoong Hong
----------------------------
     Ki-Yoong Hong, CEO
Daniela PARRA, a Minor, BY AND THROUGH Elkin PARRA, Father, Appellant, v. WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC. d/b/a Downtown Disney, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-138

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of First Northern Community Bancorp (“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (“Report”), I, Jeremiah Z. Smith, the chief financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,





(i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jeremiah Z. SmithJeremiah Z. Smith








March 21, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 8, 2004



/s/ STEPHEN G. KASNETStephen G. Kasnet Chief Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
William P. TULENKO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3781

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Christine Trakas Thornhill, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

William P. Tulenko, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.