alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  24.6
                   Consent  of  Registrant's  Auditors


JOSEPH  TROCHE                                   32  Main  Street
Certified  Public  Accountants                   Hastings  on  Hudson  NY
                                                 10706

Member  AICPA  &  NYSSCPA                        Telephone  914-478-1432
Fax  914-478-1475


November  14,  2002

Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
Washington,  D.C.  20549

RE:  Trident  Systems  International,  Inc.
     Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  Periods  ending
     September  30,  2002  and  September  30,  2001.





Gentlemen:


     We  consent  to  the Accountant's Review Reports and Statements being filed
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending on September 30,
2002  and  with  any amendment thereto.  This accounting firm hereby consents to
the  filing  of  this  consent  as  an  exhibit  to  the  Quarterly  Report
above-mentioned.



/s/Joseph  Troche,  CPA
November  14,  2002
Joseph  Troche,  CPA
32  Main  Street
Hastings  on  Hudson  NY  10706

                                       18
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit  99.1
               Certification  of  CEO  and  CAO Respecting Financial Disclosure.


                            CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                               18  U.S.C.  (S)1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Trident Systems International, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen  L. Farkas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

       (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a)
       or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

       (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
       material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations
       of  the  Company.



                                                /s/  Stephen  L.  Farkas
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Stephen  L.  Farkas
                                                Chief  Executive  Officer
                                                November  14,  2002
                                       19
<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Harbor Global Company Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen G. Kasnet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Supreme
Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

         To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 17, 2004


                                 BY:  /s/  Charles T. Phillips
                                      --------------------------------
                                      CHARLES T. PHILLIPS
                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Dated:  May 17, 2004


                                 BY:  /s/  Sandra L. Livney
                                      --------------------------------
                                      SANDRA L. LIVNEY
                                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 423 

Recognizing the University of Iowa women’s basketball team’s historic 

‘‘Crossover at Kinnick’’ game and the importance of women’s sports. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Mr. GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

DECEMBER 19, 2023 

Considered, amended, and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the University of Iowa women’s basketball 

team’s historic ‘‘Crossover at Kinnick’’ game and the 

importance of women’s sports. 

Whereas, at the Crossover at Kinnick event, the University 

of Iowa Hawkeyes competed against the DePaul University Blue Devils in a charity basketball game to benefit 

the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital; 

Whereas the Crossover at Kinnick event set a National Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this resolution 

as the ‘‘NCAA’’) women’s basketball attendance record 

with 55,646 fans filling University of Iowa’s Kinnick Stadium in Iowa City, Iowa; 

2 

SRES 423 ATS 

Whereas the previous attendance record was set at the 2002 

national championship game between the University of 

Connecticut and the University of Oklahoma, attended by 

29,619 fans; 

Whereas the Crossover at Kinnick event was the first ever 

NCAA women’s basketball game to be played outdoors in 

a football stadium; 

Whereas women athletes at the collegiate level are important 

role models for young athletes, particularly women and 

girls, by serving as examples of what can be achieved by 

pursuing one’s dreams through participation in athletics; 

Whereas participation in sports helps foster confidence, selfdiscipline, leadership, and teamwork in young girls; 

Whereas the achievements of the Iowa women’s basketball 

program are an inspiration for Iowans and women athletes everywhere; and 

Whereas Iowans and University of Iowa alumni across the 

country are proud of the history made at the Crossover 

at Kinnick event: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Iowa wom3 en’s basketball players, coaches, and support staff in 

4 setting the NCAA women’s basketball attendance 

5 record at the Crossover at Kinnick event; 

6 (2) recognizes and celebrates the impact of this 

7 record-setting event on young women athletes across 

8 the country; and 

3 

SRES 423 ATS 

1 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

2 the Senate send 1 copy of this resolution to the fol3 lowing individuals: 

4 (A) University of Iowa President Barbara 

5 Wilson. 

6 (B) University of Iowa Interim Athletic 

7 Director Beth Goetz. 

8 (C) University of Iowa Women’s Basket9 ball Coach Lisa Bluder. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Tritel, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
49792) on Form S-8 of TeleCorp-Tritel Holding Company of our report dated
February 9, 2001, except for the third and last paragraphs of Note 19 which are
as of February 26, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Tritel
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholder's equity, and cash flows for the period
from November 14, 2000 through December 31, 2000 (not separately included
therein), which report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form
10-K of TeleCorp PCS, Inc.

                              /s/ KPMG LLP

Jackson, Mississippi
March 29, 2001
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Petitioner, v. Randy Doyle ROSS, Jr. and State of Florida, Respondents.

Case No. 5D18-2471

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 1, 2019

Joyce L. Miller, Assistant Regional Counsel, of Department of Children and Families, Tavares, for Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida.

No Appearance for Respondent, Randy Doyle Ross, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Children and Families (DCF) petitions this Court for certiorari review, challenging the circuit court's order committing Randy Doyle Ross, Jr., to their care. DCF argues the order departs from the essential requirements of law because Ross does not meet the statutory requirements for commitment. *See* § 916.13, Fla. Stat. (2018). The State properly concedes error.1 Accordingly, we grant the writ, quash the order under review, and remand for further proceedings. *See**Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. Lotton*, 172 So.3d 983, 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ("[B]ecause there was no evidence presented to the trial court to support the findings it made, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by ordering commitment.").

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

1

After examining Ross, Dr. Bursten concluded that he was not incompetent due to mental illness, but rather was pretending to be incompetent, otherwise known as "malingering."
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(13)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - hawaii(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - (-)montana(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        April 1, 2023        Geologic map of the Timber Hill basalt Sweetwater Hills, Montana
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1040 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-797, K2025-796.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30173 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 672 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 12) to modernize voter 

registration, promote access to voting for individuals with disabilities, 

protect the ability of individuals to exercise the right to vote in elections 

for Federal office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2014 

Mr. LEWIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 12) to 

modernize voter registration, promote access to voting 

for individuals with disabilities, protect the ability of 

individuals to exercise the right to vote in elections for 

Federal office, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

3 XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of 

4 the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 12) to modernize voter registration, 

6 promote access to voting for individuals with disabilities, 

7 protect the ability of individuals to exercise the right to 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 672 IH 

1 vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes. 

2 All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

3 waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

4 shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

5 by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com6 mittee on House Administration. After general debate the 

7 bill shall be considered for amendment under the five8 minute rule. All points of order against provisions in the 

9 bill are waived. During consideration of the bill for amend10 ment, the chair of the Committee of the Whole may accord 

11 priority in recognition for an amendment to restore and 

12 protect the right to vote of all of our citizens in keeping 

13 with the spirit and the letter of the Voting Rights Act 

14 of 1965, which was undermined by the Shelby v. Holder 

15 decision, if offered by Representative Lewis of Georgia or 

16 his designee. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 

17 for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

18 bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

19 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or20 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

21 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

22 with or without instructions. If the Committee of the 

23 Whole rises and reports that it has come to no resolution 

24 on the bill, then on the next legislative day the House 

25 shall, immediately after the third daily order of business 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 672 IH 

1 under clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee 

2 of the Whole for further consideration of the bill. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
David L. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
 Restated2006
    
    
    2005(Unaudited)Earnings:Net Income
    
    $
    267,720
    
    
    $
    246,510Add:Provision for income taxes
    
    
    127,577
    
    
    
    117,200Fixed charges
    
    
    649,687
    
    
    
    564,070Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (25,389
    )
    
    
    (27,741
    )Earnings as adjusted (A)
    
    $
    1,019,595
    
    
    $
    900,039Fixed and preferred stock dividends:Preferred dividend requirements
    
    $
    2,562
    
    
    $
    1,936Ratio of income before provision for income taxes to net income
    
    
    148
    %
    
    
    148
    %Preferred dividend factor on pretax basis
    
    
    3,792
    
    
    
    2,865Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    622,765
    
    
    
    536,329Capitalized interest
    
    
    25,389
    
    
    
    27,741Interest factors of rents
    
    
    1,533
    
    
    
    Fixed charges as adjusted (B)
    
    
    649,687
    
    
    
    564,070Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends (C)
    
    $
    653,479
    
    
    $
    566,935Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
(A) divided by (B)
    
    
    1.57
    x
    
    
    1.60
    xRatio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
(A) divided by (C)
    
    
    1.56
    x
    
    
    1.59
    x
 -31-
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

TERRENCE S. LIDDLE, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9709-CR-00395

Appellant, )

) DAVIDSON COUNTY

VS. ) (No. 2534 Below)

) The Hon. Thomas H. Shriver

RICKY BELL, WARDEN, )

) (Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition)

Appellee. ) AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion requesting that the

judgment in the above-styled cause be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of

Criminal Appeals Rules. The appellant opposes the motion, and he has filed a motion to

submit the case for decision on the record and the appellant’s brief. Based on our review,

we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20.

On March 15, 1994, the appellant was indicted in Wilson County on six

counts of aggravated sexual battery. Subsequently, on January 17, 1995, the appellant

pled guilty to one count of aggravated sexual battery and was sentenced as a Range I

standard offender to 8 years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On December

5, 1996, the appellant filed his petition for habeas corpus relief. Counsel was appointed,

and the petition was amended. After a hearing on February 24, 1997, the state’s motion

to dismiss the petition was granted.

In this appeal, the appellant contends first that T.C.A. § 39-13-504 (1994

Supp.) failed to adequately inform him of the meaning of “unlawful sexual contact,” making

the statute constitutionally vague, however, this term was fully defined in T.C.A. § 39-13-

501(6) (1991). Next, the appellant asserts that the indictment failed to inform him with

specificity what conduct he allegedly performed that was illegal. In particular, he contends

that the indictment did not allege what unlawful sexual contact was committed. The

appellant could have filed a motion for bill of particulars pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 7(c)

but did not, thereby waiving the issue.

Finally, the appellant asserts that his petition for writ of habeas corpus should

be considered as a post-conviction petition. The appellant pled guilty on January 17, 1995,

and this petition was filed on December 5, 1996. Accordingly, the appellant would not be
-2-

entitled to post-conviction relief because the petition was filed outside the time allowed by

the applicable statute of limitation. Moreover, the appellant has failed to allege any of the

enumerated exceptions set forth in T.C.A. § 40-30-202(b). 

Having reviewed the appellant’s brief, the state’s motion, the appellant’s

response, and the entire record, we find that the state’s motion is well taken.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the state’s motion to affirm the

judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules

is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The appellant being indigent,

costs are taxed to the state. 

ENTER, this the ____ day of January, 1998.

_____________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_____________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

_____________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
2150.

#### Bush *v.*The State.

Indictment for keeping liquor, etc., from Muscogee superior court — Judge Gilbert. September 2, 1909.

Submitted October 6 —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*E. G. Mitchell, Wynn & Wohlwender,*for plaintiff in error.

*George G. Palmer, solicitor-general,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

None of the assignments of error of law contain any merit. The case was fairly, fully, and accurately submitted to the Jury by the charge of the court, and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed,.*
Charles E. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 11.2

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

1.     MISSION STATEMENT

The Audit Committee (the "Committee") will assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Audit Committee will review the
financial reporting process, the system of internal control, the audit process, and the company's process for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and with the Code of Ethical Conduct. In
performing its duties, the Committee will maintain effective working relationships with the Board of Directors, management, and the external auditors. To effectively perform his or her role, each
Committee member will obtain an understanding of the detailed responsibilities of Committee membership as well as the company's business, operations, and risks.

The
function of the Committee is oversight and while it has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this charter, it is neither the duty of the Committee to plan or to conduct
audits or to determine that the company's financial statements are complete, accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, nor to maintain internal controls
and procedures.

2.     POWERS

The Board authorizes the Audit Committee, within the scope of its responsibilities, to:



3.     COMPOSITION



4.     MEETINGS



---





5.     ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES



---







---







---





Adopted
and approved by the Board of Directors on May 5, 2000, and amended by the Board of Directors on each of February 26, 2004, February 28, 2006, March 4,
2008, March 10, 2009 and March 23, 2010.

---



QuickLinks