alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Todd KOZEL, Appellant, v. Ashley D. KOZEL, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2511

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018. Rehearing Denied May 24, 2018

John G. Crabtree, Charles M. Auslander, and Brian C. Tackenberg of Crabtree & Auslander, Key Biscayne, for Appellant.

Steven L. Brannock, Philip J. Padovano, and Joseph T. Eagleton of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa; Jeffrey D. Fisher and Zachary R. Potter of Fisher Potter Hodas, P.L., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

LUCAS, Judge.

*338Todd Kozel, the former husband, appeals two contempt rulings within an omnibus order entered by the family court after several hearings on an array of postjudgment issues. We affirm without comment the ruling that granted his former wife, Ashley Kozel's motion for contempt as to Mr. Kozel's nonpayment of child support. With respect to the ruling holding Mr. Kozel in contempt for violating the family court's injunction, we recognize that Mr. Kozel is presently challenging the merits of that injunction and an underlying judgment in a separate appeal pending before this court.1 But that really is of no moment for our disposition of this appeal. Regardless of the injunction's propriety, the order "must be obeyed until vacated or modified by [the trial] court or until it has been reversed on appeal, no matter how unreasonable or erroneous." *Kaylor v. Kaylor*, 466 So.2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (citing *Friedman v. Friedman*, 224 So.2d 424, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) ); *see also**Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Tampa S. R.R. Co.*, 101 Fla. 468, 134 So. 529, 533 (1931) ("A party proceeded against for disobedience of an injunction is never allowed to allege as a defense for his misconduct that the court erred in its judgment in granting the injunction or in refusing to dissolve it ...."). Finding no merit in any of his arguments in this appeal, we affirm the order below.

Affirmed.

KELLY and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

1

Specifically, the injunction enjoined Mr. Kozel from "selling, transferring, alienating, pledging, forfeiting, hypothecating, encumbering, mortgaging, dissipating, spending and/or purchasing, and/or concealing and/or otherwise alienating any real property, personal property, securities, cash, or other assets or income of any kind or nature in which he holds an interest." Mr. Kozel does not dispute that he violated the terms of the injunction; he simply argues that the judgment which precipitated the injunction (which is the subject of his separate appeal) was erroneously entered.
Sarah Jo MERRIMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff of Sarasota County, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. IN24-2-000]

                    With respect to an order issued by the Commission on December 16, 2024, in the above-captioned docket, with the exceptions noted below, the staff of the Office of Enforcement are designated as non-decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this docket.[1]                                          Accordingly, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2024), they will not serve as advisors to the Commission or take part in the Commission's review of any offer of settlement. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2201 (2024), they are prohibited from communicating with advisory staff concerning any deliberations in this docket.                

Exceptions to this designation as non-decisional are:

Nicholas Stavlas

Michael Raibman

Thomas Olson

Mark Maneche

Yvonne Yegge

Kevin Dinan

Charles Kitcher

Jennifer Gordon

Gareth Jones

Ian McDonald

Sam Malech

Erin Miller

Sara Brehm

Serrita Hill

Steven Bundick

Dated: December 19, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *American Efficient, LLC, Modern Energy Group LLC, MIH LLC, Midcontinent Energy LLC, Wylan Energy, L.L.C., Affirmed Energy LLC,*                         189 FERC ¶ 61,196 (2024).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-31050 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STATE of Louisiana v. Sheri BELL

NO. 2019-KK-0173

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 31, 2019

Denied.
# Eiropas Savienības C 327A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 327A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 60. gadagājums2017. gada 29. septembris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 327A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

60. gadagājums2017. gada 29. septembris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Eiropas Parlaments |
| 2017/C 327 A/01 | Atlases procedūra PE/191/S – Pagaidu darbinieks – vadības administrators (AD 7) – Piemēroto kandidātu saraksts | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas Parlaments

2017/C 327 A/01

Atlases procedūra PE/191/S – Pagaidu darbinieks – vadības administrators (AD 7) – Piemēroto kandidātu saraksts

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas Parlaments

| 29.9.2017 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 327/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2017

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 327/1

---

ATLASES PROCEDŪRA PE/191/S

Pagaidu darbinieks – vadības administrators (AD 7)

PIEMĒROTO KANDIDĀTU SARAKSTS

(2017/C 327 A/01)

| 1. | ROMANOVSKIS |
| --- | --- |

1.

ROMANOVSKIS

Gundars

| 2. | ROHLJE |
| --- | --- |

2.

ROHLJE

Gregor

| 3. | GOMES FALCÃO DE BETENCOURT |
| --- | --- |

3.

GOMES FALCÃO DE BETENCOURT

Miguel Luis

Piemēroto kandidātu saraksts tika pieņemts 2017. gada 14. jūnijā.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3







            INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT





We consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement of Arcadia Resources,
Inc. on Form S-1 (Amendment No. 5) (File No. 333-118557) of our report, which
includes an explanatory paragraph as to the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern, dated January 23, 2004, except Note 11 which is dated February 3,
2004, with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
Arcadia Resources, Inc.,(formerly known as Critical Home Care, Inc. and
Subsidiaries) as of September 30, 2003 and for the year then ended, which report
appears in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement. We also
consent to the reference to our Firm under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.


/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP

New York, New York
July 6, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(5)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - (-)tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1998        Superfund GIS - Aquifer Diffusivity in Tennessee.

publication        January 1, 2000        Superfund GIS - 1:250,000 Geology of Tennessee

Data Release        May 2, 2022        Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023)

publication        January 1, 1998        Superfund GIS - Physiographic Provinces, Aquifer Outcrops and Recharge Rates in Tennessee

Data Release        December 10, 2020        Bayesian modeling of NURE airborne radiometric data for the conterminous United States: predictions and grids

publication        October 2, 2005        Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia

publication        January 1, 2003        Erosion of an ancient mountain range, the Great Smoky Mountains, North Carolina and Tennessee
Exhibit 32.2
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of KSign International, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Hong-Kee Lee, CFO of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 12(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


May 27, 2004


/s/  Hong-Kee Lee
----------------------
     Hong-Kee Lee, CFO
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(750)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - (-)news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(50)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - missouri(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        October 13, 2016        Assessing the Magnitude of Missouri’s 2016 New Year's Flood

Technical Announcement        March 28, 2018        The 3D Elevation Program – Flood Risk Management

Technical Announcement        January 4, 2023        USGS Releases Spanish Version of National Water Dashboard

Technical Announcement        August 16, 2017        Collaboration in a Disaster
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

d0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

140266

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140266 COA: 287144 Kent CC: 08-001129-FH MARCUS DARRELL TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
IN RE: CONFIDENTIAL PARTY

NO. 2018-B-1802

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

ORDER

*1211Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.
Heike BYBEE n/k/a Heike Stoll, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 05, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
# C_2020054EN.01005301.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/53

---

Action brought on 4 December 2019 — JMS Sports v EUIPO — Inter-Vion (Spiral hair elastics)

(Case T-823/19)

(2020/C 54/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: JMS Sports sp. z o.o. (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: D. Piróg and J. Słupski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Inter-Vion S.A. (Warsaw, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the Court

Design at issue: Community design (spiral hair elastics) — Community design No 1723 677-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2019 in Case R 1573/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| — | order the intervener, in the event of intervention, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener, in the event of intervention, to bear its own costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 5(1) in connection with Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 5(1) in connection with Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of the rules governing the burden of proof; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the rules governing the burden of proof;

| — | Infringement of the principle of equality of arms. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equality of arms.

---
JERRY CHAMBER

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CAS E NO. 1D 16

- 4650

Opinion filed December 12, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela Dempsey, Judge.

Jerry Chamber , pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM

.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Jean-Jacques Bienaime, the Chief Executive Officer and President of
Genencor International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that to my knowledge (i)
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                     By: /s/ Jean-Jacques Bienaime
                                        --------------------------
                                     Chief Executive Officer and President
                                     March 26, 2003

      I, Raymond J. Land, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Genencor International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that to my knowledge
(i) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


                                      By: /s/ Raymond J. Land
                                          -------------------
                                      Senior Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      March 26, 2003

      The foregoing certifications are furnished with this Report solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2019399EN.01009401.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/94

---

Action brought on 2 October 2019 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS)

(Case T-669/19)

(2019/C 399/113)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novomatic AG (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria) (represented by: W. Mosing, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Brouwerij Haacht NV (Boortmeerbeek, Belgium)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS – Application for registration No 14 712 723

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2019 in Case R 2528/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to bear its own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the Plaintiff in the proceeding in front of the General Court and in the appellate proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to bear its own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the Plaintiff in the proceeding in front of the General Court and in the appellate proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of essential procedural requirements, namely the requirement of evidence in terms of legal certainty; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of essential procedural requirements, namely the requirement of evidence in terms of legal certainty;

| — | Infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of the Commission.

---