alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2021

p0623

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2021

162449 & (41)

NORMAN E. CARSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 162449

COA: 350257

MCAC: 18-000012

BANDIT INDUSTRIES, INC. and ACUITY, A

MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees/

Cross-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellants are considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we VACATE the December 17, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted of 

those issues that the Court of Appeals previously declined to review. See Carson v 

Bandit Industries, Inc, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, issued January 2, 2020 

(Docket No. 350257). As consideration of the appellant’s other issues may impact the 

Court of Appeals’ decision on the issue of recoupment, the Court of Appeals should also 

reconsider the recoupment issue and address the arguments presented by the parties in 

this Court with respect to that issue. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, 

because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should now be 

reviewed by this Court.
Nicholas D. WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3641

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied February 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   465,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (465,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.02


</TABLE>
IN the INTEREST OF M.L., a child.

J.M., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 March 15, 2006Date of Report
(Date of earliest event reported)
 AQUANTIVE, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Washington
    
    0-29361
    
    91-1819567(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File No.)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 821 Second Avenue, 18th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98104(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 (206) 816-8800(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   AQUANTIVE, INC.By:
    /s/ Linda A. SchoemakerName:
    Linda A. SchoemakerTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel andCorporate Secretary
Jose Luis DURAN, Appellant, v. State, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, and Margarita Gutierrez, Appellees.

No. 1D18-987

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


To Whom It May Concern:                                         January 18, 2001

        The firm of Barry L. Friedman, P.C., Certified Public Accountant
consents to the inclusion of their report of October 23, 2000, on the Financial
Statements of DEL CERRO ENTERPRISES, INC., as of September 30, 2000, in any
filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,


/s/  Barry L. Friedman
---------------------------
Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
1582 Tulita Drive
Las Vegas, NV  89123
702-361-8414
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. §1350
# C_2021490EN.01001102.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi — Poland) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and execution of a financial penalty imposed on D.P.

(Case C-338/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Mutual recognition - Financial penalties - Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA - Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution - Article 20(3) - Decision imposing a financial penalty - Observance of the rights of the defence - Notification of documents in a language not understood by the sentenced person - Translation of the essential elements of the decision)

(2021/C 490/10)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: D.P.

Defendant: Prokuratura Rejonowa Łódź-Bałuty

Operative part of the judgment

Article 20(3) of Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as allowing the authority of the executing Member State to refuse to execute a decision, within the meaning of Article 1(a) of the framework decision, imposing a financial penalty for a road traffic offence, where that decision has been notified to the addressee thereof without a translation, into a language which he or she understands, of the elements of the decision which are essential in order to enable him or her to understand the charge against him or her and fully to exercise his or her rights of the defence, and without that addressee being afforded the opportunity to obtain such a translation on request.

---

(1)  OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.

---
1703.

#### Wright *v.*Johnson *et al.*

Hill, O. J.

1. In a suit to recover damages for a libel, two defenses were filed, — justification and privilege. Both pleas admitted a prima facie case, and each cast upon the defendant the burden of proof, and gave.him the right to open and conclude the argument. Although the plea of justification may have been defective and insufficient, and the court may *379have erred in holding it to be sufficient, and in allowing the defendant to open and conclude the argument thereon, the error was harmless, as the defendant was entitled to the same right under the plea of privilege.

Action for libel, from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. January *23,*1909.

Submitted March 30,

Decided June *29,*1909.

*Tioiggs & Gazan,*for plaintiff.

*Osborne & Lawrence,*for defendants.

2. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists in large part of wholly immaterial testimony, both oral and documentary, “interspersed with objections to testimony, statements and arguments of counsel, and evidence to which objections were sustained, and also with colloquies between counsel and court.” This is not a compliance with the mandatory requirements of the Civil Code, §§5484, 5488, that the brief of evidence “shall be a condensed and succinct brief of the material portions of the oral testimony,” etc.; and assignments of error depending on an examination of the evidence will not be considered. *Hirsch*v. *Dozier Lumber Co.,*2 *Ga. App.*520 (58 S. E. 786) *; Hatchcock*v. *McGouirk,*119 *Ga.*980 (47 S. E. 563) ; *Culver*v. *Silver,*113 *Ga.*1142 (39 S. E. 472).

*Judgment affirmed.*
<Page>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                              RADVIEW SOFTWARE LTD
                          7 New England Executive Park
                              Burlington, MA 02110

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

March 20, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X,
RadView Software LTD has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur
Andersen LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was
subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity
of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen and national office consultation.

Very truly yours,

RadView Software Ltd

/s/ Brian E. LeClair

Brian E. LeClair
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong



Eppie Wong,

 CFO and a director

August 10, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Education        April 22, 2004        Introduction to Geologic Mapping

Education        October 26, 2018        Principal Aquifers

Interviews        June 1, 2022        Landers Rupture — Jonathan Fieldwork

Interviews        November 17, 2010        Completion of Continent - Wide Soil Survey

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!

Interviews        September 15, 2010        Making Waves: Hypoxia in U.S. Coastal Waters

Interviews        August 30, 2009        The Water Beneath Our Feet: New Study on California's Central Valley Groundwater Level Decline

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet

Interviews        November 30, 2009        Urban Hydrology: Restoration and Monitoring of Johnson Creek in Portland, Oregon

Interviews        April 18, 2011        USGS Hydrologic Investigation of West Africa's Congo River (part 3)

Interviews        September 6, 2011        Stranger than Fiction: The Secret Lives of Freshwater Mussels

Interviews        August 24, 2009        Pharmaceuticals in Urban Streams in Northwest Oregon
Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4854

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Grant.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
    2002.
  Form 10-Q
      James
    A. Yost
    Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
----

EXHIBIT 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the annual report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A forthe period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financial officer ofAlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of his knowledge: 

> 
1.This  10-KSB/A report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the  Exchange Act; and 
2.The  information contained in this 10-KSB/A report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.   /s/ Marcel UrbancMarcel UrbancChief Financial OfficerMay 18, 2005
[ EXHIBIT 10.2 - PROMISSORY NOTE ]


                                PROMISSORY NOTE


Charles Carafoli
----------------


$ 10,000.00                                                       June 30, 2003


1. PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST. Perfect Healthcare Corp. (the "COMPANY"), a Nevada
Corporation, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of Charles
Carafoli or holder ("PAYEE") in lawful money of the United States at the
principal office of the Company, the principal amount of Ten Thousand Dollars
($10,000.00), together with simple interest at 4% per annum on the date of this
Note. Accrued interest shall be payable in cash at the time the Company pays the
principal amount of this Note. This Note is due and payable on demand, which may
be made at any time after the earlier of Dec. 31, 2005.

2. NO PAYMENT IF UNLAWFUL. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no
payment hereunder shall be required at any time that such payment would be
unlawful under any applicable law.

3. ATTORNEYS' FEES. If the indebtedness represented by this Note or any part
thereof is collected in bankruptcy, receivership or other judicial proceedings
or if this Note is placed in the hands of attorneys for collection after
default, Company agrees to pay, in addition to the principal and interest
payable hereunder, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Payee.

4. PREPAYMENT; TRANSFER This Note may be pre-paid by the Company at any time.
This Note may be transferred only with the written consent of the Company.

5. ACCELERATION. This Note shall become immediately due and payable if (i) the
Company commences any proceeding in bankruptcy or for dissolution, liquidation,
winding-up, or other relief under state or federal bankruptcy laws; or (ii) such
proceedings are commenced against the Company, or a receiver or trustee is
appointed for the Company or a substantial part of its property, and such
proceeding or appointment is not dismissed or discharged within 60 days after
its commencement.

6. WAIVERS. Company hereby waives presentment, demand for performance, notice of
non-performance, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor. No delay on
the part of Payee in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of
such right or any other right. This Note is being delivered in and shall be
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, without regard
to the conflicts of laws provisions thereof.


                                       Perfect Health Care Corp.
                                       Date: June 30, 2003

                                       /s/ Antoine Jarjour
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                  By:  Antoine Jarjour, President / CEO
                                       Perfect Healthcare Corp.
                                       4017 Colby Ave
                                       Everett,  WA  98201
Jason Bradley SIMS, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 1D18-2197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 21, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 20, 2018

Jason Bradley Sims, pro se, Appellant.

David Rosenberg of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Lewis, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued pu blished opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court:

1. Charles Stanard Severance

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0308-16-4 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on May 23, 2017

2. Justo Mazariego Campos

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0617-16-2 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Huff on June 13, 2017The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued p ublished opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. William Edward Freeman, Jr.

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 2302-14-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Petty on November 17, 2015 Refused (151930)

2. Jesse Gregory Edmond

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0557-15-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Malveaux on August 2, 2016 Refused (161283)

3. King William County and Virgi nia Association of Counties Gr oup v. Linda Jones

Record No. 0576-15-2 En Banc opinion rendered by Judge Russell on August 9, 2016 Refused (161308)

4. José Rafael Salazar

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0879-15-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Russell on August 23, 2016 Refused (161492)

5. Rudolph David Taylor

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record Nos. 1330-15-3 and 1340-15-3 Opinion rendered by Judge Chafin on September 13, 2016 Refused (161445)
# C_2022463EN.01000501.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v X, Y v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

(Case C-713/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 11(3)(a) and (e) - Person residing in one Member State and employed in another Member State - Employment contract or contracts entered into with a single temporary employment agency - Temporary work assignments - Intervening periods - Determination of the legislation applicable during intervening periods between temporary work assignments - Termination of the employment relationship)

(2022/C 463/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank, Y

Defendants: X, Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(3)(a) and (e) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems

must be interpreted as meaning that a person residing in a Member State who carries out, through a temporary employment agency established in another Member State, temporary work assignments in the territory of that other Member State is to be subject, during the intervening periods between those temporary work assignments, to the national legislation of the Member State in which he or she resides, provided that, by reason of the temporary contract, the employment relationship ceases during those periods.

---

(1)  OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

---
Andrew T. SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(15)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - minnesota(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2022(15)

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Low-flying Research Helicopter

Photography  Lake Huron Coast

Photography  Beachscape

Photography  Niagara Falls

Photography  Minnesota River at Jordan

Photography  Old Water Pump

Photography  Beach of the Great Lakes

Photography  USGS Director Marcia McNutt and FWS Service Director Sam Hamilton sign a strategic habitat conservation MOU

Photography  Surface Rupture in Northwest Saudi Arabia