alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


The Board of Directors of
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2001
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and all
related schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report
on Form 10-K of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants

A member firm of KPMG International

Jerusalem, Israel

March 29, 2001
1

 According to both parties Automania also filed a bill of review in county court, then

dismissed that and filed a bill of review in the justice court; the latter apparently remains pending.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00592-CV

Automania, L.L.C., Appellant

v.

Jason May, Appellee

FROM THE JUSTICE COURT # 3 OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. 32003-S-0012, HONORABLE DIANA G. CAMPOS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Automania, L.L.C.filed a notice ofrestricted appeal from a default judgment in favor

ofJason May rendered by a justice of the peace. Because we find no basis on which this appeal may

be brought directly from justice court to this Court, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

May sued Automania, seeking to recover for damages incurred when Automania

breached a contract to rebuild his engine. May alleged that Automania defectively rebuilt the engine

and refused to repair the engine. May recovered a default judgment for return of the $4600 in actual

damages and $400 for attorney’sfees. Because the damages were limited to $5000, the justice court

could sit as a small claims court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 28.002-.003 (West 2004).

Automania filed a notice of restricted appeal.1 May then filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.
Automania alleges in its response to May’s motion to dismiss that May advised Automania that a

restricted appeal filed in this Court was the proper avenue to challenge the default judgment.

2

Appealsfrom justice courts generally lie either in the county or the district court. See

id. § 51.001; see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 574b. We do not have appellate jurisdiction over an appeal

absent a final judgment or appealable order from the district court. See Tejas Elevator Co. v.

Concord Elevator, Inc., 982 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.). No such judgment

or order appears in the record of this case from the justice court.

Appeals from small claims courts lie in the county court or the county court at law.

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.052 (West 2004). The appeal is by trial de novo, and the decision of the

county court or county court at law isfinal. Id. § 28.053. There is no appeal to the courts of appeals.

Woodlands Plumbing Co. v. Rodgers, 47 S.W.3d 146, 148 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001, pet.

denied); Davis v. Covert, 983 S.W.2d 301, 303 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. dism’d

w.o.j.).

Because we find no basis on which we can exercise jurisdiction over this restricted

appeal from justice court, we grant May’s motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(a). We deny May’s request for sanctions.

 

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellee’s Motion

Filed: April 22, 2004
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I,Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr., certify that:

1.

Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of EP GlobalCommunications Inc.;

  

 

2.

Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3.

Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.

Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and have:

 

a)

designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)

evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)

disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.

Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)

allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b)

anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:April 13, 2005 

 

  

 

  

/s/Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.

  

———————————————

  

JosephM. Valenzano, Jr.

  

ChiefExecutive Officer
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 25, 2013 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Li Fushen          
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Li Fushen              
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kurt Bordian, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                 



| | By:    |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        | /s/
      Kurt Bordian 
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | September 27, 2010     



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(6)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)
              - 2023(1)

staff profileChris Sanocki
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Haack,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 7, 2003

/s/ Steven J. Haack

Steven J. Haack
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

4
Jose G. MEDEROS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1518

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         148,836
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,597
<PP&E>                                          10,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,121
<BONDS>                                          2,522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       236,942
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,087
<SALES>                                         31,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,586
<CGS>                                            8,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,657)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



Certification Of Chief Executive Officer

And Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Bankshares Incorporated, respectively, certify that, to the best of each such individuals knowledge and belief, the Annually Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pioneer Bankshares Incorporated at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



/s/ THOMAS R. ROSAZZAThomas R. RosazzaPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: 3/25/04



/s/ LORI G. HASSETTLori G. HassettVice President and Chief Financial Officer




Date: 3/25/04



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pioneer Bankshares, Incorporated and will be retained
by Pioneer Bankshares, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
9
Exhibit 32.1


                     Pinecrest Services, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Pinecrest Services, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)      the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)      the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


                                    /s/ April L. Marino
Date:   May 3, 2006                 ____________________________________
                                    April L. Marino
                                    Principal Executive Officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Latroy O'Neal SIMMONS

NO. 2018-KK-1919

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

*284Denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Okyeame WOODARD

No. 2018-KH-1005

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

*770Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00255-CV

In the Interest of R.P., Jr.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. FA-90-1160-C, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING

On April 30, 2002, appellant, Robert Payne, Sr., filed in the trial court a waiver of appeal 

and stated that he no longer desires to pursue an appeal from the order in the suit affecting the parent-child 

relationship. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 

 

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed For Want of Prosecution

Filed: May 9, 2002

Do Not Publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6512
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, versus ROBERT CY MANN, Plaintiff - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02- 2687-MJG) Submitted: August 19, 2003 Decided: August 26, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Cy Mann, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Cy Mann appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Mann , No. CA-02-2687- MJG (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 19, 2006

s0712 

# Order

July 19, 2006

130825 & (40)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 130825 COA: 258336 Genesee CC: 04-013556-FH KEITH DEMOND THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 23, 2006 judgm ent of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered. The application fo r leave to appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether a defendant must “keep or maintain” a vehicle used for the purpose of selling a controlled substance “contin uously for an appreciable period of time” as required by People v Griffin , 235 Mich App 27, 32-33 (1999), in order to sustain a conviction under MCL 333.7405(1 )(d); and (2) whether the ev idence presented in this
case was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction for keeping or maintaining a drug vehicle. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presen ted should be reviewed by this Court. We ORDER that this case be argue d and submitted to the Court to gether with the case of People v Wright (Docket No. 130295), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission. The Prosecuting A ttorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determina tion of the questions pr esented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

C AVANAGH

, J., would grant application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant.