alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Richard Lee HILL, Jr. and Glenn Elvin Smith v. BECHTEL OG & C CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.

NO. 2018-CC-1974

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 2019

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF CAMERON

PER CURIAM

Granted. Plaintiffs' allegations regarding the validity of the arbitration agreement are intertwined with its arguments relating to the nullity of the underlying agreement. Therefore, the issue is properly presented to the arbitrator, not the court. *See**Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna* , 546 U.S. 440, 126 S.Ct. 1204, 163 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2006) ; *Cambas Electric, Inc. v. McDonnel Group, LLC* , 16-1774 (La. 10/28/16), 208 So.3d 377. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and relators' exception of prematurity is granted.

Hughes, J., would deny.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(23)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(37)
              - multimedia_image-141771(37)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - montana(4)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - (-)vermont(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Center News        July 13, 2023        USGS Captures Critical Data During New England Flood

Center News        December 7, 2021        Products about January and March 2018 Nor’easters
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00570-CV

NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

v.

VIRGINIA CANAS

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-CCV-60799-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

the party incurring the same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 29, 2015
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)

May 2, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of May 2, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Stock Watch Man, Inc. for the
three months ending March 31, 2001, in any filings which are necessary now
or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,



/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
---------------------------
    G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
Exhibit 32



STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Advanced Integrated Management Services, Inc. (the "Company")  for  the  three  months  ended  June  30,  2004,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Reginald Hall, Chief Executive Officer, and Virginia Moss, Chief Financial Officer of  the  Company,  certify  that:



*   the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and



*   information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material

respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

on  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented.



/s/  Reginald Hall

Reginald Hall



President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer



Date: September
17, 2004



/s/ Virginia Moss

Virginia Moss



Chief  Financial  Officer



Date: September
17, 2004





This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30822

Summary Calendar

In re: COMBUSTION, INC.

PLAINTIFFS’ STEERING COMMITTEE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK L. TESSIER,

Movant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(94-MDL-4000)

September 18, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, EMILIO M. GARZA and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

POLITZ, Chief Judge: *

This appeal arises out of a mass disaster toxic tort class acti on involving a

hazardous waste dump site located in Livingston Parish, Louisiana. The site served

as an oil recycling center un til 1980 and is now known as the Combustion, Inc.

Superfund Site.

By December of 1994 over 13,000 claimants had filed proof of claim forms1 417 U.S. 156 (1974).

2 Combustion v. Tessier , 103 F.3d 124 (5 th Cir. 1996) (unpublished table decision).

2 in this action. In July of 1995 the district court approved a preliminary settlement

agreement between the class and some of the defendants and ordere d a fairness

hearing thereon. The court also ordered all class members who had failed to file

a timely proof of claim to notify the court of their intention to appear at the hearing

and to show good cause why they should be allowed to take part in the litigation.

Patrick L. Tessier notified the court that, as a land owner in the contaminated

area, he qualified as a class member and that he had not received notice of the suit

until after the deadline for filing a proof of claim. At the hearing, Tessier informed

the court that his name and address was reasonably ascertainable to the Plaintiffs’

Steering Committee and that due process required that he receive personal notice.

The district court, finding that notice was reasonable and adequate, initially refused

to allow Tessier to take part in the litigation.

On appeal, we noted that Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin 1 requires that

i ndividual notice be given to all class members whose names and address es are

ascertainable through reasonable effort. As it was not clear from the district court’s

order whether the Eisen standard had be en applied, we remanded for this

determination. 2 On remand, the district court found that Tessier had actual notice

of the litigation and, therefore, determined that individual notice was not required.

Our review of the record, briefs, and applicable law discloses neither error

nor abuse of discretion in the district court’s credibility call on this issue.3

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Cavins, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of CallWave Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CallWave Inc.



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2008

/s/ Jeffrey CavinsJeffrey Cavins, President and Chief Executive Officer
Gregory PERRY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jane E. BLACKMAR and Jack E. Blackmar, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5038

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 25, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00529-CV 

RACQUEL MACKEY, Appellant 

V. 

JACQUELINE LEE, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-13265 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal stating the parties have 

settled all matters in controversy. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a). 

170529F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RACQUEL MACKEY, Appellant 

No. 05-17-00529-CV V. 

JACQUELINE LEE, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-13265. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Myers and Schenck participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that each party bear their own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered January 25, 2018.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, cash flows and financial highlights of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Factors influencing Cognitive Impairment.                    

*Date:*                         February 20, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas John O'Farrell, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 402-8559,                         *tom.ofarrell@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 17, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30561 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Haack, Treasurer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 13, 2007





/s/
                Steven J. HaackSteven
                J. HaackSecretary
                and Treasurer  (Principal Financial
                Officer)
Paolo STANCHI, Appellant, v. 3 FATHOMS, INC., University of Miami, Blue Wilderness Dive Expeditions, cc a/k/a Blue Wilderness and Mark Addison, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2773

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Raytaurus E. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1720

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 7, 2019

Raytaurus E. Armstrong, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Salvador Álvarez Valdes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: June 23, 2011





SIGNATURE:
/s/ Salvador Álvarez ValdesTITLE: Chief Executive Officer





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The Princeton Review, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:



| | 1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |        |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 6. 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. PERIK                 
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Michael J. Perik                     
|                     |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 6, 2010 |  |        |  |                                      
|                     |  |        |  |                                      
|                     |  | By:    |  | /s/ MICHAEL A. ROSSI                 
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Michael A. Rossi                     
|                     |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Corporate Controller 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Princeton Review, Inc. and will be retained by The Princeton Review, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.