alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 186 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 186

  A resolution seeking justice for the Japanese citizens abducted by 
                              North Korea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2023

   Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Hirono) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  A resolution seeking justice for the Japanese citizens abducted by 
                              North Korea.

Whereas the United States Government recognizes that North Korea was abducting 
        Japanese citizens since the 1970s;
Whereas, in September 2002, North Korea admitted that it had abducted Japanese 
        citizens and promised to prevent further recurrences;
Whereas, in October of 2002, only 5 abductees were returned to Japan after being 
        held prisoner for 24 years, despite the explicit commitment of North 
        Korea to investigate what had happened to all abductees;
Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights upholds the basic principles 
        of liberty and freedom enshrined within the United States Constitution 
        and Bill of Rights;
Whereas human rights awareness is essential to the realization of fundamental 
        freedoms and contributes to promoting equality, preventing conflict and 
        human rights violations, and enhancing participation in democratic 
        processes;
Whereas these abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korea directly conflict 
        with the basic principle of liberty and freedom; and
Whereas there have been several attempts at dialogue between North Korea and 
        Japanese leaders in an effort to yield stable results: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) calls on North Korea to release any abducted foreign 
        nationals, including those from Japan;
            (2) urges North Korea to return the remains and provide 
        information on any deceased abductees;
            (3) urges North Korea to make such reparations as are 
        appropriate regarding abductees; and
            (4) urges North Korea to apologize and permanently cease 
        such activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


KERYX BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James F. Oliviero, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 9, 2011

/s/ James F. OlivieroJames F. Oliviero

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - (-)science_education(3)
              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(8)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(42)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(8)
              - multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - (-)new jersey(3)

## By Year

Education        June 20, 2018        Floods: Recurrence intervals and 100-year floods

Education        December 14, 2018        USGS Data Delivery Tools

Education        November 5, 2018        Hydroacoustics and Technological advancements in Streamgaging
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2016

t1214 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2016

153669

- 70

In re Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER

_________________________________________

SHERRY BIERKLE, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER,

Appellant,

v SC: 153669

COA: 322996

Oakland Probate Ct:

ERNEST LEE UMBLE, 2012

- 341834

- DE

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

In re Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER

_________________________________________

SHERRY BIERKLE, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER,

Appellant,

and

JOESPH Y ORK, EDMUND YORK, RONALD

McKEEL, DANIEL McKEEL, GREGORY

McKEEL, MICHAEL SIES, NANCY

SCHREIBER, and TERRI CARTER,

Interested Persons,

v SC: 153670

COA: 322997

Oakland Probate Ct:

ERNEST LEE UMBLE, 2012

- 341834

- DE

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they

should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I Evan Brovenick, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IBX Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
Report (the "Evaluation Date");

(c) Presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Annual
Report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2004        /s/ Evan Brovenick
                            Evan Brovenick, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Maxcom
Telecomunicaciones S.A. de C.V. (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report"), I, Jose Antonio Solbes, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 24, 2004

                                         /s/ JOSE ANTONIO SOLBES
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Jose Antonio Solbes
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Maxine Clark, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Bear of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 2, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Maxine Clark             
|                    |  |  |  | Maxine Clark                 
|                    |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and    
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Bear         
|                    |  |  |  | Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.  
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Timothy GOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

-------------------------------------------------------

:

JEAN ANTOINE, : CASE NO. 08-CV-00615

:

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. : OPINION & ORDER

: [Resolving Doc. No. 146]

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

:

-------------------------------------------------------

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

In this Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case, Defendant debt collector Shapiro & Burson,

LLP moves the Court to seal three trial exhibits it has marked as “confidential.” The Defendant

describes these exhibits as “Shapiro & Burson, LLP File Documents,” “Initial Disclosures by Former

Co-Defendant JP Morgan Chase,” and “Internal Messages Between Shapiro & Burson, LLP & JP

Morgan Chase Regarding Foreclosure of 2706 South Dakota Ave. NE.” 

While the Court has discretion to seal filings where appropriate, “the general presumption [is]

that court documents are to be available to the public.” In re Pepco Employment Litig., No. 86–0603,

1992 WL 115611, at *5–7 (D.D.C. May, 8 1992).

The Court’s earlier order allowed the parties to designate as “confidential” documents they

deem confidential. Yet without having had an opportunity to examine these purported confidential

trial exhibits, the Court is unable to weigh the factors to determine whether and to what extent the

Defendant’s interest outweighs the strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial
Case No. 1:08-CV-00615

Gwin, J.

 “These factors include: (1) the need for public access to the documents at issue; (2) the extent to which the 1/

public had access to the documents prior to the sealing order; (3) the fact that a party has objected to disclosure and the

identity of that party; (4) the strength of the property and privacy interests involved; (5) the possibility of prejudice to

those opposing disclosure; and (6) the purposes for which the documents were introduced.” See Johnson v. Greater Se.

Cmty. Hosp. Corp., 951 F.2d 1268, 1277-78 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

-2-

proceedings. The Court cautions that it generally believes that public access outweighs private 1/

interests in all instances save well established claims involving trade secrets.

The Court thus DENIES the Defendant’s motion to seal trial exhibits based on the parties’

protective order. The Court will examine the exhibits at trial, which is set for this Monday, May 2,

2011, and issue its ruling then. Counsel will have an opportunity to give argument in support.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 29, 2011 s/ James S. Gwin 

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit
23.2




Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board
of Directors


Keryx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated March 31,
2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Keryx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ (deficiency)
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report
on Form 10-K of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.:





-
            Form
      S-8 dated February 5, 2001 (File No.
333-55006)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated December 12, 2003, as amended (File No.
    333-111143)


-
            Form
      S-8 dated September 29, 2004 (File No.
  333-119377)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated March 16, 2004, as amended (File No.
  333-113654)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated April 19, 2004 (File No.
333-114593)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated September 29, 2004 (File No.
  333-119376)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated July 11, 2005 (File No.
333-126494)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated December 30, 2005 (File No.
  333-130809)


-
            Form
      S-3 dated April 6, 2006, as amended (File No.
  333-133051)


-
            Form
      S-8 dated April 6, 2006, as amended (File No.
  333-133052)


-
            Form
      S-3/A dated June 21, 2006 (File No.
333-133051)


-
            Form
      S-8 dated July 31, 2007 (File No. 333-145003);
  and


-
            Form
      S-3 dated August 28, 2009 (File No.
333-161607).






Our
report dated March 31, 2009 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that
the Company has incurred substantial recurring losses from operations, a
deficiency in equity, has limited cash, cash equivalents, and short term
securities, and illiquid investments in auction rate securities that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.




Our
report also refers to the Company’s adoption of an accounting standard issued by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board for the fair value of financial assets
and liabilities in 2008.




/s/ KPMG
LLP





New York,
New York


March 25,
2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         351,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  503,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               855,631
<PP&E>                                          60,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,771)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,939,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,229
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,802,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,939,310
<SALES>                                        528,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               528,511
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  924,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (396,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (393,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (393,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.012)


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Smart
Online, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-124569) and related prospectuses of our audit
report dated April 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Smart Online, Inc., which report appears in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Smart Online, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008.
    /s/ CHERRY,
BEKAERT & HOLLAND, L.L.P.
 
 Raleigh,
North Carolina
 April 15,
2010
Bryan Orlando APONTE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4628

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The appellee's motion to dismiss is granted. Case 2D18-4628 is dismissed. The challenged order will be reviewed in case 2D18-4516.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6332** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
ERIC WHEELER, a/k/a “E” , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Shelby

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 4:96

- cr
- 00053

- MR

- 2 )

Submitted : May 2 3 , 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eric Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, O FFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Wheeler appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pu rsuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wheeler , No. 4:96

- cr
- 00053

- MR

- 2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2013). We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Julio RIVERA, Appellant, v. NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3704

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

Paul B. Feltman of Alvarez, Feltman, & DaSilva, P.L., Coral Gables, for appellant.

Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and C. Brooks Ricca, Jr. of C. Brooks Ricca, Jr. and Associates, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.**See**Yero v. Miami-Dade Cty.* , 838 So.2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

May and Forst, JJ., and Hilal, Jennifer, Associate Judge, concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - multimedia_webcam(10)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(10)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)

## By Location

              - north carolina(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        July 27, 2011        Climate Connections: Questions from North and South Carolina