alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(41)
              - multimedia_image(9)
              - multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Thomas
Hagen certify that:
 
 1.   I
have reviewed this annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 on
Form 10-KSB of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc.;
 
 2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)   Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)   Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)   Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)   All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)   Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:  April
14, 2008
 
 /S/
Thomas
Hagan
 Thomas
Hagan
 Acting
Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Tong Jilu,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Unicom Limited;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  June 24, 2004 | /s/ Tong  Jilu |                     |
|---------------------------|----------------|--------------------------|
|                      | Name:          | Tong Jilu                |
|                      | Title:         | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                           |                |                          |  |

 

----
Lesley NICOLAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 16, 2019

Rier Jordan, P.A., and Andrew F. Rier, Miami, and Jonathan E. Jordan, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Ferrell v. State*, 29 So.3d 959, 976 (Fla. 2010) ("Trial counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise a meritless argument.")
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 288 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 288

       Observing the 150th anniversary of Vanderbilt University.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2023

 Mr. Hagerty (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Observing the 150th anniversary of Vanderbilt University.

Whereas Vanderbilt University was founded in 1873 to create opportunities, 
        promote community engagement, and inspire future generations of 
        scholars;
Whereas Vanderbilt University, forged in Tennessee spirit, has grown from a 
        regional university to one of the premier research institutions in the 
        United States;
Whereas Vanderbilt University has, since its inception, provided distinguished 
        educational opportunities to tens of thousands of undergraduate, 
        graduate, and professional students from across the United States and 
        around the world;
Whereas the partnerships Vanderbilt University developed with stakeholders 
        foster the fulfillment of human potential by supporting organizations 
        and working to bring the people and resources of Vanderbilt University 
        together in service of others;
Whereas the world-renowned researchers of Vanderbilt University are using 
        revolutionary innovation to address the most urgent and complex problems 
        of society;
Whereas, with over 154,000 active alumni and 6 Nobel Laureates, Vanderbilt 
        University graduates throughout the world lead in their respective 
        fields and continue to push the limits of scientific discovery;
Whereas Vanderbilt University student-athletes set new benchmarks for excellence 
        both on and off the field; and
Whereas Vanderbilt University is proud of, but not satisfied with, its 
        accomplishments of the past 150 years and aims to grow to become the 
        Great University of the 21st century: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors and congratulates Vanderbilt University on the 
        occasion of its 150th anniversary;
            (2) commends Vanderbilt University for its remarkable 
        history of seminal research and educating generations of 
        leaders, scientists, teachers, nurses, doctors, and engineers; 
        and
            (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Senate 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to--
                    (A) the Chancellor of Vanderbilt University, Daniel 
                Diermeier; and
                    (B) the Chair of the Board of Trust, Bruce R. 
                Evans.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(File Nos. 333-90384 and 333-119180) of Community Central Bank Corporation on
Form S-8 of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated
March 9, 2006, on the consolidated financial statements incorporated by
reference in Community Central Bank Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 30, 2006
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerrold Wish, Principal Financial Officer of Navitone Technologies, Inc. certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Navitone Technologies, Inc..;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.

[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003];

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:

March 30, 2005

By:

/s/ Jerrold Wish

Jerrold Wish

Principal Financial Officer
1595.

#### Frost *v.*Pennington.

Hill, O. J.

1. While as a general rule eases should be called' and tried in the order in which they are docketed, the rules of practice adopted by the trial courts regulating the assignment of cases and the making up of trial calendars will not be interfered with, unless in the application of such rules to the facts of a particular case manifest injustice has been done and the assignment of the case for trial was an abuse of discretion. Civil Code, §5658; *Duggar*v. *Lackey,*85 *Ga.*631 (11 S. E. 1025).

2. “Generally speaking, the construction placed upon its own rules by a court of original jurisdiction is conclusive; and only in cases where it is clear that the construction given is wrong, and that injustice has been done, will the discretion of such a court construing its rules be interfered with by a reviewing court.” *Roberts*v. *Kuhrt,*119 *Ga.*704 (46 S. E. 856).

3. Applications for continuance and postponement of cases are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the court; and unless the facts show that the discretion exercised in a particular case was manifestly and legally unsound, it will not be disturbed. Civil Code, §5138. When the postponement of a case was requested on the ground of the absence of a witness served with a subpoena duces tecum, it was not abuse of discretion to refuse the request, when it appeared that the witness was a resident of the county and was not served with the subpoena duces tecum ten days prior to the trial of the case. Civil Code, § 5255.

*299Complaint, from city court of Richmond county — Judge Eve. November 9, 1908.

Argued February 11, —

Decided June 15, 1909.

*Henry 8.*Jones, for plaintiff in error. *Oswell B.*Eve, contra.

4. Numerous grounds of tlie motion for new trial point out specific parts of tlie evidence which it is claimed show that the verdict is unsupported by . the facts. If the evidence, considered in its entirety, supports the verdict, it will not be set aside because apparently contrary to detached portions of the evidence.

5. No material error of law appears. The questions involved only disputed issues of fact. These were settled by the verdict, which the trial court approved. *Judgment affirmed.*
Richard PINON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1677

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Richard Pinon, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Johnson v. State*, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) ; *Melvin v. State*, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Coughlin v. State*, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); *Steward v. State*, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; *Brown v. State*, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; *Haynes v. State*, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) ; *Paul v. State*, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Isaiah L. DUNBAR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4552

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Upon consideration of Appellant's response, docketed December 4, 2018, this case is dismissed as a duplicate of case 2D18-4393.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 June 19, 2006
 Delphi Corporation
  Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation)
    
    1-14787
(Commission File Number)
    
    38-3430473
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 5725 Delphi Drive, Troy, MI
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    48098
(Zip Code)
 (248) 813-2000
 
  see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENTITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITSSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXThird Amendment to Amended & Restated Credit AgreementFourth Amendment to Amended & Restated Credit Agreement    Table of Contents  
 ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
   
 ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS
 10-K




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99 (a)
    
    Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 26, 200699 (b)
    
    Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dates as of June 19, 2006
 
 SIGNATURE
  DELPHI CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: June 20, 2006
    
    By: /s/ JOHN D. SHEEHAN(John D. Sheehan,Vice President and Chief Restructuring Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer)




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99 (a)
    
    Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 26, 200699 (b)
    
    Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dates as of June 19, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GFSAD30

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Science Animations        November 27, 2017        Cropland Extent of Africa with GFSAD30

Center News        November 21, 2018        The GFSAD30 project accomplished their goal!

Data Release        January 24, 2022        Download rates of the Global Food-Security-Support-Analysis Data at 30-m Resolution (GFSAD30) Cropland-Extent Products

publication        April 7, 2022        Global food-security-support-analysis data at 30-m resolution (GFSAD30) cropland-extent products—Download Analysis

Project        April 9, 2018        GFSAD30 - Archives

Center News        August 15, 2017        GFSAD30 mentioned on USGS's Twitter page

Project        November 1, 2016        Global Food Security-Support Analysis Data at 30 m (GFSAD30)

Photography        December 31, 2016        Rice fields in Na Yai Am District, Chanthaburi Province, Thailand

Featured Story        November 14, 2017        New Map of Worldwide Croplands Supports Food and Water Security

Posters        June 13, 2022        July Public Lecture Flyer, 2022
S.M., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-408

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Kerrick L. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2496

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 08, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This court has considered appellant's response received October 22, 2018, to the order to show cause dated October 11, 2018.

In Donaldson v. State, 136 So. 3d 1281, 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), this court held: "Since 2012, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(e) has explained that the computation of time in appeals is governed by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.514(b). That rule provides that the automatic five-day extension applies only when some act is required to be done after service of a document by mail, not when the act is required to be done after rendition or filing of an order, even if the rendered order is mailed to the parties. See Bouchard v. State, Dep't of Bus. Reg., 448 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) ; Turner v. State, 557 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)."

Accordingly, the "five-day extension" does not apply to appellant's notice of appeal which had to be filed within 30 days after the rendition of the order disposing of the motion for rehearing. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely filed 34 days after rendition of the order disposing of the motion for rehearing.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.