alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002



            I, Stephen Farkas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of AAMPRO Group, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report of AAMPRO Group, Inc. on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AAMPRO Group,
Inc.

Dated: August 21, 2006



                                                 By: /s/ Stephen Farkas
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 Name: Stephen Farkas
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                 and Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                      and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
                -------------------------------------------------



I, James B. Kylstad, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
         December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended: and

(ii)     the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material aspects the financial condition and results of operations of
         WHY USA Financial Group, Inc.


            /s/  James B. Kylstad
            ---------------------
            James B. Kylstad, Chief Executive Officer
            May 14, 2004





I, Mike Peterson, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
         December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended: and

(ii)     the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material aspects the financial condition and results of operations of
         WHY USA Financial Group, Inc.


            /s/  Mike Peterson
            -----------------------
            Mike Peterson, Chief Financial Officer
            May 14, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(750)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - (-)documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

## By Year

Presentations (PowerPoint)        August 28, 2018        Flood Inundation Types Science Overview

Presentations (PowerPoint)        November 6, 2018        Post-Wildfire Playbook

Satellite imagery        October 6, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Hurricane Ian Aftermath (New Smyrna Beach, FL)

Presentations (PowerPoint)        August 28, 2018        FIM Program Overview Presentation

Presentations (PowerPoint)        August 28, 2018        Links between FIM and USGS Mission Areas

Satellite imagery        February 1, 2024        Landsat 8 Mosaic of Okavango Delta

Satellite imagery        April 25, 2018        Painting the Desert

Satellite imagery        March 22, 2017        Outburst

Satellite imagery        August 31, 2009        Algerian Sahara
Dora DELGADO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2387

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Michael LEDET v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-C-1751

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Peter A. ALBERT and Karen P. Albert, Appellants, v. ABS REO TRUST, II, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1291

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

Scott R. LeConey of Ables, Craig & LeConey, PLC, Sebring, for Appellants.

Sarah T. Weitz of Weitz & Schwartz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_publications(29)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(11)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(30)
              - california(8)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(13)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(6)
              - indiana(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(7)
              - maine(4)
              - (-)maryland(11)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - mississippi(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(9)
              - texas(11)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(9)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        May 27, 2022        USGS Remembers the Ellicott City Floods

Featured Films and Shorts        May 27, 2022        USGS Remembers the Ellicott City Floods (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        November 29, 2022        USGS on the Road: Stormflow Forensics

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        November 29, 2022        USGS on the Road: Stormflow Forensics (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        October 17, 2023        USGS MD-DE-DC Capabilities: Surface Water

Featured Films and Shorts        January 24, 2023        The Calm Before

Featured Films and Shorts        February 13, 2023        The Calm Before: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer

Featured Films and Shorts        September 15, 2020        Working with the USGS MD-DE-DC Water Science Center

Featured Films and Shorts        May 20, 2021        The Essential Storm Drain Water Management
Anthony RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2494

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018

Anthony Rivera, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Boler v. State*, 678 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 1996) ; *Franke v. State*, 997 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; *Coughlin v. State*, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; *Cooper v. State*, 800 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, James G.
Regel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Telecom Express, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/ James G. RegelName:

James G. RegelTitle:

Chief Executive Officer





I, James E. Williams, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Integrated Telecom Express, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/ James E. WilliamsName:

James E. WilliamsTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
# **Exhibit 12.2**

# **Certification**

I, Tong Jilu, certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of China Unicom Limited;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.               The company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a)              Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

c)              Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.               The company’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)              All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: June 29, 2006 |   | By:                                                    |   | /s/ Tong Jilu |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------|
|                     |   | Name:  Tong Jilu                             |
|                     |   | Title:    Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 12.4


               CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Companhia De Bebidas Das Americas
- AmBev (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Luis Felipe Dutra Leite, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                       /s/ Luis Felipe Pedreira Dutra Leite
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Luis Felipe Pedreira Dutra Leite
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Dated: June 27, 2003
























     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Th e Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judg e 1 

### for the Northern District of Iowa.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3296

___________ Thaddeus C. Pulla, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa Amoco Oil Company, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 23, 1997 Filed: May 1, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM.
Thaddeus C. Pulla appeals from the final order of the United States Distric t Court for the Southern District of Iowa, reducing his punitiv e 1 damages award against Amoco Oil Company (Amoco) from $500,000 to $2,000, following a remand from this court in Pulla v. A moco Oil Co. , 72 F.3d 648, 658-61 (8th Cir. 1995). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. Pulla d oes not challenge the size of the punitive damages award i n this appeal, only that the district court, not the jury, determined th e amount; he argues that, as a matter of state law , he was entitled to a new trial. We agree with Amoco that, because

### -2-

Pulla first raised this issue in his motion for reconsideration, he ha s waived hi s new trial argument. A motion to alter or amend a judgmen t cannot be used to raise arguments which could have been raised prior to th e issuance of judgment. See Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp. , 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 820 (1988). In any event, Pulla's argument that Iowa state law requires a new trial is without merit. The original punitive damages award violated due process, see Pulla , 72 F.3d at 661; state law was not involved in that decision. As the district cour t made clear, its obligation was to establish a punitive damages award which passed constitutional muster. We conclude the d istrict court has done so. See TXO Prod. Corp v. Alliance Resources Corp. , 509 U.S. 443, 453-5 4 (199 3)(due process consideration imposes substantive limit of punitiv e award). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covansys Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rajendra B. Vattikuti, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Rajendra B. Vattikuti Rajendra B. Vattikuti
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
May 4, 2006
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the first amended Quarterly Report of Perfect Health Care
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report), Antoine Jarjour, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 24, 2004

Signed:

/s/ Antoine Jarjour
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   400
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (53,174)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (53,174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (53,174)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>