alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1970.

#### Cedar Rapids National Bank *v.*Beckham.

Complaint, from city court of Abbeville — Judge Nicbolsou. May 12, 1909.

Submitted July 20, —

Decided July 31, 1909.

*F. H. Williams,*for plaintiff. *M. B. Gannon,*for defendant.

Powell, J.

1. In a suit by a transferee of a negotiable instrument, an indorsement thereon in the corporate name of the payee, though not accompanied by the corporate seal, is sufficient proof of the transfer, unless the indorsement be denied by a sworn plea of non est factum. Civil Code, §3705; *Sheffield*v. *Johnson County Bank,*2 *Ga. App.*221 (58 S. E. 386).

2. The plea in the present case was not sufficient to put the plaintiff to proof of the indorsement. *Crockett*v. *Garrard, 4 Ga. App.*360 (61 S. E. 552).

3. The court erred in granting a nonsuit. *Judgment reversed.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1921

LYNN HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES ARMY; DONALD RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; KATHRYN R. REPPERGER; IRENE MORRISON; MARK KARRAKER; USA POSTAL GROUP EUROPE; US GOVERNMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-1368-1) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lynn Howard, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Dennis Edward Szybala, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Matthew Paul Ruzicka, UNITED STATES ARMY, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lynn Howard appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. United States Army , No. CA-03-1368-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 7 & entered June 9, 2004). We deny the motion filed by attorney George R. Royer to appear on Howard’s behalf as counsel pro hac vice as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Anthony Phillip LEDEA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2095

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

Anthony Phillip Ledea, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Ocean  Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stephen H. Durland,  Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent  thereof) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Repor fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                             /s/ Stephen H. Durland
                             -------------------------------------
                             Stephen H. Durland
                             Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
                             February 17, 2003
Garrett BRANT, Appellant, v. VOLUSIA COUNTY FIRE SERVICES/VOLUSIA COUNTY RISK MANAGEMENT, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1755

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Kelli Biferie Hastings of Law Office of Kelli B. Hastings, PLLC Orlando, and James R. Spears of Law Office of James R. Spears, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant.

Arthur U. Graham, County of Volusia, DeLand, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.
1559.

#### Smith *v.*Chivers.

Certiorari, from Washington, superior court — Judge Bawlings. November 7, 1908.

Submitted January 28, —

Decided May 4, 1909.

*M. L. Gross, A. R. Wright,*for plaintiff in error.

Hill, C. J.

1. The defendant in a justice’s court, when sued on an unconditional contract in writing, must appear and make his defense at the-first term, either by pleading or by the marking of his name, or that of his attorney, on the docket. Civil Code, §4134; *Heyward*v. *Field,*95 *Ga.*714 (22 S. E. 653); *Morgan*v. *Prior,*110 *Ga.*791 (36 S. E. 75).

2. When no defense whatever is made at or before the first term to a suit, in a justice’s court on an unconditional contract in writing, no plea can be filed on an appeal to a jury from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The justice did not err in dismissing the appeal.

*Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 310 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 310

  Recognizing the Motorcycle Safety Foundation for 50 years of safety 
                               education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2023

Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Budd, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Tillis, 
 and Mr. Casey) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
       to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the Motorcycle Safety Foundation for 50 years of safety 
                               education.

Whereas, in 1973, the Motorcycle Safety Foundation began creating the first 
        motorcycle rider safety training curriculum in the United States;
Whereas the Motorcycle Safety Foundation is a nonprofit organization providing 
        motorcycle rider training and education;
Whereas the Motorcycle Safety Foundation meets the needs of motorcycle riders by 
        continuing to create courses for the most popular bikes on the road and 
        on the trail, including the hands-on Adventure Bike Rider Course and the 
        Dirtbike School courses, that enable motorcycle riders to get the most 
        out of their bikes;
Whereas new and experienced riders can benefit from learning basic motorcycle 
        controls, safe-riding habits, and street strategies in a comprehensive, 
        research-based curriculum created by the Motorcycle Safety Foundation;
Whereas 10,000,000 motorcyclists have taken the Basic Rider Course taught by 
        Motorcycle Safety Foundation rider coaches in the last 50 years;
Whereas 46 States and the Armed Forces use Motorcycle Safety Foundation 
        curriculum as their motorcycle license waiver course;
Whereas nearly 10,000 rider coaches teach Motorcycle Safety Foundation 
        curriculum at 2,700 training sites across the United States; and
Whereas the efforts of the Motorcycle Safety Foundation are aimed at making the 
        roadways of the United States safer for both motorcycle riders and non-
        riders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the Motorcycle Safety 
Foundation for 50 years of safety education and improving the ride for 
motorcycle riders across the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Rudy ESTRADA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4600

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of the Appellant to comply with this court's November 20, 2018, order to show cause.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries ofAmerican Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationAmerican Medical Systems, Inc.
    
    DelawareAmerican Medical Systems Australia Pty. Ltd.
    
    AustraliaAmerican Medical Systems Benelux B.V.B.A.
    
    BelgiumAmerican Medical Systems Canada Inc.
    
    CanadaAmerican Medical Systems Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyAmerican Medical Systems Europe B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsAmerican Medical Systems France S.A.S
    
    FranceAmerican Medical Systems Iberica S.L.
    
    SpainAmerican Medical Systems Luxembourg S.à.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgAmerican Medical Systems UK Limited
    
    United KingdomAMS  American Medical Systems do Brasil
Produtos Urológicos e Ginecológicos Ltda.
    
    BrazilAMS Japan Inc.
    
    JapanAMS Research Corporation
    
    DelawareAMS Sales Corporation
    
    DelawareAMS Sverige A.B.
    
    SwedenInnovaQuartz Incorporated
    
    ArizonaLaserscope
    
    CaliforniaLaserscope International, Inc.
    
    DelawareSolarant Medical, Inc.
    
    DelawareThermatrx, Inc.
    
    Delaware
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        This action was issued on December 9, 2024. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         for relevant dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 202-622-2490; or                         *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​contact-ofac.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website:                     *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

## Notice of OFAC Actions

On December 9, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 104316)    

Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2024-30372 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
Jejuan L. DIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3898

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed January 29, 2019

Jejuan L. Diggs, Madison, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**Ives v. State* , 993 So.2d 117, 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding *255that a challenge to the procedure used in qualifying a defendant for Prison Releasee Reoffender sentencing is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion).

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
W.L. WILLIAMS, III, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM and Danielle Shenea Williams, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0783

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 28, 2019

W.L. Williams, III, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Cavins, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of CallWave Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of CallWave Inc.



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|      |  |                   |  | 
|Date: |  | February 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Cavins     
|      |  |                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Cavins         
|      |  |                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
SUMMER TREES 26 LLC, Appellant, v. SUMMER TREES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and Unknown Heirs Against Shoemaker, n/k/a Dietrich, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3756

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018

James R. Leone, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Gene Reibman, Plantation, and Joel Martin McTague, of Frank, Weinberg & Black, P.L., Plantation, for Appellee, Summer Trees Homeowners Association, Inc.

No Appearance for other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
# C_2020045EN.01007801.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/78

---

Action brought on 18 November 2019 — Bennahmias v Parliament

(Case T-799/19)

(2020/C 45/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jean-Luc Bennahmias (Marseille, France) (represented by: J.-M. Rikkers, J.-L. Teheux, and M. Ganilsy, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 16 September 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 16 September 2019;

| — | annul debit note No 2019-1598 ordering the recovery of EUR 15 105; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul debit note No 2019-1598 ordering the recovery of EUR 15 105;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is inadequately reasoned, in that the reasoning of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament is ambiguous and does not indicate the extent to which the documents submitted did not constitute proof of work. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is inadequately reasoned, in that the reasoning of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament is ambiguous and does not indicate the extent to which the documents submitted did not constitute proof of work.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment in the contested decision in that the facts relied on by the Secretary-General of the European Parliament were incorrect. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment in the contested decision in that the facts relied on by the Secretary-General of the European Parliament were incorrect.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a reversal of burden of proof. In that regard, the applicant claims that it is not for him to adduce evidence as regards the work of his parliamentary assistant; rather, it is for the Parliament to prove the contrary. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a reversal of burden of proof. In that regard, the applicant claims that it is not for him to adduce evidence as regards the work of his parliamentary assistant; rather, it is for the Parliament to prove the contrary.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality in so far as the sum claimed from the applicant implies that the parliamentary assistant never worked for the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality in so far as the sum claimed from the applicant implies that the parliamentary assistant never worked for the applicant.

---
# Službeni list C 241A/26.

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 241A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 60.26. srpnja 2017. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 241A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 60.26. srpnja 2017.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2017/C 241 A/01 | Ispravak objave Europskog ureda za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) – Oglas za slobodno radno mjesto glavnog direktora (razred AD 15) – Bruxelles – Zapošljavanje člana privremenog osoblja – Članak 2. točka (a) Uvjeta zaposlenja ostalih službenika – COM/2017/10373 ( SL C 204 A, 28.6.2017. ) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2017/C 241 A/01

Ispravak objave Europskog ureda za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) – Oglas za slobodno radno mjesto glavnog direktora (razred AD 15) – Bruxelles – Zapošljavanje člana privremenog osoblja – Članak 2. točka (a) Uvjeta zaposlenja ostalih službenika – COM/2017/10373 ( SL C 204 A, 28.6.2017. )

( SL C 204 A, 28.6.2017. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 26.7.2017 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2017

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 241/1

---

Ispravak objave Europskog ureda za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) – Oglas za slobodno radno mjesto glavnog direktora (razred AD 15) – Bruxelles – Zapošljavanje člana privremenog osoblja – Članak 2. točka (a) Uvjeta zaposlenja ostalih službenika – COM/2017/10373

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 204 A od 28. lipnja 2017.
  )

(2017/C 241 A/01)

Na stranici 5., u odjeljku „Rok za prijavu”:

umjesto:„Rok za prijavu jest 27. srpnja 2017. Nakon 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu prijava više neće biti moguća.”;

treba stajati:„Rok za prijavu jest 15. rujna 2017. Nakon 12 sati (podne) prema briselskom vremenu prijava više neće biti moguća.”.

---
Exhibit 10.5

                                                       Personal and Confidential
================================================================================
                                 INTERNAL MEMO
================================================================================

To:   Bob Trachtenberg               From:  Martin Burg
Date: August 15, 2002
Subject: Salary Adjustments

Memo:

I agree to participate in the program of Company-wide salary cuts. I understand
and agree to the reduction of my gross monthly salary by 10%. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, I understand that any contractual severance payments due me in
the event of my termination without cause shall be based upon my pre-cut salary.

Employee name:  Bob Trachtenberg

Employee signature: /s/ Bob Trachtenberg

Dear Employee,

Keryx is very appreciative of your agreement to take a reduction in monthly
salary in light of the tough financial circumstances in the economy at present.
We hope you understand the need to cut back at present in order to help grow a
strong, healthy and efficient Company in the future, and we look forward to
growing this Company With your help.

Yours sincerely,


/s/ Ira Weinstein
-------------------------
Ira Weinstein
COO
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
Date: August 15, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - (-)indiana(6)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

Data Release        May 2, 2022        Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023)

API        April 19, 2017        StreamStats

Data Release        December 10, 2020        Bayesian modeling of NURE airborne radiometric data for the conterminous United States: predictions and grids

publication        November 1, 2004        Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, and Indiana

Project        July 26, 2016        Flood Inundation Mapping in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana

staff profileLindsay E Hunt
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

KAREN M. CONSTANTINE, 

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF 

THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, DECEASED 

AND INDIVIDUALLY AS WIDOW IN HER 

OWN RIGHT 

V. 

LENOX INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC. 

AND ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES 

CORPORATION 

PETITION OF: LENOX INSTRUMENT 

COMPANY, INC. 

ORDER

: No. 55 EM 2023 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2024, the Petition for Permission to Appeal 

and the Application for Leave to File Reply are DENIED.