alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST CAPITAL LAND TRUST, LLC, as Trustee Under Trust No. 6302, Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a Bank of New York AS TRUSTEE FOR the CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-32CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-32CB, et al, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-213

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 16, 2019

Bruce C. Botsford, of Bruce Botsford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Matthew E. Hearne, of Frenkel Lambert Weis Weisman & Gordon, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee, Bank of New York Mellon, etc.

No Appearance for Remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4203

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Dedrevionus C. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2019]

Dedrevionus C. Williams, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Damoorgian and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James H. Jenkins, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on Form
     8-K  containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect of
     periods  included in the year covered by this annual report,  of Equity One
     ABS, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in light of the
     circumstances  under which such  statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing  information required
     to be  provided  to the  trustee  by the  servicer  under the  pooling  and
     servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  for  inclusion  in these  reports  is
     included in these reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance  statement included in
     the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in  accordance  with
     the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar,  agreement,  and except
     as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has  fulfilled  its  obligations
     under the servicing agreement; and

5.   The  reports  disclose  all  significant   deficiencies   relating  to  the
     servicer's  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards based upon the
     report provided by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a
     review in  compliance  with the  Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program  for
     Mortgage  Bankers or similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and
     servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
trustee.

Date: March 26, 2004

                                      /s/ James H. Jenkins
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      James H. Jenkins, Executive Vice President
                                        and CFO
                                      Equity One ABS, Inc.
Joseph Lushington GARRELL, DOC #T49977 Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

Joseph Lushington Garrell, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-3292

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Daniel Todd Little

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central 

____________ 

Submitted: May 3, 2024

Filed: May 8, 2024

[Unpublished] 

____________ 

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Little received a 360-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to 

sexually exploiting a child. See 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), (e). An Anders brief suggests 

that the district court1 abused its discretion by ordering him to serve his federal

1

The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for 

the Southern District of Iowa.
-2- 

sentence consecutively to undischarged Iowa sentences arising out of “separate 

conduct.” See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

We conclude there has been no abuse of discretion. See United States v. 

Nelson, 982 F.3d 1141, 1146 (8th Cir. 2020) (articulating the standard of review). 

The record establishes that the district court sufficiently considered the statutory 

sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3584(b), and did not rely on an improper 

factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Ward, 686 F.3d 

879, 884 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining that the district court has “wide latitude to weigh 

the . . . factors” and “assign[ing] some factors greater weight than others” does not 

justify reversal (citation omitted)). 

We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other 

non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). We 

accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission 

to withdraw.

______________________________
Luther HUTCHINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - multimedia_webcam(10)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(10)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(11)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - kansas(3)
              - maine(3)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(12)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(6)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Real-time Data        October 7, 2016        Hurricane and Flood Response Map Viewer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(6)
              - alaska(19)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(17)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(65)
              - colorado(12)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(8)
              - delaware(9)
              - (-)district of columbia(8)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - louisiana(17)
              - maine(9)
              - maryland(13)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(4)
              - new hampshire(7)
              - new jersey(10)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(11)
              - north carolina(7)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(15)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(13)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(9)
              - u.s. virgin islands(5)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(17)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Research        January 18, 2018        Forecasting Coastal Change

Research        April 12, 2016        Geologic Hazards and Catastrophic Events

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer (AD)

General        July 16, 2021        Surface Water

Project        April 12, 2016        Understanding Coastal Change

Project        May 15, 2020        Surface Water Capabilities @ MD-DE-DC

Presentations and Events        April 5, 2019        National Liaison Committee Meeting for the NWQP — Part 1
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sayan
      Navaratnam, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*By:*
            /s/ Sayan
              Navaratnam*Sayan
                Navaratnam*
              *Chairman
                and Chief Executive*
              *Officer*


November
      14, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                List of Subsidiaries of Key3Media Group, Inc.

Key3Media Events, Inc. (Delaware)
        ExpoNova Events + Exhibitions AB (Sweden)

        Key3Media VON Events, Inc. (Delaware)

        Key3Media BCR Events, Inc. (Delaware)

        Key3Media Events Japan, Inc. (Japan)

        Key3Media Events Canada, Inc. (Canada)

        Key3Media Events Pty, Ltd. (Australia)

        ZD Events S.A. (Mexico)

        Key3Media S.A. (France)
                Key3Media East (France)

Key3Media Advertising, Inc. (Delaware)
        50% owner of Event Advertising, LLC (Delaware)
GENERAL SESSIONS.

NEW YORK,

OCTOBER, 1823.

#### *The Peopl*e vs. *P. F. I. Gautier.*

Misdemeanor.

*Maxwell,*District Attorney, Counsel for the People.

*Price,*Counsel for the Prisoner.

Mr. Gautier was indicted under the act of the Assem» bly of the state of New York, passed the 15th day of April, 1817, entitled “an act to regulate sales by public auction,” for selling goods at public auction, not having been appointed in pursuance of that or any other act of the assembly of this state. The words of the second section of the act are, “ that the person administering the government of this state, by and with the advice and consent of the council of appointment, shall annually appoint so many persons, within this state, to be auctioneers, as they shall judge proper.” The third section declares, “ that if any person or persons, not appointed and authorized in the manner by this act directed, nor by or under the authority of the United States, shall sell, or attempt to sell any goods, wares, merchandize, or effects, whatever, by way of public auction or vendue, within this state, he shall be considered guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, on conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding five hundred dollars, or imprisoned for a term not exceeding three months,” «fee.

*78Price, counsel for the defendant) contended) that there could be ño conviction under this statute, inasmuch as the constitution had abrogated it by changing the manner of appointment. An auctioneer could not now be appointed “by and with the advice and consent of the council of appointment, such a power not being in existence, having been abrogated by the constitution, and by £< an act directing the mode of appointing certain officers,” which defined the manner of appointing auctioneers, to wit, “that the person administering the government of this state shall nominate, and with the consent of the senate, appoint.” It was entirely silent as to any penalties for selling goods at public auction, without such appointment. It was a *casus*omissus, not provided for by ;any law in the state. Every man who chose might sell .at public auction without being amenable to the penalties of the act of the 15th of April, 1817, or any other act. It would be the duty of the legislature to pass an act upon this subject; but until that was done, there was no ¡remedy.

The court was of the same opinion -, and decided that the act of 1817 was inoperative, and abrogated by the new constitution ; and the act of 1823 was silent as to any penalties for selling goods at public auction, and instructed the jury to acquit the defendant.

The jury returned a verdict of *not guilty.*
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-28,964-06

EX PARTE MARK LYNN MILLIGAN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W11-27465-U(B) IN THE 291ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to imprisonment for fifteen years. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Milligan v. State, No. 05-12-01537-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 30, 2014) (not designated for

publication). 

On March 3, 2016, the trial court entered an order designating issues. The District Clerk

properly forwarded the record to this Court pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). 

However, the record has been forwarded without the trial court having resolved the designated
issue(s) in this case. We remand this application to the 291st District Court of Dallas County to

allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and

conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 14, 2016

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terence Yap Wing Khai



Terence Yap Wing Khai, President, CEO and

 a director

November 14, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, ****Paul N. Saleh certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IWO Holdings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

**November 14, 2005**
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Inyx,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jack Kachkar,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jack Kachkar
-----------------------
Jack Kachkar
Chief Executive Officer

April 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Edward Chan, COO, CEO, and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Edward Chan



Edward Chan, COO, CEO and

 a director

December 28, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1277 

CA 13-00540 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

AFFINITY ELMWOOD GATEWAY PROPERTIES LLC, 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AJC PROPERTIES LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

EVELYN BENCINICH, SUSAN M. DAVIS, STEVEN 

GATHERS, ANGELINE C. GENOVESE, SANDRA GIRAGE 

AND LORENZ M. WUSTNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

ARTHUR J. GIACALONE, EAST AURORA, FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLP, BUFFALO (BRENDAN H. LITTLE OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A.

Michalek, J.), entered March 8, 2013. The order, as relevant to this

appeal, denied the cross motion of defendants-appellants for recusal. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Affinity Elmwood Gateway Props. LLC v AJC

Props. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ____ [Jan. 3, 2014]).

Entered: January 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court