alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:
June 5, 2009/s/ F. Edwin Harbach

F. Edwin HarbachChief Executive Officer
Charles FAUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1715

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 6, 2018]

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Louis G. Carres, Special Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We dismiss this appeal without prejudice for appellant to seek relief on the sentencing issue under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 or 3.850.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10








Exhibit 10.36




Agreement




This Agreement is made as of the 13th day of March, 2003 between Shanghai Teachers Training Centre (the “Shanghai”) and Today’s Teachers Technology and Culture Ltd. (the “TTTC”).




Whereas:




Both parties agree to jointly develop national grade A kindergarten curriculum and teacher’s manual. Details as follows:




1.

Shanghai is responsible for the development of the curriculum and the teacher’s manual, and the work should be completed within one year period. Detailed development requirements shall be confirmed by the final outline in due course;




2.

TTTC is responsible for the development cost including a RMB120,000 startup fund which should be paid to Shanghai in two installments;




3.

TTTC is responsible for the consulting fee and the conference cost of RMB60,000, author’s remuneration fee of RMB100 per 1,000 characters, drawing fee of RMB50 per picture, and the fees for editing and processing;




4.

The copyrights of the curriculum and the teacher’s manual and the right to select publisher as well as the distribution right all belong to TTTC. TTTC shall pay Shanghai a royalty which is equivalent to 1% of annual retail revenue;




5.

TTTC is responsible for the training of the curriculum and the teacher’s manual. The Parties will sign separate agreement with regard to the training plan and cost;




6.

The contents of the curriculum and the teacher’s manual shall be Shanghai’s own original contents. If there is any piracy or other violations of copyright, Shanghai shall take all the responsibilities and hold harmless and indemnify TTTC from the damages.




This agreement has an eight years term effective from the date both parties have duly executed this Agreement, as of the 13th day of March, 2003.







Shanghai:

Signature







TTTC:

Signature
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(11)
              - multimedia_image(47)
              - multimedia_image-141771(47)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(11)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(4)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - utah(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(71)
              - 2023(29)
              - (-)2022(73)
              - 2021(22)
              - 2020(4)
              - 2019(11)
              - 2018(2)

staff profileDaniel M Wagner

Photography  Drowned Alligator Hatchling

staff profileRobert J Waschbusch

Science Theme        March 3, 2022      Water Hazards

staff profileChristopher Magirl

Photography  Gage House Comparison

Photography  Westhope Comparison

science explorer topicWater and Extreme Weather

science explorer topicCoasts, Storms, and Sea Level Rise 

staff profileNoah M Lebsack

Photography  Aerial View of Subsiding Marshes in the Mississippi River Delta

staff profileAlan D Lasker

science explorer topicCoastal Hazards and Resilience

Photography  Lake Darling Comparison

staff profileSteven B Franks

staff profileJoseph T Fleming

Science Theme        July 15, 2022      Coastal Elevation Data and Mapping

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Science Theme        June 30, 2022      Hazards

staff profileDavid Bender

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Pioneering Fish Passage

Science Theme        July 15, 2022      Coastal Hydrology and Storm Surge

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

Photography  Floodwater at Wild Rice River

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Current page            2 
-                Page            3 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JUSTIN FORD, DOC #D51823, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4598 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed July 6, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Margaret O. Steinbeck, Judge. Justin Ford, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CRENSHAW, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Motion granted, appeal dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18 ,

202 4

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 2 4

- 00 1 75

- CR

____________ MARCO ANTONIO LEIJA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 776682

MEMORANDUM O PINION
A written request to dismiss the appeal, personally signed by appellant, has
been filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.
Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court to issue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
A.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3257

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Because A.M. has failed to serve an initial brief as provided by this court's order of November 13, 2018, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

LaROSE, C. J., and SALARIO and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 4.6c

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                         4% CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


         THIRD AMENDMENT, dated as of September 8, 2006, TO 4% CONVERTIBLE
PROMISSORY NOTE, dated May 12, 2004, made by and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, with its principal offices located at 111 North Branch
Street, Sellersville, PA 18960 (the "Borrower") and Neil Berman, an individual,
of 21346 St. Andrews Boulevard, # 421, Boca Raton, FL 33433 (the "Holder").
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meaning assigned to such term in the Original Note.

         WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder are parties to that certain 4%
Convertible Promissory Note, dated May 12, 2004, as amended, (the "Original
Note") pursuant to which the Borrower has borrowed the amount of $193,740 from
the Holder;

         WHEREAS, the Original Note provides that the Maturity Date shall be
September 12, 2006; and

         WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder have agreed to extend the Maturity
Date and to amend Section 1.6 of the Original Note in order to provide the
Borrower with additional time to secure financing; and

         WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Original
Note, the Borrower and the Holder hereby approve the amendment of the Original
Note as set forth herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

         1. By their respective execution of this AMENDMENT, the Borrower and
the Holder agree that Section 1.6 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows: "Maturity Date" shall mean November 28, 2006.

         2. Except as expressly provided herein, the Original Note shall
continue in full force and effect.

         3. This THIRD AMENDMENT supercedes any and all prior written or oral
agreements with respect to the Original Note, and may be executed by facsimile
and in counterparts, which, taken together, shall be deemed an original and
shall constitute a single AMENDMENT.



                             SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS




           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Holder have executed this
Third Amendment as of the date first written above.


        DELTA MUTUAL INC.                          NEIL BERMAN
         (BORROWER)                                   (HOLDER)




By:   /s/ Peter F. Russo                         By:  /s/ Neil Berman
    --------------------------                       -----------------
      Peter F. Russo                                    Neil Berman
      President & CEO
Exhibit 32-a




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




As required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Charles G. McClure, Jr., hereby certify that:




1.

The Annual Report of ArvinMeritor, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.

The information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ArvinMeritor, Inc.




/s/ Charles G. McClure, Jr.  Charles G. McClure, Jr.  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President




Date: November 23, 2010




---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I,Thomas F. Farar, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:    March 9, 2006

 
|   | /s/  Thomas F. Farar                           |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas  F. Farar                               |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary |
|   | (Principal  Accounting and Financial Officer)  |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 103893-103894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 103894]]

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1042 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-799, K2025-798.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30175 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 4.5d

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                           THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
                               4% CONVERTIBLE NOTE


         AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 4% CONVERTIBLE NOTE, is dated
as of November 27, 2006; made by and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, with its principal offices located at 111 North Branch Street,
Sellersville, PA 18960 (the "Borrower") and T&T Vermoegensverwaltungs AG, as
lawful transferee, of Bahnhofstrasse 73, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland (the
"Holder"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meaning assigned to such term in the Original Note.

         WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder are parties to that certain Third
Amended and Restated 4% Convertible Note, dated May 12, 2004, as amended (the
"Original Note"), pursuant to which the Borrower has borrowed the amount of
$100,000 from the Holder;

         WHEREAS, the Original Note provides that the Maturity Date shall be
         November 30, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder have agreed
         to extend the Maturity
Date and to amend Section 1.6 of the Original Note in order to provide the
Borrower with additional time to secure financing; and

         WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Original
Note, the Borrower and the Holder hereby approve the amendment of the Original
Note as set forth herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual
covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

         1. By their respective execution of this AMENDMENT, the Borrower and
the Holder agree that Section 1.6 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read
in its entirety as follows: "Maturity Date" shall mean February 28, 2007.

         2. Except as expressly provided herein, the Original Note shall
continue in full force and effect.

         3. This AMENDMENT may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts,
which, taken together, shall be deemed an original and shall constitute a single
AMENDMENT.

         4. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Holder have caused this
AMENDMENT to be executed as of the date first written above.


                            -SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS-





DELTA MUTUAL, INC.                      T&T VERMOEGENSVERWALTUNGS  AG
  (BORROWER)                                 (HOLDER)




By:  /s/ Peter F. Russo               By: /s/ Ivano Angelastri__
    ----------------------                  -----------------------
    Peter F. Russo                      Name:  Ivano Angelastri
    President & CEO                     Title:  Managing Director
1891.

#### Ephram *v.*The State.

Russell, J.

The judge did not err in overruling the *motion*for a new trial, either upon the general grounds, or upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. *Judgment affirmed.*

*434Accusation of assault and battery, from city court of Blakely— Judge Jordan. April 23, 1909.

Submitted June 9,

Decided July 6, 1909.

*Hawes & Pottle,*for plaintiff in error.

*Waller Park, solicitor,*contra.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7523
GEORGE JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-2682-WDQ) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 4, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: George Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motions for general relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs. , No. CA-04-2682-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 2

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Shareholders of
Æterna Zentaris Inc.

We
have audited the consolidated balance sheets ofÆterna Zentaris Inc.as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
consolidated statements of operations, deficit, other capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In
our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants

Quebec,
Quebec, Canada
February 25, 2005, except as to note 25c) dated March 10, 2005

Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences

In the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion
paragraph) when there are changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Company's financial statements, such as the changes described in note 3
to the consolidated financial statements. Our report to the Shareholders dated February 25, 2005, except as to note 25c) which is as of March 10, 2005 is expressed in
accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the auditors' report when the changes are properly accounted for and
adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants

Quebec,
Quebec, Canada
February 25, 2005, except as to note 25c) dated March 10, 2005

---



QuickLinks
STATE of Louisiana v. Larky BICKHAM

NO. 2018-KO-0412

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant in part.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00215

- CR

E X PARTE O SCAR A CUNA §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 158th District

Court

of Denton County (F16

- 2622

- 158)

September 2 6 , 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial court is

affirmed.

SECOND DIS TRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell