alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

1 Becton Drive
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
tel: 201.847.6957
fax: 201.847.5502
www.bd.com


                                                                       (BD LOGO)

August 12, 2004


Coram Healthcare Corporation
1675 Broadway
Suite 900
Denver, CO 80202

Contract Addendum
BD ID# 1000026717 (500026)

     Becton, Dickinson and Company ("BD") and Coram Healthcare Corporation
("Coram") acknowledge that the Supply Agreement by and between BD and Coram
dated June 10, 1998 (the "Supply Agreement") remains in full force and effect
and has been extended through October 31, 2004 (the "Extended Term").

     In addition, BD hereby acknowledges that it has previously waived all
claims for payment of the Pricing Adjustment set forth in Section E.1 of the
Supply Agreement, and Coram shall have no additional Annual Minimum Committed
Volumes or other purchase commitments under the Supply Agreement through the
Extended Term.

     Authorized representatives of the parties have executed this Amendment as
of the dates below.


By: /s/ Scott R. Danitz                      By: /s/ Krista A. Thompson
   --------------------------                   -------------------------------

Printed Name: Scott R. Danitz                Printed Name: Krista Thompson
             ----------------                             ---------------------
Title: SRVP, CFO & Treasurer                 Title: VP GM, Becton, Dickinson
      -----------------------                       and Company
Date: 8-16-04                                      ----------------------------
     ------------------------                Date: 8-13-04
                                                  -----------------------------



Becton, Dickinson and Company
STATE of Louisiana v. Tyrone WASHINGTON

NO. 2018-KO-0783

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

*344Denied.
Exhibit 12.2


               CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Companhia De Bebidas Das Americas
- AmBev (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Magim Rodriguez Junior, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                            /s/ Magim Rodriguez Junior
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Magim Rodriguez Junior
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            Dated: June 27, 2003


























     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Bret Cloward, as Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IWO Holdings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

August 11, 2005
2082.

#### Ringer *v.*Town of Milner.

Certiorari, from Pike superior court — Judge Reagan. June 28, 1909.’

¡Submitted October 6,- —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*Henry O, Farr, J. J. Garland,*for plaintiff in error.

Russell, J.

Proof- of the venue -is essential to establish, the jurisdiction of a trial court. To authorize the conviction of one charged with the violation of a municipal ordinance, it must appear that the offense charged was committed within the corporate limits of the municipality in question. There being no evidence in this case that the store in which the alleged disorderly conduct took place was within the corporate limits of the town of Milner, it was error to overrule the certiorari. *Judgment reversed.*
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata 

CATHERINE L. JENKINS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2782-04-2 PER CURIAM 

 MARCH 22, 2005 

ARLINGTON (COUNTY OF) SCHOOL BOARD 

 AND VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL GROUP 

 SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Wesley G. Marshall, on brief), for appellant. 

 (William S. Sands, Jr.; Duncan and Hopkins, P.C., on brief), for 

appellees. 

 Catherine L. Jenkins (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission. Claimant contends the commission erred in (1) finding she failed to prove she 

suffered post-concussive syndrome, a head and/or brain injury, depression, chronic fatigue 

syndrome, or any back injury as a result of her compensable November 13, 2000 injury by 

accident; (2) failing to apply the longstanding rule of interpretation that the opinions of the 

treating physicians are entitled to great weight; (3) accepting Dr. Bruce Smoller’s opinion; 

(4) finding claimant was not entitled to an award of disability benefits; and (5) finding she failed 

to prove she was disabled from July 12, 2001 and continuing as result of her November 13, 2000 

compensable injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in 

its final opinion. See Jenkins v. Arlington (County of) School Bd., VWC File No. 205-69-08 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

(Oct. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
Dominique R. BLUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1058

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-11962

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00021-RH-CAS-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG MICHAEL HATHCOCK, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(October 4, 2017)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-11962 Date Filed: 10/04/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Barbara Jean Throne, appointed counsel for Craig Michael Hathcock, has 

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s 

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hathcock’s convictions and sentences are 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-11962 Date Filed: 10/04/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Adrian SIMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

Adrian Sims, Blountstown, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 64 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 64

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 13, 2013.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Garamendi.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Blumenauer (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Cardenas).
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mr. Welch (to rank immediately 
after Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of COL China Online International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chi Keung Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Chi Keung Wong


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)





February [  ], 2011


























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Trend Mining Company (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ryan,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      that,
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      September 11, 2007





/s/
                John P. RyanJohn
                P. RyanChief
                Financial Officer





This
      certificate accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not incorporated by reference
      into any filing of Trend Minding, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
      amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
      or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 10(A)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                       TO
                    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF SELIM A. BASSOUL

      This Amendment No. 3 is made this 27th day of May, 2004, by and among THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("TMC"), MIDDLEBY MARSHALL INC., a
Delaware corporation, (collectively the "Employer") and SELIM A. BASSOUL
("Employee").

                                    RECITALS

A. Employer and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated
as of May 16, 2002, and as amended from time to time thereafter (the "Employment
Agreement").

B. Employer and Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement to make certain
changes to Employee's compensation.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW THEREFORE the parties agree as follows:

1. Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding to the end
thereof the following new subsection (f):

      "(f) 2005 Bonus. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to
      the contrary, in the event that for any reason whatsoever other than (i)
      termination of Employee's employment for "Cause", as defined below, or
      (ii) voluntary resignation by Employee prior to January 4, 2005, Employer
      does not offer, on or before February 1, 2005, to extend the term of this
      Agreement, or that an extension is offered and Employee does not accept
      such offer on or before February 1, 2005, then, in addition to all other
      amounts payable to Employee hereunder, Employer shall pay to Employee, not
      later than February 15, 2005, the sum of $1,100,000.

2. This Amendment No. 3 is effective as of the date hereof.

3. Except as above amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION                                SELIM A. BASSOUL
        AND
MIDDLEBY MARSHALL INC.


By: /s/ William F. Whitman, Jr.                         /s/ Selim A. Bassoul
    --------------------------------                    --------------------
    Chairman of the Board

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the
day and year first above stated.
Christopher Kenneth SMITH, DOC #578881, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Cavins, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of CallWave Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of CallWave Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey Cavins
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:              |  | Jeffrey Cavins         
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
1654.

#### Martin *v.*City of Tifton.

Certiorari, from Tift superior court — .Judge Mitchell. December 7, 1908.

Submitted February 9, —

Decided March 23, 1909.

*J. B. Murrow, J. J. Murray,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. J. Wallace,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

1. At common law, process was served on a municipal corpora' tion by serving its mayor or other head officer, as being the “most visible part of the corporation.” In the absence of statutory provision, this manner of service of process upon municipalities is still valid. Therefore, in a certiorari proceeding in which the municipality is the defendant in certiorari, notice of the sanction of the writ, and of the time and place of hearing, directed to the mayor of the named municipality and served upon him as mayor, is a sufficient compliance with section 4644 of the Civil Code. 14 Enc. PI. & Pr. 232; Cloud *v.*Pierce City, 86 Mo. 357.

2. The rule of service above stated is not affected by the fact that the mayor served with the notice is himself the municipal official whose judgment it is sought to review on certiorari.

*Judgment reversed.*
Jeffrey Lamont BRINSON, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4105

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Christopher T. Seaver, Chief Executive Officer of Hydril Company, a Delaware
corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



(1)    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   
|-------------------
|Dated: May 14, 2003



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), in accordance with the procedures provided for by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in Release No. 33-8212 for treatment as a document accompanying the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
This certificate shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall this certificate be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as
shall be set forth by specific reference in such a filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.