alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Smart Online, Inc.; |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: April 30, 3013 | By:    | /s/ Robert M. Brinson, Jr. |   |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Robert M. Brinson, Jr.     |   |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer    |   |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 27, 2018

a0723 

# Order

Clerk July 27, 2018

156575

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156575

COA: 338669

Cass CC: 13

- 010009

- FC

KEITH JAMES LINTZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because th e defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong



Eppie Wong,

 CFO and a director

October 19, 2006
Frederick J. QUANDT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3054

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

Frederick J. Quandt, Panama City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Deirdra J. Burgess, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Medical Discoveries,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)    presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

      a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6.    I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 31, 2006

                                              /s/ DEIRDRA J. BURGESS
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Deirdra J. Burgess
                                             Controller
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Donaldson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|              |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| November 20, 2006 |   | /s/ William R. Donaldson                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|              |   |   

  

William R. Donaldson Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

 

 

  |
Ronald LEWERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 09, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT
        3.3**
 
 FIRST
        AMENDMENT TO
 AMENDED
        AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF
 SMART
        ONLINE, INC.
 
 Article
        V, Section 5 of the Bylaws is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence
        thereof.
 
 The
        following new Sections 5A and 5B are added to Article V of the
        Bylaws:
 
 Section
        5A .  Telephonic
        Meetings .
        Members
        of a committee of the Board of Directors may participate in a meeting of
        such
        committee by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment
        by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each
        other,
        and participation in a meeting pursuant to this Section shall constitute
        presence in person at such meeting.
 
 Section
        5B .  Action
        Without Meeting .
        Unless
        otherwise restricted by the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
        these Bylaws, or the Charter establishing such committee, any action required
        or
        permitted to be taken at any meeting of a committee may be taken without
        a
        meeting, if all members of the committee consent in writing, and such writing
        or
        writings are filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the
        committee.
 
 The
        Corporation shall cause the foregoing Amendment to be included in any amended
        and restated copy of the Bylaws and no further approval of such amendment
        or
        restated copy shall be required for such inclusion.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-271-CV

DC BLUES	APPELLANT

	V.

TEAMSTER LOCAL 767 	APPELLEES

AND TEAMSTER UNION	

	------------

	FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant DC Blues appeals from the trial court’s judgment signed July 26, 2004.  No postjudgment motion was filed to extend the appellate deadline.  Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due August 25, 2004.2  It was not filed until August 30, 2004.  No motion to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal was filed, but under Verburgt,3 when a notice of appeal is filed within fifteen days after its due date, we imply a corresponding motion to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal.4  Appellant still has the burden, however, to offer a reasonable explanation for filing the notice of appeal late.5

	Because the notice of appeal was untimely, we sent a letter to Appellant requesting a response showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal, as it appeared we lacked jurisdiction.  We did not receive a response.  Because Appellant failed to offer a reasonable explanation for filing its notice of appeal late, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.6

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 9, 2004
##### 



(ORRICK LOGO)
    
    ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
719 Second Avenue
Suite 900
Seattle, Washington 98104TEL 206-839-4300
FAX 206-839-4301www.orrick.com
  
 Re:
    
    Targeted Genetics CorporationRegistration Statement on Form S-3




---



#####
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 10.1







Amendment No. 10 to the 

Second Amended and Restated

Operating Agreement










1.   Section 11.4 of the Operating Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:




11.4   Tax Matters Partner. The Board of Directors shall, from time to time by resolution, appoint one of its members as "tax matters partner" of the Company pursuant to Code Section 6231(a)(7). Such tax matters partner shall be a Member of the Company. The tax matters partner is authorized to perform all duties imposed by Sections 6222 through 6234 of the Code; provided, however, that
the tax matters partner may not take any such action that is material to the Company without the consent of the Board of Directors; provided, further, that this sentence does not authorize such tax matters partner, the Board or any member of the Board to take any action left to the determination of an individual Member under Code Sections 6222 through 6234. The Company shall indemnify, to the full extent permitted by law, the tax matters partner from and against any damages and losses (including attorneys' fees) arising out of or incurred in connection with any action taken or omitted to be taken by in carrying out responsibilities as tax matters partner, provided such action taken or omitted to be taken does not constitute fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct.








	 	 	 
	 	
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	Effective Date: August 13, 2004	By:  	/s/ Leonard Wostrel
	 	



	 	Leonard Wostrel, Secretary
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Smart Online, Inc.; |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: April 30, 3013 | By:    | /s/ Gleb Mikhailov                    |   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Gleb Mikhailov                        |   |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer and Principal |   |
|                  |   | Accounting Officer                    |   |
Joshua HODGE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 11, 2018

Joshua Hodge, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

Makar, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.11


 


ANDREW CORPORATION


EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE BENEFIT PLAN AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT, made this 5th day of July, 2004, by and between Andrew
Corporation (the “Company”) and Fred Lietz (the “Executive”),


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Andrew Corporation Executive
Severance Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective May 14, 2004 (the
“Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive has been designated as an eligible participant
in the Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Executive and Company hereby agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Plan
Benefits.  The Executive has been
designated as a TIER III Participant in the Plan and shall be eligible solely
for the benefits set forth therein applicable to TIER III Participants.  The receipt of such benefits shall be subject
to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan, including, but not
limited to, terms related to the amount, time and form of benefits.  By execution of this Agreement, the
Executive agrees to be bound by the provisions of the Plan, as amended and
restated effective May 14, 2004, and as may be subsequently amended.


 


2.                                       Arbitration.  The Executive acknowledges that
Section 7.2 of the Plan contains an arbitration provision, and by
execution of this Agreement agrees to be bound by the terms of such arbitration
provision.


 


3.                                       Plan
Not Contract of Employment.  The
Plan does not constitute a contract of employment and nothing in the Plan shall
be construed to give the Executive the right to be retained by the Company or
to any benefits not specifically provided by the Plan.


 


4.                                       Plan
Supercedes Prior Change in Control Severance Agreements.  The Executive acknowledges and agrees that
the benefits and terms set forth in the May 14, 2004 restatement of the Plan,
as applicable to the Participant based on the Tier designated in paragraph 1
above, are a replacement for and in lieu of any benefits to which the Executive
may have been entitled under the Plan prior to its restatement or under any
other agreement with the Company relating to Change in Control severance
benefits.  The Executive further
acknowledges such benefits and terms may be subsequently amended pursuant to
Section 7.1 of the Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date first above written.


 


	
  EXECUTIVE

  	
  ANDREW CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Fred Lietz

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Ralph E. Faison

  	
   

  
	
  , individually

  	
   

  	
  By: Ralph E. Faison

  
	
   

  	
  Its: President & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
16F





Auditors’
Letter Regarding Change in Auditor





April 13,
2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission





Washington,
D.C. 20549





Ladies
and Gentlemen:





We were
previously principal accountants for Companhia de Bebidas das Américas – AmBev
and, under the date of April 12, 2010, we reported on the consolidated financial
statements of Companhia de Bebidas das Américas- AmBev as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. On February 11, 2010, we were
formally notified that we were dismissed.





We have
read Companhia de Bebidas das Américas – AmBev’s statements included under Item
16F of its Form 20F dated April 20, 2010, and we agree with such
statements.





Very
truly yours,





/s/ KPMG
Auditores Independentes


KPMG
Auditores Independentes


São
Paulo, Brazil
Tracy James JUSTICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1782

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Gross, Levine and Conner, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_publications(29)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(11)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - (-)maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation

National News Release        June 1, 2016        This hurricane season, scientists bring wave action into the picture