alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report
    
    (Date of earliest event reported):
    
    February 22, 2006
 LaCROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.
  Wisconsin
    
    0-23800
    
    39-1446816(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
file number)
    
    (IRS employer
identification number)
 18550 NE Riverside Parkway, Portland, Oregon 97230
 (503) 776-1010
 Not Applicable
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act
(17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS
  ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.  (d) .
 Exhibit No.

Description99.1
    
    LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. Press Release
dated February 22, 2006, entitled LACROSSE FOOTWEAR SIGNS FINANCIAL
AGREEMENT WITH PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION.
 2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  LaCROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.Dated: February 24, 2006
    By:
    /s/ David P. CarlsonDavid P. CarlsonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.

Description99.1
    
    LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. Press
Release dated February 22, 2006, entitled LACROSSE FOOTWEAR
SIGNS FINANCIAL AGREEMENT WITH PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION.
 4
Anthony D. KELLEM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2408

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EP Global Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 28, 2008
Betty FUSCO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. LENNAR HOMES, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4430

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Floyd PRYER, Sr. et al. v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC., et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1577

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant for reasons assigned by Judge Holdridge.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

*766I agree with the denial of this writ application. I write separately to note that, because the evidentiary issues presented here are uniquely complicated, in my view the trial court should provide the jury with specific caution on how to receive and evaluate the evidence presented.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sheffield Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, James Charles, President and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/James Charles



James Charles, President and

 a director

August 13, 2004
Justin KENDALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-439

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 9, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Justin Kendall, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to *825*Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we have reviewed the entire record on appeal and brief filed by counsel seeking to withdraw. There are no issues of arguable merit in the two appeals before this Court, arising from lower court cases numbered 15-5828CF10A and 16-009287CF10A. We specifically reject appellant's sentencing challenge in the 2015 case, based on the authorities recognizing that a defendant is not entitled to retain his youthful offender status after his violation of probation and adult sentencing. *See* *Eustache v. State* , 248 So.3d 1097, 1102 (Fla. 2018) ; *Granger v. State,* 252 So.3d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Therefore, we affirm the adjudications and sentences.

However, the record demonstrates that the trial court did not file a written order revoking community control in case number 15-5828CF10A. This requires remand to the trial court for entry of a written order revoking community control and specifying the conditions violated. *Musto v. State* , 174 So.3d 568, 569-70 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

*Affirmed, but remanded for entry of written revocation order in case number 15-5828CF10A, consistent with this opinion.*

Gerber, C.J., Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Warkaneski Brandon SCOTT

NO. 2018-KO-1031

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-30782 Summary Calendar

_______________

JO ANNE CARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

JAIL OF CADDO PARISH, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(94-CV-926-S)

_________________________

November 7, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jo Anne Carter appeals the dismissal, as frivolous under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), of her prisoner's civil rights suit.

She alleged a myriad of constitutional violations, including denial

of access to the courts, denial of visiting privileges with her

children, deprivation of property, denial of medical care, denial1 Given the lack of substantive merit of this appeal, we p retermit the

question of the applicability of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

2 of her right to practice religion, conditions of confinement,

harassment, and verbal abuse. She also alleged claims based on the

treatment received by other inmates.

On appeal, Carter does little more than provide a conclusional

list of some of the claims she asserted in the district court. She

provides no facts in support or arguments in opposition to the

dismissal.

Even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to

preserve them. Y ohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993). Issues not raised or briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned. Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex. , 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th

Cir. 1993).

Accordi ngly, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. S ee

5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. All pending motions are DENIED. 1
George V. MALLAS, Appellant, v. Nicolaos V. MALLAS and John V. Mallas, Appellees.

No. 4D18-680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN RE: ELLA CORTLAND GOODYEAR

NO. 2018-B-2032

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM

Respondent was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent has violated Rules 8.4(a) and 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Ella Cortland Goodyear, Louisiana Bar Roll number 23099, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF S.M., Jr.

NO. 2019-CK-0112

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

*900Not Considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, § 5.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL T. MORALES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 19

- 15870

D.C. No. 2:18

- cv

- 03051

- TLN

- AC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 6, 2020 * *

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Michael T. Morales appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action under the Federal Tort

Claims Act (“FTCA”) alleg ing he became disabled after receiving negligent

medical car e from Northern Valley Indian Health (“NVIH”)

— a tribal clinic for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15870

which the federal government has contractually assumed tort liability under the

FTCA for personal injury resulting from NVIH employees’ medical care. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Brady v. United States

,

211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Morales’s action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction b ecause Morales failed to file an administrative tort claim with

the United States prior to initiating his civil action. See id. at 502

– 04 (explaining

that the FTCA’s administrative claim requirement is jurisdictional and “must be

strictly adhered to” ; affirming distric t court’s dismissal of FTCA claim ).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION
of the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) (implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

I, Stephen G. Bassett, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Axcelis Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 15, 2010

/s/ STEPHEN G. BASSETT Stephen G. Bassett,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Amanda ROBBINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ZIPRECRUITER, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Raymond Glenn BARNETT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
1752.

#### Jones *v.*Bank of Waynesboro.

Powell, J.

Tb'e evidence amply warranted the verdict. Under the testimony in the case, the court did not err in submitting to the jury the questions as to fraud. The case was fairly tried and was free from material error. *Judgment affirmed.*

*390Levy and claim, from city court of Waynesboro — Judge Johnston. October 21, 1908.

Submitted May 21,

Decided June 29, 1909.

*E. J. Fullbright,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lawson & Scales, F. L. Brinson,*contra.
IN the INTEREST OF B.W., A.W., and L.W., children.

C.W., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-553

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 367 

Designating September 2023 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2023 as ‘‘National Spinal Cord 

Injury Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas approximately 302,000 individuals in the United 

States live with spinal cord injuries, which cost society 

billions of dollars in health care costs and lost wages; 

Whereas there are approximately 18,000 new spinal cord injuries in the United States each year; 

Whereas more than 42,000 individuals with spinal cord injuries are veterans; 

Whereas motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries; 

Whereas almost half of all spinal cord injuries sustained by 

individuals 30 years of age or younger occur as a result 

of a vehicular accident; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 367 ATS 

Whereas the average remaining years of life for individuals 

living with spinal cord injuries has not improved significantly since the 1980s; 

Whereas there is an urgent need to develop new 

neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and 

Whereas increased education and investment in research are 

key factors in improving outcomes for individuals living 

with spinal cord injuries, enhancing the quality of life of 

individuals with spinal cord injuries, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2023 as ‘‘National 

3 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments, therapies, and a cure for spinal cord in8 juries; 

9 (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies 

10 that offer promise and hope to individuals living 

11 with paralysis; and 

12 (5) commends the dedication of national, re13 gional, and local organizations, researchers, doctors, 

14 volunteers, and people across the United States who 

15 are working to improve the quality of life of individVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:55 Sep 27, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR367.ATS SR367

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 367 ATS 

1 uals living with spinal cord injuries and their fami2 lies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Harry Paul HETT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2449

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Leslie R. Pogue & Jeannette I. Pogue v. Elizabeth A. Williamson

Appellate case number: 01-17-00844-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-56353

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

This appeal was abated pending a determination of appellee’s attorney’s authority to 

proceed with the appeal following the death of appellee. Appellants have now filed a “Motion to 

Remove Abatement,” and attorneys for the appellee have likewise filed reports indicating that 

the appeal may now proceed on the brief filed prior to appellee’s death. See, e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 

7.1(a)(1).

We lift the abatement and reinstate the appeal on the active docket. The case is set for 

submission on the briefs, oral argument denied, on Wednesday, January 15, 2020, to a panel of 

Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Richard Hightower__________________________

Acting individually 

Date: ____December 19, 2019_______________
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_publications(55)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(20)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(4)
              - florida(4)
              - georgia(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maryland(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(5)
              - (-)ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Story        January 4, 2016        USGS Measures Historic Flooding Across the Nation
Brandon K. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2755

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1


                 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM CONSENT


To the Board of Directors
Inyx, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Form S-8 of Inyx, Inc. (filed on
June 26, 2003 file No. 333-106548 and file No. 333-106549) of our report, dated
April 9, 2004, except for Note 3 as to which the date is April 1, 2005, on our
audit of the consolidated financial statements of Inyx, Inc., formerly known as
Doblique, Inc., as of December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and to all references to our firm included in this
Registration Statement.

/s/ Berkovits, Lago & Company, LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
April 8, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30847]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 544 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-863, K2025-864.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30847 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```