alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(67)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(30)
              - california(8)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(13)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(6)
              - indiana(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(7)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(11)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - mississippi(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(3)
              - (-)pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(9)
              - texas(11)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(9)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the annual report of Continan Communications, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 2, 2007                                      /s/ Claude C. Buchert
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Claude C. Buchert,
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 2, 2007                                      /s/ Ross A. Nordin
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Ross A. Nordin,
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 7.1



MAXCOM TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A.B. DE C.V.

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
CHARGES IN ACCORDANCE WITH IFRS



|                                          |  | Year ended December 31,               |           
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ----------
|                                          |  | 2013                                  |           
|                                          |  | (thousands of nominal pesos           |           
|                                          |  | for 2011 and 2012, except ratio data) |           
|Income (Loss) Before Income Tax           |  |                                       | (1,235,424
|Determination of the Ratio Fixed charges: |  |                                       |           
|Interest expense                          |  |                                       | 223,678   
|Interest capitalized during period        |  |                                       | —         
|Rental expense                            |  |                                       | 24,713    
|Amortization of Debt issuance costs       |  |                                       | 107,053   
|Total fixed charges                       |  |                                       | 355,444   
|Earnings:                                 |  |                                       |           
|Income (loss) from continuing operations  |  |                                       | (1,235,424
|Fixed charges                             |  |                                       | 355,444   
|Amortization of capitalized interest      |  |                                       | 22,987    
|Less: interest capitalized during period  |  |                                       | —         
|Total earnings                            |  |                                       | (856,993  
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges        |  |                                       | (2.41     
|Insufficiency (sufficiency)               |  |                                       | 1,212,437
Joshua NEELEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2135

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Motorsports and
Entertainment Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William R. Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 20, 2005                                       /s/ William R. Donaldson
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   William R. Donaldson
                                                   Chief Financial Officer and
                                                   Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained
by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Robert J. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Lashay A. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laurie Benoit-Knox, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(53)
              - (-)products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(12)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(1)
              - california(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Software Release        April 13, 2017        Pedestrian Evacuation Analyst Tool
Christian MATIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.02**CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory T. Donovan do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, cash flows and financial highlights of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.By: /s/ Gregory T. Donovan
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES P. MCNULTY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 70 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Sheila Renee BONNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Sheila Renee Bonner, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Derrell Rico WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Greg Caracci, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Derrell Rico Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

May 29, 2018 

s0521 

Order 

 

Clerk 

May 29, 2018 

156173 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 156173 

 COA: 336936 

Macomb CC: 2003-003761-FC 

EDWARD FRANK LINT, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Charlie Frank BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32(b)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, Richard I. Linhart, Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of James Monroe Bancorp,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ Richard I. Linhart
----------------------------------------------------
Richard I. Linhart
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Pioneer Bankshares,Inc. 

 

We consent to incorporation in this Form 10-KSB of our report, datedFebruary 3, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flowsfor the year then ended. 

 

/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C. 

 

Winchester, Virginia 

March 25, 2005
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 9

- 0 0 018

- C V

Style: Lucrecia Mendia v. Fiesta Mart

, L.L.C.

Date motion filed * : June 19 , 201 9

Type of motion: Opposed Fourth Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant ’s c ounsel Tina Z. Robbins

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: March 27

, 201 9

Number of extensions granted: 3 Current Due D ate: June 17 , 2019

Date Requested: July 2, 2019 (97 days from original due date and 15

days from current due date )

Ordered that motion is:

☒ Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: Ju ly 2 , 201 9

.  No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary

circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

☒ Other:

_ Although this is a ppellant’s fourth extension request, it is the first request after

the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record on June 4, 2019

. Accordingly, appellant’s

fourth m otion for an extension of time to file her brief is granted until July 2, 2019 , but

counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary

circumstances

.

__________ __________________________________________________

Judge’ s signature:

___

/s/ Laura C. Higley

______

x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ June 25, 2019

____
1596.

#### Speth *v.*Maxwell, executrix.

Action for damages, from city court of Kichmond county— Judge Eve. October 22, 1909.

Submitted February 11, —

Decided October 1, 1909.

A refrigerator and an ice-box in use in the store of Speth, in his milk and butter business, were seized under an attachment sued out by Maxwell. The trial of a traverse of the attachment resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of Speth, .and he sued Maxwell for damages, alleging that the trespass of Maxwell in causing the seizure and removal of the property forced him to close up his business; that through the trespass he suffered actual damage, in the loss of his refrigerator, ice-box, and stock of goods, amounting to $200; in the closing up of his business and consequent enforced idleness for five months, $500; and in damage through the humiliation to which he was subjected by the trespass, $1,000. It was alleged that Maxwell, in causing the levy, acted with malice and without probable cause. On the trial of the .action for damages there was evidence as to actual damage to the plaintiff’s business, in consequence of the seizure. The court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant; to which the plaintiff excepted.

*F. W. Gapers,*for plaintiff,

cited: *Ga. R.*80/508; 67/58 (4); Civil Code, §3844.

*G. E. ■& B. S. Cohen,*for. defendant,

cited: *Ga. R.*29/64; 30/519; 54/473; 72/480; 73/534; 75/73; 79/638; 86/238; 96/148; 96/730; 104/235; 118/140-41; Civil Code, §3843.

Russell, J.

Under the ruling in *Williams*v. *Inman, (1 Ga. App.*321 2, 3), the plaintiff was entitled to recover actual damages, irrespective of malice or want of probable cause. The questions of malice and want of probable cause should have been submitted to the jury only as to the allowance of exemplary damages in addition to the actual damages which the plaintiff was entitled to recover under the evidence. Consequently, it was error to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant.

*Judgment reversed.*
BANK OF NEW YORK, etc., Appellant, v. Peter W. OBERMEYER, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 26, 2018

DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, and Shawn Taylor (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Gregg Horowitz (Sarasota), for appellees.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

In this foreclosure case, Bank of New York appeals the trial court's order denying its verified Motion to Vacate Order of Sanctions filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. We affirm.

Trial was set in this case on three different dates, April 28, 2014, July 10, 2014, and December 12, 2014. Each time, the borrowers' counsel drove from his office in Sarasota to the Key West courthouse in Monroe County. Each time, the Bank inexplicably failed to appear. The case was dismissed without prejudice on December 16, 2014, and that order was not appealed.

Meanwhile, the borrowers moved for sanctions in the form of costs and attorney's fees including the time expended by their counsel in driving from Sarasota to Key West for the trials that the Bank failed to attend. The Bank also failed to attend the hearing on that motion. Not surprisingly, the motion was granted. The Bank subsequently moved under rule 1.540(b) to vacate the sanctions order and costs, which the trial court denied. The Bank timely appeals.

Having carefully reviewed the arguments of the parties, including the arguments in the Bank's late-filed initial brief, we find nothing improper or illegal in the trial court's decision to require the payment of the borrower's counsel travel costs in addition to the usual costs and fees in these unusual circumstances. *See**Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Stewart Title Guar. Co.*, 132 So.3d 858, 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting *Eve's Garden, Inc. v. Upshaw & Upshaw, Inc.*, 801 So.2d 976, 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ("Although travel time is generally not compensable, travel time may be awarded as part of a sanction under certain circumstances, such as where a party was aware that his actions could result in unnecessary litigation.") ); *see,**e.g.*, *Consultech of Jacksonville, Inc. v. Dep't of Health*, 876 So.2d 731, 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (finding no abuse of discretion in an attorney's fees award of travel time as a sanction for failure to attend a deposition).

Affirmed.