alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                     National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Review of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) Phase III-Translational Centers (P30) Applications                

*Date:*                     March 18-19, 2025                

*Time:*                     10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate grant applications                

*Address:*                     National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.                

Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.

*Contact Person:*                     Manas Chattopadhyay, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12N, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-827-5320,                     *manasc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 19, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30873 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
i ; ‘*. 

### OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY 

## GENERAL OF TEXAS , ‘ , ’ .&~. AUSTIN

l o f b t b ~,

r e aaa

l 

## 6 follar*~,i

‘ . ; ..I.. ,, “-
Lionel BRADLEY, DOC #T52652, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



             Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-63638) pertaining to The Princeton Review, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-77016) pertaining to
The Princeton Review, Inc. 401(k) Employee Savings Plan of our report dated
March 3, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of The Princeton Review, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 2003
Howard Lee SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1904

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

Howard Lee Smith, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, C.J., SALTER and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRYL YOUNG,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 7, 2006
 ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
 000-31249(Commission File Number)
    
    88-0331369(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESPress Release dated August 7, 2006    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (c) Exhibits.
 Exhibit 99.1
    
    Press Release, dated August 7, 2006, related to Items 2.02.
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Arcadia Resources, Inc.By:
    /S/  Rebecca R. IrishRebecca R. IrishIts:  Chief Financial Officer  3
Steve AUSTIN, Jr., Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D18-422

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 13, 2018.

Steve Austin, Jr., in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.
Aremi Ascuncion PEREZ LOPEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 28, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

GIBSON HALL,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 363, 2018

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 88004234DI (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: July 27, 2018

Decided: August 17, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, the Court 

concludes that:

(1) On July 16, 2018, the appellant, Gibson Hall, filed a notice of appeal 

from a Superior Court order, dated June 18, 2018, denying his motion for transcripts. 

Hall sought the transcripts to provide documentation in support of postconviction 

relief. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Hall to show cause why this 

appeal should not be dismissed based upon this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear 

an interlocutory appeal in a criminal matter. In his response to the notice to show 

cause, Hall argues that the order denying his motion for transcripts is final and 

immediately appealable. 
2

(2) Hall is mistaken. Under the Delaware Constitution only a final 

judgment may be reviewed by the Court in a criminal case.1 The Superior Court’s 

June 18, 2018 order denying Hall’s motion for transcripts is an interlocutory order.2 

The denial of a motion for transcripts is not appealable as a final order before entry 

of a final judgment on a motion for postconviction relief.3 In denying Hall’s motion 

for transcripts the Superior Court noted that a motion for postconviction relief would 

likely be subject to summary dismissal under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2), 

but Hall did not file a motion for postconviction relief and the Superior Court did 

not deny a motion for postconviction relief in the June 18, 2018 order. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice 

 

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b).

2

See, e.g., Davis v. State, 2014 WL 4243634, at *1 (Del. Aug. 26, 2014) (holding that order 

denying motion for transcripts to pursue further postconviction remedies was interlocutory).

3

Id.
Exhibit 32.1.(1)

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Systems Management
Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 11, 2005


                                 BY: /s/ JIM KARLAK
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                         JIM KARLAK
                                         PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6346

JOHN WICK FALKENSTEIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-3081-PJM) Submitted: July 14, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wick Falkenstein, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Falkenstein v. Beshears , CA-97-3081-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-426-CV

IN RE DAVID TULLOS	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MCCOY,  JJ. 

DELIVERED:  November 20, 2008
Alejandro D. BENABE-RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

Alejandro D. Benabe-Rivera, Perry, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant's apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment(s) and sentence(s) in Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 2011-CF-005070, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. *See* *State v. Spencer*, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will *288be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. *See* *Isley v. State*, 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *Simpkins v. State*, 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 24, 2013

In The

Cou of lppea( 

:ffi(tt] i ttitt of at aIlas

No. 05-12-00279-CR

No. 05-12-00295-CR

JOHN TERRY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-16254-P, F09-16253-P

ORDER

The State’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. The brief, which

was tendered on January 18, 2013, is filed as of the date of this order.

Is/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7379** 

SHON CONNER WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG MED , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv - 00011

- MGL )

Submitted : December 30, 2014 Decided: January 7, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shon Conner Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shon Conner Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate j udge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
p etition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Williams v . Warden FCI Williamsburg Med , No. 4:14

-

cv - 00011

- MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional proce ss.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc.
(“Camelot”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, George Jackson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Camelot
Entertainment Group, Inc. and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of Camelot Entertainment Group,
Inc.






December
12, 2008




/s/ 
George Jackson


George
Jackson


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Joseph Jimenez, certify that:  1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novartis AG;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 27, 2011  By:
/s/ JOSEPH JIMENEZJoseph JimenezChief Executive Officer
Derek HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. /s/ Eppie Wong, CFO November 13, 2008
Roland EDWARDS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2996

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 03, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Order entered May 14, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00512-CV

IN RE DWAMETRIA NELSON, Relator

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-05377-C

ORDER

Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We VACATE the Court’s April 29, 2014 order staying the April 16, 2014 “Order 

Granting Motion to Compel Answers to Discovery” and requesting a response. We ORDER

that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.2


       STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     With  reference  to the  Amendment  No.  1 to the  Annual  Report  of  VINA
Technologies,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended  December
31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Stanley E. Kazmierczak,  the chief financial officer
of the Company,  certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title
18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge

     (i) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




                                        /s/ Stanley E. Kazmierczak
                                        --------------------------
                                        Stanley E. Kazmierczak

                                        April 30, 2003



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.