alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification**

 

Pursuantto Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersignedofficer of China Unicom Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifies that theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  June 28, 2005 | By:    | /s/  Tong Jilu           |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                  | Name:  | Tong  Jilu               |
|                  | Title: | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                       |        |                          |        |  |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) underthe Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C § 1350 and will not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The Princeton Review, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:

| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for   the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the   requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                    

|Date: March 23, 2005 | By:    | /s/ JOHN S. KATZMAN    
|-------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                     |        |                        
|                     | Name:  | John S. Katzman        
|                     | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |        |                        
|                     |        |                        
|Date: March 23, 2005 | By:    | /s/ STEPHEN MELVIN     
|                     |        |                        
|                     | Name:  | Stephen Melvin         
|                     | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Princeton Review, Inc. and will be retained by The Princeton Review, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Wesley Bruce ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-779

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 27, 2018]

Amy Morse of Morse & Morse, LLC., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 52 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 5, 2013. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Ms. Lofgren 

and Mr. Vargas. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Amendment to the  1984 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10(xxxiv) 
  
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 NATIONAL DATA CORPORATION 1984 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR 
 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 December 19, 2000 
  
 Section 6(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
is substituted therefor: 
  
 6(a) Change in
Capital Structure. In the event that the Board of Directors shall determine that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse split, reorganization,
merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the Common Stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of a
Grantee under the Plan, then the Board of Directors shall (i) make appropriate adjustments in the number and kind of stock or other securities that may thereafter be issued in connection with the Plan, and (ii) make appropriate adjustments in the
number and kind of stock or other securities as to which outstanding options, or portions thereof then unexercised, shall be exercisable, and in the exercise price thereof, so that the Grantee’s proportionate interest shall be substantially
maintained as before the occurrence of such event. Any such adjustments made by the Board of Directors shall be conclusive. 
  
 The undersigned certifies this to be a correct copy of the Amendment to the Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on December 19, 2000.

  

			
	NDCHealth Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/  Christine Rumsey


	 	 	Christine Rumsey
	 	 	Executive Vice President Human Resources
SECOND
      AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT








THIS
      SECOND AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is effective as of November 12, 2007,
      between Fuel Frontiers, Inc., a Nevada corporation and Kentucky Fuel Associates,
      Inc., a Kentucky corporation, collectively known as (the “Parties”)





WHEREAS,
      the Parties mutually agree to amend the Development Agreement first entered
      into
      between the Parties on July 30, 2007:





NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and other good
      and
      valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
      acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree that the Development Agreement be and
      the
      same hereby is amended as follows:





1.  Paragraph
      2(C) of the Development Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety
      as follows:





“2. **C.**  In
      consideration for each site located by KFA pursuant to the terms of this
      Agreement, and accepted by FFI for development, FFI agrees to pay KFA (7%)
      of
      the net pre-tax income of each CTL fuel production facility identified by KFA
      and developed by FFI for the entire lifetime of each production facility, to
      be
      distributed on a quarterly basis, within 30 business days of FFI and/or its
      parent company Nuclear Solutions, Inc.’s quarterly SEC filing. The computation
      of the quarterly net income shall be in accordance with GAAP accounting
      standards.”








The
      Parties each hereby represents and warrants that they have full right, power
      and
      authority to enter into this Agreement and that the respective persons executing
      this Agreement are duly authorized to do so.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement
      the day and year first above written.




Dated
      this 12 th day of
      November, 2007.





FUEL
                FRONTIERS, INC.
            KENTUCKY
                FUEL ASSOCIATES, INC.Patrick
                Herda /s/
            Garry
                Sparks /s/By:
                Patrick Herda
            By:
                Garry SparksTitle:
                Chairman & CEO
            Title:
                President
Larry CULP v. George WALKER

Jax Development, Inc. v. Ned White a/k/a Harvey Edward White, III and Whiteco Farm Company, LLC

Ned White and Ashley White v. Larry Culp

NO. 2018-CC-1787

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Stay denied. Writ denied.
Exhibit 31

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.    Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification

I,
James B. Sherwood, Chairman of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd., certify that:

Dated:
August 14, 2003

| | /s/J.B. SHERWOODJames B. Sherwood Chairman
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

85

---



ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.    Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification

I,
Simon M.C. Sherwood, President of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd., certify that:

Dated:
August 14, 2003

| | /s/S.M.C. SHERWOODSimon M.C. Sherwood President
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

86

---



ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.    Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification

I,
James G. Struthers, Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd., certify that:

Dated:
August 14, 2003

| | /s/J.G. STRUTHERSJames G. Struthers Vice
PresidentFinance
and Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

87

---

QuickLinks
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(33)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(9)
              - georgia(7)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(34)
              - maine(12)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(11)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(2)
              - (-)nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(6)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(29)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(18)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Photography        February 11, 2017        Carson River Next to Morgan Mill Rd
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00726- CR

Jam es Logan Allen, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 277 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 08- 1821 -K 277, H ONO RAB LE K EN ANDERSON, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

After J ames L og an Allen pled gu i l t y to the offe nse of ag g rava ted robber y , a jury assessed punishment a t forty y ear s in prison. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief c oncluding that this appeal is frivolous and w ithout merit. The brief m eets the require ments of Anders v. Calif

ornia , 3 8 6 U. S. 738, 744 (1967), by prese nting a profe ssional evalua tion of the

rec ords demonstrating why there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State , 573 S.W

. 2 d 8 0 7 (T ex . Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jack son v. State , 485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);
Gainous v. State , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant rec eived a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his rig ht to examine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se brief. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se br ief ha s been f iled and no extension of time was re quested.We have revie wed the rec ord and find no reve rsible err or. See Garner v. State ,

300 S.W .3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We ag ree with counsel that the a ppeal is fr ivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is
g rante d. The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

J eff Rose, J ustice
Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose
Affir med Filed: Apr il 15, 2011 Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Robert P. Atwell and George Jackson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 17, 2010





/s/ Robert P. Atwell


Robert P. Atwell,


Chief Executive Officer and President





Date: May 17, 2010





/s/ George Jackson


George Jackson,


Chief Financial Officer
Kadarius POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 6, 2018]

Kadarius Powell, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Gerber, C.J., Warner and May, JJ., concur.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 25, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

HANNAH SHELBY STAUFFER;

JOHN STAUFFER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

COLORADO MEDICAL BILLING

CORPORATION; STAUFFER

SCHOOLS, INC.; KIDS CAMPS,

INC., (nonprofit corp.),

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOLENE C. BLAIR; DANIEL KAUP;

KAREN E. HAYES, D.O.; A

WOMAN’S PLACE OF FORT

COLLINS, P.L.L.P.; PETER

DUSBABEK; TODD VRIESMAN;

MONTGOMERY, KOLODNY,

AMATUZIO & DUSBABEK, L.L.P.;

J. BRADFORD MARCH, III;

MARCH, OLIVE, & PHARRIS,

L.L.P.; CHERYL TRINE; CHERYL

TRINE LAW FIRM, LLC;

CHRISTINE SKORBERG; A

WOMAN’S HEALING CENTER,

LLC, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-1193

(D.C. No. 1:13-CV-03256-RM-MJW)

(D. Colo.)
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before GORSUCH, O’BRIEN, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

Unhappy with how the Colorado courts handled a civil lawsuit that ended

many years ago, John and Hannah Stauffer filed this federal action in the hope of

undoing that state court judgment. But given the enduring rule that we lower

federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to entertain “federal suits that

amount to appeals of state-court judgments,” it’s tough to see what business or

authority we have wading into the merits of the Stauffers’ claims. Bolden v. City

of Topeka, 441 F.3d 1129, 1139 (10th Cir. 2006); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,

263 U.S. 413 (1923); D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). 

And that’s far from the only fatal defect in this appeal. As the district court

pointed out, the Stauffers already brought (and lost) a federal lawsuit attacking

the same state court judgment they complain about in this case. See Final

Judgment, Stauffer v. Blair, No. 12-CV-01702-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 14,

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and

judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive

value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

- 2 -
2012). Indeed, we briefly entertained and ultimately dismissed an appeal in that

earlier action a few years ago, and we see no reason to consider today arguments

or claims that were or could have been raised then. See Mars v. McDougal, 40

F.2d 247, 249 (10th Cir. 1930). Accordingly, and for substantially the same

reasons given by the district court, we affirm the dismissal of the Stauffers’

complaint. All pending motions are denied.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch

Circuit Judge

- 3 -
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of EP Global Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 14, 2006





By:    /s/ Paul Cunningham

Paul Cunningham.

Chief Financial Officer

(principal accounting officer)
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-1759

SAM and TONY M., by Next Friend Gregory C. Elliott;

CAESAR S., by Next Friend Kathleen J. Collins; DAVID T.,

by Next Friend Mary Melvin; BRIANA, ALEXIS, CLARE, and

DEANNA H., by Next Friend Gregory C. Elliott; and

DANNY and MICHAEL B., by Next Friend Gregory C. Elliott;

for themselves and those similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

DONALD L. CARCIERI, in his official capacity as Governor

of the State of Rhode Island; JANE A. HAYWARD, in her

official capacity as Secretary of the Executive Office of

Health & Human Services; and PATRICIA MARTÍNEZ, in her

official capacity as Director of the Department of

Children, Youth and Families,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 18, 2010, is amended

as follows:

On p. 3, n.1, line 9: replace "Danny and Michael M." with

Danny and Michael B.";

On p. 18, n.10, line 7: replace "dully" with "duly".
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/ Chan Chi Fai, CEO and COO November 13, 2008
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00120-CV

Tomachia Jones

v.

JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association

On Appeal from the

400th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-273879

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 1, 2021
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfect Health Care Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Antoine
Jarjour, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 18, 2005

Signed:

/s/Antoine Jarjour
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 25, 2012 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Li Fushen          
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Li Fushen              
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Shawn HAMLETT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4337

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This petition is dismissed because of the petitioner's failure to satisfy this court's November 1, 2018, fee order.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.