alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - (-)north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

Topic        February 22, 2017        Geospatial Resources (GIS) for North Carolina

Topic        April 4, 2017        Geospatial (GIS) and Map Resources for the South Atlantic Region

Data Release        May 2, 2022        Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023)

Data Release        December 10, 2020        Bayesian modeling of NURE airborne radiometric data for the conterminous United States: predictions and grids

publication        January 1, 2011        EAARL coastal topography-Northern Outer Banks, North Carolina, post-Nor'Ida, 2009

publication        November 24, 2009        Use of StreamStats in the Upper French Broad River Basin, North Carolina: A Pilot Water-Resources Web Application

publication        October 2, 2005        Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina

publication        January 1, 2003        Erosion of an ancient mountain range, the Great Smoky Mountains, North Carolina and Tennessee

staff profileLaura N Gurley

Project        April 2, 2018        Heavy-Mineral Sand Resources in the Southeastern U.S.
# C_2019399EN.01009901.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/99

---

Action brought on 4 October 2019 – Health Product Group v EUIPO – Bioline Pharmaceutical (Enterosgel)

(Case T-678/19)

(2019/C 399/117)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Health Product Group sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bioline Pharmaceutical AG (Baar, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Enterosgel – International registration designating the European Union No 896 788

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2019 in Case R 482/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and cancel the trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and cancel the trade mark;

| — | award the costs in applicant’s favour. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs in applicant’s favour.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Feature Stories

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(5)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(4)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south dakota(7)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(16)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(15)

## By Year

Podcasts        September 25, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 104 – EROS 50th: Alumni and Friends, Part 2

Podcasts        March 25, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 115 – EROS Women in Science

Podcasts        February 11, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 112 - Landsat in Popular Media

Interviews        July 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 97 – EROS 50th: Earth As Art Bonus

Featured Films and Shorts        May 10, 2019        Image of the Week - A New Yellowstone Hot Spot

Featured Films and Shorts        June 8, 2020        LP DAAC Prospectus: 2019 - 2021

Podcasts        July 25, 2022        Eyes on Earth Episode 78 - Landsat 50 Lookback
STATE of Louisiana v. Jerman NEVEAUX

No. 2019-KK-0031

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM

Stay lifted; motion to modify stay order denied as moot; writ granted in part. We lift the stay order previously issued so that the district court can act expeditiously on defendant's motion to proceed in fonna pauperis. We grant defendant's application in pah to remand to the court of appeal to reconsider its ruling in light of the outcome, f the proceedings on defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The application is otherwise denied. **REMANDED**
Sylvester LYNN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Sylvester Lynn, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED .

WETHERELL, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5
[LOGO]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                                 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
                                                 900 Rene-Levesque Blvd East
                                                 Suite 500
                                                 Quebec Quebec
                                                 Canada G1R 2B5
                                                 Telephone + 1 (418) 522 7001
                                                 Facsimile + 1 (418) 522 5663







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F of AEterna Laboratories Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 of
our report dated January 31, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial
statements for the three-years ended December 31, 2002.





[SIGNATURE]



CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Quebec, Quebec, Canada
May 12, 2003

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited,
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Mercantile Bank Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-52620, 333-91434, 333-99853 333-103242, 333-117763 and 333-119767) and Form
S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-59154, 333-103376, 333-108929, and 333-107814) of our
reports dated February 23, 2006 with respect to the 2005 consolidated financial
statements of Mercantile Bank Corporation, and management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports are
included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mercantile Bank Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2005.




                                               /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                               Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 13, 2006
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Experts





G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                      330 E. Warm Springs
                                                     Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                             702.528.1984
                                                     425.928.2877 (e-fax)


October 29, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of October 29, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Mercado Industries, Inc.
for the nine months ending September 30, 2001, in any filings which are
necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA



<PAGE>
Dustin Harold HEATHMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 3, 2018

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
1607.

#### Central of Georgia Railway Co. *v.*Bowden.

Motion for new trial, from Bibb superior court — Judge Felton. November 23, 1908.

Submitted February 2, —

Decided May 18, 1909.

*B. S. Wimberly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ha/rdeman, Jones & Johnston,*contra.

Hill, O. J.

Where a motion for a new trial was filed in term, and the court set the hearing for a specified date and gave the movant until the final hearing to prepare and present his brief of evidence, and where, on the day specified, the motion was not heard, but was continued to a later date, and the movant was given until this latter date to prepare and present his brief of evidence, the dismissal of the motion for a new trial,, on the ground that the movant failed to prepare and present his brief of evidence on the date last named, was not error. *Hinely*v. *State,*1 *Ga. App.*518 (57 S. E. 1021); *Brown*v. *Richards,*114 *Ga.*318 (40 S. E. 224). *Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

e-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mary A. Grace,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of e-Smart Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | March 20, 2008         
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Mary A. Grace      
|      |  | Mary A. Grace,         
|      |  | Chief Executive Officer
Roderick MOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1767 

EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF RICHMOND, a Municipal Corporation and

political subdivision of the Commonwealth of

Virginia, and/or, in his/her personal

capacities and individual and official

capacities as officials, administrators,

department heads and final decision makers of

and for the City; LAWRENCE DOUGLAS WILDER,

Mayor; WILLIAM HARRELL, Chief Administrative

Officer; RUDOLPH MCCOLLUM, Former Vice-Mayor,

Mayor; JOHN A. RUPP, Former City Attorney;

JEAN K. SHOWALTER, General Registrar; GLEN

BUTLER, Director of Social Services,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

TIMOTHY KAINE, Former Mayor; ROBERT C. BOBB,

Former City Manager; CALVIN JAMISON, Former

City Manager,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:05-cv-00823-HEH)
- 2 -

Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmett Johnson Jafari, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Freedman, CITY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, John Adrian Gibney, Jr.,

THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Johnson Jafari appeals the district court’s orders

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint under Section

5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c (2000), and

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), denying Jafari’s motion to set aside

judgment, and granting Defendants’ petition for attorney’s fees.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Jafari v. City of Richmond, No. 3:05-cv-00823-HEH (E.D. Va.

May 12, 2006; May 30, 2006; June 8, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Reportof Kenexa Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Nooruddin S. Karsan, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Donald F. Volk, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their respectiveknowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| *By:*    | * * | */s/ Nooruddin S. Karsan* | * * |
|----------|----------|---------------------------|----------|
| * * | * * | *Nooruddin S. Karsan*     |
| * * | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |
| * * | * * | *August 9, 2006*          |
| * * | * * | * *                  |
| *By:*    | * * | */s/ Donald F. Volk*      | * * |
| * * | * * | *Donald F. Volk*          |
| * * | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |
| * * | * * | *August 9, 2006*          |

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Kenexa Corporation and will beretained by Kenexa Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mid-Am Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Milton Polland, a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Milton Polland



Milton Polland,

 Director

May 17, 2004
1

 
**Specified Employee.**Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, if the Executive is a “specifiedemployee” within the meaning of Section 409A as of the date of the Executive’s termination ofemployment and the Company determines, in good faith, that immediate payment of any amounts orbenefits would cause a violation of Section 409A, then any amounts or benefits which are payableunder this Agreement upon the Executive’s “separation from service” within the meaning of Section409A which (i) are subject to the provisions of Section 409A;  (ii) are not otherwise excluded under Section 409A; and  (iii) would otherwise be payable during the first six-month period following such separationfrom serviceshall be paid on the first business day next following the earlier of (1) the date that is sixmonths and one day following the Date of Termination or (2) the date of Executive’s death.For purposes of Section 409A, each payment under this Agreement shall be deemed to be aseparate payment.     5. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement or in the Plan to the contrary, no adjustment orsubstitution pursuant to Section 7.7 of the Plan or Section 8 of the Agreement and no amendment tothe Agreement pursuant to Section 7.2 of the Plan or Section 13 of the Agreement, as applicable,shall be made in a manner that results in noncompliance with the requirements of Section 409A. Theforegoing rule shall apply to the extent a Restricted Stock Unit is subject to Section 409A or tothe extent a Restricted Stock Unit becomes subject to Section 409A as a result of the adjustment,substitution or amendment described herein.
2