alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.02
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Theresa D. Becks, Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing owner ofCampbell Alternative Asset Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks      Theresa D. Becks Chief Financial Officer March 29, 2005
E-3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT 0F 2002


      I, Stephen Farkas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of AAMPRO Group, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report of AAMPRO Group, Inc. on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AAMPRO Group,
Inc.



                                      By:    /s/ Stephen Farkas
                                             ----------------------------
                                      Name:  Stephen Farkas
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer


     Dated:       November 21, 2005
Maximiliano REY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

Maximiliano Rey, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

SCALES, J.

*840*ON CONFESSION OF ERROR*

Maximiliano Rey appeals a June 29, 2018 order of the Miami-Dade Circuit Court denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence. Based on the State of Florida's commendable confession of error, we remand this case to the trial court to determine whether Rey is entitled to additional prison credit.

On February 5, 2013, Rey, an habitual offender, pleaded guilty in two separate cases to charges of burglary, grand theft, petit theft and possession of cocaine. The trial court sentenced Rey to a probationary split sentence by sentencing him to state prison for two years, followed by eighteen months of probation. He was also sentenced to 288 days in county jail on one of the counts. The trial court granted Rey jail credit. After his release in 2014, Rey violated his probation. On November 11, 2016, the trial court sentenced Rey to seven years in prison and again granted Rey jail credit. Rey contends that he should have been, but was not, granted both *jail* credit and an additional 347 days of *prison* credit for his time spent in state prison from February 5, 2013 to January 18, 2014. Rey maintained that the trial court did not follow through on its oral pronouncement at Rey's November 11, 2016 resentencing that Rey be credited with "all time served."

The State concedes that Rey was entitled to both jail credit and prison credit. "A defendant sentenced to a probationary split sentence who violates probation and is resentenced to prison is entitled to credit for all time actually served in prison prior to his release on probation unless credit is waived." *Scharman v. Crews*, 123 So.3d 147, 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The record is not clear in this instance whether the trial court directed the Florida Department of Corrections, pursuant to section 921.0017 of the Florida Statutes, to compute the appropriate prison credit; nor, ultimately, is it clear whether Rey either waived the additional prison credit or is entitled to it. In the order on appeal, however, the trial court generally found that its credit calculations conform to its oral pronouncement of "all time served."

We reverse the order on appeal and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. If, on remand, the trial court determines to summarily deny Rey's claim for additional prison credit, the trial court shall ensure that its order be accompanied by those portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate that Rey is not entitled to relief, per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Reversed and remanded.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(20)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - (-)other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - (-)new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

General        March 31, 2023        Learn more about available data related to flooding
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 20, 2006
 Volkswagen Public Auto Loan Securitization, LLCVolkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2
  Delaware
    
    333-103709
    
    83-0349353333-103709-02
    
    43-6903059(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (Registrants IRS
Employer Id. Nos.)
 3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326
   
  
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other Events.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.Exhibit IndexVolkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2 Servicer Certificate    Table of Contents  
   
  
 Exhibit 99.1
    
    Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2 Servicer
Certificate for the Collection Period ended March 31, 2006
provided to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.
(Filed with this report.)
  Dated: April 20, 2006
    
    Volkswagen Public Auto Loan Securitization, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant TreasurerVolkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2By: VW Credit, Inc. as AdministratorBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. FlahertyAssistant Treasurer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit no.
    
    Description on ExhibitExhibit 99.1
    
    Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2003-2 Servicer
Certificate for the Collection Period ended March 31, 2006
provided to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.
(Filed with this report.)
Michael CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Michael Campbell, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS








The Board of Directors
First Federal Bancshares Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 7,
2002 with respect to the 2001 consolidated financial statements of First Federal
Bancshares, Inc., included in this annual report on Form 10-KSB, in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-72140) pertaining to the First
Federal Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Stock-Based Incentive Plan.




                                               /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                               Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Oak Brook, Illinois
March 27, 2002
Robert MULLALY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4815

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 31, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Robert Mullaly appeals his life sentence. We reverse and remand for resentencing because, in sentencing Mr. Mullaly, the trial judge relied on a 1993 assault charge, which was dropped.

Mr. Mullaly was found guilty of rape in 1973 and was required to be treated with sexual psychotherapy as a prerequisite to his sentencing. *See* *Slappey v. State* , 584 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). *See also* *Haager v. State* , 36 So.3d 883, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (describing the sentencing scheme applicable to sex offenders in the 1970s). But the court sentenced him to life in prison without the required treatment. In 2015, Mr. Mullaly filed a motion to vacate the 1973 judgment and sentence and to hold a new sentencing because of the error. The court granted his motion, vacated the 1973 judgment and sentence, and found that he completed the requisite treatment. Mr. Mullaly was then resentenced to life in prison.

At Mr. Mullaly's resentencing, the trial court considered the mitigating factors, as well as the aggravating events that happened while Mr. Mullaly was on parole. One of the events was an alleged 1993 assault on his wife, a charge that was dropped. The trial court mentioned it twelve times in the course of Mr. Mullaly's resentencing and appeared to consider it an aggravator.

Under these circumstances, we agree with Mr. Mullaly that the trial judge sentenced him improperly, by relying partly on the alleged 1993 assault on his wife. *See* *Drinkard v. State* , 177 So.3d 993, 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (remanding for resentencing, because "[a]t sentencing, the trial court repeatedly referred to the state's evidence that appellant had been racing on a highway - conduct for which appellant and a co-defendant had been charged and acquitted"). And the State failed to show that the alleged 1993 assault "played no part in the sentence imposed." *See* *Williams v. State* , 8 So.3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (citations omitted) ("When portions of the record show the trial court relied upon prior acquittals in determining a defendant's sentence, the State has the burden to demonstrate those considerations 'played no part in the sentence imposed.' ").

Accordingly, we reverse Mr. Mullaly's sentence and remand for sentencing before a different judge.

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Quarterly Report) of Silvergraph International, Inc. (the Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James R. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.   Date:  August 19, 2009 /s/ James R. Simpson James R. Simpson, CEO (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)   This certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant unless such incorporation is expressly referenced within.
<PAGE>
                                                                       Exhibit 8

                           Statement of Subsidiaries


  General.  We have only one subsidiary, Slovak Wireless Finance Company B.V.
("SWFC"), which was incorporated on December 29, 1999 as a private company with
limited liability under the laws of The Netherlands.  SWFC is a wholly owned
subsidiary and has no subsidiaries of its own.  SWFC has an authorized share
capital comprised of 900 ordinary shares each with a par value of 100, of which
185 have been issued.  The constitutive documents of SWFC are deposited with the
Chief Registrar of the District Court of Luxembourg ("Greffier en Chef du
Tribunal d'Arrondissement de et a Luxembourg"), where you can examine these
documents and obtain copies free of charge.  You can also obtain copies from
Kredietbank S.A. Luxembourgeoise, our paying agent in Luxembourg.

  Business.  SWFC was formed solely for the purpose of issuing, in 2000, our 11
1/4% Senior Guaranteed Notes due 2007 (the "Notes") and raising future financing
for our business operations.  SWFC may obtain additional financing by entering
into loan agreements and issuing additional securities.  Debt owed by SWFC as a
result of any such additional financing may rank equally with the Notes.

  Registered Office.  The registered office of SWFC is Amsteldijk 166, 1079LH
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.  Its telephone number is +30-21-644-6125.

  Capitalization.  The following table sets forth the capitalization of SWFC as
of the date of this annual report:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Share Capital:
<S>                                                                          <C>                    <C>
 Issued and paid in full - 185 shares, 100 par value (Euro 18,500).........                               Sk  814,000
Debt:
  175,000,000 11 1/4% Senior Guaranteed Notes due 2007
  Series A, issued March 23, 2000 and not exchanged (Euro 5,500,000).......  Sk    241,978,000
  Series B, exchanged for Series A on September 19, 2000 (Euro 169,500,000)  Sk  7,457,322,000      Sk  7,699,300,000
                                                                           -------------------    -------------------

Total:                                                                                              Sk  7,700,114,000
                                                                                                  ===================
</TABLE>

  SWFC has no other securities outstanding.

  Board of Director.  The members of SWFC's board of directors are Thomas J.
Cancro, who is also the chief financial officer of EuroTel Bratislava, a.s., and
Forum Administrators, B.V.  SWFC is managed by its board of directors, whose
members we elect and whom we may suspend or remove from office at any time after
the expiry of their initial term of one year.

  Financial Statements.  The financial statements of SWFC are included in our
consolidated financial statements.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  VALLEY BANCORP
  
 (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)000-50950
    
    88-0493760
 1300 S. Jones Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
 (702) 821-4100
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act of (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act of (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
 www.valleybancorp.com




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Dated:   April 18, 2006VALLEY BANCORPBy
    
/s/  Dick HoltzclawDick HoltzclawExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Scott M. JOHNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 25, 2019

Scott M. Johns, Defuniak Springs, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Josue VILLA-GOMEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2034

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 14, 2018.

Rupak R. Shah of Escobar & Associates, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Opel Capital, LLC letter to Digital Lightwave, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Optel Capital, LLC 
 6200 Courtney Campbell Causeway 
 Bayport Plaza, Suite 740 
 Tampa, Florida 33607 
 Tel:
813-287-6337 Fax: 813-287-2886 
  
 August 5, 2004 

 
 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL 
  
 James Green, Chief Executive Officer and President 
 Digital Lightwave, Inc. 
 15550 Lightwave Drive 
 Clearwater, Florida 33760 
  
 Re: Digital Lightwave, Inc. (the “Company”) 
  
 Dear Mr. Green: 
  
 As you are aware, on July 31, 2004 all of the outstanding debt owed by the Company to Optel, LLC and Optel Capital, LLC (collectively, “Optel”)
pursuant to those certain several secured promissory notes issued by the Company in favor of Optel (the “Notes”), equal to approximately $24.9 million plus accrued interest, became due and payable upon demand by Optel at any time. Optel
acknowledges that it and the Company are currently in negotiations to restructure its outstanding debt evidenced by the Notes and hereby notifies the Company that it currently does not intend to demand payment under the Notes. Optel reserves its
right to demand payment under the Notes at any time. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/S/    PAUL RAGAINI        
	Paul Ragaini, Treasurer
Deborah BISHOP, Appellant, v. Davis REED and Imperi Corp., Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-2048

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

Christopher E. Hewitt and Scott A. Kuhn of Kuhn Law Firm, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Ronald W. Gregory, II, of Gregory Law Firm, P.L., St. Petersburg, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.