alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 184 

Expressing support for the designation of April 2023 as ‘‘Parkinson’s 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2023 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 2023 as 

‘‘Parkinson’s Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas Parkinson’s disease— 

(1) affects more than 1,000,000 individuals in the 

United States; 

(2) is the fastest-growing and second most common 

neurodegenerative disease in the world; 

(3) is believed to be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, but the exact cause in 

most individuals is still unknown; and 

(4) is the 14th leading cause of death in the United 

States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 184 IS 

Whereas it is estimated that, by 2037, the number of individuals with Parkinson’s disease in the United States will 

nearly double, and the disease will cost the United States 

at least $80,000,000,000 annually; 

Whereas the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease can include dementia and cognitive impairment, tremors, slowness of 

movement and rigidity, gait and balance difficulties, 

speech and swallowing difficulties, depression, and a variety of other symptoms; 

Whereas there are millions of family caregivers, friends, and 

loved ones whose lives are greatly affected by Parkinson’s 

disease; and 

Whereas more research, education, and community support 

services are needed to— 

(1) find better treatments and a cure for Parkinson’s disease; and 

(2) maintain dignity for those living with the disease 

today: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

3 April 2023 as ‘‘Parkinson’s Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of Parkinson’s 

5 Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments and a cure for Parkinson’s disease; 

8 (4) recognizes the individuals living with Par9 kinson’s disease who participate in vital clinical 

10 trials to advance the knowledge of the disease; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 184 IS 

1 (5) commends the dedication of organizations, 

2 volunteers, researchers, and millions of individuals 

3 across the country working to improve the quality of 

4 life of people living with Parkinson’s disease and 

5 their families. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00459

- CR

Willie Smith WARD

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 19th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- 2338

- C1

Honorable Ralph T. Strother, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 9, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
EXHIBIT
31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bret Cloward, as Chief
Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IWO Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

June 20, 2005

/s/ BRET
CLOWARD
Bret ClowardChief Executive
Officer

---
Gary Kenneth WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0137

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 21, 2018

Gary Kenneth Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.
Isaac J. HARVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Isaac J. Harvis, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6386

FRANKLIN C. SMITH
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

WILLIAM R. O ’ BRIEN, Virginia Beach Circuit Judge; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of (VDOC); SCOTT FREDERICK HALLAUER, Sentencing & Appeal Attorney
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv

- 00266

- MSD

- RJK )

Submitted : July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and R ICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Franklin C. Smith , Appellant Pro Se

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Fr anklin C. Smith appeals the district court’s order granting Smith’s motion to
voluntarily dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) action and dismissing the action without
prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Smith ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See
Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Heribierto RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1376

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 99.1


       STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     With  reference  to the  Amendment  No.  1 to the  Annual  Report  of  VINA
Technologies,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended  December
31, 2002 (the "Report"),  I, W. Michael West, the chief executive officer of the
Company,  certify for the  purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that, to my knowledge

     (i) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




                               /s/ W. Michael West
                               ---------------------
                               W. Michael West

                               April 30, 2003



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Myrnabelle ROCHE a/k/a Myrnabel Roche, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE TRUST 2007-S1 and Frank Vincent Reilly, Jr., Appellees.

No. 4D18-2264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2019]

Myrnabelle Roche and Luciana Ugarte of MRN Law, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Allison Morat of Pearson Bitman LLP, Maitland, for appellee U.S. Bank National Association.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
##### 



Cray/Media:
    
    Investors:Steve Conway
    
    Victor Chynoweth651/592-7441
    
    206/701-2094sttico@aol.com
    
    vic@cray.com
 CRAY INC. REPORTS SELECTED, PRELIMINARY FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2005 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS  Company to delay filing of Form 10-K due to review of potential non-cash adjustments of up to
$3.3 million to 2004 financial results
Cray to host conference call today, March 17, 2006 at 8:00 am Eastern Time
      1




---



##### 



Outlook
  2




---



##### 



Recent Highlights
 
    
    Indias National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting ordered a Cray X1E
system. When installed, the supercomputer will rank as the subcontinents most
powerful numerical weather prediction system. Cray also announced the acquisition of
a Cray X1E system by Indias Institute for Plasma Research.
    
    Cray announced that the United Kingdoms AWE plc awarded Cray with a $35 million
contract, including $9 million of future maintenance, to build one of the worlds most
powerful supercomputers. When completed, the Cray XT3 system will have a peak
performance of over 40 teraflops (trillions of calculations per second).
    
    In November, Cray announced the appointment of HPC industry veteran, Jan Silverman
to the position of Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business
Development. Cray further strengthened its leadership team recently with the addition
of Linda Howitson, Vice President of Human Resources; Ken Roselli, Vice President,
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, and Victor Chynoweth, Vice President and
Treasurer.
    
    Sandia National Laboratories Red Storm supercomputer, developed jointly by Cray
and Sandia, posted industry leading performance measures in the High Performance
Computing Challenge (HPCC) PTRANS benchmark, which measures the communications
capability of the system. In November, Sandia and Cray announced that the system would
be expanded to peak performance exceeding 50 teraflops.
    
    The Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) announced that its Cray X1E system is
the fastest operational weather prediction system in the world. Now
in operations,
the Cray X1E system at KMA ranked number 16 on the TOP500 list of supercomputer sites
around the world.
 Conference Call Information
   3




---



##### 



About Cray Inc.
  Safe Harbor Statement
   
 4
I, Jose Antonio Solbes, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit




---



##### 



committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   DATE: June 13, 2008SIGNATURE:
    
    /s/ Jose Antonio SolbesTITLE: Chief Financial Officer
Hector VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Ana M. Davide, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(52)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Data Access        August 24, 2017        Coastal Change Hazards Portal
February 2 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RAYMOND L. BROOKS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00752

- CV V.

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB ER CO. , Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant = s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment
signed by the court below on July 29, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it
meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid b y

RAYMOND L. BROOKS

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(751)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - (-)news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - missouri(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        October 13, 2016        Assessing the Magnitude of Missouri’s 2016 New Year's Flood

Analytical References        January 1, 2014        CoSMoS Southern California flooding hazard scenarios

Technical Announcement        March 28, 2018        The 3D Elevation Program – Flood Risk Management

Technical Announcement        January 4, 2023        USGS Releases Spanish Version of National Water Dashboard

Technical Announcement        August 16, 2017        Collaboration in a Disaster
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 8.1


             SUBSIDIARY                           COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
             Gaelta Research and Development      Northern Ireland
                Limited
             Galen Limited                        Northern Ireland
             Galen Research Laboratories Limited  Northern Ireland
             Ivex Pharmaceuticals Limited         Northern Ireland
             Galen (Chemicals) Limited            Republic of Ireland
             Galen, Inc.                          United States
             QuChem Limited                       Northern Ireland
             Bartholomew Rhodes Limited           England and Wales
             Interactive Clinical Technologies,   United States
                Inc.
             J. Dana Associates, Inc.             United States
             Warner Chilcott PLC                  Republic of Ireland
             Warner Chilcott, Inc.                United States
             Warner Chilcott Laboratories         Republic of Ireland
                Ireland Limited
             Warner Chilcott (Bermuda),           Bermuda
                Limited
             Applied Chemical Concepts,           United States
                Inc.
             Rouvex Limited                       Northern Ireland
             Madaus UK Limited                    Northern Ireland
             Ashbourne Pharmaceuticals            England and Wales
                (Holdings) Limited
             Chargelink Limited                   England and Wales
             Dallas Burston Healthcare            England and Wales
                 Limited                          England and Wales
             Inter-Medics                         England and Wales
Richard HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3160

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 27, 2018]

Richard Harris, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7259

EDDIE DEAN PANNELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-310)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 15, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Dean Pannell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

2

Although a magistrate judge found Pannell’s notice of appeal

was timely after according Pannell three extra days under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 6(e), Rule 6(e) does not apply to time periods that begin

with the filing in court of a judgment or order. See Albright v.

Virtue, 273 F.3d 564, 571 (3d Cir. 2001).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Dean Pannell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

as successive. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

June 23, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on July 26, 2004.1

Because Pannell failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal.2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
- 3 -

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED