alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1949.

#### BARKER *v.*THE STATE.

In an accusation of cheating and swindling, an allegation that the defendant, by reason of his false and fraudulent representations, obtained from the prosecutor “groceries consisting of meats and other groceries, of the value of one dollar and ten cents,” is not sufficient as against a special demurrer directed at this delinquency.

Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Moultrie— Tudge McKenzie. May 15, 1909.

Submitted June 23,

Decided July 6, 1909.

*W. F. Way,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. B. Kline, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

The defendant was charged with the offense of being a cheat and swindler. It was alleged that, by reason of false representations duly set out in the accusation, the defendant had cheated the prosecutor by obtaining from him “groceries, consisting of meat and other groceries, of the value of one dollar and ten cents.” The defendant, on arraignment and before pleading to the merits, filed a special demurrer, on the ground that there was “no sufficient allegation of the goods alleged to have been obtained.” The accusation was defective. *Oglesby*v. *State,*123 *Ga.*506 (51 S. E. 505); *Henderson*v. *State,*113 *Ga.*1148 (39 S. E. 446); *Langston*v. *State,*109 *Ga.*153 (35 S. E. 166). In view of the ease with which accusations may be amended at any time before the jury is sworn *(Goldsmith*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*283, 58 S. E. 486), there is no reason why the State’s counsel should not be compelled to make his allegations definite and specific. An allegation of the kind involved here might be sufficient in an indictment, where no right of amendment is permitted. See *Brand*v. *State,*112 *Ga.*25 (37 S. E. 100), and cit. The *Oglesby*case, supra, however, is clear authority for the proposition that such an allegation is not sufficient in an accusation like the one before us. *Judgment reversed.*
STATE of Louisiana v. Jarvis TURNER

NO. 2017-KP-1865

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Cavins, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of CallWave Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of CallWave Inc.



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|      |  |                   |  | 
|Date: |  | November 12, 2007 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Jeffrey Cavins     
|      |  |                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Jeffrey Cavins         
|      |  |                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Glenn P. Sblendorio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Glenn P. Sblendorio
-----------------------------------
Glenn P. Sblendorio
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

               Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  I,  the  undersigned  Treasurer  and  Chief
Financial  Officer of Nuclear  Solutions,  Inc., (the "Company"),  herby certify
that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended  March 31, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated May 22, 2006.                             /s/ Patrick Herda
                                                -----------------------
                                                President, CFO
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 163 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Public Safety Telecommunicators 

Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2023 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. TUBERVILLE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

and Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Public Safety 

Telecommunicators Week. 

Whereas public safety telecommunications professionals play 

a critical role in emergency response; 

Whereas the work that public safety telecommunications professionals perform goes far beyond simply relaying information between the public and first responders; 

Whereas, when responding to reports of missing, abducted, 

and sexually exploited children, the information obtained 

and actions taken by public safety telecommunications 

professionals form the foundation for an effective response; 

Whereas, when a hostage taker or suicidal individual calls 

911, the first contact that individual has is with a public 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 163 IS 

safety telecommunications professional, whose negotiation 

skills can prevent the situation from worsening; 

Whereas, during crises, public safety telecommunications professionals, while collecting vital information to provide 

situational awareness for responding officers— 

(1) coach callers through first aid techniques; and 

(2) give advice to those callers to prevent further 

harm; 

Whereas the work done by individuals who serve as public 

safety telecommunications professionals has an extreme 

emotional and physical toll on those individuals, which is 

compounded by long hours and the around-the-clock nature of the job; 

Whereas public safety telecommunications professionals 

should be recognized by all levels of government for the 

lifesaving and protective nature of their work; 

Whereas major emergencies, including natural disasters and 

the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic, 

highlight the dedication of public safety telecommunications professionals and their important work in protecting the public and police, fire, and emergency medical 

officials; and 

Whereas public safety telecommunications professionals are 

often called as witnesses to provide important testimony 

in criminal trials: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Public Safety Telecommunicators Week; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes the important and 

5 lifesaving contributions of public safety teleVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:49 Apr 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR163.IS SR163

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 163 IS 

1 communications professionals in the United States; 

2 and 

3 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to remember the value of the work performed by 

5 public safety telecommunications professionals. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(60)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(48)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - (-)north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
JOHN RYSKAMP, Petitioner,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTE RNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 1398

______________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Court in No.
013681

- 11L.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before R ADER , Chief Judge

, N EWMAN and H UGHES , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue moves to di smiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. John Ryskamp responds

. Case: 14-1398 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 05/29/2014RYSKAMP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REV 2

Ryskamp appeals from an order of the United States Tax Court granting the government’s motion for summary judgme nt and allowing it to collect Ryskamp’s federal income tax liability

. * A second notice of appeal was docketed with the United State s Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

. This court does not have jurisdiction to review dec isions of the Un ited States Tax Court. 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) (“The United States Courts of Appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have exclusive jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Tax Court . . .”). Because the Un ited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has already received and docketed this matter, dismissal of this appeal before this court is appropriate

, rather than transfer

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s26

* Ryskamp’s petition for writ of mandamus regarding the United States Tax Court case was recently dismissed by this court for lack of jurisdiction. See In re Ryskamp

, No. 2014

- 112 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2014). Case: 14-1398 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 05/29/2014RYSKAMP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REV 3

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 29, 2014 Case: 14-1398 Document: 8 Page: 3 Filed: 05/29/2014
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. B. Lipham, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
August 14, 2009


/s/
      H.B. Lipham, IIIH.B.
      Lipham, IIIChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 18-51073

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Charles Brandon O’Neal, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:18-CR-183-4

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Charles Brandon O’Neal has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental brief 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). O’Neal has not filed a response. We 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 18-51073 Document: 00515702534 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2021
No. 18-51073

2

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42. 

Case: 18-51073 Document: 00515702534 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2021
Astor BENITEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1387

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 27, 2018

Astor Benitez, Punta Gorda, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Chancy MALLORY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2458

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 17, 2018

Chancy Mallory, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Dismissed* . *See* *Oser v. State,* 699 So.2d 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Gerber, C.J., Levine and Forst, JJ., concur
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,

J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 29, 2018

s0521 

# Order

Clerk May 29, 2018

156173

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 6173 COA: 336936 Macomb CC: 2003-003761-FC EDWARD FRANK LINT, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the app lication for leave to appeal the May 26, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Amendment to the 1987 Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10(xxiii) 
  
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 NATIONAL DATA CORPORATION 1987 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 December 19, 2000 
  
 Section 6(a) of the Plan is
hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefor: 
  
 6(a) Change in Capital Structure. In the event that the Committee shall determine that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock, or other property), recapitalization, stock
split, reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the Common Stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent
dilution or enlargement of the rights of an Optionee under the Plan, then the Committee shall make such equitable changes or adjustments as it deems necessary or appropriate to any or all of (i) the number and kind of stock or other securities that
may thereafter be issued in connection with the Plan, including without limitation the maximum number of Options that may be granted to any one participant during a particular time period, (ii) the number and kind of stock or other securities
issuable in respect of outstanding Options, and (iii) the exercise price or purchase price relating to any Option; provided that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, such adjustment shall be made in accordance with Section 424(c) of the Code,
to the extent applicable. Any such adjustments made by the Committee shall be conclusive. 
  
 The undersigned certifies this to be a correct copy of the Amendment to the Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on December 19, 2000. 
  

			
	NDCHealth Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/  Christine Rumsey


	 	 	Christine Rumsey
	 	 	Executive Vice President Human Resources
Gregory THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1007

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Gregory Thomas, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.14
                             As of February 8, 2006

Globis Asia LLC
1239 Veeder Drive
Hewlett, NY  11557
Attn: Paul Packer

Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 4,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $100.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,



Vinit Bansal


Agreed to:
Globis Asia LLC


By:
    ----------------
    Name:
    Title:
William A. GRAYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 7, 2019

William A. Grayer, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jose LAGOS

No. 2018-KK-1724

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted. *Miranda v Arizona* , 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) requires that a suspect subject to custodial interrogation has the right to consult with an attorney and to have counsel present during questioning, and that the police must explain this right to the suspect before questioning begins. *Id.* , 384 U.S. at 469-473, 86 S.Ct. at 1625-1627. When an accused has "expressed his desire to deal with the police only through counsel, [he] is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police." *Edwards v. Arizona* , 451 U.S. 477, 484-485, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 1885, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). In the present case, while demonstrating some confusion regarding his rights, defendant nonetheless clearly and unambiguously invoked his right to counsel at which point the detective should have ceased further inquiry. Accordingly, we grant defendant's application to reverse the district court's denial of his motion to suppress his statement, and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed here.

**REVERSED AND REMANDED**

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

GUIDRY, J., would deny.
STATE of Louisiana v. Chasity ANDREWS

NO. 2019-KK-0069

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 13, 2019

*1215Stay denied. Writ denied.
Lou A. BABINEAUX v. The BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR the UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA SYSTEM

NO. 2018-CC-1663

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

PER CURIAM

Granted. The case is remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and full opinion, with due consideration of its earlier holding in *Washington v. the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System* , 2018-0008 (La. App. 1 Cir. 5/14/18), 2018 WL 2202309.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.
Robert Frank CARTER, IV, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Rachel Ellen GARCIA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
Tommy JONES, DOC #355564, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.