alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Martin Wotton, President of visionGATEWAY, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify
that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors:

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls
over financial reporting.

Dated:  September 9, 2005

Martin G. Wotton
President
(Principal Financial Officer)
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000817 25-JUN-2015 08:05 AM
James ZEBRANKE, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The mandate in 2D13-6074 having issued March 17, 2016, this petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                                                      |                                   |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                                      |
|                                  |                                                                 |                              |
| Date: September              20, 2005 | By:                                                             | /s/ Thomas              A. Loucks |
|                                       | Thomas                A. LoucksPrincipal                Executive Officer |
|                                       |                                                                      |
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion sh o uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 98-10810

_______________________ S & M REPRESENTATIVE; LEONARD LASSIG, Skooter, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus RICHARD G HRGA, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-1863-G)

_________________________________________________________________ May 6, 1999 Before JONES, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has considered appellants’ position in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so,

we find no reversible err or of fact or law and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED
.
CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) of BearingPoint, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Harry L. You, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | Other than the inclusion of unaudited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as disclosed in the Report, the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry L. YouName:

Harry L. YouDate:

January 31, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - multimedia_webcam(10)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(10)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(30)
              - california(8)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(13)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(6)
              - indiana(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(7)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(11)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - mississippi(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - (-)south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(9)
              - texas(11)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(9)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        September 18, 2020        USGS hydrologists respond to historic hurricane season

Featured Films and Shorts        October 5, 2018        Image of the Week - Hurricane Florence

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 102969-102970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30045]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 984 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 102970]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-729, K2025-728.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30045 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(11)
              - multimedia_image(47)
              - multimedia_image-141771(47)
              - (-)connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(11)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2023(1)
              - (-)2022(1)

social mediaFloods News
1

ALD-297 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-3365

___________

KAMAL KARNA ROY, For Sey and Volunteers Officer of Non Profit Conglomerate & 

Associations (17-1 Millions) In Number an Volunteer Fiducial Officer See Page1A For 

Details,

Appellant

v.

SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HON J. ROBERT, Chief 

Judge; PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA GOVERNMENT

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 12-cv-04152)

District Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to 

Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

September 27, 2012

Before: SLOVITER, FISHER and WEIS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: October 4, 2012)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.
2

On July 24, 2012, Kamal Karna Roy of Saranac Lake, New York, filed a pro se 

civil rights complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania, naming the Supreme Court of the United States, the Chief Justice of the 

United States, the President of the United States, the United States Government, and 

several private companies and universities as defendants. The District Court granted Roy 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis but immediately dismissed his complaint without 

leave to amend, citing its incomprehensibility in addition to its failure to conform to the

requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Roy timely filed this appeal.

We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, given the District 

Court’s dismissal of the complaint without leave to amend. See Borelli v. City of 

Reading, 532 F.2d 950, 951-52 (3d Cir. 1976). We agree with the District Court that the 

complaint is incomprehensible and that it fails to comply with Rule 8. See In re 

Westinghouse Sec. Litig., 90 F.3d 696, 702 (3d Cir. 1996). While a court must ordinarily 

grant leave to amend a deficient complaint, we believe that the District Court was not 

required to do so under the circumstances presented here. See Grayson v. Mayview State 

Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 108 (3d Cir. 2002).
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30132]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1016 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-768, K2025-767.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30132 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(23)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(37)
              - multimedia_image-141771(37)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(5)
              - alaska(9)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(36)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(4)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(15)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(14)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(11)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(15)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(16)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(10)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(17)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - (-)vermont(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(14)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

B-roll        July 11, 2023        Otter Creek Flooding in Center Rutland, Vermont

Featured Films and Shorts        April 12, 2024        USGS New England Water Science Center

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
 000-31249(Commission File Number)
    
    88-0331369(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.SIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.
  Section 3(a)(9)
 
 SIGNATURES
  Arcadia Resources, Inc.By:
    /S/ John E. Elliott, IIJohn E. Elliott, II Its:
    Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 27, 2006
### IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 143

Ronald Wayne Wootan, Petitioner and Appellant

v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20240025

Appeal from the District Court of Rolette County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Anthony S. Benson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Brian D. Grosinger, State’s Attorney, Rolla, ND, for respondent and appellee.1 Wootan v. State No. 20240025

Per Curiam. Ronald Wootan appeals from an order denying his postconviction relief application entered after the district court held an evidentiary hearing on remand. See Wootan v. State , 2023 ND 151, ¶ 11, 994 N.W.2d 347 (remanding because genuine issue of material fact existed on claim asserting trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by stating sentences would run concurrently). The court on remand found Wootan’s trial counsel’s representation of him was reasonable and withdrawal of his guilty plea was not necessary to correct a manifest injustice. Wootan argues the court erred in denying his application, claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel before entering his guilty plea.
“When a defendant pleads guilty on the advice of counsel, the defendant may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea.” Jung v. State , 2024 ND 94, ¶ 11, 6 N.W.3d 853 (citation omitted). “The [district] court has discretion in finding whether a manifest injustice necessitating the withdrawal of a guilty plea exists, and we review the court’s decision for abuse of discretion.” State v. Rangel , 2024 ND 96, ¶ 6, 6 N.W.3d 860 (citation omitted). Findings of fact made in a postconviction relief proceeding are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Urrabazo v. State , 2024 ND 67, ¶ 6, 5 N.W.3d 521. After a review of the record, we conclude the district court’s findings of facts are not clearly erroneous, the court did not err in determining Wootan failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, and the court did not abuse its discretion by not allowing him to withdraw his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Sean JENKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2072

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Sean Jenkins, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Se pt e m be r 12, 2008 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 08- 11321 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 3 - 0 0 0 6 0 - CR- 4 - SPM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s S H A R O N S H E R M A N H A L L , a .k .a . S h a r o n P . S h e rm a n , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( S e p t e m b e r 12, 2008) B efo re B L A C K , C A RN E S an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: G w e ndol y n S pi ve y , appoi nt e d c ouns e lf orS ha r on S he rm a n H a l l , ha s f i l e d a2

m ot i on t o w i thdr a w on appe a l , s upport e d byabr i e f pr e pa r e d pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 ( 1967) . O uri nde pe nde nt r e vi e w of

the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s tha tc ouns e l ’ s a s s e s s m e ntof the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof the appe a l i s c orr e c t . B e c aus e i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s no arg u ab l y m eri t o ri o u s i ssu es, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s f

i ndi ng tha tH a l l vi ol a t e d the t e rm s of he rs upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , a l ong w i th h erm od i fi ed m on thl y r es t i tut i on paym entam ou nt , ar e A FFI R M ED .
Mark Hanley GIBBONS, Appellant, v. Clifford S. GIBBONS & Timothy M. Gibbons, Co-Trustees of the Sam M. Gibbons Revocable Trust, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.