alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 225 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 225

 Commemorating the 107th running of the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race and 
     recognizing the race as ``the greatest spectacle in racing''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2023

     Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Braun) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
                           and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating the 107th running of the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race and 
     recognizing the race as ``the greatest spectacle in racing''.

Whereas Sunday, May 28, 2023, will mark the 107th running of the Indianapolis 
        500 Mile Race (referred to in this preamble as the ``Indianapolis 
        500'');
Whereas the Indianapolis 500 has occurred every year since 1911, except during 
        the involvement of the United States in World Wars I and II from 1917 
        through 1918 and 1942 through 1945, respectively;
Whereas the Indianapolis 500 is the largest single day sporting event in the 
        world, with more than 300,000 fans packing the grandstands and the 
        expansive infield of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway on race day;
Whereas radio coverage of the Indianapolis 500 dates back to 1922, and the 
        Indianapolis Motor Speedway Radio Network was established in 1952;
Whereas a radio broadcast of the entire Indianapolis 500 first began in 1953 and 
        the radio broadcast reaches millions of listeners each year;
Whereas Alice Greene, a copywriter at the Indianapolis-based radio station WIBC, 
        coined the phrase ``the greatest spectacle in racing'' in 1954, and the 
        phrase was made famous by broadcaster Sid Collins, who served as the 
        voice of the Indianapolis 500 for nearly 3 decades;
Whereas the Indianapolis 500 has played an integral part in the culture and 
        heritage of--

    (1) Indianapolis, Indiana;

    (2) motorsports; and

    (3) the automotive industry in the United States and throughout the 
world; and

Whereas the Indianapolis Motor Speedway has been a showcase of speed, human 
        achievement, and the continuous pursuit of glory, and is a source of 
        great pride for all citizens of Indiana: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the 107th running of the Indianapolis 500 
        Mile Race; and
            (2) recognizes the Indianapolis 500 Mile Race as ``the 
        greatest spectacle in racing''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Harris County Housing Authority v. Guy Rankin, IV

Appellate case number: 01-12-00870-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-24968

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 15, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Laura Carter Higley___________________

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Higley, Massengale, and Brown

Date: March 22, 2013
Blake M. TILLEY, Appellant, v. Alyssa Eva GRANT and Allen Trevor Michaelson, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-4007

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed December 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 30, 2019

Samuel A. Walker, Tee Persad and Russell J. Frank, of CPLS, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Nancy A. Hass, of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. *See**G.F.C. v. S.G.* , 686 So.2d 1382 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We conclude *183that *Simmonds v. Perkins* , 247 So.3d 397 (Fla. 2018), is distinguishable and, accordingly, not applicable.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Gary R. MCGRIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1160

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 3, 2019]

Gary R. McGriff, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Certificate Number:              Number of Shares:            Class:  Common                            Par Value:  NPV
Date of Issue:                   Registered Holder:           Transfers (or Allotments) From:           Certificate Received
                                                                                                        Date:


                                                                                                        Signature:_________________

----------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------------
<S>                            <C>                 <C>                        <C>                               <C>
 Certificate Number            Class               Number of Shares           Par Value                         Date of Issue
----------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------------
                              Common                                             NPV
----------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------------
</TABLE>

THIS CERTIFIES THAT
                    ------------------------------------------------------------

of
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 is the registered holder

of                                                                      Shares,
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                          in the Authorized Capital of

                     WAVERIDER COMMUNICATIONS (CANADA) INC.

                       IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

         transferable only in the Central Securities Register, and in accordance
         with the Articles of the Company, by completion of the Form of Transfer
         endorsed hereon and surrender of this certificate.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this certificate to be signed
         by its duly authorized officer this _______________.

         TRANSFER OF THESE SHARES IS RESTRICTED.


                                        ____________________________________



<PAGE>






  The undersigned,  for valuable consideration received,
  hereby transfer to


 _______________________________________________________
                        (transferee)


_________________________________________________________
                     (number and class)

share(s) in the authorized capital of the Company to hold unto the transferee,
his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, subject to the Articles of the
Company.

  DATE___________________________________

  SIGNATURE______________________________

  WITNESS________________________________
<PAGE>

[CHAMPION ENTERPRISES LOGO]                                Exhibit 99.1

INVESTOR CONTACT:
Lisa D. Lettieri
Vice President of Investor Relations
Champion Enterprises
(248) 340-7731
llettieri@championhomes.net

OR

MEDIA CONTACTS:
Tim Hanson or Paul Kesman
Identity Investor Relations
(248) 258-2333
chb@identitypr.com

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF CALEDONIAN BUILDING SYSTEMS

AUBURN HILLS, MICH., APRIL 7, 2006 - - Champion Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: CHB), a
leader in factory-built construction, confirmed today that it has completed its
recently announced purchase of Calsafe Group (Holdings) Ltd. and the related
(pound)45 million financing in the form of a Sterling-denominated addition to
its existing seven year term credit facility. Calsafe Group (Holdings) Ltd.,
through its operating subsidiary Caledonian Building Systems, is a leading U.K.
- - based steel-framed modular manufacturer.


ABOUT CHAMPION

Auburn Hills, Michigan-based Champion Enterprises, Inc. is a leader in
factory-built construction, operating 36 manufacturing facilities in North
America and the United Kingdom, and partnering with over 3,000 independent
retailers, builders and developers. The Company produces manufactured and
modular homes through its family of homebuilders, as well as modular commercial
buildings for military and commercial applications. For more information, please
visit www.championhomes.com.

                                       ###

         2701 Cambridge Court, Suite 300 | Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326
                     (248) 340-9090 | www.championhomes.com
# C_2019383EN.01007901.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/79

---

Action brought on 30 September 2019 – Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO – Dermavita (JUVEDERM ULTRA)

(Case T-664/19)

(2019/C 383/88)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Allergan Holdings France (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dermavita Co. Ltd (Beirut, Lebanon)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA – European Union trade mark No 6 295 638

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2019 in Joined Cases R 1655/2018-4 and R 1723/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision insofar as it revokes the EUTM No. 6295638 JUVEDERM ULTRA for the contested goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision insofar as it revokes the EUTM No. 6295638 JUVEDERM ULTRA for the contested goods;

| — | order EUIPO and Dermavita Co. Ltd. to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Dermavita Co. Ltd. to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 58(1) and 64(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 58(1) and 64(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. John DIGIROLAMO

No. 2018-KP-1255

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time *334limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated another application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 150 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 150

  Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at the 
                   Covenant School on March 27, 2023.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

 Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and Mr. Hagerty) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at the 
                   Covenant School on March 27, 2023.

Whereas, on March 27, 2023, a mass shooting that claimed the lives of 6 teachers 
        and students took place at the Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee;
Whereas these victims included 9-year-old students, Evelyn Dieckhaus, William 
        Kinney, and Hallie Scruggs, head of the school Dr. Katherine Koonce, 
        custodian Mike Hill, and substitute teacher Cynthia Peak;
Whereas the people of Tennessee and the United States continue to pray for the 
        individuals who were affected by this unspeakable evil;
Whereas the Nashville community has shown strength, compassion, and unity; and
Whereas officers of the Nashville Police Department and other first responders 
        demonstrated incredible bravery preventing the loss of additional life: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the memories of the victims of the senseless and 
        cowardly attack at the Covenant School on March 27, 2023, and 
        offers heartfelt condolences and deepest sympathies to the 
        families, loved ones, friends, and church family of the 
        victims;
            (2) recognizes the strength and resilience of the Covenant 
        School community, the City of Nashville, and the State of 
        Tennessee;
            (3) expresses deep gratitude to the first responders, 
        including police officers, emergency medical personnel, fire 
        department officials, and local, State, and Federal agents and 
        officers, including Nashville Police Chief John Drake, whose 
        incredible bravery prevented the loss of additional life; and
            (4) applauds the heroism displayed by the officers, 
        including officers Rex Engelbert and Michael Collazo, who 
        willingly ran toward danger, putting their lives on the line to 
        save others.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covansys Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James S. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ James S. Trouba James S. Trouba
Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2006
Christopher Charles MCINTOSH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3653

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019

Christopher Charles McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
Order entered June 3 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 21

- 00704

- CR
JEROME JOHNSON , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Dist rict Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F01

- 53637

- JH

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s May 25 , 2022 motion to access the supplemental clerk’s record. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of the May 31, 2022 supplemental clerk’s record to Jerome Johnson, TDCJ #01198301, Estelle Unit, 264 FM 3478 , Huntsville, TX
77320

- 3320 . This case is at issue and will be submitted in due course.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(30)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(118)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(18)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(14)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(7)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - (-)washington(3)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(3)

staff profileJoJo Mangano

staff profileChristopher P Konrad

staff profileDavid J Topping, Ph.D.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF PSB GROUP, INC.

                               Peoples State Bank

                               PSB, Capital, Inc.

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF PEOPLES STATE BANK

                           PSB Insurance Agency, Inc.

                         Universal Mortgage Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.01
***CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER***
     I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as managingowner, of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust, certify that (i) the Form 10K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained inthe Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust .         CAMPBELL ALTERNATIVE ASSET TRUST  By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing owner        By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland           Bruce L. Cleland     Chief Executive Officer     March 29, 2005  
E-4
Matthew LAINE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4776

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Netting v. State, 129 So. 3d 429, 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("lneffective assistance of postconviction counsel is not a cognizable claim in Florida, because there is no constitutional entitlement to the appointment of postconviction counsel."); Fla. R. App. P. 9.141 (d)(5).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Ann Coffey BEAN v. Jonathan S. BEAN, et al.

Succession of Theo B. Bean, Jr.

NO. 2018-CC-1689

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Supreme Court of Louisiana January 14, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(20)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - montana(4)
              - (-)new hampshire(3)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Center News        July 13, 2023        USGS Captures Critical Data During New England Flood

Center News        December 7, 2021        Products about January and March 2018 Nor’easters

Center News        October 27, 2022        Remembering Hurricane Sandy Ten Years Later
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Doron
Roethler, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Doron
    RoethlerDoron
      RoethlerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerMarch
      30, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.