alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30298]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 3, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Brent B. Hassell, Assistant 
Vice President) P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to [email protected]:
    1. The Craig G. Phillips Revocable Trust, Craig G. Phillips, as 
trustee, both of Buckhannon, West Virginia; to acquire voting shares of 
Freedom Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares 
of Freedom Bank, Inc., both of Belington, West Virginia.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-30298 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
George P. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5196

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

George P. Carter, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Richard Allen MINGST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 6, 2018]

Richard Allen Mingst, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Ciklin and Forst, JJ., concur.
Karonda WASHINGTON, Lateisha Atkinson on Behalf of Her Minor Child Ja'Myah Bass and Tashell Jones on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Ezekiel Blakes v. ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Sid Gautreaux, East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff, Tyler Comeaux, GoAuto Insurance Company and Shankeyshia Jones

No. 2018-C-1967

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons:

With emergency lights and sirens engaged, defendant Deputy Comeaux was responding to a call regarding "a disturbance with a weapon ... with an individual inside of a house with a gun". *Washington v. OneBeacon Am. Ins. Co.* , 18-0248, p.2 (La. App. 1 Cir. 11/2/18), --- So. 3d ----, 2018 WL 5732437. There was screaming in the background of the call, further evidencing a potential loss of life and a need for immediate law enforcement attention. *Id.* The lower courts' finding that the officer acted with reckless disregard in his pursuit raises policy concerns that warrant scrutiny by this Court; accordingly, I would grant and docket this case.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 27 

Designating February 1, 2023, as ‘‘Blue Star Mother’s Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Ms. ERNST) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating February 1, 2023, as ‘‘Blue Star Mother’s 

Day’’. 

Whereas, on January 22, 1942, in the midst of the Second 

World War, Army Captain George Maines ran an advertisement in the Flint News-Advertiser calling for mothers 

of members of the Armed Forces to meet; 

Whereas, on February 1, 1942, 300 mothers of members of 

the Armed Forces held their first meeting at the Durant 

Hotel in Flint, Michigan, and February 1, 2023, is the 

81st anniversary of that meeting; 

Whereas, on July 14, 1960, the Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc., received its charter from Congress; 

Whereas Blue Star Mothers make enormous sacrifices while 

their sons and daughters are providing for the defense of 

the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 27 ATS 

Whereas Blue Star Mothers pack and ship thousands of care 

packages every year to members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas, volunteer to help homeless veterans, provide support for wounded warriors, visit with hospitalized 

veterans, honor fallen heroes during funeral services, and 

offer a compassionate community for the mothers of men 

and women of the Armed Forces serving in harm’s way; 

Whereas Blue Star Mothers promote the values of the United 

States, demonstrate a patriotic spirit, and advance a national sense of pride and appreciation for the men and 

women of the Armed Forces; and 

Whereas there are more than 200 chapters of the Blue Star 

Mothers of America, Inc., throughout the United States 

representing thousands of military families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates February 1, 2023, as ‘‘Blue Star 

3 Mother’s Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes— 

5 (A) the contributions of the members of 

6 the Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc.; and 

7 (B) the important role Blue Star Mothers 

8 play in supporting each other and members and 

9 veterans of the Armed Forces; and 

10 (3) encourages the people of the United 

11 States— 

12 (A) to observe Blue Star Mother’s Day; 

13 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 27 ATS 

1 (B) to support the work of local chapters 

2 of the Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 27, 2006
 Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter; State ofCommission File
    
    Incorporation; Address of Principal Executive Offices; and
    
    IRS EmployerNumber
    
    Telephone Number
    
    Identification Number1-16169
    
    EXELON CORPORATION
(a Pennsylvania corporation)
10 South Dearborn Street  37th Floor
P.O. Box 805379
Chicago, Illinois 60680-5379
(312) 394-7398
    
    23-29901901-1839
    
    COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
(an Illinois corporation)
440 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60605-1028
(312) 394-4321
    
    36-0938600000-16844
    
    PECO ENERGY COMPANY
(a Pennsylvania corporation)
P.O. Box 8699
2301 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101-8699
(215) 841-4000
    
    23-0970240333-85496
    
    EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC
(a Pennsylvania limited liability company)
300 Exelon Way
Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348
(610) 765-6900
    
    23-3064219
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Section 7
 Regulation FD
Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure




---



##### 



Section 9Financial Statements and Exhibits
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibits
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99
    
    Revised Slides




---



##### 



EXELON CORPORATIONPECO ENERGY COMPANYEXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC/s/ John F. Young

John F. YoungExecutive Vice President, Finance and Markets,and Chief Financial OfficerExelon CorporationCOMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY/s/ Robert K. McDonald

Robert K. McDonaldSenior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer andChief Risk OfficerCommonwealth Edison CompanyJune 27, 2006
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerald WEST, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 9, 2019]

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*819The State appeals an order granting the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence. We reverse. Because the defendant is eligible for parole, his sentence is not unconstitutional under *Miller v. Alabama* , 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), or *Graham v. Florida* , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). *Franklin v. State* , 258 So.3d 1239, 2018 WL 5839174 (Fla. Nov. 8, 2018). He is not therefore entitled to resentencing under section 921.1402, Florida Statutes.

In *State v. Michel* , 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018), and *Franklin* , the Florida Supreme Court receded from *Atwell v. State* , 197 So.3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). The defendant argues *Michel* does not create binding precedent because only three justices joined in Justice Polston's opinion and Justice Lewis concurred only in the result. However, four justices joined the majority in *Franklin* , which recognized that *Atwell* is no longer good law and "improperly applied *Graham* and *Miller* ." *Franklin* , 258 So.3d at 1241.

*Reversed.*

Taylor, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Lennard Patrick JERVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2037

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 27, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Ciklin, Conner, JJ., and Mirman, Lawrence, Associate Judge, concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10242

Summary Calendar

BENNIE L. COLLINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LUBBOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 5:05-CV-124

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bennie Collins appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against

the Lubbock Police Department (“LPD”). He alleges that LPD officers took

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 23, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10242

2

$6,335 from him when they pulled him over for a traffic violation and arrested

him for possession of a switchblade. 

Collins has failed to raise, as an issue on appeal, the primary basis for the

dismissal, which is that LPD is not subject to suit under Darby v. Pasadena Police Dep’t, 939 F.2d 311, 313 (5th Cir. 1991). Although pro se briefs are afforded

a liberal construction, even pro se litigants must brief the issues to preserve

them. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Collins has failed to provide any legal or factual analysis of this issue, he has abandoned any challenge to the ruling. See id. Accordingly, we do not reach the other issues raised on appeal. 

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
David MORAN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3276

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network International Alliance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong



Eppie Wong,

 CFO and a director

December 28, 2006
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 ORIGEN FINANCIAL, INC.  RETENTION PLAN
 Purpose and Adoption
   Definitions




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Designation of Participants; Tiers of Participation
 Participation in the Plan
 Tiers of Participation
 Tier
    
    Change in Control Payment MultiplierTier 1
    
    0.25Tier 2
    
    0.5Tier 3
    
    1.0Tier 4
    
    1.0Tier 5
    
    2.0Tier 6
    
    2.99
 Payment After Change in Control
 Participants Employed with the Company on the Change in
Control Payment Date
 Participants No Longer Employed with the Company at the
Change in Control Payment Date
 4




---



##### 



No More Than One Change in Control Payment
 Covenant Not to Compete
 Excise Tax Payment
 5




---



##### 



General Release
 Entitlement to Benefits Under Other Plans, Programs, Agreements and
Arrangements
 Other Change in Control Payments
 Severance Payments
 Equity Compensation
 Miscellaneous
 Successors
 Termination or Amendment of Plan
 6




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Tax Withholding
 Effective Date
 7
Exhibit 32.1





Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Harry Bagot, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (the “Company”), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated: September 17, 2012
/s/ Harry BagotPresident and CEO
Exhibit 31.2





Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 302)





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, William E. Chady, certify that:




(1)      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nuclear Solutions, Inc., (Registrant).





(2)      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





(3)      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





(4)      The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





(5)      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and





(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: September 17, 2012




By:
/s/ William E. ChadyWilliam E. ChadyChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 17,2008 (except for Note 3 as to which the date is March 16, 2009), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of The Princeton Review, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of The Princeton Review, Inc. and Subsdiaries Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-149940 with an effective date of March 28, 2008, 333-145537 withan effective date of August 17, 2007, 333-104136 with an effective date of March 31, 2003, 333-63638 with an effective date of June 22, 2001 and 333-77016 with an effective date of January 18, 2002). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

New York, New York 

March 16, 2009
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30828]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1079 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-847, K2025-848.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30828 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Cheryl Messier, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radius Gold Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

DATED:  June 27, 2008

/s/ Cheryl Messier



Cheryl Messier,

Chief Financial Officer