alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - (-)science_science(11)
              - multimedia_image(47)
              - multimedia_image-141771(47)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(11)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(6)
              - (-)2022(11)
              - 2021(15)

science explorer topicFloods

Science Theme        March 3, 2022      Water Hazards

science explorer topicWater and Extreme Weather

science explorer topicCoasts, Storms, and Sea Level Rise 

science explorer topicCoastal Hazards and Resilience

Science Theme        July 15, 2022      Coastal Elevation Data and Mapping

Science Theme        June 30, 2022      Hazards

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Coastal and Wetland Ecosystems

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Pioneering Fish Passage

Science Theme        July 15, 2022      Coastal Hydrology and Storm Surge

Science Theme        July 29, 2022      Coastal | La costa
Michael Tyrone MCCARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3305

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Linsey Sims-Bohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a list of all of the subsidiaries of the Registrant:

1.    CHS Services, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

2.    eBioCare.com, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

3.    Hemophilia Access, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of
      Tennessee.

4.    Apex Therapeutic Care, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of
      California.

5.    Infinity Infusion, LLC, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

6.    Infinity Infusion II, LLC, organized under the laws of the State of
      Delaware.

7.    Infinity Infusion Care, Ltd., organized under the laws of the State of
      Texas.

8.    Curative Health Services of New York, Inc. (f/k/a OptCare, Inc., organized
      under the laws of the State of New York.

9.    Optimal Care Plus, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of
      Delaware.

10.   MedCare, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

11.   Critical Care Systems, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of
      Delaware.

12.   Curative Health Services Co., organized under the laws of the State of
      Minnesota.

13.   Curative Health Services III Co., organized under the laws of the State
      of Minnesota.

14.   Curative Pharmacy Services, Inc., organized under the laws of the State
      of Delaware.
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in thisperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of RadView Software Ltd.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2003 | /s/ Ilan Kinreich                           |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                     | Ilan Kinreich                               |
|                     | President and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|                     |                                        |
|                     |                                        |
| Date:  May 15, 2003 | /s/ Brian E. LeClair                        |
|                     | Brian E. LeClair                            |
|                     | Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JIMMY K. BONEY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3340

[ February 14, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 001795CF10A

.

Jimmy K. Boney, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Steven J. Haack, Principal Financial Officer of WGNB Corp., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WGNB Corp.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 10, 2005 /s/ Steven J. HaackSteven J. HaackTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
 19
#### UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON et al.

First Division. Juneau.

December 8, 1924.

No. 1777-B.

Post Office &wkey;>48(6), 44 — Indictment and Information — Larceny from a Post Office.

The indictment against tbe defendants charges them with stealing post office property. The first count charges the stealing of 15 books, each containing 12 uncanceled two-cent United States postage stamps, etc.; the second count charges them with stealing $29.95 in lawful money, the property of the Post Office Department. On general demurrer, that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime, *held,*that it is not necessary to state the value of the property stolen, if the property has some value; the value is not material, in distinguishing between petit and grand larceny; the substance of the crime is stealing post office property, and the distinction between petit and grand larceny is not material to the validity of the indictment.

The indictment herein contains two counts, each charging the defendants with stealing post office property. The first *267count charges the defendants with stealing 15 books, each book containing 12 uncanceled two-cent United States postage stamps, the property of the Post Office Department of the United States; and the second count charges the defendants with stealing $29.95 in lawful money of the United States, the property of the Post Office Department of the United States. To each of these counts the defendants interposed a general demurrer, on the ground that the indictments did not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime.

A. G. Shoup, U. S. Atty., of San Jose, Cal.

Grover C. Winn and Harry F. Morton, both of Juneau, for defendants.

REED, District Judge.

Each count of the indictment appears to be laid under section 190, Penal Code of the United States (18 USCA § 313), which provides that “whoever shall steal, purloin, or embezzle any mail bag or other property in use by or belonging to the Post Office Department,” of the United States, shall be punished. The indictment follows the statute, and the allegation that stamps and money are property of the Post Office Department would be a matter of proof on trial.

That the indictment does not state the value of the United States postage stamps alleged to be stolen is immaterial, because it is not necessary to state the value of the property stolen, if the property has some value, and the value of the property does not become material in distinguishing whether the crime should be petit larceny or grand larceny. The substance of the crime in this instance is stealing post office property, and the distinction between petit and grand larceny is not material to the validity of the indictment.

The demurrer is therefore overruled.

<§=>See same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
Brandon DOWDY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(6)
              - alaska(19)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(17)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(65)
              - colorado(12)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(8)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(8)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - louisiana(17)
              - maine(9)
              - maryland(13)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(4)
              - new hampshire(7)
              - new jersey(10)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(11)
              - north carolina(7)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(15)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(13)
              - (-)tennessee(1)
              - texas(9)
              - u.s. virgin islands(5)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(17)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
Paul R. BROSKY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2081

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

Paul R. Brosky, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO; 18-PDB-041

NO. 2018-OB-1493

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Leave to appeal denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(23)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(37)
              - multimedia_image-141771(37)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - (-)vermont(1)

## By Year

newsletter        January 6, 2021      WaterMarks Newsletter - 2020
Antwon DEBOLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1706

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 2, 2016

t1026

Order 

Clerk

November 2, 2016

153522

In re SCHWEIN Estate

_________________________________________

SANDY MEAD, Personal Representative for the

Estate of DAVID SCHWEIN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 153522

COA: 324305 

Ingham Probate Ct: 13-002609-DE

KEVIN BARTON, TERRI ANDERSON and

MEREDITH BARTON,

Respondents-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The stay of 

proceedings ordered on July 29, 2016 is DISSOLVED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 226 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 226

          Designating May 20, 2023, as ``Kids to Parks Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2023

 Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Capito, Ms. 
   Collins, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Booker, and Mr. Heinrich) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

                 May 31 (legislative day, May 30), 2023

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Designating May 20, 2023, as ``Kids to Parks Day''.

Whereas the 13th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated on May 20, 2023;
Whereas the goals of Kids to Parks Day are--

    (1) to promote healthy outdoor recreation and responsible environmental 
stewardship;

    (2) to empower young people; and

    (3) to encourage families to get outdoors and visit the parks and 
public land of the United States;

Whereas, on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural, suburban, and urban areas 
        of the United States can be reintroduced to the splendid national, 
        State, and neighborhood parks located in their communities;
Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety of natural 
        resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals 
        seeking outdoor recreation;
Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, should be encouraged to 
        lead more healthy and active lifestyles;
Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to take a break from 
        their busy lives and enjoy a day of active, wholesome fun; and
Whereas Kids to Parks Day will--

    (1) broaden an appreciation for nature and the outdoors in young 
people;

    (2) foster a safe setting for independent play and healthy adventure in 
neighborhood parks; and

    (3) facilitate self-reliance while strengthening communities: Now, 
therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 20, 2023, as ``Kids to Parks Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recreation and the 
        preservation of open spaces for the health and education of the 
        young people of the United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Kids to Parks Day with safe family trips to parks.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of report (date of earliest event reported): April 28, 2006
 Innuity, Inc.
  Utah
    
    0-29129
    
    87-0370820(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 8644 154th Avenue NE
Redmond, WA 98052
  (425) 497-9909
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  INNUITY, INC.Dated: May 4, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Robert K. BenchRobert K. BenchChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 539 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-840, K2025-841.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30804 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(21)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_audio(13)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(13)
              - multimedia_image(30)
              - multimedia_image-141771(29)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(10)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - news_news-149245(7)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - connecticut(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - (-)south dakota(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Photo gallery of flood aftermath in the Hot Springs area during 1941-1
Greg MAKI a/k/a Gregory Eugene Maki and Elizabeth Maki a/k/a Elizabeth Ann Maki, Appellants, v. MULTIBANK 2009-1 RES-ADC VENTURE, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Gregory Maki and Elizabeth Maki, pro se.

Stephen P. Drobny, Ronald D.P. Bruckmann, and Zachary D. Ludens of Jones Walker LLP, Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.