alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of 

Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00105-CV

Trial court case number: D-1-GN-07-003482

Trial court: 98th District Court of Travis County

Generally, a notice of appeal is due within 30 days after the judgment is signed. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.1. The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within 15 days after 

the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension and the 

notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3. 

Appellant appeals a judgment signed by the trial court on November 4, 2013. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was due December 4, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Appellant 

filed his notice of appeal on December 13, 2013. The Court will imply a motion for extension 

when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 

26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 

S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because appellant filed his notice of appeal within the 15-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 and provided a reasonable explanation for the late filing, we 

find that appellant’s notice of appeal is timely. Id. We DISMISS appellant’s motion for 

extension filed on December 23, 2013 as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 4, 2014
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: GIS

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(2)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(43)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(39)
              - arkansas(8)
              - california(66)
              - colorado(52)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - delaware(15)
              - district of columbia(13)
              - florida(34)
              - georgia(9)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(39)
              - illinois(6)
              - indiana(6)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(5)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(28)
              - maine(15)
              - maryland(24)
              - massachusetts(25)
              - michigan(5)
              - minnesota(8)
              - mississippi(14)
              - missouri(9)
              - montana(43)
              - nebraska(6)
              - nevada(21)
              - new hampshire(11)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(13)
              - new york(23)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(10)
              - (-)ohio(7)
              - oklahoma(10)
              - oregon(29)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(8)
              - south dakota(28)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(24)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(23)
              - vermont(7)
              - virginia(34)
              - washington(40)
              - west virginia(10)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(28)

## By Year

Center News        September 6, 2018        CMHRP Lidar Coordinator invited to be Keynote Speaker at the 2018 Ohio GIS Conference

Data Release        May 2, 2022        Prospect- and Mine-Related Features from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- and 15-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps of the United States (ver. 10.0, May 2023)

API        April 19, 2017        StreamStats

Data Release        December 10, 2020        Bayesian modeling of NURE airborne radiometric data for the conterminous United States: predictions and grids

publication        October 2, 2005        Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia

publication        December 31, 2005        Upper Auglaize watershed AGNPS modeling project

Project        July 26, 2016        Flood Inundation Mapping in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana
JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

FINAL REPORT1

AMENDMENT OF Pa.R.J.C.P. 120, 127, 140, 160, 166, 182, 185, 187, 190, 191, 192, 

243, 512, 800, 1120, 1127, 1154, 1166, 1182, 1185, 1187, 1190, 1191, 1243, 1342, 

1512, 1608, 1610, 1635, and 1800

On April 6, 2017, the Court amended the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure to 

change the term “master” to “juvenile court hearing officer.”

The term “master” was incorporated into the Rules from the Juvenile Act. See 

42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 et seq. The continued use of the term “master” had been rejected 

by several judicial districts because it was considered archaic, subject to 

misperception, and inconsistent with the use of “hearing officer” in other proceedings. 

Accordingly, in some judicial districts the title of “master” had been updated to “hearing 

officer,” which more accurately reflects the authority to preside over delinquency and 

dependency matters. The Committee deliberated on the merits of this local practice

and agreed that “master” should be updated to the more modern phrase of “hearing 

officer” within the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure.

A proposal was published for public comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin at 42 

Pa.B 5480 (August 25, 2012) to replace “master” with “hearing officer.” In response to a 

comment and to differentiate among the different types of hearing officers in other 

proceedings, a post-publication modification to the proposal expanded the title from 

“hearing officer” to “juvenile court hearing officer.” 

 

 

1

The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee 

Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the 

Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
Chason JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1102

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Julio Guerra MOLINA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 04, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to the petitioner to file a motion to hear and rule in the trial court and, if necessary, a new petition for writ of mandamus in this court after waiting a reasonable period of time.

VILLANTI, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32 (a)

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Northland Cable Properties Seven
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of
Northland Communications Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and

            (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.

DATE: 3-30-06

/S/ JOHN S. WHETZELL
John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Felix ZAMOT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-945

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

LAGOA, C.J.

Affirmed. *See**Franklin v. State*, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S556, 258 So.3d 1239, 2018 WL 5839174 (Fla. Nov. 8, 2018) (reaffirming *Michel*'s determination that the "majority's analysis in *Atwell* improperly applied *Graham* and *Miller*" and holding that Franklin's three 1000-year concurrent sentences with parole, and presumptive parole release date of 2352, for non-homicide juvenile offenses "fulfills *Graham*'s requirement that juveniles be given a 'meaningful opportunity' to be considered for release during their natural life based upon 'normal parole factors' " (quoting *Virginia v. LeBlanc*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1726, 1729, 198 L.Ed.2d 186 (2017) ); *State v. Michel*, 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018) (holding "that juvenile offenders' sentences of life with the possibility of parole after 25 years do not violate the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution as delineated by the United States Supreme Court in *Graham v. Florida*, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), *Miller v. Alabama*, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and *Virginia v. LeBlanc*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1726, 198 L.Ed.2d 186 (2017)").
Rafael Antonio Olvera AMEZCUA, Appellant, v. Javier Navarro VELASCO, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-541

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 11, 2018

Rasco Klock Perez Nieto, and Juan Carlos Antorcha, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., Coral Gables, and Susan E. Klock, for appellant.

Krupnick Campbell Malone Buser Slama Hancock Liberman, P.A., and Carlos A. Acevedo, Walter G. Campbell, Kevin A. Malone, Kelley B. Stewart, and Michael J. Ryan (Ft. Lauderdale); Joel S. Perwin, Miami, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ

PER CURIAM.

*342Rafael Antonio Amezcua appeals the Order on Motion to Strike and Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint with Prejudice by Olvera Defendants entered February 16, 2018 reconsidering the prior Order Re: Olvera Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint entered October 17, 2017. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

On appeal, Amezcua contends the trial court erred by not dismissing this action on the basis of forum non conveniens and requests that we remand with directions to the trial court to dismiss in favor of a Mexican forum. However, the order denying the defendants' motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint is not an appealable non-final order because it does not address the enforceability of any forum clause, the issue of forum non-conveniens or any other issue with respect to venue.1 The prior order on the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, likewise, did not address the issue of forum non conveniens.2

Dismissed.

1

Amezcua notes in his notice of appeal that he is filing the notice in an abundance of caution because "it is unclear whether or not the lower court denied the Motion to Dismiss on venue grounds."

2

The order expressly states: "The Court will not address the Motion to Dismiss based on Forum Non Conveniens and Failure to Join Indispensable Parties at this time, as it did not previously, until there is a standing complaint to address."
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ August 19, 2013

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2012

- 1196

ASHLEY FURNITURE IND USTRIES, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES Defendant

- Appellee,

AND

UNITED STATES INTERN ATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendant

- Appellee,

AND

AMERICAN FURNITURE M ANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL TRADE, KINCAID FURNITURE CO., INC., L. & J.G. STICKLEY, INC., SANDBERG FURNITURE M ANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., STANL EY FURNITURE COM PANY, INC., T. COPEL AND AND SONS, INC. , AND VAUGHAN

- BASSETT FURNITURE CO MPANY, INC., Defendants

- Appellees.______________________
2012

- 1196

De cided: August 19, 2013 P recedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change:

Page 1
, change “ 10

- CV

- 0081 ” to “ 07

- CV

- 0323 ”.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 105

- CV

Trial court case number: D

- 1

- GN

- 07

- 003482

Trial court: 98th District Court of Travis County

Generally, a notice of appeal is due within 30 days after the judgment is signed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within 15 days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension and the notice of appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.

Appellant appeals a judgment signed by the trial court on November 4, 2013

. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due December 4, 2013. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 1 3 , 2013. The Court will imply a motion for extension when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the 15

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because appellant filed his notice of appeal within the 15

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 and provided a rea sonable explanation for the late filing, we find that appellant’s notice of appeal is timely. Id. We DISMISS appellant’s motion for
extension filed on December 23, 2013 as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 4 , 2014
Gerard MCGOVERN v. Timothy F. HAND and The Hand Law Firm, APLC

NO. 2018-CC-1735

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of EP Global Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Salluzzo, Chief Operating Officer (Chief Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



Date: August 9, 2005





/s/ Robert J. Salluzzo



———————————————



Robert J. Salluzzo



Chief Operating Officer  (Chief Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1112 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-891 K2025-892.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30995 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO**
 
 **Exhibit
32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Inyx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Hamerski, Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
 
 ****Date: May 20, 2005
    By:
    /s/ John
HamerskiJohn HamerskiVice President and Chief Financial
      Officer
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. B. Lipham, III,
      Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 13, 2007





/s/
                H.B. Lipham, IIIH.
                B. Lipham, IIIChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12615]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Iba N'Diaye: Between Latitude and Longitude” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-30708 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
1926.

#### CLARY *v.*NASH, agent.

The bill of exceptions not being unqualifiedly verified by the trial jud^e, the writ of error must be dismissed.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Argued July 16, —

Decided July 31, 1909.

J. *T. Irvin, G. J. Perryman,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. H. Remsen, Wyatt A. Harnesberger,*contra.

Powell, J.

The certificate to the bill of exceptions begins as follows: “I do certify that the foregoing bill of exceptions is true, except that it appeared that the property levied upon was not left with the levying officer and no replevy bond was given,” etc. It therefore appears that the trial judge does not unqualifiedly verify the bill of exceptions. If when the bill of exceptions is presented to the trial judge it needs correction or qualification, the proper amendment should be made in the bill of exceptions itself; and where there is an attempt to limit its verity by a recital in the certificate, the proceeding is nugatory and does not confer (jurisdiction upon this court. *Fort*v. *Sheffield,*108 *Ga.*781 (33 S. *550E. 660); *Sanges*v. *State,*110 *Ga.*260 (34 S. E. 327); *McCullough v*. *Bank,*111 *Ga.*131 (36 S. E. 465); *Taylor*v. *Howard,*112 *Ga.*347 (37 S. E. 392); *Bond*v. *Winn,*113 *Ga.*19 (5), (38 S. E. 328). *Writ of error dismissed.*