alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(55)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(30)
              - california(8)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(13)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(6)
              - indiana(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(7)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(11)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - (-)mississippi(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(9)
              - texas(11)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(9)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        January 15, 2016        Measuring Water Quality at Vicksburg (2016 Floods)

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2019        Digging into the soil of wetlands

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2019        The Power of Wetland Plants

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2019        Why do wetlands matter?

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2019        Wonderful Watery Wetlands - Part 2
Nicole BANKER and Frank Anderson, Appellants, v. WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., Successor Trustee to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee F/B/O Holders of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II, Inc., Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust, etc., et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2960

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

Moses R. DeWitt, of Dewitt Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

Allison Morat and Teris A. McGovern, of Pearson Bitman LLP, Maitland, for Appellee Wilmington Trust, N.A., Successor Trustee to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee f/b/o Holders of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II, Inc., Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust, etc.

No Appearance for Remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., and CHASE, M., Associate Judge, concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 6



             MAXCOM TELECOMMUNICACIONES, S.A. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARY

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                -------------------------------------------------------
                                                      1999                           2000
                                                ----------------     ----------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>                  <C>               <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding....       10,264,827           11,463,667        11,463,667

Net loss for the period.......................  Ps.    (236,638)     Ps.    (597,010)  U.S.$   (62,060)

Net loss per share............................  Ps.      (23.05)     Ps.      (52.08)  U.S.$     (5.41)
</TABLE>








                                     E-154
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7476

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DERRICK ANTHONY LUCAS, a/k/a Ease Up , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , Senior District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00794

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : July 6, 2021 Decided: July 13, 2021

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Derrick Anthony Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Anthony Lucas appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error . Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Lucas , No. 4:07

- cr - 00794

- TLW

- 1 (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argum ent because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Daniel P. BEATTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3210

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 15, 2019

Daniel P. Beatty, Zephyrhills, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Elizabeth U. BALDWIN, Individually and as a Member of Manor at Vero Beach, LLC, and Manor at Vero Beach, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, Appellants, v. Paul R. WILLET, Individually and as a Member of Manor at Vero Beach, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 19, 2018]

Aaron V. Johnson of Collins, Brown, Barkett, Garavaglia & Lawn, Chartered, Vero Beach, for appellants.

George A. Glenn, Jr. of Law Offices of George A. Glenn, Vero Beach, for appellee.

Forst, J.

Appellants Elizabeth Baldwin and Manor at Vero Beach, LLC challenge the order granting Appellee Paul R. Willet's motion for temporary injunction in the underlying action for a constructive trust. We reverse because the order is facially deficient-addressing only one prong of the four-part injunction test. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to make specific factual findings on each prong of the test.

To obtain a temporary injunction, a movant must establish the following four-part test: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) lack of an adequate remedy at law; (3) irreparable harm absent an entry of an injunction; and (4) that injunctive relief will serve the public interest. *Dubner v. Ferraro* , 242 So.3d 444, 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (citing *Univ. Med. Clinics, Inc. v. Quality Health Plans, Inc.* , 51 So.3d 1191, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ).

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) specifies the form and scope of injunctions, requiring that "[e]very injunction shall specify the reasons for entry, [and] shall describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained without reference to a pleading or another document ...." The findings supporting the four-part test must be "clear, definite, and unequivocal." *Net First Nat'l Bank v. First Telebanc Corp.* , 834 So.2d 944, 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting *Aerospace Welding, Inc. v. Southstream Exhaust & Welding, Inc.* , 824 So.2d 226, 227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ). This Court has consistently held that strict compliance with rule 1.610(c) is required. *See**Dubner* , 242 So.3d at 447 ; *Am. Learning Sys., Inc. v. Gomes* , 199 So.3d 1076, 1082 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ; *Eldon v. Perrin* , 78 So.3d 737, 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Here, the trial court made several factual findings, but the order does not state with clarity which factual findings support each of the prongs of the four-part test required to issue a temporary injunction. Willet concedes this point, but contends that he provided substantial evidence to *892the trial court regarding each prong in support of the temporary injunction. However, because strict compliance with rule 1.610(c) is required, we reverse and remand for the trial court to make clear, definite, and unequivocal factual findings on each prong of the four-part test in determining whether Willet is entitled to relief.

*Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion* .

May and Conner, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

COMMUNITY CENTRAL BANK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Three Months Ended
                                    March 31,
                             ----------------------
                                  2006     2005
                                 ------   ------
                                 (In thousands,
                             except per share data)
<S>                          <C>          <C>
BASIC

Net Income                       $  703   $  752
/ Weighted Average Shares         3,813    3,355
                                 ------   ------
Basic Earnings Per Share         $ 0.18   $ 0.22
                                 ======   ======

DILUTED

Net Income                       $  703   $  752
/ Weighted Average Shares         3,884    3,450
                                 ------   ------
Diluted Earnings Per Share       $ 0.18   $ 0.22
                                 ======   ======
</TABLE>

*    Per share data has been retroactively adjusted to stock dividends.


                                       33
HANOVER INS. CO., et al. v. RICELAND AVIATION, INC., et al.

United States Aircraft Ins. Group, et al. v. Global Tower, LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1847

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
FLORDIA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-CC-1859

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2016

a0525

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2016

152121

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152121

COA: 320870 

Saginaw CC: 13-038720-FC

LEON HENRY HATHAWAY, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court to determine whether 

the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentence 

procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial 

court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court 

determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional 

constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial 

court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the 

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 545 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-864, K2025-865.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30844 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Dale KIPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2637

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

Leonard S. Feuer of Leonard Feuer, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7523

GEORGE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-04-2682-WDQ)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 4, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

George Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Johnson’s motions for general relief and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pub. Safety & Corr.

Servs., No. CA-04-2682-WDQ (D. Md. Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 238 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 238

Expressing support for recognizing September 20 as National Service Dog 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2023

    Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Moran) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

                           September 19, 2023

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for recognizing September 20 as National Service Dog 
                                  Day.

Whereas service dogs assist individuals with a wide range of challenges,
Whereas service dogs are able to support veterans struggling after war;
Whereas service dogs have assisted individuals in the United States since 1929;
Whereas evidence-based research has shown that service dogs provide numerous 
        health and fitness benefits;
Whereas tens of thousands of service dogs are estimated to be working in the 
        United States today; and
Whereas National Service Dog Day is an appropriate tribute to service dogs and 
        the organizations that offer service dogs free of charge to United 
        States veterans and individuals with disabilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports recognizing September 20 as National Service 
        Dog Day;
            (2) encourages all individuals in the United States to 
        learn about the history of service dogs and the unique, 
        positive impact service dogs have on individuals with 
        disabilities; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for organizations that train and pair service dogs with 
        disabled individuals in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
*1738.*

#### Green *v.*Massee & Felton Lumber Company.

Action for damages, from city court of Macon — Judge Hodges. January *12,*1909.

Argued April 16,

Decided June 29, 1909.

Green sued the Massee & Felton Lumber Company for damages on account of personal injuries. His petition was dismissed on general demurrer, and he excepted. The petition alleges, that while he was in the employment of the defendant company as a laborer, laying a line of pipe on its premises, “certain persons not in the employment of the said . . company, at work in a tank situated on the premises of said company near the place where . . petitioner was laying pipe as aforesaid, negligently and carelessly threw a large piece of timber from said tank down upon . . petitioner, striking him across the back and injuring him” in a manner described; that “said persons were at work on said tank by the invitation, knowledge, approval, and consent of the said . . company;” and that “said injuries were caused entirely by the said . . company in permitting said piece of timber to be thrown down upon . . petitioner as aforesaid, and in thus rendering said place in which . . petitioner was at work unsafe; all of which was negligence on the part of said defendant, causing . . petitioner’s injuries as aforesaid.”

*Joseph H. Hall, Warren*Roberts, for plaintiff.

*Lane & Parle,*for defendant.

Powell, J.

1. The petition fails to allege such a state of circumstances as to show a duty on the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury for which he *sues;*and it does not disclose that the defendant was legally responsible for the conduct of the persons through whom the injury was immediately committed. Hence the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer.

2. The plaintiff in error has requested this court to give leave to amend, in the event of an affirmance. Leave to amend is granted.

*Judgment affirmed, with direction.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Retromer Function and Alzheimer's Disease.                    

*Date:*                         February 19, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michael James Butler, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 496-9666,                         *michael.butler@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 19, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30878 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P