alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Kenexa Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Nooruddin S. Karsan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Donald F. Volk,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their respective knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    NOORUDDIN S.
KARSANNooruddin S. Karsan Chief Executive Officer March 16, 2009By:

/s/    DONALD F. VOLKDonald F. Volk Chief Financial Officer March 16, 2009


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kenexa Corporation and will be retained by Kenexa Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Santiago JIMENEZ a/k/a Santiago Milian, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2705

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*660Affirmed. *See* § 812.13(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2014) (providing: "An act shall be deemed 'in the course of the taking' if it occurs either prior to, contemporaneous with, or subsequent to the taking of the property and if it and the act of taking constitute a continuous series of acts or events"); *Fonseca v. State*, 547 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (affirming robbery conviction where defendant grabbed money from a store cash register and ran; the cashier chased defendant and grabbed him, preventing him from leaving the store; the cashier and defendant fell to the ground, at which time defendant punched and kicked the cashier and then fled the store); *Messina v. State*, 728 So.2d 818 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that robbery can be established by proof that force was used to retain the victim's property once it has been taken); *Lemus v. State*, 641 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (same).
1736.

#### REDDING *v.*CENTRAL GEORGIA TELEPHONE COMPANY.

■“Where the duty of inspection has been delegated to the employee, such employee, generally speaking, assumes the risk of all dangers incident to making the inspection.”

Action for damages, from city court of Macon — Judge Hodges. January 6, 1909. ...

Argued April 16, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

*Lane & Parle,*for plaintiff.

*J. E. Hall, Evins ■& Spence,*for defendant.

*832Hill, C. J.

The plaintiff in error sued the Central Georgia Telephone Company to recover damages for personal injuries received by him as an employee of the company. The court awarded a nonsuit, and this is the error of which he complains. He testified, in brief, that he was employed as a lineman by the defendant company, and that it was his duty “to go over and look over the telephone line and see the irregularities and defects in the system, wherever the wires were strung; and whenever he saw any trouble, it was his place to repair it, and, if he could not repair it, to report it. He was the only employee of the company charged with the work' of inspecting the line and keeping it in good shape and repair.” He was informed by the company that there was some trouble in connection with the wires at Macon, Georgia, and, in pursuance of instruction, he went to Macon to find out what it was, and found that the wires were crossed on a pole in the city of Macon. While climbing this pole to inspect and correct the trouble, his hand came in contact with a hot wire that was lying on one of the iron spikes driven into the pole for climbing, and he received a shock which threw him to the ground, causing the injury for which he sues. It is true that in this case the wire that caused the injury did not belong to his master, but belonged to another corporation; but. it is apparent, from this brief statement of, his testimony, that the injury which he received was, as against his own master, incident to his emplyment of inspection, and was a risk assumed by him. The case, on the facts, falls squarely within the decision announced by Chief Justice Bleckley in the case of *Dartmouth Spinning Company*v. *Achord,*84 *Ga.*14 (10 S. E. 449, 6 L. R. A. 190), and followed by this court in the case of *Lucas*v. *Southern Ry.*Co., 1 *Ga. App.*810 (57 S. E. 1041); and this is true whether the position of the hot wire across the iron spike was an open or a concealed danger. The judgment of nonsuit was therefore properly awarded.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE
              SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Tabin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Total First Aid,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being
prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 13, 2004

/s/ Jeffrey Tabin
-------------------
Jeffrey Tabin
Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - (-)kansas(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(6)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileKeith A Loftin, Ph.D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1087 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-855, K2025-856.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30836 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
E.G., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1185

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019

E.G., a juvenile, in proper person.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7535** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the Uni ted States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg
. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. ( 3:00

- cr - 00024

- JPB

- JES

- 1 )

Submitted : February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23 , 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circ uit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arthur Lee Hairston appeals the district court's order granting in part Hairston’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hairston , No. 3:00

- cr - 00024

- JPB

- JES

- 1 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the co urt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Tyrome Terrell ROBERTS Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30996]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1113 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-892 K2025-893.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30996 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Jason Quinn BLACKWELL

No. 2018-KP-0076

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of *779a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1013 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-763, K2025-762.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30129 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Steven Lashaun DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3830

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Steven Lashaun Davis, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Louis Eisman, the chief executive officer of Ayotte Music Inc., certify that
(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2001, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F financial statements
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ayotte Music Inc.

                                          /s/  Louis Eisman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Louis Eisman, Chief Executive Officer

                                        Date:  August 2, 2002



<PAGE>





              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Michael Fugman, the chief financial officer of Ayotte Music Inc., certify
that (i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2001,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F financial
statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Ayotte Music Inc.

                                          /s/  Michael Fugman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael Fugman, Chief Financial Officer

                                        Date:  August 2, 2002




<PAGE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(48)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_other_news(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - (-)montana(4)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Center News        December 12, 2022        How the 2022 Yellowstone flood affected a monitoring site on the Gardner River

Center News        June 20, 2022        How might the devastating June 2022 floods in and around Yellowstone National Park influence seismic and hydrothermal activity?

Center News        April 1, 2024        The 1959 Madison Slide, Part 2: Recovery and remediation

Center News        January 2, 2023        Yellowstone—the year 2022 in review