T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S E GU ND O A L B E R T O P AL MAC A R R IL L O , a. k. a. S egun do P al m aC a rr i l l o, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71121 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 019- 474 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J ul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S egun do A l bert o P al m a- C arri l l o, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f P eru, pet i t i on s pro s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ a f f i rm a nc e of

a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de ni a l of

hi s appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd 

# FI LED

JU L 14 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71121 2 pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l a w a nd r e vi e w f

or s u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . H

usye v v . Mukasey , 528 F . 3d 1172, 1177 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatP al m a- C arri l l o est abl i shed e xtr a or di na ryc i r c um s t a nc e s t o e xc us e the unt i m e l yf i l i ng of hi s a s y l um ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 5 ) ; T oj -Cul pa tan v. H

older , 612 F . 3d 1088, 1091- 92 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( c onc l udi ng tha t , s e pa r a t e l yort a ke n t oge the r , a n a s y l um appl i c a nt ’ s i nabi l i tyt o s pe a k E ngl i s h, hi s tw o- m onths i n a n i m m i gr a t i on de t e nt i on ce nt er , and the transfe r of hi s c as e w er e not“ extra ordi naryci rc um st ance s” that w ou l d excuse hi s e xcusi ng hi s unt i m el y f i l i ng ). S u b stan ti al ev id en ce su p p o rts th e a g en cy ’s d en ial o f P alm a- C arrill o ’s w i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l c l a i m be c aus e the unf ul f i l l e d thr e a t s he r e c e i ve d f r om uni de nt i f i e d i ndi vi dua l s c onne c t e d w i th the S e nde r o L um i nos o do notc om pe l the c onc l us i on tha the w a s pe r s e c ut e d ortha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nottha the w i l l be p e r s e c u te d . See N

ah rv an iv. G on zales , 399 F . 3d 1148, 1153- 54 ( 9th C i r . 2005) (f i nd i ng no pastpers ec ut i on or w el l -f ou nd ed fe arof future pers ec ut i on w here appl i cant“ re ce i ved o nl y t el epho ne or w ri tt en threa t s, and n everhad a pers on al confront at i on w i th any of the peop l e threa t eni ng hi m ”) .08- 71121 3 F i nal l y, subst ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni al of re l i ef un der C A T b e c au s e P a lm a - C a rr illo f a ile dto s h o w it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t th a t h e w ill b e to rtu r e d if

r e tu rn e d to P e ru . See N uru v. G on zales , 4 0 4 F .3 d1 2 0 7 , 1 2 2 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) ( e x p l a i n i n g th a t“ t o rtu r e i s m o r e s e v e r e th a n p e r s e c u t i o n ” a n dC AT cl ai m s m ustsa t i sf

y a“ m ore l i kel y than n ot ” burden o f proof). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.