alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6633

KELLY NEWBY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-01-274)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly Newby, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kelly Newby appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Newby v. Angelone, No. CA-01-274 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00180

- CV

Amanda JAFFE , Appellant

v. REPSOL OIL & GAS USA, LLC , Appellee
From the 36th Judicial District Court , McMullen County, Texas Trial Court No. M

- 18

- 0015

- CV

- A Honorable Patrick L. Flanigan , Judge Presiding
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ , JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the joint agreed motion to dismiss appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Each party shall bear its own costs of appeal.
SIGNED October 19, 2022.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Chief Justice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT CY MANN,

Plaintiff - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-

2687-MJG)

Submitted: August 19, 2003 Decided: August 26, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Cy Mann, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Cy Mann appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Mann, No. CA-02-2687-

MJG (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(9)
              - georgia(7)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(34)
              - maine(12)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(11)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(6)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - (-)oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(29)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(18)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Photography        April 17, 2006        Downloading data during a flood on the Williamson River

Photography        January 9, 2021        Columbia River Basalts seen at Steens Mountain, Oregon

Photography        September 27, 2017        Looking downstream onto Hells Canyon Reservoir
Exhibit 13.2











Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of Aeterna Zentaris Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis Turpin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 17, 2015








/s/ Dennis TurpinDennis TurpinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Timothy THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4356

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 19, 2018

Timothy Thomas, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Simon Ridgway, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radius Gold Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

DATED:  June 27, 2008

/s/ Simon Ridgway



Simon Ridgway,

President and Chief Executive Officer
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 E0 03 9 . BRANNER v . J OHNSON et a l

.

Th e Pet i t i o n fo r W ri t o f M a n d a m u s fi led b y Ch arl i e Bran n er Jr. i s h ereb y DENI ED

. 1

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 See Byrd v

. Ro b in s o n , 349 Ga. A p p

. 1 9, 20 (825 SE2d 424) (201 9 ) (“ There may

o c c asio nally ap p ear to be a need to f ile an o riginal petitio n in the [ap p ellate c o u rts] to issu e p ro c ess in the natu re o f man d a m u s , an d perhap s qu o w arranto o r p ro hibitio n,

w here a s u p e r io r c o u rt j u d ge is named as t he resp ond ent. This a p p earanc e is mislea d ing. Su c h p etitio n may be f iled in the ap p ro p riate su p erio r c o u rt. B eing the
resp o nd ent, the su p e rio r c o u rt j u d ge w ill d isqu alif y, ano ther s u p erio r c o u rt j u d ge w ill be ap p ointed to hear and d etermine the matter, and the f inal dec isio n may be ap p ealed

to the [ap p ellate c o u rt] f

o r rev iew

. ” ) (p u nc tu atio n o m itted ). December 19, 2023

12/19/2023
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 106628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1075 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-838, K2025-839.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30817 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
George P. CARTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-5198

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 28, 2019

George P. Carter, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit** **11.1**

 

**Computation of Earnings per Share**

 

|                               |   | **March 31, 2006** |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
| **Basic:**                         |   |               |
|                               |   |               |
| Net Income                         |   | $36,831            |
|                               |   |               |
| Average shares:                    |   |               |
| Common shares issued               |   | 93,769,177         |
| Average shares outstanding         |   | 93,769,177         |
|                               |   |               |
| Net income per common share, basic |   | ($0.00)            |
|                               |   |               |
|                               |   |               |
| **Diluted:**                       |   |               |
|                               |   |               |
| Net Income                         |   | $36,831            |
|                               |   |               |
| Average shares:                    |   |               |
| Common shares issued               |   | 102,285,677        |
| Average shares outstanding         |   | 93,769,177         |
|                               |   |               |
| Net income per common share, basic |   | ($0.00)            |
|                               |   |               |
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Miguel Cabredo Benites, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: June 23, 2011





SIGNATURE:
/s/ Miguel Cabredo BenitesTITLE: Chief Financial Officer





This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F. This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20121

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

RICARDO CAMPUZANO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

H-99-CR-567-1

June 28, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant Ricardo Campuzano-Martinez (“Campuzano”) appeals his

conviction after a guilty plea for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326,

which prohibits a person who has been previously deported from

being present in the United States without consent of the Attorney
2

General. We affirm.

Campuzano’s indictment, filed September 22, 1999, alleged that

he, “an alien previously deported and removed from the United

States, was found present in the United States at Houston, Texas,

without having obtained the consent of the Attorney General of the

United States to apply for readmission into the United States.”

Campuzano moved for dismissal of the indictment, contending that it

failed to allege that he committed any act or had the requisite

specific or general intent. Campuzano then pleaded guilty, without

having obtained a ruling on his motion to dismiss the indictment.

On appeal, Campuzano challenges the sufficiency of his

indictment, which challenge we review de novo. See United States

v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233, 236 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Campuzano contends that his indictment does not charge an

offense because it fails to allege any mens rea. The statute under

which Campuzano was indicted and convicted requires that a

defendant have general intent to re-enter the United States, which

mens rea may be inferred from the fact that the defendant was

previously deported and subsequently found in the United States

without consent of the Attorney General. United States v. BerriosCenteno, ___ F.3d ___, 2001 WL 435494, *3 (5th Cir. April 27,

2001). The indictment in the instant case is almost identical to

the indictment found sufficient in Berrios-Centeno. Id. at *4 n.4.

We conclude that Campuzano’s indictment sufficiently alleged the
3

general intent mens rea required in § 1326 offenses. 

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Campuzano’s conviction.

AFFIRMED.
M.B., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4299

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 17, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Because M.B. has failed to serve an initial brief as provided by this court's order of December 12, 2018, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(112)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(36)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(30)
              - multimedia_video-149197(4)
              - news_news-149245(4)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Illustrations        June 17, 2022        Installing natural infrastructure can impact the water and carbon budgets of dryland streams and watersheds
Naylor SCOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 14, 2019

Naylor Scott, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Frederick KOEHLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1629

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 27, 2018]

Frederick Koehler, Miami, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Taylor and May, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David A. Wilson
---------------------------------
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - (-)products_data(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(20)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(11)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - kansas(3)
              - maine(3)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(1)
              - (-)new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(12)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Data Release        January 20, 2022        Data and shapefiles used to document the floods associated with the January and March 2018 Nor'easters for Coastal Areas of New England (ver. 2.0, November 2021)

Real-time Data        October 1, 2020        New England Below Normal 28-day average streamflow compared to historical streamflow for the day of year