alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Motorsports and
Entertainment Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William R. Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

August 16, 2004                         /s/ William R. Donaldson

                                        William R. Donaldson
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained
by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statements (Form S-8, No. 333-63638, 333-104136 and 333-145537) pertaining to The Princeton Review, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-77016) pertaining to The Princeton Review, Inc. 401(k) Employee Savings Plan 

of our report dated March 30, 2007, except for Notes 2, 14 and 18 as to which the date is March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of The Princeton Review, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP 

New York, NY 

March 17, 2008
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(38)
              - products_data(12)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(98)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - (-)news_news-149250(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(7)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(4)
              - florida(4)
              - georgia(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maryland(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - (-)new york(2)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Story        September 9, 2021        USGS Crews Work Fast to Capture Critical Flooding Measurements in the Mid-Atlantic

Featured Story        October 10, 2017        USGS Tracks Evolution of a Fire Island Hurricane-Made Breach
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe have issued our reports dated March 15, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingincluded in the Annual Report of Origen Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of Origen Financial, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-127931), effective September 14,2005, Form S-11 (File No. 333-112520), effective May 25, 2005 and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121279), effective December 15, 2004./s/ GRANTTHORNTON LLPSouthfield, Michigan
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of PetCARE Television Network,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Donald R. Mastropietro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Donald R. Mastropietro
--------------------------
Donald R. Mastropietro
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00548-CR

Eduardo Mora-Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-12-301539, HONORABLE JIM CORONADO, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

In the above cause, the State’s brief was originally due on September 3, 2014, and the

State has been granted two extensions, for a total of 60 days. The State has now filed a third motion

for extension of time, seeking an additional 30 days to file the brief, which would make the brief

due on December 3, 2014. We grant the motion, extending the deadline to the following Monday,

December 8, 2014. No further extensions will be granted.

It is ordered November 14, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Do Not Publish
Dion GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3037

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 10.12

                    LETTER AGREEMENT FOR CHINA JOINT VENTURE

Savoy Resources Corp. (Savoy) and a group of companies (ACS) consisting of ATAC
Resources Ltd. (ATAX), Cash Minerals Ltd. (Cash) and Strategic Metals Ltd.
(Strategic) hereby agree to form a joint venture to recognize resource
opportunities in China, acquire prospective targets and explore those
acquisitions.

During the target recognition phase, participation and funding shall be 50%
Savoy and 50% ACS.  Once a prospective target is acquired Savoy will have the
right to buy 50% participation and one of the ACS companies will have the right
to the remaining 50% participation.  The participating ACS company will be
determined based upon the main commodity at the acquired target.  ATAC will have
first right to gold targets, Cash to energy and industrial mineral targets and
Strategic to other metal and gemstone targets.

If at any time one of the joint venture members is unable or unwilling to
fulfill its obligations, its participating interest shall be diluted according
to the following formula.

                                contibutions by non-participating party
                                ---------------------------------------
participating interest =        total contributions by participating and
                                     non-participating parties

If an ACS company elects not to participate or to sell its interest, another of
the ACS companies will have the first right to participate in its place
or purchase that that interest.  If any party's participating interest dilutes
below 10% its participating interest shall automatically convert to a net profit
royalty interest in the joint venture.

All decisions by the joint venture shall be by majority with the voting rights
proportional to the participant's interest.  In case of a tie vote concerning
funding of a project, the party proposing the larger program shall have the
right to institute that program at its own expense if the other partner declines
to participate at that level.  A non-participating partner's interest will not
be diluted until the entire amount of the proposed expenditures is completed.
The partners agree that Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Limited shall be the
operator of the joint venture.

The joint venture shall be subject to the laws of British Columbia.  Should any
dispute arise concerning this Agreement, the parties agree to refer it to an
arbitrator for binding resolution.

Dated this 22nd day of January 2004 at Vancouver, B.C.



/s/ Savoy Resources Corp.
-------------------------
Savoy Resources Corp.

<PAGE>


/s/ ATAC Resources Ltd.
-------------------------
ATAC Resources Ltd.


/s/ Cash Minerals Ltd.
-------------------------
Cash Minerals Ltd.


/s/ Strategic Metals Ltd.
-------------------------
Strategic Metals Ltd.


/s/ Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Limited
----------------------------------------------
Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Limited
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(33)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(6)
              - connect_staff_profiles(7)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)massachusetts(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - vermont(1)

## By Year

newsletter        January 6, 2021      WaterMarks Newsletter - 2020
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50616 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALVARO MEMBRANO-ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-616-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alvaro Membrano-Acosta appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Membrano-Acosta contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Membrano-Acosta maintains thatNo. 03-50616 -2- he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Membrano-Acosta acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Stacie DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3289

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

Stacie Davis, Ocala, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30815]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1073 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-836, K2025-837.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30815 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JESSICA DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

EMILY STEPHENS and ROBERT G. STEPHENS,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-2396

[May 20, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; William W. Haury, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 13-

007960.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Benjamin L. Bedard and Jeffrey W. Hurcomb of Roberts, Reynolds, 

Bedard & Tuzzio, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Shameen A. DEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 25, 2019

Shameen A. Dean, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1




SUMMARY SHEET FOR 2008 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




     The following table sets forth the compensation for USEC’s non-employee directors for the term
commencing at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders held on April 24, 2008:



	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer

	 	$200,000 paid at the beginning of
the service year. $80,000 of the
retainer is paid in cash and
$120,000 of the retainer is paid in
the form of restricted stock units,
although a director may elect to
receive a greater proportion of the
retainer in restricted stock units.
Restricted stock units vest on the
first to occur of: (1) one year from
the date of grant, (2) termination
of the director’s service by reason
of Retirement, death or disability,
or (3) a change in control.
	 
	 	 
	Committee Chairman Fees

	 	$20,000 annual fee for Audit,
Finance and Corporate Responsibility
Committee chairman. $10,000 annual
fee for Compensation Committee
chairman. $7,500 annual fee for all
other committees’ chairman.
Committee chairman fees are paid in
cash at the beginning of the service
year, although a director may elect
to receive their committee chairman
fee in restricted stock units.
	 
	 	 
	Incentive Restricted Stock Unit 

Awards

	 	If a director chooses to receive
restricted stock units as payment
for the part of the annual retainer
or chairman fees that they are
otherwise entitled to receive in
cash, he or she will receive an
incentive payment of restricted
stock units equal to 20% of the
portion of the annual retainer and
chairman fees that the director
elects to take in restricted stock
units in lieu of cash. These
incentive restricted stock units
will vest on the first to occur of:
(1) three years from the date of
grant, (2) termination of the
director’s service by reason of
Retirement, death or disability, or
(3) a change in control. Incentive
restricted stock units are granted
at the time the annual retainer is
paid.






     All restricted stock units are granted pursuant to the USEC Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
as amended, and are subject to the terms of such plan and the applicable restricted stock unit
award agreements approved for issuance of restricted stock units to non-employee directors under
the plan. Restricted stock units carry the right to receive dividend equivalent restricted stock
units to the extent dividends are paid by the Company.
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navitone Technologies, Inc., ("Navitone") on Form 10-QSB for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Zuliani, Chief Executive Officer of Navitone, and I, Jerrold A. Wish, Principal Financial Officer of Navitone, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Navitone.

 

Date: August 10, 2005

/s/ Michael Zuliani

Michael Zuliani

Chief Executive Officer 

 

Date: August 10, 2005

/s/ Jerrold A. Wish

Jerrold A. Wish

Principal Financial Officer
---

| | Tel: 604 688 5421Fax: 604 688 5132www.bdo.ca | BDO Canada LLP600 Cathedral Place925 West Georgia
      StreetVancouver BC V6C 3L2 Canada
| | -------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

CounterPath CorporationVancouver, Canada

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 and Form S-8/A (No.333-157036 and No.
333-125812, respectively) of CounterPath Corporation (the Company) of our
report dated July 25, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements
which appears in this Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO Canada LLP

Vancouver, CanadaJuly 25, 2011

BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability
partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by
guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member
firms.

---
Ramon LLERA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Llera, deceased, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

Esther A. Zaretsky of Law Office of Esther A. Zaretsky, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Wendy F. Lumish and Alina Alonso Rodriguez of Bowman and Brooke LLP, Miami, and Francis M. McDonald, Jr., and Courtney M. King of McDonald Toole Wiggins, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
CDC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC as Trustee, Appellant, v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P., Appellee.

No. 1D17-3896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 31, 2018

Ian P. Hudson of King Hudson, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Dariel Abrahamy of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Because Appellant has failed to file the transcript of the bench trial and failed to carry its burden of showing reversible error, we affirm the final judgment. The lack of an adequate record of the proceedings below prevents us from determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence at trial. Therefore, we must affirm. *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee* , 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

AFFIRMED.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
April
        14,
        2006
 
 Mr.
        David
        E.Y. Sama
 Managing
        Director
 Hendon,
        Stamford Hill & Co.
 800
        Second Avenue, 81h Floor
 New
        York,
        New York 10017
 
 Dear
        David:
 
 This
        letter confirms that pursuant to Article X of its Bylaws, Smart Online, Inc.
        will indemnify you, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for
        any and
        all fees and expenses, as defined in Article X of the Bylaws ("Expenses"),
        including but not limited to attorneys' fees incurred by you or on your behalf
        in connection with a proceeding that has been initiated by the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission and any other related proceeding that may arise
        ("Proceeding").
 
 Pursuant
        to Article X of its Bylaws, Smart Online, Inc. further agrees that having
        received an undertaking from you agreeing that you will repay the Expenses
        described herein should it ultimately be determined that you were not entitled
        to indemnification, Smart Online, Inc. will pay Expenses incurred by you
        in
        advance of the final disposition of the Proceeding.
 
 Very
                  truly yours,/s/
                  Dennis Michael NouriDennis
                  Michael NouriPresident
                  and Chief Executive Officer
                Smart
                  Online, Inc.
 
  
  
 UNDERTAKING
 
 Pursuant
        to Article X of the Bylaws of Smart Online, Inc., I hereby undertake and
        agree
        that I will repay any Expenses advanced to me or others on my behalf in the
        event that it ultimately is determined that I was not entitled to
        indemnification under the Bylaws and the law of the State of Delaware. I
        understand that this Undertaking does not and cannot bind third parties,
        such as
        my attorneys, to repay any Expenses paid to them for work done on my behalf.
 
 
 
 By: 
                  /s/ David E.Y. SarnaName:
                  David E.Y. SarnaDated:
                  April 14, 2006