alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, April L. Marino, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinecrest
Services, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or  omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a  significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



Date: November 7, 2005        /s/ April L. Marino
                              ____________________________________________
                              April L. Marino, Principal Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30830]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1081 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-849, K2025-850.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30830 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, * From the County Court

 at Law of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. 142727.

Vs. No. 11-14-00064-CR * July 16, 2015

Lisa Ann Petersen, * Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

we reverse the trial court’s order granting Lisa Ann Petersen’s motion to 

suppress evidence, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings.
Nicole DIETZ, Appellant, v. Ronald DIETZ, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2243

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 10, 2018

Paul W. Darby, of Holden & Darby, P.A., Tavares, for Appellant.

Andrew Graf, of Rohe Twyman, P.A., Winter Garden, and A.J. Rohe III, of Rohe Law, Tavares, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Lenist KEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3213

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 17, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Network Alliance International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Eppie Wong Yuk Ping, CFO and a director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Eppie Wong Yuk Ping



Eppie Wong Yuk Ping,

 CFO and a director

May 13, 2005
Andrew Carl SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 647 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 122
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 647

                          [Report No. 113-525]

  Directing the Secretary of the Treasury to transmit to the House of 
     Representatives copies of any emails in the possession of the 
  Department that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) of 
former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director 
            Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2014

Mr. Stockman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

                             July 17, 2014

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, referred to 
             the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the Secretary of the Treasury to transmit to the House of 
     Representatives copies of any emails in the possession of the 
  Department that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) of 
former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director 
            Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives direct the Secretary of 
the Treasury to transmit to the House of Representatives, no later than 
14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, copies of 
any electronic communication in the possession of the Secretary or the 
Department that was transmitted to or from any electronic mail 
account(s) used by former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations 
Division Director Lois Lerner at any time between January 1, 2009, and 
April 30, 2011.
                                                 House Calendar No. 122

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 647

                          [Report No. 113-525]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Directing the Secretary of the Treasury to transmit to the House of 
     Representatives copies of any emails in the possession of the 
  Department that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) of 
former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director 
            Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 17, 2014

 Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, referred to 
             the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), I, Chris D. North, Chief Financial Officer of Hydril Company, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter-ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |                                       
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 3, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Chris D. North                    
|                      |  |  |  | Chris D. North Chief Financial
Officer

|
|
Anthony J. CIRRUZZO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
REVIVE PHARMACY, INC., et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Aji Kan NAMALA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 30, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10512 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. MARVIN CLARENCE PRESLEY Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CR-99-2-K

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Marvin Clarence Presley appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He argues for the first time on appeal pursuant to Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and United States v. Williams , 343 F.3d 423 (5 th Cir.), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 966 (2003), that his sentence should not have exceeded one year of imprisonment because his underlying conspiracy conviction was only a Class E felony.No. 04-10512 -2- Neither Blakely nor Williams , however, plainly supports the determination urged by Presley either that 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(1) creates an additional aggravated offense for every offense in the United States Code or that the statutory maximum for purposes of felony classification under 18 U.S.C. § 3559 is the top end of an offender’s guideline range, as opposed to the maximum term of imprisonment authorized by the statute. Consequently, Presley has not demonstrated plain error on the part of the district
court. See United States v. Vasquez , 216 F.3d 456, 459 (5th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 11

- 00405

- CR

Lionel GONZALES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004CR1992

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED dismissing the prosecution with prejudice

.

SIGNED August 21 , 2013.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Exhibit 10b-6




DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE GOALS ESTABLISHED IN CONNECTION WITH 2011 FISCAL YEAR OF
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS




The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors of ArvinMeritor, Inc. (“ArvinMeritor”), established a cash performance plan for the three-year performance period ending September 30, 2013 (the “2013 Plan”), and also established targets for the 2011 fiscal year of the cash performance plan for the three year performance period ending September 30, 2011 (the “2011 Plan”) and the cash performance plan for the three year performance period ending September 30, 2012 (the “2012 Plan”), under Section 13 of the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan or, in the case of the 2011 Plan, the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Performance goals for each of the performance plans are based on three one-year targets, which are set at the end of the year for the following year. For the 2011 fiscal year of the 2011 Plan, the 2012 Plan and the 2013 Plan, these targets are based on a targeted Adjusted EBITDA margin that is set at the beginning of the applicable year. For the 2011 Plan, participants can earn from 0% to 200% of his target award, based on actual performance against specified levels. Payouts are also multiplied by the percentage change in the price of ArvinMeritor common stock over the three-year performance period, which may increase the payment finally awarded up to a maximum of 200% of the original amount or reduce it down to a minimum of 50% of the original amount. For the 2012 Plan and the 2013 Plan, participants can earn from 0% to 300% of his target award, based on actual performance against specified levels.




At the end of the three year performance period, the total amount paid will be the sum of the percentages of target award earned for each year.




---
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-14-00279- CV Appellan t, G ulf

Coast Coalition of Cities//Cross-Appellan t, Railroad Com m ission of T exas v. Appellee, Railroad Com m ission of T exas//Cross-Appellee, G ulf Coast Coalition of Cities
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 353 RD JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 1-0 0309 1, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N The parties have filed a joi nt motion reques t i n g t h at t his appea l be dis missed. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: June 20, 2014
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                                                                         |                                                      |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                                                                                    |                                                 |
| Date:                  April 3, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                | /s/ Chi                  Keung                  Wong |
|                                 | Chi                    Keung Wong, Chief                    Executive Officer and Chief                    Financial Officer |

***A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature      that      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement      required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained      by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or      its      staff upon request.***

----
NO. 30052 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
HAWAII STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION and UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS,

AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants,

vs. NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai# i; BARBARA A. KRIEG, Interim Director, Department of Human Resources Development, State of Hawai# i; and KALBERT K. YOUNG, Director, Department of Budget and Finance, State of Hawai # i; Doe Defendants 1-10, Defendants-Appellees/Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT

(CIV. NO. 09-1-1372) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., and Duffy, J., Circuit Judge Ahn in place of Moon, C.J., recused and retired, and Circuit Judge Lee in place of Recktenwald, J., recused, and Acoba, J., dissenting) Plaintiffs-Appellants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants Hawaii State Teachers Association and United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO’s motion for reconsideration is hereby denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai# i, February 3, 2012. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Karen S. S. Ahn /s/ Randal K. O. Lee Electronically Filed Supreme Court 30052 03-FEB-2012 02:32 PM
Daniel WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 17, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                       EXHIBIT 6

             MAXCOM TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARY
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    1999             2000               2001              2002             2002
<S>                                         <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING      10,264,827        11,463,667        13,748,445       134,738,030      134,738,030

NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD                     PS. (261,142.0)   PS. (658,830.0)   PS. (690,340.0)   PS. (732,703.0)   U.S.$ (70,250)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                          PS.      (25.4)   PS.      (57.5)   PS.      (50.2)   PS.       (5.4)   U.S.$   (0.52)
</TABLE>
Emmanuel Forrest LOCKHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 31, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Benjamin Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1185Appellant, Emmanuel Forrest Lockhart, appeals from a judgment and sentence for attempted first-degree murder with a firearm, attempted robbery with a firearm, and burglary while armed. He raises three issues on appeal, as to the first two of which we affirm without discussion.

In his third issue, Appellant asserts that his sentences violate the constitutional prohibition on excessive punishments and we should extend the *Graham v. Florida* , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), line of cases to adult offenders. Appellant urges us to require sentencing courts to focus on offenders' actual mental age on a case-by-case basis given the rationales of the *Graham* line of cases and the neurological research showing that the brain continues to develop until the mid-twenties. We affirm on the authority of *Romero v. State* , 105 So.3d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). *See also**McCray v. State* , 247 So.3d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) ; *Wilson v. State* , 249 So.3d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) ; *Jean-Michel v. State* , 96 So.3d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.