alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-12-00273-CV 

________________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.T. AND J.T.

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 418th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-05-05651 CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 V.G. and J.T. appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to the minor 

children J.T. and J.T. The trial court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that 

statutory grounds existed for the termination and that termination of the parental rights of 

V.G. and J.T. would be in the best interest of the children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 

161.001(1) (D), (E), (2) (West Supp. 2012).

Court-appointed appellate counsel for V.G. and J.T. submitted a brief in which 

counsel concludes that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); In the Interest 

of L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief 
2

presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel served appellants with 

a copy of the Anders brief, moved to withdraw, and requested that appellants be provided 

with an opportunity to file a pro se brief. On August 14, 2012, we notified the parties 

that appellants could file a pro se brief on or before September 4, 2012. Neither appellant 

has filed a pro se brief.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the trial court record. We conclude that no 

arguable grounds for appeal exist, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. 

We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw.1

AFFIRMED.

___________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on September 25, 2012

Opinion Delivered October 18, 2012

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

 

1

In connection with withdrawing from the case, counsel shall inform appellants of 

the result of this appeal and that they have the right to file a petition for review with the 

Texas Supreme Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 53; In the Interest of K.D., 127 S.W.3d 66, 68 

n.3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Christopher Dineen, Chief FinancialOfficer**

 

I, Christopher Dineen, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RadView Software Ltd.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.

 
| Date: August 15, 2005 |                    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | /s/  CHRISTOPHER DINEEN |   |
|                  | Christopher Dineen      |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 105620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30878]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Retromer Function and Alzheimer's Disease.
    Date: February 19, 2025.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 
8B, Rockville, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Michael James Butler, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 496-9666, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 19, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-30878 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Steven MITCHELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2079

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 12, 2018

Steven Mitchell, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00475-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10FD0110

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 25, 2018. The clerk’s record 

was filed July 10, 2018. No reporter’s record or brief was filed.

On January 10, 2019, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

filed a brief on or before February 11, 2019, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no brief or other response. The appeal is ordered dismissed.
2 

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(60)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(5)
              - alaska(9)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(36)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(4)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(15)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(14)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(11)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(15)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(16)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - (-)north carolina(5)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(10)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(17)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(14)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        October 5, 2018        Image of the Week - Hurricane Florence

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

Featured Films and Shorts        May 10, 2011        Connecting People and Urban Streams

Podcasts        May 10, 2011        Connecting People and Urban Streams

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
INTERVIDEO, INC.



EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall Bambrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of InterVideo, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InterVideo, Inc.



Date: March 31, 2006



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Randall Bambrough                                                                 
|Randall Bambrough Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 21.1**   **Subsidiaries of**  **American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.** **Jurisdiction of Incorporation**   American Medical Systems, Inc. Delaware   American Medical Systems Australia Pty. Ltd. Australia   American Medical Systems Benelux B.V.B.A. Belgium   American Medical Systems Canada Inc. Canada   American Medical Systems France S.A.S. France   American Medical Systems Deutschland GmbH Germany   American Medical Systems Iberica S.L. Spain   American Medical Systems UK Limited United Kingdom   AMS Research Corporation Delaware   AMS Sales Corporation Delaware   American Medical Systems Europe B.V. The Netherlands   Thermatrx, Inc. Delaware   AMS – American Medical Systems do BrasilProdutos Urológicos e Ginecológicos Ltda. Brazil   Influence Medical Technologies, Ltd. Israel   Ovion Inc. Delaware   InnovaQuartz Incorporated Arizona   Laserscope California   Laserscope International, Inc. Delaware   Solarant Medical, Inc. Delaware   American Medical Systems Luxembourg S.à.r.l. Luxembourg   Cytrix Israel Ltd. Israel
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERTO ANTONIO MENDIOLA,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00304-CR

Appeal from the

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D01577)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall 

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2019.

MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Visiting Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Palafox, and Massengale, JJ.
1760.

#### Hagins *et al. v.*Blitch, executor.

Hill, C. J.

1. Although a judgment be dormant, under the statute, and has, therefore, lost its lien, it is still a subsisting debt, and the judgment can be renewed, as matter of right, by scire facias or by suit. During the period of dormancy there is no presumption in favor of the ' defendant that the judgment has been paid, but such presumption exists only as to third persons. Civil Code, §5378; *Battle*v. *Shivers,*39 *Ga.*410; *Chambliss*v. *Phelps,*39 *Ga.*386 (2); *Groves*v. *Williams,*68 *Ga.*598 (3).

2. hi a suit to revive a judgment issued from a justice’s court, when the only plea is the general issue, the introduction in evidence of a transcript of the judgment, with entries showing summons and personal service, and the transcript of the fi. fa., with entries of partial payments, would be sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a verdict reviving the judgment on the balance of the debt due thereon. Under the plea of the general issue, the correctness of the debt, satisfaction by payment, or satisfaction by lapse of time, is not in issue. Civil Code, §5053; *Matthews*v. *Bates,*93 *Ga.*318 (20 S. E. 320).

4. The court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*840Appeal, from Bulloch superior court — Judge Rawlings. October 28, 1908.

Submitted May 5, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

*G-. 8. J ohnston, Sines & J ordan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Brannen <& Booth,*contra.
Jymerius Javonte BROWNLEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0322

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 8, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

****

I, Greg Heller, being the Chief Financial Officer of Sea Sun Capital Corporation, certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005.		      - Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made and is not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and		        - Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this amended annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual report.		          - The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:		            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;			
- Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of his/her annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and			       Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;			
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):		
- All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,            					summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and			       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and			
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.		
Dated:  July 15, 2005			_/s/  Greg Heller____________			Greg Heller
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 630 

Recognizing the benefits and importance of music making as an essential 

form of creative expression and expressing support for designating the 

Summer Solstice, June 21, 2014, as Make Music Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Ms. BASS, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. HAHN, Mr. NADLER, 

Ms. CLARKE of New York, and Mr. MEEKS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the benefits and importance of music making 

as an essential form of creative expression and expressing 

support for designating the Summer Solstice, June 21, 

2014, as Make Music Day. 

Whereas the Summer Solstice, June 21, is the first day of 

summer and an appropriate day to annually celebrate the 

myriad of joys and benefits of making music; 

Whereas this event began over 30 years ago in France as 

Feˆte de la Musique, and observations of Make Music Day 

now take place internationally in 800 cities in 110 countries around the world; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVNPROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 630 IH 

Whereas these celebrations have become a global phenomenon 

involving millions of musicians of all styles and skill levels, performing publicly; 

Whereas making music continues to demonstrate the power 

of music as providing enjoyment, building cultural connections, raising social awareness, celebrating history, 

and examining the whole of the human experience; 

Whereas making music inspires people of all abilities, persuasions, and ethnicities to come together to ‘‘just play’’; 

Whereas making music is an integral part of United States 

culture and a chronicle of the Nation’s struggles and triumphs; 

Whereas making music advances learning, enhances the overall educational experience, and contributes to a complete 

education; 

Whereas making music is shown to benefit the well-being of 

people throughout their lives, and that making music 

contributes to a fuller, more satisfying life; and 

Whereas Make Music Day will come to life throughout the 

United States with thousands of events on June 21, 

2014, when musicians of all ages and abilities will perform on streets, sidewalks, stoops, plazas, parks, in group 

lessons, solo performances, instrument circles, musical 

parades, and mass appeal events open to all: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of Make Music 

3 Day to celebrate the national commitment to making 

4 music and the importance of access to music edu5 cation for all children; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVNPROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 630 IH 

1 (2) recognizes Make Music Day organizers and 

2 volunteers across the United States for promoting 

3 Make Music Day and for their efforts in promoting 

4 awareness of the benefits of making music and the 

5 importance of access to music education. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVNPROD with BILLS
Exhibit 11.1

Computation of Earnings per
Share

|                                      |  |                |             |  
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ----------- | -
|                                      |  | March 31, 2008 |            
|                                      |  |                |            
|Basic:                                |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Net loss                              |  | ($             | 184,642     | )
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Average
 shares:                      |  |                |             |  
|Common shares issued                  |  |                | 101,190,146 |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Average shares outstanding            |  |                | 97,226,805  |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Net income
 per common share, basic   |  | ($             | 0.00        | )
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Diluted:                              |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Net Loss                              |  | ($             | 184,642     | )
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Average
 shares:                      |  |                |             |  
|Common shares issued                  |  |                | 113,556,646 |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Average shares outstanding            |  |                | 97,226,805  |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|                                      |  |                |             |  
|Net income
 per common share, diluted |  | ($             | 0.00        | )
|                                      |  |                |             |  

---