alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc.
      (“Camelot”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert P. Atwell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Camelot Entertainment
      Group, Inc. and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc..













*/s/
      Robert P. Atwell*


Robert
      P.
      Atwell


Chief
      Executive Officer






May
      15,
      2006




















**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc.
      (“Camelot”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      George Jackson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Camelot Entertainment
      Group, Inc. and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc..











*/s/George
      Jackson*


George
      Jackson


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      15,
      2006
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of Directors
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bienvenida Pichardo, Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>James Layton Koenig, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Donald A. Miles, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2017, after a nonjury trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment (Donald A. Miles, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2017, reversed, with $25 costs, and matter remanded for a new trial.</p><p>Plaintiff retained defendant, an attorney, to represent her son in an appeal of a criminal conviction, and, pursuant to the terms of a written retainer agreement, plaintiff paid defendant a flat fee of $25,000. Plaintiff subsequently commenced this action against defendant seeking a refund of the fee on the ground that defendant failed to perform the services he was hired to perform. After trial, Civil Court dismissed the action. Although the court found that defendant could not establish the number of hours he expended on the underlying criminal matter, the court nonetheless dismissed the case because plaintiff failed to sustain her burden of proof. Upon plaintiff's appeal, we reverse and remand for a new trial.</p><p>As a matter of public policy, courts pay particular attention to the fee arrangement between attorneys and their clients (<i>see Jacobson v Sassower</i>, 66 NY2d 991, 993 [1985]), and even when it is the client who commences an action to recover a portion of the attorneys' fees paid, it is the attorney who must shoulder the burden of demonstrating the fair and reasonable value of the services rendered (<a href="../2014/2014_50223.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Superior Sleep Servs., Inc. v Diana Brodstein, Attorney at Law, P.C., </i>42 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50223[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th and 13th Jud Dists 2014];<a href="../2007/2007_51494.htm" target="_blank"><i> Jones v Wright</i>, 16 Misc 3d 133</a>[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51494[U] [App Term, 9th and 10th Jud Dists 2007]). Thus, in order to properly adjudicate this matter, the trial court was required to determine the reasonable value of the services performed by defendant in the underlying criminal matter and the portion, if any, of the retainer fee to be returned to the <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>plaintiff (<i>see generally Markard v Markard</i>, 263 AD2d 470 [1999]. Since the court failed to make such determination and appears to have improperly placed the burden of establishing the reasonable value of the legal services rendered upon plaintiff-client, we reverse and remand for a new trial.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: December 14, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Derrick Tyrone GRANTLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

Derrick Tyrone Grantley, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Ronald WILLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3507

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Ronald Willard, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
John MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS AMENDED AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned officer of XXX Acquisition Corp. ( hereinafter the "Company") hereby certifies to such officer’s knowledge that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), as filed with the  securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: July 21, 2011
By:
/s/ Marcia RosenbaumMarcia RosenbaumChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 13.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003, of Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (the "Company") as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the
date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Pedro Richards,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: July 13, 2004

                                                      /s/ Pedro Richards
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Pedro Richards
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and will be retained by Grupo
Financiero Galicia S.A. and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon
request.
Keith Dwayne FULLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4351

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                     Pinecrest Services, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Pinecrest Services, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
        ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.




Date:   August 8, 2005             /s/ April L. Marino
                                   ____________________________________
                                   April L. Marino
                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: February 27, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ross A. LonghiniName:
    
    Ross A. LonghiniTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer,Executive Vice President andChief Operating OfficerDate: February 27, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark A. HeggestadName:
    
    Mark A. HeggestadTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IWO Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Robert W. Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Piper                  
|Robert W. Piper                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|November 1, 2004
Louis L. ROEDER, Appellant, v. ORANGE TREE MASTER MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2018

Peter R. McGrath, of Peter R. McGrath, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Matt G. Firestone, of Shuffield, Lowman & Wilson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
J.P., Father or L.P. and E.P., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1867

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020045EN.01007901.xml

| 10.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/79

---

Action brought on 20 November 2019 – Austria Tabak v EUIPO – Mignot & De Block (AIR)

(Case T-800/19)

(2020/C 45/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Austria Tabak GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and R. Ahijón Lana, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mignot & De Block BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark AIR – European Union trade mark No 2 309 110

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2019 in Case R 1665/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Fourth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Fourth Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-32103) of our report dated March 14, 2006, relating to the consolidated financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, of Fisher Communications, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Markal TILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2018]

Markal Tillman, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Taylor and May, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 266 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 266

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 18, 2013.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1947) to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and 
other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2018, and 
for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Agriculture. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise without 
motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant 
to a subsequent order of the House.
    Sec. 2.  Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1797) to amend title 18, United States 
Code, to protect pain-capable unborn children in the District of Columbia, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 
the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113-15 
shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Rashad M. HALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-457

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018.

Rashad M. Hales, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registered
fourth quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 8, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Carmen L. DiersenCarmen L. DiersenTitle: Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
Secretary
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Endeavor

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(6)
              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_publications(52)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(9)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(8)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(10)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Data Release        December 20, 2016        U.S. national categorical mapping of building heights by block group from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForms S-8 (File No.’s 333-67086, 333-101321 and 333-99237)pertaining to RadView Software Ltd.’s Key Employee Share Incentive Plan (1996),United States Share Incentive Plan (2000), and Employee Share ParticipationPlan and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-114308)of our report dated April 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of RadView Software Ltd. and its subsidiaries included inthe Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2005.

|                                       |   |                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| April 10, 2006  Tel-Aviv, Israel |   | Kost Forer  Gabbay & Kasierer  A Member of Ernst & Young Global |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


       CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                               (18 U.S.C. 1350).


THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A KNOWING OR
WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Re: Essential Reality, Inc.


Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, George A. Mellides, the principal
financial officer of Essential Reality, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June
30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


DATED AS OF THIS 16 OF AUGUST 2004


                        /s/ George A. Mellides
                        ---------------------------
                        George A. Mellides,
                        Principal Financial Officer


                                       19