alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sherlyn GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4226

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Gary R. Gossett, Jr., Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(412)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5604)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1087)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(100)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(254)
              - connect_locations(3)
              - connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Animated GIF        July 20, 2023        Lateral Spread
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7416

VARNUM M. KRUMM, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus HOWARD PAINTER, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-89-5) Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 19, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Varnum M. Krumm, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Varnum J. Krumm, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Krumm v. Painter , No. CA-99-89-5 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - (-)products_data(3)
              - products_publications(25)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(12)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(11)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(6)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - kansas(3)
              - (-)maine(3)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - montana(3)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(12)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(5)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Data Release        January 20, 2022        Data and shapefiles used to document the floods associated with the January and March 2018 Nor'easters for Coastal Areas of New England (ver. 2.0, November 2021)

Real-time Data        October 1, 2020        New England Below Normal 28-day average streamflow compared to historical streamflow for the day of year

Data Release        August 26, 2021        Results of peak-flow frequency analysis and regionalization for selected streamgages in or near Maine, based on data through water year 2019
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dominic Burns, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Dominic BurnsDominic
      Burns
                Chief
      Executive Officer





August
14, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1074 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-837, K2025-838.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30816 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Robin TIBBITTS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. B. JONES INVESTMENTS, LLC D/B/A Runaway Country-Space Coast Music Festival and Runaway Country, LLC, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Case No. 5D17-2987

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

Richard Whittington, of Richard Whittington, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Allan P. Whitehead and Erika McBryde, of Frese, Whitehead & Anderson, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105108-105109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30846]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 26, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 543 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 105109]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-862, K2025-863.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30846 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 13.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Maxcom TelecomunicacionesS.A. de C.V. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”),I, René Sagastuy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
Date: June 29, 2005                                                       /s/ RENE SAGASTUY   René Sagastuy   Chief Executive Officer
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 18, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 0761 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 18627

________________ 

### 5979 Alton Road Land Trust Dated August 8, 2020 , Appellant,

vs. 

### Stav Software, LLC , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, David C. Miller , Judge.
Armstrong Teasdale LLP, and Eleanor T. Barnett and Marlon J. Weiss
, for appellant.

Omar K. Ibrahem, P.A., and Omar K. Ibrahem, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and MILLER , JJ.

LOGUE, C.J.

T he appellant appeals the denial of its motion for attorney’s fees based
upon an offer of judgment. As the appellee correctly argues, however, wh ile2

t he offer may be construed as accomplishing this end, it does not , as
expressly required by the rule, “state that the proposal resolves all damages
that would otherwise be awarded in a final judgment in the action in which
the proposal is served.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442(c)(2)(B). See Knapp v. Harling
, 374 So. 3d 880, 882 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2023) (“The problem here for Appellee is
that his settlement proposal didn't state that it would resolve ‘all damages’ in
the action.”).

Affirmed.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 639 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (S. 815) to prohibit employment 

discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2014 

Mr. POLIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (S. 815) to prohibit 

employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (S. 815) to prohibit employment dis4 crimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender 

5 identity. All points of order against consideration of the 

6 bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All 

7 points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. 

8 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

9 the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 

10 without intervening motion except one hour of debate 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 639 IH 

1 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

2 minority member of the Committee on Education and the 

3 Workforce and one motion to recommit. 

4 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

5 the consideration of S. 815. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Certificate of Trust of Radian Group Capital Trust I



 EXHIBIT 4.10 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 RADIAN GROUP CAPITAL TRUST I 
  
 This Certificate of Trust of Radian Group Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), dated as of August 12, 2004, is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801, et seq.). 
  
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is “Radian Group Capital Trust I.” 
  
 2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-1600. 
  
 3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the
trustees of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
individual capacity, but solely as Property Trustee
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher Monigle


	Name:	 	Christopher Monigle
	Title:	 	Authorized Signer
	
	  
 WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
individual capacity,
but solely as Delaware Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher Monigle


	Name:	 	Christopher Monigle
	Title:	 	Authorized Signer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Chen, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:
      March 10, 2009
              By:
              /s/ John ChenJohn
      ChenTitle:
      Director and Chief Financial
Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Donald Lee LEGER, Jr.

No. 2017-KP-0416

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. MARY**

Writ denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Justice Crichton.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

Crichton, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons:

I would grant and docket the State's application to answer two significant questions of law before allowing the post-conviction evidentiary hearing, which will require a substantial expenditure of time and resources, to proceed in this matter. First, this court has never squarely addressed the standard by which a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to assert a *Batson* challenge during jury selection would be evaluated, or whether such a claim is even cognizable on state collateral review. Second, this court has yet to articulate a standard to determine whether the state's ability to respond to an application for post-conviction relief has been materially prejudiced by events not under the control of the State which have transpired since the date of the original conviction. *See* La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(B). Both of these issues are presented here, and I believe that in the interest of economy this court should address them before allowing post-conviction proceedings to continue.
The Honorable John F. Nangle, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1811

_____________

Jessie Buchanan, also known as *

Jesse Buchanan, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Bob Bretherick (originally sued as * Appeal from the United States

Bob Breathrick), * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Defendant - Appellant, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Troy White; Crittenden County, *

Arkansas, *

*

Defendants, *

*

Dick Busby, *

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: March 13, 1998

Filed: March 25, 1998

_____________

Before BOWMAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and

NANGLE, District Judge.1
The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the

2

Eastern District of Arkansas, acting pursuant to the consent of the parties in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Jessie Buchanan won jury verdicts on his claim that his jailer denied him

adequate medical care in violation of the Constitution, and on the sheriff's counterclaim

for the cost of Buchanan's incarceration. The District Court entered judgment on the 2

verdicts. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs and oral arguments on

appeal, we conclude the District Court's judgment is correct, and affirm without further

comment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financial
officer and principal accounting officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

| | 1. | This 10-Q report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and                                                                 
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in this 10-Q report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of AlphaRx, Inc.



/s/ Marcel
Urbanc Marcel Urbanc Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer May 14, 2010

---
# U nite d S tates C ourt of A pp eals F or the F irs t Ci rcu it

No. 09-1759

SAM and TONY M., by Next Friend Gregory C. Elliott; CAESAR S., by Next Friend Kathleen J. Collins; DAVID T., by Next Friend Mary Melvin; BRIANA, ALEXIS, CLARE, and DEANNA H., by Next Friend Gregory C. Elliott; and DANNY and MICHAEL B., by Next Friend Gregory C. Elliott; for themselves and those similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. DONALD L. CARCIERI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Rhode Island; JANE A. HAYWARD, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Executive Office of Health & Human Services; and PATRICIA MARTÍNEZ, in her official capacity as Director of the Department of

Children, Youth and Families, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on June 18, 2010, is amended as follows: On p. 3, n.1, line 9: replac e " Danny and Michael M." with Danny and Michael B."; On p. 18, n.10, line 7: replace "dully" with "duly".