alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 458 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 15, 2014. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

3547) to extend the application of certain space launch liability provisions through 2014, with the Senate amendments 

thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of 

any point of order, a single motion offered by the chair of 

the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 

House: (1) concur in the Senate amendment to the title; and 

(2) concur in the Senate amendment to the text with an 

amendment inserting the text of Rules Committee Print 113– 

32 (as modified by section 6 of this resolution) in lieu of the 

matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate. The Senate 

amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The 

motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question. 
2 

•HRES 458 EH 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of the motion specified in the 

first section of this resolution, House Concurrent Resolution 

74 shall be considered as adopted. 

SEC. 3. The chair of the Committee on Appropriations 

may insert in the Congressional Record not later than January 16, 2014, such material as he may deem explanatory of 

the Senate amendments and the motion specified in the first 

section of this resolution. 

SEC. 4. On any legislative day during the period from 

January 17, 2014, through January 24, 2014— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 5. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 4 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

SEC. 6. The modification referred to in the first section 

of this resolution is as follows: page 363, strike lines 12 

through 16 and insert the following: 
3 

•HRES 458 EH 

‘‘(1) COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION.— 

Section 1413a(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

‘‘(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘, with 

adjustment under paragraph (2) of section 

1401a(b) of this title to which the member would 

have been entitled (but without the application of 

paragraph (4) of such section),’ after ‘under any 

other provision of law’; and 

‘‘(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘whichever is applicable to the member.’ and inserting 

‘with adjustment under paragraph (2) of section 

1401a(b) of this title to which the member would 

have been entitled (but without the application of 

paragraph (4) of such section), whichever is applicable to the member.’.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Geraldine BLAKELY and Christopher Blakely, Appellants, v. FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a Frontline Insurance, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1511

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

Kramer Green Zuckerman Greene & Buchsbaum, P.A., and Robert I. Buchsbaum (Hollywood), for appellants.

Jay M. Levy, P.A. and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

***ON PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR***

PER CURIAM.

Geraldine and Christopher Blakely (the "Blakelys") appeal a non-final order compelling them to participate in appraisal in their first-party property insurance dispute with First Protective Insurance Company ("FPIC"). Pursuant to FPIC's commendable partial confession of error, we hereby reverse the trial court's order compelling appraisal before conducting an evidentiary hearing.1*See**Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Abbott*, 63 So.3d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), *citing**1201*Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Maytin*, 51 So.3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) ; *Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Galeria Villas Condo. Ass'n, Inc.*, 48 So.3d 188, 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). We therefore remand this cause for further proceedings, including a properly noticed evidentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

1

We dismiss the remaining assignments of error, without prejudice for the Blakelys to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the event they fail to obtain rulings on the pending discovery motions prior to the evidentiary hearing on remand. *See**Lakeshore Townhomes Condo. Ass'n v. Bush*, 664 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) ("While mandamus is not available to compel a judge to rule a particular way, it is appropriate to compel some ruling.").
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - (-)products_maps(5)
              - products_publications(80)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(7)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(5)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(4)
              - connecticut(1)
              - (-)georgia(5)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(12)
              - iowa(2)
              - kentucky(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(4)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

map        September 4, 2012        Flood-inundation maps for Suwanee Creek from the confluence of Ivy Creek to the Noblin Ridge Drive bridge, Gwinnett County, Georgia

map        October 14, 2015        Flood-inundation maps for South Fork Peachtree Creek from the Brockett Road bridge to the Willivee Drive bridge, DeKalb County, Georgia

map        June 25, 2012        Flood-inundation maps for Peachtree Creek from the Norfolk Southern Railway bridge to the Moores Mill Road NW bridge, Atlanta, Georgia

map        August 7, 2012        Flood-inundation maps for Sweetwater Creek from above the confluence of Powder Springs Creek to the Interstate 20 bridge, Cobb and Douglas Counties, Georgia

map        August 20, 2015        Flood-inundation maps for Big Creek from the McGinnis Ferry Road bridge to the confluence of Hog Wallow Creek, Alpharetta and Roswell, Georgia
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 413 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 73
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 413

                          [Report No. 113-265]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3350) to authorize health 
  insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale current individual 
  health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential 
     health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2013

   Mr. Burgess, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3350) to authorize health 
  insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale current individual 
  health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential 
     health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3350) to authorize health 
insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale current individual 
health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential 
health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 73

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 413

                          [Report No. 113-265]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3350) to authorize health 
  insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale current individual 
  health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential 
     health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Order entered October 11 , 2012 

In The 

Court of appeal 

jr iftb 71Diotritt of Texao at Matfao 

No. 05-12-00926-CR 

HERNAN FRAIRE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F09-23600-T 

ORDER 

The reporter's record is overdue in this appeal. We have received correspondence from 

court reporter Bridget Barnhill that appellant has not designated the record. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived 

of the reporter's record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason. 

o The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the 

appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute 

this appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect. 

o If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without 

payment of costs for the reporter's record. If appellant is entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. 

Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such 

measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may 
include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not 

indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. 

o The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court 

reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter's 

explanation for the delay in filing the reporter's record; and (3) the earliest date by 

which the reporter's record can be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order. 

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier. 

LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3406

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Vance Campbell, also known as * Richard Huff, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 6, 2005 Filed: April 13, 2005

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges

___________ PER CURIAM. Vance Campbell appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1), and 846. Campbell argues that the drug-quantity calculation violated Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), that the entire federal Sentencing Guidelines should be held unconstitutional, and that the case-2- should be remanded for resentencing under an indeterminate sentencing scheme. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the district court. The Supreme Court recently decided in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), that the reasoning in Blakelyapplies to the federal Sentencing Guidelines, and therefore that “any fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of guilty . . . must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.” See id. at 756. The district court’s drug-quantity determination did not implicate Campbell’s rights, however, b ecause he stipulated to the drug quantity in his plea agreement. See id. Campbell was unconstitutionally sentenced, over his objection, under a mandatory Guidelines system. See id. at 756-57 (federal Sentencing Guidelines are merely advisory). We conclude, however, that he cannot show reversible error because the district court specified that it would impose a sentence within the Guidelines range even if the Guidelines were held to be not binding, and Campbell was sentenced at the bottom of the undisputed Guidelines range. See United States v. Sayre , No. 04-1330, 2005 WL 544819 at *2 (noting that, whether sentence was reviewed for plain error or harmless error, affirmance was appropriate because ultimate inquiry was whether district court’s error in following nonmandatory sentencing scheme affected defendant’s ultimate sentence, and it was clear district court wanted to impose sentence it felt appropriate on the undisputed facts, making any remand futile); cf. Williams v. United States , 503 U.S. 193, 202-03 (1992) (when district court misapplies Guidelines, remand is required unless reviewing court determines, on basis of whole record, that error is harmless, i.e., error did not affect district court’s selection of sentence imposed). Finally, although Campbell does not specifically raise the issue, we find that his sentence was not unreasonable. See Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 764-67.-3- Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - multimedia_webcam(10)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(10)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(8)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - (-)south carolina(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        October 3, 2018        USGS science on a map of the Carolinas after Hurricane Florence

Charts or Graphs        September 16, 2018        As Florence rains, rivers keep rising, submerging some USGS instrument
1.
    
    I have reviewed the annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form
20F/A, of Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de C.V.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    SIGNATURE:
    
    /s/ Jose Antonio Solbes

TITLE: Chief Financial Officer
1 District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting

by designation. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 93-3102

_____________________________________

FLO ZELDA WATTS, A MENTALLY INCOMPETENT PERSON by Richard E. Franklin, her Curator, Guardian

and Conservator,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WILLIAM RICE LUMMIS as the Provisional, Temporary and Co-Administrator of the Succession for Howard R. Hughes, Jr.;

deceased; William Rice Lummis, Et Al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

______________________________________________________ (January 14, 1994)

On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for

Rehearing En Banc

Before REAVLEY and DAVIS, Cir cuit Judges, and Trimble 1

, District Judge.

BY THE COURT:

The appellant's petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en

banc are denied.

The appellant's petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc

pro mpt us to impose further sanctions because of the legally

baseless claims she has relentlessly urged and continues to urge in

this appeal. Sanctions were imposed in a previous suit involving2

virtually identical claims, see Ganoe v. Lummis

, 662 F.Su pp. 718

(S.D.N.Y. 1987), aff'd

, 841 F.2d 1116 (2d Cir. 1988), cert. denied

,
487 U.S. 1206, 108 S.Ct. 2848 (1988), and we imposed double costs

after summarily rejecting this appeal. The motions currently urged

by the appellant are frivolous and only serve to multiply and

prolong this vexatious litigation. We therefore impose sanctions

in the amount of $3,500 jointly and severally against appellant and

her attorneys, Dennis L. Tomlin and E. Lynn Singleton, and in favor

of appellee Lummis pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(38)
              - products_data(12)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(98)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(7)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - (-)new york(7)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(6)
              - 2023(1)

staff profileAmy Edwards Simonson

staff profileRobert Francis Breault

staff profileChristopher L Gazoorian

staff profileRonald Busciolano

staff profileChristopher E Schubert

staff profileWilliam Capurso

staff profilePaul Misut, PE (NY)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - (-)products_maps(4)
              - products_publications(47)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(4)
              - connecticut(1)
              - georgia(5)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(12)
              - iowa(2)
              - kentucky(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - (-)utah(4)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1974        Map showing flood and surface water information in the Sugar House quadrangle, Salt Lake County, Utah

map        January 1, 1972        Map showing drainage basins and historic cloudburst floods in the Salina quadrangle, Utah

map        January 1, 1989        Map showing 1983 landslides in Utah

map        January 1, 1978        Channel migration of the White River in the eastern Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado