alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                           WEST GEORGIA NATIONAL BANK

April 11, 2002

Steven J. Haack
2375 Grant Place
Villa Rica, Georgia 30180

         RE:     WEST GEORGIA NATIONAL BANK ("WGNB") EMPLOYMENT OF STEVEN J.
                 HAACK ("EMPLOYEE")

Dear Mr. Haack:

         The purpose of this letter is to set forth the new terms upon which
WGNB agrees to employ you and under which you agree to be employed at WGNB. In
that regard, please consult the letter agreement between you and WGNB dated
August 31, 2000. This letter shall be treated as an amendment to that letter
agreement pursuant to the "Miscellaneous" section of that letter agreement. The
letter agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except as amended below:

         TERM. This Agreement is for a term of two years from the above date and
may be extended for one additional year if neither party gives notice of
termination more 90 days before the expiration of the initial term.

         COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS. From the time you agree to the terms of this
letter until such time that this letter is amended or such time that your
employment is terminated, WGNB will pay you for your services at a rate of
$95,060 annually. (All other terms of "Compensation and Benefits" from the
letter agreement remain in full force and effect.)

         IMPACT OF TERMINATION CAUSE UPON SEVERANCE COMPENSATION. If you are
terminated without cause you shall receive upon such termination a lump-sum
payment equal to two years compensation, including salary and benefits. (All
other terms of "Impact of Termination Cause Upon Severance Compensation" from
the letter agreement remain in full force and effect.)

         If you agree with the terms of this letter, please signify by signing
below.

                                     Sincerely,

                                     West Georgia National Bank

                                     /s/ L. Leighton Alston

                                     By: L. LEIGHTON ALSTON
                                     Its: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




         Agreed to and accepted, this 26 day of April, 2002.

                                     /s/ Steven J. Haack
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Steven J. Haack
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-Q of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, I, Richard I. Linhart, Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with
         the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of
         1934; and

     (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
         30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Richard I. Linhart
--------------------------------------------------
Richard I. Linhart
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
certification is included solely for the purpose of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not to be used for
any other purpose. In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I,
Robert Slavik, hereby certify in my capacity as an officer of Savoy Resources
Corp. that to my knowledge:

     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Savoy Resources Corp.




Date:  November 15, 2004                By: /s/ Robert Slavik
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Robert Slavik,
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Principal Accounting Officer and
                                            Director (Principal Executive,
                                            Financial and Accounting Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(750)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

## By Year

Satellite imagery        October 6, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Hurricane Ian Aftermath (New Smyrna Beach, FL)

Satellite imagery        February 1, 2024        Landsat 8 Mosaic of Okavango Delta

MOUs        December 15, 2016        MOU between USGS and FEMA - framework (replaces 2011)

Satellite imagery        April 25, 2018        Painting the Desert

Satellite imagery        March 22, 2017        Outburst

Satellite imagery        August 31, 2009        Algerian Sahara
Jordeth Lee GRAVES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1385

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
Addendum to 6 August 1982 Insulin Agreement, dated May 18, 2004



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Addendum to 6 August 1982 Insulin Agreement 
  
 This Addendum of May 18, 2004 (“Effective Date”) to the Insulin Agreement (as defined below) is entered into between Novo Nordisk
A/S, a Danish corporation having a principal place of business at Novo Alle, DK-2880, Bagsvaerd, Denmark (“Novo Nordisk”) and ZymoGenetics Inc., a Washington Corporation having a principal place of business at 1201 Eastlake Avenue East,
Seattle, Washington 98102 (“ZGI”). 
  
 WHEREAS: 
  

	 	(A)	ZGI (formerly known as Zymos Corporation) and Novo Industri A/S (the predecessor corporation to Novo Nordisk) entered into an insulin agreement dated 6 August 1982 (“Insulin
Agreement”) relating to recombinant production of human insulin and an amendment agreement dated 13 March 1987 (“1987 Agreement”) 

  

	 	(B)	Under the Insulin Agreement ZGI would receive part of the cost reduction realised by Novo Nordisk due to the shift from semi-synthetic to recombinant production of human insulin.


  

	 	(C)	ZGI and Novo Nordisk desire to specify in this Addendum the methodologies that have been applied to date and the methodologies to be applied from the Effective Date for calculating
payments pursuant to the Insulin Agreement. 

  
 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS
HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 
  

	1.	The provisions of Clause 1(f) and Exhibit B of the Insulin Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof as if fully set out herein.


  

	2.	For the purposes of calculation of Cost Reduction under the Insulin Agreement the parties agree that: 

  

	 	a)	The Variable Costs of the Novo Method have been and will continue to be the Variable Costs of DKK [] per MU insulin, (as determined in 1987) and such Variable Costs have been (since
1987) and will continue to be increased by []% per annum or by []% of the total increase in the Danish wholesale price index during each preceding period of 24 months, whichever is the greater. The parties agree that the Variable Costs of the Novo
Method will not be the actual Variable Costs in any given year. 

  

	 	b)	The Variable Costs of the Zymos Method have been and will continue to be the Variable Costs of DKK [] per MU insulin, (as determined in 1987) and such Variable Costs have been
(since 1987) and will continue to be increased by []% per annum or by []% of the total increase in the Danish wholesale price index during each preceding period of 24 months, whichever is the greater. The parties agree that the Variable Costs of the
Zymos Method will not be the actual Variable Costs in any given year. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Novo Nordisk and ZGI have caused this Addendum to be executed in their names by their properly and
duly authorized officers or representatives 
  

			
	 NOVO NORDISK A/S
	 	 ZYMOGENETICS, INC.

		
	 /s/ Jesper Brangaard, CFO

	 	 /s/ James A. Johnson, CFO


	 Name:
	 	 Name:

	 Title:
	 	 Title:

		
	 NOVO NORDISK A/S
	 	 
		
	 /s/ Kare Schultz, COO

	 	 
	 Name:
	 	 
	 Title:
	 	 

  

 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         624,770
<DEPRECIATION>                               (337,456)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,191,241
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,584
<OTHER-SE>                                   (893,863)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,962
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,831,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,826,174)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,826,174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,826,174)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.A****CERTIFICATION**I, Lisa A. Stewart, certify that:1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of El Paso Exploration & ProductionCompany;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. Date: March 17, 2006         */s/ Lisa A. Stewart*   Lisa A. Stewart   President and Chief Executive Officer
Chester C. PELT, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2845

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 19, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The appellant's motion to treat appeal as a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
H. Res. 589 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 20, 2014. 

Resolved, That following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the House 

of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Messer. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00764-CV

Ronald GUTIERREZ Individually, R.G.&C. Automotive, Inc., and G&C Total Care, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Joceline NOLLKAMPER,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-13097

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF PROSECUTION. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellants.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**Report of IndependentAuditors**

 

 

To the Board of Directorsof AmeriCredit Corp.

 

 

Re:                 Sale and Servicing Agreement related to AmeriCreditAutomobile Receivables Trust 2003-B-X as of and for the year ended December 31,2003

 

 

We have examined management’sassertion about AmeriCredit Corp. and its subsidiaries’ (the “Company”)compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the MortgageBankers Association of America’s *Uniform Single Attestation Program for MortgageBankers*, to the extent such procedures are applicable, as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2003 included in the accompanying managementassertion (Exhibit I).  Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicingstandards.  Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination.

 

Our examination was made inaccordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary inthe circumstances.  We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination of the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company has complied with the aforementioned minimumservicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 30, 2004

 

----

 

Exhibit I

 

 

AmeriCredit Financial Services,Inc.

801 Cherry Street, Suite 3900

Fort Worth, Texas  76102

 

Management’s Assertion Concerning Compliancewith USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

 

 

March 30, 2004

 

 

As of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. has complied in allmaterial respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in theMortgage Bankers Association of America’s Uniform Single Attestation Programfor Mortgage Bankers (“USAP”), to the extent such procedures are applicable.

 

 
| /s/ Preston  A. Miller                 |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Preston A.  Miller                     |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| AmeriCredit  Financial Services, Inc.  |

 

----
A.T., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-372

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gerardo MONSIVAIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1511

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. DiGuilio*, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).
Shelly Gail GIBSON and Affordable Assets Real Estate Co., a Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. KINGS POINT SIGNATURE REAL ESTATE, LLC, and Ben Schachter, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1848

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 13, 2018]

Gary P. Lightman of Lightman & Manochi, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Brian H. Koch of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Kings Point Signature Real Estate, LLC.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.85



May 24, 2005



|                        |  |                                        
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Joseph Corbett          |  |                                        
|Chief Financial Officer |  |                                        
|BearingPoint, Inc.      |  | Independent Contractor Letter Agreement



Dear Joe:



Effective May 25, 2005, you agree to be available as an independent contractor, on an as
needed basis, to assist BearingPoint, Inc. in the transition of your role as Chief Financial Officer. In this role you will perform duties related to the financial affairs of BearingPoint, Inc., until either party terminates this agreement. You
commit to working, as needed, and at the direction of the Chairman of the Audit Committee, subject to the termination provision below. You agree to provide reasonable assistance and cooperation to BearingPoint, Inc. in the preparation for,
responding to, and giving of testimony associated with, legal proceedings brought by or against third parties by BearingPoint, Inc., including, but not limited to, claims, investigations, inquiries, disputes and other such proceedings.



You will invoice BearingPoint, Inc. monthly at an hourly rate equivalent to an annual
salary of $500,000 (i.e. $240.00/hour). BearingPoint, Inc. will maintain, for you, access to its email system, and two laptop computers, and will reimburse you for pre-approved business related expenses in accordance with BearingPoint, Inc. policy.



We agree that at no time will you or BearingPoint, Inc., in any way disparage
or discuss the other party or its successors, and current or former agents, officers, services, or employees in a derogatory manner. Both of us are free, of course, to respond truthfully to inquiries from a governmental agency, such as the Internal
Revenue Service, the SEC, or courts of competent jurisdiction including, but not limited to, a subpoena or court order.



Either party may terminate this arrangement at any time, for any reason, upon five (5) days prior written notice. All fees and approved expenses incurred will be
invoiced and due within 5 days of receipt. In the event either party terminates this agreement, your commitment and availability to provide reasonable assistance with legal proceedings, as above referenced, shall continue subject to the same terms
as to payment, hourly rate, and expense reimbursement as specified above.



|                        |  |  |  |         |  |                   
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------- |  | ------------------
|Sincerely,              |  |  |  |         |  |                   
|                        |  |  | 
|/s/ Harry You           |  |  |  |         |  |                   
|Harry You               |  |  |  |         |  |                   
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |         |  |                   
|BearingPoint, Inc.      |  |  |  | Agreed: |  | /s/ Joseph Corbett
|                        |  |  |  |         |  | Joseph Corbett