alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1921

LYNN HOWARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES ARMY; DONALD RUMSFELD, Secretary

of Defense; KATHRYN R. REPPERGER; IRENE

MORRISON; MARK KARRAKER; USA POSTAL GROUP

EUROPE; US GOVERNMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-03-1368-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynn Howard, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Dennis

Edward Szybala, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,

Virginia; Matthew Paul Ruzicka, UNITED STATES ARMY, Arlington,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

 Lynn Howard appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. United

States Army, No. CA-03-1368-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 7 & entered June

9, 2004). We deny the motion filed by attorney George R. Royer to

appear on Howard’s behalf as counsel pro hac vice as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
JOINDER AGREEMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 12, 2004



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 JOINDER AGREEMENT 
  
 The undersigned hereby agrees, effective as of the date hereof, to become a party to that certain Operating Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated as of April 12, 2004 by and among Pioglobal First Russia, LLC (the “Company”), its Board of Directors, Pioglobal Omega, LLC, Andrei Uspensky, and any other unit holder, warrant holder or option holder who from time to time
becomes a party to the Agreement by execution of a Joinder Agreement. The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that the undersigned will be included within the meaning of the term “Restricted Unit Holder” as defined and used in the
Agreement. 
  
 As a condition to accepting the undersigned as a
Member and Restricted Unit Holder, as those terms are defined and used in the Agreement, the Company and the undersigned agree that Section 8.7(b) of the Agreement shall be amended with respect to the undersigned as follows: 
  
 The reference to “January 1, 2003” in Section 8.7(b) shall be
replaced with “the date of the grant of such Call Securities”. 
  

									
				
	 May 19,2004
	 	 	 	 	 	/s/    DMITRY LARIN        
	 Date
	 	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Dmitry Larin
 Sign name on signature line and print name
 legibly below signature.)

				
	 	 	 	 	 Address:
	 	 119415 Moscow
 Leninsky Prospekt 116-1-47

				
	 	 	 	 	 Telephone:
	 	 7-095-784-1036

	 	 	 	 	 Facsimile:
	 	 7-095-960-2905


  
 Acknowledged and agreed to:

  

			
	 PIOGLOBAL FIRST RUSSIA, LLC

		
	 By:
	 	/s/    DONALD H. HUNTER        
	 Name:
	 	Donald H. Hunter
	 Title:
	 	Vice President and Treasurer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(20)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(14)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(25)
              - colorado(10)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(7)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(35)
              - maine(13)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(15)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - (-)new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(13)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(6)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(30)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(21)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(12)

## By Year

Photography        May 1, 2023        Jeremiah Pomerleau looks at high water marks from the Flood at Saco River near Conway, NH

Photography        December 21, 2023        High-Water Mark in Plymouth, New Hampshire

Photography        December 7, 2017        Surveying for the FEMA project
Exhibit 6.1



MAXCOM TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A.B. de C.V.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                                             |  | Year Ended December 31, |         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------
|                                                                             |  | 2011                    |         
|                                                                             |  |                         |         
|                                                                             |  |                         |         
|                                                                             |  |                         |         
|Weighted average shares (Basic EPS) U.S. GAAP                                |  |                         | 789,819 
|Weighted average shares (Diluted EPS) U.S. GAAP                              |  |                         | 812,882 
|Net (loss) Income under U.S. GAAP for basic computation                      |  |                         | (536,959
|Preferred stock dividend under US GAAP not available for common shareholders |  |                         | —       
|Amount allocated to preferred shareholders                                   |  |                         | —       
|Net (loss) Income under U.S. GAAP for dilutive computation                   |  |                         | (536,959
|Basic EPS U.S. GAAP                                                          |  |                         | (0.68   
|Diluted EPS U.S. GAAP                                                        |  |                         | (0.68   
|Weighted average shares (Basic EPS) MFRS                                     |  |                         | 789,819 
|                                                                             |  |                         |         
|Weighted average shares (Diluted EPS) MFRS                                   |  |                         | —       
|Net (loss) Income under MFRS for basic computation                           |  |                         | (536,457
|Net (loss) Income under MFRS for dilutive computation                        |  |                         | (536,457
|Basic EPS MFRS                                                               |  |                         | (0.68   
|Diluted EPS MFRS                                                             |  |                         | (0.66
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Silvergraph International, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies:  (i)The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  DATE:   November 12, 2010/s/ JAMES R SIMPSONJames R. SimpsonChief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silvergraph International, Inc. and will be retained by Silvergraph International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Dewayne MONTGOMERY v. GARRY LEWIS PROPERTIES

NO. 2018-C-1585

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(42)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_slideshow(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149210(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - california(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - (-)kansas(2)
              - north dakota(1)

## By Year

file        July 1, 2007        The Year Streamflow Records Fell - 2007 Floods in Kansas

Newsletters        April 6, 2023        Kansas Water Science Center Presents: Science Seminar Series Ecological Drought: Indicators of Vulnerability and Risk for Riverine Ecosystems
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Aeterna Zentaris Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis Turpin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 27, 2012



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis Turpin                                
|                                                 
|Dennis Turpin, CA                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Roberto RODRIGUEZ a/k/a Orlando Rodriguez, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 6, 2018

Roberto Rodriguez a/k/a Orlando Rodriguez, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Roberto Rodriguez ("Orlando Rodriguez") appeals an order summarily denying, without a response from the State, and without attaching any documents in support of denial, his "petition for correction of name." He seeks to correct record documents relating to his criminal conviction and sentence which show his name as "Roberto Rodriguez" when he is, in fact, Orlando Rodriguez.

In its response filed in this appeal, the State concedes that the trial court's summary order of denial should be reversed and the case remanded for a ruling on the merits of Mr. Rodriguez' petition. We agree. *See**Howard v. State*, 139 So.3d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (reversing trial court's summary order of denial of defendant's motion to correct record and remanding for consideration of motion on the merits). Accordingly, we hereby reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing to occur, within ten days and pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(a) and *Howard*, on the merits of Mr. Rodriguez' petition for correction of name.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.
IN RE: Connie M. EASTERLY A/K/A Connie M. Eversberg

NO. 2018-B-2090

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

*587ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Connie M. Easterly a/k/a Connie M. Eversberg, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Connie M. Easterly a/k/a Connie M. Eversberg, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26278, be and she hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(30)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(118)
              - (-)products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(18)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(14)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - (-)washington(1)

## By Year

Software Release        April 13, 2017        Pedestrian Evacuation Analyst Tool
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 HLI OPERATING COMPANY
 RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Unaudited)
(Millions of dollars except ratios)
 Year Ended
    
    
    Year Ended
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4 Months
    
    
    Year ended
    
    
    Year endedJanuary 31,
    
    
    January 31,
    
    
    8 Months Ended
    
    
    Ended
    
    
    January 31,
    
    
    January 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    January 31, 2004
    
    
    May 31, 2003
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings:Earnings (loss) before taxes on income, minority interest,
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and
extraordinary gain
    
    $
    (462.6
    )
    
    $
    (45.4
    )
    
    $
    (31.6
    )
    
    $
    28.2
    
    
    $
    (73.0
    )
    
    $
    (375.1
    )Interest expense:Bank borrowings and long-term debt
    
    
    66.4
    
    
    
    51.3
    
    
    
    41.8
    
    
    
    21.6
    
    
    
    72.7
    
    
    
    175.2New Preferred Stock dividends
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Rentals (1)
    
    
    5.6
    
    
    
    6.2
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    0.3
    
    
    
    9.4
    
    
    
    10.3Earnings (loss) before interest expense, New Preferred Stock
dividends, taxes on income, minority interest, cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle and extraordinary
gain
    
    $
    (389.8
    )
    
    $
    12.9
    
    
    $
    15.2
    
    
    $
    50.1
    
    
    $
    9.1
    
    
    $
    (189.6
    )Fixed charges:Bank borrowings and long-term debt
    
    $
    66.4
    
    
    $
    51.3
    
    
    $
    41.8
    
    
    $
    21.6
    
    
    $
    72.7
    
    
    $
    175.2New Preferred Stock dividends
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    0.8
    
    
    
    0.5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Rentals (1)
    
    
    5.6
    
    
    
    6.2
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    0.3
    
    
    
    9.4
    
    
    
    10.3Total fixed charges
    
    $
    72.8
    
    
    $
    58.3
    
    
    $
    46.8
    
    
    $
    21.9
    
    
    $
    82.1
    
    
    $
    185.5Ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    2.29
    
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    N/A
    (2)Coverage deficiency on fixed charges
    
    $
    462.6
    
    
    $
    45.4
    
    
    $
    31.6
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    $
    73.0
    
    
    $
    375.1
 
 (1)
    
    Estimated interest component of rent expense.(2)
    
    Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

s0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

140975

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140975 COA: 296825 Oakland CC: 2001-177540-FC ANGELO JOE AMADOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the April 8, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Miguel Angel VARGAS-SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2919

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2018

Miguel Angel Vargas-Santiago, Perry, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
1379.

#### Brunswick *&*Western Railroad Company *v.*Hart Lumber Company.

Complaint, -from city court of Nashville — Judge Peeples. August 31, 1908.

Submitted November 24, 1908.- —

Decided July 31, 1909.

*JJendriclcs & Christian,*for plaintiff in error.

*Buie & Knight,*contra.

Russelx., J.

1. The original answer was not subject to the objection that it stated no defense.

2. Where this court held that one paragraph of the answer was subject to a special demurrer filed as to it, and the judgment of this court was made the judgment of the court below, by formal order entered on the remittitur, the effect was to strike the paragraph from the plea. This, however, did not preclude the defendant from filing subsequently a new amendatory plea or answer, in which the defense he had originally sought to set up was amplified and made more definite.

3. Tlie special demurrer to the amendment was itself not sufficiently specific.

*Judgment affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(67)
              - (-)products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(7)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(2)
              - (-)pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Data Visualization        September 14, 2023        Hurricane Ida: USGS Response in Pennsylvania to September 1-2, 2021, Flooding Related to Remnants of Hurricane Ida

Data Visualization        February 15, 2023        Pennsylvania Flood Data for Rapid Deployment Network Site Selection
Exhibit 32.1

Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dale E. Messick, Interim President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: March 31, 2011



|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DALE E. MESSICK                                                                        
|Dale E. Messick Interim President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)