alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(38)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(221)
              - products_software(2)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(25)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(4)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(60)
              - multimedia_video-149194(48)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - multimedia_webcam(3)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_other_news(12)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(2)
              - (-)california(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(2)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(4)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(7)
              - texas(12)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

State News Release        May 29, 2024        New tool informs flooding and sea level rise solutions for San Francisco Bay Area

State News Release        December 11, 2014        Media Advisory: Accompany a USGS Field Crew as they Measure Stream Flow and Flooding in Storm-Affected Areas of Northern California

State News Release        January 10, 2017        Reporters: Accompany a USGS field crew as they monitor stream flow and flooding

State News Release        January 8, 2017        Reporters: Accompany a USGS field crew as they monitor stream flow and flooding

State News Release        July 27, 2015        Media Advisory: Cascadia Quake and Orphan Tsunami — Public Lecture
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ASSETS TRUST 2006-6, Mortgage Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-6, Appellant, v. William F. NOLL, III, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2848

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 4, 2019

A. Donald Scott, Jr. of Clarfield, Okon, Salomone & Pincus, Orlando, for Appellant.

Louis D. D'Agostino and Maria Vigilante of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

ATKINSON, Judge.

*362Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ("Deutsche Bank") appeals the final judgment awarding William F. Noll, III, the attorney's fees and costs that he incurred as a prevailing party after he obtained a final summary judgment dismissing Deutsche Bank's foreclosure case. Deutsche Bank successfully appealed that underlying judgment in case number 2D16-5635. As such, because Mr. Noll is no longer the prevailing party and no longer entitled to an award of fees and costs on that basis, we must reverse. *See**U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n for CSFB Heat 2006-7 v. Tranumn*, 234 So.3d 871, 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (citing *Marty v. Bainter*, 727 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ("Once a final judgment is reversed and remanded by an appellate court, there can be no prevailing party for purposes of an award of prevailing party attorney's fees. Consequently, an award of attorney's fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed.") ).

Reversed and remanded.

SILBERMAN and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(6)
              - alaska(19)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(17)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(65)
              - colorado(12)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(8)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(8)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - louisiana(17)
              - maine(9)
              - maryland(13)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(4)
              - new hampshire(7)
              - new jersey(10)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(11)
              - north carolina(7)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(15)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(13)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(9)
              - u.s. virgin islands(5)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(17)
              - (-)wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

publication        April 19, 2017        Variable effects of climate on forest growth in relation to  climate extremes, disturbance, and forest dynamics

Featured Films and Shorts        November 16, 2010        Designing for natural channel reconstructions, Villa Mann Creek
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


Mindspeed
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each
of the following persons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth
below, to the form of Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2008:


 


Najabat H. Bajwa


 


Kurt F. Busch


 


Jing Cao


 


Ron Cates


 


 Raouf Y. Halim


 


Gerald J. Hamilton


 


Bret W. Johnsen


 


Thomas J. Medrek


 


Thomas O. Morton


 


Thomas A. Stites


 


Preetinder S. Virk


 


The
multiple set forth in Section 6(i) (B) of the Employment
Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and the multiple set forth in Section 6(i) (B) of
the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated March 31, 2006, except for the sixteenth paragraph of
Note 12 as to which the date is April 13, 2006 of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC,
in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-00000) and related Prospectus of
The Majestic Star Casino, LLC dated May 19, 2006.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Las Vegas, Nevada
May 17, 2006



<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated March 30, 2005, except for the twenty-second paragraph
of Note 1 as to which the date is April 5, 2005 of the historical financial
statements of Trump Indiana, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No.
333-00000) and related Prospectus of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC dated May 19,
2006.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 17, 2006






<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated February 25, 2005 of the historical financial statements
of Buffington Harbor Riverboats, L.L.C. in the Registration Statement (Form S-4
No. 333-00000) and related Prospectus of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC dated May
19, 2006.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
May 17, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report ETELCHARGE.COM, INC. (the “ ***Company*** ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ ***Report*** ”),
      I,
      Carl O. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




/s/
      Carl O. Sherman


Carl
      O.
      Sherman


Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer


Dated:
      May 12, 2006
IN RE: Michael S. SEPCICH

NO. 2018-OB-1783

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

ON APPLICATION FOR READMISSION

PER CURIAM

This proceeding arises out of an application for readmission to the practice of law filed by petitioner, Michael S. Sepcich, a disbarred attorney.

**UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY**

Petitioner submitted false billing for work he did not perform in connection with the representation of his clients. He self-reported his misconduct to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") and sought help from the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program ("JLAP") to treat his alcohol abuse. He then joined with the ODC in submitting a petition for interim suspension, which we granted. After considering a joint petition for consent discipline, we disbarred petitioner, retroactive *589to July 9, 2010, the date of his interim suspension. *In re: Sepcich* , 15-0709 (La. 5/22/15), 165 So.3d 914.

In March 2018, petitioner filed an application for readmission with the disciplinary board, alleging he has complied with the readmission criteria set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24(E). The ODC took no position regarding the application for readmission. Accordingly, the matter was referred for a formal hearing before a hearing committee.

Following the hearing, the hearing committee recommended that petitioner be readmitted to the practice of law, subject to the condition that he comply with his JLAP recovery agreement and that JLAP provide periodic reports to the ODC. Neither petitioner nor the ODC objected to the hearing committee's recommendation.

**DISCUSSION**

After considering the record in its entirety, we find petitioner has met his burden of proving that he is entitled to be readmitted to the practice of law on a conditional basis. Accordingly, we will order that petitioner be readmitted to the practice of law, subject to the condition that he comply with his JLAP recovery agreement and that JLAP provide periodic reports to the ODC.

**DECREE**

Upon review of the recommendation of the hearing committee, and considering the record, it is ordered that Michael S. Sepcich, Louisiana Bar Roll number 24877, be immediately readmitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the condition that he comply with his JLAP recovery agreement and that JLAP provide periodic reports to the ODC. Should petitioner fail to comply with this condition of readmission, his conditional right to practice may be terminated immediately, or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, as appropriate. All costs of these proceedings are assessed against petitioner.
Exhibit 32.1

Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kent A. Murphy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

March 26, 2010



/S/    KENT A. MURPHY,
PH.D.Kent A. Murphy, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Curtis J. Clawson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Curtis J. Clawson
----------------------
Curtis J. Clawson
President and Chief Executive Officer

April 19, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A), AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gail P. Seneca, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Luminent Mortgage
Capital, Inc. (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and we have:a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: March 3, 2004 By:
  
    /s/ GAIL P. SENECAGail P. SenecaChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 470 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 470

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 4, 2014.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3590) to protect and enhance opportunities for recreational hunting, 
fishing, and shooting, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 
waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
STATE of Louisiana v. David PATTERSON

No. 2018-KH-0065

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

CHRISTOPHER B. JONES,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2870 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 1 DB 2022

Attorney Registration No. 64689

(Lackawanna County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2022, having received no response to a

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Christopher B. Jones is placed on temporary 

suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He shall comply 

with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to 

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order are specifically 

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 

402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.
**Exhibit 23.0**

Consent of Crowe Chizek and Company LLC 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Number 333-72140, 333-102670, and 333-101508 on Form S-8 of FirstFederal Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2006 appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of First Federal Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/S/    CROWE CHIZEKAND COMPANY LLC

Crowe Chizek and Company LLC 

Oak Brook, Illinois 

March 27, 2006