alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(7)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(12)
              - (-)district of columbia(1)
              - florida(9)
              - georgia(7)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(34)
              - maine(12)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(11)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(6)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(29)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(18)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Photography        August 4, 2020        Measuring streamflow on Rock Creek after Hurricane Isaias
Exhibit 99.1

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification

The
undersigned hereby certify that this Form 10-Q quarterly report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods presented in the report.

|/s/J.B. SHERWOODJames B. Sherwood Chairman
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)      |  | /s/J.G. STRUTHERSJames G. Struthers Vice
PresidentFinance
and Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             |  |                                                                                       
|/s/S.M.C. SHERWOODSimon M.C. Sherwood President
(Co-Chief Executive Officer) |  |                                                                                       
|Dated:  May 15, 2003                                                         |  |                                                                                       

[A
signed original of this written certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd.
and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

29

---

QuickLinks
NEW LINE INVESTMENTS, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. OH CAPITAL COLLECTIONS, LLC, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1648

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

Upon consideration of respondent's motion for appellate attorneys' fees, it is ordered that said motion is conditionally granted and remanded to the trial court to fix amount.

Petitioners' motion for attorneys' fees is hereby denied.

SUAREZ, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc.
(“Camelot”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, George Jackson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Camelot
Entertainment Group, Inc. and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of Camelot Entertainment Group,
Inc.






May 20,
2009




/s/ 
George Jackson





George
Jackson


Chief
Financial Officer
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 14 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00295

- CV

LIVE OAK UNITS, LLC, ERIC DARNELL HOPKINS AND SHEILA A. TENISON , Appellant s

V. GARY FLEMING, TRUSTEE OF TEXAS QUEST FUNDING TRUST

-

GF112211

- 107, 108, 109, AND 110 , Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 41906

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed A pri l 12, 20 20 . No clerk’s record has
been filed. The cl er k responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant s did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On June 14, 2021 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s
intentio n to dismiss the appeal for want o f prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed. On August 10, 2021
, appellant s w ere ordered to provide t hi s court with proof of payment for the record on or before August 25, 2021

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).
I n the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in dismissal of the appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 3 7.3(b). No response was filed.
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. We dismiss the appeal

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justi ces Wise, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
Andrew MITCHELL, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 7, 2019

Andrew Mitchell, pro se, Appellant.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED.

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 103882-103883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30240]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Licensing Support Network Advisory Review Panel; Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Licensing Support System Advisory Review Panel was 
established by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a 
Federal Advisory Committee in 1989. Its purpose was to provide advice 
on the fundamental issues of design and development of an electronic 
information management system to be used to store and retrieve 
documents relating to the licensing of a geologic repository for the 
disposal of high-level radioactive waste, and on the operation and 
maintenance of the system. This electronic information management 
system was known as the Licensing Support System.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell E. Chazell, Office of the

[[Page 103883]]

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; 
telephone: (301) 415-7469 or at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In November 1998, the Commission approved 
amendments to title 10 Code of Federal Regulations part 2 that renamed 
the Licensing Support System Advisory Review Panel as the Licensing 
Support Network Advisory Review Panel (LSNARP). The Licensing Support 
Network (LSN) was shut down in 2011 and the document collection was 
submitted to the Office of the Secretary. The document collection was 
made publicly available in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and 
Management System in August 2016 and contains over 3.69 million 
documents associated the proposed high-level waste facility at Yucca 
Mountain. Membership on the Panel will continue to be drawn from those 
whose interests could be affected by the use of the LSN document 
collection, including the Department of Energy, the NRC, the State of 
Nevada, the National Congress of American Indians, affected units of 
local governments in Nevada, the Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force, and 
nuclear industry groups. Federal agencies with expertise and experience 
in electronic information management systems may also participate on 
the Panel.
    The NRC has determined that renewal of the charter for the LSNARP 
until December 16, 2026, is in the public interest in connection with 
duties imposed on the Commission by law. This action is being taken in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act after consultation 
with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of December, 2024.
Russell E. Chazell,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-30240 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1

March 15, 2006

Mittal Steel USA
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the financial statements of Mittal Steel USA as of December 31,
2005, and for the year ended December 31, 2005, included in your Annual Report
on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our
report thereon dated March 15, 2006, which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the change in accounting for
inventory from the first-in-first-out (FIFO) to the last-in-first-out (LIFO)
method. Note 2(g) to such financial statements contains a description of your
adoption during the year ended December 31, 2005 of the change in accounting for
inventory from the FIFO to the LIFO method. In our judgment, such change is to
an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 627 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 627

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 17, 2014.
    Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives request the Senate 
to return to the House the bill (H.R. 4412) entitled ``An Act to authorize the 
programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and for other 
purposes.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.0
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AquaCell Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the second fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.


Date: February 14, 2006                       /s/ James C. Witham
                                     -----------------------------------
                                           Name:  James C. Witham
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 14, 2006                       /s/ Gary S. Wolff
                                     -----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gary S. Wolff
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-30086 Summary Calendar

__________________
CHARLES W. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. TOM NORRIS; MARY COCKERHAM; BURL CAIN, Acting Warden; RICHARD L. STALDER; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. CA-95-1972-A-M1

- - - - - - - - - - April 30, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Robertson moves this court for in forma pauperis status to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Robertson fails to raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Robertson's motion for leave to.............. No.-2- Larry D. Boney moves this

court for in forma pauperis status to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action under 41 U.S.C. § 1983. Boney fails to raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Boney's motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED. proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(751)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - (-)other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

About        February 5, 2024        California's History of Large Storms & Floods

Training Materials        May 10, 2019        Tracking Change Over Time—River Flooding - Teacher

About        November 15, 2023        2023 Quarter 4 USGS Stream Discharge and National Snow and Ice Data Center Data

About        June 9, 2023        River and Coastal Processes Team
The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued pu blished opinions have been appealed to the Supreme Court:

1. Howard Allen Groffel

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0485-18-2 Opinion rendered by Chief Judge Decker on August 20, 2019

2. Ronnie Leon Bryant

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1907-17-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on September 10, 2019The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued p ublished opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Robert McKinley Blankenship

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1366-17-3 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on February 5, 2019 Refused (190299)

2. James Wesley Amonett, Jr.

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1613-17-4 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on February 19, 2019 Refused (190363)

3. Jeffrey Dean Bondi

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1676-17-1 Opinion rendered by Judge O’Brien on March 26, 2019 Refused (190583)

4. Eric William Wandemberg

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0137-18-2 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on April 2, 2019 Refused (190552)The Supreme Court issued opinions in the following cases, whic h had been appealed

from this Court:

1. Latoya Denise Jefferson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0638-17-3 Memorandum opinion rendere d by Judge Malveaux on March 20, 2018 (Delayed appeal awarded by the Supreme Court on August 14, 2018 ) Judgment of Court of Appeal affi rming convictions affirmed; rem anded to

this Court for remand to trial court for determination of amo unt of restitution by opinion rendered on October 24, 2019 (181114)

2. James David Everett, II v. Kathryn Jean Tawes

Record No. 1838-17-1 Memorandum opinion rendered by Ret ired Judge Bumgardner on July 10, 2018 Judgment of Court of Appeal reversed and matter remanded to tri al court for

consideration of the motion to reconsider pendente lite spous al support by opinion rendered on October 31, 2019 (181238)

3. Noah Salim Burnham v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 2018-17-2 CAV petition for appeal denied by Judge O’Brien on July 25, 201 8 Judgment of Court of Appeals a ffirmed in part and reversed in p art and remanded

to trial court for e ntry of a new proba tion violation order r egarding the misdemeanor conviction by opini on rendered on October 31, 201 9 (181096)
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
        1350
 In
        connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of First Northern Community
        Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Louise A. Walker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
        States
        Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that, to my knowledge,
 
 (i)  the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (ii)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




Date:May
                  9, 2007
              
              /s/
                  Louise A. WalkerLouise
                  A. Walker, Sr. Executive Vice President and
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc.
      (“Camelot”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, George Jackson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Camelot
      Entertainment Group, Inc. and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Camelot Entertainment Group,
      Inc..






August
      15, 2007




*/s/George
      Jackson*


George
      Jackson


Chief
      Financial Officer
2060.

#### Varner *et al. v.*The State.

Indictment for assault with, intent to murder, from Sumter superior court — Judge Littlejohn. July 6, 1909.

Submitted October 5, —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*W. M. Harper,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Williams, solicitor-general,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

An indictment for the offense of assault with intent to murder contained the allegation that the defendants “did . ., with certain rocks in their hands held, feloniously and of their malice aforethought, make an assault” upon the person of the prosecutor, and the evidence in support of these allegations was that the injury was inflicted by rocks thrown by the defendants from woods or bushes near the roadside. *Eeld:*(1) This was not a material variance between the allegata and the probata, and the court did not err in admitting the testimony. (2) The verdict of assault and battery was fully supported by the evidence. *Judgment affirmed.*