alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     414,000,000
<SECURITIES>                                112,700,00
<RECEIVABLES>                              614,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                             (143,200,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           443,300,000
<PP&E>                                  13,326,800,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         (1,422,600,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          27,795,200,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,195,900,000
<BONDS>                                 13,753,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    2,054,200,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,700,000
<OTHER-SE>                               9,549,800,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            27,795,200,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,987,900,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              967,800,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           821,900,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         729,100,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (1,817,600,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                33,100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,784,500,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,784,500,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (9.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.63)


</TABLE>
Towanda M. SAVOY v. The STANDARD FIRE INS. CO., et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1805

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Robert P. Atwell and Steven  Istock, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 22, 2010





/s/ Robert P. Atwell


Robert P. Atwell,


Chief Executive Officer and President





Date: November 22, 2010





/s/ Steven  Istock


Steven  Istock,


Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 9, 2007 |  | /s/    ADELENE Q.
PERKINS                                                                         
|                     |  | Adelene Q. Perkins Executive Vice President & Chief Business Officer (Principal financial
officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Rudy TITUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 6, 2018]

Rudy Titus, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Lee Wesson HOPE, Appellant, v. ADVANTAGE TRIM & LUMBER OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-169

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019.

Philip N. Hammersley, and Eric M. Hanson of Norton, Hammersley, Lopez, & Skokos, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant.

Scott K. Petersen, Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
2144, 2145.

#### JONES *v.*THE STATE (2 cases).

As to the suspension of the statute of limitations, the cases are controlled by *Watkins*v. *State,*68 *Ga.*832; and, as to other points, by *Frost*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*3-11 (47 S. E. 901), and *Dozier*v. *State,*107 *Ga.*708 (33 S. E. 418).

Accusations of misdemeanors, from city court of Sandersville— Judge Jordan. August 28, 1909.

Argued October 6,- —

Decided October 13, 1909.

*Goodwin & Evans,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. E. Hyman, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

In one of these cases the defendant was convicted of gaming; in the other, of carrying a concealed pistol. The *804accusations were dated August 7, 1909, and charged the offenses as having been committed on February 15, 1907, but further recited that from that date until August 7, 1909, the defendant had “so concealed himself that he could not be arrested.” The proof was that on February 15, 1907, the defendant and several others were seen by a constable, playing and betting with cards and money. He arrested them and took them before a magistrate and had a warrant issued for them. On the way to jail the defendant escaped, and the officers were not able to rearrest him, until the sheriff of a neighboring county arrested him about August 1, 1909. Pending the first arrest the defendant was searched and a pistol was found concealed upon his person. The question as to the statute of limitations might be troublesome, were it not for the decision in the case of *Watkins*v. *State,*68 *Ga.*832. Under the Penal Code, §30, the statute is suspended if the offender “so conceal himself that he can not be arrested.” Here the defendant was arrested and afterwards escaped. In the *Watkins*case the court ruled: “If after the commission of a crime the offender escapes and conceals himself so that he can not be arrested, the statute of limitations will be suspended during the time for which such concealment continues. Nor does it matter that the offender is arrested, and then escapes and conceals himself before indictment, and avoids a rearrest; such concealment will suspend the statute of limitations.” As to the other points the authorities cited in the headnote are controlling.

*Judgment affirmed.*
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 262 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2023 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. FISCHER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the 

committees of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the commit2 tees of the Senate, together with related materials, be 

3 printed as a Senate document, and that there be printed 

4 250 additional copies of such document for the use of the 

5 Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Keith Anthony Marine v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number s : 01

- 13

- 00668

- CR

01

- 13

- 00669

- CR

Trial court case number s : 1071617

1078980

Trial court: 263rd D istrict Court of Harris County

It is ordered that appellant Keith Anthony Marine’s “ Order Regarding Request for

Rehearing ” filed on November 18, 2013 is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.5 (permitting

additional motions for rehearing after first motion i s ruled upon only when appellate court

modifies judgment, vacates judgment and renders new judgment, or issues different opinion).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting for the Court

Date: November 26, 2013
Francis N. BURGESS, Sr. v. H. Alex TROTTER

2016-CT-01496-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: October 9, 2018 Closed: January 10, 2019

Certiorari - Denied
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Pathogenesis and treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD).                    

*Date:*                         March 5, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institute on Aging, 5601 Fishers Lane, Suite 8B, Rockville, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nesar Uddin Akanda, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer National Institute of Aging, National Institute of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 2E405, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 594-8984,                         *nesar.akanda@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 17, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-30557 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Kaitlynn Louise HARTIGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Simon Ridgway, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radius Gold Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 13, 2005



| |  | /s/ Simon Ridgway
Signature
Name: Simon RidgwayTitle: President
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
Filed 8/12/15 Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). Th is opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

GREAT OAKS WATER COMPANY,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SANTA CLARA V ALLEY WATER

DISTRICT,

Defendant and Respondent. H035885

(Santa Clara County

Super. Ct. No. CV053142)

Plaintiff Great Oaks Water Company (Great Oaks) brought this appeal from the

trial court’s denial of its request for attorney fees i n an action where it secured a judgment

against defendant Santa Clara Valley Water District (District ) based upon the latter’s

allegedly unlawful fixing of a groundwater extraction charge, and allegedly improper

application of the proceeds of the charge. Great Oaks contends that it should have been

awarded its fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, which authorizes

such an award “to a successful party .

. . in any action which has resulted in the

enforcement of an important right affecti ng the public interest,” provided certain

conditions are satisfied. Great Oaks contends that the trial court erred by concluding that

the conditions were not satisfied.

This appeal, h owever, is a companion to the appeal in Great Oaks Water Company

v. San ta Clara Valley Water District , No. H035 260 , in which the District has challenged2

the judgment underlying the application for fees at issue here. By separate opinion in that

matter this court has now reversed the underlying judgment in its entirety. It f ollows that

Great Oaks is no longer “a successful party” for purposes of the statute it relies on here,

and that its claims of error in this matter are therefore moot.

T he order denying the application for attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure

sec tion 1021.5 is affirmed.3 ______________________________________

RUSHING , P.J.

WE CONCUR:

____________________________________

PREMO, J

.

____________________________________

ELIA, J.

Great Oaks Water Company v. Santa Clara Valley Water District

H035885
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(60)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(10)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)north carolina(1)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        May 10, 2011        Connecting People and Urban Streams
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(42)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_slideshow(4)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149210(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(9)
              - georgia(7)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - (-)kansas(5)
              - louisiana(34)
              - maine(12)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(11)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(6)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(29)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(18)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Photography        June 7, 2017        Easton Flood

Photography        September 15, 2016        River Flood

Photography        December 31, 2003        Unfinished Bridge at Lecompton

Photography        August 16, 2012        Chapman Creek

Photography        May 16, 2006        Otter Creek
Exhibit
        13.1
  **Certification
        of the Principal Executive Officers**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  In
        connection with the annual report of Companhia de Bebidas das Américas - AmBev
        (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Luiz
        Fernando Ziegler de Saint Edmond and Miguel Nuno da Mata Patricio ,
        Chief
        Executive Officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  
 (1)
              
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:
        July 5 th ,
        2007
 
 By:
                  /s/ Luiz Fernando Ziegler de Saint EdmondName:Luiz
                  Fernando Ziegler de Saint EdmondTitle:
                  Chief Executive Officer for Latin AmericaBy:
                  /s/ Miguel Nuno da Mata PatricioName:Miguel
                  Nuno da Mata PatricioTitle:
                  Chief Executive Officer for North
                  America
 
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 31, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 31, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0210. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. ADRIENNE DANIELLE

SMITH, et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

14A059222