alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.15





SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.





March 28, 2014





TO:  Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Stephen Day, on behalf of myself and SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF and the 40-F: Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Prefeasibility Study dated September 5, 2012.





Yours truly,/s/ Stephen DayStephen Day, M.Sc., P. Geo.
Artie PERKINS, A/K/A/ Carl Allen, DOC #140792, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 14, 2018.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Fard A. DICKERSON

NO. 2018-KH-0222

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
Susan SNITCOVSKY, Appellant, v. Craig SANGERMAN, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2762

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellant.

Egozi & Bennett, P.A., and Bernard L. Egozi and Isaac S. Lew, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Finding there was no issue of material fact regarding Appellant's defenses, we affirm the summary judgment under review. *Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins*, 914 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) ("In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.") (citations and quotations omitted); *Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank*, 143 So.3d 489, 490 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (Borrower's affidavit of non-receipt of default notice did not create genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment where note required only that notice be mailed and undisputed affidavit established notice was mailed); *Parra de Rey v. Rey*, 114 So.3d 371, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (upholding summary judgment where party failed to establish material issue of fact regarding defense of duress).

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                    EXHIBIT 6
            MAXCOM TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               1999             2000             2001              2002             2003               2003
                               ----             ----             ----              ----             ----               ----
<S>                      <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>               <C>
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON
SHARES OUTSTANDING           10,264,827       11,463,667       13,748,445       134,738,030       175,927,429        175,927,429
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD  PS. (271,526.3)  PS. (685,028.4)  PS. (717,791.4)  PS.  (761,838.9)  PS.  (367,183.0)  U.S.$  (32,667.5)
NET LOSS PER SHARE       PS.      (26.5)  PS.      (59.8)  PS.      (52.2)  PS.        (5.7)  PS.        (2.1)  U.S.$       (0.2)
</TABLE>
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 14 

Amending rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate to include amendments of the House of Representatives in the requirements for identifying 

spending items, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. BUDD, and Mr. DAINES) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Amending rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the Senate 

to include amendments of the House of Representatives 

in the requirements for identifying spending items, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of 

2 the Senate is amended— 

3 (1) in paragraph 2(a)— 

4 (A) in the matter preceding clause (1)— 

5 (i) by striking ‘‘Senate’’; and 

6 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or a message from 

7 the House of Representatives’’ after ‘‘by 

8 committee’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 14 IS 

1 (B) in clause (1)— 

2 (i) by striking ‘‘or joint resolution’’ 

3 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘, joint 

4 resolution, or message’’; and 

5 (ii) by striking ‘‘Senator’’ and insert6 ing ‘‘Member of Congress’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph 3(a)(1), by striking ‘‘Senator’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘Member of Congress’’; 

9 (3) in paragraph 5(a), by striking ‘‘Senator’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘Member of Congress’’; and 

11 (4) in paragraph 7, by striking ‘‘or conference 

12 report’’ and inserting ‘‘conference report, or message 

13 from the House’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Feature Stories

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(7)
              - (-)arizona(4)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(4)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(7)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(16)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(15)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        January 23, 2020        PubTalk 1/2020 — The Rise of the USGS in Space Exploration

Presentations and Events        January 22, 2021        Gearing up for Landing Day—USGS Mars Rover Team (Dr. Ryan Anderson)

Podcasts        October 3, 2019        Outstanding in the Field (Ep 5): Fish in the Grand Canyon

Presentations and Events        March 25, 2021        PubTalk 3/2021 - A Jaguar's Field of Dreams
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 21, 2016

t1214

Order 

Clerk

December 21, 2016

153669-70

In re Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER

_________________________________________

SHERRY BIERKLE, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER,

Appellant,

v SC: 153669

COA: 322996 

Oakland Probate Ct: 

ERNEST LEE UMBLE, 2012-341834-DE

Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

In re Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER

_________________________________________

SHERRY BIERKLE, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER,

Appellant,

and

JOESPH YORK, EDMUND YORK, RONALD

McKEEL, DANIEL McKEEL, GREGORY

McKEEL, MICHAEL SIES, NANCY

SCHREIBER, and TERRI CARTER,

Interested Persons,

v SC: 153670

COA: 322997 

Oakland Probate Ct: 

ERNEST LEE UMBLE, 2012-341834-DE

Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they 

should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1981

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

CARLOS FIGUEROA-CARDONA, a/k/a El Primo, a/k/a Charlie,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Daniel R. Domínguez, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Selya, Lynch and Lipez,

Circuit Judges.

Victor Ramos Rodriguez on brief for appellant.

Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jorge E. VegaPacheco, Assistant United States Attorney, and Nelson PerezSosa, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

September 25, 2000
-2-

Per Curiam. The notice of appeal in this matter

was filed one day late. Still, after a thorough review of

the record and of the parties’ submissions, we find that the

merits of the appeal favor the appellee. Thus, we bypass

the jurisdictional question. See United States v. Woods,

210 F.3d 70 (1st Cir. 2000). We affirm the order of

detention, essentially for the reasons set out by the

district judge in his written order.

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report"), fully
          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                        /s/ Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 30, 2006


                                       82
Stephen A. HAWKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2322

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 2, 2019

Stephen A. Hawkins, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*370The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1

Commencement Date Memorandumto that certain Lease  between  Integrated Telecom Express, Inc.  and  Granum Holdings, A California Limited Partnership

This
Commencement Date Memorandum is entered into to be effective on the 23rd of February, 2001 and is by and between NMSBPCSLDHB, a California Limited Partnership (also known as Granum
Holdings), hereinafter referred to as "Landlord" and Integrated Telecom Express, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Tenant".

Witnesseth

Whereas the Landlord and Tenant have previously entered into a certain Lease dated September 21, 2000 (the "Lease") covering the Premises located at 400 Race Street, San
Jose, California.

Whereas
the Landlord has changed its name to NMSBPCSLDHB, A California Limited Partnership.

Whereas
the City of San Jose has granted a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy effective February 23, 2001.

Whereas
by this Memorandum, the Landlord and Tenant desire to set forth the Commencement Date of the Term of the Lease.

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and covenants herein contained, the Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:

Commencement Date: The Commencement Date of the Term of the Lease shall be February 23, 2001.

Termination: The Termination date of the Lease Term shall be February 22, 2011 (120 months after the Commencement Date).

EXCEPT
AS provided herein, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Lease remain the same and continue to be in full force and effect.

In
witness whereof the Landlord and Tenant have executed and delivered this Commencement Date Memorandum to be effective on the day, month and year first written above.

|Landlord                                      |  | Tenant                          
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|NMSBPCSLDHB, a California
Limited Partnership |  | Integrated Telecom Express, Inc.
|By:                                           |  | /s/ BOB GRANUM                  
|Its:                                          |  | General Partner                 

---

QuickLinks
. . . . . 

j 

-. ‘.. 

. . . . . . . - 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(30)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(118)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(18)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(14)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - (-)washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        September 21, 2015        El Niño and La Niña will Exacerbate Coastal Hazards Across Entire Pacific

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation
STATE of Louisiana v. Chasity ANDREWS

NO. 2019-KK-0068

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

*ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS*

PER CURIAM

Stay lifted; writ granted.

Louisiana C.Cr.P. art. 729.5 confers on the trial court the authority to sanction a discovery violation, providing the court with an array of options. The court may order the offending party "to permit the discovery or inspection, grant a continuance, order a mistrial on motion of the defendant, prohibit the party from introducing into evidence the subject matter not disclosed, or enter such other order, other than dismissal, as may be appropriate." La. C.Cr.P. art. 729.5(A). Although a mistrial is among the sanctions available to a trial court, it is a drastic remedy, and except in circumstances in which the mistrial is mandatory, "is warranted only when a trial court error results in substantial prejudice to the defendant, depriving him of a reasonable expectation of a fair trial." **State v. Harris** , 00-3459, p. 8-9 (La. 2/26/02), 812 So.2d 612, 617.

Under the particular facts of this case, the trial court abused its vast discretion in granting the motion for mistrial. The State has represented in the trial court and in pleadings before this court that it will recall its witnesses for cross-examination in light of the newly produced discovery. As a consequence of the mistrial, the defense has had several days in which to review the newly produced material and prepare its case, alleviating the element of surprise. Under these circumstances, it does not appear that any alleged prejudice suffered by defendant by the late disclosure of allegedly prior inconsistent statements of the victim has substantially compromised defendant's right to a fair trial because the alleged inconsistencies may still be explored.

*1203Accordingly, the writ is granted and the judgment of the trial court is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny.

HUGHES, J., would deny.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Stephen Agress, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Distributors
Holding Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date: November 14, 2006

                        /s/ Stephen Agress
                        --------------------------------------
                        Stephen Agress
                        Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.11 (c)




Wardrop, A Tetra Tech Company





March 31, 2011




TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.  Reference is also made to the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (Registration No. 333-164530, the “F-10”) of the Company which incorporates by reference the information contained in the AIF and the 40-F.





I, Ken Deter, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and Wardrop, A Tetra Tech Company, hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Wardrop, A Tetra Tech Company’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF, the 40-F and the F-10: Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Project, Preliminary Economic Assessment - 2008 dated March 10, 2008.





Yours truly,/s/ Ken DeterKen Deter, P.Eng