alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 14, 2019

Order 

Clerk

February 14, 2019

158141(58)

KAITLIN HAHN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 158141

v COA: 336583

Oakland CC: 2016-152229-NF

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,

and

AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Insurance Alliance of Michigan to 

file an untimely brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on 

February 1, 2019, is accepted for filing.
Rashon SHIRER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, WALLIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit31.1

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

I,Antoine Jarjour, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Perfect Health CareCorp.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly

report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being  prepared;

 

(b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

(c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;

5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:June 17, 2005

/s/Antoine Jarjour

Presidentand CEO

 

----
Philmer JOHNSON, Jr., et al. v. CITY OF WESTLAKE

NO. 2018-CC-1683

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.
Colandro Dewayne PETERS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 12, 2018

Colandro Dewayne Peters, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit** **11.1**

 

**Computation of Earnings per Share**

 

|                                 |   | **March 31, 2008** |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
| **Basic:**                           |   |               |
|                                 |   |               |
| Net loss                             |   | ($184,642)         |
|                                 |   |               |
| Average shares:                      |   |               |
| Common shares issued                 |   | 101,190,146        |
| Average shares outstanding           |   | 97,226,805         |
|                                 |   |               |
| Net income per common share, basic   |   | ($0.00)            |
|                                 |   |               |
|                                 |   |               |
| **Diluted:**                         |   |               |
|                                 |   |               |
| Net Loss                             |   | ($184,642)         |
|                                 |   |               |
| Average shares:                      |   |               |
| Common shares issued                 |   | 113,556,646        |
| Average shares outstanding           |   | 97,226,805         |
|                                 |   |               |
| Net income per common share, diluted |   | ($0.00)            |
|                                 |   |               |
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-118594) for the Company's 2004 Stock
Compensation Plan and Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-115167) for the company's
Dividend Reinvestment Plan of our report dated March 12, 2007 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of PSB Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2006
which appear in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006.


Plante & Moran, PLLC

Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 28, 2007
Bettina GRANDBERRY v. RIH ACQUISITIONS MS II, LLC

2017-CT-00258-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: October 18, 2018 Closed: December 13, 2018

Certiorari - Dismissed.
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of
COL China Online International, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended December 31, 2006, Chi Keung Wong, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated:
February 14, 2007

| | /s/   
Chi Keung Wong Chi Keung Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-11306 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRUZ IZQUIERDO-SALAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CR-34-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Cruz Izquierdo-Salas (Izquierdo) appeals the district

court’s denial of his motion to dismiss a criminal indictment for

illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Izquierdo seeks to collaterally challenge

the prior deportation that served as the basis of his illegal reentry conviction. He argues that the expedited deportation

proceedings before an Immigration and Naturalization Services

(INS) Officer violated his right to due process. 
No. 99-11306 

-2-

This court has held that an expedited deportation proceeding

conducted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1228 does not violate an alien’s

right to due process. See United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte,

186 F.3d 651, 657-59 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct.

838 (2000). Izquierdo does not allege that the INS failed to

comply with § 1228(b)(4). See id. at 658. Nor does he allege

actual prejudice as a result of any procedural irregularities. 

Id. at 658-59. Accordingly, Izquierdo’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
November 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21192 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK EDWARD DEMPSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-02-CR-118-1)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to repre s ent Patrick Edward Dempsey on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the brief, Dempsey’s response, and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is G RANTED , counsel is excused from further
responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED

. S ee

5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.
M.O., Father of S.P., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2796

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 20, 2018

David Maldonado, of The Maldonado Law Firm, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, of Department of Children and Families, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee.

Thomasina Moore, Director of Appeals, and Sara E. Goldfarb, of Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, and Carrington Madison Mead, of Law Office of Carrington Madison Mead, Jacksonville, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

d0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

140266 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140266 

 COA: 287144 

Kent CC: 08-001129-FH 

MARCUS DARRELL TAYLOR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Inyx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Hamerski,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the small business issuer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.


/s/ John Hamerski
----------------------------------------------
John Hamerski
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

April 21, 2005
--------------
Date
Anthony Lorenzo REDDICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2999

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Bankshares, Inc., respectively, certify that, to the best of each
such individuals knowledge and belief, the Annually Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification
except as required by law.



/s/ THOMAS R. ROSAZZAThomas R. RosazzaPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: 3/29/2010



/s/ LORI G. HASSETTLori G. HassettVice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
3/29/2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30443

JOHN THOMPSON

Plaintiff–Appellee

v.

HARRY F. CONNICK, in his official capacity as District Attorney;

ERIC DUBELIER, in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney;

JAMES WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney;

EDDIE JORDAN; in his official capacity as District Attorney;

ORLEANS PARISH DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

Defendants–Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER,

BARKSDALE, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN,

ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

*

PER CURIAM:

This Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the judgment of the district court by

reason of an equally divided vote. See Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 13, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Judge Dennis and Judge Graves did not participate in this decision. *

Case: 07-30443 Document: 00511476774 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/13/2011
No. 07-30443

Cir. 2009) (en banc). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment

of this Court. See Connick v. Thompson, 131 S. Ct. 1350 (2011).

Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the district court for entry of

judgment in favor of Appellants.

2

Case: 07-30443 Document: 00511476774 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/13/2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Michael Lee, as chief executive officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|1. | This 10-Q report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in this 10-Q report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.

/s/ Michael LeeMichael Lee 
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2009

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(27)
              - multimedia_image(17)
              - multimedia_image-141771(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(9)
              - multimedia_video(62)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(56)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_other_news(19)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(3)
              - hawaii(13)
              - oregon(2)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(1)
              - (-)wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

B-roll        September 7, 2017        Excavating the Teton Trench September 2017 - Day 2

B-roll        September 6, 2017        Excavating the Teton Trench September 2017 - Day 1
Larry D. ODUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2724

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 8, 2019

Larry D. Odum, Clermont, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(53)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(12)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(3)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(7)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - 2023(1)

staff profileJanet H Curran

staff profileCharles S Couvillion

staff profileJohn C. Hammond, PhD
Ex-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CORRECTIONS

CORPORATION OF AMERICA 2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, Corrections Corporation of America, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), maintains
the Amended and Restated Corrections Corporation of America 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Board”) may amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Board has determined that Section 8 of the Plan regarding stock option awards to
Non-Employee Directors (as defined in the Plan) should be deleted in its entirety.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of May 27, 2008, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1. Amendment. Section 8 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.



     2. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by the terms of the above
amendment, the provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first
above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John D. Ferguson
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John D. Ferguson 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Executive Officer and President 	 
	 




1