alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(38)
              - products_data(12)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(98)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(7)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(4)
              - connecticut(1)
              - georgia(5)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(12)
              - iowa(2)
              - kentucky(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - (-)new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(4)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

map        July 25, 2012        Flood-inundation maps for the West Branch Delaware River, Delhi, New York, 2012
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Jason Spievak, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CallWave Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.3

       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 of our report dated March 18, 2004,
except for the second, third and fourth paragraphs of Note 1, which appear in
the consolidated financial statements in the Company's Form S-1 dated February
9, 2005 and are not presented herein as to which the date is December 13, 2004;
and except for the revisions of classifications disclosed in Note 2 as to which
the date is March 30, 2005; and except for the reclassifications of operating
segments in Note 17 as to which the date is March 13, 2006, relating to the
consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders' equity and of cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 2003, which appear in Loudeye Corp.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the
references to us under the headings "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
April 5, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 451 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 451

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 7, 2014.
    Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate that a quorum of the 
House is present and that the House is ready to proceed with business.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
ERNST & YOUNG	**Ernst & Young LLP** 	      Phone: (720) 931 4000

Suite 3300	Fax     (720) 931 4444

370 17th Street	www.ey.com

Denver, Colorado 80202 5663

	

Report on Management's Assertion on 

Compliance with the Specified Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the

Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors

Aurora Loan Services Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled            Report of Management, that Aurora Loan Services Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing standards identified in Exhibit A to the Report of Management (the "specified minimum servicing standards") as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during the year ended November 30, 2003. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those specified minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the specified minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the specified minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned specified minimum servicing standards during the year ended November 30, 2003, is fairly             stated, in all material respects.

 

 

Ernst & Young LLP

February 2, 2004
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 2082

MARK DOWNEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00233

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : Dec ember 1 4 , 2023 Decided: December 18, 2023

Before GREGORY and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Mark Downey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-2082 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Mark Downey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to quash a prefiling injunction entered against him in 2019. The district court denied the motion
because Downey, in violation of the prefiling injunction, failed to obtain leave to file his
motion

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Downey v. U.S. Dep’t of Just. , No. 1:19

- cv - 00233

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2023). In addition, we deny Downey’s motions, filed in t his court, to quash the prefiling injunction. We deny as moot the motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-2082 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/18/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 06, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 06, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0122. ILG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, d/b/a ILG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES et al. v. LLOYD DAN MURRAY, JR. et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17V355
Eddie J. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1971

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 29, 2018

Eddie J. Harris, Cross City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32-a


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE


13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





As required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jeffrey A. Craig, hereby certify that:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report of Meritor, Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meritor, Inc.




/s/ Jeffrey A. CraigJeffrey A. CraigChief Executive Officer andPresident





Date: June 2, 2016
Exhibit 32.0  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of First Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1)

The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
covered by the Report.  /s/   James J. SteborJames J. SteborPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/   Cathy D. PendellCathy D. PendellTreasurer   March 30, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(18)
              - products_maps(12)
              - products_publications(68)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(17)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - (-)news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(2)
              - illinois(1)
              - (-)indiana(3)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(4)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(7)
              - texas(12)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

State News Release        June 17, 2015        Media Advisory: USGS Measures Flooding in Indiana

State News Release        June 16, 2016        New USGS Streamgage Aims to Protect Hoosier Lives, Property

State News Release        August 11, 2016        New USGS Streamgages Bolster Protection of Hoosier Lives, Property
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(18)
              - multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(8)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - (-)other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - (-)florida(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

General        September 7, 2021        The Value of U.S. Coral Reefs for Risk Reduction

General        September 5, 2023        22-46. Addressing coastal change hazards with remote sensing
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of XXX Acquisition Corp.. on Form 10-Q for the period from ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date: June 27, 2011

/s/ Marcia RosenbaumName: Marcia RosenbaumTitle: CEO & CFO
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of




Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Dieuvella M. CELESTIN, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Apex Security & Convention Services Inc., Appellees.

No. 1D18-46

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6209** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TIBEL CLARK, a/k/a Felix Johnson , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. C. Weston Houck , Senior District Judge ; Henry M. Herlong, Jr. Senior District Judge . ( 4:01

- cr 00056

- CWH

- 2; 4:04

- cv - 00747

- HMH )

Submitted : June 2 0 , 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN , and D AVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tibel Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney , Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Tibel Clark seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion for reconsideration as a motion pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) , and denying it as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial o f a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitution al claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Clark has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 553 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 553

 Recognizing Linemen, the profession of Linemen, and the contributions 
 of these brave men and women to protect public safety, and expressing 
     support of designation of April 18, 2014, as National Lineman 
                           Appreciation Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

 Mr. Gingrey of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing Linemen, the profession of Linemen, and the contributions 
 of these brave men and women to protect public safety, and expressing 
     support of designation of April 18, 2014, as National Lineman 
                           Appreciation Day.

Whereas the profession of Lineman is steeped in personal, family, and 
        professional tradition;
Whereas Linemen are often first responders during storms and other catastrophic 
        events where these brave men and women work to make the scene safe for 
        the other public safety heroes;
Whereas Linemen work with thousands of volts of electricity high atop power 
        lines 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to keep electricity flowing;
Whereas Linemen must often work under dangerous conditions far from their 
        families to construct and maintain the Nation's energy infrastructure;
Whereas Linemen put their lives on the line every day with little recognition or 
        appreciation from the community regarding the danger of their work; and
Whereas April 18, 2014, would be an appropriate date to designate as National 
        Lineman's Appreciation Day: Now therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the efforts of Linemen in keeping the power 
        on and protecting public safety; and
            (2) supports the designation of National Lineman 
        Appreciation Day.
                                 <all>
```