alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-13825

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-22247-JAL

ROCHELLE DRIESSEN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF 

EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION AND STUDENT SERVICES, 

11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND 

FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JUVENILE DIVISION, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(May 31, 2013)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 12-13825 Date Filed: 05/31/2013 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Rochelle Driessen appeals the district court’s dismissal for frivolity under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) of her Individuals With Disabilities Education Act 

(IDEA) claim. After careful review, we affirm.

On June 15, 2012, Driessen filed suit against the above defendants, alleging 

several IDEA violations. In her complaint, she conceded that a Florida state court 

had terminated her parental rights to her two children and attached a copy of a 

state-court order to that effect. The district court took note and sua sponte

dismissed Driessen’s complaint as frivolous, noting that she had filed two previous 

IDEA lawsuits, both dismissed because she had no parental rights and therefore 

lacked standing to sue under the IDEA, and that her parental status had admittedly 

remained unchanged. This is Driessen’s appeal.

We review a dismissal for frivolity for an abuse of discretion. Miller v. 

Donald, 541 F.3d 1091, 1100 (11th Cir. 2008). “A claim is frivolous if and only if 

it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Id. (internal quotation marks 

omitted). Driessen appealed both of her prior IDEA cases to this court. In the 

first, we affirmed the district court’s dismissal on grounds not relevant to this 

appeal. See Driessen v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., No. 12-11377, 2013 WL 

310055 (11th Cir. Jan. 28, 2013) (unpublished). In the second, we also affirmed, 

holding that Driessen lacked standing because, as someone who did not have

permanent legal guardianship of her children, she was without the authority to 

Case: 12-13825 Date Filed: 05/31/2013 Page: 2 of 3 
3

make educational decisions for her children that is necessary to confer standing to 

assert an IDEA claim. Driessen v. Lockman, No. 12-13277, 2013 WL 1920911

(11th Cir. May 10, 2013) (unpublished). Driessen admitted in her complaint in the 

instant case that she still lacked legal guardianship of her children. Accordingly, 

for the reasons stated in Driessen v. Lockman, we conclude that Driessen’s

assertion of standing to bring this suit “lacks an arguable basis either in law or in 

fact,” Miller, 541 F.3d at 1100 (internal quotation marks omitted), and the district 

court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing her case under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-13825 Date Filed: 05/31/2013 Page: 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(14)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(25)
              - colorado(10)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(7)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(35)
              - maine(13)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(15)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(13)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(6)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(30)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(21)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(12)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        January 1, 2020        U.S. Virgin Islands Coral Reefs and Coastal Hazard Risk Reduction
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF DIGITAL VILLAGE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          43,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,102
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,948)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,102
<SALES>                                            753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   753
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (21,842)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,089)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sherri C.Oberg, certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Acusphere, Inc.;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     [Paragraphomitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC ReleaseNos. 34-47986 and 34-49313];

c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2006

 
|        | /s/ Sherri C. Oberg           |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Sherri C. Oberg               |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(27)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(48)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(13)
              - (-)west virginia(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        January 30, 2024        USACE Huntington Use of USGS Data and Services

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MICHAEL FOLEY, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

MICHELLE PONT, 

Respondent. 

No. 69406 

FILED 

JAN 1 9 2016 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This appeal was docketed in this court on December 18, 2015, 

without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was 

issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice 

further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause 

appearing, this appeal is dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

TRACE K LINDEMAN 

• 

BY: tiK6..1 ( • aWiCiArcc: Hon Linda Marquis, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Michael Foley 

Michelle Pont 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

110-a112 (0) 19C
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - (-)products_data(3)
              - products_publications(41)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(34)
              - multimedia_image-141771(30)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(4)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_other_news(13)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - california(41)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(5)
              - (-)puerto rico(3)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(5)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Data Release        August 6, 2020        Field observations of ground failure triggered by the 2020 Puerto Rico earthquake sequence Web Application

Data Release        June 24, 2020        Inventory of landslides triggered by the 2020 Puerto Rico earthquake sequence

Data Release        July 16, 2021        Multichannel seismic-reflection and navigation data collected using SIG ELC1200 and Applied Acoustics Delta Sparkers and Geometrics GeoEel digital streamers during USGS field activity 2020-014-FA.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 631 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 631

   Supporting the goals and ideals of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2014

Mr. DesJarlais (for himself and Ms. Duckworth) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the goals and ideals of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas more than 5,200,000 people are estimated to live with posttraumatic 
        stress disorder during the course of a given year in the United States;
Whereas women are more likely than men to develop posttraumatic stress disorder 
        during their lifetime;
Whereas according to the Veterans Affairs National Center for Post-Traumatic 
        Stress Disorder, experts believe roughly 11 to 20 percent of veterans 
        who served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring 
        Freedom suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder;
Whereas less than 40 percent of returning military personnel seek assistance;
Whereas as many as 10 percent of veterans who served in the Persian Gulf War and 
        30 percent of veterans who served during the Vietnam era suffer from the 
        effects of post-traumatic stress disorder;
Whereas without treatment, posttraumatic stress disorder can lead to alcohol and 
        drug abuse, flashbacks, heart attacks, depression, suicide, and stroke;
Whereas posttraumatic stress disorder can cause pernicious effects in families 
        and communities;
Whereas raising public awareness of this condition will help facilitate the 
        discovery of effective treatment options, therapies and a cure; and
Whereas the dedication of organizations, researchers, doctors, medical 
        facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and people working 
        across the United States to improve the quality of life of people living 
        with posttraumatic stress disorder should be commended: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and 
ideals of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
Amendment to the C.I.S. Technologies, Inc. HCC Management Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10(xxvii) 
  
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 C.I.S. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HCC MANAGEMENT STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 December 19, 2000 
  
 Section 3(b) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefor: 
  
 3(b) In the event that the Committee shall determine that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Stock, or other
property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the Stock such that an adjustment is
appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of a participant under the Plan, then the Committee shall make such equitable changes or adjustments as it deems necessary or appropriate to any or all of (i) the number and kind
of stock or other securities that may thereafter be issued in connection with the Plan (including without limitation the limitations set forth in Section 3(a) above), (ii) the number and kind of stock or other securities issuable in respect of
outstanding Options, and (iii) the exercise price or purchase price relating to any Option. 
  
 The undersigned certifies this to be a correct copy of the Amendment to the Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on December 19, 2000. 
  

			
	NDCHealth Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Christine Rumsey


	 	 	Christine Rumsey
	 	 	Executive Vice President Human Resources
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(29)
              - products_data(11)
              - products_maps(4)
              - products_publications(68)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(10)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(6)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(4)
              - (-)colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(8)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - south carolina(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        September 18, 2013        Precipitation data collected in the 30 days before September 18, 2013

Charts or Graphs        September 18, 2013        Precipitation data collected in the 7 days before September 18, 2013
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6824
MICHAEL STEVEN SAYKO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.; ALAN D. EASON; MARLENE LOUGAR; J. HEMLER; KATHY GRANT; STACE DONOHOO, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1055-AW) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Steven Sayko, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sayko v. Lanham , No. CA-96-1055-AW (D. Md. Apr. 17, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULE 13a - 14(b)
18**
 **U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT**
 **OF
2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael
Nouri, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 **/s/
Michael Nouri**
 Michael
Nouri
 Principal
Executive Officer
 April
13, 2005
 
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.