UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-Q

                                   (Mark One)

     [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
        EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

                                       OR

            [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
                           THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
          OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______ TO __________

                        Commission file number: 333-51240

                                HORIZON PCS, INC.
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

           DELAWARE                                      31-1707839
(State or other jurisdiction                (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 of incorporation or organization)


        68 EAST MAIN STREET
         CHILLICOTHE, OHIO                               45601-0480
(Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)

                                 (740) 772-8200
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No[X]

As of August 15, 2003, there were 26,646 shares of class A common stock
outstanding and 58,443,254 shares of class B common stock outstanding.



<PAGE>


                                   HORIZON PCS
                                    FORM 10-Q
                              SECOND QUARTER REPORT

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>     <C>          <C>                                                                     <C>
                                                                                              Page
                                                                                              ----

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

       ITEM 1.       Financial Statements........................................................1

       ITEM 2.       Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
                     and Results of Operations..................................................16

       ITEM 3.       Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.................32

       ITEM 4.       Controls and Procedures....................................................33

PART II       OTHER INFORMATION

       ITEM 1.       Legal Proceedings..........................................................34

       ITEM 2.       Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds..................................34

       ITEM 3.       Defaults Upon Senior Securities............................................34

       ITEM 4.       Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................34

       ITEM 5.       Other Information..........................................................34

       ITEM 6.       Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K...........................................48

</TABLE>

     Horizon PCS, Inc. ("Horizon PCS") is the issuer of 14.00% Senior Discount
Notes ("discount notes") due October 1, 2010, and 13.75% Senior Notes ("senior
notes") due June 15, 2011. The discount notes and senior notes were the subject
of exchange offers that were registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") (Registration No. 333-51238 and 333-85626, respectively). The
Co-Registrants are Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. ("HPC"), and Bright
Personal Communications Services, LLC ("Bright PCS"), collectively, the
"Operating Companies," which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Horizon PCS. Each
of the Operating Companies has provided a full, unconditional, joint and several
guaranty of Horizon PCS' obligations under the notes. Horizon PCS has no
operations separate from its investment in the Operating Companies. Pursuant to
Rule 12h-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, no separate financial
statements and other disclosures concerning the Operating Companies other than
narrative disclosures set forth in the Notes to the Interim Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements have been presented herein. Concurrent with
the offering of the discount notes discussed above, Horizon PCS issued 295,000
warrants to purchase up to 3,805,000 shares of Horizon PCS' class A common
stock. The warrants were registered with the SEC (Registration No. 333-51240).
As used herein and except as the context otherwise may require, the "Company,"
"we," "us," "our" or "Horizon PCS" means, collectively, Horizon PCS, Inc., and
the Operating Companies.


                                      -i-
<PAGE>


                          PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                              <C>                <C>

HORIZON PCS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                     June 30,          December 31,
                                                                                       2003               2002
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
                                                                                    (unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
   Cash and cash equivalents ($55,000,000 on deposit at December 31, 2002,
     in accordance with covenant amendment in 2002)...........................    $  46,501,806      $  86,137,284
   Restricted cash............................................................       12,032,009         24,063,259
   Accounts receivable-- subscriber, less allowance for
     doubtful accounts of approximately $2,060,000 and 2,308,000 at
     June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, respectively.......................       22,873,834         19,524,527
   Receivable from affiliate and Parent.......................................           84,130              8,497
   Equipment inventory........................................................        3,265,469          4,082,795
   Prepaid expenses and other current assets..................................        4,233,789          2,671,458
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
      Total current assets....................................................       88,991,037        136,487,820
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------

OTHER ASSETS:
   Intangible assets-- Sprint PCS licenses,
     net of amortization......................................................               --         40,381,201
   Debt issuance costs, net of amortization...................................       18,506,061         19,995,818
   Deferred activation expense and other assets...............................        5,460,276          6,723,827
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
      Total other assets......................................................       23,966,337         67,100,846
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET...................................................      190,636,809        239,536,593
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------

           Total assets.......................................................    $ 303,594,183      $ 443,125,259
                                                                                 ================   ================
</TABLE>


(Continued on next page)


                                      -1-
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                              <C>                <C>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
As of June 30,  2003,  and  December  31, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    June 30,         December 31,
                                                                                      2003               2002
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
                                                                                  (unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
  Accounts payable............................................................    $  16,622,321      $  23,280,465
  Payable to Sprint...........................................................       13,998,869          9,910,262
  Accrued personal property, real estate and other taxes......................        4,229,138          3,767,000
  Accrued interest, payroll and other accrued liabilities.....................        5,854,924          6,574,092
  Deferred service revenue....................................................        6,340,000          5,308,457
  Current portion of long-term debt, net of discount..........................      531,344,322                 --
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
        Total current liabilities.............................................      578,389,574         48,840,276
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:

  Long-term debt, net of discount.............................................               --        516,284,349
  Other long-term liabilities.................................................        8,106,502          8,319,206
  Deferred activation revenue.................................................        5,247,821          6,092,645
  Deferred taxes..............................................................               --          6,030,935
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
        Total long-term liabilities...........................................       13,354,323        536,727,135
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
          Total liabilities...................................................      591,743,897        585,567,411
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)

CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK...................................................      163,325,759        157,105,236

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
  Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
    or outstanding, at $0.0001 par value......................................               --                 --
  Common stock-- class A, 300,000,000 shares authorized,
    26,646 issued and outstanding, at $0.0001 par value.......................                3                  3
  Common stock-- class B, 75,000,000 shares authorized,
    58,458,537  issued  and  58,443,254   outstanding  on  June  30,  2003,
    and 58,458,337 issued and 58,443,054 outstanding on December 31, 2002,
    at $0.0001 par value......................................................            5,846              5,846
  Treasury stock-- class B, 15,283 shares, at $7.267 per share................         (111,061)          (111,061)
  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)...............................           67,069           (394,575)
  Additional paid-in capital..................................................       91,852,141         91,852,117
  Deferred stock option compensation..........................................         (575,927)          (885,747)
  Retained deficit............................................................     (542,713,544)      (390,013,971)
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
          Total stockholders' equity (deficit)................................     (451,475,473)      (299,547,388)
                                                                                 ----------------   ----------------
            Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)..............    $ 303,594,183      $ 443,125,259
                                                                                 ================   ================
</TABLE>




    The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated
                              financial statements

                                      -2-
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>              <C>           <C>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the  Three  and Six  Months  Ended  June  30,  2003  and 2002 (unaudited)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                        For the Three Months Ended         For the Six Months Ended
                                                                  June 30,                          June 30,
                                                      -------------------------------   -------------------------------
                                                           2003             2002             2003             2002
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------
OPERATING REVENUES:
   Subscriber revenues...........................      $  47,857,766   $  37,100,328     $  91,436,720   $  72,115,533
   Roaming revenue...............................         13,578,695      13,115,952        27,376,568      23,935,240
   Equipment revenues............................          2,071,360       1,597,639         3,889,456       3,972,928
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------
      Total operating revenues...................         63,507,821      51,813,919       122,702,744     100,023,701
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

OPERATING EXPENSES:
   Cost of service (exclusive of items shown
     separately below)...........................         46,860,008      41,639,567        90,655,941      77,390,376
   Cost of equipment.............................          5,073,999       3,741,694        10,828,768       8,661,289
   Selling and marketing.........................         12,350,927      10,880,414        24,791,711      25,587,635
   General and administrative (exclusive of
     items shown separately below)...............         11,582,872      10,269,326        20,739,060      19,444,375
   Non-cash compensation ........................            154,910         163,137           309,820         340,374
   Depreciation and amortization.................         10,291,619       9,479,776        21,152,305      17,429,407
   (Gain) Loss on sale of property and equipment.            (41,064)        355,265           216,312         641,003
   Impairment of intangible assets and property
     and equipment...............................         73,760,278       3,500,000        73,760,278       3,500,000
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------
      Total operating expenses...................        160,033,549      80,029,179       242,454,195     152,994,459
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

OPERATING LOSS...................................        (96,525,728)    (28,215,260)     (119,751,451)    (52,970,758)

   Interest income and other, net................            225,795       1,001,073           525,907       1,744,709
   Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized..        (17,011,030)    (15,455,914)      (33,284,472)    (28,194,322)
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

LOSS ON OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES...........
                                                        (113,310,963)    (42,670,101)     (152,510,016)    (79,420,371)
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

Income tax bENEFIT...............................          6,031,000              --         6,031,000              --
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

NET LOSS.........................................       (107,279,963)    (42,670,101)     (146,479,016)    (79,420,371)
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND.........................         (3,151,448)     (2,856,397)       (6,220,557)     (5,712,766)
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS........      $(110,431,411)  $ (45,526,498)    $(152,699,573)  $ (85,133,137)
                                                      =============== ================  =============== ===============

Basic and diluted net loss per share available
   to common stockholders........................      $       (1.89)  $       (0.78)    $       (2.61)  $       (1.46)
                                                      =============== ================  =============== ===============
Weighted-average common shares outstanding.......         58,469,861      58,469,700        58,469,900      58,469,700
                                                      =============== ================  =============== ===============

</TABLE>

    The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated
                              financial statements

                                      -3-
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>               <C>            <C>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                        For the Three Months Ended        For the Six Months Ended
                                                                  June 30,                       June 30,
                                                      -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          2003          2002                    2003           2002
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

NET LOSS......................................        $ (107,279,963)  $ (42,670,101)    $(146,479,016)  $ (79,420,371)
                                                      =============== ===============   =============== ===============

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
     Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging
     activities...............................               127,737        (269,901)          461,644         120,042
                                                      --------------- ---------------   --------------- ---------------

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)...................         $(107,152,226)  $ (42,940,002)    $(146,017,372)  $ (79,300,329)
                                                      =============== ================  =============== ===============


</TABLE>

    The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated
                              financial statements


                                      -4-

<PAGE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                   <C>                    <C>

HORIZON PCS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                              For the Six Months Ended
                                                                                      June 30,
                                                                            2003                   2002
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
     Net Loss....................................................      $(146,479,016)          $ (79,420,371)
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
 Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
   activities:
     Depreciation and amortization...............................         21,152,305              17,429,407
     Impairment of intangible assets and property and equipment..         73,760,278               3,500,000
     Deferred income tax benefit.................................         (6,031,000)                     --
     Non-cash compensation expense...............................            309,820                 340,374
     Non-cash interest expense...................................         16,258,827              12,985,511
     Bad debt expense............................................          3,586,767               7,493,937
     Loss on hedging activities..................................                 --                  34,103
     Loss on disposal of property and equipment..................            216,312                 641,003
     Change in:
       Accounts receivable.......................................         (6,936,074)            (14,217,878)
       Equipment inventory.......................................            817,326               1,914,483
       Prepaid expenses and other................................         (1,562,331)             (1,790,738)
       Accounts payable..........................................         (6,658,144)             (4,221,932)
       Payable to Sprint.........................................          4,088,607               4,597,189
       Accrued liabilities and deferred service revenue..........         12,805,763               9,781,001
       Receivable/payable from affiliates and Parent.............            (75,633)                418,426
       Other assets and liabilities, net.........................            760,319                 142,212
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
         Total adjustments.......................................        112,493,142              39,047,098
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
         Net cash used in operating activities...................        (33,985,874)            (40,373,273)
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
     Capital expenditures........................................         (5,649,628)            (49,113,012)
     Purchase of short-term investments..........................                 --              (6,525,263)
     Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment............                 --               1,543,482
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
         Net cash used in investing activities...................         (5,649,628)            (54,094,793)
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
     Deferred financing fees and other...........................                 --              (2,461,230)
     Exercise of stock options...................................                 24                      --
     Borrowings on long-term debt................................                 --             105,000,000
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
         Net cash provided by financing activities...............                 24             102,538,770
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.............        (39,635,478)              8,070,704
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD...................         86,137,284             123,775,562
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD.........................      $  46,501,806           $ 131,846,266
                                                                      ================        =================

</TABLE>


                                      -5-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 1 - GENERAL

     The results of operations for the periods shown are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year. In the opinion of
management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary
to make a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature excluding the impairment of
intangible assets and property and equipment (see Note 6) and the
reclassification of long-term debt to short-term debt (see Note 7). The
financial information presented herein should be read in conjunction with the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, which includes
information and disclosures not presented herein.

NOTE 2 - LIQUIDITY

     As of June 30, 2003,  the Company was not in compliance  with its covenants
with regard to its senior secured debt. The failure to comply with a covenant is
an event of default under the secured credit facility, which gives the lenders
the right to pursue remedies. These remedies include acceleration of amounts due
under the facility.  An acceleration of the amounts due under the facility would
also  represent a default under the indentures for the senior notes and discount
notes  (Note  7).  Therefore,  all of the  Company's  long-term  debt  has  been
classified as short-term as of June 30, 2003.

     On August 15, 2003, the Company delivered to the lenders under its senior
secured credit facility a certificate that indicated that the Company failed to
comply with a financial covenant for the second quarter of 2003 as required by
the senior secured credit facility. On August 15, 2003, the lenders elected to
declare an acceleration of the loans under the senior secured credit facility.

     On August 15, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary
petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code. Please see note 11 for further information.

NOTE 3 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

     On April 26, 2000, Horizon Telcom, Inc. ("Parent" or "Horizon Telcom")
formed Horizon PCS, Inc. The Company primarily provides wireless personal
communications services ("PCS") as a PCS affiliate of Sprint. The Company
entered into management agreements with Sprint during 1998 and 1999. These
agreements, as amended, provide the Company with the exclusive right to build,
own, and manage a wireless voice and data services network in markets located in
Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, Tennessee, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New
York, New Jersey, Michigan, North Carolina and Indiana under the Sprint PCS
brand. The term of the agreements is twenty years with three successive ten-year
renewal periods unless terminated by either party under provisions outlined in
the management agreements. The management agreements include indemnification
clauses between the Company and Sprint to indemnify each party against claims
arising from violations of laws or the management agreements, other than
liabilities resulting from negligence or willful misconduct of the party seeking
to be indemnified.

     On August 15, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary
petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code. Please see note 11 for further information.

NOTE 4 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, describes the
Company's significant accounting policies in greater detail than presented
herein.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     The accompanying unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules



                                      -6-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 4 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)


and regulations. Thesestatements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, HPC and Bright PCS. All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated. These statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002.

ESTIMATES

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates.

RESTRICTED CASH

     In connection with the Company's December 2001 offering of $175,000,000 of
senior notes due in 2011 (Note 7), approximately $48,660,000 of the offering's
proceeds were placed in an escrow account to be used toward the first four
semi-annual interest payments due under the terms of the notes. The Company paid
approximately $12,031,000 and $24,596,000, during six months June 30, 2003, and
year ended December 31, 2002, respectively, representing the first three
installments. The remaining interest payment has been classified as short-term
and is scheduled to be paid in December of 2003.

EQUIPMENT INVENTORY

     Equipment inventory consists of handsets and related accessories.
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost (determined by the weighted average
method) or market (replacement cost).

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     Property and equipment, including improvements that extend useful lives,
are stated at cost (Note 5), while maintenance and repairs are charged to
operations as incurred. Construction work in progress includes expenditures for
the purchase of capital equipment, construction and items such as direct payroll
and related benefits and interest capitalized during construction.

     The Company capitalizes interest pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 34, "Capitalization of Interest Cost." The
Company capitalized interest of approximately $630,000 and $3,126,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In addition, the Company
capitalized labor costs of approximately $84,000 and $2,075,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

     The Company records equipment revenue from the sale of handsets and
accessories to subscribers in its retail stores and to local distributors in its
territories upon delivery. The Company does not record equipment revenue on
handsets and accessories sold by national third-party retailers or directly by
Sprint to subscribers in our territory. After the handset has been purchased,
the subscriber purchases a service package, revenue from which is recognized
monthly as service is provided and is included in subscriber revenue, net of
credits related to the billed revenue. The Company believes the equipment
revenue and related cost of equipment associated with the sale of wireless
handsets and accessories is a separate earnings process from the sale of
wireless services to subscribers. For industry competitive reasons, the Company
sells wireless handsets at a loss. Because such arrangements do not require a
customer to subscribe to the Company's wireless services and because the Company
sells wireless handsets to existing customers at a loss, the Company accounts



                                      -7-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 4 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)


for these transactions separately from agreements to provide customers wireless
service.

     The Company recognizes revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, services have been rendered or products have been delivered, the price
to the buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is reasonably
assured. The Company's revenue recognition policy is consistent with the current
interpretations of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements." Accordingly, activation fee revenue and
direct customer activation expense is deferred and will be recorded over the
average life for those customers (currently estimated to be 24 months) that are
assessed an activation fee.

     A management fee of 8% of collected PCS revenues from Sprint PCS
subscribers based in the Company's territory, is accrued as services are
provided and remitted to Sprint and recorded as general and administrative
expense. Revenues generated from the sale of handsets and accessories, inbound
and outbound Sprint PCS roaming fees, and roaming services provided to Sprint
PCS customers who are not based in the Company's territory are not subject to
the 8% management fee.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

     The Company's policies do not permit the use of derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes. The Company uses interest rate swaps to
manage interest rate risk. The net amount paid or received on interest rate
swaps is recognized as an adjustment to interest income and other.

     The Company has adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended by SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities." These statements require
an entity to recognize all derivative and hedging activities as an asset or
liability measured at fair value. Depending on the intended use of the
derivative, changes in its fair value will be reported in the period of change
as either a component of earnings or a component of other comprehensive income.
The Company uses interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, to manage
interest rate risk. The net amount paid or received on interest rate swaps is
recognized as an adjustment to interest income and other. Changes in the fair
value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and
qualifies as a cash-flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income to the
extent that the derivative is effective as a hedge, until earnings are affected
by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of a derivative instrument that qualifies as
either a fair-value hedge or a cash-flow hedge is reported in earnings. Changes
in the fair value of derivative trading instruments are reported in current
period earnings. Outstanding temporary gains and losses are netted together and
shown as either a component of other assets or accrued liabilities.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

     The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations including Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for
Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation - an interpretation of APB
Opinion No. 25" issued in March 2000, to account for its fixed plan stock
options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of
grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the
exercise price. SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"
established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by
SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic
value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -
Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123." The
following table illustrates the effect on net loss if the fair-value-based
method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.


                                      -8-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 4 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                             <C>                <C>                 <C>               <C>
                                                     Three Months Ended June 30,          Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                       2003             2002                 2003               2002
                                                ----------------   ----------------    ----------------   ----------------
Net loss available to common stockholders,
  as reported................................    $(110,431,411)     $ (45,526,498)       $(152,699,573)     $ (85,133,137)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
  expense included in reported net loss......          154,910            163,137              309,820            340,374
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
  compensation expense determined under
  fair value base method for all awards, net
  of related tax effects.....................         (197,258)         (287,667)             (394,516)          (575,333)
                                                ----------------   ----------------    ----------------   ----------------
Pro Forma net loss available to common
  stockholders...............................    $(110,473,759)     $ (45,651,028)       $(152,784,269)     $ (85,368,096)
                                                ================   ================     ================  ================

Basic and diluted loss per share available to
  common stockholders - as reported..........    $       (1.89)     $       (0.78)       $       (2.61)     $       (1.46)
Basic and diluted loss per share available to
  common stockholders - pro forma............    $       (1.89)     $       (0.78)       $       (2.61)     $       (1.46)

</TABLE>

NET LOSS PER SHARE

     The Company computes net loss per common share in accordance with SFAS No.
128, "Earnings per Share." Basic and diluted net loss per share available to
common stockholders is computed by dividing net loss available to common
stockholders for each period by the weighted-average outstanding common shares.
No conversion of common stock equivalents has been assumed in the calculations
since the effect would be antidilutive. As a result, the number of
weighted-average outstanding common shares as well as the amount of net loss per
share is the same for basic and diluted net loss per share calculations for all
periods presented. There are three items that could potentially dilute basic
earnings per share in the future. These items include common stock options,
stock purchase warrants and convertible preferred stock. These items will be
included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No.150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150
establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain
financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It
requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within the scope
of SFAS No. 150 as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of
those instruments were previously classified as equity. The application of SFAS
No. 150 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements. This Statement is effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the
beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003.

     In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No.149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 149 amendments require
that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly,
clarifies when a contract with an initial investment meets the characteristic of
a derivative and clarifies when a derivative requires special reporting in the
statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is effective for hedging relationships
designated and for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003,
except for provisions that relate to SFAS No. 133 Statement Implementation
Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters prior to June 15, 2003,
which should be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates, and
certain provisions relating to forward purchases or sales of when-issued
securities or other securities that do not exist, which should be applied to
existing contracts as well as new contracts entered into after June 30, 2003.
The application of SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.


                                      -9-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 4 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

     In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123." This Statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary
change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. In addition, this Statement requires prominent disclosures in both
annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported
results. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 as of
December 31, 2002, but continues to account for stock compensation costs in
accordance with APB Opinion No. 25.

     In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This Statement addresses financial
accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities
by requiring that expenses related to the exit of an activity or disposal of
long-lived assets be recorded when they are incurred and measurable. Prior to
SFAS No. 146, these charges were accrued at the time of commitment to exit or
dispose of an activity. The Company adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003, and
it did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.

     In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements
No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections." SFAS No. 145 addresses the accounting for gains and losses from
the extinguishment of debt, economic effects and accounting practices of
sale-leaseback transactions and makes technical corrections to existing
pronouncements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003, and it did
not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

     In 2002, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force, ("EITF"), reached a
consensus on Issue 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables."
Issue 00-21 provides guidance on how a vendor should account for arrangements
under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. The guidance
in this Issue is effective for revenue agreements entered into in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company is still evaluating the impact this
guidance might have on its financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. The Company will adopt the guidance in Issue 00-21 as of July 1, 2003.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

     Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2003
presentation.

NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     Property and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                 <C>               <C>
                                                                      June 30,         December 31,
                                                                        2003               2002
                                                                    --------------    --------------
Network assets...................................................   $ 129,220,980     $ 196,548,216
Switching equipment..............................................      64,037,616        63,294,413
Furniture, vehicles and office equipment.........................      10,470,871        10,348,364
Land.............................................................         966,689           966,689
                                                                    --------------    --------------
    Property and equipment in service, cost......................     204,696,156       271,157,682
Accumulated depreciation.........................................     (18,397,023)      (46,273,707)
                                                                    --------------    --------------
        Property and equipment in service, net...................     186,299,133       224,883,975
Construction work in progress....................................       4,337,676        14,652,618
                                                                    --------------    --------------
            Total property and equipment, net....................   $ 190,636,809     $ 239,536,593
                                                                    ==============    ==============
</TABLE>

     During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company incurred a loss of
approximately $216,000 related to disposal of assets from two of our closed
retail stores and a planned store that never opened. During the six months ended
June 30, 2002, the Company retired certain network assets and replaced them with
equipment to upgrade the network resulting in a loss of approximately $641,000.


                                      -10-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)

     During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded a liability
of $22,600 and a cumulative change in accounting principle of $9,570 related to
the adoption SFAS No. 143 for potential costs associated with certain asset
retirement obligations. The cumulative change in accounting principle is
included in "interest income and other, net" on the accompanying statement of
operations.

     During the second quarter of 2003, the Company reduced the book value of
the network assets related to an impairment recorded on property and equipment
discussed below in Note 6.

NOTE 6 - IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS

     The Company was not in compliance with the loan covenants as of June 30,
2003. This created the need for an impairment assessment of its intangible
assets and property and equipment as required by SFAS No. 144. Therefore, the
Company projected future undiscounted cash flows and determined they were
insufficient to recover the carrying amounts for the intangible assets and
property and equipment. This required the Company to recognize an impairment
loss for the excess of carrying value over fair value. To determine fair value,
the Company performed a valuation utilizing a cost approach adjusted for items
such as technological and functional obsolescence as appropriate.

     The Company determined that the carrying value of the intangible assets
exceeded the fair value of the assets. As a result, the Company recorded
impairment on the intangible assets of approximately $39,152,000. As a result of
the impairment charge, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $6,031,000 due to
the reduction of a deferred tax liability related to the intangibles. As of June
30, 2003, net deferred income taxes were zero.

     Additionally, the Company determined the fair market value of the property
and equipment was less than the carrying value of the assets. As a result, the
Company recorded an impairment on property and equipment of approximately
$34,609,000.

     During 2002, the Company launched switches in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
and disconnected some switching equipment in Chillicothe, Ohio. As a result,
approximately $6.2 million of switching equipment was considered an impaired
asset as defined by SFAS No. 144. Accordingly, impairment expense for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2002, includes approximately $3.5 million of
expense related to the impaired assets. The total amount of depreciation
recorded to date on this equipment was approximately $5.6 million. This
equipment was sold for book value during 2003.

NOTE 7 - LONG-TERM DEBT

    The components of long-term debt outstanding are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                        <C>                  <C>               <C>
                                           Interest Rate at         June 30,        December 31,
                                             June 30, 2003            2003              2002
                                           ---------------      ---------------   ---------------
Discount notes........................         14.00%           $  295,000,000    $  295,000,000
Senior notes..........................         13.75%              175,000,000       175,000,000
Secured credit facility - term loan A.         5.10%               105,000,000       105,000,000
Secured credit facility - term loan B.         5.60%                50,000,000        50,000,000
Long-term debt, face value............                             625,000,000       625,000,000
Less: unaccreted interest portion of
  discount                                                         (93,655,678)     (108,715,651)
notes.................................
Less: debt classified as short-term
  due to covenant violation...........                            (531,344,322)               --
                                                                ---------------   ---------------
    Total long-term debt..............                          $           --    $  516,284,349
                                                                ===============   ===============
</TABLE>


                                      -11-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 7 - LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)

     As of June 30, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with the covenants
under the agreement for the senior credit facility; therefore, the Company's
indebtedness is classified as short-term. On August 15, 2003, the lenders
accelerated the indebtedness under the senior credit facility. The acceleration
also caused a default under the Company's senior notes and discount notes.
Therefore, all of the Company's long-term debt has been classified as short-term
as of June 30, 2003.

     The Company's secured credit facility includes financial covenants
including restrictions of the Company's ability to draw on the $95.0 million
line of credit. Due to the aforementioned covenant violation, the entire $95.0
million line of credit is unavailable.

     On August 15, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary
petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code. Please see note 11 for further information.


NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

SPRINT 3G DEVELOPMENT FEES

     Over the past 18 months, Sprint increased service fees in connection with
its development of 3G-related back-office systems and platforms. The Company,
along with other PCS affiliates of Sprint, is currently disputing the validity
of Sprint's right to pass through this fee to the affiliates. If this dispute is
resolved unfavorably to the Company, then Horizon PCS will incur additional
expenses. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has not recorded or paid amounts
billed by Sprint for 3G development costs of approximately $1,100,000.

OPERATING LEASES

     The Company leases office space and various equipment under several
operating leases. In addition, the Company has tower lease agreements with third
parties whereby the Company leases towers for substantially all of the Company's
cell sites. The tower leases are operating leases with a term of five to ten
years with three consecutive five-year renewal option periods. In addition, the
Company receives a site development fee from a tower lessor for certain tower
sites which the lessor constructs on behalf of the Company.

     The Company also leases space for its retail stores. At June 30, 2003, the
Company leased 42 stores, operating throughout its territories. See Note 10 for
additional detail on stores closing after June 30, 2003.

LEGAL MATTERS

     The Company is party to legal claims arising in the normal course of
business. Although the ultimate outcome of the claims cannot be ascertained at
this time, it is the opinion of management that none of these matters, when
resolved, will have a material adverse impact on the Company's results of
operations or financial condition.

GUARANTEES

     The discount notes and senior notes are guaranteed by the Company's
existing subsidiaries, HPC and Bright PCS, and will be guaranteed by the
Company's future domestic restricted subsidiaries. The Company has no
independent assets or operations apart from its subsidiaries. The guarantees are
general unsecured obligations. Each guarantor unconditionally guarantees,
jointly and severally, on a senior subordinated basis, the full and punctual
payment of principal premium and liquidated damages, if any, and interest on the
discount notes when due. If the Company creates or acquires unrestricted
subsidiaries and foreign restricted subsidiaries, these subsidiaries need not be
guarantors.

STORE CLOSINGS

     During the first quarter of 2003 the Company closed two retail stores. In
conjunction with these closings, we recorded a liability and corresponding lease
expense of approximately $97,000 representing the net present value of the
remaining lease obligations, net of the anticipated sublease revenues. See Note
10 for additional detail on stores closing after June 30, 2003.

                                      -12-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

NTELOS NETWORK AGREEMENT

     In August 1999, the Company entered into a wholesale network services
agreement with the West Virginia PCS Alliance and the Virginia PCS Alliance (the
"Alliances"), two related, independent PCS providers whose network is managed by
NTELOS. Under the network services agreement, the Alliances provide the Company
with the use of and access to key components of their network in most of HPCS'
markets in Virginia and West Virginia. The initial term was through June 8,
2008, with four automatic ten-year renewals. This agreement was amended in the
third quarter of 2001 to provide for a minimum monthly fee to be paid by the
Company through December 31, 2003. The minimum monthly fee includes a fixed
number of minutes to be used by the Company's subscribers. The Company incurs
additional per minute charges for minutes used in excess of the fixed number of
minutes allotted each month. The aggregate amount of future minimum payments for
the full year ended December 31, 2003 is $38,600,000. Total costs recorded, for
both fixed and variable charges incurred by the NTELOS agreement, were
approximately $20,467,000 and $14,429,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003
and 2002, respectively and approximately $33,036,000, for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

     On March 4, 2003, NTELOS and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntarily
petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The results of
NTELOS' restructuring could have a material adverse impact on our operations.
Pursuant to bankruptcy law, the Alliances have the right to assume or reject the
network services agreement. If the Alliances reject the network services
agreement, we will lose the ability to provide service to our subscribers in
Virginia and West Virginia and will be in breach of our management agreements
with Sprint.

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

     The Company owns three of the towers within its wireless network. Under the
provisions of SFAS No. 143, which the Company adopted on January 1, 2003, a
liability and a corresponding asset in the amount of approximately $23,000 were
recorded on January 1, 2003 for the legal obligation the Company has to remove
these towers and make necessary improvements to bring the site to its original
condition at the end of the land lease term. A one-time charge of approximately
$10,000 for the cumulative change in accounting policy is included in "Interest
income and other, net" for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The balance of
the asset will be depreciated over the remaining lives of the land leases
associated with the towers.

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTIES

     The Company has non-interest-bearing receivables from affiliate companies
(other subsidiaries of the Parent) related to advances made to and services
received from these affiliated companies. At June 30, 2003, the Company had a
receivable from the affiliates related to prepayments. The balances due from
related parties as of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                          <C>                <C>

                                                                 June 30,         December 31,
                                                                   2003               2002
                                                             -----------------  ----------------
Receivable from affiliate.................................   $         84,130   $         8,497
</TABLE>

     During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, affiliated companies
provided the Company administrative services including financial, regulatory,
human resource and other support services. These services are provided under
agreements that have a term of three years, with the right to renew the
agreement for additional one-year terms each year thereafter. The cost of the
management services for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, were
approximately $2,800,000 and $2,700,000, respectively.

                                      -13-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     On July 28, 2003, the Company implemented a company-wide work force
reduction to further reduce costs that are within the Company's control. The
employment of approximately 300 employees has been terminated, and the Company
has closed approximately 19 of its 42 company-owned sales and service centers to
reduce costs in areas where revenues are not currently meeting criteria for
return on investment. The Company is also converting approximately 13 of its
other company-owned sales and service centers to customer service centers. The
Company expects to record a restructuring charge in the third quarter of 2003
but has not yet determined the financial impact.


NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - BANKRUPTCY

     Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing. On August 15, 2003, Horizon PCS, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), Horizon Personal Communications, Inc., an
Ohio corporation and subsidiary of the Company ("Percom") and Bright Personal
Communications Services LLC, an Ohio limited liability company and subsidiary of
the Company ("Bright") (the Company, Bright, and Percom collectively, the
"Debtors"), filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of
the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Ohio (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The Debtors
expect to continue to manage their properties and operate their businesses in
the ordinary course of business as "debtors-in- possession" subject to the
supervision and orders of the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to Sections 1107(a) and
1108 of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Case"). In general, as a
debtor-in-possession, the Company is authorized under Chapter 11 to continue to
operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the
ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
Under Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of a bankruptcy petition
automatically stays most actions against the Company, including most actions to
collect pre-petition indebtedness or to exercise control of the property of the
Company's estate. Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially all
pre-petition liabilities will be subject to settlement under a plan of
reorganization.

     Under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Company may assume or reject
certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including leases of real
property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and certain other
conditions. In general, rejection of an unexpired lease or executory contract is
treated as a pre-petition breach of the lease or contract in question.
Counterparties to these rejected contracts or leases may file proofs of claim
against the Company's estate for damages relating to such breaches. The United
States Trustee for the Southern District of Ohio will appoint an official
committee of unsecured creditors (the "Creditors' Committee"). The Creditors'
Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard on all matters
that come before the Bankruptcy Court. The rights and claims of various
creditors and security holders will be determined by a plan of reorganization
that is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. Under the priority rules established
by the Bankruptcy Code, certain post-petition liabilities and pre-petition
liabilities are given priority over pre-petition indebtedness and need to be
satisfied before unsecured creditors or stockholders are entitled to any
distribution.

                                       -14-
<PAGE>
HORIZON PCS, INC.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2002,
And for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT - BANKRUPTCY (CONTINUED)

     Reorganization Plan. In order to exit Chapter 11 successfully, the Company
will need to propose, and obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of, a plan
of reorganization (the "Reorganization Plan") that satisfies the requirements of
the Bankruptcy Code. As provided by the Bankruptcy Code, the Company initially
has the exclusive right to solicit a plan of reorganization for 120 days from
the date of filing its petition for relief. At this time, it is not possible to
predict accurately the effect of the Chapter 11 reorganization process on the
Company's business, creditors or stockholders or when the Company may emerge
from Chapter 11. The Company's future results depend on the timely and
successful confirmation and implementation of a plan of reorganization.

     The Bankruptcy Case was commenced in order to implement a comprehensive
financial restructuring of the Company, including the senior credit facility,
the senior notes, the discount notes and preferred and common equity securities.
No Reorganization Plan has been submitted to the Bankruptcy Court. It is likely
that, in connection with a final Reorganization Plan, the liabilities of the
Company will be found in the Bankruptcy Case to exceed the fair value of its
assets. This would result in claims being paid at less than 100% of their face
value and holders of preferred and common stock being entitled to little or no
recovery. At this time, it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome
of the bankruptcy proceedings.

     Accounting Impact. The Company will be required to follow the provisions of
Statement of Position 90-7 "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization
Under the Bankruptcy Code" ("SOP 90-7"). Pursuant to SOP 90-7, the Company's
pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise will be reported
separately on the balance sheet as an estimate of the amount that will
ultimately be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court. SOP 90-7 also requires separate
reporting of certain expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for
losses related to the bankruptcy filing as reorganization items. At June 30,
2003, no adjustments have been made in the consolidated financial statements to
reflect the provisions of SOP 90-7.

     Going Concern. Our independent auditors have issued their Independent
Auditors' Report on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 with an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates
continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities
in the ordinary course of business. However, as a result of recurring operating
losses, such realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities are subject
to uncertainty, which raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                      -15-
<PAGE>



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and the related notes.

                           FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), which can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as: "may", "might", "could", "would",
"believe", "expect", "intend", "plan", "seek", "anticipate", "estimate",
"project" or "continue" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or
comparable terminology. All statements other than statements of historical fact
included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including without limitation,
the statements under "ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and "ITEM 5. Other Information" and located
elsewhere herein regarding our financial position and liquidity are
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements also include, but
are not limited to:

     o    estimates of current and future population for our markets;

     o    forecasts of growth in the number of consumers and businesses using
          personal communication services;

     o    estimates for churn and ARPU (defined below);

     o    statements regarding our plans for and costs of the build-out of our
          PCS network;

     o    statements regarding our anticipated revenues, expense levels,
          liquidity and capital resources and projections of when we will
          achieve break-even or positive EBITDA and operating cash flow; and

     o    the anticipated impact of recent accounting pronouncements.

     Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance such expectations will prove
to have been correct. Important factors with respect to any such forward-looking
statements, including certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from our expectations (Cautionary Statements), are
disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation,
in conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements included herein include,
but are not limited to:

     o    our filing of a petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     o    our breach of a financial covenant in the credit agreement for our
          senior secured credit facility, and the acceleration of the senior
          secured debt by the lenders;

     o    our ability to continue as a going concern;

     o    our significant level of indebtedness;

     o    the nature and amount of the fees that Sprint charges us for back
          office services;

     o    our potential need for additional capital or the need for refinancing
          existing indebtedness;

     o    our dependence on our affiliation with Sprint and our dependence on
          Sprint's back office services;

     o    the need to successfully complete the build-out of our portion of the
          Sprint PCS network on our anticipated schedule;

     o    changes or advances in technology and the acceptance of new technology
          in the marketplace;

                                      -16-
<PAGE>

     o    competition in the industry and markets in which we operate;

     o    the potential to continue to experience a high rate of customer
          turnover;

     o    our lack of operating history and anticipation of future losses;

     o    potential fluctuations in our operating results;

     o    our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel;

     o    changes in government regulation; and

     o    general political, economic and business conditions.

     These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All
subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or
persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
Cautionary Statements. See "Item 5. Other Information" for further information
regarding several of the risks and uncertainties.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     Based primarily upon the failure of our attempt to negotiate a
restructuring of the fees paid to Sprint, on July 28, 2003, we implemented a
company-wide work force reduction to further reduce costs that are within our
control. The employment of approximately 300 employees has been terminated, and
we have closed approximately 19 of our 42 company-owned sales and service
centers to reduce costs in areas where revenues are not currently meeting
criteria for return on investment. We are also converting approximately 13 of
its other company-owned sales and service centers to customer service centers.
The Company expects to record a restructuring charge in the third quarter but
has not determined the financial impact.

     In connection with our cost reduction efforts, we have significantly
reduced work on the expansion of its network and the enhancement of its network
capacity. We expect the reduction in work force and network improvements to have
a significant impact on our results of operations for the remaining six months
of 2003.

     On August 15, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary
petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

KEY METRICS

     Horizon PCS provides certain financial measures that are calculated in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
("GAAP") and adjustments to GAAP ("non-GAAP") to assess the company's financial
performance. In addition, we use certain non-financial terms, such as churn,
which are metrics used in the wireless communications industry and are not
measures of financial performance under GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures
reflect standard measures of liquidity, profitability or performance and the
non-financial metrics reflect industry conventions, both of which are commonly
used by the investment community for comparability purposes. The non-GAAP
financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as substitutes for,
the information prepared in accordance with GAAP.

     Customer Additions. As of June 30, 2003, we provided personal communication
service ("PCS") directly to approximately 310,000 customers. For the three
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company's net subscribers increased by
approximately 15,100 and 12,400 customers, respectively. Gross activations
during the second quarter of 2003 were 15% higher than the same period in 2002.
Our subscriber base at June 30, 2003 consists of approximately 75% prime credit
class customers compared to approximately 67% at June 30, 2002. We have focused
our efforts on adding better quality customers in an effort to reduce churn and
lower our bad debt exposure. In July 2003,we reduced our workforce and began


                                      -17-
<PAGE>

closing retail centers to reduce costs. We expect our customer additions to be
significantly reduced beginning in the third quarter of 2003.

     Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA summarizes the average cost to acquire new
subscribers during the period. CPGA is the income statement components of
selling and marketing and cost of equipment (net of equipment revenue), divided
by the total new subscribers acquired during the period. CPGA was $359 for the
three months ended June 30, 2003, compared to $364 for the three months ended
June 30, 2002. This decrease is primarily the result of greater gross additions.
Beginning in the third quarter, we expect CPGA to increase due in part to a
reduction in new customers to offset fixed costs on a per customer basis.

     Cash Cost Per User. CCPU is the cash costs per period to operate the
business on a per user basis consisting of cost of service and general and
administrative expenses, divided by the average subscribers for the period and
divided by the number of months in the period. CCPU was $65 for the three months
ended June 30, 2003, compared to $77 for the three months ended June 30, 2002.
This decrease is primarily the result of an increase in our subscriber base.
CCPU is expected to decrease going forward due to our workforce reductions.

     Churn. Churn is the monthly rate of customer turnover that results from
both voluntarily and involuntarily discontinued service during the month. Churn
is computed by dividing the number of customers that discontinued service during
the month, net of 30-day returns, by the beginning customer base for the period.
Quarterly churn is an average of the three months in the quarter. Churn for the
three months ended June 30, 2003, was 2.7% compared to 3.2% for the three months
ended June 30, 2002. This decrease in churn is a result of our efforts to
increase the credit quality of our subscriber base. We believe that it is likely
that churn will increase as a result of our actions taken on July 28, 2003,
discussed above, possibly substantially.

     Average Revenue Per Unit. ARPU summarizes the average monthly revenue per
customer. ARPU is computed by dividing service revenue and roaming revenues for
the period by the average subscribers for the period, and dividing by the number
of months in the period.

     The following summarizes the components of ARPU for the three months ended
June 30:

                                                     2003            2002
                                                -------------   -------------
       Service revenues
          Recurring.........................    $          40   $          40
          Minute sensitive..................                9              13
          Features and other................                4               3
                                                -------------   -------------
            Total service revenues..........               53              56
                                                -------------   -------------

       Roaming revenues.....................               15              19
                                                -------------   -------------
              ARPU..........................    $          68   $          75
                                                -------------   -------------

     ARPU from minute sensitive revenues has declined as recent service plans
are offering more minutes at a lower monthly charge due to increased competition
in the wireless industry. These additional minutes have driven down the ARPU
received when customers use more minutes than their plan allows. We anticipate
this trend to continue on voice-only service plans.

     The reduction in the reciprocal roaming rate between Sprint and its PCS
affiliates has caused a decline in the roaming ARPU. The Sprint PCS reciprocal
roaming rate decreased to $0.058 per minute on January 1, 2003, compared to
$0.10 during 2002. This rate decrease lowered revenue from the reciprocal
roaming with Sprint and its PCS affiliates by approximately 42% for the second
quarter of 2003.



                                      -18-
<PAGE>


     The following tables reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures discussed
above for the three months ended June 30.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      <S>                                                   <C>             <C>
                                                                2003            2002
      Cost Per Gross Add (CPGA)                             --------------  --------------
          Selling and marketing........................     $  12,350,927   $  10,880,414
          Cost of equipment............................         5,073,999       3,741,694
          Equipment revenues...........................        (2,071,360)     (1,597,639)
                                                            --------------  --------------
            Total cost of gross additions..............     $  15,353,566   $  13,024,469
                                                            --------------  --------------

       Activations, excluding transfers................            42,800          35,800

          CPGA.........................................     $         359   $         364

       Cash Cost Per User (CCPU)                                 2003            2002
                                                            --------------  --------------
          Cost of service..............................     $  46,860,008   $  41,639,567
          General and administrative...................        11,582,872      10,269,326
                                                            --------------  --------------
            Total cash costs...........................     $  58,442,880   $  51,908,893
                                                            --------------  --------------

       Average subscribers.............................           302,000         224,600

          CCPU.........................................     $          65   $          77

                                                                 2003            2002
       Average Revenue Per User (ARPU)                      --------------  --------------
          Subscriber revenues..........................     $  47,857,766   $  37,100,328
          Roaming revenues.............................        13,578,695      13,115,952
                                                            --------------  --------------
            Total subscriber revenues..................     $  61,436,461   $  50,216,280
                                                            --------------  --------------

       Average subscribers.............................           302,000         224,600

          ARPU.........................................     $          68   $          75
</TABLE>

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Revenues. The following table sets forth a breakdown of our revenues by
type for the three months ended June 30:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     <S>                             <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
                                                             2003                 2002
                     (Dollars in thousands)          -------------------  -------------------
                                                        Amount       %      Amount        %
                                                     ----------  -------  ----------  -------
                     Subscriber revenues             $   47,858      75%  $   37,100      72%
                     Roaming revenues                    13,579      21%      13,116      25%
                     Equipment revenues                   2,071       4%       1,598       3%
                                                     ----------  -------  ----------  -------
                     Total revenues                  $   63,508     100%  $   51,814     100%
                                                     ==========  =======  ==========  =======
</TABLE>


     Subscriber revenues. Subscriber revenues for the three months ended June
30, 2003, were approximately $47.9 million, compared to approximately $37.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately
$10.8 million. The growth in subscriber revenues is primarily the result of the
growth in our customer base. We provided PCS services to approximately 310,000
customers at June 30, 2003, compared to approximately 235,100 at June 30, 2002.
The growth in subscriber revenue was reduced by decreases in ARPU resulting from
lower minute sensitive revenue as subscribers are purchasing plans with more
minutes included. We expect subscriber revenue to fall below or remain at their
current levels for the remainder of the year.

     Roaming revenues. Roaming revenues remained relatively flat from
approximately $13.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2002, to
approximately $13.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, an
increase of approximately $500,000. This reflects an increase in the number of


                                      -19-
<PAGE>

roaming minutes of approximately 51% offset by a decrease in the rate paid by
Sprint for roaming. Excluding the effects of a change in the reciprocal roaming
rate, we expect roaming revenues to remain at similar levels for the remainder
of the 2003.

     Equipment revenues. Equipment revenues for the three months ended June 30,
2003, were approximately $2.1 million, compared to approximately $1.6 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2002, representing an increase of
approximately $500,000. The increase is attributable to an increase in the
number of handsets sold. We expect the reduction in the number of company-owned
Sprint PCS retail outlets to have a negative effect on equipment revenues.

     Cost of service. Cost of service for the three months ended June 30, 2003,
was approximately $46.9 million, compared to approximately $41.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately $5.3 million.
This increase reflects an the increase in costs incurred under our network
services agreement with the Alliances of approximately $3.0 million, as a result
of an increase in usage charges, due in part to our subscriber growth during the
last half of 2002 and the first half of 2003. Additionally, cost of service in
2003 was higher than 2002 due to the increase in network operations, including
tower lease expense, circuit costs and payroll expense, of approximately
$700,000. Growth in our customer base resulted in increased customer care,
activations, and billing expense of approximately $1.0 million and other
variable expenses, including increased switching and national platform expenses
of approximately $800,000. The increase in cost of service was offset by a
decrease in long distance charges of approximately $200,000 due to enhancement
of our network capabilities. The workforce reduction discussed above is expected
to have a positive impact on our cost of service.

     Cost of equipment. Cost of equipment for the three months ended June 30,
2003, was approximately $5.1 million, compared to approximately $3.7 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately $1.4 million.
The increase in the cost of equipment is the result of the growth in our
wireless customers. We sold approximately 27,400 handsets through our direct
sales channels during the three months ended June 30, 2003, compared to
approximately 20,900 during the same period in 2002. This was partially offset
by the decreasing unit cost of the handsets. For competitive and marketing
reasons, we have sold handsets to our customers below our cost and expect to
continue to sell handsets at a price below our cost for the foreseeable future.
Overall we expect cost of equipment to decline as an effect of the reduction in
company-owned Sprint PCS retail stores.

     Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased to
approximately $12.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, compared
to approximately $10.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, an
increase of approximately $1.5 million. This includes an increase in marketing
and advertising in our sales territory of approximately $600,000, an increase in
subsidies and rebates on handsets sold by third parties of approximately
$200,000 and an increase in commissions paid to third parties of approximately
$700,000. Selling and marketing expenses increased due to higher activations in
the second quarter of 2003. We expect significant reductions in selling and
marketing expense due to the workforce reduction and corporate strategy of
limiting our subscriber additions.

     General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses
for the three months ended June 30, 2003, were approximately $11.6 million
compared to approximately $10.3 million in for the three months ended June 30,
2002, an increase of approximately $1.3 million. The increase reflects an
increase in the Sprint PCS management fee of approximately $1.0 million, an
increase in fees paid for outside financial services including bank group
consultants, financial advisors, and legal advice of approximately $1.0 million
and other general expenses of approximately $1.1 million. The increase was
offset by a decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts of approximately
$1.8 million as we continue to see positive effects from the increased credit
quality of our subscriber base.

     Non-cash compensation expense. We recorded approximately $200,000 and
$200,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for
certain stock options granted in November 1999.

     Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by approximately $800,000 to a total of approximately $10.3
million during the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase reflects the
continuing construction of our network as we funded approximately $63.1 million
of capital expenditures during 2002.

                                      -20-
<PAGE>

     Impairment of intangible assets and property and equipment We were not in
compliance with the loan covenants as of June 30, 2003. This created the need
for an impairment assessment of our intangible assets and property and equipment
as required by SFAS No. 144. As a result the Company recorded impairment on the
intangible assets of approximately $39.2 million and on the property and
equipment of approximately $34.6 million. During the second quarter of 2002, the
Company had approximately $6.2 million of switching equipment become impaired as
defined by SFAS No. 144. Accordingly, impairment expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2002, includes $3.5 million of expense related to the impaired
assets. We performed these valuations utilizing the best information available
at the time. These impairment charges represent an estimate that may change in
the future.

     Gain on sale of property and equipment. During the three months ended June
30, 2003, we incurred a gain of approximately $41,000 related to related to the
disposal of various assets.

     Interest income and other, net. Interest income and other income for the
three months ended June 30, 2003, was approximately $200,000 compared to
approximately $1.0 million in 2002 and consisted primarily of interest income.
This decrease was due primarily to a lower average balance of cash investments
during the second quarter of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 and
lower short-term interest rates.

     Interest expense, net. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30,
2003, was approximately $17.0 million, compared to approximately $15.5 million
in 2002.

     At June 30, 2003, the interest rate on the $105.0 million term loan A
borrowed under our secured credit facility was 5.10%, while the interest rate on
the $50.0 term loan B was 5.60%. Interest expense on the secured credit facility
was $2.3 million and $2.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2003
and 2002, respectively.

     Interest expense on the discount notes was approximately $7.8 million and
$6.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     On June 15, 2002, we began making semi-annual interest payments on our
senior notes issued in December 2001 at an annual rate of 13.75%. Interest
expense accrued on the senior notes was approximately $6.0 million during the
both three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. Under the terms of the senior
notes, cash to cover the first four semi-annual interest payments was placed in
an escrow account.

     Interest expense also includes approximately $800,000 and $600,000 during
the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, of amortization
from the deferred financing fees related to our secured credit facility, our
discount notes and our senior notes. Also contributing to interest expense was
approximately $300,000 and $200,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2003
and 2002, respectively, in commitment fees we paid on the unused portion of our
secured credit facility.

     Capitalized interest during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,
was approximately $200,000 and $1.0 million, respectively.

     Income tax benefit. As a result of the impairment charge, we recorded a tax
benefit of approximately $6.0 million due to the reduction of a deferred tax
liability related to the intangibles. As of June 30, 2003, net deferred income
taxes were zero.

     Preferred stock dividend. On May 1, 2001, our convertible preferred stock
began paying a stock dividend at the rate of 7.5% per annum, payable
semi-annually. The dividends are paid with additional shares of convertible
preferred stock. Through June 30, 2003, we have issued an additional 5,486,298
shares of convertible preferred stock in payments of all dividends through April
30, 2003, including 1,141,206 shares on May 1, 2003.

     Other comprehensive income (loss). During 2001, we entered into two
two-year interest rate swaps, effectively fixing $50.0 million of the term loan
B borrowed under the secured credit facility. The first swap expired on January
27, 2003, and the amounts effected remain unhedged. We do not expect the effect
of the remaining swap to have a material impact to interest expense for the
remainder of its life. Other comprehensive income of approximately $100,000 was
recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2003.

                                      -21-
<PAGE>


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

KEY METRICS

     Customer Additions. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the
Company's net subscribers increased by approximately 39,100 and 41,000
customers, respectively. Gross activations during the first six months of 2003
were 7% higher than the same period in 2002. We expect our customer additions to
be significantly reduced beginning in the third quarter of 2003.

     Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA was $337 for the six months ended June 30,
2003, compared to $351 for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This decrease is
primarily the result of an increase in gross activations in 2003 compared to
2002. Beginning in the third quarter, we expect CPGA to increase due in part to
a reduction in new customers to offset fixed costs on a per customer basis.

     Cash Cost Per User. CCPU was $64 for the six months ended June 30, 2003,
compared to $76 for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This decrease is
primarily the result of an increase in our subscriber base. CCPU is expected to
decrease going forward due to our workforce reductions.

     Churn. Churn for the six months ended June 30, 2003, was 2.8% compared to
3.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This decrease in churn is a result
of our efforts to increase the credit quality of our subscriber base. We believe
that it is likely that churn will increase as a result of our actions taken on
July 28, 2003, discussed above, possibly substantially.

     Average Revenue Per Unit. The following summarizes the components of ARPU
for the six months ended June 30:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       <S>                                    <C>              <C>
                                                    2003            2002
                                               -------------   -------------
       Service revenues
          Recurring........................    $          40   $          40
          Minute sensitive.................                9              13
          Features and other...............                3               3
                                               -------------   -------------
            Total service revenues.........               52              56
                                               -------------   -------------

       Roaming revenues....................               16              19
                                               -------------   -------------
              ARPU.........................    $          68   $          75
                                               -------------   -------------
</TABLE>

     ARPU from minute sensitive revenues has declined as recent service plans
are offering more minutes at a lower monthly charge due to increased competition
in the wireless industry. These additional minutes have driven down the ARPU
received when customers use more minutes than their plan allows. We anticipate
this trend to continue on voice-only service plans.

     The reduction in the reciprocal roaming rate between Sprint and its PCS
affiliates has caused a decline in the roaming ARPU. The Sprint PCS reciprocal
roaming rate decreased to $0.058 per minute on January 1, 2003, compared to
$0.10 during the first quarter of 2002. This rate decrease lowered revenue from
the reciprocal roaming with Sprint and its PCS affiliates by approximately 42%
for 2003.


                                      -22-
<PAGE>


     The following tables reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures discussed
above for the six months ended June 30.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     <S>                                                 <C>              <C>
                                                              2003             2002
     Cost Per Gross Add (CPGA)                           --------------   --------------
        Selling and marketing........................    $  24,791,711    $  25,587,635
        Cost of equipment............................       10,828,768        8,661,289
        Equipment revenues...........................       (3,889,456)      (3,972,928)
                                                         --------------   --------------
          Total cost of gross additions..............    $  31,731,023    $  30,275,996
                                                         --------------   --------------

     Activations, excluding transfers................           94,100           86,200

        CPGA.........................................    $         337    $         351

                                                                2003            2002
     Cash Cost Per User (CCPU)                           --------------   --------------
        Cost of service..............................    $   90,655,941   $  77,390,376
        General and administrative...................        20,739,060      19,444,375
                                                         --------------   --------------
          Total cash costs...........................    $  111,395,001   $  96,834,751
                                                         --------------   --------------

     Average subscribers.............................           289,700         213,700

        CCPU.........................................    $           64   $          76

                                                                2003            2002
     Average Revenue Per User (ARPU)                     --------------   --------------
        Subscriber revenues..........................    $   91,436,720   $  72,115,533
        Roaming revenues.............................        27,376,568      23,935,240
                                                         --------------   --------------
          Total subscriber revenues..................    $  118,813,288   $  96,050,773
                                                         --------------   --------------

     Average subscribers.............................           289,700         213,700

                   ARPU..............................    $           68   $          75

</TABLE>

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues. The following table sets forth a breakdown of our revenues by type:

                                           For the Six Months Ended
                                                     June 30,
                                   ----------------------------------------
   (Dollars in thousands)                  2003                2002
                                   -------------------  -------------------
                                      Amount        %      Amount       %
                                   -----------  ------  -----------  ------
   Subscriber revenues             $    91,437     75%  $   72,116    72%
   Roaming revenues                     27,377     22%      23,935    24%
   Equipment revenues                    3,889      3%       3,973     4%
                                   -----------  ------  -----------  ------
   Total revenues                  $   122,703    100%  $  100,024   100%
                                   ===========  ======  ===========  ======

     Subscriber revenues. Subscriber revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2003, were approximately $91.4 million, compared to approximately $72.1 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately $19.3
million. The growth in subscriber revenues is primarily the result of the growth
in our customer base. We provided PCS service to approximately 310,000 customers
at June 30, 2003, compared to approximately 235,100 at June 30, 2002. The growth
in subscriber revenue was reduced by decreases in ARPU resulting from lower
minute sensitive revenue as subscribers are purchasing plans with more minutes
included. We expect subscriber revenue to fall below or remain at their current
levels for the remainder of the year.

     Roaming revenues. Roaming revenues increased from approximately $23.9
million during the six months ended June 30, 2002, to approximately $27.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately
$3.5 million. This increase resulted from launching additional markets over the
past year as well as expanding roaming agreements with wireless carriers, offset
by the decrease in the reciprocal roaming rate described above. Excluding the
effects of a change in the reciprocal roaming rate, we expect roaming revenues
to remain at similar levels for the remainder of the 2003.


                                      -23-
<PAGE>

     Equipment revenues. Equipment revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2003, were approximately $3.9 million, compared to approximately $4.0 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, representing a decrease of approximately
$100,000. The decrease is attributable to a decline in the sales price of
handsets as the average sales price, net of discounts and rebates, decreased to
$67 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, from $107 for the same period in
2002, partially offset by an increase in the number of handsets sold. We expect
the reduction in the number of company-owned Sprint PCS retail outlets to have a
negative effect on equipment revenues.

     Cost of service. Cost of service for the six months ended June 30, 2003,
was approximately $90.7 million, compared to approximately $77.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately $13.3 million. This
increase reflects an the increase in roaming expense and long distance charges
of approximately $1.4 million and the increase in costs incurred under our
network services agreement with the Alliances of approximately $6.0 million,
both as a result of our subscriber growth during the last half of 2002 and the
first half of 2003. Additionally, cost of service in 2003 was higher than 2002
due to the increase in network operations, including tower lease expense,
circuit costs and payroll expense, of approximately $2.1 million. Growth in our
customer base resulted in increased customer care, activations, and billing
expense of approximately $2.2 million and other variable expenses, including
increased switching and national platform expenses of approximately $1.6
million. The workforce reduction discussed above is expected to have a positive
impact on our cost of service.

     Cost of equipment. Cost of equipment for the six months ended June 30,
2003, was approximately $10.8 million, compared to approximately $8.7 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of approximately $2.1
million. The increase in the cost of equipment is the result of the growth in
our wireless customers. We sold approximately 58,400 handsets through our direct
sales channels during the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to
approximately 37,100 during the same period in 2002. This was partially offset
by the decreasing unit cost of the handsets. For competitive and marketing
reasons, we have sold handsets to our customers below our cost and expect to
continue to sell handsets at a price below our cost for the foreseeable future.
Overall we expect cost of equipment to decline as an effect of the reduction in
company-owned Sprint PCS retail stores.

     Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses decreased to
approximately $24.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to
approximately $25.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, a decrease
of approximately $800,000. This decease is attributable to a decline in
subsidies paid to third parties of approximately $800,000. We expect significant
reductions in selling and marketing expense due to the workforce reduction and
corporate strategy of limiting our subscriber additions.

     General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses
for the six months ended June 30, 2003, were approximately $20.7 million
compared to approximately $19.4 million in for the six months ended June 30,
2002, an increase of approximately $1.3 million. The increase reflects an
increase in the Sprint PCS management fee of approximately $1.8 million, an
increase in fees paid for outside financial services including bank group
consultants, financial advisors, and legal advice of approximately $1.4 million
and other general expenses of approximately $2.0 million. The increase was
offset by a decrease in the provision for doubtful accounts of approximately
$3.9 million as we continue to see positive effects from the increased credit
quality of our subscriber base. In addition, the decrease in the provision for
doubtful accounts was partially due to an approximately $900,000 non-recurring
credit received from Sprint related to deposits that should have offset amounts
previously written-off. Sprint corrected its error by rightfully remitting these
funds to us in the first quarter of 2003.

     Non-cash compensation expense. We recorded approximately $300,000 and
$300,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, for
certain stock options granted in November 1999. Stock-based compensation expense
will continue to be recognized through the conclusion of the vesting period for
these options in 2005. The annual non-cash compensation expense expected to be
recognized for these stock options is approximately $600,000 in 2003, $200,000
in 2004, and $100,000 in 2005.

     Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by approximately $3.8 million to a total of approximately
$21.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase reflects


                                      -24-
<PAGE>

the continuing construction of our network as we funded approximately $63.1
million of capital expenditures during 2002.

     Impairment of intangible assets and property and equipment We were not in
compliance with the loan covenants as of June 30, 2003. This created the need
for an impairment assessment of our intangible assets and property and equipment
as required by SFAS No. 144. As a result the Company recorded impairment on the
intangible assets of approximately $39.2 million and on the property and
equipment of approximately $34.6 million. During the second quarter of 2002, the
Company had approximately $6.2 million of switching equipment become impaired as
defined by SFAS No. 144. Accordingly, impairment expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2002, includes $3.5 million of expense related to the impaired
assets. We performed these valuations utilizing the best information available
at the time. These impairment charges represent an estimate that may change in
the future.

     Loss on sale of property and equipment. During the six months ended June
30, 2003, we incurred a loss of approximately $200,000 related to the disposal
of assets from two of our closed retail stores and a planned store that never
opened.

     Interest income and other, net. Interest income and other income for the
six months ended June 30, 2003, was approximately $500,000 compared to
approximately $1.7 million in 2002 and consisted primarily of interest income.
This decrease was due primarily to a lower average balance of cash investments
during 2003 as compared to 2002 and lower short-term interest rates.

     Interest expense, net. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30,
2003, was approximately $33.3 million, compared to approximately $28.2 million
in 2002.

     At June 30, 2003, the interest rate on the $105.0 million term loan A
borrowed under our secured credit facility was 5.10%, while the interest rate on
the $50.0 term loan B was 5.60%. Interest expense on the secured credit facility
was $4.7 million and $3.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively.

     We accrue interest at a rate of 14.00% annually on our discount notes
issued in September 2000 and will pay interest semi-annually in cash beginning
in October 2005. Unaccreted interest expense on the discount notes was
approximately $93.7 million at June 30, 2003. Interest expense accrued on the
senior notes was approximately $12.0 million during both the six months ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002. Interest expense on the discount notes was approximately
$15.0 million and $13.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, respectively.

     Interest expense also includes approximately $1.5 million and $1.2 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, of
amortization from the deferred financing fees related to our secured credit
facility, our discount notes and our senior notes. Also contributing to interest
expense was approximately $700,000 and $1.0 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, in commitment fees we paid on the unused
portion of our secured credit facility.

     Capitalized interest during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,
was approximately $600,000 and $3.1 million, respectively.

     Income tax benefit. As a result of the impairment charge, we recorded a tax
benefit of approximately $6.0 million due to the reduction of a deferred tax
liability related to the intangibles. As of June 30, 2003, net deferred income
taxes were zero.

     Preferred stock dividend. On May 1, 2001, our convertible preferred stock
began paying a stock dividend at the rate of 7.5% per annum, payable
semi-annually. The dividends are paid with additional shares of convertible
preferred stock. Through June 30, 2003, we have issued an additional 5,486,298
shares of convertible preferred stock in payments of all dividends through April
30, 2003, including 1,141,206 shares on May 1, 2003.

     Other comprehensive income (loss). During 2001, we entered into two
two-year interest rate swaps, effectively fixing $50.0 million of the term loan
B borrowed under the secured credit facility. The first swap expired on January
27, 2003, and the amounts effected remain unhedged. We do not expect the effect
of the remaining swap to have a material impact to interest expense for the


                                      -25-
<PAGE>

remainder of its life. Other comprehensive income of approximately $500,000 was
recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

     As of June 30, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with its covenants
with regards to its outstanding senior secured debt. The failure to comply with
a covenant is an event of default under our secured credit facility, which gives
the lenders the right to pursue remedies. These remedies could include
acceleration of amounts due under the facility. If the lenders elect to
accelerate the indebtedness under the facility, this would also represent a
default under the indentures for our senior notes and discount notes (see "Note
7" in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements") and would give Sprint
certain remedies under our Consent and Agreement with Sprint. The Company does
not have sufficient liquidity to repay all of the indebtedness under these
obligations. Horizon PCS's independent auditors' report dated March 4, 2003
states that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

     In addition, without the additional borrowing capacity under the senior
credit facility, significant modifications in the amounts charged by Sprint
under the management agreements, significant modifications in the amounts
charged by the Alliances under the Network Service Agreement and/or a
restructuring of our capital structure, the Company likely does not have
sufficient liquidity to fund its operations so that it can pursue its desired
business plan and achieve positive cash flow from operations.

     On August 15, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries filed voluntary
petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code.

     If we are not able to successfully emerge from bankruptcy, or if the
lenders take possession of our existing cash balances, we will not be able to
fund our current operations, capital expenditures and debt service requirements
as contemplated in our business plan. There can be no assurance that our
creditors will support our proposed reorganization, that any Reorganization Plan
we submit will be confirmed by the bankruptcy court, or that it will not be
subsequently modified. If we are not successful, the lenders under our senior
credit facilities will be entitled to exercise their remedies under the senior
credit facility, which includes the right to foreclose upon their collateral,
which includes our existing cash balances. As a result, we may be forced to
liquidate under applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. There can be no
assurance of the level of recovery to which our secured and unsecured creditors
would receive in such a liquidation.

     The realization of the Company's assets and repayment of its liabilities is
subject to significant uncertainty. There can be no assurance that the Company
will successfully recapitalize its balance sheet, and meet the other conditions
necessary to emerge from bankruptcy, or that its liquidity and capital resources
will be sufficient to maintain its normal operations. The ability of the Company
to continue as a going concern is dependent upon a number of factors including,
but not limited to, emergence from bankruptcy, customer and employee retention,
and the Company's ability to continue to provide quality services. The
bankruptcy negotiations could materially change the amounts and classifications
reported in the consolidated financial statements, which do not give effect to
any adjustments to the carrying value or classification of assets or liabilities
that might be necessary as a consequence of any change in business strategy or
business plans as a result of these negotiations.

     The Company has taken, or intends to take, in the context of the Bankruptcy
case, the following steps to minimize its use of cash and continue operations:

     o    Entering into negotiations with Sprint to adjust the amounts charged
          by Sprint to the Company under the Sprint management agreements to
          improve the Company's cash flow from operations.

     o    Entering into negotiations with the lenders under our senior credit
          facility.

     o    Entering into negotiations or arbitration with the Alliances to reduce
          the amounts charged by the Alliances to the Company under the network
          agreements to improve the Company's cash flow from operations.

     o    Pursuing means to reduce operating expenses by critically analyzing
          all expenses and entering into pricing negotiations with key vendors.

     o    Consider closing or limiting service in our under performing markets.



                                      -26-
<PAGE>

     o    Closing or reducing operations at approximately 32 stores.

     o    Laying off approximately 300 employees.

     The Company would need to be successful in these efforts to be in position
to execute its business plan and achieve positive cash flow. The Company can
give no assurance that it will be successful in these efforts. In its
discussions with Sprint, Sprint has effectively refused to modify the fee
structure as needed under the first item listed above.

     On July 17, 2003, Horizon PCS withheld payment on, and filed a dispute with
respect to, a substantial portion of the invoice from Sprint PCS for services
rendered in May 2003. On August 11, 2003, Horizon PCS withheld payment on, and
filed a dispute with respect to, a substantial portion of the invoice from
Sprint PCS for services rendered in June 2003.

     The Company has engaged Berenson & Company, an investment banking firm, to
assist in its efforts to renegotiate or restructure its equity, debt and other
contractual obligations.

     As discussed in our 10-K and other prior SEC filings, we have been in
discussions with Sprint to negotiate more favorable and economically viable
support charges from Sprint. Our original business model established our
expenses from Sprint based on the discussions and agreements centered around the
original management agreement. Throughout the last several years, Sprint has
progressively increased the amounts charged to us, both in the form of higher
fees and additional charges, such as the 3G costs, some of which, in our view,
are not substantiated and are not supported by the Sprint/Horizon PCS management
agreement. Regardless, these charges are significantly higher than our original
business model. In addition, Sprint has continually lowered the monthly
recurring charge offered to subscribers, while increasing the minute allotment.
This has resulted in lower revenue both from the recurring fee and from overtime
usage. Lastly, the NDASL program engineered by Sprint in 2001 and 2002 resulted
in an economic disaster for both Sprint and the affiliates. We, along with the
other affiliates, expended millions of dollars to acquire those subscribers,
only to see the subscriber either not pay their bill or churn after a short
period of time as a customer, thus negatively impacting our cash flow. These
additional charges and reduced revenue per subscriber have impaired us to the
point of our current operating environment, including non-compliance with our
EBITDA covenant in the second quarter of 2003.

     We approached Sprint in the first quarter with an economic proposal, which
we deemed to be fair and one that would allow us to operate well into the
future. We asked for fee relief and Sprint declined and refused to assist us. As
recently as early July, we went back to Sprint with a more moderate proposal
that contemplated significant concessions by our creditors. Again, Sprint
declined our offer and failed to offer a counterproposal. We believe our
proposals were ones that benefited both parties and maximized the value of our
company. In our view, Sprint's offerings and decisions, including the items
mentioned above, have had a negative impact on our business. Two peer
affiliates, IPCS and US Unwired, are currently suing Sprint, citing several
wrongful actions in the operations and charges made by Sprint. We have been
evaluating these lawsuits carefully as we consider our future actions.

     In addition, we continue to review any and all alternatives within our
operating rights, including raising prices and lowering the cost of acquisition
of a subscriber, in order to remain financially viable. We have withheld
payments to Sprint with respect to invoices for alleged services under the
Sprint PCS agreements, as discussed in Note 8 in the "Notes to Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements."



                                   -27-
<PAGE>


     Financing Overview. The following table presents the estimated future
outstanding long-term debt at the end of each year and future required annual
principal payments for each year then ended associated with our financing based
on contractual level of long-term indebtedness:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>

                                                             Years Ending December 31,
(Dollars in millions)              -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       2003         2004          2005          2006          2007      Thereafter
                                   -----------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ----------
Secured credit facility,
  due 2008.....................    $    155.0   $    146.7    $    126.5    $     99.7    $     71.6    $     --
     Variable interest rate (1)           5.12%        5.12%         5.12%         5.12%         5.12%        5.12%
     Principal payments........    $     --     $      8.3    $     20.2    $     26.8    $     28.1    $    71.6
Discount notes, due 2010 (2)...    $    217.5   $    253.1    $    283.7    $    286.1    $    288.5    $     --
     Fixed interest rate.......          14.00%       14.00%        14.00%        14.00%        14.00%       14.00%
     Principal payments........    $     --     $     --      $     --      $     --      $     --      $   295.0
Senior notes, due 2011.........    $    175.0   $    175.0    $    175.0    $    175.0    $    175.0    $     --
     Fixed interest rate.......          13.75%       13.75%        13.75%        13.75%        13.75%       13.75%
     Principal payments........    $     --     $     --      $     --      $     --      $    --       $   175.0

</TABLE>
____________________
(1)  Interest rate on the secured credit facility equals LIBOR plus a margin
     that varies from 400 to 450 basis points. At June 30, 2003, $25.0 million
     was effectively fixed at 7.65% through an interest rate swap discussed in
     "ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk". The
     nominal interest rate is assumed to equal 5.12% for all periods ($50.0
     million at 5.60% and $105.0 million at 5.10%).
(2)  Face value of the discount notes is $295.0 million. End of year balances
     presented herein are net of the discount and net of the related warrant
     value and assume accretion of the discount as interest expense at an annual
     rate of 14.00%.

     Statement of Cash Flows. At June 30, 2003, we had cash and cash equivalents
of approximately $46.5 million and working capital deficit of approximately
$489.4 million. At December 31, 2002, we had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $86.1 million and working capital of approximately $87.6 million.
The decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $39.6 million is
primarily attributable to the funding of our loss from continuing operations of
approximately $152.7 million (this loss includes certain non-cash charges) and
funding our capital expenditures of approximately $5.6 million during the first
six months of 2003.

     Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30,
2003, was approximately $34.0 million. This reflects the continuing use of cash
for our operations to build our customer base, including but not limited to
providing service in our markets and the costs of acquiring new customers. As
discussed in Note 10 in the "Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements," the Company has taken significant steps to improve the net cash
from operations. The Company is reviewing all phases of operations and capital
expenditures, to reduce the amount of cash needed for operations.

     Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30,
2003, was approximately $5.6 million, consisting of capital expenditures to
upgrade our network. We expect future capital expenditures to be much less than
2002 and similar to the half of 2003 level as we focus more on the operation and
maintenance of our network and less on build out and expansion.

     Credit Ratings. At June 30, 2003, the discount notes were rated by Standard
and Poors ("S&P") as "CCC+" with a negative outlook, which means an obligation
"is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business,
financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or
economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its
financial commitment on the obligation." At June 30, 2003, Moody's Investors


                                      -28-
<PAGE>

Services ("Moody's") rated the notes as "C", which is Moody's lowest bond
rating. The CUSIP on the discount notes is 44043UAC4.

     At June 30, 2003, the senior notes were rated by S&P as "CCC+" with a
negative outlook. Moody's rated the senior notes as "C," which is Moody's lowest
bond rating. The CUSIP on the senior notes is 44043UAH3.

     Funding Requirements. At June 30, 2003, we had a $95.0 million line of
credit, with certain restrictions discussed above, committed under our secured
credit facility. However, this line of credit is not available due to our
violation our debt covenants.

     Due to our actions on July 28, 2003, we expect a significant reduction in
our funding needs for the remainder of 2003. For the six months ended December
31, 2003, we anticipate our funding needs will be less than $10.0 million,
including projected operating cash losses, cash interest payments and capital
expenditures. The actual funds required to build-out and upgrade our network and
to fund operating losses, working capital needs and other capital needs may vary
materially from these estimates and additional funds may be required because of
unforeseen delays, cost overruns, unanticipated expenses, unplanned charges from
Sprint, regulatory changes, engineering design changes and required
technological upgrades and other technological risks.

Other risk factors that may impact liquidity include:

     o    we may not be able to sustain our growth or obtain sufficient revenue
          to achieve and sustain positive cash flow from operations or
          profitability;

     o    we may experience a higher churn rate, which could result in lower
          revenue;

     o    new customers may be of lower credit quality, which may require a
          higher provision for doubtful accounts;

     o    increased competition causing declines in ARPU;

     o    our failure to comply with restrictive financial and operational
          covenants under the secured credit facility; and

     o    our upgrade to 3G services, due to which we have incurred significant
          capital expenditures, may not be successful in the marketplace and may
          not result in incremental revenue.


                                      -29-
<PAGE>


SEASONALITY

     Our business is subject to seasonality because the wireless industry is
heavily dependent on calendar fourth quarter results. Among other things, the
industry relies on significantly higher customer additions and handset sales in
the calendar fourth quarter as compared to the other three calendar quarters. A
number of factors contribute to this trend, including:

     o    the increasing use of retail distribution, which is more dependent
          upon the year-end holiday shopping season;

     o    the timing of new product and service announcements and introductions;

     o    competitive pricing pressures; and

     o    aggressive marketing and promotions.

INFLATION

We believe that inflation has not had a material adverse effect on our results
of operation.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES & ESTIMATES

     Going Concern. The accounts have been prepared on the basis that the
company is a going concern. Due to continuing losses including the heavy losses
in 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, and the Company's deficiency in net
current assets and negative stockholders' equity, there are certain risks
regarding the Company's ability to continue to do business in a normal manner.
In the event that the Company was not able to continue as a going concern, the
asset values reflected in the balance sheet would likely have to be revised or
reclassified and additional liabilities could arise and the classification of
liabilities could be revised. Risks which exist for the Company's status as a
going concern are discussed at "Item 5 - Other Information - Risk Factors". In
addition, certain creditors of the Company have potential claims against the
Company. While these claims are not necessarily accepted by the Company and its
attorneys, successful legal action by any of these creditors would impose severe
cash requirements on the Company that could also place the Company's going
concern status at risk. Further, the Company is dependent upon Sprint, NTELOS,
and several other critical business partners. Should a disruption in the
relationship occur with any of these organizations, the Company would struggle
to replace them with alternate suppliers. Finally, due to the serious nature of
the losses, the lenders to the Company are constantly reviewing their ongoing
level of support to the Company. If any of the credit lines to the Company are
substantially reduced, the Company will face a liquidity shortfall.

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Estimates are used in determining our
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, which are based on a percentage of
our accounts receivables by aging category. The percentage is derived by
considering our historical collections and write-off experience, current aging
of our accounts receivable and credit quality trends, as well as Sprint's credit
policy. However, our historical write-off and receivables trends for our
wireless customers are limited due to the recent launch of new markets. The
following table provides certain statistics on our allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable for the periods ended June 30:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                              <C>           <C>                  <C>           <C>
                                                 Three Months Ended June 30,         Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                 ---------------------------        ---------------------------
                                                      2003         2002                 2003        2002
                                                 ------------- -------------        ------------- -------------

Provision as a % of subscriber revenue........              5%           11%                   4%           10%
Write-offs, net of recoveries as a % of
  subscriber  revenue.........................              4%           10%                   5%           10%
Allowance for doubtful accounts as a % of
  accounts receivable.........................              8%           10%                   8%           10%

</TABLE>

     During the second half of 2001 and first half of 2002, a significant number
of our customer additions were under the no deposit account spending limit
("NDASL") program. These lower credit quality customers activated under the
NDASL program led to higher churn rates and an increased amount of bad debt
during 2002 as a significant number of these customers were disconnected and


                                      -30-
<PAGE>

written-off. Sprint has discontinued the NDASL program and replaced it with
Clear Pay, which tightened credit restrictions, and Clear Pay II, which
re-instituted deposit requirements for most lower credit quality customers and
introduces additional controls on loss exposure. In addition, we've focused our
marketing efforts into recruiting higher quality customers. As a result, our
percentage of prime credit customers in our subscriber portfolio increased to
75% at June 30, 2003, up from its lowest percentage of 65% at March 31, 2002.
The improvement of our subscriber base has reduced our exposure to write-offs.
In addition, during the first quarter of 2003, we received approximately
$900,000 for deposits Sprint had retained through August of 2002, that should
have been used to offset write-offs. We applied this refund as a reduction to
bad debt expense, recognized in our financial results in the first quarter of
2003.

     Revenue Recognition. The Company records equipment revenue from the sale of
handsets and accessories to subscribers in our retail stores and to local
distributors in our territories upon delivery. The Company does not record
equipment revenue on handsets and accessories purchased from national
third-party retailers or directly from Sprint by subscribers in our territory.
After the handset has been purchased, the subscriber purchases a service
package, revenue from which is recognized monthly as service is provided and is
included in subscriber revenue, net of credits related to the billed revenue.
The Company believes the equipment revenue and related cost of equipment
associated with the sale of wireless handsets and accessories is a separate
earnings process from the sale of wireless services to subscribers. For industry
competitive reasons, the Company sells wireless handsets at a loss. Because such
arrangements do not require a customer to subscribe to the Company's wireless
services and because the Company sells wireless handsets to existing customers
at a loss, the Company accounts for these transactions separately from
agreements to provide customers wireless service.

     The Company recognizes revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, services have been rendered or products have been delivered, the price
to the buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is reasonably
assured. The Company's revenue recognition policy is consistent with the current
interpretations of SEC SAB No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements." Accordingly, activation fee revenue and direct customer activation
expense is deferred and will be recorded over the average life for those
customers (currently estimated to be 24 months) that are assessed an activation
fee.

     A management fee of 8% of collected PCS revenues from Sprint PCS
subscribers based in the Company's territory, is accrued as services are
provided and remitted to Sprint and recorded as general and administrative.
Revenues generated from the sale of handsets and accessories, inbound and
outbound Sprint PCS roaming fees, and roaming services provided to Sprint PCS
customers who are not based in the Company's territory are not subject to the 8%
management fee.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No.150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150
establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain
financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It
requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within the scope
of SFAS No. 150 as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of
those instruments were previously classified as equity. The application of SFAS
No. 150 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements. This Statement is effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the
beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003.

     In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No.149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 149 amendments require
that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly,
clarifies when a contract with an initial investment meets the characteristic of
a derivative and clarifies when a derivative requires special reporting in the
statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is effective for hedging relationships
designated and for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003,
except for provisions that relate to SFAS No. 133 Statement Implementation
Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters prior to June 15, 2003,
which should be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates, and
certain provisions relating to forward purchases or sales of when-issued
securities or other securities that do not exist, which should be applied to
existing contracts as well as new contracts entered into after June 30, 2003.
The application of SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.

                                      -31-
<PAGE>

     In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123." This Statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary
change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. In addition, this Statement requires prominent disclosures in both
annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported
results. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 as of
December 31, 2002, but continues to account for stock compensation costs in
accordance with APB Opinion No. 25.

     In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This Statement addresses financial
accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities
by requiring that expenses related to the exit of an activity or disposal of
long-lived assets be recorded when they are incurred and measurable. Prior to
SFAS No. 146, these charges were accrued at the time of commitment to exit or
dispose of an activity. The Company adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003, and
it did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.

     In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements
No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections." SFAS No. 145 addresses the accounting for gains and losses from
the extinguishment of debt, economic effects and accounting practices of
sale-leaseback transactions and makes technical corrections to existing
pronouncements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003, and it did
not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

     In 2002, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force, ("EITF"), reached a
consensus on Issue 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables."
Issue 00-21 provides guidance on how a vendor should account for arrangements
under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. The guidance
in this Issue is effective for revenue agreements entered into in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company is still evaluating the impact this
guidance might have on its financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. The Company will adopt the guidance in Issue 00-21 as of July 1, 2003.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

     We do not engage in commodity futures trading activities and do not enter
into derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. We also
do not engage in transactions in foreign currencies that would expose us to
additional market risk. We manage the interest rate risk on our outstanding
long-term debt through the use of fixed and variable-rate debt and interest rate
swaps.

     In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to interest
rate risk. Our primary interest rate risk exposure relates to (i) the
variable-rate secured credit facility, (ii) our ability to refinance our
fixed-rate discount and senior notes at maturity at market rates, and (iii) the
impact of interest rate movements on our ability to meet interest expense
requirements and meet financial covenants under our debt instruments.

     In the first quarter of 2001, we entered into a two-year interest rate
swap, effectively fixing $25.0 million of term loan B borrowed under the secured
credit facility. This swap expired on January 27, 2003, and the amounts affected
remained unhedged. In the third quarter of 2001, we entered into another
two-year interest rate swap, effectively fixing the remaining $25.0 million of
term loan B. The table below compares current market rates on the balance
subject to the swap agreement:

         (Dollars in millions)                       At June 30, 2003
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                            Balance    Market rate    Swap rate
                                         ------------  ------------ ------------
         Swap 2.....................         $25.0         5.60%        7.65%

     Since our swap interest rate is currently greater than the market interest
rate on our underlying debt, our results from operations currently reflect a
higher interest expense than had we not hedged our position. At June 30, 2003,
the Company recorded approximately $67,000 in other comprehensive gains related
to swap gains on the balance sheet.


                                      -32-
<PAGE>

     While we cannot predict our ability to refinance existing debt, we continue
to evaluate our interest rate risk on an ongoing basis. If we do not renew our
swaps, or, if we do not hedge incremental variable-rate borrowings under our
secured credit facility, we will increase our interest rate risk, which could
have a material impact on our future earnings. As of June 30, 2003,
approximately 79% of our long-term debt is fixed rate or is variable rate that
has been swapped under fixed-rate hedges, thus reducing our exposure to interest
rate risk. Currently, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would
increase our interest expense approximately $1.3 million annually.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for
establishing and maintaining "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) for the
Company. With the participation of management, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures as of June 30, 2003.

     Under our agreements with Sprint, Sprint provides us with billing,
collections, customer care and other back office services. The Company, as a
result, necessarily relies on Sprint to provide accurate, timely and sufficient
data and information to properly record our revenues, expenses and accounts
receivable which underlie a substantial portion of our periodic financial
statements and other financial disclosures. The relationship with Sprint is
established by our agreements and our flexibility to use a service provider
other than Sprint is limited.

     Because of our reliance on Sprint for financial information, the Company
must depend on Sprint to design adequate internal controls with respect to the
processes established to provide this data and information to the Company and
Sprint's other network partners. To address this issue, Sprint engages its
independent auditors to perform a periodic evaluation of these controls and to
provide a "Report on Controls Placed in Operation and Tests of Operating
Effectiveness for Affiliates" under guidance provided in Statement of Auditing
Standards No. 70. These reports are provided annually to the Company.

     The Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that
its Disclosure Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control system, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdown can occur because of simple error or mistake. The
design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any
design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions.

     Based upon the Company's Disclosure Controls evaluation, the CEO and CFO
have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, the Company's
Disclosure Controls are effective to give reasonable assurance that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.

     There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or, to
the knowledge of the management of the Company, in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.


                                      -33-
<PAGE>


                           PART II--OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     None.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

     As of June 30, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with its covenants
with regards to its senior secured debt. The failure to comply with a covenant
is an event of default under our secured credit facility, which gives the
lenders the right to pursue remedies. On August 15, 2003, the lenders elected to
accelerate the amounts due under the facility. This acceleration also represents
a default under the indentures for our senior notes and discount notes (see
"Note 7" in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements") and may give
Sprint certain remedies under our Consent and Agreement with Sprint. The Company
does not have sufficient liquidity to repay all of the indebtedness under these
obligations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

                                  RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

BANKRUPTCY RELATED RISK FACTORS

     Our operations may be disrupted due to the filing of the Chapter 11
proceeding. On August 15, 2003, we filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The impact that the Chapter 11 cases may have
on our operations cannot be accurately predicted or quantified. For instance,
due to the Bankruptcy Case, potential customers may refuse to use our services,
key vendors may refuse to do business with us or key employees may leave the
Company. The continuation of the Chapter 11 cases could further adversely affect
our operations and our current and potential relationships with our customers,
employees, suppliers, and other representatives.

     Any plan of reorganization that we propose may not be acceptable to our
creditors and other stakeholders and/or may not be confirmed by the Bankruptcy
Court. If our Reorganization Plan is not confirmed and/or an alternative
reorganization cannot be agreed upon, it is possible that we may try to sell our
company under Section 363 of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

     Our capital stock and high-yield notes are unsecured and located at our
holding company, and as a result, a restructuring of our debt may substantially
reduce the value of our notes and capital stock, potentially to zero. We operate
our business through subsidiaries and have no material assets at our holding
company, Horizon PCS, Inc., other than equity investments in our two operating
companies, Percom and Bright. Our holding company is the issuer of our capital
stock and our high-yield notes. Our high yield notes are guaranteed by our
operating subsidiaries. The only material assets of our holding company, the
equity investments in our subsidiaries, are pledged as collateral to our senior
secured creditors. Generally, the rights and claims of various creditors and
security holders would be determined by a plan of reorganization that is
confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. Under the priority rules established by the
Bankruptcy Code, certain post-petition liabilities and pre-petition liabilities
(i.e., our senior secured debt) of a debtor need to be satisfied before
unsecured creditors or stockholders are entitled to any distribution. We may
propose material reductions in our level of senior secured debt and believe that
this may be required to have a feasible Reorganization Plan. As a result, a plan
of reorganization could result in holders of our capital stock and bonds
receiving little or no value as part of the plan of reorganization.



                                      -34-
<PAGE>

     WE DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CASH AND CASH COMMITMENTS TO ENABLE US TO PURSUE
OUR DESIRED BUSINESS PLAN TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE CASH FLOW.

     Our business and prospects have been significantly adversely affected by a
number of factors. These factors include the general economic recession in the
U.S., the significant slow down in subscriber acquisition over the past year
throughout most of the wireless telecommunications industry, aggressive pricing
competition which has developed within the wireless telecommunications industry,
the greater than expected churn which we have suffered and several factors which
arise from our relationship with Sprint. As a result of these and other factors,
we likely will not have sufficient cash and cash commitments to enable us to
pursue our desired business plan to achieve positive cash flow.

OTHER RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR INDEBTEDNESS

     OUR SUBSTANTIAL INDEBTEDNESS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL HEALTH
AND PREVENT US FROM FULFILLING OUR LONG-TERM DEBT OBLIGATIONS.

     As of June 30, 2003, our total debt outstanding was $531.3 million,
comprised of $155.0 million borrowed under our secured credit facility, $175.0
million due under our senior notes issued in December 2001 and $295.0 million
represented by our discount notes (which are reported on our balance sheet at
June 30, 2003, net of a discount of approximately $93.7 million).

     Our substantial debt will have a number of important consequences,
including the following:

     o    we may not have sufficient funds to pay interest on, and principal of,
          our debt;

     o    we have to dedicate a substantial portion of any positive cash flow
          from operations to the payment of interest on, and principal of, our
          debt, which will reduce funds available for other purposes;

     o    we may not be able to obtain additional financing for currently
          unanticipated capital requirements, capital expenditures, working
          capital requirements and other corporate purposes;

     o    some borrowings likely will be at variable rates of interest, which
          will result in higher interest expense in the event of increases in
          market interest rates;

     o    due to the liens on substantially all of our assets and the pledges of
          equity ownership of our subsidiaries that secure our secured credit
          facility, our lenders may control our assets upon a default;

     o    our debt increases our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
          industry conditions;

     o    our debt limits our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
          changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and

     o    our debt places us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
          competitors that have less debt.

     TO SERVICE OUR INDEBTEDNESS, WE WILL REQUIRE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF CASH.
OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE CASH DEPENDS ON MANY FACTORS BEYOND OUR CONTROL.

     Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to
fund our network build-out, anticipated operating losses and working capital
requirements will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to
a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.


                                      -35-
<PAGE>

     We cannot be certain that our business will generate sufficient cash flow
from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us under our
secured credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our
indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all
or a portion of our indebtedness, including the notes, on or before maturity. We
may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all.

     IF WE FAIL TO PAY OUR DEBT, OUR LENDERS MAY SELL OUR LOANS TO SPRINT GIVING
SPRINT THE RIGHTS OF A CREDITOR TO FORECLOSE ON OUR ASSETS.

     If the lenders accelerate the amounts due under our secured credit
facility, Sprint has the right to purchase our obligations under that facility
and become a senior lender. To the extent Sprint purchases these obligations,
Sprint's interests as a creditor could conflict with ours. Sprint's rights as a
senior lender would enable it to exercise rights with respect to our assets and
Sprint's continuing relationship in a manner not otherwise permitted under the
Sprint PCS agreements.

RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

     IF WE FAIL TO COMPLETE THE BUILD-OUT OF OUR NETWORK, SPRINT MAY TERMINATE
THE SPRINT PCS AGREEMENTS AND WE WOULD NO LONGER BE ABLE TO OFFER SPRINT PCS
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES FROM WHICH WE GENERATE SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OUR REVENUES.

     Our long-term affiliation agreements with Sprint, which we refer to as the
Sprint PCS agreements, require us to build and operate the portion of the Sprint
PCS network located in our territory in accordance with Sprint's technical
specifications and coverage requirements. The agreements also require us to
provide minimum network coverage to the population within each of the markets
that make up our territory by specified dates.

     Under our original Sprint PCS agreements, we were required to complete the
build-out in several of our markets in Pennsylvania and New York by December 31,
2000. Sprint and HPC agreed to an amendment of the build-out requirements, which
extended the dates by which we were to launch coverage in several markets. The
amended Sprint PCS agreement provides for monetary penalties to be paid by us if
coverage is not launched by these extended contract dates. The amounts of the
penalties depends on the market and length of delay in launch, and in some
cases, whether the shortfall relates to an initial launch in the market or
completion of the remaining build-out. The penalties must be paid in cash or, if
both Horizon PCS and Sprint agree, in shares of Horizon PCS stock.

     Under the amended Sprint PCS agreement, portions of the New York, Sunbury,
Williamsport, Oil City, Dubois, Erie, Meadville, Sharon, Olean, Jamestown,
Scranton, State College, Stroudsburg, Allentown and Pottsville markets were
required to be completed and launched by October 31, 2001. Although we launched
service in portions of each of these markets, we did not complete all of the
build-out requirements. We notified Sprint in November 2001 that it was our
position that the reasons for the delay constitutes events of "force majeure" as
described in the Sprint PCS agreements and that, consequently, no monetary
penalties or other remedies were applicable. The delay was primarily caused due
to delays in obtaining the required backhaul services from local exchange
carriers and zoning and other approvals from governmental authorities. On
January 30, 2002, Sprint notified us that, as a result of these force majeure
events, it does not consider our build-out delay to be a breach of the Sprint
PCS agreement. We agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to complete the
build-out by June 30, 2002. In January 2003, we and Sprint agreed to extend the
scheduled completion date for 21 sites in Pennsylvania and New York and agreed
to eliminate 25 sites from our build-out. We believe that we are in substantial
compliance with our build-out requirements.

     We will require additional expenditures of significant funds for the
continued development, construction, testing, deployment and operation of our
network. These activities are expected to place significant demands on our
managerial, operational and financial resources. A failure to meet our build-out
requirements for any of our markets, or to meet Sprint's technical requirements,
would constitute a breach of the Sprint PCS agreements that could lead to their
termination if not cured. If Sprint terminates these agreements, we will no
longer be able to offer Sprint PCS products and services.


                                      -36-
<PAGE>

     IF SPRINT TERMINATES THE SPRINT PCS AGREEMENTS, THE BUY-OUT PROVISIONS OF
THOSE AGREEMENTS MAY DIMINISH THE VALUATION OF OUR COMPANY.

     Provisions of the Sprint PCS agreements could affect our valuation and
decrease our ability to raise additional capital. If Sprint terminates these
agreements, the Sprint PCS agreements provide that Sprint may purchase our
operating assets or capital stock for 80% of the "Entire Business Value" as
defined by the agreement. If the termination is due to our breach of the Sprint
PCS agreements, the percent is reduced to 72% instead of 80%. Under our Sprint
PCS agreements, the Entire Business Value is generally the fair market value of
our wireless business valued on a going concern basis as determined by an
independent appraiser and assumes that we own the FCC licenses in our territory.
In addition, the Sprint PCS agreements provide that Sprint must approve any
change of control of our ownership and consent to any assignment of the Sprint
PCS agreements. Sprint also has a right of first refusal if we decide to sell
our operating assets in our Bright PCS markets. We are also subject to a number
of restrictions on the transfer of our business including a prohibition on
selling our company or our operating assets to a number of identified and yet to
be identified competitors of Sprint. These and other restrictions in the Sprint
PCS agreements may limit the marketability of and reduce the price a buyer may
be willing to pay for the Company and may operate to reduce the Entire Business
Value of the Company.

     THE TERMINATION OF OUR STRATEGIC AFFILIATION WITH SPRINT OR SPRINT'S
FAILURE TO PERFORM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE SPRINT PCS AGREEMENTS WOULD
SEVERELY RESTRICT OUR ABILITY TO CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS.

     Because Sprint owns the FCC licenses that we use in our territory, our
ability to offer Sprint PCS products and services on our network is dependent on
the Sprint PCS agreements remaining in effect and not being terminated. Sprint
may terminate the Sprint PCS agreements for breach by us of any material terms.
We also depend on Sprint's ability to perform its obligations under the Sprint
PCS agreements. The termination of the Sprint PCS agreements or the failure of
Sprint to perform its obligations under the Sprint PCS agreements would severely
restrict our ability to conduct our wireless digital communications business.

     IF THE WEST VIRGINIA PCS ALLIANCE AND VIRGINIA PCS ALLIANCE FAIL TO PROVIDE
THEIR NETWORK TO US IN THEIR MARKETS, OR IF OUR NETWORK SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
THE ALLIANCES IS OTHERWISE TERMINATED, WE WILL LOSE THE ABILITY TO USE THE
ALLIANCES' NETWORKS.

     West Virginia PCS Alliance and Virginia PCS Alliance, which we refer to as
the Alliances, are two related, independent PCS providers whose network is
managed by NTELOS. On March 4, 2003, NTELOS and certain of its subsidiaries
filed voluntarily petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia. The results of NTELOS' restructuring could have a material adverse
impact on our operations. Pursuant to bankruptcy law, the Alliances have the
right to assume or reject the network services agreement. If the Alliances
reject the network services agreement, we will lose the ability to provide
service to our subscribers in Virginia and West Virginia through the Alliances'
Network, and Sprint may take the position that we would be in breach of our
management agreements with Sprint.

     Prior to the Alliances' bankruptcy filing, Horizon had asserted that the
Alliances had overcharged Horizon for services that were neither authorized nor
contemplated by the network services agreement. As a result of the Alliances'
bankruptcy filing, Horizon was at risk that any subsequent payments that it
would make for services under the network services agreement could impair its
setoff or recoupment rights with respect to its claim for a repayment of the
unauthorized charges. Consequently, Horizon declined to make a scheduled payment
of $3.0 million to the Alliances on March 11, 2003 for services rendered by the
Alliances in January 2003 and, on that date, filed a motion in the Alliances'
bankruptcy case to protect its rights.

     On March 24, 2003, Horizon and the Alliances entered into a Stipulation
which provided that Horizon would pay the January 2003 and February 2003
invoices, the bankruptcy court would provide procedural protection of Horizon's
claim and the parties would move forward to settle or arbitrate the merits of
Horizon's claim. On March 26, 2003, the Court in the NTELOS bankruptcy case
approved the Stipulation. On August 11, 2003, we filed a demand for arbitration
with the American Arbitration Association with respect to our claims. On August
11, 2003, NTELOS provided a notice that the Company was in default in the
payment of fees under the Network Services Agreement and reserved its right to
terminate the Agreement at the expiration of a 10 business day cure period. On
August 14, 2003, NTELOS filed its Answering Statement and Counterclaims,
asserting counterclaims in excess of $12 million.



                                      -37-
<PAGE>

     Under our network services agreement, the Alliances provide us with the use
of and access to key components of their network in most of our markets in
Virginia and West Virginia. We directly compete with the Alliances in the
markets where we use their network. If the Alliances fail to maintain the
standards for their network as set forth in our network services agreement with
them or otherwise fail to provide their network for our use, our ability to
provide wireless services in these markets may be adversely affected, and we may
not be able to provide seamless service for our customers. If we breach our
obligations to the Alliances, or if the Alliances otherwise terminate the
network services agreement, we will lose our right to use the Alliances' network
to provide service in these markets. In that event, it is likely that we will be
required to build our own network in those markets and incur the substantial
costs associated with doing so.

     IF OTHER SPRINT NETWORK PARTNERS HAVE FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES, THE SPRINT
PCS NETWORK COULD BE DISRUPTED.

     Sprint's national network is a combination of networks. The large
metropolitan areas are owned and operated by Sprint, and the areas in between
them are owned and operated by Sprint network partners, all of which are
independent companies like we are. We believe that most, if not all, of these
companies have incurred substantial debt to pay the large cost of building out
their networks. If other network partners experience financial difficulties,
Sprint's PCS network could be disrupted. If Sprint's agreements with those
network partners are like ours, Sprint would have the right to exercise various
remedies in the event of such disruptions. In such event, there can be no
assurance that Sprint or the network partner could restore the disrupted service
in a timely and seamless manner.

     One of the network partners, iPCS, Inc., recently filed a chapter 11
bankruptcy petition. In connection with its bankruptcy filing, iPCS filed a
Complaint against Sprint Corporation and Sprint PCS alleging that Sprint PCS
breached its management agreement and services agreement with iPCS, seeking an
equitable accounting of alleged overcharges and underpayments by Sprint PCS to
iPCS, and seeking specific performance of (i) Sprint PCS' obligation to purchase
the operating assets of iPCS by virtue of iPCS' purported exercise of its
contractual "put" right as a result of the alleged material breaches, and (ii)
Sprint's obligation to pay an increased share of Collected Revenue as a result
of iPCS' lenders issuing a notice of acceleration. Finally, iPCS alleges that
Sprint Corporation is liable on each of the claims because it allegedly
controls, authorizes, directs and/or ratifies the conduct of Sprint PCS under
the management agreement and services agreement. In July, 2003, another Sprint
network partner, US Unwired filed a suit against Sprint alleging that Sprint has
violated racketeering and corruption laws, breached fiduciary duty and committed
fraud. Because we believe that these lawsuits allege conduct under agreements
which are similar to our Sprint agreements, we are reviewing them to determine
the extent to which the factual and legal assertions have similarities to our
relationship with Sprint.

     IF SPRINT DOES NOT COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ITS NATIONWIDE PCS NETWORK,
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN CUSTOMERS, WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT
OUR REVENUES.

     Sprint's PCS network may not provide nationwide coverage to the same extent
as its competitors' networks, which could adversely affect our ability to
attract and retain customers. Sprint is creating a nationwide PCS network
through its own construction efforts and those of its affiliates. Today, neither
Sprint nor any other PCS provider offers service in every area of the United
States. Sprint has entered into affiliation agreements similar to ours with
companies in other territories pursuant to its nationwide PCS build-out
strategy. Our business and results of operations depend on Sprint's national PCS
network and, to a lesser extent, on the networks of its other affiliates. Sprint
and its affiliate program are subject, in varying degrees, to the economic,
administrative, logistical, regulatory and other risks described in this
document. Sprint and its other affiliates' PCS operations may not be successful,
which in turn could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

     OUR REVENUES MAY BE LESS THAN WE ANTICIPATE WHICH COULD MATERIALLY
ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR LIQUIDITY, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

     Revenue growth is primarily dependent on the size of our subscriber base,
average monthly revenues per user and roaming revenue. During the year ended
December 31, 2002, we experienced slower net subscriber growth rates than
planned, which we believe is due in large part to increased churn, declining
rates of wireless subscriber growth in general, the re-imposition of deposits
for most sub-prime credit subscribers during the last half of the year, the
current economic slowdown and increased competition. Other carriers also have
reported slower subscriber growth rates compared to prior periods. We have seen
a continuation of competitive pressures in the wireless telecommunications



                                      -38-
<PAGE>


market causing some major carriers to offer plans with increasingly large
bundles of minutes of use at lower prices which may compete with the calling
plans we offer, including the Sprint calling plans we support. Increased price
competition may lead to lower average monthly revenues per user than we
anticipate. In addition, the lower reciprocal roaming rate that Sprint has
announced for 2003 will reduce our roaming revenue, which may not be offset by
the reduction in our roaming expense. If our revenues are less than we
anticipate, it could materially adversely affect our liquidity, financial
condition and results of operation

     WE ARE DEPENDENT UPON SPRINT'S BACK OFFICE SERVICES AND ITS THIRD-PARTY
VENDORS' BACK OFFICE SYSTEMS. PROBLEMS WITH THESE SYSTEMS, OR TERMINATION OF
THESE ARRANGEMENTS, COULD DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS AND POSSIBLY INCREASE OUR COSTS.

     Because Sprint provides our back office systems such as billing, customer
care and collections, our operations could be disrupted if Sprint is unable to
maintain and expand its back office services, or to efficiently outsource those
services and systems through third-party vendors. The rapid expansion of
Sprint's business will continue to pose a significant challenge to its internal
support systems. Additionally, Sprint has relied on third-party vendors for a
significant number of important functions and components of its internal support
systems and may continue to rely on these vendors in the future. We depend on
Sprint's willingness to continue to offer these services to us and to provide
these services at competitive costs. We paid Sprint approximately $20.6 million
for these services during 2002. The Sprint PCS agreements provide that, upon
nine months' prior written notice, Sprint may elect to terminate any of these
services. If Sprint terminates a service for which we have not developed a
cost-effective alternative, our operating costs may increase beyond our
expectations and restrict our ability to operate successfully.

     Further, our ability to replace Sprint in providing back office services
may be limited. While the services agreements allow the Company to use
third-party vendors to provide certain of these services instead of Sprint, the
high startup costs and necessary cooperation associated with interfacing with
Sprint's system may significantly limit our ability to use back office services
provided by anyone other than Sprint. This could limit our ability to lower our
operating costs.

     WE DEPEND ON OTHER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES FOR SOME SERVICES THAT, IF
DELAYED, COULD DELAY OUR PLANNED NETWORK BUILD-OUT AND DELAY OUR EXPECTED
INCREASES IN CUSTOMERS AND REVENUES.

     We depend on other telecommunications companies to provide facilities and
transport to interconnect portions of our network and to connect our network
with the landline telephone system. American Electric Power, Ameritech, AT&T,
Verizon and Sprint (long distance) are our primary suppliers of facilities and
transport. Without these services, we could not offer Sprint PCS services to our
customers in some areas. From time to time, we have experienced delays in
obtaining facilities and transport from some of these companies, and in
obtaining local telephone numbers for use by our customers, which are sometimes
in short supply, and we may continue to experience delays and interruptions in
the future. Delays in obtaining facilities and transport could delay our
build-out and capacity plans and our business may suffer. Delays could also
result in a breach of our Sprint PCS agreements, subjecting these agreements to
potential termination by Sprint.

     MATERIAL RESTRICTIONS IN OUR DEBT INSTRUMENTS MAY MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO
OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING OR TAKE OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS TO REACT TO CHANGES
IN OUR BUSINESS.

     The indenture governing the senior notes contains various covenants that
limit our ability to engage in a variety of transactions. In addition, the
indenture governing our discount notes and the secured credit agreement both
impose additional material operating and financial restrictions on us. These
restrictions, subject to ordinary course of business exceptions, limit our
ability to engage in some transactions, including the following:

     o    designated types of mergers or consolidations;

     o    paying dividends or other distributions to our stockholders;

     o    making investments;

     o    selling assets;



                                      -39-
<PAGE>

     o    repurchasing our common stock;

     o    changing lines of business;

     o    borrowing additional money; and

     o    transactions with affiliates.

     In addition, our secured credit facility requires us to maintain certain
ratios, including:

     o    leverage ratios;

     o    an interest coverage ratio; and

     o    a fixed charges ratio,

     and to satisfy certain tests, including tests relating to:

     o    minimum covered population;

     o    minimum number of PCS subscribers in our territory;

     o    minimum total revenues; and

     o    minimum EBITDA.

     These restrictions could limit our ability to obtain debt financing,
repurchase stock, refinance or pay principal or interest on our outstanding
debt, consummate acquisitions for cash or debt or react to changes in our
operating environment. An event of default under the secured credit facility may
prevent the Company and the guarantors of the senior notes and the discount
notes from paying those notes or the guarantees of those notes.

     THE TERMS OF THE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK MAY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL
RESULTS.

     The terms of the convertible preferred stock give the holders of the
preferred stock the following principal rights:

     o    to initially designate two members of our board of directors, subject
          to reduction based on future percentage ownership;

     o    to approve or disapprove fundamental corporate actions and
          transactions;

     o    to receive dividends in the form of additional shares of our
          convertible preferred stock, which may increase and accelerate upon a
          change in control; and

     o    to require us to redeem the convertible preferred stock in 2005.

     If we become subject to the repurchase right or change of control
redemption requirements under the convertible preferred stock while our secured
credit facility, our discount notes or the senior notes are outstanding, we will
be required to seek the consent of the lenders under our secured credit
facility, the holders of the discount notes and the holders of the senior notes
to repurchase or redeem the convertible preferred stock, or attempt to refinance
the secured credit facility, the discount notes and the senior notes. If we fail
to obtain these consents, there will be an event of default under the terms
governing our secured credit facility. In addition, if we do not repurchase or
redeem the convertible preferred stock and the holders of the convertible
preferred stock obtain a judgment against us, any judgment in excess of $5.0
million would constitute an event of default under the indentures governing the
discount notes and the senior notes.



                                      -40-
<PAGE>

     IF WE BREACH OUR AGREEMENT WITH SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. ("SBA"), OR IT
OTHERWISE TERMINATES ITS AGREEMENT WITH US, OUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WIRELESS
SERVICE FROM MOST OF OUR CELL SITES WILL BE LOST.

     We lease cell sites from SBA. We rely on our contract with SBA to provide
us with access to most of our cell sites and to the towers located on these
sites. If SBA were to lose its underlying rights to these sites, our ability to
provide wireless service from these sites would end, subject to our right to
cure defaults by SBA. If SBA terminates our agreement as a result of our breach,
we may lose our right to provide wireless services from most of our cell sites.

     WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY OBTAINING INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT AND HANDSETS,
WHICH COULD RESULT IN DELAYS IN OUR NETWORK BUILD-OUT, DISRUPTION OF SERVICE OR
LOSS OF CUSTOMERS.

     If we cannot acquire the equipment required to build or upgrade our network
in a timely manner, we may be unable to provide wireless communications services
comparable to those of our competitors or to meet the requirements of the Sprint
PCS agreements. Manufacturers of this equipment could have substantial order
backlogs. Accordingly, the lead-time for the delivery of this equipment may be
longer than anticipated. In addition, the manufacturers of specific types
handsets may have to distribute their limited supply of products among their
numerous customers. Some of our competitors purchase large quantities of
communications equipment and may have established relationships with the
manufacturers of this equipment. Consequently, they may receive priority in the
delivery of this equipment. If we do not obtain equipment or handsets in a
timely manner, we could suffer delays in the build-out of our network,
disruptions in service and a reduction in customers.

     SPRINT'S VENDOR DISCOUNTS MAY BE DISCONTINUED, WHICH COULD INCREASE OUR
EQUIPMENT COSTS AND REQUIRE MORE CAPITAL THAN WE HAD PROJECTED TO BUILD-OUT OR
UPGRADE OUR NETWORK.

     We intend to continue to purchase our infrastructure equipment under
Sprint's vendor agreements that include significant volume discounts. If Sprint
were unable to continue to obtain vendor discounts for its affiliates, the loss
of vendor discounts could increase our equipment costs for our network
build-out.

     CONFLICTS WITH SPRINT MAY NOT BE RESOLVED IN OUR FAVOR, WHICH COULD
RESTRICT OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE OUR BUSINESS AND PROVIDE SPRINT PCS PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES, ADVERSELY AFFECTING OUR RELATIONSHIPS WITH OUR CUSTOMERS, INCREASE OUR
EXPENSES OR DECREASE OUR REVENUES.

     Under the Sprint PCS agreements, Sprint has a substantial amount of control
over the conduct of our business. Conflicts between us may arise, and these
conflicts may not be resolved in our favor. The conflicts and their resolution
may harm our business. For example:

     o    Sprint may price its national plans based on its own objectives and
          may set price levels and customer credit policies that may not be
          economically sufficient for our business;

     o    Sprint may increase the prices we pay for our back office services;
          and

     o    Sprint may make decisions that adversely affect our use of the Sprint
          and Sprint PCS brand names, products or services.

     WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH LARGER, MORE ESTABLISHED WIRELESS
PROVIDERS WHO HAVE RESOURCES TO COMPETITIVELY PRICE THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES,
WHICH COULD IMPAIR OUR ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN CUSTOMERS.

     Our ability to compete will depend in part on our ability to anticipate and
respond to various competitive factors affecting the telecommunications
industry, including new services that may be introduced, changes in consumer
preferences, demographic trends, economic conditions and discount pricing
strategies by competitors. In each market, we compete with at least two cellular
providers that have had their infrastructure in place and have been operational
for a number of years. They may have significantly greater financial and
technical resources than we do, they could offer attractive pricing options and
they may have a wider variety of handset options. We expect existing cellular
providers will continue to upgrade their systems and provide expanded digital
services to compete with the Sprint PCS products and services we offer. Many of


                                      -41-
<PAGE>

these wireless providers generally require their customers to enter into
long-term contracts, which may make it more difficult for us to attract
customers away from them.

     We will also compete with several PCS providers and other existing
communications companies in our markets and expect to compete with new entrants
as the FCC licenses additional spectrum to mobile services providers. A number
of our cellular, PCS and other wireless competitors have access to more licensed
spectrum than the amount licensed to Sprint in most of our territory and
therefore will be able to provide greater network call volume capacity than our
network to the extent that network usage begins to reach or exceed the capacity
of our licensed spectrum. Our inability to accommodate increases in call volume
could result in more dropped or disconnected calls. In addition, any competitive
difficulties that Sprint may experience could also harm our competitive position
and success.

     We anticipate that market prices for two-way wireless voice services and
products generally will continue to decline as a result of increased
competition. Consequently we may be forced to increase spending for advertising
and promotions. Increased competition also may lead to continued increases in
customer churn. Those trends could cause additional losses from operations.

     WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OFFER COMPETITIVE ROAMING CAPABILITY, WHICH COULD
IMPAIR OUR ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN CUSTOMERS.

     We rely on agreements with competitors to provide automatic roaming
capability to our PCS customers in many of the areas of the United States not
covered by the Sprint PCS network, which primarily serves metropolitan areas.
Some competitors may be able to offer coverage in areas not served by the Sprint
PCS network or may be able to offer roaming rates that are lower than those
offered by Sprint and its affiliates. Some of our competitors are seeking to
reduce access to their networks through actions pending with the FCC. Moreover,
the engineering standard for the dominant air interface upon which PCS customers
roam is currently being considered for elimination by the FCC as part of a
streamlining proceeding. If the FCC eliminates this standard, our Sprint PCS
customers may have difficulty roaming in some markets.

     THERE IS NO UNIFORM SIGNAL TRANSMISSION TECHNOLOGY AND IF WE DECIDE TO USE
OTHER TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FUTURE, THIS DECISION COULD SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE OUR
EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES TO REPLACE THE TECHNOLOGY USED ON OUR NETWORK.

     The wireless telecommunications industry is experiencing evolving industry
standards. We have employed code division multiple access (CDMA) technology,
which is the digital wireless communications technology selected by Sprint for
its network. CDMA may not provide the advantages expected by us and by Sprint.
In addition to CDMA, there are two other principal signal transmission
technologies, time division multiple access, or TDMA, and global systems for
mobile communications, or GSM. These three signal transmission technologies are
not compatible with each other. If one of these technologies or another
technology becomes the preferred industry standard, we may be at a competitive
disadvantage and competitive pressures may require Sprint to change its digital
technology which, in turn, may require us to make changes at substantially
increased costs.

     WE MAY NOT RECEIVE AS MUCH SPRINT PCS ROAMING REVENUE AS WE ANTICIPATE AND
OUR NON-SPRINT PCS ROAMING REVENUE IS LIKELY TO BE LOW.

     We are paid a fee from Sprint or a PCS affiliate of Sprint for every minute
that a Sprint PCS subscriber based outside of our territory uses our network.
Similarly, we pay a fee to Sprint PCS or a PCS affiliate of Sprint for every
minute that our customers use the Sprint PCS network outside our territory. Our
customers may use the Sprint PCS network outside our territory more frequently
than we anticipate, and Sprint PCS subscribers based outside our territory may
use our network less frequently than we anticipate. As a result, we may receive
less Sprint PCS roaming revenue in the aggregate, than we previously anticipated
or we may have to pay more Sprint PCS roaming fees in the aggregate than we
anticipate. The fee for each Sprint PCS roaming minute used was decreased from
$0.20 per minute before June 1, 2001, to $0.15 per minute effective June 1,
2001, and further decreased to $0.12 per minute effective October 1, 2001. The
Sprint PCS roaming rate was changed to $0.10 per minute in 2002. Sprint has
reduced the reciprocal roaming rate to $0.058 per minute of use as of January 1,
2003. As a result, we may receive less Sprint PCS roaming revenue in the


                                      -42-
<PAGE>

aggregate, than we previously anticipated. Furthermore, we do not expect to
receive substantial non-Sprint PCS roaming revenue.

     IF SPRINT PCS CUSTOMERS ARE NOT ABLE TO ROAM INSTANTANEOUSLY OR EFFICIENTLY
ONTO OTHER WIRELESS NETWORKS, WE MAY SUFFER A REDUCTION IN OUR REVENUES AND
NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS.

     The Sprint PCS network operates at a different frequency and uses or may
use a different signal transmission technology than many analog cellular and
other digital systems. To access another provider's analog cellular, TDMA or GSM
digital system when outside the territory served by the Sprint PCS network, a
Sprint PCS customer is required to utilize a dual-band/dual-mode handset
compatible with that provider's system. Generally, because dual-band/dual-mode
handsets incorporate two radios rather than one, they are more expensive, larger
and heavier than single-band/single-mode handsets. The Sprint PCS network does
not allow for call hand-off between the Sprint PCS network and another wireless
network, so a customer must end a call in progress on the Sprint PCS network and
initiate a new call when outside the territory served by the Sprint PCS network.
In addition, the quality of the service provided by a network provider during a
roaming call may not approximate the quality of the service provided by Sprint.
The price of a roaming call may not be competitive with prices of other wireless
companies for roaming calls, and Sprint customers may not be able to use Sprint
PCS advanced features, such as voicemail notification, while roaming. These
roaming issues may cause us to suffer a reduction in our revenues and number of
customers.

     PARTS OF OUR TERRITORIES HAVE LIMITED LICENSED SPECTRUM, WHICH MAY
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE QUALITY OF OUR SERVICE.

     In the majority of our markets, Sprint has licenses covering 20 MHz or 30
MHz of spectrum. However, Sprint has licenses covering only 10 MHz in parts of
our territory covering approximately 3.8 million residents out of a total
population of over 10.2 million residents. In the future, as our customers in
those areas increase in number, this limited licensed spectrum may not be able
to accommodate increases in call volume and may lead to increased dropped calls
and may limit our ability to offer enhanced services.

     NON-RENEWAL OR REVOCATION BY THE FCC OF THE SPRINT PCS LICENSES WOULD
SIGNIFICANTLY HARM OUR BUSINESS BECAUSE WE WOULD NO LONGER HAVE THE RIGHT TO
OFFER WIRELESS SERVICE THROUGH OUR NETWORK.

     We are dependent on Sprint's PCS licenses, which are subject to renewal and
revocation by the FCC. Sprint's PCS licenses in many of our territories will
expire as early as 2005 but may be renewed for additional ten-year terms. There
may be opposition to renewal of Sprint's PCS licenses upon their expiration and
the Sprint PCS licenses may not be renewed. The FCC has adopted specific
standards to apply to PCS license renewals. For example, if Sprint does not
demonstrate to the FCC that Sprint has met the five-year construction
requirements for each of its PCS licenses, it can lose those licenses. Failure
to comply with these standards in our territory could cause the imposition of
fines on Sprint by the FCC or the revocation or forfeiture of the Sprint PCS
licenses for our territory, which would prohibit us from providing service in
our markets.

     IF THE SPRINT PCS AGREEMENTS DO NOT COMPLY WITH FCC REQUIREMENTS, SPRINT
MAY TERMINATE THE SPRINT PCS AGREEMENTS, WHICH COULD RESULT IN OUR INABILITY TO
PROVIDE SERVICE.

     The FCC requires that licensees like Sprint maintain control of their
licensed spectrum and not delegate control to third-party operators or managers
like us. Although the Sprint PCS agreements reflect an arrangement that the
parties believe meets the FCC requirements for licensee control of licensed
spectrum, we cannot be certain the FCC will agree with us. If the FCC determines
that the Sprint PCS agreements need to be modified to increase the level of
licensee control, we have agreed with Sprint to use our best efforts to modify
the Sprint PCS agreements to comply with applicable law. If we cannot agree with
Sprint to modify the Sprint PCS agreements, they may be terminated. If the
Sprint PCS agreements are terminated, we would no longer be a part of the Sprint
PCS network and we would have extreme difficulty in conducting our business.


                                      -43-
<PAGE>

     WE MAY NEED MORE CAPITAL THAN WE CURRENTLY ANTICIPATE TO COMPLETE THE
BUILD-OUT AND UPGRADE OF OUR NETWORK, AND A DELAY OR FAILURE TO OBTAIN
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL COULD DECREASE OUR REVENUES.

     The completion of our network build-out will require substantial capital.
Additional funds would be required in the event of:

     o    significant departures from our current business plan;

     o    unforeseen delays, cost overruns, unanticipated expenses; or

     o    regulatory, engineering design and other technological changes.

     For example, it is possible that we will need substantial funds if we find
it necessary or desirable to overbuild the territory currently served through
our arrangements with the Alliances. Due to our highly leveraged capital
structure, additional financing may not be available or, if available, may not
be obtained on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us or within limitations
permitted under our existing debt covenants. Failure to obtain additional
financing, should the need for it develop, could result in the delay or
abandonment of our development and expansion plans, and we may be unable to fund
our ongoing operations.

     SPRINT MAY REQUIRE US PAY ADDITIONAL FEES THAT COULD NEGATIVELY EFFECT OUR
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

     Recently, Sprint has sought to increase service fees connection with its
development of 3G-related back-office systems and platforms. The Company, along
with other PCS affiliates of Sprint, is currently disputing the validity of
Sprint's right to pass through this fee to the affiliates. If this dispute is
resolved unfavorably to the Company, then Horizon PCS will incur additional
expenses.

     UNAUTHORIZED USE OF OUR NETWORK AND OTHER TYPES OF FRAUD COULD DISRUPT OUR
BUSINESS AND INCREASE OUR COSTS.

     We will likely incur costs associated with the unauthorized use of our
network, including administrative and capital costs associated with detecting,
monitoring and reducing the incidence of fraud. Fraud impacts interconnection
costs, capacity costs, administrative costs, fraud prevention costs and payments
to other carriers for unbillable fraudulent roaming. Although we believe that
Sprint has implemented appropriate controls to minimize the effect to us of
fraudulent usage, our efforts may not be successful.

     EXPANDING OUR TERRITORY MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS.

     As part of our business strategy, we may expand our territory through the
grant of additional markets from Sprint or through acquisitions of other Sprint
PCS affiliates. We will evaluate strategic acquisitions and alliances
principally relating to our current operations. These transactions may require
the approval of Sprint and commonly involve a number of risks, including:

     o    difficulty assimilating acquired operations and personnel;

     o    diversion of management attention;

     o    disruption of ongoing business;

     o    inability to retain key personnel;

     o    inability to successfully incorporate acquired assets and rights into
          our service offerings;

     o    inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and
          policies; and

     o    impairment of relationships with employees, customers or vendors.

     Failure to overcome these risks or any other problems encountered in these
transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business. In connection
with these transactions, we may also issue additional equity securities and
incur additional debt.


                                      -44-
<PAGE>

     THE SPRINT PCS AGREEMENTS AND OUR RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
INCLUDE PROVISIONS THAT MAY DISCOURAGE, DELAY OR RESTRICT ANY SALE OF OUR
OPERATING ASSETS OR COMMON STOCK TO THE POSSIBLE DETRIMENT OF OUR NOTEHOLDERS.

     The Sprint PCS agreements restrict our ability to sell our operating assets
and common stock. Generally, Sprint must approve a change of control of our
ownership and consent to any assignment of the Sprint PCS agreements. The Sprint
PCS agreements also give Sprint a right of first refusal if we decide to sell
the operating assets of our Bright PCS markets to a third party. In addition,
provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation could also operate to
discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of our company. For
example, our restated certificate of incorporation provides for:

     o    two classes of common stock, with our class B common stock having ten
          votes per share;

     o    the issuance of preferred stock without stockholder approval; and

     o    a classified board, with each board member serving a three-year term.

     The restrictions in the Sprint PCS agreements and the provisions of our
restated certificate of incorporation could discourage any sale of our operating
assets or common stock.

     HORIZON TELCOM WILL BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF SIGNIFICANT MATTERS
PRESENTED TO STOCKHOLDERS AS A RESULT OF ITS OWNERSHIP POSITION, WHICH COULD
POTENTIALLY IMPAIR OUR ATTRACTIVENESS AS A TAKEOVER TARGET.

     Horizon Telcom beneficially owns approximately 55.6% of our outstanding
common stock on fully diluted basis as of June 30, 2003. In addition, the shares
held by Horizon Telcom are class B shares, which have ten votes per share. The
class A shares have only one vote per share. As a result, Horizon Telcom holds
approximately 83.0% of the voting power on a fully diluted basis at June 30,
2003. Horizon Telcom will have the voting power to control the election of our
board of directors and it will be able to cause amendments to our restated
certificate of incorporation or our restated bylaws. Horizon Telcom also may be
able to cause changes in our business without seeking the approval of any other
party. These changes may not be to the advantage of our company or in the best
interest of our other stockholders or the holders of our notes. For example,
Horizon Telcom will have the power to prevent, delay or cause a change in
control of our company and could take other actions that might be favorable to
Horizon Telcom, but not necessarily to other stockholders. This may have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change in control. In addition, Horizon
Telcom is controlled by members of the McKell family, who collectively own
approximately 60.7% of the voting interests of Horizon Telcom. Therefore, the
McKell family, acting as a group, may be able to exercise indirect control over
us.

     WE MAY FACE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WITH HORIZON TELCOM, WHICH MAY HARM OUR
BUSINESS.

     Conflicts of interest may arise between Horizon Telcom, and us or its other
affiliates, in areas relating to past, ongoing and future relationships,
including:

     o    corporate opportunities;

     o    tax and intellectual property matters;

     o    potential acquisitions;

     o    financing transactions, sales or other dispositions by Horizon Telcom
          of shares of our common stock held by it; and

     o    the exercise by Horizon Telcom of its ability to control our
          management and affairs.

     Horizon Telcom controls approximately 83.0% of the voting power of our
shares on a fully diluted basis. Horizon Telcom is engaged in a diverse range of
telecommunications-related businesses, such as local telephone services and
Internet services, and these businesses may have interests that conflict or
compete in some manner with our business. Horizon Telcom is under no obligation


                                      -45-
<PAGE>

to share any future business opportunities available to it with us, unless
Delaware law requires it to do so. Any conflicts that may arise between us and
Horizon Telcom or any of its affiliates or any loss of corporate opportunity to
Horizon Telcom that may otherwise be available to us may impact our financial
condition or results of operations because these conflicts of interest or losses
of corporate opportunities could result in a loss of customers and, therefore,
business. Because Horizon Telcom will be able to control the outcome of most
conflicts upon which stockholders could vote and because it will have the voting
power to control our board of directors, conflicts may not be resolved in our
favor.

     PRESENT AND FUTURE TRANSACTIONS WITH HORIZON TELCOM MAY BE ON TERMS THAT
ARE NOT AS FAVORABLE AS COULD BE OBTAINED FROM THIRD PARTIES.

     In the past, we have entered into transactions with Horizon Telcom
including the leasing of towers by Horizon Telcom to us and the advancing of
cash to us to finance our operations. In addition, Horizon Services, a
subsidiary of Horizon Telcom provides administrative services to us including
finance and accounting services, computer access and human resources. Although
these transactions were on terms that we believe are fair, because Horizon
Telcom currently owns 56.3% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted
basis, third parties with whom we wish to enter into agreements or the
marketplace in general may not perceive these transactions with Horizon Telcom
to be fair. In addition, because Horizon Telcom has the power to control our
board of directors, we may not be able to renew these agreements on terms
favorable to us.

     WE MAY EXPERIENCE A HIGH RATE OF CUSTOMER TURNOVER, WHICH WOULD INCREASE
OUR COSTS OF OPERATIONS AND REDUCE OUR REVENUE AND PROSPECTS FOR GROWTH.

     Our strategy to minimize customer turnover, commonly known as churn, may
not be successful. As a result of customer turnover, we lose the revenue
attributable to these customers and increase the costs of establishing and
growing our customer base. The PCS industry has experienced a higher rate of
customer turnover as compared to cellular industry averages. We have experienced
an increase in churn during 2002, primarily caused by NDASL customers' inability
to pay for services billed. Current and future strategies to reduce customer
churn may not be successful.

     The rate of customer turnover is affected by the following factors, several
of which are not within our ability to address:

     o    credit worthiness of customers;

     o    extent of network coverage;

     o    reliability issues such as blocked calls, dropped calls and handset
          problems;

     o    non-use of phones;

     o    change of employment;

     o    a lack of affordability;

     o    price competition;

     o    Sprint's PCS customer credit policies;

     o    customer care concerns; and

     o    other competitive factors.

     A high rate of customer turnover could adversely affect our competitive
position, results of operations and our costs of, or losses incurred in,
obtaining new customers, especially because we subsidize some of the cost of the
handsets purchased by our customers.


                                      -46-
<PAGE>

     OUR ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO COVER
UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS.

     On an ongoing basis, we estimate the amount of customer receivables that we
may not collect to reflect the expected loss on such accounts in the current
period. However, our allowance for doubtful accounts may underestimate actual
unpaid receivables for various reasons, including:

     o    adverse changes in our churn rate exceeding our estimates;

     o    adverse changes in the economy generally exceeding our expectations;
          or

     o    unanticipated changes in Sprint's PCS products and services.

     If our allowance for doubtful accounts is insufficient to cover losses on
our receivables, our business, financial position or results of operations could
be materially adversely affected.

     BECAUSE THE WIRELESS INDUSTRY HAS EXPERIENCED HIGHER CUSTOMER ADDITIONS AND
HANDSET SALES IN THE FOURTH CALENDAR QUARTER AS COMPARED TO THE OTHER THREE
CALENDAR QUARTERS, A FAILURE BY US TO ACQUIRE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE CUSTOMERS IN
THE FOURTH QUARTER COULD HAVE A DISPROPORTIONATE NEGATIVE EFFECT ON OUR RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.

     The wireless industry is historically dependent on fourth calendar quarter
results. Our overall results of operations could be significantly reduced if we
have a worse than expected fourth calendar quarter for any reason, including the
following:

     o    our inability to match or beat pricing plans offered by competitors;

     o    our failure to adequately promote Sprint's PCS products, services and
          pricing plans;

     o    our inability to obtain an adequate supply or selection of handsets;

     o    a downturn in the economy of some or all of the markets in our
          territory; or

     o    a generally poor holiday shopping season.

     REGULATION BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES MAY INCREASE OUR COSTS OF PROVIDING
SERVICE OR REQUIRE US TO CHANGE OUR SERVICES, WHICH COULD IMPAIR OUR FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE.

     The licensing, construction, use, operation, sale and interconnection
arrangements of wireless telecommunications systems are regulated to varying
degrees by the FCC, the Federal Aviation Administration and, depending on the
jurisdiction, state and local regulatory agencies and legislative bodies.
Adverse decisions regarding these regulatory requirements could negatively
impact our operations and our cost of doing business.

     USE OF HAND-HELD PHONES MAY POSE HEALTH RISKS, REAL OR PERCEIVED, WHICH
COULD RESULT IN THE REDUCED USE OF OUR SERVICES OR LIABILITY FOR PERSONAL INJURY
CLAIMS.

     Media reports have suggested that radio frequency emissions from wireless
handsets may be linked to various health problems, including cancer, and may
interfere with various electronic medical devices, including hearing aids and
pacemakers. Concerns over radio frequency emissions may discourage use of
wireless handsets or expose us to potential litigation. Any resulting decrease
in demand for our services, or costs of litigation and damage awards, could
impair our ability to profitably operate our business.


                                      -47-
<PAGE>


     REGULATION BY GOVERNMENT OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION RELATING TO THE USE OF
WIRELESS PHONES WHILE DRIVING COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

     Some studies have indicated that some aspects of using wireless phones
while driving may impair drivers' attention in certain circumstances, making
accidents more likely. These concerns could lead to litigation relating to
accidents, deaths or serious bodily injuries, or to new restrictions or
regulations on wireless phone use, any of which also could have material adverse
effects on our results of operations. A number of U.S. states and local
governments are considering or have recently enacted legislation that would
restrict or prohibit the use of a wireless handset while driving a vehicle or,
alternatively, require the use of a hands-free telephone. Legislation of this
sort, if enacted, would require wireless service providers to provide hands-free
enhanced services, such as voice activated dialing and hands-free speaker phones
and headsets, so that they can keep generating revenue from their subscribers,
who make many of their calls while on the road. If we are unable to provide
hands-free services and products to our subscribers in a timely and adequate
fashion, the volume of wireless phone usage would likely decrease, and our
ability to generate revenues would suffer.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(A)  EXHIBITS

     Exhibit No.    Description
     -----------    -----------

      3.1*          Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Horizon
                    PCS.

      3.2*          Bylaws of Horizon PCS.

     31.1           Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
                    302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     31.2           Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
                    302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     32.1           Certification  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                    Act of 2002.

     32.2           Certification  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                    Act of 2002.

----------------
     *    Incorporated by reference to the exhibit with the same number
          previously filed by the Registrant on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333- 51238).

(B)  REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

     1.   On May 5, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K
          regarding its earnings press release for the quarter ended March 31,
          2003.

     2.   On July 31, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K
          regarding its work force reduction, store closings and cost reduction
          efforts



                                      -48-
<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersign thereunto duly authorized.

                                        HORIZON PCS, INC.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Registrant


    Date: August 15, 2003               By: /s/  William A. McKell
          -----------------                 ------------------------------------
                                            William A. McKell
                                            Chief Executive Officer


    Date: August 15, 2003               By: /s/  Peter M. Holland
          -----------------                 ------------------------------------
                                            Peter M. Holland
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial and
                                            Chief Accounting Officer)


                                      -49-
1637446