alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(750)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - (-)multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149217(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

## By Year

Screenshots        April 11, 2024        QR code for Alaska Flood Observation Facebook Group

Screenshots        April 11, 2024        QR code for DGGS Photo Database of Flooding in Alaska

Training Materials        May 10, 2019        Tracking Change Over Time—River Flooding - Teacher
August 22 , 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DONTREAL DAVAL BROWN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00389

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

___________ _____________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, whic h i s cap able of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is MODIFIED to delete the specific amount of court costs imposed against appellant

. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as MODIFIED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Interactive  Motorsports  and
Entertainment  Corp.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William R. Donaldson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;  and (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of
operations of the Company.


November 20, 2003               /s/ William R. Donaldson
                                --------------------------------------------
                                William R. Donaldson
                                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained
by  Interactive  Motorsports  and  Entertainment  Corp.  and  furnished  to  the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.9


 


ANDREW CORPORATION


EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE BENEFIT PLAN AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT, made this 5th day of July, 2004, by and between Andrew
Corporation (the “Company”) and Mark Olson (the “Executive”),


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Andrew Corporation Executive
Severance Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective May 14, 2004 (the
“Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive has been designated as an eligible participant
in the Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Executive and Company hereby agree as follows:


 


1.                                       Plan
Benefits.  The Executive has been
designated as a TIER III Participant in the Plan and shall be eligible solely
for the benefits set forth therein applicable to TIER III Participants.  The receipt of such benefits shall be
subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan, including,
but not limited to, terms related to the amount, time and form of
benefits.  By execution of this
Agreement, the Executive agrees to be bound by the provisions of the Plan, as
amended and restated effective May 14, 2004, and as may be subsequently
amended.


 


2.                                       Arbitration.  The Executive acknowledges that
Section 7.2 of the Plan contains an arbitration provision, and by
execution of this Agreement agrees to be bound by the terms of such arbitration
provision.


 


3.                                       Plan
Not Contract of Employment.  The
Plan does not constitute a contract of employment and nothing in the Plan shall
be construed to give the Executive the right to be retained by the Company or
to any benefits not specifically provided by the Plan.


 


4.                                       Plan
Supercedes Prior Change in Control Severance Agreements.  The Executive acknowledges and agrees that
the benefits and terms set forth in the May 14, 2004 restatement of the Plan,
as applicable to the Participant based on the Tier designated in paragraph 1
above, are a replacement for and in lieu of any benefits to which the Executive
may have been entitled under the Plan prior to its restatement or under any
other agreement with the Company relating to Change in Control severance
benefits.  The Executive further
acknowledges such benefits and terms may be subsequently amended pursuant to
Section 7.1 of the Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date first above written.


 


	
  EXECUTIVE

  	
  ANDREW CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Mark Olson

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Ralph E. Faison

  	
   

  
	
  , individually

  	
   

  	
  By: Ralph E. Faison

  
	
   

  	
  Its: President & Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12612]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “The First Homosexuals” by Alphawood Foundation, through its subsidiary Alphawood Exhibitions LLC, at the Wrightwood 659 Gallery, Chicago, Illinois, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-30573 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 210 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a commemorative 

postage stamp should be issued in remembrance of the victims and 

in honor of the veterans of the peacekeeping mission in Beirut, Lebanon, 

from 1982 to 1984. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2013 

Mr. JONES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

a commemorative postage stamp should be issued in 

remembrance of the victims and in honor of the veterans 

of the peacekeeping mission in Beirut, Lebanon, from 

1982 to 1984. 

Whereas on the morning of October 23, 1983, at approximately 6:20 a.m., a truck packed with explosives broke 

security and detonated outside of the United States Marine Corps Barracks in Beirut, Lebanon; 

Whereas 241 United States Military personnel were killed in 

the blast; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 210 IH 

Whereas a total of 273 members of the Armed Services from 

36 States across the United States were killed while serving in Beirut, Lebanon, from 1982 to 1984; 

Whereas the servicemen were part of a multinational peacekeeping force; 

Whereas the honor and sacrifice of the victims and veterans 

will never be forgotten; 

Whereas remembering those who lost their lives and those 

who served in Beirut would enhance public awareness of 

the roots of the war on terror and strengthen public resolve to rid the world of evil; 

Whereas October 23, 2008 will mark the 25th anniversary of 

the Beirut bombing; and 

Whereas the Nation should celebrate the peace in the American spirit that was embodied in the mission of these fallen heroes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should 

4 issue a commemorative postage stamp in remem5 brance of the victims and in honor of the veterans 

6 of the Beirut peacekeeping mission; and 

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

9 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2001.

#### Beckworth *v.*Phillips.

Action for damages, from city .court of Mount Yernon — Judge Griffin presiding. May 26, 1909.

Submitted October 26, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

Powell, J.

1. Verdicts and judgments are usually conclusive only upon parties and privies. The prosecutor is not such a party and has not such privity in a criminal prosecution as to make the verdict rendered in the criminal case binding on him in a civil case brought for the redressing of the same alleged wrong. *Powell*v. Wiley, 125 *Ga.*823 (54 S. E. 732), and cit.

2. Where a defendant in a civil action for assault and battery attempts to justify or to mitigate on account of opprobrious language used to him by the plaintiff, the questions whether the language used was opprobrious, and whether it was such as to amount to justification or mitigation, are exclusively for the jury, and it is not incumbent upon the court, either with or without request, to charge the jury that particular words are opprobrious. *Thompson*v. Shelverton, 131 *Ga.*714 (63 S. E. 220; *Fish*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*416 (52 S. E. 737).

3. In an action for assault and battery, especially where there is a prayer for punitive damages, the enlightened conscience of the jury affords the measure.

4. It is not error for the court to refuse to allow the defendant to prove an act of justification or mitigation not pleaded. Especially is this true where the alleged conduct of the plaintiff was remote from the assault.

5. The evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*860
      *J. B. Geiger,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. B. Calhoun, L. C. Underwood, Eugene Talmadge,*contra.
Exhibit  23.d





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our report dated December 10, 2013, relating to the financial statements of Meritor WABCO Vehicle Control Systems appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Meritor, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2013:





FormRegistration No.PurposeS-8333-192458Amended 2010 Long Term Incentive PlanS-3333-179405Registration of common stock, preferred stock, warrants and guarantees of debt securitiesS-8333-171713Amended 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1643332010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-3333-163233Registration of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, and guaranteesS-8333-1411862007 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-3333-143615Registration of convertible notes, guarantees and common stockS-3333-134409Registration of convertible notes, guarantees and common stockS-8333-107913Meritor, Inc. Savings PlanS-8333-123103Meritor, Inc. Hourly Employees Saving PlanS-3333-58760Registration of debt securitiesS-8333-496101997 Long-Term Incentives PlanS-3333-43118Meritor, Inc. 1988 Stock Benefit PlanS-3333-43116Meritor, Inc. 1998 Stock Benefit PlanS-3333-43112Meritor, Inc. Employee Stock Benefit PlanS-8333-42012Employee Stock Benefit Plan, 1988 Stock Benefit Plan, and 1998 Employee Stock Benefit Plan








/S/ Deloitte & Touche





Detroit, Michigan


December 10, 2013
##### 



Exhibit
10.96
 BEARINGPOINT, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 Agreement), Grant Date), Company), Executive), Common Stock).
    1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units.
 a. Grant Date), Restricted
Stock
Units),
 b.
 2. Vesting of Restricted Stock Units.
 a. Vesting Date)
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Vesting Date
    
    Number of Restricted Stock UnitsGrant Date
    
    
    204,400July 1, 2007
    
    
    29,200July 1, 2008
    
    
    29,200July 1, 2009
    
    
    29,200
 Disability
 b.
   3. Termination of Employment. provided however Good Reason Employment Letter).
 4. Termination of Restricted Stock Units and Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Units
Gain.
 a.
  - 2 -




---



##### 



b.
 - 3 -




---



##### 



c. Cause Managing Director Agreement) provided however, provided however,
 5. Settlement of the Restricted Stock Units.
 a. Issuance of Shares of Common Stock or Cash. provided however, provided further Code) Fair Market Value
 - 4 -




---



##### 



provided however
 b. Settlement Schedule. Settlement Schedule).
 Settlement of RSUsand PermissibleSale Dates
    
    Number of RSUsGrant Date
    
    
    131,400July 1, 2007
    
    
    43,800July 1, 2008
    
    
    29,200July 1, 2009
    
    
    29,200July 1, 2010
    
    
    29,200July 1, 2011
    
    
    29,200
 c. Restrictions on Grant of the Restricted Stock Units and Issuance of
Shares.
 d. Restrictions upon Certain Terminations of Employment.
 - 5 -




---



##### 



e. Restrictions on Sale of Shares.
 f. Registration of Shares.
 g. Fractional Shares.
 h. Dividend Equivalents.
 - 6 -




---



##### 



6. Withholding Taxes.
 a. In General.
 b. Payment in Cash.
 c. Payment in Shares.
 7. Change in Control.
 a.
 b. Change in Control
   - 7 -




---



##### 



Incumbent
Board) provided however Person
  8. Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure.
 9. Rights as a Shareholder.
 10. No Employment Rights.
 - 8 -




---



##### 



11. Legends.
 12. Nontransferability of Restricted Stock Units.
 13. Amendment.
 14. Administration of this Agreement.
 15. Binding Effect.
 16. Governing Law.
 17. Construction.
 - 9 -




---



##### 



18. Employment Letter.
  BEARINGPOINT, INC.Harry L. YouChief Executive Officer
 - 10 -




---



##### 



Acknowledgement, Acceptance and Agreement:
  /s/ Judy Ethell

Signature
    
    
    
    10/3/06

DateJudy Ethell

Print Name
 - 11 -
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 28, 2006
 TALX CORPORATION
 
 Missouri
    
    000-21465
    
    43-0988805(State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 St. Louis, Missouri 63146
   o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Acto Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Acto Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2b under the Exchange Acto Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSSlide Presentation    Table of Contents  
 Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
 th
  Non-GAAP Financial Measures
   
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
 Exhibits.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Date:  June 28, 2006
    TALX CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ L. Keith GravesL. Keith GravesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Slide Presentation for June 29, 2006 Presentation at William Blair & Companys 26th Annual Growth Stock Conference
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: FRD

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

General        September 30, 2020        440.8 - Nuclear Formerly Restricted Data (FRD) and Restricted Data (RD) Information Classification and Declassification

Research        July 20, 2018        Fredericksburg (FRD)

Photography        June 30, 2011        Fredericksburg Geomagnetic Observatory

Photography  Fredericksburg Geomagnetic Observatory
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven J. Haack, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 6, 2009




/s/ Steven J. Haack


Steven J. Haack


Secretary & Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10184

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JASON RICHARD RANSOM

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-11-ALL

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jason Richard

Ransom has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ransom has filed a response. The

record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration atthis time of Ransom’s

claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell,

470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10184

2

counsel’s brief, and Ransom’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.