alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

             -----------------------------------------------------

         In connection with the filing by Trend Mining Company (the "Company")
of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


August 19, 2004
                                           /s/ Thomas Loucks
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Thomas Loucks
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


August 19, 2004
                                           /s/ John P. Ryan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John P. Ryan
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(15)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(69)
              - 2023(21)
              - 2022(11)
              - (-)2021(3)

staff profileNicholas J Estes

staff profileAllan Ruddy

staff profileMichael Ierardi
**Exhibit 32**

 

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

 

Section 1350 Certification

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that this report ofOrient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of and for the periods presented in the report.

 

 
| /s/  P.M. White                                                                          |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul  M. White  President and  Chief Executive Officer  (acting Chief Financial Officer) |   |

 

 

Dated:   November9, 2007

 

 

[A signed original of this written certification hasbeen provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained byOrient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.]

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**






**(18
      U.S.C. Section 1350)**













H.
      David
      Ramm, Chief Executive Officer, and John D. Giolli, Chief Financial Officer,
      of
      Millennium Cell Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in
      connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005
      (the “Report”) and does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) that to our knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
      dates
      and for the periods expressed in the Report.







A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.







/s/
      H.
      David Ramm


H.
      David
      Ramm


Chief
      Executive Officer


August
      15, 2005





/s/
      John D. Giolli


John
      D.
      Giolli


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      15, 2005
R.B., Father of W.B., a Child, Appellant, v. GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-3017

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 14, 2018

Shari J. Wilson, Rockledge, for Appellant

Thomasina Moore and Sara E. Goldfarb, of Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Guardian ad Litem Program.

Kelley Schaeffer, of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(38)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(221)
              - products_software(2)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(25)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(4)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(60)
              - multimedia_video-149194(48)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - multimedia_webcam(3)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_other_news(12)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - (-)california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(8)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - puerto rico(5)
              - south carolina(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2010        Mission Bay San Diego flooding scenario

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        CoSMoS projection for San Diego

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2018        Screenshot of Our Coast, Our Future

Charts or Graphs        April 2, 2018        CoSMoS Implementation versions
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7034

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. NICKY GENE BYRD , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00354

- NCT

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 00621

- NCT

- JLW )

Submitted : December 27, 2018 Decided: February 12, 2019

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Nicky Gene Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nicky Gene Byr d seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of
ap pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jur ists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedu ral grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the reco rd and conclude that Byrd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials bef ore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(13)
              - products_publications(81)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(35)
              - multimedia_image-141771(34)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(11)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(7)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(48)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - (-)louisiana(4)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 27, 2016        Live Chat with James Fountain on Louisiana Floods

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers

Presentations and Events        June 26, 2018        Waterfowl Seeking Submerged Aquatic Vegetation

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
Robert Levine CAPERTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Sean Kevin Gravel, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 448 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the symbols and 

traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who celebrate Christmas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2013 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BENTIVOLIO, Mrs. BLACK, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. FLORES, Mr. FORBES, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, 

Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PITTS, Mr. POSEY, Mr. SOUTHERLAND, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. 

WENSTRUP, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. LANKFORD, 

Mr. JONES, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. JORDAN, and Mr. MILLER

of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the symbols and traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who celebrate Christmas. 

Whereas Christmas is a national holiday celebrated on December 25; and 

Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment of 

the Constitution, in prohibiting the establishment of reliVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:21 Dec 19, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR448.IH HR448

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 448 IH 

gion, would not prohibit any mention of religion or reference to God in civic dialog: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the symbols and tra3 ditions of Christmas; 

4 (2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban ref5 erences to Christmas; and 

6 (3) expresses support for the use of these symbols 

7 and traditions by those who celebrate Christmas. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Distributors Holding Inc., a
Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Barbara A. Ras, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to her knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: November 7, 2005

                                          /s/ Barbara A. Ras
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Barbara A. Ras
                                          Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                                          Financial and Accounting Officer)
John C. SCOLES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 07, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Jean Raymond RODNEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1948

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 2, 2019

Jean Raymond Rodnez, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Hernandez v. State*, 124 So.3d 757 (Fla. 2012) (holding that *Padilla v. Kentucky*, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively). *See also* *State v. Green*, 944 So.2d 208, 210 (Fla. 2006) (holding that the two-year limitations period for filing a motion to withdraw plea for failure of the trial court to advise a defendant that the plea could result in deportation "commences when the judgment and sentence become final unless the defendant could not, with the exercise of due diligence, have ascertained within the two-year period that he or she was subject to deportation"); *Jules v. State*, 233 So.3d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
Jeremiah TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5258

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

Jeremiah Taylor, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Lewis, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
1994.

#### Gainesville Realty Company *v.*Langford.

Appeal, from Hall superior court — Judge Kimsey. June 16, 1909.

Submitted July 20, —

Decided November 9, 1909.

Hill, C. J.

The only question in this case is one of fact. No error of law is complained of, and the evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*859
      *W. M.*Johnson, for plaintiff.

B. *P, Gaillard Jr.,*for defendant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(5)
              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileAnthony "Tony" S Trease
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WGNB Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Haack, Secretary and
      Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      14, 2007


/s/ Steven J. HaackSteven
              J. HaackSecretary
                & Treasurer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
Grey Lamont GOODMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3203

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2019

Grey Lamont Goodman, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 16, 2022

No. 04-20-00333-CR

EX PARTE AHMED ZOHAIR

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR2128A-W1

Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an appeal of the trial court’s ruling on a pre-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See 

Arreola v. State, 207 S.W.3d 387, 390 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). 

 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2 provides that in a criminal appeal where the 

defendant is the appellant, “[t]he trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order....” TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). “An order denying a pretrial application seeking habeas corpus relief is an appealable 

order.” Ex parte Stevens, No. 03-19-00103-CR, 2019 WL 1123457, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin 

Mar. 11, 2019, no pet.) (citing Ex parte Schmidt, 109 S.W.3d 480, 481 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)); 

accord Arreola, 207 S.W.3d at 390. Rule 25.2 further provides, “If the defendant is the 

appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal 

under Rule 25.2(a)(2),” and cautions that “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that 

shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these 

rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d). But the Rules of Appellate Procedure also provide for this court to order 

the trial court to supplement the record with the certification of a defendant’s right to appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

FILE COPY
Ahmed’s habeas appeal is currently submitted to this court for consideration, but the Rule 

25.2 form contained in the record does not belong to the trial court’s denial of Ahmed’s 

application for writ of habeas corpus. Rather, it belongs to Ahmed’s plea proceeding. The 

record contains no other Rule 25.2 form. Contra TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2. 

We therefore abate this appeal and order the trial court to submit a supplemental clerk’s 

record that contains a Rule 25.2 certification of Appellant Ahmed’s right to appeal by May 31, 

2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2, 34.5(c)(2). 

It is so ORDERED on May 16, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

General        September 7, 2021        The Value of U.S. Coral Reefs for Risk Reduction