alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Challenger Powerboats, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |                                                             | 
|----------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        |  |     |                                                            
|                        |  |     |                                                            
|                        |  |     |                                                             | 
|Date: November 19, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Laurie Phillips                                         | 
|                        |  |     | Laurie Phillips                                             | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
ZACHARY J. KNIGHT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 600

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County

. Stanley H. Griffis, III , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo B ondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BENTON, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
AL PRINCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 18, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 7, 2019

Al Prince, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition filed on May 14, 2018, is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and is dismissed. *See* *Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Petitioner is cautioned that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings will result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court or referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. *See* *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999) ; § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat.

Wolf, Lewis, and Rowe, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit
10.97
 BEARINGPOINT, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 Agreement), Grant
Date), Company), Executive), Common Stock).
    1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units.
 a. Grant Date), Restricted
Stock
Units),
 b.
 2. Vesting of Restricted Stock Units.
 a. Vesting Date)
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Vesting Date
    
    Number of Restricted Stock UnitsGrant Date
    
    
    23,500July 1, 2007
    
    
    23,500July 1, 2008
    
    
    23,500July 1, 2009
    
    
    23,500
 Disability
 b.
   3. Termination of Employment. provided however, Good Reason Employment Letter).
 4. Termination of Restricted Stock Units and Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Units
Gain.
 a.
  - 2 -




---



##### 



- 3 -




---



##### 



b.
 c. Cause Managing Director Agreement) provided however, provided however
 5. Settlement of the Restricted Stock Units.
 a. Issuance of Shares of Common Stock or Cash. provided however provided further Code)
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Fair Market Value provided however
 b. Settlement Schedule. Settlement Schedule).
 Settlement of RSUsand PermissibleSale Dates
    
    Number of RSUsGrant Date
    
    
    23,500July 1, 2007
    
    
    23,500July 1, 2008
    
    
    23,500July 1, 2009
    
    
    23,500
 c. Restrictions on Grant of the Restricted Stock Units and Issuance of
Shares.
 d.
Restrictions upon Certain Terminations of Employment.
 - 5 -




---



##### 



e. Restrictions on Sale of Shares.
 f. Registration of Shares.
 g. Fractional Shares.
 h. Dividend Equivalents.
 - 6 -




---



##### 



6. Withholding Taxes.
 a. In General.
 b. Payment in Cash.
 c. Payment in Shares.
 7. Change in Control.
 a.
 b. Change in Control
   - 7 -




---



##### 



Incumbent
Board) provided however Person
  8. Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure.
 9. Rights as a Shareholder.
 10. No Employment Rights.
 - 8 -




---



##### 



11. Legends.
 12. Nontransferability of Restricted Stock Units.
 13. Amendment.
 14. Administration of this Agreement.
 15. Binding Effect.
 16. Governing Law.
 17. Construction.
 - 9 -




---



##### 



18. Employment Letter.
  BEARINGPOINT, INC.Harry L. YouChief Executive Officer
 - 10 -




---



##### 



Acknowledgement, Acceptance and Agreement:
  /s/ Judy Ethell

Signature
    
    
    
    10/3/06

DateJudy Ethell

Print Name
 - 11 -
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Targeted Genetics Corproation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities & Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J.
Poston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                              /s/ David J. Poston
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David J. Poston
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            March 14, 2006

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as Exhibit 32 to the Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and in accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of
Regulation S-K. This certification is not being "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is not and should not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into the Form 10-K or any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_publications(55)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(20)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - (-)other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)ohio(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

General        March 31, 2023        Learn more about available data related to flooding
Maxiana SAINTFLEUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-0020

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 6, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Damoorgian and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                                   PURSUANT TO

                               SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June
30, 2003 (the "Report") of BearingPoint, Inc. (the "Registrant"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Randolph C.
Blazer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                                /s/ Randolph C. Blazer
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name: Randolph C. Blazer
                                                Date: September 29, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
F. Russo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ Peter Russo
                                                ---------------------
                                                Peter F. Russo
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

 July 22, 2005
----

**EXHIBIT 12.4**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Sandra Lim, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this Annual  Report on Form 20-F of Regalito Copper Corp. (formerly Lumina Copper Corp.)  (the "Registrant");

2.      Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,  fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of  operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in this report;

4.      The Registrant's other  certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for the Registrant and have:

(a)      Designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the  period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)      [omitted  in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238]

(c)      Evaluated the effectiveness  of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this  report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such  evaluation; and

(d)      Disclosed in this report  any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that  occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal  control over financial reporting; and

5.      The Registrant's other  certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation  of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and  the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing  the equivalent functions):

(a)      All significant deficiencies  and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)      Any fraud, whether or not  material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant  role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2006
Catalino BURGOS, Jr., DOC #T61144, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 14, 2018

Catalino Burgos, Jr., pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

e-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mary A. Grace,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of e-Smart Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                  
|----------------------- |  | -----------------
|Date: October 24, 2007 
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Mary A. Grace
|Mary A. Grace,         
|Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.42
 Mobility Electronics, Inc.  Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan  Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
 Agreement     Grant Date Company   Participant
 WHEREAS Plan
 WHEREAS
 NOW THEREFORE
 1. Award of Restricted Stock Units    Units
 2. Vesting Schedule Vesting Date
 Time Based Vesting Time Based Vesting Date
 Performance Based Accelerated Vesting
 Acceleration Target
 Death; Disability; Termination Without Cause; or Retirement




---



##### 



Cause Retirement
 Change in Control Change in Control Exchange Act voting securities Transaction




---



##### 



3. Restrictions
 Termination of Agreement and Rights to Units
 Non-Assignability
 4. Form and Timing of Payment Shares
 5. Tax Withholding
 6. Change in Capital Structure
 7. No Rights as a Stockholder
 8. No Right to Employment
 9. Participant Bound by Plan




---



##### 



10. Conflicts
 11. Binding Effect
 12. Governing Law
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 MOBILITY ELECTRONICS, INC.By:Name:Title:
  SignaturePrint NameSocial Security Number or
Commerce ID NumberAddress
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(33)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(6)
              - connect_staff_profiles(7)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - (-)massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation

National News Release        June 1, 2016        This hurricane season, scientists bring wave action into the picture
Keith J. MYLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2674

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 13, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Conner, JJ., concur.
Kenneth L. BALDWIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D18-0558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 20, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed as untimely filed, without prejudice to any right Appellant may have to file a motion to correct illegal sentence with respect to the argument raised in claim two of the underlying motion to correct, vacate, and set aside an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
##### 



Exhibit 10.40
 (BEARING POINT LOGO)
Managing Director Agreement
    

(BAR CODE)
 MANAGING DIRECTOR AGREEMENT
 ,
 1. Employment/Exclusive Services. , ; ; .
 2. Compensation and Benefits .
  3. Duty of Loyalty .
 4. Conflicts of Interest .




---



##### 



Managing Director Agreement
 5. Covenants .
 Non-Disclosure . .
 Non-Competition .
 Non-Solicitation of Clients and Prospective Clients .
 Non-Solicitation of Employees




---



##### 



Managing Director Agreement
 .
 6. Remedies . :
 Compensation Forfeiture .
 Injunctive Relief .
 Competitive Injuries .
 Employee Solicitation .
 7. Certain Definitions .
 Cause




---



##### 



Managing Director Agreement
  Client
 Prospective Client .
 BearingPoint /
 BearingPoint Services
 Competitive Business
 8. Termination and Resignation .
 . ,




---



##### 



Managing Director Agreement
   9. Mediation and Arbitration .
 10. Survival.
 11. Entire Agreement .
 12. Choice of Law .
 13. Waiver .
 14. Severability . .




---



##### 



Managing Director Agreement
 15. Assignment and Beneficiaries .
 16. Counterparts .




---



##### 



Managing Director Agreement
  BEARINGPOINT
    
    
    
    EMPLOYEEBy:(Signature)Title:(Print Employees Full Name)Dated:(Employees ID)Dated: