alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |  |  |  |  |
|                           |   |   |
|                           | Aeterna Zentaris Inc.(Canada) |   |
|                           |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |   |   |
|                           | 100% |   |   | 100% |   |
|                           |   |   |
| Aeterna Zentaris GmbH(Germany) |   | Aeterna Zentaris, Inc.(Delaware) |
|                           |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |
|                           | 100% |   |   |
|                           |   |   |
| Zentaris IVF GmbH(Germany)     |   |   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |   |
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 March 3, 2006
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 MSX International, Inc.
  Delaware
    
    333-49821
    
    38-3323099(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 1950 Concept Drive, Warren, Michigan
 48091
 (248) 299-1000
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  ITEM 1.01. ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENTITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITSSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXFourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 3, 2006    Table of Contents  
 ITEM 1.01. ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
      
 ITEM 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
AND EXHIBITS
 (c)
    
    Exhibits:
 10.1
    
    Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
March 3, 2006 among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other parties
signatory thereto.
 1




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
    By:
    
    /s/ Frederick K. MinturnFrederick K. MinturnExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description10.1
    
    Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
March 3, 2006 among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other parties
signatory thereto.
Gary ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4499

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Vincent JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 25, 2018]

Vincent Jones, Moore Haven, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, Conner and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Exhibit  23.d





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our report dated December 10, 2013, relating to the financial statements of Meritor WABCO Vehicle Control Systems appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Meritor, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2014:





FormRegistration No.PurposeS-3333-200858Registration of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities and guaranteesS-8333-192458Amended and Restated 2010 Long Term Incentive PlanS-8333-171713Amended 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1643332010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1411862007 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-107913Meritor, Inc. Savings PlanS-8333-123103Meritor, Inc. Hourly Employees Saving PlanS-8333-496101997 Long-Term Incentives PlanS-3333-43116Meritor, Inc. 1998 Stock Benefit PlanS-3333-43112Meritor, Inc. Employee Stock Benefit PlanS-8333-42012Employee Stock Benefit Plan, 1988 Stock Benefit Plan, and 1998 Employee Stock Benefit Plan











/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Detroit, Michigan


December 12, 2014
**JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURA L RULES COMMITTEE**  **FINA L REPORT**  **1**
**AMENDMENT OF Pa.R.J.C.P. 120, 127, 140, 160, 166, 182, 185, 187, 190, 191, 192,**  **243, 512, 800, 1120, 1127, 1154, 1166, 1182, 1185, 1187, 1190, 1191, 1243, 1342, 1512, 1608, 1610, 1635, and 1800**  On April 6 , 2017 , the Court amended the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure to change the term “master” to “juvenile court hearing officer.”
The term “master” was incorporated into the Rules from the Juvenile Act. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 et seq

. The continued use of the term “master” ha d been rejected by several ju dicial districts because it was considered archaic , subject to mispercept ion , and inconsistent with the use of “hearing officer” in other proceedings

. Accordingly, in some judicial districts the title of “master” had been updated to “hearing officer, ” which more accurately reflects the authority to preside over delinquency and dependency matters. The Committee deliberated on the merits of this local practice and agreed th at “master” should be updated to the more modern phrase of “hearing officer” within the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure

. A proposal was published for public comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin at 42 Pa.B 5480 (August 25, 2012) to replace “master” with “hearing officer

. ” In response to a comment and to differentiate among the different types of hearing officers in other proceedings , a post

- publication modification to the proposal expand ed the title from “hearing officer” to “juvenile court hearing officer.”

1 The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
Order entered September 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00859-CV

THERESA BARNETT, Appellant

V.

DAVID S. CROCKETT, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-00136

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 3, 2014 “notice of appeal” in which she 

complains of the trial court’s August 13, 2014 order sustaining two contests to her affidavit of 

inability to pay and the trial court’s August 28, 2014 order denying her amended motion to strike 

the August 13th order. We construe the notice of appeal as a motion pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 20.1(j)(1) and ORDER Renee Carroll, Official Court Reporter of the 116th 

Judicial District Court, to file the record of the August 5, 2014 indigency hearing. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1(j)(1),(3). We further ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Gary Fitzsimmons to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of any order granting appellant leave to file 

an “updated” or “new” affidavit of indigence. If no such order can be located, Mr. Fitzsimmons 

shall notify the Court in writing. The requested reporter’s and supplemental clerk’s record, or 
written verification, shall be filed no later than September 8, 2014 and without advance 

payment of costs. See id. 4.1, 20.1(j)(3). No extensions will be granted. See id. 20.1(j)(4).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Tonya Parker, Presiding Judge, 116th Judicial District Court; Ms. Carroll; Mr. 

Fitzsimmons; and all parties.

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Alfonso Apolinar DE LA CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1897

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 7, 2018

Alfonso Apolinar De La Cruz, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a)(2) ; *Jones v. State* , 198 So.3d 920, 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) ; *Mills v. State* , 23 So.3d 186, 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ; *see also**Nieves v. State* , 113 So.3d 162, 163 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ("[A] defendant who is arrested for different offenses on different dates is not entitled to have jail credit applied equally to all prison sentences even though the sentences are run concurrently." (quoting *Washington v. State* , 873 So.2d 609, 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ) ).

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 668 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the Community Development Block Grant 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2014 

Mr. FATTAH (for himself, Mr. TURNER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. 

BRADY of Pennsylvania, and Mr. GIBSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the Community 

Development Block Grant program. 

Whereas the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 

program is a Federal program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and provides direct grants to States and local governments for 

the purposes of economic and community development; 

Whereas the CDBG program was established under title I of 

the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; 

Whereas this grant program was signed into law by President 

Gerald R. Ford on August 22, 1974, and is among the 

longest running grant programs in our Nation’s history; 

Whereas this grant program assists more than 1,200 State 

and local governments each year; 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 668 IH 

Whereas this grant program allows grantees flexibility in 

tackling unique and complex challenges facing their communities; 

Whereas the CDBG program has invested over $145 billion 

in urban, suburban, and rural economies since its inception; 

Whereas CDBG funding is used to leverage other funds from 

the private sector, non-profit organizations, and State 

and local governments; 

Whereas every CDBG dollar invested in communities 

leverages, on average, $4.07 in other funds; 

Whereas between fiscal years 2005 and 2013 this program 

has created or retained approximately 330,500 jobs; 

Whereas the CDBG program has funded public improvements 

benefitting States and local communities; 

Whereas between fiscal years 2005 and 2013, the CDBG program provided public services to over 100 million people 

and assisted more than 1 million households; 

Whereas the CDBG program has been used to assist communities in the aftermath of natural disasters and in the 

midst of economic crises; and 

Whereas the CDBG program provides the largest amount of 

Federal assistance to State and local governments for development efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Com3 munity Development Block Grant program, now in 

4 its 40th year of continuous service; 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 668 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the benefits the CDBG program 

2 has provided to urban, suburban, and rural commu3 nities; and 

4 (3) acknowledges the importance of this Fed5 eral grant program to States and local communities 

6 throughout the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jerry D. Chase, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.




Date: May 09, 2011
By:
/s/ Jerry D. ChaseName:
Jerry D. ChaseTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer(Chief Executive Officer)


I, Reagan Y. Sakai , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.




Date: May 09, 2011
By:
/s/ Reagan Y. SakaiName:
Reagan Y. SakaiTitle:
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Chief Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2025-1)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Surface Transportation Board has adopted the first quarter 2025 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads.

# DATES:

*Applicability Date:*                         January 1, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. If you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, please call (202) 245-0245.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) is an index formulated to represent changes in railroad costs incurred by the nation's largest railroads over a specified period of time. The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is required by law to publish the RCAF on at least a quarterly basis. Each quarter, the Association of American Railroads computes three types of RCAF figures and submits those figures to the Board for approval. The Board has reviewed the submission and adopts the RCAF figures for the first quarter of 2025. The first quarter 2025 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.944. The first quarter 2025 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.367. The first quarter 2025 RCAF-5 is 0.347. Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available at                     *www.stb.gov.*

Decided: December 18, 2024.

By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Primus, and Schultz.

Stefan Rice,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2024-30705 Filed 12-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
1848.

#### Brown *v.*The State.

Hill, C. J.

1. Obtaining money on a mortgage or bill of sale of personal property by false and fraudulent statements as to the existence of liens may be an offense under the' Penal Code, §668 or §670, although the liens may be recorded, and by an inspection of the records might have been discovered. *Holton*v. *State,*109 *Ga.*131 (34 S. E. 358); *Crawford*v. *State,*117 *Ga.*247 (43 S. E. 762).

2. The statute 'of limitations does not begin to run in favor of the offender until his offense is known to the prosecutor, or to *some*one interested . in the prosecution or injured1 by the offense. An allegation in an indictment for cheating and swindling that the offense was unknown to the person cheated and defrauded until a certain named date is sufficient, and proof of the allegation would presumptively fix the date when the statute of limitations would begin to run. Penal Code, §30, par. 4; *Cohen*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*689 (59 S. E. 4).

*330Accusation of cheating and swindling, from city court of Quit-man — Judge McCall. January 8, 1909.

Submitted May 18, —

Decided June 15, 1909.

*Branch ■& Snow,*for plaintiff in error.

*B, M. Turner, solicitor,*contra.

3. We find no error of law, and the evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(5)
              - products_publications(80)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(7)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(5)
              - (-)news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - (-)georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(2)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - iowa(7)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(4)
              - ohio(3)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(7)
              - texas(12)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

State News Release        November 10, 2015        New Interactive Flood Warning Tool Developed for Big Creek

State News Release        February 10, 2014        Flood Chart Aids in Evacuation Decisions

State News Release        November 9, 2022        USGS forecasts Tropical Storm Nicole could significantly impact southeastern beaches
David BAKER, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Amando CRUZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 04, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Mark JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2549

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 8, 2019

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, and Crystal McBee Frusciante, Sunrise, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(17)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(42)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Illustrations        June 17, 2022        Installing natural infrastructure can impact the water and carbon budgets of dryland streams and watersheds
Exhibit 16June 21, 2006U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
1650.

#### Dudley *v.*Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co.

Complaint, from city court of Sparta- — Judge Little. December 23, 1908.

Submitted February 25, —

Decided May 18, 1909.

*B. II. Lewis, for plaintiff in error. W. II. Burwell,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

The evidence demanding tlie verdict, the error of law assigned is immaterial. *Judymenl affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 571 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 571

   Recognizing the roles and contributions of America's teachers to 
building and enhancing the Nation's civic, cultural, and economic well-
                                 being.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2014

Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
Vargas, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Jolly, Mr. Hanna, 
Mr. Chabot, Ms. Titus, Ms. Moore, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Wolf, 
  Mrs. Black, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Tonko, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Deutch, Mr. 
 Price of North Carolina, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Bentivolio, Mr. Benishek, 
 Mr. Terry, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Sablan, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, 
Mr. Holt, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Reed, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. 
   Smith of Texas, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Marino, Mr. Diaz-Balart, and Ms. 
Jenkins) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the roles and contributions of America's teachers to 
building and enhancing the Nation's civic, cultural, and economic well-
                                 being.

Whereas education and knowledge are the foundation of America's current and 
        future strength;
Whereas teachers and other education staff have earned and deserve the respect 
        of their students and communities for their selfless dedication to 
        community service and the future of our Nation's children;
Whereas the purpose of ``National Teacher Day'', held on May 6, 2014, is to 
        raise public awareness of the unquantifiable contributions of teachers 
        and to promote greater respect and understanding for the teaching 
        profession; and
Whereas students, schools, communities, and a number of organizations 
        representing educators are hosting teacher appreciation events in 
        recognition of ``National Teacher Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks and promotes the 
profession of teaching by encouraging students, parents, school 
administrators, and public officials to participate in teacher 
appreciation events during ``National Teacher Day''.
                                 <all>
```