alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



I, Nooruddin S. Karsan, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kenexa Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 3, 2005 |  | /s/ Nooruddin S.Karsan 
|                       |  | Nooruddin S. Karsan    
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 /s/ G. RICHARD WAGONER, JR.
[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Bruner , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2024

- Ohio

- 85.]

O HIO S TATE B AR A SSOCIATION v . B RUNER . [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Bruner , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 20 2 4

- Ohio

- 85 .] (No. 202 0

- 1533

— Submitted January 11 , 202 4

— Decided January 12 , 20 24 .)

O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

__________________ __ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Harvey Bruce Bruner, Attorney Registration No. 0004829, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 17, 2021, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years, finds that respondent has complied
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24)

. {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the s tate of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Bruner
, 167 Ohio St.3d
15 , 202 1

- Ohio

- 4048 , 188 N.E.3d 1026

. K ENNEDY , C.J., and F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , S TEWART , B RUNNER , and D ETERS , JJ., concur.

_______________ __
Jeffery FORBES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

Jeffery Forbes, Lake City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Harold OZENNE

No. 2017-KP-0097

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE**

PER CURIAM:

*277Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Additionally, relator fails to show that the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in state collateral proceedings in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.
Emil LUGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2897

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019

David S. Molansky, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and G. Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**
   **Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  
 I, H. David Ramm, Interim President & Chief Executive Officer of Millennium Cell Inc., certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Millennium Cell Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [intentionally omitted] and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) [intentionally omitted];
 
 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 15, 2004
 
 /s/ H. David Ramm
 H. David Ramm
 Interim President & Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_education(17)
              - science_faqs(14)
              - science_science(751)
              - products_data(356)
              - products_maps(78)
              - products_publications(4311)
              - products_software(12)
              - products_web_tools(51)
              - multimedia_audio(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(96)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(9)
              - multimedia_before_after(17)
              - multimedia_image(1659)
              - multimedia_image-141769(49)
              - multimedia_image-141770(14)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1466)
              - multimedia_image-141772(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(8)
              - multimedia_image-141775(73)
              - multimedia_image-141776(27)
              - multimedia_image-204460(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(20)
              - multimedia_video(419)
              - multimedia_video-149194(144)
              - multimedia_video-149195(141)
              - multimedia_video-149196(26)
              - multimedia_video-149197(35)
              - multimedia_video-149198(17)
              - multimedia_video-149225(7)
              - multimedia_webcam(22)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(16)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(41)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149208(6)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - documents_file-149214(6)
              - documents_file-149216(4)
              - documents_file-149217(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(10)
              - documents_file-149222(3)
              - news_news-149245(99)
              - news_news-149246(8)
              - news_news-149248(28)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(51)
              - news_newsletters(17)
              - news_other_news(101)
              - (-)connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(104)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(55)

## By Location

              - texas(1)

## By Year

              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)

social mediaTexas Flood Watch

social mediaFloods News

MOUs        December 15, 2016        MOU between USGS and FEMA - framework (replaces 2011)
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

             MAXCOM TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIRIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       2001            2002            2003            2004            2005           2005
                                  -------------   -------------   -------------   -------------   -------------   ------------
<S>                               <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
  OUSTANDING                         13,748,445      13,885,006      14,654,063      14,806,980      13,370,478     13,370,478
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD           Ps.  (780,212)  Ps.  (828,093)  Ps.  (399,115)  Ps.  (133,303)  Ps.   (71,239)  $     (6,651)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                Ps.    (56.75)  Ps.    (59.64)  Ps.    (27.24)  Ps.     (9.00)  Ps.     (5.33)  $      (0.50)
</TABLE>
Patrick SIMMONS, Sr., et al. v. The STATE of Louisiana, et al.

NO. 2018-C-1613

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2354

DAVID BROOKSHIRE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C.F. SAUER COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-01-3833)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Mann, Jr., MANN LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Douglas M. Nabhan, WILLIAMS MULLEN,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Brookshire appeals the district court’s order, accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and granting summary

judgment to C.F. Sauer Company in his Family Medical Leave Act

(“FMLA”) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Brookshire v. C.F. Sauer Co., No. CA-01-3833 (D.S.C.

Oct. 24, 2002). To the extent that Brookshire alleges on appeal

that he qualified for FMLA leave on the grounds of a “chronic

serious health condition” under 29 C.F.R. § 825.114(a)(2)(iii)

(2003), we decline to consider the argument because he failed to

raise this issue in opposition to Sauer’s motion for summary

judgment. “‘If a party fails to assert a legal reason why summary

judgment should not be granted, that ground is waived and cannot be

considered or raised on appeal.’” Grenier v. Cyanamid Plastics,

Inc., 70 F.3d 667, 678 (1st Cir. 1995) (quoting Vaughner v. Pulito,

804 F.2d 873, 877 n.2 (5th Cir. 1986)). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financial officer of AlphaRx,  Inc.,
do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

1.    This 10-QSB report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
      of the Exchange Act; and

2.    The information  contained in this 10-QSB report fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the  financial  condition and result of operations of
      AlphaRx, Inc.




/s/ Marcel Urbanc
-----------------

Marcel Urbanc
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of **ABERDENE MINES LIMITED**(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Cameron Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 8th day of October, 2004.

 
/s/ Cameron Reynolds 
Cameron Reynolds 
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, James R. Morris, certify that: 

1.        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.;

2.        Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.        This item is omitted as it is not applicable for this 10-K/A AmendmentNo. 1. 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: 

a)        designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b)        designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c)        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

d)        disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 16, 2012
L.R., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018.

L.R., a juvenile, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - (-)other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - (-)guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

General        September 7, 2021        The Value of U.S. Coral Reefs for Risk Reduction
H. Res. 627 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 17, 2014. 

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

request the Senate to return to the House the bill (H.R. 

4412) entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and for other 

purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.