alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, Marcel Urbanc, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer ofAlphaRx, Inc. certify that: 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of AlphaRx, Inc.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.     I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave: 

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c)    presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the EvaluationDate; 

5.     We havedisclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

a)     allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b)     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

6.    I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changesin internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses. 

/s/ Marcel Urbanc Marcel Urbanc Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer February 12, 2007****

----
Exhibit 31.2
     I, Chris D. North, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofHydril Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)*    (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: August 6, 2004 /s/ Chris D. North   Chris D. North   Chief Financial Officer   * 4(b) of certification omitted in accordance with Securities and Exchange Act Release 33-8238.
Michael Alexander THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 8, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Michael Alexander Thomas, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
Xavier THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4852

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 4, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, And Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of AXM Pharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chet Howard, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





/s/  Chet Howard

Chet Howard,

Chief Executive Officer

Acting Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  April 15, 2005
Ryan WILDER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1903

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

Following review of the petition for writ of prohibition, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Motorsports and
Entertainment Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William R. Donaldson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 20, 2005                                /s/ William R. Donaldson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            William R. Donaldson
                                            Chairman, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained
by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 178 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Kelly. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2023 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Kelly. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Kelly, Cr. No. 21- 

708, pending in the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the 

production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a former 

employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:33 Apr 27, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR178.ATS SR178

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 178 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized 

3 to provide relevant testimony in the case of United States 

4 v. Kelly, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

5 should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Schwager, and any current or former officer 

8 or employee of the Secretary’s office, in connection with 

9 the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 

10 resolution. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Jurisdiction of
    
    PercentageSubsidiaries
    
    Incorporation
    
    OwnedDirect SubsidiariesCorporativo en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom SF, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom TV, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Telscape de México, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Telereunión, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Sierra Comunicaciones Globales, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom U.S.A., Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Sierra Communications USA, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Indirect SubsidiariesOutsourcing Operadora de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *
    *TECBTC Estrategias de Promoción, S.A. de C.V.
(formerly Técnicos Especializados en
Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V.)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *
    *
 
 *
    
    Maxcom owns all of the capital stock of its direct subsidiaries, except for one share of each,
which share is owned by Corporativo en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., in the case of Maxcom
Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V., and by Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V., in
the cases of Corporativo en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., Maxcom SF, S.A. de C.V., Maxcom TV,
S.A. de C.V., Telscape de México, S.A. de C.V., Sierra Comunicaciones Globales, S.A. de C.V. and
Telereunión, S.A. de C.V. This organizational structure is due to the fact that Mexican law
requires that corporations have a minimum of two shareholders.**
    
    For its indirect subsidiaries, Maxcom owns one share of each, and the remaining shares are owned
by Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V.
1

MHDocs 6660625_1 15224.1

CAUSE NO. 6,470

BETSY MECOM, DONALD R. 

MULLINS, JR., LANNIE LOUISE 

MECOM, MARK HARVEY MULLINS 

and WAHATOYA, LTD.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

WESTPORT OIL & GAS COMPANY, 

L.P. n/k/a KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS 

ONSHORE, L.P.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

49TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ZAPATA COUNTY, TEXAS

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Defendant Westport Oil & Gas Company, L.P. n/k/a Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, 

L.P. (“Defendant”), hereby gives notice that it desires to appeal from the Final Judgment, signed 

by the Court on August 31, 2015, to the Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas at San Antonio. In 

addition Defendant appeals (a) all rulings and orders leading up to the Final Judgment that were 

in any way adverse to Defendant, including without limitation any adverse orders and rulings 

made by Court prior to trial, during trial, or after the jury’s verdict but before entry of Final 

Judgment; and (b) the Court’s adverse rulings and orders, made after entry of Final Judgment, 

including without limitation the Court’s November 9, 2015 order denying Defendant’s motion 

for new trial, for remittitur, and to modify, correct and/or reform the judgment. 

Filed 11/10/2015 11:59:17 AM

Dora Castanon

District Clerk

Zapata County, Texas

6470

ACCEPTED

04-15-00714-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

11/13/2015 12:02:55 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

04-15-00714-CV

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/13/2015 12:02:55 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2 

MHDocs 6660625_1 15224.1

Respectfully submitted, 

MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR PC 

By: /s/ D. Mitchell McFarland 

 D. Mitchell McFarland 

 State Bar No. 13597700 

 Carrie Schadle 

 State Bar No. 24051618 

 700 Milam, Suite 2700 

 Houston, Texas 77002 

 Telephone: (713) 222-1470 

 Facsimile: (713) 222-5894 

 mmfarland@munsch.com 

 cschadle@munsch.com 

 CAMPERO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

 ADOLFO CAMPERO, JR. 

 State Bar No. 00793454 

 315 Calle Del Norte, Suite 207 

 Laredo, Texas 78041 

 Telephone: (956) 796-0330 

 Facsimile: (956) 796-0399 

 acampero@camperolaw.com 

 SAMORA LAW FIRM 

 Gwen J. Samora 

 State Bar No. 00784899 

 4210 Oberlin Street 

 Houston, Texas 77005 

 Telephone: (832) 646-3537 

 gwen@samorafirm.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT WESTPORT OIL & GAS COMPANY, L.P. 

 N/K/A KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE, L.P.

 
3 

MHDocs 6660625_1 15224.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been sent via 

electronic service and via email on this 10th day of November, 2015, to the following counsel of 

record: 

Email to mjones@jonesgill.com

Michael D. Jones 

Jones Gill LLP 

6363 Woodway, Suite 1100 

Houston, Texas 77057 

Email to cwehmeyer@smwenergylaw.com

Corey Wehmeyer

Santoyo Moore Wehmeyer P.C.

1020 N.E. Loop 410 , Suite 320

San Antonio, TX 78209 

 

 /s/ D. Mitchell McFarland 

D. Mitchell McFarland
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00097-CR

Ruben Gian Antonio LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5998W

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 21, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 10b-7




DESCRIPTION OF ANNUAL INCENTIVE GOALS ESTABLISHED FOR FISCAL YEAR
2011 UNDER THE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN




The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors of ArvinMeritor, Inc.(“ArvinMeritor”), established annual incentive goals for fiscal year 2011 under the Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended. These annual incentive goals are based on the levels of Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow from continuing operations that are achieved for the year, measured against fixed target amounts. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-controlling interests of consolidated joint ventures, loss on sale of receivables, restructuring expenses and asset impairment charges. Free cash flow is defined as operating cash flows provided by continuing operations (before restructuring payments) minus capital expenditures. The Compensation Committee also established target awards, stated as a percentage of base salary, for participants.




Potential annual incentive bonuses are comprised of two components: one-half of potential payments is dependent on each of (a) the level of achievement of the Adjusted EBITDA targets and (b) the level of achievement of free cash flow targets. In addition, the final award calculation is subject to a modifier that is based on an employee’s annual performance rating. The calculated award may be adjusted up to +50% or -100%. The adjustment process maintains the original budget.




To determine the amounts that are paid as bonuses, performance is measured against targets for each of the applicable components of the award calculation. For each part of the calculation for which performance exceeds that threshold, the portion of an individual’s target award that is paid out is dependent on, and increases with, the percentage of the goal that is achieved. The calculated payout, before any adjustments, for an individual cannot exceed 200% of his target award.




---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc lude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T OSCAR GON ZALE Z- LOPE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 75123 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 985- 991 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O sc arG on za l ez -L op ez , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea lfr om an im m ig r atio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic atio n f o rc an c e llatio n o f

r e m o v a l. W e have j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of 

# FI LED NO V 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 75123 2 l aw, Mi elew cz

yk v. H older , 575 F . 3d 992, 994 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e a g e n c yp r o p e r lyc o n c lu d e dth at G o n z a le z - L o p e z is s tatu to r ilyin e lig ib le for c ance l l at i on of re m ov albecause hi s c on vi ct i on for vi ol at i on of C al i forni a P enal Co d e § 2 7 3 . 5 i s c at e g o r i c a l l yac r i me o f d o me s t i c v i o l e n c e u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( E ) ( i) . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9b (b)( 1)(C ); B an uelos-Ayon v. H older , 611 F .3 d1 0 8 0 , 1 0 8 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ; s e e al s o 8 U . S . C . § 1229a ( c ) ( 3) ( B ) ( l i s t i ng perm i ss ibl e docum ent s f or proo f of c on vi ct i on ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Glenn P. Sblendorio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

/s/ Glenn P. Sblendorio
-----------------------
Glenn P. Sblendorio
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
STATE of Louisiana v. Coelious C. DYSON AKA Corlious Corall Dyson

NO. 2017-K-1048

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(11)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(112)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(7)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - (-)iowa(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        October 14, 2016        EarthView–Cedar River Surges to Second-Highest Level in Eastern Iowa
Thomas J. FELTEN and Judy J. Felten, Appellants, v. BANK OF THE WEST, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 21, 2018

Patrick R. Frank and Keisha D. Rice of Frank & Rice, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Stacey S. Fisher of Sprechman & Fisher, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.