alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 657 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 11, 2014. 

Whereas Hamas is a United States-designated terrorist organization whose charter calls for the destruction of the 

State of Israel; 

Whereas Hamas continues to reject the Quartet’s core principles—recognize Israel’s right to exist, renounce violence, and accept previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements; 

Whereas Hamas has killed hundreds of Israelis and dozens 

of Americans in rocket attacks and suicide bombings; 

Whereas since Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, Hamas 

and other terrorist groups have fired thousands of rockets at Israel; 

Whereas since June 2014, Hamas has fired nearly 300 rockets at Israel; 

Whereas Hamas’s weapons arsenal includes approximately 

12,000 rockets that vary in range; 

Whereas Iran has long provided material support to Hamas 

and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, including assistance that 

has enabled these terrorist organizations to produce 

longer-range rockets capable of striking Tel Aviv and Jerusalem; 
2 

•HRES 657 EH 

Whereas innocent Israeli civilians are indiscriminately targeted by Hamas rocket attacks; 

Whereas the United States and Israel have cooperated on 

missile defense projects, including Iron Dome, David’s 

Sling, and the Arrow Anti-Missile System, projects designed to thwart a diverse range of threats, including 

short-range missiles and rockets fired by non-state actors, such as Hamas; 

Whereas the United States has provided $235,000,000 in fiscal year 2014 for Iron Dome research, development, and 

production; 

Whereas, during the most recent rocket attacks from Gaza, 

Iron Dome has successfully intercepted dozens of rockets 

that were launched against Israeli population centers; 

and 

Whereas 5 million Israelis are currently living under the 

threat of rocket attacks from Gaza: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) reaffirms its support for Israel’s right to defend 

its citizens and ensure the survival of the State of Israel; 

(2) condemns the unprovoked rocket fire at Israel; 

and 

(3) calls on Hamas to immediately cease all rocket 

and other attacks against Israel. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Charlie JACKSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4191

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 19, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's "emergency writ of coram nobis" is treated as a petition for writ of mandamus and is denied without prejudice to any right Petitioner might have to raise the asserted issues on appeal of his judgment and sentence.
Exhibit 32

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS LTD.

Section 1350 Certification

The
undersigned hereby certify that this report of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. for the periods presented fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the report.

|/s/ J.B. SherwoodJames B. Sherwood
Chairman
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)                |  | /s/ S.M.C. SherwoodSimon M.C. Sherwood
President
(Co-Chief Executive Officer)
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ J.G. StruthersJames G. Struthers
Vice PresidentFinance and
Chief Financial Officer |  |                                                                              

Dated:
August 9, 2004

[A
signed original of this written certification has been provided to Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and will be retained by Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

36

---



QuickLinks
1698.

#### Peeples *v.*Tygart.

Hill, C. J.

1. The answer of the magistrate to the writ of certiorari was as follows: “After reading over the evidence and the rulings as set forth in the within petition for certiorari, answer that, to the best of my recollection, the evidence and rulings of the court as set forth in said petition are correct.” *Held: (a)*This was a substantial verification of all the statements of fact set out in the petition for certiorari. (6) If the defendant in certiorari was dissatisfied with the answer of the magistrate, he should have filed exceptions thereto as provided by the Civil Code, *§4647; Davis v. Rhodes,*112 *Ga.*107 (37 S. E. 169); *Harris*v. *Daly,*121 *Ga.*511 (49 S. E. 609).

2. If the magistrate whose judgment is to- be reviewed on certiorari fails to certify and send up to the superior court all the proceedings in the cause, the proper procedure, where the questions made in the petition for certiorari can not be determined without such proceedings, is to ask for an order from the superior court, directing the magistrate to certify and send up such proceedings before the cause is reached for a hearing. If the questions made in the petition for certiorari and verified1 by the answer can be determined without the proceedings in the court below, the failure to certify and send up such proceedings will not be ground for dismissing the certiorari. *Judgment reversed.*

*410Certiorari, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. January 15, 1909.

Submitted. March 11,

Decided July 6, 1909.

*Hendricks & Christian,*for plaintiff in error.

*Alexander & Gary,*contra.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Acusphere, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Sherri C. Oberg,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John F. Thero, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to ourknowledge, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ SHERRI C. OBERG     |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Sherri C. Oberg         |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                    |   |   |
| /s/ JOHN F. THERO       |   |   |
| John F. Thero           |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|                    |   |   |
| May 12, 2006       |   |   |

 

This certification isbeing submitted solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not tobe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor will thecertification be deemed incorporated by reference in to any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to theextent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony Harvey, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/
      Anthony Harvey
| | ------ | ------------------------
| |        |                         
| | Name:  | ANTHONY HARVEY          
| |        |                         
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer 
| |        |                         
| | Date:  | September 27, 2011      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 11, 2016

No. 04-16-00426-CV

Ignacio VALENZUELA

, A ppellant

v.

Cruz RODRIGUEZ

, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV05285

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This court has determined this appeal is appropriate for referral to alternative dispute resolution

(ADR). 4 TH T EX

. A PP

. (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC

. R. 2. All further communications with this court by the

parties regarding ADR shall be directed to the clerk of the court.

All parties are ORDERED to respond in writing by August 25, 2016 stating: (1) any objection to

mediation; and (2) whether the parties agree on the selection of a mediator and, if so, the name and

address of the mediator of their choice.

If the parties agree to mediation and select a mediator, this court will issue an order suspending all

appellate deadlines for forty-five days to allow the parties to concentrate on the scheduling and completion

of the mediation process.

Is it so ORDERED on August 11, 2016.

______________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on

August 11, 2016.

___ ___________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0561

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CAMERON J. EAGLEMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 21, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2021

03/15/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0561
Jurisdiction of
    
    
    PercentageSubsidiaries
    
    Incorporation
    
    
    OwnedDirect SubsidiariesCorporativo en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom SF, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom TV, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Telscape de México, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Telereunión, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Sierra Comunicaciones Globales, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    *Maxcom U.S.A., Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Sierra Communications USA, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    100
    %Indirect SubsidiariesOutsourcing Operadora de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    **TECBTC Estrategias de Promoción, S.A. de C.V.
(formerly Técnicos Especializados en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V.)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    **Asesores Telcoop, S.A. de C.V
    
    Mexico
    
    
    **
 
 *
    
    Maxcom owns all of the capital stock of its direct subsidiaries, except for one share of
each, which share is owned by Corporativo en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., in the case of
Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V., and by Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A.
de C.V., in the cases of Corporativo en Telecomunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., Maxcom SF, S.A. de
C.V., Maxcom TV, S.A. de C.V., Telscape de México, S.A. de C.V., Sierra Comunicaciones
Globales, S.A. de C.V. and Telereunión, S.A. de C.V. This organizational structure is due to
the fact that Mexican law requires that corporations have a minimum of two shareholders.**
    
    For its indirect subsidiaries, Maxcom owns one share of each, and the remaining shares are
owned by Maxcom Servicios Administrativos, S.A. de C.V.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. YOUNG, DC #X46598, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2D18-1521

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 25, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle D. Sisco, 

Judge.

Michael A. Young, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Paul WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Appellees.

No. 1D18-0585

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 19, 2018

Paul White, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *James v. Jones* , 244 So.3d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) ; *Zuluaga v. State, Dep't of Corr.* , 32 So.3d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

B.L. Thomas, C.J., Jay, J., and Long, JR., Robert E., Associate Judge, concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. David KLEIN

No. 2018-KK-1611

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

*1213Writ granted. Code of Criminal Procedure art. 729.7(A), pertaining to protection of witness identity, provides that "[t]he court shall maintain the deletion or excision if, at an ex parte proceeding which shall be recorded and maintained under seal, the party excising or deleting such information makes a prima facie showing that the witness's safety may be compromised by the disclosure." Defendant here contended the district court erred in making that determination. Although the court of appeal declined to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction, *State v. Klein* , 18-0722 (La. App. 8/31/18) (unpub'd), it appears that the court made that decision without reviewing the transcript of the ex parte proceeding conducted in the district court, which is required by Article 729.7 to be maintained under seal and to which defendant lacks access. Accordingly, we grant defendant's application to remand to the court of appeal with instructions to reconsider defendant's application after it orders the district court to furnish it with the transcript to be filed under seal. In addition, on remand the court of appeal should also afford the State the opportunity to respond.

**REMANDED**

GUIDRY, J., would deny.

CLARK, J., would deny.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Donaldson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|              |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| November 20, 2006 |   | /s/ William R. Donaldson                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|              |   |   

  

William R. Donaldson Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and will be retained by Interactive Motorsports and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

 

 

  |
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.32

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                               EMPLOYMENT AGREMENT
                             OF CHARLES J. CASAMENTO

      This Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Employment Agreement (the
"Agreement) dated as of April 4, 1999 by and between Questcor Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., a California corporation (formerly named "Cypros Pharmaceutical
Corporation") (the "Company"), as previously amended, and Charles J. Casamento
("Executive") is made and entered into as of July 20, 2004. The Company and
Executive desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained herein, and with reference to the above recital, the parties hereby
agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

      1. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein will have the meanings
set forth in the Agreement.

      2. The term of the Agreement previously was automatically extended to
December 31, 2004 and is subject to further extension pursuant to Section 1.3 of
the Agreement. The parties, by this Amendment, agree that, for the purposes of
the application of Section 1.3 of the Agreement with respect to extension of the
Agreement to cover calendar year 2005, (i) the reference in the second sentence
of Section 1.3 of the Agreement (as previously amended) to "not less than five
months" shall refer instead to "not less than four months," and (ii) the
reference in the third sentence of Section 1.3 of the Agreement (as previously
amended) to "five months prior to the last day of the term of the Agreement"
shall refer instead to "four months prior to the last day of the term of the
Agreement." Extensions thereafter will continue to be governed by Section 1.3 of
the Agreement without giving effect to such changes.

      3. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof. The Agreement,
as amended by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.

QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.            /s/ CHARLES J. CASAMENTO
A California corporation                  ------------------------
                                          Charles J. Casamento

By: /s/ TIMOTHY E. MORRIS
    -----------------------------------

Title:  Sr. Vice President, Finance &
        Administration, and CFO
**Exhibit 32.2**
   
 SECTION
        1350 CERTIFICATION
 (Chief
        Financial Officer)
 
 
 I,
        Robyn
        Priest, Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
        eTelcharge.com (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 1.  The
        Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of eTelcharge for the year ended December 31,
        2007
        (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of eTelcharge.
   /s/
                      Robyn PriestDated:
                      June 3, 2008
                  Robyn
                      PriestSenior
                      Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial
                      Officer
  This
        certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to
        Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
        required by such Act, be deemed filed by eTelcharge for purposes of Section
        18
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject
        to the
        liability of that section.