alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

e-SMART® TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of e-Smart® Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 27, 2009 (the Report), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Certified Services, Inc.



|                            
|----------------------------
|Dated: May 27, 2009         
|                            
|/s/ Mary A. Grace, President
|Chief Executive Officer     
|                            
|Dated: May 27, 2009         
|                            
|/s/ Mary A. Grace, President
|Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11.1

Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Earnings per Share


                                                                   June 30, 2005
        Basic:

        Net Income                                                   ($427,946)
                                                                     ==========

        Average shares:
             Average shares outstanding                              87,992,153
                                                                     ==========

        Net income per common share, basic                              ($0.00)
                                                                        =======


        Diluted:

        Net Income                                                   ($427,946)
                                                                     ==========

        Average shares:
             Average shares outstanding                              99,383,653
                                                                     ==========

        Net income per common share, basic                              ($0.00)
                                                                        =======
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 SABANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  /s/ Soctt A. OboyChief Financial OfficerDated: March 31, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNIE ROBERT TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-01-37; CA-02-836-1)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 15, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Robert Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie Robert Taylor seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate

judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U. S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for transcripts and his motion

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, Jack B.Buchold, Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)                                  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  the information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2006 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of The Bank Holdings.
| Dated: April 2, 2007                   |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/ Jack B. Buchold                    |   |
| Jack B. Buchold                        |
| Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JAMES E. MCNAIR

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 4019

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 17, 2017

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County

, Willard Pope , Judge.

James E. McN air, Bristol, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James McNair appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal

sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that

his prior conviction for aggravated assault is not a qualifying offense for the purpose of

sentencing him as a three

- ti me violent felony offender under section 775.084(c), Florida

Statu t es (2006)

. Because the record as a whole does not demonstrate on its face an2

entitlement to relief, this claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800(a). 1 Instead, it should

have been raised on direct appeal or in a timely motion for postconviction relief under

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. 2 See Hill v. State , 912 So. 2d 610, 610 (Fla.

2d DCA 2005) (citing Cook v. State , 816 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))

. Accordingly,

we affirm.

AFFRIMED.

BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

1 Although it is not clear from the face of the record that McNair's sentence is illegal,

the records attached to the trial court’s order do not establish that the sentence is legal.

T he attached records show that for the prior offense Appellant was origin ally charged with aggravated battery with a firearm and the facts of the underlying case certainly support a conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon; however

, the attached records

do not show that A ppellant ultimately pled to the lesser incl uded offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

. Neither the plea agreement nor the plea colloquy was

included in the record

, and the attached prior judgment further confuses the issue by ci ting

to a non

- existent statute. With that said , “[t]o the extent that there may be records in the instant proceedings that demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief, it was and remains [McNair’s] burden

— not the trial court’s

— to specifically identify those records.”

McClain v. State , 157 So. 3d 5 28, 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (citing Johnson v. State

, 60

So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011) (“Under rule 3.800(a) , ‘the burden [is on] the petitioner to

demonstrate an entitlement to rel ief on the face of the record .’ ” (quoting Williams v. State

, 957 So. 2d 600, 602 (Fla. 2007) ) )

.

2 We note that Mc Nair’s motion was timely under r ule 3.850(b) and was under oath. If the trial court needed to explore the issue further, it coul d have treated the motion as a

r ule 3.850 motion and held an evidentiary hearing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b).
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**ChristopherDineen, Chief Financial Officer**

## ** **

I, ChristopherDineen, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RadView Software Ltd.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)            allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.

 
| Date:  November 13, 2003 |                    |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                          | /s/  CHRISTOPHER DINEEN |
|                          | Christopher  Dineen     |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(33)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(11)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(6)
              - connect_staff_profiles(7)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(5)
              - alaska(9)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(36)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(4)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(15)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(14)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(11)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(15)
              - (-)massachusetts(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(16)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(10)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(17)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(14)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 12, 2024        USGS New England Water Science Center

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

Featured Films and Shorts        April 23, 2021        Center Stage Video Series: Alexander Bissell

Featured Films and Shorts        April 23, 2021        Center Stage Video Series: Alexander Bissell (AD)

B-roll        March 17, 2020        Detecting Dune Features: Coast Guard Beach, Massachusetts
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50243

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NICOLAS GUERRERO GAONA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:12-CR-878-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nicolas Guerrero

Gaona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero Gaona has filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as Guerrero Gaona’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-50243 Document: 00512473897 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-50243

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-50243 Document: 00512473897 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(78)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - (-)other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

About        June 9, 2023        River and Coastal Processes Team
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(77)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)illinois(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - north dakota(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        October 10, 2018        Internship: Large-scale Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV) for...
|   | (1)The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |

|                  |   |                             |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                  |   |                             |   |
| December      5, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Yingxia      Jiao  |   |
|                  |   | Yingxia      Jiao                |   |
|                  |   | Chief      Executive Officer     |   |
|                  |   |                             |   |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Texxon,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  March 31, 2006, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Benjamin Hansel,
Chief Executive Officer (and principal  financial  officer) of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


May 22, 2006                      /s/ Benjamin Hansel
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Benjamin Hansel, Chief
                                  Executive Officer and principal
                                  financial officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
STATE of Louisiana v. Clifton DAIGLE

No. 2017-KP-1256

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *671*Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant in part.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00764

- CV

Ronald GUTIERREZ Individually, R.G.&C. Automotive, Inc., and G&C Total Care, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Joceline NOLLKAMPER

, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 13097

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTI ON. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellants.

SIGNED December 23, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
STATE of Louisiana v. Clifford DERUISE

NO. 2018-KH-1717

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing *339that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Lorenzo BROOKS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Lorenzo Brooks, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*1189The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.