alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 27, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1073 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-836, K2025-837.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30815 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4




HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.

2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED)




First Amendment




          Hercules Offshore, Inc. (the “Company”) has previously established the Hercules Offshore, Inc.
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of July 11, 2007 (the “Plan”).
The Company hereby amends the Plan effective as of February 14, 2008, as follows:





     1. The definition of Fair Market Value in Section 2 of the Plan is replaced in
its entirety as follows:




     “Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock, as of a
particular date, is equal to (a) if shares of Common Stock are
listed on a national securities exchange, the closing price per
share of Common Stock on the consolidated transaction reporting
system for the principal national securities exchange on which
shares of Common Stock are listed on that date or, if there has been
no such sale so reported on that date, on the last preceding date on
which such a sale was so reported; or (b) if (a) is not applicable,
then such amount as may be determined by the Committee or the Board
by the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation methodology
taking into consideration in applying its methodology all available
information material to the value of the Company.



 

HERCULES OFFSHORE, INC.
Thomas Albert MACDONALD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

Thomas Albert MacDonald, Jr., Daytona Beach, pro se.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
Ryan BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2312

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 31, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael Berman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Curon Medical, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Curon Medical, Inc.





By:

/s/    MICHAEL
BERMANName:

Michael BermanTitle:

Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Jeff POOLE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the CITY OF POMPANO BEACH POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3521

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 17, 2019]

Benedict P. Kuehne, Michael T. Davis and Susan Dmitrovsky of Kuehne Davis Law, P.A., Miami, and Ronald J. Cohen of Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ivelisse Berio Lebeau and Robert S. Sugarman of Sugarman & Susskind, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.3.7


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER SEVEN

TO THE

FIRSTBANK PROFIT SHARING AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN


 


WHEREAS,
FirstBank has changed its name to AccessBank; and


 


WHEREAS,
Section 1.3.1(b] of the FirstBank Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (the “Plan”) provides that the Company may amend the Plan.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
the Company hereby amends the Plan by the adoption of following amendments:


 


1.                   The
name of the Plan is amended to read the “AccessBank Profit-Sharing and Employee
Stock Ownership Plan,” effective June
1, 2004.


 


2.                   Any inconsistent
provisions of the Plan shall be read consistent with this amendment.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned officers being duly authorized by the Board of
Directors of AccessBank and Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc., hereby approve and
adopt this Amendment as of the date first set forth below.


 


 


	
   

  	
  ACCESSBANK

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
     /s/   Don
  K. Padgett

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  06-25-04

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ACCESS
  ANYTIME BANCORP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
  BY:

  	
     /s/   N.R.
  Corzine

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  06-25-04
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO



Consent of Independent Auditors

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3/A(No. 333-165037)and on Form
F-10/A (No. 333-167915) of our report dated March 27, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting , which appears in Aeterna Zentaris Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 20-F.



LOGO

Montréal, Québec, Canada

March 27, 2012











|1 | Chartered accountant auditor permit No. 21323
|- | ---------------------------------------------



|PricewaterhouseCoopers | LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l., Chartered Accountants
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------

|1250 | René-Lévesque Boulevard West, Suite 2800, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3B 2G4
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

|T:+1 | 514 205 5000, F: +1 514 876 1502, www.pwc.com/ca
|---- | ------------------------------------------------

PwC refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a
separate legal entity.

|
|
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Resources, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Mark Ariail, ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   J. Mark Ariail |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| November 19, 2003    |

 

1

----
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Supreme Hospitality on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas John Cloud, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in al material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Supreme Hospitality



By/s/ Thomas John Cloud, Jr.

Thomas John Cloud, Jr.

President and CEO

November 13, 2002































CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Supreme Hospitality on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Joseph Wilson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

(4)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in al material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Supreme Hospitality



By/s/ Robert Joseph Wilson

Robert Joseph Wilson

Secretary/Treasurer and CFO

November 13, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50616

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALVARO MEMBRANO-ACOSTA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-616-1-WWJ

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Alvaro Membrano-Acosta appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Membrano-Acosta contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Membrano-Acosta maintains that
No. 03-50616

-2-

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be

imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Membrano-Acosta acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 670 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 120
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 670

                          [Report No. 113-522]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4719) to amend the 
  Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend and expand the 
       charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2014

   Mr. Burgess, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4719) to amend the 
  Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend and expand the 
       charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4719) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend and expand the 
charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Ways and Means now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113-51 shall 
be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with 
or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 120

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 670

                          [Report No. 113-522]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4719) to amend the 
  Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend and expand the 
       charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 15, 2014

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906                |
| OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                 |

|   | (1)    | the annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of CapTerra Financial Group, Inc., for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CapTerra Financial Group, Inc.                                                |

| Date: March 22, 2011 | /s/ Gregory C. Venn                   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                 | Gregory C. Venn                       |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

----
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 17, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00439-CV 

IN RE COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS 

SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-18552 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Nowell, and Miskel 

Opinion by Justice Miskel 

In its May 10, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from 

part of a trial court order compelling it to answer an interrogatory. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. 

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude 

that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

230439F.P05 

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL 

JUSTICE
IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE TERRENCE S. LIDDLE, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C

01-9709-CR-00395 Appellant, ) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) (No. 2534 Belo w) ) The Hon. Thomas H. Sh river RICKY BELL, WARDEN, ) ) (Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition) Appellee. ) AFFIRMED PU RSUANT TO R ULE 20
O R D E R This matter is before the Court up on the state’s motion request ing that the judgmentin the above-styled cause be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules. The appellant opp oses the motion, and he has filed a motion to submit the case for decision on the record and the appellant’s br ief. Based on our revie w, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20.

On March 15, 1994, the appellant was indicted in W ilson County on six counts of aggravated sexual batte ry. Subsequently, on January 17, 1995, the appell ant pled guilty t o one count of aggravated sexual battery and was sentenc ed as a Range I standard offenderto 8 years in the Tennessee D epartment of Correction. On December 5, 1996, the appellant filed his petition forhabeas corpus relief. Counsel was appointed, and the petition was amended. After a hearing on February 24, 1997, the state’s motion to dismiss the petition w as granted.

In this appeal, th e appellant contends first that T.C .A. § 39-13-504 (1994 Supp.) failed to adequately inform him of the meani ng of “unlawful sexual contac t,” making the statute constitutionally v ague, however, this

term wasfully defined in T.C.A. § 39-13- 501(6) (1991). Next, the appellant asserts that the indic tm ent failed to inform him with specificity

what conduct he allegedl y performed that was illegal. In particular, he contends that the indictment did not allege what

unlawful sexual contact was committed. The appellantcould have filed a motionfor bill of particulars pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 7(c) but did not, thereby wai ving the issue.
Finally, the appellant asserts that his petition for writ of habeas corpus should be considered as a post-conv iction petition. The

appellantpled guilty on Januar y 17, 1995, and this petition was filed on December 5, 1996. Accordingly, the appellant would not be-2-

entitled to post-conviction relief because the petition was filed outside the time allow ed by the applicable statute of limitation. Moreov er, the appellant has failed to al lege any of the enumerated exceptions set forth i n T.C.A. § 40-30-202(b).

Having reviewe

d the appella nt’s brief, the state’s mo tion, t he appellant’s response, and the entire recor d, we find that the state’s moti on is well taken.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDE RED that the state’s motion to affirm the judgmentof the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules is granted and the judgment of the t rial co urt is affirmed. The appellant being indigent, costs are taxed to the stat e.
ENTER, this the ____ day of Januar y, 1998.

_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE CONCUR:

_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDG E

_____________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE