T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t, a n d th e r e f o r e , d e n ie s d e f

e n d a n ts ’ r e q u e s t f

o ro r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I NG R I D P E T E R S ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. W I L L I A M S . M O R R I S , I V , P r e s i de nt M orri s C om m un i ca t i on s, P ub l i sherH om er N e w s ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 35961 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 1 - c v - 0 0 0 7 5 - J WS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A l a s ka J ohn W . S e dw i c k, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d F IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I ngr i d P e t e r s on appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng he rdi ve r s i ty a c t i on a l l e gi ng l i be l ba s e d on al oc a l A l a s kane w s pape ra rt i c l e about 

# FI LED JAN 03 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 35961 2 c r i m i na l c ha r ge s be i ng f i l e d a ga i ns the rs ons . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo adi s m i s s a l f orl a c k of

pe r s ona l j ur i s di c t i on, Sc hw ar z e negge rv . Fr e d M

ar t i n MotorC o. , 374 F . 3d 797, 800 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , a nd th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n f

o rr e m a n d , D -B ea m L td. , P ’sh i p v. R o l ler D erb

y Ska tes, Inc. , 3 6 6 F. 3 d 9 7 2 , 9 7 4 n . 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y di s m i s s e d P e t e r s on’ s a c t i on a ga i ns tde f e nda nt W illia m S . M o rr is I V b e c au s e P e te r s o n f a ile d to e s tab lis h th a t M o rr is h a d c e rta in m in im u m c o n ta c ts w ith th e S ta te o f A la s k as u c h th a t th e m a in te n a n c e o f h e rs u it there w ou l d n otoffe nd “ tra di t i on al no t i on s of f ai r pl ayand sub st ant i al j ust i ce . ” I ns . C o. of

N . A m . v . M

ar i na Sal i na Cr uz , 649 F . 2d 1266, 1269- 70 ( 9th C i r . 1981) ( s e tt i ng f orth t e s tf

orge ne r a l ors pe c i f

i c pe r s ona l j ur i s di c t i on ove rnonr e s i de nt de f e nda ntunde rA l a s ka ’ s l ong- a rm s t a tut e ) ( c i t a t i ons a nd i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks o m itte d ) ) ; s e e al

s o I nt ’ l Shoe C o. v . W

as hi ngton , 32 6 U . S . 31 0, 31 9 (19 45 ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y de ni e d P e t e r s on’ s m ot i on f orr e m a nd be c aus e the c o u rt w a s n o t d iv e s te d o f ju r is d ic tio n b y P e te r s o n ’s a tte m p ts a f te rr e m o v a l to re du ce her r equestfor dam ages bel ow the m i ni m um j uri sdi ct i on al l evel and add as d efen d an t s n o n -ex i st en tA l ask a en t i t i es t o d estro y co m p l et e d i v ersi ty. See Hi l l v. B l i nd I ndus . & Se r vs . of

M d. , 1 7 9 F .3 d 7 5 4 , 7 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) ( d iv e r s ity j uri sdi ct i on exi st i ng atthe com m ence m entof an act i on i s notdi vest ed by a l at er11- 35961 3 re du ct i on of the am ou nti n con trovers y or achange i n the part i es ’ ci t i ze nshi p). T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng P et er son further l eav e t o am en db ecau se P et erso n o n l y so u g h tt o ad d t i m e-b arred cl ai m s ag ai n st n o n - e x is te n t c o rp o r a te e n titie s . Se e O kw u v . McKim , 6 8 2 F .3 d 8 4 1 , 8 4 4 , 8 4 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2012) ( s e tt i ng f

orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w a nd f

i ndi ng no abus e of

di s c r e t i on f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of pl a i nt i f f’ s r e que s tf

ora nothe ropportuni ty t o a m e nd w here pl ai nt i ff

fa i l ed t o i dent i fyany “ am endm entconsi st entw i th the fa ct s s he has a lr e a d y a lle g e d th a t w o u ld g iv e h e rav iab le c la im ” ) . W e do n otaddres s m att er s notspec i fi ca l l y and di st i nct l y r ai se d and ar gu ed i n the ope ni ng br i e f

, i nc l udi ng the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s a w a r d of c os t s a nd i t s de ni a l of P e te r s o n ’s d is c o v e ry a n d r e c u s a l m o tio n s . Se e P adge t t v . W r i ght , 587 F . 3d 983, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). P et er son’ s argum ent s r egar di ng the di stri ctcourt ’ s a l l eged bi as ar e unpe r s ua s i ve a nd nots upport e d by the r e c or d. D e f e nda ntM orr i s ’ s r e que s tf orc os t s a nd f

e e s , s e tf orth i n the a ns w e r i ng b r ie f , is d e n ie d w ith o u t p r e

ju d ic e b e c au s e s u c h r e q u e s ts m u s t b e m a d e b y s e p a r a te m o tio n . See 9th C i r . R . 39- 1. 6. AF F I RME D.