alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6.4


 


EXTENSION

OF

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


EXTENSION AGREEMENT, this 30th day of July 2004, by and between ACCESSBANK
(Bank) formerly known as FIRSTBANK, a federally chartered stock savings bank
and ACCESS
ANYTIME BANCORP, INC.
(Company) and Kenneth J.
Huey, Jr. (Officer).


 


The Officer is Executive Vice President and a
Director of the Bank and has been duly elected to these positions. Also, the
Officer is Chief Financial Officer and a Director of the Company and has been
duly elected to these positions.


 


The Bank/Company desires to amend the term of
a previous EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION by and between the Officer and the
Bank/Company dated the 23th
day of August 2001, to be effective from August 1, 2004 and shall
continue for a period of one year through August 1. 2005. with a salary at
a rate of not less than $145.000 per annum. All other terms and conditions
remain the same.


 


	
  ACCESSBANK

  	
  Access Anytime BanCorp, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Robert Chad Lydick

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Norman R. Corzine

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Robert “Chad” Lydick, Chairman

  	
   

  	
  Norman R. Corzine, Chairman

  
	
   

  	
  Board of Directors

  	
   

  	
  Board of Directors

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  OFFICER

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/  Kenneth J. Huey, Jr.

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Kenneth J. Huey, Jr.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 581 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 581

       Recognizing the 125th anniversary of the City of Compton.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2014

Ms. Hahn submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Recognizing the 125th anniversary of the City of Compton.

Whereas May 14, 2014, marks the 125th anniversary of incorporation of the City 
        of Compton;
Whereas the City of Compton was the seventh city in the Los Angeles County 
        incorporated on May 14, 1888;
Whereas the City of Compton, ``the Hub City'', is the passageway of 25 percent 
        of all United States waterborne international trade;
Whereas the City of Compton is home to various historical landmarks such as 
        Heritage House, Angeles Abbey Cemetery, Eagle Tree, Dr. Martin Luther 
        King, Jr., Memorial, and Woodlawn Cemetery;
Whereas the City of Compton has contributed to the diversity of California by 
        electing Douglas Dollarhide, California's first African-American mayor 
        of a metropolitan city, and Doris Davis, the first African-American 
        woman to be mayor of a major city; and
Whereas the City of Compton has and continues to change and stands poised for 
        success in the years to come: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and celebrates the City of Compton to the 
        thousands of residents of the city, the county of Los Angeles; 
        and
            (2) celebrates the long and exceptional history of the City 
        of Compton and its contributions to California and the United 
        States on the 125th anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
Escamille WILLIAMCEAU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Certifications



Exhibit 31-1



I,  Reginald Hall,  President  and  Chief Executive Officer certify that:



1.   I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Integrated Management Services, Inc.



2.   Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this  quarterly  report;



3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present in all material  respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and for, the periods presented in this quarterly  report;



4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  am  responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure that material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in  which this quarterly report  is  being  prepared;



b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this  annual  report  ("Evaluation  Date");  and



c)   presented  in  this  annual  report  our  conclusions  about  the effectiveness  of  the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation  as  of  the  Evaluation  Date;



5.   The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee  of  registrant's  board  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent  functions):



a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have identified  for  the  registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal  controls;  and



b)   any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal controls;  and



6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly  report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other  factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/  Reginald Hall

Reginald Hall



President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer



Date: September 1, 2004
. 

OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTlN 

1. 

Bonorablo IIozm Gclrrison - J?qp 3 
. 

. cu~taiicss that there is a causal ‘coPloctlon bctsc3n 

the cOti.itiOnS Fhi& t!13 Ctr;lDyCP ylts &Out ttiD 0r, 

ployeo api1 t&s resiiltinl; injury. (Lixylanrl CasJr;ltr 

c'o.vs. Sdth, 40 S. 11. (2) 913; TOSZS IndomItg Co. 

ys. Freelar, 2s S. l7. $GG, (Zrit of emor Eisxisse~) ; 

45 Toor. JLS'. p. 403, Sec. T3). 

6a3.cl2 

our suprcr;lr, Court has 

'AR illjU~ has t0 d0 With, all2 

arisss out of tha kork or busLn3ss 

02 the oq1ogcr, oIlan 5.t results 

.from a risk 'or I;&z.?ril Wiil5Ch is 

necessarily, or ord&arily, or 

r~asouaialy i.nimreot;in, cr iocident t 0, t&3 corxhlct Of snclz Fork 

or btw.Ress .a -- T&z;‘ocrm’s 

Rooi~~occ?l Asso. vs. E&n&m, 

246 S.Di.r2, 28 d.L+ n. $402.. 

In th&t casa Eehr3isn, an enrlloyO*, van rau 

over and kllleil by a rzilroti, cik,ti3 &SC goi3-i~ to 

his work. 

s&-It 

Justioo Graorrsoti, for tIm Su:~coa Coywt 
APPROVEDBdAY 6, 1940 

ATTORNEY GENE& OF TEXAS * 

. 

-. .
STATE of Louisiana v. Darrell HOLMES

No. 2018-KP-1146

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc.
as managing owner of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust, certify that (i) the Form
10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Campbell Alternative Asset
Trust .

                                    CAMPBELL ALTERNATIVE ASSET TRUST
                                    By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing owner

                                    By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Bruce L. Cleland
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 14, 2004

                                      E 6
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

 NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

 CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334-229-0733

June 7, 2024

CL-2023-0412

Jeremy S. Mitchem v. State of Alabama ex rel. Robert Broussard, District 

Attorney for the Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit (Appeal from Madison 

Circuit Court: CV-20-901674).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the 

above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: 

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on 

rehearing.

Moore, P.J., and Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Edwards, J., dissents, without opinion.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
DANIEL J. BAIER, CPA, P.C.                     2541 Monroe Avenue * Suite 304
                                                  Rochester, New York 14618
                                                      (716) 271-4550
================================================================================
Certified Public Accountant * Business and Financial Advisory Services


                                                   November 20, 2000


Office of the Chief Accountant
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

I would like to inform you that I have read the disclosures provided by East
Coast Airlines, Inc. (File #000-30797) in its filing of form 10-Q dated November
20, 2000 and that there are no disagreements regarding the statements made under
Item 5 - Other Information.

                                          Sincerely,


                                          /s/ Daniel J. Baier

                                          Daniel J. Baier
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1327 PETER J. LIMONE ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellant.

____________________ No. 08-1328 EDWARD GRECO, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on August 27, 2009 is corrected as follows: On p.9, l.19, "Norman Zalkind" should be "Jack I. Zalkind"
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 534 

Recognizing the 150th Anniversary of Mayo Clinic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2014 

Mr. WALZ (for himself, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. KLINE, Mr. 

PETERSON, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. 

NOLAN, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, and Mr. KIND) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 150th Anniversary of Mayo Clinic. 

Whereas Dr. William Worrall Mayo first announced his plans 

to establish a medical practice in Rochester, Minnesota, 

on January 27, 1864; 

Whereas 2014 marks 150 years of Mayo Clinic providing continuous, quality service to patients; 

Whereas the Mayo Clinic model of integrated, high-quality 

health care has become an international model for providing health care; 

Whereas the many historic achievements of Mayo Clinic include— 

(1) developing the first integrated, multi-specialty 

practice of medicine; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 534 IH 

(2) creating the first anti-blackout suits for military 

pilots during World War II; 

(3) winning the Nobel Prize in 1950 for discovering 

cortisone; 

(4) developing a DNA test that detects anthrax in 

less than 1 hour; and 

(5) continuing a tradition of helping individuals in 

the most need of help, including by deploying medical 

teams to earthquake-stricken Haiti; 

Whereas Mayo Clinic continues to value compassion, integrity, quality, and innovation in its leadership around the 

world; and 

Whereas Mayo Clinic is considered a premiere global center 

of health and healing dedicated to medical care, research, 

and education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 150th anniversary of Mayo Clinic. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10815 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BONIFACIO MORENO-DE LA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-2-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Bonifacio MorenoDe La Cruz raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Kenneth Michael GILLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 8, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant;

Kenneth Michael Gilley, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 845 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-558, K2025-556.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29721 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 10











Exhibit 10.9







AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT




THIS AGREEMENT dated as of the 22nd day of January, 2003




BETWEEN:




HUME, KIERAN INC., a company having an office at 900 -805

8th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 1H7




(herein called the "Optionee")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:




CHINA VENTURES INC., a company duly incorporated under

the laws of the Province of British Columbia and having its head

office at Suite 1118, Cathedral Place, 925 West Georgia Street,

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3L2




(herein called the "Company")

OF THE SECOND PART




WHEREAS:




A.

The parties entered into a Stock Option Agreement dated as of January 14,2003 (the "Option Agreement") pertaining to a grant to the Optionee of an option to purchase a total of 1,537,000 Common shares without par value in the capital stock of the Company; and




B.

The parties to the Option Agreement wish to clarify and amend the terms of the Option Agreement as provided herein.




NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth and contained, the parties hereby agree, each with the other, as follows:




1.

The Option Agreement is hereby amended as paragraph 1 is deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in its place:




"1. The Company does hereby grant to the Optionee an option to purchase a total of 1,537,000 Common shares without par value in its capital stock (herein called "the Option"). The Option shall vest over a period of twelve months from the date of this Agreement with one quarter vesting on the date of this Agreement and one quarter vesting on each date that is three months, six months and twelve months from the date of this Agreement. Subject to paragraph 7 herein, the Option shall be exercisable in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time after vesting, for a period of five years commencing January 14, 2003, at a price as follows:




(a)

512,000 Common shares at $0.13 per share;




(b)

512,000 Common shares at $0.18 per share; and




(c)

513,000 Common shares at $0.24 per share."




2.

The parties acknowledge that, except as amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Option Agreement remain unamended and in full force and effect. Time shall remain of the essence.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.







HUME, KIERAN INC.







“signed”_____________________

Authorized Signatory










CHINA VENTURES INC.







“signed”_____________________

Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Companhia de Bebidas das Américas  Ambev (the Company) on Form
20F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, I, Nelson José Jamel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2013



/s/ Nelson José JamelName:

Nelson José JamelTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1993.

#### Webster *v.*Griffin, Judge.

Application for mandamus.

Argued July 14, —

Decided October 5, 1909.

*Hal Wimberly, for movant. J. H. Roberts,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

Where a mandamus nisi has been issued to the judge of a city court, requiring him to show cause why he should not sign and certify a bill of exceptions, and in his answer he states that he declined to sign and certify the same because the statement of facts therein was not true, and, although he had returned the same to the attorney tendering it, with his objections thereto in writing, that these objections had not been satisfactorily met and removed, the rule will be discharged, as the answer can not be .traversed. Civil Code, §5545; *Platen*v. *Adams,*72 *Ga.*199. *Rule discharged.*