# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16

- 335 V
Filed: March 29, 2017
U NPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SARAH FIELDS

, *
* Petitioner, *

v. *
* Attorney s’ Fees and Costs;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES

, *
* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA

, for petitioner.
Althea Walker Davis , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY S’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On March 15, 2016

, p etitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 ( the “Vaccine Act” ). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury caused in fact by her October 21, 2014 influenza vaccination

. On September 8, 2016

, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on r espondent ’ s proffer

. (ECF No.17 ).

On March 8, 2017

, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF
No. 24 ). Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1 6,399

. 00 and attorneys’

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th
the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this d efinition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 costs in the amount of $5 77.09 for a total amount of $1 6,976.09

. Id. at 2

. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner
incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses On Marc h 14, 2017, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s mot ion

. (ECF No. 25 ).

In her response, respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that she “is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees
and costs are met in this case. ” Id. at 2. Petitioner “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 3.

The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s request . In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the undersigned finds no ca use to re duce the requested hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned
GRANTS petitioner’s mo tion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly , the undersigned award s the total of $1 6,976.09 3 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
M aximillian J. Muller, Esq

.

T he clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs

. , 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.