alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millennium Cell Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
S. Tang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Stephen S. Tang
-------------------
Stephen S. Tang
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Cheryl Messier, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radius Gold Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

DATED:  May 27, 2009

/s/ Cheryl Messier



Cheryl Messier,

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7

July 7, 2004

Mr. Louis Richards, Vice President
MileOne Automotive, Inc.
Atlantic Automotive Corp.
23 Walker Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21208

Dear Lou:

Reference is made to a certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of February 9,
2004, as clarified by that certain Side Letter Agreement dated February 9, 2004,
as further clarified by that certain First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement
dated as of March 1, 2004 and as further clarified by that Second Amendment to
Purchase Agreement dated as of April 13, 2004 (the "Agreement"), by and among
Mr. Tire, Inc. k/n/a MileOne Automotive, Inc. ("Seller"), Atlantic Automotive
Corp. and Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. ("Monro").

This will confirm our telephone conversation in which we agreed to extend the
period of time to August 31, 2004 that Monro has to audit Seller's adjustments
under Sections 2.05B, 2.05C, 2.05D and 2.05E, as applicable, of the Agreement.

Please acknowledge your consent in the space provided. Thank you for your
cooperation.

Very truly yours,

/s/ CATHERINE D'AMICO
--------------------------------------
Catherine D'Amico
Chief Financial Officer

CD:mc

Acknowledged and agreed this 22
Day of July 2004.

MILEONE AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

/s/ LOUIS RICHARDS
--------------------------------------
            Louis Richards
            Vice President

ATLANTIC AUTOMOTIVE CORP.

/s/ LOUISE RICHARDS
--------------------------------------
            Louis Richards
            Vice President
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136132 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 136132 COA: 279709 Oakland CC: 2006-208604-FH EDWARD BRIAN NORDSTROM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 19, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(17)
              - california(99)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(47)
              - idaho(15)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(21)
              - (-)new jersey(2)
              - oregon(7)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - south dakota(4)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(25)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(62)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Presentations and Events        April 5, 2024        Press Conference — M 4.8 near Whitehouse Station, NJ

Presentations and Events        April 5, 2024        Press Conference — M 4.8 near Whitehouse Station, NJ (afternoon)
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge,
(i) the Form 10-K filed by Surrey Bancorp (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|      |  |                |  |                |  |     |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | SURREY BANCORP
|      |  |                |  |               
|Date: |  | March 27, 2008 |  |                |  | By: |  |                                      
|      |  |                |  |                |  |     |  | s/ Edward C. Ashby, III              
|      |  |                |  |                |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |                |  |               
|Date: |  | March 27, 2008 |  |                |  | By: |  |                                      
|      |  |                |  |                |  |     |  | s/ Mark H. Towe                      
|      |  |                |  |                |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Feature Stories

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(4)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(7)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(16)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(15)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileAlexandra  Hays
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   PERCENTAGE OF   JURISDICTION OR STATE
           SUBSIDIARY                OWNERSHIP        OF INCORPORATION
           ----------              -------------   ---------------------
<S>                                <C>             <C>
EvergreenBank                           100%             Washington
EvergreenBancorp Capital Trust I        100%              Delaware
</TABLE>
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Ann Marie Gilmore, Michael Paul Rotan

, * From the 32nd District Court

and Harry Don Rotan

, of Nolan County,

Trial Court No. 19,585

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00253

- CV * September 20 , 2018

Arvel Dean Rotan and * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C. J

. Gary Wayne Rotan

, (Panel consists of: Bailey

, C. J.,

Willson , J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

t here is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The

costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Ann Marie Gilmore,

Michael Paul Rotan, and Harry Don Rotan

.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - (-)science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(25)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(12)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(8)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(29)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(4)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(16)
              - georgia(16)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(4)
              - illinois(10)
              - indiana(18)
              - iowa(11)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(13)
              - (-)maine(7)
              - maryland(10)
              - massachusetts(10)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(7)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(19)
              - nebraska(5)
              - nevada(8)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(19)
              - new mexico(17)
              - new york(38)
              - north carolina(16)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(10)
              - oklahoma(12)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(14)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(19)
              - south dakota(21)
              - tennessee(8)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(5)
              - vermont(5)
              - virginia(18)
              - washington(30)
              - west virginia(4)
              - wisconsin(18)
              - wyoming(9)

## By Year

Topic        November 25, 2020        New England Flood Information

Project        April 21, 2023        Stream Flood Vulnerability Assessment at Acadia National Park

Project        May 18, 2018        Development of Flood Insurance Maps in New England

Topic        April 14, 2016        Flood Science- Northeast Region Capability Team

Project        May 17, 2018        Development of Regional Regression Equations to Estimate the Magnitude of Peak Flows for Selected Annual-Exceedance Probabilities in Maine

Project        August 9, 2021        Remembering Tropical Storm Irene in New England

Research        June 4, 2020        Vernal Pool Inundation Models
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1971

MICHAEL HUNT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 7:17

- cv - 00083

- FL )

Submitted : July 30, 2019 Decided: August 15, 2019

Before AGEE , KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinio n . William Lee Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Joshua B. Royster, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFI CE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mark J. Goldenberg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Hunt appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Hunt’s application for supplemental security income. “In soc ial security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold the determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are suppor ted by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’ r Soc. Sec. Admin. , 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. Colvin , 810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing for substantial evidence, we do not undertake t o reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the
ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue , 667 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted). We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Hunt’s claim for benefits , and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment upholding the denial of benefits. See Hunt v. Berryhill , No. 7:17

- cv - 00083

- FL ( E.D.N.C. July 30, 2018). We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31

Certification

I, Richard J. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Impac
CMB Trust Series 2003-6;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under
that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Wendover Financial Services Corporation, as subservicer, Countrywide
Home Loans Servicing LP, as subservicer, SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., as
subservicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/:  Richard J. Johnson
Richard J. Johnson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Impac Funding Corporation
ex10e.htm


    AT&T
      Inc.

    Non-Employee
      Director Stock Purchase Plan

    (Effective
      June 27, 2008)

    


    A
      Non-Employee Director of AT&T Inc. (the “Company”) may file a written
      election with the Secretary of the Company to invest one hundred percent (100%)
      or fifty percent (50%) of his or her annual retainer payments (including any
      additional retainer payments to Committee Chairpersons or the Lead Director)
      in
      shares of common stock of the Company (“Shares”).  This election shall
      be made no later than December 31 of the year preceding, and shall be effective
      for, the calendar year in which the annual retainer will be
      paid.  This election will renew automatically each year unless the
      Director notifies the Secretary of the Company in writing no later than December
      31 of the preceding year.

    


    The
      Shares shall be purchased from the Company on the last day Shares are traded
      on
      the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in the calendar month in which such
      retainer would have been paid if not for the investment election (the “Purchase
      Date”).  The number of Shares purchased on a Purchase Date shall equal
      the portion of the annual retainer payment being used to purchase Shares,
      divided by the closing price of a Share on the NYSE on such Purchase Date (or
      such other measurement of the value of a Share that the Board of Directors
      of
      the Company shall determine in its sole discretion). Fractional Shares shall
      not
      be issued.  Any amount that would be used to purchase a fractional
      Share shall be paid in cash.

    


    No
      interest shall accrue with respect to funds to be invested
      hereunder.  Participants in this plan shall have no legal or equitable
      rights, interest, or claims in any property or assets of the
      Company.  No assets of the Company shall be held under any trust for
      the benefit of participants, or held in any way as collateral security for
      the
      fulfilling of the obligations of the Company under this plan.  The
      Company’s assets shall be, and remain, the general, unpledged, unrestricted
      assets of the Company.  The only obligation of the Company under this
      plan shall be merely that of an unfunded and unsecured promise of the Company
      to
      sell Shares on the Purchase Date.  Participants may not assign any of
      their rights under this plan.

    


    All
      elections and notices of any kind hereunder shall be in writing and provided
      to
      the Secretary of the Company in a form prescribed by the
      Secretary.  Unless marked as irrevocable, an election may be modified
      or revoked at any time prior to, and shall not be effective until, the deadline
      for making such election.  The Board may terminate, amend, or modify
      this plan at any time and from time to time.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000562

28-AUG-2019

09:14 AM
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000828 17-JUL-2013 08:24 AM