alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The Princeton Review, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date:  March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    JOHN M.
CONNOLLY   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | John M. Connolly       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|Date:  March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    CHRISTIAN G.
KASPER
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                      |  | Christian G. Kasper    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Princeton Review, Inc. and will be
retained by The Princeton Review, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY ROY CROSBY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-96-361, CA-99-1835-4)

Submitted: March 13, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Roy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We have confined our review to those issues raised in Appellant’s informal brief, 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and to the extent

Appellant seeks to raise claims not first presented to the district

court, we decline to review such claims.

2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Roy Crosby seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Crosby, Nos. CR-96-361; CA99-1835-4 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CHUGAI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, GENENTECH, INC., HOFFMANN

- LA ROCHE INC., Appellants

v.

CELLTRION, INC., Appellee

______________________

2024

- 1111, 2024

- 1115

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022

- 00578 and IPR2022

- 00579.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of a ppellants ’ unopposed motion to

dismiss th ese appeal s pursuant to Rule 42(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The appeals are dismissed. Case: 24-1111 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2024CHUGAI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA v. CELLTRION

, INC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

March 6 , 2024

Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: M arch 6, 2024 Case: 24-1111 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2024
Exhibit  32.b





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








As required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Kevin A. Nowlan, hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report of Meritor, Inc. on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meritor, Inc.
















/s/ Kevin A. NowlanKevin A. NowlanSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Date:  May 3, 2013
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(23)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(37)
              - multimedia_image-141771(37)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(5)
              - colorado(6)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(7)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(2)
              - (-)vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(6)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileIan Phillip Armstrong, M.S.
Henry James LAGI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 18, 2018

Henry James Lagi, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Joseph Leroy HAMPTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 8, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D. E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00674

- CV

Edgar MARKWARDT

, Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 11416 Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk ’ s record was due November 13 , 2015 , but was not filed. On November 24

, 2015 , the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk ’ s record was not filed because appellant ha s not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk ’ s fee to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee.

Accordingly, w e ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before December 12, 2015 that either (1) the clerk ’ s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk ’ s record without prepayment of the clerk ’s fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1

, 3 5.3(a). If appellant fail s to file such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the district clerk, the

court reporter, and all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Dontavion KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1715

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

Dontavion King, Century, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for postconviction relief under review is not contained within the record and cannot be located by the lower court, the lower court clerk or the State. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded with directions that Appellant be permitted to re-file an amended motion within thirty days after the mandate issues, upon which the trial court shall render a ruling. *See**Peraza v. State* , 920 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Spencer DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2603

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 14, 2019

Spencer Daniels, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Lucious M. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5036

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 7, 2019

Lucious M. Jackson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_publications(75)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(18)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(8)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(13)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(12)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - (-)florida(9)
              - georgia(7)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(34)
              - maine(12)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(11)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(12)
              - montana(13)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(6)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(10)
              - north dakota(35)
              - ohio(20)
              - oklahoma(5)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(29)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(42)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(37)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(18)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Photography        April 15, 2009        Florida floods with extreme highwater

Photography        September 26, 2022        Sensor deployed before Hurricane Ian

Photography        September 26, 2022        Sensor deployed before Hurricane Ian

Photography        September 26, 2022        Sensor deployed before Hurricane Ian

Photography        September 26, 2022        Deploying sensors before Hurricane Ian

Photography        September 26, 2022        Sensor deployed before Hurricane Ian

Photography        April 15, 2009        Northwest Florida is inundated by floodwaters

Photography        December 31, 2017        Low dunes near Cape Canaveral launch pads often overwash during storms

Photography        October 5, 2022        USGS Science After Hurricane Ian
Jeremy Jermaine BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Greg Caracci, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 98-10122

_____________________________________
LINDA GUADARRAMA; TERRI LYNN MOORE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
VERSUS

JOHN VANCE, ET AL., Defendants, JOHN VANCE; NORMAN KINNE, Individually and in his

Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:95-CV-723-D)

______________________________________________________ December 8, 1998 Before DAVIS, SMITH and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The district court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity on grounds that genuine issues
of material fact were presented. The district court did not specifically identify those issues of material fact and we have reviewed the record to determine whether the district court erred in reaching this conclusion. S ee Colston v. Barnhart , 146 F.3d 2822

(5th Cir. 1998) (order denying rehearing en banc). Upon review of
the record, we agree with the district court that genuine issues of material fact are presented. We therefore lack jurisdiction to further review the district court's judgment.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Tyrone JONES

No. 2018-KH-0070

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations *781period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50871

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS ZAPATA-ANDRADE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-710-1-PRM

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Juan Carlos Zapata-Andrade appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. ZapataAndrade contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the

aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

that should have been alleged in his indictment. Zapata-Andrade

maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged
No. 02-50871

-2-

only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his

sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which

may be imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47.

Zapata-Andrade acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105640-105641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30814]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract

[[Page 105641]]

1072 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-832, K2025-833.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30814 Filed 12-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Alphonso T. PITTS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1798

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

Following review of the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ., concur.