alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549-1004
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) March 16, 2006
 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
  STATE OF DELAWARE
    
    1-143
    
    38-0572515(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 300 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan
    
    48265-3000(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (313) 556-5000
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



ITEM 2.05 COST ASSOCIATED WITH EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES.
  ITEM 2.06 MATERIAL IMPAIRMENTS.




---



##### 



ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS.
  Income from continuing operationsfor the years ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000(dollars in millions)As originally reported:
    
    $
    2,805
    
    
    $
    2,862
    
    
    $
    1,975
    
    
    $
    1,222
    
    
    $
    3,639Pre-tax adjustments for:Supplier credits
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    (69
    )
    
    
    (405
    )
    
    
    (52
    )Transactions with former subsidiary:Settlement agreement
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (55
    )
    
    
    Contractual adjustment
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    (18
    )Benefit plans economic assumptions
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    (51
    )
    
    
    (30
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Precious metals inventory
transactions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    27
    
    
    
    (27
    )Total
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    (44
    )
    
    
    (99
    )
    
    
    (415
    )
    
    
    (97
    )Related tax effects
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    156
    
    
    
    37Total of above adjustments net of tax
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    (27
    )
    
    
    (81
    )
    
    
    (259
    )
    
    
    (60
    )Other, net
of tax
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    64
    
    
    
    (81
    )
    
    
    78
    
    
    
    (20
    )Total restatement adjustments net of tax
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    (162
    )
    
    
    (181
    )
    
    
    (80
    )As restated
    
    $
    2,804
    
    
    $
    2,899
    
    
    $
    1,813
    
    
    $
    1,041
    
    
    $
    3,559
 ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
 EXHIBITS
 Exhibit
    
    Description
    
    Method of Filing99.1
    
    Press Release dated
March 16, 2006
    
    Attached as Exhibit




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: March 17, 2006
    By:

/s/
Paul W. Schmidt(Paul W. Schmidt, Controller)




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 EXHIBIT NO.
    
    DESCRIPTION99.1
    
    Press Release dated March 16, 2006
Theodore MOSS III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013

RDATE 7/30/2015

 NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 1ST COURT OF APPEALS 

From: Deputy Clerk: MICHELLE LOPEZ

 Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2012-67412a 

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 66047998

DUE 8/28/2015 ATTORNEY 24069800

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 1ST

DATE JUDGMENT SIGNED: 6/29/2015 

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL DATE FILED: N/A

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED N/A

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 7/29/2015

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 60

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: BC, C, OA

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/MICHELLE LOPEZ 

 MICHELLE LOPEZ, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/30/2015 9:14:50 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk







JUC8H (NR4#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JUL 30, 2015(C1) 

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT

 GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

 

CASE NUM: 201267412A_ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 270 PUB? _

CASE TYPE: BREACH OF CONTRACT CASE STATUS: CASE ON APPEAL 

STYLE: REGIONS BANK VS CHAHADEH, HASSAN 

=============================================================================

 **** INACTIVE PARTIES **** 

 PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY 

 NUM NUMBER STAT 

 _ 00002-0001 DEF 00787725 CHAHADEH, HASSAN HOWARD, WADE 

 _ 00001-0001 PLT 11339500 REGIONS BANK KERR, ANDREW 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

==> (2) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 

1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP
Exhibit 31.1

Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kent A. Murphy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Luna Innovations Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date: April 14, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ KENT A. MURPHY, PH.D.            
|Kent A. Murphy, Ph.D.                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, Michael Lee, as chief executive officer ofAlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of his knowledge: 

1. This 10-QSB report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Exchange Act; and 

2. The information contained in this 10-QSB report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx,Inc. 

| /s/ Michael Lee         |
|-------------------------|
| Michael Lee             |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 14, 2006         |

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00706-CV

S.T.N. Properties, Ltd.

v.

Rio Grande Valley All Tune & Lube, Inc. and Bennett Abbitt

On Appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-0335-12-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 1, 2015
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(20)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - (-)new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation

National News Release        June 1, 2016        This hurricane season, scientists bring wave action into the picture
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 561 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 561

    Marking the 60th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court 
                 decision Brown v. Board of Education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2014

 Mr. Hastings of Florida (for himself, Ms. Jenkins, and Ms. Wilson of 
Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Marking the 60th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court 
                 decision Brown v. Board of Education.

Whereas May 17, 2014, marks the 60th anniversary of the United States Supreme 
        Court decision, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954);
Whereas Brown v. Board of Education overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 
        (1896);
Whereas in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court held that ``Separate 
        educational facilities are inherently unequal,'' and that segregation of 
        schools violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment; and
Whereas Brown v. Board of Education was a major milestone in the 20th century 
        civil rights movement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives marks the 60th 
anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), which 
signaled the end of State-sanctioned segregation of schools in the 
United States, so that it is unlawful to deny access to public 
facilities on the basis of race.
                                 <all>
```
DLD
- 225 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 23

- 2124

___________ IN RE: SHAWN D. SHAW

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:19

- cv
- 16702 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

September 28, 2023
Before: JORDAN, CHUNG, and SCIRICA , Circuit Judg es

(Opinion filed : October 3, 2023 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM On June 23, 2023, Petitioner Shawn D. Shaw filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus asking this Court to order the District Court to act on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentenc e, which argued three grounds for relief

.

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

By order entered May 19, 2022, the District Court denied grounds two and three of the petition, reserving ruling on ground one. By order entered July 24, 2023, the District
Court denied ground one of the petition

— the sole remaining claim raised by Petitioner’s § 2255 motion

— and de clined to issue a certificate of appealability.
As Shaw’s mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy , we will
dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that . . . prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot. ”).
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

 

Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Earnings per Share 

 

 

|                               |   | **September 30, 2006** |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| **Basic:**                         |   |                   |
|                               |   |                   |
| Net loss                           |   | ($603,528)             |
|                               |   |                   |
| Average shares:                    |   |                   |
| Common shares issued               |   | 95,587,661             |
| Average shares outstanding         |   | 93,902,399             |
|                               |   |                   |
| Net income per common share, basic |   | ($0.01)                |
|                               |   |                   |
|                               |   |                   |
| **Diluted:**                       |   |                   |
|                               |   |                   |
| Net Income                         |   | ($603,528)             |
|                               |   |                   |
| Average shares:                    |   |                   |
| Common shares issued               |   | 102,285,677            |
| Average shares outstanding         |   | 93,902,399             |
|                               |   |                   |
| Net income per common share, basic |   | ($0.01)                |
|                               |   |                   |
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
GREGORY FRANCIS SCHMIDT , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0668 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1998

- 007677 The Honorable Kathleen H. Mead , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent Gregory Francis Schmidt , San Luis Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Michael J. Brown and Judge Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 2-14-2019STATE v. SCHMIDT Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Gregory Francis Schmidt seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's fourth petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for p ost

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. Petitioner has not est ablished an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
|[radiusauditorletter002.jpg] | Tel: 604  688 5421
Fax: 604  688 5132
www.bdo.ca | BDO Canada LLP
600 Cathedral Place
925 West Georgia Street
Vancouver BC  V6C 3L2  Canada
|---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



June 25, 2010

Mr. Simon Ridgway

Radius Gold Inc.

830  355 Burrard Street

Vancouver, BC

V6C 2G8

Dear Mr. Ridgway:

As stated in Note 2(d) to the consolidated financial statements of Radius Gold Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company changed its method of accounting for exploration costs by expensing the costs as incurred as it more accurately reflects the exploration industry and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because management believes that this treatment provides a more relevant and consistent depiction of the asset base of the Company prior to establishing the economic feasibility of its resource base. In connection with our audit of the above mentioned financial statements, we have evaluated the circumstances and the business judgment and planning which formulated your basis to make the change in accounting principle.

It should be understood that criteria have not been established by the Canadian generally accepted accounting principles for selecting from among the alternative accounting principles that exist in this area. Further, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants has not established the standards by which an auditor can evaluate the preferability of one accounting principle among a series of alternatives. However, for purposes of the Companys compliance with the requirements of the TSX Venture Exchange and Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.  There was no change in the accounting for exploration costs under United States of America Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Based on our audit, we concur in managements judgment that the newly adopted accounting principle described in Note 2(d) is preferable in the circumstances. In formulating this position, we are relying on managements business planning and judgment, which we do not find to be unreasonable.

Very truly yours,

(signed) BDO CANADA LLP

Chartered Accountants



|BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 160 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 160

   Commending and congratulating the University of Connecticut men's 
   basketball team for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic 
               Association Men's Basketball Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2023

  Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Murphy) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commending and congratulating the University of Connecticut men's 
   basketball team for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic 
               Association Men's Basketball Championship.

Whereas, on Monday, April 3, 2023, the University of Connecticut's men's 
        basketball team (referred to in this preamble as the ``UConn Huskies'') 
        won the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic Association Men's Basketball 
        Championship with a 76-59 win over the San Diego State Aztecs at NRG 
        Stadium in Houston, Texas;
Whereas this is the UConn Huskies' fifth national championship, continuing the 
        team's undefeated streak in national championship games;
Whereas the UConn Huskies earned all 5 national titles since 1999, a feat that 
        no other college team has surpassed;
Whereas Adama Sanogo was named the Most Outstanding Player of the tournament, 
        averaging 19.7 points per game with 4 double-doubles; and
Whereas the UConn Huskies won every National Collegiate Athletic Association 
        tournament game by 13 points or more, becoming only the fifth team in 
        history to do so: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the University of Connecticut men's basketball 
        team for winning the 2023 National Collegiate Athletic 
        Association Men's Basketball Championship;
            (2) congratulates the fans, students, and faculty of the 
        University of Connecticut; and
            (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Senate 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to--
                    (A) the President of the University of Connecticut, 
                Radenka Maric; and
                    (B) the Head Coach of the University of Connecticut 
                men's basketball team, Dan Hurley.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 04 77 CITY OF BOZEMAN,

Plaintiff and Appellee, Vs. TAMMY JANE SMITH ,

Defendant and Appellant.
**ORDER OF EXTENSION OF TIME** Upon consideration of Appellant’s moti on for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 8 , 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal. 08/06/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0477Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2020