alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS   I, Kevin Bales, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radius Gold Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 14, 2012  By: /s/Kevin Bales Kevin Bales Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lissa A. Goldenstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of
Argonaut Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Argonaut Technologies, Inc.

Date:  March 31, 2003

                                 By:  /s/ LISSA A. GOLDENSTEIN
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Lissa A. Goldenstein
                                      Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2014

No. 04-14-00625-CR

Ex Parte Devan S. MATTHEWS,

Appellant

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR11609

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On June 16, 2014, the trial court denied Appellant’s pre-trial application for writ of 

habeas corpus. Appellant had thirty days to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); 

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Green v. State, 999 S.W.2d 474, 

476 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref’d). 

Appellant concedes he did not timely file a notice of appeal, but he asserts he had no 

notice or actual knowledge of the appealable order within twenty days of the date the order was 

signed. Cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(c) (no notice in civil case); TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a (same). 

However, in a criminal case, neither Appellate Rule 4.2 nor Civil Rule 306a applies. E.g.,

Dewalt v. State, 417 S.W.3d 678, 689–90 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013), pet. ref’d, 426 S.W.3d 100 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (“Although [no notice of the appealable order] might excuse an untimely 

notice of appeal in a civil case, ‘[n]o comparable rule exists for criminal cases,’ and Texas courts 

have routinely held, as we must do here, that being unaware of an appealable order or judgment 

does not excuse an untimely notice of appeal.” (second alteration in original) (footnotes 

omitted)); Pope v. State, No. 05-10-01455-CR, 2011 WL 924477, at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 

18, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same). 

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo, 

918 S.W.2d at 522; Green, 999 S.W.2d at 476. In this case, Appellant concedes the notice of 

appeal was not timely filed but moves this court to grant an extension of time to file the notice of 

appeal. 

A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeal’s 

jurisdiction if 

(1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing,
(2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen 

days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and 

(3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. 

Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2012) (“If a notice of appeal is not timely filed [under Rule 26.2 or Rule 26.3], the court of 

appeals has no option but to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”). 

Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS from the 

date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Castillo, 

369 S.W.3d at 198; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
  
 rd
 Re:
    
    Superior Wholesale Inventory Financing Trust XI (Issuer)
Annual Statement as to Compliance
    a.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of February 24, 2005 through
December 31, 2005, and of its performance under the Indenture, the Trust Sale and Servicing
Agreement, and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and
 b.
    
    To his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Indenture, the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement, and the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement throughout such period.
  /s/ J. B. Van Orman, Jr.
John H. NELSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2018

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

John H. Nelson, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(2)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(30)
              - california(8)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(13)
              - georgia(2)
              - (-)guam(2)
              - hawaii(6)
              - indiana(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(7)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(11)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - mississippi(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(9)
              - texas(11)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(9)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        January 6, 2020        How Our Reefs Protect Us: Valuing the Benefits of U.S. Reefs

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2019        How Our Reefs Protect Us: Valuing the Benefits of U.S. Reefs (AD)
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 104155-104156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30336]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency For Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 
announces a Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting on ``Implementing and 
Evaluating Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support Strategies in 
Real-World Settings(U18)''

DATES: January 10th, 2025

ADDRESSES: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Video Assisted 
Review), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Griffith, Committee Management 
Officer, Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority 
Populations, Division of Policy, Coordination, and Analysis, Agency for 
Healthcare Research and Quality, (AHRQ), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 
Maryland 20857. Telephone: (301) 427-1557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of 
experts in fields related to health care research who are invited by 
AHRQ, and agree to be available, to conduct on an as needed basis, 
scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ support. Individual members 
of the Panel do not attend regularly scheduled meetings and do not 
serve for fixed terms or a long period of time. Rather, they are asked 
to participate in particular review meetings which require their type 
of expertise.
    The SEP meeting referenced above will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications for 
``Implementing and Evaluating Patient-Centered Clinical Decision 
Support Strategies in Real-World Settings(U18)'' are to be reviewed and 
discussed at this meeting. The grant applications and the discussions 
could

[[Page 104156]]

disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: December 16, 2024.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-30336 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
```
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-50243 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. NICOLAS GUERRERO GAONA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-878-1
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal P ublic Defender ap p o i n t ed to represent Nicolas Guerrero Gaona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero Gaona h as filed a response. W e h a v e r eviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as Guerrero Gaona’s response. We concur with counsel’ s assessment that the appeal p resents n o nonfrivolous issue f or appellate review. Accordingly, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 17, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-50243 Document: 00512473897 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13-50243

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, c o u nsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL I S DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-50243 Document: 00512473897 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
##### 



BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
up to 1,800,000 Shares of Common Stock
with up to 360,000 related Warrants
 Subscription Price $10.00 Per Share
 PLACEMENT AGENT AGREEMENT
 May 5, 2006
 
   1. SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING.




---



##### 



2. RETENTION OF AGENT; COMPENSATION; SALE AND DELIVERY OF THE SHARES.
    provided however
   2




---



##### 



provided, however
   3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY.
      3




---



##### 



provided however
 4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF UNDERWRITER
     6




---



##### 



5. COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY.
     7




---



##### 



provided however
  8




---



##### 



6. COVENANTS OF UNDERWRITER
    9




---



##### 



7. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF UNDERWRITER
    10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



8. CONDITIONS TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMPANY.
     9. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONTRIBUTION.
  12




---



##### 



provided however
     10. TERMINATION.
  13




---



##### 



11. MISCELLANEOUS.
 Notices
 Successors & Assigns
 Partial Invalidity
 Applicable Law
 Captions
 Counterparts
 Survival
 Pronouns
 Entire Agreement
 14




---



##### 



Public Notice
  Very truly yours,
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.By:
    /s/ Richard MillerRichard MillerChief Financial Officer   BENTLEY LAWRENCE SECURITIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Richard L. CoskeyRichard L. CoskeyPresident 15
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT USHA PATEL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4660 ) HEARTWOOD 47, LLC (as successor to ) BankAtlantic), ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 22, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Claudia R. Isom, Judge. Eric O. Husby, Tampa, for Appellant. Eric B. Zwiebel of Emanuel & Zwiebel, PLLC, Plantation, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(8)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(52)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(1)
              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(48)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
D.W., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem, Appellees.

No. 4D18-2532

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 27, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 648 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 648

 Directing the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission to transmit 
to the House of Representatives copies of any emails in the possession 
of the Commission that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) 
   of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division 
       Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2014

Mr. Stockman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Directing the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission to transmit 
to the House of Representatives copies of any emails in the possession 
of the Commission that were transmitted to or from the email account(s) 
   of former Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division 
       Director Lois Lerner between January 2009 and April 2011.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives direct the Chairman of 
the Federal Election Commission to transmit to the House of 
Representatives, no later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 
of this resolution, copies of any electronic communication in the 
possession of the Chairman or the Federal Election Commission that was 
transmitted to or from any electronic mail account(s) used by former 
Internal Revenue Service Exempt Organizations Division Director Lois 
Lerner at any time between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Simon Ridgway, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 20-F/A of Radius Explorations Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 22, 2004



| |  | /s/ Simon Ridgway
Signature
Name: Simon RidgwayTitle: President
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------