alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sample Stock Option Award Letter



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 (Current Date) 
 (Employee Name): 
 At the direction
of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company, you are hereby notified that the Committee has granted you a non-qualified stock option (the “Option”) pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive
Plan as adopted by the Company and as in effect on the date of the grant (the “Plan”). 
 This Option entitles you to purchase
                     shares of Common Stock of the Company at the price of
$                 per share which is payable in cash or by check in United States Dollars, Common Shares of the Company, or other property acceptable to the
Committee. The date of grant of this Option is                     , 20        , and it is the
determination of the Committee that on that date the fair market value of the Company’s Common Shares was $             per share. The Option must be exercised, if at all, on or
before                     , 20        . One-third (1/3) of the shares represented by
this Option shall become exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of the grant. The Option may not be exercised for fractional shares. 
 Except as described below, the Option is subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions of the Plan as in effect on the date of the grant. Copies of the Plan and current prospectus are enclosed. At the time or times you wish to exercise
this Option in whole or in part, please refer to this letter and the provisions of the Plan dealing with methods and formalities of exercising your option. 
 Notwithstanding Section 6.6 of the Plan, the Options shall not become immediately and fully exercisable solely due to the consummation of the transaction contemplated in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 23, 2008, by
and among the Company, Triarc Companies, Inc. and Green Merger Sub, Inc. If for any reason, you do not wish to receive the award and elect instead to have it irrevocably cancelled, contact Angie Walker to request a rejection form, which you may
complete and fax back no later than                     , 20        . If you choose to submit a
rejection form, the rejection is irrevocable. If you have any questions regarding this stock option grant, please feel free to contact me. 
 Sincerely,

 WENDY’S INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 Karen F. Ickes 

Senior Vice President - Human Resources Services 
 30
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

745 

KA 12-02277 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TAJAUN PAUL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

LINDA M. CAMPBELL, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a resentence of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E.

Fahey, J.), rendered November 3, 2011. Defendant was resentenced upon

his conviction of murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in

the first degree, robbery in the first degree (eight counts), burglary

in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in

the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by directing that the sentence imposed

on the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree

shall run concurrently with the sentences imposed on counts 10 through

13 of the indictment, as renumbered by County Court, and as modified

the resentence is affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a resentence that imposed various

periods of postrelease supervision, defendant contends that County

Court failed to comply with the prior order of this Court entered on

defendant’s appeal from the underlying judgment of conviction (People

v Paul, 298 AD2d 849, lv denied 99 NY2d 562). We agree. Defendant

was convicted upon a jury verdict of crimes arising from two separate

robberies, and the court sentenced him to concurrent and consecutive

terms of imprisonment. On defendant’s prior appeal, this Court

concluded that the sentence imposed on the count of criminal

possession of a weapon in the second degree was illegal to the extent

that it was directed to run consecutively to the sentences imposed on

counts 10 through 13 of the indictment, as renumbered by the court,

for robbery in the first degree, and we modified the judgment

accordingly (id. at 850). Following the appeal, the court was alerted

to its failure at sentencing to impose periods of postrelease

supervision (see Correction Law § 601-d), as required by Penal Law §

70.45 (1). Upon resentencing, the court added the requisite periods

of postrelease supervision, but erroneously imposed the same
-2- 745 

KA 12-02277 

concurrent and consecutive terms of imprisonment imposed in the

original sentence. Contrary to defendant’s contention, this Court has

the authority to correct the resentence to the extent that it is

illegal (see People v Rodriguez, 18 NY3d 667, 671; People v LaSalle,

95 NY2d 827, 829), and we therefore modify the resentence accordingly. 

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 52 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 52

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 5, 2013.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Ms. Lofgren and Mr. Vargas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tina Klocke, Chief Operations and Financial Bear, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 18, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Tina Klocke                                             
|                     |  |  |  | Tina Klocke                                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Operations and Financial Bear, Treasurer and Secretary
|                     |  |  |  | Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.                                 
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

PSB GROUP, INC. ANNOUNCES

SECOND-QUARTER EARNINGS

Madison Heights, MI. July 18, 2006 - PSB Group, Inc., (OTCBB: PSBG), the bank
holding company for Peoples State Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank with
offices in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb and Genesee Counties, announced net income for
the second quarter of 2006 was $938,000, or $.31 per average outstanding share,
compared to $1,282,000, or $.42 per average outstanding share in the second
quarter of 2005. Second quarter earnings for 2006 represent an increase of
$203,000, more than 27%, over first quarter earnings in 2006. Earnings to date
for the year 2006 totaled $1,673,000 or $.55 per average outstanding share,
compared to $2,169,000 or $.72 per average outstanding share in 2005.

     Total assets as of June 30, 2006 were $500,795,000 compared to $485,819,000
on June 30, 2005. The lending portfolio totaled $380,838,000 as of June 30, 2006
compared to $347,152,000 at June 30, 2005, representing a 9.7% increase in total
loans. Deposits totaled $447,007,000 on June 30, 2006 compared to $423,613,000
at the same time 2005, representing a 5.5% increase in total deposits.

     Robert L. Cole, President and Chief Executive Officer, commenting on
second-quarter earnings in 2006 when compared to the same period in 2005, stated
"We realized a 12.5% increase in operational and staffing expenses mainly
associated with the cost of opening two new full-service banking centers by
Peoples State Bank last year, development costs for a new banking center to be
constructed in Troy during 2006, and costs related to the acquisition of Nations
One Mortgage by Universal Mortgage Corporation. Moreover, we have seen a
$339,000 decrease in loan related fee income during the first half of 2006,
mainly caused by the uncertain direction of the local economy. All of these
factors contributed to downward pressure on earnings, which were offset in part
by a 4% increase in net interest income during the same period."


                                     Page 5

<PAGE>

     PSB Group, Inc. is a registered holding company. Its primary subsidiary,
Peoples State Bank, currently serves the southeastern Michigan area with 12
full-service banking offices in Farmington Hills, Fenton, Grosse Pointe Woods,
Hamtramck, Madison Heights, St. Clair Shores, Southfield, Sterling Heights and
Warren; in addition to a commercial loan production office in Mt. Clemens. The
bank has operated continuously under local ownership and management since it
first opened for business in 1909.

     Universal Mortgage Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Peoples State
Bank, originates residential mortgage loans in the southeastern Michigan area
from offices in Ann Arbor, Clinton Township, Fenton, Howell, Macomb Township,
Troy and Warren.

Contact: David A. Wilson
         Senior Vice President & CFO
         (248) 548-2900


                                   Page 6
Exhibit 2

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Shareholders of
Æterna Zentaris Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets ofÆterna Zentaris Inc.as at December 31, 2005 and
2004 and the consolidated statements of operations, deficit, other capital and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In
our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

GRAPHIC

Chartered Accountants

Quebec, Quebec, Canada
February 28, 2006

Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences

In
the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there are changes in accounting
principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Company's financial statements, such as the changes in reporting currency described in note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements. Our report to the Shareholders dated February 28, 2006 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such changes in
accounting principles in the auditors' report when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

GRAPHIC

Chartered Accountants

Quebec,
Quebec, Canada
February 28, 2006

---



QuickLinks
IN RE: The NAME CHANGE OF Ronald Russell JOHNSON.

No. 4D18-695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

Jason H. Haber of Haber | Blank, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appellee.

Per Curiam.

The petitioner appeals the circuit court's order denying his petition for a name change. The petitioner argues the circuit court erred in two respects: (1) by denying his facially sufficient petition without setting forth a factual basis for what appears, from the face of the order, to have been the circuit court's conclusion that he sought the name change for an ulterior or illegal purpose; and (2) by denying his request to have a court reporter record the hearing.

We agree with both arguments. *See**In re Zimmer* , 207 So.3d 1006, 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ("Where a trial court denies a facially sufficient petition [for name change], the factual basis for doing so must be set forth in its order."); Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.535(b) ("Any proceeding shall be reported on the request of any party.").

We reverse and remand for a new hearing before a different judge, as the prior judge has since left the bench.

*Reversed and remanded for new hearing.*

Gerber, C.J., Warner and Forst, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit31.2**

I, Donald F. Volk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Kenexa Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| *Date: November 10, 2006* | */s/  Donald F. Volk*     | * * |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|----------|
| * *                  | *Donald F. Volk*          |
| * *                  | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Lewis JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3892

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of the Appellant to comply with this court's November 16, 2018, order to show cause.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit  23.e





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 30, 2014, relating to the financial statements of Master Sistemas Automotivos Ltda. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, appearing in Item 15 of Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Meritor, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2015 in the following Registration Statements:








FormRegistration No.PurposeS-3333-200858Registration of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities and guaranteesS-8333-192458Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-171713Amended 2010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1643332010 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-1411862007 Long-Term Incentive PlanS-8333-107913Meritor, Inc. Savings PlanS-8333-123103Meritor, Inc. Hourly Employees Savings PlanS-8333-496101997 Long-Term Incentives PlanS-8333-42012Employee Stock Benefit Plan, 1988 Stock Benefit Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Benefit Plan





/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu


Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes


Porto Alegre, Brazil


May 31, 2016
Wallace C. JONES Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1958

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 3, 2018

Upon consideration, petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of this cause.

Following review of the petition for a writ of certiorari, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed as a premature appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(l).

LAGOA, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ., concur.
Order filed February 25, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00626-CV

____________

GREGORY GOTTWALD, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A G GROUP AND 

D/B/A DURATECH SERVICES AND D/B/A DURATECH FOUNDATION 

REPAIR , AND DURATECH SERVICES, L.L.C., Appellants

V.

MELINDA O'CONNELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-81888

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due February 10, 2020. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. If appellants do not file a brief with this court on or before

March 11, 2020, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(19)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(48)
              - (-)products_software(1)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_other_news(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - (-)montana(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Software Release        January 30, 2018        Montana StreamStats: a water-resources web application
STATE of Louisiana v. Janeiro L. MCBRIDE

NO. 2018-KO-0580

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 18, 2019

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(14)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(36)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(7)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(5)
              - alaska(9)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(36)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(4)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(2)
              - connecticut(4)
              - delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(7)
              - florida(15)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(14)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(11)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(15)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(16)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - (-)puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(3)
              - south carolina(5)
              - south dakota(10)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(17)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(14)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        August 30, 2021        Reducing Flood Risks by Restoring Coral Reefs

Featured Films and Shorts        August 30, 2021        Reducing Flood Risks by Restoring Coral Reefs (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        January 6, 2020        How Our Reefs Protect Us: Valuing the Benefits of U.S. Reefs

Featured Films and Shorts        December 8, 2019        How Our Reefs Protect Us: Valuing the Benefits of U.S. Reefs (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

Featured Films and Shorts        July 19, 2022        Reducción de los riesgos de inundación mediante la restauración de los arrecifes de coral (con audiodescripción)

Featured Films and Shorts        July 19, 2022        Reducción de los riesgos de inundación mediante la restauración de los arrecifes de coral