alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(43)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(39)
              - american samoa(6)
              - california(67)
              - colorado(3)
              - hawaii(45)
              - idaho(3)
              - montana(6)
              - (-)nevada(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(30)
              - virginia(14)
              - washington(13)
              - wyoming(8)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Photography        June 9, 2022        Monte Cristo Fault, Nevada
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Brian P. CampbellBrian P. CampbellChief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT OPTION AGREEMENT





THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT OPTION AGREEMENT ("First Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of March 31, 2005, by and between Radius Gold Inc., a British Columbia corporation whose address is Suite 830, 355 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 2G8, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Exploraciones Mineras de Guatemala, S.A., whose address is c/o Radius Gold Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Radius"),and Glamis Gold Ltd., a British Columbia corporation whose address is 5190 Neil Road, Suite 310, Reno, Nevada 89502, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Entre Mares de Guatemala, S.A., a Guatemala corporation whose address is c/o Glamis Gold Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Glamis").Radius and Glamis will at times be referred to herein as the "Parties" or individually as a Party"

RECITALS



1.

The Parties entered into that certain Exploration and Development Option Agreement as of October 14, 2004 (the "Agreement"), which granted to Glamis certain rights to explore and acquire from Radius an interest in those properties described in Exhibit A to the Agreement.



2.

The Parties wish to amend the Agreement to exclude one of the concessions from Exhibit A.



AGREEMENT



NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the payment of Ten Dollars from Glamis to Radius, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties hereby confirm and acknowledge, and the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained and recited, the Parties hereto agree as follows:





1.

Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to exclude the Jocotan II concession as described therein from the description of the Property. Glamis shall have no rights, obligations or liabilities with respect said Jocotan II concession and Radius shall indemnify and hold Glamis harmless from the same.



2.

Except as set forth in this First Amendment, the Agreement is hereby ratified by the Parties and shall remain in full force and effect.



3.

This First Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, and all such counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Exploration and Development Option Agreement to be duly executed, delivered, and effective from the date first above written.



[firstamdagreeglamis001.jpg]
Bobby L. MAGWOOD, DOC #023111, Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(18)
              - products_maps(12)
              - products_publications(68)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(17)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - (-)indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation
Exhibit 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of First Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James J. SteborJames J. SteborPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Cathy D. PendellCathy D. PendellTreasurer




March 28, 2005
# C_2020402EN.01000801.xml

| 25.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9972 — Neste/Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 402/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Neste Oyj (‘Neste’, Finland), |
| --- | --- |

—

Neste Oyj (‘Neste’, Finland),

| — | Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils B.V. (‘Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils’, the Netherlands). |
| --- | --- |

—

Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils B.V. (‘Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils’, the Netherlands).

Neste acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils located in the Netherlands. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Neste: refining and marketing low-emission, high-quality traffic fuels, producing both fossil and renewable fuels. Neste currently owns and operates a renewable fuel production plant in a site adjacent to Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Neste: refining and marketing low-emission, high-quality traffic fuels, producing both fossil and renewable fuels. Neste currently owns and operates a renewable fuel production plant in a site adjacent to Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils,

| — | for Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils: production and related assets (loading/unloading assets, storage tanks, and a refinery for vegetable oils and their derivatives) located in Rotterdam harbour, and the related personnel, excluding any feedstock sourcing and supply agreements. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Bunge Loders Croklaan Oils: production and related assets (loading/unloading assets, storage tanks, and a refinery for vegetable oils and their derivatives) located in Rotterdam harbour, and the related personnel, excluding any feedstock sourcing and supply agreements.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9972 — Neste/Bunge Loders Croklann Oils

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
M.S., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 26, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and James A. Odell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kayla H. McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Negron v. State*, 306 So.2d 104, 108 (Fla. 1975), *receded from on other grounds,* *F.B. v. State*, 852 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2003) (holding: "Proof of the element of value is essential to a conviction for grand larceny and must be established by the State beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt. In determining the value of property, proof thereof may be shown by such elements or facts affecting the question as may exist. Recourse may be had to the items of cost, as well as the utility and use of the property. The original market cost of the property, the manner in which it has been used, its general condition and quality, the percentage of depreciation since its purchase or construction are elements of proof to be submitted to the jury to aid it in ascertaining value in such cases"); *Bloodsaw v. State*, 994 So.2d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; *Gilbert v. State*, 817 So.2d 980 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). *See also* § 812.012(10)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing that "value" as used in sections 812.012-812.037 means, inter alia, "the market value of the property at the time and place of the offense or, if such cannot be satisfactorily ascertained, the cost of replacement of the property within a reasonable time after the offense"); § 92.605(5), Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing: "In a criminal proceeding in a court of this state, an out-of-state record of regularly conducted business activity, or a copy of such record, shall not be excluded as hearsay evidence by s. 90.802, if an out-of-state certification attests that: (a) Such record was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of those matters; (b) Such record was kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity; (c) The business activity made such a record as a regular practice; (d) If such record is not the original, it is a duplicate of the original, unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness"); § 90.902(11), Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing that "[e]xtrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is not required for admissibility" of an "original or duplicate of evidence that would be admissible under s. 90.803(6), which is maintained in a foreign country or domestic *553location and is accompanied by a certification or declaration from the custodian of the records or another qualified person" setting forth the requisite factors for admission as provided in section 90.803(6) ).
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(105)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(42)
              - multimedia_image-141771(42)
              - multimedia_video(17)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(12)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(48)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(4)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - (-)texas(3)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(13)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers

Presentations and Events        June 26, 2018        Waterfowl Seeking Submerged Aquatic Vegetation

Presentations and Events        September 20, 2018        Habitat Connectivity: Assessing Threats and IDing Conservation Actions
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4223

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO D. SCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-100)

Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George E. Leedom, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F.

Fahey, United States Attorney, Laura Ann Colombell, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* U. S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1998).

2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio D. Scott appeals his sentence to 46 months imprisonment based upon his guilty plea to possession of a stolen firearm,

in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(j) (West 2000). Scott argues

that the district court erred in including a state court conviction

that occurred when he was a juvenile in the calculation of his

criminal history category under § 4A1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. United States v. Bacon, 94 F.3d 158,

163-64 (4th Cir. 1996); United States v. Bradshaw, 999 F.2d 798,

800-01 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we affirm Scott’s conviction

and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Rodolfo LLAMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Frank W. McDermott and Arthur M. Miksis of McDermott Law Firm, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
D.M., Father of K.M. and R.M., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3032

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 7, 2019

Elliott R. Ambrose, of The Law Office of Elliott R. Ambrose, Brooksville, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, of Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, of Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
##### 



Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. Enters into Development and License Agreement with Amylin
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 Bothell, WA June 26, 2006 
   ,
 About Nastech
 www.nastech.com
 Nastech Forward Looking Statements




---



##### 



Contacts:
 ir@nastech.com
 Noonan Russo
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(9)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(55)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - (-)mississippi(1)
              - nebraska(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - south dakota(13)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 26, 2011        Flooding Hits Along the Mississippi River
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the annual  report of General Steel  Holdings,  Inc..  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Commission on April 11, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, John Chen,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                                      By: /s/  John Chen
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         John Chen
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



DATED: April 11, 2005
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Metaline Contact Mines (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
L. Howell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.

Date: March 26, 2004

                                         By: /s/ Richard L. Howell
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Richard L. Howell
                                             President & Chief Executive Officer
Daryl PETERSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4043

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.