alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 379 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 379

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 11, 2013.
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
managers on the part of the House of the conference on the disagreeing votes of 
the two Houses on the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill H.R. 
2642 (an Act to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and 
other programs of the Department of Agriculture and other programs of the 
Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2018, and for other purposes) 
should--
            (1) agree to provisions relating to a limitation on premium subsidy 
        based on average adjusted gross income in excess of $750,000;
            (2) agree to provisions relating to a requirement for the Secretary 
        to carry out a study on crop insurance and the impacts of an adjusted 
        gross income limitation, as specified in paragraph (1); and
            (3) not agree to provisions relating to a delayed effective date.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
##### 



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WGNB Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
   
 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - (-)arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(6)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(3)
              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - 2019(1)

staff profileDavid J Topping, Ph.D.

staff profileLaura M Norman, Ph.D.

staff profilePrasad S. Thenkabail, PhD
H. Res. 288 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 9, 2013. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2609) making appropriations for energy and 

water development and related agencies for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2014, and for other purposes. The first 

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After 

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 

under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions 

in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are 

waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 

chair of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 

recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an 
2 

•HRES 288 EH 

amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 

Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 

of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 

read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back to 

the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - (-)products_data(4)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - california(41)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(5)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - (-)virginia(4)
              - washington(5)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Real-time Data        November 27, 2014        Earthquake Daily Data

Real-time Data        October 27, 2014        Earthquake Activity Data

Real-time Data        December 27, 2014        Earthquake Real-Time Data

Data Release        October 29, 2014        Airborne Geophysical Surveys over the 2011 Mineral, Virginia Earthquake Area
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 523 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 523

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 25, 2014.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Jolly.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Jolly.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
James BANNISTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3991

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Sean Kevin Gravel, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney Generals, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Stubbs, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of CallWave, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of CallWave, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark Stubbs
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:           |  | Mark Stubbs            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:          |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors
    KPMG Consulting, Inc.

We have issued our reports dated August 6, 2002, except for Note 23, as to which
the date is September 18, 2002, accompanying the financial statements and
Schedule II, of KPMG Consulting, Inc. (successor to the consulting business of
KPMG LLP), which are included in this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said reports in KPMG Consulting, Inc.'s Registration Statements on Form S-3
(File No. 333-83990, effective March 18, 2002) and on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-55354, effective February 9, 2001, File No. 333-55380, effective February 9,
2001 and File No. 333-55378, effective February 9, 2001).



/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


New York, New York
September 26, 2002
exv10w13



 





Exhibit 10.13




MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

DIRECTOR’S CHARITABLE MATCHING PROGRAM




     The Director’s Charitable Matching Program provides for corporate matching
of charitable contributions made by nonemployee directors, on a
dollar-for-dollar basis, up to an aggregate maximum of $5,000 per year.
Jessie Lee OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2033

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Carbajal v. State*, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011) ; *State v. King*, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982) ; *State v. Roby*, 246 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1971) ; *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; *Desmond v. State*, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) ; *Budd v. State*, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) ; *Hillman v. State*, 410 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) ; *McMillan v. State*, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; *Harris v. State*, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ; *Hart v. State*, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ; *Freeny v. State*, 621 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 612 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 612

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
   Government of Mexico should forthwith repatriate Sgt. Andrew Paul 
  Tahmooressi from Mexican prison(s) and expressing the sense of the 
House of Representatives that the President of the United States should 
  take actions to impose sanctions on Mexico until such time as Sgt. 
                        Tahmooressi is released.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2014

Mr. Stockman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
   Government of Mexico should forthwith repatriate Sgt. Andrew Paul 
  Tahmooressi from Mexican prison(s) and expressing the sense of the 
House of Representatives that the President of the United States should 
  take actions to impose sanctions on Mexico until such time as Sgt. 
                        Tahmooressi is released.

Whereas Sgt. Tahmooressi served with the U.S. Marine Corps for two tours of duty 
        in Afghanistan earning a rare combat field promotion to Sergeant;
Whereas Sgt. Tahmooressi was driving near the U.S.-Mexican border on March 31, 
        2014, when he took a wrong turn and unintentionally drove into Mexico. 
        He was stopped by police in Mexico and arrested for possessing three 
        firearms which were fully legal in Texas and were registered to him; and
Whereas Sgt. Tahmooressi has a distinguished record in the U.S. Marine Corps and 
        there is no indication that Sgt. Tahmooressi was in violation of other 
        laws in Mexico, except possession of his own firearms: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the Government of Mexico should expeditiously release 
        and repatriate Sgt. Tahmooressi and all possessions that have 
        been seized; and
            (2) the President of the United States should communicate 
        with the Government of Mexico that he will impose increasingly 
        harsh sanctions on Mexico until such time as Sgt. Tahmooressi 
        is released.
                                 <all>
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 LEE STONE, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3 vs. NO. 31,788 4 FAIRY PURIFOY 5 Defendants-Appellee, 6
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY 7 Albert J. Mitchell, District Judge 8 John R. Hakanson 9 Alamogordo, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Lee Stone 12 San Jon, NM 13 Pro se Appellant 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 GARCIA, Judge. 162 Plaintiff, appearing pro se, appeals from a district court order dismissing his 1 complaint. We proposed to affirm and Plaintiff has responded with a memorandum 2 in opposition. He also purports to be m oving to amend the docketing statement. We 3 hereby deny the motion to amend and a ffirm the district court order. 4 Defendant’s docketing statement raised ni ne issues challenging a district court 5 order dismissing his defamation complaint w ith prejudice. [DS 14] Our calendar 6 notice observed that this Court may take judicial notice of our own files. See State v. 7 Turner , 81 N.M. 571, 576, 469 P.2d 720, 725 (Ct. App. 1970) (recognizing the Court 8 of Appeals’ authority to take judicial no tice of its own records) . In Ct. App. No. 9 31,714, Fairy Purifoy v. Dusty Stone , Appellant Dusty Stone is appealing, inter alia, 10 from a district court order granting Fairy Purifoy’s second motion for protective order 11 or permanent injunction against Lee Stone , Dusty Stone, and any and all siblings, 12 heirs, successors or assigns of Lee Stone or Dusty Stone, filed on October 21, 2011. 13 [Ct. App. No. 31,714 RP 381]. A Decision Le tter from that proceeding appears in the 14 record in this case. [RP 34] Given the nature of this order, we continue to conclude 15 that any challenge to the dismissal of the present case would require Lee Stone to have 16 that order set aside. In other words, Plaintiff may not do an end-run around the 17 protective order by bringing a new legal theory against Purifoy to court. Because he 183 has not set aside the protective order, we gi ve effect to this order by affirming the 1 district court ruling in this proceeding. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 3

_______________________________ 4 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 5

WE CONCUR: 6

7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 8

9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 10
CHERNOFF DIAMOND & CO., LLC, Appellant, v. GALLIN ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a Gallin Associates, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2018

Christopher L. DeCort of Johnson & Cassidy, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Sheila Skellie of the Law Office of David J. Kurland, Largo, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Chief Judge.

Chernoff Diamond & Co., LLC, appeals the trial court's nonfinal order setting aside the final default judgment entered against Gallin Associates, Inc. We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(B) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5), and reverse.

We review the trial court's order for gross abuse of discretion. *See**United Capital Funding Corp. v. Technamax, Inc.*, 946 So.2d 63, 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). To set aside the final default judgment, Gallin had to show: "(1) that the failure to file a responsive pleading was the result of excusable neglect; (2) that it has a meritorious defense; and (3) that it acted with due diligence in seeking relief from the default." *See**Allstate Floridian Ins. Co. v. Ronco Inventions, LLC*, 890 So.2d 300, 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing *Goodwin v. Goodwin*, 559 So.2d 109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) ).

Gallin failed to prove excusable neglect. The record demonstrates that Gallin's president, Lawrence Gallin, was served with the complaint and knew he had to respond. Yet, he put the complaint and summons in a drawer, left for vacation, and forgot about the lawsuit until he received notice of the entry of a final judgment.

We are constrained to reverse and remand for the trial court to reinstate the final default judgment. *See**564*Bethesda Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Laska*, 977 So.2d 804, 807 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ("[A] default will not be set aside where the defaulted party or his attorney (1) simply forgot or (2) intentionally ignored the necessity to take appropriate action; that is to say, where the conduct could reasonably be characterized as partaking of gross negligence or as constituting a willful and intentional refusal to act." (quoting *Jeyanandarajan v. Freedman*, 863 So.2d 432, 433-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ) ); *see, e.g.*, *Orlando Partners, Ltd. v. Classic Tour Lines*, 492 So.2d 1117, 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (holding there was no excusable neglect where wife stated she told her husband about receipt of summons but forgot to tell him about hearing on motion for entry of default and husband did not recall knowledge of summons).

Reversed and remanded.

SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32(a)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, John R. Maxwell President and Chief
Executive Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ John R. Maxwell
-------------------------------------
John R. Maxwell
President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 13.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Maxcom TelecomunicacionesS.A. de C.V. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”),I, José Antonio Solbes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
Date: June 29, 2005                                                       /s/ JOSE ANTONIO SOLBES   José Antonio Solbes   Chief Financial Officer
Order filed February 25, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00626

- CV

____________ GREGORY GOTTWALD, IN DIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A G GROUP AND D/B/A DURATECH SERVI CES AND D/B/A DURATE CH FOUNDATION REPAIR , AND DURATECH SERVICES, L .L.C. , Appellant s
V.
MELINDA O'CONNELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 81888



### O R D E R
Appellant s ’ brief was due February 10, 2020

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed. If appellant s do not file a brief with this court on or before March 11, 2020 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.