alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curon Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alistair F. McLaren, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ALISTAIR F. MCLAREN                               
|                        |  |     |  | Alistair F. McLaren                                  
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE
              SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michel L. Marengere, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Total First Aid,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being
prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2004

/s/ Michel L. Marengere
------------------------
Michel L. Marengere
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 467 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 467

 Expressing support for designation of February 12, 2014, as ``Darwin 
 Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 
                               humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2014

    Mr. Holt (for himself, Mr. Himes, and Mr. Honda) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science, 
                         Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of February 12, 2014, as ``Darwin 
 Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 
                               humanity.

Whereas Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by the mechanism of natural 
        selection, together with the monumental amount of scientific evidence he 
        compiled to support it, provides humanity with a logical and 
        intellectually compelling explanation for the diversity of life on 
        Earth;
Whereas the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is 
        further strongly supported by the modern understanding of the science of 
        genetics;
Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Darwin that 
        has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve 
        many problems and improve living conditions;
Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from those unconcerned with 
        the adverse impacts of global warming and climate change;
Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools compromises the 
        scientific and academic integrity of the United States education 
        systems;
Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to 
        focus and around which to build a global celebration of science and 
        humanity intended to promote a common bond among all of Earth's peoples; 
        and
Whereas February 12, 2014, is the anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin in 
        1809 and would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Darwin Day'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Darwin Day''; and
            (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy symbol on which 
        to celebrate the achievements of reason, science, and the 
        advancement of human knowledge.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
COL China Online International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
December 31, 2005, Chi Keung Wong, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated:  February 17, 2006                       /s/ Chi Keung Wong
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Chi Keung Wong
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfect Health Care Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), Antoine
Jarjour, as Principal Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June  21, 2004

Signed:

/s/Antoine Jarjour
----------------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Acting Chief Executive Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) April 13, 2006
 Delphi Corporation
  Delaware
    
    1-14787
    
    38-3430473(State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)Incorporation)
 5725 Delphi Drive, Troy, MI
    
    48098(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (248) 813-2000
 
  see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS
  SIGNATURE
  DELPHI CORPORATION(Registrant)Date:
    
    April 18, 2006By:
    
    /s/ JOHN D. SHEEHAN(John D. Sheehan,Vice President and Chief Restructuring Officer,Chief Accounting Officer and Controller)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EVELIO GOMEZ-GOMEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-10526

D.C. No. 4:08-CR-00651-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Evelio Gomez-Gomez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and 20-month

sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez-Gomez’s counsel

has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

FILED

MAY 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-10526

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT****32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**





In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of First Northern Community
      Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007
      (the “Report”), I, Owen J. Onsum, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
      Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to my knowledge,





(i)        the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)        the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
            November
                8, 2007
            
            /s/  Owen
                J. OnsumOwen
                J. Onsum, President and Chief Executive
                Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Axmacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                    /s/ Thomas Axmacher
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Thomas Axmacher
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 16, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41251

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO GARCIA-BUSTAMANTE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CR-1260-1

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro GarciaBustamante (Garcia) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has filed a response. The record is

insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Garcia’s claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on

direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 9, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41251 Document: 00511565964 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2011
No. 10-41251

no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” 

United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Garcia’s response. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Garcia’s motion for the appointment of

new counsel is DENIED, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-41251 Document: 00511565964 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2011
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-10338

Conference Calendar

__________________

JIMMY LEE HICKSON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KALMANOV, Doctor,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:96-CV-50-X

- - - - - - - - - -

June 25, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jimmy Lee Hickson, #500542, appeals the dismissal of his

civil rights action without prejudice for failure to pay his

prior monetary sanctions and failure to move for leave to file

his complaint. Hickson argues that the district court erred in

precluding him from filing his complaint without conducting an

inquiry to determine whether he is able to make payment. We have

reviewed the record and Hickson's brief and conclude that there
No. 96-10338

-2-

is no error. See Hickson v. Kalmanov, No. 7:96-CV-50-X (N.D.

Tex. Mar. 11, 1996). 

 The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Hickson that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition

of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Hickson is further cautioned

to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court.

 APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Gerard L. BROOKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2423

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

Gerard L. Brookins, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



INTERVIDEO, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall Bambrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, the Quarterly Report of InterVideo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InterVideo, Inc.



Dated: August 15, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Randall Bambrough  
|Randall Bambrough      
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.1










CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





i.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
      request.







Date:
      April 2, 2007


/s/ Zuo Sheng
                Yu
                By:
                  Zuo Sheng Yu
                Title:
                  Chief Executive Officer and
                  Chairman
Changes to Summary of Compensation for Non-employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Changes to Compensation of Non-employee Directors 
 The compensation arrangements for our non-employee directors
(“Outside Directors”) were described on Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We have made certain changes to these arrangements, as described below. 
 The fee to an Outside Director for attending each quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors that the Outside Director attends in person was increased
to $15,000. An Outside Director may be paid such fee for attending a quarterly Board meeting via telephonic conference call if the Outside Director has good reason for the Outside Director’s failure to attend such meeting in person as
determined by the Chairman of the Board, but such payment is limited to one occurrence in any given fiscal year. The fee to an Outside Director who is a member of the Audit Committee for attending each quarterly meeting of such committee that
the Outside Director attends in person was increased to $6,000. In addition, we established a fee of $3,000 which is paid quarterly to each Outside Director who is a member of the Compensation Committee, provided that, in order to be eligible
to receive the fee with respect to a fiscal quarter, the Outside Director must have served on the Compensation Committee on the last day of such fiscal quarter. Previously, Compensation Committee members did not receive compensation for their
services as members of the Compensation Committee. The foregoing changes were effective April 1, 2008. 
 The Company has adopted a
policy, under which from time to time, the Board of Directors may hold meetings and other related activities in various locations for which the Company’s payment of the expenses of Board members and Board members’ guests who participate in
such meetings and activities may be deemed compensation to participating directors. To the extent such participation is deemed compensation to a director, the Company has also adopted a policy to pay to such director (or withhold and pay to the
appropriate taxing authority on behalf of such director) a “tax gross-up” in cash, which would approximate the amount of the director’s (i) federal and state income and payroll taxes on the taxable income associated with such
personal use plus (ii) federal and state income and payroll taxes on the taxes that the director may incur as a result of the payment of taxes by the Company. 
 All other elements of the compensation arrangements for our Outside Directors, as described on Exhibit 10.13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, remain in effect.