T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L UZ E L E NA C AT AL AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 72182 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 962- 154 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L uz E l e naC a t a l a n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the or de rof

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( “ B I A ” ) a f f i rm i ng an i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n h e rd e p o rta tio n p r o c e e d in g s h e ldin abs e nt i a . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f ora n abus e of 

# FI LED JU L 31 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 72182 2 d is c r e tio n th e a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Flo r es - Ch a v ezv . A s h c r o ft , 3 6 2 F . 3 d1 1 5 0 , 1 1 5 4 -5 5 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ), an drev i ew d e n o v o du e p ro cess cl ai m s, H am azaspyan v. H

older , 590 F . 3d 744, 747 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on f o rr e v i e w. T h e a g e n c yd idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g C a ta lan ’s m o tio n to r e ope n a l l e gi ng al a c k of not i c e a nd s e e ki ng t o appl yf ors us pe ns i on of

de port a t i on un der the N i cara gu an A dj ustm entand C entra l A m er i can R el i ef A ct(“N A C A R A ”) , P ub. L . N o. 105- 100, 111 S t a t . 2160 ( 1997) . C a t a l an f i l e d he rm ot i on be y ond the or di na rym ot i ons de a dl i ne of S e pt e m be r30, 1996, a nd the s pe c i a l de a dl i ne of S e p te m b e r1 1 , 1 9 9 8 , f

o rN A C A R A m o tio n s , se e 8 C . F . R . §§ 10 03 . 23 (b)( 1), 1003. 43( e ) ( 1) , a nd C a t a l a n’ s s i gna tur e a c know l e dgi ng r e c e i ptof a n or de rt o s how c au s e n o t i f

y i n g h e ri n En g l i s h a n dSp an i s h o f h e rr i g h t s a n do b l i g a t i o n s , th e t i me and p l ac e of herdepo rt at i on hear i ng , and the consequences of f ai l i ng t o app ear e s tab lis h e s th a t s h e r e c e iv e da d e q u a te n o tic e o f h e rd e p o rta tio n p r o c e e d in g s , se e Flores -Cha vez , 3 6 2 F .3 da t 1 1 5 5 - 5 6 ( “[ I ]n o r d e rto r e c e iv e g e n e r a llya d e q u a te not i c e , a n a l i e n m us tbe i nf orm e d, i n al angua ge he unde r s t ands , of hi s r i ght s a nd re spon sibi l i t i es i n regard t o the depo rt at i on hear i ng , the t i m e and pl ac e of that hear i ng and the consequences of f ai l i ng t o app ear. ”) .12- 72182 3 T he B IA di d n otvi ol at e C at al an’ s due proces s r i gh t s by f ai l i ng t o p rovi de a re as on ed expl anat i on for i t s deni alof her m ot i on t o reopen b ec ause i tprov i ded s p e c if ic a n dc o g e n t r e a s o n s s u f f ic ie n t to e n ab le o u rr e v ie w o f its d e c is io n . See N aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 5 9 7 F .3 d9 8 3 , 9 9 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( “[ T h e a g e n c y ] is r e q u ir e d. . . m e r e ly. . . [ to ] c o n s id e rth e is s u e s r a is e d , an da n n o u n c e its d e c is io n in t e rm s s uf f i c i e ntt o e nabl e ar e vi e w i ng c ourtt o pe r c e i ve tha ti tha s he ar d and tho ug htand n otm er el y r ea ct ed. ” ( ci t at i on and i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed)) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.