alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ormando D. WESBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2217

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No.333-32599 and No. 333-74611) of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2006relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2005,and the related statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two yearsin the period ended December 31, 2005, which report is incorporated by reference in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.       /s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC            Plante & Moran, PLLC  Auburn Hills, Michigan
Amendment No. 1 to Bylaws of Bliss Essentials Corp.
                              Dated March 31, 2005


            The Bylaws of Bliss Essentials Corp., a Nevada corporation, are
hereby amended as follows:

            1. Section 2.12 of Article II is hereby deleted in its entirety and
the following is inserted in its place:

"2.12 Stockholder Action Without a Meeting

      Unless the Articles of Incorporation provide otherwise, any action to be
taken at any annual or special meeting of such stockholders of this corporation,
or any action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting of such
stockholders, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a
vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken,
shall be signed by the holders of the outstanding stock having not less than the
minimum number of votes that would have been necessary to authorize or take such
action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present
and voted and shall be delivered to the corporation by delivery to its registed
office in Nevada, its principal place of business, or an officer or agent of the
corporation having custody of the book in which proceedings of meetings of
stockholders are recorded. Delivery made to a corporation's registered office
shall be by hand or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested."

            2. Section 3.11 of Article III is hereby deleted in its entirety and
the following is inserted in its place:

"3.11 Board of Director Vacancies.

      All vacancies, including those caused by an increase in the number of
directors, may be filled by a majority of the remaining directors, though less
than a quorum, unless it is otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation.

      The term of a director elected to fill a vacancy expires at the next
shareholders' meeting at which directors are elected. However, if his term
expires, he shall continue to serve until his successor is elected and qualifies
or until there is a decrease in the number of directors."

            3. A new Article XI is hereby added which shall read in its entirety
as follows:

                                  "ARTICLE 11.
                      ACQUISITION OF CONTROLLING INTEREST"

11.1 Acquisition of Controlling Interest

      The provisions of NRS 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive, which apply to any
acquisition of a controlling interest in an issuing corporation, shall not apply
to this corporation or to an acquisition of a controlling interest in this
corporation by any type of existing or future stockholder, none of which is
identified herein."
Jeremy FUENTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2395

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

Jeremy Fuentes, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Lewis, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 196 

Supporting the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the 

right to counsel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2013 

Mr. DEUTCH (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. CHABOT, Ms. WILSON of Florida, 

Ms. LEE of California, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia, and Ms. CHU) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the Sixth Amendment to the United States 

Constitution, the right to counsel. 

Whereas on March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court recognized 

in Gideon v. Wainwright that counsel must be provided 

to indigent defendants in all felony cases; 

Whereas the Supreme Court held that providing counsel to 

indigent defendants in all felony cases meets the essential 

requirements of the Sixth Amendment to the United 

States Constitution; and 

Whereas the Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin 

that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person 

may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 196 IH 

petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless they were represented by counsel at their trial: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the Sixth Amendment to the 

3 United States Constitution, the right to counsel; and 

4 (2) supports strategies to improve the criminal 

5 justice system to ensure that indigent defendants in 

6 all felony cases are adequately represented by coun7 sel. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 19, 2006 

s0712 

Order 

 

July 19, 2006 

130825 & (40) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 130825 

 COA: 258336 

Genesee CC: 04-013556-FH 

KEITH DEMOND THOMPSON, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

Cross-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered. The application for leave to appeal is GRANTED, limited to 

the issues: (1) whether a defendant must “keep or maintain” a vehicle used for the 

purpose of selling a controlled substance “continuously for an appreciable period of time” 

as required by People v Griffin, 235 Mich App 27, 32-33 (1999), in order to sustain a 

conviction under MCL 333.7405(1)(d); and (2) whether the evidence presented in this 

case was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction for keeping or maintaining a 

drug vehicle. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is DENIED, because 

we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We 

ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of 

People v Wright (Docket No. 130295), at such future session of the Court as both cases 

are ready for submission. The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the 

Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other 

persons or groups interested in the determination of the questions presented in this case 

may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant.
Karen KLYMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

 

**Officer’s Certification**

# ** **

I,Preston A. Miller, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AmeriCreditFinancial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2003-B-X;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the servicinginformation required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under thesale and servicing agreement is included in these reports;

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponthe review required under the sale and servicing agreement, and except asdisclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under thesale and servicing agreement; and

 

5.               The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the sale andservicing agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

 
| Date:  | March 29,  2004                  |                  |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                  | /s/ Preston A. Miller |   |   |
|   | Preston A. Miller                     |                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |                  |
|        |                                       |                       |        |        |  |  |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)
              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileCharles S Couvillion
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

        I, William  Maguire,  hereby  certify that I am the duly elected  Senior
Vice  President of GMAC Mortgage  Corporation  (the  "Servicer"),  a corporation
organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of  Pennsylvania,  that I have made
such  reasonable  investigation  as I have  deemed  necessary  to  deliver  this
Certificate, including discussions with responsible officers of the Servicer and
further certify to the best of my knowledge as follows:

               1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar
        year  beginning  January 1, 2002 and ending on  December  31,  2002 (the
        "Calendar Year") and of its performance under the servicing  agreements,
        including  the servicing  agreement  dated as of September 26, 2002 (the
        "Servicing  Agreement"),  by and among the Servicer, the Issuer, and the
        Indenture Trustee, has been made under my supervision.

               2. To the  best  of my  knowledge,  based  on  such  review,  the
        Servicer  has  complied  in  all  material  respects  with  the  minimum
        servicing  standards set forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program
        for Mortgage  Bankers and has fulfilled all of its material  obligations
        in all material respects throughout the Calendar Year.


        Capitalized  terms not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the
Servicing Agreement.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the seal of the
Servicer.

Dated:  March 31, 2003
Re: GMACM Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-HLTV1
                                                   GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION



                                                   By:  /s/William Maguire
                                                   Name:  William Maguire
                                                   Title: Senior Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0666

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF:

MARTIN W. MACLAY,

 Deceased.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable John W. Larson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2024

08/07/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0666
Kyle K. MERRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5152

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 26, 2018

Kyle K. Merritt, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-13-0000972 

26-AUG-2014 

08:26 AM 

SCWC-13-0000972
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

DERRICK HERNANDEZ,


also known as DERRICK LEROY HERNANDEZ,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-13-0000972; CR. NO. 12-1-1766)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ
 

of Certiorari, filed on July 14, 2014, is hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 26, 2014.
 

Shawn A. Luiz 

for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Brook Ashley MARBELLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2462

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 20, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole J. Martingano , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EISNAUGLE and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   400
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(13)

## By Location

              - colorado(6)
              - virginia(2)
              - west virginia(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(113)
              - 2023(24)
              - 2022(10)
              - (-)2021(13)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

staff profileWilliam Leith

staff profileSanaz Rezaeian

staff profileJackson K Odum

staff profileBruce W Presgrave

staff profileJames W Dewey

staff profileStephen H Hartzell

staff profileRobert A Williams

staff profileGeorge L Choy

staff profileCyrus Whitney Read

staff profileJay Wellik

staff profileWilliam Thomas Pecora

staff profileCharles Edward Heywood

staff profileDavid Powars
IB 

Union Calendar No. 47 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 934 

[Report No. 113–71] 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act related to a segment of the 

Lower Merced River in California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2013 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK (for himself, Mr. COSTA, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. NUNES, Mr. 

VALADAO, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

MAY 17, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 934 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act related to a 

segment of the Lower Merced River in California, and 

for other purposes. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 934 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOWER MERCED RIVER. 

4 (a) WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT.—Section 

5 3(a)(62)(B)(i) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1274(a)(62)(B)(i)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘the normal maximum’’ the first 

8 place that it appears and all that follows through 

9 ‘‘April, 1990.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘the 

10 boundary of FERC Project No. 2179 as it existed 

11 on February 15, 2013, consisting of a point approxi12 mately 2,480 feet downstream of the confluence with 

13 the North Fork of the Merced River, consisting of 

14 approximately 7.4 miles.’’; and 

15 (2) by striking ‘‘the normal maximum operating 

16 pool water surface level of Lake McClure’’ the sec17 ond place that it appears and inserting ‘‘the bound18 ary of FERC Project No. 2179 as it existed on Feb19 ruary 15, 2013, consisting of a point approximately 

20 2,480 feet downstream of the confluence with the 

21 North Fork of the Merced River’’. 

22 (b) EXCHEQUER PROJECT.—Section 3 of Public Law 

23 102–432 is amended by striking ‘‘Act:’’ and all that fol24 lows through the period and inserting ‘‘Act.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 47 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 934 

[Report No. 113–71] 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act related 

fornia, and for other purposes. to a segment of the Lower Merced River in CaliMAY 17, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00332-CV

IN RE MIKE HICKS

Original Proceeding

O P I N I O N

Relator, Mike Hicks, has filed "Relator's Motion for Emergency Relief and Request 

for Stay." The motion, purportedly filed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

52.10, requests that we stay the effect of an order which requires compliance by 10:00 AM 

on October 13, 2016. The motion indicates that the "Relator will be filing a Petition for 

Writ of Mandamus subsequent to the filing of this Motion." The referenced petition has 

not been filed. The trial court's order and any other documents, such as a record of events 

in the trial court that resulted in the order, are not attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.3(k); 52.7. The motion is not verified as required for a petition for writ of mandamus 

and the supporting record. See id. 52.3(j).

The Relator's motion is premature. The filing of original proceedings in the 
In re Hicks Page 2

appellate courts is governed by Section Three of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

Rule 52.1 specifies how such a proceeding is commenced in an appellate court. 

Specifically it provides: 

52.1. Commencement

An original appellate proceeding seeking extraordinary relief — such as a 

writ of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, injunction, or quo warranto 

— is commenced by filing a petition with the clerk of the appropriate 

appellate court. The petition must be captioned “In re [name of relator].” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. Further, Rule 52.10 expressly contemplates a pending petition for 

writ of mandamus when a motion for temporary relief is filed. The rule provides, in part:

"The relator may file a motion to stay any underlying proceedings or for 

any other temporary relief pending the court’s action on the petition."

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a). Moreover, the rule provides the Court can grant temporary relief 

"pending the court’s action on the petition." Id. (b).

While we are not prepared to hold that in no circumstance would we consider a 

motion for emergency relief and requesting a stay of a trial court proceeding or order 

without a pending petition for writ of mandamus, we do not believe this proceeding 

evidences the extraordinary circumstances that would justify such an action by the court. 

Accordingly, we dismiss "Relator's Motion for Emergency Relief and Request for a Stay" 

without prejudice to filing such a motion after a petition for writ of mandamus has been 

filed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
In re Hicks Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 13, 2016

[OT06]
Robert D. ASWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D18-3592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 19, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.