alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Entourage Mining
Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: February 25, 2009

/s/ Gregory F.
KennedyGregory F. Kennedy, President and
C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)

---
H. Res. 478 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 11, 2014. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 540), to designate the air route traffic control center located in Nashua, 

New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Patricia Clark Boston Air Route 

Traffic Control Center’’. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of 

a substitute consisting of the text of sections 1 through 3 of 

Rules Committee Print 113–37 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, and on any amendment thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

of debate equally divided and controlled by the Majority 

Leader and Minority Leader or their respective designees; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
2 

•HRES 478 EH 

SEC. 2. House Resolution 475 is amended in section 2 

by striking ‘‘February 13, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘February 

12, 2014’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-41251 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ALEJANDRO GARCIA-BUSTAMANTE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-1260-1
Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appo i n t ed to represent Alejandro GarciaBustamante (Garcia) has moved for leave to withdr aw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Garcia’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 9, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-41251 Document: 00511565964 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2011No. 10-41251

no opportunity existed to develop the record on the meri t s of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 20 0 6) (internal quotation marks and citation o mitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of th e r e c ord reflected therein, as well as Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Garcia’s motion for the appointment of

new counsel is DENIED, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excuse d f

r om further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-41251 Document: 00511565964 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2011
H. Res. 373 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 8, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 89) making appropriations for the salaries and related expenses of certain Federal employees during a lapse in 

funding authority for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the joint 

resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) 40 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3273) to establish a bicameral working group on deficit reduction and economic growth. All points of order against consideration of the 
2 

•HRES 373 EH 

bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 40 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 3. (a) In the engrossment of H.J. Res. 89, the 

Clerk shall— 

(1) add the text of H.R. 3273, as passed by the 

House, as new matter at the end of H.J. Res. 89; 

(2) conform the title of H.J. Res. 89 to reflect the 

addition of the text of H.R. 3273, as passed by the 

House, to the engrossment; 

(3) assign appropriate designations to provisions 

within the engrossment; and 

(4) conform cross-references and provisions for 

short titles within the engrossment. 

(b) Upon the addition of the text of H.R. 3273, as 

passed by the House, to the engrossment of H.J. Res. 89, 

H.R. 3273 shall be laid on the table. 

SEC. 4. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

90) making continuing appropriations for the Federal Avia-
3 

•HRES 373 EH 

tion Administration for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the joint 

resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) 40 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
George ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph CRAWFORD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3557

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 17

- 51060

**Whole Woman's Health, On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians and Patients; Planned Parenthood Center**  **for Choice, On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians,**  **and Patients; Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, On Behalf of Itself, Its**  **Staff, Physicians, and Patients; Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center, On Behalf of Itself, Its**  **Staff, Physicians, and Patients; Alam o City Surgery**  **Center, P.L.L.C., On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians, and Patients,**  doing business as **Alamo Women's Reproductive Services; Southwestern Women's Surgery**  **Center, On Behalf of Itself, Its Staff, Physicians, and Patients; Curtis Boyd, M.**  **D., On His Own Behalf and On Behalf of His Patients; Jane Doe, M.D., M.A.S., On Her**  **Own Behalf and On Behalf of Her Patients; Bhavik Kumar, M.D., M.P.H., On His Own Behalf and On Behalf**  **of His Patients; Alan Braid, M.D., On His Own Behalf**

**and On Behalf of His Patients; Robin Wallace, M.D.,**  **M.A.S., On Her Own Behalf and On Behalf of Her Patients,** 

Plaintiffs

— Appellees

**,**

versus

**Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, In His Official Capacity; Sharen Wilson, Criminal District Attorney** 

**for Tarrant County, In Her Official Capacity; Barry**  **Johnson, Criminal District Attorney for McLennan County, In His Official Capacity,**  United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
October 30, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk17

- 51060

Defendants

— Appellants

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:17

- CV

- 690

(Opinion October 13, 2020, **5 Cir., 2020, 2020 WL 6042428** ) (Modified Opinion October 22, 2020, **5 Cir., 2020, 2020 WL 6218657** )

Before **Owen,** Chief Judge

**,** and **Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis,**  **Elrod, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Engelhardt,**  and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. 1** 

**Per Curiam:**

A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not
disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this

case en banc,

**IT IS ORDERED** that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to

5 th Cir.R.41.3

, the panel opinion in this case dated October 22, 2020, is

vacated.

1 Judges Southwick, Duncan, and Oldham are recused in this case and did not participate in this
decision.



### 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 527 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-765, K2025-764.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30120 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7169

JOSEPH MARIO TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-416-JFM)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Mario Turner, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Appellant's motion for

a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Smith, No. CA-96-

416-JFM (D. Md. July 17, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DE VISSER GRAY
        CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
     401-905 West Pender Street
   Vancouver, BC Canada   V6C 1L6
           (604)687-5447



March 2, 2004



To whom it may concern:


RE:	FORM 10
	BLISS ESSENTIALS CORP.


We hereby authorize and consent to the use of our auditors' report
dated January 27, 2004, as an Exhibit to the above refrenced filing and
to the use of our name as it appears therein.

Sincerely,

DE VISSER GRAY
/s/ De Visser Gray

Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, British Columbia
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 
 ®
 
 Contact:
 For Immediate Release
 Onyx Responds to CDC Statement
 BELLEVUE, Wash.
    About Onyx Software




---



##### 



Forward-Looking Statement
 This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements about Onyxs growth
strategy and its consideration of the CDC proposal. Forward-looking statements are based on the
opinions and estimates of management at the time the statements are made and are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in
the forward-looking statements. The words predict, believe, expect, intend, anticipate,
variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but their
absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Factors that could affect Onyxs actual results include, but are not limited
to the ongoing success of our growth strategy, the discussions, if any, that may take place between
Onyx and CDC and the Important Factors That May Affect Our Business, Our Results of Operations
and Our Stock Price described in our annual report on form 10-K and our quarterly reports on form
10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission which are available on our
investor relations home page at www.onyx.com/investors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance upon these forward-looking statements that speak only as to the date of this release. Onyx
undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect new
information, events or circumstances after the date of this release or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 325 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 

should award the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Glen 

Doherty and Tyrone Woods, both of whom died from enemy action 

during the attack on United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya, on 

the night of September 11–12, 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. HALL, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. 

COOK, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. BROUN of 

Georgia, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. GRAYSON, and Mr. 

MCCARTHY of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the President should award the Presidential Medal of 

Freedom posthumously to Glen Doherty and Tyrone 

Woods, both of whom died from enemy action during 

the attack on United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya, 

on the night of September 11–12, 2012. 

Whereas on September 11, 2012, United States facilities and 

personnel in Benghazi, Libya, were attacked by militants 

with ties to Islamist terrorist groups; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 325 IH 

Whereas four Americans were killed in the attack: Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, 

and Tyrone Woods; 

Whereas Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were former Navy 

SEALs serving as security personnel in Libya who, as 

the attack unfolded, fought valiently to defend American 

property and protect United States personnel; 

Whereas their small security team was thrown into action in 

the face of enemies who were better armed with heavier 

weapons and who greatly outnumbered the Americans, 

and in ensuing combat, Woods and Doherty sacrificed 

their own lives in the effort to save the lives of others; 

Whereas according to Executive Order 1086, signed by President John F. Kennedy on February 22, 1963, the first 

listed criterion for the award of the Medal of Freedom 

by the President is to ‘‘any person who has made an especially meritorious contribution to . . . the security or 

national interests of the United States’’, which is a description that clearly fits both Glen Doherty and Tyrone 

Woods: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should award the Presi3 dential Medal of Freedom posthumously to Glen Doherty 

4 and Tyrone Woods for their selfless dedication, courage, 

5 and sacrifice during the battle in Benghazi, Libya, during 

6 the night of September 11–12, 2012. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2972

___________ Arthur Heim, k/a Sir Arthur Heim, * * Appellant, * * v. * * George W. Bush, * * Appellee. *

___________ Appeals from the United States No. 01-3341 District Court for the ___________ District of Nebraska. Arthur Heim, k/a Sir Arthur Heim, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant, * * v. * * United States District Court for the * District of Nebraska-Omaha, et al., * Case Nos. 99-CV-150-99-9446, in * the Supreme Court of the United States * Judges, et al., Term 2000; Magistrate * Judge Kathleen A. Jaudzemis; District * Judge Joseph F. Bataillon, et al., * * Appellees. *

___________1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- Submitted: December 5, 2001 Filed: December 10, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Arthur Heim challenges the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 orders sanctioning him for filing harassing and frivolous litigation. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that, for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders, the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the result reached by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all pending motions. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 335 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 335

To refer H.R. 3068, a bill making congressional reference to the United 
 States Court of Federal Claims pursuant to sections 1492 and 2509 of 
 title 28, United States Code, the Indian trust-related claims of the 
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians of Michigan as well 
                       as its individual members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2013

Mr. Benishek submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To refer H.R. 3068, a bill making congressional reference to the United 
 States Court of Federal Claims pursuant to sections 1492 and 2509 of 
 title 28, United States Code, the Indian trust-related claims of the 
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians of Michigan as well 
                       as its individual members.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    Pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United States Code, the bill 
(H.R. 3068), entitled ``A Bill relating to members of the Grand 
Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians of Michigan,'' now pending 
in the House of Representatives, is referred to the chief judge of the 
United States Court of Federal Claims for a determination as to whether 
the tribe and its members have Indian trust-related legal or equitable 
claims against the United States other than the legal claims that are 
pending in the Court of Federal Claims on the date of enactment of this 
resolution.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDING AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill, the chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed according to the provisions of sections 1492 
        and 2509 of title 28, United States Code, notwithstanding the 
        bar of any statute of limitations; and
            (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the 
        earliest practicable date, providing--
                    (A) findings of fact and conclusions of law that 
                are sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the Indian-trust related 
                claims of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and 
                Chippewa Indians of Michigan and its tribal members for 
                compensation as legal or equitable claims against the 
                United States other than the legal claims that are 
                pending in the Court of Federal Claims on the date of 
                enactment of this resolution; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to the claimants.
                                 <all>
```