alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1025 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-780, K2025-779.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30155 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0007. JAY GOREE v. NAJARIAN CAPITAL, LLC.

Jay Goree filed this application for discretionary appeal from an order entered

by the DeKalb County Magistrate Court in this dispossessory action. “The only

avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA

§ 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.”

Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). In other words, a party

aggrieved by a magistrate court ruling must first seek review in the state or superior

court.

The Georgia Constitution requires that “[a]ny court shall transfer to the

appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or

venue lies elsewhere.” 1983 Ga. Const., Art. 6, Sec. 1, Para. 8; Bosma v. Gunter, 258

Ga. 664 (373 SE2d 368) (1988). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED

to DeKalb County State Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/15/2015

September 15, 2015
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Feature Stories

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(15)
              - idaho(4)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - montana(3)
              - (-)north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(7)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(16)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(15)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileAlexandra  Hays

Podcasts        January 26, 2010        USGS Hydrologic Data Collection Program in North Carolina
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 905 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 905

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the research credit 
 permanent and to increase the alternative simplified research credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2013

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the research credit 
 permanent and to increase the alternative simplified research credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Research and Development Tax Credit 
Extension Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH CREDIT MADE PERMANENT; INCREASE IN ALTERNATIVE 
              SIMPLIFIED RESEARCH CREDIT.

    (a) Research Credit Made Permanent.--
            (1) In general.--Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 is amended by striking subsection (h).
            (2) Conforming amendments.--
                    (A) Subsection (c) of section 41 of such Code is 
                amended by striking paragraph (4).
                    (B) Paragraph (1) of section 45C(b) of such Code is 
                amended by striking subparagraph (D).
            (3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 
        2013.
    (b) Increase in Alternative Simplified Research Credit.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraph (A) of section 41(c)(5) of 
        such Code (relating to election of alternative simplified 
        credit) is amended by striking ``14 percent (12 percent in the 
        case of taxable years ending before January 1, 2009)'' and 
        inserting ``17 percent''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to taxable years ending after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 115TH DISTRICT COURT OF UPSHUR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th 

day of April, A.D. 2018, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Jud Waymond Smith, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-17-00140-CR

Trial Court No. 17233

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jud Waymond Smith, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 5th day of June, A.D. 2018.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-112277 on Form S-8and Registration Statement Nos. 333-121816, 333-121980 and 333-125479 on Form S-3 of our reportsdated March 16, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Luminent MortgageCapital, Inc. and subsidiaries and management’s report of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Luminent MortgageCapital, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPSan Francisco, California
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0130

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

TARA BOZO, 

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

IRA VASGAARD,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT David Andrew Lord, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this April 6, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Jamie J. McKittrick, Dwight J. Schulte, David Andrew Lord

04/06/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0130
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29855]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 918 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-652, K2025-651.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29855 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Nina WARREN, Appellant, v. Richard WARREN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4081

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

Leslie Ann Ferderigos, of Leslie Ann Law, P.A., Windermere, for Appellant.

Richard Warren, Winter Park, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Order issued January
, 2013

In The 

## Qinirt nf Tptzt13 

## fift1! Diitrict tif ixa5 at 

## Jat1ai No. 05-12-01353-CV GQ ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, Appellant V. 1NAYATALI RAJANI ANt) TilE RAJANI GROUP, Appellees On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial 1)istrict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-I 1-05188 

### ORDER Basedonthe Courfs opinion ofthis date, appellees’ November26. 2012 and December 19. 201 2 motions to extend time to file response to appellant’s motion for extension oftime to file notice ofappeal” are DENIED as moot.

LANG JUSTIC
Order filed, December 04, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00951-CR

____________

EX PARTE BRENT WAYNE JUSTICE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1385768

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 03, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Judy Fox, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of First Northern Community Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Louise A. Walker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,





(i)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 12, 2011

/s/  Louise A. WalkerLouise A. Walker, President and Chief Executive Officer
Ramon ZEPEDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

Ramon Zepeda, Perry, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, May and Conner, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 99 

To prohibit anticompetitive activities and to provide that health insurance 

issuers and medical malpractice insurance issuers are subject to the 

antitrust laws of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit anticompetitive activities and to provide that 

health insurance issuers and medical malpractice insurance issuers are subject to the antitrust laws of the 

United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance In5 dustry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF ANTICOMPETITIVE ACTIVITIES. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, nothing 

8 in the Act of March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1011 et seq., comVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:38 Jan 09, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H99.IH H99

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 99 IH

1 monly known as the ‘‘McCarran-Ferguson Act’’), shall be 

2 construed to permit health insurance issuers (as defined 

3 in section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 300gg–91)) or issuers of medical malpractice in5 surance to engage in any form of price fixing, bid rigging, 

6 or market allocations in connection with the conduct of 

7 the business of providing health insurance coverage (as de8 fined in such section) or coverage for medical malpractice 

9 claims or actions. 

10 SEC. 3. RESTORING THE APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST 

11 LAWS TO HEALTH SECTOR INSURERS. 

12 (a) AMENDMENT TO MCCARRAN-FERGUSON ACT.— 

13 Section 3 of the Act of March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1013), 

14 commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act, is 

15 amended by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(c) Nothing contained in this Act shall modify, im17 pair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust 

18 laws with respect to the business of health insurance. For 

19 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘antitrust 

20 laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 

21 first section of the Clayton Act, except that such term in22 cludes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to 

23 the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods 

24 of competition.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 99 IH

1 (b) RELATED PROVISION.—For purposes of section 

2 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) 

3 to the extent such section applies to unfair methods of 

4 competition, section 3(c) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act 

5 shall apply with respect to the business of health insurance 

6 without regard to whether such business is carried on for 

7 profit, notwithstanding the definition of ‘‘Corporation’’ 

8 contained in section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission 

9 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the**

**United      States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**

**of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                                           |                                                             |                                                        |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| October              31,              2007  | /s/ Robert              F.              Kendall   |                                                        |
|                                             | Name:                                                            | Robert F. Kendall, CPA                                      |   |
|                                             | Title:                                                           | Chief Financial Officer                                     |   |
|                                             |                                                             | (principal                financial and accounting officer) |   |

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 26, 2014

NO. 03
- 13
- 00249
- CR

Ex p arte Juan Valenzuela
- Rodriguez

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED
-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the application for writ of habeas corpus filed in the trial court. Having reviewed the record and th e parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error
in the trial court’s denial of the application for writ of habeas corpus . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s denial of the application for writ of habeas corpus

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
George W. WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - (-)products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(14)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(49)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(25)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(14)
              - (-)colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(10)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

map        January 1, 1988        Seismicity map of the state of Colorado

map        January 1, 1984        Seismicity map of the state of Colorado