alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors

GlobalSCAPE, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementspertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. (Form S-8No. 333-61160),   pertaining to the2000 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-61180) and pertaining to the2006 Non-Employee Directors Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333,145771)of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. of our report dated March 21, 2008 with respectto the consolidated financial statements of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. included inthe Annual Report (Form 10-K) as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, andfor the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.

 
| /s/ PMB Helin Donovan, LLP |   |
|----------------------------|--------|

 

Austin, Texas

March  26, 2008

 

 

## ****
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Xtreme  Companies,  Inc.,  a  Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the  Company  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.



/s/  Laurie  A.  Phillips
--------------------------------------
Laurie  A.  Phillips
Chief  Executive  Officer
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
Dated:  June  5,  2006
STATE of Louisiana v. Marlone Rassen BRUMFIELD

NO. 2017-KO-1790

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Doug Wright, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Intermountain Community Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: March 17, 2006

/s/ Doug Wright
--------------------------
Doug Wright
President and Chief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KEVIN BUDDINGTON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 479

[ October 1, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Thomas J. Coleman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 006882CF10A

.

Bradford M. Cohen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirme d.

L EVINE

, C.J., C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24E0039. BRANNER v. JOHNSON et al.

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Charlie Branner Jr. is hereby

DENIED.

1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1

See Byrd v.Robinson, 349Ga.App. 19, 20 (825 SE2d 424) (2019) (“There may

occasionally appear to be a need to file an original petition in the [appellate courts] to

issue process in the nature of mandamus, and perhaps quo warranto or prohibition,

where a superior court judge is named as the respondent. This appearance is

misleading. Such petition may be filed in the appropriate superior court. Being the

respondent, the superior court judge will disqualify, another superior court judge will

be appointed to hear and determine the matter, and the final decision may be appealed

to the [appellate court] for review.”) (punctuation omitted).

December 19, 2023

12/19/2023
Rhonda JOHNSON v. MANITOWOC CO., D/B/A Frymaster and Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company

NO. 2018-C-1759

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 99.20




Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc.





March 31, 2011




TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F. Reference is also made to the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (Registration No. 333-164530, the “F-10”) of the Company which incorporates by reference the information contained in the AIF and the 40-F.





We consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to the use of the name "Snowden Mining Industry Consultants" in connection with the following report in the AIF, the 40-F and the F-10: Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Project, Preliminary Economic Assessment - 2008 dated March 10, 2008.




Dick Matthews is no longer under our employment.  We are assuming responsibility for the disclosure, opinions and reports prepared by such individual in his place with respect to the 40-F and the AIF as if the disclosure, opinions, and reports were prepared by us and without reference to Dick Matthews.  In connection with this assumption of responsibility, we hereby consent to the use of our name in the 40-F and the AIF.




Yours truly,Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Inc./s/Authorized Signatory
Arthur WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2018

Arthur Williams, Bristol, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*576Appellant, Arthur Williams, appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief alleging newly discovered evidence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1). In his motion, Appellant argues that the affidavits of two inmates who allegedly witnessed the murders for which Appellant was convicted are newly discovered and that the inmates' testimonies would have led to an acquittal at trial.

The trial court summarily denied the motion finding that the affidavits are not exculpatory and referenced portions of the trial transcripts. However, the portions of the transcripts designated by the trial court do not appear in our record. We are therefore unable to review the trial court's denial. *See**Fowler v. State* , 67 So.3d 1073, 1074 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

As such, we reverse and remand for the trial court to attach records that conclusively refute Appellant's allegations or to hold an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BERGER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30094]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 997 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-747, K2025-746.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30094 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
| · Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Prefeasibility Study dated September 5, 2012;· 2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012;· Courageous Lake Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment 2011 dated July 15, 2011;· Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell (KSM) Prefeasibility Study Update 2011 dated June 15, 2011;· Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell (KSM) Preliminary Feasibility Study 2010 dated March 31, 2010; and |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| · Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Project, Preliminary Economic Assessment - 2008 dated March 10, 2008.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |

|   |   | Yours truly,         |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   |   |                 |   |
|   |   | /s/ W.N. Brazier     |   |
|   |   | W.N. Brazier, P.Eng. |   |
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                        --------------------------------

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The Princeton Review,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:

      (1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
            ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2003                   By:  /s/ John S. Katzman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   John S. Katzman
                                           Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 12, 2003                   By:  /s/ Stephen Melvin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Stephen Melvin
                                           Title:  Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A N T O N I O V A L E N Z U E L A C R U Z ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73985 A ge nc yN os . A 079- 540- 031

A 079- 540- 032 A 079- 540- 033 A 079- 540- 034 ME MOR AN DU M * O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A n to n io V a le n z u e laC ru z , M ar iaG u a d a lup e T e r an R a m ir e z , an dtw o o f th e ir c hi l dr e n, na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o r e ope n ba s e d on 

# FI LED APR19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73985 2 i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t an c e o f

c o u n s e l . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u an tt o 8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , and w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T h e a g e n c yd idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re op en as un t i m el y bec ause pet i t i on er s f i l ed the m ot i on m ore than three ye ar s a ft er th e B I A ’s F e b ru ary2 4 , 2 0 0 4 , r e m o v a l o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 3( c ) ( 2) , and pe t i t i one r s f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha tthe ya c t e d w i th the due di l i ge nc e r e qui r e d f or e q u itab le to llin g , s e e I

tu rr ib a rr ia , 3 2 1 F .3 da t 8 9 7 ( e q u itab le to llin g is a v a ilab le to ape t i t i one rw ho i s pr e ve nt e d f r om f i l i ng due t o de c e pt i on, f r aud ore rr or , and exer ci se s due di l i gence i n d i sc ov er i ng such ci rc um st ance s) ; cf . G ha hrem an iv. G on zales , 49 8 F . 3d 99 3, 10 00 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 104601-104602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30543]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. SSA-2024-0041]

Rate for Assessment on Direct Payment of Fees to Representatives 
in 2025

AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing the assessment percentage rate under the 
Social Security Act (Act) is 6.3 percent for 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mona B. Ahmed, Associate General 
Counsel for Program Law, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security 
Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401. 
Phone: (410) 965-0600, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A claimant may appoint a qualified 
individual as a representative to act on their behalf in matters before 
the Social Security Administration (SSA). If the claimant is entitled 
to past-due benefits and was represented either by an attorney or by a 
non-attorney representative who has met certain prerequisites, the Act 
provides that we shall withhold up to 25 percent of the past-due 
benefits and use that money to pay the representative's approved fee 
directly to the representative.
    When we pay the representative's authorized fee directly to the 
representative, we must collect from that fee payment an assessment to 
recover the costs we incur in determining and paying representatives' 
fees. The Act provides that the assessment we collect will be the 
lesser of two amounts: a specified dollar limit; or the amount 
determined by multiplying the fee we are paying by the assessment 
percentage rate. (Sections 206(d), 206(e), and 1631(d)(2) of the Act, 
42 U.S.C. 406(d), 406(e), and 1383(d)(2).)
    The Act initially set the dollar limit at $75 in 2004 and provides 
that the limit will be adjusted annually based on changes in the cost-
of-living. (Sections 206(d)(2)(A) and 1631(d)(2)(C)(ii)(I) of the Act, 
42 U.S.C. 406(d)(2)(A) and 1383(d)(2)(C)(ii)(I).) The maximum dollar 
limit for the assessment currently is $120, as we announced in the 
Federal Register on October 25, 2024 (89 FR 85276).
    The Act requires us each year to set the assessment percentage rate 
at the lesser of 6.3 percent or the percentage rate necessary to 
achieve full recovery of the costs we incur to determine and pay

[[Page 104602]]

representatives' fees. (Sections 206(d)(2)(B)(ii) and 
1631(d)(2)(C)(ii)(II) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 406(d)(2)(B)(ii) and 
1383(d)(2)(C)(ii)(II).)
    Based on the best available data, we have determined that the 
current rate of 6.3 percent will continue for 2025. We will continue to 
review our costs for these services on a yearly basis.

Sean Brune,
Deputy Commissioner, for Budget, Finance, and Management, Social 
Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-30543 Filed 12-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Jeffrey A. Brodsky, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NTL Europe, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
Date: November 18, 2003
/s/ Jeffrey A. Brodsky