alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO**
 
 **Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Inyx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Hamerski,
        Vice
        President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
 
 Date: July
                25,
                2005
              By:
              /s/ John
                HamerskiJohn
                HamerskiVice President
                and
                Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7039
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHRISTIAN O. KANU, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-226-HAR, CA-94-2592-HAR) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Christian O. Kanu, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. He alleges that the district courtcommitted sentencing errors and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. However, because his claims of sentencing error could have been raised on appeal, but were not, he may not now assert them. See Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976) (nonconstitutional claims not raised on appeal may not be asserted in a collateral proceeding); United States v. Ward , 55 F.3d 412, 413 (8th Cir. 1995) (an allegation of error in the application or computation of the sentencing guidelines is not constitutional). Wealso find that Appellant has failed to establish that his attorney's performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced thereby. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 693 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Danny BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NOS.: 2D18-4574 2D18-4577 2D18-4578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Keith BURKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1539

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 20, 2018

Keith Burks, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Texxon, Inc. (the "Registrant"),  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Gifford M. Mabie
III,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and the  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Registrant certify, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Registrant.

                            /s/ Gifford M. Mabie III
                           -----------------------------------
                           Name: Gifford M. Mabie III

Date: May 15, 2003
STATE EX REL. Lorenzo Carthal Hampton v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1531

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
M.D., the Father, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

Thomas J. Butler, for appellant.

Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Laura J. Lee (Tallahassee), for the Guardian ad Litem Program, for appellees.

Before SALTER, LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Mohammed COLLINS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1528

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ;

*177*State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Brian MARCHIONE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4145

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
 (Cereghino logo)
    
    (Cereghino logo)
 CONTACT:
    
    Michal D. Cann
    
    President & CEO
    
    corporate investor relationsRick A.
Shields
    
    SVP & CFO
    
    5333  15THAvenue South,360.679.3121
    
    
    
    Suite 1500Seattle, WA 98108206.762.0993www.stockvalues.com
  
 
 WASHINGTON BANKING COMPANY DECLARES QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND
     This news release may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements describe managements expectations regarding
future events and developments such as future operating results, growth in loans and deposits, the
capability to continue to pay cash and stock dividends, and continued success of the Companys
business plan. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which
reflect managements views only as of the date hereof. Future events are difficult to predict, and
the expectations described above are subject to risk and uncertainty that may cause actual results
to differ materially. In addition to discussions about risks and uncertainties set forth from time
to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, factors that may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking
statements include, among others: (1) local and national general and economic condition; (2)
unexpected changes in interest rates and their impact on net interest margin; (3) competitive
pressure among financial institutions; (4) legislation or regulatory requirement; and (5) the
ability to realize the efficiencies expected from investment in personnel and infrastructure.
Washington Banking Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect
circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made. Any
such statements are made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 www.wibank.com
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION





The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2 (the “Trust”) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”):





1.           The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.





2.           Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement.











By:
/s/ David J. KolibachukName:
David J. KolibachukTitle:
Vice PresidentDated:
February 8, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 345 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 345

 Recognizing the importance of nonprofit organizations and expressing 
support for designation of May 16, 2014, as ``National Nonprofit Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2013

  Mr. Hastings of Florida (for himself, Mr. Rooney, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. 
Buchanan, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Deutch, 
 Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Honda, Ms. Norton, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Lowenthal, 
 Ms. McCollum, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Peters of Michigan, and Ms. Wilson of 
Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the importance of nonprofit organizations and expressing 
support for designation of May 16, 2014, as ``National Nonprofit Day''.

Whereas an estimated 2,300,000 nonprofit organizations operate in the United 
        States;
Whereas the nonprofit sector continues to grow in size and scope;
Whereas nonprofit organizations serve a vital role in facilitating charitable 
        giving and social action;
Whereas the combined donations and volunteer hours of individuals to nonprofit 
        organizations are worth billions of dollars; and
Whereas May 16, 2014, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``National 
        Nonprofit Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of nonprofit organizations to 
        the communities they serve, the issues they support, and the 
        economy of the United States; and
            (2) supports the designation of ``National Nonprofit Day''.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Endeavor

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(6)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(52)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(9)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(8)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(10)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Photography        June 15, 2019        Mitch Eaton Fly Fishing

Photography        December 14, 2023        Brett Degregorio
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Community
Bankshares of Florida, Inc. does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that this report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of United Community Bankshares of Florida, Inc. /s/ Shirley L. TylerShirley L. TylerExecutive Vice President and Treasurer
 Date: March 1, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 LIST OF ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES OF MSX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 MSX International (Holdings), Inc.
    
    (Delaware)MSX International Services (Holdings), Inc.
    
    (Delaware)MSX International Canada Limited
    
    (Canada)MSX International European (Holdings), L.L.C.
    
    (Delaware)MSX International Netherlands (Holdings) C.V. (1)
    
    (Netherlands)MSX International Netherlands B.V.
    
    (Netherlands)MSX International do Brasil Ltda.
    
    (Brazil)MSX International Australia Pty Limited
    
    (Australia)MSX International Sweden AB
    
    (Sweden)MSX International Holdings Italia S.r.l.
    
    (Italy)Satiz S.r.l.
    
    (Italy)Satiz do Brasil Ltda
    
    (Brazil)Satiz Poland Sp.zo.o.
    
    (Poland)MSX International TechServices, S.A.
    
    (Spain)MSX International Business Services France
    
    (France)MSX International Holdings Limited
    
    (UK)MSX International Limited
    
    (UK)MSX International GmbH
    
    (Germany)MSX International Engineering GmbH
    
    (Germany)MSX International Engineering Services, Inc.
    
    (Delaware)Pilot Computer Services, Incorporated
    
    (California)MegaTech Engineering, Inc.
    
    (Michigan)Chelsea Computer Consultants, Inc.
    
    (New York)Millennium Computer Systems, Inc.
    
    (New York)Management Resources International, Inc.
    
    (Michigan)MSX International Platform Services, LLC (2)
    
    (Michigan)Intranational Computer Consultants
    
    (California)Programming Management & Systems, Inc.
    
    (Missouri)MSX International Strategic Technology, Inc.
    
    (Michigan)MSX International DealerNet Services, Inc.
    
    (Delaware)MSX International DealerNet Services B.V.
    
    (Netherlands)
 
 (1)
    
    Owned jointly by MSX International (Holdings), Inc., MSX International Services
(Holdings), Inc., and MSX International European Holdings LLC.(2)
    
    Owned jointly by MSX International Engineering, Inc. (1%) and Management
Resources International, Inc. (99%)
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 317 

Celebrating the upcoming 2015 Special Olympics World Games in Los 

Angeles, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2013 

Ms. HAHN (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HOYER, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ

of California, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. ROYCE, Ms. WATERS, Ms. CHU, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. BASS, Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD, Mr. BECERRA, 

and Mr. SCHIFF) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the upcoming 2015 Special Olympics World 

Games in Los Angeles, California. 

Whereas the Special Olympics is the largest sports organization for adults and children with intellectual disabilities 

in the world; 

Whereas the Special Olympics changes attitudes and enhances the lives of millions of persons with disabilities; 

Whereas the Special Olympics World Games, occurring every 

2 years, is one of the largest sports and humanitarian 

events in the world; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 317 IH 

Whereas the 2015 World Games will be held in the United 

States for the first time since 1999; 

Whereas the City of Los Angeles, as the second largest urban 

area in the United States and a sports capital of the 

world, is exceptionally suited to host the World Games; 

Whereas the 2015 World Games is predicted to draw over 

7,000 athletes, 3,000 coaches, 30,000 volunteers, and 

500,000 spectators from across the globe; and 

Whereas the 2015 World Games in Los Angeles, California, 

will inspire and educate its participants, spectators, and 

a global audience: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the Special 

3 Olympics World Games to the millions of people 

4 with intellectual disabilities and their loved ones; 

5 (2) supports the efforts of the coaches, edu6 cators, volunteers, leaders, and staff who make the 

7 Games possible; and 

8 (3) celebrates the return of the World Games to 

9 the United States and the City of Los Angeles. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jorge L. MEJIA, Appellant, v. JOY WALLACE CATERING AND TRAVELERS INS., Appellees.

No. 1D18-3272

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 20, 2018

Mark L. Zientz of Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Justin R. Crum of Law Office of Jack D. Evans, Orlando, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
STATE EX REL. Spencer GILMORE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0031

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

*343Denied.
Lifton ROBINSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 3, 2019

Lifton Robinson, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2

- 10

- 2 93

- CR

SHEKETHA JONETTE SCOTT APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT N O. 5 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

On June 28 , 2010, A ppellant Sheketha Jonette Scott pleaded guilty to

assault and the trial court sentenced her t o nineteen days ’ confinement. On Ju ly

20 , 2010, A ppellant filed a notice of appeal. On July 22, 2010 , the trial court

entered its amended Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’ s Right of Appeal in

accordance with r ule 25.2(a )(2). Tex. R. App. P

. 25.2(a)(2) . The amended

certification states that this criminal case “is a plea

- bargain case, and the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

defendant has NO right of appeal

. ” On July 22 , 2010 , we notified A ppellant ’s

counsel that the certification indicating that Appellant had no right to appeal had

been filed in this court and that this appeal could be dismissed unless A ppellant

or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal on or before August 2, 2010

. See Tex. R. App

. P. 25.2(d)

,

44.3

. To date , we have received no response showing any grounds for

continuing the appeal

. Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right of appeal in a plea

- bargain case to matters

that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or to cases in

which the app ellant obtained the trial court’ s permission to appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(a)(2) . The trial court’ s certification denied permission to appeal, and

A ppellant does not challenge a pretrial ruling on a written motion or the valid ity of

his waiver of the right to appeal such a motion

. Accordingly, we dismiss this

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J. ; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT

, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 27, 2010
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Alison L. May, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2005 ofRedEnvelope, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238]; and
c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
d. disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: July 19, 2005   *By:*                               */s/ ALISON L. MAY*   *Alison L. May*  *Chief Executive Officer*
Lawrence Matthew BOKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-926

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.