alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[LETTERHEAD OF RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD.]

June 22, 2004


Re: David A. Eklund Resignation

Dear Dave:

                  This letter will set forth our agreement with respect to your
resignation from RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") effective June 30,
2004.

                  You hereby resign as Executive Vice President of the Company,
and from all other titles or positions you now hold with the Company or any of
its subsidiaries or affiliates, such resignation to be effective as of June 30,
2004. The respective rights and obligations of the you and the Company in
connection with such resignation shall be governed by the terms and conditions
of your employment agreement with the Company dated June 30, 2003 (the
"Employment Agreement"), except that the "Non-Competition Period", as defined in
Section 4.04 of the Employment Agreement, shall continue until June 30, 2006.
From the date of your resignation through the end of the Non-Competition Period,
in lieu of any payments to which you would otherwise have been entitled under
Section 5.05(a) of the Employment Agreement, the Company shall pay you $375,000
per year, such amount to be payable in equal monthly installments as provided in
Section 5.05(a) of the Employment Agreement.

                  Your rights with respect to options and restricted stock
awards presently held by you will be governed by the terms and conditions of the
Company's stock plans under which such awards were granted, and any award
agreements relating thereto.

                  Except as provided in this letter, the respective rights and
obligations of you and the Company under the Employment Agreement shall remain
unchanged.

                                               Sincerely,



                                               RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD.


                                               By:     /s/ James N. Stanard
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                   James N. Stanard
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

    /s/ David A. Eklund
-----------------------------------------
David A. Eklund

    22 June 2004
-----------------
Date
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00686

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF C.A .G.

From the 436th District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- JUV

- 00059

The Honorable Lisa Jarrett, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Modifying

Disposition Commitment to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department is AFFIRMED.

No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant

.

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 103631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30077]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 431

Energy Efficiency Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial 
Equipment

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    In Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 200 to 499, 
revised as of January 1, 2024, make the following corrections:

0
1. Amend Appendix C to subpart R of part 431 in section 3.2.7.1, in the 
table, by removing the words ``Table 1'' and adding in its place, the 
words ``Table C.4''.

0
2. Amend Appendix C1 to subpart R of part 431 by reinstating the 
heading and introductory text to section 3.2.5 before Table 15 to read 
as follows:

Appendix C1 to Subpart R of Part 431--Uniform Test Method for the 
Measurement of Net Capacity and AWEF2 of Walk-In Cooler and Walk-In 
Freezer Refrigeration Systems

* * * * *
    3. * * *
    3.2 * * *
    3.2.5 Test Operating Conditions for Two-Capacity Indoor Matched-
Pair or Single-Packaged Refrigeration Systems
    For two-capacity indoor medium-temperature matched-pair or 
single-packaged refrigeration systems, conduct tests using the test 
conditions specified in table 15 of this appendix. For two-capacity 
indoor low-temperature matched-pair or single-packaged refrigeration 
systems, conduct tests using the test conditions specified in table 
16 of this appendix.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-30077 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
```
Dennis HEGSTROM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2669

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. Michel*, 257 So.3d 3, 2018 WL 3613383 (Fla. July 12, 2018) ("[W]e hold that juvenile offenders' sentences of life with the possibility of parole after 25 years do not violate the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution as delineated by the United States Supreme Court in *Graham v. Florida*, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), *Miller v. Alabama*, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and *Virginia v. LeBlanc*, --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1726, 198 L.Ed.2d 186 (2017) ; *Romero v. State*, 105 So.3d 550, 552-53 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ("[A]ppellant was not a juvenile at the time of the offense. He urges us to overlook this fact by focusing on the juvenile nature of his mental and emotional development. He argues, in essence, that he was a juvenile in all but age. ... *Graham[ v. Florida*, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) ] is not controlling for an adult defendant.").
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 18, 2022        From the Seafloor to Outer Space, USGS is on the Case
EXHIBIT 31.B
CERTIFICATION
      I, D. Mark Leland, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of El Paso Production Holding Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 31, 2005   /s/ D. Mark Leland   D. Mark Leland
Tyjuan WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 20, 2018

Tyjuan Williams, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 339 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 339

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 11, 2013.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2775) to condition the provision of premium 
and cost-sharing subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
upon a certification that a program to verify household income and other 
qualifications for such subsidies is operational, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.15




Bosche Ventures Ltd.





March 31, 2011




TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.  Reference is also made to the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (Registration No. 333-164530, the “F-10”) of the Company which incorporates by reference the information contained in the AIF and the 40-F.





I, Harold Bosche, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and Bosche Ventures Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Bosche Ventures Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF, the 40-F and the F-10:  Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell (KSM) Preliminary Feasibility Study 2010 dated March 31, 2010.




Yours truly,/s/   Harold BoscheHarold Bosche, P.Eng.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as managing owner of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust, certify that (i) the
Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Campbell Alternative Asset
Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Alternative Asset Trust.

                               CAMPBELL ALTERNATIVE ASSET TRUST
                               By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing owner


                               By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                   -----------------------------
                                    Bruce L. Cleland
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    November 13, 2003


                                      E 6
Michael Wayne HINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018

Michael Wayne Hinson, Orlando, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 18-PDB-D24

2018-OB-1368

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Leave to appeal denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Texxon,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gifford M. Mabie III,
Chief  Executive  Officer  (and  principal  financial  officer) of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


December 17, 2004                 /s/ Gifford M. Mabie III
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Gifford M. Mabie III, Chief
                                  Executive Officer and principal
                                  financial officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part
of the Report.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Ocean Resources, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis McLaughlin, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Dennis McLaughlin III |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Chief  Executive Officer        |
| May 24, 2004                    |

 

----
Mickey AXELBAND, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MARLINS STADIUM OPERATOR, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0327

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 5, 2018

Upon the Court's own motion, it is ordered that this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is dismissed for failure to comply with this Court's order dated September 4, 2018, and with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
K.R., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Kevin Coyle Colbert, Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Laura J. Lee and Thomasina F. Moore (Tallahassee); Holland & Knight LLP, and Jamie Billotte Moses, B.C.S. (Orlando), for the Guardian ad Litem Program; Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families, for appellees.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the amended Annual Report of Vaso Active
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Frattaroli, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

By: /s/ Joseph Frattaroli
    ---------------------
Chief Financial Officer
July 20, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(17)
              - multimedia_image(14)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_image-141775(8)
              - multimedia_video(21)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(19)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(16)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(39)
              - american samoa(6)
              - california(67)
              - colorado(3)
              - hawaii(45)
              - idaho(3)
              - (-)montana(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(30)
              - virginia(14)
              - washington(13)
              - wyoming(8)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Photography        June 27, 2023        Earthquake Lake and the Madison slide

Photography        October 18, 1959        Dragline working to lower the outlet channel of Earthquake Lake on October 18, 1959

Photography        August 21, 1959        View of the Madison Slide on August 21, 1959 with rapidly filling Earthquake Lake

Photography        June 21, 2022        Front cover of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory’s Volcano and Earthquake Monitoring Plan for the Yellowstone Caldera System, 2022–2032

Photography        May 1, 2023        Front cover of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory 2022 annual report

Photography        December 1, 2022        Cross-section of Whitebark Pine
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEVON WARNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 388 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEVON WARNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 389 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

. The Application to Withdraw as Counsel is DISMISSED AS MOOT.