alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                                                                                        |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                                                                        |   |
| Date:      March 31, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Mark      Meller                    |   |
|                      |   | Mark      Meller                                                                                                                            |   |
|                      |   | President                                                                                                                                   |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                |   |
STATE EX REL. Franklin SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1813

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, by pleading guilty unconditionally, relator waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. *State v. Crosby* , 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant to order an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the ankle monitor report.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

This certification is furnished pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C Section 1350.

 

Each of the undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer and the Vice President of Finance, Secretary and Chief FinancialOfficer of Advanced Power Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Dated: November 10, 2003                                           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                               |
|   | /s/ PATRICK P.H. SIRETA                                            |   |
|   | Patrick Sireta                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |                                                               |
|   | /s/ GREG M. HAUGEN                                                 |   |
|   | Greg M. Haugen                                                     |
|   | Vice President, Finance and Administration                         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Michael RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32
----------




            CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Annual Report on
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By:  /s/  Gary Nickele                By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
         ---------------------------          ---------------------------
         Gary Nickele                         Gailen J. Hull
         Chief Executive Officer              Chief Financial Officer and
                                              Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The
Princeton Review, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:



| | 1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. PERIK
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                |  | Michael J. Perik                     
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ STEPHEN C. RICHARDS
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                   |  | Stephen C. Richards                                
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The
Princeton Review, Inc. and will be retained by The Princeton Review, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 8063** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANDREA BLOODWORTH, a/k/a Andre Thettle Green , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 00337

- TLW

- 1; 4:12

- cv - 02007

- TLW )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Andrea Bloodworth , Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Andrea Bloodworth seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and the amendments thereto . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S . 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right
. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Bloodworth has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 (the Amendment) to the annual report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2010 (the Report, and as amended by the Amendment filed on the date hereof, the Amended
Report), I, Kent A. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

April 14, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/ KENT A. MURPHY, PH.D.            
|Kent A. Murphy, Ph.D.                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Cortez A. DAVIS, a/k/a Cortez Antonio Davis, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1251

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                RedEnvelope, Inc.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RedEnvelope, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric C. Wong, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.






/s/ Eric C. Wong

Chief Financial Officer

June 22, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 21, 2014

p0218 

# Order

Clerk February 21, 2014

148066

SC: 148066

In re TALH, Minor. COA: 314749

Mecosta CC Family Division:

12

- 001290

- AY

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant th e application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1).

The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order

addressing whether the lower courts erred in determining that the respondent

substantially complied with his child support obligations for the pertinent timeframe

under MCL 710.51(6). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their

application papers.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of Record of Decision.

# SUMMARY:

On December 6, 2024, the Department of the Air Force (DAF) signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for the T-7A Recapitalization at Laughlin AFB, TX, Environmental Impact Statement.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Ms. Chinling Chen (AFCEC/CIE), Headquarters AETC Public Affairs; 100 H East Street, Suite 4; Randolph AFB, TX 78150. (210) 395-0979;                         *chinling.chen@us.af.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The DAF has decided to replace all T-38C aircraft at Laughlin AFB with up to 79 T-7A aircraft, and continue flying training programs at Laughlin AFB, TX. Initial delivery will be limited to 51 aircraft per the Secretary of the Air Force Strategic Basing Decision.

                    The DAF decision documented in the ROD was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on June 21, 2024, through a Notice of Availability in the                     **Federal Register**                     (Volume 89, Number 120, Page 52040) with a waiting period that ended on July 22, 2024.                

*Authority:*                     This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321,                     *et seq.*) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7)).                

Tommy W. Lee,

Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-30356 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3911-44-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), I,
Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: March 3, 2004 By:
    /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDAChristopher J. ZydaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and will be retained by
Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Kelvin Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3021

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of PetCARE  Television  Network,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on March 30, 2004 (the  "Report"),  I,
Philip M. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Philip M. Cohen
-----------------------
Philip M. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004


A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Douglas RATCLIFFE, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
John L. SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2936

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7059
In Re: OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE,
Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:07-hc-02014-BR) Submitted: August 3, 2007 Decided: August 14, 2007 Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Okang Kareem Rochelle, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Okang Kareem Rochelle, a federal inmate, petitions this court for a writ of mandamus. Rochelle’s petition challenges a February 15, 2007 order from the Eastern District of North Carolina. That order denied a pro se motion filed by Rochelle in which he (1) requested that his August 6, 2007 civil commitment hearing be held, not by video conference, but in open court; (2) requested copies of the discovery motion in his underlying criminal case; (3) requested the Public Defenders’ Office to be removed from his case; (4) challenged the adequacy of his evaluations at the Federal Medical Center at Butner, North Carolina; and (5) requested that he be released from the Federal Medical Center so that he could acquire resources to hire private counsel and mount his defense. Rochelle’s mandamus petition reasserts claims raised in his pro se motion. With respect to his request to be released from Butner Medical Center, Rochelle fails to demonstrate a clear entitlement to a writ of mandamus on this request. SeeIn re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Finally, Rochelle’s remaining claims are not cognizable in a petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Rochelle’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny Rochelle’s motion to stay the civil commitment hearing. In light of this disposition,- 3 - Rochelle’s motion to expedite is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED