alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - (-)florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        January 1, 1983        Studies related to the Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake of 1886 — Tectonics and seismicity

publication        January 1, 1971        Earthquake history of Florida

publication        October 15, 1950        Effects of earthquakes, trains tides, winds, and atmospheric pressure changes on water in the geologic formations of southern Florida
Gary MCCALLA, Appellant, v. E. C. KENYON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Douglas Herring, and Timothy Young, Appellees.

No. 1D18-432

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 27, 2018

Peter A. Robertson, William Douglas Stanford, Jr., and Thomas J. Tollefsen of The Robertson Firm, St. Augustine, for Appellant.

S. Grier Wells, GrayRobinson, P.A., Jacksonville, and Kristie Hatcher-Bolin, GrayRobinson, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - (-)science_science(8)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(112)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(36)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(30)
              - multimedia_video-149197(4)
              - news_news-149245(4)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(8)
              - (-)arizona(8)
              - arkansas(9)
              - california(38)
              - colorado(29)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(4)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(16)
              - georgia(16)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(4)
              - illinois(10)
              - indiana(18)
              - iowa(11)
              - kansas(5)
              - louisiana(13)
              - maine(7)
              - maryland(10)
              - massachusetts(10)
              - michigan(7)
              - minnesota(7)
              - mississippi(9)
              - missouri(8)
              - montana(19)
              - nebraska(5)
              - nevada(8)
              - new hampshire(4)
              - new jersey(19)
              - new mexico(17)
              - new york(38)
              - north carolina(16)
              - north dakota(11)
              - ohio(10)
              - oklahoma(12)
              - oregon(6)
              - pennsylvania(9)
              - puerto rico(14)
              - rhode island(5)
              - south carolina(19)
              - south dakota(21)
              - tennessee(8)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(5)
              - vermont(5)
              - virginia(18)
              - washington(30)
              - west virginia(4)
              - wisconsin(18)
              - wyoming(9)

## By Year

Event        February 25, 2019        September 2013 Southwest Floods

Event        February 26, 2019        August-September 2014 Southwest Floods

Project        March 19, 2018        Nogales, Sonora - Flood Control

Project        March 10, 2021        Is timing really everything? Evaluating Resource Response to Spring Disturbance Flows

Project        December 2, 2016        Erosion and Invasive Saltcedar

Project        November 29, 2016        Large-scale streamflow experiments

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Research        October 22, 2018        Sub-ice Volcanism on Earth and Mars
Exhibit 31

ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC.
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, James A. Konrath, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
annual report, of Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-1,

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating
to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee.

Date:  March 15th, 2004


By: /s/: James A. Konrath
Name:	   James A. Konrath
Title:   Chairman of the Board
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Lee, chief executive officer of AlphaRx, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of AlphaRx, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
>   information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
>   subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
>   particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
>   prepared;
>   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
>   procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
>   quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
>   c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
>   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
>   as of the Evaluation Date;

5. We have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

> a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
>   controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
>   process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
>   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
>   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
>   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
>   and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 12, 2006

/s/ Michael Lee

Michael Lee, Chief Executive Officer

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(17)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - (-)delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation

National News Release        June 1, 2016        This hurricane season, scientists bring wave action into the picture
##### 



Exhibit
10.68
 
  
 Award Notice of Stock Option Grant
  Company
 Option:
    
    You have been awarded a non-statutory stock option to
purchase from the Company 1,232,600 shares of its
common stock, $0.01 par value, subject to adjustment,
as provided in Section 3.5 of your BearingPoint, Inc.
Stock Option Agreement (the Agreement).Option Date:
    
    January 2, 2008Exercise Price:
    
    $2.76 per share, subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 3.5 of the Agreement.Exercise Schedule:
    
    Except as otherwise provided in Section 2.2 of the
Agreement and in Section 7.8 of the BearingPoint, Inc.
2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan), the Option
shall become exercisable (i) on the first anniversary
of the Option Date with respect to 25% of the number of
shares subject thereto on the Option Date, (ii) on the
second anniversary of the Option Date with respect to
an additional 25% of the number of shares subject
thereto on the Option Date, (iii) on the third
anniversary of the Option Date with respect to an
additional 25% of the number of shares subject thereto
on the Option Date and (iv) on the fourth anniversary
of the Option Date with respect to the remaining 25% of
the number of shares subject thereto on the Option
Date.Expiration Date:
    
    Except to the extent earlier terminated pursuant to
Section 2.2 or 2.5 of the Agreement or earlier
exercised pursuant to Section 2.3 of the Agreement, the
Option shall terminate at 5:00 p.m., New York time, on
January 2, 2018.




---



##### 



BearingPoint, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Roderick McGearyRoderick McGeary, Chairman
 Acknowledgment, Acceptance and Agreement
  /s/ F. Edwin Harbach
    
    
    
    1/18/08Signature
    
    
    
    DateF. Edwin HarbachPrint Name
    
    
    
    Employee ID Number
 BearingPoint, Inc.
 2




---



##### 



BearingPoint, Inc.
 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 Company Award Notice Option Date Plan Option
 Option Subject to Acceptance of Agreement
 Time and Manner of Exercise of Option
 Maximum Term of Option Expiration Date
 Exercise of Option
 Exercise Schedule
    1




---



##### 



Method of Exercise
 Termination of Option
   2




---



##### 



provided however
 Termination of Option and Forfeiture of Option Gain
       3




---



##### 



Additional Terms and Conditions of Option
 Nontransferability of Option
 Investment Representation
 Withholding Taxes
 Required Tax
Payments
 4




---



##### 



Tax Reporting and Payment Liability
 Adjustment
 Compliance with Applicable Law
 5




---



##### 



Delivery of Certificates
 Option Confers No Rights as Stockholder
 Acknowledgement and Waiver
 Decisions of Board or Committee
 6




---



##### 



Agreement Subject to Plan
 Miscellaneous Provisions
 Designation as Non-Statutory Stock Option
 Meaning of Certain Terms
   Legal Representative
 Permitted Transferee
 Retirement
 Securities Act
 Successors
 Notices
 7




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Counterparts
 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

PROVIDENCE SERVICE 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ 

§ No. 345, 2019 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ C.A. No. N18C-06-114 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: August 8, 2019 

 Decided: August 20, 2019 

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER

 

 Upon consideration of the notice of interlocutory appeal, the supplemental 

notice of appeal, and the documents attached hereto, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) The defendant below-appellant, Illinois Union Insurance Company 

(“Chubb”), has petitioned this Court under Supreme Court Rule 42 to accept an 

interlocutory appeal from a Superior Court opinion, dated July 9, 2019, granting the 

motion for partial summary judgment filed by the plaintiff below-appellee, 

Providence Service Corporation, and denying the cross-motion for summary 
judgment filed by Chubb.1

 The Superior Court held that the professional incidents 

in two different lawsuits were not related for purposes of the Prior Acts or Prior 

Notice Exclusion in the excess insurance policy issued by Chubb. 

(2) On July 19, 2019, Chubb filed an application for certification of an 

interlocutory appeal. Chubb argued that the Superior Court’s decision determined a 

substantial issue of material importance, there were conflicting trial court decisions 

on the question of law resolved in the decision, and review of the decision might 

terminate the litigation and would serve the interests of justice. Providence opposed 

the application. 

(3) On August 7, 2019, the Superior Court denied the application. 

Applying the Rule 42 criteria, the Superior Court concluded that the opinion 

determined a substantial issue, but that there were not conflicting trial court 

decisions and that review would not substantially reduce further litigation or serve 

the interests of justice. 

(4) We agree that interlocutory review is not warranted in this case. 

Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of the 

Court.2

 In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application 

for interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for certification under 

 

1 Providence Serv. Corp. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co., 2019 WL 3854261 (Del. July 9, 2019). 

2

 Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v). 
Supreme Court Rule 42(b). The case is not exceptional,3

 and the potential benefits 

of interlocutory review do not outweigh the inefficiency, disruption, and probable 

costs caused by an interlocutory appeal.4

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory 

appeal is REFUSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice 

 

 

3

 Supr. Ct. R. 42(b)(ii). 

4

 Supr. Ct. R. 42(b)(iii).
CERTIFICATIONS





I, Simon Ridgway, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Radius Gold Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

DATED:  May 14, 2008

/s/ Simon Ridgway



Simon Ridgway,

President and Chief Executive Officer