alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(412)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5604)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1087)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(100)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(254)
              - connect_locations(3)
              - connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!
Exhibit 10.4

                                                       Personal and Confidential
================================================================================
                                 INTERNAL MEMO
================================================================================

To:   Ira Weinstein                  From:  Martin Burg
Date: August 15, 2002
Subject: Salary Adjustments

Memo:

I agree to participate in the program of Company-wide salary cuts. I understand
and agree to the reduction of my gross monthly salary by 10%. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, I understand that any contractual severance payments due me in
the event of my termination without cause shall be based upon my pre-cut salary.

Employee name:  Ira Weinstein

Employee signature: /s/ Ira Weinstein

Dear Employee,

Keryx is very appreciative of your agreement to take a reduction in monthly
salary in light of the tough financial circumstances in the economy at present.
We hope you understand the need to cut back at present in order to help grow a
strong, healthy and efficient Company in the future, and we look forward to
growing this Company With your help.

Yours sincerely,


/s/ Benjamin Corn
-------------------------
Benjamin Corn, M.D.
CEO
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
Date: August 15, 2002
H. Res. 454 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 8, 2014. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Ms. Clark of 

Massachusetts. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# T ATTORNEY @ELVERAE~ OF TEXAS AUSTIN. 

## T-s 78711

December 16. 1974
The Honorable Walter M. Holcombe County Attorney Reeves County Pecos. Texas 79772

Dear Mr. Holcombe: Opinion No. H- 476 Re: Whether Article 44”3(21),

V. T. C.S.e requires a telephone company to furnish customer information to alaw enforcement agency wit~hout legal process. You have requested our opinion concerning the constructi,on ofArti.cle 4413(21), V. T. C.S., which provides:

The Director, with the advice and consent of the Commission. shall formulate and put i,nto effect plans and means of cooperating with the sheriffs and local police and peace officers throughout the Statue for the purpose of the preventi,on an,d discovery of ci-imes and the apprehension of criminals and the prromi.ion of publ!,c safety-; and i,tshall be t:heduty of aI,1such l.ocal police and peace officers to cooperate w;th the Director ?,nsuch plans. E\e,ry telegraph and tekphonr company and radio station operating within this State shall grant priority of service to t.hepo?i,ce ageI?cies and to rhe Depa,rtment of Publ,ic Safety, when notified that such service is urgent: in the i,r,?r.rests of the publrc wel.fart-. Your qursti,on is whether Art:icle 4413(21) compel,s atcl,epZlone company to supply customer informat:i,on to a kw erforcrment agency without legal prmess, Article 4413(2Pj sxys in‘k caption, “Di,rector shall provide for cooperation;” and by its terms deal,s wi,th intrastate cooperation between 1,awofficers- Since cooperation between peace officers would be difficult without ready means of comrmmi carlot-j comrmmicat~inrt companies are requi,red to “grant priority of servtce” to l.aw rn,forcc-mcnt personnel when the n.erd for such service is urgent. The context off:hr statute i.ndicates that the “service” which i,s required is aprovision of ameam of communieati.on, not the production oi records, po 2168The Honorable Walter M. Holcombe, page 2 (H-476)

In addition, other stat&es dealing with “service” by apublic utility company make clear that such “service” is that which is rendered to the public in the normal operation ofthe company. V. T. C.S. arts. 1.119, 1124, 1175(12). It is our opinion, therefore. that it is the granting of priority ofthis type of service that is compelled by Article 4413(21), and not the supplying of customer information. See generally, Silverthorne Lumber Co. V. United States, 251 U.S. 385(1920). SUMMARY Article 4413 (21,), V. T. C.S., does not require a telephone company to provide customer information to law enforcement officers in the absence of valid legal process.

APPROVED: 

# i’/ Attorney General of Texas



# ,‘I.. k-..~ DAVID M. KENDf gLL, First Assi,stant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 2169
H. Res. 42 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 23, 2013. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Courtney. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Schrader. 

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Pierluisi, Mr. Capuano, 

Ms. Clarke, and Mr. Deutch. 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Ca ́rdenas, Mr. 

Horsford, and Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Barber, Ms. 

Kuster, and Mr. Murphy of Florida. 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Walz. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BABOUCAR TAAL, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 19-3079 (RC)

)

)

FEDERAL ELECTION )

COMMISSION, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, sues the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”), which 

dismissed his administrative complaint alleging that a bank in New Hampshire had violated the 

Federal Election Campaign Act, 52 U.S.C. §§ 30101-30126. See Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1 

(alleging that the bank “engaged in illegal campaign contributions to a series of candidates for 

both state and federal offices, in a patronage system as far back as the 1990s and in relevant time 

and pertinent campaign(s) that of the then outgoing chairman of St Mary’s, for Governor and 

United States Senate.”); Compl. Attach. (FEC Decision). Pending before the Court is 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted. Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has neither complied with the order to respond 

to the instant motion by the extended deadline of October 16, 2020, see ECF No. 18, nor 

requested additional time to respond. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion will be 

granted.
2

“Before proceeding to the merits of a case, the court must confirm that it has Article III 

jurisdiction.” Lovitky v. Trump, 949 F.3d 753, 758 (D.C. Cir. 2020). By his silence, plaintiff 

has conceded defendant’s valid argument that he lacks standing to sue. See Mem. at 15-21; 

Order, ECF No. 15 (noting that defendant’s unopposed arguments may be treated as conceded). 

Because the “defect of standing is a defect in subject matter jurisdiction,” Haase v. Sessions, 835 

F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987), the Court has “no appropriate occasion” to assess the merits of 

plaintiff’s claims under Rule 12(b)(6), Lovitky, 949 F.3d at 763. Therefore, this case will be 

dismissed. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

________/s/____________

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge

Date: October 29, 2020
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 00-20689 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
ABIODUN MOHOLAJI MABINOURI, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-111-1

- - - - - - - - - - May 23, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Abiodun Moholaji Mabinouri appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to aiding and abetting the delivery of stolen U.S. Treasury checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 510(b) and 2. He challenges the district court’s refusal to adjust his offense level for acceptance of responsibility, the court’s inclusion in its loss calculation of a check for $584,721.99, and the court’s imposition of a two level role-in-the-offense increase under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c).No. 00-20689 - 2 - Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The district court acted well within its broad discretion in concluding that Mabinouri had failed to demonstrate acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Nguyen , 190 F.3d 656, 659 (5th Cir. 1999). Mabinouri’s arguments, raised for the first time on appeal, challenging the district court’s acceptance of responsibility determination and the district court’s loss calculation as violative of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), are also meritless. As Apprendi is inapplicable to this case, there is no error, plain or otherwise. United States v. Meshack , 225 F.3d 556, 576-77 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 834 (2001), amended on reh’g in part , --- F.3d ----, 2001 WL 224656 (2001). Finally, the district court did not clearly err by imposing a two level role-in-the-offense increase under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). See United States v. Parker , 133 F.3d 322, 329-30 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - california(22)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(16)
              - idaho(14)
              - montana(19)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south dakota(3)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(56)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2004        2004 Tsunami

Featured Films and Shorts        August 19, 2023        USGS EROS: Celebrating 50 Years of Excellence

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1973        EROS Data Center Earth Resources Technology Satellite (ERTS)
Amendment #1 to 2005 Stock Award and Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.30 
 AMENDMENT #1 
 TO 
 2005 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, EDGAR Online, Inc. (the “Company”),
maintains the 2005 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) in order to aid the Company in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding employees and non-employee directors of the Company or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates (both as
defined in the Plan), to provide for equitable and competitive compensation opportunities, to recognize individual contributions and reward achievement of Company goals, and promote the creation of long-term value for stockholders by closely
aligning the interests of Participants (as defined in the Plan) with those of stockholders; 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the
stockholders of the Company have approved an amendment to the Plan (“Amendment #1”) to increase the maximum number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), that may be issued
under the Plan by one million (1,000,000) shares of Common Stock. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with the foregoing, the Plan
shall be amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Effective as of the date hereof, Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended, in its entirety, to read as follows: 

 “(a) The total number of shares of Stock reserved and available for delivery in connection with Awards under the Plan shall be (i) two million
eighty-seven thousand five hundred (2,087,500) shares, plus (ii) the number of shares that, immediately prior to the Effective Date, remain available for new awards under the Preexisting Plans plus (iii) the number of shares subject
to awards under the Plan or Preexisting Plans which become available in accordance with Section 4(b) after the Effective Date; provided, however, that the total number of shares with respect to which ISOs may be granted shall not exceed the
number specified under clause (i) above. The total number of shares available is subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11(c). Any shares of Stock delivered under the Plan shall consist of authorized and unissued shares or treasury
shares.” 
  

	2.	In all respects not amended by Amendment #1, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

 [Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of the amendment set forth herein, the
appropriate officer of the Company has executed this Amendment #1, effective as of June 23, 2008. 
  

			
	EDGAR ONLINE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Philip D. Moyer

		 	Philip D. Moyer
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
----

|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 16, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Tae Heum Jeong      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Tae      Heum Jeong,         |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

| * | This      Certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States      Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the      Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This      Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as      otherwise stated in such filing. |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Edwin Allen WREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3919

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 26, 2006
 Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.
  Maryland
    
    000-49814
    
    04-3627031State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 375 North Willowbrook Road, Coldwater, MI 49036
 
  (517) 278-4566
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
  Section 1. Definition of Change in Control; Change in Control Period
 1.1 Change in Control.
        -2-




---



##### Table of Contents



1.2 Change in Control Period.
 Section 2. Obligations of the Company upon Termination.
 2.1 Other than for Cause, Death, Disability or Retirement.
   2.2 Cause; Death; Disability; Retirement
 2.3 Cause
 -3-




---



##### Table of Contents



Section 3. Definitions.
 3.1 Cause
 3.2 Disability.
 3.3. Good Reason.
     3.4 Retirement.
 -4-




---



##### Table of Contents



Section 4. Excise and Other Tax Ramifications.
 4.1 Reduction in Excess Parachute Payments Tax Ramifications.
 4.2 Section 162(m)
 Section 5. Administration of the Agreement.
 5.1 Notice of Termination.
 5.2 Date of Termination.
    -5-




---



##### Table of Contents



Section 6. Arbitration.
 et seq
    Section 7. Successors and Assigns
 Section 8. Amendments.
 Section 9. Applicable Law.
 Section 10. Severability
 Section 11. Notice.
 Section 12. No Mitigation.
 -6-




---



##### Table of Contents



Section 13. Termination of Agreement.
 
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits.Exhibit Number10.1
    
    Form of Management Continuity Agreement
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Monarch Community
Bancorp, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December
31, 2005).
 -7-




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  MONARCH COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.Dated:  April 26, 2006
    /s/Donald L. DenneyDonald L. Denney,President and Chief Executive Officer -8-
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 378 Committee Discharged House (CDH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 378

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain 
    provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the 
Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw 
                           and refined sugar.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2013

Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Goodlatte, 
   and Mr. Blumenauer) submitted the following resolution; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                            October 11, 2013

    The Committees on Agriculture and Ways and Means discharged and 
                               considered

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain 
    provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the 
Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw 
                           and refined sugar.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the managers on the part of the House of the conference on the 
disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House amendment to the 
Senate amendment to the bill H.R. 2642 (an Act to provide for the 
reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the 
Department of Agriculture and other programs of the Department of 
Agriculture through fiscal year 2018, and for other purposes) should 
advance provisions to repeal the Administration of Tariff Rate Quotas 
language as added by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, 
and thus restore the Secretary of Agriculture's authority to manage 
supplies of sugar throughout the marketing year to meet domestic demand 
at reasonable prices.
                                 <all>
```