alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Gordon CRITTENDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-2808 4D18-2969

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Commercial
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 (Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Dated: March 9, 2004 /s/ David GladstoneDavid GladstoneChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jerry
D. Chase, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.




Date:
      November 11, 2009By:
                /s/ Jerry
      D. ChaseName:
                Jerry
      D. ChaseTitle:
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer(ChiefExecutive
      Officer)




I, Reagan
Y. Sakai , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Lantronix, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Lantronix, Inc.




Date:
      November 11, 2009By:
                /s/
      Reagan Y. SakaiName:
                Reagan
      Y. SakaiTitle:
                Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Chief
      Financial Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(6)
              - alaska(19)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(17)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(65)
              - colorado(12)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(8)
              - (-)delaware(9)
              - district of columbia(8)
              - florida(18)
              - georgia(8)
              - guam(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - louisiana(17)
              - maine(9)
              - maryland(13)
              - massachusetts(13)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(7)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(4)
              - new hampshire(7)
              - new jersey(10)
              - new mexico(4)
              - new york(11)
              - north carolina(7)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(15)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(8)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(13)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(9)
              - u.s. virgin islands(5)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(3)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(17)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer

publication        February 28, 2023        Development and application of a coastal change likelihood assessment for the northeast region, Maine to Virginia

publication        May 15, 2023        A numerical investigation of the mechanisms controlling salt intrusion in the Delaware Bay Estuary

Featured Films and Shorts        March 14, 2023        Imagery as Streamflow Data: Introducing the USGS Flow Photo Explorer (AD)

General        July 16, 2021        Surface Water

Project        April 12, 2016        Understanding Coastal Change

publication        December 9, 2018        Projected changes in climate and physical processes

Project        May 15, 2020        Surface Water Capabilities @ MD-DE-DC
# C_2021517EN.01012201.xml

| 22.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 517/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 517/122

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area (recast)

(COM(2021) 434 final — 2021/0248 (COD))

(2021/C 517/21)

| Referral | European Parliament, 13.9.2021
  Council, 3.9.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 43(2) and article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 22.9.2021 |
| Plenary session No | 563 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 235/1/2 |

Referral

European Parliament, 13.9.2021

Council, 3.9.2021

Legal basis

Articles 43(2) and article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

22.9.2021

Plenary session No

563

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

235/1/2

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 563rd plenary session of 22 and 23 September 2021 (meeting of 22 September), by 235 votes to 1 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 22 September 2021.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
H. Res. 524 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 26, 2014. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 1459) to ensure that the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 applies to the declaration of national monuments, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Natural Resources. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill are waived. No amendment to 

the bill shall be in order except those printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 
2 

•HRES 524 EH 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of March 27, 2014, for the Speaker to entertain motions 

that the House suspend the rules, as though under clause 1 

of rule XV, relating to the following: (a) a measure addressing the Medicare payment system for physicians; and (b) a 

measure addressing Ukraine. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 554 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 554

Recognizing the alarming mortality rate of African-American women with 
                             breast cancer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2014

Ms. Hahn submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the alarming mortality rate of African-American women with 
                             breast cancer.

Whereas serious disparities persist in United States health care today;
Whereas life-saving progress has been made in breast cancer treatment over the 
        last two decades, but we have not seen the same progress in the 
        treatment of African-American breast cancer patients;
Whereas African-American women have a 41 percent higher breast cancer mortality 
        rate than white women in the United States;
Whereas this disparity results in 1,700 additional deaths each year;
Whereas in Los Angeles, a black breast cancer patient is about 70 percent more 
        likely to die from the disease than a white breast cancer patient is 
        likely to die from the disease;
Whereas African-American women are more likely to be diagnosed with later stage 
        breast cancer; and
Whereas African-American women are less likely to be screened for breast cancer 
        and less likely to receive the medical treatment they need to fight 
        breast cancer: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the disparity in treatment rates of African-
        American breast cancer patients;
            (2) affirms that this disparity is unacceptable and should 
        be addressed;
            (3) calls for immediate action to be taken to raise 
        awareness of breast cancer screening for all women in the 
        United States; and
            (4) calls for immediate action to be taken to expand access 
        to treatment for all breast cancer patients regardless of race.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(412)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5604)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1087)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(100)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(254)
              - connect_locations(3)
              - connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Training Materials        March 27, 2019        Earthquake Effects

Training Materials        May 9, 2019        Table-Top Earthquakes
99.1

OCWEN Company Logo Here


Ocwen Federal Bank FSB
Compliance Certification Year Ended December 31, 2003
GSAMP Trust 2003-HE1

The undersigned Officer of Ocwen Federal Bank FSB (the "Servicer")
confirms that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during
the calendar year ending on December 31, 2003 and of the performance of
the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for GSAMP
Trust 2003-HE1 dated as of May 1, 2003 has been made under
his supervision.  Except as noted on the Management Assertion on
Compliance with USAP, to the best of the undersigned Officer's
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
of its obligations as set forth in the Servicing Agreement.


March 12, 2004

BY: /s/: Scott W. Anderson
Scott W. Anderson
Senior Vice President


Ocwen Federal Bank FSB
1675 Palm Beach Lakes boulevard, West Palm Beach, FL  33401
Mail to:  P.O. Box 24737, West Palm Beach, FL  33416-4737
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Kaylen Dewayne Simmons v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00930-CR

Trial court case number: 12-CR-2519

Trial court: 212th District Court of Galveston County

Although the record reflects that the appellant has the right to appeal the denial of his 

motion to suppress, the trial court’s certification indicates that appellant both has the right of 

appeal and has waived the right of appeal. The Rules of Appellate Procedure require that a 

certification from the trial court of the appellant’s right to appeal be filed in every criminal case 

in which the trial court enters a judgment or other appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (appellate court has 

ability to examine a certification for defectiveness and obtain another certification whenever 

appropriate). 

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remove it from this Court’s active docket so that a 

certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal may be executed.

We direct the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Galveston

County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s counsel, Joseph Willie, shall be present. 

Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person, or he may appear by closed video 

teleconference.

1

At the hearing, the trial court shall complete a certification of the appellant’s right to 

appeal. The certification must be signed by the trial court, appellant, and appellant’s counsel. If 

appellant appears by video teleconference, appellant’s signature on the certification may be 

obtained by mailing the certification to appellant following the hearing.

 

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that 

provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication 

of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the 

State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate 

privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing 

the State.
A supplemental clerk’s record containing the completed certification of appellant’s right 

to appeal shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental 

clerk’s record is filed in this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a 

hearing date and notify the parties of such date. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 18, 2014
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(38)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(221)
              - products_software(2)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(25)
              - multimedia_image-141771(17)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(4)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(60)
              - multimedia_video-149194(48)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - multimedia_webcam(3)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149212(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_other_news(12)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(1)
              - (-)california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nebraska(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(13)

## By Year

Podcasts        October 13, 2021        Eyes on Earth Episode 60 – Landsat 9 Launch Part 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AlphaRx, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Marcel Urbanc, as chief financial officer and principal accounting
officer of AlphaRx, Inc., does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

|3. | This 10-Q report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                           
|4. | The information contained in this 10-Q report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of AlphaRx, Inc.

/s/ Marcel UrbancMarcel Urbanc 
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer 
May 15, 2009

---
Fernando ALFARO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Rick WELLS, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2701

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See Robinson v. State, 95 So. 3d 437, 438 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (holding an accused seeking a reduction in bail has the burden to present evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court's order); Dyson v. Campbell, 921 So. 2d 692, 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("It does not follow, however, that where a defendant testifies that he cannot meet a given bond amount, that bond is per se excessive or unreasonable. In addition to a defendant's financial resources, a trial court must consider a host of other factors in determining whether to release the defendant on bail or other conditions, and if so, what bail or other conditions are appropriate."); Good v. Wille. 382 So. 2d 408, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) ("Depending upon the financial circumstances of the defendant, excessive bail is tantamount to no bail.").

VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony ARMSTEAD

No. 2018-KH-0033

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state *583court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.