Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - 32 CFR Part 310
          - [Docket ID: DoD-2024-OS-0137]
          - RIN 0790-AL80

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense (Department or DoD) is giving concurrent notice of a modified system of records titled “Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database,” DHRA 06, and this rulemaking, which exempts portions of this system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act to avoid interference during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or investigations.

# DATES:

Send comments on or before February 18, 2025.

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by docket number, Regulation Identifier Number (RIN), and title, by any of the following methods.

                        *                         *Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.*                         Follow the instructions for submitting comments.                    

                        *                         *Mail:*                         Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency, Regulatory Directorate, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox 24, Suite 05F16, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.                    

*Instructions:*                         All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this                         **Federal Register**                         document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at                         *https://www.regulations.gov*                         as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Rahwa Keleta,                         *OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil;*                         (703) 571-0070.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Background

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Office of the Secretary of Defense is modifying and reissuing a system of records titled “Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database,” DHRA 06. This system of records was originally established to centralize case-level sexual assault data involving a member of the Armed Forces, in a manner consistent with law and DoD regulations for Unrestricted and Restricted reporting and to facilitate reports to Congress on claims of retaliation in connection with an Unrestricted Report of sexual assault made by or against a member of the Armed Forces.

## II. Privacy Act Exemption

                    The Privacy Act permits Federal agencies to exempt eligible records in a system of records from certain                           ( print page 104070)                        provisions of the Act, including the provisions providing individuals with a right to request access to and amendment of their own records and accountings of disclosures of such records. If an agency intends to exempt a particular system of records, it must first go through the rulemaking process pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(1)-(3), (c), and (e). This proposed rule explains why an exemption is being claimed for this system of records and invites public comment, which DoD will consider before the issuance of a final rule implementing the exemption.                

The DoD proposes to modify 32 CFR part 310 to add a new Privacy Act exemption rule for DHRA 06, “Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database,” and to exempt portions of this system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act because some records may contain investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), other than material within the scope of subsection (j)(2). The DoD is proposing to claim exemptions from several provisions of the Privacy Act, including various access, amendment, disclosure of accounting, and notice requirements, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).

                    A notice of a modified system of records for DHRA 06, “Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database,” is also published in this issue of the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

### Regulatory Analysis

#### Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” as Amended by Executive Order 14094, “Modernizing Regulatory Review,” and Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review”

Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. It has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under these executive orders.

#### Section 202, Public Law 104-4, “Unfunded Mandates Reform Act”

Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532(a)) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the private sector, in any one year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. This proposed rule will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or Tribal governments, nor will it affect private sector costs.

####                     Public Law 96-354, “Regulatory Flexibility Act” (5 U.S.C. 601*et seq.*)                

                    The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency has certified that this proposed rule is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601*et seq.*) because it would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule is concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD. Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require DoD to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.                

####                     Public Law 96-511, “Paperwork Reduction Act” (44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq.*)                

                    The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq.*) was enacted to minimize the paperwork burden for individuals; small businesses; educational and nonprofit institutions; Federal contractors; State, local, and Tribal governments; and other persons resulting from the collection of information by or for the Federal Government. The Act requires agencies obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget before using identical questions to collect information from ten or more persons. This proposed rule does not impose reporting or recordkeeping requirements on the public.                

#### Executive Order 13132, “Federalism”

Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that has federalism implications, imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments, and is not required by statute, or has federalism implications and preempts State law. This proposed rule will not have a substantial effect on State and local governments.

#### Executive Order 13175, “Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments”

Executive Order 13175 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian Tribes, preempts Tribal law, or affects the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. This proposed rule will not have a substantial effect on Indian Tribal governments.

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310

      - Privacy

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is proposed to be amended as follows:

# PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as follows:

Authority:5 U.S.C. 552a.

2. Amend § 310.29 by adding paragraph (c)(30) to read as follows: 

§ 310.29

* * * * *

(c) * * *

                        (30)                         *System identifier and name.*                         DHRA 06, Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database.                    

                        (i)                         *Exemptions.*                         This system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H), (I), and (f).                    

                        (ii)                         *Authority.*5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).                    

                        (iii)                         *Exemption from the particular subsections.*                         Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons:                    

                        (A)                         *Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2)*                        —                        *Exemption (k)(2).*                         Records in this system of records may contain investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes other than material within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). Application of exemption (k)(2) may be necessary because access to, amendment of, or release of the accounting of disclosures of such records could: inform the record subject of an investigation of the existence, nature, or scope of an actual or potential law enforcement or disciplinary investigation, and thereby seriously impede law enforcement efforts by permitting the record subject and other persons to whom the subject might disclose the records or accounting of records to avoid criminal penalties, civil remedies, or disciplinary measures; interfere with a civil or administrative action or investigation by allowing the subject to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or                               ( print page 104071)                            apprehension, which may undermine the entire investigatory process; or reveal confidential sources who might not have otherwise come forward to assist in an investigation and thereby hinder DoD's ability to obtain information from future confidential sources, and result in an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of others.                    

                        (B)                         *Subsection (d)(3), and (d)(4).*                         These subsections are inapplicable to the extent that an exemption is being claimed from subsections (d)(1) and (2). Accordingly, exemptions from subsections (d)(3), and (d)(4) are claimed pursuant to (k)(2).                    

                        (C)                         *Subsection (e)(1).*                         In the collection of information for investigatory purposes it is not always possible to conclusively determine the relevance and necessity of particular information in the early stages of the investigation or adjudication. In some instances, it will be only after the collected information is evaluated in light of other information that its relevance and necessity for effective investigation and adjudication can be assessed. Collection of such information permits more informed decision-making by the Department when making required disciplinary determinations. Accordingly, application of exemption (k)(2) may be necessary.                    

                        (D)                         *Subsection (e)(4)(G) and (H).*                         These subsections are inapplicable to the extent exemption is claimed from subsections (d)(1) and (2).                    

                        (E)                         *Subsection (e)(4)(I).*                         To the extent that this provision is construed to require more detailed disclosure than the broad, generic information currently published in the system notice, an exemption from this provision is necessary to protect the confidentiality of sources of information and to protect the privacy and physical safety of individuals providing information, including witnesses, victims, informants, or others. Accordingly, application of exemption (k)(2) may be necessary.                    

                        (F)                         *Subsection (f).*                         The agency's rules are inapplicable to those portions of the system that are exempt. Accordingly, application of exemption (k)(2) may be necessary.                    

                        (iv)                         *Exempt records from other systems.*                         In the course of carrying out the overall purpose for this system, exempt records from other systems of records may in turn become part of the records maintained in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those other systems of records are maintained in this system, the DoD claims the same exemptions for the records from those other systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the prior system(s) of which they are a part, provided the reason for the exemption remains valid and necessary.                    

Dated: December 12, 2024.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2024-29916 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P