alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(b)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003, I, Richard I. Linhart, Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of James
Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

              (1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
                  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Act of 1934; and

              (2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter
                  ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ Richard I. Linhart
----------------------
Richard I. Linhart
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

HENRY K. JOHNSON,

Petitioner

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 

BOARD OF REVIEW,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 94 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Craig MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-162

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Stephen J. Weinbaum, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 495 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 496 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 497 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 498 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[495 EAL 2021, 496 EAL 2021, 497 EAL 2021, 498 EAL 2021, 499 EAL 2021, 500 EAL 

2021 and 501 EAL 2021] - 2

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 499 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 500 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 501 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
[495 EAL 2021, 496 EAL 2021, 497 EAL 2021, 498 EAL 2021, 499 EAL 2021, 500 EAL 

2021 and 501 EAL 2021] - 3

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Herb Sider, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
     of World Wide Web, Inc.;

  2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
     any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
     not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     quarterly report; and

  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this quarterly report,
     fairly present in all material respects the financial
     position, results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer
     as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report.

  4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
     responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
     14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
       that material information relating to the registrant, including its
       consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
       those entities, particularly during the period in which this
       quarterly report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
       filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
       our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

  5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
       internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
       ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
       have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
       weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
       or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
       internal controls; and

  6.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
     that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
     to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
     material weaknesses.

Date:  September 29, 2003

/s/ Herb Sider
    ------------
    Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Life USA, Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report").  Kelly  Kendall,
President, CFO & CEO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Kelly Kendall
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Kelly Kendall, President, CEO & CFO

Dated:  June 29, 2005
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Amended andRestated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2003, as amended and supplemented from time to time, (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, as servicer, Nissan Wholesale Receivables Corporation II, astransferor, and Nissan Master Owner Trust Receivables, as issuer, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2020. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(28)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - connect_social_media(6)
              - connect_staff_profiles(15)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(5)

## By Year

              - 2024(118)
              - 2023(50)
              - (-)2022(65)
              - 2021(33)
              - 2020(4)
              - 2019(13)

Science Theme        July 22, 2022      Topographic Lidar Surveys

Science Theme        December 9, 2022      Remote Sensing Research and Development

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      On the Ground

staff profileJ. Stephen Schindler

staff profileErnest Crider

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Current page            3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of visionGATEWAY, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Martin G. Wotton, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | 
|September 9, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/    MARTIN G. WOTTON
|                  |  |  |  | Martin G. Wotton       
|                  |  |  |  | President
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA-19-0407

STATE OF MONTANA, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellees, )

) ORDER FOR

 vs. ) ADDITIONAL TIME FOR

) FILING OPENING BRIEF

MICHAEL BREAREY, )

) 

 Defendant/Appellant. )

Upon review of the Defendant/Appellant Unopposed Motion for Additional Time 

for Filing Opening Brief, and good cause therefrom;

It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant/Appellant shall have an additional 

thirty (30) days from April 17, 2020 to file their Opening Brief. Defendant/Appellant Opening 

Brief will be due May 18, 2020.

cc: Jami Rebsom

 Martin Lambert

 Bjorn Boyer

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 8 2020

04/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0407
Nathaniel JACKSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - (-)science_science(5)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(27)
              - multimedia_image(9)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(6)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(14)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(13)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(17)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(68)
              - colorado(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(4)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(21)
              - (-)idaho(5)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(18)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(4)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(28)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Topic        December 6, 2023        Monitoring Seismicity to Locate Earthquakes

Topic        December 7, 2023        Monitoring Cascade Volcanoes

Event        August 5, 2019        M5.3 2017 Soda Springs, Idaho Sequence

Program        June 26, 2019        Information by Region-Idaho

Project        March 30, 2021        Pacific Northwest Geologic Mapping: Northern Pacific Border, Cascades and Columbia
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - (-)connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(24)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2023(1)
              - 2021(1)
              - 2020(1)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

location  Earthquake Science Center
Susan PRIEST, Appellant, v. Summer L. VELISEK, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 29, 2018

Maureen Monaghan Matheson, of Satellite Beach, and Robert M. Moletteire, Melbourne, for Appellant.

Elizabeth C. Wheeler, of Elizabeth C. Wheeler, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

John C. Hamilton, Law Office of John C. Hamilton of Tampa, P.A., San Antonio, Amicus Curiae, for the Non-Party Expert, Michael J. Foley, M.D., in support of Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Susan Priest, appeals an order granting Appellee's, Summer L. Velisek, motion for a new trial in the underlying negligence action. The trial court based the order granting a new trial on a combination of two issues: Appellant's cross-examination of Appellee's expert witness about his financial bias (where the expert was asked if he previously testified to earning two million dollars annually from all defendants) and Appellee's unsolicited and unexpected mentioning of "insurance" while she testified during Appellant's case-in-chief. The court found it erred in allowing the cross-examination of Appellee's expert and that Appellee's mention of insurance was prejudicial. Appellant argues that neither ground supports the grant of a new trial. We agree.

In granting a new trial, the trial court ruled that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 prohibited Appellant's counsel from questioning Appellee's expert concerning his total annual income from all defendants, and that it should have applied this rule to bar any inquiry into the expert's total annual income on cross-examination.1 However, rule 1.280 is a rule pertaining to discovery-not evidence. Therefore, we find that the trial court erroneously relied upon this procedural rule in granting a new trial in Appellee's favor.

Likewise, the trial court erred when it granted a new trial based upon Appellee's own unexpected and unsolicited statement in front of the jury regarding her insurance. We find this argument lacks merit because at a minimum, any error was expressly waived by Appellee's counsel.2

Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order granting a new trial and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict and judgment.

REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., and ROGERS, S.G., Associate Judge, concur.

1

We do not reach any other arguments regarding the propriety of questioning an expert in this fashion as this is the only argument preserved below and properly before us on appeal.

2

As a result of the explicit waiver found in the record, we need not decide if Appellee's own statement is invited error.
H. Res. 278 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 26, 2013. 

Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office 

of Representative from the Forty Third Congressional District of California is dismissed. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Terrance D. OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Aaron C. PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4545

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(17)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(68)
              - colorado(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - (-)georgia(4)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(21)
              - idaho(5)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(18)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(4)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(28)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Program        June 26, 2019        Information by Region-Georgia

Research        April 12, 2016        Geologic Hazards and Catastrophic Events

Project        September 27, 2018        Piedmont and Blue Ridge Project

Project        September 11, 2018        Coastal Basement Geology of the Southeastern U.S. Project
Robert BOYETT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3774

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Larry THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3014

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018

Larry Thompson, Florida City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.