alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 January 17, 2006
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 DAIMLERCHRYSLER MASTER OWNER TRUST
 
  Delaware
    
    333-106332-02
    
    26-6015118(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 500 Stanton Christiana Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(248) 427-2565(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act
(17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2 (b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2 (b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4 (c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4 (c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSMonthly Noteholders' Statement, relating to the 01/17/2006 Payment Date    Table of Contents  Other Events
 Other Events
  Financial Statements and Exhibits
 Financial Statements and Exhibits
       Exhibit 99:
    
    Monthly Noteholders Statement,relating to the
January 17, 2006Payment Date. 2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  DaimlerChrysler Master Owner Trust (Registrant)By:
    
    DaimlerChrysler Financial
Services Americas LLC,as Servicer
 By:
    
    /s/ Mark L. DavisMark L. DavisAssistant Controller
  3




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99
    
    Monthly Noteholders Statement, relating to the January 17,
2006 Payment Date.
 4
Jeremy M. CARTER, Petitioner, v. Paul HERNANDEZ, Julio Giraldo, Carlos Acosta, and Oscar Suarez, Respondents.

No. 1D18-2953

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

Jeremy M. Carter, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearances for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 778 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain 

rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. 

DEUTCH, and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States 

courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade 

names, or commercial names. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Stolen Trademarks 

5 Honored in America Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

7 Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Re8 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 778 IH

1 section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 

2 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 

3 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘by a designated national’’; 

5 and 

6 (B) by inserting before the period ‘‘that 

7 was used in connection with a business or as8 sets that were confiscated unless the original 

9 owner of the mark, trade name, or commercial 

10 name, or the bonafide successor-in-interest has 

11 expressly consented’’; 

12 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘by a des13 ignated national or its successor-in-interest’’; 

14 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub15 section (e); 

16 (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol17 lowing: 

18 ‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall 

19 apply only if the person or entity asserting the rights knew 

20 or had reason to know at the time when the person or 

21 entity acquired the rights asserted that the mark, trade 

22 name, or commercial name was the same as or substan23 tially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name 

24 that was used in connection with a business or assets that 

25 were confiscated.’’; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 778 IH

1 (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 

2 striking ‘‘In this section:’’ and all that follows 

3 through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘In this sec4 tion, the term’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
. . . . . j

-. ‘.. . . . . . . .- 

# OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
Omar KINSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2657

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

Omar Kinsey, Bonifay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 256 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 256

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2013.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to 
prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed 
Services. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall rise without 
motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant 
to a subsequent order of the House.
    Sec. 2.  Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1256) to direct the Securities and Exchange 
Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to jointly adopt rules 
setting forth the application to cross-border swaps transactions of certain 
provisions relating to swaps that were enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall 
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. The amendments recommended by the 
Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any amendment 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Financial Services and 20 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Agriculture; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 3.  The chair of the Committee on Agriculture is authorized, on behalf 
of the committee, to file a supplemental report to accompany H.R. 1947.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Roderick WASHINGTON, a/k/a Roderick Antwon Washington. Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3206

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Roderick Washington was convicted of two counts of kidnapping and two counts of first-degree murder. He was seventeen years old when he participated in the offenses with several codefendants. His original sentences were overturned as violations of the Eighth Amendment, *Lawton v. State*, 181 So.3d 452, 453 (Fla. 2015), and he was resentenced to two life terms and two forty-year terms under section 775.082(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (2016), with the proviso that he could petition the court for review after twenty-five years under section 921.1402(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2016). In resentencing Washington, the sentencing court found that Washington intended to kill the victims.

*521In this appeal, Washington again challenges the sentences imposed on him, citing *Williams v. State*, 242 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 2018), which holds that *Alleyne v. United States*, 570 U.S. 99, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013), requires a jury, rather than a judge, to make the factual finding as to whether the juvenile offender actually killed, intended to kill, or attempted to kill the victim. *See* 242 So.3d at 288. Although the court in *Williams* concluded that *Alleyne* violations are subject to harmless error review, 242 So.3d at 289, the violation here cannot be deemed harmless. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to resentence Washington under section 775.082(1)(b)(2). *See* *Williams*, 242 So.3d at 294.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-S4, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 2 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

BENITO JEROME BOWIE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; OKLAHOMA COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; OKLAHOMA COUNTY JAIL; SHIRLEY DARRELL and HARRY CURRIE, Oklahoma County Commissioners,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-6300 (D.C. No. CIV-00-88-C) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL , ANDERSON , and KELLY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of1 The case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B). -2- this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Benito Jerome Bowie, an Oklahoma state in mate proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of a magistrate judge to enter summary judgment in favor of defendants. 1
We affirm. Mr. Bowie filed this civil rights action under 42 U .S.C. § 1983, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when h e was denied access to a law library during the time he was detained at the Okla homa County Detention Center from January 30, 1996 to January 6, 1998. He also claims defendants engaged in a conspiracy to deprive him of his constitutional r ights. He has abandoned on appeal his claims relating to the conditions of his confinement at the jail. The parties are familiar with the underlying facts. Th erefore, we do not repeat them. We review de novo the district court’s grant of sum mary judgment, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the partyopposing summary judgment. McKnight v. Kimberly Clark Corp. , 149 F.3d 1125, 1128 (10th Cir. 1998). Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genu ine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matte r of law. Celotex Corp. v.-3-

Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Because plaintiff is representing himself, his pleadings will be liberally construed. Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, as well as the briefs submitted by the parties. Applying the standards s et out above, we affirm the judgment for substantially the same reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s July 25, 2000 report and recommendation and the dis trict court’s August 17, 2000 order adopting the recommendation. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue f orthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Brian GILLESPY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 20, 2018

Brian Gillespy, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Riley STEWARD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(21)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-204460(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - (-)utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        July 13, 2022        Utah’s ancient mega-landslides

Science Animations        July 29, 2020        Lake Powell - Topobathymetric Digital Elevation Model

Featured Films and Shorts        July 30, 2017        A Record of Change: Science and Elder Observations on the Navajo N.

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1969        John Wesley Powell, Canyon Geologist
IN RE: JUDICIARY COMMISSION NO. 18-187

NO. 2018-O-1773

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Leave to appeal denied.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 28


              UNIPROP MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITIES INCOME FUND
                            2006 PROPERTY APPRAISALS

Cushman & Wakefield recently completed market value appraisals of UMHCIF's four
properties as of March 2006. The table below sets forth certain appraisal
information for each property, as well as relevant comparisons:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      MARCH 06          MARCH 05      VARIANCE
PROPERTY                             APPRAISALS        APPRAISALS        IN %
<S>                                 <C>               <C>                <C>
Aztec Estates, FL                   $22,800,000       $22,400,000        1.8%
Kings Manor, FL                      17,800,000        15,850,000       12.3%
Old Dutch Farms, MI                   5,850,000         7,250,000      (19.3%)
Park of Four Seasons, MN             16,400,000        19,100,000      (14.1%)
                                    -----------       -----------     ------

GRAND TOTAL:                        $62,850,000       $64,600,000       (2.7%)
</TABLE>

                     2006 ESTIMATED NET ASSET VALUE OF UNITS

Based on the March 2006 appraisal of the Partnership's properties, the General
Partner has calculated the estimated net asset value of each unit, based on the
following assumptions:

-        Sale of all the Properties in March 2006 for their appraised value. o
         Costs and selling expenses are 3.0% of the sale price.

-        Amount payable to creditors other than the mortgage debt, is
         negligible.

-        Tax consequences of a sale are not taken into consideration.

Calculations:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                             <C>
March 2006 appraised value of the properties:                   $  62,850,000
                                                                -------------

Minus: Costs and selling expenses (3.0%):                           1,885,500
       Mortgage Debt:                                              30,762,766
       Sellers' Contingent Purchase Price:                          1,970,000*
                                                                -------------

Net Sale Proceeds:                                               $28,231,734
                                                                 ============

Limited Partners' Share of Net Sales Proceeds (80.0%)            $ 22,585,387
Number of Units:                                                       30,000

ESTIMATED CURRENT NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT:                      $     752.85
                                                                 ============
</TABLE>


*        Reflects the $1,500,000 partial payment of Contingent Purchase Price
         which was paid on May 15, 1997 out of operating cash reserves.
STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin C. FREEMAN

NO. 2018-KO-0221

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy Fairbanks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NationsHealth, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007     By: /s/ Timothy Fairbanks     Timothy Fairbanks    Chief Financial Officer