alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF ‘I-NE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS _. 

,.~ 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Wayne Lefsvre 

County Auditor 

Qlay Qounty: 

Henrietta, rexas 

,Dear .Si.r I 

,. ~..' 

:: 

Pour reoent 

ment on the above et 

quote from your le 

don of this Depsrten reoeirea. We 

aonteml that the State X?arm 

ght be classed as a mutual on 

up that it has with two other 

y the enclosed oZrcular, they 

t it might be unlawful for the 

ame other than from an imsr- 

*Xl11 you .plsaee be kind emugh to give us ;pOar 

opLx&on as to whether it roula be all right for the 

~Om&?JdOnerB’ Oourt to buy insuranoe from *State 

Barn Fire Insurance Company*.* 

._j .,. 
., ‘\. 

\ 

\ 

Honorable Wayne Lefevre, page 2 

Te are informsd by the State InBImUUX Department 

that the ml3fate Farmpire Insurance Cornpat@ is a fordgn 

corporation, organieed on the capital etook plan, having 

a capital stock Of $260~000.00, and a per&t to do business 

in this State. Therefore,~ there is no statutory or constitutional prohibition against the Commissioners' Court buying 

the insurance above mentioned from such company. 

Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your 

inquiry, we are 

Pours very truly. 

APPR0h-J bIAX 23, 1941 

S/Grover Sellers 

FIRST ASSISTAHT 

ATTORHEX GEYEIUL
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5

TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30822

Summary Calendar

In re: COMBUSTION, INC.

PLAINTIFFS’ STEERING COMMITTEE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK L. TESSIER,

Movant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(94-MDL-4000)

September 18, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, EMILIO M. GARZA and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

POLITZ, Chief Judge:*

This appeal arises out of a mass disaster toxic tort class action involving a

hazardous waste dump site located inLivingston Parish, Louisiana. The site served

as an oil recycling center until 1980 and is now known as the Combustion, Inc.

Superfund Site.

By December of 1994 over 13,000 claimants had filed proof of claim forms
 

1

 417 U.S. 156 (1974).

 

2 Combustion v. Tessier, 103 F.3d 124 (5th Cir. 1996) (unpublished table decision).

2

in this action. In July of 1995 the district court approved a preliminary settlement

agreement between the class and some of the defendants and ordered a fairness

hearing thereon. The court also ordered all class members who had failed to file

a timely proof of claim to notify the court of their intention to appear at the hearing

and to show good cause why they should be allowed to take part in the litigation.

Patrick L. Tessier notified the court that, as a land owner in the contaminated

area, he qualified as a class member and that he had not received notice of the suit

until after the deadline for filing a proof of claim. At the hearing, Tessier informed

the court that his name and address was reasonably ascertainable to the Plaintiffs’

Steering Committee and that due process required that he receive personal notice.

The district court,finding that notice wasreasonable and adequate, initially refused

to allow Tessier to take part in the litigation.

On appeal, we noted that Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin1requires that

individual notice be given to all class members whose names and addresses are

ascertainable through reasonable effort. As it was not clear from the district court’s

order whether the Eisen standard had been applied, we remanded for this

determination.2 On remand, the district court found that Tessier had actual notice

of the litigation and, therefore, determined that individual notice was not required.

Our review of the record, briefs, and applicable law discloses neither error

nor abuse of discretion in the district court’s credibility call on this issue.
3

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23**
|  |   |
|--|--------|

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement No. 333-114717 of The Bank Holdings on Form S-8of our report, dated March 16, 2005, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSBof The Bank Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

 

 

McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

 

 

Las Vegas, NevadaMarch 30, 2005

 

 

 

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International, anaffiliation of separate and independent legal entities.

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002,  as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Frederick W. Wakelin,  Jr.,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The  Report  fully complies with  the requirements of  section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents,  in  all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.





/s/ FREDERICK W. WAKELIN, JR.
------------------------------------------
Frederick W. Wakelin, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Entourage Mining Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                          | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|Date: June 29, 2007                       | 
|                                          | 
|                                          | 
|/s/ Pradeep Varshney                      | 
|Pradeep Varshney, Chief Financial Officer | 
|(Principal Financial Officer)             |
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - science_science(148)
              - products_data(13)
              - products_publications(237)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(41)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(35)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(3)
              - multimedia_video(151)
              - multimedia_video-149194(96)
              - multimedia_video-149195(31)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(8)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149210(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(10)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(7)

## By Location

## By Year

Newsletters        April 16, 2021        KSWSC Science Seminar Series Extreme Events Monitoring with USGS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Judy M. Robinett, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Medical Discoveries,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)    presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

      a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6.    I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 31, 2006

                                       /s/ JUDY M. ROBINETT
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Judy M. Robinett
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 13, 2006
 FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
  Washington
    
    000-22439
    
    91-0222175(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File No.)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 100 Fourth Avenue N., Suite 510, Seattle, Washington 98109
 
 (206) 404-7000
 
 
  see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Item 9.01.
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    Press release issued by Fisher
Communications, Inc., dated March 13, 2006.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Dated: March 13, 2006
    By /s/ Robert C. BatemanRobert C. BatemanSenior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer - 3 -




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
  - 4 -
Devin N. JONES and Lisa A. Jones, Appellants, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30153]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1023 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-776, K2025-775.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30153 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO]

                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                      125 High Street
                                                      Boston, MA 02110-1707
                                                      Telephone (617) 530 5000
                                                      Facsimile (617) 530 5001
                                                      www.pwc.com

June 28, 2007



Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549

Commissioners:

We have read the statements made by BearingPoint, Inc. in the first and second
paragraphs of Item 9 to the BearingPoint's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006. We agree with the statements concerning our Firm
in the first and second paragraphs of such Form 10-K.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(78)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(4)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

National News Release        May 13, 2014        Coral Reefs are Critical for Risk Reduction & Adaptation
Wilson Brandon SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2992

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 12, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and M.J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*549Appellant challenges his conviction for sexual battery raising various grounds for error. We affirm and write only to address Appellant's contention that the trial court improperly sentenced him to a first degree felony under section 794.011(5)(a), Florida Statutes, and improperly assessed an adult-on-minor sentence points multiplier under section 921.0024(2), Florida Statutes, in absence of a jury verdict specifying the victim's age.

The age of the victim increased the maximum sentence faced by Appellant and was therefore an element of the crime which needed to be proven. *See* *Apprendi v. New Jersey* , 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) ; *Blakely v. Washington* , 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) ; *Alleyne v. United States* , 570 U.S. 99, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013) ; *Insko v. State* , 969 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 2007) ; *see also* *Coggins v. State* , 921 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). However, any error here is subject to a harmless error analysis. "Where an *Apprendi* */* *Blakely* error has occurred, the harmless error analysis asks, 'whether the record demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found [the facts at issue].' " *DeLaFe v. State* , 124 So.3d 293, 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (quoting *Galindez v. State* , 955 So.2d 517, 523 (Fla. 2007) ); *see also* *Perritte v. State* , 912 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (holding that since defendant's age was not in dispute there was no error in failing to instruct the jury on that element).*

The issues in dispute at trial were whether the incidents happened and whether the victim was under Appellant's custodial authority. The victim and her mother testified to the victim's age, and it was not in dispute. Further, during closing arguments defense counsel called the victim "[a] 16 year old." If any error occurred here, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

The possibility of jury pardon is not a consideration in conducting this harmless error analysis.
Calvin W. DOWD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1880

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30144]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1035 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-791, K2025-790.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30144 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```