alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WAMU MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-AR5;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as
servicers and sub-servicers:

Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
Grace McLaurin STEERE, Appellant, v. Peter S. BROBERG and Lucy Duffield Steere, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Bruce M. Steere, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James W. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1796

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALISON LORRAINE HATHEWAY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

AILEEN DEFEO, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 20-16126 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05610-DLR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Alison Lorraine Hatheway appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of 

foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo the district court’s sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-16126 

Procedure 12(b)(6). Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 

1987). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hatheway’s action sua sponte after 

giving Hathaway “notice of its sua sponte intention to invoke Rule 12(b)(6) and 

afford[ing her] an opportunity to . . . submit a written memorandum in opposition 

to such motion[.]” Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 362 (9th Cir. 1981) (citation and 

internal quotation marks omitted); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 

(2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, 

accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” (citation and 

internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
Luis Armando LANCHEROS, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1164

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3038702-MAR-201108:39 AM
Scott DYKSTRA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6824

MICHAEL STEVEN SAYKO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.;

ALAN D. EASON; MARLENE LOUGAR; J. HEMLER;

KATHY GRANT; STACE DONOHOO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-96-1055-AW)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Steven Sayko, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sayko v. Lanham, No. CA-96-1055-AW (D. Md. Apr. 17, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Kenneth Ray GOODWILL, DOC# R83409, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-114717 andNo. 333-139453) of The Bank Holdings on Form S-8 of our report, dated March 16,2005, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Bank Holdings for theyear ended December 31, 2006.
|                   | /s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP |   |
|-------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|              |                            |
|              |                            |
| Las Vegas, Nevada |
| March 29, 2007    |

 

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSMInternational, an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.

----
Order filed, February 18, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00097-CV

____________

ANTONIO BERMUDEZ, JR., Appellant

V.

JUANA ZAPATA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-57232

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 06, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jenine Redden, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Giordano, Jr., President
(Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

|Date:  August 12, 2005 | /s/ Joseph Giordano, Jr.           
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------
|                       | Joseph Giordano, Jr.               
|                       | President (Chief Executive Officer)
|                       |                                    

---
Escalante CHILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018

Escalante Chiles, Indiantown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0715

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WOLFGANG ALEXANDER LUCAS VASQUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 21, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 12 2020

08/12/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0715
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Tierney,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael J. Tierney
-------------------------------------
MICHAEL J. TIERNEY
Chief Executive Officer
April 2, 2007
H. Res. 215 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 16, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 45) 

to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and 

health care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against 

provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 

intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally divided among and controlled by the respective chairs and 

ranking minority members of the Committees on Education 

and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, and Ways and 
2 

•HRES 215 EH 

Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00058-CR

Michael Fruin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 961194, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Michael Fruin pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a child. See Tex. Pen. 

Code Ann. ' 22.011 (West Supp. 2002). He was convicted of this offense and placed on community 

supervision. He now appeals from an order revoking supervision based in part of his pleas of true to 

some of the alleged violations.

Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is 

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 

485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). 

 A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine 

the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed 
2

the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find 

nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The order revoking community supervision is affirmed.

______________________________________

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Affirmed

Filed: August 30, 2002

Do Not Publish
John Bartholomew LOWE v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-00214-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: September 24, 2018 Closed: December 13, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Exhibit 31

LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2003-3
ASSET BACKED-CERTIFICATES

SERIES 2003-3


I, Jeffery A. Sorensen, a Vice President of Long Beach Securities
Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-3 Asset-Backed Certificates,
Series 2003-3;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.


Date: March 24, 2004


/s/: Jeffery A. Sorensen
Jeffery A. Sorensen
Vice President
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re BridgeTex Pipeline Company, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-16-00632-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-63615

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

On August 10, 2016, BridgeTex Pipeline Company, LLC filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. We ordered the real party in interest, Primoris 

Energy Services corporation d/b/a Sprint Pipeline Services, to file a response to the motion for 

temporary relief by August 17, 2016. On August 17, 2016, the parties filed an agreed motion to 

abate the mandamus proceeding because the parties have reached a settlement. The parties ask 

that we abate all deadlines until they either notify us that a settlement agreement has been 

executed or until BridgeTex asks us to lift the abatement and take action on the petition and 

motion for temporary relief. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, this original proceeding is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed 

from this court’s active docket. The proceeding will be reinstated on this court’s active docket 

either when the parties file a motion to reinstate or a motion to dismiss the proceeding based on 

an executed settlement agreement. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 18, 2016
Order filed, December 04, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00951

- CR

____________ EX PARTE BRENT WAYN E JUSTICE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1385768



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due December 03, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the c ourt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Judy Fox , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. H U I Q I A N G Y A N , a . k. a . H ui C hang, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 10641 D. C . No . 1 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 0 0 2 - R VM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

the N orthe rn M ar i anaI s l ands R a m onaV . M angl ona , C hi e f Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , I K U T A , an dW A T F O R D , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . H ui Q i a ng Y a n appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c ha l l e nge s the three -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for c on spi ra cy t o unl a w f

ul l ypr oduc e a nd tr a ns f

e ra n i de nt i f

i c a t i on doc um e nt , i n vi ol a t i on of 18 U . S . C . § 1028( a ) ( 1) , ( a ) ( 2) , a nd ( f ) . P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U . S.



# FI LED APR17 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 10641 2 738 ( 1967) , Y a n’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng tha tthe r e ar e no gr ounds f or re l i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as coun se l of re cord. W e have provi ded Y an the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent al b r ie f o ra n s w e r in g b r ie f

h a s b e e n f

ile d . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks          Theresa D. Becks    Chief Executive Officer    Campbell & Company, Inc.    Managing Owner    Campbell Alternative Asset Trust    August 14, 2007  
E 2