alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 103845-103846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30313]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, SEP-4: NCI Clinical and 
Translational Cancer Research, February 04, 2025, 10 a.m. to February 
05, 2025, 7 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W264, Rockville, Maryland, 20850 which was 
published in the Federal Register on

[[Page 103846]]

November 14, 2024, FR Doc 2024-26497, 89 FR 90021.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting end time on 
February 05, 2025, from 7 p.m. to 2 p.m. The meeting is now, February 
04, 2025, 10 a.m. to February 05, 2025, 2 p.m. The meeting dates, 
format, and location will stay the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: December 16, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-30313 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Kimberley ENGSTROM, Appellant, v. Kenneth ENGSTROM, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1243

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

Law Offices of Scott Alan Orth, P.A., and Scott Alan Orth (Hollywood), for appellant.

Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann and Robert D. Orshan, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, C.J.

Kimberley Engstrom ("former wife") appeals from: (1) an order granting Kenneth Engstrom's ("former husband") motion for summary judgment on the former wife's "Corrected Supplemental Amended Rule 12.540 Petition for Relief From Judgment for Fraud on Financial Affidavit" and granting the former husband's motion for attorney's fees and costs; (2) an order denying *508the former wife's motion for rehearing; and (3) a "Final Summary Judgment Denying Former Wife's Corrected Supplemental Amended Rule 12.540 Petition for Relief from Judgment for Fraud on Financial Affidavit and Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs." Because the former wife's rule 12.540 petition sets forth a proper claim for relief from judgment based on a fraudulent affidavit submitted to the trial court in a marital case1 and there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether the former husband's affidavit was in fact fraudulent and whether the former wife relied on the draft of the allegedly fraudulent affidavit when she entered into the marital settlement agreement, which was allegedly materially similar to the affidavit the husband executed and submitted to the trial court, we reverse the orders under review and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the former wife's rule 12.540 petition. *See**Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P.*, 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla. 2000) ("Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.").

Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.

1

When the former wife filed her rule 12.540 petition, Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540 provided, in part, as follows: "Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 shall govern general provision concerning relief from judgment, decrees, or orders, except: ... there shall be no time limit for motions based on fraudulent financial affidavits in marital ... cases[.]" *See**In re Amendments to Fla. FamilyLaw Rules of Procedure*, 214 So.3d 400 (Fla. 2017).
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2003, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, as servicer, Nissan Wholesale Receivables Corporation II, as transferor, and Nissan Master Owner Trust Receivables, as issuer, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2015.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
---

---

# Exhibit 13.2

# Certificate of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I,
Roderick Chisholm, acting as the Chief Financial Officer of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the
Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.       
          the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
          31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2009

| |  | Signed: /s/ Roderick Chisholm
Roderick ChisholmChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 459 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 459

 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3372) to provide a 
    process for ensuring the United States does not default on its 
                              obligations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2014

Mr. Honda submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3372) to provide a 
    process for ensuring the United States does not default on its 
                              obligations.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
3372) to provide a process for ensuring the United States does not 
default on its obligations. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) a 
proper amendment in the nature of a substitute to ensure the complete 
and timely payment of the obligations of the United States Government 
until December 31, 2014, if offered by Representative Honda of 
California or his designee, which shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order except for those arising under 
clause 7 of rule XVI, shall be considered as read, and shall be 
separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 3372 as provided for in the first section of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

I, Marcel Urbanc, chief financial officer of AlphaRx, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of AlphaRx, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
    being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
    of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
    Evaluation Date;

5. We have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
    controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.


Date: February 10, 2004

/s/ Marcel Urbanc
-----------------
Marcel Urbanc, Chief Financial Officer


                                      14
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kurt Bordian, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                 



| | By:    |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        | /s/
      Kurt Bordian 
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | September 28, 2009     





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Michael WELLS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PHIL MOOK ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3569

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39555

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JODY LEE NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 731

Filed: November 21, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Jefferson County. Hon. Gregory W. Moeller, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with four years 

determinate, for assault with intent to commit a serious felony, affirmed.

Thompson Smith Woolf & Anderson, PLLC; Stevan H. Thompson, Idaho Falls, 

for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GUTIERREZ, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jody Lee Nelson pled guilty to assault with intent to commit a serious felony. Idaho 

Code § 18-909. The district court sentenced Nelson to a unified term of ten years, with four 

years determinate. Nelson appeals, contending his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 

1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 
2

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Nelson’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companyfor the year ended December 31, 2008, I, Hal Giomi, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)           such Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of The Bank Holdings.

 
| Dated:  March 31, 2009          |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| /s/  Hal Giomi                       |   |
|                                 |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
STATE EX REL. Richard B. WOODS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1945

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF OUACHITA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Derrick SAMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

Tiffany Gatesh Fearing, of Suncoast Legal Group, P.L., Spring Hill, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Michael CUMMINGS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D15-4225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 24, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to this court's orders of July 18, 2018, and August 30, 2018, this case is dismissed due to Appellant's failure to file a brief directed to the merits of his appeal.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Roger RICHARDS

NO. 2018-KH-1716

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, John R. Maxwell, President and Chief
Executive Officer of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
         of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ John R. Maxwell
-------------------
John R. Maxwell
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of First Northern Community Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Louise A. Walker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,





(i)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 14, 2010

/s/  Louise A. WalkerLouise A. Walker, Sr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer