alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.9**

**IPEC HOLDINGS INC.**

**SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

Executive supplemental reimbursement insurance (“Supplemental Insurance”) for all of theexecutive officers of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) became effective May 1, 2005.The Supplemental Insurance provides an annual benefit of up to $50,000 per employee or family unitfor unreimbursed medical expenses incurred during a calendar year (subject to a $10,000 per occurrencelimit). The Supplemental Insurance reimburses the executive officers, and their eligible dependents,for medical expenses not covered by the Company’s group major medical plan, or by any othergroup health plan or government programs, including items such as deductibles, coinsurance amounts,special health equipment, annual physicals, dental care and vision care. The Company’s annualpremium under the plan is dependent upon actual claims, but cannot exceed $6,100 per executive.

----
Opinion issued October 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00169-CR

———————————

DANIEL JACOBSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1485376

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Daniel Jacobson pleaded guilty to the offense of driving while 

intoxicated. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 49.04. In accordance with Jacobson’s plea bargain, 

the trial court sentenced him to imprisonment for five years, but it suspended the sentence 

and placed him on community supervision for five years. 
2

Jacobson filed a notice of appeal. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, 

contending he has no right to appeal. Jacobson has not responded to this motion.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant only may appeal those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission 

to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must 

be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not

been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The 

trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no 

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s 

certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because 

appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 

S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction 

to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 

25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis 

for the appeal.”). 

Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Entourage Mining Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                         | 
|---------------------------------------- | 
|Date: June 29, 2007                      | 
|                                         | 
|/s/ Gregory F. Kennedy                   | 
|Gregory F. Kennedy, President and C.E.O. | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)            |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 410 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 410

Expressing support for the designation of a ``Small Business Saturday'' 
 and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                        owned small businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2013

  Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Cicilline, and Ms. Herrera 
Beutler) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of a ``Small Business Saturday'' 
 and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                        owned small businesses.

Whereas small businesses represent 99.7 percent of all businesses having 
        employees (commonly referred to as ``employer firms'') in the United 
        States;
Whereas small businesses employ over 49 percent of the employees in the private 
        sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses pay over 42 percent of the total payroll of the 
        employees in the private sector in the United States;
Whereas small businesses are responsible for more than 46 percent of the 
        private, nonfarm product of the gross domestic product;
Whereas small businesses generated 64 percent of net new jobs created between 
        1993 and 2011;
Whereas 87 percent of consumers in the United States agree that the success of 
        small businesses is critical to the overall economic health of the 
        United States;
Whereas 89 percent of consumers in the United States agree that small businesses 
        contribute positively to the local community by supplying jobs and 
        generating tax revenue;
Whereas 93 percent of consumers in the United States agree that it is important 
        to support the small businesses in their community; and
Whereas November 30, 2013, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Small 
        Business Saturday'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of a ``Small Business 
        Saturday''; and
            (2) supports efforts--
                    (A) to encourage consumers to shop locally; and
                    (B) to increase awareness of the value of locally 
                owned small businesses and the impact of locally owned 
                small businesses on the economy of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(43)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(67)
              - american samoa(8)
              - california(87)
              - colorado(4)
              - hawaii(72)
              - idaho(9)
              - illinois(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(14)
              - (-)nevada(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new york(7)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(34)
              - south carolina(1)
              - virginia(15)
              - washington(16)
              - wyoming(17)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Photography        June 9, 2022        Monte Cristo Fault, Nevada
| 1.   | I      have reviewed the annual report and other reports containing distribution      information for the period covered by the annual  report; |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      the best of my knowledge, no untrue statements of material fact exist in      these reports, and no material facts were  omitted. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Theses      reports include to the best of my knowledge,  the financial      information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing      documents of the issuer; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The      Servicer is compliant with its servicing obligations and minimum servicing      standards except as detailed below. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | No      default in performance of any obligations has  occurred. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July      1, 2009 | By/s/:    | DAVID L. DERFELT            |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                         |                     | David      L. Derfelt       |
|                         |                     | V.      P. & Controller |
|                         |                     |                        |

----
Christopher COMITO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0957

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 104153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30451]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than January 21, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Karen Smith, Assistant Vice 
President, Mergers & Acquisitions and Enforcement) 2200 North Pearl 
Street Dallas, Texas 75201-2272. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to [email protected]:
    1. F&M Bancshares, Inc., De Leon, Texas; to acquire Newcastle 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers State Bank of 
Newcastle, both of Newcastle, Texas.
    2. LevelField Financial, Inc., Houston, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring Burling Bank, Chicago, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-30451 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Celestor GREGORY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1843

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 8, 2018]

Celestor Gregory, Mayo, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Gross, May and Conner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)







CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Master Owner Trust Receivables (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.




Date:      June 26, 2015




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
Otis KIRKLAND, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and Wal Mart Associates, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-1240

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
---

EXHIBIT 13.3

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
  (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) I,
  David Strang, President of Regalito Copper Corp. (formerly Lumina Copper Corp.)
  (the "Company") hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
  31, 2005 ("Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of the operations of the Company.

/s/ David StrangName: David Strang 
  Title: President

Dated: March 20, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
  as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - florida(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(3)
              - 2023(3)
              - 2022(3)
              - 2021(5)
              - 2019(1)

staff profileCorinne Bowers, PhD

staff profileNathaniel Plant, Ph.D.

Science Theme        January 31, 2024      Hydrologic Hazards
Jose MORA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0108

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4581 ) RENARDO WENDELL BUNDRAGE, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed November 20, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. Peter Lombardo of Law Office of Peter Lombardo, Bradenton, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IPEC Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shawn C. Fabry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request


Date:  November 14, 2003                /S/ SHAWN C. FABRY
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Shawn C. Fabry
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
<PAGE>
Filed 4/27/21 P. v. Preciado CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALEJANDRO ROMO PRECIADO,

Defendant and Appellant.

F080449

(Super. Ct. No. VCF350822)

OPINION

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Nathan G. 

Leedy, Judge.

William D. Farber, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant. 

Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and 

Respondent.

-ooOoo-

* Before Poochigian, Acting P.J., Franson, J. and Smith, J.
2.

Appointed counsel for appellant Alejandro Romo Preciado asked this court to 

review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People 

v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Preciado was advised of his right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. This court did not receive a 

supplemental brief from him. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition 

more favorable to Preciado, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On May 5, 2017, the Tulare County District Attorney’s Office filed a criminal 

complaint charging Preciado with one count of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated 

without gross negligence. (Pen. Code,1 § 191.5, subd. (b).) 

On October 24, 2019, the trial court indicated a sentencing lid of two years in state 

prison. Preciado entered a plea of no contest to the charged offense of vehicular 

manslaughter without gross negligence (§ 191.5, subd. (b)) pursuant to People v. West

(1970) 3 Cal.3d 595. 

On December 12, 2019, after consideration of the probation officer’s report, the 

trial court sentenced Preciado to a state prison term of two years. In addition, the court 

imposed various fines and fees.

On December 12, 2019, Preciado filed a timely notice of appeal. 

After reviewing the record, we find no arguable error on appeal that would result 

in a disposition more favorable to Preciado.

DISPOSITION

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. 

1 All further undefined statutory citations are to the Penal Code unless otherwise 

indicated.
Angel MASSAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.