104468 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2024 / Proposed Rules 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Kurt Ladendorf, Aviation Safety 

Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 

410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: (817) 222– 

5254; email: Kurt.D.Ladendorf@faa.gov. 

(2) For Airbus Helicopters material 

identified in this AD that is not incorporated 

by reference, contact Airbus Helicopters, 

2701 North Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 

75052; phone: (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232– 

0323; fax: (972) 641–3775; website: 

airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/ 

hcare-services/airbusworld. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the material listed in this paragraph 

under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) You must use this material as 

applicable to do the actions required by this 

AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA) AD 2023–0030, dated February 2, 

2023. 

(ii) [Reserved] 

(3) For EASA material identified in this 

AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 

50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 

8999 000; email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; 

website: easa.europa.eu. You may find the 

EASA material on the EASA website at 

ad.easa.europa.eu. 

(4) You may view this material at the FAA, 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest 

Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N– 

321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call (817) 222–5110. 

(5) You may view this material at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, 

visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ 

ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov. 

Issued on December 16, 2024. 

Victor Wicklund, 

Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness 

Division, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2024–30374 Filed 12–20–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2024–2048; Airspace 

Docket No. 24–AWP–101] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Colusa County Airport, Colusa, CA 

Correction 

Proposed Rule Document 2024– 

27837, appearing on pages 94601– 

94603, in the issue of Friday, November 

29, 2024, was incorrectly published in 

the Rules section and should have 

appeared in the Proposed Rules section. 

[FR Doc. C1–2024–27837 Filed 12–19–24; 2:00 pm] 

BILLING CODE 0099–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

[REG–106595–22] 

RIN 1545–BQ83 

Substantiation Requirements and 

Qualified Nonpersonal Use Vehicles; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (REG– 

106595–22), published in the Federal 

Register on December 3, 2024, 

containing proposed regulations relating 

to the definition of qualified 

nonpersonal use vehicles. 

DATES: Written or electronic comments 

and requests for a public hearing must 

be received by March 3, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly 

encouraged to submit public comments 

electronically via the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at http://

www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and 

REG–106595–22) by following the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Requests for a public hearing 

must be submitted as prescribed in the 

‘‘Comments and Requests for a Public 

Hearing’’ section. Once submitted to the 

Federal Rulemaking Portal, comments 

cannot be edited or withdrawn. The 

Department of the Treasury (Treasury 

Department) and the IRS will publish 

for public availability any comment 

submitted electronically or on paper, to 

the IRS’s public docket. Send paper 

submissions to CC:PA:01:PR (REG– 

106595–22), Room 5203, Internal 

Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben 

Franklin Station, Washington, DC 

20044. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Concerning the proposed regulations, 

Stephanie Caden at (202) 317–4774; 

concerning submissions of comments or 

requests for a public hearing, the 

Publications and Regulations section by 

email at publichearings@irs.gov 

(preferred) or (202) 317–6901 (not tollfree numbers). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice of proposed rulemaking 

(REG–106595–22) that is subject to this 

correction contains proposed 

regulations issued under the authority 

granted to the Secretary of the Treasury 

or her delegate (Secretary) by sections 

274(p) and 132(o) of the Internal 

Revenue Code (Code) that would amend 

the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR 

part 1) under sections 274(i) and 132(d) 

related to qualified nonpersonal use 

vehicles. 

Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, FR Doc. 2024–28040 

(REG–106595–22), appearing on page 

95727 in the Federal Register on 

Tuesday, December 3, 2024, is corrected 

on page 95727, in the second column, 

under the caption FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT, the second line is 

corrected to read ‘‘Stephanie Caden at 

(202) 317–4774;’’. 

Aron L. Cosby, 

Federal Register Liaison, Publications and 

Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 

Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure 

and Administration). 

[FR Doc. 2024–30280 Filed 12–20–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

32 CFR Part 310 

[Docket ID: DoD–2024–OS–0135] 

RIN 0790–AL55 

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of 

Defense (OSD), Department of Defense 

(DoD). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense 

(Department or DoD) is giving 

concurrent notice of a new Departmentwide system of records pursuant to the 

Privacy Act of 1974 for the DoD–0023, 

‘‘Military Corrections and Parole Board 

Records’’ system of records and this 

proposed rulemaking. In this proposed 

rulemaking, the Department proposes to 

exempt portions of this system of 

records from certain provisions of the 

Privacy Act because of national security 

and law enforcement requirements. 

DATES: Send comments on or before 

February 21, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods. 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2024 / Proposed Rules 104469 

* Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

* Mail: Department of Defense, Office 

of the Assistant to the Secretary of 

Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and 

Transparency, Regulatory Directorate, 

4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox 

24, Suite 05F16, Alexandria, VA 22350– 

1700. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number or Regulation Identifier 

Number (RIN) for this Federal Register 

document. The general policy for 

comments and other submissions from 

members of the public is to make these 

submissions available for public 

viewing on the internet at https://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Rahwa Keleta, Defense Privacy and Civil 

Liberties Directorate, Office of the 

Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for 

Privacy, Civil Liberties, and 

Transparency, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

Mailbox #24, Suite 05F16, Alexandria, 

VA 22350–1700; OSD.DPCLTD@

mail.mil; (703) 571–0070. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 

1974, the DoD is establishing a new 

system of records titled, ‘‘Military 

Corrections and Parole Board Records,’’ 

DoD–0023. This system of records 

describes DoD’s collection, use, and 

maintenance of records covering 

military Service members confined for 

violation of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice. These records include 

information on prisoner’s confinement, 

health assessment, disciplinary actions 

while in confinement, observations by 

confinement staff and United States 

probation officers, and confinement 

utilization assessments such as basis for 

correctional treatment and education 

programs. The records also include 

information used for clemency and 

parole decisions conducted by the 

military Departments’ Clemency and 

Parole Boards. 

II. Privacy Act Exemption 

The Privacy Act allows Federal 

agencies to exempt eligible records in a 

system of records from certain 

provisions of the Act, including those 

that provide individuals with a right to 

request access to and amendment of 

their own records. If an agency intends 

to exempt a particular system of records, 

it must first undertake the rulemaking 

process to provide public notice and an 

opportunity to comment on the 

proposed exemption. This proposed 

rule explains why an exemption is being 

claimed for this system of records and 

invites public comment, which DoD 

will consider before the issuance of a 

final rule implementing the exemption. 

The DoD proposes to modify 32 CFR 

part 310 to add a new Privacy Act 

exemption rule for the DoD–0023, 

‘‘Military Corrections and Parole Board 

Records’’ system of records. The DoD 

proposes this exemption because some 

of its records may contain classified 

national security information and 

disclosure of those records to an 

individual may cause damage to 

national security. The Privacy Act, 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), 

authorizes agencies to claim an 

exemption for systems of records that 

contain information properly classified 

pursuant to executive order. The DoD is 

proposing to claim an exemption from 

the access and amendment requirements 

and certain disclosure accounting 

requirements of the Privacy Act, 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), to 

prevent disclosure of any information 

properly classified pursuant to 

executive order, as implemented by DoD 

Instruction 5200.01 and DoD Manual 

5200.01, Volumes 1 and 3. 

The DoD also proposes to exempt this 

system of records because these records 

support the conduct of criminal law 

enforcement activities, and certain 

requirements of the Privacy Act may 

interfere with the effective execution of 

these activities, and undermine, good 

order and discipline. The Privacy Act, 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), 

authorizes agencies with a principal law 

enforcement function pertaining to the 

enforcement of criminal laws (including 

activities of prosecutors, courts, etc.) to 

claim an exemption for systems of 

records that contain information 

identifying criminal offenders and 

alleged offenders, information compiled 

for the purpose of criminal 

investigation, or reports compiled 

during criminal law enforcement 

proceedings. Additionally, the Privacy 

Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), 

authorizes agencies to compile 

investigatory material for law 

enforcement purposes, other than 

materials within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 

552a(j)(2). The DoD is proposing to 

claim exemptions from several 

provisions of the Privacy Act, including 

various access, amendment, disclosure 

accounting, and notice requirements, 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 

552a(k)(2), to prevent the harms 

articulated in this rulemaking from 

occurring. 

If implemented, this rulemaking will 

deny an individual access under the 

Privacy Act to only those portions of 

records for which one or more claimed 

exemptions apply. In addition, records 

in this system of records are only 

exempt from the Privacy Act to the 

extent the purposes underlying the 

exemption pertain to the record. 

A notice of a new system of records 

for DoD–0023, ‘‘Military Corrections 

and Parole Board Records,’’ is published 

elsewhere in this issue of the Federal 

Register. 

Regulatory Analysis 

Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review,’’ as Amended by 

Executive Order 14094, ‘‘Modernizing 

Regulatory Review,’’ and Executive 

Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation 

and Regulatory Review.’’ 

Executive Orders 12866 (as amended 

by Executive Order 14094) and 13563 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distribute impacts, and equity). 

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the 

importance of quantifying both costs 

and benefits, of reducing costs, of 

harmonizing rules, and of promoting 

flexibility. It has been determined that 

this rulemaking is not a significant 

regulatory action. 

Section 202, Public Law 104–4, 

‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ 

Section 202(a) of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 

(2 U.S.C. 1532(a)) requires agencies to 

assess anticipated costs and benefits 

before issuing any rule whose mandates 

may result in the expenditure by State, 

local and Tribal governments in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector, in 

any one year of $100 million in 1995 

dollars, updated annually for inflation. 

This rulemaking will not mandate any 

requirements for State, local, or Tribal 

governments, nor will it affect private 

sector costs. 

Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory 

Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) 

The Assistant to the Secretary of 

Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and 

Transparency has certified that this 

rulemaking is not subject to the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.) because it would not, if 

promulgated, have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. This 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS
104470 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2024 / Proposed Rules 

rulemaking is concerned only with the 

administration of Privacy Act systems of 

records within the DoD. Therefore, the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, 

does not require DoD to prepare a 

regulatory flexibility analysis. 

Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork 

Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) 

The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) was enacted to 

minimize the paperwork burden for 

individuals; small businesses; 

educational and nonprofit institutions; 

Federal contractors; State, local and 

Tribal governments; and other persons 

resulting from the collection of 

information by or for the Federal 

Government. The Act requires agencies 

obtain approval from the Office of 

Management and Budget before using 

identical questions to collect 

information from ten or more persons. 

This rulemaking does not impose 

reporting or recordkeeping requirements 

on the public. 

Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ 

Executive Order 13132 establishes 

certain requirements that an agency 

must meet when it promulgates a 

proposed rule (and subsequent final 

rule) that has federalism implications, 

imposes substantial direct compliance 

costs on State and local governments, 

and is not required by statute, or has 

federalism implications and preempts 

State law. This rulemaking will not have 

a substantial effect on State and local 

governments. 

Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments’’ 

Executive Order 13175 establishes 

certain requirements that an agency 

must meet when it promulgates a 

proposed rule (and subsequent final 

rule) that imposes substantial direct 

compliance costs on one or more Indian 

tribes, preempts Tribal law, or affects 

the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. This 

rulemaking will not have a substantial 

effect on Indian Tribal governments. 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310 

Privacy. 

Accordingly, the Department of 

Defense proposes to amend 32 CFR part 

310 as follows: 

PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY 

AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT 

OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER 

THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 310 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a. 

■ 2. Amend § 310.13 by: 

■ a. Adding reserved paragraphs (e)(15) 

and (16). 

■ b. Adding paragraph (e)(17). 

The additions read as follows: 

§ 310.13 Exemptions for DoD-wide 

systems. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

(15)–(16) [Reserved] 

(17) System identifier and name. 

DoD–0023, ‘‘Military Correction and 

Parole Board Records’’. 

(i) Exemptions. When applying 

exemption (j)(2), this system of records 

is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and 

(4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), 

(4)(G), (4)(H), and 4(I), (5), and (8); (f); 

and (g). When applying exemption (k)(1) 

and (k)(2), this system of records is 

exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d)(1), 

(2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), 

(4)(H), (4)(I), and (5), and (f). 

(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), 

(k)(1), and (k)(2). 

(iii) Exemption from the particular 

subsections. Exemption from the 

particular subsections is justified for the 

following reasons: 

(A) Subsection (c)(3),(d)(1), and 

(d)(2)—(1) Exemption (j)(2). Records in 

this system of records may contain 

investigatory material compiled for 

criminal law enforcement purposes to 

include information identifying 

criminal offenders and alleged 

offenders, information compiled for the 

purpose of criminal investigation, or 

reports compiled during criminal law 

enforcement proceedings. Application 

of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary as 

access to, amendment of, or release of 

the accounting of disclosures of such 

records could: Inform the record subject 

of an investigation of the existence, 

nature, or scope of an actual or potential 

law enforcement or disciplinary 

investigation, and thereby seriously 

impede law enforcement, prosecutorial, 

or disciplinary efforts by permitting the 

record subject and other persons to 

whom he might disclose the records to 

avoid criminal penalties, or disciplinary 

measures; reveal confidential sources 

who might not have otherwise come 

forward to assist in an investigation and 

thereby hinder DoD’s ability to obtain 

information from future confidential 

sources and result in an unwarranted 

invasion of the privacy of others. 

(2) Exemption (k)(1). Records in this 

system of records may contain 

information concerning DoD personnel 

or disciplinary activities that is properly 

classified pursuant to executive order. 

Application of exemption (k)(1) for such 

records may be necessary because 

access to and amendment of the records, 

or release of the accounting of 

disclosures for such records could 

reveal classified information. Disclosure 

of classified records to an individual 

may cause damage to national security. 

(3) Exemption (k)(2). Records in this 

system of records may contain 

investigatory material compiled for law 

enforcement purposes other than 

material within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 

552a(j)(2). Application of exemption 

(k)(2) for such records may be necessary 

because access to, amendment of, or 

release of the accounting of disclosures 

of such records could: inform the record 

subject of an investigation of the 

existence, nature, or scope of an actual 

or potential law enforcement or 

disciplinary investigation, and thereby 

seriously impede law enforcement, 

disciplinary, or prosecutorial efforts by 

permitting the record subject and other 

persons to whom he might disclose the 

records or the accounting of records to 

avoid criminal penalties, civil remedies, 

or disciplinary measures; interfere with 

a civil or administrative action or 

investigation which may impede those 

actions or investigations; reveal 

confidential sources who might not 

have otherwise come forward to assist 

in an investigation and thereby hinder 

DoD’s ability to obtain information from 

future confidential sources; and result 

in an unwarranted invasion of the 

privacy of others. 

(B) Subsection (c)(4), (d)(3) and (4). 

These subsections are inapplicable to 

the extent that an exemption is being 

claimed from subsections (d)(1) and (2). 

(C) Subsection (e)(1). In the collection 

of information for investigatory or law 

enforcement purposes, it is not always 

possible to conclusively determine the 

relevance and necessity of particular 

information in the early stages of the 

investigation or adjudication. In some 

instances, it will be only after the 

collected information is evaluated in 

light of other information that its 

relevance and necessity for effective 

investigation and adjudication can be 

assessed. Collection of such information 

permits more informed decision-making 

by the Department when making 

required disciplinary and prosecutorial 

determinations. Additionally, records 

within this system may be properly 

classified pursuant to executive order. 

Accordingly, application of exemptions 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2024 / Proposed Rules 104471 

(j)(2), (k)(1), and (k)(2) may be 

necessary. 

(D) Subsection (e)(2). To collect 

information from the subject individual 

could serve notice that he or she is the 

subject of a criminal investigation and 

thereby present a serious impediment to 

such investigations. Collection of 

information only from the individual 

accused of criminal activity or 

misconduct could also subvert 

discovery of relevant evidence and 

subvert the course of justice. 

Accordingly, application of exemption 

(j)(2) may be necessary. 

(E) Subsection (e)(3). To inform 

individuals as required by subsection 

(e)(3) could reveal the existence of a 

criminal investigation and compromise 

investigative efforts. Accordingly, 

application of exemption (j)(2) may be 

necessary. 

(F) Subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H). 

These subsections are inapplicable to 

the extent an exemption is claimed from 

subsections (d)(1) and (2). 

(G) Subsection (e)(4)(I). To the extent 

that this provision is construed to 

require more detailed disclosure than 

the broad, generic information currently 

published in the system notice, an 

exemption from this provision is 

necessary to protect the confidentiality 

of sources of information and to protect 

privacy and physical safety of witnesses 

and informants. 

(H) Subsection (e)(5). It is often 

impossible to determine in advance if 

investigatory records contained in this 

system are accurate, relevant, timely 

and complete, but, in the interests of 

effective law enforcement, it is 

necessary to retain this information to 

aid in establishing patterns of activity 

and provide investigative leads. With 

the passage of time, seemingly irrelevant 

or untimely information may acquire 

new significance as further investigation 

brings new details to light and the 

accuracy of such information can only 

be determined through judicial 

processes. Accordingly, application of 

exemption (j)(2) may be necessary. 

(I) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice 

could give persons sufficient warning to 

evade investigative efforts. Accordingly, 

application of exemption (j)(2) may be 

necessary. 

(J) Subsection (f). The agency’s rules 

are inapplicable to those portions of the 

system that are exempt. Accordingly, 

application of exemptions (j)(2), (k)(1), 

and (k)(2) may be necessary. 

(K) Subsection (g). This subsection is 

inapplicable to the extent that the 

system is exempt from other specific 

subsections of the Privacy Act. 

Accordingly, application of exemption 

(j)(2) may be necessary. 

(iv) Exempt records from other 

systems. In the course of carrying out 

the overall purpose for this system, 

exempt records from other systems of 

records may in turn become part of the 

records maintained in this system. To 

the extent that copies of exempt records 

from those other systems of records are 

maintained in this system, the DoD 

claims the same exemptions for the 

records from those other systems that 

are entered into this system, as claimed 

for the prior system(s) of which they are 

a part, provided the reason for the 

exemption remains valid and necessary. 

Dated: December 11, 2024. 

Aaron T. Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29639 Filed 12–20–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 51 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0262; FRL–12160–01– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AW41 

Regional Haze Third Implementation 

Period; Extension of the State 

Implementation Plan Due Date 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing revisions to 

the Regional Haze Rule under the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) to change the due date 

for the next round of State 

Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the 

third implementation period. Under the 

Regional Haze Rule, States must submit 

plans to protect visibility in mandatory 

Class I Federal areas (Class I areas) to 

continue reasonable progress towards 

natural visibility. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 6, 2025. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2023–0262, by any of the 

following methods: via the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal, http://

www.regulations.gov (our preferred 

method). Follow the online instructions 

for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the Docket ID No. for this 

rulemaking. Comments received may be 

posted without change to https://

www.regulations.gov, including 

personal information provided. For 

detailed instructions on sending 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Paige Wantlin, Air Quality Policy 

Division, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards (Mailcode C539–01), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 109 

TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 

(919) 541–5760; email address: 

Wantlin.Paige@epa.gov or Mr. Brian 

Timin, Air Quality Policy Division, 

Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards (Mailcode C539–01), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 109 

TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 

(919) 541–1850; email address: 

Timin.Brian@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Public Participation 

Written Comments 

Submit your comments, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023– 

0262, at https://www.regulations.gov 

(our preferred method), or the other 

methods identified in the ADDRESSES

section. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from the 

docket. The EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit to the EPA’s docket at 

https://www.regulations.gov any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI), 

Proprietary Business Information (PBI), 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). Please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets for additional 

submission methods; the full the EPA 

public comment policy; information 

about CBI, PBI, or multimedia 

submissions; and general guidance on 

making effective comments. 

II. General Information 

A. Preamble Glossary of Terms and 

Acronyms 

The following are abbreviations of 

terms used in this document. 

CAA Clean Air Act 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS