alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE EX REL. Jermaine RUMLEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1959

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Frank Connor, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PPLUS Trust Series HTZ-1;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor
and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


     Date: March 30, 2004                   /s/Michael Frank Connor
                                            -----------------------
                                            Michael Frank Connor
                                            President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Endeavor

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(6)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - (-)mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south dakota(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

publication        December 8, 2015        What role do hurricanes play in sediment delivery to subsiding river deltas?
Christine M. LUIZZA & Nicholas Luizza, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1006 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-756, K2025-755.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30122 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 103897-103898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30182]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to

[[Page 103898]]

the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification 
Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1049 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-806, K2025-805.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30182 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Tollyn J. TWITCHELL and Robina M. Twitchell, Co-Trustees of the Tollyn J. Twitchell Living Trust under Agreement Dated November 3, 2010, Tollyn J. Twitchell, Individually, Terry G. Twitchell and Lea Koester, Personal Representative of the Estate of Sylvia T. Hutchins, Appellants, v. Whitney L. SCOTT, Successor Trustee of the Sylva T. Hutchins Revocable Trust, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3447

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6922** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GEORGE MARTIN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg
. Irene M. Keeley , District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00021

- IMK

- MJA

- 1; 1:13

- cv - 00149

- IMK

MJA )

Submitted : November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, M OTZ and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. George Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: George Martin seeks to appeal t he district court’s order s (1) accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on most of the claims raised in Martin’s 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion ; and (2) denying relief on one specific aspect of Martin’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim on which the court held an evidentiary hearing . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate o f appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on pro cedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny3 a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materia ls before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Thomas Eugene MYERS, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 11, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Shawna R. Moyers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSBof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Jack B. Buchold,Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)           suchAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Companyfor the year ended December 31,2004 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of The BankHoldings.

 
| Dated March 28,  2005        |
|----------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jack B. Buchold                    |   |
| Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Jazz Pharmaceuticals public limited company; and |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | April 22, 2016 |   | By: |   | /s/     Bruce C. Cozadd |
|   |   |   |   |   | Bruce C. CozaddChairman and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 13.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of MAG Silver Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank R. Hallam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





­­­­/s/ Frank R. Hallam



Name: Frank R. Hallam

Title: Chief Financial Officer

June 28, 2006





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Willie J. MILLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1977

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

Willie J. Milling, East Palatka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 3 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2013. 

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the United States that a 

quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is ready 

to receive any communication that he may be pleased to 

make. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Kenexa Corporation. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,Nooruddin  S. Karsan,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andDonald F. Volk,  Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to theirrespective knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| * * | *By:*  | */s/  Nooruddin S. Karsan* |   |   |
|----------|--------|----------------------------|--------|--------|
|     |   | *Nooruddin  S. Karsan*     |   |
|     |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |   |
|     |   | *May 12,  2006*            |   |
|     |   | * *                   |   |
|     | *By:*  | */s/  Donald F. Volk*      |   |   |
|     |   | *Donald  F. Volk*          |   |
|     |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |   |
|     |   | *May 12,  2006*            |   |
|          |        |                            |        |        |  |

 

 

This certification is madesolely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KenexaCorporation and will be retained by Kenexa Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Deniven Dupree Bell v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 0 0 52 6

- CR

Trial court case number: A

- 1 6

- 0 822

- SB

Trial court: 51st District Court of Tom Green County

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a brief concluding that the above

referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct.

1396, 1400 (1967). Although he requests to be allowed to withdraw in his brief, c ounsel

has not filed a motion t o withdraw from representation. An Anders brief must

accompany a motion to withdraw ; neither the brief nor the motion may be filed on its

own. See id. ; In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406

– 08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

Accordingly, we direct appellant’s appointed counsel, J oseph P. Johnson , to file

with the Clerk of this Court within 1 4 days of the date of this order a motion to withdraw

that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and 9. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 6.5, 9; Schulman , 252 S.W.3d at 410, 412.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: November 21 , 2017
Exhibit 31.01
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing owner ofCampbell Alternative Asset Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
E 2

 

 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.