alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7656

CHRISTOPHER STEPHON WASHINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01570-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Stephon Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney 

General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Stephon Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Washington’s motion for transcripts at 

government expense, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. Res. 393 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 29, 2013. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr. 

Pocan. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(6)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - texas(3)
              - (-)utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - 2020(1)

staff profileDavid J Topping, Ph.D.
STATE of Louisiana v. Randy FINCH

NO. 2017-KP-1898

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

*597Denied. Untimely. See La.S.Ct.R. X, § 5.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jorge LOPEZ BENAVIDES

NO. 2018-KK-1665

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Deondrick CLARK

NO. 2017-CK-1588

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(3)
              - (-)products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - (-)georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        January 1, 1983        Studies related to the Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake of 1886 — Tectonics and seismicity

publication        August 1, 1994        Some observations of landslides triggered by the 29 April 1991 Racha earthquake, Republic of Georgia

publication        May 1, 2016        Summary of the GK15 ground‐motion prediction equation for horizontal PGA and 5% damped PSA from shallow crustal continental earthquakes
Teresa BOTTEN-EDWARDS and Roddney Botten-Edwards, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

George A. Vaka and Richard N. Asfar of Vaka Law Group, P.L., Tampa; and Ronald M. Simon and Amanda D. Suriel of Simon Trial Firm, Miami, for Appellants.

Karen M. Shimonsky and Thomas A. Valdez of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") of COL
China Online International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, Chi Keung Wong, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  May 14, 2009                     /s/ Chi Keung Wong
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Chi Keung Wong, Chief Executive Officer
                                         and Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J.
Leonard Ivins, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Oncolin Therapeutics,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such  Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Oncolin Therapeutics, Inc.





Date:  May
4, 2010





By:
                /s/ J. Leonard IvinsJ.
      Leonard IvinsChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.4


August
10, 2007





Mr. Rob
Howe, President and CEO


eTelcharge.com


1636 N.
Hampton Road, Suite 270


DeSoto,
Texas 75115-8621





Dear
Rob,





It has
been a pleasure to visit eTelcharge.com for the last two days. The concept is
exciting and the people are wonderful.  I would welcome the
opportunity to work with you in taking this concept to the next
step.





I
understand that your needs in the way of a financial consultant (for now) is
approximately 3 days a month on-site with some work from home and "on-call"
privileges as needed.  We can define this more as we have more time
together.





Based on
these needs, I propose the following.  eTelcharge.com will pay $10,000
plus 1,200,000 stock options to retain my services.  In addition to a
retainage fee, this amount also compensates me for the time I spent doing due
diligence as well as extra time that may be required during September to get up
and running.  This is due and payable immediately.  If
eTelcharge.com terminates this relationship, none of this amount will be
repaid.  If I terminate the relationship for any reason during the
first 8 months, the following will be repaid from this.




During
      Month One
              $8,000During
      Month Two
              6,000During
      Month Three
              5,000During
      Month Four
              4,000During
      Month Five
              3,000During
      Month Six
              2,000During
      Month
              1,000
  After
retention, $3,500 per month (beginning in September) plus 100,000 stock options
per month (up to a maximum of 1,200,000 stock options).  This is
payable on the 15th of the
month, or the Friday before the 15th of the
month, if the 15th is on a
weekend.  Stock options can be issued semi-annually.





If this
is acceptable to eTelcharge.com, please sign and return one copy to
me.  Thanks so much and I am really looking forward to continuing this
adventure with you.


/s/
      Rob Howe
              
              
              /s/
      Robyn Gatch-PriestRob
      Howe
              
              
              Robyn
      Gatch-PriestChairman
      and CEO
              
              
              Financial
      Consultant
Fourth Amendment to Citrix Systems, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
 CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC. 
 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS,
Citrix Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) desires to amend the Citrix Systems, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and in effect, the “Plan”) to limit the term of any options or stock appreciation rights issued under the Plan
and granted after the effective date of this amendment to no more than ten (10) years (the “Plan Amendment”); and 
 WHEREAS,
on April 22, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Plan Amendment. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 15 of the Plan,
the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 7.2(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof: 

  

					
		  	 “Option Period. No Option may be exercised on or after the tenth anniversary of the Grant Date,
 or, with respect to Incentive Options, on or after the fifth anniversary of the Grant Date
 if the Optionee is a Ten Percent Owner.”
	  	

  

	2.	Section 7.3(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof: 

  

					
		  	“Other Terms. Except as the Committee may deem inappropriate or inapplicable in the circumstances, Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to terms and conditions substantially
similar to those applicable to a Nonstatutory Option. In addition, a SAR related to an Option which can only be exercised during limited periods following an Acquisition may entitle the Participant to receive an amount based upon the highest price
paid or offered for Stock in any transaction relating to the Acquisition or paid during the thirty (30) day period immediately preceding the occurrence of the Acquisition in any transaction reported in the stock market in which the Stock is
normally traded. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised on or after the tenth anniversary of the Grant Date.”	  	

  

	3.	Except herein above provided, the Plan is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-10338 Conference Calendar

__________________ JIMMY LEE HICKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KALMANOV, Doctor, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:96-CV-50-X
- - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jimmy Lee Hickson, #500542, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action without prejudice for failure to pay his prior monetary sanctions and failure to move for leave to file his complaint. Hickson argues that the district court erred in precluding him from filing his complaint without conducting an inquiry to determine whether he is able to make payment. We have reviewed the record and Hickson's brief and conclude that thereNo. 96-10338 -2- is no error. See Hickson v. Kalmanov , No. 7:96-CV-50-X (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 1996). The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Hickson that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Hickson is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32(b)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Form 10-QSB of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc. for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, Richard I. Linhart, Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of James
Monroe Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

     (1) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
         of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
         31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of James Monroe Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Richard I. Linhart
----------------------
Richard I. Linhart
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Keryx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Ira Weinstein, Interim Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      a.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      b.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                    /s/ Ira Weinstein
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: May 15, 2003                 Ira Weinstein
                                    Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

## By Location

              - district of columbia(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(3)
              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - 2021(2)
              - 2020(1)
              - (-)2019(2)

partnerColumbia Corridor Drainage Districts, OR

partnerDistrict of Columbia (DC) - Department of Energy & Environment
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 553 

Recognizing Linemen, the profession of Linemen, and the contributions of 

these brave men and women to protect public safety, and expressing 

support of designation of April 18, 2014, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2014 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Linemen, the profession of Linemen, and the 

contributions of these brave men and women to protect 

public safety, and expressing support of designation of 

April 18, 2014, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

Whereas the profession of Lineman is steeped in personal, 

family, and professional tradition; 

Whereas Linemen are often first responders during storms 

and other catastrophic events where these brave men and 

women work to make the scene safe for the other public 

safety heroes; 

Whereas Linemen work with thousands of volts of electricity 

high atop power lines 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, 

to keep electricity flowing; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 553 IH 

Whereas Linemen must often work under dangerous conditions far from their families to construct and maintain 

the Nation’s energy infrastructure; 

Whereas Linemen put their lives on the line every day with 

little recognition or appreciation from the community regarding the danger of their work; and 

Whereas April 18, 2014, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as National Lineman’s Appreciation Day: Now 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts of Linemen in keeping 

3 the power on and protecting public safety; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of National Line5 man Appreciation Day. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Floods

Filters

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(5)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(3)
              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - (-)2019(1)

partnerFlood Control District of Maricopa County
H. Res. 451 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 7, 2014. 

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate 

that a quorum of the House is present and that the House 

is ready to proceed with business. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
----

EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, Michael Lee, chief executive officer of AlphaRx, Inc. certify that: 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of AlphaRx, Inc.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.     I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave: 

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c)    presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the EvaluationDate; 

5.     We havedisclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

a)     allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b)     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

6.    I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changesin internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses. 

Date: February 12, 2007 

/s/ Michael Lee 

Michael Lee, Chief Executive Officer 

----