T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T
DO R A A L I C I A H E RNA ND E Z ; NE S T OR AN I BAL ORE LL AN A H ERNA ND EZ , P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 06- 74438 07- 70401 A ge nc yN os . A 073- 970- 693

A 073- 970- 694
ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . In these consol i dat ed pet i t i on s, D ora A l i ci a H ernand ez and N es t or A ni bal O re l l ana H ernand ez , m other and son and nat i ves and ci t i ze ns of E l S al vado r, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) orders d is m is s in g th e irap p e a l f r o m a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s o r d e rd e n y in g th e ir 

# FI LED JU N 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 70401 2 appl i cat i on s f

or cancel l at i on of re m ov al , as w el l as the B IA ’ s s ub se qu entorder d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew d e n o v o cl ai m s o f co n st i tu t i o n al v i o l at i o n s i n i m m i g rat i o n p ro ceed i n g s. Ra m v . I NS , 2 4 3 F .3 d5 1 0 , 5 1 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) . I n N o . 0 6
- 7 4 4 3 8 , w e d is m is s in partand de nyi n pa rtthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w . I n N o. 07- 70401, w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. N e s t orH e rnande z w a i ve d a nyc ha l l e nge t o the a ge nc y ’ s c onc l us i on tha the is in e lig ib le f

o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s notr a i s e d and ar gue d i n apa rty ’ s ope ni ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). D o r aH e rn an d e z ’ s e q u a l p r o t e c t i o n c l a i m i s u n a v a i l i n g , b e c au s e th e U . S.
c itiz e n c h ildo f

ap e r s o n u n law f

u llyp r e s e n t in th e U n ite dS ta te s is n o t s im ilar ly
s itu a te dto th e U .S . c itiz e n c h ildo f ap e r s o n law f

u llyp r e s e n t in th e U n ite dS ta te s . Se e D i l l i n gh a m v . I

NS , 267 F . 3d 996, 1007 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( “ I n or de rt o s uc c e e d on hi s [ e qua l pr ot e c t i on] c ha l l e nge , the pe t i t i one rm us te s t abl i s h tha thi s tr e a tm e nt d i fferedfro m th ato f si m i l arl y si tu at edp erso n s. ”). D o ra H ern an d ez’ s du e p ro cess c la im s d o n o t r a is e ac o lo r ab le c o n s titu tio n a l c la im . See M art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 424 F . 3d 926, 930 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( “ tr a di t i ona l abus e of di s c r e t i on07- 70401 3 c h a lle n g e s r e c a s t a s a lle g e ddu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s d o n o t c o n s titu te c o lo r ab le const i tut i on alcl ai m s thatw ou l d i nv ok e our j uri sdi ct i on . ”) P e t i t i one r s f

a i l t o a ddr e s s , and the r e f or e ha ve w a i ve d anyc ha l l e nge t o, the B I A ’s J a n u ary5 , 2 0 0 7 , d e c is io n d e n y in g r e o p e n in g . Se e M ar t i nez - Se rrano , 94 F . 3d a t1259- 60. P e t i t i one r s ’ m ot i on t o r e m and i s de ni e d. In N o. 06 -744 38 : P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art. I n No . 0 7 - 7 0 4 0 1 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.