alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 452 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 452

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 7, 2014.
    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of daily meeting of the 
House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative 
business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 
Thursdays; and 9 a.m., on all other days of the week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1571

ROSETTA RUSHING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Virginia School for

the Deaf and Blind; DON SMITH, Principal,

Virginia School for the Deaf and Blind,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-95-168-4)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosetta Rushing, Appellant Pro Se. James Stuart Gilmore, III,

Attorney General, Ronald Nicholas Regnery, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

In this employment discrimination action, Appellant appeals

from the district court's orders granting Defendants' motion to

dismiss certain of her claims and granting summary judgment as to

the remainder. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Rushing v. Virginia, No. CA95-168-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 28 & July 5, 1996). In addition, because

Appellant has already paid the filing fee, we deny her motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Andre Deshawn APPLEWHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

Andre Deshawn Applewhite, Blountstown, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Syntax-Brillian Corporation (the “Company”) forthe year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Wayne A. Pratt, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, andTreasurer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                       /s/ wayne a. pratt   Wayne A. Pratt   *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,and Treasurer*   September 13, 2006
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

June 1, 2012

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2010-1341

NEIL MINTZ and JIF-PAK MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

AND

MARCUS MINTZ, Plaintiff,

v.

DIETZ & WATSON, INC. and PACKAGE CONCEPTS & MATERIALS, INC., Defendants-Appellees,

Decided: May 30, 2012

Precedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following changes:

Page 10, line 7, change “V.” to – “v.” –.

Page 13, line 17, change “ Lunda ” to – “ Lundia ” –.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT
REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported) March 13, 2006
 Origen Financial, Inc.
 
  DELAWARE
    
    000-50721
    
    20-0145649State of Incorporation
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 27777 Franklin Road, Suite 1700, Southfield, Michigan
    
    48034(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
  SIGNATURES
  Dated: March 13, 2006
    Origen Financial, Inc.By:
    /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.W. Anderson Geater, Jr., Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



ORIGEN FINANCIAL, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description
    
    Furnished Herewith99.1
    
    Text of Press Release, dated
March 13, 2006
    
    X
Tawaski Anthony ABRAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3077

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Amendment Mortgage and Security Agreement



 Exhibit 10(35) 
 AMENDMENT MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 30, 2006, 
 BETWEEN X-RITE, INCORPORATED AND
FIFTH THIRD BANK 
 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 2008 (COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-14800) 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 X-RITE, INCORPORATED 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	Original Face Amount	  	Grand Rapids, Michigan
	$13,500,000	  	Original Issuance Date
		  	June 30, 2006

 Reference is made to the $13,500,000 Promissory Note dated June 30, 2006 (as previously
amended, and as the same may be further amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Note”) issued by X-Rite, Incorporated, a Michigan corporation (the “Borrower”) to Fifth Third Bank, a Michigan banking
corporation (together with its successors and assigns, the ‘Lender”). 
 The Borrower and the Lender hereby agree as
follows: 
 AMENDMENT. 
 Upon
satisfaction of each of the conditions precedent set forth below, the Note shall be amended as follows: the “July 30, 2008” Maturity Date on the first line of the first page of the Note shall be and hereby is deleted and shall be
and hereby is replaced with the following date: “August 30, 2008”. 
 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT. 
 This Fifth Amendment shall become effective upon the satisfaction of the following conditions precedent: 
 1. The Borrower shall have paid the Lender all fees due and payable to it pursuant to the Fee Letter by and between the Borrower and the
Lender dated the date hereof. 
 2. The Borrower shall have paid all costs and expenses of, or incurred by, the Lender in
connection with the negotiation, preparation, execution and delivery of this Fifth Amendment. 
 MISCELLANEOUS. 
 Except as amended or waived hereby, all other terms and provisions of the Note shall remain unamended and unaffected hereby. All terms used but not
defined in this Fifth Amendment shall have the meanings given thereto in the Note. This Fifth Amendment shall be affixed to the Note and shall and hereby does become part thereof, and the Borrower shall record this Fifth Amendment in the register
regarding this Note maintained by the Borrower. 
  

 –1– 








 AMENDMENT MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 30, 2006, 
 BETWEEN X-RITE, INCORPORATED AND FIFTH THIRD BANK 
 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 2008 (COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-14800) 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, X-RITE, INCORPORATED has caused this Fifth Amendment to be executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer this 30th day of July, 2008. 
  

			
	X-RITE, INCORPORATED
		
	By	 	 /s/ David Rawden

		 	David Rawden
		 	Chief Financial Officer


  
  

							
	
	Accepted and Agreed to:
	
	FIFTH THIRD BANK
		
	By	 	 /s/ Scott R. DeMeester

		 	Scott R. DeMeester
		 	Vice President

  

 –2–
Adam MENKES, Appellant, v. DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Dennis McLaughlin,certify that:

 

1.                       I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ocean Resources, Inc.

 

2.                       Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

3.                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4.                       The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Actrules l3a-14 and 15d-16) for the registrant and have:

 

A)                  designed such disclosure controlsand procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

B)                    evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “evaluationdate”); and

C)                    presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the evaluation date.

 

5.                       The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

A)                  all significant deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and

B)                    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls.

 

----

 

6.                       The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: November 19, 2004

 
|  /s/  Dennis McLaughlin, III |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Dennis  McLaughlin, III           |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer          |   |

 

----
SHAW A/C & ELECTRICAL, LLC v. LIBERTY BANK & TRUST COMPANY

NO. 2018-CC-1101

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM

Granted. The district court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to exclude defendant's untimely opposition and in continuing the hearing on the motion for partial summary judgment. *See* La. Code Civ. P. art. 966(B)(2) ; *Newsome v. Homer Memorial Medical Center* , 10-0564 (La. 4/9/10), 32 So.3d 800 ; *Buggage v. Volks Constructors* , 06-0175 (La. 5/5/06), 928 So.2d 536.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court denying plaintiff's motion to exclude the opposition is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court which is directed to conduct a hearing on the motion for partial summary judgment without consideration of the untimely opposition.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny.

WEIMER, J., would deny.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29809]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 904 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-630, K2025-629.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29809 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersignedcertifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of RadView SoftwareLtd.
|                  |
|-----------------------|
| Date: August 14, 2006 |
|                  | /s/ YOCHAI HACOHEN |   |
|                  | Yochai Hacohen |
|                  | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |   |
|                  |   |
| Date: August 14, 2006 |
|                  | /s/ CHRISTOPHER DINEEN |   |
|                  | Christopher Dineen |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |
|                  |   |

 

The foregoing certification if being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not beingfiled under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 18, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133650 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

BOBBY GILLEYLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133650 

 COA: 272760 

Macomb CC: 06-000002-CK 

FARM BUREAU INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and R. KEITH 

GRAHAM,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the claims advanced by 

appellant are completely lacking in merit. Costs of $250 are assessed against the 

plaintiff-appellant in favor of the defendants-appellees under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing 

a vexatious appeal. 

l0711 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 18, 2007 

 Clerk
Bela DERY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shlomo Dery, Ddeceased, Appellant, v. BROWARD NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3453

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-105388) of NationsHealth, Inc.,  (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-119462) pertaining to the NationsHealth,Inc. 2004 Option Plan,  (3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126197) pertaining to the RGGPLS HoldingInc. Stock Bonus Plan & Trust, and  (4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No 333-126561) pertaining to the NationsHealth, Inc.2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan;of our report dated February 18, 2005, with respect to the 2004 consolidated financial statementsand schedule of NationsHealth, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006./s/ RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 07, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 07, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A2151. SONDIAL PROPERTIES LLC et al. v. ONSET FINANCIAL.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On August 17, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and 

a brief no later than August 26, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of 

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is 

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
exhibit4-33.htm


    EXHIBIT
4.3.3

    


    


    CERTIFICATE
OF SECRETARY

    


    I, JOHN M. LOWBER, the duly elected and acting
Secretary of General Communication, Inc., an Alaska corporation, do hereby
certify and declare that the resolution of the Board of Directors contained in
the minutes of its meeting attached hereto as Exhibit 4.3.3A is a true and
correct copy of that resolution as contained in those minutes duly adopted by
the Board of Directors of General Communication, Inc. at its meeting held on
April 25, 2008.

    


    Executed this 31st day of July 2008 at
Anchorage, Alaska.

    


    GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.

    


    


    By:___/s/_John M. Lowber_______

    John M. Lowber, Secretary

    


    


    


    [S E A
L]

    



    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    EXHIBIT
4.3.3A

    EXCERPT
FROM MINUTES OF ACTION BY THE

    BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.

    APRIL
25, 2008

    


    


    RESOLVED, that the board of
directors of General Communication, Inc. ("Company") authorizes increasing the
allocation of common stock to the Company's Qualified Employee Stock Purchase
Plan by 2,000,000 shares plus 800,000 shares to cover shares previously issued
through the plan as restricted shares, for a total of 2,800,000 shares of
Company Class A common stock ("Shares");

    


    RESOLVED FURTHER, that the
Board approves filing a registration statement pursuant to the federal
Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act") and, in particular, in the
format of Form S-8, where such registration statement will pertain specifically
to the registration of the offer of the Plan Stock and such Plan Stock will be
offered or acquired through the Plan; and

    


    RESOLVED FURTHER, that the
president and other officers of the Company are directed to take such steps as
are necessary to register the offer of the Plan Stock and otherwise to be in
compliance with the Securities Act and other securities laws.
STATE of Louisiana v. Tyrone K. DAVENPORT and Dale M. Elmore

NO. 2017-K-1950

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied.
Joseph SHERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 25, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K/A
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) December 7, 2005
 Delphi Corporation
  Delaware
    
    1-14787
    
    38-3430473(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 5725 Delphi Drive, Troy, MI
    
    48098(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (248) 813-2000
 
  see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATORY NOTEITEM 4.01 CHANGES IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANTITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITSSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXLetter from Deloitte & Touche LLP    Table of Contents  
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
  
 ITEM 4.01 CHANGES IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99 (a)
    
    Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 SIGNATURE
  DELPHI CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: December 19, 2005
    By:
    /s/ JOHN D. SHEEHAN(John D. Sheehan,Vice President and Chief Restructuring Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller)




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99 (a)
    
    Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MITCHELL CRAIG LITZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 3 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.