alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(14)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(49)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(25)

## By Location

              - (-)colorado(1)
              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Supporting material        October 10, 2018        Internship: Extending subduction zone earthquake hazard assessments...
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30054]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 89 FR 97617.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Thursday, December 
12, 2024 at 10 a.m., Hybrid Meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC (12th Floor) and Virtual.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following item was also discussed: 
Statement of Policy Regarding the Notification of Respondents in 
Matters Under Review Remanded from a Challenge Pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
3019(a)(8).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-30054 Filed 12-13-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```
Matthew COOPER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2623

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
A.P. B., The Father, Appellant, v. T.C.-M., The Mother, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(10)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

map        January 1, 1981        Seismicity map of the State of Minnesota
EXHIBIT 23.2
 
 CONSENT OF DAVID ROSS, P.Geo.
 
 I refer to the technical reports prepared by Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (formerly Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.) dated September 10,  2010 and February 1, 2012, November 16, 2012 (the “Technical Reports”) that are referenced in the Registrant’s Annual Information Form (“AIF”) of MAG Silver Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  I was responsible for preparing, authoring and certifying the Technical Reports.
 
 I hereby consent to reference to my name and to the use of the Technical Reports in the AIF filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/“David A. Ross”
 David Ross,P.Geo.
 March 27, 2013
Ramon J. DURAN, Appellant, v. Katia M. Alvarez DURAN, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1874

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

Harvey D. Rogers and Amanda D. Rogers, for appellant.

A. Antonio Tomas, for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Baron Duane HOGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #12-2003 Limited.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

                                        /s/ Freddie M. Kotek
                                        Freddie M. Kotek
                                        Chief Executive Officer of the
                                        Managing General Partner
NO. 07-00-0356 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A MAY 2, 2001

______________________________ PETROLEUM WHOLESALE, INC., APPELLANT V. SHABANA ENTERPRISES, INC. AND VARSHA HUSSAIN, APPELLEES

_________________________________ FROM THE133 RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY; NO. 97-44520; HON ORABLEPAT LYKOS, JUDG E

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

ON UN OPP OSE D MOTION TO A BA TE AP PEAL AND A LLOW T RIA L COURT T O FILE FINDI NGS OF FACT App el la nt Pet ro le um W ho le sa le , In c. re qu es ts th at we abate this appeal so that the tr ial court can file findings of fact to be presented in a supplem ental clerk’s record. According to the certi ficate o f conference contained in the m otion, appellees Shabana2

Enterprise s, Inc. and VarshaHussain do not oppose the motion. Appel lant fi led a requ est for findings of fact that prom pted appellees to file proposed findings of fact but appellant did not discover that the proposed f indin gs w erenot sign ed by th e trial cour t un til appellan t’s counsel reviewed the c lerk’s record. Acco rdingly, appellant did not fil e a notice of past due findings pursuant to R ule 297 of the Te xas Ru les of Civil Procedure. We grant the m otion, abate the appeal, and rem and the cause to thetrial court for further proceedi ngs. Upon reman d , the tr ial court shall cause notice of a hearing to be given and thereafter

conducta hearing and determ ine whether it is appropriate to m ake findings of fact. The trial court shall cause the heari ng to be transcri bed and shal l make such findings of fact, if any, as it deems appropriate, to be included in a supplemental cl erk’s record. We express no opinion as to the propriety or effect of filing findings of fact w here, as here, a notice of past due findings was not given pursuant to Rule 297. Finally, the trial court sha ll file the supplemental clerk’s record an d the supplem ental reporter’s record w ith the Clerk of this Court by F riday, June 15, 2001. Appell ant’s brief shall be filed within 30 days after the later ofthe fil ing of the supp lemental cler k’s record or suppl emental reporter’s record, and appellees’ brief shall be filed within 30 days after appellant’s brief is filed. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 00 7 . J AY GOREE v

. NAJ ARI AN CAPI TAL, LLC.

J ay Go ree fi l ed t h is ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal fro m an o rd er en t ered

b y t h e DeKal b Co u n t y M ag i s t rat e Co u rt i n t h is d i sp o ss es s o ry act io n

. “ Th e o n l y

av en ue o f ap p eal av ai l ab l e fro m [a] m ag i s t rat e co u rt ju d g m en t i s p ro v i d ed b y OCGA

§ 1 5 -1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), wh i ch al l o ws fo r a d e n ov o ap p eal t o t h e s t at e or su p eri o r co u rt .”

Ha n d l er v. Hu l

s ey , 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p. 7 5 1 (4 0 6 SE2 d 22 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ). In o t h er wo rd s , a p art y

ag g ri ev ed b y a m ag i s trat e co u rt ru li n g m u s t fi rs t s eek rev i ew in t h e s t at e o r s u p eri o r

co u rt

. Th e Geo rg i a Co n s t i tu t i o n req ui res t h at “ [a] n y co urt s h a l l t ran sfer t o t h e

ap p ro p ri at e co u rt i n t h e s t at e an y ci vi l cas e i n w h i ch it det erm i n es t h at ju ri sd i ct i o n o r

v en ue l i es el s ewh ere.” 1 9 83 Ga. Co n s t

., Art

. 6

, Sec. 1

, Para. 8 ; Bo s ma v. G u n t er , 2 5 8

Ga. 6 6 4 (3 7 3 SE2 d 3 6 8 ) (1 98 8 ). Acco rd i n gl y , t h is cas e i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED

t o DeKal b Co u n t y

St at e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/15/2015 September 15, 2015
Donald BUCKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3672

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 21, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jamie Spivey, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10999

Conference Calendar

ROSALINDA MIRANDA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GINNY VAN BUREN, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Carswell,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-421

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rosalinda Miranda, federal prisoner # 79975-079, appeals the

dismissal of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, which challenged her

1998 drug conspiracy conviction and sentence. She challenged her

conviction and sentence pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543

U.S. 220 (2005).

Because Miranda challenged errors that occurred at or before 

sentencing, her claim could not be asserted in a § 2241 petition. 

See Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 2000).
No. 05-10999

-2-

Moreover, her Booker claim may not proceed under the savings

clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Padilla v. United States, 416

F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the district

court’s dismissal of Miranda’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.
Renato R. REMAK, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3723

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2.8
                             As of February 8, 2006

Globis Overseas Fund, Ltd.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY  10004
Attn: Paul Packer

Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 4,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $100.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,



Rudy Wilson


Agreed to:
Globis Overseas Fund, Ltd.


By:
    ---------------
    Name:
    Title:
IN RE: Kristy E. GRIFFIN

NO. 2018-OB-1699

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") filed formal charges against respondent, alleging that she violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(f)(5), 3.2, and 8.1(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. In addition, the ODC is conducting an investigation into three new complaints against respondent which allege similar misconduct. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The ODC has concurred in respondent's petition.

Having considered the Petition for Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by Kristy E. Griffin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 28348, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of Kristy E. Griffin for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kristy E. Griffin shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which she is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which she is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134509 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134509 COA: 276637 Midland CC: 04-001938-FC IGNACIO JAMES VANHORN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curon Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alistair F. McLaren, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |    
|Date: August 2, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ ALISTAIR F. MCLAREN                              
|                     |  |     |  | Alistair F. McLaren                                  
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. EVEL I O G OM EZ - GO M EZ , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 10526 D. C . No . 4 : 0 8 - C R - 0 0 6 5 1 - C KJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona C i ndyK . J or ge ns on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E v e lio G o m e z - G o m e z ap p e a ls f r o m h is g u iltyp le ac o n v ic tio n a n d2 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rille g a l r e - e n trya f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), G om ez -G om ez ’ s c ou nsel h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e a r e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to



# FI LED MA Y27 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 10526 2 w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of

r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appe l l antw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Inyx,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jack Kachkar,  Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.







/s/ Jack Kachkar
-----------------------
Jack Kachkar
Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 383 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 383

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 22, 2013.
    Resolved, That the House has learned with profound sorrow of the death of 
the Honorable Thomas S. Foley, former Member of the House for 15 terms and 
Speaker of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred First, One Hundred 
Second and One Hundred Third Congresses.
    Resolved, That in the death of the Honorable Thomas S. Foley the United 
States and the State of Washington have lost a valued and eminent public servant 
and citizen.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```