alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Freemel T. BEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1638

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

Freemel T. Best, Live Oak, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

d1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

142663(26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142663 COA: 298070 Wayne CC: 06-005429 CLEVELAND ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s September 26, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Gold Entertainment Inc. (“PGE
      Inc.”) on Form 20-F for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
      Tuit, President and Chief Executive Officer of PGE Inc., certify, pursuant
      to
      s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of PGE Inc.








*/s/
      Mark Tuit*


Mark
      Tuit


Chief
      Executive Officer






November
      29, 2006














**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Gold Entertainment Inc. (“PGE
      Inc.”) on Form 20-F for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ron
      Loudoun, Chief Financial Officer of PGE Inc., certify, pursuant to s.906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of PGE Inc.






*/s/
      Ron Loudoun*


Ron
      Loudoun


Chief
      Financial Officer




November
      29, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - connect_locations(1)
              - (-)connect_social_media(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(3)
              - 2021(3)
              - (-)2020(3)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

social mediaUSGS Earthquakes

social mediaUSGS Tweet Earthquake Dispatch (TED)

social mediaUSGS ShakeAlert
H. Res. 370 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 2, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House any joint resolution 

specified in section 2 of this resolution. All points of order 

against consideration of each such joint resolution are waived. 

Each such joint resolution shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against provisions in each such joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on each such joint resolution and on any amendment 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) 30 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. The joint resolutions referred to in the first section of this resolution are as follows: 

(a) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 70) making continuing appropriations for National Park Service operations, 

the Smithsonian Institution, the National Gallery of Art, and 
2 

•HRES 370 EH 

the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for fiscal 

year 2014, and for other purposes. 

(b) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 71) making continuing appropriations of local funds of the District of Columbia for fiscal year 2014. 

(c) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making continuing appropriations for veterans benefits for fiscal year 

2014, and for other purposes. 

(d) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 73) making continuing appropriations for the National Institutes of Health 

for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes. 

SEC. 3. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3230) making 

continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to 

provide pay and allowances to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who perform inactive-duty training during such period. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) 30 minutes of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) 

one motion to recommit. 
3 

•HRES 370 EH 

SEC. 4. It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of October 6, 2013, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules as though under 

clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Ray LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3889

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Matthew P. Young, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Jazz Pharmaceuticals public limited company; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            |  |     |  |                                                                      
|--------------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:        April 25, 2017 |  | By: |  | /s/    Matthew P. Young                                              
|                            |  |     |  | Matthew P. Young
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Vernon CAREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1738

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 11, 2018

Vernon Carey, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Levine and Conner, JJ., concur.
Robert HANNEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1330

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Michael HARRIS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1733

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

*591Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.
Anthony SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, HARRIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 125 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 125

    Encouraging the Navy to commission the USS Somerset (LPD-25) in 
                      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2013

   Mr. Shuster (for himself, Mr. Rothfus, Ms. Schwartz, Mr. Brady of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania, 
 Mr. Barletta, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Marino, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. 
 Gerlach, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Dent, 
 and Mr. Perry) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Encouraging the Navy to commission the USS Somerset (LPD-25) in 
                      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Whereas the USS Somerset (LPD-25) is the ninth and newest amphibious transport 
        dock ship in the San Antonio class;
Whereas the USS Somerset honors the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 
        whose actions prevented terrorist hijackers from reaching their intended 
        target, forcing the aircraft to crash in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, 
        on September 11, 2001;
Whereas, in the words of former Secretary of the Navy Gordon England, ``The 
        courage and heroism of the people aboard the flight will never be 
        forgotten and USS Somerset will leave a legacy that will never be 
        forgotten by those wishing to do harm to this country.'';
Whereas the USS Somerset joins the USS New York (LPD-21) and the USS Arlington 
        (LPD-24) in remembering the heroes of September 11, 2001;
Whereas the USS Somerset was christened in July 2012 and will be commissioned 
        when it is put in active service;
Whereas the Navy has cleared Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as a potential site for 
        the commissioning ceremony of the USS Somerset; and
Whereas Philadelphia is one of the closest ports to Somerset County, and it 
        would be fitting that the commissioning ceremony be held there: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives encourages the Navy to 
commission the USS Somerset (LPD-25) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
                                 <all>
```
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 14, 2016 521489 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

DOMINGA MARRERO, 

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 23, 2016

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Dominga Marrero, New York City, appellant pro se. 

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary

Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed January 8, 2015, which dismissed claimant's appeal

from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

Decision affirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 521489 

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
**CTION
        906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO**
 
 **Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Inyx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Hamerski,
        Vice
        President and Chief Financial Officer of the small business issuer, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the small business
        issuer.
 
 
 
 /s/
        John Hamerski
 John
        Hamerski
 Vice
        President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 August
        19, 2005
 Date
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. (ACRT) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 12, 2008         

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ACRT, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACRT and will be
retained by ACRT and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



62
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(411)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5605)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1088)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(101)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(255)
              - connect_locations(3)
              - connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!

Reference Materials        August 20, 2021        Haiti Earthquake Translated Talking Points - Update August 18th 2021
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 20.3



March 31, 2004



Chase Manhattan Bank USA,                   Moody's Investors Services, Inc.
National Association                        ABS Monitoring Department
c/o JP Morgan Chase                         99 Church Street
Institutional Trust Services                New York, NY 10007
500 Stanton Christiana Road, OPS4,
3rd Floor
Newark, DE 19713

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas        Standard & Poor's Rating Services
Corporate Trust & Agency Services --        Asset Backed Surveillance Department
Structured Finance Services                 55 Water Street
60 Wall Street - 26th Floor                 New York, NY 10041
MS NYC60 - 2606
New York, NY 10005

Fitch Ratings
Attn:  Asset Backed Securities
Auto Group - 32nd Floor
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY  10004


Re: ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE FOR WFS FINANCIAL 2003-2 OWNER TRUST

Dear Sir or Madam:

                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") dated
as of May 1, 2003, and to Section 3.09 of the Indenture ("Indenture"), dated as
of the same date, the undersigned officers of WFS Financial Inc (the "Master
Servicer" and "Administrator") certify that:

       (i)    a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
              preceding fiscal year and of its performance under the Agreement
              has been made under such officers' supervision and to the best of
              such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the Master
              Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
              throughout such year and no default under the Agreement has
              occurred and is continuing; and


<PAGE>
Annual Statement as to Compliance for WFS Financial 2003-2 Owner Trust
March 31, 2004
Page 2



       (ii)   a review of the activities of the Issuer during the preceding
              fiscal year and of its performance under the Indenture has been
              made under such officers' supervision and to the best of such
              officers' knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
              with all conditions and covenants under the Indenture throughout
              such year.

/s/ Mark Olson                               /s/ J. Keith Palmer
--------------------------------             -----------------------------------
Mark Olson                                   J. Keith Palmer
Senior Vice President and Controller         Senior Vice President & Treasurer


cc:  A. Katz, Esq.
Martha FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1178

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Pomeranz & Associates, P.A. and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellant.

Kass Shuler and Richard S. McIver and Robert L. McDonald, Jr. (Tampa), for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
A.G., the Father, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2448

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Rory DIMES

No. 2018-KH-1404

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 14, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Reconsideration granted; writ granted. The application is transferred to the court of appeal to consider as a timely filed application for supervisory writs concerning the district court's April 15, 2018 denial of his application for post-conviction relief. *See**State ex rel. Johnson v. Maggio* , 440 So.2d 1336, 1337 (La. 1983).