alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ALEXIS CAMPBELL

, *

* No. 1 1

- 343 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: March 27, 2013

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award in the

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * amount to which respondent has not

* objected

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

Lawrence R. Cohan , Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner;

Alexis B. Babcock , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Petitioner, Alexis Campbell

, filed a stipulation of f act concerning final attorneys’ fees

and costs in the above

- captioned matter on March 26 , 2013 . Previously, Ms. Campbell

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent for review.

Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections to certain items. Based on

subsequent discussions, petitioner amended her application to request $ 30,000 .00, an amount to

which respondent does not object

. The Court awards this amoun t

.

Ms. Campbell filed for compensation alleging that she was injured by the hepatitis A

vaccine she received on July 10, 2008

. Ms. Campbell received compensation based upon the

parties’ stipulation. Decision , filed January 22, 2013 . Because Ms. Camp bell received

compensation, she is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

Ms. Campbell seeks a total of $ 30,0 00.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for her counsel.

Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, Ms. Campbell represents that she

incurred no out

- of

- pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. Respondent has no

objection to th e amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs.

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

After rev iewing the request, the court awards a check made payable to petitioner and

petitioner’s attorney in the amount of $ 30,0 00.00 for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs.

The court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matt er.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each pa rty filing

a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
S.A., Mother of A.A. and Z.A., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 18, 2018

Jennifer Barbookles, Tampa, for Appellant.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Tallahassee, for the Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.

Ward L. Metzger, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.24
                             As of February 8, 2006

Craig Samuels
4808 Moorland Lane
Suite 109
Bethesda, MD  20814


Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 10,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $250.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,



Rudy Wilson


Agreed to:
Craig Samuels


---------------
[J

- 40

- 2020]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PE TITION OF

ANTON ANDREW FOR THE

DEMOCRATIC NOMINATIO N FOR

REPRESENTATIVE IN TH E GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 160TH DISTRICT

APPEAL OF: LINDSAY E LIZABETH

ROMAN AND SHELLY WIL SON

CHAUNCEY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 22 MAP 2020

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court a t No. 127 MD

2020 dated March 17 , 2020

SUBMITTED: March 31, 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 7, 2020

AND NOW , this 7 th day of April, 2020

, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is

hereby AFFIRMED

. The parties’ joint ancillary application to supplement the transcript

with exhibits is GRANTED

.
H. Res. 264 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 17, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the 

House shall be considered to have taken from the Speaker’s 

table the bill, H.R. 588, with the Senate amendment thereto, 

and to have concurred in the Senate amendment with the following amendment: 

In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the 

amendment of the Senate to the text of the bill, insert the 

following: 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vietnam Veterans Donor 

Acknowledgment Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. DONOR CONTRIBUTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AT THE 

VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL VISITOR CENTER. 

Section 6(b) of Public Law 96–297 (16 U.S.C. 431 

note) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4) by striking the ‘‘and’’ after the 

semicolon; 

(2) in paragraph (5)— 
2 

•HRES 264 EH 

(A) by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’; 

and 

(B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; 

and’’; and 

(3) by inserting at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) notwithstanding section 8905(b)(7) of title 40, 

United States Code— 

‘‘(A) the Secretary of the Interior shall allow 

the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. to acknowledge donor contributions to the visitor center 

by displaying, inside the visitor center, an appropriate statement or credit acknowledging the contribution; 

‘‘(B) donor contribution acknowledgments shall 

be displayed in a form approved by the Secretary of 

the Interior and for a period of time commensurate 

with the level of the contribution and the life of the 

facility; 

‘‘(C) the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund 

shall bear all expenses related to the display of 

donor acknowledgments; 

‘‘(D) prior to the display of donor acknowledgments, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. 
3 

•HRES 264 EH 

shall submit to the Secretary for approval, its plan 

for displaying donor acknowledgments; 

‘‘(E) such plan shall include the sample text 

and types of the acknowledgments or credits to be 

displayed and the form and location of all displays; 

‘‘(F) the Secretary shall approve the plan, if 

the Secretary determines that the plan— 

‘‘(i) allows only short, discrete, and unobtrusive acknowledgments or credits; 

‘‘(ii) does not permit any advertising slogans or company logos; and 

‘‘(iii) conforms to applicable National 

Park Service guidelines for indoor donor recognition; and 

‘‘(G) if the Secretary of the Interior determines 

that the proposed plan submitted under this paragraph, does not meet the requirements of this paragraph, the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(i) advise the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. not later than 30 days after receipt of the proposed plan of the reasons that 

such plan does not meet the requirements; and 
4 

•HRES 264 EH 

‘‘(ii) allow the Vietnam Veterans Memorial 

Fund, Inc. to submit a revised donor recognition plan.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - (-)district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        December 1, 1998        Preliminary results from the investigation of the Pymatuning earthquake of September 25, 1998

publication        January 1, 2017        Amplification of earthquake ground motions in Washington, DC, and implications for hazard assessments in central and eastern North America
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(17)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(68)
              - colorado(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(4)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(21)
              - idaho(5)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(18)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(4)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(28)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Program        June 26, 2019        Information by Region - Minnesota
Change in Directors' Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CHANGE IN DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION 
 On July 14, 2008, A. O.
Smith Corporation’s Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, changed the compensation payable to non-employee directors, effective immediately, as described below. 
 The annual retainer paid to a director shall be $125,000, of which the cash retainer shall remain unchanged at $35,000 payable quarterly in advance and $90,000 paid in
A. O. Smith Corporation Common Stock; that the board and committees’ meeting fees shall remain unchanged at $1,500 per meeting, with the exception of the Investment Policy Committee meeting fee, which shall remain unchanged at $3,000 per
meeting, $500 for each telephonic meeting, and $1,500 for the new director orientation meeting fee; that the annual retainer for Audit Committee members shall remain unchanged at $5,000 and that the annual retainer for the members of the Investment
Policy Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Personnel and Compensation Committee shall remain unchanged at $3,000; and that the annual retainer for the chairpersons of the Audit Committee, Investment Policy Committee, Nominating and
Governance Committee and Personnel and Compensation Committee chairpersons shall be $10,000 each. 
  

 23
## NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 457

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JAMES BROWN AND EARLINE DAVIS

- BROWN, Appellants,

v. JERROD WAYNE PILLANS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas



# ORDER

Before Justices Benavides , Longoria , and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam
Appellant’s counsel, Corwyn Davis, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel
asserting that he was retained for a limited purpose and was unintentionally left on the
notice of appeal. Appellants did not file an objection to the motion.
The motion indicates appellant was advised of current deadlines; however, after
the filing of the motion, the clerk and reporter’s records were received by the Court, and2

new deadlines now exist. Appellant’s brief is now due to be filed in this Court on Ma rch 1,
2021. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,
counsel is directed to notify appellant, in writing, of any previously undisclosed deadlines
and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court.

The Honorab le Corwyn Davis’ motion to withdraw is hereby granted, and
appellants are directed to notify this Court promptly if they retain new counsel on appeal
by filing a notice including that attorney’s name, mailing address, telephone number,
facsimile number, em ail, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See generally T EX

.
R. A PP

. P. 6. Furthermore, if appellant fails to timely file a brief on or before March 1, 2021,
the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed on th e 26th day of February , 20 2 1

.
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE GROUP, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Richard P. PARILLO, Jr., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2018

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Thomas E. Scott and Brian A. Dominguez, for appellants.

Stok Folk + Kon, Robert A. Stok and Joshua R. Kon, for appellees.

Before LAGOA, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 10.11**

 

March 10, 2003

 

David Jevans 

530 Menlo Oaks Drive 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

 

Re: Employment Agreement 

 

Dear Mr. Jevans: 

 

Pursuant to our recent discussions, this letter memorializes the terms of your continued employment with Valicert, Inc. (the “Company”). 

 

1. Salary. Your salary is $165,000 on an annualized basis, less applicable withholding. 

 

2. Bonus. Immediately prior to the consummation of theMerger (as such term is defined in the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger dated February 18, 2003, by and among Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (“Tumbleweed”), Velocity Acquisition Sub, Inc., and the Company (the “MergerAgreement”)), you shall earn a bonus in the amount of $139,000, less applicable withholding (“Bonus”). 

 

3. Amendment of Stock Option Agreement. Your stock option agreements shall be amended (collectively, the “OptionAmendment”) to provide that immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement), options for 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that are unvested as of that date shall becomefully vested, and the period of time in which you may exercise his options shall be extended to two (2) years after your termination, with respect to the following stock option grants: options granted on December 12, 2002 and May 29, 2002. Copies ofthe Option Amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2. 

 

4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the attached exhibit, constitutes the entire agreement between you and the Company relating to the specific subject matter hereof and supersedesprior negotiations, representations or agreements between you and the Company. 

 

5. Modification. This Agreement may only be modified or amended by a supplemental written agreement signed by you, an authorized representative of Tumbleweed and an authorized representative ofthe Company. 

 

6. Termination. If theMerger (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) is terminated and not consummated by the parties thereto, this Agreement shall immediately terminate, and the Company shall not be obligated to confer any of the benefits described inparagraphs 2 and 3 above. This Agreement shall terminate upon consummation of the Merger (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement). 

 

I agree that there is no other compensation or benefits in any form to which I am entitled from the Company. 

 

Please signand date this letter on the space provided below to acknowledge your acceptance of the terms of this Agreement. 

 

Sincerely,

/s/    TIMOTHYCONLEY        

Timothy Conley

Chief Financial Officer

 

I agreeto and accept continued employment with Valicert, Inc. on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 

 

Date:
 
          3/17/03
   
/s/    DAVIDJEVANS
Teddy Oneal BELFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3756

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Antawone E. JAMES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Calvin Lee HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
C.S.G., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.16


 


SCHEDULE I


 


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SCHEDULE


 


The
following shall become effective as of July 1, 2008


 


Basic
Annual Retainer (all Directors): $50,000


 


Supplemental
Annual Retainers:


Board Chair:  $100,000


Audit Committee
Chair:  $15,000


Compensation Committee
Chair:  $15,000


Governance and Nominating
Committee Chair: $5,000


Health, Safety and
Environmental Committee Chair: $5,000


Audit Committee
Members:  $5,000


Compensation Committee
Members: $5,000


 


Meeting
Fees:


Board meeting: $2,000


Committee meeting: $1,500


 


Annual Equity Award
Amount:  $90,000


Deferral Election:


Elected
Conversion Date:  Available for Current
Plan Year


Total
Annual Retainer in Equity Awards: 
Available for Current Plan Year
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10470

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Semein Cruz, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-107-1

______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Semein Cruz has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Cruz has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Cruz’s claim of ineffective 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 27, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10470 Document: 00516911242 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2023
No. 23-10470

2

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without 

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Cruz’s response. We concur with

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10470 Document: 00516911242 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2023