alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00407

- CV

In re Jaime Luevano

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FROM CORYELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Jaime L u e vano has filed a petition for writ of mandamus directed at Texa s
Gov ern or G reg Abbott. However, we have no j urisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against
the g overnor unless neces sary to enforce our jurisdiction, which is not implicated here. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(b); see also In re Luevano , No. 03

- 15

- 00014

- CV, 2 015 WL 267889, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Jan. 14, 2015, no pet.)

.

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

____________ ______________________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justi ces Tr iana and Kelly
Filed: Aug ust 27 , 2021
Exhibit 31.4







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with this Annual Report of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Christopher J. Reynolds, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: March 30, 2012
By:
/s/ Christopher J. ReynoldsChristopher J. ReynoldsVice President Finance and CFO




This certification accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be used or relied upon for any other purpose including Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF COUNTERPATH CORPORATION

|Name                              | State of Incorporation   | Name Under Which Subsidiary Does Business
|--------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                                  |                          |                                          
|CounterPath Technologies Inc.     | British Columbia, Canada | CounterPath Technologies Inc.            
|                                  |                          |                                          
|6789722 Canada Inc.               | Canada                   | 6789722 Canada Inc.                      
|                                  |                          |                                          
|BridgePort Networks, Inc.         | Delaware                 | BridgePort Networks, Inc.                
|                                  |                          |                                          
|BridgePort Networks (Europe) Ltd. | United Kingdom           | BridgePort Networks (Europe)
      Ltd.  
|                                  |                          |                                          
|FirstHand Technologies Inc.       | Ontario, Canada          | FirstHand Technologies Inc.              
|                                  |                          |                                          
|BridgePort Networks K.K.          | Japan                    | BridgePort Networks K.K.                 

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Extreme Events

Filters

              - science_science(148)
              - products_data(13)
              - products_publications(237)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(41)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(35)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(3)
              - multimedia_video(151)
              - multimedia_video-149194(96)
              - multimedia_video-149195(31)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(8)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149210(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(10)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(7)

## By Location

              - puerto rico(1)

## By Year

B-roll        June 28, 2020        Red Devil Cichlid (Amphilophus labiatus) Guarding Habitat
<PAGE>

GENENCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                    Entity                              State/Country of Incorporation
-----------------------------------------------      -------------------------------------

<S>                                                       <C>
Genencor International,
Asia Pacific Pte Ltd.                                             Singapore

Genencor International, B.V.                                     Netherlands

Genencor International, B.V.B.A.                                   Belgium

Genencor International France S.A.R.L.                              France

Genencor International Indiana, Inc.                               Delaware

Genencor International Japan, Ltd.                                 Delaware

Genencor International Oy                                          Finland

Genencor International Vertriebs GmbH                              Germany

Genencor Latin America, S.R.L. and Genencor
International Argentina, S.R.L.                                   Argentina

Genencor Luxembourg  S.A.R.L.                                     Luxembourg

Genencor Mauritius, Ltd.                                          Mauritius

Genencor (Wuxi) Bio-Products Co., Ltd.                        Jiangsu Province,
                                                          Peoples Republic of China

Enzyme Bio-Systems Ltd.                                            Delaware
</TABLE>


                                       66
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30199]

[[Page 103885]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 534 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-818, K2025-818.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30199 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(411)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5605)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1088)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(101)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(255)
              - connect_locations(3)
              - connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!

Satellite imagery        April 1, 2024        Landsat 9 Image Captures Iceland Volcano Lava
**EXHIBIT 31.B****CERTIFICATION**I, Gene T. Waguespack, certify that:1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of El Paso Exploration & ProductionCompany;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. Date: March 17, 2006         */s/ Gene T. Waguespack*   Gene T. Waguespack   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin Kelly, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 10, 2009

                                          /s/ Kevin Kelly
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Kevin Kelly
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7607 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER JACOB DAVIS, a/k/a Marcus Swanson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-73-F, CA-01-59-5-F)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Jacob Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Walter Jacob Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a proceeding

under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here,

a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural

grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the

movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reasons would

find it debatable whether the [motion] states a valid claim of the

denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in

it procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.

2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and

conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Davis

has not made the requisite showing. See United States v. Davis,

Nos. CR-94-73-F; CA-01-59-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40784

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN HERNANDEZ-GUERRERO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-375-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan HernandezGuerrero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez-Guerrero has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOHNY QUINONEZ-BELTRAN, AKA 

Johny Beltran, AKA Jesus Calderon Lopez, 

AKA Johnhy Beltran Quinonez, AKA Johny 

Quinonez, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-30040 

D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00042-BLW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Johny Quinonez-Beltran appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the sentence of 12 months and 1 day imposed following his guilty-plea 

conviction for distribution of cocaine and possession with the intent to distribute 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-30040 

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Quinonez-Beltran contends that the district court erred by denying his 

request for a minor-role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review the 

district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, its factual findings for 

clear error, and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. 

See United States v. Diaz, 884 F.3d 911, 914 (9th Cir. 2018). Contrary to

Quinonez-Beltran’s claim, the court did not conclude that he was precluded from 

receiving the adjustment because his role was essential to the drug transactions. 

Rather, the court reasoned that although street-level dealers may receive the 

adjustment under some circumstances, those circumstances did not exist in this 

case. As the court concluded, Quinonez-Beltran was not “substantially less 

culpable than the average participant” because he fostered relationships with

customers, negotiated pricing, delivered drugs, and received proceeds. See id. at 

916-17. The court properly compared Quinonez-Beltran to his alleged supplier 

and applied the factors listed in the commentary to the minor-role Guideline. See

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A), (C); Diaz, 884 F.3d at 916-17. The court did not 

clearly err in any of its factual findings, nor did it abuse its discretion by denying 

the adjustment. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C); Diaz, 884 F.3d at 914. 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 18


April 8, 2004


Board of Directors of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
Northville, Michigan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Hayes Lemmerz International,
Inc. (the Company) and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2004 (the Successor) and
2003 (the Predecessor), and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and
cash flows for the period from June 1, 2003 to January 31, 2004 (the Successor),
the period from February 1, 2003 to May 31, 2003 and each of the years in the
two-year period ended January 31, 2003 (the Predecessor), and have reported
thereon under date of April 6, 2004. The aforementioned consolidated financial
statements and our audit report thereon are included in the Company's annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004. As discussed in Note 7
to those financial statements, the Successor Company changed its method of
accounting for potential goodwill impairment under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142,"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", by changing
the date as of which it will perform its annual testing of whether goodwill is
impaired from January 31st to November 1st of each year. Also, in Note 7, the
Company states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the
circumstances because (1) choosing the 1st day of the 4th quarter allows
adequate time to perform the first step of the test and, if necessary, the
second step of the test while still providing time to report the impact of the
test in the Company's periodic filings, (2) the Successor Company has never
chosen a test date for goodwill impairment, (3) goodwill of the Predecessor
Company was eliminated as a result of fresh start accounting, and (4) the
Predecessor Company no longer exists. In accordance with your request, we have
reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business
judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method
of accounting was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG LLP