alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joel Adrian CRUZ, Doc #158197, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated March 31, 2006, except for the sixteenth paragraph of
Note 12 as to which the date is April 13, 2006 of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC,
in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-134325) and related Prospectus
of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC dated June 26, 2006.



                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Las Vegas, Nevada
June 20, 2006



<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated March 30, 2005, except for the twenty-second paragraph
of Note 1 as to which the date is April 5, 2005 of the historical financial
statements of Trump Indiana, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No.
333-134325) and related Prospectus of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC dated June
26, 2006.



                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 20, 2006






<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated February 25, 2005 of the historical financial statements
of Buffington Harbor Riverboats, L.L.C. in the Registration Statement (Form S-4
No. 333-134325) and related Prospectus of The Majestic Star Casino, LLC dated
June 26, 2006.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 20, 2006
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Continan Communications, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.


Date: May 20, 2008                        Name:    /s/ Geoffrey A. Fox
                                                  ---------------------
                                                    Geoffrey A. Fox
                                         Title:   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 99(B)**
SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
     I, Joseph Andries, the duly authorized Senior Vice President of LyonFinancial Services, Inc. d/b/a US Bancorp Portfolio Services (the “Servicer”),hereby certify as follows in connection with the delivery of the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of DVI Receivables XIX, L.L.C. (the “Report”), pursuant to Section8.05 of the Contribution and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofMay 1, 2003, byand between DVI Financial Services, Inc., as Contributor and Servicer and DVIReceivables Corp. XIX, as Transferor (as amended, the “Agreement”):
1. I have reviewed the relevant terms of the Agreement and havemade, or caused to bemade under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicerduring theperiod from February 24, 2004 through the end of the year covered bysuch Report. 2. Such review has not disclosed the existence of any ServicerEvent of Default (asdefined in the Agreement). 3. On the basis of such review, I am of the opinion that duringsuch period the Servicerhas serviced the Contracts (as defined in the Agreement) in compliancewith theprocedures of the Agreement.
I consent to the filing of this certificate as an exhibit to the Report asrequired by the rules and regulations of the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto signed my name.    */s/*Joseph Andries Senior Vice President, Lyon Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a US Bancorp Portfolio Services
MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT HOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1341

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Robert A. Schreiber, for appellant.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L, Laura K. Wendell, Mitchell J. Burnstein and Alicia Gonzalez (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 302**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Michael Manahan, certify that:




I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PracticeXpert, Inc.;




1. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





3. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and


presented
      in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
      based on such evaluation; and




(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the Issuer’s fiscal quarter ending June
      30, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.




4. The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All
      deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
      the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date: August
              18, 2006/s/ Michael
              ManahanMichael
                Manahan
              Principal
                Executive Officer
Alan S. NAPIER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 14880

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:18

- cr
- 00013

- HLM

- WEJ

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JESUS EDUARDO DUARTE CAMACHO,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ ( July 9, 2020 )
Befor e WILSON and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges, and CORRIGAN , ∗ District Judge.

∗ Honorable Timothy J. Corrigan, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 18-14880 Date Filed: 07/09/2020 Page: 1 of 22 P E R C U R I A M : Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho appeals his 210

- month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of methamphetamine, possession with i ntent to distribute at least 500 grams of methamphetamine, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug

- trafficking
crime. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred at sentencing when it
denied a minor

- role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1. 2. After reviewing the record
and the briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying Camacho’s request for a minor

- role reduction.
See United States v. Bernal

- Benitez , 594 F.3d 1303, 1320 (11th Cir. 2010) (stating
that we rev iew a district court’s denial of a role reduction for clear error). Therefore, we affirm Camacho’s sentence.
AFFIRMED. Case: 18-14880 Date Filed: 07/09/2020 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7613

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRANCINA MARIA DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-68, CA-99-3094-7-20) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Francina Maria Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Francina Maria Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis , Nos. CR-89-68; CA99-3094-7-20 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. Res. 266 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 18, 2013. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1947) to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department 

of Agriculture through fiscal year 2018, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Agriculture. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole 

shall rise without motion. No further consideration of the bill 

shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the 

House. 

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be 

in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1797) to 
2 

•HRES 266 EH 

amend title 18, United States Code, to protect pain-capable 

unborn children in the District of Columbia, and for other 

purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now 

printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113– 

15 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and 

on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**STATEMENT
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**


**KERYX
      BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James F. Oliviero, Vice
      President, Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:August
                11, 2008
            
            /s/
                James F. OlivieroJames
                F. Oliviero
              Vice
                President, Finance
              Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
   I, Leonard M. Anthony, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of International SteelGroup Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known, to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;
 b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and
 c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 11, 2004 /s/ Leonard M. Anthony       Leonard M. Anthony   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Narrowstep Inc. (the "Company"), I, Lisa
VanPatten, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:  May 30, 2007                       /s/  Lisa VanPatten
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Lisa VanPatten
                                           Chief Financial Officer
First Amendment to the World Fuel Services Corporation 2006 Omnibus Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 WORLD FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION 
 2006 OMNIBUS PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), made on this 23rd day of June, 2008, to the WORLD FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION 2006 OMNIBUS PLAN (the “Plan”), by World Fuel Services Corporation, a Florida
corporation (the “Company”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company did adopt the Plan, effective as of June 20, 2006, for the benefit of its eligible Participants so that the Company
could attract, retain, motivate, and reward participants and further align Participant’s interests with those of the Company’s other shareholders through compensation that is based on the Company’s common stock; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section VII of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) reserved the right to amend the
Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend the Plan to modify the definition of fair market value and has approved this
Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of February 26, 2008, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 

1. Paragraphs (j)(i)-(iii) of Article 8 of the Plan are hereby amended to read as follows: 
 “(i) If the principal market for the Stock is a national securities exchange or the NASDAQ stock market, then the “Fair Market
Value” as of that date shall be the closing sales price of the Stock on the day that the Award is granted on the principal exchange or market on which the Stock is then listed or admitted to trading. 
 (ii) If sale prices are not available or if the principal market for the Stock is not a national securities exchange and the Stock is not
quoted on the NASDAQ stock market, the average between the highest bid and lowest asked prices for the Stock on the day that the Award is granted as reported on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board Service or by the National Quotation Bureau, Incorporated
or a comparable service.” 
 (iii) If the day is not a trading day, and as a result, paragraphs (i) and
(ii) next above are inapplicable, the Fair Market Value of the Stock shall be determined as on the most recent trading day prior to the date the Award is granted. If paragraphs (i) and (ii) next above are otherwise inapplicable, then
the Fair Market Value of the Stock shall be determined in good faith by the Committee.” 







 2. In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged by the Amendment. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed on behalf of the Company on the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	WORLD FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION,
	a Florida corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul H. Stebbins

	Name:	 	Paul H. Stebbins
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


  

 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60905 Summary Calendar

RONNIE MCGEE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
LIEUTENANT ROBERT STURDIVANT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STEVEN TYLER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RODERICK LEWIS , Defendant s
- Appellee s

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 90

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ronnie McGee, Mississippi prisoner # K4515, appeals the judgment entered in favor of the named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. However, his appellate brief fails to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedu re 28(a)(8) as it is entirely devoid of any citations to documentary evidence or leg al authority. S ee Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 11, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60905 Document: 00513337859 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2016No. 14

- 60905

2 Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (stating that appellant’s fail ure to identify any error in lower court ’s analysis is the same as if he had not appealed); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993) (“Although we liberally construe the briefs of pro se appellants, we also require that arguments must be briefed to be preserved.”) (internal quotation marks and
citation omitted ). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-60905 Document: 00513337859 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2016