alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

MediciNova, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-163116 and 333-138241) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-151808, 333-141694, and 333-122665) on Form S-8of MediciNova, Inc. of our reports dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MediciNova, Inc. and subsidiaries (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MediciNova,Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and for the period from September 26, 2000 (inception) through December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of MediciNova, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

March 31, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1919

In re: JOHNNY LEE GORE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9)

Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

claiming that the district court has unduly delayed issuing a 

ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. He 

seeks an order from this court directing the district court to 

act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue 

delay by the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Collaboration Agreement - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank



 Exhibit 10.44 
 COLLABORATION AGREEMENT 
 Party A: Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Suzhou Branch 
 Party B: Multi-Fineline Electronix (Suzhou No.2) Co., Ltd 
 In view to
further strengthen the close relationship between Party A (hereinafter called A) and Party B (hereinafter called B) and on the base of the principles of equality and mutual benefit, both parties, through friendly negotiation, have agreed to enter
into the following agreement under the terms specified as followed: 
 I With the total amount of RMB seventy five million credit line, A
facilitate with B with varied corporate financing types, including short-time loan, issuing of L/C, banking acceptance bills, etc. 
 II With
the minimum deposit amount of USD 3 million, the interest will be calculated with the interest rate of LIBOR minus 15 base points. 
 III L/C issuance will be charged on the basis of 0.72‰ per L/C. 
 IV T/T remittance will be charged as follows: maximum,
RMB 500 yuan; minimum, RMB 50 yuan, below RMB 50 or above RMB 500 the fee will be charged on the basis of 0.45‰. 
 V Currencies
exchange rate is as follows: if exchange amount is above 0.2 million US dollars, foreign currency exchanging into RMB can be adjusted upward 100 base points on the basis of purchase price; if below 0.2 million, upward 85 base points.








 VI L/C negotiation will be charged on the basis of 0.9‰. 
 VII B will open RMB and USD settlement account in A, and B should look upon A as the main collaboration bank. 
 VIII After the contract takes into effect, both parties will negotiate and replenish the contract as soon as the contract has any conflict with the Laws
regulations and rules of China. 
 IX The duration for this contract is from 31 July, 2008 to 31 July, 2009. 
 X With two originals to A and B respectively, this agreement will be taken into effect with the stamps of both parties. 
  

					
	/s/ Yan Qi	 		 	/s/ Philip A. Harding
			
	Party A: [seal]	 		 	Party B: [seal]
			
		 		 	Date: 31 July, 2008
Keithian GREENHOUSE v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2017-CI-2122

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Denied.
Rosana Boulhosa NASSAR, Appellant, v. Wayne Drew SORRELL, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1844

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 8, 2018

Rosana Boulhosa Nassar, Fort Pierce, pro se.

Chobee Ebbets, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 280 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding a taxpayer 

bill of rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mr. ROSKAM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 

regarding a taxpayer bill of rights. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Bill 

4 of Rights Resolution’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES RE6 GARDING A TAXPAYER BILL OF RIGHTS. 

7 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that 

8 each taxpayer has— 

9 (1) the right to be informed; 

10 (2) the right to be assisted; 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 280 IH 

1 (3) the right to be heard; 

2 (4) the right to pay no more than the correct 

3 amount of tax; 

4 (5) the right of appeal; 

5 (6) the right to certainty; 

6 (7) the right to privacy; 

7 (8) the right to confidentiality; 

8 (9) the right to representation; and 

9 (10) the right to a fair and just tax system. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 979 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-723, K2025-722.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30040 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Charles STOKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Charles Stokes, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This court issued an order on October 16, 2018, directing Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him in view of his having instituted numerous frivolous and meritless proceedings in this court. *See* *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

*574We have reviewed and accept Appellant's response, but caution him that any further frivolous appellate filings challenging the judgment and sentence imposed in Lake County Judicial Circuit Cases Nos. 1983-CF-716, 1986-CF-1104 and 2006-CF-385 may result in imposition of sanctions. *See* *Isley v. State* , 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough.").

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Robert FLETCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2035

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
** **

 

** **

 

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ProText Mobility, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Charles, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

 

1.           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

 

2.           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

The foregoing certification accompanied the Annual Report on Form 10-K filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350.  It is being reproduced herein for information only.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Arie Cohen, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CardioNet, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 7,  2008           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Arie Cohen                         |   |
| Arie Cohen                             |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)         |   |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(5)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(4)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - (-)guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(3)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(7)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

National News Release        April 10, 2015        Researchers Test Smartphones for Earthquake Warning
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - (-)science_faqs(12)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for November 1, 2022

faq        July 10, 2017        Can some people sense that an earthquake is about to happen (earthquake sensitives)?

faq        July 10, 2017        Is there earthquake weather?

faq        February 6, 2023        Can large amounts of rain in California cause an increase in earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can animals predict earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can you predict earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can the ground open up during an earthquake?

faq        July 10, 2017        Why are we having so many earthquakes? Has naturally occurring earthquake activity been increasing? Does this mean a big one is going to hit? OR We haven't had any earthquakes in a long time; does this mean that the pressure is building up for a big one?

faq        July 6, 2017        Are earthquakes associated with variations in the geomagnetic field?

faq        July 10, 2017        Do solar flares or magnetic storms (space weather) cause earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can we use explosives to cause small earthquakes in order to prevent having large ones?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can "MegaQuakes" really happen? Like a magnitude 10 or larger?

faq        July 10, 2017        Will California eventually fall into the ocean?
Odelia DOWLING v. CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, et al.

CA 18-171, CA 18-169

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

November 28, 2018

Robert E. Landry, Patrick D. Gallaugher, Kevin P. Fontenot, Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry, 901 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 900, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 433-9436, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation

Craig Isenberg, Kyle W. Siegel, Joshua O. Cox, Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, LLC, 909 Poydras, 24th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112, (504) 589-9700, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation

Wells T. Watson, Jake D. Buford, Baggett, McCall, Burgess, Watson & Gaughan, P.O. Drawer 7820, Lake Charles, LA 70606-7820, (337) 478-8888, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Odelia Dowling

Richard Elliott Wilson, Somer G. Brown, Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLC, 723 Broad Street, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 436-6611, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Odelia Dowling

Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, John D. Saunders, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.

COOKS, Judge.

*1086For the reasons assigned by this court in *Bowling v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.* , 18-169 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/28/18), --- So.3d ----, the judgment of the trial court awarding Odelia Dowling $13,200.00 in damages for her exposure to the release of hydrogen sulfide or sulfur dioxide into the air by CITGO is affirmed.

**AFFIRMED.**

Pickett, J. dissents for the reasons assigned in 18-169, Bowling v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.
Jon W.F. KUIKEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



INTERVIDEO, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall Bambrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, the Quarterly Report of InterVideo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InterVideo, Inc.



Dated: November 14, 2005



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Randall Bambrough                    
|Randall Bambrough Chief Financial Officer
Mario ST. FORIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED FILM SERVICE, Inc., a Corporation, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

No. 14282.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

May 29, 1953.

Morrison, Hecker, Buck, Cozad & Rogers, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.

W. T. Kelley, General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, and James W. Cassedy, Asst. General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to Review and Set aside Order of Federal Trade Commission dismissed and order of Federal Trade Commission affirmed and enforced, on stipulation of parties, etc.
Name of Subsidiary
    
    OwnershipSouth Glen Eagles Drive, LLC
    
    
    51
    %Hwy 46 and Bluffton Parkway, LLC
    
    
    51
    %AARD LECA LSS Lonestar, LLC
    
    
    51
    %AARD LECA VL1, LLC
    
    
    51
    %AARD-Charmar Greeley, LLC
    
    
    51
    %AARD Charmar Greeley Firestone
    
    
    51
    %AARD-Econo Lube Stonegate, LLC
    
    
    51
    %Buckeye AZ, LLC
    
    
    51
    %AARD-Cypress Sound, LLC
    
    
    51
    %AARD Esterra Mesa 1, LLC
    
    
    100
    %CapTerra Fund I, LLC
    
    
    100
    %
Exhibit
32.1





Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2008 (the “Report”) by Edgewater Foods International, Inc.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








Date:
December 1, 2008





/s/  Robert
Saunders


Robert
Saunders


Chief
Executive Officer





/s/  Michael
Boswell


Michael
Boswell


Acting
Chief Accounting Officer











A
signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to Edgewater Foods International, Inc and will be retained by
Edgewater Foods International, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.