alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - (-)california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - virginia(10)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(45)
              - 2023(13)
              - (-)2022(3)
              - 2020(1)
              - 2019(2)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

staff profileAustin J Elliott, Ph.D.

staff profileSuzanne Hecker

staff profileValerie Irene Thomas
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Systems Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Douglas W. Kohrs, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and M. James Call, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    November 10, 2003
    
    
    
    By: /s/ Douglas W. KohrsName:  Douglas W. Kohrs
Title:    President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:    November 10, 2003
    
    
    
    By: /s/M. James CallName:  M. James Call
Title:  Executive Vice President and
     Chief Financial Officer


Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and will be retained
by American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

25
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 101881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29654]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 10012]
RIN 1545-BR09

Election To Exclude Certain Unincorporated Organizations Owned by 
Applicable Entities From Application of the Rules on Partners and 
Partnerships; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to TD 10012, which was 
published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, November 20, 2024. TD 
10012 contains final regulations that modify existing regulations to 
allow certain unincorporated organizations that are owned in whole or 
in part by applicable entities to be excluded from the application of 
partnership tax rules.

DATES: This correction is effective on January 19, 2025. For the date 
of applicability, see Sec.  1.761-2(f).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the final regulations, 
contact Cameron Williamson at (202) 317-6684 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 10012) that are the subject of this 
correction are under sections 761(a), 6031(a), 6417(d) and (h), and 
7805(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, FR Doc. 2024-26944 (TD 10012), appearing on page 91552 
in the Federal Register on Wednesday, November 20, 2024, is corrected 
as follows:

Sec.  1.761-2  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 91562, in the first column, in paragraph (a)(5)(ii), in the 
third line down from the top of the paragraph, the language ``Sec.  
1.6417-1(c)'' is corrected to read ``Sec.  1.6417-1(k)''.

Kalle L. Wardlow,
Federal Register Liaison, Publications & Regulations Section, Associate 
Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2024-29654 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. KHOI Q. HOANG

No. 2017-K-0100

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 517-663, Division H; Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2016-KA-0479.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit-"It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Robert SARHAN, Appellant, v. H & H INVESTORS, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D18-89

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Eddie Lewis DARBY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - (-)science_science(3)
              - products_publications(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(17)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(68)
              - colorado(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - (-)district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(4)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(21)
              - idaho(5)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(18)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(4)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(28)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Research        January 2, 2018        Washington DC Stone and Brick Buildings Vulnerable to Distant Quakes

Program        June 26, 2019        Information by Region - Washington D.C.

Research        April 12, 2016        Geologic Hazards and Catastrophic Events
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30599 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTHONY THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2218

- - - - - - - - - - March 11, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Anthony Thomas, prisoner no. 24664-034, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that 1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney at the time of the entering of his guilty plea and of his sentencing failed to inform him of his right to appeal and 2) the factual basis was insufficient to establish that he used or carried a weapon during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense.No. 97-30599 -2- Our review of the evidentiary hearing and of Thomas’ guilty plea hearing reveals that the district court did not clearly err in finding that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. United States v. Gipson , 985 F.2d 212, 216 (5th Cir. 1994). The factual basis signed by Thomas and Thomas’ statements at his guilty-plea hearing indicate that he used a vehicle during a drug trafficking offense with knowledge that a gun was present in the vehicle in relation to the offense. These facts are sufficient to establish that he carried a weapon under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) under the current law of this circuit. See United States v. Muscarello , 106 F.3d 636, 639 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. granted , 118 S. Ct. 621 (Dec. 12, 1997).
AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - (-)products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(10)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - (-)nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

map        January 1, 1981        Seismicity map of the state of Nebraska

map        January 1, 1991        Seismicity map of the state of Nebraska
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

Center News        March 4, 2022        Pathology Case of the Month - European Starling
Marianne H. ENGLE, Appellant, v. Henry Charles MORRILL, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5134

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.16





March 13, 2015





TO:          Seabridge Gold Inc.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")


Consent of Expert





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”), to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, I, William Threlkeld, the Senior Vice President, Exploration of the Company and a Registered Professional Geologist, consent to the use of my name and authorize the use of the information represented in the 40-F as having been prepared by or under my supervision.




I confirm that I have read the 40-F and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the information represented in the 40-F as having been prepared by me or under my supervision or within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with such information.




Yours truly,/s/ William ThrelkeldWilliam Threlkeld
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Earl SANDERS

NO. 2018-KO-0342

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 101463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29545]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2024 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 101463]]

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER

Title 2 CFR

Revision to Subject Matter

    Editorial Note:  The Director of the Office of the Federal 
Register, pursuant to his authority to maintain an orderly system of 
codification under 44 U.S.C. 1510 and 1 CFR 8.2, hereby changes the 
subject matter of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations from 
``Grants and Agreements'' to ``Federal Financial Assistance.''

0
Accordingly, the subject matter of title 2 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations is revised as of December 16, 2024.

[FR Doc. 2024-29545 Filed 12-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
```
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4516



# 
G EORGEW ILSON M C G RAW ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

 U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4517



# 
G EORGEW ILSON M C G RAW

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge.

(CR-93-227) Submitted: May 31, 2002 Decided: June 20, 2002 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.COUNSEL Tracy Weese, Shepherdstown, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Samuel D. Marsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION PER CURIAM: George Wilson McGraw appeals the district court’s revocation ofhis supervised release and related imposition of a twelve-month sentence. McGraw claims that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he violated a condition of his supervised release and that the district court erred in failing to specify in its order which statelaw McGraw violated. We review these challenges for abuse of discretion. United States v. Copley , 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). After carefully reviewing the record and the district court’s order, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, proved that McGraw placed a telephone call to his ex-wife, Rebecca McCoy, reminding her of his prior threat to return from prison and kill her. McCoy felt sufficiently threatened to call the police to report the threat and request protection. The district court explicitly stated that the issue amounted to a credibility determination and credited the testimony of McCoy and the Government witnesses over McGraw and his witnesses. Because the decision rests upon thedistrict court’s credibility determination, its decision may not be disturbed. United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). We also conclude that the district court did not err by referencing the violation alleged in the petition for revocation of supervised release instead of reciting the specific violation of state law alleged. 2 U NITED S TATES v. M C G RAWWe dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. M C G RAW
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of EP Global, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacitiesand on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

Date: January 4, 2006

By: /s/ Robert J. Salluzzo   

Robert J. Salluzzo

Chief Operating and Financial Officer

  

 

  

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided BPInternational, Inc. and will be retained by BP International, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30126 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTHUR STEVENS MARTINS, also known as Steven Tetevi, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-60028-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 10, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Arthur Stevens Martins has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief and the record and have found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Wayne T. COLDIRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mackel D. WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3770

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 2, 2019

d0624

Order 

Clerk

July 2, 2019

158629(65)

In re LOUIS G. BASSO, JR., REVOCABLE 

LIVING TRUST.

_________________________________________

MARY ANGELA BASSO,

Appellant,

v SC: 158629

COA: 337321

Oakland PC: 2015-363780-TV

THOMAS BRENNAN FRASER, Successor

Trustee, and RONALD M. BARRON, Trustee,

Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 4, 

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).