alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Karim A. CLARKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1431

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 103891)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1034 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-790, K2025-789.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30143 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Willie FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1157

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 20, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Winsor, J.

Willie Floyd is what state law calls a "habitual traffic offender." *See* § 322.264, Fla. Stat. (2014). When an officer pulled him over for going nearly double the speed limit, the officer discovered that Floyd's license had been suspended or revoked some fifteen times-and that it was still revoked. The State charged Floyd with violating section 322.34(5), which provides that "[a]ny person whose driver license has been revoked pursuant to [the habitual traffic offender statute] and who drives any motor vehicle upon the highways of this state while such license is revoked is guilty of a felony of the third degree." He was convicted and sentenced to 33.5 months in prison.

By its own terms, the statute applies only if a "driver license has been revoked,"

*938*id.* , and the Florida Supreme Court has confirmed that the statute does not apply to those who never had a license in the first place, *State v. Miller* , 227 So.3d 562, 565 (Fla. 2017) ("Having a driver license that has been revoked under the habitual traffic offender statute, section 322.264, Florida Statutes, is a necessary element of a section 322.34(5) offense."). Floyd's sole argument on appeal is that he never had a "driver license" because he had only a "learner's permit." He argues concisely: "A learner's permit is not a driver's license." Init. Br. at 7. If Floyd were correct on this point, he would prevail under *Miller* . But he is not correct.

Although Floyd (and perhaps others) refer colloquially to a "learner's permit," the Florida Legislature chose to classify what Floyd held as a "learner's driver license." § 322.1615, Fla. Stat. Moreover, the Legislature defined "driver license" to mean "a certificate that, subject to all other requirements of law, authorizes an individual to drive a motor vehicle and denotes an operator's license as defined in 49 U.S.C. s. 30301." § 322.01(17), Fla. Stat.; *see also*49 U.S.C. § 30301 (" '[M]otor vehicle operator's license' means a license issued by a State authorizing an individual to operate a motor vehicle on public streets, roads, or highways."). A "learner's driver license" indeed authorizes a holder to drive a motor vehicle, albeit with certain restrictions. § 322.1615, Fla. Stat. (providing that "[a] person who holds a learner's driver license may operate a vehicle" subject to certain restrictions). The most notable restriction is that someone with a "learner's driver license" may drive only when a licensed driver over 21 is riding up front. *Id.* Floyd correctly notes that the license "does not allow someone to drive a car by themselves," Init. Br. at 7, but it does allow someone to drive a car. The statutory definition of "driver license" includes learner's licenses like the one Floyd once held.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell, J., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(21)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(10)
              - products_publications(49)
              - products_software(2)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(72)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(45)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(17)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(51)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(6)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - guam(1)
              - (-)hawaii(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Data Access        October 1, 2017        Oahu Tsunami Evacuation Dashboard
Exhibit No. 32



Certification of Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Paul M. Bonaiuto, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Journal Communications, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Journal Communications, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven J. Smith                                                   
|Steven J. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 
|March 8, 2004                                                         
|                                                                      
|/s/ Paul M. Bonaiuto                                                  
|Paul M. Bonaiuto, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 8, 2004
John Michael BOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2036

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Peter JOLLY, Victor Destremps and Annette Brown, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. ASSOCIATION OF POINCIANA VILLAGES, INC., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4026

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Ron. Gonn R. Isaabs 

Go&~ Auditor 

Xilem County 

Gammon, Texer 

Deer Sir! 

; : 

. \, \ 

~--..-‘,. i ‘-. 

Opinion Ho. O-1372 --.__ ‘\~ 

Re: Gommiaeioner~t.Gourt .3nns pciwer 

priate monhf ouk of trio ckme*l ",IpZ 

- 

oonncel tA/teprenent 

for the purpose or 

ionality of Senate 

Bfll So. 224. 

.&TTGRtiEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

BY 

A. 3. Bolllne 

Assistant
Carlus Dewayne MCKAUFMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1628

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kenneth MASCIO, Noel Mascio, Larry Chmiel, Yong Chmiel, Colette Stibich, Jason Stibich, JCCJ, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Richard Melchionno, Arturo Fuente, Vienna Fuente, Lucie Liccese, Michelle Bird, Holger Reins, Yvonne Reins, Kurt Besch, Renae Besch, Jon E. Berkovich, Leona Camba, Alfredo Camba, William T. Royal, Sr., Bertram Adams, Eduardo Sousa, William McKown and Amanda McKown, Appellants, v. The MANNING TEAM, INC., a Dissolved Florida Corporation, GN Enterprises, L.L.C. d/b/a Keller Williams Tampa Properties; Nicola Ubaldini and Rene Dawn Manning, Appellees.

Case Nos. 2D17-1424 2D18-3375

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Doyle L. HEARD, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC., New Leaf Markets, Inc., Eric Irons, Heather Murphy, Beth Scwartz, Benjamin Goldberg, Wendy Morgan, Dave Watson, June Wiaz, Madelon Horwich, and Jim Terrell, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4941

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 26, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ROGER J. BROWN, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

____________________

2010-3175

______________________ Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DE0432090182-I-3.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

M INNETTE B URGES , Burges Law Offices, of Tucson, Arizona, argued for petitioner.

J ESSICA R. T OPLIN , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were T ONY W EST , Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Director, and R EGINALD T. B LADES , J R ., Assistant Director

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER , Chief Judge, L OURIE and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 10, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
<PAGE>
            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-118594) for the Company's 2004 Stock
Compensation Plan and Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-115167) for the Company's
Dividend Reinvestment Plan of our report dated March 18, 2008 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of PSB Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2007
which appear in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.


/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 24, 2008
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (xi)1350

     This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
certification is included solely for the purpose of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not to be used for
any other purpose. In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I,
Arthur Johnson, hereby certify in my capacity as an officer of Savoy Resources
Corp. that to my knowledge:

     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Savoy Resources Corp.



Date:  November 21, 2005                  /s/ Arthur Johnson
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Arthur Johnson, President,
                                          Chief Executive Officer,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
99.3





OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, LLC


SERVICERS ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.


SENIOR/SUBORDINATED
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES


SERIES 2001-E





Pursuant
to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing Agreement (September 2001 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 2001 among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood Acceptance
Corporation (the Servicer) and J P Morgan Chase & Co., the undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period November 1, 2001 through September 30, 2002 and of its
performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement through such
period.





By:  /s/ Derek M SuretteName:  Derek M SuretteTitle:    Vice President /ControllerDate:    September 30, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVE N. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
John Daniel PETERS, II, Appellant, v. FLORIDA FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, the Humphries Family Partnership, Ltd., Houston Carlton Rigel f/k/a Houston Carlton Humphries, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Linezka TORRES and Jorge Navarro, as Parents and Legal Guardians of Lucas Navarro, Their Minor Son, Petitioners, v. VARIETY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, a Florida Not for Profit Corporation, d/b/a Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Respondent.

No. 3D18-1355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

Goldberg & Rosen, P.A., and Judd G. Rosen and Mustafa H. Dandashly ; Eaton & Wolk, P.L., and Douglas F. Eaton, Miami, for petitioners.

Falk, Waas, Hernandez, Cortina, Solomon & Bonner, P.A., and Norman M. Waas, Scott E. Solomon, Coral Gables, and Richard Warren, Richmond, for respondent Variety Children's Hospital d/b/a Nicklaus Children's Hospital; Radey Law Firm, and Thomas A. Crabb, Tallahassee, and Lauren K. Thompson (Tallahassee), for Intervention Project for Nurses, Inc.; Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter, Fort Lauderdale, and Lindsey A. Hicks, Coral Gables, for Thomas James Sprufera, III.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Linezka Torres and Jorge Navarro, as parents and legal guardians of Lucas Navarro, their minor son (collectively, "the plaintiffs"), seek certiorari review of the order denying their request for an *in camera* inspection of a portion of Thomas Sprufera's patient file held by Intervention Project for Nurses, Inc. ("IPN"). We grant the petition, quash the trial court's order denying the plaintiffs' request for an *in camera* inspection, and direct the trial court to reconsider the plaintiffs' motion seeking an order from the trial court authorizing the release of these records following its *in camera* inspection.1

Certiorari granted; order quashed with directions.

1

This Court takes no position on the merits of the plaintiffs' motion seeking an order from the trial court authorizing IPN to release these documents.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 228 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 228

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 22, 2013.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3) to approve the construction, operation, and maintenance of the 
Keystone XL pipeline, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 90 
minutes equally divided among and controlled by the respective chairs and 
ranking minority members of the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, 
Energy and Commerce, and Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall 
be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the 
amendments in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committees on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, Energy and Commerce, and Natural Resources 
now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113-11. 
That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. 
No amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order 
except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original 
text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure the material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and     By:
    /s/ James W. Creamer, IIIJames W. Creamer, IIIChief Executive and Chief FinancialOfficer
David COOPER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Jr., Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4485

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 06, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted. The State failed to establish that the proof of the petitioner's guilt is evident or the presumption of the petitioner's guilt is great. See State v. Perry, 605 So. 2d 94, 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) ("the degree of proof sufficient to deny an accused the right to bail in a capital [or life offense] case under our Constitution, to wit, proof that guilt is evident or the presumption of guilt is great is actually a greater degree of proof than that which is required to establish guilt merely to the exclusion of a reasonable doubt") (quoting State ex rel. Van Eeqhen v. Williams, 87 So. 2d 45, 46 (Fla. 1956) ). The petitioner did not demonstrate entitlement to immediate release. However, within three days of the date of this order, the trial court shall determine the appropriate conditions of pretrial release under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131 or, upon proper motion by the State, conduct the appropriate hearing in to determine whether the petitioner may be detained pursuant to rule 3.132.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.