alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.36
                                                                   -------------

                     Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement

This Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement dated September 23, 2004 (the
"Amendment") is made by and between Trey Resources, Inc., f/k/a iVoice
Acquisition 1, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"Company"), having an office at 750 Highway 34, Matawan, New Jersey 07747 and
Jerome Mahoney, with an office at 750 Route 34, Matawan, NJ 07747. (the
"Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H :

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an employment
agreement dated January 1, 2003 (the "Employment Agreement"), and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to mutually amend this
Employment Agreement,

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

The terms and conditions as set forth below shall amend the Employment
Agreement:

1. Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read with the
additional language following this subsection:

         The fixed compensation to be paid the Executive, as specified pursuant
         to this subsection, shall accrue, but payment shall be deferred until
         such time as the Board of Directors of the Company feel that the
         Company has sufficient financial resources to pay such fixed
         compensation.

2. Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following language:

         The Executive shall also be entitled to three weeks vacation, unlimited
         sick leave and fringe benefits, (Health Insurance, Disability
         Insurance, Auto Insurance, unaccountable travel expense allowance of
         $600.00 per month, a car allowance of $800 per month and an Annual
         Bonus) in accordance with Company policies and plans in effect, from
         time to time, for directors of the Company.

<PAGE>

3. Section 15 shall be amended to delete the words: ". . . with a copy to
counsel to the Company at Muenz & Meritz, P.C., 3 Hughes Place, Dix Hills, New
York 11746, Attention: Lawrence A. Muenz, Esq." and replaced with the words: ".
.. . with a copy to counsel to the Company at: Meritz & Muenz LLP, 2021 O Street,
NW, Washington, DC 20036, Attention: Lawrence A. Muenz, Esq.

4. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.


Trey Resources, Inc.                                  Jerome Mahoney


By: _________________                                 By: _________________
    Mark Meller
    President


Date: _______________                                 Date: _______________
Antonio L. WARREN, Sr. v. Felicia WARREN

2161054

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Julia D. Collins of The Isaak Law Firm, Montgomery, for appellant.

Mary Lee Abele, Birmingham, for appellee.

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

Antonio L. Warren, Sr. ("the husband"), appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court divorcing him from Felicia Warren ("the wife"), dividing the marital property and debts, and awarding the wife alimony and $3,000 toward her attorney fee.

On appeal, the husband contends that the trial court's division of marital assets was inequitable and that there was no reason for what he says is an inequitable distribution. He also contends that the trial court failed to consider the husband's ability "to meet the alimony obligation based upon information presented at trial." The third issue the husband raises on appeal is whether the trial court considered certain factors when directing the husband to pay $3,000 toward the wife's attorney fee, including the earning capacity of the parties, the results of the litigation, the conduct of the parties, and the financial circumstances of the parties.

It is undisputed that a trial was held on May 4, 2017. In its judgment, the trial court states that its decision was reached considering, among other things, the ore tenus testimony of the parties. The record shows that trial subpoenas were issued, and the witness lists the parties exchanged indicated that several witnesses were expected to be called to testify. However, the record on appeal does not contain a transcript of the trial. The notice of appeal indicates that a transcript was not ordered. The form shows a check in the box next to the sentence saying "Transcript will not be ordered," so the failure to obtain a transcript is not an oversight.

Additionally, no statement of the evidence made pursuant to Rule 10(d), Ala. R. App. P., is included in the record on appeal.

> " 'An appellant bears the burden of ensuring that the record contains sufficient evidence to warrant reversal.' *Bobo v. Bobo*, 585 So.2d 54, 56 (Ala. Civ. App. 1991). '[W]hen, as in this case, "oral testimony is considered by the trial court in reaching its judgment and that testimony is not present in the record as either a transcript or Rule 10(d), A[la]. R. A[pp]. P., statement, it must be conclusively presumed that the testimony [was] sufficient to support the judgment.'' ' *Beverly v. Beverly*, 28 So.3d 1, 4 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (quoting *Rudolph v. Rudolph*, 586 So.2d 929, 930 (Ala. Civ. App. 1991) )."

*1148*L.D.K. v. V.K.*, [Ms. 2160205, June 23, 2017] --- So.3d ----, ---- (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).

Without a trial transcript or a Rule 10(d) statement of the evidence, this court has no way to review the issues presented in this appeal, all of which involve a review of the evidence and are not simply questions of law. Because we must conclusively presume that the testimony presented at trial was sufficient to support the judgment, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Pittman, Thomas, Moore, and Donaldson, JJ., concur.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SUNTRUST BANK, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
#### GIBSON v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

No. 11013.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 4, 1953.

Decided June 16, 1953.

Alan Kahn, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richter, Lord & Farage, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Owen B. Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa. (Arthur E. Newbold, III, Barnes, Dech-ert, Price, Myers & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

*925PER CURIAM.

This is a suit brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.'C.A. § 51 et seq., and the Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 22 et seq. The defendant received a verdict in the court below. All that the plaintiff complains of here is the trial judge’s charge to the jury. This we have examined. Everything the judge said was literally correct and any slight possibility that the jury could have been confused into thinking that negligence was required for liability under the Boiler Inspection Act is completely eliminated by the judge’s giving, at plaintiff’s request, specific instruction to the effect that negligence is not necessary under that statute.

The charge of the trial court was careful, fair and accurate. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalSCAPE, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, James R
Morris, Chief Executive Officer and Mendy Marsh, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 12, 2009



/s/James R MorrisJames R Morris President and Chief Executive Officer






/s/ Mendy MarshMendy Marsh Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

s0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147834

In re ISTIFAN

_________________________________________

KUSSAI J. ISTIFAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 147834

COA: 315679

Oakland CC: 1989

- 092664

- FH

OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR and

CYRIL C. HALL,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 103887)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1001 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-751, K2025-750.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30098 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Ricky Lee RATTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Rhonda Renee COX, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2532

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 29, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal is granted in circuit court case number 15-11350-CF. This order shall serve as a timely notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence, the latter imposed May 4, 2018. Within twenty days the trial court shall consider appellant's eligibility for appointment of appellate counsel, provided appellant files within ten days a motion in the circuit court requesting same accompanied by a financial affidavit, and shall enter an order thereupon, with a copy to appellant and a copy to this court.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, accompanied by any order of indigency that may have been entered by the circuit court, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                           THE PRINCETON REVIEW, INC.

         This employment Agreement is between Steve Quattrociocchi ("Exec") and
The Princeton Review, Inc. ("TPR"), and is subject to the terms of the Executive
Compensation Policy Statement, the current form of which is attached as Exhibit
A (the "Policy Statement"). Terms may be defined in The Princeton Review
Glossary. This Agreement supersedes any previous employment agreement.

1.   Job Description: Exec shall serve as the Executive VP of the Test Prep
     Division.

2.   Compensation: TPR shall pay Exec $275,000 per year, increasing annually by
     3%. He shall also receive a bonus of up to 50% of base salary.

3.   Stock Option Grant: TPR shall grant Exec an option to purchase 50,000
     shares of Common Stock, as authorized by TPR's Compensation Committee, at
     fair market value as indicated by the closing price of REVU on April 22,
     2002. These options shall be subject to the terms and conditions of The
     Princeton Review, Inc. Stock Option Grant attached hereto.

4.   Term: This Agreement has an initial expiration date of February 14, 2004
     but will automatically be extended for additional two-year periods upon the
     completion of the initial term and any two-year extension period thereafter
     until (i) Exec voluntarily terminates employment or (ii) TPR gives contrary
     written notice to Exec at least 6 months prior to the completion of the
     initial term or any two-year extension period thereafter. TPR will not be
     under any obligation to make additional option grants, such as those
     described in paragraph 3 above, for any extension terms of this Agreement
     unless agreed by TPR and Exec.

5.   Severance Payments and Benefits: If TPR terminates Exec's employment
     without Cause, then in addition to the payments provided under Section 5.1
     of the Policy Statement, but in lieu of the payments provided under Section
     5.3 of the Policy Statement, TPR will pay Exec an amount equal to his
     annual base salary for an additional twelve months following termination.

6.   Spite: Remedies available to TPR under Section 2.4.2 of the Policy
     Statement shall not include repayment of stock option appreciation.



Agreed to this April 10, 2002.


    /s/ Mark Chernis                                 /s/ Steve Quattrociocchi
----------------------------                     ------------------------------
Mark Chernis                                     Steve Quattrociocchi
President, TPR
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of ACRO Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Gadi Aner, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Gabby Klausner, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/  Gadi AnerGadi AnerChief Executive Officer and Chairman




By:
/s/ Gabby KlausnerGabby KlausnerTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: April 15, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1012 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-762, K2025-761.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30128 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

publication        July 1, 1970        4 Earthquake: Major offshore earthquakes recall the Aztec myth

Presentations and Events        November 18, 2021        PubTalk-11/2021: Busting Myths About One of the Largest Volcanic Systems in the World - The Top 10 Misconceptions about Yellowstone Volcanism

publication        August 1, 2015        Myths and facts on wastewater injection, hydraulic fracturing, enhanced oil recovery, and induced seismicity

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis
.
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS AUSTlN**1.** BonorabloIIozm Gclrrison - J?qp 3.

**. cu~taiicss**  **that there**  **is a**  **causal ‘** **coPloctlon bctsc3n**  **the cOti.itiOnS**  **Fhi& t!13**  **Ctr;lDyCP ylts**  **&Out ttiD**  **0r,** ployeoapi1

**t&s** resiiltinl;

injury. (Lixylanrl CasJr;ltr c'o.vs.Sdth, 40 S. 11. (2) 913; TOSZS IndomItg Co. ys. Freelar,2s S. **l7. $GG,**  **(Zrit of**  **emor Eisxisse~)**  **;** 45 Toor.

JLS'. p. 403, Sec. T3). 6a3.cl2 our suprcr;lr, Court has 'AR **illjU~** has t0 d0 With, all2 arisss out of tha kork or busLn3ss 02 the oq1ogcr, oIlan 5.t results .froma risk 'orI;&z.?ril Wiil5Ch is necessarily,or ord&arily, or r~asouaialy

i.nimreot;in,

cr ioci**dent t**  **0, t&3**  **corxhlct Of**  **snclz Fork**  **or btw.Ress**  **.a --**  **T&z; ‘** **ocrm ’** **s Rooi~~occ?l**  **Asso. vs.**  E&n&m, 246 S.Di.r2, 28 d.L+ n. $402.. In th&t casa Eehr3isn, an enrlloyO*,

van rau over and kllleil

by a rzilroti,

cik,ti3 &SC goi3-i~

to his work. s&-It JustiooGraorrsoti, for tIm Su:~coa CoywtAPPROVEDBdAY 6, 1940 ATTORNEY GENE& OF TEXAS *

.

-. .
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-132479,333-108363, and 333-108362) on Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-131758, 33-129501,and 33-124998) on Form S-3 of Syntax-Brillian Corporation of ourreport dated September 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Syntax-BrillianCorporation as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2006, which report appears inthe June 30, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Syntax-Brillian Corporation./s/ Grobstein, Horwath & Company LLPSherman Oaks, California
#*
William Arthur Mcintosh TDCJ-ID no. 688254 Robertson Unit 12071 F.M. 3522 Abilene, Texas 79601 Clerk/ Abel Acosta Court of Criminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, texas 78711 June 28, 2015 Mr. Acosta, 

### I am requesting a copy of th edocket sheet fior the following cause no.'s PD-0331-15, PD-0332-15, PD-0333-15, PD-0334-15, PD-0335-15, PD-0336-l5,fD-0337- 

### 15, PD-0338-15, PD-0339-15, PD-0340-15. Iwould greatly appreciate getting a 

### copy of the docket sheet for the above numbered cause numbers as Iwould like to see the progress of my PDR. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, William Mcintosh



## , RECEIVEDIN 

## COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JUL 012015 

### AbelAcosta,Clerk