alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29725]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 490 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-541, K2025-539.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29725 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - maryland(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - (-)south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Podcasts        December 18, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 110 – Geospatial Information Response Team

Podcasts        November 21, 2022        Eyes on Earth Episode 84 - Hurricane Disturbance Mapping
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 196 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 196

 Supporting the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the 
                           right to counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2013

Mr. Deutch (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Chabot, Ms. Wilson of Florida, 
   Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Johnson of 
  Georgia, and Ms. Chu) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the 
                           right to counsel.

Whereas on March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court recognized in Gideon v. Wainwright 
        that counsel must be provided to indigent defendants in all felony 
        cases;
Whereas the Supreme Court held that providing counsel to indigent defendants in 
        all felony cases meets the essential requirements of the Sixth Amendment 
        to the United States Constitution; and
Whereas the Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin that absent a knowing 
        and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, 
        whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless they were 
        represented by counsel at their trial: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the Sixth Amendment to the United States 
        Constitution, the right to counsel; and
            (2) supports strategies to improve the criminal justice 
        system to ensure that indigent defendants in all felony cases 
        are adequately represented by counsel.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30193]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 13, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1060 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-819, K2025-819.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30193 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00351-CR

NATHANIEL ROBERT COLLIER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-1144-C2

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on January 30, 2019. A first extension of time 

of 30 days was granted, and appellant’s brief was due March 1, 2019. A second extension 

of time of 31 days was granted, and appellant’s brief was due April 1, 2019. Now, counsel 

for appellant has requested an additional 30 days which would make the brief due on 

May 1, 2019. This most recent request has pushed the total days to file the brief to 121 

days to file a brief that the Rules of Appellate Procedure provide should be filed in 30 

days. We cannot, in good conscience, grant counsel four times the amount of time 
Collier v. State Page 2

allowed by the rules to file appellant’s brief where there is no suggestion in the motion 

that this case is unusual in any way. 

Accordingly, appellant’s Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s 

Brief is denied. Appellant’s brief is due May 1, 2019. If not filed by the deadline set 

herein, the appeal will be abated for a hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Motion denied

Order issued and filed April 17, 2019
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                                   CONSENT OF
                              PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC

<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-118594) for the Company's 2004 Stock
Compensation Plan and Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-115167) for the Company's
Dividend Reinvestment Plan of our report dated February 21, 2005 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of PSB Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2004
which appear in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of PSB Group,
Inc.

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 25, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7039

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRISTIAN O. KANU,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.

(CR-91-226-HAR, CA-94-2592-HAR)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christian O. Kanu, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. He alleges that the district court

committed sentencing errors and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. However, because his claims of sentencing error

could have been raised on appeal, but were not, he may not now

assert them. See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976)

(nonconstitutional claims not raised on appeal may not be asserted

in a collateral proceeding); United States v. Ward, 55 F.3d 412,

413 (8th Cir. 1995) (an allegation of error in the application or

computation of the sentencing guidelines is not constitutional). We

also find that Appellant has failed to establish that his attorney's performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced thereby.

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 693 (1984). Accordingly, we

affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 12.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Daniel T. MacInnis, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MAG Silver Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 28, 2006

Daniel T. MacInnis



Daniel T. MacInnis



Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
13.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Manny Dhinsa, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer of Strata Oil & Gas Inc. (the “Company”), certify, under the
standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal
year  ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and  results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  May
22, 2008











By:
            /s/ Manny DhinsaName:
            Manny
      DhinsaTitle:
            President,
      Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer(Principal
      Executive Officerand
      Principal Financial Officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Changes are Blacklined (====)

EXHIBIT 32.0
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of AquaCell
                        ==================
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the third fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.


Date: August 3, 2005                          /s/ James C. Witham
      ==============                       -----------------------------------
                                           Name:  James C. Witham
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 3, 2005                          /s/ Gary S. Wolff
      ==============                       -----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gary S. Wolff
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Inyx,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Jack  Kachkar,
Chief Executive  Officer of the small business issuer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Jack Kachkar
----------------

Jack Kachkar
Chief Executive Officer

June 23, 2004
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) February 17, 2006
 Delphi Corporation
 
 Delaware
    
    1-14787
    
    38-3430473(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 5725 Delphi Drive, Troy, MI
    
    48098(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (248) 813-2000
 
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENTITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITSSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXFinal Order entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court    Table of Contents  
 ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
  
 ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99 (a)
    
    Final Order entered by the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York on February
17, 2006
 
 SIGNATURE
  DELPHI CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: February 23, 2006By:
    /s/ JOHN D. SHEEHAN(John D. Sheehan,Vice President and Chief Restructuring Officer,
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller)




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99 (a)
    
    Final Order entered by the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York on February
17, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 258 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 258

  Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1565) to protect 
  Second Amendment rights, ensure that all individuals who should be 
  prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant 
    Criminal Background Check System, and provide a responsible and 
                  consistent background check process.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2013

Ms. Esty submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1565) to protect 
  Second Amendment rights, ensure that all individuals who should be 
  prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant 
    Criminal Background Check System, and provide a responsible and 
                  consistent background check process.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House 
resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the 
Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1565) to protect Second 
Amendment rights, ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited 
from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant Criminal 
Background Check System, and provide a responsible and consistent 
background check process. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate 
the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. 
All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 
have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. If 
the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has come to no 
resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the House 
shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under clause 
1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for further 
consideration of the bill.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 1565.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.16





November 26, 2014




TO:
Seabridge Gold Inc.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission




Re: Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")


Consent of Expert





Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with (i) Amendment  No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”), to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-10, and any amendments thereto, including any post-effective amendments (the “Registration Statement”), to be filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, I, William Threlkeld, the Senior Vice President, Exploration of the Company and a Registered Professional Geologist, consent to the use of my name and authorize the use of the information represented in the 40-F and the Registration Statement as having been prepared by or under my supervision.




I confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the information represented in the 40-F and the Registration Statement as having been prepared by me or under my supervision or within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with such information.




Yours truly,/s/ William ThrelkeldWilliam Threlkeld
Tracy Nicole BROWN, Appellant, v. Rasool KAMMA, Jr., Appellee.

No. 1D18-171

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.