alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


 I, David G. Powers, certify, that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of United Community
Bankshares of Florida, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:


   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including our
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee or registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

   (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


Date: March 25, 2004

By: /s/ David G. Powers
____________________________
David G. Powers, President
and Chief Executive Officer
### Opinion issued October 13 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— 

### NO. 01 - 16 - 00169 - CR

——————————— DANIEL JACOBSON , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1485376

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Daniel Jacobson pleaded guilty to the offense of driving while intoxicated. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE § 49.04. In accordance with Jacobson’s plea bargain, the trial court sentenced him to imprisonment for five years, but it suspended the sentence and placed him on community supervision for five years.2

Jacobson filed a notice of appeal. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending he has no right to appeal. Jacobson has n ot responded to this motion. In a plea bargain case, a defendant only may appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . art. 44.02; T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on app eal. See id

. The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the def endant has no right of appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 61 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal , we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- barga ined is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss the ap peal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as managing owner of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust, certify that (i) the
Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Campbell Alternative Asset Trust
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Campbell Alternative Asset
Trust.

                                    CAMPBELL ALTERNATIVE ASSET TRUST
                                    By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing owner

                                    By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Bruce L. Cleland
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 13, 2004

                                       E6
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(2)
              - (-)products_publications(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - (-)delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        September 19, 2018        Mw 4.2 Delaware Earthquake of 30 November 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
          31, 2007 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirement of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 14, 2007


                                       31
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 8, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Martin J. Emerson

Martin J. Emerson
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 985 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to prevent the spread of Asian carp 

in the Great Lakes and the tributaries of the Great Lakes, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2013 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. 

WALBERG, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BENTIVOLIO, 

Mr. PETERS of Michigan, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. UPTON, Mr. BENISHEK, and 

Mr. DUFFY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to prevent the spread 

of Asian carp in the Great Lakes and the tributaries 

of the Great Lakes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asian Carp Prevention 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 985 IH

1 SEC. 2. COORDINATION OF EFFORTS TO PREVENT THE 

2 SPREAD OF ASIAN CARP. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec4 retary of the Army shall coordinate and lead the actions 

5 of the Federal Government with respect to preventing the 

6 spread of Asian carp in the Great Lakes and the tribu7 taries of the Great Lakes. 

8 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF ASIAN 

9 CARP. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army may 

11 carry out projects to prevent the spread of Asian carp in 

12 the Great Lakes and the tributaries of the Great Lakes, 

13 including— 

14 (1) installing electric, acoustic, air bubble, and 

15 other barriers; 

16 (2) applying piscicides; 

17 (3) improving locks; 

18 (4) taking actions at the Brandon Road Lock 

19 and Dam, Illinois, to prevent the spread of Asian 

20 carp; and 

21 (5) implementing other projects determined 

22 necessary by the Secretary. 

23 (b) APPLICATION OF OTHER LAW.—With respect to 

24 projects carried out under subsection (a), such projects 

25 shall be treated as in compliance with all applicable envi26 ronmental Federal laws. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 985 IH

1 SEC. 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF EFFICACY STUDY REC2 OMMENDATIONS. 

3 The Secretary of the Army shall implement measures 

4 recommended in the efficacy study, or provided in interim 

5 reports, authorized under section 3061 of the Water Re6 sources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114; 

7 121 Stat. 1121), with such modifications or emergency 

8 measures as the Secretary of the Army determines to be 

9 appropriate, to prevent aquatic nuisance species from by10 passing the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal 

11 Barrier Project referred to in that section and to prevent 

12 aquatic nuisance species from dispersing into the Great 

13 Lakes. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.5


 


REVOLVING NOTE


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  June 10,
  2008

  
	
  $25,000,000

  	
   

  	
  Minneapolis, Minnesota

  



 


The
undersigned, jointly and severally, for value received, promise to pay to the
order of The PrivateBank and Trust Company (the “Lender”) at the
Administrative Agent’s Office (as defined in the Credit Agreement) the
aggregate unpaid amount of all Loans made to the undersigned by the Lender
pursuant to the Credit Agreement referred to below (as shown on the schedule
attached hereto (and any continuation thereof) or in the records of the
Lender), such principal amount to be payable on the dates set forth in the
Credit Agreement.


 


The
undersigned, jointly and severally, further promise to pay interest on the
unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such Loan
is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the time(s) set forth
in the Credit Agreement.  Payments of
both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States
of America.


 


This
Revolving Note evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the
terms and provisions of, the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement,
dated as of June 10, 2008 (as amended, supplemented or modified, the “Credit
Agreement”; terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined
in the Credit Agreement), among the undersigned, LaSalle Bank National
Association, certain other lenders party thereto and the Lender, to which
Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and
provisions under which this Revolving Note may or must be paid prior to its due
date or its due date accelerated.


 


This
Revolving Note is made under and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota
applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State.


 


	
  WINMARK
  CORPORATION

  	
   

  	
  GROW
  BIZ GAMES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Brett D. Heffes

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Brett D. Heffes

  
	
  Name:   Brett Heffes

  	
   

  	
  Name: Brett Heffes

  
	
  Title:  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  	
   

  	
  Title:  Chief
  Financial Officer and Treasurer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  WIRTH
  BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

  	
   

  	
  WINMARK
  CAPITAL CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Brett D. Heffes

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Brett D. Heffes

  
	
  Name: Brett Heffes

  	
   

  	
  Name:  Brett Heffes

  
	
  Title:  Chief
  Financial Officer and Treasurer

  	
   

  	
  Title:  Chief
  Financial Officer and Treasurer
Transfer
      Agreement of Offering the Capital

     

    Transferor
      (Party A): Xi’an Zhongxi Zhengliu Dianlu Transformer Factory

    Transferee
      (Party B): Zhejiang Lvneng Electric Co., Ltd.

    


    After
      approval by the shareholders meeting of Xi’an Amorphous Alloy Zhongxi
      Transformer Co., Ltd. which held on July 10, 2007, consulted by Party A and
      Party B, regarding Party A will transfer it’s offering capital in Xi’an
      Amorphous Alloy Zhongxi Transformer Co., Ltd to Party B, they agreed to sign
      this agreement.

    


    1.
      Party
      A will transfer it’s 6.25% shares which is RMB2,000,000 of offering capital
      Party A owned in Amorphous Alloy Zhongxi Transformer Co., Ltd. to Party B,
      Party
      B shall pay the transfer fees within 30 days upon the signing of this
      agreement.

    


    2.
      After
      transferring of offering the capital, Party A has no entitled to enjoy the
      shareholders right, and has no responsibilities of the shareholders in Xi’an
      Amorphous Alloy Zhongxi Transformer Co., Ltd. Party B shall enjoy the
      shareholders right and shall take the shareholders responsibility in Amorphous
      Alloy Zhongxi Transformer Co., Ltd.

    


    This
      agreement will be effective upon the signing of this agreement by Party A and
      Party B.

    


    Transferor:

    Xi’an
      Zhongxi Zhengliu Dianlu Transformer Factory

    


    Transferee:

    Zhejiang
      Lvneng Electric Co., Ltd.

    


    The
      date
      of signing: July 11, 2007
Ryan Lee HANNINEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4026

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
GATEWAY HOLDING, LLC, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. RH FUND, XIV, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3070

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
No. 317PA14 TENTH DISTRICT

FILED 6 NOVEMBER 2015

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v.

RODNEY NIGEE PLEDGER TAYLOR

)

)

)

)

)

From Wake County

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

This case comes before the Court by way of defendant’s petition for 

discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31. We also allowed the State’s 

conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues.

We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals in part and remand this case 

to the Court of Appeals to consider defendant’s Fifth Amendment argument on the 

merits. As to all other issues in defendant’s petition for discretionary review, and as 

to all issues in the State’s conditional petition for discretionary review, we conclude 

that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 5th day of November, 2015.

s/Ervin, J.

For the Court
-2-

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North 

Carolina, this the 5th day of November, 2015.

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER

Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hackney

Assistant Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7390

JUAN COLES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EUGENE NUTH, Warden, M.T.S.C.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA98-2965-CCB)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Coles, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Juan Coles seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Coles v. Nuth, No. CA-98-2965-CCB (D. Md.

Sept. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Martha RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, Appellee.

No. 4D18-797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*