alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1044 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-801, K2025-800.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30177 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Latisha MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, John C. Pound, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 1, 2007 of RedEnvelope, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b. [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: July 30, 2007*By: /s/ JOHN C. POUND**John C. Pound*
Michael KOFFARNUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Lisabeth Fryer, of Lisabeth J. Fryer, P.A., Lake Mary, and Whitney S. Boan, of Whitney S. Boan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss, in part, Appellant's appeal as to his first issue raised for reversal and affirm as to his second ground for relief. We do so without prejudice to Appellant's right to seek appropriate and timely postconviction relief in the trial court.

AFFIRMED, in part; DISMISSED, in part, without prejudice.

ORFINGER, LAMBERT, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Reserve Canada Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the" Report"), I, Ken
Pearson, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 21, 2007            By/s/ Ken Pearson
                               Name:  Ken Pearson
                               Title;  President (Principal Accounting Officer)
                                       Executive Officer and Principal
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
          I, Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr., certify that:
          1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BrillianCorporation;
          2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
          3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
          4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;
          b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
          c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
          5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
          b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     /s/ VINCENT F. SOLLITTO, JR.  Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr. *President and Chief Executive Officer*
Date: March 26, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 26, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60696 Summary Calendar

ROGELIO RAMIREZ, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A91 199 591

-------------------- Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rogelio Ramirez petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Ramirez contends that the BIA erred when it found him removable based on his Texas conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (UUMV). Ramirez also asserts that the BIA erred when it denied his request for a waiver of removal under former Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(c), former 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c).No. 05-60696 -2- This court must consider, sua sponte if necessary, whether appellate jurisdiction exists. See Chunn v. Chunn (In re Chunn) , 106 F.3d 1239, 1241 (5th Cir. 1997). Ramirez admits “[t]his court previously held that it did not have jurisdiction to review [his] removal order, presumably finding UUMV is an aggravated felony - crime of violence.” However, he asks this court to determine whether his Texas conviction for UUMV is a crime of violence in light of Leocal v. Ashcroft , 543 U.S. 1 (2004). This court’s pre- Leocal jurisprudence was consistent with Leocal ’s holding related to 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). See, e.g. , United States v. Chapa-Garza , 243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir. 2001). Therefore, Ramirez’s petition fails to “present[] grounds that could not have been presented in the prior judicial proceeding.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(2). Accordingly, this court would have jurisdiction over this petition only if “the remedy provided by the prior proceeding was inadequate or ineffective to test the validity of the order.” Id. Ramirez fails to make such a showing. For these reasons, Ramirez’s petition for review is
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
Other

2048.328
L.H., the Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0305

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Alvaro ELIAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 18-2532

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

*ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING POST-TRIAL RELEASE*

PER CURIAM.

*1249Alvaro Elias seeks review of the trial court's denial of Elias's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.691(b) motion for post-trial release pending review of his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). In denying Elias's motion for post-trial release, the trial court was required to enter a written order setting forth the factual basis on which the court reached its decision and the reasons for its denial. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691(b) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(3). The lower court committed reversible error in failing to enter such a written order. *See**Metayer v. State*, 52 So.3d 691, 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ; *Montgomery v. State*, 788 So.2d 274, 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ; *Buckhalter v. State*, 416 So.2d 862, 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, we grant Elias's motion for review, reverse the denial of Elias's motion for post-trial release, and remand for the lower court to reconsider Elias's motion in accordance with the applicable criminal and appellate rules within three days of the date of this opinion. If the lower court again denies post-trial release, it must make the necessary written findings to support the denial.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(14)
              - (-)products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(49)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(25)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(6)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Data Access        April 12, 2018        What to Expect in a Big Urban Earthquake
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(18)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(106)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(3)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - news_news-149245(7)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(39)
              - american samoa(6)
              - california(67)
              - colorado(3)
              - hawaii(45)
              - idaho(3)
              - montana(6)
              - nevada(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - (-)oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(30)
              - virginia(14)
              - washington(13)
              - wyoming(8)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Photography        June 5, 2021        Mount Hood and Fault-plane Solution for June 5, 2021 Earthquake

Photography        September 30, 2020        Installing a seismometer at station BRSP on Mount Hood

Photography        October 1, 2019        Preparing the jumbo piston corer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(13)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2022(80)
              - (-)2021(1)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Photography  Time lapse of Jan 17, 2010, earthquake swarm on Madison Plateau, YNP.
Johnny PHILLIPS, #C01681, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(68)
              - products_data(41)
              - products_maps(14)
              - products_publications(909)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(6)
              - multimedia_audio(11)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(11)
              - multimedia_image(87)
              - multimedia_image-141769(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(67)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(9)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(8)
              - multimedia_video(99)
              - multimedia_video-149194(66)
              - multimedia_video-149195(22)
              - multimedia_video-149196(8)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - news_news-149245(26)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(9)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(16)
              - news_other_news(11)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(60)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(35)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - (-)california(5)
              - hawaii(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - new york(7)
              - south carolina(1)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Illustrations        January 10, 2024        The “Did you feel it?” ZIP Map for the 1994 Northrdige earthquake.

Illustrations        April 1, 2018        Cover of The HayWired Earthquake Scenario—We Can Outsmart Disaster

Illustrations        December 31, 2021        Landers Fault and Hector Mine Fault Aftershocks

Illustrations        December 31, 1989        Cross-Sections of Seismicity Along the San Andreas Fault

Illustrations        December 31, 1999        Aftershocks (1)