alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6004
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RANDOLF MOORE, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a Booney, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-H-7; 4:04-cv-00014-H) Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: May 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolf Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Randolf Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
(i)  EXHIBIT 99.1


          A.   Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

          B.   (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



     In  connection  with the filing by Doblique,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September  30,  2002 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) and
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial  respects,  the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.




                                /s/ /Pam J. Halter
                                ----------------------------
                                President



                                /s/ Pam J. Halter
                                ----------------------------
                                Principal Accounting Officer



November 13, 2002
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James D. Fay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NeoPhotonics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2011   
|                       
|/s/    JAMES D. FAY    
|James D. Fay           
|Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 102165-102166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29649]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Titmus, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 603-292-4479; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    On July 05, 2024, the National Science Foundation published a 
notice in the Federal Register of permit applications received. The 
permits were issued on the following dates:

1. Heather Liwanag, Permit No. 2025-004, August 15, 2024

[[Page 102166]]

2. Zheng Wang, Permit No. 2025-005, August 16, 2024
3. Paul Ponganis, Permit No. 2025-006, August 16, 2024

    On July 26, 2024, the National Science Foundation published a 
notice in the Federal Register of permit applications received. The 
permits were issued on the following dates:

1. Ethan Norris, ASC, Permit No. 2025-008, September 26, 2024
2. Jason Flesher, SCENIC, Permit No. 2025-007, September 25, 2024

    On August 5, 2024, the National Science Foundation published a 
notice in the Federal Register of permit applications received. The 
permits were issued on the following dates:

1. Chris Linder, Permit No. 2025-009, September 26, 2024
2. Dan Costa, Permit No. 2025-010, September 27, 2024

    On September 12, 2024, the National Science Foundation published a 
notice in the Federal Register of permit applications received. The 
permits were issued on the following dates:

1. Robin West, Seabourn, Permit No. 2025-011, October 25, 2024
2. Heather Lynch, Permit No. 2025-013, November 22, 2024
3. Heather Lynch, Permit No. 2025-012, November 11, 2024

    On September 30, 2024, the National Science Foundation published a 
notice in the Federal Register of permit applications received. The 
permits were issued on the following dates:

1. Dale Andersen, Permit No. 2025-014, November 27, 2024

    On October 31, 2024, the National Science Foundation published a 
notice in the Federal Register of permit applications received. The 
permits were issued on the following dates:

1. Ari Friedlaender, Permit No. 2025-019, December 1, 2024
2. Ari Friedlaender, Permit No. 2025-020, December 1, 2024
3. Sujatha Bagal, NGS, Permit No. 2025-021, December 9, 2024

Alina Pavao,
Administrative Assistant, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2024-29649 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6930** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. LIONEL ELIZAH WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:90

- cr - 00149

- RGD

- 2; 2:13

- cv - 00005

- RGD )

Submitted : August 29 , 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Lionel Elizah Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Harvey MacBride, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lionel Elizah Willi ams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denie s relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independentl y reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately present ed in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Kevin FRASER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-151

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 145 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the sinking of U.S.S. Thresher (SSN 

593). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER (for herself and Ms. PINGREE of Maine) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the sinking of U.S.S. 

Thresher (SSN 593). 

Whereas U.S.S. Thresher was first launched at Portsmouth 

Naval Shipyard on July 9, 1960; 

Whereas U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for her final voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew 

of 16 officers, 96 sailors, and 17 civilians; 

Whereas the mix of that crew reflects the unity of the naval 

submarine service, military and civilian, in the protection 

of the United States; 

Whereas at approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while 

in communication with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, 

and approximately 220 miles off the coast of New England, U.S.S. Thresher began her final descent; 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 145 IH 

Whereas U.S.S. Thresher was declared lost with all hands on 

April 10, 1963; 

Whereas in response to the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, the 

United States Navy instituted new regulations to ensure 

the health of the submariners and the safety of the submarines of the United States; 

Whereas those regulations led to the establishment of the 

Submarine Safety and Quality Assurance program 

(SUBSAFE), now one of the most comprehensive military safety programs in the world; 

Whereas SUBSAFE has kept the submariners of the United 

States safe at sea ever since as the strongest, safest submarine force in history; 

Whereas, since the establishment of SUBSAFE, no 

SUBSAFE-certified submarine has been lost at sea, 

which is a legacy owed to the brave individuals who perished aboard U.S.S. Thresher; 

Whereas from the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, there arose in the 

institutions of higher education in the United States the 

ocean engineering curricula that enables the preeminence 

of the United States in submarine warfare; and 

Whereas the crew of U.S.S. Thresher demonstrated the ‘‘last 

full measure of devotion’’ in service to the United States, 

and this devotion characterizes the sacrifices of all submariners, past and present: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 50th anniversary of the sink3 ing of U.S.S. Thresher; 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 145 IH 

1 (2) remembers with profound sorrow the loss of 

2 U.S.S. Thresher and her gallant crew of sailors and 

3 civilians on April 10, 1963; and 

4 (3) expresses its deepest gratitude to all subma5 riners on ‘‘eternal patrol’’, who are forever bound to6 gether by dedicated and honorable service to the 

7 United States of America. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(4)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(8)
              - multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - news_other_news(5)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(17)
              - (-)american samoa(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(68)
              - colorado(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(4)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(21)
              - idaho(5)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(18)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(4)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(28)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Fieldwork        December 1, 2009        USGS Scientists in Samoa and American Samoa Studying Impacts of Tsunami in 2009

Project        October 23, 2019        U.S. Seismic Hazard Maps – Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, Samoa and the Pacific Islands, and Guam and Northern Mariana Islands
**Exhibit 34.3**

 

Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheBoard of Directors

GeneralElectric Capital Corporation:

 

We have examined the accompanyingmanagement’s assertion that General Electric Capital Corporation (the Company)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securitiestransactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving credit cardreceivables, accounts receivable and asset based lending receivables (thePlatform), as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.  Management has determined that servicingcriteria 1122(d)(1)(ii) is applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the Platform, and that all other servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) are not applicable to the primary servicing services providedby the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individualasset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constitutingthe Platform.  Management is responsiblefor the Company’s compliance with this servicing criterion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company*’*s compliance with the servicing criteria specified aboveand performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances.  Our examinationincluded testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities thatcomprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to thePlatform, and determining whether the Company processed those selectedtransactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theservicing criteria.  Furthermore, ourprocedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determinewhether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our teststhat may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by theCompany during the period covered by this report for the selected transactionsor any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion.  Our examination does not providea legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that theCompany complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for thetwelve months ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL

March 28, 2008

 

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(10)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

map        January 1, 1987        Seismicity map of the state of Florida