alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 256 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 12, 2013. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1960) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 

year 2014 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services. After general debate, the Committee of the Whole shall 

rise without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall 

be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the 

House. 
2 

•HRES 256 EH 

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be 

in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1256) to direct the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to jointly adopt rules 

setting forth the application to cross-border swaps transactions of certain provisions relating to swaps that were enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendments recommended 

by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the 

bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, 

and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Financial Services and 

20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Agriculture; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
3 

•HRES 256 EH 

SEC. 3. The chair of the Committee on Agriculture is 

authorized, on behalf of the committee, to file a supplemental 

report to accompany H.R. 1947. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Charles CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-321

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Medical Systems Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 3, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Douglas W. Kohrs, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Carmen L. Diersen, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: August 12, 2004
    
    By:
    /s/ Douglas W. KohrsName:
    Douglas W. KohrsTitle:
    Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 12, 2004
    
    
    By:
    /s/ Carmen L. DiersenName:
    Carmen L. DiersenTitle:
    Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Cassius Eugene PICKETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1010

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



INTERVIDEO, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Randall Bambrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, the Quarterly Report of InterVideo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InterVideo, Inc..



Dated: November 15, 2004



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Randall Bambrough                    
|Randall Bambrough Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of EP Global Communications, Inc., f/k/a East Coast Airlines Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Salluzzo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company for the time period covered in this report and current Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



Dated: March 9, 2004



By: /s/ Robert Salluzzo



Robert Salluzzo, Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer for the time period covered

in this report and current Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with this Annual Report of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Christopher J. Reynolds, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:     March 28, 2013
By:
/s/ Christopher J. ReynoldsChristopher J. ReynoldsVice President Finance and CFO




This certification accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be used or relied upon for any other purpose including Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(12)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)california(13)
              - colorado(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(45)
              - (-)2023(13)
              - 2022(3)
              - 2020(1)
              - 2019(2)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

location  Earthquake Science Center

staff profileJessica Murray

staff profileMargaret E Glasgow

staff profileEvan Hirakawa

staff profileLisa Schleicher, PhD

staff profileTravis Alongi, PhD

staff profileJustin Rubinstein

staff profileNicholas (Nick) M Beeler

staff profileDavid A Lockner

staff profileEllen L Phillips

staff profileWalter Mooney

staff profileMax Schneider, PhD

staff profileCarl M Wentworth
Kenneth JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-357

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeffrey Scott DOLAND, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          28,526
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (5,138)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,924
<PP&E>                                         266,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (31,097)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,169,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    177,107
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,169,601
<SALES>                                         25,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,305
<CGS>                                           28,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,198)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (516)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (48,290)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (40)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (48,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.57)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  430,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    328,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               815,079
<PP&E>                                       1,456,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,486,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,647,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,396
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,486,620
<SALES>                                      8,434,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        7,579,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,332,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (20,569)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (520,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (520,433)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (520,433)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

**Certifications**

I,Harold N. Kvisle, certify that:

1.                                       I havereviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of TransCanada Corporation;

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.                                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report.

DatedMarch 19, 2007
|        | /s/ Harold N. Kvisle                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Harold N. Kvisle                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29902]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 949 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-691, K2025-690.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29902 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00316- CV
J. B., App ellant
v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 98TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 12- 0061 45, H ONO RAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

On Aug ust 14, 2014, t h i s C ourt aff irmed the trial court’s order terminating J .B.’ s pare ntal rig hts to his minor child. See Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001. On Aug ust 15, 2014, this Court 1
rec eived appellant’s m o t i on for extension of time to file an appellant’ s brief. We construe this motion as a motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehe aring and g rant the motion in part. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.8. I f appellant wants to file a motion for rehear i n g, h e m u s t d o so by September 15, 2014.

I t is ordere d on Aug ust 22, 2014.

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in

We ref er to the fathe r by his initials only
. See Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. 1 P. 9.8.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - (-)iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        November 9, 2016        St. Louis area earthquake hazards mapping project; seismic and liquefaction hazard maps

publication        January 1, 1972        Earthquake history of Iowa
Kenneth PURDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-370

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

Matthew R. McLain, McLain Law, P.A., Maitland, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

*ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT*

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Supreme Court accepted review of our January 27, 2017 decision in this case to answer the following certified question:

> WHEN A JUVENILE OFFENDER IS ENTITLED TO A SENTENCE REVIEW HEARING, IS THE TRIAL COURT REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE AGGREGATE SENTENCE THAT THE JUVENILE OFFENDER IS SERVING FROM THE SAME SENTENCING PROCEEDING IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO MODIFY THE OFFENDER'S SENTENCE BASED UPON DEMONSTRATED MATURITY AND REHABILITATION?

The court answered the certified question in the negative, quashed our decision, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. *State v. Purdy* , 43 Fla. L. Weekly S321, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 4345959 (Fla. Aug. 30, 2018).

*568Accordingly, we affirm the sentence imposed by the trial court following the sentence review hearing on Appellant's conviction for first-degree murder. We also affirm the trial court's determination that it did not have the authority or discretion to modify Appellant's previously imposed 112.7-month sentences for his armed robbery and armed carjacking convictions that were run concurrently with each other but consecutively to Appellant's sentence for first-degree murder.

Appellant raised two other claims on appeal that were unrelated to the certified question answered by the Florida Supreme Court. First, as previously conceded by the State, the three-year minimum mandatory provisions that were part of Appellant's 112.7-month prison sentences for the armed robbery and armed carjacking convictions are to run concurrently. There was conflicting language in separate, contemporaneously rendered sentencing documents on this issue when Appellant was first sentenced. Therefore, the trial court is directed to clarify and correct the judgment and sentences on remand, if it has not already done so.

Lastly, at the sentence review hearing, the trial court found that Appellant was not eligible for gain time on his sentence for the first-degree murder. The authority to regulate gain time resides exclusively with the Department of Corrections, not the trial court. *See**Miller v. State* , 882 So.2d 480, 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (citing *Moore v. Pearson* , 789 So.2d 316, 319 (Fla. 2001) ). On remand, the trial court is directed to strike as surplusage any language in the sentencing documents regarding gain time. *Id.* ("If, in sentencing, a court attempts to bar or grant gain time, such language has been treated as surplusage or stricken." (citing *Shupe v. State* , 516 So.2d 73, 73 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) ; *Singletary v. Coronado* , 673 So.2d 924, 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) ) ).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

ORFINGER, BERGER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.