alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 13886
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus AZARIOUS TARON WILLIAMS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 3:22

- cr

- 00301

- LCB

- HNJ

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13886 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 13886

Before N EWSOM , L UCK , and A NDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: William K. Bradford , appointed counsel for Azarious Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Williams’s conviction and sent ence are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 23-13886 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2024 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.02**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing owner ofCampbell Alternative Asset Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
E 4

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks        Theresa D. Becks  Chief Financial Officer  August 15, 2005
E 5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6749

MONTAVIUS ANTOINE JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DAVID MITCHELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00003-FDW)

Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 30, 2017

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Montavius Antoine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Montavius Antoine Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as untimely filed.0F

∗

 The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims 

is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

 ∗ This appeal follows our remand to the district court for consideration of Johnson’s 

claims that his petition was timely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(C), (D) (2012). See 

Johnson v. Mitchell, 685 F. App’x 214 (4th Cir. 2017) (No. 16-7216). On remand, the 

district court thoroughly analyzed these arguments, and Johnson’s appeal is now properly 

before this court.
3

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Christopher Charles King v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 01137

- CR

Trial court case number: 64792

Trial court: 23rd District Court of Brazoria County

On January 6, 2014, Christopher Charles King filed a motion to extend time to file a

motion for rehearing. The motion is GRANTED , and any motion for rehearing is due on

January 30, 2014. It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Ac ting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 16, 2014
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-147916, 333-149077, 333-157460 and 333-172058) pertaining to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 2007 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan ofEntropic Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 3, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Entropic Communications, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofEntropic Communications, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

February 3, 2012
Exhibit 21

                          Name of Subsidiary Ownership

           Name of Subsidiary                              Ownership
           ----------------------------------------------  ---------
           CCI Southeast, LLC ("CCISE")                    100.00%
           AARD-Belle Creek, LLC (Belle Creek")            100.00%
           CCI Corona, LLC ("CCI Corona")                  100.00%
           Eagle Palm I, LLC ("Eagle")                     100.00%
           AARD-Greeley-Lot 3, LLC ("Greeley")             100.00%
           Riverdale Carwash Lot 3A, LLC ("Riverdale")     100.00%
           Cross Country Properties II, LLC ("CCPII")       80.00%
           AARD-Stonegate, LLC ("Stonegate")                51.00%
           AARD-Charmar-Olive Branch, LLC ("Olive Branch")  51.00%
           AARD-Cypress Sound, LLC ("Cypress Sound")        51.00%
           AARD-TSD-CSK Firestone, LLC ("Firestone")        51.00%
           South Glen Eagles Drive, LLC("West Valley")      51.00%
           119th and Ridgeview, LLC ("Ridgeview")           51.00%
           53rd and Baseline, LLC ("Baseline")              51.00%
           Hwy 278 and Hwy 170, LLC ("Bluffton")            51.00%
           State and 130th, LLC ("American Fork")           51.00%
           L-S Corona Pointe, LLC ("L-S Corona")            50.01%
           Cross Country Properties III, LLC ("CCPIII")     50.00%
           Across America Real Estate Exchange, Inc.       100.00%
           Across America Financial Services, Inc.         100.00%
# C_2020331EN.01000201.xml

| 7.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9932 — Kaufland/SCP Real Digital Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 331/02)

On 24 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9932. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9932. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 12.2

             CERTIFICATE OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
             RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A) AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roderick Chisholm, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Seabridge Gold
Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 25, 2005


                                                /s/ Roderick Chisholm
                                              ---------------------------
                                                Roderick Chisholm
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Corey BOONE, DOC #139748, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - (-)products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        January 22, 2011        Putting down roots in earthquake country: Your handbook for earthquakes in the Central United States

publication        June 20, 2011        Earthquakes in Mississippi and vicinity 1811-2010

publication        November 9, 2016        St. Louis area earthquake hazards mapping project; seismic and liquefaction hazard maps

publication        January 1, 1993        Central United States earthquakes, 1974-1991
STATE of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker STAFFORD a/k/a Derrick Stafford

NO. 2018-K-0549

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Annual Report of MAG Silver Corp. (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry Taddei, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








/s/ “Larry Taddei”


Larry Taddei


Chief Financial Officer


March 27, 2013
Asher DAYAN, Appellant, v. Alona Epstein DAYAN, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1020 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-773, K2025-772.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30136 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Caliber  Energy,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David Naylor,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     David Naylor
--------------------
David Naylor
Treasurer, CFO and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


March 25, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32 (b)

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Northland  Cable  Properties  Eight
Limited  Partnership  (the  "Partnership")  on Form  10Q for  the  period  ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Form  10-Q"),   I,  Gary  Jones,   President  of  Northland
Communications Corporation,  the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that;

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a)
          or (15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or
          78(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.

DATE: 11-14-05

/s/ GARY S. JONES
    ------------
    Gary S. Jones
    President

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland  Cable  Properties  Eight Limited  Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties  Eight Limited  Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Christopher COTTRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.