alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JACK BENNY WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Snow,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50453

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00099-SJO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jack Benny Williams appeals his 18-month sentence imposed for selling

counterfeit currency of the United States with intent to defraud, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 473. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams’s

FILED

JAN 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50453

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Williams the opportunity to

file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81, 109 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10981

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SOGEL GONZALEZ ROBLES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-395

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sogel Gonzalez 

Robles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez Robles has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

as Gonzalez Robles’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 30, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10981 Document: 00513025972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2015
No. 14-10981

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10981 Document: 00513025972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/30/2015
EXHIBIT 23.3
 
 CONSENT OF HENRIK THALENHORST
 
 I refer to the technical report prepared by Strathcona Minerals Services Limited dated November 11, 2011 and technical report prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. dated July 1, 2012 (the “Technical Reports”) referenced in the Registrant’s Annual Information Form (“AIF”) of MAG Silver Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  I was responsible for preparing, authoring and certifying the Technical Reports.
 
 I hereby consent to reference to my name and to the use of the Technical Reports in the AIF filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ “Henrik Thalenhorst”
 Henrik Thalenhorst
 March 27, 2013
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, David G. Powers, certify, that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Heritage Bankshares of Florida,Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including our consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.     Date: March 6, 2006 By: */s/ David G. Powers*         David G. Powers, President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit No. 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Journal Communications, Inc. (Form S-8 Reg. Nos. 333-109956and 333-108509 and Form S-3 Reg. No. 333-118552) of our report dated February 8, 2007, except for Note 14 as to which the date is February 26, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of JournalCommunications, Inc. and our report dated February 8, 2007 with respect to the Journal Communications, Inc.’s management assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Journal Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

March 5, 2007
STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond MELANCON

No. 2017-KP-1074

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel *983under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
PONTCHARTRAIN NATURAL GAS SYSTEM, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

NO. 2018-CC-1121

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION BY INTERIM FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 10, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Mark A. HeggestadMark A. HeggestadTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer 42
Jeannette L. CARRERO, Appellant, v. KENYON & PARTNERS, INC. and Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1459

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
exv10w7







EXHIBIT 10.7




Molex Incorporated

Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements




	 	 	 	 	 
	Cash Compensation:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer
	 	$	60,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Board Meeting Attendance Fee
	 	$	3,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Committee Meeting Attendance Fee
	 	$	2,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit
Committee Chairperson Meeting Attendance Fee
	 	$	4,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	
Other Committee Chairperson Meeting Attendance Fee
	 	$	3,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Equity Compensation:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Stock Options granted on the date of the
Annual Stockholders’ Meeting
	500 shares multiplied by the number of

 years of service or fraction thereof







	o	 	All retainer and meeting fees are payable quarterly in arrears on the last Thursday of
January, April, July and October.
	 
	o	 	All or a portion of the annual retainer and meeting fees can be deferred under the
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferrals can be invested in an interest-bearing
account payable in cash, or in a stock unit account payable in shares of Molex Common
Stock. A deferral election form must be submitted within 30 days of election to the Board.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29740]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 849 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-562, K2025-560.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29740 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(21)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(10)
              - products_publications(49)
              - products_software(2)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(72)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(45)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(17)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(51)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - (-)hawaii(1)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Supporting material        July 31, 2018        Frequently Asked Questions about Deformation at Kīlauea Summit
STATE EX REL. Kenneth SMOTHERS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1439

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 102179)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 905 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-631, K2025-630.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29810 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 13,
2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Princeton National
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K
of Princeton National Bancorp, Inc.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL
April 21, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO under Section 906



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Trump Casino Holdings, LLC and Trump Casino Funding, Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, the Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOHN P. BURKE                            
|John P. Burke                                
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
|Trump Casino Holdings, LLC; and              
|Trump Casino Funding, Inc.                   



March 31, 2005
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BABOUCAR TAAL

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1 9

- 3079 (RC)

)

)

FEDERAL ELECTION )

COMMISSION

, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, appearing pro se

, sues the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) , which

dismissed his administrative complaint alleging that a bank in New Hampshire had vio lated the

Federal Election Campaign Act

, 52 U.S.C. § § 3010 1

- 301 26

. See Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1

(alleging that the bank “ engaged in illegal campaign contributions to a series of candidates for

both state and federal offices, in a patronage system as far back as the 1990s and in relevant time

and pertinent campaign(s) that of the then outgoing chairman of St Mary ’ s, for Governor and

United States Senate. ” ) ; Compl. Attach

. ( FEC D ecision). Pending before the Court is

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of

subject matter jurisdic tion and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted

. Mot. to Dismiss , ECF No. 13

. Plaintiff has neither complied with the order to respond

to the instant motion by the extended deadline of October 16, 2020, see ECF No. 1 8, nor

requested additional time to respond. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion will be

granted.2 “ Before proceeding to the merits of a case, the court must confirm that it has Article III

jurisdiction. ” Lovitky v. Trump , 949 F.3d 753, 758 (D.C . Cir. 2020)

. By his silence, plaintiff

has conceded defendant’s valid argument that he lacks standing to sue

. See Mem. at 15

- 21 ;

Order , ECF No. 15 ( noting that defendant’s unopposed arguments may be treated as conceded).

Because the “ defect of standing is a defect in subject matter jurisdiction ,” Haase v. Sessions , 835

F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

, the Court has “no appropriate occasion” to a ssess the merits of

plaintiff’s claims under Rule 12(b)(6)

, Lovitky

, 9 49 F.3d at 763

. Therefore, this case will be

dismissed . A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion

.

________/s/____________

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge

Date: October 29 , 2020
Riley HICKMAN v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation, Humble Oil & Refining Company, Humble Oil & Refining Corporation, Chevron USA, Inc., BP Corporation North America, Inc., The Texas Company, Devon Energy Production Company, LP., Dynamic Exploration, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company, Shell Oil Company, Marathon Oil Company, Sunset Petroleum, Stone Oil Company of Baton Rouge and Al Cunningham

NO. 2018-C-1463

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.