alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 14 52

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l App el le e

v.
Don al d An dr ews
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l App el la nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - F t. Sm it h

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 3, 2 01 2 Fi le d: Octo be r 23 , 20 12 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re MUR PHY, ARNOLD, an d S MITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Afte r Don al d And rews pl ead ed gu il ty to co ns pi rin g to di st rib ut e m or e th an 50 gr am s of a m ix tu re or su bs ta nc e co nt ai ni n g met ha m ph et am in e, in vi ol at io n of21 U.S.C. §§ 84 1( a)(1 ), (b )(1 )(B) (v ii i), an d 8 4 6 , th e di st ric t co ur t se nt en ced 1 M r
. A n d r e w s to th e m an da to ry m in im um of 60 m on th s in pr is on an d 5 y ears of

su pe rv is ed rel eas e. On ap pe al , co un se l m ov es to wit h d r a w , a nd ha s fil ed a br ie f

un de r And ers v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 (19 67 ).

The d i s t r i c t co ur t co rrec tl y co nc lu de d th at th e 5- y ear st at ut or y m in im um
se nt en ce ap pl ie d, ba se d on t h e un ob jecte d- to drug qu an ti ty reco m m en de d in th e pr es en te nc e rep or t. See 21 U.S.C. § 84 1( b) (1 )( B ) ( vi ii ); Uni te d St at es v. Dou gl as , 64 6 F.3 d 11 34 , 11 37 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ) (if de fen da nt ob jects on ly to pr es en te nc e rep or t’s

reco m m en da ti on , bu t no t to fact s th em se lv es , co ur t m ay acce pt f a c t s a s tru e). The

co ur t la ck ed di sc ret io n un de r th e ci rcu m st an ces to se nt en ce Mr. And rews be lo w th e st atut or y m in im

um
. See Uni te d St at es v. W at ts , 55 3 F.3 d 60 3, 60 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ). W e ha ve rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d fin d no
no nf riv ol ou s i ss ue s fo r ap pe al

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ct
co ur t, an d we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wit hd raw, su bjec t to co un se l in fo rm in g ap pe ll an t ab ou t p ro ced ur es forsee ki ng reh eari ng or f il in g a pe ti ti on for

cert io rari

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ro be rt T. Dawso n, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju d g e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. -2

-
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - (-)products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - news_news-149248(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(10)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

map        January 1, 1986        Seismic-reflection profiles of the New Madrid seismic zone-data along the Mississippi River near Caruthersville, Missouri

map        January 1, 1979        Seismicity map of the State of Missouri

map        January 1, 1994        Map showing seismicity and sandblows in the vicinity of New Madrid, Missouri
Gerard L. BROOKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2818

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 7, 2018

Gerard L. Brookins, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Wolf, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

TRANSCANADA CORPORATION

450 - 1st Street
S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2P 5H1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Harold N. Kvisle, the Chief Executive Officer of TransCanada Corporation (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, in connection with the Company's Annual Report as filed on Form 40-F for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), that:



| |  |  | /s/HAROLD N. KVISLEHarold N. Kvisle Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2009
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

C-3

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, James J. Stebor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James J. SteborJames J. SteborPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 14, 2006
# Eiropas Savienības C 241A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 241A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 60. gadagājums2017. gada 26. jūlijs |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 241A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

60. gadagājums2017. gada 26. jūlijs

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Labojumi |
| 2017/C 241 A/01 | Labojums sludinājumā Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF) – Sludinājums par vakantu ģenerāldirektora amatu (AD 15 kategorija) Briselē – Pagaidu darbinieka pieņemšana darbā saskaņā ar Pārējo darbinieku nodarbināšanas kārtības 2. panta a) punktu – COM/2017/10373( OV C 204 A, 28.6.2017. ) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

Labojumi

2017/C 241 A/01

Labojums sludinājumā Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF) – Sludinājums par vakantu ģenerāldirektora amatu (AD 15 kategorija) Briselē – Pagaidu darbinieka pieņemšana darbā saskaņā ar Pārējo darbinieku nodarbināšanas kārtības 2. panta a) punktu – COM/2017/10373( OV C 204 A, 28.6.2017. )

OLAF

( OV C 204 A, 28.6.2017. )

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Labojumi

| 26.7.2017 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2017

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 241/1

---

Labojums sludinājumā “Eiropas Birojs krāpšanas apkarošanai (OLAF) – Sludinājums par vakantu ģenerāldirektora amatu (AD 15 kategorija) Briselē – Pagaidu darbinieka pieņemšana darbā saskaņā ar Pārējo darbinieku nodarbināšanas kārtības 2. panta a) punktu – COM/2017/10373”

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 204 A, 2017. gada 28. jūnijs
  )

(2017/C 241 A/01)

5. lappusē iedaļā “Pieteikuma iesniegšanas termiņš”:

tekstu:“Pieteikuma iesniegšanas termiņš ir 2017. gada 27. jūlijs. Tiešsaistē būs iespējams reģistrēties tikai līdz plkst. 12.00 dienā pēc Briseles laika.”

lasīt šādi:“Pieteikuma iesniegšanas termiņš ir 2017. gada 15. septembris. Reģistrēties būs iespējams tikai līdz plkst. 12.00 dienā pēc Briseles laika.”

---
Anthony DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1361

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
William HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30198]

[[Page 103897]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 533 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-815, K2025-815.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30198 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2008



 Exhibit 10.3 
 

 
 June 24, 2008 
 Mr. John J. Legere 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 Global Crossing Limited 
 200 Park Avenue 
 Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 
 Re: First Amendment to Employment Agreement 
 Dear Mr. Legere: 
 Reference is made to the Employment
Agreement dated as of August 15, 2006 (the “Agreement”) between you and Global Crossing Limited (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used in this letter shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 Effective June 24, 2008, the Agreement is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 6(c)(ii) of the Agreement is amended by deleting therefrom the references to “two (2) times the sum of Base Salary plus Annual Bonus” and “for a
period of two (2) years following the date of such termination” and inserting, in lieu thereof, “three (3) times the sum of Base Salary plus Annual Bonus” and “for a period of three (3) years following the date of
such termination,” respectively. 

  

	 	2.	Section 6(c)(iii) of the Agreement is amended by deleting therefrom the references to “one (1) times the sum of Base Salary plus Annual Bonus” and “for a
period of one (1) year following the date of such termination” and inserting, in lieu thereof, “three (3) times the sum of Base Salary plus Annual Bonus” and “for a period of three (3) years following the date of
such termination,” respectively. 

 Except as specifically set forth herein, all provisions of the Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect. 
 Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by executing this First Amendment in the space indicated
below. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 GLOBAL CROSSING LIMITED

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Neil Barua

	Name:	 	Neil Barua
	Title:	 	Chief Administrative Officer


  

			
	 ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

	
	 /s/ John J. Legere

	 John J. Legere
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - (-)california(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis
Nathan ALBUQUERQUE, Appellant, v. ANIMA DOMUS/AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, Appellees.

No. 1D18-842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 26, 2018

Richard A. Sicking and Mark A. Touby of Touby, Chait & Sicking, P.L., Coral Gables, for Appellant.

Rayford H. Taylor, of Hall Booth Smith P.C., Atlanta, and Andrew R. Borah of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, Waranch & Westcott, Deerfield Beach, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-0564

LT Case No. 2020-CF-003478-A

_____________________________

JOHNATHAN DAVID HALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

R. Anthony Salem, Judge.

Rachel E. Reese and Olivia M. Goodman, O’Brien Hatfield Reese, 

P.A. Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

July 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, SOUD, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0567

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

LESLIE DEAN ERNST,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 5, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 29 2023

08/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0567
Joseph W. KEARNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3071

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

Joseph W. Kearns, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Frederick Edward ADDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1308

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
EX-10(c)





Exhibit 10 (c)




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(Effective as of May 18, 2005)




     WHEREAS, TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC. (the “Company”) has adopted and maintains the Taubman Centers,
Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, as effective May 18, 2005 (the “Plan”);
and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Plan, the Company may amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, to allow
directors the opportunity to choose whether deferrals are made from the cash portion or the stock
portion of his annual retainer fee.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended. effective as of January 1, 2008, in the following
respects:




	 	1.	 	Section 1.7 of the Plan (Committee) is amended to read as follows:






     “1.7 ‘Committee’ means the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.”




	 	2.	 	Section 3.1 of the Plan (Deferral Election Forms) is amended to read as follows:






     “3.1 Deferral Election Forms. Each Director may elect to defer up to 100% of the
annual retainer fee he shall receive in any calendar year with respect to his service
as a Director, including the portion of his annual retainer fee that would otherwise
be paid in stock under the Taubman Centers, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Grant
Plan, by executing a written Deferral Election Form. Once the election to defer is
made, a Director will not have access to the amounts deferred until service on the
Board of Directors has terminated or until the occurrence of a Change of Control
Event. Directors must elect on the Deferral Election Form whether deferrals of less
than 100% of the annual retainer fee will be made from the cash portion of the
Director’s annual retainer fee or the portion that would otherwise be paid in stock
under the Taubman Centers, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Grant Plan, or a portion
of both. Each Deferral Election Form must: (a) specify the percentage the Director
elects to defer, (b) identify the proportion of deferrals to be made from the cash
portion and stock portion of the Director’s retainer fee, (c) state that the deferred
retainer fee will be paid following the termination of the Director’s service pursuant
to Section 3.4 of the Plan, and (d) be executed before the first day of the taxable
year in which the Director will earn the retainer fee subject to the Deferral Election
Form or, if later, within 30 days after he first becomes eligible for the Plan. A
Deferral Election Form will not apply to any retainer fees earned or paid prior to the
date the Deferral Election Form is executed.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this First Amendment as of the date written
below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC.

a Michigan corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Robert S. Taubman
 	 
	 	 	Its:      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 	 
	 	Date: 	May 29, 2008
Laurie TIMMONS, Laura's Secret, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Shauna S. GRIER and Robert L. Grier, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4047

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.

Denied.
David RENCZKOWSKI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3768

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Darrell THORPE and Crystal Thorpe, Appellants, v. US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CP SRMOF II 2012-A TRUST; Selene Finance, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3854

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RANDOLF MOORE, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a Booney,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-H-7; 4:04-cv-00014-H)

Submitted: May 11, 2007 Decided: May 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolf Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Randolf Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multilink TechnologyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Richard N. Nottenburg, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

          2.          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   |   |                                                                                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ RICHARD N. NOTTENBURG                                                                        |
|   |   |                                                                                                  |
|   |   | **Richard N. Nottenburg  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer  May 14, 2003** |