alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON et al.

First Division. Juneau.

December 8, 1924.

No. 1762-B.

Post Office <§=>48(7) — Indictment and Information — Robbery of Post Office Building.

The indictment charged that the defendants “did unlawfully, forcibly, and feloniously break into and enter a certain building used in part as a post office of the United States at Hawk Inlet, with intent to commit larceny in that part of said building so used as said United States post office at Hawk Inlet, Alaska.” On demurrer, urged that the words “then and there” should be inserted in the indictment before the word “used” before it would allege a crime. *Held,*the indictment shows on its face that the building was used in part as a United States post office, and states a crime.

A. G. Shoup, U.'S. Atty., of San Jose, Cal.

Grover C. Winn, of Juneau, for defendants.

REED, District Judge.

The demurrer in this case is that the indictment does not charge a crime against the United States, and the special point raised is that the venue is not stated. The charging part of the indictment is:

> “That the said Charley Johnson and William Watson, near Hawk Inlet, within the district of Alaska and within the jurisdiction of this court, on the fifth day of November, in the year of our Lord 1924, did unlawfully, forcibly, and feloniously break into and enter a certain building used in part as a post office of the United States at Hawk *264Inlet, Alaska, with intent to commit larceny in that part of said building so used as said United States post office at Hawk Inlet, Alaska.”

It is urged, on the part of the defendants, that the words “then and there” should be inserted in the indictment before the word “used,” so that the indictment would read “unlawfully, forcibly, and feloniously break into and enter a certain building then and there used in part as a post office of the United States at Hawk Inlet,” etc-

I am of the opinion that it is not necessary that the words so claimed to be necessary should be inserted, as the indictment shows in itself, under the peculiar language used, that on the 5th day of November, 1924, the building was used in part as a United States post office.

The demurrer will be overruled.

<®3»See same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B ARR Y NOR T HC R OSS PATTER SON, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M . LINDER

M A N, He a d of Pa stora l Se rvic e s; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16315 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-01571-PGR M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Pa ul G. Rose nbla

tt, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, GOULD, a n d N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Ariz ona sta te prisone r B a

rry Northc ross Patte rson a

p pe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging tha t de fe nda nts viola te d his First Ame ndm e nt right to fre e e xe rc ise of re ligion a n d va rious othe r 

# FIL ED FEB 3 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c onstitutiona l viola t ions. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Hamilton v . Brow n , 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th C ir. 2011) (dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A); S hak ur v . Sc hriro , 514 F.3d 878, 883 (9th C ir. 2008) (sum m a ry judgm e nt). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Pa

tte rson’ s First Am e ndm e nt c la im

be c a use Patte rson fa ile d

to ra i se a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda

nts Le e and B e c k e r viola

te d his First Ame ndm e nt rights by suspe n ding his koshe

r m e a l privile ge s a fte r Patte rson viola te d the te rm s of his m e a l pla n by sha ring or tra ding food with othe r inm ate s. Se eO’Lonev . Estate of Shabazz , 482 U.S. 342, 350-52 (1987) (re stra i nt on inmate ’ s a bility to e x e rc ise his re ligion doe s not viola

te the First Am e ndm e nt if it is re a sona bly re late d to a le gitim ate pe nologic a l inte re st). The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d Patte rson’ s c la im s a g a i nst the re m a ining de fe nda

nts be c a use Patte rson fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to sta te a pla u sible c la im

for re lie f unde r any

via ble le ga l the ory . Se eStarr v . Bac a , 652 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th C ir. 2011) (e xpla i ning supe rvisory lia bility unde r § 1983); He bbev . Plile r , 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th C ir. 2010) (a lthough pro se ple a d ings

1 3 - 1 6 3 1 5 2are t o be libe ra l ly c onstrue d, a

pla intiff still m

ust pre se nt fa c tua l a lle gations suffic i e nt to sta

te a pla u sible c l a im for re lie f). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 3 1 5 3
Exhibit 23.5




Rescan Environmental Services Ltd.





March 28, 2013





TO:    Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Pierre Pelletier, on behalf of myself and Rescan Environmental Services Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Rescan Environmental Services Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF and the 40-F:


·
Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Prefeasibility Study dated September 5, 2012;


·
2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012; and


·
Courageous Lake Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment 2011 and is dated July 15, 2011.





Yours truly,/s/ Pierre PelletierPierre Pelletier, P. Eng.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David A. Wilson
________________________________________

DAVID A. WILSON
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2004
Jerry Ochoa CIOCON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2734

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER TODD SMITH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-30374

D.C. No. 2:04-cr-06004-RHW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012 ** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Todd Smith appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

FILED

NOV 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-30374

Smith first contends that the district court imposed a substantively

unreasonable sentence. In light of the fact that this was Smith’s fifth revocation

offense, the 24-month sentence is substantively reasonable. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e); United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (at a

revocation sentencing, the district court may sanction the defendant for his breach

of trust).

Smith next contends that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by

failing to provide proof of his enrollment in school and by failing to interview a

witness before the witness testified. Although ineffective assistance of counsel

claims are generally not considered on direct appeal, the record here is sufficiently

developed to permit consideration of this claim. See United States v. Alferahin,

433 F.3d 1148, 1160 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006). Smith’s claim fails because even if his

counsel’s performance were deficient, it did not prejudice him. See Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 693-94 (1984).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 280 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 280

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding a 
                        taxpayer bill of rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2013

 Mr. Roskam submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding a 
                        taxpayer bill of rights.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Bill of Rights 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING A TAXPAYER BILL 
              OF RIGHTS.

    It is the sense of the House of Representatives that each taxpayer 
has--
            (1) the right to be informed;
            (2) the right to be assisted;
            (3) the right to be heard;
            (4) the right to pay no more than the correct amount of 
        tax;
            (5) the right of appeal;
            (6) the right to certainty;
            (7) the right to privacy;
            (8) the right to confidentiality;
            (9) the right to representation; and
            (10) the right to a fair and just tax system.
                                 <all>
```
David Scott HASTINGS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 903 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-629, K2025-628.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29808 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(68)
              - products_data(41)
              - products_maps(14)
              - products_publications(909)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(6)
              - multimedia_audio(11)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(11)
              - multimedia_image(87)
              - multimedia_image-141769(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(67)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(9)
              - multimedia_image-141776(5)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(8)
              - multimedia_video(99)
              - multimedia_video-149194(66)
              - multimedia_video-149195(22)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(8)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - news_news-149245(26)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(9)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(16)
              - news_other_news(11)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(60)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(35)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - (-)california(8)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Science Animations        April 9, 2023        ShakeMovie Computer Simulation of the M6.7 1994 Northridge, CA Earthquake

Science Animations        July 12, 2019        Animation of Ridgecrest Earthquake Seq. thru July 6 (Prelim. Results)

Science Animations        August 23, 2019        Animation of a Scenario M6.9 Earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault

Science Animations        July 9, 2019        California Earthquakes (July 2019) - Animation Sequence

Science Animations        July 12, 2019        Animation of Ridgecrest Foreshock Seq up to M7.1 (Prelim. Results)

Science Animations        October 14, 2008        Groundshaking animation: Hayward Fault, Oakland epicenter

Science Animations        October 14, 2008        Groundshaking animation: Hayward Fault, Fremont epicenter

Science Animations        October 14, 2008        Groundshaking animation: Hayward Fault, San Pablo Bay epicenter
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 96 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cameras in the Court5 room Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 28, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘§ 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings 

11 ‘‘The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage 

12 of all open sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, 


smartinez on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 96 IH

1 by a vote of the majority of justices, that allowing such 

2 coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation 

3 of the due process rights of one or more of the parties 

4 before the Court.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

6 for chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
Changes are Blacklined (====)

EXHIBIT 32
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of AquaCell
                        ==================
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB-A for the first fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.


Date: August 3, 2005                          /s/ James C. Witham
      ==============                       -----------------------------------
                                           Name:  James C. Witham
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 3, 2005                          /s/ Gary S. Wolff
      ==============                       -----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gary S. Wolff
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30126]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1010 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-760, K2025-759.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30126 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Texxon, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to my
knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.


Date: August 17, 2006                            By: /S/ ROSS NORDIN
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Ross Nordin
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for theyear ended December 31, 2004, I, Hal Giomi, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)           suchAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Companyfor the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of The BankHoldings.

 
| Dated: March 28, 2005           |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| /s/ Hal Giomi                        |   |
|                                 |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----