alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6472

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH J. JOHNSON, a/k/a K-9,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:07-cr-00924-DCN-3; 2:12-cv-03337-DCN)

Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth J. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South 

Carolina; Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth J. Johnson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Herbert MCELROY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1231

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - (-)nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Science Animations        August 21, 2018        Image of the Week - One Year Ago: Eclipse Darkens Nebraska

Featured Films and Shorts        August 19, 2007        Water Vision
A. Z.-M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1448

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(9)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(49)
              - hawaii(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

staff profileRobert E Anthony
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  PracticeXpert,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Jonathan Doctor,  President of the Company, and Michael Manahan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ JONATHAN DOCTOR                        /S/ MICHAEL MANAHAN
-------------------------                  -------------------------
Jonathan Doctor,                           Michael Manahan,
Chief Executive Officer                    Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2004                               May 19, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to PracticeXpert,  Inc., and will be retained by  PracticeXpert,  Inc.,
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Power-Save Energy Corp
 (“Power-Save”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Forster, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of Power-Save Energy Corp and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Brek Energy.






*/s/
      Michael Forster*


Michael
      Forster


Chief
      Executive Officer




November
      9, 2005













**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Power-Save Energy
      Corp (“Power-Save”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathleen Forster, Chief Financial Officer
      of Power-Save Energy Corp and a member of the Board of Directors,
      certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Brek Energy.













*/s/
      Kathleen Forster*


Kathleen
      Forster


Chief
      Financial Officer




November
      9, 2005
Alan PATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1937

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Reserve Canada Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,

Jacqueline Danforth , Principal Accounting Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:

s/s/ Jacqueline Danforth



Name: Jacqueline Danforth



Title:

Principal Accounting Officer

Date:

July 26, 2005
**Exhibit 34.3**

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

General Electric CapitalCorporation:

We have examined theaccompanying management’s assertion, that General Electric Capital Corporation(the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the servicing ofcredit card asset-backed securities transactions issued by the GE CapitalCredit Card Master Note Trust (the Platform), as of and for the twelve monthsended December 31, 2006.  Management hasdetermined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii) is applicable to theactivities it performs with respect to the Platform, and that all other servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the primary servicingservices provided by the Company with respect to the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with this servicing criterion. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on ourexamination.

Our examination wasconducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteriaspecified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessaryin the circumstances.  Our examinationincluded testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of theservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited tothe selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Companyduring the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may haveoccurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected thebalances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion.  Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

In our opinion,management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 isfairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 30, 2007

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 840 

To improve services for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2013 

Mr. SABLAN (for himself, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. BORDALLO, and Ms. 

MOORE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To improve services for victims of sexual assault and 

domestic violence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES GRANTS. 

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (4) of section 

5 14601(b) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 

6 U.S.C. 14043g(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘, except 

8 that the United States Virgin Islands, American 

9 Samoa, Guam, the District of Columbia, Puerto 

10 Rico, and the Commonwealth of the Northern MarVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:56 Mar 01, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H840.IH H840

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 840 IH

1 iana Islands shall each be allocated 0.125 percent of 

2 the total appropriations’’; and 

3 (2) by striking the third sentence. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to grants under sec6 tion 14601 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 

7 (42 U.S.C. 14043g) for fiscal year 2013 and succeeding 

8 fiscal years. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Javier D. O'RELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 943 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-685, K2025-684.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29896 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Executive Officer

     In connection with the Annual Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed on with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2005, and as amended by this
Form 10-KSB/A, as filed on or about the date hereof (collectively, the
"Report"), I, Merton Corn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 8, 2005

                                              /s/ MERTON CORN
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Merton Corn, President and CEO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NO. SCWC-28413

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

AMY M. LEE,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS AFSCME, LOCAL 646, AFL-CIO;

STATE OF HAWAI#I, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

 Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 28413; CIV. NO. 06-1-0227)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J. Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s application for writ

of certiorari filed on October 18, 2011, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 22, 2011.

R. Steven Geshell for

Petitioner/PlaintiffAppellant on the

application

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-28413

22-NOV-2011

09:47 AM
EXHIBIT 13.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
annual report of Legrand Holding SA (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Olivier Bazil, Director of the Company and
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Legrand SA, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:  1.             The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.             The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 30, 2004   /s/ Olivier Bazil Name: Olivier Bazil Title:
Director of the Company and Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of
Legrand SA
Exhibit 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of eTelcharge.com,  Inc.(the  "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl O.
Sherman Sr.,  Chief  Executive of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d)); and
         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Carl O. Sherman Sr.
---------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

June 17, 2003
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications 
  I,
Harold N. Kvisle, certify that:  1.I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of TransCanada Corporation;  2.Based on my
knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and  3.Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report.   Dated
July 29, 2005     /s/
  Harold N. KvisleHarold
  N. Kvisle
  President and Chief Executive Officer