alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Ocean  Resources,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Graham Jessop, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                             /s/ Graham Jessop
                             ------------------------
                             Graham Jessop
                             Chief Executive Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
                             February 17, 2003
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfa vors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/4/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

AART DYKHUIZEN AND CENTRAL MACHINE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. TSUGAMI CORP. AND REM SALES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees. Case No. 95-4112 (D.C. 93-C-932W) (District of Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Aart Dykhuizen and Central Machine, Inc. appeal the distric t court’s judgments dismissing their complaint against Defendants-Appellees Tsugami Corp. and REM Sales, Inc. with prejudice. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its well-w ritten orders accompanying the judgments at issue. After a de novo review of the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ compla int, we2

conclude, as did the district court, that the plaintiffs’ claim on appeal, whether constr ued as one for breach of warranty or for breach of contract, is based on a sale of goods under Utah’s enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code. See Utah Code Ann. § 70A-2-105(1). As such, it is time-barred by the four-year statute of limitations set forth in Utah Code Ann. § 70A -2-725.
See Perry v. Pioneer Wholesale Supply Co. , 681 P.2d 214, 216 (Utah 1984) (“[W]here the Uniform Commercial Code sets forth a limitation period for a specific type of ac tion, this limitation controls over an older, more general statute of limitations.”). Thus, the di strict court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ complaint was proper. Also before the court is the motion of REM Sales to dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. In its motion, REM Sales argues that this court lacks juri sdiction to hear the plaintiffs’ appeal because claims are still pending before the distri ct court against Defendant Alta Machine Tool. Under Bristol v. Fibreboard Corp. , 789 F.2d 846 (10th Cir. 1986) (per curiam), REM Sales’s motion is without merit. In Bristol , we held that the district court’s failure to enter an order dismissing unserved defendants from the case prior to the entr y of the judgment did not foreclose appellate jurisdiction because the unserved defendants were ne ver made parties to the underlying district court action. Id. at 847; see also Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Dealy , 911 F.2d 1096, 1099 (5th Cir. 1990) (“[U]nserved defendants are not parties for purposes of Rule 54(b) and a judgment does not lack the finality necessary for appeal merel y because claims against unserved defendants are unresolved.”). We therefore AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ com plaint against the defendants, and we DISMISS REM Sales’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.3

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court, Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as chief executive officer of ViaCell, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

      (1)        the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005
            fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)        the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
            period ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company.

Date: May 13, 2005

                                                           /s/ Marc D. Beer
                                                    -----------------------
                                                               Marc D. Beer
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David A. Wilson
-------------------------------------
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2008
Gregory Frank TOTH, Appellant, v. Stephanie Spielman MILLER, Formerly Known as Stephanie Miller-Toth, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D15-3835 2D16-289 CONSOLIDATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 31, 2018

Robert L. Donald of Law Office of Robert L. Donald, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Margaret H. White-Small of Margaret H. White-Small, Attorney at Law, Ponte Vedra Beach, and Stacy L. Sherman of Stacy L. Sherman, P.A., Cape Coral, for Appellee.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's motion for rehearing is denied. On the court's own motion, the prior opinion dated August 31, 2018, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.

In this consolidated appeal, Gregory Frank Toth challenges the amended final judgment dissolving his marriage to Stephanie Spielman Miller and the money judgment entered in favor of Ms. Miller pursuant to the amended final judgment of dissolution. Mr. Toth raises a number of challenges to the amended judgment, one of which is dispositive.1 He argues, and we agree, that the record as a whole in this case creates the appearance that the amended judgment does not reflect the judge's independent decision-making. *See**Perlow v. Berg-Perlow*, 875 So.2d 383, 390 (Fla. 2004).

The judge adopted Ms. Miller's proposed sixty-five-page final judgment without a single alteration. While this fact alone might not convince us the judge had failed to exercise independent decision-making, when viewed in the context of the record as a whole, and in particular some of the judge's comments at the final hearing, we face a scenario much like the one we described in *Bishop v. Bishop*, 47 So.3d 326 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). There, we concluded that the "errors and omissions" in the judgment together with the circumstances under which it was entered did not establish that it was the product of the judge's own "thoughtful and independent analysis of the facts, the evidence presented, and the law that applies." *Id.* at 329 (citing *Perlow*, 875 So.2d at 390 ).

Accordingly, we affirm the portion of the amended final judgment that dissolved the parties' marriage. We reverse the remainder of that judgment and remand with directions that the judge enter a final *1168judgment reflecting his independent decision-making consistent with the evidence and applicable law. *See**id.* at 331. In light of our reversal of the amended judgment, we also reverse the money judgment entered in favor of Ms. Miller pursuant to that judgment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

1

We decline to reach the other issues raised in the initial brief and express no opinion on the merits of Mr. Toth's claims.
STATE EX REL. Shawn WICKEM v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1449

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Wickem v. State, 15-1276 (La. 5/13/16), 190 So.3d 707.
J.F., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. D.M.K., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jalil HARVELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2899

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
          31, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirement of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 12, 2006


                                       28
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 13a-14(a)

or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





I, Robert Saunders, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Edgewater Foods International, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

---



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







Date:

November 29, 2007





By: /s/  Robert Saunders



Robert Saunders



Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT
OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





I,
Dominic Burns, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Creative Vistas,
Inc.;





2. based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. the
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under one supervisor, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. the
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Dated:
August 14, 2009





/s/ Dominic BurnsDominic
      Burns
                Chief
      Executive Officer
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 259 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Ghadar Party 

in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2013 

Mr. HONDA (for himself and Mr. BERA of California) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the founding of the 

Ghadar Party in the United States. 

Whereas Indian nationals started coming to the United 

States for higher education and economic opportunities in 

the beginning of the 20th century; 

Whereas there are an estimated 3,000,000 people of Indian 

origin in the United States forming an integral part of 

the social fabric of the Nation; 

Whereas Indian nationals were inspired by the success of the 

American Revolution against Great Britain; 

Whereas in 1913, Indians nationals formed the Hindustani 

Association of the Pacific Coast in Astoria, Oregon, popularly known as the Ghadar Party with a major objective 

of liberating India from British colonialism; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 259 IH 

Whereas the Ghadar Party established its headquarters in 

San Francisco, California; 

Whereas the Ghadar Party launched a magazine titled 

‘‘Ghadar’’ to promote aims, objectives, and activities of 

the organization and published over 5,000 copies weekly 

for circulation; 

Whereas thousands of Ghadar supporters living in the United 

States and Canada returned to India and inspired their 

countrymen to fight for their independence from Great 

Britain, which was achieved in 1947; 

Whereas hundreds of Ghadarites fought and died for the 

freedom of their home country; and 

Whereas 2013 is the 100th anniversary of the formation of 

this historic Ghadar Party that recognizes the universal 

right of sovereign nations to independence and self-rule: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Ghadar 

3 Party in the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K/A of Syntax-Brillian Corporation;     2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                       /s/ vincent f. sollitto, jr.   Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr.   *Chief Executive Officer*   Date:October 20, 2006