alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Gail P. Seneca, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 14, 2005 By:
    /s/ GAIL P. SENECAGail P. SenecaChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
E 2

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:                     /s/ Theresa D. Becks    Theresa D. Becks    Chief Executive Officer
SLAT PO Amendment  No. 10


 Exhibit 10.29.10 
 AMENDMENT NO. 10 
 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 10 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital
Support Agreement, effective as of the 28th day of July 2008 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), between SEI Liquid Asset Trust (the “Trust”) on behalf of its Prime Obligation Fund (the “Fund”) and SEI Investments Company
(the “Support Provider”). 
 WHEREAS: 
  

	 	1.	The parties hereto entered into a Capital Support Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2007, and amended February 15, 2008, March 5, 2008, March 10,
2008, March 24, 2008, March 26, 2008, March 31, 2008, April 17, 2008, June 18, 2008 and July 22, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 

  

	 	2.	The parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein. 

 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto
agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 

  

	2.	Section l(g) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 

 “Maximum Contribution Amount” means sixteen million five hundred thousand dollars ($16,500,000). 
  

	3.	Section 1(n) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 

 “Segregated Account” means an account established by the Support Provider for the benefit of the Fund at a bank which is a qualified custodian under the 1940 Act, which may be an interest-bearing account
and/or which account’s assets may be invested into money market instruments, and which during the term of the Agreement (i) shall hold cash or cash equivalent securities in an amount equal to thirteen million five hundred thousand dollars
($13,500,000), and (ii) the assets of which shall be available to the Fund by means of ACH transfer initiated by the Fund without the requirement of further action or consent by the Support Provider; provided, however, that the amount required
to be maintained in the Segregated Account may be reduced as set forth in Section 3 of the Agreement. 
 [Remainder of page left blank
intentionally.] 
  

 1 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment No. 10 to the Capital Support Agreement to be
executed and to become effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dennis J. McGonigle

	Name:	 	Dennis J. McGonigle
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	Date:	 	July 28, 2008
	
	 ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
  
 One Freedom Valley Drive
 Oaks, PA 19456

	
	 SEI LIQUID ASSET TRUST on behalf of its
 PRIME OBLIGATION FUND

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Timothy D. Barto

	Name:	 	Timothy D. Barto
	Title:	 	Vice President
	Date:	 	July 28, 2008
	
	 ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
  
 One Freedom Valley Drive
 Oaks, PA 19456



  

 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1015 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-767, K2025-766.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30131 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
William Anthony DANTE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 3D17-2434

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2018

William Anthony Dante, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 965 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 965

  To prohibit the possession or transfer of junk guns, also known as 
                        Saturday Night Specials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2013

Mr. Gutierrez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the possession or transfer of junk guns, also known as 
                        Saturday Night Specials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST POSSESSION OR TRANSFER OF JUNK GUNS, 
              ALSO KNOWN AS SATURDAY NIGHT SPECIALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(aa)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or 
transfer a junk gun which has been shipped or transported in interstate 
or foreign commerce.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the continuous and otherwise 
lawful possession of a junk gun by a person during any period that 
began before the effective date of this subsection.''.
    (b) Junk Gun Defined.--Section 921(a) of such title is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(36)(A) The term `junk gun' means--
            ``(i) a handgun that is not a sporting handgun; and
            ``(ii) any combination of parts from which a handgun 
        described in clause (i) can be assembled.
    ``(B) The term `sporting handgun' means a handgun which the 
Secretary has determined, using the criteria applied in making 
determinations under section 925(d)(3), to be of a type generally 
recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to 
sporting purposes.''.
    (c) Penalty.--Section 924(a)(1)(B) of such title is amended by 
inserting ``or (aa)'' before ``of''.
                                 <all>
```
IN the MATTER OF PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLAIM OF Brian SNAVELY, et al.

17-238

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

December 13, 2017

Alan K. Breaud, Timothy W. Basden, Breaud & Meyers, 600 Jefferson Street, Suite 1101, Lafayette, LA 70502, (337) 266-2200, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS: Ace Pain Management, LLC, Rice Medical Management, LLC, Margaret Rice, M.D., APMLLC, Margaret A. Rice, M.D., Stacey E. Singleton

Joseph Lomax Jordan, Jr., Max Jordan, Lawyer, 1817 W. University Ave., Lafayette, LA 70506, (337) 233-9984, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE: Linda M. Snavely

James H. Gibson, Charles M. Kreamer, Michael O. Adley, Allen & Gooch, 2000 Kaliste Saloom Rd, Ste. 400 (70508), P.O. Drawer 81129, Lafayette, LA 70598-1129, (337) 291-1000, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: J. Lomax Jordan, Jr.

Court composed of Elizabeth A. Pickett, D. Kent Savoie, and Van H. Kyzar, Judges.

SAVOIE, Judge.

*53For the reasons set forth in *Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC**,* 17-237 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/17), 257 So.3d 1264, the exception of prescription filed by Ms. Snavely and J. Lomax Jordan is granted. Defendants' motions seeking attorney fees as sanctions filed in each of the three consolidated matters are dismissed with prejudice. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants.

**PRESCRIPTION EXCEPTION GRANTED; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.**
LAFOURCHE REALTY COMPANY, INC. and The Allan Company v. ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC., Entergy Louisiana Holdings, Inc., Entergy Services, Inc., Irby Construction Company, Irby Construction Company of Mississippi, Highlines Construction Company, Inc., and Frogco, Inc.

NO. 2018-C-1516

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 8, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Miguel NAVA, DOC #H40801, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2018

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, Second District, and Joseph Thye Sexton, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDMUND L. HAENIG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 865 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 2269 

EDA 2013 entered on November 7, 

2014, affirming the Order of the Lehigh 

County Court of Common Pleas at No. 

CP-39-CR-0000743-1996 entered on 

July 15, 2013

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED and the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. 

Muniz, ___ A.3d ___, 2017 WL 3173066 (Pa. Jul. 19, 2017). 

DECIDED: October 16, 2017
John SCHAUFLER, DOC #H21724, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

We affirm the trial court's revocation of John Schaufler's probation and the sentences imposed upon revocation without further comment. We note, however, that although the trial court recognized at the March 2017 revocation hearing that it should not re-adjudicate Schaufler guilty of the original offenses because it had already adjudicated him guilty of those offenses in May 2005 when originally imposing probation, *see**Butler v. State*, 195 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Duplicative adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous, are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings."), the record on appeal nevertheless includes a second written judgment adjudicating him guilty of the original offenses. This judgment, which was signed the same day as the revocation hearing and accompanies the written sentences imposed following revocation of his probation, was entered in error. *See**id.* at 1148-49 ("[T]he circuit court only enters a judgment on a violation of probation in those instances when it withheld an adjudication of guilt, i.e., withheld judgment, at the time it originally imposed probation." (quoting *Jackson v. State*, 56 So.3d 65, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (Altenbernd, J., concurring) ) ). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Schaufler's probation and the ensuing sentences but remand for vacatur of the March 2017 written judgment adjudicating Schaufler guilty a second time.

Affirmed in part; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Amended Quarterly report of World Wide Web,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June  30,
2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the
date  hereof (the "Report"), I, Herb Sider, acting in the  capacity
as the Chief Financial Officer of  the Company, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.


/s/  Herb Sider
-----------------------------
     Herb Sider
     Chief Financial Officer
     September 29, 2003
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 320 

Celebrating the West Linn Centennial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2013 

Mr. SCHRADER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the West Linn Centennial. 

Whereas in 1845, at Robert Moore’s request, the Provisional 

Legislature of Oregon named the town on the site ‘‘Linn 

City’’, in honor of former Senator Lewis Linn who had 

advocated for passage of the Donation Land Claim Act 

that Moore used to establish the town; 

Whereas West Linn became home to burgeoning industry including flour mills, lumber mills, and shipping; 

Whereas on August 15, 1913, after nearly 75 years as a 

United States settlement and thousands of years as a sacred home to indigenous peoples, West Linn was incorporated as a city in the State of Oregon; 

Whereas West Linn played an important role in the development of Oregon and the industrialization of the West; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 320 IH 

Whereas Robert Moore came from Illinois to Oregon in the 

early 1840s and purchased a 1,000 acre plot of land 

along the west bank of the Willamette River, an area that 

would eventually become West Linn, from Chief Wanaxha 

of the Wallamut Indians; 

Whereas in 1913, the West Side Improvement Club voted 

50–7 to incorporate the districts of West Oregon City, 

Bolton, Sunset, and Willamette Heights as the modern 

city of West Linn, in order to obtain needed utilities and 

improvements; 

Whereas West Linn has adopted the motto, ‘‘City of Hills, 

Trees, and Rivers’’, which recognizes the natural beauty 

of its landscape; and 

Whereas in order to commemorate its centennial and to properly celebrate the history of its people, the West Linn 

Centennial Planning Committee was established in 2010 

to organize, oversee, and execute the celebration to mark 

the one hundred year anniversary of West Linn: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 and commends the City of West Linn, Oregon, and its 

3 people on West Linn’s centennial. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
David FORGACH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2914

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

Stacy A. Scott, Public Defender; Deborah A. Phillips and Rachael O'Brien, Assistant Public Defenders, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*582DISMISSED . *Cf.**Rivera v. Dep't of Health* , 177 So.3d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Lewis, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, President

May 10, 2007
Josefa VALDIVIA, Appellant, v. TARGET CORPORATION, d/b/a Target, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1374

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Allen H. AlleyAllen H. AlleyChairman of the Board,President andChief Executive OfficerDate: March 13, 2006