alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-4882

In Re: ALVIN JERONES PURDIE, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-46)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Jerones Purdie, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Jerones Purdie, Jr., filed this petition for a writ of

mandamus seeking reversal of his drug and firearm convictions based

on a delay in the appellate process stemming from his inability to

obtain transcripts of his jury trial. To obtain mandamus relief,

a petitioner bears the heavy burden of showing that he has no other

adequate avenues of relief and that his right to the relief sought

is clear and indisputable. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court,

490 U.S. 296, 308-09 (1989). Purdie alleges that his inability to

obtain adequate trial transcripts has precluded him from perfecting

a direct appeal of his conviction in violation of his due process

rights. Despite the extensive delays that have accompanied his

appeal, a briefing order will be set in the near future that will

provide Purdie the opportunity to present his appeal to this court.

Through the appellate process Purdie may present his concerns. See

Fed. R. App. P. 10(c); United States v. Wilson, 16 F.3d 1027, 1031

(9th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, although we grant Purdie’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **Certification    of Chief Executive Officer**     I, Richard Randall, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of TranS1 Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and we have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within    those entities, particularly during the period in which this    report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Richard    Randall    Richard Randall    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: March 25, 2008
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellant, v. J.F., Father of J.M.F., a Child and H.K. Mother of J.M.F., a Child, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-3091

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2018

Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellant.

Heather Morcroft, Winter Park, for Appellee, J.F., Father of J.M.F.

Divinne Smith, Orlando, for Appellee, H.K., Mother of J.M.F.

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals and Joanna Summers Brunell, Appellate Counsel, Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Children and Families ("DCF") appeals an order terminating its supervision and the court's jurisdiction over J.M.F. ("Child"), J.F. ("Father"), and H.K. ("Mother"). We reverse because in entering the order, the trial court ignored the provisions of section 39.521(7), Florida Statutes (2018), which require DCF to maintain supervision and the court to retain jurisdiction over the parties until six months after reunification. *See**also**Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. T.T.*, 42 So.3d 962, 964 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). In this case, the court terminated supervision and jurisdiction less than two months after Child had been reunified with Father. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the portion of the order terminating DCF's supervision and the court's jurisdiction. *See**In Interest of S.E.*, 249 So.3d 764, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") of Texxon, Inc. (the "Registrant"),  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Gifford M. Mabie
III,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and the  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Registrant certify, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Registrant.

                            /s/ Gifford M. Mabie III
                           -----------------------------------
                           Name: Gifford M. Mabie III

Date: August 14, 2003
Exhibit23.2(c)



Tetra Tech Canada Inc.



March 29, 2017



|TO: |  | Seabridge Gold Inc.
                                                                                United States Securities and Exchange Commission
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Re: |  | Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")
                                                                                Consent of Expert
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to the following report:



|· |  | 2016 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study Update and Preliminary Economic
Assessment dated October 6, 2016 (the “Report”)
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”), to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, I, Hassan Ghaffari, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and Tetra Tech Canada
Inc., hereby:



|1. |  | consent to the public filing of the Report and the use of any extracts from or a summary
of the Report in the 40-F;
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | consent to the use of my name and Tetra Tech Canada Inc.’s name and references
to the Report, or portions thereof, in the 40-F and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from
the Report in the 40-F;
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | confirm that I have read the 40-F and that it fairly and accurately represents the
information in the sections of the Report for which I am responsible; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4. |  | confirm that I have read the 40-F and have no reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Report or that are within my knowledge as a
result of the services performed by me in connection with the Report.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Yours truly,           
| |  | -----------------------
| |  |                        
| |  | /s/ Hassan Ghaffari    
| |  | Hassan Ghaffari, P.Eng.
##### 



1301 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019-6092
TEL 212 259-8000 FAX 212 259-6333
 EXHIBIT 8.1
 
 
 
 Registration Statement on Form S-3 File Nos. 333-132560 and
333-132560-01
  FCF Corp. Registrants Registration Statement Commission Act Notes Series Indenture Indenture Trustee Trust Trust
Agreement Owner Trustee Indenture
Supplement Agreements
 Prospectus Prospectus Supplement




---



#####
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(5)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(4)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(3)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(7)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)
              - (-)west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

National News Release        April 10, 2015        Researchers Test Smartphones for Earthquake Warning
Bryan Thomas ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 20, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Thomas Robinson was charged by indictment with the first-degree premeditated murder of Stephen Gorney (Count One), robbery with a deadly weapon (Count Two), and dealing in stolen property (Counts Three and Four). Robinson was under the age of eighteen at the time of the offense. He was tried jointly with his codefendant, Tyzick Joseph Wall, before a jury. Robinson was found guilty as charged on all four counts. He was sentenced to concurrent life terms on Counts One and Two and to two consecutive fifteen-year terms on Counts Three and Four. Robinson was also ordered to pay, among other costs, $200 in prosecution and investigative costs, $300 in public defender costs and fees, and the $50 public defender application fee. Separately, the State Attorney's Office for the Fifth Judicial Circuit was awarded $5736.40 in restitution for additional prosecution costs incurred for trial witness travel expenses and expert witness fees.

*218We affirm Robinson's convictions and sentences on all counts without further discussion.1 However, we reverse the restitution order that awarded the State Attorney's Office $5736.40 and remand for the inclusion of this amount in the costs order in addition to the existing $200 line item for prosecution and investigative costs. *See* §§ 775.089(1)(c)1., 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2015). We also reverse the inclusion of public defender fees and costs in the cost order in excess of $100 in public defender fees and costs and the $50 application fee because documentation supporting a greater amount is not present in the record. *See* §§ 27.52(1)(b), 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015) ; *Alexis v. State*, 211 So.3d 81, 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; *Simmons v. State*, 24 So.3d 636, 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). We remand with instructions that public defender fees and costs be reduced to $100 and the $50 application fee or to hold a hearing with notice to obtain evidence from the public defender supporting the $300 public defender fee and cost award. *See* §§ 27.52(1)(b), 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2015) ; *Alexis*, 211 So.3d at 83.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

SAWAYA, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

1

We reject Robinson's argument that he is entitled to be resentenced on Count One pursuant to *Williams v. State*, 242 So.3d 280, 288-89 (Fla. 2018) (citing *Alleyne v. United States*, 570 U.S. 99, 115, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013) ). Unlike the situation in *Williams*, Robinson was only charged with first-degree premeditated murder, and so the jury's guilty verdict contains an inherent unambiguous finding of intent to kill.
Moses Leon RICHARDSON, IV, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-362

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied December 3, 2018

Arthur A. Huggins, Jr., of Huggins Law Firm, PLLC, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Uniprop Manufactured Housing Communities
Income Fund II (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I Joel Schwartz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Joel Schwartz
--------------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer, Uniprop, Inc.

March 24, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(28)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(4)
              - products_publications(158)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)
              - multimedia_video(25)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(12)
              - multimedia_video-149195(12)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(8)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(10)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - california(66)
              - hawaii(17)
              - idaho(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - (-)washington(12)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Presentations and Events        September 22, 2022        PubTalk-09/2022 - You Can be Powered by ShakeAlert®️ - Earthquake Early Warning for All!

Presentations and Events        June 27, 2002        PubTalk 6/2002 — Finding Elusive Earthquake Faults

Presentations and Events        November 8, 2023        Forecasting and seismic detection of debris flows at Mount Rainier National Park

Presentations and Events        April 6, 2021        CVO Monitoring Program: Keeping an Eye on Cascade Volcanoes

Presentations and Events        February 23, 2021        Mount St. Helens Rocked Our World! What we've learned since 1980.

Presentations and Events        May 13, 2021        Status of (mostly) WA Volcanoes: Report to Emergency Managers 2020-21

Presentations and Events        April 20, 2021        Mitigating Hazards at Cascade Range Volcanoes

Presentations and Events        November 23, 2020        VDAP: Trends in Volcano Response and Capacity Building

Presentations and Events        March 10, 2021        Mount St. Helens—Lives Changed, Lessons Learned, Legacies of 1980

Presentations and Events        June 24, 2021        PubTalk - 6/2021: Mount St. Helens Revisited

Presentations and Events        July 21, 2021        Washington Geological Survey’s Landslide Hazard Program

Presentations and Events        June 22, 2022        Shear surface undulations modulate gouge strength and contribute to divergent landslide acceleration
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB")
of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Jose' A. Infante, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
          78m(a) or 78o(d); and

     (ii) to my knowledge, the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Issuer as of and for the period covered
          by the report.

Dated: March 31, 2006


                                        /s/  Jose' A. Infante
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jose' A. Infante
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of EP Global Communications, Inc., f/k/a East Coast Airlines Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Salluzzo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company for the time period covered in this report and current Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



Dated: March 9, 2004



By: /s/ Robert Salluzzo



Robert Salluzzo, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer for the time period covered

in this report and current Chief Financial Officer