alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Lawrence E. BRILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Order entered March 6, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01191
- CV JULIE JONES, Appellant

V. DAN WILLEMS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 04952
- E



### O RDER
The clerk’s record in this appeal has not been filed

. On December 7, 2018, Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren filed a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing appellant that the cler k’s record would not be filed u ntil she paid the fee for preparation of the record. Appell ant, however, has represented to the Court that she filed a statement of inability to pay costs in the trial court. Because nothing before us reflects the county co urt signed an order requiring appellant to pay costs, we ORDER Mr. Warren to file the clerk’s record, without payment of costs, no later than March 19, 2019. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145 (a).
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Warren and the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 935 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-675, K2025-674.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29882 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 10.4
 THE MEDICINES COMPANY
 Granted Under 2009 Equity Inducement Plan
 
  Issuance of Shares
 
 Vesting




---



##### 



Restrictions on Transfer provided provided
 Restrictive Legends
   Provisions of the Plan
  - 2 -




---



##### 



Withholding Taxes; Section 83(b) Election
   Miscellaneous
 No Rights to Employment
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Severability
 Waiver
 Binding Effect
 Notice
 Pronouns
 Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 Governing Law
 Participants Acknowledgments
 - 4 -




---



##### 



THE MEDICINES COMPANYBy:
Name:Title:PARTICIPANTNameAddress:
 - 5 -
STATE of Louisiana v. Norman PEARLEY & Wilson Washington

NO. 2018-KK-1387

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Richard COVERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2849

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
99.16








McElhanney
Consulting Services Ltd.





March 25,
2010




TO:           Seabridge
Gold Inc.





Ladies
and Gentlemen:





Reference
is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc.
(the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year
then ended, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference
in the 40-F.





I, Robert
Parolin, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd.,
hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the
following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name and
McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd.’s name in connection with the following
report in the AIF: the Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell Preliminary Economic Assessment
Addendum – 2009 dated September 8, 2009.





Yours
      truly,/S/ ROBERT PAROLINRobert
      Parolin, P.Eng.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONALD TERELL STOCKTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 96 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50598 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus REGINALD ERVIN MACKALL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CA-323

- - - - - - - - - - February 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Reginald Ervin MacKall appeals his conviction of distribution of cocaine base in a school zone. He contends solely that his guilty plea is invalid because the district court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1). MacKall avers that his plea is invalid because the district court failed to inform him fully of the nature of the charge and failed to advise him of the maximum statutory term of imprisonment and mandatory minimum term of supervised release. The district court's error was harmless2

inasmuch as the aggregate maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release did not exceed the statutory maximum that was actually explained to MacKall. See United States v. Pierce , 5 F.3d 791, 793-94 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Michael Louis MCINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 20, 2018

Michael Louis McIntosh, Cross City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, EVANDER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual  Report of Tally Ho Ventures,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Nigel
Gregg,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certifies,  to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: May 18, 2007



Nigel Gregg
Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1337. CHAUNCEY BARNWELL v. CHRISTINE TATUM.

Christine Tatum d/b/a Tatum Court Reporting filed suit against Chauncey

Barnwell d/b/a Brown Barnwell, PC in magistrate court. The magistrate court found

in favor of Tatum, and Barnwell appealed to state court. The state court entered a

judgment in favor of Tatum in the amount of $905.80 plus interest and costs. 

Barnwell then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a

magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11), (b); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216

Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). And appeals in actions for damages in

which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less likewise must be brought by discretionary

application. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357, 357

(509 SE2d 655) (1998). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is

jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471

SE2d 60) (1996).

February 25, 2020
Barnwell’sfailure to comply with the discretionary review procedure deprives

us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/25/2020
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
reporT on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB")
of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
          78m(a) or 78o(d); and

     (ii) to my knowledge, the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Issuer as of and for the period covered
          by the report.

Dated: March 31, 2006

                                         /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Tracey A. Welsh
                                        Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heung Hung Lee, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Heung Hung LeeHeung
      Hung Lee
                Chief
      Financial Officer





August
14, 2009
Dylan MACHADO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Maria Rodriguez, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1698

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

ORDERED that the joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal is recognized by the Court, and this petition for writ of certiorari is hereby dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(27)
              - multimedia_image(9)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(6)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(14)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(13)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - california(41)
              - hawaii(1)
              - (-)idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(5)
              - puerto rico(3)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(5)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Data Release        July 29, 2019        Digital Surface Models for the northern 16 km of the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake rupture, northern Lost River fault zone (Idaho, USA)
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 20, 2006
 Volkswagen Dealer Finance, LLC
 Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust
  333-125416
    
    38-3528063Delaware
    
    333-125416-01
    
    13-7255034(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (Registrants IRS
Employer Id. Nos.)
 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---



##### 



Exhibit 99.1
    
    Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust Filed 2005-1
Servicer Certificate for the month ended December 31, 2005
provided to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.
(Filed with this report.)
  Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner TrustBy:
    Volkswagen Dealer Finance, LLCBy:
    /s/ Timothy J. FlahertyTimothy J. Flaherty




---



##### 



Exhibit no.
    
    Exhibit DescriptionExhibit 99.1
    
    Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust Filed 2005-1
Servicer Certificate for the month ended December 31, 2005
provided to JPMorgan Chase Bank, as indenture trustee.
(Filed with this report.)
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Creative  Vistas,  Inc.,  an Arizona  corporation  (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13
          (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 8, 2002
       ------------------


/s/ Rudy R. Miller
-------------------------
President

Dated: August 8, 2002


/s/ Mary A. Nance
-------------------------
Treasurer
**SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO**
 
 **Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Inyx, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack Kachkar, Chief
        Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.
 
 Date: July
                25,
                2005
              By:
              /s/ Jack
                KachkarJack
                KachkarChief Executive
                Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
September 23, 2014
N o. 04

- 14

- 00625

- CR
E x Parte Devan S. MATTHEWS , Appellant From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009CR11609 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER On June 16, 2014, t he trial court denied Appellant’s pre

- trial application for writ of habeas corpus. A ppellant had thirty days to file a notice of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 6.2(a ); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) ; Green v. State , 999 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref’ d)

. Appellant concedes he did not timely file a notice of appeal, but he asserts he had no notice or actual knowledge of the appealable order within twenty days of the date the order was signed

. Cf. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.2(c) (no notice in civil case) ; T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 306a (same)

. However, in a criminal case, neither Appellate Rule 4.2 nor Civil Rule 306a applies

. E.g. , Dewalt v. State , 417 S.W.3d 678, 689

– 90 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2013) , pet . ref’d , 426 S.W.3d 100 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (“ Although [no notice of the appealable order] might excuse an untimely notice of appeal in a civil case, ‘ [n]o comparable rule exists for criminal cases, ’ and Te xas courts have routinely held, as we must do here, that being unaware of an appealable order or judgment does not excuse an untimely notice of appeal. ” (second alteration in original) (footnotes omitted)) ; Pope v. State , No. 05

- 10

- 01455

- CR, 2011 WL 924477 , at *2 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Mar. 18, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same)

. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522 ; Green , 999 S.W.2d at 476 . In this case, Appellant concedes the notice of appeal was not timely filed but moves this court to grant an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeal’s jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing ,(2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal , and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time.
Olivo , 9 18 S.W.2d at 522 ; see also Castillo v. State , 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (“ If a notice of appeal is not timely filed [under Rule 26.2 or Rule 26.3] , the court of appeals has no option but to dismiss the appe al for lack of jurisdiction. ”). Therefore, we ORDER A ppellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Castillo , 369 S.W.3d at 198; Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 52 2

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Feroz BHOJANI, Appellant, v. SOLOMON LAW GROUP, P.A. and A.O.K. Liquors & Spirits of Tampa Bay, Inc. a/k/a A.O.K. Liquors of Tampa Bay, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4844

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of COL China
      Online International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,
      2006, Chi Keung Wong, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
              November 14, 2006
            /s/ Chi
              Keung WongChi Keung Wong, Chief Executive Officer
              andChief
                Financial Officer
STATE EX REL. Lucas RODDY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1719

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See *1259State ex rel. Roddy v. State, 15-0017 (La. 10/30/15), 178 So.3d 132.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(91)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - colorado(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - (-)oregon(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileBarbara Martin