alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------



                                      13
<PAGE>

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


             I, Richard DeLeo, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust
             2003-15;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

             Date: March 25, 2004



                              /s/ Richard DeLeo
                              ------------------
                                  Richard DeLeo
                                  Senior Managing Director



                                      14
Charlton OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Dr. Christina PAYLAN, Petitioner, v. Timothy FITZGERALD and Farmer & Fitzgerald, P.A., Respondents.

Case No. 2D17-5161

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit
99.19








Snowden
Mining Industry Consultants Inc.





March 25,
2010




TO:           Seabridge
Gold Inc.





Ladies
and Gentlemen:





Reference
is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc.
(the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year
then ended, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference
in the 40-F.





We
consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following
report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to the use of the name "Snowden
Mining Industry Consultants" in connection with the following report in the AIF:
Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Project, Preliminary Economic Assessment -
2008 dated March 10, 2008.




Dick
Matthews is no longer under our employment.  We are assuming
responsibility for the disclosure, opinions and reports prepared by such
individual in his place with respect to the 40-F and the AIF as if the
disclosure, opinions, and reports were prepared by us and without reference to
Dick Matthews.  In connection with this assumption of responsibility,
we hereby consent to the use of our name in the 40-F and the AIF.






Yours
      truly,Snowden
      Mining Industry Consultants Inc./S/ROBERT
      MCCARTHYAuthorized
      Signatory
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of EP Global, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacitiesand on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 January 4, 2006

By: /s/ Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.

Joseph M. Valenzano, Jr.

  

Chief Executive Officer

  

 

  

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided BPInternational, Inc. and will be retained by BP International, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. James M. KAMAU, Respondent.

No. 1D15-497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 3, 2018

Christie S. Utt, General Counsel, and Mark L. Mason, Assistant General Counsel, State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

David M. Robbins and Susan Z. Cohen of Epstein & Robbins, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

Per Curiam.

*782Respondent's motion to enforce this Court's mandate in *Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Kamau* , 174 So.3d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), is denied. The motion is based on the premise that the circuit court did not comply with our mandate to "follow the correct law" when it denied Respondent's petition for writ of certiorari on remand because the court did not apply *Wiggins v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles* , 209 So.3d 1165 (Fla. 2017), which was issued after the mandate. That premise is flawed because *Wiggins* did not overrule the well-established rule cited in our prior opinion that the circuit court in a first-tier certiorari proceeding is not permitted to reweigh the evidence presented to the hearing officer. Rather, the decision merely recognized a narrow exception to that rule in cases where the hearing officer's findings are directly contradicted by a video recording. *Id.* at 1172, 1175. Here, because there was no video recording of the stop that led to the suspension of Respondent's driver's license, *Wiggins* has no bearing on the law that the circuit court was required to apply in ruling on the petition for writ of certiorari. Accordingly, because we determined in our prior opinion that the circuit court "improperly reweighed the evidence concerning the lawfulness of Respondent's detention and arrest" when it granted the petition for writ of certiorari, it follows that the court complied with the mandate when it declined to "reconsider[ ] the merits" and denied the petition on remand. *See**Brunner Enters., Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue* , 452 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 1984) ("[I]t is a well-settled rule of law that 'the judgment of an appellate court, where it issues a mandate, is a final judgment in the cause and compliance therewith by the lower court is a purely ministerial act.' " (quoting *O.P. Corp. v. Vill. of N. Palm Beach* , 302 So.2d 130, 131 (Fla. 1974) ) ).

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell and Ray, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:  | /s/ Gadi Aner                         |   |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |      | Gadi Aner                             |
|   |      | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman  |
|   |      |                                  |
|   | By:       | /s/ Gabby Klausner                    |   |
|   |      | Gabby Klausner                        |
|   |      | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

----
Curtis Novell YOUNG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3801

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Garrett M. KERN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is transferred.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JUAN JOSE PEREZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 733 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 936 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to eliminate straight-party 

voting from any voting system used for Federal elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2013 

Mr. MATHESON (for himself and Mr. DENT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to eliminate 

straight-party voting from any voting system used for 

Federal elections. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘People Before Party 

5 Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF STRAIGHT-PARTY VOTING IN FED7 ERAL ELECTIONS. 

8 Section 301(a)(6) of the Help America Vote Act of 

9 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15481(a)(6)) is amended by striking the 

10 period at the end of the sentence and inserting ‘‘, except 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 936 IH

1 that no State may provide a voter with the opportunity 

2 to indicate the selection of a political party as a represen3 tation of the selection of an individual candidate.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Travis Jon FERNANDES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
          30, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirement of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                        /s/ Thomas F. Rokisky
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas F. Rokisky
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 14, 2006


                                       29
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Jose M Meleth, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Single Source Financial
Services Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a)   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
     information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its  consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the  period  in which  this  annual  report  is being
     prepared;
b)   evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of
     the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
functions):
(i)  all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize,  and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
(ii) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees who have a significant  role in the issuer's  internal  controls;
     and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated:     March 28, 2006
/s/ Jose M Meleth, Jose M Meleth, Chief Financial Officer
|   | · | Courageous Lake Prefeasibility Study dated September 5, 2012 and amended November 11, 2014 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | 2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012 and amended November 11, 2014 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 1. | consent to the public filing of the Reports and the use of any extracts from or a summary of the Reports in the 40-F; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | consent to the use of my name and Resource Modeling Inc.'s name and references to the Reports, or portions thereof, in the 40-F and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Reports in the 40-F; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | confirm that I have read the 40- and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the sections of the Reports for which I am responsible; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Reports or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Reports. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    |   | Yours truly,                                   |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|         |   |                                           |
|         |   |  /s/ Michael J. Lechner, P.Geo., RPG, CPG |
|         |   |  Michael J. Lechner, P.Geo., RPG, CPG     |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 966 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 966

 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
    numerical limitations on immigrant visas and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2013

  Ms. Hanabusa (for herself, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Honda, Mr. Takano, Mr. 
    Faleomavaega, Ms. Chu, Mr. Sablan, and Mr. Farr) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
    numerical limitations on immigrant visas and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filipino Veterans Family 
Reunification Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT.

    Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) Aliens who--
                    ``(i) are eligible for a visa under paragraph (1) 
                or (3) of section 203(a); and
                    ``(ii) have a parent (regardless of whether the 
                parent is living or dead) who was naturalized pursuant 
                to--
                            ``(I) section 405 of the Immigration Act of 
                        1990 (Public Law 101-649; 8 U.S.C. 1440 note); 
                        or
                            ``(II) title III of the Act of October 14, 
                        1940 (54 Stat. 1137, chapter 876), as added by 
                        section 1001 of the Second War Powers Act, 1942 
                        (56 Stat. 182, chapter 199).''.
                                 <all>
```
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 0047 5

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048

- 306563

- 19

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### L ARRY 

### J OE 

### M ORGAN 

### , Appellant

V



### . G OVERNOR 

### G REG 

### A BBOTT 

### , J UDGE 

### G EORGE 

### G ALLAGHER 

### , D AVID 

### C. H AGERMAN 

### , B ENSON 

### V ARGHESE 

### , S HAREN 

### W ILSON 

### , W ILLIAM 

### S TANLEY 

### H ARRIS 

### , J USTICE 

### J AMES 

### T. C AMPBELL 

### , J USTICE 

### M ACKEY 

### H ANCOCK 

### , J USTICE 

### P ATRICK 

### A. P IRTLE 

### , J UDGE 

### J OHN 

### P. C HUPP 

### , L ISA 

### M ORTON 

### ,

AND 

### W ALWORTH 

### B URGE 

### , M.D ., Appellees2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Larry Joe Morgan filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s final judgment dismissing his claims against Appellee s and ordering that he take nothing on

his claims . However, Appellant is on the list of vexatious litigants subject to prefiling orders that is compiled b y the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.104; see generally http://www.txcourts.gov/judicial

- data/vexatious

- litigants. A clerk of a court may not file an appeal presented, pro se, by a v exatious litigant who is subject to a prefiling order unless the litigant obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge permitting the filing. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103. On January 10, 2020, we notified Appellant that he had not provided th is court with an order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing of this appeal.

We cautioned Appellant that we would dismiss this appeal unless he provided this court

w ith such an order on or before January 30, 2020

. In response to our notice, w e received “Appellant’s Second Motion for Appeal

. ” In that document, Appellant asserts that he had objected in the trial court to the appointment of a visiting judge to hear

var ious motions filed by the parties, including Appellees’ motions to dismiss

. He has not, however, provided this court with an order permitting him to file this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

De livered: April 30, 2020
A.J., a Juvenile, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0767

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.