alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Washington Banking Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michal D. Cann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of
the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report
or under such Acts.

/s/ Michal D. Cann
------------------------
Michal D. Cann
Chief Executive Officer


March 16, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 12, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 815 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-523, K2025-521.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29193 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - (-)multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - (-)wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 18, 2021        PubTalk-11/2021: Busting Myths About One of the Largest Volcanic Systems in the World - The Top 10 Misconceptions about Yellowstone Volcanism

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for November 1, 2022
Exhibit
32.2


STATEMENT
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


KERYX
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James F. Oliviero, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





1) 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Date:May 11,
      2010
              /s/ James F. OlivieroJames
      F. OlivieroChief
      Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(2)
              - (-)products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(4)
              - alaska(231)
              - american samoa(4)
              - arizona(10)
              - arkansas(35)
              - california(909)
              - colorado(14)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(3)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(49)
              - idaho(27)
              - illinois(34)
              - indiana(15)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(18)
              - kentucky(24)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(8)
              - missouri(45)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(43)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - ohio(6)
              - oklahoma(52)
              - oregon(106)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - puerto rico(41)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(24)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(38)
              - texas(14)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(28)
              - washington(158)
              - west virginia(3)
              - wisconsin(3)
              - wyoming(27)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

publication        January 1, 1973        Earthquake history of Maryland
Samantha Beatrice RACINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3991

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Darnell JOHNSON

NO. 2018-KK-0613

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
IV 

House Calendar No. 23 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202 

[Report No. 113–52] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 807) to require that the Government prioritize all obligations on the debt held by the public in the 

event that the debt limit is reached. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2013 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 807) to require 

that the Government prioritize all obligations on the 

debt held by the public in the event that the debt limit 

is reached. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 807) to require that the Government prioritize all obliga4 tions on the debt held by the public in the event that the 

5 debt limit is reached. All points of order against consider6 ation of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 202 RH 

1 of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways 

2 and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as 

3 adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

4 All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amend5 ed, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

6 as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 

7 amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening 

8 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

9 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

10 the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further 

11 amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 

12 Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Rep13 resentative Camp of Michigan or his designee, which shall 

14 be in order without intervention of any point of order, 

15 shall be considered as read, shall be separately debatable 

16 for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the pro17 ponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a 

18 demand for division of the question; and (3) one motion 

19 to recommit with or without instructions. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 23 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202 

[Report No. 113–52] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 807) 

event that the debt limit is reached. gations on the debt held by the public in the to require that the Government prioritize all obliMAY 7, 2013 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                    In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Multilink Technology Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Richard N.Nottenburg, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                    1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                    2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        |           |                           |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------|
|   |  By: | /s/ RICHARD N. NOTTENBURG |
|   |      |                           |
|   |      | Richard N. Nottenburg     |
|   |      | Chairman of the Board and |
|   |      | Chief Executive Officer   |
|   |      | August 13, 2003           |
Vincent WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 12, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*494Appellant Vincent Williams was convicted of willfully fleeing and attempting to elude a police officer in an authorized patrol vehicle, as well as resisting arrest without violence. He was ultimately sentenced on both counts, concurrently, to 364 days in jail followed by three years' probation, a one-year suspension of his driver's license, and a $1000 fine. In this appeal, he contends that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to prove that the police were attempting to stop him in an authorized police vehicle which prominently displayed the agency insignia and other jurisdictional marking. We affirm on the authority of *Dumais v. State* , 40 So.3d 850, 852-53 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (finding evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of fleeing and eluding a police officer in an authorized patrol vehicle where officers testified that they were chasing the defendant in a "marked" police vehicle and defendant admitted that he knew he was fleeing from the police).

We reverse, however, the $1000 fine, because the State erroneously informed the court that the fine was mandatory. Section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (2016), under which appellant was prosecuted, does not include a mandatory fine. It is not clear that the court would have imposed the same fine had it known that the fine was not mandatory. On remand, the trial court may reconsider imposing a fine consistent with a third-degree felony conviction. *See* § 775.083(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2016).

*Reversed and remanded.*

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.
Kedar Astor LYONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 78 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 H. R. 78

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4110 Almeda Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``George Thomas `Mickey' 
                     Leland Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE THOMAS ``MICKEY'' LELAND POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4110 Almeda Road in Houston, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George Thomas `Mickey' Leland Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Thomas `Mickey' Leland Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Lawrence JACOBS

NO. 2017-KP-1060

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7327

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHERRI PROVINCE SHELBURNE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-92-39-R, CA-96-259-R)

Submitted: September 16, 1997 Decided: September 29, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherri Province Shelburne, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Shelburne, Nos. CR-92-39-R; CA-96-259-R

(W.D. Va. July 30, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997

WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
10.7





October
1, 2009





Mr. Ayaz
Kassam


Superlattice
Power Inc.


420
Nellis Blvd., A3-146


Las
Vegas, NV  89110





Dear Mr.
Kassam,





EV
Innovations hereby advises Superlattice Power, Inc. that it will not issue a
notice of default for your failure to comply with your covenant to invest a
minimum of $1,500,000 in the first year of the term of our License
Agreement.





If you
have any questions, please feel free to call me at (702) 952-9900.





Sincerely,/s/
      Stacey FlingStacey
      FlingPresident
Ivan JACOBS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3647

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit        32.2 **

**STATEMENT        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF **

**KERYX        BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC. **

**PURSUANT        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION         906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|                                    |                                                                                                                                |                           |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                                                                           |                      |
| Date:                  November 4, 2005 |                                                                                                                                | /s/                Ron Bentsur |
|                                    | Ron                Bentsur                                                                                                          |
|                                    | Vice                  President, Finance and Investor Relations  (Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
H. Res. 202 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 8, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 807) 

to require that the Government prioritize all obligations on 

the debt held by the public in the event that the debt limit 

is reached. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

are waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

(2) the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by 

Representative Camp of Michigan or his designee, which shall 
2 

•HRES 202 EH 

be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall 

be considered as read, shall be separately debatable for 10 

minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and 

an opponent, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q/A for the period ended
March 31, 2003 (the Report) of BearingPoint, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert S. Falcone, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert S. FalconeName: Robert S. Falcone Date: October 6, 2003
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

September 25, 2001 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDERSON TOLIVER 

 Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County

Nos. 223083, 223085 Stephen M. Bevil, Judge

No. E2001-00584-CCA-R3-CD 

December 18, 2001

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, J., concurring.

 I concur in the result reached and most of the reasoning used in the majority opinion.

However, I would hold that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on attempted aggravated

child abuse under the evidence presented. As the majority opinion holds though, under State v.

Williams, 977 S.W.2d 101, 106 (Tenn. 1988), the failure to give the instruction was harmless beyond

a reasonable doubt.

_____________________________

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE