alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


KERYX
BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James F. Oliviero, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





1)   
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)   
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 12, 2009
              /s/ James F. OlivieroJames
      F. Oliviero
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0300. IN THE INTEREST OF L. D., A CHILD (FATHER).

A19D0306. IN THE INTEREST OF D. D., A CHILD (FATHER).

The juvenile court entered an order terminating the father’s parental rights to

the above-referenced minor children. The father filed a motion for new trial. On

December 18, 2018, the juvenile court entered an order denying that motion. At 3:12

a.m. and at 11:32 p.m. on January 18, 2019, the father electronically filed these two

applications for discretionary review. We lack jurisdiction. 

The Court hasrecently granted the mother’s applications arising fromthe same

order, and the Court would prefer to hear both parents’ appeals on the merits. The

Court’s docket indicates, however, that the father’s applications were electronically

filed at 3:12 a.m. and 11:32 p.m. respectively on the 31st day after the statutory

deadline. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of

entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582

(420 SE2d 393) (1992).Thisstatutory deadline isjurisdictional, and we cannot accept

an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-34 (d). Boyle v.

State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). These applications are therefore

untimely, and they are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

February 13, 2019
If the father possesses evidence to the contrary, he is free to move for

reconsideration of these dismissals within the time required byCourt of AppealsRule

37 (b). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/13/2019
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of EP Global Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: November 14, 2008  By: /s/ Joseph M. Valanzano, Jr. Joseph M. Valanzano, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(16)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(19)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(15)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(180)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - (-)maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(112)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Illustrations        November 4, 2022        Pennington Mountain Critical Minerals Earth MRI Geophysical Scan

Photography        October 30, 2022        Pennington Mountain Rock with Critical Minerals
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(28)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(4)
              - products_publications(158)
              - products_software(1)
              - (-)products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)
              - multimedia_video(25)
              - multimedia_video-149194(12)
              - multimedia_video-149195(12)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(8)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)
              - other_basic-42(10)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - california(6)
              - colorado(1)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - (-)washington(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Data Visualization        June 22, 2022        Cascadia subduction zone database: compilation of published datasets relevant to Cascadia subduction zone earthquake hazards and tectonics

Data Access        September 27, 2022        Cascadia Subduction Zone Database
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-82,875-01 and WR-82,875-02

In re STATE OF TEXAS ex rel. JOHN F. HEALEY, JR., District Attorney,

268 JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Relator

TH

ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS

AND/OR PROHIBITION FROM CAUSE NO. 10-DCR-054233 IN THE

268 DISTRICT COURT, FORT BEND COUNTY

TH

Per curiam.

O R D E R

We have before us a motion for leave to file a petition for writs of mandamus

and/or prohibition, and if granted, a motion for a stay of the proceedings. We also have

before us a petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition.

In May 2011, a jury convicted Albert James Turner (the real party in interest) of

the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set

punishment at death. This Court abated Turner’s direct appeal and remanded the cause to
Turner/Healey/Elliott - 2

the trial court to determine whether it is feasible to conduct a retrospective competency

trial, and if so, to conduct a retrospective competency trial. Turner v. State, 422 S.W.3d

676 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). After the trial court determined feasibility and scheduled a

retrospective competency trial, the trial court later decided instead to hold a jury trial on

Turner’s current competency to take place on March 16, 2015. Relator filed a motion to

1

reconsider that decision, which the trial court denied. Relator then filed the instant

petition for mandamus and/or prohibition in this Court.

Before deciding whether to grant relator leave to file its petition, we believe the

trial judge and respondent in the case below, the Honorable Brady G. Elliott, Judge of the

268 District Court, and the real party in interest, Albert James Turner, should have the

th

opportunity to respond.

Within 30 days of the date of this order, Judge Elliott, or his representative, and a

representative of the real party in interest, may file their respective responses in this

Court. The jury trial to determine Turner’s current competency is stayed pending further

order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015.

Do Not Publish

There is some discrepancy in the record as to whether the current competency trial will 1

take place on March 16 or March 17. In a hearing on February 3, the trial court stated that the

current competency trial will take place on March 16. However, in its order denying the State’s

motion for reconsideration on February 13, the trial court stated that the current competency trial

will take place on March 17.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  **STATEMENT
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**
 **KERYX
        BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Weiss,
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
        as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on
        my knowledge:
 
 1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:November
                  10, 2008
              
              /s/
                  Michael S. WeissMichael
                  S. Weiss
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(3)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(117)
              - 2023(29)
              - 2022(101)
              - 2021(34)
              - (-)2020(7)
              - 2019(7)
              - 2018(1)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

social mediaUSGS Earthquakes

General  Errata for Latest Earthquakes

locationNational Earthquake Information Center

social mediaUSGS Tweet Earthquake Dispatch (TED)

partnerNational Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP)

partnerPacific Northwest Seismic Network (PNSN)

social mediaUSGS ShakeAlert
PriceWaterHouse Coopers

PriceWaterHouse Coopers
125 High Street
Boston, MA 02110
Telephone (617) 530-5000
Facsimile (617) 530-5001

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
GMAC Mortgage Corporation

We have examined management's assertion about
GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its subsidiaries'
(the "company")compliance with the minimum
servicing standardsidentified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
("USAP") as of and for the year ended December
31, 2003 included in the accompanying
management assertion (see Exhibit I). Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with
standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountant, and accordingly, included
Examining on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
Compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on
the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

/s/Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP

March 24, 2004


GMAC Mortgage Corp
Exhibit I


Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 19, 2004

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003,
GMAC Mortgage Corp and its subsidiaries
(the "Company"), has complied in all material
respects with the minimum servicing standards
(the "Standards")set forth in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company
had in effect fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policies in the amounts of $125,000,000 and $100,000,000
respectively.

/s/David Applegate
David Applegate
Chief Executive Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp.

/s/Ralph Hall
Ralph Hall
Chief Operating Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(28)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - connect_social_media(6)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(15)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(94)
              - 2023(40)
              - (-)2022(15)
              - 2021(10)

staff profilePatricia J Loferski, Ph.D.

staff profileDaniel J. Cordier

staff profileJoseph T Fleming

staff profileChristopher Barber, PhD

staff profileJeffrey Phillips

staff profileTheresa Presser

staff profileC Scott Southworth

staff profileDavid A Brostuen

staff profileJasmeet Kahlon

staff profileJacob E Poletti, M.S.

staff profileMarith Reheis

staff profileNancy Durika

staff profileRobert Stamm

staff profileJ. Stephen Schindler

staff profileErnest Crider
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/MICHAEL W. PALKOVICMichael W. Palkovic
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

February 28,
2007

---



QuickLinks
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134509 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134509 

 COA: 276637 

Midland CC: 04-001938-FC 

IGNACIO JAMES VANHORN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Dwayne JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2225

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

Dwayne Jones, Madison, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Lance K. Bradford, as the Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,the sole Manager of Vestin Fund III, LLC, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Vestin Fund III, LLC;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofVestin Fund III, LLC as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin FundIII, LLC and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to VestinFund III, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-82377 and34-47986; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund III, LLC’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluations; and (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund III,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringVestin Fund III, LLC’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affectVestin Fund III, LLC’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. Vestin Fund III, LLC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to Vestin Fund III, LLC’s auditors and the audit committee ofVestin Fund III, LLC’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Fund III,LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Fund III,LLC’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2004
/s/ Lance K. BradfordLance K. Bradford
Patricia SPANN v. GERRY LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A Gerry Lane Chevrolet, ABC and XYZ

NO. 2018-C-1649

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Not considered; not timely filed. See La.S.Ct.R. X, § 5(a).
Donald J. HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 20, 2018

Terrence E. Kehoe, of Law Office of Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.12(b)





Tetra Tech EBA Inc.
 (formerly EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd. or EBA, a Tetra Tech Company)


March 27, 2014





TO:  Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Nigel Goldup, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (formerly EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd. or EBA, a Tetra Tech Company), hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following reports and to the references, as applicable, to my name and EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF and the 40-F:


·
Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Prefeasibility Study dated September 5, 2012; and


·
Courageous Lake Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment 2011 dated July 15, 2011.





Yours truly,/s/ Nigel GoldupNigel Goldup, P.Eng.
Earl James DOWNS, DOC#H26167, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-97

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.