Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2024 / Notices 102951 

ash/clay chunk, groundstone fragments, 

utilized flakes, post fragments, manos 

and mano fragments, shell beads, 

pestles and pestle fragments, battered 

rock, projectile points, core tools, bone 

awls and awl fragments, worked bone, 

polished bone, chipping debitage, stone 

fragments, faunal bone, gorges, arrow 

shaft straightener, burned and unburned 

acorns, bone whistle parts, a dirt root 

cast, charcoal beam fragments, scrapers, 

mortars, pounders, baked clay, cobbles, 

charcoal, boiling stones, and shell 

fragments. Of the total associated 

funerary objects, three bags and 62 

individual items are present. The 

associated funerary objects were 

recovered from the Case Site (4–TEH– 

S246), which is located in southern 

Tehama County near Vina, California. In 

1965, UCLA Archaeological Survey 

excavated the site under the direction of 

Donald S. Miller and Phil Burnham. The 

collection was recorded as never having 

been received until a small portion was 

found mixed with another accession/ 

collection. The remainder may have 

been retained by the property owner. 

Human remains were found at the site 

by the property owner but are not 

present. During consultations, the Tribal 

Representative from Paskenta Band of 

Nomlaki Indians identified this as a 

Wintun site that is within the ancestral 

territory of the Tribe. Due to the 

presence of human remains, the 

representative identified the entire site, 

and any material found there, as 

culturally sensitive. There is no known 

use of potentially hazardous substances 

for treatment of the associated funerary 

objects. 

Human remains representing, at least, 

two individuals have been identified. 

The 169 bags and 516 individual 

associated funerary objects are flakes, 

cores, core tools, faunal bone, bone awls 

and awl fragments, cobbles, fire stones, 

manos and mano fragments, choppers, 

pounding stones, acorns, projectile 

points and point fragments, 

hammerstones, nodules, bone whistle 

parts, flake tools, scrapers, clay 

fragments, metal fragments, shell 

pendants, fishhooks, modified bone, fire 

fractured stone, pestles and pestle 

fragments, beads, groundstone 

fragments, stone fragments/samples, 

digging stones, stone rings, shell 

fragments, worked flakes, boiling stones, 

sharpening tools, organics, charcoal, 

and soil samples. The human remains 

and associated funerary objects were 

recovered from the Bambauer Site (4– 

TEH–S247), which is located in 

southern Tehama County near Hamilton 

City, California. In 1965, UCLA 

Archaeological Survey excavated the 

site under the direction of Donald S. 

Miller and Thomas Durbin. The 

collection is noted as initially going to 

California State University, Chico under 

the care of Keith Johnson until 2003, 

when it was received at UCLA. During 

2024 consultations, human remains 

were located mixed in with faunal bone. 

Human remains were also recovered in 

1974 excavations of the same site, 

which were repatriated to the Paskenta 

Band of Nomlaki Indians in 2023. In a 

1965 site report, excavation director 

Thomas Durbin states that 4–TEH–S247 

is known to be a Wintun site. During 

consultations, the Tribal Representative 

from Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians 

also identified this as a Wintun site that 

is within the ancestral territory of the 

Tribe. Due to the presence of human 

remains, the representative identified 

the entire site, and any material found 

there, as culturally sensitive. There is no 

known use of potentially hazardous 

substances for treatment of the human 

remains or associated funerary objects. 

No lineal descendant can be 

determined. 

Cultural Affiliation 

Based on the information available 

and the results of consultation, cultural 

affiliation is clearly identified by the 

information available about the human 

remains and associated funerary objects 

described in this notice. 

Determinations 

The Fowler Museum at UCLA has 

determined that: 

• The human remains described in 

this notice represent the physical 

remains of two individuals of Native 

American ancestry. 

• The 172 bags and 2,641 individual 

objects described in this notice are 

reasonably believed to have been placed 

intentionally with or near individual 

human remains at the time of death or 

later as part of the death rite or 

ceremony. 

• There is a connection between the 

human remains and associated funerary 

objects described in this notice and the 

Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians of 

California. 

Requests for Repatriation 

Written requests for repatriation of the 

human remains and associated funerary 

objects in this notice must be sent to the 

authorized representative identified in 

this notice under ADDRESSES. Requests 

for repatriation may be submitted by: 

1. Any one or more of the Indian 

Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations 

identified in this notice. 

2. Any lineal descendant, Indian 

Tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization 

not identified in this notice who shows, 

by a preponderance of the evidence, that 

the requestor is a lineal descendant or 

an Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization with cultural affiliation. 

Repatriation of the human remains 

and associated funerary objects 

described in this notice to a requestor 

may occur on or after January 17, 2025. 

If competing requests for repatriation 

are received, the Fowler Museum at 

UCLA must determine the most 

appropriate requestor prior to 

repatriation. Requests for joint 

repatriation of the human remains and 

associated funerary objects are 

considered a single request and not 

competing requests. The Fowler 

Museum at UCLA is responsible for 

sending a copy of this notice to the 

Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian 

organizations identified in this notice. 

Authority: Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 

U.S.C. 3003, and the implementing 

regulations, 43 CFR 10.10. 

Dated: December 11, 2024. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29939 Filed 12–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1428] 

Certain Women’s Flats With Colored 

Outsoles Thereof; Notice of Institution 

of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

November 13, 2024, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

on behalf of Gavrieli Brands LLC of 

Culver City, California. An amended 

complaint was filed on November 20, 

2024. A supplement to the amended 

complaint was filed on December 2, 

2024. The complaint, as amended and 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain women’s flats with colored 

outsoles thereof by reason of 

infringement of the claim of one or more 

of U.S. Design Patent No. D681,928 (the 

‘‘ ’928 patent’’), U.S. Design Patent No. 

D844,950 (the ‘‘ ’950 patent’’), U.S. 

Design Patent No. D844,951 (the ‘‘ ’951 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
102952 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2024 / Notices 

patent’’), U.S. Design Patent No. 

D681,927 (the ‘‘ ’927 patent’’), U.S. 

Design Patent No. D781,035 (the ‘‘ ’035 

patent’’), U.S. Design Patent No. 

D781,032 (the ‘‘ ’032 patent’’), U.S. 

Design Patent No. D686,812 (the ‘‘ ’812 

patent’’), and U.S. Design Patent No. 

D688,853 (the ‘‘ ’853 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. The complaint also alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, or in 

the sale of certain flats with colored 

outsoles thereof by reason of trade dress 

infringement, the threat or effect of 

which is to destroy or substantially 

injure an industry in the United States. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order, or in the 

alternative a limited exclusion, and 

cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, as amended 

and supplemented, except for any 

confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (202) 205– 

2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 12, 2024, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 

(a) an investigation be instituted to 

determine whether there is a violation 

of subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in 

the importation or sale of certain 

products identified in paragraph (2) by 

reason of trade dress infringement, the 

threat of which is to destroy or 

substantially injure an industry in the 

United States; 

(b) an investigation be instituted to 

determine whether there is a violation 

of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, or the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of the claim of the ’928 

patent; the claim of the ’950 patent; the 

claim of the ’951 patent; the claim of the 

’927 patent; the claim of the ’035 patent; 

the claim of the ’032 patent; the claim 

of the ’812 patent; and the claim of the 

’853 patent, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘women’s ballet flats 

with colored outsoles thereof’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Gavrieli 

Brands LLC, 5731 Buckingham 

Parkway, Culver City, California 90230. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Kijera’s OneDrop LLC, 630 Malcolm X 

Blvd., Suite 8M, New York, NY 10037 

Craze, CSFD 1008 Maria Clara Road, 

Essel Park, CSFD, Philippines 

Pierjeda Information Technology Co., 

Ltd., Room 413, 4 Floor, No. 50 

Huihua Road, Tonde Street, Baiyun 

District, Guangzhou, China 

Shengze Trading Company, 122 Linhou, 

Meixi Village, Shiliu Town, Zhangpu 

County, Zhangshou City, Fujian 

Province, China 

Guangzhou Shun Cheng Trading Co., 

Ltd., Room 501, No. 5, Lane 4, 

Hongxingqiaobian Street, Shimen 

Street, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 

China 

Kunming Ouxiang Trading Co., Ltd., No. 

1808, 18th Floor, Caizhi Xinjing 

Building, No. 924 Beijing Road, 

Lianmeng Street, Panlong District, 

Kunming City, Yunnan Province, 

China 

Huihui Bianan, No. 18 West Avenue, 

Huilong Weihuo B17, Huilonguan, 

Changping District, Beijing, China 

Bingxin Qingfeng, 3rd Floor, Building 

A, Apro Industrial Zone, No. 1 

Shenghong Road, Huangpu Town, 

Zhongshan City, Guangdong, 

Province, China 

Baiqiuju1983, 3rd Floor, Building A, 

Apro Industrial Zone, No. 1 

Shenghong Road, Huangpu Town, 

Zhongshan City, Guangdong, 

Province, China 

tb249835650, 3rd Floor, Building A, 

Apro Industrial Zone, No. 1 

Shenghong Road, Huangpu Town, 

Zhongshan City, Guangdong, 

Province, China 

Yuyoufang Foreign Trade Store, 3rd 

Floor, Building A, Apro Industrial 

Zone, No. 1 Shenghong Road, 

Huangpu Town, Zhongshan City, 

Guangdong, Province, China 

Xu Wenping 123, 3rd Floor, Building A, 

Apro Industrial Zone, No. 1 

Shenghong Road, Huangpu Town, 

Zhongshan, City, Guangdong 

Province, China 

Ynwll, No. 18 West Avenue, Huilong 

Weihuo B16, Huilonguan, Changping 

District, Beijing No. 18, Huilongguan, 

China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2024 / Notices 102953 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 13, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29977 Filed 12–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–750 and 731– 

TA–1728 (Preliminary)] 

Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic 

Abrasive Grains From China; Revised 

Schedule for the Subject 

Investigations 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

DATES: December 13, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keysha Martinez (202–205–2136), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these investigations may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 25, 2024, the Commission 

established a schedule for the conduct 

of the preliminary phase of the subject 

investigations (89 FR 95235, December 

2, 2024). Subsequently, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extended 

the deadline for its initiation 

determination from December 16, 2024 

to January 6, 2025 (89 FR 100465, 

December 12, 2024). The Commission, 

therefore, is revising its schedule to 

conform with Commerce’s new 

schedule. 

The Commission must reach 

preliminary determinations within 25 

days after the date on which the 

Commission receives notice from 

Commerce of initiation of the 

investigations, and the Commission’s 

views must be transmitted to Commerce 

within five business days thereafter. 

For further information concerning 

this proceeding, see the Commission’s 

notice cited above and the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and B (19 CFR part 207). 

Authority: These investigations are 

being conducted under authority of title 

VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice 

is published pursuant to § 207.12 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 13, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–30024 Filed 12–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1427] 

Certain Components for Injection 

Molding Machines, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

November 12, 2024, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

on behalf of Husky Injection Molding 

Systems LTD. of Canada and Husky 

Injection Molding Systems, Inc. of 

Milton, Vermont. Husky filed a 

supplemental complaint on November 

29, 2024, and subsequently refiled the 

same ‘‘supplemental’’ complaint as an 

amended complaint on December 2, 

2024. The amended complaint, alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain components for injection 

molding machines, and products 

containing the same by reason of the 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 9,713,891 (‘‘the ’891 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 11,794,375 (‘‘the ’375 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 10,093,053 

(‘‘the ’053 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

8,834,149 (‘‘the ’149 patent’’); and U.S. 

Patent No. 7,645,132 (‘‘the ’132 patent’’). 

The amended complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by the applicable 

Federal Statute. The complainant 

requests that the Commission institute 

an investigation and, after the 

investigation, issue a limited exclusion 

order and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Orndoff, The Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 12, 2024, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–2, 4, and 6–8 of the ’891 patent; 1–3, 

5–15, and 17–21 of the ’375 patent; 

claims 1–4, 6, and 8–10 of the ’053 

patent; claims 1–9 and 18 of the ’149 

patent; and claims 1–4, 7, 10–12, 14–19, 

21–24, and 26 of the ’132 patent, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘mold products, cavity 

insert products, and molding apparatus 

products for injection molding 

machines, components for injection 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES