alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDREA BLOODWORTH, a/k/a Andre Thettle Green,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:06-cr-00337-TLW-1; 4:12-cv-02007-TLW)

Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea Bloodworth, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrea Bloodworth seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and 

the amendments thereto. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Bloodworth has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Thomas E. KENVILLE, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Robert BOYKIN, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2569

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Patrick SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 4, 2018

Patrick Smith, Coleman, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6707

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DUVELL MOZART EVERETT,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:07-cr-00001-REP-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2012 Decided: September 17, 2012

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duvell Mozart Everett, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Duvell Mozart Everett appeals the district court’s 

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a 

sentence reduction. We review an order granting or denying a 

§ 3582 motion for a sentence reduction for abuse of discretion. 

See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010) 

(citing United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 

2004)). “A district court abuses its discretion if it . . . 

bases its exercise of discretion on an erroneous factual or 

legal premise.” DIRECTV, Inc. v. Rawlins, 523 F.3d 318, 323 

(4th Cir. 2008) (citing James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th 

Cir. 1993)). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and 

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

rejecting Everett’s arguments for a reduction greater than that 

awarded. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.6





Bosche Ventures Ltd.





March 28, 2013





TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Harold Bosche, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and Bosche Ventures Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following reports and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Bosche Ventures Ltd.’s name in connection with the following reports in the AIF and the 40-F:


·
2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012;


·
Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell (KSM) Prefeasibility Study Update 2011 dated June 15, 2011; and


·
KSM Preliminary Feasibility Study 2010 dated March 31, 2010.





Yours truly,/s/ Harold BoscheHarold Bosche, P.Eng.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1021 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-774, K2025-773.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30137 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Jonise M. LEONARD, Appellant, v. Yves LEONARD, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2714

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 30, 2018

Barry Rigby, of Law Offices of Barry Rigby, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Hal Roen, of Hal Roen, P.A., Maitland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(411)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5605)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1088)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(101)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(255)
              - (-)connect_locations(3)
              - connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)

## By Year

              - 2023(1)
              - 2021(1)
              - 2020(1)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Reference Materials        August 20, 2021        Haiti Earthquake Translated Talking Points - Update August 18th 2021

location  Earthquake Science Center

location  Earthquake Hazards Program

locationNational Earthquake Information Center
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 30551 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Kentrell Laday,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:21

- CR

- 178

- 1

**___________________ ___________**  Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Kentrell Laday has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Laday has filed a response. To the extent that Laday attempts to raise claim s of ineffective assistance of counsel, t he record is not sufficiently developed

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 14, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30551 Document: 00516711982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2023No. 22

- 30551

2 to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Laday ’s claims ; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Laday ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accor dingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. However, there is a clerical error in the written judgment. The record reflects that Laday p leaded guilty to possession of a firearm after a conviction for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (9)

. The judgment lists § 922 as the statute of conviction but does not include subsection (g)(9), and it incorrectly describes the nature of the offense as “Unlawful Transport Of Firearms, Etc.

– Possession Of An Unregistered Firearm With Forfeiture Allegation.” Accordingly, we **REMAND** to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical e rror in the judgment. See **Fed. R. Crim. P.** 36

. Case: 22-30551 Document: 00516711982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2023
Jermaine THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Montero v. State*, 996 So.2d 888, 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ("Appellant ... claimed that his plea was involuntary because he was under the effect of psychotropic medication when he entered into it. Appellant, however, was specifically questioned on the record regarding the medication he had taken.... He testified under oath that these medications were not affecting his ability to understand the proceedings. He answered all questions during the plea hearing appropriately, and independently asked questions of the court that demonstrated his understanding of the proceedings. He cannot go behind his *1193sworn assertions and challenge the voluntariness of his plea.").
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corillian Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), Alex P.
Hart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul K. Wilde, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 10, 2006

/s/ ALEX P. HART

Alex P. Hart
Chief Executive Officer and President

/s/ PAUL K. WILDE

Paul K. Wilde
Chief Financial Officer

                                       33
DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Palkovic, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/MICHAEL W. PALKOVICMichael W. Palkovic
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

February 28,
2007

---



QuickLinks
Kimberly REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2914

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 18, 2018

Kimberly Reese, Ocala, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





SECTION
      906
      CERTIFICATION





In
      connection with the amended annual
      report of MAG Silver Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A-2 for the fiscal year
      ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank R. Hallam, Chief Financial Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.








­­­­/s/
      Frank R. Hallam





Name:
      Frank R.
      Hallam


Title:
      Chief Financial
      Officer


January
      14, 2008








A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
      by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form
      20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
      Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective
      of
      any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-60905

Summary Calendar

RONNIE MCGEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT ROBERT STURDIVANT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 

STEVEN TYLER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RODERICK LEWIS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:13-CV-90

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie McGee, Mississippi prisoner # K4515, appeals the judgment 

entered in favor of the named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. 

However, his appellate brief fails to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 28(a)(8) as it is entirely devoid of any citations to documentary 

evidence or legal authority. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-60905 Document: 00513337859 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2016
No. 14-60905

2

Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (stating that appellant’s failure to 

identify any error in lower court’s analysis is the same as if he had not 

appealed); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993) (“Although we 

liberally construe the briefs of pro se appellants, we also require that 

arguments must be briefed to be preserved.”) (internal quotation marks and 

citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-60905 Document: 00513337859 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2016
STATE of Louisiana v. Leo Franklin LOONEY

NO. 2018-KO-0298

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.

CLARK, J., recused.
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the annual report of MAG Silver Corp. (the “Registrant”) on Form
40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel T.
MacInnis, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








­­­­/s/
Daniel T. MacInnis





Name:
Daniel T. MacInnis


Title:
Chief Executive Officer


March 27,
2008
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certifications**

I,Gregory A. Lohnes, certify that:

1.                                       I havereviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of TransCanada Corporation;

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

DatedMarch 19, 2007
|        | /s/ Gregory A. Lohnes                                |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Gregory A. Lohnes                                    |
|   | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----