alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1056 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-813, K2025-812.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30189 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-14880

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00013-HLM-WEJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JESUS EDUARDO DUARTE CAMACHO, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(July 9, 2020)

Before WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and CORRIGAN,

∗ District 

Judge.

∗ Honorable Timothy J. Corrigan, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, 

sitting by designation.

Case: 18-14880 Date Filed: 07/09/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jesus Eduardo Duarte Camacho appeals his 210-month sentence for 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of

methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of 

methamphetamine, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking 

crime. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred at sentencing when it 

denied a minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. After reviewing the record

and the briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district 

court did not clearly err in denying Camacho’s request for a minor-role reduction. 

See United States v. Bernal-Benitez, 594 F.3d 1303, 1320 (11th Cir. 2010) (stating 

that we review a district court’s denial of a role reduction for clear error). 

Therefore, we affirm Camacho’s sentence. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-14880 Date Filed: 07/09/2020 Page: 2 of 2
SCWC-16-0000351

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

JOHN DOE, Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant, 

vs.

ATTORNEY GENERAL, CLARE E. CONNORS, 

Respondent/Appellee-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000351; CIV. NO. 15-1-2158)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant John Doe’s application 

for writ of certiorari filed on July 5, 2019, is hereby 

accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 29, 2019.

 /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000351

29-AUG-2019

10:01 AM
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M ILAGR OS M ONDR

AGON-OC AM PO, Pe titione r, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-73947 Age n c y No. A087-544-209 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2014 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, SILVER M AN, a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. M ila gros M ondra g on-Oc am po, a native an d c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing her a p p e a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de nia l of he r a pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of re m o va l. Our 

# FIL ED JAN 23 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 2 - 7 3 9 4 7jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w de novo que stions of la w and c onstitutiona

l c la im s . Martine

z-Rosas v . Gonzale

s , 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th C ir. 2005) . W e dism iss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the a ge nc y ’ s disc re t iona ry de te rm ination tha

t M ondra g on-Oc a

m po fa i le d to show e xc e ptiona l a nd e xtre m e ly

unusua l ha

rdship to he r Unite d Stat e s c i tiz e n c hildre n. Se eid. at 930. M ondra gon-Oc am po’ s c onte ntion tha

t the a g e nc y viola

te d due proc e ss by

m isa pply ing thela

wto thefa c ts of he r c a se and m isc onstruing e vide nc e of ha rdship is not supporte d by the re c ord and doe s not sta

te a c olora ble due proc e ss c la im

tha t would invoke

our jurisdic tion. Se eid . (“ tra ditional a

buse of disc re tion c ha l le nge s re c a st a s a lle ge d due proc e ss viola tions do not c onstitute

c olora ble c onstitutiona

l c l a im s” ); se ealso Me n de z-C astro v . Muk

a se y , 552 F.3d 975, 980-81 (9th C ir. 2009) (this c ourt la c ks jurisdic tion to re v ie w a

pplic ation of thee xc e p tiona l a nd e xtre m e ly

unusua l ha rdship sta nda rd to the fa c ts of a

c a s e , “be the y

dispute d or othe rwise ” ). M ondra gon-Oc a

m po’ s c onte ntion tha

t the B IA use d

the wrong sta

nda rd of re vie w a n d e nga g e d in de novo fa c t finding is be lie d by the re c ord. S

e e 8 C .F.R . §1003.1(d)(3)(i)-(ii); Lata v . IN S , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (a n a lie n m ust show error a

n d pre j udic e to pre va il on a due proc e ss c la im).

1 2 - 7 3 9 4 7

2M ondra gon-Oc a m po’ s re m a ining c onte ntions a re unpe rsua s ive . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 2 - 7 3 9 4 7 3
##### 



Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
    /s/
FREDERICK A. HENDERSON
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00239

- CV

S. W. and M. S. , Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 319,539

- B , THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPH E R L. CORNISH , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant s S. W. and M. S. filed their notice s of appeal on April 26, 2022 . The

appellate record was complete on May 6 , 2022 , making appellant s ’ brief s due on May 26, 202 2

.

O n May 26, 2022 , counsel f o r appellant s filed motion s for extension of time to file

appellant s ’ brief s

.
The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 day s

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion s and order Yolanda C ortes Mares and

Natalie Fowler to file appellant s ’ brief s no later than Ju ne 1 6, 2022 . If the brief s are not filed by2 that date, counsel may be required to show cause why they should not be held in contempt

of court.

It is ordered on June 2, 2022

.

Before Chief Justice B yrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Jamel Lee BELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3231

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29897]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 944 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-686, K2025-685.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29897 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, J. Mark Ariail, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm l0-QSB of Ocean Resources, Inc.

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-l4)for the registrant and have:

 

A)                                  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

B)                                    evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“evaluation date”); and

C)                                    presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the evaluation date;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

A)                                  all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

B)                                    any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls.

 

6.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date: February 17, 2004 |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| */s/*J. Mark Ariail          |   |
| J. Mark Ariail               |
| Chief Financial Officer      |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Christopher Schwartz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of TriMedia Entertainment Group, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.        February 13, 2007 By:  /s/Christopher Schwartz    Christopher Schwartz    Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 168 

Condemning the horrific attacks of April 15, 2013, in Boston, Massachusetts, 

and expressing support, sympathy, and prayers for all persons impacted 

by this tragedy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2013 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. NEAL, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. 

TSONGAS, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. LYNCH, and Mr. KEATING) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the horrific attacks of April 15, 2013, in Boston, Massachusetts, and expressing support, sympathy, 

and prayers for all persons impacted by this tragedy. 

Whereas the two bombings that occurred in Boston, Massachusetts, on Patriots’ Day, April 15, 2013, during the 

running of the 117th Boston Marathon represent a terrible tragedy and horrific act of terrorism against the 

people of the United States; 

Whereas the people of the United States mourn for those persons who lost their lives or were wounded in the attacks; 

Whereas police, firefighters, National Guard personnel, emergency medical personnel, and other first responders acted 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 168 IH 

promptly and heroically in responding to the attacks, 

thereby helping to prevent additional losses of life; 

Whereas the full resources of the Federal, State, and local 

governments are being brought to bear to investigate 

these attacks and to bring the perpetrator or perpetrators 

to justice; 

Whereas the citizens of Massachusetts are a resilient people 

and will recover from this tragedy; and 

Whereas the people of the United States will always remember the victims of the previous acts of terrorism that have 

occurred in the United States and will always stand together as one people: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the senseless attacks in Boston, 

3 Massachusetts, on Monday, April 15, 2013; 

4 (2) offers sympathy and condolences to the vic5 tims’ families; 

6 (3) sends thoughts and prayers for those per7 sons who are recovering from injuries; 

8 (4) honors the heroic efforts of medical per9 sonnel who are tirelessly providing care for the vic10 tims of this horrific act of violence; 

11 (5) admires the courage of first responders and 

12 the many citizen heroes who aided the injured and 

13 tended to the community; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 168 IH 

1 (6) commits to providing all necessary resources 

2 to law enforcement officials who are investigating 

3 the terrorist attacks; 

4 (7) commits to working together as united 

5 Americans to bring the perpetrator or perpetrators 

6 of the attacks to justice; and 

7 (8) recognizes that the city of Boston, the peo8 ple of Massachusetts, and all Americans will rise up 

9 from this tragedy and stand together as patriots. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Eric WYDRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1343

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 20, 2018

William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
| · | Updated resource estimate for the Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell (KSM) Project effective February 6, 2012; |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | Updated resource estimate for the Courageous Lake Project effective January 9, 2012; |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | Courageous Lake Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment 2011 dated July 15, 2011; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | KSM Prefeasibility Study Update 2011 dated June 15, 2011; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

| · | March 2011 Updated KSM Mineral Resources dated March 29, 2011; |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | January 2011 Mineral Resource Estimate, Courageous Lake Project, Northwest Territories, Canada dated March 15, 2011; |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | KSM Preliminary Feasibility Study 2010 dated March 31, 2010; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Project, Preliminary Economic Assessment – 2008 dated March 10, 2008.  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | Yours truly,                                |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                        |   |
|   |   | /s/ Michael J. Lechner                      |   |
|   |   | Michael J. Lechner, P. Geo (B.C.), RPG, CPG |   |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132225 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132225 

 COA: 271377 

Jackson CC: 05-000680-FH 

ROBERT ANTHONY MUSU,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1206 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 13, 2006 

 Clerk