alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, George Paspalas, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1to the Annual Report on Form 40-F of MAG Silver Corp.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the issuer and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any changein the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The issuer’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 23, 2020
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported) April 26, 2006
 Targeted Genetics Corporation
 
  Washington
    
    0-23930
    
    91-1549568(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 1100 Olive Way, Suite 100, Seattle, Washington
    
    98101(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (206) 623-7612
 Not Applicable
 
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 8.01. Other EventsItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
  
 Item 8.01. Other Events.
  
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    Press Release of Targeted Genetics Corporation dated April 26, 2006
 
 SIGNATURES
  Targeted Genetics CorporationBy:
    /s/ David J. PostonDavid J. PostonChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release of Targeted Genetics Corporation dated April 26, 2006
M.E.J., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1564

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Order entered July 24, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00392
- CV
CAROL S. ABLON , ET AL. , Appellant s V. WILLIAM NEAL ABLON, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 14902
- I 

### O RDER Before the Court is the parties’ July 22, 2013 second agreed motion to abate this accelerated appeal pending settlement negotiations. We GRANT the parties’ motion and ABATE the appeal for sixty days. The appeal will be reinstated when the Court receives a motion to dismiss or in sixty days from the date of this order, whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. 1350

as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Surrey Bancorp (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                         |  |                |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                         |  | SURREY BANCORP
|                         |  |               
|Date: September 21, 2005 |  | By:            |  | /s/ Edward C. Ashby, III             
|                         |  |                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |               
|Date: September 21, 2005 |  | By:            |  | /s/ Mark H. Towe                     
|                         |  |                |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2003-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of May 22, 2003 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by and
between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2003-A, as issuer (the
"Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
              May 22, 2003 until December 31, 2003 was conducted under my
              supervision.

         2.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
              knowledge, fully performed in all material respects all its
              obligations, under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout
              such period and no material default in the performance of such
              obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
              paragraph 3 below.

         3.   None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2004.


                                            /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                            ----------------------
                                            Richard J. Naeder
                                            Authorized Signatory
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Directors 

MediciNova, Inc.: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-163116 and 333-138241) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-151808, 333-141694, and 333-122665) on Form S-8 of MediciNova, Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2010, with respectto the consolidated balance sheet of MediciNova, Inc. and subsidiaries (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year endedDecember 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of MediciNova, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 24, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Careaga, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nannaco, Inc.
("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

August 26, 2005

/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Financial Officer
Katrelle JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3399

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_education(22)
              - science_faqs(118)
              - science_science(411)
              - products_data(220)
              - products_maps(149)
              - products_publications(5605)
              - products_software(48)
              - products_web_tools(35)
              - multimedia_audio(122)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(105)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(17)
              - multimedia_image(1088)
              - multimedia_image-141769(48)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(861)
              - multimedia_image-141772(15)
              - multimedia_image-141774(9)
              - multimedia_image-141775(101)
              - multimedia_image-141776(49)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_image-207195(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(13)
              - multimedia_video(384)
              - multimedia_video-149194(127)
              - multimedia_video-149195(159)
              - multimedia_video-149196(31)
              - multimedia_video-149197(7)
              - multimedia_video-149198(23)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(28)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - news_news-149245(54)
              - news_news-149246(15)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(46)
              - news_news-149249(13)
              - news_news-149250(101)
              - news_newsletters(15)
              - news_other_news(255)
              - connect_locations(3)
              - (-)connect_social_media(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(160)
              - other_basic-37(7)
              - other_basic-42(111)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(3)
              - 2021(3)
              - 2020(3)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Policy and Directives        December 30, 2015        Recommendations from NEPEC on operational earthquake forecasting

social mediaUSGS Earthquakes

social mediaEarthquake Hazards Program (News)

social mediaEarthquake Science Center (News)

social mediaUSGS Earthquakes

social mediaUSGS Tweet Earthquake Dispatch (TED)

social mediaUSGS Seismic Network

social mediaUSGS News: Natural Hazards

social mediaNatural Hazards Playlist

social mediaUSGS ShakeAlert
Anthony Patrick BARATTA, Appellant, v. Tatiana COSTA-MARTINEZ, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018.

Anthony Patrick Baratta, in proper person.

Tatiana Costa-Martinez, in proper person.

Mandel Law Group, P.A., Palmetto Bay, and Roberta G. Mandel, former counsel for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent/Father Anthony Patrick Baratta appeals the Pick-Up Order and Break Order entered on August 3, 2018. The pick-up order was entered upon the Motion for Order of Commitment to Take Respondent/Father into Custody and for Writ of Bodily Attachment filed by the Mandel Law Group on July 31, 2018. This motion was accompanied by an affidavit from attorney, Roberta G. Mandel, Esq., attesting that Baratta had failed to comply with the trial court's July 25, 2016 order to pay approximately $21,000 in attorney's fees to the Mandel Law Group, P.A. The Mandel Law Group formerly represented the Petitioner/Mother Tatiana Costa-Martinez.

We reverse the pick-up order because, upon the filing of the motion for order of commitment and accompanying affidavit, no show cause order was issued and because there was no compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840, applicable to indirect criminal contempt proceedings. *See**Maher v. Junior*, 198 So.3d 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ; *Anton v. Anton*, 106 So.3d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; *De Castro v. De Castro*, 957 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; *Decoro v. State*, 771 So.2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ; *Baker v. Green*, 732 So.2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

We therefore reverse the trial court's finding of indirect criminal contempt without prejudice.

Reversed.
Exhibit
99.11








Moose
Mountain Technical Services





March 24,
2010




TO:           Seabridge
Gold Inc.





Ladies
and Gentlemen:





Reference
is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc.
(the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year
then ended, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference
in the 40-F.





I, Jim
Gray, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and Moose Mountain Technical Services, hereby
consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following
report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Moose Mountain
Technical Services’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF:
Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell Preliminary Economic Assessment Addendum – 2009 dated
September 8, 2009.




Yours
      truly,/S/
      JIM GRAYJim
      Gray, P.Eng.
Exhibit 23.2(b)








EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.





March 30, 2012





TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Nigel Goldup, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF and the 40-F: Courageous Lake Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment 2011 dated July 15, 2011.





Yours truly,/s/ Nigel GoldupNigel Goldup, P.Eng.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Ambrosi, Chief Executive Officer
of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ambrosi  
|Robert J. Ambrosi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 24, 2006          



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ACRT,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACRT and will be retained by ACRT and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
S. G. mother of K. H., minor child , Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES , Appellee.

__________________ _ ____________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF A PPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3430

Opinion filed November 2, 2015. An ap peal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. David M. Gooding , Judge. Robert W. Keep, Jr., Office of Criminal Conflict & Civi l Regional Counsel, Region One, Jacksonville , for Appellant. Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, and Tricia L. Meisner, Managing Attorney, Children’s Legal Services, Jacksonville; Stephanie C. Zimmerman, Statewide Appeals Director, Children’s Legal Servic es, Bradenton, for Appellee. David P. Krupski, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford.

PER CURIAM. S.G. appeals an order adjudicating her child dependent and requiring her to comply with a case plan. At the arraignment hearing, the low er tribunal entered a consent by default for the mother, finding she was properly noticed of the2 arraignment hearing but failed to appear. On appeal, S.G. argues the lower tribunal denied her due process when it ordered her to comply with a case plan at t he arraignment hearing without providing notice that adjudication or disposition of the petition would occur. We accept the Department of Children and Families’ concession of error on this point, and reverse and remand for further proceedings

consistent w ith Chapter 39, Florida Statutes. See J.H. v. Dep’t of Children &

Families , 890 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); see also Dep’t of Children &

Families v. T.S. , 154 So. 3d 1223, 1226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“An arraignment provides the opportunity ‘for the par ent or legal custodian to admit, deny, or consent to findings of dependency alleged in the petition.’ § 39.506(1)

- (2), Fla. Stat. (2014). Depending on the parents’ response, a disposition hearing will be held within fifteen or thirty days of the arraignm ent hearing. Id. ”). Because this issue is dispositive, we do not address the second issue S.G. raises on appeal. BENTON, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.