alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 13a-14(a)

or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





I, Robert Saunders, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Edgewater Foods International, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;  and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

---



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







Date:

November 28, 2006





By: /s/ Robert Saunders



Robert Saunders



Chief Executive Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-11-00444-CR

____________________

TERRI LEANN DRONET, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 75th District Court 

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR26673 

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

In this appeal Terri Leann Dronet has challenged the voluntariness of her 

confession. On submission of the appeal, it became apparent that the judge who 

heard the motion to suppress did not make findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 38.22, § 6 (West 2005). The judge who heard 

the motion to suppress subsequently died. On February 28, 2013, we abated the 

appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings relating to a 

determination of the voluntariness of the appellant’s confession. See Tex. R. App. 
2

P. 44.4. Our Order of February 28, 2013 authorized the trial court to conduct a 

new suppression hearing at the appellant’s request, but evidently the trial court was 

not aware that the appellant desired to have the trial court conduct a new 

suppression hearing when the trial court made written findings based on the record 

of the previous hearing. The appellant has requested a new hearing before the new 

judge. See Garcia v. State, 15 S.W.3d 533, 535-37 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). 

It is, therefore ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is remanded 

to the trial court for a new suppression hearing. The trial court shall make findings 

of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. Code. Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 38.22, § 6. A 

supplemental clerk’s record, containing the trial court’s findings of fact and 

conclusions of law, together with a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing 

conducted by the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by June 10, 

2013. The appeal will be reinstated without further order of the Court when the 

supplemental record is filed.

The appellant may address the trial court’s findings in a supplemental brief, 

which must be filed within thirty days after the supplemental record is filed. If the 

appellant files a supplemental brief, the State may file a supplemental brief in 

response, due thirty days after the appellant files her supplemental brief.

 
3

ORDER ENTERED May 2, 2013.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
## The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104

- 3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334

- 229

- 0733

June 7, 2024

CL

- 2023

- 0412

Jeremy S. Mitchem v. State of Alabama ex rel. Robert Broussard, District

Attorney for the Twenty

- Third Judicial Circuit (Appeal from Madison

Circuit Court: CV

- 20

- 901674).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the

above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on

rehearing.

Moore, P.J., and Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Edwards, J., dissents, without opinion.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 522 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-735, K2025-734.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30103 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 992 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-741, K2025-740.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30089 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
First Amendment to Chittenden Corporation Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CHITTENDEN CORPORATION 
 First Amendment to the 
 Chittenden Corporation Stock Incentive Plan, 
 as Amended and Restated 
 In accordance with the provisions of Section 12(g) of the Chittenden Corporation Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of February 16, 2005 (the “Plan”), the Plan is amended as follows: 
 1.
Section 8(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “(b) Shares of Restricted Stock may
not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except as herein provided, during the Restricted Period. Certificates issued in respect of shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in the name of the Employee and deposited
by such Employee with the Company. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in the provisions of the applicable Award, during the Restricted Period the Employee shall have voting rights on such shares and shall receive applicable
dividends. At the expiration of the Restricted Period, the Company shall deliver such certificates to the Employee or the Employee’s legal representative.” 
 2. Except as hereinabove provided, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
  

			
	CHITTENDEN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ F. Sheldon Prentice

		 	F. Sheldon Prentice
		 	 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
 Secretary



 Adopted by the Board of Directors: April 18, 2007
The ESTATE OF Phyllis A. RAMSEY, BY AND THROUGH Ralph E. RAMSEY, Personal Representative, Appellant, v. NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC, NHS Management, LLC, and Randall G. Blue (as to West Melbourne Health and Rehabilitation Center), Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018

Megan L. Gisclar and Joanna Greber Detloff, of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Christopher B. Hopkins and Mary F. April, of McDonald Hopkins, LLC, West Palm Beach, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The Estate of Phyllis A. Ramsey ("the Estate") brought a nursing home abuse and neglect action against the Appellees. The Estate challenges a non-final order granting Appellees' motion to compel arbitration. We affirm the trial court's order compelling arbitration, but remand with instructions to sever from the arbitration agreement the provision applying the Alabama Rules of Evidence to the admissibility of evidence at the arbitration hearing. *See**Northport Health Servs. of Fla., LLC v. Louis* , 240 So.3d 120, 123 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (holding that provision of rehabilitation center's admission agreement that Alabama Rules of Evidence apply to arbitration hearing was unenforceable, but provision was severable from remainder of agreement).

We decline to address the other argument raised on appeal by the Estate. *See, e.g.* , *Aills v. Boemi* , 29 So.3d 1105, 1109 (Fla. 2010) (stating that specific legal ground upon which claim is based must be raised at trial and, except in cases of fundamental error, claim different than that will not be heard on appeal).

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------



                                      13

<PAGE>



                                 CERTIFICATION


     I, Richard DeLeo, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
     Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect
     of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWMBS,
     Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2003-12CB;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
     whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
     report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
     required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
     reports is included in these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
     servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
     upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
     agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer
     has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
     upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
     conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
     Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
     reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
     Bank of New York, as Trustee.


     Date: March 25, 2004


                              /s/ Richard DeLeo
                              ------------------
                                  Richard DeLeo
                                  Senior Managing Director




                                      14
Ricky ST. LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 14, 2018

Ricky St. Louis, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1 AND 32.2


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of XXX Acquisition Corp. (f/k/a/ as Continan
Communications, Inc. and hereinafter the "Company") hereby certifies to such
officer's knowledge that the Company's Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Amendment No. 1 to the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be
part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: May 26, 2009
                                         Name:  /s/ Marcia Rosenbaum
                                                -----------------------
                                                Marcia Rosenbaum
                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Dominique Dajuan SHAVUO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1531

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 31, 2018

Dominique Shavuo, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1  Chief Executive Officer Certification





                                 IBX GROUP, INC.

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely in connection with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code, "Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports", and is not
being filed as part of IBX Group, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2002 accompanying this certification.

I, Evan Brovenick, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IBX Group, Inc.,
certify that IBX Group, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of IBX Group, Inc.

Date: August 14, 2002                       IBX GROUP, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Evan Brovenick
                                            Evan Brovenick
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Ricardo GARCIA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1778

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

Ricardo Garcia, in proper person.

DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, and Shawn Taylor (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

SCALES, J.

Appellant Ricardo Garcia appeals a Final Judgment of Mortgage Foreclosure in favor of appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. We reverse because the case below was removed to federal court one day before the trial court entered the final judgment; thus, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment.

After the Bank sued Garcia to foreclose a mortgage, a tenant of Garcia filed a cross-complaint against Garcia in the foreclosure action, alleging that Garcia and his wife violated the federal Truth in Lending Act by representing that the subject mortgage had been rescinded. The tenant asserted in the cross-complaint that this misrepresentation entitled the tenant to remain in the property. On July 10, 2017, this cross-complainant filed a notice of removal of the entire foreclosure action to federal court.1 The following day, on July 11, 2017, the trial court entered the final *202foreclosure judgment. The United States District Court remanded the case back to the circuit court on July 19, 2017.

State court jurisdiction ceases upon removal of a case to federal court and any pre-remand proceedings occurring in the state court after the case has been removed are void. *Musa v. Wells Fargo Del. Tr. Co.*, 181 So.3d 1275, 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (citing *Maseda v. Honda Motor Co.*, 861 F.2d 1248 (11th Cir. 1988) ). In a detailed review of the law in this area, the First District concluded that even an improper removal to federal court, or a removal for improper motives, will not preserve state court jurisdiction. *Id.* at 1280-84 ; *see also**Cole v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n*, 201 So.3d 749, 750 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).2

Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the final judgment, we are compelled to reverse the final judgment and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

1

This was the second time during the pendency of the foreclosure litigation that this tactic was employed. On January 20, 2017, a different tenant of Garcia filed an identical cross-complaint and sought removal of the entire case to federal court. The United States District Court remanded the case back to the circuit court on February 24, 2017.

2

As the First District pointed out, a frivolous or bad faith removal to federal court may implicate the trial court's "authority to sanction such conduct (once it regains jurisdiction)." *Musa*, 181 So.3d at 1284.