alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cornelia BARSAN, Appellant, v. TRINITY FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D18-502

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2018.

Arthur J. Morburger, for appellant.

Law Offices of Damian G. Waldman, P.A., and David J. Miller (Largo) and Damian G. Waldman (Largo), for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* § 673.3081(1), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; *Bennett v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co.*, 124 So.3d 320, 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (noting that the term "presumed" in section 673.3081(1) means that until some evidence is introduced which would support a finding that the signature is forged or unauthorized, the plaintiff was not required to prove that it is valid (citing UCC comment 1 to section 673.3081), and because defendants failed to make any evidentiary showing to support their claim that the signer was unauthorized, plaintiff was entitled to rely on the presumption to obtain summary final judgment). *See also**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; *Cardona v. Casas*, 225 So.3d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) : *Rodriguez v. Lorenzo*, 215 So.3d 631, 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (applying *Applegate* and noting that, in the absence of a transcript of the relevant hearing, the reviewing court is unable to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion).
| TO:  | Seabridge Gold Inc.United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Re:  | Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")Consent of Expert |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | 2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012 and amended November 11, 2014 (the "Report") |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | consent to the public filing of the Report and the use of any extracts from or a summary of the Report in the 40-F and the Registration Statement; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | consent to the use of my name and Stantec Consulting Ltd.'s name and references to the Report, or portions thereof, in the 40-F and the Registration Statement and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in the 40-F and Registration Statement; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 7. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and that they fairly and accurately represent the information in the sections of the Report for which I am responsible; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 8. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    |   | Yours truly,              |
|--------------|--------|---------------------------|
|         |   |                      |
|         |   |                      |
|         |   | /s/ Tony Wachmann, P.Eng. |
|         |   | Tony Wachmann, P.Eng.     |
ex4_4.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
4.4

    
      Common
Stock Purchase Warrant (Hunter M.A. Carr)

    

    
      
        

      

    

     

     

    THE
SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED PURSUANT TO
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD
UNLESS PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION
FROM REGISTRATION.

    
      	
              Number  WA  001

            	
              1,050,000
      Warrant

            


    

    EXERCISABLE
FROM 9:00 A.M., NEW YORK TIME,

    ON JUNE
1, 2007, UNTIL

    5:00
P.M., NEW YORK TIME, JUNE 1, 2011

    The
Mint Leasing, Inc.

    INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

    


    
      	
              This
      certifies that  HUNTER M.A. CARR

            
	 
      
	 
      
	
              is
      the owner of  ONE MILLION FIFTY THOUSAND AND
    00/100

            


    

    WARRANTS,
EACH TO PURCHASE ONE FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARE OF COMMON STOCK, $.001
PAR VALUE, OF

    


    The
Mint Leasing, Inc. at the initial Exercise Price of a) 350,000 shares at $.10
per share, b) 200,000 shares at $.50 per share, c) 200,000 shares at $1.00 per
share, d) 150,000 shares at $1.50 per share, e) 150,000 shares at $2.00 per
share.  Payment of the Purchase Price shall be paid in the manner, at
the time and on the terms and conditions specified in this Warrant and the
Warrant Agreement.  The certificate or certificate shall be registered
in the name specified in the notice of exercise free and clear of any legend,
restriction or stop order.  This Warrant is transferable on the books
of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney
upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

    


    Witness
the manual or facsimile signatures of the Company’s duly authorized officers,
countersigned by the Warrant Agent.

    


    Dated:
June 1, 2007

    


    


    


    
      	
              /s/ Jerry Parish

            	 
      	
              /s/ Jerry Parish

            	 
	
              Jerry
      Parish, Secretary

            	 
      	
              Jerry
      Parish,
      President  & CEO

            	 


    

    


    


    


    Exhibit A
– Page 3
N.S., The Father, Appellant(s)/petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Loretta Lois BICKERSTAFF, et al. v. Richard J. BICKERSTAFF

NO. 2018-CC-1895

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 23, 2018

Stay denied. Writ denied.
Certificate of Amendment for NTC Capital III



 EXHIBIT 4.14 
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 NTC CAPITAL III 
 This Certificate of
Amendment of NTC Capital III (the “Trust”), is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustee to amend the certificate of trust of a statutory trust formed under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et
seq.)(the “Act”). 
 1. Name. The name of the trust is NTC Capital III. 
 2. Amendment of Certificate. The Certificate of Trust of the Trust is hereby amended by changing the name and address of the Trustee in the State
of Delaware to BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711. 
 3. Effective Date. This Certificate of
Amendment shall be effective upon filing. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned trustee of the Trust has executed this Certificate of
Amendment in accordance with Section 3811(a)(2) of the Act. 
  

			
	BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, not in its individual capacity but solely as Delaware trustee
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

	Name:	 	Kristine K. Gullo
	Title:	 	Vice President
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,in his capacity as an officer of NationsHealth, Inc. (“NationsHealth”), that, to his knowledge, theAnnual Report of NationsHealth on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of NationsHealth. This written statement is being furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-KSB. A signed original of thisstatement has been provided to NationsHealth and will be retained by NationsHealth and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     Date: March 24, 2005 By: /s/ Glenn M. Parker, M.D.           Glenn M. Parker, M.D.   Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)     Date: March 24, 2005 By: /s/ Timothy Fairbanks           Timothy Fairbanks   Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)

## By Location

              - alaska(5)
              - california(60)
              - colorado(49)
              - hawaii(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - texas(1)
              - (-)virginia(6)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(2)
              - 2021(2)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

staff profileCecily J. Wolfe, Ph.D.

staff profileWilliam Leith

staff profileJill Franks

staff profileSophia B. Liu, Ph.D.

staff profileLindsay A. Davis

staff profileCharles Edward Heywood
STATE of Louisiana v. Joe STEPHENS

NO. 2018-KH-1462

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Writ not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(34)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(17)
              - american samoa(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(68)
              - colorado(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(4)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(21)
              - idaho(5)
              - (-)illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(18)
              - pennsylvania(4)
              - puerto rico(12)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(4)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(7)
              - washington(28)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Program        June 26, 2019        Information by Region-Illinois
Anthony HARTLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4344

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
     I, Rodney B. Mott, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A ofInternational Steel Group Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3.  [Intentionally left blank];  4.  The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the company and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the company’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee ofcompany’s board of directors:
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date:March 21, 2005 /s/ Rodney B. Mott   Rodney B. Mott
Lennox MITTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

Lennox Mitto, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 890 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-616, K2025-615.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29794 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Timothy Eugene THOMPKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Life
USA, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Wesley F. Whiting, President,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer of Life USA,  Inc.,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

a)            such Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Life USA, Inc. for
              the  year  ended  December  31,  2007,  fully  complies  with  the
              requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
              Act of 1934; and

b)            the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
              Life USA, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the  financial  condition and
              results of operations of Life USA, Inc..





                            /s/ Wesley F. Whiting
                                ----------------
                                Wesley F. Whiting, Chief Executive Officer,
                                President & Principal Accounting Officer


Date:    April 14, 2008



A        signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
         been  provided to The Saint  James  Company and will be retained by The
         Saint James  Company  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1203

KEVIN MICHAEL JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00788-HEH)

Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Michael Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Michael Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for 

failing to comply with an order directing him to complete his in forma pauperis application. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. 

Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:17-cv-00788-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2018). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Amendment
































In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above.  







Sincerely,




BLINK LOGIC INC. 




By: /s/ L.R. Bruce                

Name:  L. R. Bruce

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00686-CV

IN THE MATTER OF C.A.G.

From the 436th District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-JUV-00059

The Honorable Lisa Jarrett, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Modifying 

Disposition Commitment to the Texas Juvenile Justice Department is AFFIRMED.

No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice