alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

QUALITY INVESTMENT HOMES, INC., a Florida Corporation

, Appellant,

v.

PATRICK DESTRAT

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 938

[ November 4, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Olga Gonzalez

- Levine , Judge; L.T. Case No. 20

- 9793 COWE (80)

.

William A. Treco of Tepps Treco, Plantation, for appellant.

Patrick Destrat, Sunrise, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. Announces Officer ChangesCOLDWATER, MICHIGAN, February 24, 2006— Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc., (Nasdaq CapitalMarket: MCBF), the holding company for Monarch Community Bank, announced the appointment of RalphMicalizzi to Vice President-CFO and Treasurer of the Company and the Bank, effective immediately.Mr. Micalizzi succeeds William Kurtz who has assumed the position of Senior Vice President and COO.Mr. Micalizzi joined the Company in February 2005 as Internal Auditor. He has 8 years of bankingexperience and was CFO of United Midwest Savings Bank in Columbus, Ohio prior to joining Monarch.Mr. Kurtz has been with the Company since 1997.Donald L. Denney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company stated “the Board ofDirectors and I feel these changes strengthen the Company’s management team and positions us tocontinue moving forward”.Contact:
**Exhibit 34.1**

 

Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheBoard of Directors

GEMoney Bank:

 

We have examined the accompanyingmanagement’s assertion that GE Money Bank (the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securities transactionsfor which the Company acted as servicer involving credit card receivables,accounts receivable and asset based lending receivables (the Platform), as ofand for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.  Management has determined that servicingcriteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(vi) areapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, and thatall other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicableto the primary servicing services provided by the Company with respect to thePlatform.  Appendix B to management’sassertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securitiesdefined by management as constituting the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessmentabout the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company*’*s compliance with the servicing criteria specified aboveand performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances.  Our examination includedtesting selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, anddetermining whether the Company processed those selected transactions andperformed those selected activities in compliance with the servicingcriteria.  Furthermore, our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determinewhether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests thatmay have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Companyduring the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or anyother transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion.  Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that theCompany complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for thetwelve months ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL

March 28, 2008

 

 

----
Exhibit 99.6

                 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(d)



I, Ron Luth, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report of Regions
Acceptance LLC related to the Regions Auto Receivables Trust 2003-1;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

     4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: World Omni Financial
Corporation d/b/a CenterOne Financial Services, as Sub-servicer.

Date:  March 30, 2004


By:  /s/ Ron Luth
     ---------------------------------------
     Name:  Ron Luth
     Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
     Company:  Regions Acceptance, LLC, as depositor
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132911 & (21) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 132911 

 COA: 270348 
 Wayne CC: 00-010268-01 

JEFFREY D. TURNER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED. 

s0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
STATE EX REL. Rigoberto F. VENTURA v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1458

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sayan
      Navaratnam, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:







1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*By:*/s/ Sayan Navaratnam*Sayan
                Navaratnam*
              *Chairman
                and Chief Executive*
              *Officer*  November
      14, 2007
EX-10.19






EXHIBIT 10.20




ORAL AGREEMENTS




Compensation



Pursuant to an oral arrangement, directors who are not affiliated with Titanium Asset Management
Corp. receive an annual cash retainer of $30,000, which is paid in quarterly installments.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T h e p a rtie s c o n s e n te dto p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 28 * * U .S .C . § 6 3 6 ( c ) .

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on * ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GA R Y H . B R US H, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. P E T E RF A R B E R - S Z E K R E N Y I , e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 17818 D. C. No . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 1 0 0 9 - DLB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D e nni s L . B e c k, M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 *** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G ary H . B rush, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng exce ss i ve force 

# FI LED NO V 20 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 17818 2 a nd de ni a l of

m e di c a l c a r e i n vi ol a t i on of the E i ghth A m e ndm e nt . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on a d is m is s a l a s as a n c tio n , Sne l le rv . C i t yof B ai nbr i dge I

s land , 606 F . 3d 636, 638 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on by di sm i ss i ng B rush’ s a ct i on as a san ct i o n aft er rev i ew i n g th e ev i d en ce b efo re i tan dco n cl u d i n g th atB ru sh s u b m itte df

r au du le n t a f

f id a v its c o n c e rn in g a lle g e dv io la tio n s o f h is E ig h th A m e n d m e n t r ig h ts . See T r ues de l l v . S. Cal. P e rm ane nte Me d. G r p. , 293 F . 3d 11 46 , 11 53 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( F ed. R . C i v. P . 11 al l ow s s anct i on s i f afi l i ng i s e i ther le g a llyf r iv o lo u s o rf

a c tu a llym is le a d in g ) ; A nhe us e r - B us c h, I nc . v . N atural B evera g e D istri b s. , 6 9 F . 3 d3 3 7 , 3 4 8 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 5 ) (a d i stri ctco u rtm ay ex erci se its in h e r e n t p o w e rto d is m is s a n a c tio n a s as a n c tio n w h e n ap a rtyw illf u lly dece i ves the court ). AF F I RME D.
John NAESER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-803

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed. See**Gethers v. State* , 838 So.2d 504, 505 (Fla. 2003) ("[A]bsent the execution of an arrest warrant, a defendant who is in jail in a specific county pursuant to an arrest on one or more charges need not be given credit for time served in that county on charges in another county when the second county has only lodged a detainer against the defendant.").

Gerber, C.J., Warner and Forst, JJ., concur.
Diego MEJIA-MACH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.25
  
  Re: Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    SSB Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
    By:/s/
Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 WILLOWBRIDGE
ASSOCIATES INC.
 By:/s/
Steven R. CranePrint Name:
    

Steven R. Crane




---



##### 



Re: Management Agreement Renewals
 
  
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    SSB Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Winton Feeder LP I
    
    CMF Winton Master Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    AURORA III
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    Citigroup Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Global Futures Fund Ltd.
    By:/s/
Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
 By:
    
    /s/ Martin HuntPrint Name:
    
    Martin Hunt




---



##### 



Re: Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    SB AAA Master Fund LLC
    
    Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.
    
    Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
    
    Legion LTD AAA
    
    Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
    
    Citigroup Global Futures Fund LTD.
 
 CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC
 By:/s/
Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.
 By:
    
    /s/ Anthony AnnunziatoPrint Name:
    
    Anthony Annunziato
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)arkansas(2)
              - california(13)
              - colorado(6)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(23)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2022(1)

staff profileJoseph T Fleming

staff profileAmanda R Whaling
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DISCOVER BANK,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 35,322

5 BRENDA S. LOPEZ,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

8 Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge

9 Machol & Johannes, LLLP

10 Dana K. Grubesic

11 Albuquerque, NM

12 for Appellee

13 Brenda S. Lopez

14 Santa Fe, NM

15 Pro Se Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 VIGIL, Judge.

18 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2

1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

3 {2} DISMISSED.

4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 _______________________________

6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 ___________________________________

9 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

10 _________________________________

11 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29672]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act notice; Notice of public meeting agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public Meeting: U.S. Election Assistance Commission Technical 
Guidelines Development Committee Meeting.

DATES: Tuesday, January14th, 2025, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. ET.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in person at the National 
Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, 9700 Great Seneca Highway, 
Rockville, MD 20850. Pre-registration is required.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(Sunshine Act), Public Law 94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. 
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will conduct annual meeting of the 
EAC Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) to discuss 
regular business of the board.
    Agenda: The EAC and TGDC members will hold an annual meeting to 
discuss program updates for EAC Testing and Certification and the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Voting Program, 
and more. The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: 
https://www.eac.gov/events/2025/01/14/eac-technical-guidelines-development-committee-2024-annual-meeting. Registration is required to 
attend. Please register by January 6, 2025.
    The EAC will accept written comments and questions from members of 
the public. If you would like to participate, please email 
[email protected] with your full name and question or comment no 
later than 9:00 a.m. E.T. on January 14, 2025.
    Background: Section 221 of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 
(52 U.S.C. 20971(b)) requires that the EAC adopt voluntary voting 
system guidelines, and provide for the testing, certification, 
decertification, and recertification of voting system hardware and 
software.
    The TGDC was established in accordance with the requirements of 
Section 221 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-252, 
codified at 52 U.S.C. 20961), to act in the public interest to assist 
the Executive Director of the EAC in the development of voluntary 
voting system guidelines.
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Camden Kelliher,
General Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-29672 Filed 12-12-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810-71-P
```
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50628

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHERYL YVONNE BARNETT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 5:08-CR-225-ALL

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cheryl Barnett has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Barnett has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record

and brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 5, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) of BearingPoint, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert S. Falcone, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert S. FalconeName:   Robert S. Falcone Date:     May 10, 2004
James BURKE, Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY MOTORSPORTS, LLC, d/b/a Jumbo Auto & Truck Plaza of Fort Pierce; American Import Car Sales, Inc., d/b/a Hollywood Kia; Kurkin Forehand Brandes, LLP, Marc Brandes, Esq. and Craig Blinderman, Esq., Appellees.

No. 4D18-81

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Myron JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2205

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Myron James, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, Damoorgian and Ciklin, JJ., concur.