alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 31, 2005
 Commission
File Number
    
    Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter, State of
Incorporation, Address of
Principal Executive Offices and
Telephone Number
    
    I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.1-11607
    
    DTE Energy Company
(a Michigan corporation)
2000 2nd Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226-1279
313-235-4000
    
    38-32177521-2198
    
    The Detroit Edison Company
(a Michigan corporation)
2000 2nd Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226-1279
313-235-4000
    
    38-0478650
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers.Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXPress Release dated October 31, 2005    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers.
     
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    Press Release of DTE Energy Company dated October 31, 2005.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Date: October 31, 2005
    
    DTE ENERGY COMPANY
(Registrant)/s/ Daniel G. Brudzynski
Daniel G. Brudzynski
Vice President and ControllerTHE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
(Registrant)/s/ Daniel G. Brudzynski
Daniel G. Brudzynski
Vice President and Controller




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release of DTE Energy Company dated October 31, 2005.
Javier Enrique ORDUNEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3380

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony R. Harvey, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon
Copper Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/
      Anthony R. Harvey
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | ANTHONY R. HARVEY          
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | February 7, 2011           



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the**


**United
      States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Biomass
      Processing Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December
      31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Larry W. Denney, Chairman, President,
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:July
                23, 2007
            
            /s/
              Larry W. DenneyName:
                Larry W. Denney
              Title:Chairman,
                President,
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PATRICK F. CROLL,

Defendant BelowAppellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§

§ No. 583, 2016

§

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID Nos. 0801001836 and

§ 0803007023

§ 

Submitted: January 23, 2017

 Decided: February 28, 2017

Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

This 28th day of February 2017, upon consideration of the appellant’s 

opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record below, it appears 

to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Patrick Croll, filed this appeal from the Superior 

Court’s denial of his motion for correction of sentence. The State has filed a 

motion to affirm the judgment below on the ground that it is manifest on the 

face of Croll’s opening brief that his appeal is without merit. We agree and 

affirm. 

(2) In June 2008, Croll pled guilty to one count each of Aggravated 

Menacing, Possession of a Deadly Weapon During the Commission of a 
2

Felony (PDWDCF), Assault in the Second Degree,1 Unlawful Sexual 

Contact in the Second Degree, and Endangering the Welfare of a Child. The 

Superior Court sentenced Croll to a total period of thirty-three years at Level 

V incarceration, to be suspended after serving nineteen years in prison 

followed by decreasing levels of supervision. Croll’s direct appeal was 

dismissed as untimely.2 Since that time, Croll has filed several unsuccessful 

petitions seeking postconviction relief.3 

(3) In September 2016, Croll filed a motion for correction of illegal 

sentence under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a), alleging that his 

separate sentences for Aggravated Menacing and PDWDCF violate double 

jeopardy principles and should be merged. The Superior Court denied his 

motion. This appeal followed.

(4) On appeal, Croll reiterates his claim that his separate sentences 

are illegal because they violate double jeopardy principles. Croll is 

incorrect. As the Superior Court held, Delaware law is clear that a defendant 

may be sentenced for both Aggravated Menacing and a related weapon 

offense like PDWDCF because the General Assembly intended to punish the 

 

1 Before sentencing, the State dismissed the charge of Assault in the Second Degree.

2 Croll v. State, 2009 WL 486615 (Del. Apr. 17, 2009).

3

See, e.g., Croll v. State, 2010 WL 2891502 (Del. June 21, 2010).
3

two offenses separately.4 Accordingly, Croll’s separate sentences for 

PDWCF and Aggravated Menacing do not violate double jeopardy. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

 

4 DeShields v. State, 2015 WL 115487 (Del. Jan. 7, 2015).
EXHIBIT
        10.3



    


    [Paul
      J.
      Meyer Letterhead]

    


    July
      25,
      2008

    


    


    


    Reliv
      International, Inc.

    136
      Chesterfield Industrial Blvd.

    Chesterfield,
      MO 63005

    


    Attn: 
      Mr. Robert L. Montgomery

    Chief
      Executive Officer

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    On
      behalf
      of myself and the other members of the Board of Directors of the Paul & Jane
      Meyer Family Foundation (the “Foundation), we confirm and agree that, for a
      period of one year from the date of this letter, we will not engage, or
      encourage or direct any other person to engage, in communication or action
      adverse to, or in conflict with the actions of, the management of Reliv
      International, Inc. (the “Company”). This covenant will not, however, impair or
      affect the Foundation’s sale or transfer of shares of common stock of the
      Company, subject to the Foundation’s compliance with its obligations under the
      Stock Purchase Agreement between the Foundation and the Company dated as of
      July
      24, 2008 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), or the Foundation’s exercise of any
      of its rights and remedies under or relating to the Stock Purchase Agreement.
      

    


    
      	 	
              Sincerely,
                

            
	 	 
	 	
              /s/
                Paul J. Meyer 

            
	 	
                   Paul
                J. Meyer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 726 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 726

  To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to reauthorize a 
  provision to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of Native 
                          American languages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2013

Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico (for himself, Ms. Hanabusa, Ms. Roybal-
 Allard, Mr. Moran, Mrs. Negrete McLeod, Ms. Slaughter, Ms. McCollum, 
 and Mr. Pearce) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to reauthorize a 
  provision to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of Native 
                          American languages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN LANGUAGES PROGRAM.

    Section 816(e) of the Native American Programs Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 2992d(e)) is amended by striking ``2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 
2012'' and inserting ``2013 through 2017''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                /s/ Thomas F. Rokisky, Chief Executive Officer
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Thomas F. Rokisky
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               November 12, 2002
Maria WOOD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Bruce G. WOOD, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3684

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed. Denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 775 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to exempt election officials from 

Federal jury service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. FORBES, Mr. 

GOODLATTE, Mr. HURT, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. 

WOLF, and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to exempt election 

officials from Federal jury service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Uninterrupted Elec5 tions Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF ELECTION OFFICIALS FROM FED7 ERAL JURY DUTY. 

8 Section 1863 of title 28, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 775 IH

1 ‘‘(e)(1) Each plan under this section shall provide 

2 that a election or registration official, if named as a pro3 spective juror, is exempt from starting service as a juror 

4 during any election period. 

5 ‘‘(2) In this subsection— 

6 ‘‘(A) the term ‘election or registration official’ 

7 means an appointed or elected local election adminis8 trator, or a permanent full-time employee of such an 

9 administrator, whose duties include the registration 

10 of voters or the administration of elections; and 

11 ‘‘(B) the term ‘election period’ means the pe12 riod beginning 60 days before and ending 30 days 

13 after an election with respect to which the election 

14 or registration official has any of the duties de15 scribed in subparagraph (A).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Kerby CADET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```
**Exhibit 99.2

                                          REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
                                    REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors
Structured Obligations Corporation
New York, New York

We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National
Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2003-2 (the
Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support
deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Depositor's management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor's
and Trustee's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements
described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2006.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of Structured Obligations Corporation, U.S.
Bank National Association, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the
Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than
those specified parties.

/s/ RubinBrown LLP      
St. Louis, Missouri
March 2, 2007
```

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29718]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 842 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-555, K2025-553.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29718 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Brent LEBOUEF

NO. 2018-KO-1070

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Christus Health Gulf Coast (as an entity, d/b/a Christus St. Catherine

Hospital, and formerly d/b/a Christus St. Joseph Hospital ) v

. Linda G.

Carswell

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00292

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 05

- 36179

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: September 13, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting Individually Acting for the Court

P anel consists of: Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Justice Brown would grant the motion for

rehearing.

Date: April 1, 2014
STATE of Florida, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lavaya Ann MAY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3267

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Rodjay B. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4682

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WASHINGTON MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-AR2;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as
servicers and sub-servicers:

Greenpoint Mortgage Company, Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director