alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory S. Butterfield, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report of Altiris, Inc. on Form 10-K;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:    March 15, 2006. /s/   Gregory  S. Butterfield   Gregory S. Butterfield       President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Paul Cunningham, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of EP Global Communications, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2006;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The smallbusiness issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b) paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;

(c) evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed inthis report any change in the small business issuer's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer'scontrol over financial reporting; and.

5. The smallbusiness issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

(b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer's internalcontrols and procedures for financial reporting.

August 22, 2006

By: /s/ Paul Cunningham

           Paul Cunningham

Chief Financial Officer
Charmaine BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

         I, William J. Maguire, hereby certify that I am the duly elected Senior
Vice President of GMAC Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), a corporation
organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, that I have made
such reasonable investigation as I have deemed necessary to deliver this
Certificate, including discussions with responsible officers of the Servicer and
further certify to the best of my knowledge as follows:

                  1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
         calendar year beginning January 1, 2003 and ending on December 31, 2003
         (the "Calendar Year") and of its performance under the servicing
         agreements, including the servicing agreement dated as of March 26,
         2003 (the "Servicing Agreement"), by and among the Servicer, the
         Issuer, and the Indenture Trustee, has been made under my supervision.

                  2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
         Servicer has complied in all material respects with the minimum
         servicing standards set forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program
         for Mortgage Bankers and has fulfilled all of its material obligations
         in all material respects throughout the Calendar Year.

         Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the
Servicing Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the seal of the
Servicer.

Dated:  March 31, 2004
Re: GMACM Home Equity Loan Trust 2003-HE2
                                               GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

                                               By:      /s/ William J. Maguire             
                                                        Name:  William J. Maguire
                                                        Title:  Senior Vice President
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Catcher Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the period
indicated.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



|                    |  |     |  |                                     
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: May 21, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/    ROBERT H.
TURNER             
|                    |  |     |  | Robert H. Turner                    
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                    |  |    
|Dated: May 21, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/    DENIS
MCCARTHY               
|                    |  |     |  | Denis McCarthy                      
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Huguette JEAN, etc., Appellant, v. ONM DEVELOPMENT, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1063

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

The Purnell Law Firm, P.A., and Angelia Baldwin Purnell (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers LLP, and Allison C. Heim (Tampa), for appellee ONM Development, LLC.

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Because the former tenant's affidavit does not contradict the Property Manager's affidavit stating that "the turnover from the Developer of the Condominium to the Condominium Association took place on December 16, 2009" and that, as a result, "[a]s of December 16, 2009, the Developer no longer had control over The Oaks in North Miami, [given that] control was transferred to the Condominium Association," the trial court properly granted summary judgment as there were no genuine issues of material fact. *Morgan v. Cont'l Cas. Co.*, 382 So.2d 351, 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.
Y.T., The Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0731

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 15, 2005         



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ACRT,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACRT and will be retained by ACRT and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



69
STATE of Louisiana v. Jason Isreal DUPUIS

No. 2018-KK-1676

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 21, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 15th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ACADIA**

Writ denied.

Hughes, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.

La. Code Crim. Proc. article 215.1(A) provides that a law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense and may demand of him his name, address, and an explanation of his actions. *Terry v. Ohio* , 392 U.S. 1, 16, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 215.1 requires that an officer point to specific and articulable facts to justify an investigatory stop. *State v. Frank* , 04-0592 (La. App. 3 Cir. 09/29/04), 883 So.2d 1107, 1113.

Here, the officer's testimony shows that the defendant and his companion were fishing, not engaged in theft of crawfish or any other criminal activity. Nonetheless, the officer testified the defendant was detained and not free to leave. The officer testified only to vague, non-specific allegations of "crawfish theft." It is obvious that the defendant and his female companion were not stealing crawfish, but rather were fishing at night, a common south Louisiana practice. They had fishing poles, a dip net to secure the fish, and an empty sack to carry them home. It is highly unlikely that they could have accomplished theft of crawfish on a bicycle. The same officer had stopped the defendant while fishing before and arrested defendant's companion (perhaps accounting for defendant's *184nervousness). The officer specifically testified that the defendant was detained and not free to go.

After the officer had already patted the defendant down for weapons, it was unreasonable for the officer to demand that the detainee produce his cigarette pack. If he had one on his person, it certainly did not contain stolen crawfish. The fact that the officer's hunch was fruitful does not render it constitutional. The Fourth Amendment is means, not ends, based. The motion to suppress should granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Jonathan Doctor, President and Chief Executive Officer of PracticeXpert, Inc.
(the "Corporation"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Corporation for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



                            Date: May 2, 2006

                            By:  /s/ Jonathan Doctor
                                 Jonathan Doctor,
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Kof Little Sioux Corn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the fiscal yearended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Grotjohn, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Gary  Grotjohn            |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Gary Grotjohn                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | Dated: December 28, 2005 |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 864 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate at least one city 

in the United States each year as an ‘‘American World War II City’’, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mr. MCINTYRE (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate 

at least one city in the United States each year as 

an ‘‘American World War II City’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF AMERICAN WORLD WAR II 

4 CITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 shall at least designate one city in the United States each 

7 year as an ‘‘American World War II City’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 864 IH

1 (b) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION.—After the des2 ignation made under subsection (c), the Secretary, in con3 sultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall make each 

4 designation under subsection (a) based on the following 

5 criteria: 

6 (1) Contributions by a city to the war effort 

7 during World War II, including those related to de8 fense manufacturing, bond drives, service in the 

9 Armed Forces, and the presence of military facilities 

10 within the city. 

11 (2) Efforts by a city to preserve the history of 

12 the city’s contributions during World War II, includ13 ing through the establishment of preservation orga14 nizations or museums, restoration of World War II 

15 facilities, and recognition of World War II veterans. 

16 (c) FIRST AMERICAN WORLD WAR II CITY.—The 

17 city of Wilmington, North Carolina, is designated as an 

18 ‘‘American World War II City’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

I, Evan Brovenick, the Chief Executive Officer of IBX Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IBX Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report, based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and;

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2003                   /s/ Evan Brovenick
                                        ------------------
                                        Evan Brovenick, Chief Executive Officer
Velan VERDIER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1576

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                               
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/    R. BROOKS SHERMAN,
JR.                 
|Date: November 30, 2009 |  | R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
James IVERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1844

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

James Iverson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.