alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 758 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 758

    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
     monuments in Utah except by express authorization of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2013

Mr. Stewart (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Jones, 
 Mr. Cramer, and Mrs. Lummis) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 
     monuments in Utah except by express authorization of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Utah Land Sovereignty Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN UTAH.

    The proviso of the last sentence of the first section of the Act of 
September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is 
amended by inserting ``or Utah'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```
Henry ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3067

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1a

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ~

PricewaterhouseCoopers **LLP
214 N. Tryon Street

Suite 3600

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone (704) 344 7500 

Facsimile (704) 344 4100
**Report of Independent Accountants

 

 

 

To the Board of Directors andShareholders of 

Bank of America, N.A. Capital Markets Servicing Group:

We have examined management's assertion, about Bank of America N.A.'s Capital Markets Servicing Group ("CMSG"), as Master Servicer, compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit 1), except as that assertion relates to minimum servicing standards I.4, II, III.2, III.3, III.4, III.6, V AND VI, for which primary servicing of loans is performed by subservicers. Management is responsible for CMSG's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about CMSG's compliance, as master servicer, except as that assertion relates to the minimum servicing standards I.4, II, III.2, III.3, III.4, III.6, V and VI, for which primary servicing of loans is performed by subservicers, based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about CMSG's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The primary servicing of loans in this portfolio is performed by subservicers on behalf of CMSG. Consequently, we did not perform procedures regarding the minimum servicing standards I.4, II, III.2, III.3, III.4, III.6, V AND VI. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on CMSG's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, CMSG, as master servicer, complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects except as that assertion relates to minimum servicing standards I.4, II, III.2, III.3, III.4, III.6, V AND VI, for which the primary servicing of loans is performed by subservicers and as noted in the accompanying management assertion.

 
***PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 8, 2004*******
Exhibit
      10.34

    

      Promissory
        Note Amendment 

       

      (Christopher
        Knight) 

       

      This
        Promissory Note Amendment (this "Amendment")
        amends
        that certain Promissory Note dated November 15, 2005 issued by DrTattoff,
        LLC
        ("Maker") to the undersigned in the original principal amount of $12,000
        (the
        "Promissory
        Note").

       

      The
        Promissory Note is due on demand by the undersigned. The undersigned hereby
        agrees that the Promissory Note shall mature and be due and payable in full
        on
        the earlier of April 1, 2008 or the closing of "Series B" round of financing
        of
        Maker that is currently contemplated by Maker in connection with and after
        the
        prospective merger by Maker with Lifesciences Opportunities Incorporated.
        

      
         

        
          	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Christopher
                  Knight	 	 	 
	
                  
Christopher
                  Knight	 	 	
                
	 	 	 	 
	Dated: July 3, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1



e-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mary A. Grace, the
Registrants Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of e-Smart Technologies, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; and



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



a)
Designed and recently commenced the implementation of such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and



b) Evaluated the increasing effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



Dated: August 15, 2005



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Mary A. Grace          
|Chief Executive Officer    
|and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of EP Global Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: August 14, 2008  By: /s/ Joseph M. Valanzano, Jr. Joseph M. Valanzano, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
In the INTEREST OF C.B., a Child.

A.B., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-2776

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2



      Statement of Chief FINANCIAL Officer of under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     With  reference to the  Quarterly  Report of VINA  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the  "Report"),  I,
Stanley E. Kazmierczak,  the chief financial officer of the Company, certify for
the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code
that

     (i) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                /s/ Stanley E. Kazmierczak
                                --------------------------
                                  Stanley E. Kazmierczak

                                  May 14, 2003
STATE EX REL. Wilbert WILLIAMS, IV v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1487

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final.

*272Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                                 IBX GROUP, INC.

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely in connection with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code, "Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports", and is not
being filed as part of IBX Group, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2002 accompanying this certification.

I, Evan Brovenick, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IBX Group, Inc.,
certify that IBX Group, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of IBX Group, Inc.

Date: November 14, 2002                 IBX GROUP, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Evan Brovenick
                                        Evan Brovenick, Chairman and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Ava Electris CANNIE, Eva Electris Cannie, and Eva Helene Cannie, Petitioners, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB etc., Respondent.

No. 1D18-3527

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 5, 2018

Ava Electris Cannie, Eva Electris Cannie, and Eva Helene Cannie, pro se, Petitioners.

David Rosenberg of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied. *See**Powell v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.* , 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j), now rule 9.141(c), are not applicable).

Lewis, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT
      10.10



    SYMPHONY
      ACQUISITION CORP. 

    


    


    ______________,
      2008

    


    


    


    Crescendo
      Advisors II, LLC 

    825
      Third
      Avenue, 40th Floor

    New
      York,
      New York 10022

    


    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      (“IPO”) of the securities of Symphony
      Acquisition Corp. (“Symphony”)
      and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by Symphony of a “Business
      Combination” or Symphony’s liquidation (in each case as described in Symphony’s
      IPO prospectus) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
      Date”), Crescendo Advisors II, LLC shall make available to Symphony certain
      office space, utilities and secretarial support as may be required by Symphony
      from time to time, situated at 825 Third Avenue, 40th
      Floor,
      New York, New York 10022 (or any successor location). In exchange therefor,
      Symphony shall pay Crescendo Advisors II, LLC the sum of $10,000 per month
      on
      the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
      Date.

    


    Very
      truly yours,

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	SYMPHONY
              ACQUISITION CORP. 
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Name:
	 	Title 




     

    AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    


    CRESCENDO
      ADVISORS II, LLC

    


    


    By: _________________

    Name:
       

    Title:
Dana WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Dana White, Avon Park, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Lamont James NIXON, Jr.

NO. 2018-KO-0770

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael D. Durham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|/s/ Michael D. Durham                                                                    
|Name: Michael D. Durham Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer Date: March 14, 2008
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Wayne Smith, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer of Arvana Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

|   | (i)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of      the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”)      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the      Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                         |

|   | By:    | */s/  Wayne Smith*           |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Wayne  Smith                 |
|   |   |                         |
|   | Title: | Chief  Executive Officer and |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer     |
|   |   |                         |
|   | Date:  | April  30, 2010              |

----
Demtri Deshawn JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0930

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_publications(14)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)missouri(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Infographics        October 1, 2022        Map with overview of minerals survey in central Arkansas and and southern Missouri
Patrick FURMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4214

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

Patrick Furman, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied.

Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Silvio NARVAEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1414

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) of BearingPoint, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Randolph C. Blazer, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Randolph C. BlazerName:    Randolph C. BlazerDate:     August 6, 2004
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 742 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the 

Commodity Exchange Act to repeal the indemnification 

requirements for regulatory authorities to obtain access 

to swap data required to be provided by swaps entities 

under such Acts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 742 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Swap Data Repository 

3 and Clearinghouse Indemnification Correction Act of 

4 2013’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. 

6 (a) DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS.—Sec7 tion 5b(k)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

8 7a–1(k)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(5) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.—Before 

10 the Commission may share information with any en11 tity described in paragraph (4), the Commission 

12 shall receive a written agreement from each entity 

13 stating that the entity shall abide by the confiden14 tiality requirements described in section 8 relating to 

15 the information on swap transactions that is pro16 vided.’’. 

17 (b) SWAP DATA REPOSITORIES.—Section 21(d) of 

18 the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 24a(d)) is amend19 ed to read as follows: 

20 ‘‘(d) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.—Before the 

21 swap data repository may share information with any enti22 ty described in subsection (c)(7), the swap data repository 

23 shall receive a written agreement from each entity stating 

24 that the entity shall abide by the confidentiality require25 ments described in section 8 relating to the information 

26 on swap transactions that is provided.’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 742 RFS 

1 (c) SECURITY-BASED SWAP DATA REPOSITORIES.— 

2 Section 13(n)(5)(H) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

3 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(n)(5)(H)) is amended to read as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘(H) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.— 

6 Before the security-based swap data repository 

7 may share information with any entity de8 scribed in subparagraph (G), the security-based 

9 swap data repository shall receive a written 

10 agreement from each entity stating that the en11 tity shall abide by the confidentiality require12 ments described in section 24 relating to the in13 formation on security-based swap transactions 

14 that is provided.’’. 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this Act shall take effect as if enacted as part of the Dodd17 Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

18 (Public Law 111–203) on July 21, 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0477

CITY OF BOZEMAN, 

Plaintiff and Appellee,

Vs. 

TAMMY JANE SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER OF EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good 

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including September 8, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal. 

08/06/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0477

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2020