alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This Amendment No. 1,
effective as of July 1, 2004, (the Effective Date), amends the Employment Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2003 (Agreement), by and between Jefferson Bancshares, Inc., Jefferson Federal Bank and Anderson L.
Smith. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:



1. The second sentence of Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:



Performance standards
shall be measured on a fiscal year, and no bonus shall be payable if Executive is not employed on June 30 of the year in question; provided, however, in the event of death of the Executive, the bonus for the fiscal year of Executives death
shall be prorated on a quarterly basis, using the information for the quarter(s) completed prior to Executives death.



2. This Amendment shall be construed as an indivisible part of the Agreement. Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



3. This
Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.



[Signature Page Follows]





---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed as of the date
first above written.



|                    |  |  |  |                            |  |                          |  |                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Attest:             |  |  |  | JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC.
|                    |  |  | 
|/s/ Terry M. Brimer |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ John E. McCrary, Jr.
|                    |  |  |  |                            |  |                          |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors



|                    |  |  |  |                        |  |                          |  |                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Attest:             |  |  |  | JEFFERSON FEDERAL BANK
|                    |  |  | 
|/s/ Terry M. Brimer |  |  |  | By:                    |  | /s/ John E. McCrary, Jr.
|                    |  |  |  |                        |  |                          |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors



|                     |  |  |  |                       |  |                   |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | 
|Witness:             |  |  |  | EXECUTIVE            
|                     |  | 
|/s/ Jack E. Campbell |  |  |  | /s/ Anderson L. Smith
|                     |  |  |  |                       |  | Anderson L. Smith



2
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2.2

                             As of February 8, 2006

Globis Capital Partners, L.P.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Paul Packer

Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby agrees to transfer to you 12,000 shares ("Shares") of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of Asia Automotive Acquisition
Corporation ("Company"), a blank check company organized for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar
business combination with an automotive operating business that has its primary
operating facilities located in Asia, in exchange for $300.

By agreeing to the foregoing transfer, you understand that the Shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"); that you are acquiring the Shares for your account for investment
purposes only; that you have no present intention of selling or otherwise
disposing of the Shares in violation of the Securities Act; that you are an
"accredited investor" as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under
the Securities Act; and that, based solely on a review of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended to date, filed with the SEC, you are familiar
with the proposed business, management, financial condition, and affairs of the
Company.

Very truly yours,


-------------------------------------
William Herren

Agreed to by:
Globis Capital Partners, L.P.


By:
    ---------------------------------
Name:
      -------------------------------
Title:
       ------------------------------
Clifton FRANKLIN v. FOUNTAIN GROUP ADJUSTERS, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-CC-1490

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
Domingo VELOSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2745

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 838 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-550, K2025-548.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29714 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON LAWRENCE REIGLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 642 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Medina International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Nick DeMare, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2006.

/s/ Nick DeMare

Signature: Nick DeMareTitle: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         174,835
<SECURITIES>                                   476,904
<RECEIVABLES>                                  185,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               837,306
<PP&E>                                          70,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,977,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,828
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,855,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,977,153
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               884,133
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  770,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,101,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (987,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (984,810)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (984,810)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10428 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE D. FARQUHAR, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

- --------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-64-X & 3:97-CR-35

- ---------
January 19, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

George Farquhar appeals his convictions for failure to appear

at sentencing hearings, 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (a)(1). He c ontends that the

district court erred in denying his motion for a pre-sentence study

or mental examination to determine his mental competency. He also

contends, in the event that this court finds that the district

court did not err in denying his motion, that his counsel’s failure

to investigate, develop, and present evidence relevant to his

motion for a pre-sentence study or mental examination denied him

effective assistance of counsel.2

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and conclude that the district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying Farquhar ’s motion for a pre-sentence

study or mental examination under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3006A, 3552(b) and

(c), 4241(a), and 4244 because Farquhar failed to make the requisite showing of

reasonable cause to believe that he was incompetent to stand trial. See United States v. Williams
, 998 F.2d 258, 264-67 (5th Cir. 1993). Furthermore, Farquhar ’s ineffective assistance of counsel

claim cannot be litigated on direct appeal because he did not adequately raise it in the district

court. United States v. Gibson , 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v.

Higdon
, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). Farquhar may raise his

ineffective assistance of counsel in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion; if

he requires counsel t o assist in the preparation of the § 2255

motion, Farquhar may make that request to the district court

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 835 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-547, K2025-545.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29711 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 78 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.78

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  4110 Almeda Road in Houston, Texas, as the ``George Thomas `Mickey' 
                     Leland Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GEORGE THOMAS ``MICKEY'' LELAND POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4110 Almeda Road in Houston, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George Thomas `Mickey' Leland Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Thomas `Mickey' Leland Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006
JAMES E. EATON,

Petitioner,

v.

TRUSTMARK NATIONAL 

BANK,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1338

Opinion filed August 9, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

Stephen MacNamara, Tallahassee; Daniel W. Uhlfelder and Nicola J. Pappas of 

Daniel W. Uhlfelder, P.A., Santa Rosa Beach, for Petitioner.

Oscar J. Locklin of Locklin, Saba, Locklin & Jones, P.A., Pace, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5810 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude 

certain cotton futures contracts from coverage under 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5810 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CON2 TRACTS FROM COVERAGE UNDER UNITED 

3 STATES COTTON FUTURES ACT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(1) of the United 

5 States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘except that any cotton futures 

8 contract’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘except that— 

9 ‘‘(A) any cotton futures contract’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(B) any cotton futures contract that per13 mits tender of cotton grown outside of the 

14 United States is excluded from the coverage of 

15 this paragraph and section to the extent that 

16 the cotton grown outside of the United States 

17 is tendered for delivery under the cotton futures 

18 contract.’’. 

19 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub20 section (a) shall apply with respect to cotton futures 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5810 RDS 

1 contracts entered into on or after the date of the enact2 ment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
SON THANH UONG, DOC #314757, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-122

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

**** 

**Report Of Independent**

**Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors

Structured Obligations Corporation

New York, New York

 

 

We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2003-2 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.

 

In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of Structured Obligations Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.

 

 

 

        /s/ RubinBrown LLP        

 

Overland Park, Kansas

February 28, 2011

 

 

----
Wilfred Paul MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARC Corporate Realty Trust, Inc.® (ACRT) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of
ACRT, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of ACRT.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce Nelson       
|Bruce Nelson           
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 1, 2006          



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ACRT,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACRT and will be retained by ACRT and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.