alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020035EN.01001001.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9410 — Saudi Aramco/SABIC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 35/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Saudi Arabian Oil Company (‘Saudi Aramco’, Saudi Arabia), |
| --- | --- |

—

Saudi Arabian Oil Company (‘Saudi Aramco’, Saudi Arabia),

| — | Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (‘SABIC’, Saudi Arabia). |
| --- | --- |

—

Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (‘SABIC’, Saudi Arabia).

Saudi Aramco acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of SABIC.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Saudi Aramco is primarily engaged in the exploration, production and marketing of crude oil, natural gas and oil-based transport fuels as well as in the production and marketing of refined products and petrochemicals. |
| --- | --- |

—

Saudi Aramco is primarily engaged in the exploration, production and marketing of crude oil, natural gas and oil-based transport fuels as well as in the production and marketing of refined products and petrochemicals.

| — | SABIC is primarily active in the production and sale of commodity chemicals (including petrochemicals), intermediates, polymers, fertilizers and metals. |
| --- | --- |

—

SABIC is primarily active in the production and sale of commodity chemicals (including petrochemicals), intermediates, polymers, fertilizers and metals.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9410 — Saudi Aramco/SABIC

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Exhibit 10.1  




ADDENDUM 



EMPLOYMENT AND
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT 



DANIEL TURISSINI 



This Agreement is made as of July 25,
2007, between WidePoint Corporation (WidePoint) and Daniel E. Turissini (Employee),
and represents an Addendum to the Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between the parties
executed in October, 2004. This Addendum is intended to clarify and supplement, and not
replace, the provisions of the executed and existing Employment and Non-Compete Agreement. 



	 	1. 	The
Employment Agreement shall be annually renewable, as contemplated in Paragraphs 1 and 4
of the original Agreement, with such Employment Period continuing hereunder.  






	 	2. 	This
supplemental Addendum specifically confirms that the Agreement is hereby
                    extended for its fourth and fifth consecutive annual periods,
commencing                     October 25, 2007 for two additional one year periods,
through and including                     October 24, 2009.  






	 	3. 	In
consideration for, and as an incentive to, Employee’s incremental
                    commitment, WidePoint agrees to annual payments of $25,000 for each
of the                     fourth and fifth annual periods from October 25, 2007
through                     October 24, 2009. Such payments will be made in advance,
as of the                     execution date of this Addendum, but are contingent upon
Employee’s                     compliance with the terms of the Addendum.  






	 	4. 	The
Compensation and Benefits provisions (Paragraph 2) of the original
                    Agreement shall remain unchanged. This includes Base Salary,
Benefits, and                     Expenses. Apart from the provisions of the earlier
Addendum, a Senior Management                     Incentive Program will be separately
developed for each of the calendar years                     2008 and 2009, including
Cash and Stock award opportunities tied to performance                     metrics.  






	 	5. 	The
Termination and Non-Compete provisions (Paragraphs 4 and 5) shall
                    remain unchanged and in effect.  






        In
witness whereof, the parties have executed this Addendum on the day and year first written
above. 



	EMPLOYEE:	WIDEPOINT CORPORATION:
	
/s/ Daniel Turissini(signed)	/s/ Steve L. Komar
	Daniel Turissini, CEO, ORC	Steve L. Komar, CEO
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Little Sioux Corn Processors,L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gary Grotjohn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   |  /s/ Gary  Grotjohn |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Gary Grotjohn            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   | Dated: December 29, 2006 |

 

----
Exhibit
      23





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No.
      333-129294) of our report dated March 30, 2007 (which
      report expresses an unqualified opinion), relating to the financial statements
      of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly Corporate Road Show.Com Inc.) included
      in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.






/s/
      Lazar, Levine & Felix, LLP


New
      York,
      New York


April
      2,
      2007
#### U. S. PRINTING *&*NOVELTY CO., Inc. et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

No. 11602.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 11, 1953.

Decided June 4, 1953.

Mr. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr., Washington, D. C, with whom Mr. Arthur V. Sullivan,

Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioners.

Mr. Alan B. Hobbes, Special Attorney, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Robert B. Dawkins, Assistant General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.

Before PROCTOR, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission.1 The facts are essentially similar to those in Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 1952, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 169, 194 F.2d 346, 348. The order of the Commission forbids petitioner, a manufacturing printer, to sell in interstate commerce “push cards, puncliboards, or other lottery devices *which are to be used, or which, due to their design, are suitable for use*in the sale or distribution of merchandise to the public by means of a game of chance, gift enterprise or lottery scheme.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Petitioner urges that the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Halseth, 1952, 342 U.S. *277, 72*S.Ct. 275, 96 L.Ed. 308, establishes that the Federal Trade Commission has no authority over the sale of lottery devices. For the reasons given by the Ninth Circuit in Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade Commission, 1952, 194 F.2d 607, 611, this contention must be rejected. Petitioner also attacks the form of the Commission’s order, alleging it to be inconsistent with our decision in Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, supra. As to this, we agree with petitioner. The order of the Federal Trade Commission will he amended so as to insert, in replacement of the words italicized above, the words “ ‘which are designed or intended to be used’ ”. As thus modified, the order will be affirmed.

So ordered.

1

. The order was issued under authority of kicciion 5 of the Federal Trade Act, 38 Stat. 719 (1914), as amended, 15 U.S. C.A. § 45.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 794 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 794

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of 
 furnishing clinical psychologist services under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2013

 Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mrs. Christensen, Ms. Chu, Mr. DeFazio, 
 Mr. Ellison, Mr. Honda, Ms. Moore, and Mr. Pierluisi) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of 
 furnishing clinical psychologist services under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS PHYSICIANS FOR 
              PURPOSES OF FURNISHING CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--The first sentence of section 1861(r) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' before ``(5)''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, or 
        (6) a clinical psychologist, but only with respect to the 
        furnishing of qualified psychologist services described in 
        subsection (ii) for which the psychologist is legally 
        authorized to perform by the State and who is acting within the 
        scope of the psychologist's license (or other authorization 
        under State law)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2





Report Of Independent


Registered Public Accounting Firm







To the Board of Directors Structured Obligations Corporation New York, New York







We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2003-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.





In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2013.





This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.







/s/ RubinBrown LLP











Overland Park, Kansas





March 11, 2014
Harold STEPHENSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tayna PORUBA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2851

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 19, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for a writ prohibiting Judge Jack Helingerfrom presiding further in circuit court case number 11-14772-FD-12 is granted. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(f) ; In re I.K., Jr., 869 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA2003). Accordingly, the chief judge shall immediately appoint a successor judge pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.215(b)(4).

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(4)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - virginia(10)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(4)
              - 2023(1)
              - (-)2022(4)

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

staff profileStephanie G Prejean

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska

Photography  Geologic Studies on Sitkinak Island, Alaska
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 21, 2014

p0218

Order 

Clerk

February 21, 2014

148066

SC: 148066

In re TALH, Minor. COA: 314749

Mecosta CC Family Division:

12-001290-AY

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). 

The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the lower courts erred in determining that the respondent 

substantially complied with his child support obligations for the pertinent timeframe 

under MCL 710.51(6). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their 

application papers.
Exhibit 10.40

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN  DTS, INC. AND DANIEL E. SLUSSER

This Amendment (the "Amendment") effective as of February 9, 2010, is made and entered into by and between DTS, Inc. (the
"Company") and Daniel E. Slusser (the "Executive").

Whereas,
DTS and Executive have previously entered into an Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2009 (the "Agreement"); and

Whereas,
the parties to the Agreement wish to amend the Agreement;

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:



"Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the term shall be extended to expire on December 31, 2010."

This
Amendment does not delete, terminate or replace any provision of the Agreement except as specifically provided herein.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the day and date first written above.

DANIEL E. SLUSSER

DTS, INC.By:

/s/ DANIEL E. SLUSSER Daniel E. Slusser

By:

/s/ JON KIRCHNER Jon Kirchner President & Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 9, 2010

Date: February 9,
2010


---



QuickLinks
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

URS Federal Services, Inc. ) 

) 

UnderContractNo. W56HZV-15-D-ER17 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 60809, 61110 

Terry L. Elling, Esq. 

Elizabeth N. Jochum, Esq. 

Holland & Knight LLP 

Tysons, VA 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Deirdre K. Baker, JA 

CPT Harry M. Parent III, JA 

Trial Attorneys 

SUMMARY BINDING DECISION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE D'ALESSANDRIS 

By ADR agreement approved by the Board on 22 November 2017, the parties 

requested that this appeal be decided by a one judge "summary proceeding with 

binding decision." The parties agreed that this "decision shall be final, conclusive, not 

subject to reconsideration or appeal, and may not be set aside, except for fraud." 

(ADR Agreement at 1, 3) This decision has no value as precedent and cannot be cited 

in any other proceeding. The undersigned conducted a one-day evidentiary hearing on 

10 April 2018 at the Board's offices in Falls Church, Virginia, after which the parties 

rested and presented arguments. 

DECISION 

The appeals of URS Federal Services, Inc. (URS) are denied. Based upon a 

review of testimony at the evidentiary hearing and the record, we find that URS failed 

to satisfy its burden of proof necessary to recover in these appeals. 

Dated: 12 April 2018 

DA YID D' ALESSANDRIS 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60809, 61110, Appeals of 

URS Federal Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 948 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-690, K2025-689.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29901 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby                           ( print page 102966)                        gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 924 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-660, K2025-659.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29871 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P