alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 971 

To prohibit the sale or trade to another community of community development 

block grant award amounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2013 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. MCHENRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the sale or trade to another community of 

community development block grant award amounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Proper Com5 munity Investments Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALE OR TRADE OF COMMUNITY 

7 DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AWARDS. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 105 of the Housing and 

9 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305) 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 971 IH

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(i) PROHIBITION ON SALE OR TRADE OF

4 AWARDS.—A metropolitan city, urban county, unit of gen5 eral local government, or Indian tribe, or insular area that 

6 receives a grant of amounts under this title from the Sec7 retary or through a State allocation pursuant to section 

8 106(d) may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or 

9 any portion of such amounts to or for any other metropoli10 tan city, urban county, unit of general local government, 

11 Indian tribe or insular area.’’. 

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Housing and 

13 Urban Development shall issue any regulations necessary 

14 to carry out section 105(i) of the Housing and Community 

15 Development Act of 1974, as added by the amendment 

16 made by subsection (a) of this section, not later than the 

17 expiration of the 90-day period beginning on the date of 

18 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 667 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 667

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To redesignate the Dryden Flight Research Center as the Neil A. 
  Armstrong Flight Research Center and the Western Aeronautical Test 
          Range as the Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF DRYDEN FLIGHT RESEARCH CENTER.

    (a) Redesignation.--The National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center in Edwards, 
California, is redesignated as the ``NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight 
Research Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the flight research 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF WESTERN AERONAUTICAL TEST RANGE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) Western Aeronautical Test Range in California is 
redesignated as the ``NASA Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the test range referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``NASA 
Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 667

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To redesignate the Dryden Flight Research Center as the Neil A. 
  Armstrong Flight Research Center and the Western Aeronautical Test 
          Range as the Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range.
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 881 

To limit the use of cluster munitions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2013 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. ISSA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To limit the use of cluster munitions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cluster Munitions Ci5 vilian Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON THE USE OF CLUSTER MUNITIONS. 

7 No funds appropriated or otherwise available to any 

8 Federal department or agency may be obligated or ex9 pended to use any cluster munitions unless— 

10 (1) the submunitions of the cluster munitions, 

11 after arming, do not result in more than 1 percent 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 881 IH

1 unexploded ordnance across the range of intended 

2 operational environments; and 

3 (2) the policy applicable to the use of such clus4 ter munitions specifies that the cluster munitions 

5 will only be used against clearly defined military tar6 gets and will not be used where civilians are known 

7 to be present or in areas normally inhabited by civil8 ians. 

9 SEC. 3. PRESIDENTIAL WAIVER. 

10 The President may waive the requirement under sec11 tion 2(1) if, prior to the use of cluster munitions, the 

12 President— 

13 (1) certifies that it is vital to protect the secu14 rity of the United States; and 

15 (2) not later than 30 days after making such 

16 certification, submits to the appropriate congres17 sional committees a report, in classified form if nec18 essary, describing in detail— 

19 (A) the steps that will be taken to protect 

20 civilians; and 

21 (B) the failure rate of the cluster muni22 tions that will be used and whether such muni23 tions are fitted with self-destruct or self-deacti24 vation devices. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 881 IH

1 SEC. 4. CLEANUP PLAN. 

2 Not later than 90 days after any cluster munitions 

3 are used by a Federal department or agency, the President 

4 shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

5 a plan, prepared by such Federal department or agency, 

6 for cleaning up any such cluster munitions and submuni7 tions which fail to explode and continue to pose a hazard 

8 to civilians. 

9 SEC. 5. APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE10 FINED. 

11 In this Act, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional com12 mittees’’ means the Committee on Foreign Relations, the 

13 Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Ap14 propriations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign 

15 Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Com16 mittee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michael BOLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Shannon S. FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1524

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
      10.39a


**AMENDMENT
      TO**


**6%
      PROMISSORY NOTE**





AMENDMENT
      TO 6% PROMISSORY NOTE, is dated as of **October
      10, 2008;** made by
      and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal
      offices located at 111 North Branch Street, Sellersville, PA 18960 (the
“Company”) and Egani, Inc., an Arizona corporation, (the “Lender”) with a
      mailing address of 8260 East Raintree Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85260. Capitalized
      terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
      assigned to such term in the Original Note.





WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Lender are parties to that certain 6% Promissory Note,
      dated
      April 28, 2008 (the “Original Note”), pursuant to which the Company has borrowed
      the amount of **$9,550** from
      the
      Lender;





WHEREAS,
      the Original Note provides that the Maturity Date shall be October 28, 2008;
      and





WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Lender have agreed to extend the Maturity Date and to amend
      Section 1.4 of the Original Note; and





WHEREAS,
      in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Original Note, the Company
      and the Lender hereby approve the amendment of the Original Note as set forth
      herein.





NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained
      herein, the parties agree as follows:





1.
      By
      their respective execution of this AMENDMENT, the Company and the Lender
      agree that Section 1.4 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read in its
      entirety as follows: **“Maturity
      Date”** shall
      mean **November
      30, 2008;** and





2.
      Except
      as expressly provided herein, the Original Note shall continue in full force
      and
      effect.





3.
      This
      AMENDMENT may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, which, taken
      together, shall be deemed an original and shall constitute a single
      AMENDMENT.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Lender have caused this AMENDMENT to be
      executed as of the date first written above.




DELTA
                MUTUAL, INC.
            
            EGANI,
                INC.(COMPANY)
            
            (LENDER)By:
            /s/
                Malcolm W. Sherman
            
            By:
            /s/
                Daniel PeraltaMalcolm
                W. Sherman
            
            
            Daniel
                PeraltaExecutive
                Vice President
            
            
            President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 959 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 959

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  from awarding any grant, contract, cooperative agreement, or other 
  financial assistance under section 103 of the Clean Air Act for any 
 program, project, or activity to occur outside the United States and 
                    its territories and possessions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2013

  Mr. Whitfield (for himself, Mr. Barrow of Georgia, Mr. Griffith of 
 Virginia, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. 
Pompeo, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Terry, Mr. Guthrie, and Mr. Olson) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
   Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
  from awarding any grant, contract, cooperative agreement, or other 
  financial assistance under section 103 of the Clean Air Act for any 
 program, project, or activity to occur outside the United States and 
                    its territories and possessions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability in Grants Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FUNDING CERTAIN FOREIGN PROGRAMS, PROJECTS, 
              AND ACTIVITIES.

    Section 103 of the Clean Air Act is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(l) Prohibition Against Funding Foreign Programs, Projects, and 
Activities.--The Administrator shall not award any grant, contract, 
cooperative agreement, or other financial assistance under this section 
for any program, project, or activity to occur outside the United 
States and its territories and possessions.''.
                                 <all>
```
Shawn CLINGAN, Appellant, v. Rachel KICZALES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - hawaii(19)
              - idaho(8)
              - illinois(2)
              - (-)indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(2)
              - maine(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(9)
              - nevada(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(28)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(18)

## By Year

Center News        February 15, 2023        Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds geochemistry surveying in central United States
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29781]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 877 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-600, K2025-599.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29781 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit
      No. 10.18


    
      	
              Principal
                Amount: $267,636.75

            	
              Issue
                Date: June 20, 2008

            


    

     

    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

     

    FOR
      VALUE
      RECEIVED, Visual Management Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Maker"),
      promises to pay to the order of The Russ & Russ PC Defined Benefit Pension
      Plan (the "Holder"), the principal amount of Two Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand
      and One Hundred Ninety-One Dollars and Seventy Eight Cents ($267,636.75) plus
      all accrued and unpaid interest thereon as provided below at such place as
      Holder shall direct in writing on December 20,
      2008.

    


    Interest
      shall accrue on the principal amount of this Note at a rate of ten percent
      (10%)
      per
      annum.

    


    Maker
      shall have the right to prepay all of any part of the principal amount of this
      Note at any time or times without penalty or notice. 

    


    Maker
      hereby waives presentation and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest
      and notice of protest. 

    


    In
      the
      event that payment hereunder is not made when due, the Holder shall have the
      right to recover all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees,
      incurred by the Holder in enforcing its rights under the Note. 

    


    This
      Note
      shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State
      of
      New Jersey, without regard to principles of conflicts of law. 

    


    This
      Note
      may not be modified, changed, waived, discharged or terminated, except by an
      agreement in writing signed by the party against which enforcement of the
      change, waiver, discharge or termination is sought. 

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Note to be duly executed as
      of
      the day and year first above written.

     

    
      	
              Visual
                Management Systems, Inc.

            
	 
	
               

            
	
              Jason
                Gonzalez, Chief Executive Officer
## THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF GREG G COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 27th

day of February, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Sharon Morrison, Appellant

v.

Whispering Pines Lodge I, L.L.P. d/b/a Whispering Pines Lodge and Whispering Pines Lodge, L .L.C. d/b/a Whispering Pines Lodge, Appellees No. 06

- 13

- 00067

- CV

Trial Court No. 2011

- 1549

- CCL2

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Sharon Morrison, pay all costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 16th day of October , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
STATE EX REL. Robert Dale WILSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1579

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

*179Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Silvia Paoli DE BENEDETTI, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. COLINA INSURANCE LIMITED, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 3D18-90

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29791]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 887 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-613, K2025-612.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29791 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IB 

Union Calendar No. 36 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 701 

[Report No. 113–58] 

To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 directing the Securities 

and Exchange Commission to add a particular class of securities to 

those exempted under such Act to provide a deadline for such action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GARRETT, 

and Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

MAY 15, 2013 

Additional sponsors: Mr. COLLINS of New York and Mr. FITZPATRICK

MAY 15, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 701 RH

A BILL 

To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 directing 

the Securities and Exchange Commission to add a particular class of securities to those exempted under such 

Act to provide a deadline for such action. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 701 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RULEMAKING DEADLINE FOR EXEMPTING CER4 TAIN SECURITIES. 

5 Section 3(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

6 U.S.C. 77c(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘The Commis7 sion’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than October 31, 2013, the 

8 Commission’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 36 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 701 

[Report No. 113–58] 

A BILL 

To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 

deadline for such action. those exempted under such Act to provide a sion to add a particular class of securities to directing the Securities and Exchange CommisMAY 15, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Ryan Stevie TIRADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2023

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.