alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Board of Director Compensation of Mosaic



 Exhibit 10.iii.j. 
 THE MOSAIC COMPANY 
 SUMMARY OF BOARD OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 Non-Employee Directors 
 The policy adopted by the
Board of Directors of The Mosaic Company (“Mosaic”), as recommended by its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective December 14, 2007, provides for cash compensation to non-employee directors as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $170,000 to the Chairman of the Board and $85,000 to each other director; 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $20,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $10,000 to other members of this Committee; 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $15,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and $5,000 to other members of this Committee; and 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $10,000 to each director who serves as chair of its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Environmental, Health and Safety
Committee and Special Transactions Committee. 


 Prior to December 14, 2007, the policy adopted by Mosaic’s Board
of Directors, as recommended by its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, provided for cash compensation to non-employee directors as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $150,000 to the Chairman of the Board and $75,000 to each other director; 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $20,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $5,000 to other members of this Committee; 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $15,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee; and 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $10,000 to each director who serves as chair of other Board committees (other than the Executive Committee).



 In addition, the policy in effect during fiscal 2008 provided for an annual grant of restricted stock units providing
grants of Mosaic’s common stock, valued at $130,000 to the Chairman of our Board and $65,000 to each other director. Effective for fiscal 2009, the Board increased the amounts at which the awards are valued to $170,000 for its Chairman of the
Board and $85,000 for each other director. 
 Mosaic does not pay meeting fees or provide any perquisites to its directors. It does reimburse
its directors for travel and business expenses incurred in connection with meeting attendance. 
 Employee Directors 
 Directors who are employees receive no director fees or other separate compensation for service on the Board or any committee of the Board for the period
during which they are employees.
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Lawrence SHAPIRO, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1987

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 749 

To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to provide an exception to the annual 

privacy notice requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. HINOJOSA, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. RENACCI, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. 

OWENS, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. PETERS of Michigan, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New 

York, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of 

New Mexico, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to provide an 

exception to the annual privacy notice requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminate Privacy No5 tice Confusion Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 749 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ANNUAL PRIVACY NOTICE REQUIRE2 MENT UNDER THE GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY 

3 ACT. 

4 Section 503 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 

5 U.S.C. 6803) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(f) EXCEPTION TO ANNUAL NOTICE REQUIRE8 MENT.—A financial institution that— 

9 ‘‘(1) provides nonpublic personal information 

10 only in accordance with the provisions of subsection 

11 (b)(2) or (e) of section 502 or regulations prescribed 

12 under section 504(b), and 

13 ‘‘(2) has not changed its policies and practices 

14 with regard to disclosing nonpublic personal infor15 mation from the policies and practices that were dis16 closed in the most recent disclosure sent to con17 sumers in accordance with this section, 

18 shall not be required to provide an annual disclosure under 

19 this section until such time as the financial institution 

20 fails to comply with any criteria described in paragraph 

21 (1) or (2).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 982 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to require 

the public disclosure by trusts established under section 

524(g) of such title, of quarterly reports that contain 

detailed information regarding the receipt and disposition 

of claims for injuries based on exposure to asbestos; 

and for other purposes. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 982 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Furthering Asbestos 

5 Claim Transparency (FACT) Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 524(g) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(8) A trust described in paragraph (2) shall, subject 

10 to section 107— 

11 ‘‘(A) file with the bankruptcy court, not later 

12 than 60 days after the end of every quarter, a report 

13 that shall be made available on the court’s public 

14 docket and with respect to such quarter— 

15 ‘‘(i) describes each demand the trust re16 ceived from, including the name and exposure 

17 history of, a claimant and the basis for any 

18 payment from the trust made to such claimant; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(ii) does not include any confidential med21 ical record or the claimant’s full social security 

22 number; and 

23 ‘‘(B) upon written request, and subject to pay24 ment (demanded at the option of the trust) for any 

25 reasonable cost incurred by the trust to comply with 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 982 RFS

1 such request, provide in a timely manner any infor2 mation related to payment from, and demands for 

3 payment from, such trust, subject to appropriate 

4 protective orders, to any party to any action in law 

5 or equity if the subject of such action concerns li6 ability for asbestos exposure.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

8 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub9 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

10 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

11 Act. 

12 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend13 ments made by this Act shall apply with respect to cases 

14 commenced under title 11 of the United States Code be15 fore, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

(MANTYLA MCREYNOLDS LLC LOGO)

The CPA. Never Underestimate The Value.(SM)

November 7, 2005

Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Dear Sir/Madam:

We have read the statements included in item 4.01 of the Form 8-K dated on or
about November 10, 2005, of Source Energy Corporation, to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements
contained in Item 4.01 insofar as they relate (i) to our reports on the
financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and
(ii) to our dismissal. Further, during the two most recent fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were no disagreements between the Company and
our firm on any matter of accounting principles, accounting practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. We are not in a position
to agree or disagree with the statements in Item 4.01 regarding the engagement
another independent registered public accounting firm or the approval of such
engagement by the Board of Directors.

Very truly yours,

(MANTYLA MCREYNOLDS LLC)
-------------------------------------
Mantyla McReynolds LLC

     cc: Source Energy Corporation
         8644 154th Avenue NE
         Redmond, WA 98052

5872 South 900 East, Suite 250-Salt Lake City, Utah 84121-(801) 269-1818-Fax
(801) 266-3481
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004 In connection with the Annual Report of CAPTERRA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., formerly known as ACROSS AMERICA REAL
ESTATE CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Peter Shepard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Peter
Shepard

Peter Shepard,

Chief Executive Officer Dated: OCTOBER 15, 2008  3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - (-)products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(2)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(2)
              - florida(1)
              - (-)georgia(3)
              - hawaii(10)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(3)
              - new mexico(3)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - pennsylvania(3)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(3)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

map        January 1, 1991        Seismicity map of the state of Georgia

map        January 1, 1987        Seismicity map of the state of Georgia

map        January 1, 1979        Seismicity map of the State of Georgia
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 12 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that any 

extension of the public debt limit only be considered in a standalone bill. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. COURTNEY, and Mr. YARMUTH) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that any extension of the public debt limit only 

be considered in a standalone bill. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 

4 ‘‘Consideration of public debt limit extension 

5 ‘‘12. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or 

6 joint resolution extending the limit on the public debt if 

7 such measure contains any other matter.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers



 EXHIBIT 10. (a) 
 Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers 
 The Board of Directors (“Board”) of Computer Task Group, Incorporated (“Company”) approved the following base salaries1, equity awards2 and annual cash incentive (“Incentive”) target awards for the principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and other executive officers who were named in the Summary Compensation Table of the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2008 (together, the
“Named Executive Officers”). 
  

								
	 Name and principal position
	  	Salary ($)	  	Stock
Awards
(# shares)	  	Option
Awards
(# shares)
				
	 James R. Boldt
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	450,000	  	35,000	  	40,000
				
	 Brendan M. Harrington
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	237,000	  	4,000	  	20,000
				
	 Filip J.L. Gydé
Senior Vice President and General Manager, CTG Europe
	  	$	312,194	  	4,000	  	20,000
				
	 Michael J. Colson
Senior Vice President, Solutions
	  	$	246,000	  	4,000	  	20,000
				
	 Arthur W. Crumlish
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Strategic Staffing Solutions
	  	$	239,000	  	4,000	  	20,000

 Annual Cash Incentive. Each Named Executive Officer is also generally eligible to receive an
Incentive. The formula for calculating such Incentive provides that at least eighty percent (80%) of the stipulated plan target (“Threshold”) must be achieved before any remuneration is awarded for that objective. If the Threshold is
achieved, the executive officer receives fifty percent (50%) of the designated plan award for that objective. Then, for each additional percentage point (1%) achieved above the Threshold, up to one hundred percent (100%) of the plan
target (“Objective Goal”), the executive officer receives another two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the designated plan award for that objective. For each additional percentage point (1%) achieved above the Objective Goal, the
executive officer receives another five percent (5%) of the designated plan award for that objective. Each plan prohibits the receipt of amounts in excess of two hundred percent (200%) of the designated plan award for that objective.

 The designated plan award is generally calculated as a percentage of annual base salary. The following designated plan awards were approved by the Board:
(i) for Mr. Boldt, CEO, one hundred percent (100%) of base salary actually paid, (ii) for Mr. Harrington, CFO, fifty percent (50%) of base salary actually paid, (iii) for Mr. Gydé, SVP, forty-five
percent (45%) of base salary actually paid, (iv) for Mr. Colson, SVP, seventy-five percent (75%) of base salary actually paid, and (v) for Mr. Crumlish, SVP, fifty percent (50%) of base salary actually paid.

  

	 1
	 Salary adjustments became effective April 7th 2008. 



	 2
	 Equity awards were granted on May 13th 2008. 


  

 21
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - california(12)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(5)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        March 21, 2017        Monitoring Land-Atmosphere Exchange of Moisture to Understand Drought
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ALEXIS CAMPBELL, *

* No. 11-343V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: March 27, 2013

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award in the

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * amount to which respondent has not

* objected

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol, Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner;

Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Petitioner, Alexis Campbell, filed a stipulation of fact concerning final attorneys’ fees 

and costs in the above-captioned matter on March 26, 2013. Previously, Ms. Campbell

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent for review.

Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections to certain items. Based on 

subsequent discussions, petitioner amended her application to request $30,000.00, an amount to 

which respondent does not object. The Court awards this amount. 

Ms. Campbell filed for compensation alleging that she was injured by the hepatitis A 

vaccine she received on July 10, 2008. Ms. Campbell received compensation based upon the 

parties’ stipulation. Decision, filed January 22, 2013. Because Ms. Campbell received 

compensation, she is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

Ms. Campbell seeks a total of $30,000.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for her counsel. 

Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, Ms. Campbell represents that she 

incurred no out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. Respondent has no 

objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

After reviewing the request, the court awards a check made payable to petitioner and

petitioner’s attorney in the amount of $30,000.00 for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs. 

The court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this matter.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

 

2

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing 

a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 796 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 796

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
use the commercially available volume of cellulosic biofuel in setting 
 requirements for the renewable fuel program under the Clean Air Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2013

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
use the commercially available volume of cellulosic biofuel in setting 
 requirements for the renewable fuel program under the Clean Air Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE CLEAN AIR ACT.

    Section 211(o)(7)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7545(o)(7)(D)(i)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``, as determined by the Administrator 
        based on the estimate provided under paragraph (3)(A)'';
            (2) by striking ``the Administrator may also reduce'' and 
        inserting ``the Administrator shall also reduce''; and
            (3) by inserting ``For purposes of this subparagraph, the 
        projected volume of cellulosic biofuel production for a 
        calendar year shall not be more than 5 percent or 1 million 
        gallons (whichever is greater) more than the total volume of 
        cellulosic biofuel that was commercially available for the most 
        recent calendar year for which such total volume is known.'' 
        after ``by the same or a lesser volume.''.
                                 <all>
```
Janine RHODES, Appellant, v. Daniel C. RHODES, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Iquille CHAPPELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ieascha J. FINN, Appellant, v. 7-ELEVEN, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5079

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 30, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Adam DYER, Appellant, v. WALGREEN CO., GPC Maintenance Systems Incorporated, and Reaction Services, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

Brendan R. Riley, of Riley Law Group, New Port Richey, for Appellant.

James A. Coleman and David C. Knapp, of James A. Coleman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Walgreen Co.

Anthony J. Russo and Mihaela Cabulea, of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, and Shelton S. Bridges, IV, of Law Office of Glenn G. Gomer, Tampa, for Appellee, Reaction Services, Inc.

No Appearance for Appellee, GPC Maintenance Systems Incorporated.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.