alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IBX Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David Blechman,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


         Dated:  November 14, 2003      /s/ David Blechman
                                        ------------------
                                        David Blechman
                                        Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
certification is included solely for the purpose of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not to be used for
any other purpose. In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, Floyd
A. Wandler, hereby certify in my capacity as an officer of Savoy Resources Corp.
that to my knowledge:

     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Savoy Resources Corp.



Date:  May 28, 2004                   /s/ Floyd A. Wandler
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Floyd A. Wandler President and Director
                                      (Principal  Executive,  Financial and
                                      Accounting Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

t0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144060

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144060

COA: 303086

Wayne CC: 02-013495-FC

KEVIN LONELL HARRINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Surrey Bancorp (the Issuer)
for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |  |  |                |  |                             |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | SURREY BANCORP
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 24, 2004 |  |  |  | By:            |  | /s/    Edward C. Ashby, III
|                     |  |  |  |                |  |                             | 
|                     |  |  |  |                |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 24, 2004 |  |  |  | By:            |  | /s/    Mark H. Towe        
|                     |  |  |  |                |  |                             | 
|                     |  |  |  |                |  |                             |  | Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 107 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 13, 2013. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 890) 

to prohibit waivers relating to compliance with the work requirements for the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families, and for other purposes. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 113–3 shall be 

considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, 

as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
2 

•HRES 107 EH 

Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Richard D. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1067

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

Richard D. Rogers, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Kelsey and Winokur, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM







We have issued our report dated March 23, 2012, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Horne International, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year December
25, 2011. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Home International,
Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-113528, effective March 12, 2004 and File No. 33-114680, effective April 21, 2004).





|                    | 
|------------------- | 
|Baltimore, Maryland | 
|March 31, 2012      |
STATE of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne THIBODEAUX

No. 2018-KH-1239

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Genovese, J., recused.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 30637 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**
versus **Tryton Alonzo Thomas,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:21

- CR

- 275

- 1

**_____________ _________________**  Before **Barksdale, Engelhardt,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Tryton Alonzo Thomas pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine , in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)( 1 ) (prohibiting unlawful acts with controlled substance) , (b)( 1 )( A )(v iii ) ( outlining sentencing for “50 grams or more of m ethamphetamine”) , 846 (prohibiting conspiracy)

. He was sentenced , inter alia , to 262 months ’

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 30, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30637 Document: 00516984754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2023No. 22

- 30637

2 imprisonment , based in part on a career - offender enhancement under Guideline § 4B1.1

. Thomas contends his instant offense is not a qualifying controlled

substance offense

. See Guideline § 4B1.2 cmt. n.1 (amended 2023) (defining terms)

. He maintains : the G uideline language does not include inchoate offenses ; and , alt hough the commentary does include such offenses , the commentary is inconsisten t with the text of the G uideline. Although post

- Booker , the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory only, the district court must avoid significant procedural error, such as improperly calculating the Guidelines sentencing range. Gall v. United States , 552 U. S. 38, 46, 51 (2007). If no such procedural error exists, a properly preserved objection to an ultimate sentence is reviewed for substantive reasonableness under an abuse

- of

- discretion standard. Id . at 51; United States v. Delgado

Martinez , 564 F.3d 750, 751

– 53 (5th Cir. 2009). In that respect, for issues preserved in district court, its application of the Guidelines is reviewed de
novo ; its factual findings, only for clear error. E.g. , United States v. Cisneros

Gutierrez , 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 20 08). As reflected above, Guidelines interpretation and application are reviewed de novo

. E.g. , United States v. Sam , 467 F.3d 857, 861 (5th Cir. 2006). Following completion of briefing in this case, o ur court, en banc , rejected a contention identical to Thomas’

. United States v. Vargas , 74 F.4th 673, 690, 697

– 98 (5th Cir. 2023) (en banc) (“[W]e reaffirm our longstanding precedent that inchoate offenses like conspiracy are included in the definition of ‘ controlled substance offense ’ ”

. )

. **AFF IRMED.**  Case: 22-30637 Document: 00516984754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2023
c54382_ex10-22.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing







	 	Enzon Pharmaceuticals,
        Inc. 
	 	685 Route 202/206 
	Bridgewater, NJ
        08807 
	 	 
	Phone:   	908 541 8600 
	Fax: 	908 575-9457 
	www.enzon.com







April 11, 2006 


NatImmune A/S 

Fruebjergvej 3 box 3

DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø

Denmark 

	Re:  	
 Amendment #1 to License Agreement between NatImmune A/S (“NatImmune”) and	
	 	Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Enzon”) dated September 30, 2005, as amended by	
	 	Amendment #1 dated November 15, 2005 (the “Agreement”)		 





Gentlemen:


We are writing to confirm the agreement between NatImmune and Enzon that Section 2.3 of the Agreement concerning the terms for an agreement respecting the Baltic Countries, which provision was amended from “December 31,
2005” to “March 31, 2006” by Amendment #1, be further amended such that “March 31, 2006” be changed to “September 30, 2006”. 


All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged. Capitalized words used in this letter that are not defined in this letter shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Agreement. 


Please sign below to acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing. 


Yours truly, 

	ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS,
        INC. 	 	Accepted and agreed by: 
	 
	 
	/s/
        Lawrence R. Miller 	 	NATIMMUNE A/S 
	Lawrence R. Miller 	 	 	 
	Vice President and General Counsel 	 	By:   	/s/
        Martin Bonde
	 	 	Name: Martin Bonde 
	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 
	 	 	By: 	/s/
        Claus Berner Møller
	 	 	Name: Claus Berner Møller 
	 	 	Title: Chairman
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 100533-100534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

[RR83550000, 245R5065C6, RX.59389832.1009676]

Change in Discount Rate for Water Resources Planning

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of change in discount rate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is announcing the interest rate to 
be used by Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation of plans 
for water and related land resources is 3.00 percent for fiscal year 
2025.

DATES: This discount rate is to be used for the period October 1, 2024, 
through and including September 30, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandee Blumenthal, Bureau of 
Reclamation, Reclamation Law Administration Division, P.O. Box 25007, 
Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone (303) 445-2435; or email at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 and 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 require an annual 
determination of a discount rate for Federal water resources planning. 
The discount rate for Federal water resources planning for fiscal year 
2025 is 3.00 percent. The prior year's rate, as announced in the 
Federal Register on November 16, 2023 (88 FR 78785), was 2.75 percent 
for fiscal year 2024. Discounting is used to convert future monetary 
values to present values.
    This rate has been computed in accordance with section 80(a), 
Public Law 93-251 (88 Stat. 34), and 18 CFR 704.39, which: (1) specify 
that the rate will be based upon the average yield during the preceding 
fiscal year on interest-bearing marketable securities of the United 
States which, at the time the computation is made, have terms of 15 
years or more remaining to maturity (average yield is rounded to 
nearest one-eighth percent); and (2) provide that the rate will not be 
raised or lowered more than one-quarter of 1 percent for any year. The 
U.S. Department of the Treasury calculated the specified average to be 
4.5055 percent. In accordance with the Water Resource Council Rules and 
Regulations, the maximum adjustment allowed for the current fiscal year 
rate is one-quarter of one percentage point from the previous fiscal 
year rate, which was 2.75 percent. Therefore, the fiscal year 2025 rate 
is 3.00 percent.

[[Page 100534]]

    All Federal agencies will use the rate of 3.00 percent in the 
formulation and evaluation of water and related land resources plans 
for the purpose of discounting future benefits and computing costs or 
otherwise converting benefits and costs to a common-time basis.

Christopher Beardsley,
Director, Mission Assurance and Protection Organization.
[FR Doc. 2024-29263 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 488 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-539, K2025-537.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29723 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Alphonso T. MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy
L. Krist, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Timothy L.
      KristTimothy
      L. KristPrincipal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      OfficerMay
      14, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 679 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 679

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the service in the 
 reserve components of certain persons by honoring them with status as 
                          veterans under law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2013

Mr. Walz (for himself, Mr. Runyan, Mr. Denham, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Latham, 
Mr. Matheson, and Mr. Rahall) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the service in the 
 reserve components of certain persons by honoring them with status as 
                          veterans under law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honor America's Guard-Reserve 
Retirees Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF STATUS UNDER LAW BY HONORING CERTAIN MEMBERS OF 
              THE RESERVE COMPONENTS AS VETERANS.

    (a) Veteran Status.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 38, United States Code, 
        is amended by inserting after section 107 the following new 
        section:
``Sec. 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service 
              in the reserve components
    ``Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of title 10 to 
retired pay for nonregular service or, but for age, would be entitled 
under such chapter to retired pay for nonregular service shall be 
honored as a veteran but shall not be entitled to any benefit by reason 
of this section.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
        item relating to section 107 the following new item:

``107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in 
                            the reserve components.''.
    (b) Clarification Regarding Benefits.--No person may receive any 
benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs solely by reason of section 107A of title 38, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE PETITION OF RILEY M. WAVRA PR 21-0004 

# FILED DEC 29 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana ORDER
Riley M. Wavra has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State Bar ofMontana after having been on inactive status since March 2021. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice oflaw in the state ofMontana. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this

### z9 day ofDecember, 2021. For the Court, By ChiefJustice 12/29/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0004