alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of Louisiana v. Tyronne WILLIAMS

NO. 2017-KO-1965

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

Denied.
Darwin OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)science_science(28)
              - multimedia_image(13)
              - multimedia_image-141771(13)
              - connect_social_media(6)
              - connect_staff_profiles(15)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(11)
              - 2023(7)
              - (-)2022(28)
              - 2021(20)

science explorer topicEarth's Pulse: Hazard Monitoring

science explorer topicHow the Earth Moves

Science Theme        September 26, 2022      Earth MRI

Science Theme        June 23, 2022      Earth History and Climate

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Cryosphere: Earth’s Snow, Ice, and Permafrost

science explorer topicOcean and Climate

science explorer topicPaleoclimate

science explorer themeOcean

science explorer topicMarine Geology

science explorer topicWater and Extreme Weather

science explorer topicCoasts 101

science explorer topicMapping the Seafloor

science explorer topicSnow, Ice, and Permafrost

science explorer themeNatural Hazards

science explorer topicOcean Discovery

Science Theme        July 22, 2022      Geophysical surveys

Science Theme        November 7, 2022      Minerals

Science Theme        December 27, 2022      Integrated Science Approach

Science Theme        December 1, 2022      Research and Development

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Paleoclimate

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Hydrologic Change

Science Theme        July 19, 2022      Geomagnetism

Science Theme        July 15, 2022      Coastal Elevation Data and Mapping

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      Methods

Science Theme        April 25, 2022      Cause and Effect

Science Theme        July 22, 2022      Topographic Lidar Surveys

Science Theme        December 9, 2022      Remote Sensing Research and Development

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      On the Ground
##### 



/s/ Robert E. BeltsRobert E. BeltsPresident of Ironton Iron, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of INTERMET CorporationDate: October 31, 2005
Exhibit 31.2I, Shirley L. Tyler, certify, that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Heritage Bankshares of Florida,Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including our consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.        Date:    March 30, 2007 By:  */s/ Shirley L. Tyler*    Shirley L. Tyler, Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Tommie ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1942

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ARLINGTON-FAIRFAX BROADCASTING CO., Inc.

No. 6558.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 10, 1953.

Decided May 6, 1953.

Robert H. Hurt, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Ows-ley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Norman E. Jorgensen, Washington, D. C. (Krieger & Jorgensen, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent. ,

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SO-PER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board which found respondent guilty of unfair labor practices, ordered it to cease and desist therefrom and to bargain with a union which had been chosen as bargaining representative of its employees and directed that it reinstate with back pay an employee found to have been discriminatorily discharged. The facts are fully and correctly set forth in the decision of the Board and the report of the trial examiner, and what was there said need not be repeated. The findings and order of the board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole and the order will accordingly be enforced.

Order enforced.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 887 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 887

  To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2013

 Mr. Pompeo (for himself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. 
 Westmoreland, Mr. Amash, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Kline, and Mr. Bentivolio) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``EDA Elimination Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Termination.--The Economic Development Administration is 
terminated.
    (b) Repeal.--The Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 
(42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) is repealed.
    (c) Conclusion of Business.--The Secretary of Commerce shall take 
such actions as may be necessary and appropriate to conclude the 
outstanding affairs of the Economic Development Administration, 
including dispositions of personnel, assets, and obligations.
    (d) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--This section may not be 
construed to prevent the expenditure of any funds received before the 
effective date of this Act. Such funds shall be subject to the laws and 
regulations that would have applied to the funds if this section had 
not been enacted.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal 
year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 34.2



Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
General Electric Capital Corporation:



We have examined management’s assessment,
included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliance, that General Electric Capital Corporation (the “Company”)
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB
for asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving private-label and co-branded credit
card receivables and excluding private asset-backed securities transactions involving receivables that are not originated through
the retail card segment of Synchrony Financial, formerly known as GE Capital Retail Finance (the Platform), as of and for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2014. Management has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii) and 1122(d)(1)(iv) are applicable
to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, and that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are
not applicable to the servicing services provided by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to Management’s
Assessment of Compliance identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting
the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance
with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions
and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.
Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing
criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assessment
that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 2015
# C_2020370EN.01002801.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/28

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR CYBERSECURITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/28)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.enisa.europa.eu/about-enisa/accounting-finance

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Intermountain Community Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we,Curt Hecker, Chief Executive Officer, and Doug Wright, Chief Financial
Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 17, 2006

/s/ Curt Hecker                                        /s/ Doug Wright
---------------                                        ---------------
Curt Hecker                                            Doug Wright
Chief Executive Officer                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL COMPLIANCE
CERTIFICATE



SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL (the “Servicer”)
hereby certifies as of December 31, 2018 as follows:



|1. | The Servicer has reviewed, for the period beginning January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018: (a) the activities of
the Servicer as they related to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2003, between the Servicer, as successor-in-interest
to GE Capital, and Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust (formerly known as GE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust) (the “Servicing
Agreement”) and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement. Such review of the activities of
the Servicer and the performance by the Servicer of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement has been made by persons under
the direct supervision of the undersigned.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects for the period beginning
January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This report is delivered pursuant
to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.










| | SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL
| | -------------------
| |                    
| | By:                
| | Name:              
| | Title:             



| | SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL          
| | -----------------------------
| | Annual Compliance Certificate
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(11)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(4)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - (-)texas(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Mapping Roadways at Landsat Scale
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

      (1)   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirement
            of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                                     /s/  Thomas F. Rokisky
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Thomas F. Rokisky
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     May 12, 2005

                                       27
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - (-)wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 18, 2021        PubTalk-11/2021: Busting Myths About One of the Largest Volcanic Systems in the World - The Top 10 Misconceptions about Yellowstone Volcanism

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for November 1, 2022
Darlene GATLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1677

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IBX Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alvin Brovenick,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


         Dated:  May 25, 2004           /s/ Alvin Brovenick
                                        -------------------
                                        Alvin Brovenick
                                        Treasurer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2008/s/ Eddie R. MunsonEddie R. MunsonChief Financial Officer
Larry Darnell PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1275

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.