alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

INTERVIDEO, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randall Bambrough, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of InterVideo, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InterVideo, Inc.

Date: November 9, 2006



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Randall Bambrough                                                                 
|Randall Bambrough Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellant, v. T.S., Mother of P.T., Z.T., J.T., and C.T., Children, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Keith R. Marchiando, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

                                        /s/ Keith R. Marchiando
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Keith R. Marchiando
                                        Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)

March 10, 2006

                                     103
# C_2020422EN.01000101.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9868 — Raytheon Technologies Corporation/Saudi Arabian Oil Company/Middle East Cyber Services JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 422/01)

On 10 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9868. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9868. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
MDM TOOL SUPPLY, LLC v. Jeremy Wade GUIDRY

NO. 2018-CC-1776

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Stay denied. Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           e-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of e-Smart Technologies, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 24, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Certified Services, Inc.

Date:  December 30, 2003


By:   /s/  Mary A. Grace
   ---------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer,
and Chief Financial Officer


Note: The certification the Registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly
stated in such filing.
Lysander LONGMIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2217

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 30, 2018

Lysander Longmire, Lowell, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**Zeigler v. State* , 632 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla. 1993) (citing *Demps v. State* , 515 So.2d 196, 198 (Fla. 1987) ).

ORFINGER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Kenneth T. MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2628

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kimberly Jean KLEINHENZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1246

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 4, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Terrel Allen LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Oscar Kito RIVERA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3439

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,each of the undersigned officers of Cascades Inc. (the
Corporation), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



|1) | the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Report) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Corporation as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated March 28, 2014



/s/ Mario PlourdeName: Mario PlourdeTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Allan HoggName: Allan HoggTitle: Vice - President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Rufus MILLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 18, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 30, 2018

Rufus Miller, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Makar, Osterhaus, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Mayo WHITTON, Dea Whitton, Chris Whitton, Cody Whitton, Shiras Whitton, Individually, and on Behalf of His Minor Child, Rylance C. Whitton v. The LOUISIANA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, ASD Consultant, Inc., and Louisiana Systems Built Home, LLC

NO. 2018-CC-1372

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED
STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 28, 2006
 KAYDON CORPORATION
  Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    0-12640
(Commission
File Number)
    
    13-3186040
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 
  
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXPress Release, dated April 28, 2006    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
  
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99
    
    Press Release dated April 28, 2006




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  April 28, 2006
    
    KAYDON CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Kenneth W. Crawford

Kenneth W. CrawfordVice President and Corporate Controller




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99
    
    Press Release dated April 28, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registered fourth quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 10, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Carmen L. DiersenCarmen L. DiersenTitle: Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
STATE EX REL. Paul E. CAMPBELL v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1494

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF VERMILION**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 100557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29192]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 814 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-522, K2025-520.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29192 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2020379EN.01002101.xml

| 10.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/21

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2020/C 379/08)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 1.10.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.10.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | LEZ/*8ABDE (special condition to LEZ/07.) |
| Species | Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.) |
| Zone | 8a, 8b, 8d and 8e |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 24/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

1.10.2020

Duration

1.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

LEZ/*8ABDE (special condition to LEZ/07.)

Species

Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.)

Zone

8a, 8b, 8d and 8e

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

24/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(8)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(3)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(3)
              - montana(4)
              - (-)nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(47)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(11)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        August 19, 2007        Water Vision
STATE EX REL. Anthony Paul JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1527

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

*986Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 977 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 977

                   For the relief of Esther Karinge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2013

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Esther Karinge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ESTHER KARINGE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Esther Karinge shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Esther Karinge enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Esther Karinge, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Esther 
Karinge shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
M.T., The Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-314

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 20, 2018.

M.T., the father, in proper person.

Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children and Families; Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee (Sanford), for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program; Children & Youth Law Clinic, and Robert Latham, for R.T., the child.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.