alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 514 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-657, K2025-656.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29845 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141771(14)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(5)
              - california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - (-)virginia(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Featured Story        April 18, 2022        From the Seafloor to Outer Space, USGS is on the Case
Gerard DELELLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-61

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SARBANES-OXLEY CERTIFICATION

                          SARBANES-OXLEY CERTIFICATION

I, Keith D. Browning, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
         CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2003-1;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
         agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
         fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
         reports.


Date: May 28, 2004                                  /s/ Keith D. Browning
                                                    Keith D. Browning
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ RAJ K. PATEL, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1323

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:22

- cv

- 00734

- LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.

______________________
P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R Raj K. Patel appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ August 12, 2022, judgment dismissing his complaint. In response to the court’s March 2 , 202 3, show

cause order, the United States urges dismissal of this appeal as untimely

. Mr . Patel “ move[s] .

. . to allow the Case: 23-1323 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2023PATEL v. US 2

appeal

, ” ECF No. 13 at 1 , and suggests that this case may be consolidated with Appeal No. 2023

- 1325

. *

The timely filing of a notice of appeal from the Court of Federal Claims is “a jurisdictional requirement” and “not subject t o equitable tolling

. ” Marandola v. United States

, 518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citation omitted)

. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court ofFederal Claims within 60 days after the entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § § 2107, 2522; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) ; Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C)

. In this case, it is undisputed that Mr. P atel’s notice of appeal was filed 137 days after final judgment . Thus, we lack jurisdiction over Mr. Patel’s untimely appeal

. To the extent that Mr. Patel’s response argues that this appeal can be deemed timely based

on this court’s jurisdiction over his separate appeal involving a different underlying case , we must reject that argument at least because his notice of appeal in that case filed on December 21, 2022, was likewise not filed within 60 days of entry of final judgment in this case

. Accord ingly

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The appeal is dismissed

. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs

.

April 21 , 2023 Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

* T he court notes that it granted the United States’ motion for summary affirmance in Appeal No. 2023

- 1325 on March 7, 2023

. Case: 23-1323 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 04/21/2023
Exhibit 10.1


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	
  $3,000,000

  	
  Austin, Texas     

  



 


July 23, 2008


 


Valence
Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”), hereby promises
to pay to the order of Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC (“Lender”),
or its successors and assigns, in lawful money of the United States of America,
Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000), together with accrued and unpaid interest
thereon, September 15, 2008 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


The
unpaid principal amount of this Promissory Note shall bear interest at a rate
per annum equal to 8.0% calculated on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual
number of days elapsed.


 


This
Promissory Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, without premium
or penalty.


 


In
the event that Lender purchases any equity securities of Maker from Maker after
the date of this Promissory Note, all principal and accrued but unpaid interest
then outstanding hereunder may be used by Lender as full or partial, as the
case may be, satisfaction of the purchase price of such equity securities.  In the event that Lender exercises such right
and the entire principal and accrued but unpaid interest then outstanding
hereunder is used to purchase all or a portion of such equity securities, then
all indebtedness and obligations hereunder shall be canceled and extinguished
concurrently therewith.


 


Maker
hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest, notice of
protest and all other demands, protests and notices in connection with the
execution, delivery, performance, collection and enforcement of this Promissory
Note.  Maker shall pay all costs of
collection when incurred, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and
expenses.


 


This
Promissory Note is being delivered in, is intended to be performed in, shall be
construed and interpreted in accordance with, and be governed by the internal
laws of, the State of Texas, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.


 


This
Promissory Note may only be amended, modified or terminated or any provision
hereof waived by an agreement in writing signed by the party to be
charged.  This Promissory Note shall be
binding upon the successors and assigns of Maker and inure to the benefit of
Lender and its successors, endorsees and assigns.


 


	
   

  	
  VALENCE
  TECHNOLOGY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Robert L. Kanode

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Robert L. Kanode

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  CEO & President
KPMG
LLPSuite 2000355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA
90071-1568

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors American Honda Finance
Corporation

Members of the Board:

We have examined
management's assertion about American Honda Finance
Corporation's (the Company's) compliance with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers,
as they relate to the servicing of retail automobile loan contracts, as
of and for the year ended March 31, 2005 included in the accompanying
management's assertion. The minimum servicing standards not
considered by the Company to be applicable to the servicing of retail
automobile loans include procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section I –
Custodial Bank Accounts, procedures 1, 2, 3, and 4 of section III
– Disbursements and procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section V –
Mortgage Loan Accounting. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based
on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and, accordingly, including examining, on a test basis,
evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, American Honda Finance Corporation has complied, in
all material respects, with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended March 31, 2005.

/s/ KPMG LLP

June 7,
2005

---
Terry T. RAWLS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby                           ( print page 102976)                        gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 989 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-734, K2025-733.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30050 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 941 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to 

borrow amounts from the Treasury is used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2013 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To ensure that any authority of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund to borrow amounts from the Treasury is 

used only to pay mortgage insurance claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘End Unnecessary Bor5 rowing Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF BORROWING AUTHORITY. 

7 Paragraph (2) of section 206(f) of the National 

8 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1711(f)(2)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 941 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraphs: 

3 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed 

4 to authorize or require the Secretary to borrow any 

5 amounts to comply with the capital ratio require6 ment under such subparagraph. 

7 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, any authority of the Secretary under this Act 

9 or otherwise to borrow amounts from the Treasury 

10 of the United States for the Mutual Mortgage Insur11 ance Fund may be used only to the extent necessary 

12 to pay claims on mortgage insurance that is an obli13 gation of such Fund.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS