F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 26 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

BEAR LODGE MULTIPLE USE

ASSOCIATION, A Wyoming Non-profit

Corporation; ANDY PETEFISH, doing

business as Tower Guides; KENNETH D.

ALLEN; GARY W. ANDERSON;

GREGORY HAUBER; WES BUSH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

BRUCE BABBITT, in his official

capacity as United States Department of

the Interior Secretary; ROGER G.

KENNEDY, in his official capacity as

Director of the National Park Service;

JOHN E. COOK, in his official capacity

as Rocky Mountain Regional Director,

National Park Service; DEBORAH O.

LIGGETT, in her official capacity as

Superintendent of Devil's Tower National

Monument; NATIONAL PARK

SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees,

CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE;

ROMANUS BEAR STOPS; BURDELL

BLUE ARM; ARVOL LOOKING

HORSE; STEVEN VANCE,

Defendants-Intervenors - 

Appellees,

No. 98-8021
- 2 -

GROUP OF CONCERNED SCHOLARS;

MEDICINE WHEEL COALITION ON

SACRED SITES OF NORTH

AMERICA, NORTHERN ARAPAHO

TRIBE, SISSETONWAHPETON SIOUX TRIBE, UPPER

SIOUX INDIAN COMMUNITY;

NATIONAL CONGRESS OF

AMERICAN INDIANS; THE BAPTIST

JOINT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC

AFFAIRS; THE BECKET FUND FOR

RELIGIOUS LIBERTY; BUREAU OF

CATHOLIC INDIAN MISSIONS;

CLIFTON KIRKPATRICK, AS STATED

CLERK OF THE GENERAL

ASSEMBLY; THE PRESBYTERIAN

CHURCH (U.S.A.); ENRIGHT

BIGHORN, AS STATED CLERK OF

THE DAKOTA PRESBYTERY IN THE

SYNOD OF LAKES & PRAIRIES AND

THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

(U.S.A.); THE EVANGELICAL

LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA;

FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON 

NATIONAL LEGISLATION;

GENERAL CONFERENCE OF

SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS;

NATIONAL JEWISH COMMISSION

ON LAW AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS;

PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES;

UNION OF AMERICAN HEBREW

CONGREGATIONS; UNION OF

ORTHODOX JEWISH

CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA,

 Amici Curiae.

 
- 3 -

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING

(D.C. No. 96-CV-063-D)

William Perry Pendley, (Todd S. Welch, with him on the briefs), Mountain States Legal

Foundation, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jared A. Goldstein, United States Department of Justice, Environmental & Natural

Resources Division (Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General; John A. Bryson, United

States Department of Justice, Environmental & Natural Resources Division, with him on

the briefs), Washington, D.C.; for Defendants-Appellees.

Steven J. Gunn, Indian Law Resource Center (Steven C. Emery and Thomas J. Van

Norman, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Eagle Butte, South Dakota, with him on the brief),

Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees.

Peter G. Griffin, Jacobson, Buffalo, Schoessler & Magnuson, LTD., Minneapolis,

Minnesota: Jack F. Trope, Sant’Angelo and Trope, P.C., Cranford, New Jersey: Steven C.

Moore and Walter R. Echo-Hawk, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado:

Kevin J. Hasson and Eric W. Treene, The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty,

Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

Before PORFILIO, MCKAY, and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

Devils Tower is a National Monument, as well as the place of creation and

religious practice for many American Indians. Rock climbers use the Tower for

recreational and commercial climbing ascents. Over the past 30 years rock climbing on

Devils Tower has dramatically increased, affecting the environment and the spiritual life
1Plaintiffs-appellants (Climbers) include: Bear Lodge Multiple Use Association,

an organization whose stated objectives are to develop management goals for natural

resources and to maintain public access to the sites; Andy Petefish, the owner of a

commercial guiding service at Devils Tower; and three long-time recreational climbers of

Devils Tower.

2Devils Tower is referred to by many American Indians as “Mato Tipila” which

(continued...)

- 4 -

and practices of Americans Indians. To address the various concerns, the National Park

Service (NPS) developed a Final Climbing Management Plan for Devils Tower National

Monument (FCMP). In addition to providing educational and environmental programs,

the FCMP asks that climbers voluntarily refrain from climbing during the month of June

when American Indians engage in the Sun Dance and other ceremonies. The Secretary of

the Interior (Secretary) approved the plan. Bear Lodge Municipal Use Association and

other climbers (Climbers)1 challenged the Secretary’s approval, arguing the FCMP

violates the Establishment Clause. The district court found the FCMP balanced the

competing interests and observed the Constitution, and was therefore within Secretarial

discretion in managing Devils Tower National Monument. Our jurisdiction arises

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We believe the Climbers alleged no injury and, therefore,

lacked standing to sue. 

I.

The Devils Tower National Monument, a 600-foot butte, is located in northeastern

Wyoming. The FCMP reports that Devils Tower2

 is a "sacred site" to indigenous peoples
2

(...continued)

means “Bear Lodge” in Lakota, or “He Hota Paha,” which means “Grey Horn Butte” in

Lakota. It is also called “Bear’s Tipi” in Arapahoe, “Bear’s House” in Crow, and “Tree

Rock” in Kiowa.

- 5 -

of the northern plains who travel to the monument to perform "traditional cultural

activities." Devils Tower is also eligible for inclusion to the National Register of Historic

Places as a traditional cultural property. In recent years, the Tower has been increasingly

used by recreational and commercial rock climbers. Devils Tower, therefore, implicates

interests of several American Indian tribes, rock climbers, and the National Park Service.

American Indians at Devils Tower

The Intervenors Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, et al., and members of numerous

other Indian tribes have long viewed Devils Tower as a sacred site of special religious

and cultural significance. The NPS explains, “archaeological evidence has revealed that

the ancestors to the Lakota people inhabited the Devils Tower area as far back as 1000

A.D., while ancestors to the Shoshone people inhabited the area in the 1500's.” The

historical use of Devils Tower and surrounding areas by Lakota people was

acknowledged by the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868. Amici Concerned Scholars state,

“Devils Tower is central to [the Indians’] etiological explanation of the universe.” The

most sacred religious artifact of the Sioux people is the White Buffalo Calf Pipe, given to

them by White Buffalo Calf Woman at the beginning of creation when she emerged from

Devils Tower. The Tower is prominent in other religiously relevant traditional stories of

the Sioux, as well as in the cosmology of numerous other northern plains tribes. 
3

In addition to the Intervenor Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, the Arapahoe, Crow,

Kiowa, Lakota (Sioux), and Wind River (Easter Shoshone) tribes historically occupied

the Devils Tower region, dating back before Wyoming was established as a territory or

Devils Tower became a National Monument.

- 6 -

According to Intervenor Romanus Bear Stops, a traditional spiritual leader of the

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Devils Tower is also a pilgrimage site where important

liturgical functions are performed. At Devils Tower, Indian people3 partake in Sun

Dances and individual Vision Quests. The Sun Dance is a group ceremony of fasting and

sacrifice which leads to spiritual renewal of the individual and group as a whole. Sun

Dances are performed around the summer solstice. Vision Quests are intense periods of

prayer, fasting, sweat lodge purification, and solitude designed to connect with the

spiritual world and gain insight. Sun Dances and Vision Quests, as well as individualized

prayer offerings and sweat lodge ceremonies, require solemnity and solitude.

The district court did not question the sincerity of the religious practices at Devils

Tower. Intervenors explain these traditional religious uses of the Tower are:

vital to the health of our nation and to our self-determination as a Tribe. 

Those who use the butte to pray become stronger. They gain sacred

knowledge from the spirits that helps us to preserve our Lakota culture and

way of life. They become leaders. Without their knowledge and

leadership, we cannot continue to determine our destiny.

Amici Concerned Scholars state “as with most cultural groups, traditional religious

practice[s] are essential to maintaining a stable and healthy community for Indian

people.” 
4As early as 1818, the United States contracted with Christian missionary societies

to organize and run boarding schools which enrolled Indian students, either voluntarily or

by force. See Francis E. Leupp, Former Commissioner of Indian Affairs, THE INDIAN

AND HIS PROBLEM, 138 (1971 ed., originally printed in 1910). Consistent with

President Grant’s “Peace Policy,” religious orders were given general administrative

control of reservations in the 1870's. See, e.g., Annual Report of the Commissioner of

Indian Affairs (November 1, 1872) (listing reservation assignments to various religious

orders).

- 7 -

Federal Policy on Indian Religious Worship

As the various amici inform us, past federal policy was to assimilate American

Indians into United States culture, in part by deliberately suppressing, and even

destroying, traditional tribal religions and culture in the 19th and early 20th centuries. 

The government provided direct and indirect support to Christian missionaries who

sought to convert and civilize the Indians, and “from the 1890's to 1930's, the

government moved beyond promoting voluntary abandonment of tribal religions to, in

some instances, affirmatively prohibiting those religions.” Jack F. Trope, Protecting

Native American Religious Freedom: The Legal, Historical, and Constitutional Basis for

the Proposed Native American Free Exercise of Religion Act, 20 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc.

Change 373, 374 (1993).4 By the late 19th Century federal attempts to replace traditional

Indian religions with Christianity grew violent. In 1890 for example, the United States

Calvary shot and killed 300 unarmed Sioux men, women and children en route to an

Indian religious ceremony called the Ghost Dance; these included individuals from the

Intervenors’ tribe. In 1892, Congress outlawed the practice of traditional Indian religious
5See also, Dept. of the Interior, Regulations of the Indian Office 106 (1894)

(prohibiting the Sun Dance).

- 8 -

rituals on reservation land. Engaging in the Sun Dance, one of the ceremonies at issue in

this case, was punishable by withholding 10 days’ rations or 10 days’ imprisonment. See

H. Exec. Doc. No. 1 part 5, vol. II, 53 Cong., 2d Sess., at 28-31, reprinted Francis Paul

Prucha, S.J., AMERICANIZATION OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN: WRITINGS

FROM THE FRIENDS OF THE INDIANS 1880-1900 (1973), 300-05.5 This and other

laws disrupted and harmed Indian practices, but many, including the Sun Dance and

others at issue in this case, survived.

Starting in the 1930's federal policy toward Indians changed, and over the past 65

years, has valued and protected tribal governments and cultures. In 1978, Congress

enacted the American Indian Religious Freedom Act creating a government-wide policy

to protect Indian sacred sites and traditional forms of worship. See 42 U.S.C. § 1996

(1994). In 1990, Congress passed the Native American Graves and Repatriation Act

(NAGPRA) requiring federal land managers, including the NPS, to protect Indian graves,

consult with Indian tribes concerning religious and cultural sites and objects, and to

repatriate cultural and religious items found on federal lands. See 25 U.S.C. § 3001

(1995). Under the National Historical Preservation Act Amendments of 1992, “properties

of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe ... may be determined

eligible for inclusion on the National Register” and federal agencies, including the NPS
6See, e.g., 16 U.S.C. § 460uu-47 (1993 & 1998 Supp.) (authorizing access to and

temporary closures of El Malpais National Monument for traditional cultural and

religious purposes); 16 U.S.C. § 410pp-6 (1992 & 1998 Supp.) (authorizing temporary

closures of Cibola Historical Park for Indian religious services); 16 U.S.C. § 228i(c)

(1992) (preserving access to Grand Canyon National Park for Indian religious purposes);

16 U.S.C. § 41011-4 (1992) (preserving access to federal park lands or archaeological

sites for traditional Indian religious purposes); 25 U.S.C. §§ 640d-20 (1995) (providing

the Navajo and Hopi tribes with rights to use and access sacred sites).

- 9 -

are directed to consult “with any tribe ... that attaches religious and cultural significance

to [such] properties.” 16 U.S.C. § 470a(d)(6)(A)-(B) (1985 & 1998 Supp.) The federal

government acknowledges that site specific worship is vital to Indian religious practices. 

Recently the executive branch has ordered federal agencies to: (1) accommodate access to

and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites by Indian religious practitioners and (2) avoid

aversely affecting the physical integrity of such sacred sites. See Exec. Order 13007, 61

Fed. Reg. 26771 (1996). Numerous other laws generally protect Indian religion and

allow access to and/or temporary closure of specific tribal sacred sites located on federal

lands.6

Climbers at Devils Tower

The Climbers explain “climbing on Devils Tower is recognized by the NPS ‘as a

legitimate recreational and historic activity.’” There is evidence of climbing on the

Tower as far back as 1893, and the first “technical climb” occurred in 1937. Climbing at

Devils Tower accounted for 1.3% of the annual visitations to the Monument for the years

1989 to 1995, and climbing in the month of June constituted 0.25% of the annual
- 10 -

visitation for those same years. According to the Climbers, from 1989 through 1994,

June has been the most popular month for climbing Devils Tower. The FCMP reported: 

Recreational climbing at Devils Tower has increased dramatically from 312

climbers in 1973 to over 6,000 annually. New route development in the last

ten years resulted [in] accelerated route development and bolt placement.

Today the tower has about 220 named routes. Approximately 600 metal

bolts are currently embedded in the rock along with several hundred metal

pitons. Devils Tower is world famous for its crack climbing, which

depends primarily on removable protection placed by climbers in cracks. 

Activities performed by the numerous climbers on the tower during

the spring through fall climbing season have affected nesting raptors, soil,

vegetation, the integrity of the rock, the area's natural quiet, and the rock's

physical appearance. Some American Indians have complained that the

presence of climbers on the sacred butte and the placement of bolts in the

rock has adversely impacted their traditional activities and seriously

impaired the spiritual quality of the site.

(FCMP at iii). In addition to placing permanent and temporary metal “protection” in the

rock, climbing requires climbers to yell certain commands to their partners. Climbers

have also taken pictures of Native Americans in ceremonies, removed sacred prayer

bundles, and intruded on solitude. 

The Climbers acknowledge that “privacy is considered essential . . .for many of the

religious practices of some American Indians, including Vision Quests, the leaving of

prayer offerings, sweatlodge rites, [and] the Sun Dance.” However, their brief describes: 

In a survey performed in June and July of 1992 by a group independent of

the NPS, climbers were asked specifically if their “views of climbing would

change if they knew that Native Americans considered it a sacred site and

objected to climbing.” Sixty-seven (67) percent said their view of climbing

would not change out of respect for the religious beliefs of some Native

Americans and “that they would continue to climb the tower.”
7President Roosevelt declared the Tower is “a natural wonder and an object of

historic and great scientific interest ... [and] warning is hereby given to all unauthorized

persons not to appropriate, injure, or destroy any feature of the natural tower.”

Presidential Proclamation No. 458, 34 Stat. 3236, 3237 (Sept. 24, 1906).

8

In 1994, the NPS counted 6,035 climbers on Devils Tower. NPS indicated the

total recreational users of Devils Tower number nearly half a million per year, of which

climbers constitute 1.3%.

- 11 -

The Climbers also contend “climber-watching” is a favorite activity of numerous visitors

to Devils Tower. All of the individual named plaintiffs in this case continue to climb at

Devils Tower.

National Park Service Plan

In 1906, President Roosevelt established Devils Tower and the 1300-acre area

surrounding it as the first national monument. See Presidential Proclamation No. 658, 34

Stat. 3236 (Sept. 24, 1906). Since 1916, Devils Tower has been under the management of

the National Park Service, an agency of the Department of the Interior. Under its

governing statute, NPS must protect the values for which Devils Tower National

Monument was established. See 16 U.S.C. 1a-1 (1988).7 In its appellate brief, NPS

explains one of the primary bases for the Tower’s designation as a National Monument is 

“the prominent role it has played in the cultures of several American Indian tribes of the

North Plains. ” 

Recognizing that increasing climbing activity8 affects the environment as well as

“the ability of American Indians to engage in their ceremonial activities in peace,” NPS

began preparing a draft climbing management plan in 1992. Its objectives were to
- 12 -

“manag[e] climbing so as to preserve and protect the monument’s natural and cultural

resources, and to increase visitor awareness of American Indian beliefs and traditional

practices at Devils Tower.” With the assistance of environmentalists, county officials,

climbers, and representatives of American Indian communities, NPS issued a draft

climbing management plan in July 1994, and made available 1200 copies to interested

parties. A public comment period lasted until the end of October 1994, during which

NPS received nearly 300 written comments, and also recorded oral comments at six

public meetings held around the region. The NPS issued the “Final Climbing

Management Plan / Finding of No Significant Impact for Devils Tower National

Monument” in February 1995. The FCMP "sets a new direction for managing climbing

activity at the Tower for the next three to five years.” FCMP at i. Its purpose is "to

protect the natural and cultural resources of Devils Tower and to provide for visitor

enjoyment and appreciation of this unique feature." Id. To protect against any new

physical impacts to the Tower, the FCMP provides that no new bolts or fixed pitons will

be permitted on the Tower, and new face routes requiring new bolt installation will not be

permitted. Id. at 24-25. The FCMP does allow individuals to replace already existing

bolts and fixed pitons. Id. at 25. In addition, the plan calls for access trails to be

rehabilitated and maintained, and requires camouflaged climbing equipment, and

climbing routes to be closed seasonally to protect raptor nests. Id. at 24-29. The FCMP

further provides that "[i]n respect for the reverence many American Indians hold for
9The sign is posted by the NPS at the base of the Tower and reads, “The Tower is

sacred to American Indians. Please stay on the trail.”

- 13 -

Devils Tower as a sacred site, rock climbers will be asked to voluntarily refrain from

climbing on Devils Tower during the culturally significant month of June." Id. at i.

The NPS represents it will rely on climbers' self-regulation and a new educational

program “to motivate climbers and other park visitors to comply" with the FCMP. Id. at

22. The NPS has also placed a sign encouraging visitors to stay on the trail surrounding

the Tower.9

 The FCMP provides for evaluation of the plan after three to five years. 

Factors indicating an unsuccessful voluntary closure would include little to no decrease in

the number of climbers, an increase in the number of unregistered climbers, and increased

conflict between user groups in the park. Id. at 23. The voluntary closure will be "fully

successful when every climber personally chooses not to climb at Devils Tower during

June out of respect for American Indian cultural values." Id. However, the FCMP

recognizes, “the value of a voluntary closure is that individuals can make a personal

choice about climbing. Climbers can regulate themselves by deciding if they want to

refrain from June climbing out of respect for American Indian cultural values.” Id. at 22.

If NPS determines that voluntary June closure and the educational programs have

not been successful, it will consider several actions, including, but not limited to:

(a) revise the climbing management plan; (b) reconvene a climbing

management plan work group; (c) institute additional measures to further

encourage compliance; (d) change the duration and nature of the voluntary
- 14 -

closure; (e) convert the June closure to mandatory; (f) write a new

definition of success for the voluntary closure.

Id. at 23.

The NPS plans to comply with its June closure by not allowing NPS staff to climb

on the Tower in June except to enforce laws and regulations or to perform emergency

operations. Originally, the plan also contained a provision stating that commercial use

licenses for climbing guide activities would not be issued by the NPS for the month of

June. Id. at 22. The Climbers filed a motion to enjoin NPS from imposing the ban on

commercial climbing during the month of June. The district court granted the motion in

June 1996. In December of that year, the Secretary issued a decision revoking the

commercial climbing ban.

Although the FCMP no longer calls for a ban on commercial climbing in the

month June, the Climbers argue that the Secretary wrongfully contends he has the power

to impose such a rule. Other provisions objected to by the Climbers remain in the plan. 

These include the voluntary ban on climbing in June; an interpretive education program

which explains the religious and cultural significance that the Monument has among some

American Indians; and finally, the placement of signs which encourage people to remain

on the trail surrounding the Tower. 

II.
10We are not, as the Climbers erroneously argue, reviewing a grant of summary

judgment in favor of the Secretary. If the standing issue did not preclude us from doing

so, we would review de novo the district court’s decision the Secretary acted within his

discretion in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-

706. See Public Lands Council v. Babbit,154 F.3d 1160, 1166 (10th Cir. 1998).

11Apparently, the Climbers have abandoned their argument, totally rejected by the

district court, that the interpretive program and sign injured school children visiting the

(continued...)

- 15 -

Before the district court, the Climbers challenged the Secretary’s approval of the

FCMP, arguing the FCMP violated the Establishment Clause. The district court decided

on the merits that the Secretary’s approval of the NPS plan was “a lawful and legitimate

exercise of [his] authority ... carefully crafted to balance the competing needs of

individuals using Devil’s Tower ... while ... obeying the edicts of the Constitution.”10

On appeal, the Climbers again raise their Establishment Clause claim, and the Secretary

responds the Climbers lack standing to sue. The Secretary points out:

FCMP has not caused any injury to Bear Lodge or its members because they

remain free to climb Devils Tower any time they choose, including during

June.... Indeed, while many climbers have chosen not to climb during the

month of June out of respect for American Indian use of the site, appellants

Andy Petefish, Gary Anderson, Kenneth Allen, Gregory Hauber, and Wes

Bush have continued to climb in June.

Nonetheless, the Climbers contend even if they have climbed, other members of the Bear

Lodge Multiple Use Association have been “coerced by the ban into refraining from

climbing. Thus even if the named plaintiffs were found to lack standing, other

Association members suffer the injury in fact necessary to confer standing on the

association itself.”11
11(...continued)

Monument, thereby conferring standing on the Climbers.

- 16 -

 The United States Supreme Court articulated the standing requirements in Lujan v.

Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 112 S. Ct. 2130 (1992). In that case, several

environmental organizations dedicated to wildlife conservation and other environmental

causes, sought to challenge the Secretary of the Interior's reinterpretation of section

7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536. The Court outlined the three

essential elements necessary to establish standing:

First, the plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact"–an invasion of a

legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b)

actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical. Second, there must be a

causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of–the

injury has to be fairly ... trace[able] to the challenged action of the

defendant, and not ... th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third

party not before the court. Third, it must be likely, as opposed to merely

speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. 

Id. at 560-61 (internal quotations and citations omitted). The party invoking federal

jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing these elements and of coming forward with

evidence of specific facts which prove standing. Id. at 561. 

Establishing injury in fact requires "a factual showing of perceptible harm." Id. at

566 (quoting United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures, 412

U.S. 669, 688, 93 S. Ct. 2405, 2416 (1973)); see also Department of Commerce v.

United States House of Representatives, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S. Ct. 765, 766-67 (1999)

(To establish standing, a plaintiff must allege personal injury which is fairly traceable to
- 17 -

defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct, and which is likely to be redressed by the

requested relief.). We have held, "to satisfy Article III's case or controversy requirement,

a litigant in federal court is required to establish its own injury in fact." National Council

for Improved Health v. Shalala, 122 F.3d 878, 882 (10th Cir. 1997) (emphasis added). 

Although a given action may cause harm to third persons, "a litigant may invoke only its

own constitutional rights and may not assert rights of others not before the court." Id.

The named individual recreational climbers whose climbing activities have been

undeterred by the FCMP have established no injury in fact and therefore do not have

standing. Further, the district court found commercial climbing guide Andy Petefish did

not substantiate his claim of economic injury as a result of the voluntary closure, and he

has provided no additional substantiation here. Even if other Bear Lodge members have

elected not to climb in June, that decision is one of several choices available under the

plan and is not an injury conferring standing. As the district court held, the possibility of

mandatory closure is a “remote and speculative possibility,” and is just one of many

possibilities FCMP will consider if the present plan proves unsuccessful. The Climbers’

fear of an outright climbing ban in June does not satisfy the constitutional requirement for

an injury in fact, which must be “actual or imminent not conjectural or hypothetical.” 

Bennett v. Spear, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S. Ct. 1154, 1163 (1997).

In short, the Climbers “claim that the Constitution has been violated, [but] they

claim nothing else. They fail to identify any personal injury suffered by them as a
- 18 -

consequence of the alleged constitutional error.” Valley Forge Christian College v.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 485, 102

S. Ct. 752, 765 (1982). The Climbers are clearly incensed by the NPS’ request that they

voluntarily limit their climbing, but 

standing is not measured by the intensity of the litigant's interest or the

fervor of his advocacy. That concrete adverseness which sharpens the

presentation of issues, is the anticipated consequence of proceedings

commenced by one who has been injured in fact; it is not a permissible

substitute for the showing of injury itself.

 

Id. at 486, 102 S. Ct. at 766 (internal quotations and citations omitted). Because they

have alleged no injury as a result of their claim the FCMP improperly establishes religion,

we hold the Climbers have no standing to sue in this case.

III.

 We believe the Climbers’ lack of standing is dispositive. Therefore, we do not

reach either the Climbers’ argument the FCMP establishes religion or the Secretary’s

response that the plan was designed, in part, to eliminate barriers to American Indians’

free practice of religion and such accommodation is appropriate in situations like this

where the impediments arise because the sacred place of worship is found on property of

the United States. 

AFFIRMED.