alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 501 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-590, K2025-589.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29769 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2020249EN.01000701.xml

| 29.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/7

---

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2020/649

(2020/C 249/03)

Pursuant to Article 2 of Council Decision (EU) 2020/649 of 7 May 2020 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union during the 56th session of the Committee of Experts for the Carriage of Dangerous Goods of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail as regards certain amendments to Appendix C to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (1), the Commission informs that the decisions taken at the body and applicable from 1 January 2021 are available at:

http://otif.org/fileadmin/new/2-Activities/2D-Dangerous-Goods/2Df-Notifications/2021/NOT-RID-20016-e-amendments_2021_RID.pdf

---

(1)  OJ L 153, 15.5.2020, p. 1.

---
Erik SANDERSON, Individually; Technomarine Construction, Inc., a Florida Corporation; and Technomarine Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellants, v. Christopher KARCH, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 21, 2018]

Thomas J. Ali of Jupiter Legal Advocates, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.

Alan B. Rose and Gregory S. Weiss of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.**See**Bank of Am., N.A. v. Ribaudo* , 199 So.3d 407, 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (holding that the court's "clear errors" in failing to consider relevant factors before striking a witness and failing to consider the *Kozel* factors before dismissing a complaint as discovery sanctions could not be reviewed on appeal in light of sanctioned party's failure to "raise either of these issues at the hearing on the motion to dismiss or by subsequently filing a motion for rehearing or reconsideration").

Gross, Damoorgian and Ciklin, JJ., concur.
#### HARRIS v. ELLIS.

No. 14445.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 29, 1953.

*686George Harris, in pro. per.

Willis E. Gresham, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Texas, for appellee.

Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RIVE§, Circuit Judges.

BORAH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant is confined in the Texas State Penitentiary under a sentence of life imprisonment imposed by the Tarrant County Criminal District Court of Fort Worth, Texas on June 8, 1946. Upon a charge of passing a forged instrument and in violation of the Habitual Criminal Act of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. arts 61 to 64, he was tried and found guilty by a jury in that court on June 3, 1946.

After having unsuccessfully challenged the legality of his detention by habeas corpus proceedings in the courts of the State of Texas and having been denied certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States, he applied to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court denied his petition and declined to issue a certificate of probable cause, but permitted him to file his notice of appeal in forma pauperis.

Section 2253, Title 28 U.S.C.A. provides that “An appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding where the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court, unless the justice or judge who rendered the order or a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of probable cause.”

In the absence of a certificate of probable cause, the order of the district court is not reviewable by this court. Brite v. People of the State of California, 9 Cir., 178 F.2d 925; Hopson v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 182 F.2d 936; Ex parte Farrell, 1 Cir., 189 F.2d 540, 543.

We take this opportunity, however of saying that we find in the record no adequate basis for the issuance of a certificate of probable cause and no reason to believe that the district court lawfully could have done otherwise than deny the appellant’s petition. The appellant made no substantial showing of the denial of any federal right and upon the authority of Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 116, 117, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; White v. Ragen, 324 U.S. 760, 764, 65 S.Ct. 978, 89 L.Ed. 1348; Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 203, 204, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
SCWC-17-0000827

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF HAWAII FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION,

IAFF, LOCAL 1463, AFL-CIO,

Petitioner/Complainant-Appellant-Appellant,

and

RICK BLANGIARDI, MAYOR, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU;

SHELDON K. HAO, FIRE CHIEF, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU;

HONOLULU FIRE DEPARTMENT, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU;

and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU,

Respondents/Respondents-Appellees-Appellees,

and

HAWAII LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; KERRY KOMATSUBARA;

SESNITA A.D. MOEPONO; and J N. MUSTO (2016-001),

Respondents/Agency-Appellees-Appellees

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000827; CIVIL NO. 16-1-1390-07)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

The application for writ of certiorari filed on 

February 7, 2022, by Petitioner/Complainant-Appellant-Appellant

Hawaii Fire Fighters Association, IAFF, Local 1463, AFL-CIO is 

hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 22, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000827

22-MAR-2022

07:49 AM

Dkt. 3 ODAC
Exhibit
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical International Technology, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
   /s/
Michel Bayouk
 Michel
Bayouk
 Secretary
and Principal Accounting Officer
   May 15,
2009
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 March 28, 2006
(Date of report; date of
earliest event reported)
 Commission file number:
 RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    20-1770738(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard
Minneapolis, Minnesota
55437
  952) 857-8700
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 8.01 Other EventsSIGNATURESCondensed Consolidated Financial StatementsCondensed Consolidated Financial Statements    Table of Contents  
 Item 8.01
Other Events
 Note 1




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)Dated:  March 28, 2006
    /s/ Davee L. OlsonDavee L. OlsonChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNo.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 200499.2
    
    Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2008

BEATRICE V. WILES, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-799-675) Submitted: April 20, 2005 Decided: May 31, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ephraim Tahir Mella, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Anthony C. Payne, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Beatrice V. Wiles, a native and citizen of Liberia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. Insofar as Wiles challenges the Board’s decision not to sua sponte reopen her case, we find we are without jurisdiction. SeeBelay-Gebru v. INS , 327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir. 2003); Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft , 320 F.3d 472, 474-75 (3d Cir. 2003); Ekimian v. INS , 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002); Luis v. INS , 196 F.3d 36, 40-41 (1st Cir. 1999). The Board also noted Wiles’ motion to reopen was untimely as it was filed almost seven years after the Board closed the case. In her opening brief to this court, Wiles does not challenge that finding. Accordingly, we decline to review that decision. See United States v. Al-Hamdi , 356 F.3d 564, 571 n.8 (4th Cir. 2004); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). We deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Martin P. Galvan, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CardioNet, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 7,  2008                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   |
|                                         |   |
| /s/ Martin P. Galvan                         |   |
| Martin P. Galvan, CPA                        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer            |   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(6)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - (-)nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 20, 2021        Image of the Week - Cold War Craters in Nevada

Featured Films and Shorts        April 23, 2018        Image of the Week - Urban Growth in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Science Animations        April 15, 2019        Observing Sierra Nevada Mountain Snowpack 2000-2019 with Terra MODIS

How to's and trainings        June 21, 2019        Site Selection for Indirect Discharge Measurements

How to's and trainings        December 15, 2020        What Does a USGS Hydrologic Technician Do

How to's and trainings        June 20, 2018        Indirect Measurement Field Notes and Metadata

Featured Films and Shorts        August 29, 2018        Image of the Week - Burning Man
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020073EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/10 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9734 — HPS/MDP/Arachas)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 73/06)

1.

On 27 February 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020073EN.01001001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | HPS Investment Partners, LLC (‘HPS’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (‘MDP’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Arachas Topco Limited (‘Arachas’, Ireland). |

HPS and MDP acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Arachas.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | HPS is a US-based investment firm. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | MDP is a US-based private equity investment firm. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Arachas is an insurance broker operating in the commercial and personal non-life sector in Ireland. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020073EN.01001001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9734 – HPS/MDP/Arachas

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020073EN.01001001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020073EN.01001001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER INACCORDANCE**

**WITH SECTION 302 OF THE *SARBANES OXLEY ACT*OF 2002**

I, Christian Dubé,Chief Financial Officer of Cascades Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form40-F of Cascades Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.               The issuer’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed inthis report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The issuer’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated March 28, 2007                  |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Christian  Dubé              |   |
| Name :  Christian Dubé      |
| Title :  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----