alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Achron, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report of North American Natural Gas, Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in the SEC Release No. 33-8238;

c)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction);

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: |  | March 13, 2006 |  | RICHARD ACHRON                            
|----- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | Richard Achron
Principal Financial Officer





---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                   |  |                              
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Steven H. Holtzman       
|                   |  | Steven H. Holtzman           
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                   |  | (Principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. Shawnathon Lamon FABRE

NO. 2018-KO-0210

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
Ralf BAUCHROWITZ, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0585

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Randy Lee TURNER

NO. 2018-K-0780

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

*185Granted. See Order Attached.

WEIMER, J., recused.

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Thirty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 717086, Division C; Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2017 KA 1648.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit-"It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
#### William KELLY, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.

No. 11037.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 19, 1953.

Decided June 24, 1953.

Charles A. Lord, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richter, Lord & Farage, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Charles J. Biddle, Philadelphia, Pa. (Francis Hopkinson, Drinker Biddle *&*Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a suit by the plaintiff, an injured employee, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. The sole question in the case is whether the district court erred in holding that the defendant is not a common carrier by railroad within the meaning of that Act and entering summary judgment accordingly. We find ourselves in complete agreement with the views expressed in the able and comprehensive opinion filed by Judge Clary in the district court, 110 F.Supp. 4, to which we need add nothing.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5876 

To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to prohibit 

the flying of unmanned recreational aircraft near commercial airports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Mr. MEEKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

to prohibit the flying of unmanned recreational aircraft 

near commercial airports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Skies Act 

5 of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE FLYING OF UNMANNED REC7 REATIONAL AIRCRAFT NEAR COMMERCIAL 

8 AIRPORTS. 

9 Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

10 Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5876 IH

1 (1) in subsection (c) by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘, including that the operator 

3 of an unmanned recreational aircraft may not fly the 

4 aircraft— 

5 ‘‘(1) above 400 feet and within 5 miles of the perim6 eter of an airport that provides scheduled passenger air 

7 transportation; or 

8 ‘‘(2) where it may be seem from the perimeter of the 

9 airport.’’. 

10 (2) by inserting at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than one 

12 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 

13 year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 

14 report containing— 

15 ‘‘(1) a description of any incident in which an 

16 unmanned recreational aircraft flew above 400 feet 

17 less than 5 miles from the perimeter of an airport 

18 that provides scheduled passenger air transportation; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(2) the action taken by the Secretary in re21 sponse to the incident. 

22 ‘‘(e) DEFINITION OF UNMANNED RECREATIONAL

23 AIRCRAFT.—In this section, the term ‘unmanned recVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:09 Dec 23, 2014 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5876.IH H5876

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5876 IH

1 reational aircraft’ means an unmanned aircraft flown for 

2 hobby or recreational purposes.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dominic Burns, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Dominic BurnsDominic
      BurnsChief
      Executive Officer





August
13, 2010
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                        SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
                        --------------------------------

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sun & Surf, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ending  October  31,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Clifford Pope, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                                          /s/ Clifford Pope
                                                         ------------------
                                                         Clifford Pope
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         February 6, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting,  the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section  906, has been  provided to Sun & Surf,  Inc. and
will be  retained  by Sun & Surf,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 743 

To restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to the business 

of health insurance to protect competition and consumers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself and Ms. SLAUGHTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To restore the application of the Federal antitrust laws to 

the business of health insurance to protect competition 

and consumers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance In5 dustry Fair Competition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORING THE APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST 

7 LAWS TO HEALTH SECTOR INSURERS. 

8 (a) AMENDMENT TO MCCARRAN-FERGUSON ACT.— 

9 Section 3 of the Act of March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1013), 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 743 IH

1 commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act, is 

2 amended by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(c) Nothing contained in this Act shall modify, im4 pair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust 

5 laws with respect to the business of health insurance. For 

6 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘antitrust 

7 laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 

8 first section of the Clayton Act, except that such term in9 cludes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to 

10 the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods 

11 of competition.’’. 

12 (b) RELATED PROVISION.—For purposes of section 

13 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) 

14 to the extent such section applies to unfair methods of 

15 competition, section 3(c) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act 

16 shall apply with respect to the business of health insurance 

17 without regard to whether such business is carried on for 

18 profit, notwithstanding the definition of ‘‘Corporation’’ 

19 contained in section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission 

20 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Cheryl RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. MEMORIAL HOSPITAL/BROADSPIRE, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert John ZUBICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1090

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 923 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 

direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2013 

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any 

deduction for direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Say No to Drug Ads 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR DIRECT-TO7 CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENT OF PRESCRIP8 TION DRUGS. 

9 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Part IX of subchapter B of 

10 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 923 IH

1 to items not deductible) is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 280I. DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENT OF 

4 PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

5 ‘‘No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for 

6 any amount paid or incurred for a direct-to-consumer ad7 vertisement of a prescription drug.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for part IX of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

10 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 

11 item: 

‘‘Sec. 280I. Direct-to-consumer advertisement of prescription drugs.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

14 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief GRANTED AND Order filed 

February 3, 2017. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00093-CV

____________

IN RE MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRANDE LODGE OF 

TEXAS AND JURISDICTIONS FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS, 

Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1082736

ORDER

On February 3, 2017, relator Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grande Lodge of 

Texas and Jurisdictions Free and Accepted Masons, filed a petition for writ of 
2

mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Roberta 

Lloyd, Judge of the County Civil Court at Law No 4, in Harris County, Texas, to set 

aside the court’s Final Judgment, signed on January 30, 2017, in trial court number 

1082736.

Relator also has filed an opposed emergency motion for temporary relief 

asking our court to stay the Final Judgment pending a decision on the petition for 

writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. It appears from the facts 

stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request for relief requires further 

consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief 

is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief 

and issue the following order:

We ORDER the Final Judgment, signed on January 30, 2017, in trial court 

cause number 1082736, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

In addition, the court requests Gregory August, Johnnie L. Jones, Mack Prince 

Deshay, and Arthur C. Mays, the real parties-in-interest, to file a response to the 

petition for writ of mandamus on or before February 17, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 

52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Jewell.
J.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# C_2020366EN.01001201.xml

| 30.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/12

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2020/C 366/08)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| High fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1246 of 28 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars originating in the People’s Republic of China
  (OJ L 204, 29.7.2016, p. 70) | 30.7.2021 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

High fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1246 of 28 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars originating in the People’s Republic of China

(OJ L 204, 29.7.2016, p. 70)

30.7.2021

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  October 31, 2005
    /s/ Joseph D. ReidJoseph D. ReidChief Executive Officer   E-5
----

| 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K      of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 24, 2009  |    | /s/      Chang H. Ahn        |   |
|---------------------------------|--------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                            |         | Chang      H. Ahn            |   |
|                            |         | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

----