alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - (-)science_faqs(12)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 18, 2021        PubTalk-11/2021: Busting Myths About One of the Largest Volcanic Systems in the World - The Top 10 Misconceptions about Yellowstone Volcanism

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for November 1, 2022

faq        July 10, 2017        Can some people sense that an earthquake is about to happen (earthquake sensitives)?

faq        July 10, 2017        Is there earthquake weather?

faq        February 6, 2023        Can large amounts of rain in California cause an increase in earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can animals predict earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can you predict earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can the ground open up during an earthquake?

faq        July 10, 2017        Why are we having so many earthquakes? Has naturally occurring earthquake activity been increasing? Does this mean a big one is going to hit? OR We haven't had any earthquakes in a long time; does this mean that the pressure is building up for a big one?

faq        July 6, 2017        Are earthquakes associated with variations in the geomagnetic field?

faq        July 10, 2017        Do solar flares or magnetic storms (space weather) cause earthquakes?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can we use explosives to cause small earthquakes in order to prevent having large ones?

faq        July 10, 2017        Can "MegaQuakes" really happen? Like a magnitude 10 or larger?

faq        July 10, 2017        Will California eventually fall into the ocean?

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - products_publications(12)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(13)
              - colorado(6)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(23)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileBenjamin S. Linhoff, Ph.D.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_publications(14)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(67)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - (-)missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(102)
              - virginia(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Photography        March 14, 2016        Southeast Missouri Helicopter Survey
DENIED and Opinion Filed October 26, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 23

- 01040

- CV IN RE TRT HOLDINGS, INC., RBR REAL ESTAT E HOLDINGS, LLC,

BRIAN ZELMAN, AND ADAM ZEI TSIFF , Relators Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 21

- 11406
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Partida

- Kipness, and Breedlove

Opinion by Justice Breedlove Bef ore the Court is relators’ October 17, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus. Relators challenge the trial court’s October 5, 2023 Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Strike, Continue Trial Setting, Amend Scheduling Order, and Quash Jury

Demand. Also before t he Court is relators’ October 17, 2023 motion for emergency temporary relief, which relators supplemented by letter dated October 23, 2023. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator s to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.– 2

–

proceeding)

. After reviewing relators’ petition and the record before us, we conclude

that relators have failed to demonstrate entitlem ent to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a). We also deny relators’ emergency motion as moot

.

231040f.p05 /Maricela Breedlove/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE
**Exhibit 4.4.1.10**

 

Synopsisof terms of employment for Peter Abraham

 

Mr Abraham does not have aformally documented employment contract. The terms of his employment are a combination of common law andstatutory provisions and terms agreed between Mr Abraham and the company.  His employment is also subject to a Federalstaff award and agreements between the company and the CSR & RinkerSalaried Staff Association.  The key provisionsinclude:

•                  Term of employment - other than in the caseof misconduct, the company is required to give 12 months notice of termination,or may provide payment in lieu of notice. If payment in lieu of notice is given, the amount will be equivalent to12 months total remuneration - including at least target incentives.  If he is made redundant, Mr Abraham isentitled to the greater of: (a) the amount referred to in the previoussentence; or (b) 3 months base remuneration (base remuneration is equivalent toapproximately 75% of fixed remuneration) plus 0.7 months base remuneration peryear of service, up to a maximum of 24 months base remuneration.  Unpaid amounts of accrued leave are alsopayable.  Mr Abraham is required to give3 months notice of termination.

•                  Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually.  Mr Abraham is eligible to participate inboth long and short-term incentive plans.

•                  Employee share plans - Mr Abraham is entitledto participate in employee share plans available to Australian executives andemployees.

•                  Superannuation - Mr Abraham is a member of aRinker group sponsored superannuation fund and is entitled to benefits inaccordance with the rules of that fund.

•                  Leave entitlements - Mr Abraham is entitledto leave in accordance with the Federal staff award.

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18**


**U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT**


**OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Nicholas
      Sinigaglia, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
      the
      Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





**/s/
      Nicholas Sinigaglia**


Nicholas
      Sinigaglia


Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer


August
      14, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Henry Lee BAKER, IV, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D13-1249

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 16, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Lisa Ann Haskins, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

***ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT***

PER CURIAM.

Henry Lee Baker**,** IV, appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for attempted second-degree murder. Baker, who was sixteen years old at the time of the offense and nineteen years old during sentencing, shot a police officer at an apartment complex. The jury found that the victim was a law enforcement officer engaged in the lawful performance of a legal duty, that Baker possessed and discharged a firearm, and that as a result, he inflicted great bodily harm. Baker is currently serving a fifty-four-year sentence.

In initially affirming Baker's sentence, this Court followed its precedent in *Henry v. State*, 82 So.3d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), where we held that an aggregate sentence of ninety years imposed on a juvenile did not violate the Eighth Amendment. *Baker v. State*, 136 So.3d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). However, the Florida Supreme Court overturned our precedent in *Henry v. State*, 175 So.3d 675 (Fla. 2015), and accordingly quashed our decision in *Baker v. State*, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S507, 2018 WL 5116551 (Fla. Oct. 19, 2018).

Pursuant to the supreme court's decision in *Lee v. State*, 234 So.3d 562 (Fla. 2018), Baker is entitled to resentencing under the juvenile sentencing provisions in chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402 of the Florida Statutes, allowing him the opportunity for early release based on a demonstration of maturity and rehabilitation.

*640REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

COHEN, C.J., BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Continan Communications, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.


Date: May 20, 2008                        Name:    /s/ Geoffrey A. Fox
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Geoffrey A. Fox
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer
Derrick Deon ROBINSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for belated appeal is dismissed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Donald GLOVER

NO. 2018-KK-1278

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

# FILE No. 83542 

### OCT 28 2(21 ELIZABETH A. BROWN OF r UPREME COURT B l r:4 No. 83608 DEPUIY CLEIC MICHAEL RONALD BROOKS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. MICHAEL RONALD BROOKS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se appeals from judgments of conviction. This coures review of these appeals reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgments of conviction on July 16, 2021. Appellant did not file the notices of appeal, however, until September 21, 2021, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). Because an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeals, and

ORDERS these appeals DISMISSED.' 

### •
Cadish , J 

## (3de/4 , J. J. Pickering Herndon 'Based on this dismissal, the court takes no action in regard to the pro se letter filed in Docket No. 83608.

-3101~ SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10) I947Acc: Hon. Kathleen M. Drakulich, District Judge Michael Ronald Brooks Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (o) l947A 407> 2
EXHIBIT 23.3


CONSENT OF MICHAEL THOMAS
 
 I refer to the technical report prepared by AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd. dated July 1, 2012 (the “Technical Report”) referenced in the Registrant’s Annual Information Form (“AIF”) of MAG Silver Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  I was responsible for preparing, authoring and certifying the Technical Report.
 
 I hereby consent to reference to my name and to the use of the Technical Report in the AIF filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ “Michael Thomas”
 Michael Thomas, MAusIMM (CP)
 AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Limited
 March 31, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PATRICK F. CROLL

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. § § No

. 583, 2016 § § § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID Nos. 0801001 836 and § 0803007023 §

Submitted: January 23, 2017 Decided: February 28 , 201 7

Before HOLLAND

, VA LIHURA

, and VAUGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 28 th day of February 201 7

, upon consideration of the appellant’s

opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record below

, it appears

to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Patrick Croll, filed this appeal from the Superior

Court’s denial of his motion for correction of sentence. The State has filed a

motion to affirm the judgment below on the ground that it is manifest on the

face of Croll’s opening brief that his appeal is without merit. We agree and

affirm.

(2) In June 2008, Croll pled guilty to one count each of Aggravated

Menacing, Possession of a Deadly Weapon During the Commissio n of a2

Felony (PDWDCF), Assault in the Second Degree, 1 Unlawful Sexual

Contact in the Second Degree, and Endangering the Welfare of a Child. The

Superior Court sentenced Croll to a total period of thirty

- three years at Level

V incarceration, to be suspend ed after serving nineteen years in prison

followed by decreasing levels of supervision. Croll’s direct appeal was

dismissed as untimely. 2 Since that time, Croll has filed several unsuccessful

petitions seeking postconviction relief. 3

(3) In September 2 016 , Croll filed a motion for correction of illegal

sentence under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a), alleging that his

separate sentences for Aggravated Menacing and PDWDCF violate double

jeopardy principles and should be merged

. The Superior Court deni ed his

motion. This appeal followed.

( 4 ) On appeal, Croll reiterates his claim that his separate sentences

are illegal because they violate double jeopardy principles. Croll is

incorrect. As the Superior Court held

, Delaware law is clear that a defendan t

may be sentenced for both Aggravated Menacing and a related weapon

offense like PDWDCF because the General Assembly intended to punish the

1 Before sentencing, the State dismissed the charge of Assault in the Second Deg ree.

2 Croll v. State , 2009 WL 486615 (Del. Apr. 17, 2009).

3 See, e.g., Croll v. State , 2010 WL 2891502 (Del. June 21, 2010).3

two offenses separately. 4 Accordingly, Croll’s separate sentences for

P DWCF and Aggravated Menacing do not violate double jeopardy

. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice

4 DeShields v. State , 2015 WL 115487 (Del. Jan. 7, 2015).
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30031]

[[Page 102978]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 970 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-714, K2025-713.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30031 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit No. 32.1



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEO Channel.com, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10- QSB for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Larry
Creeger,  Chief  Executive and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.





April 1, 2005                      By: /s/ Larry Creeger
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Larry Creeger
                                       Chief Executive Officer,
                                       Chief Financial Officer





--------------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2020235EN.01000201.xml

| 17.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/2

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2020/C 235/02)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 22.6.2020 at 24.00 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 22.6.2020–31.12.2020 |
| Member State | Greece |
| Stock or Group of stocks | BFT/AE45WM |
| Species | Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) |
| Zone | Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 08/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

22.6.2020 at 24.00

Duration

22.6.2020–31.12.2020

Member State

Greece

Stock or Group of stocks

BFT/AE45WM

Species

Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus)

Zone

Atlantic Ocean, east of 45° W, and Mediterranean

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

08/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
V.R., a Minor, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1345

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismiss.