alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AURORA LOAN Services
A Lehman Brothers Company
Master Servicing/3131 South Vaughn Way #500
Aurora, Colorado 80014
ph#303-632-3000

February 26, 2004

Karen Schluter CitiBank, NA
111 Wall Street, 14th Floor/Zone 3
New York, NY 10005

RE: SASCO Series:2003-3XS,2003-7H, 2003-12XS
2003-14, 2003-18XS, 2003-23H,2003-S1, 2003-28XS,
2003-29, 2003-30, 2003-33H, 2003-36XS,2003-35
2003-38

Annual Officer's Certificate as to Compliance

Dear Ms. Schluter:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the period ending
on December 31, 2003:

1. I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Master
Servicer during the preceding calendar year under the terms of the Trust
Agreements and to the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or obligations under the
Agreements;

2. Based on said review and to the best of this Officer's knowledge,
the Master Servicer is not in default of its obligations under the
terms of the Trust Agreements in any material respect, or, if
there is a default in the fulfillment of its obligations, a description
of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has been
reported to this Officer;

3. To the best of this Officer's knowledge, nothing has arose to lead
this Officer to believe that its Servicer has failed to perform any of its
duties, responsibilities and obligations under its Servicing Agreement
during the preceding calendar year;

4. To the best of this Officer's knowledge, the Servicer is not in
default of its obligations under the terms of its Servicing Agreement
in any material respect, or, if there is a default in the fulfillment
of its obligations, a description of each default or failure and the
nature and status thereof has been reported to this Officer;

5. The Master Servicer has received from its Servicer such Servicer's
annual certificate of compliance and a copy of such Servicer's annual
audit report, in each case to the extent required under the applicable
Servicing Agreement, or, if any such certificate or report has not been
received by the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer is using its best
reasonable efforts to obtain such certificate or report.

Certified By:
/s/ E. Todd Whittemore

---------------
Name: E. Todd Whittemore
Executive Vice President
Master Servicing Division
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. J.
Meese, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ C. James Meese, Jr.C.
      James Meese, Jr.Principal
      Executive OfficerAugust 12,
      2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 913 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-643, K2025-642.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29850 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heung
      Hung Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:







1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*By:*/s/
                  Heung Hung Lee*Heung
                    Hung Lee*
                  *Chief
                    Financial Officer*  November
        14, 2007
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Randolph C. Blazer,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ended September 30, 2002 of BearingPoint, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 6, 2003
Charles E. SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2071

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 15, 2018

Charles E. Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fairy
      Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*By:*
            /s/ Heung
              Hung Lee*Heung
                Hung Lee*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*


November
      14, 2006
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Bankshares Inc., respectively, certify that, to the best of each
such individuals knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pioneer Bankshares Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification
except as required by law.



|                   |  |                                           
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|                   |  | /s/ THOMAS R. ROSAZZA                     
|                   |  | Thomas R. Rosazza                         
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                   | 
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  |                                           
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ LORI G. HASSETT                       
|                   |  | Lori G. Hassett                           
|                   |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                   | 
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  |                                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Pioneer
Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Susan Russo MARCHAND, et al. v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-00-1419

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied.
NO. 07-11-0239-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL D JULY 13, 2010

In the Interest of S.M., a Child

__________________ _________ FROM THE 72nd DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2008-542,245; HONORABLE RUB EN REYES, PRESIDING

Order of Dismissal

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Cesar Mendez filed a notice of appeal on June 15, 2011. However, appellant did not pay the $175 filing fee r equired under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. Nor did he file with us an affida vit of indigence per Te xas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1. By letter fr om this Court dated June 21, 2011, we informed appellant that the filing fee had not been paid and that the failure to cure the default within ten days may result in a dismissal of his appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Enterprises , 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref = d). The fee was not so paid. Nor did appellant tender an affidavit of indigence within that time. Indeed, the absence of such an affidavit was noted by the tr ial court via an order dated July 1, 2011,2 wherein it discharged appellant ’s appointed counsel from furt her representing appellant. The trial court also disclosed in the order t hat appellant had not claimed to be indigent. Because appellant has failed to pay the re quisite filing fees as directed by the court, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texa s Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
Shane SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 25, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 855 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-568, K2025-566.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29746 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3856

___________________________

Claire J. Lee

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Hennepin County; Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., doing business as Hennepin

County Medical Center

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: March 3, 2017

Filed: March 8, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Claire J. Lee appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment

1

in her action under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act

(EMTALA). Viewing the summary judgment record in a light most favorable to 2

Lee, and drawing all inferences in her favor, we conclude that the grant of summary

judgment to defendants was warranted. See Star City Sch. Dist. v. ACI Bldg. Sys.,

LLC, 844 F.3d 1011, 1017 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review); Hunt ex rel. Hunt v.

Lincoln County Mem’l Hosp., 317 F.3d 891, 893 n.4 (8th Cir. 2003) (elements of

EMTALA claim). We find no merit to Lee’s arguments concerning discovery and

unfair treatment by the magistrate judge. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and

we also deny Lee’s motion for sanctions. 

______________________________

The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Hildy

Bowbeer, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Lee raised other claims under federal and state law which she has abandoned. 2

See Hess v. Ables, 714 F.3d 1048, 1051 n.2 (8th Cir. 2013) (claim is abandoned

where appellant fails to brief this court on why dismissal was improper). 

-2-
STATE EX REL. Rian TATE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1685

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. *State ex rel. Tate v. State* , 16-0003 (La. 4/13/17), 215 So.3d 667.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

For Immediate Release


Contact:  Kenneth K. Rieth, CEO
          Peter C. Canepa, CFO
          Riviera Tool Company, 616.698.2100

                  RIVIERA TOOL RECEIVES LISTING EXTENSION FROM

                             AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE


GRAND RAPIDS, Mich., April 10, 2006 -- Riviera Tool Co. (AMEX: RTC) today
reported it has received notification from the American Stock Exchange (Amex)
that the Company has received an extension of time (no later than August 9,
2007) to regain compliance with the continued listing standards.

The Grand Rapids, Mich. designer and manufacturer of stamping die systems had
previously received and disclosed that on February 9, 2006 the Company was below
certain of the Amex's continued listing standards (shareholders equity of less
than $4.0 million and losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in
three out of its four most recent fiscal years) as set forth in Section
1003(a)(ii) of the Amex Company Guide.

In order to maintain its' listing, the Company was afforded the opportunity to
submit a plan of compliance to the Amex and on March 13, 2006 presented its plan
to the Amex. On April 3, 2006, the Amex notified the Company that it accepted
the Company's plan of compliance and granted an extension of time to regain
compliance with the continued listing standards. The company will be subject to
periodic review during the extension period. Failure to make progress consistent
with the plan or to regain compliance with the continued listing standards by
the end of the extension period could result in the Company being delisted from
the American Stock Exchange.

"We are pleased that the Amex has granted us an extension allowing us to regain
compliance," said Kenneth K. Rieth, president and chief executive officer of
Riviera Tool. "Our business continues to improve and we expect these results
will help us return to compliance."

ABOUT RIVIERA TOOL

Riviera Tool Co. (www.rivieratool.com) designs, develops and manufactures
large-scale, custom metal stamping die systems used in the high-speed production
of sheet metal parts and assemblies for the global automotive industry. A
majority of Riviera's sales are to BMW, Nissan, DaimlerChrysler, General Motors
Corp., Ford Motor Co. and their Tier One suppliers.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995: The statements contained in this news release include certain predictions
and projections that may be considered forward-looking statements under
securities laws. These statements involve a number of important risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including
but not limited to economic, competitive, governmental and technological.

                                     # # # #