alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.9.1  


EA1-1_1151 1 A


Lots 17 and 1.8,
27-45, 51-50, 61-71, 83 and 84, 85-89, 92, 101-105, 197-1161 117,
118, 125-132, 133 and 134,
145-156,172, 173, /74, 175, 176-187, 189 and /90, 205-216, 217 and 218,
219-224, 227-228, 243-251,
449-453,458-464, 471-476, 477-481 and 482-493, COLLIER HEIGHTS, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Map
Book 8, Page(s) 2 of the Public Records of St. lams County, Florida.
STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene SCARBOROUGH

No. 2018-KK-1791

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted. As a general matter, at a hearing on a motion to suppress a statement given while in custody, the state bears the burden of proving the free and voluntary nature of the confession. *State v. Hills* , 354 So.2d 186, 188 (La. 1977). To meet that burden, the state must show that the defendant knew of his right to remain silent and his right to counsel and *266that he intelligently waived those rights. La.C.Cr.P. art. 703(D) ; La.R.S. 15:451 ; *State v. Seward* , 509 So.2d 413, 417 (La. 1987). Whenever a defendant alleges police misconduct in eliciting a confession, the state must rebut these allegations specifically. *State v. Davis* , 380 So.2d 607, 610 (La. 1980). Additionally, the district judge's conclusions on the credibility and weight of testimony relating to the voluntariness of a confession for the purpose of admissibility will not be overturned unless they are not supported by the evidence. *State v. Jackson* , 381 So.2d 485, 488 (La. 1980).

Here, no officer testified at the suppression hearing who had any knowledge of whether defendant was given his *Miranda* warnings or was present when defendant was questioned. Although a detective with pertinent knowledge was subpoenaed by both parties, he was out of state and unable to attend. Therefore, the district court erred in finding the state carried its burden and in denying defendant's motion to suppress. Accordingly, we vacate the district court's ruling and remand with instructions that the district court conduct a new suppression hearing at which, at the minimum, the detective who was previously unavailable can testify.

**VACATED AND REMANDED**

WEIMER, J., would deny.
Raymond L. ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1250

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

Raymond L. Robertson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Raymond L. Robertson challenges the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the denial of the petition and caution Robertson that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings will result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court or referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. *See**State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999) ; § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat (2018).

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Antonio WEATHERSBY v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00422-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: September 14, 2018 Closed: November 29, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition For Writ Of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - (-)products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - (-)connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

              - 2020(1)

Data Release        July 21, 2022        Data Release for Latency Testing of Wireless Emergency Alerts intended for the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States of America

social mediaUSGS ShakeAlert

Data Release        May 7, 2018        Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS) for Southern California, v3.0, Phase 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 876 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-599, K2025-598.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29780 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Alfred H. RacineAlfred H. RacinePresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John H. LowryJohn H. LowryChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of EP Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date: May 13, 2005



By:/s/ Robert J. Salluzzo

Robert J. Salluzzo

Chief Operating and Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided BP International, Inc. and will be retained by BP International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Emmett HOLLIDAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christopher Coffey, Vice President of RFS Holding, L.L.C., certifythat:

 

1.            Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.            Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosedin the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;and

 

5.            Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40603

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CALIXTO SILVA-ESPINOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04–CR-2089-1

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Calixto Silva-Espinoza (Silva) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following

deportation. Silva argues that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Silva’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Silva contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly 
No. 05-40603

-2-

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Silva

properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review. 

The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - (-)pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story
STATE EX REL. Franklin D. CHURCH v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0064

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LIVINGSTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record *1255a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 99 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 99

   To prohibit anticompetitive activities and to provide that health 
insurance issuers and medical malpractice insurance issuers are subject 
  to the antitrust laws of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

 Mr. Conyers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit anticompetitive activities and to provide that health 
insurance issuers and medical malpractice insurance issuers are subject 
  to the antitrust laws of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Insurance Industry Antitrust 
Enforcement Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF ANTICOMPETITIVE ACTIVITIES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, nothing in the Act of 
March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1011 et seq., commonly known as the 
``McCarran-Ferguson Act''), shall be construed to permit health 
insurance issuers (as defined in section 2791 of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-91)) or issuers of medical malpractice 
insurance to engage in any form of price fixing, bid rigging, or market 
allocations in connection with the conduct of the business of providing 
health insurance coverage (as defined in such section) or coverage for 
medical malpractice claims or actions.

SEC. 3. RESTORING THE APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO HEALTH SECTOR 
              INSURERS.

    (a) Amendment to McCarran-Ferguson Act.--Section 3 of the Act of 
March 9, 1945 (15 U.S.C. 1013), commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson 
Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Nothing contained in this Act shall modify, impair, or 
supersede the operation of any of the antitrust laws with respect to 
the business of health insurance. For purposes of the preceding 
sentence, the term `antitrust laws' has the meaning given it in 
subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act, except that 
such term includes section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to the 
extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods of competition.''.
    (b) Related Provision.--For purposes of section 5 of the Federal 
Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent such section applies 
to unfair methods of competition, section 3(c) of the McCarran-Ferguson 
Act shall apply with respect to the business of health insurance 
without regard to whether such business is carried on for profit, 
notwithstanding the definition of ``Corporation'' contained in section 
4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
the undersigned officer of MediciNova, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                    
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/    YUICHI
IWAKI                
|Date: February 15, 2007 |  | Yuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D.          
|                        |  | President & Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
William Aloysius LOWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3739

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. George D. LOWDINS

NO. 2017-KO-1923

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

Denied.
Keyron Cornelius CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Forrest P. WALL, M.D., F.A.C.S. v. Gregory W. BRYAN, DPM, Michelle R. Ritter, M.D., R. Blair Drummond, DPM, Janna Cruey-Roark and Ambulatory Surgery Center of Louisiana, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-C-1270

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1 	CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Agronix, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2004, (the "Report"), I, Peter Drummond, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
Company's financial position and results of operations.

/s/Peter Drummond 



 Peter Drummond, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



Date: June 1, 2004
Charlotte GERRY, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MISS FLORIDA SCHOLARSHIP PAGEANT, INC., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1587

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Diopside Crystals

Filters

              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

              - maryland(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 20, 2016        Diopside Crystals

publication        January 15, 1977        Mechanical twinning in diopside Ca(Mg,Fe)Si2O6: Structural mechanism and associated crystal defects

publication        January 1, 1988        Electrical conductivity of diopside: evidence for oxygen vacancies

publication        January 1, 1968        Bonding in eight ordered clinopyroxenes isostructural with diopside
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 February 13, 2006
(Date of report; date of
earliest event reported)
 Commission file number:
 RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    20-1770738(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard
Minneapolis, Minnesota
55437
  952) 857-8700
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionSIGNATURESAnnouncement of Financial Results    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)Dated:  February 13, 2006
    /s/ Davee L. OlsonDavee L. OlsonChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNo.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Announcement of Financial Results
Michael BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2301

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 4, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.