alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 95 

To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating taxpayer financing 

of presidential election campaigns and party conventions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating 

taxpayer financing of presidential election campaigns and 

party conventions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF TAXPAYER FINANCING OF 

4 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. 

5 (a) TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF INCOME TAX

6 PAYMENTS.—Section 6096 of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

8 new subsection: 


smartinez on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 95 IH

1 ‘‘(d) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 

2 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011.’’. 

3 (b) TERMINATION OF FUND AND ACCOUNT.— 

4 (1) TERMINATION OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

5 CAMPAIGN FUND.— 

6 (A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 95 of subtitle 

7 H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 9014. TERMINATION. 

10 ‘‘The provisions of this chapter shall not apply with 

11 respect to any presidential election (or any presidential 

12 nominating convention) after the date of the enactment 

13 of this section, or to any candidate in such an election.’’. 

14 (B) TRANSFER OF EXCESS FUNDS TO GEN15 ERAL FUND.—Section 9006 of such Code is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following 

17 new subsection: 

18 ‘‘(d) TRANSFER OF FUNDS REMAINING AFTER TER19 MINATION.—The Secretary shall transfer all amounts in 

20 the fund after the date of the enactment of this section 

21 to the general fund of the Treasury, to be used only for 

22 reducing the deficit.’’. 

23 (2) TERMINATION OF ACCOUNT.—Chapter 96 

24 of subtitle H of such Code is amended by adding at 

25 the end the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 95 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 9043. TERMINATION. 

2 ‘‘The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to any 

3 candidate with respect to any presidential election after 

4 the date of the enactment of this section.’’. 

5 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

6 (1) The table of sections for chapter 95 of sub7 title H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 9014. Termination.’’. 

9 (2) The table of sections for chapter 96 of sub10 title H of such Code is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 9043. Termination.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                   |  |                                   
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2009 |  | /s/ Adelene Q. Perkins            
|                   |  | Adelene Q. Perkins                
|                   |  | President & Chief Business Officer
|                   |  | (Principal financial officer)     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances

set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 00-10067

Summary Calendar

_____________________

CARMELO CHAPARRO-HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. HARRINGTON, District Director

of the Dallas Office of Immigration and

Naturalization Service,

Respondent-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 3:00-CV-47)

_______________________________________________________

September 25, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carmelo Chaparro-Hernandez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion
2

for a temporary restraining order and application for writ of habeas corpus. We

agree with the district court that it does not have jurisdiction to hear his appeal of

the Immigration Judge’s removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2); Udenze v.

Strapp, 977 F. Supp. 418, 421 (N.D. Tex. 1997). We also agree that it does not

have jurisdiction over his amnesty claim. See McNary v. Haitian Refugee Ctr., Inc.,

498 U.S. 479, 486 (1991) (holding that courts of appeals are the only forums for

judicial review under the Immigration and Reform Act). 

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14
             Date:  May 3, 2006
    /s/ JOHN CHAPPLEJohn ChapplePresident, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board 45
Bruce SCHWACK a/k/a Bruce G. Schwack, and Dawn Hirsch a/k/a Dawn Schwack a/k/a Dawn R. Hirsch a/k/a Dawn Robyn Hagen, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR ARGENT SECURITIES, INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-W2, Appellee.

No. 4D18-872

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 102976-102977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30007]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 959 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 102977]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-702, K2025-701.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-30007 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
[Cite as State v. Dumas , 2023
- Ohio
- 270.]



## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. NATHANIEL DUMA S , Defendant

- Appellant

.

O P I N I O N A N D J U D G M E N T E N T R Y

Case No. 1 2 MA 00 31
Delayed Application to Reopen

BEFORE: Cheryl L. Waite, Gene Donofrio, Carol Ann Robb, Judges.

JUDGMENT: Overruled.

Atty. Gina DeGenova , Mahoning County Prosecutor , 21 West Boardman Street, 6th Floor, Youngstown, Ohio 44503, for Plaintiff

- Appellee
Nathaniel Dumas , Pro se , # 622

- 439 , P.O. Box 56 , Lebanon, Ohio 45036 , Defendant

Appellant

. Dated: January 30, 2023– 2

–

Case No. 12 MA 0031 PER CURIAM. {¶1} On November 17, 2022, Appellant Nathaniel Dumas filed a delayed motion for reopening in Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 11 CR 429, pursuant to App.R. 26(B). Appellant was convicted of and sentenced for felony murder , aggravated robbery , and po ssession of a firearm while under a disability, along with corresponding firearm specifications

. He was sentenced to twenty

- eight years to life in prison. The judgment was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Dumas , 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 12 MA 31, 2015

- Ohio

- 2683. Appellant's application for reopening asserts ineffective assistance of counsel in his direct appeal. {¶2} This is Appellant's second application for reopening. In our prior O pinion, we determined that Appellant's counsel was effective in the dir ect appeal. State v.
Dumas , 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 12 MA 0031, 2016

- Ohio

- 4799, at ¶ 13. “ [T]here is no right to file success ive applications for reopening.” State v. Williams , 99 Ohio St.3d 179,
2003

- Ohio

- 3079, 790 N.E.2d 299, ¶ 12. “ Once ineffective assistance of counsel has been raised and adjudicated, res judicata bars its relitigation.” State v. Cheren , 73 Ohio St.3d 137, 138, 652 N.E.2d 707 (1995). {¶3} Appellant's delayed application for reopening is overruled.

JUDGE CHERYL L. WAITE

JUDGE GENE DONOFRIO

JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB– 3

–

Case No. 12 MA 0031 NOTICE TO COUNSEL This document constitutes a final judgment entry.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T W A N S O O C H E E ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 71952 A ge nc yN os . A 072- 343- 669

A 072- 343- 670 A 072- 343- 671 A 072- 343- 672 ME MOR AN DU M * O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t2, 2011 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , IK U T A , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W an S oo C hee, K um N am C hee, S un g A e C hee, and B on g S ukC hee, na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of

S outh K or e a , pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of Im m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g th eir ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s 

# FI LED AU G 10 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 71952 2 r e m ova l or de r . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252, and w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e rej ectp et i t i o n ers’ co n t en t i o n th atth e g o v ern m en tfai l edt o est ab l i sh re m ov abi l i ty by c l ear andconv i nci ng evi dence, because they c on ce ded r e m o v ab ility . See Y

ou ngSu n Shi n v. Mukasey , 54 7 F . 3d 10 19 , 10 24 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) ( “[ W ]h e r e th e a lie n c o n c e d e s r e m o v ab ility , th e g o v e rn m e n t’s b u r d e n in th is re gard i s s at i sf

i ed. ” ( ci t at i on and q uo t at i on om i tt ed)) . P et i t i on er s’ cont ent i on thatthe go vernm entshou l d b e e qu i t abl y e st op ped f r o m o r d e r in g th e irr e m o v a l is u n av a ilin g . See Sul i t v. Schi l t gen , 213 F . 3d 449, 45 4 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( “ [E ] st op pel agai nstthe go vernm enti s unavai l abl e w here p e titio n e r s h av e n o t lo s t an yr ig h ts to w h ic h th e yw e r e e n title d .” ) ; c f . Sal gado-D i az v. G on zalez , 39 5 F . 3d11 58 , 11 65 -68 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). P et i t i on er s’ re m ai ni ng cont ent i on s are no tpers uasi ve. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(17)
              - products_data(8)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(231)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_image(67)
              - multimedia_image-141769(23)
              - multimedia_image-141771(39)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(17)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(9)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(5)
              - california(8)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Science Animations        May 20, 2016        Shaking of Frontier Building — Anchorage, Alaska, During Mw7.1 Earthquake, January 24, 2016

Science Animations        March 30, 2016        Shaking in the Atwood Building in Anchorage, Alaska

Science Animations        November 30, 2018        Shaking of Frontier Building, M7.0 November 30, 2018, Anchorage Quake

Science Animations        November 30, 2018        Shaking of Atwood Building, Mw 7.0 November 30, 2018, Anchorage quake

Science Animations        November 30, 2018        Shaking of BP Exploration Building, M7 Nov. 30, 2018, Anchorage Quake
IB 

Union Calendar No. 33 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 767 

[Report No. 113–55] 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the Pilot Project offices 

of the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. NOEM, and Mrs. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

MAY 14, 2013 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 15, 2013] 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 767 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify the 

Pilot Project offices of the Federal Permit Streamlining 

Pilot Project. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 767 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PILOT PROJECT OFFICES OF FEDERAL PERMIT 

4 STREAMLINING PILOT PROJECT. 

5 Section 365 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

6 U.S.C. 15924) is amended by striking subsection (d) and 

7 inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(d) PILOT PROJECT OFFICES.—The following Bureau 

9 of Land Management Offices shall serve as the Pilot Project 

10 offices: 

11 ‘‘(1) Rawlins Field Office, Wyoming. 

12 ‘‘(2) High Plains District Office, Wyoming. 

13 ‘‘(3) Montana/Dakotas State Office, Montana. 

14 ‘‘(4) Farmington Field Office, New Mexico. 

15 ‘‘(5) Carlsbad Field Office, New Mexico. 

16 ‘‘(6) Grand Junction/Glenwood Springs Field 

17 Office, Colorado. 

18 ‘‘(7) Vernal Field Office, Utah.’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 33 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 767 

[Report No. 113–55] 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify 

Streamlining Pilot Project. the Pilot Project offices of the Federal Permit 

MAY 14, 2013 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2020055EN.01000601.xml

| 18.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP and Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe apply

(2020/C 55/06)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

The legal basis for this processing operation are Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP (2), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/215 (3), and Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 (4), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2020/213 (5).

The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1.C in the Directorate-General for Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection – RELEX of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:

Council of the European Union

| General Secretariat |
| --- |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The GSC's Data Protection Officer can be contacted at:

Data Protection Officer

data.protection@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision 2011/101/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2020/215, and Regulation (EC) No 314/2004, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/213.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision 2011/101/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 314/2004.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects such as the right of access, as well as the rights to rectification or to object will be answered in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (edps@edps.europa.eu).

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6.

(3)  OJ L 45, 18.2.2020, p. 8.

(4)  OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 1.

(5)  OJ L 45, 18.2.2020, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of The Princeton Review, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), that:



| | 1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ MICHAEL J. PERIK                 
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Michael J. Perik                     
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: November 9, 2010 |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ CHRISTIAN G. KASPER              
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Christian G. Kasper                  
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50598

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REGINALD ERVIN MACKALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CA-323

- - - - - - - - - -

February 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reginald Ervin MacKall appeals his conviction of

distribution of cocaine base in a school zone. He contends

solely that his guilty plea is invalid because the district court

violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1). MacKall avers that his plea

is invalid because the district court failed to inform him fully

of the nature of the charge and failed to advise him of the

maximum statutory term of imprisonment and mandatory minimum term

of supervised release. The district court's error was harmless
2

inasmuch as the aggregate maximum term of imprisonment and

supervised release did not exceed the statutory maximum that was

actually explained to MacKall. See United States v. Pierce, 5

F.3d 791, 793-94 (5th Cir. 1993). 

AFFIRMED.
Ricardo VINCENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Ricardo Vincent, Okeechobee, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Warner, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Mitchell Houston JAMES, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3714

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.