alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquakes

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Filters

              - science_science(17)
              - products_data(8)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(231)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_image(67)
              - multimedia_image-141769(23)
              - multimedia_image-141771(39)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(3)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(17)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(9)
              - (-)news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149250(5)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(2)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - new york(1)
              - puerto rico(1)

## By Year

link

link

### Latest Earthquakes

### Latest Earthquakes

View the latest earthquake events and information from the past 24 hours, 7 days, or 1 month.

Earthquake Hazards Program

Search the Earthquake Catalog

Earthquake data and products

Earthquake science

Earthquake FAQs

Science Snippet        January 24, 2018        Alaska Earthquake Rattles Florida’s Groundwater Plumbing

Science Snippet        April 28, 2017        Hazard a Guess? The riskiest science quiz you will ever take!
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(87)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(562)
              - products_data(327)
              - products_maps(82)
              - products_publications(3046)
              - products_software(11)
              - products_web_tools(36)
              - multimedia_audio(224)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(213)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(11)
              - multimedia_before_after(30)
              - multimedia_image(1326)
              - multimedia_image-141769(111)
              - multimedia_image-141770(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(734)
              - multimedia_image-141772(18)
              - multimedia_image-141774(7)
              - multimedia_image-141775(141)
              - multimedia_image-141776(81)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141783(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(215)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(21)
              - multimedia_video(600)
              - multimedia_video-149194(179)
              - multimedia_video-149195(233)
              - multimedia_video-149196(42)
              - multimedia_video-149197(65)
              - multimedia_video-149198(46)
              - multimedia_video-149225(4)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(1)
              - documents_file(1062)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - documents_file-149204(8)
              - (-)documents_file-149206(2)
              - documents_file-149208(2)
              - documents_file-149209(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149213(4)
              - documents_file-149214(19)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(4)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - documents_file-149220(17)
              - documents_file-149222(990)
              - documents_file-149224(6)
              - news_news-149245(47)
              - news_news-149246(9)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(41)
              - news_news-149249(19)
              - news_news-149250(44)
              - news_newsletters(26)
              - news_other_news(287)
              - connect_locations(2)
              - connect_social_media(8)
              - connect_staff_profiles(159)
              - other_basic-37(19)
              - other_basic-42(245)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Partner Logo        May 1, 2023        Graphic element for the 50th anniversary celebration of USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Brochures        May 6, 2019        Magnetic monitoring of Earth and space

Partner Logo        June 6, 2023        GeoSTAC Logo

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the landmark case Gideon v. Wainwright, 

in which the Supreme Court held that counsel must be provided to 

indigent defendants in all felony cases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2013 

Mr. DEUTCH (for himself, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. NADLER, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. 

WATT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the landmark case Gideon v. Wainwright, in which the Supreme Court held 

that counsel must be provided to indigent defendants 

in all felony cases. 

Whereas, on March 18, 1963, the Supreme Court recognized 

in Gideon v. Wainwright that counsel must be provided 

to indigent defendants in all felony cases; 

Whereas the Supreme Court held that providing counsel to 

indigent defendants in all felony cases meets the essential 

requirements of the 6th amendment to the United States 

Constitution; 

Whereas the Supreme Court held in Argersinger v. Hamlin 

that indigent defendants are entitled, under the 6th 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 108 IH 

amendment to the United States Constitution, to courtappointed counsel in all cases where imprisonment is a 

possibility; 

Whereas 50 years after the Gideon v. Wainwright decision, 

excessive caseloads are preventing counsel for indigent 

defendants from providing quality representation; and 

Whereas the provision of counsel to indigent defendants often 

lacks fairness and increases the risk that poor people will 

be wrongfully convicted: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and honors the 50th anniversary 

3 of the decision in Gideon v. Wainwright; 

4 (2) encourages all people in the United States 

5 to recognize and honor the 50th anniversary of the 

6 Gideon v. Wainwright decision; and 

7 (3) supports strategies to improve the criminal 

8 justice system to ensure that indigent defendants in 

9 all felony cases are adequately represented by coun10 sel. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 829 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 829

   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of 
   Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the 
                National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2013

 Ms. DelBene (for herself and Mr. Larsen of Washington) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of 
   Illabot Creek in Skagit County, Washington, as a component of the 
                National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SEGMENTS.

    Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(__) Illabot creek, washington.--
                    ``(A) The 14.3-mile segment from the headwaters of 
                Illabot Creek to the northern terminus as generally 
                depicted on the map titled `Illabot Creek Proposed WSR-
                Northern Terminus', dated September 15, 2009, to be 
                administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as 
                follows:
                            ``(i) The 4.3-mile segment from the 
                        headwaters of Illabot Creek to the boundary of 
                        Glacier Peak Wilderness Area as a wild river.
                            ``(ii) The 10-mile segment from the 
                        boundary of Glacier Peak Wilderness to the 
                        northern terminus as generally depicted on the 
                        map titled `Illabot Creek Proposed WSR-Northern 
                        Terminus', dated September 15, 2009, as a 
                        recreational river.
                    ``(B) Action required to be taken under subsection 
                (d)(1) for the river segments designated under this 
                paragraph shall be completed through revision of the 
                Skagit Wild and Scenic River comprehensive management 
                plan.''.
                                 <all>
```
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 742 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the 

Commodity Exchange Act to repeal the indemnification 

requirements for regulatory authorities to obtain access 

to swap data required to be provided by swaps entities 

under such Acts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 742 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Swap Data Repository 

3 and Clearinghouse Indemnification Correction Act of 

4 2013’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. 

6 (a) DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS.—Sec7 tion 5b(k)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

8 7a–1(k)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(5) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.—Before 

10 the Commission may share information with any en11 tity described in paragraph (4), the Commission 

12 shall receive a written agreement from each entity 

13 stating that the entity shall abide by the confiden14 tiality requirements described in section 8 relating to 

15 the information on swap transactions that is pro16 vided.’’. 

17 (b) SWAP DATA REPOSITORIES.—Section 21(d) of 

18 the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 24a(d)) is amend19 ed to read as follows: 

20 ‘‘(d) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.—Before the 

21 swap data repository may share information with any enti22 ty described in subsection (c)(7), the swap data repository 

23 shall receive a written agreement from each entity stating 

24 that the entity shall abide by the confidentiality require25 ments described in section 8 relating to the information 

26 on swap transactions that is provided.’’. 
3 

•HR 742 EH

1 (c) SECURITY-BASED SWAP DATA REPOSITORIES.— 

2 Section 13(n)(5)(H) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

3 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(n)(5)(H)) is amended to read as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘(H) CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.— 

6 Before the security-based swap data repository 

7 may share information with any entity de8 scribed in subparagraph (G), the security-based 

9 swap data repository shall receive a written 

10 agreement from each entity stating that the en11 tity shall abide by the confidentiality require12 ments described in section 24 relating to the in13 formation on security-based swap transactions 

14 that is provided.’’. 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this Act shall take effect as if enacted as part of the Dodd17 Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

18 (Public Law 111–203) on July 21, 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 742 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

to be provided by swaps entities under such Acts. thorities to obtain access to swap data required demnification requirements for regulatory authe Commodity Exchange Act to repeal the in-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6056

ROY W. ARROWOOD, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. ROBERT H. MAUNEY, Warden; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; WARDEN, Northside Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cv-02158-TLW)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy W. Arrowood, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Roy W. Arrowood seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and the district court’s order denying his motion for

reconsideration filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. These orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El

v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Arrowood has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

23 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6 

To provide for expedited approval of exportation of natural gas to World 

Trade Organization countries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2014 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. UPTON, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. BARTON, Mr. OLSON, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, 

Mr. GUTHRIE, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. BURGESS, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. LANCE, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. 

LATTA, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, Mr. PITTS, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, 

Mr. HALL, Mr. TURNER, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. WOMACK) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for expedited approval of exportation of natural 

gas to World Trade Organization countries, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Domestic Prosperity 

5 and Global Freedom Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

3 717b(c)) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘For purposes’’; 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘a nation with which there is in 

6 effect a free trade agreement requiring national 

7 treatment for trade in natural gas’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

8 World Trade Organization member nation’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘World 

11 Trade Organization member nation’ means a country de12 scribed in section 2(10) of the Uruguay Round Agree13 ments Act (19 U.S.C. 3501(10)).’’. 

14 SEC. 3. PENDING APPLICATIONS. 

15 Any application for authorization to export natural 

16 gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

17 717b) for which a notice has been published in the Federal 

18 Register before March 6, 2014, shall be granted without 

19 modification or delay. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 786 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that tar sands 

are crude oil for purposes of the Federal excise tax on petroleum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that tar sands are crude oil for purposes of the Federal 

excise tax on petroleum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tar Sands Tax Loop5 hole Elimination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TAR SANDS AS CRUDE OIL FOR 

7 EXCISE TAX PURPOSES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 4612(a) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strikVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:55 Feb 28, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H786.IH H786

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 786 IH

1 ing ‘‘and natural gasoline’’ and inserting ‘‘, natural gaso2 line, and tar sands’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

5 of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 682 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 682

                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2013

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM PARLAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ibrahim Parlak enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Ibrahim 
Parlak shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofProvidence
 Resources, Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedMarch 31,
 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission on the date hereof, I,Gilbert Burciaga, do
 hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
 best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant
for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:May15,
 2009





/s/
 Gilbert Burciaga

Gilbert
 Burciaga

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



30
Ricky L. SHOEMAKER, Sr. v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-00983-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: August 27, 2018 Closed: November 8, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.