alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 885 

AN ACT 

To expand the boundary of the San Antonio Missions 

National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 885 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Antonio Missions 

3 National Historical Park Boundary Expansion Act of 

4 2013’’. 

5 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY EXPANSION. 

6 Section 201(a) of Public Law 95–629 (16 U.S.C. 

7 410ee(a)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘In order’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) In 

9 order’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘The park shall also’’ and in11 serting the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) The park shall also’’; 

13 (3) by striking ‘‘After advising the’’ and insert14 ing the following: 

15 ‘‘(5) After advising the’’. 

16 (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) (as so des17 ignated by paragraph (2)) the following: 

18 ‘‘(3) The boundary of the park is further modified 

19 to include approximately 137 acres, as depicted on the 

20 map titled ‘San Antonio Missions National Historical 

21 Park Proposed Boundary Addition’, numbered 472/ 

22 113,006A, and dated June 2012. The map shall be on 

23 file and available for inspection in the appropriate offices 

24 of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the In25 terior. 
3 

•HR 885 EH

1 ‘‘(4) The Secretary may not acquire by condemnation 

2 any land or interest in land within the boundaries of the 

3 park. The Secretary is authorized to acquire land and in4 terests in land that are within the boundaries of the park 

5 pursuant to paragraph (3) by donation or exchange only 

6 (and in the case of an exchange, no payment may be made 

7 by the Secretary to any landowner). No private property 

8 or non-Federal public property shall be included within the 

9 boundaries of the park without the written consent of the 

10 owner of such property. Nothing in this Act, the establish11 ment of the park, or the management plan of the park 

12 shall be construed to create buffer zones outside of the 

13 park. That an activity or use can be seen or heard from 

14 within the park shall not preclude the conduct of that ac15 tivity or use outside the park.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 885 

AN ACT 

To expand the boundary of the San Antonio Mispurposes. sions National Historical Park, and for other
EXHIBIT 99.1 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Reform  and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as  adopted),  I, David
Colette,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
herebys certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1.  The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  period  ended
September 30, 2002, and to which this  Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
(the "PERIODIC REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  of the Company at the end of the
period  covered by the Periodic  Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: November 13, 2002


S/ David Colette
-------------------------------------------------
David Colette
CEO & CFO

THIS  CERTIFICATION   ACCOMPANIES  THIS  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SS.  906  OF  THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED  "FILED" BY THE  COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
Kendrick Lamont CASEY v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01112-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: August 28, 2018 Closed: November 8, 2018

Motion Desc: Casey Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
UNITED STATESSECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB/AAmendment No. 1

QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly
Period Ended September 30, 2003Commission File Number 0-30601

WHY USA FINANCIAL
GROUP, INC.(Exact name of the small business as specified in its charter)

8301 Creekside #101
Bloomington, MN 55437
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

(952) 841-7050
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

|Nevada                          |  | 87-0390603                           | 
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | 
|(State or other jurisdiction of |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | 
|Incorporation or organization)  | 

Check whether the issuer (1) filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the
past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports) YES {X} NO{ } and (2) had been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES {X} NO { }

The number of shares outstanding of
the Registrants Common Stock, $0.001 par value, as of November 6, 2003 was
59,946,110.

---

---

PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION

---

# ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS AND
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

| | (a) |  | Exhibits
| | --- |  | --------

| |  | 31.3 |  | Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
| |  | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amended report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 17, 2003

| |  |                               |  |                           | 
| |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | 
| |  | WHY USA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
| |  | By                            |  | /s/   James B Kylstad     | 
| |  |                               |  |                          
| |  |                               |  | James B. Kylstad          | 
| |  |                               |  | Chief Executive Officer   | 
| |  | By                            |  | /s/   Michael J. Peterson | 
| |  |                               |  |                          
| |  |                               |  | Michael Peterson          | 
| |  |                               |  | Chief Financial Officer   | 

---
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Nelnet Education Loan Funding, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-104736, on Form S-3 of Nelnet Education Loan Funding, Inc. of our report
dated February 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Nelnet Education Loan Funding, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which
report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Nelnet
Education Loan Funding, Inc.




/s/ KPMG, LLP



Lincoln, Nebraska
March 26, 2004
Exhibit 31

Certification

I, Richard J. Johnson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Impac
CMB Trust Series 2003-5;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Wendover Financial Services Corporation, as subservicer, Countrywide
Home Loans Servicing LP, as subservicer, GMAC Mortgage Corporation,
as subservicer and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/:  Richard J. Johnson
Richard J. Johnson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Impac Funding Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

s0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

146194 & (9)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146194

COA: 312146

Wayne CC: 11

- 010318

- FC

MELVIN HENRY TAYLOR,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

remand is DENIED.

V IVIANO

, J., not participating.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 692 

To provide protection for certain Federal employees with respect to implementation of the June 15, 2012, memorandum from Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, regarding the exercise of prosecutorial 

discretion with respect to individuals who came to the United States 

as children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. BARLETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To provide protection for certain Federal employees with 

respect to implementation of the June 15, 2012, memorandum from Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland 

Security, regarding the exercise of prosecutorial discretion with respect to individuals who came to the United 

States as children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Department 

5 of Homeland Security Personnel Act of 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 692 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO REFUSE TO 

2 CARRY OUT UNLAWFUL PROVISIONS OF THE 

3 MEMORANDUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, no adverse personnel action, including em6 ployee termination, may be taken against a protected indi7 vidual which is based, in whole or in part, on the refusal 

8 of such individual to carry out a provision of the memo9 randum described in subsection (b) that has been deter10 mined by the Congress to be in violation of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

12 (b) MEMORANDUM DESCRIBED.—This Act applies 

13 with respect to the June 15, 2012, memorandum from 

14 Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, re15 garding the exercise of prosecutorial discretion with re16 spect to individuals who came to the United States as chil17 dren. 

18 (c) PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS.—For purposes of this 

19 Act, the term ‘‘protected individual’’ means an individual 

20 employed in or under any of the following: 

21 (1) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforce22 ment. 

23 (2) U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 

24 (3) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. 

25 (d) ADVERSE ACTIONS INCLUDE DENIAL OF BENE26 FITS.—The personnel actions prohibited by this Act inVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:16 Feb 25, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H692.IH H692

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 692 IH

1 clude the withholding or denial of a promotion, an increase 

2 in pay, or other similar benefit. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
March 8, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

8100 NORTH FREEWAY, LTD. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00301

- CV V.

THE CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee , the City of Houston, signed March 24, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below
AFFIRMED

.
We order appellant, 8100 North Freeway, Ltd., to pa y all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
L. M. W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 794 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for treatment 

of clinical psychologists as physicians for purposes of furnishing clinical 

psychologist services under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. CHU, Mr. DEFAZIO, 

Mr. ELLISON, Mr. HONDA, Ms. MOORE, and Mr. PIERLUISI) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for treatment of clinical psychologists as physicians for 

purposes of furnishing clinical psychologist services under 

the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 794 IH

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS AS 

2 PHYSICIANS FOR PURPOSES OF FURNISHING 

3 CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

5 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ before ‘‘(5)’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

9 ‘‘, or (6) a clinical psychologist, but only with re10 spect to the furnishing of qualified psychologist serv11 ices described in subsection (ii) for which the psy12 chologist is legally authorized to perform by the 

13 State and who is acting within the scope of the psy14 chologist’s license (or other authorization under 

15 State law)’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

18 on or after January 1, 2014. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Salvatore V. ZICARI and Rosemary Zicari, Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, not individually, but as Trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-3421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0664 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TANYA TWOTEETH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 13 2024

03/13/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0664
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heung Hung Lee,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Heung Hung LeeHeung
      Hung LeeChief
      Financial Officer





November
15, 2010
RELIABLE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, LLC, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Anderson L. SmithAnderson L. SmithPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Jane P. HuttonJane P. HuttonChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


Date: September 11, 2008
Exhibit 10.546 FIRST AMENDMENT TO MORTGAGE BROKERAGE SERVICES AGREEMENT This First Amendment to that certain Mortgage Brokerage Services Agreement dated as of November 1, 2006 (Services Agreement) made between INLAND WESTERN RETAIL REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES, INC., (Business Manager) a Maryland corporation and INLAND MORTGAGE BROKERAGE CORPORATION (Service Provider), an Illinois corporation, is made as of November 1, 2006. RECITAL Business Manager and Service Provider desire to amend the Compensation paid to Service Provider by providing for an hourly, actual cost to Service Provider, charge for post closing services requested by the Business Manager or the REIT and/or a REIT Affiliate and rendered by the Service Provider, such services including the completion of post closing obligations and other services not covered under or compensated by the percentage brokerage fee. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements to be made herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The Recital set forth above is hereby incorporated herein by reference. 2. Effective as of November 1, 2006, a new subparagraph is added to Paragraph 1 of Exhibit A, as follows; Follow up and complete post closing obligations of borrowers as requested by the Business Manager, or the REIT or Affiliates of the REIT (Post Closing Services). 3. Effective December 1, 2006, Paragraph 2 of Exhibit A to the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and in lieu thereof the following is inserted: 2. Compensation: Except for Post Closing Services, Service Provider shall be paid for all services rendered under this Agreement on the basis of 0.2% of the principal amount of each loan placed for the REIT and/or its Affiliates. For Post Closing Services, Service Provider shall be paid at the rate $34.00 per hour of Post Closing Services rendered. In all other respects the Services Agreement remains in full force and effect  INLAND WESTERN RETAIL REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Brenda Gail GujralIts:Vice President  INLAND MORTGAGE BROKERAGE CORPORATIONBy:/s/ Gail P. GressIts:Vice President
Robert D. CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. Nicole CUMMINGS, Appellee.

No. 4D18-456

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 31, 2018]

Robert D. Cummings, North Port, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.* *See* *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee* , 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.").

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.
Garry N. SAVAGE, Sr., and Garry N. Savage, Jr., Appellants, v. Bethine FILION, Individually, as Sole Successor Trustee of the Filion Family Living Trust, Dated 01/18/1992, and as Beneficiary of Her Iras and Those of the Late Richard Filion, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
M.K., the Father, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.

No. 3D18-1802

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

Abramowitz and Associates, and Jordan B. Abramowitz, Coral Gables, for petitioner.

Karla Perkins, Miami, for respondent.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

**ON CONFESSION OF ERROR**

PER CURIAM.

*506M.K., the father, appeals from the trial court's August 10, 2018, shelter order. The Department concedes that the trial court's shelter order entered on August 10, 2018, constituted a departure from the essential requirements of the law, as the shelter hearing proceeded without the presence of the Father's counsel. *See**G.W. v. Dep't of Children & Families*, 92 So.3d 307, 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). The Department therefore requests that this Court remand the matter to the trial court in order to allow a shelter hearing to proceed where both the parents and their respective counsels are present. Based on our review and the Department's proper Confession of Error, we quash the trial court's August 10, 2018, shelter order and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.