alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_publications(91)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - (-)oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        February 29, 2024        A targeted annual warning system (TAWS) for identifying aberrant declines in greater sage-grouse populations

Project        May 16, 2017        Groundwater in the Upper Deschutes Basin, Oregon

Research        September 16, 2022        Prioritizing Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems Tool (PReSET):    A USGS-facilitated Decision-support Tool for Sagebrush Ecosystem Conservation and Restoration Actions

Project        January 3, 2011        Columbia Plateau Groundwater Availability Study
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

         (1)      The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
                  ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
                  requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of
                  1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Company's Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and result of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/  Rebecca S. Stotler
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Rebecca S. Stotler
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 8, 2003




                                       26
Robert E. PHILYAW, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3251

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 17, 2018

Robert E. Philyaw, II, Defuniak Springs, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed an appeal with this Court following the denial of his motion seeking postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, the issues and arguments Appellant raises here were not presented to the postconviction court. Accordingly, those issues and arguments are not properly before this Court. *Evans v. State* , 975 So.2d 1035, 1042 (Fla. 2007). We affirm the postconviction court's order denying Appellant's rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31CERTIFICATION     I, Paul Knauss, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DaimlerChrysler FinancialServices Americas LLC, the Servicer of DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2005-A, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K containing distributionor servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual reportof DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2005-A;Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to theTrustee by the Servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion inthese reports is included in these reports;I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance reviewrequired under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilledits obligations under that agreement; andThe reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer’s compliance with theminimum servicing standards based upon the reports provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for MortgageBankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, areincluded in these reports.   Date: March 24, 2006    /s/ Paul E. Knauss     Paul E. Knauss  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, as  Servicer of DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2005-A
exv10w12



 








Exhibit 10.12




May 29, 2007




Oak Hill Capital Management, LLC

717 Fifth Avenue, 12th Floor

New York, NY 10022-8112




Dear Oak Hill Capital Management, LLC:





     Since investment funds affiliated with or designated by Oak Hill Capital
Management, LLC became stockholders of RSC Holdings, Inc. (together with its
subsidiaries, the “Company”), Oak Hill Capital Management, LLC has
provided the Company with financial, investment banking, management advisory and
other services at the request of the Company. In connection with the Company’s
initial public offering, the Monitoring Agreement between Oak Hill Capital
Management, LLC and the Company pursuant to which such services were provided
will be terminated.



     Notwithstanding such termination, the Company and Oak Hill Capital
Management, LLC anticipate that from time to time Oak Hill Capital Management,
LLC will provide services to the Company and assist the Company with financial,
investment banking and other advisory and employee recruiting matters and that,
in the course of providing such services and assisting with such matters Oak
Hill Capital Management, LLC may incur out of pocket expenses. The Company
hereby agrees to reimburse Oak Hill Capital Management, LLC for its actual
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with providing such services and
assistance to the Company, including any such expenses accrued to date. This
reimbursement obligation is separate from and in addition to any obligation on
the part of the Company to reimburse any representative of Oak Hill Capital
Management, LLC who is a member of the board of directors of the Company.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	RSC HOLDINGS INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kevin Groman
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Kevin Groman 	 
	 	 	Title:  	SVP - General Counsel
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - (-)maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2021        Image of the Week - Tides in the Bay of Fundy

How to's and trainings        September 30, 2016        Navigating the USGS Emergency Operations Collection Management Tool

Presentations and Events        May 5, 2020        Timing is Everything: Fish, Wildlife, and Timing of Life Events
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6965 TODD K. COLEY, a/k/a Kenyo Blackmon, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-167-7) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Todd K. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Todd K. Coley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Coley v. Garraghty , No. CA00-167-7 (W.D. Va. filed June 20, 2000; entered June 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Curtis Lee DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
OPINION ON REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM R. ATKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-88-291-A, CA-97-1351-AM)

Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William R. Atkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Roland Barr, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William R. Atkins seeks to appeal separate orders entered by

the district court denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and denying his motion for reconsideration. By court order, the panel granted Atkins’ petition for

rehearing and vacated its decision of September 1, 1998.

Atkins filed an untimely notice of appeal. We accordingly

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions involving the United States are accorded sixty days within which to

file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or

final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Exceptions to the appeal period obtain only if the district court extends the time to

appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order denying Atkins’ § 2255

motion on September 19, 1997, and entered its order denying Atkins’

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration on October 10,

1997. Thus, Atkins had until December 9, 1997, within which to

submit his notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). Atkins’

notice of appeal was dated December 10, 1997, and filed on December
3

22, 1997. The district court did not extend the appeal period.

Accordingly, Atkins’ failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an

extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal from either the denial of

the § 2255 motion or the denial of his motion for reconsideration.

We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal as to those orders.

Atkins also appealed from the district court’s order denying

several post-judgment collateral motions. We have reviewed the

record and find that the district court’s denial of these motions

was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

of these orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1


                   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (xi)1350

     This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
certification is included solely for the purpose of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not to be used for
any other purpose. In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, I, Arthur
Johnson, hereby certify in my capacity as an officer of Savoy Resources Corp.
that to my knowledge:

     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Savoy Resources Corp. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Savoy Resources Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Savoy Resources Corp.


Date:  September 20, 2005                By: /s/ Arthur Johnson
                                             ------------------------
                                             Arthur Johnson, President
                                             Chief  Executive Officer,
                                             Chief  Financial Officer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned  officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage  Securities Corp., a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-MS8, as follows:

     1. I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 15, 2004.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Michael L. Parker
                         Michael L. Parker,
                         President and Director
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the
undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                        |  |                                   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2009 |  | /s/ Adelene Q. Perkins            
|                        |  | Adelene Q. Perkins                
|                        |  | President & Chief Business Officer
|                        |  | (Principal financial officer)     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.1 



AMENDMENT 



        This
Amendment, dated as of July 25, 2008 (the “Amendment”), amends the Management
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2002 (the “Original Employment
Agreement”), between WidePoint Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and Steve L. Komar (the “Employee”). 



        WHEREAS,
the Original Employment Agreement expired as of July 1, 2008 and the parties now desire to
extend the duration of the employment period. 



        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound do hereby agree as follows: 



             1.     
          The duration of the Original Employment Agreement is hereby extended for (i) one
          (1) additional period of twelve (12) months, commencing upon the date of this
          Amendment, and (ii) the duration of the Original Employment Agreement shall be
          extended for one (1) additional period of another twelve (12) months immediately
          following the expiration of the first 12-month period described in the
          immediately preceding clause (i), unless the Employee gives written notice to
          the contrary to the Company at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of
          the then current period as reflected in the immediately preceding clause (i). 



             2.     
          All other provisions of the Original Employment Agreement are hereby ratified by
          the parties as continuing in full force and effect, except as otherwise provided
          in this Amendment. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this
          Amendment and the provisions of the Original Employment Agreement, the
          provisions of this Amendment shall supercede and control. 



             3.     
          The persons signing below on behalf of the Company and the Employee,
          respectively, each and all represent and warrant that this Amendment has been
          duly approved by each such party and that the persons signing this Amendment
          have the full power and authority to sign and execute this Amendment on behalf
          of the Company and the Employee, respectively. 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has duly executed this Amendment as of the date first
written above. 



	WIDEPOINT CORPORATION	 
	

By:   /s/ James T. McCubbin  	/s/ Steve L. Komar 
	Name: James T. McCubbin	Steve L. Komar, Individually
	Title: C.F.O.
Michael TRAMEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3282

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
L.H., the Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1502

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Order entered January 2 , 2020

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00452

- CR

RODRICK BERNARD SPEN CE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14

- 00153

- K



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 27, 2019 second motion for extension of time

to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received on Decembe r 28, 2019

filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Evolving Gold Corp. - Exhibit 4.9





 
































































Please see Schedule “C” to Exhibit 4.8 of the Company’s Form 20-F for the year-ended March 31, 2008.