alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Arie Cohen, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CardioNet, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2008                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Arie Cohen                         |   |
| Arie Cohen                             |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)         |   |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(16)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(349)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(16)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(14)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(115)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(92)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(20)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(27)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149220(2)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(8)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
EXHIBIT 13.1

GRUPO TMM, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, José F. Serrano Segovia, the Chief Executive Officer of Grupo TMM, S.A.B. (the Company),
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2013, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 30, 2014



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ José F. Serrano Segovia
|José F. Serrano Segovia    
|Chief Executive Officer
Mary L. GALLOWAY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 28, 2017

Mary L. Galloway, Orlando, for Appellant.

Brian Meola, of Department of Children and Families, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 986 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-733, K2025-732.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-30047 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Lashay WILLIAMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: Ayelet EDELSTEIN v. Eric Ohnona, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1690

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Alexander LOICANA

NO. 2018-KK-1545

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

*193Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

CLARK, J., would grant.
UNITED HOME CARE, INC., Trinity Home Health Care, Inc. and John D. Jones v. Charlie SIMPSON, Charles Gardner, CCZ, L.L.C., DJ-CS Properties, Inc. and CKS Properties, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-CC-1572

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Denied.
Eddie Jermain WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J AC K B E NN Y WI L L I AMS , a . k . a . S n o w, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50453 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 0 -cr-0 0 0 9 9 -S JO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anuary17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a c k B e nnyW i l l i a m s appe a l s hi s 18- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ors e l l i ng c ount e r f e i tc urr e nc yof

the U ni t e d S t a t e s w i th i nt e ntt o de f r aud, i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . § 473. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ), W il li am s’s 

# FI LED JAN 19 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50453 2 c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e ar e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on to w ith d r aw a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dW illia m s th e o p p o rtu n ityto fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 , 1 0 9 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED . AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tina Klocke, Chief Operations and Financial Bear, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Tina KlockeTina KlockeChief Operations and Financial Bear, Treasurer and SecretaryDate: November 11, 2010

Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael Edwin WORLDS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| TO:  | Seabridge Gold Inc.United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Re:  | Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")Consent of Expert |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | 2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012 and amended November 11, 2014 (the "Report") |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | consent to the public filing of the Report and the use of any extracts from or a summary of the Report in the 40-F and the Registration Statement; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | consent to the use of my name and Allnorth Consultants Ltd.'s name and references to the Report, or portions thereof, in the 40-F and the Registration Statement and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in the 40-F and Registration Statement; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 7. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and that they fairly and accurately represent the information in the sections of the Report for which I am responsible; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 8. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    |   | Yours truly,             |
|--------------|--------|--------------------------|
|         |   |                     |
|         |   |                     |
|         |   | /s/ Darby Kreitz, P.Eng. |
|         |   | Darby Kreitz, P.Eng.     |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN DEON BRAZIER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JEFFREY A. BEARD; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15898 

D.C. No. 1:13-cv-00787-LJO-MJS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017**

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Kevin Deon Brazier appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from defendants’ failure to grant him a kosher diet. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 17-15898 

Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Brazier 

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly 

exhausted administrative remedies, or whether administrative remedies were 

effectively unavailable to him. See Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1858-60 (2016) 

(describing limited circumstances under which administrative remedies are deemed 

unavailable); Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of 

administrative remedies . . . means using all steps that the agency holds out, and 

doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation, 

internal quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KATHERINE HARRIGAN, 

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF 

JOSHUA C. BULLOCK

v.

KIRSTEN FORSYTHE, SCOTT MASSEY 

AND OM MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. T/A RED 

LION PAIN & PRIMARY CARE

PETITION OF: KIRSTEN FORSYTHE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 522 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1421 MDA 

2021 entered on June 30, 2023, 

reversing and remanding the 

Order of the York County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. 2021-SU000053 entered on October 22, 

2021

KATHERINE HARRIGAN, 

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF 

JOSHUA C. BULLOCK

v.

KIRSTEN FORSYTHE, SCOTT MASSEY 

AND OM MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. T/A RED 

LION PAIN & PRIMARY CARE

PETITION OF: SCOTT MASSEY AND OM 

MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. T/A RED LION 

PAIN & PRIMARY CARE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 523 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1421 MDA 

2021 entered on June 30, 2023, 

reversing and remanding the 

Order of the York County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. 2021-SU000053 entered on October 22, 

2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, the decision of the lower court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED
[523 MAL 2023] - 2

for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decision in Ferraro v. Patterson-Erie Corp., 

1 WAP 2023, 2024 WL 1776128 (Pa. April 25, 2024).

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Christine REIMEL and Richard Reimel, Appellants, v. FEDERATED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99FIRST CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BANCORPPROXY FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSTo Be Held On                     , 2005THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS     The undersigned shareholder of FIRST CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BANCORP hereby appoints                     and                     , or either of them, to represent the undersigned at the meeting of the shareholdersof FIRST CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BANCORP to be held on                     , 2005, at 3:00 p.m. (local time), atFirst California Southern Bancorp, 1350 Rosecrans Street, San Diego, California 92106, and at anyadjournments or postponements thereof, and to vote the number of shares the undersigned would beentitled to vote if personally present at the meeting on the matters listed below.     When properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed by the undersignedshareholder and in the discretion of the proxy holder as to any other matter that may come beforethe meeting of shareholders and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. If no direction isgiven, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the proposal to approve and adopt the Plan of Merger and inthe discretion of the proxy holder as to any other matter that may properly come before the meetingor any adjournments or postponements thereof.     WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, DATE, AND PROMPTLYRETURN THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE SO THAT YOUR SHARES MAY BE REPRESENTED ATTHE MEETING.     THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE PLAN OF MERGER.     1. Proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 17,2005, by and between CAPITOL BANCORP LIMITED and FIRST CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BANCORP and the mergerand other transactions contemplated by such merger agreement.     o FOR            o AGAINST            o ABSTAIN     2. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as mayproperly come before the Meeting.
 

 
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, IT SHALL BE VOTED FORPROPOSAL 1.Dated:                     , 2005        Number of Shares of Common Stock          Signature (and title if applicable)          Signature (if held jointly)         Please sign your name exactly as itappears on your stock certificate.When shares are held by jointtenants, both should sign. Whensigning as attorney, executor,administrator, trustee or guardian,please give full title as such. Ifa corporation, please sign in fullcorporate name by the President orother authorized officer. If apartnership, please sign inpartnership name by authorized person.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21
               SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY BANCORP



Panhandle State Bank
Intermountain Statutory Trust I
Intermountain Statutory Trust II
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 October 7, 2005
 CAPTEC FRANCHISE CAPITAL PARTNERS L.P. IV
  Delaware
    
    333-9371
    
    38-3304096(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive
Lobby L, 4th Floor
Ann Arbor, Michigan
    
    
    
    48106(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (734) 994-5505
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.01.      Termination of Agreement of Sale.Item 9.01.      Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.01. Termination of Agreement of Sale .
   
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .
 (a)
    
    No financial statements are required to be filed as part of this Form 8-K.(b)
    
    No pro forma financial information is required to be filed as part of this
Form 8-K.(c)
    
    No exhibits are required to be filed as part of this Form 8-K.
 Forward-Looking Statements




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  CAPTEC FRANCHISE CAPITAL PARTNERS L.P. IV
 By:
    
    GP4 Asset Acquisition, LLCGeneral Partner of Captec Franchise Capital Partners L.P. IVBy:
    
    /s/ Patrick L. BeachPatrick L. BeachPresidentDate:
    
    October 7, 2005