alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
G. Chilek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ Martin Chilek
                                       ---------------------
                                       Martin G. Chilek
                                       Chief Financial Officer

July 26, 2005


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Page 26
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
  Recitals
 ® ®
   Defined Terms
 Payment by Distributor for Product Orders
 Payment by Distributor for Product Orders
 Account Name:
    
    The Medicines CompanyBank Name:
    
    JP Morgan Chase Bank
New York, NY 01004Account No.:
    
    [**]FED ABA No.:
    
    [**]
 Effect of Amendment




---



##### 



The Medicines Company
    
    
    
    Integrated Commercialization Solutions, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ John F. Riggs
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Doug CookName:
    
    John F. Riggs
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Doug CookTitle:
    
    VP Global Contracting & Pricing
Integrity
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    VP, Distribution Services
Roger William PITTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2057

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Roger William Pitts, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Conner, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT
OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





I, Heung
Hung Lee, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Creative Vistas,
Inc.;





2. based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. the
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under one supervisor, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. the
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Dated:
November 16, 2009





/s/ Heung Hung LeeHeung
      Hung LeeChief
      Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(87)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(562)
              - products_data(327)
              - products_maps(82)
              - products_publications(3046)
              - products_software(11)
              - products_web_tools(36)
              - multimedia_audio(224)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(213)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(11)
              - multimedia_before_after(30)
              - multimedia_image(1326)
              - multimedia_image-141769(111)
              - multimedia_image-141770(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(734)
              - multimedia_image-141772(18)
              - multimedia_image-141774(7)
              - multimedia_image-141775(141)
              - multimedia_image-141776(81)
              - multimedia_image-141783(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(215)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(21)
              - multimedia_video(600)
              - multimedia_video-149194(179)
              - multimedia_video-149195(233)
              - multimedia_video-149196(42)
              - multimedia_video-149197(65)
              - multimedia_video-149198(46)
              - multimedia_video-149225(4)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(1)
              - documents_file(1062)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - documents_file-149204(8)
              - documents_file-149206(2)
              - documents_file-149208(2)
              - documents_file-149209(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149213(4)
              - documents_file-149214(19)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(4)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - documents_file-149220(17)
              - documents_file-149222(990)
              - documents_file-149224(6)
              - news_news-149245(47)
              - news_news-149246(9)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(41)
              - news_news-149249(19)
              - news_news-149250(44)
              - news_newsletters(26)
              - news_other_news(287)
              - connect_locations(2)
              - connect_social_media(8)
              - connect_staff_profiles(159)
              - other_basic-37(19)
              - other_basic-42(245)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Policy and Directives        July 18, 2014        National Plan for Civil Earth Observations

Human Capital        March 15, 2022        USGS Library

Policy and Directives        May 24, 2021        INCIDENTAL HARASSMENT AUTHORIZATION

Policy and Directives        May 24, 2021        NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SECTION 7

Policy and Directives        October 24, 2018        National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Collection Policy
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00104

- CV

IN RE DAVID GLEN HAR RIS RELATOR

------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 2011

- PR00903

- 1

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------
The court has considered r ela tor’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: SUDDERTH, DAUPHINOT, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 26, 2015

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52 .8 (d).
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN

(Effective as of April 1, 2008)




     Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (the “Company”), the Board approved in April 2008 updates to the
Company’s director compensation plan in order to (i) replace per-meeting fees with annual retainers
and (ii) incorporate time-based vesting into all future equity grants to directors. Only members
of the Board who are not employees of the Company (“Outside Directors”) are entitled to receive the
compensation summarized below. All retainers are payable quarterly in arrears.



Board Retainer




     All Outside Directors are entitled to receive an annual retainer of $30,000. The Chairman of
the Board also receives an annual retainer of $20,000. In addition, Outside Directors who serve on
Board committees are entitled to receive the fees set forth below, as applicable.



Board Committee Retainers




     The chairperson of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an annual retainer of $20,000,
and the other members of the Audit Committee are entitled to receive an annual retainer of $15,000.



     The chairperson of the Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an annual retainer of
$15,000, and the other members of the Compensation Committee are entitled to receive an annual
retainer of $7,500.



     The chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is entitled to receive an
annual retainer of $10,000, and the other members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee are entitled to receive an annual retainer of $5,000.



Equity Compensation




     The number of shares underlying the initial stock option grant to a new director remains
unchanged at 40,000 shares, and the number of shares underlying each director’s annual anniversary
option grant remains unchanged at 15,000 shares. However, all such director option grants from and
after April 1, 2008 shall vest over three (3) years in accordance with the following vesting
schedule: 25 percent of the shares subject to the option grant shall vest immediately upon the
date of grant, and 1/36th of the balance of the shares shall vest monthly thereafter.
Edward AARON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeramy Michael HOLDER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3316

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Clifford C. FRISBY v. Ferrell WARDEN

2017-CT-00548-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: September 25, 2018 Closed: November 29, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 857 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-570, K2025-568.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29748 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 23

[LARROWE & COMPANY, PLC LETTERHEAD]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Surrey Bancorp

145 North Renfro Street

Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030-8038

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-108676 and 333-108677) of Surrey Bancorp on Forms S-8 of our report dated February 27, 2006 on the consolidated financial statements of Surrey Bancorp as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 which report appears in this December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Surrey Bancorp.



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ Larrowe & Company, PLC
|Galax, Virginia           
|March 21, 2006
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1948** 

In R e: EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 1:04

- cr - 00126

- NCT

- 1; 1:08

- cv - 00261

- NCT

- PTS)

Submitted : May 24, 2011 Decided: June 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Eddie Lavon McNeil l , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eddie Lavon McNeill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court denied McNeill’s motion on March 25, 2011 **.** Accordingly, because the district court has recently adjudicated McNeill’ s Rule 59(e) motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot . We grant McNeill’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis . We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
December 31, 2002 (the Report) of BearingPoint, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Randolph C. Blazer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



/s/    RANDOLPH C. BLAZER

| | 
| | 

Name: Randolph C. Blazer

Date: October 6, 2003
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 RULE
        13a-14(b) 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
        OF
 SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
        undersigned, Michael Nouri, Principal Executive Officer of the
        Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 
 By:/s/
                  Michael Nouri
                Michael Nouri
                Principal Executive Officer
 
 Date:
        November 22, 2005
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00310 - CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .E.L.

----------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Mother appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her daughter, A.E.L. T he trial court found by clear and convincing evidence that Mother had engaged in conduct that had endangered the physical or emotional well

- being of A.E.L. and that Mother had knowingl y placed or knowingly allowed A.E.L. to remain in conditions or surroundings that had endangered her physical or emotional well

- being

. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(1)(D), (E) (West Supp. 2013). The trial court further found that

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

termination of Mothe r’s parental rights is in A.E.L.’s best interest. See id. § 161.001(2). Mother’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the motion, counsel avers that he has conducted a pro fessional evaluation of the record and, after a thorough review of the applicable law, has reached the conclusion that there are

no arguable grounds to be advanced to support an appeal of this cause and that the appeal is frivolous. Mother was given the o pportunity to file a pro se brief, but she has not done so. The Department of Family and Protective Services s ent us a letter stating that it was waiving the opportunity to file a response

. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Ander s v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no reversible grounds on appeal and referencing any grounds that might arguably support the appeal. See 386 U.S. 738 , 74 4 , 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967) ; In re K.M. , 98 S.W.3d 774, 776

– 77 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) (holding that Anders procedures apply in parental rights termination cases), disp.

o n merits , No. 02

– 01

– 00349

– CV, 2003 WL 2006583 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth M ay 1, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). In our duties as a reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is frivolous. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); K.M. , 2003 WL 200 6583, at *2. Only then may we grant3

counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). We have carefully reviewed the appellate record and appellate counsel’s brief. We agree with appellate counsel that t he appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); In

re E.M.M

. , No. 02

- 1 2

- 00259

- CV, 2012 WL 6632785 , at * 6, * 9 (Tex. Ap p. — Fort Worth Dec. 21 , 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.). Therefore, we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order terminating Mother’s parental rights to A.E.L.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER , JJ. DE LIVERED: January 16, 2014
#### HIGGINS v. BINNS, U. S. Atty.

No. 13784.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 9, 1953.

John Michael Iliggins, in pro. per.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that Higgins’ petition for permission to prosecute his appeal in forma pauperis shows that it presents for consideration the following substantial questions: (a) whether he had been wrongfully deprived of bail where he is confined though not convicted of any crime and (b) whether one not convicted of a crime may be lawfully committed by a federal court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4244, as mentally incompetent without benefit of a jury trial, and that Pliggins has established that the district court’s certificate that the appeal is not taken in good faith is “without warrant,” Higgins v. Steele, 8 Cir., 195 F.2d 366, 369; Wells v. United States, 318 U.S. 257, 259, 63 S.Ct. 582, 87 L.Ed. 746.

It is ordered that Higgins may prosecute his appeal in forma pauperis.
U.S. ROF III LEGAL TITLE TRUST 2015-1, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Legal Title Trustee, Appellant, v. Dorothy C. GATTERDAM, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Jason F. Joseph of the Tromberg Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Kendrick Almaguer and Thomas Eross Jr. of The Ticktin Law Group, P.L.L.C., Deerfield, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.
Murray REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1456

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed November 27, 2018

Murray Reed, Clermont, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*1225AFFIRMED. *See**Baker v. State*, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004).

WALLIS, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.