alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - (-)products_data(1)
              - products_publications(19)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(34)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(7)
              - montana(5)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(6)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(3)
              - vermont(1)
              - (-)virginia(1)
              - washington(6)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Data Release        December 13, 2022        Airborne magnetic and radiometric survey, Virginia and North Carolina Fall Zone, 2021
Anthony MARESCA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1143

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

KATHERINE ELIZABETH ERNST

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM INACTIVE STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 148 DB 2017 (No. 94 RST 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 209036

(Montgomery County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2017, the Report and Recommendation 

of Disciplinary Board Member dated December 5, 2017, is approved and it is 

ORDERED that Katherine Elizabeth Ernst, who has been on Inactive Status, has never 

been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral 

qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
Anthony S. DESTEFANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1521

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 17, 2018

Anthony S. Destefano, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony S. DeStefano appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds Two through Five. However, because the record does not conclusively refute DeStefano's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor's comments on the law applicable to his sentencing, we reverse the summary denial of Ground One and remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. *See**Freeman v. State*, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) ("[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient." (citing *Maharaj v. State*, 684 So.2d 726 (Fla. 1996) ) ).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, BERGER, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
99.8








EBA
Engineering Consultants Ltd.





March 25,
2010




TO:           Seabridge
Gold Inc.





Ladies
and Gentlemen:





Reference
is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc.
(the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year
then ended, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference
in the 40-F.





I, N.
Eric Fier, CPG, P.Eng., on behalf of myself and EBA Engineering Consultants
Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the
following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name and EBA
Engineering Consultants Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in
the AIF: Seabridge Gold Inc. - Courageous Lake Project, Preliminary Economic
Assessment - 2008 dated March 10, 2008.




Yours
      truly,/S/
      N. ERIC FIERN.
      Eric Fier, CPG, P.Eng.
John Earl HUNTT, Appellant, v. Sandra Gay HUNTT, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3316

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 23, 2018

John Earl Huntt, St. Petersburg, pro se.

Arthur C. Fulmer, Jr., of Fulmer & Fulmer, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
In the INTEREST OF H.D. and X.D., Children.

R.D., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-2512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical International Technology, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.









/s/ 
       Michel
      Bayouk


Michel
      Bayouk


Secretary
      and Principal Accounting Officer





July
      16,
      2007
Michael Ray FONTAINE v. STATE of Mississippi

2015-CT-00719-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: August 20, 2018 Closed: November 8, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
Exhibit 23.13(b)




Golder Associates Ltd.





March 22, 2013





TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Ross Hammett, on behalf of myself and Golder Associates Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Golder Associates Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF and the 40-F: 2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012.





Yours truly,/s/ Ross HammettRoss Hammett
##### 



Exhibit 24.1 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF
INTERNATIONAL STEEL GROUP INC. POWERS OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors and
officers of International Steel Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby
constitutes and appoints Rodney B. Mott, Leonard M. Anthony, and Lonnie A.
Arnett, and each of them, as the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and revocation, for each of the undersigned and
in the name, place and stead of each of the undersigned, to sign on behalf of
each of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and to sign any and all amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
including, without limitation, a Form 12b-25, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting to said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them,
full power and authority to do so and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of
them or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it. Executed
as of this 9th day of March 2004. /s/ Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.
    
    /s/ Rodney B. MottWilbur L. Ross, Jr.
    
    Rodney B. MottChairman of the Board of Directors and Director
    
    President, Chief Executive Officerand Director (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Lonnie A. Arnett
    
    /s/ Leonard M. AnthonyLonnie A. Arnett
    
    Leonard M. AnthonyVice President, Controller and Chief
    
    Chief Financial OfficerAccounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)/s/ William C. BartholomayWilliam C. BartholomayDirector
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doron
Roethler, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Doron RoethlerDoron
      RoethlerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerMay
      14, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - products_publications(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for November 1, 2022

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!
Susan E. WYATT, Sandra Lock, and Robert L. Newberry, Appellants, v. Andrew J. SALTER; Margaret Mary O'Keef; Timothy Allen Kaiser; Jeff W. Goin; Michael L. Terfehr; Jenny B. Terfehr; Stephen E. Korta; Debra J. Korta; Ronald Hollmer; Patricia Hollmer; The Flanders Airfield Easement Holders Property Owners Association, Inc. f/k/a Flanders Field Property Owners Association, Inc.; Robert Lock; Terry Melton; and Gaye Melton, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2018

Stephen R. Senn and Nicholas L. Sellars of Peterson & Myers, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellants.

Daniel A. Fox, Benjamin W. Hardin, and Julie Landrigan Ball of Hardin & Ball, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellees Andrew J. Salter; Margaret Mary O'Keef; Timothy Allen Kaiser; Jeff W. Goin; Michael L. Terfehr; Jenny B. Terfehr; Stephen E. Korta; Debra J. Korta; Ronald Hollmer; Patricia Hollmer; The Flanders Airfield Easement Holders Property Owners Association, Inc. f/k/a Flanders Field Property Owners Association, Inc.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Steven Jay EDELMAN, DOC #L16675, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3422

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 34.2**

** **

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

General Electric Capital Corporation:

 

We have examined the accompanying management’s assertion that General Electric Capital Corporation, (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving credit card receivables, accounts receivable and asset based lending receivables (the Platform), as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.  Management has determined that criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(vi) are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, and that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the primary servicing services provided by the Company with respect to the Platform.  Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria including servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

(Signed) KPMG LLP

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 25, 2011

 

----
exv10wxby







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.b




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY

STOCK AWARD PROGRAM

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005)





     WHEREAS, Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), has adopted and
maintains the Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company Stock Award Program, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 2005 (the “Program”), a program established under the Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company 2007
Management Incentive Plan (the “MIP”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Program to exclude from participation any employees
hired on or after July 1, 2008 and in certain other respects.



     NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 1.10 of the MIP, the
Program is amended, effective January 1, 2008 or as of such other date set forth herein, as
follows:



     1. Section 2(h) of the Program is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end
thereof:




Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the term
“Eligible Employee” shall not include any person who was not an
employee of the Company or of an Associated Company as of June 30,
2008.



     2. Section 4(c) of the Program is hereby amended by adding the following phrase at the end
thereof:




, and any deferred shares shall be credited as Share Units, subject
to the terms of the Deferral Program.
| TO:  | Seabridge Gold Inc.United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Re:  | Seabridge Gold Inc. (the "Company")Consent of Expert |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Courageous Lake Prefeasibility Study dated September 5, 2012 and amended November 11, 2014 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | 2012 KSM (Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell) Prefeasibility Study dated June 22, 2012 and amended November 11, 2014 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | consent to the public filing of the Reports and the use of any extracts from or a summary of the Reports in the 40-F and the Registration Statement; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | consent to the use of my name and Moose Mountain Technical Services' name and references to the Reports, or portions thereof, in the 40-F and the Registration Statement and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Reports in the 40-F and Registration Statement; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 7. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and that they fairly and accurately represent the information in the sections of the Reports for which I am responsible; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 8. | confirm that I have read the 40-F and the Registration Statement and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Reports or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Reports. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|    |   | Yours truly,             |
|--------------|--------|--------------------------|
|         |   |                     |
|         |   | /s/ James H. Gray, P.Eng |
|         |   | James H. Gray, P.Eng.    |
STATE of Louisiana v. Dillion Wade TRAHAN aka Dillon Wade

NO. 2018-KO-0851

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

*197Denied.
Otis Lamar TOWBRIDGE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0017

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jacob WESTBROOK

NO. 2018-KK-1385

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Writ. denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., concurs and assigns reasons.

*258**CRICHTON, J., concurs, and would deny on the showing made. *See* La. S.Ct. R. X, § 4(6)(c).**