alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29535]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK High Impact, 
Interdisciplinary Science RC2 Review Meeting.
    Date: February 19, 2025.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, 
Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Nisan Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Diabetes 
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 668, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-
2405, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 11, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-29535 Filed 12-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
|        | (1)    |        | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |
|                                 | (2)    |                                 | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

| /s/  GlebMikhailov                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| GlebMikhailov                                                          |   |
| Chief FinancialOfficer(PrincipalFinancial and Accounting Officer) |   |
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

________________

No. 3D16-2813

Lower Tribunal No. 16-502

________________

A.P., a juvenile,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria De Jesus

Santovenia, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public

Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.

Based on the state’s proper confession of error, with which we agree, we

reverse the part of the trial court’s order withholding adjudication of delinquency,

and placing A.P. on probation, for grand theft and burglary of an unoccupied

conveyance, and remand for entry of judgment of dismissal as to these charges. 

See

J.E.P. v. State, 561 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (reversing adjudication of

delinquency where “[t]here is insufficient evidence to establish that the van J.E.P.

was attempting to jump-start was the same van charged in the information”); C.O.

v. State, 557 So. 2d 637, 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (reversing adjudication of

delinquency where “[t]here is no evidence establishing that the white 1985 Toyota

Camry stolen from Ms. Dixon at the 163rd Street shopping center on January 14th

was the same vehicle as the white, four door car which Mr. August observed C.O.

driving at 7742 N.W. 5th Court on January 15th”); J.G. v. State, 539 So. 2d 39, 40

(Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (“We reverse J.G.’s adjudications of delinquency and remand

the cause to the trial court with directions to enter judgments of acquittal based

upon the state’s failure to establish ownership of the automobile which J.G. was

charged with burglarizing and failure to establish ownership of the automobile

parts which J.G. was charged with stealing.”); C.B. v. State, 519 So. 2d 686, 687

(Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (“[T]he motion for a judgment of acquittal should have been

2
granted because the evidence as to proof of ownership of the automobile which the

appellant was charged with attempting to burglarize was woefully deficient to

support the finding that the appellant had committed such attempted burglary.”). 

A.P. does not appeal, and the state does not confess error as to, the part of the trial

court’s order withholding adjudication of delinquency and placing him on

probation for resisting a law enforcement officer without violence. That part of the

trial court’s order stands as unaffected by this appeal. 

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

3
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 00-20689

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABIODUN MOHOLAJI MABINOURI,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-111-1

- - - - - - - - - -

May 23, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abiodun Moholaji Mabinouri appeals the sentence he received

after pleading guilty to aiding and abetting the delivery of

stolen U.S. Treasury checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 510(b)

and 2. He challenges the district court’s refusal to adjust his

offense level for acceptance of responsibility, the court’s

inclusion in its loss calculation of a check for $584,721.99, and

the court’s imposition of a two level role-in-the-offense

increase under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c).
No. 00-20689

- 2 -

Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities

convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The

district court acted well within its broad discretion in

concluding that Mabinouri had failed to demonstrate acceptance of

responsibility. See United States v. Nguyen, 190 F.3d 656, 659

(5th Cir. 1999). Mabinouri’s arguments, raised for the first

time on appeal, challenging the district court’s acceptance of

responsibility determination and the district court’s loss

calculation as violative of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct.

2348 (2000), are also meritless. As Apprendi is inapplicable to

this case, there is no error, plain or otherwise. United States

v. Meshack, 225 F.3d 556, 576-77 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,

121 S. Ct. 834 (2001), amended on reh’g in part, --- F.3d ----,

2001 WL 224656 (2001). Finally, the district court did not

clearly err by imposing a two level role-in-the-offense increase

under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d

322, 329-30 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kurt Bordian, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/
      Kurt Bordian 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | February 7, 2011       



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
## **Exhibit 14.1**

 

### **CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file numbers333-120566, 333-110647, 333-1110648 and 333-111156) of our report dated May 12,2005 (except for Notes 40 and 41, as to which date is May 23, 2005), relatingto the consolidated financial statements of Rinker Group Limited, andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, each appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Rinker GroupLimited for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

 

 
|                      | /s/ DELOITTE  TOUCHE TOHMATSU |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| Deloitte  Touche Tohmatsu |
| Chartered  Accountants    |

 

Sydney, Australia

May 23, 2005

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Mendy Marsh, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 12, 2011
Andrew Jeff COFFEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-3536 & 4D17-3537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 7, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this consolidated appeal we find no fundamental error based on the prosecutor's closing argument in appellant's trial for attempted first degree murder of a law enforcement deputy. We therefore affirm appellant's judgment of conviction. However, because the trial court erred by imposing a public defender fee above the *1084statutory minimum of $100 without making factual findings in support of the additional amount, we reverse the public defender fee and remand for the trial court to reduce the fee to $100 or hold a hearing. *See**Alexis v. State* , 211 So.3d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

*Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.*

Taylor, Conner and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Community  First  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, William M. Tandy,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Michael D.  Wortham,  Chief  Financial  Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




/s/ William M. Tandy                               /s/ Michael D. Wortham
-----------------------------------                -----------------------------
William M. Tandy                                   Michael D. Wortham
Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer

Date:    March 31, 2006
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dominic Burns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:








1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Dominic BurnsDominic BurnsChief Executive Officer





May 16, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

      ( print page 102962)    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 6, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 941 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-683, K2025-682.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29894 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5833 

To require upon request a probable cause hearing in connection with property 

seizures relating to certain monetary instruments transactions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2014 

Mr. CAMP (for himself and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require upon request a probable cause hearing in connection with property seizures relating to certain monetary 

instruments transactions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Protections 

5 Against Abusive Seizures Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING IN CONNECTION WITH 

7 PROPERTY SEIZURES RELATING TO CERTAIN 

8 MONETARY INSTRUMENTS TRANSACTIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—If a hearing by a court of com10 petent jurisdiction is requested within 14 days after the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5833 IH

1 date on which notice is provided under subsection (b), 

2 property seized or restrained pursuant to section 

3 5317(c)(2) of title 31, United States Code, with respect 

4 to an alleged violation of section 5324 of title 31 of such 

5 Code, shall be returned unless the court holds an adver6 sarial hearing and finds within 14 days of such request 

7 that there is probable cause to believe that there is a viola8 tion of such section 5324 involving such property. 

9 (b) NOTICE.—Notice shall be provided to each person 

10 from whom property is seized or restrained pursuant to 

11 section 5317(c)(2) of title 31, United States Code, of the 

12 rights of such person under subsection (a). 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall 

14 apply with respect to property seized or restrained after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heung Hung Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:








1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Heung Hung LeeHeung Hung LeeChief Financial Officer








May 16, 2011