alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Craig Kussman, Chief Financial Officer of Discovery Partners International,Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that;

(1)   The Quarterly Report on 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| /s/Craig Kussman         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Craig Kussman            |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |
|                     |   |
| Date: August 8,  2006    |   |

 

 

----
EX-10.3



 






Exhibit 10.3




	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	4 Christopher Columbus Avenue
	 
	 	 	 	Danbury, CT 06810-7352
	 
	 	 	 	(203) 797-8005
	
	 	
Mulvaney
PROPERTIES	 	Fax:(203)794-1786
www.mulvaneyproperties.com
	 





July 23, 2007




Biodel, Inc.

Attn: Dr. Sol Steiner

6 Christopher Columbus Avenue




Danbury, CT 06810





	Re:  	 	Lease at 8 Christopher Columbus Avenue, Danbury, CT





Dear Sol:



This is to confirm that with 60 days’ notice, Mulvaney Properties, LLC will
release Biodel, Inc. of all its obligations with regard to the lease agreement
for the above-referenced property. The existing lease term is October 1, 2006
to January 31, 2010.




Sincerely,




MULVANEY PROPERTIES, LLC




	 	 	 
	/s/ George Mulvaney
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	George Mulvaney

	 	 
	Managing Member
	 	 





/jb
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony R. Harvey, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon
Copper Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/
      Anthony R. Harvey
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | ANTHONY R. HARVEY          
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | May 9,
      2011          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RAJ K. PATEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-1323

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:22-cv-00734-LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Raj K. Patel appeals from the United States Court of 

Federal Claims’ August 12, 2022, judgment dismissing his 

complaint. In response to the court’s March 2, 2023, show 

cause order, the United States urges dismissal of this appeal as untimely. Mr. Patel “move[s] . . . to allow the 

Case: 23-1323 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2023
2 PATEL v. US

appeal,” ECF No. 13 at 1, and suggests that this case may 

be consolidated with Appeal No. 2023-1325.*

The timely filing of a notice of appeal from the Court of 

Federal Claims is “a jurisdictional requirement” and “not 

subject to equitable tolling.” Marandola v. United States, 

518 F.3d 913, 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citation omitted). To be 

timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of 

Federal Claims within 60 days after the entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107, 2522; Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). In this case, it is undisputed that Mr. Patel’s notice of appeal was filed 137 days 

after final judgment. Thus, we lack jurisdiction over Mr. 

Patel’s untimely appeal. To the extent that Mr. Patel’s response argues that this appeal can be deemed timely based 

on this court’s jurisdiction over his separate appeal involving a different underlying case, we must reject that argument at least because his notice of appeal in that case filed 

on December 21, 2022, was likewise not filed within 60 

days of entry of final judgment in this case. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

April 21, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

* The court notes that it granted the United States’ 

motion for summary affirmance in Appeal No. 2023-1325

on March 7, 2023.

Case: 23-1323 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 04/21/2023
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             METALINE CONTACT MINES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. OF SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metaline Contact Mines (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
L. Howell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


                                        By:  /s/   Richard L. Howell
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Richard L. Howell
                                             President & Chief Executive Officer
                                             May 15, 2006
<PAGE>



Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The  undersigned  officer of Washington  Mutual  Mortgage  Securities  Corp.,  a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-MS6, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(44)
              - products_publications(212)
              - products_software(1)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_image(9)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(26)
              - multimedia_video-149194(24)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(4)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - (-)california(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        March 6, 2023        Building maps to help geothermal energy and greater sage-grouse coexist in Nevada’s sagebrush country
1

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2554

___________

Tracy Adam Thompson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Black Hawk County Sheriff’s Office, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 3, 2008

Filed: March 6, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Adam Thompson (Thompson) appeals the district court’s1

 preservice

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see Moore v.

Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review), we

conclude dismissal was proper. The sheriff’s office generally is not a suable entity

under § 1983, and Thompson did not allege any official policy or widespread practice

or custom of the sheriff’s office which deprived him of his constitutional rights. We

affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

_____________________________
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 102144-102145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29729]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than January 2, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent

[[Page 102145]]

electronically to [email protected]:
    1. Christopher M. George, Fremont, California; to acquire voting 
shares of Greenwoods Financial Group, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of The Greenwood's State Bank, both of Lake 
Mills, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-29729 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Eric D. PAYNE

NO. 2018-KK-1641

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 17, 2018

Denied.
[Neal&Co]

Consultants



Frank Hallam

July 26, 2005

Chief financial Officer

MAG Silver Corp

328 - 550 Burrard Street

Vancouver BC, V6C 2B5





Dear Frank,



As a result of my meeting on July 25th with you, Dan MacInnis and Mike Jones I submit  the following amendments to our agreement between Mag Silver and Neal & Company Consultants and proposed to take effect August 1, 2005.



-

Gord Neal (Neal & Company) will dedicate 90% of his (its) time to MAG Silver business.

-

Remuneration for services will be $9,000/month

-

Neal and Company will be granted an additional 90,000 options (or an amount that is determined by MAGs board to meet regulatory requirements)

-

Bonus program 

1.

$10,000 per new analyst coverage.

2.

$10,000 for each 3 new and (non- financing associated) institutions brought to the company by Gord Neal that take a $250,000 share purchase in MAG. This program is to be shared with john Foulkes of PTM

-

Neal and Company will receive a maximum $50,000 bonus for coordinating and closing any MAG financing of $5,000,000 or greater. This bonus is to be divided between Dan MacInnis (20%) and Neal & Co (30%)



Let me know if this meets our objectives





Gordon Neal
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 836 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 836

    To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify the 
requirement that permit applications for the discharge of pollutants be 
    approved by disinterested board members, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2013

 Mr. Gary G. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which 
   was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify the 
requirement that permit applications for the discharge of pollutants be 
    approved by disinterested board members, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sunshine on Conflicts Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. APPROVAL BY DISINTERESTED BOARD MEMBERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 402(a) of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(6) Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
this paragraph, the Administrator shall issue a rule to prohibit any 
member of a board or body that approves permit applications or portions 
thereof from voting upon, or seeking to influence, the approval of any 
permit in which that member has a direct or indirect financial 
interest, as defined in applicable State law.''.
    (b) No Force or Effect of Existing Regulation.--Section 123.25(c) 
of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, shall have no further force 
or effect after the earliest of the date on which a rule is issued 
under section 402(a)(6) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1342(a)(6)) or the end of the 120-day period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```
David Terrence STEPHENS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph EDWARDS, Warden of New River Correctional Institution, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134499 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134499 

 COA: 275923 
 Wayne CC: 03-002178-01

TOMMIE COLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Steven Crowther, Chief Financial Officer of Narrowstep Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Narrowstep Inc. for the
year ended February 28, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 24, 2006                           By:   /s/ Steven Crowther
                                                       STEVEN CROWTHER
                                                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Russo,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Peter Russo
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Peter F. Russo
                                    President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer

August 22, 2005