alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofstreetTRACKS® Gold Trust (the‘‘Trust’’) on Form 10-K for the period endingSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, J.Stuart Thomas, principal executive officer of World Gold TrustServices, LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Trust.

/s/ J. StuartThomas*        

J. Stuart Thomas**Managing Director(principal executive officer) November 29,2006

|         |                                                                                                                                                      |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| *  | The originally executed copy ofthis Certification will be maintained at the Sponsor's officesand will be made available for inspection upon request. |

|          |                                                                                                                                              |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **  | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Thomas is signingin his capacity as an officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC, thesponsor of the Trust. |

----
STATE EX REL. Leotis WEBSTER v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1437

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. State ex rel. Webster v. State, 15-0021 (La. 10/30/15), 178 So.3d 131.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with this Amendment No. 1 of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 19, 2006 

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required bySection 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Eric A. WELCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3803

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

Eric A. Welch, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Welch v. State*, 210 So. 3d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); *Welch v. State*, 138 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (table decision); *Harris v. State*, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Maria MOSCARITOLO, Appellant, v. VENTURES TRUST 2013-I-H-R BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, its Trustee, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. SOUTHERN ELECTRONICS, INC. (f/k/a Southern Radio Supply Co., Inc.) and the City of New Orleans

NO. 2018-C-1129

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM

Writ granted. Based on the facts in this case, there is no legal precedent or authority in support of granting a credit to the expropriating authority against a final judgment awarding attorney fees to the landowner in an expropriation case. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, *978and the trial court judgment is reinstated.

**REVERSED.**

Hughes, J., would grant and docket.
Craig T. DOWNS, Appellant, v. EDWARD W. EASTON LOAN NO. 1, LLC, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

William M. Tuttle, II P.A., and William M. Tuttle, II, for appellant.

Dorta Law, and Gonzalo R. Dorta and Matias Dorta, for appellees.

Before SUAREZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Form of Offer of Single Super Phosphate dated May 27, 2008



 Exhibit 10.ii.kkk. 
 Buenos Aires, May 27, 2008. 
 Messers 
 Cargill S.A.C.I. 
 Av. Leandro N. Alem 928 Piso 9 
 City of Buenos Aires 
 Dear Sirs, 
 In our capacity as Representatives of MOSAIC DE ARGENTINA S.A., hereinafter referred to as “MOSAIC”, domiciled at Avda. Leandro N. Alem 928, piso 9°, City of Buenos Aires, we hereby make the following
Commercial Offer (the “Offer”) to you, hereinafter referred to as “CARGILL”, which offer consists in a Simple Super Phospate 
 In case
you accept the Offer herein, it shall be governed by the terms and conditions stated below, namely: 
 SECTION ONE. PURPOSE 
 Pursuant to the Offer herein, in the event you accept it, MOSAIC undertakes to sell Simple Super Phosphate to CARGILL without exclusivity, subject to the condition that
the price to be agreed upon and the sales conditions are at arms’ length from both parties 
 The Offer herein shall be deemed implicitly accepted by
you upon the first purchase order made by effective means after receipt of the Offer hereof. 
 SECTION TWO:TERM 
 In addition, the Offer herein, if accepted by you, shall be valid and binding as from the date of acceptance thereof, and up until May 31, 2009. 
 SECTION THIRD. SALES VOLUME. 
 MOSAIC does not undertake to sell to
CARGILL, neither a minimum, nor a maximum volume of Simple Super Phosphate. 
 SECTION FOUR:TERMINATION 
 Having been accepted by you, the commercial relation arising hereof may be terminated either by CARGILL or by MOSAIC, at their exclusive discretion, without cause, by
serving due notice thereof by effective means, no less than thirty (30) days in advance of the relevant termination date, provided always no obligation to pay or right to receive indemnification shall arise therefrom. 







 SECTION FIVE: ASSIGNMENT 
 Neither of the Parties may assign, or transfer under any title, and/or grant license under the rights and/or obligations arising from this Offer, nor under the Offer itself, to any individual or entity, without the prior express consent of
the other Party. 
 SECTION TEN: DOMICILE – CONFLICT RESOLUTION 
 For all legal purposes, CARGILL hereby sets its domicile at Avda Leandro N. Alem 928, piso 9o, City of Buenos Aires, and MOSAIC at Avda Leandro N. Alem 928, piso 9, City of Buenos Aires. Any controversy that may
arise between the Parties in relation to the Offer herein, its existence, validity, qualification, construction, scope or performance that cannot be resolved amicably by the Parties shall be submitted to the final and binding judgment of the
District Court of the City of Buenos Aires [Tribunales Ordinarios de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires]. 
 By Mosaic de Argentina S.A.: 

Name:Sergio Garcia and Enrique Clausen 
 Title:Agents
Mark MOORE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0912

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of American  Capital  Partners  Limited,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, C. Frank  Speight,  Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005             By: /s/ C. Frank Speight
                                        --------------------
                                    C. Frank Speight
                                    Principal Executive Officer


                                       18
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - california(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)nebraska(1)
              - new york(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(54)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        May 24, 2010        Social Media and the USGS Nebraska Water Science Center
Exhibit 10.37
  
  MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN
 AWARD AGREEMENT
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
  1.  Definitions
    Award Agreement
  Grant Letter
  Mindspeed:
    Mindspeed
  Plan
  2.  Earning
    of Restricted Stock Units
            3.  Book-Entry
    Accounts or Retention of Certificates for Restricted Stock
    Units
    4.  Rights
    as a Shareholder




---



##### 



5.  Settlement
    of Earned Restricted Stock Units
        6.  Forfeiture
    of Unearned Restricted Stock Units and Dividends
    7.  Transferability
    8.  Applicable
    Law
    9.  Headings
    10.  Entire
    Agreement
   2
Jammie SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Willie BURTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
B.L. G-H, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2801

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 5, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tony MITCHELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2210

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 24, 2010

s0317 

# Order

March 24, 2010

139994

JACQUELINE MANESS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139994 COA: 287486 Monroe CC: 05-020422-NO CARLETON PHARMACY, Defendant,

and

KRYSTAL KLEEN CLEANERS COMPANY and VICKIE ASHER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY

, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
Payton Olajuwon WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1814

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, David G. Powers, certify, that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of United Community Bankshares ofFlorida, Inc.
2.  Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including our consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.     Date: March 1, 2005 By:  */s/ David G. Powers*            David G. Powers, President and Chief Executive Officer
Amy Lynn HIGHSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

Amy Lynn Highsmith, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Kelsey and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Robert ARMBRUSTER, Nicole Armbruster, F.I.N.S. Construction, LLC, and Cambrie Celeste Developer, LLC v. Steven ANDERSON, Cambrie Celeste, LLC, Cambrie Partners I, LLC, Cambrie Celeste Commercial Tenant, LLC, Avalon RE: Partners, LLC

NO. 2018-C-1276

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-3225

_____________________________

DAMIEN NASHAUN NELSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

December 22, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Amy Jo Preston, Assistant 

Public Defender, Pensacola, for Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(87)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(562)
              - products_data(327)
              - products_maps(82)
              - products_publications(3046)
              - products_software(11)
              - products_web_tools(36)
              - multimedia_audio(224)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(213)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(11)
              - multimedia_before_after(30)
              - multimedia_image(1326)
              - multimedia_image-141769(111)
              - multimedia_image-141770(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(734)
              - multimedia_image-141772(18)
              - multimedia_image-141774(7)
              - multimedia_image-141775(141)
              - multimedia_image-141776(81)
              - multimedia_image-141783(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(215)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(21)
              - multimedia_video(600)
              - multimedia_video-149194(179)
              - multimedia_video-149195(233)
              - multimedia_video-149196(42)
              - multimedia_video-149197(65)
              - multimedia_video-149198(46)
              - multimedia_video-149225(4)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(1)
              - documents_file(1062)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - documents_file-149204(8)
              - documents_file-149206(2)
              - documents_file-149208(2)
              - documents_file-149209(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149213(4)
              - documents_file-149214(19)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149219(1)
              - documents_file-149220(17)
              - documents_file-149222(990)
              - documents_file-149224(6)
              - news_news-149245(47)
              - news_news-149246(9)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(41)
              - news_news-149249(19)
              - news_news-149250(44)
              - news_newsletters(26)
              - news_other_news(287)
              - connect_locations(2)
              - connect_social_media(8)
              - connect_staff_profiles(159)
              - other_basic-37(19)
              - other_basic-42(245)
              - (-)other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)

## By Year

Human Capital        March 15, 2022        USGS Library

Methods, protocols, and procedures        May 15, 2018        Remote Sensing of the Arctic Coast of Alaska Using Airborne Lidar Data
Exhibit 99.2





Report Of Independent


Registered Public Accounting Firm




Board of Directors


Structured Obligations Corporation


New York, New York




We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2003-2 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.




In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2014.




This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.










/s/ RubinBrown LLP









Overland Park, Kansas


March 25, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Spectrum Sciences & Software
Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2003  as  filed  with  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Nancy  Gontarek,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/s/ Nancy  Gontarek
-------------------------
Principal  Financial  Officer

Dated:  April  14,  2004


                                     E - 22
<PAGE>