alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 22, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01324-CV 

No. 05-14-01325-CV 

IN RE DONALD GENE BLANTON, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 86th Judicial District Court 

Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 23078-86, 23592-86 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice FitzGerald, and Justice Francis 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus contending that the trial court improperly 

denied his motion to suppress in his 2005 trial. A grand jury indicted Donald Gene Blanton on 

two charges: (1) possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram and (2) tampering with 

evidence. Blanton v. State, No. 05-05-01060-CR, 2006 WL 2036615 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 

21, 2006, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The case was tried to a jury. 

The jury convicted him of both offenses and assessed an enhanced punishment of twenty years in 

the possession case and life in the tampering case. Id. This Court affirmed the conviction. Id. 

Relator’s petition represents an attempt to collaterally attack his criminal conviction. 

While the courts of appeals have concurrent mandamus jurisdiction with the court of criminal 

appeals in some post-conviction proceedings, Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805, 808 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2003) (forensic DNA testing), only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction in 
 –2– 

cases collaterally attacking a final judgment of conviction of a felony. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 

715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). The intermediate courts of 

appeals have no original jurisdiction over petitions for habeas corpus relief in connection with 

criminal proceedings. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004) (limiting habeas corpus 

jurisdiction of intermediate courts of appeals to civil matters); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 

11.05 (West 2005) (granting original jurisdiction in cases seeking writs of habeas corpus in 

criminal cases to the court of criminal appeals, districts courts, and county courts). Because we 

lack jurisdiction over this original proceeding, we DISMISS the petition. 

141324F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |                                                      
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Adelene Q. Perkins                               
|                     |  |  |  | Adelene Q. Perkins                                   
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2020211EN.01001101.xml

| 25.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/11

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2020/C 211/09)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 112, point 4 of the Explanatory note to CN subheading ‘

  2403 99 90 Other

  ’ is replaced by the following:

| ‘4. | expanded tobacco (cut tobacco leaves or stems, which have been increased in size in a process of cellular expansion); it is not suitable to be smoked on its own and is used as a filler in the production of cut tobacco used in cigarettes (cut filler tobacco – CFT);’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4.

expanded tobacco (cut tobacco leaves or stems, which have been increased in size in a process of cellular expansion); it is not suitable to be smoked on its own and is used as a filler in the production of cut tobacco used in cigarettes (cut filler tobacco – CFT);’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

2

---
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE**

 

GE Money Bank (the “Servicer”) herebycertifies as of December 31, 2007 as follows:

 

1.                                       The undersigned has reviewed, for theperiod beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2007: (a) theactivities of the Servicer as they related to the Servicing Agreement dated asof June 27, 2003 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Servicing*Agreement*”),among GE Money Bank and GE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust and (b) theServicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement.  The performance by the Servicer of itsobligations under the Servicing Agreement has been made by persons under thedirect supervision of the undersigned.

 

2.                                       To the best knowledge of the undersigned,based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement,the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreementin all material respects for the period beginning January 1, 2007 andending December 31, 2007.

 

This report is deliveredpursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 
|   | GE MONEY BANK |
|--------|---------------|
|   |          |   |
|   | By:           |     /s/  Brent Wallace |   |
|   | Name:         | Brent Wallace |
|   | Title:        | Chairman of the Board,  President and CEO |
|        |               |  |  |  |

 

 

----
ex4_5.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
4.5

    
      Common
Stock Purchase Warrant (Donald W. Sapaugh)

    

    
      
        

      



    


    THE
SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED PURSUANT TO
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR SOLD
UNLESS PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION
FROM REGISTRATION.

    
      	
              Number  WA  002

            	
              1,050,000
      Warrant

            


    

    EXERCISABLE
FROM 9:00 A.M., NEW YORK TIME,

    ON JUNE
1, 2007, UNTIL

    5:00
P.M., NEW YORK TIME, JUNE 1, 2011

    The
Mint Leasing, Inc.

    INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

    


    
      	
              This
      certifies that  DONALD W. SAPAUGH

            
	 
      
	 
      
	
              is
      the owner of  ONE MILLION FIFTY THOUSAND AND
    00/100

            


    

    WARRANTS,
EACH TO PURCHASE ONE FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARE OF COMMON STOCK, $.001
PAR VALUE, OF

    


    The
Mint Leasing, Inc. at the initial Exercise Price of a) 350,000 shares at $.10
per share, b) 200,000 shares at $.50 per share, c) 200,000 shares at $1.00 per
share, d) 150,000 shares at $1.50 per share, e) 150,000 shares at $2.00 per
share.  Payment of the Purchase Price shall be paid in the manner, at
the time and on the terms and conditions specified in this Warrant and the
Warrant Agreement.  The certificate or certificate shall be registered
in the name specified in the notice of exercise free and clear of any legend,
restriction or stop order.  This Warrant is transferable on the books
of the Company by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney
upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

    


    Witness
the manual or facsimile signatures of the Company’s duly authorized officers,
countersigned by the Warrant Agent.

    


    Dated:
June 1, 2007

    


     

    


    
      	
              /s/ Jerry Parish

            	 
      	
              /s/ Jerry Parish

            	 
      
	
              Jerry
      Parish, Secretary

            	 
      	
              Jerry
      Parish,
      President  & CEO

            	 
      


    

    


    


    


    Exhibit A
– Page 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(15)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - (-)south dakota(15)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(15)
              - 2023(8)
              - 2022(1)

staff profileChristopher J Crawford, Ph.D.

staff profilePete Doucette

staff profileHeather Tollerud

staff profileDanika F Wellington, Ph.D.

staff profileJeffrey R Irwin

staff profileMichael Budde

staff profileMatthew Rigge

staff profileKristi Sayler

staff profileTerry Sohl

staff profileAndrew Klose, Ph.D.

staff profileDean Gesch, Ph.D.

staff profileJeffrey J Danielson

staff profileTimothy A. Glynn

staff profileGeorge Xian

staff profileGabriel B Senay, Ph.D.
Johnny WALTHOUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0776

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018

Johnny Walthour, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(22)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(32)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(19)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_other_news(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(4)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Phoenix, Arizona - B1 Scenario
Jonathan SIMONELL, DOC #528933, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GENENCOR
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          52,203
<SECURITIES>                                     1,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,056
<INVENTORY>                                     50,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,525
<PP&E>                                         373,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,339
<BONDS>                                        144,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          151,563
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           519
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,549
<SALES>                                        150,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,390
<CGS>                                           85,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   328
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,231
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 786 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 786

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that tar sands 
   are crude oil for purposes of the Federal excise tax on petroleum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2013

 Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Blumenauer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that tar sands 
   are crude oil for purposes of the Federal excise tax on petroleum.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tar Sands Tax Loophole Elimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TAR SANDS AS CRUDE OIL FOR EXCISE TAX 
              PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 4612(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and natural gasoline'' 
and inserting ``, natural gasoline, and tar sands''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.14

                                     FORM OF
                           TERM SHEET FOR PURCHASE OF
                       OUTSTANDING DEBENTURES (VERSION 2)
                       ----------------------------------

TRANSACTION:      Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
                  "Company"), has negotiated the settlement of all its
                  outstanding obligations to Cornell Capital Partners, LP and
                  its affiliates ("Cornell"). As part of this settlement,
                  Cornell will assign up to $1,200,000 of the Company's 5%
                  secured convertible debentures (the "Debentures") to Investors

BUYER:            Current accredited shareholders of the Company (the
                  "Investors")

TO BE ASSIGNED:   Up to $1,200,000 with a minimum of $50,000 per Investor

AMENDMENT
AGREEMENT:        Simultaneous with the assignment of the Debentures, the
                  company is prepared to amend certain terms of the Debentures
                  as follows:

                  o   Investors shall waive the payment of principal and
                      interest on the Debentures that was due on September 8,
                      2006 and extend the maturity date to January 15, 2008

                  o   Company shall have the right to redeem the Debentures,
                      without penalty.

                  o   Interest shall accrue until maturity date at 16.0% per
                      annum in stock or cash at Company's discretion.

                  o   At maturity or early redemption Investor will receive full
                      payment plus interest and 800,000 shares of stock per
                      $50,000 investment.

                  o   Shares issued upon conversion shall be free trading,
                      subject only to limitations imposed on shareholders owning
                      more than 10% of the Company's common stock.

CLOSING DATE:     As soon as possible, but not later than July 14, 2007

I/we hereby purchase up to $__________ of Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc. secured
convertible debentures, to be assigned by Cornell.

PURCHASER(s):     _____________________________
BY:               _____________________________
PRINTED NAME(s):  _____________________________
TITLE(s) (if any):______________
TAX ID or SS#:    ______________
DATE:             ______________, 2007
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Registrant, along with the total number of active subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned by each as of December 31, 2006. Ownership is 100% unless indicated otherwise. 

 

|   | U.S. | Non-U.S. |
|--------|------|----------|

 

| Kaznickel, LLP, Kazakhstan |
|----------------------------|

 

| Kazakh Metals, Inc., B.V.I. | 1 |
|-----------------------------|---|

|   | Kyzyl Kain Mamyt, LLP, Kazakhstan |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO RESTATED AND AMENDED JOINT VENTURE AND 

SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT




     This Amendment (this “Amendment”) amends that certain RESTATED AND AMENDED JOINT
VENTURE AND SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT (the “JV Agreement”) dated as of April 15, 1998, as may
be further amended, restated or supplemented from time to time, by and between NACCO MATERIALS
HANDLING GROUP, INC. (“NMHG”) and GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION (“GECC”) and
is made effective as of the Effective Date set forth below. All capitalized terms not otherwise
defined herein will have the meanings set forth in the JV Agreement.



     WHEREAS, GECC and NMHG each have determined that it is in their best interest to make certain
amendments to the above-captioned JV Agreement;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which the parties hereto acknowledge; the parties hereto intending to be legally
bound agree as follows:



     1. Section 14. Term and Termination. Section 14(a) is hereby amended by deleting the date
“December 31, 2008” in the second line of such Section 14(a) and replacing it with the date
“December 31, 2013”.



     2. Effective Date. This Amendment is executed to be effective as of July 1, 2008.



     3. Effect of Amendment. All terms and conditions of the JV Agreement not expressly modified
hereby remain in full force and are hereby ratified by the parties.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representatives of the parties have executed this Amendment
on the dates set forth below but as of the date first set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Jeffery C. Mattern
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Treasurer	 	 
	Date:

	 	July 1, 2008	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Raymond Scott Barber	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	General Manager	 	 
	Date:

	 	July 1, 2008
Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 05, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN OCllILD 0. MAHN Av?aa... ..*=.A&



### ATTOBWN GIUBBALOl? TEXAS
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

March 29, 2004


        Management Report on Internal Control over the administration of
       the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2003-2 (the "Owner Trust")

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over its Administration
of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner
Trust ("Administration" of the Owner Trust), which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper Administration of the Owner Trust. The
Bank's internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions
are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to Administration of the Owner Trust. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control over
its Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003 in relation to the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective internal
control over the Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003,
based on the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Keith Schuck
-------------------------
Keith Schuck
Senior Vice President/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Patricia Garvey
-------------------------
Patricia Garvey
Senior Vice President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.