alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 930 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-668, K2025-667.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29877 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Jerry R. BAGWELL v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1838

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 12, 2018

Denied.
H. Res. 162 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 16, 2013. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Rothfus. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kendrick MATTIRE

NO. 2018-KP-0370

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Denied. Untimely. See La.S.Ct.R. X § 5; see also State v. Crandell, 05-1060 (La. 3/10/06), 924 So.2d 122.
Joseph Matthew KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3329

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.14








Golder Associates Ltd.





March 30, 2012





TO:           Seabridge Gold Inc.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Seabridge Gold Inc. (the “Company”), to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the “AIF”) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011, which is being filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.





I, Cameron Clayton, on behalf of myself and Golder Associates Ltd., hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report and to the references, as applicable, to my name and Golder Associates Ltd.’s name in connection with the following report in the AIF and the 40-F: Courageous Lake Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment 2011 and is dated July 15, 2011.





Yours truly,/s/ Cameron ClaytonCameron Clayton, M. Eng., P. Geo.
Mark F. BAUGHN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 25, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 8, 2018

Robert I. Barrar of Robert I. Barrar P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*238DENIED . *See**Ratliff v. State* , 914 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2005).

Wolf, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the Trustee) of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2 (the Trust) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trusts annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report):



1.         The Trustee is the trustee under the Trusts trust agreement.



2.         Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trusts trust agreement.







/s/ Jon C. Warn

Name:   Jon C. Warn

Title:     Vice President

Date:     March 12, 2012






---
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Ken Martin Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  August 24, 2008
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - (-)science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Education        May 20, 2020        Myths and Misconceptions About Induced Earthquakes

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!
Roland Blake HATTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 24

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., as depositor for Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2003-1, (the "Depositor"), under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2003  (the "PSA"), does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee under the PSA ("LaSalle"), as its true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the limited purpose of preparing, executing and filing, in the Depositor's name, SEC Form 10-K, with all required attachments and any other items specifically provided in the PSA to be executed and filed by LaSalle on behalf of the Depositor.

The Depositor hereby undertakes to ratify and confirm any and all action that LaSalle may do or cause to be done within the scope of the authority conferred hereby.  LaSalle is authorized to deliver copies of this Limited Power of Attorney to third parties, who may rely hereon.

This Limited Power of Attorney shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be irrevocable from the date hereof and shall remain in full force and effect until due written notice of its revocation is given by the undersigned to LaSalle by registered mail.

Dated:  March 19, 2004

Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.

By: /s/

CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA	)
	)	ss.:
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG	)

On the 19th day of March, 2004, before me, a notary public in and for said County and State, came George G. Ellison, to me known to be the Senior Vice President of Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.  (the "Corporation"), who acknowledged that he signed the foregoing instrument in the name and on behalf of the Corporation as its voluntary act and deed, pursuant to authority duly conferred upon him as an officer of the Corporation.

/s/ Ashley D. PalmerNotary Public

[SEAL]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7416

VARNUM M. KRUMM, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HOWARD PAINTER, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-99-89-5)

Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 19, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Varnum M. Krumm, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr.,

Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST

VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Varnum J. Krumm, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Krumm v. Painter, No. CA-99-89-5 (N.D.W.

Va. Sept. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 888 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-614, K2025-613.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29792 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Jeffrey Marcus KENNELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-770

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32
----------




            CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            --------------------------------------------------


     The following statement is provided by the undersigned with respect to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Annual Report on
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
KAANAPALI LAND, LLC.




    By:  /s/  Gary Nickele                By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
         ---------------------------          ---------------------------
         Gary Nickele                         Gailen J. Hull
         Chief Executive Officer              Chief Financial Officer and
                                              Chief Accounting Officer
Daniel MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-675

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen D. LEONARD, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 103051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29863]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) requires federal agencies to publish a notice in the Federal 
Register concerning each proposed collection of information before 
submission to OMB, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response 
to the notice. This notice complies with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before February 18, 2025

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to, Office of Veterans Business 
Development, Amy Garcia, [email protected], Small Business 
Administration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Garcia, Veterans Business Analyst, 
Office of Veterans, [email protected] 202-205-7526, or Curtis B. Rich, 
Agency Clearance Officer [email protected] 202-205-7030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This voluntary collection form enables the 
program office to assess both the quality of the Boots to Business 
courses and outcomes achieved by participants after attending Boots to 
Business. The data will be used for overall program management, 
continuous improvement initiatives, and reporting outcomes to better 
serve veteran entrepreneurs. Information used for reporting will be 
done in the aggregate and will not include Personally Identifiable 
Information (PII).

Solicitation of Public Comments

    SBA is requesting comments on (a) Whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.

Summary of Information Collection

    PRA Number: 3245-0390.
    Title: Boots to Business Post Course Surveys.
    Description of Respondents: Boots to Business Program Participants.
    Form Number: None.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 10,000.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 27 hours.

Curtis B. Rich,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-29863 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
Jason Cody HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3828

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Troy Craig DRISKELL, Doc #X04320, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4637

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### ANDERSON v. ANDERSON.

First Division. Ketchikan.

April 4, 1927.

No. -.

Divorce &wkey;>34— Incompatibility of Temperament.

Mere want of congeniality, or incompatibility of temperament, or wrangling and quarreling between the parties, do not, in Alaska, constitute a ground for divorce.

A. H. Ziegler, of Ketchikan, for plaintiff.

George B. Grigsby, of Ketchikan, for defendant.

*610REED, District Judge.

This action was brought by the plaintiff for a decree of divorce, on the statutory ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, calculated to injure her health and endanger her life.

The impression that the testimony makes upon me is that the fault is mutual, but it is not shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence that there was cruel and inhuman treatment on the part of the defendant, calculated to impair the health of the plaintiff or endanger her life. While it may be true that there is such incompatibility of temperament that the parties cannot now live together, yet *that is*no ground for a divorce in this jurisdiction. Mere want of congeniality, or incompatibility of temperament, or wrangling and quarreling between the parties, do not, in this jurisdiction, constitute a ground for divorce. To justify a decree on the ground set up in the complaint, there must have been such acts on the part of the husband, either in words or physical violence, as would justify a reasonable apprehension on the part of the wife taf danger to her health and life. No mere trifles, condoned or arising from mutual dissension, are grounds for dissolving the marriage relation in this jurisdiction. In my judgment, the plaintiff has not established sufficiently that the defendant was guilty of acts which caused her a reasonable apprehension of danger to her health or life, should cohabitation continue.

The defendant, in his cross-complaint, has also asked for a divorce, because of the false accusations of plaintiff in her testimony, as to his being a drunkard, etc. I am of the opinion that the unsupported testimony of the wife, charging the defendant with drunkenness and cruelty, is not a sufficient ground for a divorce in defendant’s behalf. That she may have exaggerated wrongs, or that her statements were based on hearsay, would not be sufficient to authorize the court to enter a decree against her.

These being my conclusions from the testimony, it follows that an order should be entered, denying a decree of divorce to both parties.

<§z»See same topic & KEY-NUMBER, in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350





I,
      Michael Manahan, Chief Executive Officer of PracticeXpert, Inc. (the
      "Corporation"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:





1. the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Corporation for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.








Date:
      May
      22, 2006




By: 
      /s/ Michael Manahan


Michael
      Manahan, Chief
      Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 918 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 918

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2013

   Ms. Lee of California (for herself, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
Connolly, Ms. Moore, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Honda, Mr. Garamendi, 
and Mr. Farr) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Peace Stamp for the Peace Corps 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The United States Postal Service shall, for a 2-
year period beginning no later than 12 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, issue a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps.
    (b) Requirements and Authorities.--The issuance of such semipostal 
and the disposition of the amounts becoming available from the issuance 
of such semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code, subject to the following:
            (1) The differential included in the rate of postage 
        established for such semipostal under section 416(c) of such 
        title may not exceed 25 percent.
            (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to which any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of such semipostal may 
        be transferred under section 416(d)(1) of such title.
    (c) Semipostal Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``semipostal'' has the meaning given such term by section 416(a)(1) of 
such title.
                                 <all>
```
Willie Lee WINTONS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee. v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 2D17-2659

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.