alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 936 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 936

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to eliminate straight-party 
       voting from any voting system used for Federal elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2013

Mr. Matheson (for himself and Mr. Dent) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to eliminate straight-party 
       voting from any voting system used for Federal elections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``People Before Party Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF STRAIGHT-PARTY VOTING IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS.

    Section 301(a)(6) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 
15481(a)(6)) is amended by striking the period at the end of the 
sentence and inserting ``, except that no State may provide a voter 
with the opportunity to indicate the selection of a political party as 
a representation of the selection of an individual candidate.''.
                                 <all>
```
Robert William CUSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0323 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RANDY VAUGHN SNEED,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 1 , 202 3 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 30 2023

03/30/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0323
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Nano-Jet, a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, KenMartin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Ken Martin                   ***

Ken Martin, CEO, CAO

Dated: April 17, 2007
Jean LOUVERTURE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kelvin Maurice COBB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2018

Kelvin Maurice Cobb, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Christopher v. State*, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1986).
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heung Hung Lee, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






*By:*  /s/
        Heung Hung Lee
 *------------------------------------*
 *Heung
        Hung Lee*
 *Chief
        Financial Officer*




August
      14, 2007
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPW-12-0000666 

08-AUG-2012 

01:31 PM 

NO. SCPW-12-0000666
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,
 

vs.
 

THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF


THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

(CR. NO. 08-1-0869; S.P.P. 12-1-0011)
 

ORDER
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna,


and Pollack, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of Michael Tierney's petition for a 

writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that 

petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to 

relief inasmuch as (1) a rejection of an application for a writ 

of certiorari is final and cannot be vacated, see HRAP 40.1(h), 

and (2) petitioner is actively pursuing the remedies available to 

him in the circuit court for an evidentiary hearing and the 

appointment of counsel. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to 

mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 

P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary 

remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a 
clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative
 

means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
 

requested action). Accordingly, 


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of 

mandamus is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 8, 2012. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

2
```
**Exhibit 31.1

                                              CERTIFICATION**

I, Kelly Absher, certify that:

1.       I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-K,  and all  reports  on Form 8-K  containing
distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect of periods  included  in the year  covered by this
annual report, of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-2;

2.       Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports,  taken as a whole, does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make the  statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last
day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing  information required to be provided to the
depositor by the trustee under the pooling and  servicing,  or similar  agreement,  for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible  for reviewing the  activities  performed by the depositor and the trustee under
the pooling and  servicing,  or similar  agreement and based upon my knowledge  and the annual  compliance
review  required  under that  agreement,  and except as disclosed in the reports,  the  depositor  and the
trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving  the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on  information  provided  to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association.

                                                        By:  /s/ Kelly Absher                 
                                                              Name:   Kelly Absher
                                                              Title:  Authorized Signatory
                                                              Structured Obligations Corporation
                                                              Date:  March 28, 2007
```

----
Zacquize HARACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4466

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Table of Contents


Exhibit 15.3
 DeGolyer and MacNaughton 5001 Spring Valley Road Suite 800 East Dallas, Texas 75244  March 30, 2012   Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Av.Republica do Chile 3309th floor – Centro CEP 20031-170 Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil   Ladies and Gentlemen:   We hereby consent to the references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton as set forth under the headings “Presentation of Information Concerning Reserves,” “Item 4 – Information on the Company—Additional Reserves and Production Information—Internal Controls over Proved Reserves,” and “Item 19—Exhibits” in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.—Petrobras for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report). We further consent to the inclusion of our two third-party letter reports dated February 29, 2012 and March 8, 2012 in the Annual Report. One third-party letter report contains opinions regarding our comparison of estimates prepared by us with those furnished to us by Petrobras of the net proved crude oil, condensate, and natural gas reserves, as of December 31, 2011, of certain properties owned by Petrobras in Brazil and offshore from Brazil. The other third-party letter report contains our independent estimates of the net proved crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), and natural gas reserves, as of December 31, 2011, of certain properties owned by Petrobras in South America (outside of Brazil).  We further consent to the references to our firm as set forth in the Registration Statement on Form F-3, Registration Nos. 333-163665 and 333-163665-01, of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.—Petrobras and Petrobras International Finance Company (together, the “Registrants”), under the heading “Experts,” and to the incorporation by reference to the other references to our firm contained in the Annual Report of the Registrants on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, under the headings “Presentation of Information Concerning Reserves,” “Item 4—Information on the Company—Overview of the Group,” and “Item 19—Exhibits.”    Very truly yours,  /s/DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716


---
Form of Renewal of Supply Agreement dated May 31, 2008



 Exhibit 10.ii.sss. 
 RENEWAL OF SUPPLY AGREEMENT 
 FEED GRADE PHOSPHATES (MONOCAL/BIOFOS) 
 MALAYSIA 
  

			
	 DATE:
	  	
                                
		
	 SELLER:
	  	MOSAIC CROP NUTRITION, LLC, d.b.a.
		  	MOSAIC FEED INGREDIENTS
		  	 8813 HWY 41 SOUTH
 RIVERVIEW, FL 33578


		
	 BUYER:
	  	DESA CARGILL SDN. BHD.
		  	LOT 52, LORONG SEBOR, JALAN KOLOMBONG,
		  	OFF JALAN TUARAN
		  	KOTA KINABALU, SABAH, MALAYSIA 88100
		
	 PRODUCT:
	  	MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE (BIOFOS)
		
	 SPECIFICATIONS:
	  	TYPICAL MOSAIC SPECIFICATIONS
		
	 MARKET:
	  	MALAYSIA
		
	 PERIOD:
	  	1 JUNE 2008 THROUGH 1 MAY 2009
		
	 PRICING:
	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	 QUANTITY:
	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	 DELIVERY:
	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	 PAYMENT:
	  	30 DAYS
		
	 TERMS:
	  	MOSAIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO APPLY. (ATTACHED)


									
			
	DESA CARGILL SDN. BHD.	 		 	MOSAIC CROP NUTRITION, LLC
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  
	 		 	Name:	 	  

	Its:	 	  
	 		 	Its:
Form of Renewal of Supply Agreement dated May 29, 2008



 Exhibit 10.ii.rrr. 
 RENEWAL OF SUPPLY AGREEMENT 
 FEED GRADE PHOSPHATES (TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE/ MULTIFOS) 

UNITED KINGDOM 
  

			
	DATE:	  	
                                
		
	SELLER:	  	MOSAIC CROP NUTRITION, LLC, d.b.a.
		  	MOSAIC FEED INGREDIENTS
		  	8813 HWY 41 SOUTH
		  	RIVERVIEW, FL 33578
		
	BUYER:	  	CARGILL PLC
		  	Witham St Hughs
		  	Lincoln LN6 9TN
		  	United Kingdom
		
	PRODUCT:	  	TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE (MULTIFOS)
		
	SPECIFICATIONS:	  	TYPICAL MOSAIC SPECIFICATIONS
		
	MARKET:	  	UNITED KINGDOM
		
	PERIOD:	  	JUNE 1, 2008 THROUGH MAY 31, 2009
		
	PRICING:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	QUANTITY:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	DELIVERY:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	PAYMENT:	  	CASH AGAINST DOCUMENTS
		
	TERMS:	  	MOSAIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO APPLY. (ATTACHED)

  

									
	CARGILL PLC	 		 	MOSAIC CROP NUTRITION, LLC
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  
	 		 	Name:	 	  

	Its:	 	  
	 		 	Its:
# C_2020018EN.01000201.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/2

---

Special Report No 01/2020

‘EU action on Ecodesign and Energy Labelling: important contribution to greater energy efficiency reduced by significant delays and non-compliance’

(2020/C 18/02)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 01/2020 ‘EU action on Ecodesign and Energy Labelling: important contribution to greater energy efficiency reduced by significant delays and non-compliance’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  ,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thaddeus J. ShalekThaddeus
      J. ShalekInterim
      Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jonathan SILPOT, Appellee.

No. 4D18-35

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3532

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Luis Santiago Ramirez-Gil, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 20, 2001 Filed: March 30, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Luis Santiago Ramirez-Gil pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). His sentence was enhanced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) because he had previously been deported after being convicted of an aggravated felony. The District Court 1 sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release.-2-

Ramirez-Gil argues that Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), required the government to charge the fact of his prior aggravated-felony conviction in the indictment. Apprendi , Ramirez-Gil argues, overruled Alme ndarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which had held that an earlier aggravated-felony conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that need not be charged as an element of the offense. Apprendi , however, held that " other than the fact of a prior conviction , any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt." 120 S. Ct. at 2362-63 (emphasis added). The Apprendi Court also explicitly declinedto overrule Almendarez-Torres

. Id. at 2362. Likewise, we decline to read Apprendi as disturbing the holding of Almendarez-Torres

. See UnitedStates v. Rush , 240 F.3d 729, 731 (8th Cir. 2001) (noting that Apprendi does not apply to fact of prior conviction); UnitedStates v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926, 932 n.4 (8th Cir.) (“In Apprendi , the Court left Almendarez-Torres untouched"), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 600 (2000)). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
David LEAKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3950

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Thaddeus J. Shalek, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Thaddeus J. ShalekThaddeus
      J. ShalekInterim
      Chief Financial OfficerNovember
      16, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
SLAT PO Amendment No. 9


 Exhibit 10.29.9 
 AMENDMENT NO. 9 
 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 9 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital
Support Agreement, effective as of the 22nd day of July 2008 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), between SEI Liquid Asset Trust (the “Trust”) on behalf of its Prime Obligation Fund (the “Fund”) and SEI Investments Company
(the “Support Provider”). 
 WHEREAS: 
  

	 	1.	The parties hereto entered into a Capital Support Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2007, and amended February 15, 2008, March 5, 2008, March 10,
2008, March 24, 2008, March 26, 2008, March 31, 2008, April 17, 2008 and June 18, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 

  

	 	2.	The parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein. 

 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto
agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 

  

	2.	Section 1(g) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 

 “Maximum Contribution Amount” means fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000). 
  

	3.	Section 1(n) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 

 “Segregated Account” means an account established by the Support Provider for the benefit of the Fund at a bank which is a qualified custodian under the 1940 Act, which may be an interest-bearing account
and/or which account’s assets may be invested into money market instruments, and which during the term of the Agreement (i) shall hold cash or cash equivalent securities in an amount equal to twelve million dollars ($12,000,000), and
(ii) the assets of which shall be available to the Fund by means of ACH transfer initiated by the Fund without the requirement of further action or consent by the Support Provider; provided, however, that the amount required to be maintained in
the Segregated Account may be reduced as set forth in Section 3 of the Agreement. 
 [Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]

  

 1 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment No. 9 to the Capital Support Agreement to be
executed and to become effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dennis J. McGonigle

	Name:	 	Dennis J. McGonigle
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	Date:	 	July 22, 2008
	
	 ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
  
 One Freedom Valley Drive
 Oaks, PA 19456

	
	 SEI LIQUID ASSET TRUST on behalf of its
 PRIME OBLIGATION FUND

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Timothy D. Barto

	Name:	 	Timothy D. Barto
	Title:	 	Vice President
	Date:	 	July 22, 2008
	
	 ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
  
 One Freedom Valley Drive
 Oaks, PA 19456



  

 2
STATE of Louisiana v. Brandon Michel MOORE

NO. 2018-KO-0495

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Not Considered. Not timely filed. See La.S.Ct. Rule X, § 5(a).
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of China
Yingxia  International,  Inc. for the quarter  ended June 30,  2006,  I, Yingxia
Jiao,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of China  Yingxia
International, Inc. Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:


1.   Such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006,
     fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the
     period ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects,  the
     financial   condition   and  results  of   operations   of  China   Yingxia
     International, Inc.



Dated: November 13, 2006

                                    CHINA YINGXIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                    By: /s/ Yingxia Jiao
                                    ------------------------
                                    Yingxia Jiao
                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                    Chief Financial Officer
George E. BAKER, DOC# 282007, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5062

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.