alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**I, Michael M. Megless, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HorneInternational, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Acts Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditor’s andthe audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial report.   Date:March 30, 2007     /s/ Michael M. Megless   Michael M. Megless
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50862

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT EARL HOPPER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CR-109-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Earl Hopper appeals the sentence he received after he

pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, and to notice of the

Government’s Demand for Forfeiture. He argues that he is

entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal. This issue is

res judicata. He also argues that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel at trial. This court, however, does not

review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct
No. 96-50862

-2-

appeal which were not presented to the district court. United

States v. Chavez-Valencia, 116 F.3d 127, 133 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 118 S. Ct. 325 (1997). 

Hopper argues that the waiver of the right to appeal his

sentence is not applicable because he agreed to waive the right

to appeal his sentence only if it was imposed in conformity with

the Sentencing Guidelines. Hopper further argues that the

sentencing court did not properly calculate his sentence because

it failed to distinguish between dextro-methamphetamine and levomethamphetamine when it determined his offense level, in

violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. He also challenges the

drug quantity used for determining his offense level. We have

reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and find Hopper

waived his right to appeal his sentence. Accordingly, his appeal

is DISMISSED. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 568

(5th Cir. 1992).
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PracticeXpert, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Jonathan Doctor,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Michael Manahan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jonathan Doctor                                   /s/ Michael Manahan
-------------------------------------                 --------------------------
Jonathan Doctor,                                      Michael Manahan,
Chief Executive Officer and President                 Chief Financial Officer
May 2, 2006                                           May 2, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        September 27, 2023        Prince William Sound Landslide Hazards Project Overview
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

KMART HOLDING CORPORATION
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION (1)

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kmart Holding Corporation
for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2005, each of the undersigned officers of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   this Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Kmart Holding Corporation.

Date: March 9, 2005


/s/ Aylwin B. Lewis
----------------------------------------------
Aylwin B. Lewis
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ James D. Donlon, III
----------------------------------------------
James D. Donlon, III
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Footnote 1:

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kmart Holding
Corporation and will be retained by Kmart Holding Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(20)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(10)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - west virginia(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(94)
              - 2023(40)
              - 2022(15)
              - (-)2021(10)

staff profileKristi Simmons

staff profileKelly J. Swinford

staff profileSylvia N Wilson

staff profileDavid Powars

staff profileWilliam Thomas Pecora

staff profileLara Douglas

staff profileCharles Edward Heywood

staff profileWarren  J Nokleberg

staff profileJohn Repetski

staff profileRonald Litwin
Bret REHM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 918 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2013 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. MOORE, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, and Mr. FARR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in 

addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a semipostal to benefit the 

Peace Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Stamp for the 

5 Peace Corps Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PEACE CORPS STAMP. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Postal Service 

8 shall, for a 2-year period beginning no later than 12 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 918 IH

1 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue 

2 a semipostal to benefit the Peace Corps. 

3 (b) REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITIES.—The 

4 issuance of such semipostal and the disposition of the 

5 amounts becoming available from the issuance of such 

6 semipostal shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, 

7 United States Code, subject to the following: 

8 (1) The differential included in the rate of post9 age established for such semipostal under section 

10 416(c) of such title may not exceed 25 percent. 

11 (2) The Peace Corps shall be the sole agency to 

12 which any amounts becoming available from the sale 

13 of such semipostal may be transferred under section 

14 416(d)(1) of such title. 

15 (c) SEMIPOSTAL DEFINED.—For purposes of this 

16 section, the term ‘‘semipostal’’ has the meaning given such 

17 term by section 416(a)(1) of such title. 

Æ 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(67)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(102)
              - virginia(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Photography        December 19, 2015        Beauty of Earth Science Revealed Within Great Smoky Mountains
Jarmeel BENNETT, DOC #Y43030, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                             METALINE CONTACT MINES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. OF SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metaline Contact Mines (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard L. Howell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: November 9, 2005




                                   By: /s/   Richard L. Howell
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Richard L. Howell
                                      President & Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 91 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 91

 To extend the supplemental security income benefits program to Guam, 
         the United States Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

  Mrs. Christensen (for herself, Ms. Bordallo, and Mr. Faleomavaega) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the supplemental security income benefits program to Guam, 
         the United States Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS 
              PROGRAM TO GUAM, THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS, AND 
              AMERICAN SAMOA.

    (a) In General.--Section 1101(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``, the Virgin Islands, and Guam'' each 
        place such term appears; and
            (2) by striking ``title IV'' and inserting ``titles IV and 
        XVI (as in effect pursuant to such amendment after December 31, 
        1973)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 303(b) of the Social Security Amendments of 
        1972 (86 Stat. 1484) is amended by striking ``, Guam, and the 
        Virgin Islands''.
            (2) Sections 3(a)(2), 1003(a)(2), 1403(a)(2), and 
        1603(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 303(a)(2), 1203(a)(2), 
        1353(a)(2), and 1383 note) are each amended by striking ``, the 
        Virgin Islands, and Guam''.
            (3) Section 1614(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(e)) is 
        amended by striking ``and the District of Columbia'' and 
        inserting ``, the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, 
        Guam, and American Samoa''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the 1st day of the 3rd calendar month that begins after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7073

BURNICE ANTWON HINNANT, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:15-hc-02283-FL)

Submitted: February 27, 2017 Decided: March 2, 2017

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Burnice Antwon Hinnant, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe 

DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Burnice Antwon Hinnant, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order granting summary judgment for respondent on 

Hinnant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on 

June 27, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest,

on August 5, 2016.* Because Hinnant failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

 * The district court found that August 5, 2016, is the 

earliest date the notice of appeal could have been properly 

delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 _____________________________
 FORM 8-K
 _____________________________
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 2, 2005
 Exact Name of Registrant as Specifiedin its Charter, State of Incorporation,Commission
    
    Address of Principal Executive Offices
    
    IRS EmployerFile Number
    
    and Telephone Number
    
    Identification No.1-11607
    
    DTE Energy Company
(a Michigan corporation)
2000 2nd Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226-1279
313-235-4000
    
    38-32177521-2198
    
    The Detroit Edison Company
(a Michigan corporation)
2000 2nd Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226-1279
313-235-4000
    
    38-04786501-7310
    
    Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
(a Michigan corporation)
2000 2nd Avenue
Detroit, Michigan 48226-1279
313-235-4000
    
    38-0478040
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    Earnings Release of DTE Energy Company dated November 2, 2005.
 Forward-Looking Statements




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   DTE ENERGY COMPANY(Registrant)/s/ Daniel G. BrudzynskiDaniel G. BrudzynskiVice President and ControllerTHE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY(Registrant)/s/ Daniel G. BrudzynskiDaniel G. BrudzynskiVice President and ControllerMICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY(Registrant)/s/ Daniel G. BrudzynskiDaniel G. BrudzynskiVice President and Controller




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Earnings Release of DTE Energy Company dated November 2, 2005.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 March 16, 2006
 
 Date of Report (date of earliest event reported)
 ALTIRIS, INC.
 (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    000-49793
    
    87-0616516(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 588 West 400 South
Lindon, Utah 84042
 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 (801) 805-2400
 
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 N/A
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the
Registrant under any of the following provisions:
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b)under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c)under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01. Other Events.




---



##### 



ALTIRIS, INC.By:
    /s/ Gregory S. ButterfieldGregory S. ButterfieldPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

                                                                                           Exhibit 99.1

                                             CERTIFICATION

         The  undersigned,  being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National  Association,  as trustee (the
"Trustee") of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1 (the "Trust") hereby makes the following  certifications
for  inclusion  as an  exhibit to the  Trust's  annual  report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 2007(the "Annual Report"):

1.       The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust's trust agreement.

2.       Based  on my  knowledge,  for the  period  covered  by the  Annual  Report,  the  Trustee  has
fulfilled its obligations under the Trust's trust agreement.

                                                              By:     /s/ Marlene Fahey     
                                                              Name:   Marlene Fahey
                                                              Title:  Vice President
                                                              Date:   March 28, 2008
```
Donald WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1384

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.