alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




Signature Page to the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions (rev. 2008)

(executive officers)




Complete Production Services, Inc.

2008 Incentive Award Plan




	 	 	 
	[Executive Name]

	 	[Street Address]
	Optionee’s Tax ID #: [SSN]

	 	[City, State, Zip, Country]






Complete Production Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to the
Complete Production Services, Inc. 2008 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”), hereby grants to you
(“Executive”), an option to purchase the shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01, as
set forth below (“Option”) and subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Stock Option
Agreement Terms and Conditions (Rev. 2008) and the Plan.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Option Grant Date:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Total Shares Subject to the Option:
	 	shares	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Exercise Price per Share:
	$  	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Total Exercise Price:
	$  	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Expiration Date**:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Type of Option:
	 	 	 	 	 	 







	o	 	Incentive Stock Option, up to the maximum number permitted by the Code and non-qualified
options as to all other shares
	 
	o	 	Non-Qualified Stock Option as to all shares





Vesting Schedule**:




This Option will vest and become exercisable in increments on the following dates, provided you are
still an employee on that date:




	 	 	 
	Shares	 	Vest Date
	____________

	 	___/___/___
	____________

	 	___/___/___
	____________

	 	___/___/___








 




			
	**	 	This Option will not vest and the option exercise period will expire sooner than shown under
certain circumstances, including your Termination of Service. See the Stock Option Agreement Terms
and Conditions (Rev. 2008). Notwithstanding the terms set forth in the Stock Option Agreement
Terms and Conditions (Rev. 2008), in the event of your Termination of Services due to retirement
(as determined by the Administrator), you shall have one year following such retirement to exercise
your vested Options.





You and the Company agree that this Option is granted under and governed by the terms and
conditions of the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions (Rev. 2008), the Plan and this
Signature Page, which together are a binding agreement. You acknowledge that you have read,
understand and agree to be bound by the Stock Option Agreement Terms and Conditions(Rev. 2008),
this Signature Page and the Plan, including the provisions governing the resolution of all disputes
between you and the Company through arbitration, the vesting and termination of your Options, the
exercise procedures, and the other restrictions contained therein.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
	 	EXECUTIVE	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:
	 	[Executive Name]
Exhibit
14.1











Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Strata
Oil and Gas Inc.


Vancouver,
Canada





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-82578) of Strata Oil and Gas Inc. (the “Company”) our report dated
June 23, 2010 (relating to the financial statements of the Company which appears
in this Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our
report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern.








/s/ BDO
Canada LLP





Chartered
Accountants





Vancouver,
Canada


June 23,
2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL JOHN CSONKA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 3009 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 89 DB 202 3

Attorney Registration No. 91232

( Franklin )

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9 th day of November , 2023, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three

- Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition

in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Michael John Csonka is suspended

from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year . Respondent shall comply

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board

. See

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Exhibit 31.1

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Careaga, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nannaco, Inc.
("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

February 22, 2005

/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth As Art 2

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(10)
              - multimedia_audio(15)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(12)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_image(221)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(204)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(49)
              - multimedia_video-149194(23)
              - multimedia_video-149195(20)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149222(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Earth As Art 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(20)
              - arizona(22)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(27)
              - colorado(20)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(5)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(5)
              - north carolina(4)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(23)
              - (-)tennessee(2)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(5)
              - virginia(10)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(9)

## By Year

Project        September 30, 2015        Geophysical and Geochemical Approaches to Evaluating Rare Earth Element (REE) Potential in the Southeastern U.S.

Topic        July 31, 2019        Terrestrial Analog Sample Collections
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 17-PDB-115

NO. 2018-OB-1285

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Leave to appeal denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Nithin John THANICKAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
Daniel R. Peralta, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daniel R. PeraltaDr.
      Daniel R. PeraltaChief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer




November 17,
2009
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sayan Navaratnam,
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By:
            /s/ Sayan
              Navaratnam*Sayan
              Navaratnam**Chairman
              and Chief Executive Officer*May
                22, 2006
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) of BearingPoint, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Randolph C. Blazer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Randolph C. BlazerName:

Randolph C. BlazerDate:

November 14, 2003
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-163116 and 333-138241) of MediciNova, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-151808, 333-141694, and 333-122665) of our report datedMarch 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MediciNova, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 24, 2010
Charles J. RUFFENACH, Petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICES, LLC, Respondent.

Case Nos. 5D18-469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 5, 2018

Nicholas A. Vidoni, of Watson, Soileau, DeLeo & Burgett, P.A., Cocoa, for Petitioner.

Michael R. Esposito and Michelle M. Gervais, of Blank Rome LLP, Tampa, for Respondent.

*ON MOTION FOR REHEARING*

COHEN, C.J.

After the lower court struck Charles Ruffenach's demand for a jury trial, Ruffenach filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking redress. This Court treated the petition as one for writ of certiorari and denied it by order. In response, Ruffenach filed a lengthy motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, clarification, certification, and/or written opinion. He was not entirely without justification.

In his motion, Ruffenach correctly presents that he did not seek relief under certiorari review because the law clearly provides that the striking of a demand for jury trial is not reviewable by certiorari. *Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.*, 720 So.2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998). The merits panel was well aware of the case law and reviewed the relief sought as it was fashioned. The final order should have reflected that.

However, our review led us to the same conclusion: the lower court's decision to strike the request for a jury trial is a non-appealable, non-final order not subject to mandamus review. Mandamus was designed to compel the performance of a specific, imperative ministerial duty, not to review allegedly erroneous judicial decisions. *Migliore v. City of Lauderhill*, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), *aff'd*, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1983).

Contrary to Ruffenach's argument, no other district court of appeal has held otherwise. Ruffenach's reliance on a footnote in *Department of Natural Resources v. Estech, Inc.*, 515 So.2d 758, 759 n.2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), is misplaced. *Estech*, which also addressed a challenge to the striking of a demand for a jury trial, was decided in the context of a petition for writ of certiorari, and in light of the Florida Supreme Court's decision in *Jaye*, is no longer good law. Further, citation to a footnote speculating as to whether mandamus would have been a proper vehicle for the challenge hardly constitutes authority for that proposition.

The appellate landscape has changed dramatically from the days of common law writs. We now primarily look to the Florida Constitution and the appellate rules for a determination of jurisdiction. Neither provides a basis for relief from the order entered below. The lower court's ruling interpreted the language of a contract containing a clause waiving the right to a trial by jury. If the lower court erred in its interpretation, and if Ruffenach does not prevail following trial and entry of a final judgment, his remedy will follow.

Accordingly, we grant the motion for rehearing, motion for clarification, and motion for written opinion. We deny the petition for mandamus.

EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Leo AIKENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2058

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

Leo Aikens, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Meika DeSean BRITTON v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00046-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: September 12, 2018 Closed: November 15, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Certiorari - Dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF C.C., Jr., P.B., M.B., J.B.

NO. 2018-CJ-1766

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EP Global Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph M. Valenzano Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph M. Valenzano Jr.

Joseph M. Valenzano Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 16, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for November 1, 2022

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - (-)science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        What is declination?

faq        June 30, 2017        Why are amphibian populations declining?

faq        June 30, 2017        What is the United States doing about amphibian deformity and decline issues?

faq        July 7, 2017        Why measure the magnetic field at the Earth's surface? Wouldn't satellites be better suited for space-weather studies?

faq        July 31, 2017        What do the different north arrows on a USGS topographic map mean?

Infographics        March 2, 2022        Discover Ecosystems
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 911 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-641, K2025-640.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29848 Filed 12-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P