alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick Henry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropic Communications,
Inc. (the Company), and David Lyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness
Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of February 3, 2011.



|                                                    |  |  |  |                                   
|--------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|/S/    PATRICK
HENRY                                |  |  |  | /S/    DAVID
LYLE                 
|Patrick Henry President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | David Lyle Chief Financial Officer





|* | This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates this certification by reference therein.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 856 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the social security 

number of the student and the employer identification number of the 

educational institution for purposes of education tax credits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2013 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. WESTMORELAND, and Mr. ROE

of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

the social security number of the student and the employer identification number of the educational institution for purposes of education tax credits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AND EMPLOYER 

4 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER REQUIRED FOR 

5 EDUCATION TAX CREDITS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 25A(g) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 856 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘taxpayer identification num2 ber’’ and inserting ‘‘social security number’’, and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and the employer identifica4 tion number of any institution to which qualified tui5 tion and related expenses were paid with respect to 

6 such individual,’’ after ‘‘such individual’’. 

7 (b) OMISSION TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

8 CLERICAL ERROR.—Subparagraph (J) of section 

9 6213(g)(2) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘TIN’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘social security number and employer identi11 fication number’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THE PRINCETON REVIEW, INC.**

          This AMENDMENT to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated June 7, 2004, between Stephen Melvin (“Melvin”) and The Princeton Review, Inc. (“TPR”), is entered into by Melvin and TPR.

          WHEREAS, TPR and Melvin desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein;

          NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

          1.          Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

                       “1.    *Job Description:*  Melvin shall serve as the Executive Vice President of Finance of TPR, performing such duties as are reasonable and customary for such position within a business of this type, and shall report directly to TPR’s Chief Financial Officer.”

          2.          In the event of termination of Melvin’s employment with TPR for any reason, those options to purchase shares of TPR’s common stock granted by TPR to Melvin that have vested as of the date of such termination shall remain exercisable by Melvin until the expiration date set forth on the stock option grant agreement governing such option. To the extent necessary, each stock option grant agreement from TPR to Melvin is hereby amended to reflect such modifications.

          3.          All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to their terms.

Agreed to September 12, 2005

| /s/ John Katzman             |   | /s/ Stephen Melvin |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                              |   |                    |
| John Katzman                 |   | Stephen Melvin     |
| Chief Executive Officer, TPR |   |               |
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earthquake Myths

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

## By Year

publication        July 1, 1970        4 Earthquake: Major offshore earthquakes recall the Aztec myth

Interviews        July 5, 2011        Earth History of the National Capital Region – Volcanoes, Earthquakes & Dinosaurs... Oh My!

publication        August 1, 2015        Myths and facts on wastewater injection, hydraulic fracturing, enhanced oil recovery, and induced seismicity
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Maikel Castro ENRIQUEZ, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
S.L.R., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 31, 2005
 LaCROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.
  Wisconsin
    
    0-23800
    
    39-1446816(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission file
    
    (IRS employer identificationincorporation)
    
    number)
    
    number)
 18550 NE Riverside Parkway, Portland, Oregon 97230
 (503) 776-1010
 Not Applicable
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITSSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.
  
 ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
 (d) .
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.
Press Release dated
October 31, 2005, entitled
LACROSSE FOOTWEAR REPORTS
THIRD QUARTER RESULTS.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  LaCROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.Dated: November 2, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David P. CarlsonDavid P. CarlsonExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. Press Release dated October 31,
2005, entitled LACROSSE FOOTWEAR REPORTS THIRD QUARTER
RESULTS.
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 977 

For the relief of Esther Karinge. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2013 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Esther Karinge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ESTHER 

4 KARINGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Esther Karinge shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 977 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Esther Karinge 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Esther Karinge, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 977 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Esther Karinge shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OPINION ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus WILLIAM R. ATKINS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-291-A, CA-97-1351-AM) Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William R. Atkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Roland Barr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William R. Atkins seeks to appeal separate orders entered by the district court denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and denying his motion for reconsideration. By court order, the panel granted Atkins’ petition for rehearing and vacated its decision of September 1, 1998. Atkins filed an untimely notice of appeal. We accordingly dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions involving the United States are accorded sixty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Exceptions to the appeal period obtain only if the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order denying Atkins’ § 2255 motion on September 19, 1997, and entered its order denying Atkins’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration on October 10, 1997. Thus, Atkins had until December 9, 1997, within which to submit his notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). Atkins’ notice of appeal was dated December 10, 1997, and filed on December3 22, 1997. The district court did not extend the appeal period. Accordingly, Atkins’ failure to note a timely appeal or obtain anextension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal from either the denial of the § 2255 motion or the denial of his motion for reconsideration. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as to those orders. Atkins also appealed from the district court’s order denying several post-judgment collateral motions. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court’s denial of these motions was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of these orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 906 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-632, K2025-631.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29811 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Todd BULGER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the CITY PENSION FUND FOR FIREFIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS IN the CITY OF TAMPA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's notice of voluntary dismissal is accepted and this petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Christopher Bryant GOODLEY -aka- Christopher Bryant Goodly

NO. 2017-KH-1414

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(2)

## By Year

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Program        October 1, 2018        IAU - WGCCRE

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff
##### 



Date: March 24, 2006
    
    /s/ Klaus EntenmannKlaus EntenmannPresident and Chief Executive Officer,DaimlerChrysler Financial ServicesAmericas LLC,as Servicer ofDaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2005-ADate: March 24, 2006
    
    /s/ Paul E. KnaussPaul E. KnaussVice President and Chief Financial OfficerDaimlerChrysler Financial ServicesAmericas LLC,as Servicer ofDaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2005-A
exv10w63






Exhibit 10.63




Executive Park West I

4718 Gettysburg Rd.

Mechanicsburg, PA 17055




Sixth Addendum to Lease Agreement



This Sixth amendment is made as of the 25th day of April, 2008, by and
between Old Gettysburg Associates, , a (“Landlord”), and Select Medical Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation (“Tenant”).




BACKGROUND:





	A.	 	Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Office Lease Agreement dated May 18, 1999 (as
amended by the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth addendum thereto, the “Lease”) pursuant to
which Landlord leased to Tenant, and Tenant leased from Landlord, approximately 12,225
rentable square feet of space in the building located at 4718 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg,
Pennsylvania. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Lease.
	 
	B.	 	Landlord and Tenant now desire to amend the Lease as hereinafter set forth.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:





Effective as of April 25, 2008 the following terms contained in the Basic Lease
shall be amended as follows:




	 	1.	 	The term of the 4,635 RSF that is Suite 109 (now known as Suite 101-102 data Center) in
the original lease dated May 18, 1999 shall be extended to January 31, 2023.




All other terms and conditions contained in the Lease and not amended hereby remain in full force
and effect.




 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have caused this sixth amendment to be duly
executed.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Landlord: Old Gettysburg Associates
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS:

	 	/s/ Molly Fidler
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ John Ortenzio
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Select Capital Commercial Properties, Inc.

John Ortenzio, President

Agent for Owner
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Tenant: Select Medical Corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:

	 	Illegible
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Michael E. Tarvin
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Michael E. Tarvin
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Executive Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
          30, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirement of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Rebecca S. Stotler
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 14, 2006


                                       30
STATE EX REL. Johnas DURALL v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1919

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.