alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 28

                             UNIPROP INCOME FUND II
                            2006 PROPERTY APPRAISALS

Cushman & Wakefield has recently completed market value appraisals of Uniprop
Income Fund II's nine properties. The table below sets forth certain appraisal
information for each property, as well as a comparison to the original cash
purchase price:

(IN $1,000)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            3/06          3/05             %
PROPERTY                                 APPRAISALS    APPRAISALS       VARIANCE

<S>                                      <C>           <C>              <C>
Ardmor Village                             $ 9,000       $10,250         (12.2%)
Camelot Manor                                5,300         6,000         (11.7%)
Country Roads                                3,250         3,700         (12.2%)
Dutch Hills                                  5,950         6,000           (.8%)
El Adobe                                    13,750        10,400          32.2%
Paradise Village                             6,450         5,850          10.3%
Stonegate Manor                              5,700         5,700             0%
Sunshine Village                            16,050        15,850           1.3%
West Valley                                 18,550        16,300          13.8%
                                           -------       -------       -------

Grand Total:                               $84,000       $80,050           4.9%
</TABLE>

                     2006 ESTIMATED NET ASSET VALUE OF UNITS

Based on the March 2006 appraisal of the Partnership's properties, the General
Partner has calculated the estimated net asset value of each Unit, based on the
following assumptions:

o        Sale of the Properties in March 2006 for their appraised value.

o        Costs and selling expenses are 3.0% of the sale price.

o        Tax consequences of a sale are not taken into consideration.

The estimated net asset value of each unit, assuming the sale of the properties
at their present appraised value is $16.55 calculated as follows:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                  <C>
Aggregate appraised value:                                           $84,000,000

Less: Selling Expenses (3.0%)                                          2,520,000
      Mortgage Debt:                                                  26,824,354
                                                                     -----------

Net Sales Proceeds:                                                  $54,655,646
                                                                     -----------

Number of Units:                                                       3,303,387
Net Sales Proceeds per unit:                                         $     16.55
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 749 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 749

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to provide an exception to the 
                   annual privacy notice requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ANNUAL PRIVACY NOTICE REQUIREMENT UNDER THE GRAMM-
              LEACH-BLILEY ACT.

    Section 503 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6803) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Exception to Annual Notice Requirement.--A financial 
institution that--
            ``(1) provides nonpublic personal information only in 
        accordance with the provisions of subsection (b)(2) or (e) of 
        section 502 or regulations prescribed under section 504(b), and
            ``(2) has not changed its policies and practices with 
        regard to disclosing nonpublic personal information from the 
        policies and practices that were disclosed in the most recent 
        disclosure sent to consumers in accordance with this section,
shall not be required to provide an annual disclosure under this 
section until such time as the financial institution fails to comply 
with any criteria described in paragraph (1) or (2).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 749

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to provide an exception to the 
                   annual privacy notice requirement.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, R. Brooks Sherman, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the “registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 16, 2005
M.N., the father, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FLETCHER L. MALCOLM

, 1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

LANE M. MALCOLM

,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 114 , 20 23

§

§ Court Below: Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ File No. CN 22

- 03080

§ Petition No. 22

- 11646

§

§

§

Submitted: June 23 , 20 23

Decided: June 26 , 20 23

ORDER

T he appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 3 , 20 23

. The Court issued a

briefing schedule on the following day; the opening brief was due by May 19, 2023.

On May 22, 2023, Court staff sent a brief delinquency letter to the appellant. On

June 5 , 202 3 , the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail, directing

the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure

to file an opening brief. On June 21 , 202 3 , the Court received the certified mail

receipt indicating that the noti ce to show cause had been delivered on June 12, 2023

.

The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the

required ten

- day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).2

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED, under Supreme Court Rule s 3(b) (2)

and 29(b) , that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
Amy Francesca PIELLUCCI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1229

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(2)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Illustrations        December 31, 2005        Landsat 7
Exhibit 10.2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO

TO THE

GOODRICH CORPORATION OUTSIDE DIRECTOR PHANTOM SHARE PLAN




(Approved By the Board of Directors on April 24, 2007)




          THIS AMENDMENT is made this 24th day of April, 2007 by Goodrich Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”);




WITNESSETH




          WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Phantom Share Plan,
as approved by the Board of Directors on December 7, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”);
and




          WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 7 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company has
maintained the right to amend the Plan from time to time; and




          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has taken action authorizing this Amendment to
the Plan; and




          NOW, THEREFORE, effective April 24, 2007, the last sentence of Paragraph 6(d) of the Plan is
hereby deleted and the following inserted in lieu thereof:





In the event of any stock dividend, stock split, or similar change in the
capitalization of the Company, the Plan Administrator shall be required to make
equitable adjustments to the Account of each Participant to equalize the value and
prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants in any form or manner
of adjustment as it, in good faith, may determine, in its sole discretion, to be
equitable under the circumstances.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officer, has caused this Amendment to
be executed as of the day and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	GOODRICH CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	Title:
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE


ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Heung Hung Lee, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Creative Vistas, Inc.;





2. based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. the registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under one supervisor, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. the registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated: May 16, 2011




/s/ Heung Hung LeeHeung Hung LeeChief Financial Officer
Justin Luke KING v. DEBUSK SERVICES GROUP, L.L.C., et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1054

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and full opinion.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 667 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.667

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
    To redesignate the Dryden Flight Research Center as the Neil A. 
Armstrong Flight Research Center and the Western Aeronautical Test Range 
             as the Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF DRYDEN FLIGHT RESEARCH CENTER.
    (a) Redesignation.--The National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center in Edwards, 
California, is redesignated as the ``NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight 
Research Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the flight research 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center''.
SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF WESTERN AERONAUTICAL TEST RANGE.
    (a) Redesignation.--The National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) Western Aeronautical Test Range in California is 
redesignated as the ``NASA Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the test range referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``NASA 
Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, James R Morris, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 12, 2009
Jasmin PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1373

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   I, Jean-Jacques Bienaime, Chief Executive Officer and President of Genencor
International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that to my knowledge (i) the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


                                 By: /s/  Jean-Jacques Bienaime
                                     --------------------------------
                                 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
                                 May 13, 2003




   I, Raymond J. Land, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Genencor International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that to my knowledge (i)
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                 By: /s/  Raymond J. Land
                                     --------------------------------
                                 Senior Vice President and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 May 13, 2003



   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Genencor International, Inc. and will be retained by Genencor
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                       31