Exhibit 34.1





Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL:



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the
accompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliance, that SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securities
transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving private-label and co-branded credit card receivables and excluding
private asset-backed securities transactions involving receivables that are not originated through the retail card segment of SYNCHRONY
FINANCIAL (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix),
1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to
the activities it performs with respect to the Platform (the Servicing Criteria), as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,
2018. The Company has determined that Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(1)(v) is applicable to the activities the Company performs
with respect to the Platform only as it relates to the conveyance of information in the monthly noteholder statements delivered
to the trustee. With respect to applicable Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(4)(xv), the Company has determined that there were no activities
performed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 with respect to the Platform because there were no occurrences
of events that would require the Company to perform such activities. Appendix B to Management’s Assessment of Compliance
identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management
is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion about the Company’s compliance with the Servicing Criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants to obtain reasonable assurance and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities
that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Servicing Criteria. Furthermore,
our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to
our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Servicing Criteria.



As described in the accompanying Management’s Assessment
of Compliance, for Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(4)(iv), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required
by this Servicing Criterion. The Company has determined that none of these vendors is considered a “servicer” as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the Servicing
Criterion applicable to each vendor as permitted by the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (C&DI) 200.06,
Vendors Engaged by Servicers (C&DI 200.06). As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies
and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors’ activities comply in all material respects
with the Servicing Criterion applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply C&DI 200.06 for the vendors and related Servicing Criterion as described in its assertion, and we performed
no procedures with respect to the Company’s eligibility to apply C&DI 200.06.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company
complied with the aforementioned Servicing Criteria, including Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(4)(iv) for which compliance is determined
based on C&DI 200.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 is fairly stated, in
all material respects.



/s/KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 2019