alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BANKS v. UNITED STATES.

No. 14468.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 19, 1953.

John P. Dowling, New Orleans, La., fot appellant.

John N. McKay, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La. (Douglas P. Lillis, Acting Dist. Adjudications Officer, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Miami, Fla.), for appellee.

Before HOLMES, BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the petition for naturalization is affirmed because there is outstanding against the petitioner a final finding of deportability, 8 U.S.C.A. § 729(c),1 Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603; Spinella v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 364; United States ex rel. Jankowski v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 580.

Affirmed.

1

. See. 329(c) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended by Sec. 27 of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1015.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

BOBBY THOMPSON, AKA Seal B, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-50130 

D.C. No. 

2:03-cr-00847-ABC-TJH-2 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Bobby Thompson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We need not address the government’s contention that the district court 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-50130 

should have dismissed Thompson’s motion as unexhausted. Any error in 

addressing the motion on the merits was harmless because the district court 

reasonably denied the motion on other grounds. See United States v. Keller, 2 

F.4th 1278, 1283 (9th Cir. 2021). 

Thompson contends that the district court erred by failing to consider his 

arguments for release and instead relying only on the government’s contentions. 

The record reflects that the district court considered Thompson’s claims and 

adequately explained that, even if Thompson had demonstrated extraordinary and 

compelling reasons, it would not grant relief in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

sentencing factors, particularly the seriousness of Thompson’s offenses. See 

Chavez-Meza v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1959, 1965-67 (2018). Moreover, its 

conclusion that the § 3553(a) factors weighed against release was not an abuse of 

discretion. See Keller, 2 F.4th at 1281, 1284 (9th Cir. 2021). 

To the extent Thompson claims that he was entitled to appointment of 

counsel for his compassionate release motion, his claim is unavailing. See United 

States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 513 (9th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 25, 2024        Preparing for volcano hazards: Where is the world’s largest lahar evacuation drill held?

Featured Story        August 25, 2022        Earthquake Detected! Here’s How You Can Prepare

Featured Story        February 16, 2021        ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning Delivery for the Pacific Northwest

Featured Story        April 6, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning:  Vital for City Transit

Podcasts        November 18, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 9 – Famine Early Warning

Podcasts        August 7, 2008        Kasatochi Volcano Erupts Explosively

Podcasts        March 20, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 92 – EROS 50th: The Library and Science Support

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet
Robin STEELE and Scott Steele, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee FOR CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., Home Equity Asset Trust 2004-7, Home Equity Pass-Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-7, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1530

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 13, 2018

Mark P. Stopa of the Stopa Law Firm, LLC, Tampa; and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant.

Alana Zorrilla-Gaston, Dean A. Morande, and Michael K. Winston of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Scott JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 29, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40102

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LYNNSEY DAWN CUMMINGS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 693

Filed: October 2, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Lynnsey Dawn Cummings pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent 

to deliver (methamphetamine), Idaho Code § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). The district court sentenced 

Cummings to a unified term of eight years, with three years determinate, and retained 

jurisdiction. After Cummings completed a period of retained jurisdiction, upon recommendation 

of program staff at the South Boise Women’s Correctional Center, the district court relinquished 

jurisdiction and executed the underlying sentence. Cummings filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 

motion for reduction of her sentence, which the district court denied. Cummings now appeals, 

contending the district court abused its discretion by relinquishing jurisdiction.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 
2

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 

596-97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered 

the information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. Cummings has 

failed to show that the district court abused its discretion, and we therefore affirm the order 

relinquishing jurisdiction.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N RE: DONNY L EE B RETZ , Relator. § § § § § § § No. 08-11-00243- CR AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG I N MANDA MUS

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Donny L ee Br etz has filed a petition for writ o f mandamus to compel the Texas Boa rd of Pardons and Paroles to provide him with a fair and impartial parole evalua tion and revie w proce ss. We have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamu s aga i n s t certain judge s within our g eog raphic district. T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E AN N . § 22.221(b) (West 2004)
. We also have a uthority to issue a writ of mandamu s i f i t i s n ece ssary to enfor ce our jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a)
. Br etz does not seek mandamus re l i ef aga i n s t a judge , and he has not shown that a writ is nece ssary to enfor ce our jurisdiction. Theref

ore, the petition for writ of manda mus is dis missed.

GUADA L UPE RI VERA, J ustice September 7, 2011 Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
. (Do Not Publish)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139464

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139464 COA: 286368 Livingston CC: 05-015374-FH SCOTT RICHARD HOLLOWAY, 05-015440-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(53)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(141)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(78)
              - arkansas(24)
              - california(314)
              - colorado(93)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(9)
              - florida(87)
              - georgia(22)
              - guam(5)
              - hawaii(55)
              - idaho(85)
              - illinois(21)
              - indiana(13)
              - iowa(30)
              - kansas(53)
              - kentucky(10)
              - louisiana(44)
              - maine(21)
              - maryland(35)
              - massachusetts(12)
              - michigan(33)
              - minnesota(49)
              - mississippi(23)
              - missouri(26)
              - montana(75)
              - nebraska(44)
              - (-)nevada(62)
              - new hampshire(10)
              - new jersey(23)
              - new mexico(61)
              - new york(48)
              - north carolina(35)
              - north dakota(40)
              - ohio(15)
              - oklahoma(33)
              - oregon(109)
              - pennsylvania(26)
              - puerto rico(11)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(17)
              - south dakota(59)
              - tennessee(28)
              - texas(68)
              - u.s. virgin islands(9)
              - utah(58)
              - vermont(11)
              - virginia(48)
              - washington(82)
              - west virginia(20)
              - wisconsin(43)
              - wyoming(105)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

Presentations and Events        June 10, 2013        A Mammal's Take on the 'Rapture Hypothesis' in Sierra Nevada

National News Release        February 26, 2024        USGS provides easy access to Colorado River science with new online portal

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Current page            3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileJoseph Hughes
EXHIBIT 24
  POWER OF
    ATTORNEY
  and/or Form 10-K
  Signature

Title

Date/s/  Raouf
    Y. HalimRaouf
    Y. Halim

Director and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
    Officer)

November 11, 2010/s/  Dwight
    W. DeckerDwight
    W. Decker

Chairman of the Board of Directors

November 11, 2010/s/  Robert
    J. ConradRobert
    J. Conrad

Director

November 11, 2010/s/  Michael
    T. HayashiMichael
    T. Hayashi

Director

November 11, 2010/s/  Ming
    LouieMing
    Louie

Director

November 11, 2010/s/  Thomas
    A. MaddenThomas
    A. Madden

Director

November 11, 2010/s/  Jerre
    L. SteadJerre
    L. Stead

Director

November 15, 2010/s/  Bret
    W. JohnsenBret
    W. Johnsen

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)

November 11, 2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29677]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 19, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

     Dated: December 12, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-29677 Filed 12-12-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29487]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m. on December 17, 2024.

PLACE: This Board meeting will be open to public observation only by 
webcast. Visit https://www.fdic.gov/news/board-matters/video.html for a 
link to the webcast. FDIC Board Members and staff will participate from 
FDIC Headquarters, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC.
    Observers requiring auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language 
interpretation) for this meeting should email 
[email protected] to make necessary arrangements.

STATUS: Open to public observation via webcast.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 
Board of Directors will meet to consider the following matters:

Discussion Agenda

    Proposed 2025 FDIC Operating Budget.
    Discussion Draft relating to FDIC Policy regarding the Annunzio-
Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act.
    Discussion Draft relating to FDIC Policy on Bank Capital 
Distributions in Unusual and Exigent Circumstances.

Summary Agenda

    No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. 
The Board will resolve these matters with a single vote unless a member 
of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the 
discussion agenda.
    Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously Distributed.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Direct requests for further 
information concerning the meeting to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b

    Dated at Washington, DC, on December 10, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-29487 Filed 12-11-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - hawaii(19)
              - idaho(8)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(2)
              - maine(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(9)
              - nevada(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(28)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(18)

## By Year

Center News        January 13, 2023        Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds geologic mapping in Minnesota
EXHIBIT 32.1
  
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Report of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) DIEPHOLZ





K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Dated: May 5, 2011





/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”)  DIEPHOLZ

K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 5, 2011





/s/ Charles Smith



Charles Smith

Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 5, 2011





/s/ Charles Smith

Charles Smith

Principal Accounting Officer

Dated:  May 5, 2011
  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(20)
              - arizona(22)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(27)
              - colorado(20)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(5)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - (-)new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(5)
              - north carolina(4)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(23)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(5)
              - virginia(10)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(9)

## By Year

Project        April 2, 2018        Heavy-Mineral Sand Resources in the Southeastern U.S.

Program        March 10, 2016        Long Island-New Jersey (LINJ) Coastal Drainages Study Overview
Johnathan ALTMAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.