alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed October 23, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00249-CV

____________

MARGARET ONWUDIEGWU, Appellant

V.

JAIME J. DOMINGUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 and Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CI48482

ABATEMENT ORDER

The court reporter has notified this court that portions of the requested 

reporter’s record have been lost or destroyed. Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure provides that an appellant is entitled to a new trial when the 

reporter=s record or exhibits are lost, under the following circumstances:

(1) if the appellant timely requested a reporter’s record;
(2) if, without the appellant’s fault, a significant exhibit or a 

significant portion of the court reporter’s notes and records has been 

lost or destroyed . . . ;

(3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record, 

or the lost or destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal’s resolution; 

and

(4) if the lost, destroyed or inaudible portion of the reporter’s record 

cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties, or the lost or 

destroyed exhibit cannot be replace either by agreement or the parties 

or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate 

with reasonable certainty the original exhibit.

Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine the 

following: (1) whether appellant timely requested a reporter’s record; (2) whether 

without the appellant’s fault, significant portions of the record have been lost or 

destroyed; (3) whether the lost or destroyed portions of the record are necessary to 

appellant’s appeal; and (4) if the trial court can determine that the missing portions 

of the reporter’s record can be replaced by agreement. The court is directed to 

reduce its findings to writing and to have a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

those findings filed with the clerk of this court, together with a reporter’s record 

from the hearing, within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any 

party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to 

schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not 
request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date 

and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown and Wise.
Brandon Rashad DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cedric BUTLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 21, 2018

Cedric Butler, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Wetherell, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin G. Chilek,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Martin Chilek
                                            ---------------------
                                            Martin G. Chilek
                                            Chief Financial Officer


May 19, 2004
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

July 31, 201 8.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00587- CR

IN RE RAUL OLVERA, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1009434



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 18, 2018, relator Raul Olvera filed a petition for writ of mandamus in
this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel Chris Daniel , the District
Clerk of Harris Co unty, to provide relator with a free transcript of his trial.2

We do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk because the clerk is not one of the parties specified in section 22.221(b) of the Texas Government against whom we many issue a writ. See Te x. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b). Nor is it necessary to issue a writ against the clerk to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See id . § 22.221(a).
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
E.N., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1104

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

E.N., a juvenile, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed November 22 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00 9 28

- CR

IN RE LESLIE RAY FOS TER , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16

- CR

- 1600



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 15 , 2016 , r elator Leslie Ray Foster filed a pro se petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Kerry Neves , presiding judge of the 10th District Court of Galveston County to : (1) rule on his pro se “Application for Writ Of Habeas Corpus Seeking2

Personal Bond Under Article 17.151 of the Texas C ode of Criminal Procedure or a Bond R eduction ” , dated September 11, 2016 (the Habeas Application) , and (2) grant any other relief deemed just.
Relator indicates in his petition that he was arrested for the offense of organized criminal activity and that an attorney has been appointed to represent him. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. S tate, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means that a relator’ s pro se mandamus petition should be treated as pr esenting nothing for this court’ s review. See Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App.

– Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding); In re Bogus , 14

- 16

- 00129

- CR, 2016 WL 1165807, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 24, 2016, orig. proceeding ) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (denying pro se petition for writ of mandamus because relator is represented by counsel). Because relator is represented by counsel, his pro se petition presents nothing for review.
We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher , Jamison, and Donovan

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Miguel TRUJILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2333

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2018

Miguel Trujillo, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court's summary denial of Ground 1 of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 Motion for Postconviction Relief because Appellant should have been afforded the opportunity to amend his facially insufficient claim. See *533*Taylor v. State* , 248 So.3d 280, 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) ("Because [appellant] had not previously sought or been given leave to amend his rule 3.850 motion, and because the pleading deficiency in his motion is likely correctable, he should be given the chance to do so.") The trial court's order is otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Vegas Global Strategies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kwan Sin Yee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

March 30, 2017

 
|   | /s/ KWAN SIN YEE        |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Kwan Sin Yee            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of DTS, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon E. Kirchner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated: March 6, 2009

By

/s/ JON E. KIRCHNER Jon E. Kirchner President and Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to DTS, Inc. and will be retained by
DTS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
W & T OFFSHORE, L.L.C. v. TEXAS BRINE CORPORATION and Texas Brine Company, L.L.C.

Texas Brine Company, L.L.C. v. W & T Offshore, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-C-0956

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Granted.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit-"It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 8th day of October, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand-Eighteen.
NO. 07-07-0432-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 14, 2007

______________________________

JOE CHRISTIAN SALAZAR, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 251 DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; ST

NO. 55146-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Abatement and Remand

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Joe Christian Salazar (appellant) filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for

burglary of a building on October 19, 2007. On October 11, 2007, the trial court filed its

certification representing that appellant has the right of appeal. However, the appellate

record reflects that appellant failed to sign the certification pursuant to Texas Rule of
Became effective September 1, 2007. 1

2

Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) which requires the certification to be signed by appellant and

a copy served on him.1

Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District

Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall take such action necessary to secure and file with this court a certificate of right to

appeal that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) by January 14, 2008.

 Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same

on or before January 14, 2008.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GLENN SHARICE BOLDEN, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 64 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
TITLE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL LP, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Joseph T.Crowley, the Chief Financial Officer of Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certify that the Company’s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that as of the date of this statement, the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all in material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

The purpose of this statement is to solely to comply with Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 
| Date: May 2, 2008 | / s/ JOSEPH T. CROWLEY    |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | Joseph T. Crowley         |
|                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. andwill be retained by Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
Dallas BROOKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3288

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 09, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to any right petitioner might have to request counsel in the lower tribunal. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(7) ; Graham v. State, 372 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1979).

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 99.1



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  eTelcharge.com,  Inc.(the
"Company")  on Form 10QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,Carl
Sherman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.





By: /s/ Carl Sherman
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive and Financial Officer

November 15, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth As Art 2

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(10)
              - multimedia_audio(15)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(12)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_image(221)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(204)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(49)
              - multimedia_video-149194(23)
              - multimedia_video-149195(20)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149222(2)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

State News Release        March 27, 2017        Exhibit Fusing Art and Science Coming to Bismarck
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(6)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)nevada(3)
              - south dakota(22)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        June 21, 2019        Site Selection for Indirect Discharge Measurements

How to's and trainings        December 15, 2020        What Does a USGS Hydrologic Technician Do

How to's and trainings        June 20, 2018        Indirect Measurement Field Notes and Metadata
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a)	the Form 10-K of the Company for the Annual Period Ended December 31, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. Zawadzki John A. Zawadzki 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   February 11, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                                      15

<PAGE>



COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2003-8CB
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2003-19


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                             Dated: March 25, 2004
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER



/s/ Mark Wong                                        Dated: March 25,  2004
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT



                                      16
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In accordance with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,each of the undersigned officers of Cascades Inc. (the “Corporation”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



|1) | the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Corporation as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated March 27, 2015



| | /s/ Mario Plourde                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Mario Plourde                                
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer       
| |                                                    
| | /s/ Allan Hogg                                     
| | Name: Allan Hogg                                   
| | Title: Vice - President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.