alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T APRI L5, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 15 84 6

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 5- 00 33 4- CV-ORL-3 1- GJK AUTO-OW

NERS INSURANCE COM PANY, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us SOUTHEAST FLOA TING DOCKS, INC., Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Ap ril 5, 2 01 2)
Befo re WILSON, PRYOR an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:The in st an t ap pe al in vo lv es a fee d is pu te ari si ng fro m Aut o- Owner s’ su it ag ai ns t So ut he as t b as edon a writ te n i nd em ni ty con tra ct . Sou th eas t p rev ai le d, an d fil eda m ot io n fo r at to rn ey ’s fees an d c os ts pu rs ua ntto Fla .Sta t. § 76 8.7 9. Th e di st ric t co urt d en ie d t he m ot io n, an d S ou th eas t ap pe al edto th is co urt. W e certi fie d qu es ti on s t o t he Supr em e Co urt o f Fl or id a, in cl ud in g t he fol lo win g que st io n: 1 DOES FLORIDA STATUTE §7 68 .79 APPLY TO CASES THAT ARE GOVERNED BY THE SUBSTANTIVE L AW OF ANOTHE R JUR ISDICTI ON; AND, IF SO, IS THIS STATUTE APPLICABLE EVEN T O CONTROVERSIES IN WH ICH THE PARTIES HAVE CONTRACTUALLY AG REED TO BE BOUND BY THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW S OF ANOTHER JURISDIC TION? Inth e in de m

ni ty con tra ct , th e p art ie s ag reedth atth e subs ta nt iv e la w of Mi ch ig anwou ldap pl y . The Supr em e Co urt o f Fl or id a an swe redth e certi fie d 2 qu es ti on in th e n eg at iv e, ho ld in g t ha t § 76 8.7 9 i s s ub st an ti ve in na tu re fo r co nf li ct of laws pu rp os es , th atno su ffi ci en t p ub li c p ol ic y co nc ern s o ve rri de th e p art ie s’ rig htto ch oo se th e law of apa rti cu la r fo ru m th atgo ve rn s t he subs ta nt iv e p orti on s

Auto-Owne rs Ins. Co. v. Sout heast F loating D ocks, Inc., 632 F .3d 1195 (11th Cir. 1 2011). The pa

rties stipulated that no compar able statute e x ists under Michig an law. 2 2of

th ei r co nt ract , andth us th at§7 68 .79 si m pl y do es no t ap pl y . The Fl or id a 3 Supr em e Co urt al so di sapp ro ve d o f BDO Sei dm an , LLP v. Bri ti sh Car Au ct io ns , In c., 80 2 S o.2 d 3 66 , 36 8 (F la . 4t h DCA 2 00 1)
. Alt ho ug h t he jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt d en y in g a tt orne y ’s fees an d c os ts
was ba se d upo n adi ffer en t g ro un d, we af firm on th e g ro un d a rti cu la te d b y th e Supr em e Co urt o f Fl or id a. AFFIR MED.

Southeast FloatingDocks, I nc. v. Auto-O wner s Ins. Co., ___ So.3d ___, 2012 W L 3 301029 (F la. 2012). 3
Curtis Joe MORNING, Appellant, v. Christopher E. ZEEK and Susan M. Zeek, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

Patrick J. Deese, of Patrick J. Deese, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.

Michael Faro, of Faro & Crowder, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 6, 2017

NO. 03-14-00669-CR

Ex parte Justin River Carter

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED ON REMAND-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the 

parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s order. 

Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to 

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dominic Burns,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Dominic BurnsDominic
      BurnsChief
      Executive Officer





November
15, 2010
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF


TITLE
      18,
      UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of ETELCHARGE.COM, INC., a Nevada corporation (the
      "Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of
      ETELCHARGE.COM, INC. on Form 10-QSB for the first quarter of 2005 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:





(1)  the
      10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ETELCHARGE.COM,
      INC.





**ETELCHARGE.COM,
                INC.**December
                8, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Carl
                O.
                ShermanCarl
                O. ShermanChief
                Executive Officer
 December
                8, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Michelle
                R. ShermanMichelle
                R. ShermanPrincipal
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3(a)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Winton Feeder I LP
    
    CMF Winton Master Fund L.P.
    
    Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    Abingdon Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Global Futures Fund Ltd.
    
    Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENTBy:
    
    /s/ Peter Jau HalPrint Name:
    
    Peter Jau Hal
Clinton HANNAH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00721

- CV

402 LONE STAR PROPERTY, LLC and Craig Otto

,

Appellants

v.

Barr y L. BRADFORD

, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08653

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk ’ s record was due October 31, 2016 , but was not filed. On November 1, 2016,

the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk ’s record was not filed because

appellant s ha ve not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk ’s fee to prepare the record and

appellant s are not entitled to the record without paying the fee. We ordered appellant s to provide

written proof to this court that either (1) the clerk ’ s fee ha d been paid or arrangements

satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant s were entitled to

the clerk ’ s record without prepayment of the clerk ’ s fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1

, 35.3(a). We

advised that if appellant s fail ed to file su ch proof within the time provided, this appeal w ould be

dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

In response , appellants filed proof that they had provided payment to the clerk for

preparation of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER t he Bexar County District Clerk to

file the clerk’s record in this court on or before December 21, 2016

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on Craig Otto, all current

counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter s

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of November, 2 016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Savoy Capital Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB  for the period ending June 30, 2003,
(the  "Report"), I, Andrew N. Peterie, Chief  Executive Officer and  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Andrew N. Peterie
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003
Exhibit 31.1

                     Rule 13A-14(a)/15D-14(a) Certification
                           Of Chief Executive Officer

I, Merton Corn, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB of VSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.[Omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; and

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 27, 2006
       --------------

                                               /s/ MERTON CORN
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Merton Corn, President and CEO
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

132174 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. TRACI WEBBER, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Janie L. Webber, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132174 COA: 267582 Oakland CC: 2003-055071-NM GEORGE HILBORN, and HILBORN & HILBORN, P.C., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argumen t, the parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that plaintiff adequately stated a prima facie case of legal malpractice, in light of the observation in Charles Reinhart Co v Winiemko , 444 Mich 579, 585-586 (1994), that “a plaintiff ‘must show that but for the attorn ey’s alleged malpractice, he would have been successful in the underlying suit;’” and, if so, whether it is necessary to
remand this case to the trial court for a dete rmination of whether further amendment of the complaint to allege pr oximate cause would be futile . The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in th eir application papers.

l0116 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 19, 2007

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Little SiouxCorn Processors, L.L.C. (the “Company”) for the nine month fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doug Lansink, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Doug Lansink                                                                         |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Doug Lansink  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated:  December 29, 2003 |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 4, 2010 |  | /s/ Adelene Q. Perkins                               
|                     |  | Adelene Q. Perkins                                   
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                     |  | (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
retained by Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-147916, 333-149077 and 333-157460) of Entropic Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 4, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Entropic Communications, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Entropic Communications, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

February 4, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Jim Glavas, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report of North American Natural Gas, Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in the SEC Release No. 33-8238;

c)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:     September 12, 2006 | JIM GLAVAS                 
|---------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                             | Jim Glavas                 
|                             | Principal Executive Officer



---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fairy Lee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|By:  /S/ Fairy Lee
------------------------------------
Fairy Lee
Chief Financial Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         





May 20, 2005