101050 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2024 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Commissioner David S. Johanson voted in the 

negative for Latvia and Ukraine. 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1373] 

Certain Electronic Devices, Including 

Smartphones, Computers, Tablet 

Computers, and Components Thereof; 

Notice of a Commission Determination 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Joint Motion To Terminate 

the Investigation Based on Arbitration; 

Termination of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 60) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) granting a joint motion for 

termination of the investigation in its 

entirety based on arbitration. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Namo Kim, Esq., Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3459. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 11, 2023, the Commission 

instituted this investigation under 

Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), based on a complaint filed by 

InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital VC 

Holdings, and InterDigital Patent 

Holdings, Inc., all of Wilmington, 

Delaware; and InterDigital Madison 

Patent Holdings SAS of Paris, France 

(collectively, ‘‘InterDigital’’). 88 FR 

70425–26 (Oct. 11, 2023). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleged 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain electronic devices, including 

smartphones, computers, tablet 

computers, and components thereof by 

reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,674,859; 

8,737,933 (the ’933 patent); 9,173,054 

(the ’054 patent); 9,674,556 (the ’556 

patent); and 10,250,877 (the ’877 

patent). Id. The complaint further 

alleged that an industry in the United 

States exists or is in the process of being 

established. Id. The notice of 

investigation named as respondents 

Lenovo Group Limited of Hong Kong 

SAR; Lenovo (United States) Inc. of 

Morrisville, North Carolina; and 

Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, 

Illinois. Id. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was named as a 

party to the investigation. Id. 

On January 7, 2024, the Commission 

terminated the investigation as to 

respondent Lenovo Group Limited and 

amended the complaint and notice of 

investigation to add Lenovo PC HK 

Limited of Hong Kong SAR as a 

respondent. Order No. 16 (Dec. 18, 

2023); unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Jan. 8, 2024). As amended, the 

respondents named in the investigation 

are Lenovo PC HK Limited, Lenovo 

(United States) Inc., and Motorola 

Mobility LLC (collectively, 

‘‘Respondents’’). 

On July 5, 2024, the Commission 

terminated the investigation as to claims 

4 and 8 of the ’877 patent. Order No. 42 

(June 5, 2024); unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (July 5, 2024). 

On August 1, 2024, the Commission 

terminated the investigation as to claims 

4 and 8 of the ’556 patent. Order No. 47 

(July 12, 2024); unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Aug. 1, 2024). 

On August 26, 2024, the Commission 

terminated the investigation as to claims 

1 and 23 of the ’933 patent and claims 

1 and 23 of the ’054 patent. Order No. 

51 (July 26, 2024); unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Aug. 26, 2024). 

On October 22, 2024, InterDigital and 

Respondents filed a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation based on 

arbitration. The joint motion stated that 

InterDigital and Respondents have a 

valid arbitration agreement regarding 

the patents asserted in the investigation, 

and termination of the investigation is 

consistent with public interest as it 

would conserve private and public 

resources and have no adverse effects to 

the public. 

On November 1, 2024, OUII filed a 

response to the joint motion supporting 

termination of the investigation. 

On November 7, 2024, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 60) pursuant 

to Commission Rule 210.21(d) (37 CFR 

210.21(d)), granting the joint motion to 

terminate the investigation based on 

arbitration. 

No petitions for review of the subject 

ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is terminated. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on December 

9, 2024. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 9, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29331 Filed 12–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–873–875, 878– 

880, and 882 (Fourth Review)] 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) 

From Belarus, China, Indonesia, 

Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on rebar from 

Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, 

Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time.2

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on November 1, 2023 (88 FR 

75033) and determined on February 5, 

2024, that it would conduct full reviews 

(89 FR 13089, February 21, 2024). 

Notice of the scheduling of the 

Commission’s reviews and of a public 

hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on April 15, 2024 (89 FR 

26188). The Commission conducted its 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES