Exhibit 99.3


FAX (303) 623-4258


621 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 1550 DENVER, COLORADO 80293 TELEPHONE 303) 623-9147





September 28, 2010


Petroleum Development Corporation


120 Genesis Boulevard


Bridgeport, West Virginia  26330





Gentlemen:





At your request, Ryder Scott Company (Ryder Scott) has prepared an estimate of the proved reserves, future production, and income attributable to certain leasehold and royalty interests of Petroleum Development Corporation’s (“PDC”)  PDC 2002B Partnership as of December 31, 2009.  The subject properties are located in the state of Colorado. The reserves and income data were estimated based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register (SEC regulations).  Our third party study presented herein, was prepared for public disclosure by PDC in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations.  The properties reviewed by Ryder Scott represent 100 percent of the total net proved liquid hydrocarbon reserves and 100 percent of the total net proved gas reserves of PDC 2002B Partnership.





The estimated reserves and future net income amounts presented in this report, as of December 31, 2009 are related to hydrocarbon prices.  The hydrocarbon prices used in the preparation of this report are based on the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending December 31, 2009 of the period covered in this report, determined as unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements, as required by the SEC regulations.  Actual future prices may vary significantly from the prices required by SEC regulations; therefore, volumes of reserves actually recovered and the amounts of income actually received may differ significantly from the estimated quantities presented in this report.  The results of this study are summarized below.





SEC PARAMETERS


Estimated Net Reserves and Income Data


Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests of


Petroleum Development Corporation Partnership: PDC 2002B


As of December 31, 2009





ProvedDeveloped





TotalProducing


Non-Producing


Undeveloped


ProvedNet Remaining ReservesOil/Condensate – Barrels


22,029



0



61,612



83,641Gas – MMCF


781



0



538



1,319Income Data M$Future Gross Revenue

$
3,503


$
0


$
5,530


$
9,033Deductions


2,604



0



3,016



5,620Future Net Income (FNI)

$
899


$
0


$
2,514


$
3,413Discounted FNI @ 10%

$
716


$
0


$
1,040


$
1,756


Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 2





Liquid hydrocarbons are expressed in standard 42 gallon barrels.  All gas volumes are reported on an “as sold basis” expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMCF) at the official temperature and pressure bases of the areas in which the gas reserves are located.





The estimates of the reserves, future production, and income attributable to properties in this report were prepared using the economic software package AriesTM System Petroleum Economic Evaluation Software, a copyrighted program of Halliburton The program was used solely at the request of PDC.  Ryder Scott has found this program to be generally acceptable, but notes that certain summaries and calculations may vary due to rounding and may not exactly match the sum of the properties being summarized.  Furthermore, one line economic summaries may vary slightly from the more detailed cash flow projections of the same properties, also due to rounding.  The rounding differences are not material.





The future gross revenue is after the deduction of production taxes.  The deductions incorporate the normal direct costs of operating the wells, ad valorem taxes, recompletion costs, development costs, and certain abandonment costs net of salvage. The future net income is before the deduction of state and federal income taxes and general administrative overhead, and has not been adjusted for outstanding loans that may exist nor does it include any adjustment for cash on hand or undistributed income.  Liquid hydrocarbon reserves account for approximately 50 percent and gas reserves account for the remaining 50 percent of total future gross revenue from proved reserves.





The discounted future net income shown above was calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent per annum compounded monthly.  Future net income was discounted at four other discount rates which were also compounded monthly.  These results are shown in summary form as follows.





Discounted Future Net Income $MAs of December 31, 2009Discount Rate


TotalPercent


Proved5


$
2,39815


$
1,33220


$
1,04125


$
836





The results shown above are presented for your information and should not be construed as our estimate of fair market value.





Reserves Included in This Report





The proved reserves included herein conform to the definition as set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulations Part 210.4-10(a).  An abridged version of the SEC reserves definitions from 210.4-10(a) entitled “Petroleum Reserves Definitions” is included as an attachment to this report.





The various reserve status categories are defined under the attachment entitled “Petroleum Reserves Definitions” in this report.





No attempt was made to quantify or otherwise account for any accumulated gas production imbalances that may exist.  The provedgas volumes included herein do not attribute gas consumed in operations as reserves.





Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 3





Reserves are those estimated remaining quantities of petroleum which are anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, from known accumulations under defined conditions.  All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the likelihood that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the estimated quantities determined as of the date the estimate is made.  The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of these data.  The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved.  Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability.  At PDC’s request, this report addresses only the proved reserves attributable to the properties evaluated herein.





Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward.  The proved reserves included herein were estimated using deterministic methods.  If deterministic methods are used, the SEC has defined reasonable certainty for proved reserves as a “high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered”.





Provedreserve estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering data become available or as economic conditions change.  For proved reserves, the SEC states that “as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease”.  Moreover, estimates of proved reserves may be revised as a result of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks.  Therefore, the proved reserves included in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities, and if recovered, the revenues therefrom, and the actual costs related thereto, could be more or less than the estimated amounts.





The estimates of proved reserves presented herein were based upon a detailed study of the properties in which PDC 2002B Partnership owns an interest; however, we have not made any field examination of the properties.  No consideration was given in this report to potential environmental liabilities that may exist nor were any costs included for potential liabilities to restore and clean up damages, if any, caused by past operating practices.





Estimates of Reserves





The estimation of reserves involves two distinct determinations.  The first determination results in the estimation of the quantities of recoverable oil and gas and the second determination results in the estimation of the uncertainty associated with those estimated quantities in accordance with the definitions set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulations Part 210.4-10(a).  The process of estimating the quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves relies on the use of certain generally accepted analytical procedures.  These analytical procedures fall into three broad categories or methods: (1) performance-based methods, (2) volumetric-based methods and (3) analogy.  These methods may be used singularly or in combination by the reserve evaluator in the process of estimating the quantities of reserves.  The reserve evaluator must select the method or combination of methods which in their professional judgment is most appropriate given the nature and amount of reliable geoscience and engineering data available at the time of the estimate, the established or anticipated performance characteristics of the reservoir being evaluated and the stage of development or producing maturity of the property.





Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 4





In many cases, the analysis of the available geoscience and engineering data and the subsequent interpretation of this data may indicate a range of possible outcomes in an estimate, irrespective of the method selected by the evaluator.  When a range in the quantity of reserves is identified, the evaluator must determine the uncertainty associated with the incremental quantities of the reserves.  If the reserve quantities are estimated using the deterministic incremental approach, the uncertainty for each discrete incremental quantity of the reserves is addressed by the reserve category assigned by the evaluator.  Therefore, it is the categorization of reserve quantities as proved, probable and/or possible that addresses the inherent uncertainty in the estimated quantities reported.  For proved reserves, uncertainty is defined by the SEC as reasonable certainty wherein the “quantities actually recovered are much more likely than not to be achieved”.  All quantities of proved reserves must meet the SEC definitions as noted above.





Estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may be revised in the future as additional geoscience or engineering data become available.  Furthermore, estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may also be revised due to other factors such as changes in economic conditions, results of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks as previously noted herein.





The proved reserves for the properties included herein were estimated by performance methods and analogy methods. Approximately 100 percent of the proved producing reserves attributable to producing wells were estimated by performance methods. The performance method used was decline curve analysis which utilized extrapolations of historical production data. The data utilized in this analysis were supplied to Ryder Scott by PDC or obtained from public data sources and were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof.





Approximately 100 percent of the proved undeveloped reserves included herein were estimated by the analogy method. The data utilized from the analoguewell data incorporated into our analogy analysis were considered sufficient for the purpose thereof.





To estimate economically recoverable proved oil and gas reserves and related future net cash flows, we consider many factors and assumptions including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data which cannot be measured directly, economic criteria based on current costs and SEC pricing requirements, and forecasts of future production rates.  Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved reserves must be anticipated to be economically producible from a given date forward based on existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined.  While it may reasonably be anticipated that the future prices received for the sale of production and the operating costs and other costs relating to such production may increase or decrease from those under existing economic conditions, such changes were, in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, omitted from consideration in making this evaluation.





PDC has informed us that they have furnished us all of the material accounts, records, geological and engineering data, and reports and other data required for this investigation.  In preparing our forecast of future proved production and income, we have relied upon data furnished by PDC with respect to property interests owned, production and well tests from examined wells, normal direct costs of operating the wells or leases, other costs such as transportation and/or processing fees, ad valorem and production taxes, recompletion and development costs, abandonment costs after salvage, product prices based on the SEC regulations, adjustments or differentials to product prices and well logs.  Ryder Scott reviewed such factual data for its reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data supplied by PDC.  We consider the factual data used in this report appropriate and sufficient for the purpose of preparing the estimates of reserves and future net revenues herein.





Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 5





In summary, we consider the assumptions, data, methods and analytical procedures used in this report appropriate for the purpose hereof, and we have used all such methods and procedures that we consider necessary and appropriate to prepare the estimates of reserves herein.  The proved reserves included herein were determined in conformance with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule”, including all references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, referred to herein collectively as the “SEC Regulations”.  In our opinion, the proved reserves presented in this report comply with the definitions, guidelines and disclosure requirements as required by the SEC regulations.





Future Production Rates





For wells currently on production, our forecasts of future production rates are based on historical performance data.  If no production decline trend has been established, future production rates were held constant, or adjusted for the effects of curtailment where appropriate, until a decline in ability to produce was anticipated.  An estimated rate of decline was then applied to depletion of the reserves.  If a decline trend has been established, this trend was used as the basis for estimating future production rates.





Test data and other related information were used to estimate the anticipated initial production rates for those wells or locations that are not currently producing.  For reserves not yet on production, sales were estimated to commence at an anticipated date furnished by PDC.  Wells or locations that are not currently producing may start producing earlier or later than anticipated in our estimates due to unforeseen factors causing a change in the timing to initiate production.  Such factors may include the availability of rigs, the sequence of drilling, completing and/or recompleting wells and/or constraints set by regulatory bodies.





The future production rates from wells currently on production or wells or locations that are not currently producing may be more or less than estimated because of changes including, but not limited to, reservoir performance, operating conditions related to surface facilities, compression and artificial lift, pipeline capacity and/or operating conditions, producing market demand and/or allowables or other constraints set by regulatory bodies.





Hydrocarbon Prices





The hydrocarbon prices used herein are based on SEC price parameters using the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered in this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements.  For hydrocarbon products sold under contract, the contract prices, including fixed and determinable escalations, exclusive of inflation adjustments, were used until expiration of the contract.  Upon contract expiration, the prices were adjusted to the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average as previously described.





PDC furnished us with the above mentioned average prices in effect on December 31, 2009. These initial SEC hydrocarbon prices were determined using the 12-month average first-day-of-the-month benchmark prices appropriate to the geographic area where the hydrocarbons are sold.  These benchmark prices are prior to the adjustments for differentials as described herein.  The table below summarizes the “benchmark prices” and “price reference” used for the geographic areas included in the report. In certain geographic areas, the price reference and benchmark prices may be defined by contractual arrangements.





Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 6





The product prices which were actually used to determine the future gross revenue for each property reflect adjustments to the benchmark prices for gravity, quality, local conditions, gathering and transportation fees and/or distance from market, referred to herein as “differentials”.  The differentials used in the preparation of this report were supplied to us by PDC.





In addition, the table below summarizes the net volume weighted benchmark prices adjusted for differentials and referred to herein as the “average realized prices”.  The average realized prices shown in the table below were determined from the total future gross revenue before production taxes and the total net reserves.








Geographic

Area
Product
Price

Reference
Avg Benchmark

Prices
Avg Realized

PricesUnited States
Oil/Condensate
WTI Cushing
$61.18/Bbl
$54.99/BblGas
Henry Hub/

NYMEX
$3.866/MMBTU
$3.42/MCF





The effects of derivative instruments designated as price hedges of oil and gas quantities are not reflected in our individual property evaluations.





Costs





Operating costs for the leases and wells in this report are based on the operating expense reports of PDC and include only those costs directly applicable to the leases or wells. The operating costs include a portion of general and administrative costs allocated directly to the leases and wells. In addition, the operating expenses include the monthly operating and administrative charge as defined in the partnership agreement. No deduction was made for loan repayments, interest expenses, or exploration and development prepayments that were not charged directly to the leases or wells.





Development costs were furnished to us by PDC and are based on authorizations for expenditure for the proposed work or actual costs for similar projects.  The estimated net cost of abandonment after salvage was included. The estimates of the net abandonment costs furnished by PDC were accepted without independent verification.





The proved undeveloped reserves in this report have been incorporated herein in accordance with PDC’s plans to develop these reserves as of December 31, 2009.  The implementation of PDC’s development plans as presented to us and incorporated herein is subject to the approval process adopted by PDC’s management.  As the result of our inquires during the course of preparing this report, PDC has informed us that the development activities included herein have been subjected to and received the internal approvals required by PDC’s management at the appropriate local, regional and/or corporate level.  In addition to the internal approvals as noted, certain development activities may still be subject to specific partner AFE processes, Joint Operating Agreement (JOA) requirements or other administrative approvals external to PDC. Additionally, PDC has assured us that they are not aware of any legal, regulatory, political or economic obstacles that would significantly alter their plans.





Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 7





Current costs used by PDC were held constant throughout the life of the properties.





Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification





Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over seventy years.  Ryder Scott is employee-owned and maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  We have over eighty engineers and geoscientists on our permanent staff.  By virtue of the size of our firm and the large number of clients for which we provide services, no single client or job represents a material portion of our annual revenue.  We do not serve as officers or directors of any publicly-traded oil and gas company and are separate and independent from the operating and investment decision-making process of our clients.  This allows us to bring the highest level of independence and objectivity to each engagement for our services.





Ryder Scott actively participates in industry-related professional societies and organizes an annual public forum focused on the subject of reserves evaluations and SEC regulations.  Many of our staff have authored or co-authored technical papers on the subject of reserves related topics.  We encourage our staff to maintain and enhance their professional skills by actively participating in ongoing continuing education.





Prior to becoming an officer of the Company, Ryder Scott requires that staff engineers and geoscientists have received professional accreditation in the form of a registered or certified professional engineer’s license or a registered or certified professional geoscientist’s license, or the equivalent thereof, from an appropriate governmental authority or a recognized self-regulating professional organization.





We are independent petroleum engineers with respect to PDC.  Neither we nor any of our employees have any interest in the subject properties and neither the employment to do this work nor the compensation is contingent on our estimates of reserves for the properties which were reviewed.





The results of this study, presented herein, are based on technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott.  The professional qualifications of the undersigned, the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing the evaluation of the reserves information discussed in this report, are included as an attachment to this letter.





Terms of Usage





The results of our third party study, presented in report form herein, were prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations and intended for public disclosure as an exhibit in filings made with the SEC by Petroleum Development Corporation’s PDC  Partnership 2002B.





We have provided PDC with a digital version of the original signed copy of this report letter.  In the event there are any differences between the digital version included in filings made by PDC and the original signed report letter, the original signed report letter shall control and supersede the digital version.





The data and work papers used in the preparation of this report are available for examination by authorized parties in our offices.  Please contact us if we can be of further service.





Petroleum Development Corporation


September 28, 2010


Page 8





Very truly yours,RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580/s/ Larry T. Nelms, P.E.Larry T. Nelms, P.E.Colorado License No. 17832       [SEAL]Managing Senior Vice President








Professional Qualifications of Primary Technical Person





The conclusions presented in this report are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott Company, L.P.  Larry Thomas Nelms is the primary technical person responsible for the estimate of the reserves, future production and income.





Nelms, an employee of Ryder Scott Company L.P. (Ryder Scott) since 1983, is a Managing Senior Vice President and also serves as a member of the Board of Directors, responsible for coordinating and supervising staff and consulting engineers of the company in ongoing reservoir evaluation studies worldwide.  Before joining Ryder Scott, Nelms served in a number of engineering positions with Dome Petroleum, Mizel Petro Resources and Exxon.  For more information regarding Mr. Nelms’ geographic and job specific experience, please refer to the Ryder Scott Company website at www.ryderscott.com/Experience/Employees.





Nelms earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Mississippi State University in 1963 and a Master of Science from the University of New Mexico in 1965, and he is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Colorado.  He is also a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers, where he serves as chairman of the Denver Section and also served for three years on the board of directors.





As part of his 2009 continuing education hours, Nelms attended an internally presented 16hours of formalized training as well as the  day long 2009 RSC Reserves Conference  forum, and a presentation at the Denver Section of SPEE by Dr. John Lee relating to the definitions and disclosure guidelines contained in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register.  Nelms serves as the instructor of the PetroSkills course entitled “Oil & Gas Reserve Evaluation” for a period of four years.





Based on his educational background, professional training and more than 25 years of practical experience in the estimation and evaluation of petroleum reserves, Nelms has attained the professional qualifications as a Reserves Estimator and Reserves Auditor set forth in Article III of the “Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information” promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers as of February 19, 2007.