alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT




ENTERED INTO by and between HEALTHSTREAM, INC., a Tennessee corporation (the
“Borrower”), and SUNTRUST BANK, a Georgia state banking corporation (the “Lender”),
as of this 23rd day of July, 2007.



RECITALS:




1. The Borrower and the Lender entered into a Loan Agreement dated July 21, 2006, as amended
by that certain First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated February 16, 2007 (as amended, the
“Loan Agreement”).



2. The Borrower and the Lender desire to amend the Loan Agreement as provided in this
amendment.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Borrower and the
Lender agree as follows:



1. Section 1.1 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:




1.1 Loan Facility. Subject to the Conditions Precedent and the other terms and
conditions contained in this Agreement and the other Loan Documents, and in reliance upon
the representations, warranties and covenants in this Agreement and the other Loan
Documents, Lender agrees to make Advances to Borrower on a revolving credit basis up to
$15,000,000 from time to time until the Revolving Note Maturity Date, as evidenced by and
pursuant to the Revolving Note.



2. The definition of “Revolving Loan” as used in Section 8.1 of the Loan Agreement
shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:




“Revolving Loan” means the $15,000,000.00 revolving loan facility described in
Section 1.1 hereof. The terms “Revolving Loan” and “Advance” may be
used interchangeably hereunder.



3. The definition of “Revolving Note” as used in Section 8.1 of the Loan Agreement
shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:




“Revolving Note” means that certain Revolving Credit Note dated July 21, 2006
issued by the Borrower to the order of Lender in the original principal amount of up to
$7,000,000, as amended and increased to $10,000,000 pursuant to that certain First Amendment
to Revolving Credit Note dated February 16, 2007, and as amended and increased to
$15,000,000 pursuant to that certain Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Note dated July
23, 2007, as such may be amended from time to time.



1



4. The Loan Agreement is not amended in any other respect.



5. The Borrower affirms its obligations under the Loan Agreement, as amended hereby, and the
Borrower agrees that such obligations are its valid and binding obligations, enforceable in
accordance with its terms, subject to no objection, counterclaim, or defense.



ENTERED INTO as of the date first written above.



BORROWER:



HEALTHSTREAM, INC.




By: /s/ Susan A. Brownie     

Susan A. Brownie

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




LENDER:



SUNTRUST BANK




By: /s/ Ben Reed

Title: Vice President





2
EXHIBIT 6.1

Grupo TMM and Subsidiaries

Computation of Earnings per
Share (IFRS)



|                                                                                 |  |              |             |   |      |  |             |      |  |  |             |   |  |      |             |   |  |  |             |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ----------- | - | ---- |  | ----------- | ---- |  |  | ----------- | - |  | ---- | ----------- | - |  |  | ----------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | December 31, |            
|(In thousands of Pesos except ratio data)                                        |  | 2014         |             |   | 2013 |  |             | 2012 |  |  | 2011        |   |  | 2010 |            
|Shares at the end of period                                                      |  |              | 102,182,841 |   |      |  | 102,182,841 |      |  |  | 102,182,841 |   |  |      | 102,182,841 |   |  |  | 101,994,641 |  
|Yearly weighted average shares                                                   |  |              | 102,182,841 |   |      |  | 102,182,841 |      |  |  | 102,182,841 |   |  |      | 102,176,138 |   |  |  | 102,006,730 |  
|Net (Loss) Income from continuing operations                                     |  |              | (471,468    | ) |      |  | (487,939    | )    |  |  | (615,836    | ) |  |      | 485,361     |   |  |  | (773,756    | )
|Net (Loss) Income from discontinued operations                                   |  |              | (43,013     | ) |      |  | (63,482     | )    |  |  | (165,280    | ) |  |      | (293,778    | ) |  |  | (231,558    | )
|Net (Loss) Income for the year Attributable to Stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A.B. |  |              | (516,902    | ) |      |  | (556,406    | )    |  |  | (786,454    | ) |  |      | 179,044     |   |  |  | (1,026,128  | )
|(Loss) Earnings per share from continuing operations                             |  |              | (4.614      | ) |      |  | (4.775      | )    |  |  | (6.027      | ) |  |      | 4.750       |   |  |  | (7.585      | )
|(Loss) Earnings per share from discontinued operations                           |  |              | (0.421      | ) |      |  | (0.621      | )    |  |  | (1.617      | ) |  |      | (2.875      | ) |  |  | (2.270      | )
|(Loss) Earnings per share Attributable to Stockholders of Grupo TMM, S.A.B.      |  |              | (5.059      | ) |      |  | (5.445      | )    |  |  | (7.697      | ) |  |      | 1.752       |   |  |  | (10.059     | )
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134809 & (29) (30) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SUZANNE M. BAILEY, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Clyde Justices 

Richard Bailey, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134809 

 COA: 278049 

Oakland CC: 02-045523-NH 

MAHMOOD A. KHALID, M.D. and

KHALID & ASSOCIATES, M.D., P.C., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED. 

l0914 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 14, 2007 

Clerk
Alexander Dean SARGEANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018

Alexander Dean Sargeant, Jasper, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and BERGER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
SERVICE 1st BANCORP
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
REGARDING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California
corporation (Bancorp), does hereby certify that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Bancorps Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form
  10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form10-K/A) fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | Information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Bancorp.                                                                                     

|                         |                              | 
|------------------------ | ---------------------------- | 
|Dated:  April
  28, 2008 | /s/ John O.
  Brooks­        | 
|                         |                              | 
|                         | John O. Brooks               | 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer      | 
|                         |                              | 
|Dated:  April
  28, 2008 | /s/ Robert E.
  Bloch­       | 
|                         |                              | 
|                         | Robert E. Bloch              | 
|                         | Executive Vice President and | 
|                         | Chief Financial Officer      | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

37

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Viridax   Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      3.    The Report complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Signature:                        Title                     Date

/s/ Kenneth E. Lehman         Chief Financial Officer       August 7, 2006
------------------------
Kenneth E. Lehman

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  or
otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not
be deemed  incorporated  by reference in any filing under the  Securities Act or
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the  electronic  version  of this  written  statement
required by section  906,  has been  provided to the Company will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                      E-6
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5794 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5794

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. 
                    Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. ZACHARY M. FISHER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5794

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. 
                    Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.
```
Levory W. HICKMON, Appellant, v. Adam POLLACK, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-771

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 30, 2018

Levory W. Hickmon, Lake City, pro se.

Adam Pollack, of Law Office Of Adam L. Pollack, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Pero CIBILIC and Mary Ann Cibilic v. COX OPERATING, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-C-1293

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT 3(i)(e) 

        ARTICLESOF AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF HEALTHBRIDGE, INC. 

Pursuant to the provisions of Article4.04 of the Texas Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation records thefollowing action taken by its stockholders as part of its Amended and Restated Articles ofIncorporation. 

On July 18, 2003 a majority of thestockholders of Heathbridge, Inc. approved certain action proposed by thecorporation’s board of directors at the annual general meeting, which action isrecorded herein as part of the corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles ofIncorporation dated May 10, 1999. 

ARTICLE ONE 

The name of the corporation isHealthbridge, Inc. 

ARTICLE TWO 

The following action was approved bya majority of the stockholders of the corporation on July 18, 2003: 

The stockholders approved a one fortwenty (1:20) reverse split of the corporation’s common stock. 

ARTICLE THREE 

The number of shares of thecorporation outstanding at the time this action was approved and these actions ratifiedwas 20,533,346 and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was 20,533,346. 

ARTICLE FOUR 

The number of shares voted toconsider a one for twenty (1:20) reverse split of the corporation’s common stock was12,538,503 in favor, 750,000 against with 636,136 votes abstaining from the vote. Thenumber of votes cast in favor of the reverse split of the corporation’s common stockby the stockholders was sufficient for approval of same. 

ARTICLE FIVE 

The manner, in which any exchange,reclassification or cancellation of issued shares provided for in the reverse split shallbe effected, is as follows: 

At 5.00 p.m. Pacific Time on August22, 2003, a date subsequent to the filing of these Articles of Amendment to the Amendedand Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Texas Secretary of State, all outstandingshares of common stock held by each holder of record on such date shall be automaticallycombined at the rate of one-for-twenty (1:20) without any further action on the part ofthe holders thereof or this corporation. No fractional shares will be issued. Allfractional shares for one-half share or more shall be increased to the next higher wholenumber of shares and all fractional shares of less than one-half share shall be decreasedto the next lower whole number of shares, respectively. 

ARTICLE SIX 

The manner in which such actioneffects a change in the amount of stated capital is as follows: 

Article Two of these Articles ofAmendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation empowers the corporationto effectuate a one for twenty (1:20) reverse split of the corporation’s common stockwithout amending either the par value or the authorized stock structure of thecorporation; such that the existing issued and outstanding 20,533,346 common shares parvalue $0.0001 shall become 1,026,667 common shares of $0.0001 par value. 

The reverse split will have theeffect of reducing stated capital by $1,950.66. 

Dated July 18, 2003 

/s/ Nora Coccaro 

Nora CoccaroPresident
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 25, 2024        Preparing for volcano hazards: Where is the world’s largest lahar evacuation drill held?

Featured Story        August 25, 2022        Earthquake Detected! Here’s How You Can Prepare

Featured Story        February 16, 2021        ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning Delivery for the Pacific Northwest

Featured Story        April 6, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning:  Vital for City Transit

Podcasts        November 18, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 9 – Famine Early Warning

Podcasts        August 7, 2008        Kasatochi Volcano Erupts Explosively

Podcasts        March 20, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 92 – EROS 50th: The Library and Science Support
# C_2020437EN.01001701.xml

| 18.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/17

---

Notice for the attention of certain persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2020/C 437/06)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Aleksei Mikhailovich CHALIY; Nikolai Ivanovich RYZHKOV; Valery Vladimirovich KULIKOV; Dmitry Nikolayevich KOZAK; Oleg Yevgenyvich BELAVENTSEV; Vladimir Nikolaevich PLIGIN; Aleksandr Yurevich BORODAI; Mikhail Vladimirovich DEGTYARYOV/DEGTYAREV; Vladimir Abdualiyevich VASILYEV; Alexander Mikhailovich BABAKOV; Sergey Yurievich KOZYAKOV; Mikhail Vladimirovich RAZVOZHAEV and the Joint-stock company ‘Production-Agrarian Union “Massandra”’; the Public Joint Stock Company ‘Russian National Commercial Bank; Peace to Luhansk Region and Luhansk Economic Union, persons and entities appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the abovementioned persons and entities with new statements of reasons. Those persons and entities are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 1 January 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

135657 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135657 COA: 280312 Genesee CC: 81-030384-FC CHARLES O. MCINTOSH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 12, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Genesee Circuit Cour t’s orders of August 31, 2006 and June 15, 2007, and we REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for
consideration of the merits of the defendant’s motion for re lief from judgment filed on December 27, 2005. Under th e circumstances of this case, the motion filed by the defendant on Septem ber 2, 2005 did not constitute a motion for relief from judgment under subchapter 6.500. Accordingly, the Genesee Circuit Court erred in treating the defendant’s December 27, 2005 motion for relief fro m judgment as a successive motion under MCR 6.502(G).

We do not retain jurisdiction.

p0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-300-CR

WILLIE RAY BINDER	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On July 30, 2003, appellant Willie Ray Binder filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying his pro se motion to review trial and appellate records for preparation of an article 11.07 petition for writ of habeas corpus.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2003).  The trial court’s certification of appeal indicates that appellant has had a “complete direct appeal.”  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

	On August 15, 2003, this court sent appellant a letter explaining our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over his appeal and informing him that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed, on or before August 25, 2003, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We received no response.

	This court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from the trial court’s denial of a motion for a free record that is not filed in conjunction with the direct appeal of the underlying case.  Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.).  Thus, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  October 23, 20032