alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE 

JUDGE OF THE FAMILY COURT 

DIVISION OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 326 Common Pleas

Judicial Classification Docket

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3

rd day of November, 2014, in accordance with the general 

supervisory powers vested in this Court by Article V, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania 

Constitution, the Honorable Margaret Theresa Murphy is hereby appointed as 

Administrative Judge of the Family Court Division of the First Judicial District of 

Pennsylvania for a period of three years or at the pleasure of the Court, effective 

December 1, 2014. It is further ordered that Judge Murphy shall continue with her

current assignment as Supervising Judge, Domestic Relations, in the Family Court 

Division of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania to the extent feasible and so long 

as that assignment does not interfere with her administrative duties.
Exhibit 99.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

     I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, Ford Motor Company Note-Backed Series 2003-6 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
          servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
          in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
          based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
          Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 28, 2005


         /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
---------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
J.R., a Juvenile, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Wilmax DAMUS, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Cite as Baze-Sif v. Sif, 2014-Ohio-3402.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

Sanaa Baze-Sif, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : 

v. : No. 14AP-434 

 (C.P.C. No. 13DR-07-2661) 

Said Sif, : 

(REGULAR CALENDAR) 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

 

D E C I S I O N 

Rendered on August 5, 2014 

 

Kelly M. Morgan, for appellee. 

Bellinger & Donahue, and Kelly M. Donahue, for appellant. 

 

ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

TYACK, J. 

{¶ 1} Sanaa Baze-Sif and Said Sif were married in Morocco in June 2007. They 

lived together in Dublin, Ohio. While supposedly just visiting in Morocco, Said served 

Sanaa divorce papers. Even though Sanaa was pregnant, the divorce proceedings 

continued to progress in Morocco. 

{¶ 2} Sanaa returned to the United States and filed divorce papers here. Said 

responded with a motion to dismiss, claiming that a divorce had already been granted in 

Morocco so the parties were no longer married. Since the parties were already divorced in 

the country where their marriage occurred, Said asserted no divorce could occur in the 

United States. 

{¶ 3} Counsel for Said pursued a motion to dismiss the United States divorce 

case. A judge of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic 
No. 14AP-434 2 

Relations and Juvenile Branch overruled the motion to dismiss in a detailed decision and 

entry. Counsel for Said has filed an appeal of that decision. Counsel for Sanaa has filed a 

motion asking that we dismiss the appeal. 

{¶ 4} For us to have jurisdiction over an appeal, the trial court must have 

journalized a final appealable order as defined in R.C. 2505.02. We find no such final 

appealable order to have been journalized in this case. Because of the unique factual and 

procedural history in this case, the trial court refused to grant comity to the Moroccan 

divorce decree and refused to dismiss the divorce case. The refusal to dismiss a case 

between private parties is rarely a final appealable order. We do not find the trial court's 

refusal to dismiss the divorce case between Sanaa Baze-Sif and Said Sif to be an exception. 

{¶ 5} The motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. 

Motion to dismiss granted. Appeal dismissed. 

CONNOR and DORRIAN, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(16)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(19)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(15)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(180)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - (-)south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(112)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Photography        August 2, 2019        Determining Land Change Display with Viewers

Photography        April 19, 2016        Heavy mineral sands, Folly Beach, South Carolina

Illustrations        December 31, 2005        Landsat 7
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Presidential Documents 99691 

Memorandum of November 20, 2024 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 621 of the Foreign 

Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State 

the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether 

it is important to the security interests of the United States to furnish 

up to $35 million in assistance to Ukraine without regard to any provision 

of law within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 20, 2024 

[FR Doc. 2024–29312 

Filed 12–10–24; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC2BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a)	the Form 10-K of the Company for the Annual Period Ended December 31, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Steven A. Covert



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Lee SARGENT aka Robert Lee Sargent, Sr.

NO. 2017-KO-2176

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.
Exhibit 99.2

** **

**Report Of Independent**

**Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors

Structured Obligations Corporation

New York, New York

 

We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation

(Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust

Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2003-1 (the Agreements)

relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit

support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1 for the year ended

December 31, 2009. Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with

those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with

the Agreements based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public

Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included

examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance

with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as

we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination

provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a

legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified

requirements.

 

In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the

requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31,

2009.

 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of Structured Obligations

Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association and the Certificate Holders of the

Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by

anyone other than those specified parties.

 

 

 

/s/ RubinBrown LLP   

St. Louis, Missouri

March 2, 2010

 

----
Kelly MANN a/k/a Kelly M. Mann, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee

NO. 2017-CP-00309-COA

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

May 1, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 4, 2018

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: KELLY MANN (PRO SE)

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: SCOTT STUART, JACKSON

BEFORE IRVING, P.J., FAIR AND WILSON, JJ.

FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. Kelly Mann appeals the denial and dismissal of his sixth motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) from convictions of murder and armed robbery, the results of his guilty plea. The Circuit Judge held that the "claims/arguments are the same as the ones previously dismissed by this Court" in prior PCR petitions. In his judgment, he again found those claims procedurally barred. Mann again appeals. Basing our decision on the directly on point opinion handed down in *Mann v. State* , 167 So.3d 279 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015), we again find the judgment before us should be affirmed.

¶ 2. **AFFIRMED.**

LEE, C.J., IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES, CARLTON, WILSON, GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS AND TINDELL, JJ., CONCUR.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(15)
              - alaska(202)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(108)
              - arkansas(13)
              - california(289)
              - colorado(100)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(18)
              - district of columbia(10)
              - florida(39)
              - georgia(23)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(376)
              - idaho(41)
              - illinois(19)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(16)
              - kansas(23)
              - kentucky(12)
              - louisiana(23)
              - maine(13)
              - maryland(28)
              - massachusetts(20)
              - michigan(19)
              - minnesota(24)
              - mississippi(12)
              - missouri(36)
              - montana(51)
              - nebraska(20)
              - nevada(65)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(14)
              - new mexico(26)
              - new york(35)
              - north carolina(22)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(8)
              - oklahoma(8)
              - oregon(76)
              - pennsylvania(15)
              - puerto rico(23)
              - (-)rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(19)
              - south dakota(473)
              - tennessee(13)
              - texas(29)
              - u.s. virgin islands(4)
              - utah(40)
              - vermont(4)
              - virginia(59)
              - washington(69)
              - west virginia(6)
              - wisconsin(25)
              - wyoming(79)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        August 28, 2017        Image of the Week: Gypsy Moth Infestation Continues in New England
Avery SOUFFRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gregory Frank TOTH, Appellant, v. Stephanie MILLER-TOTH, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2018.

Robert L. Donald of Law Office of Robert L. Donald, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Margaret H. White-Small of Margaret H. White-Small, Attorney at Law, Sanibel, and Stacy L. Sherman of Stacy L. Sherman, P.A., Cape Coral, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Toth appeals the judgment for fees and costs in his dissolution of marriage case. The fees and costs awards were premised on findings set forth in the parties' amended final judgment of dissolution.

*994In *Toth v. Miller*, No. 2D15-3835, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 4167598 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 31, 2018), this court reversed that judgment other than its provision dissolving the parties' marriage. Accordingly, we reverse the fees and costs judgment. *See**Nolan v. Nolan*, 188 So.3d 977, 978 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ("The reversal and remand of the equitable distribution portion of the final judgment necessitates reversal and remand of the alimony and attorney's fees portions of the final judgment as well.").

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
William Edward BUBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

----

| 1. | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                December 27, 2007 |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | By: |  /s/James                Price                                   |
|                                        |     | James                Price                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                        |     | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
Exhibit 99(d)

Independent Accountants' Report
The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I (the receivables) has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003 (the Agreement), as supplemented by the Series 2003-1 Series Supplement, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, as successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented by the Series 2003-1 Series Supplement.

 

/s/ Steve Smith
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 101050-101051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29441]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-873-875, 878-880, and 882 (Fourth Review)]

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) From Belarus, China, 
Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on rebar from 
Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine would 
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to 
an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable 
time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner David S. Johanson voted in the negative for 
Latvia and Ukraine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2023 (88 FR 
75033) and determined on February 5, 2024, that it would conduct full 
reviews (89 FR 13089, February 21, 2024). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
April 15, 2024 (89 FR 26188). The Commission conducted its

[[Page 101051]]

hearing on October 3, 2024. All persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to participate.
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on December 10, 2024. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5565 (December 2024), 
entitled Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Belarus, China, Indonesia, 
Latvia, Moldova, Poland, Ukraine: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-873-875, 
878-880, and 882 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 10, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-29441 Filed 12-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
Griagal BARR, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2233

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Griagal Barr, III, Madison, pro se.

No response required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.