alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 682 

For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM 

4 PARLAK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim Parlak shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 682 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Ibrahim Parlak 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Ibrahim Parlak shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of birth of Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

21 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

22 made available to natives of the country of birth of 

23 Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 

24 1152(e)). 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 682 IH

1 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Ibrahim Parlak shall not, 

4 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi5 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
N.J., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida and Aventura Hospital, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1681

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
|   | (1)The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |

|                             |                         |                       |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Date: December      4, 2008 | By:                | /s/      Ren      Hu  |
|                             | Ren      Hu                  |
|                             | Chief      Financial Officer |
Mack C. SHULER, a/k/a Mack Charles Shuler, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 31, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Genex Pharmaceutical Inc.: Exhibit 10.3 - Prepared by TNT Filings Inc.




  




Exhibit 10.3



Agreement 


Party A: Tianjin Zhongjin Biological Development Co. Ltd.


Party B: Tianjin Zhongjin Pharmaceutical Stock Co. Ltd. 


Whereas, Party B is using Party A’s
capital, the two parties reach the following agreement after consultation:


1. Party B agrees to use a maximum of
7 million yuan of Party A’s capital remuneratively. 

2. Party A agrees to collect an amount
of 6% of capital actual used by Party B annually as usage fee. 

3. The term of such remunerative use
of Party A’s capital by Party B starts from Jan. 1st, 2006 to Dec. 31st,
2006. 

4. This agreement may be renewed upon
agreement of the two parties. 

5. In case any one party breaches the
agreement, the violating party shall pay a penalty interest of 0.5%/day to the
other party. 

6. This agreement has two copies,
effective upon signatures of the two parties, with the same legal effectiveness.


	Party A________	Party B___________
	 	 
	Date____________	Date_____________
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(13)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - (-)new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(3)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        September 12, 2001        Landsat Records Historic World Trade Center Attack
Ruben G. ETCHEVERRY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Marisa GONZALEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
ex10p36.htm


    
      

    


    Exhibit
10.36

    


    


    May __
, 2008

    


    


    


    Re:  Notice
of Deferred Stock Unit Award under Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

    2008 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
for Non-Employee Directors

    


    Dear
________:

    


    Under
the terms of the Company’s 2008 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, and in accordance with your previous election or deemed election, you
have been awarded the following Deferred Stock Units:

    


    
      	
              Deferred
      Stock Units Awarded

               

               

            	 
      
	
               

              Award
      Date

               

            	 
      
	
              Vesting
      Date

              (date
      when Deferred Stock Units become non-forfeitable)

            	 
      


    

    


    These
Deferred Stock Units are subject to the terms and conditions provided in the
Plan.

     

    The
Company will maintain a bookkeeping Deferred Stock Account to track the Deferred
Stock Units awarded to you under the Plan, as well as any related dividend
equivalents converted into additional Deferred Stock Units or held pending such
conversion.  As soon as practicable after an event triggering
distribution of your Deferred Stock Unit award as set forth in the Plan (and
subject to applicable tax withholding, if any), we will distribute stock
certificates for unrestricted shares and any excess cash amounts to you either
in a single complete distribution or in quarterly installments, in accordance
with your election with respect to this Deferred Stock Unit
award. 

    


    If you
need information about the Deferred Stock Units, or if you need additional
copies of the Plan, the Plan Prospectus, or other documents, please contact me
at (314) 577-3314 or Laura Reeves at (314) 577-2454.

     

    Very
truly yours,

    


    


    


    


    


    Enclosures
Sandra Michelle JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40344 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaint i ff

- Appellee

v.
SABINO BARRERA

- SIERRA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 1978

- 1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sabino Barrera

Sierra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barrera

- Sierra h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40344 Document: 00512473423 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13

- 40344

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wi thdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40344 Document: 00512473423 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. MAR I O L OP E Z - VE GA , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10246 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 1 1 5 0 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i o L ope z - V e gaappe a l s f r om the 84- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rr e - e n trya f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

FEB 23 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10246 2 M ar i o L op ez -V ega c on t ends thathi s s ent ence i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e, g iv e n h is d if

f ic u lt lif e a n dth e im p a c t v io le n c e , d ru g s , a n da lc o h o l h a v e h a do n h is e m ot i ona l a nd m e nt a l he a l th. I n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd the f a c t or s s e tf

orth i n 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) , the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s e nt e nc e i s not s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7); U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 3 - 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) . AF F I RME D.
James Scott PENDERGRAFT, IV., Orlando Women's Center, LLC., Wilson Medical Management, LLC., Wilson Medical Management, Inc., Gorilla Realty Management, LLC., Gorilla Realty Management, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. C.H., as Settlor of the J.F. Special Needs Trust and the Center for Special Needs Trust Administration, Inc., as Trustee of the J.F. Special Needs Trust, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-93

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.