alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 25, 2014.

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KINGS RIVER TRAIL ASSOCIATION, INC. AND KINGS RIVER VILLAGE 

COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellants

NO. 14-12-00967-CV V.

PINEHURST TRAIL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Appellee

________________________________

PINEHURST TRAIL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Appellant

NO. 14-12-01008-CV V.

KEVIN DONNELLAN, MICHAEL DOLE, OLLIE DOLE, CARROLL KITE, 

JOAN KITE, GARY LEVICKY, EDWARD MILLER, SHIRLEY MILLER, 

ROBERT MORGAN, SYLVIA MORGAN, JOHN PING, MARSHA PING, 

JAMES POLK, DEBRA POLK, TERRY RAATZ, LINDA RAATZ, DOUGLAS

SMITH, PAMELA SMITH, SIDNEY SMITH, RUTH SMITH, JOSEPH 

ZOLMAN, MARCEY ZOLMAN, DARIN LASATER, KRISTI LASATER, 

KINGS RIVER TRAIL ASSOCIATION, INC., AND KINGS RIVER VILLAGE 

COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellees

________________________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by KINGS RIVER 

TRAIL ASSOCIATION, INC. and KINGS RIVER VILLAGE COMMUNITY 
ASSOCIATION, INC. We order that the motion be denied, and that the court’s 

former judgment of July 24, 2014 be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further 

order this court’s Opinion of July 24, 2014, withdrawn.

Cause No. 14-12-00967-CV, an appeal from the judgment signed, July 25, 

2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and 

find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED. We order that each party shall pay its own costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Cause No. 14-12-01008-CV, an appeal from the judgment signed, July 25, 

2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and 

find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED. We order that each party shall pay its own costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 763 

To repeal the annual fee on health insurance providers enacted by the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. HOLDING, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, and Mr. SALMON) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the annual fee on health insurance providers 

enacted by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ANNUAL FEE ON HEALTH INSUR4 ANCE PROVIDERS. 

5 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is 

6 amended by striking section 9010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, INC., Appellant, v. FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1122

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 26, 2018

J. Michael Huey, D. Ty Jackson, Allison G. Mawhinney, and Andy Bardos of GrayRobinson, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

W. Justin Vogel, Chief Legal Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Aleta Chapman v. Thinh Quoc Pham

Appellate case number: 01-13-00066-CV

Trial court case number: 1006033

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

On February 7, 2017, this Court had requested that the appellee, Thinh Quoc 

Pham, file a response to appellant’s motion for rehearing, if any, within 10 days of the 

date of that Order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.2. However, both parties failed to timely file 

either objections within 10 days or the “Parties Notification to Court of Mediator” within 

15 days of this Court’s Memorandum Order of Referral to Mediation (“Mediation 

Order”). This Mediation Order was issued on January 6, 2017, after appellant’s 

docketing statement, filed December 30, 2016, requested mediation.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte extends the deadline for the parties to file

objections to the Mediation Order or else a completed “Parties’ Notification to

Court of Mediator” to 10 days from the date of this Order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 154.022(b), (c) (court will withdraw mediation order if it finds basis for

objection to mediation is reasonable) (West Supp. 2016); TEX. R. APP. P. 2; see also 

Decker v. Lindsay, 824 S.W.2d 247, 249–50 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no

pet.) (court cannot force disputants to peaceably resolve their differences, but can compel

them to sit down with each other; no abuse of discretion in overruling objection to

mediation where party objected based on belief that mediation would not resolve

lawsuit). The Court sua sponte stays the February 7, 2017 Order pending a response to 

this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

  Acting individually 

Date: February 23, 2017
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - (-)tennessee(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        October 21, 2016        EarthView–Beauty of Earth Science Revealed Within Great Smoky Mountains
Willie E. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2127

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2018

Willie E. Moore, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Roberts, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediciNova, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D., as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ Yuichi Iwaki                   
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  | Yuichi Iwaki, M.D., Ph.D.          
|                     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Reginal DESROSIERS, Appellant v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ronald PETITFRERE, Appellant, v. EDGE WELL PERSONAL CARE PRIVATE BRANDS GROUP, Appellee.

No. 3D18-369

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Ronald Petitfrere, in proper person.

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., and Thomas A. Valdez (Tampa), for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit No. 32.1




                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEO Channel.com, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10- QSB for the  period  ending  March  31,  2001 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Larry
Creeger,  Chief  Executive and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



April 1, 2005                      By: /s/ Larry Creeger
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Larry Creeger
                                       Chief Executive Officer,
                                       Chief Financial Officer







--------------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Abigail Christine MADDOX and Alexandra C. Maddox, Appellants, v. John Ferrell BURKETT, Cindy Lancaster Stewart, and GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 1D17-5038

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
      OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form
      10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Russo, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934;
      and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Peter F. RussoPeter
                F. RussoPresident
                andChief
                Executive Officer


July
      3,
      2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TODD A. ZUCKERBROD , Appellant,

v.

HEATHER HASANDRAS , Appellee

.

No s . 4D 2 2

- 2235 and 4D22

- 2342

[ March 23, 2023 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s of a non

- final order from the C ircuit C ourt for the Fif t eenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura C. Burkhart

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502022GA000235

.
James M. Kaplan, Robin Corwin Campbell and Jeremy S. Baum of Kaplan Zeena LLP, Miami

, for appellant

.
Kathryn N. Lewis and Clara C. Ciadella of Kitroser & Associates, North Palm Beach

, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

L EVINE , C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 701 

To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 directing the Securities 

and Exchange Commission to add a particular class of securities to 

those exempted under such Act to provide a deadline for such action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GARRETT, 

and Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 directing 

the Securities and Exchange Commission to add a particular class of securities to those exempted under such 

Act to provide a deadline for such action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RULEMAKING DEADLINE FOR EXEMPTING CER4 TAIN SECURITIES. 

5 Section 3(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

6 U.S.C. 77c(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘The CommisVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:16 Feb 25, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H701.IH H701

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 701 IH

1 sion’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than October 31, 2013, the 

2 Commission’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2020370EN.01001401.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/14

---

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/14)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://eba.europa.eu/about-us/budget-and-accounts

---
Frank P. ROSSOTTO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL ASSN., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer**
 **pursuant to Section 302**
 **of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I, Michael Young, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SPECTRE INDUSTRIES, INC.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 Date: November 19, 2004
 
 ****/s/ Michael YoungName: Michael YoungTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_____/s/ James N. Ryan______________

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: __March 26, 2003________
# C_2020325EN.01000101.xml

| 2.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9913 — Hella/Minth/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 325/01)

On 22 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9913. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9913. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 5, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-24-01042-CV

Ex Parte SEBRA PROUTT

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Garcia

Before the Court is Sebra Proutt’s Amended Original Petition/Application for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus. According to the petition, relator was arrested and is 

currently detained in the Rockwall County jail. Relator requests that we order her 

release from the Rockwall County jail or order her bond reduced.

An appellate court has no original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal 

matters. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (writ of habeas corpus may be 

issued by the court of criminal appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or any 

judge of those courts); In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.); cf. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 22.221(d) (court of appeals may issue writ of habeas corpus when restraint of 
–2–

liberty is because of the violation of an order in a civil case). A court of appeals has

no original habeas jurisdiction over bail issues. Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 

(Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet.). Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to 

issue the requested writ of habeas corpus in this case.

We dismiss relator’s Amended Original Petition/Application for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus for want of jurisdiction.

241042f.p05 /Dennise Garcia//

DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
#### S. M. MASTERS, an Individual Trading as S. M. Masters Lumber Company, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14684.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

April 16, 1953.

Walther, Iiecker, Walther & Barnard, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

William W. Crowdus, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on stipulation of parties.
# C_2020370EN.01000501.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/5

---

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/05)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/about-cedefop/finance-and-budget/annual-accounts

---
Vivian CARNEGIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 29, 2018

Joel D. Robrish, Boca Raton, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., EISNAUGLE, J. and MUNYON, L.T., Associate Judge, concur.