alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John W. Beasley, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB being filed for Metaline Contact Mines
(the Registrant);2.
    Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report.4.
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the Registrant and have:  (i)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared.(ii)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
(the Evaluation Date); and(iii)
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (i)
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any
material weakness in internal controls; and(ii)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants controls; and Exhibit 31.2  Page 1




---



##### 



6.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses. Date: May 4, 2005/s/ John W. BeasleyJohn W. BeasleySecretary/Treasurer & CFO
 Exhibit 31.2  Page 2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00310-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E.L.

----------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Mother appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental 

rights to her daughter, A.E.L. The trial court found by clear and convincing 

evidence that Mother had engaged in conduct that had endangered the physical 

or emotional well-being of A.E.L. and that Mother had knowingly placed or 

knowingly allowed A.E.L. to remain in conditions or surroundings that had 

endangered her physical or emotional well-being. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 

§ 161.001(1)(D), (E) (West Supp. 2013). The trial court further found that 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

termination of Mother’s parental rights is in A.E.L.’s best interest. See id.

§ 161.001(2).

Mother’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw 

as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the motion, counsel avers 

that he has conducted a professional evaluation of the record and, after a 

thorough review of the applicable law, has reached the conclusion that there are 

no arguable grounds to be advanced to support an appeal of this cause and that 

the appeal is frivolous. Mother was given the opportunity to file a pro se brief, but 

she has not done so. The Department of Family and Protective Services sent us 

a letter stating that it was waiving the opportunity to file a response. 

Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California

by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there 

are no reversible grounds on appeal and referencing any grounds that might 

arguably support the appeal. See 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 

(1967); In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 776–77 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) 

(holding that Anders procedures apply in parental rights termination cases), disp. 

on merits, No. 02–01–00349–CV, 2003 WL 2006583 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

May 1, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). 

In our duties as a reviewing court, we must conduct an independent 

evaluation of the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining 

that the appeal is frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991); K.M., 2003 WL 2006583, at *2. Only then may we grant 
3

counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. 

Ct. 346, 351 (1988). 

We have carefully reviewed the appellate record and appellate counsel’s 

brief. We agree with appellate counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and 

without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the 

appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); In 

re E.M.M., No. 02-12-00259-CV, 2012 WL 6632785, at *6, *9 (Tex. App.—Fort 

Worth Dec. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.). Therefore, we grant appellate 

counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order terminating 

Mother’s parental rights to A.E.L.

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 16, 2014
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 100496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29278]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 13, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice 
President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. Liberty Financial Corporation, Middletown, Connecticut; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring Liberty Bank, also of 
Middletown, Connecticut.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-29278 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                           by Chief Financial Officer

     In connection with the Annual Report of VSB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed on with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2005, and as amended by this
Form 10-KSB/A, as filed on or about the date hereof (collectively, the
"Report"), I, Raffaele M. Branca, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2005

                                      /s/ RAFFAELE M. BRANCA
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Raffaele M. Branca
                                      Executive Vice President and CFO


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
23.2







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No.
333-129294) and the Registration Statement of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on
Form S-3 (Registration Statement No. 333-152640) of our report dated March 24,
2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), relating to the financial
statements of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.








/s/ Lazar, Levine &
Felix LLP


New York,
New York


March 24,
2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - (-)michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Amendment Number 1 to the Annual Report of Tally Ho Ventures,
      Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
      undersigned, Jose M. Meleth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
      to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 19, 2006





/s/
      Jose M. Meleth


Jose
      M.
      Meleth, Principal Accounting Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Wind sheltering impacts on land-atmosphere fluxes over fens      

      November 13, 2019    

Wetlands and their ability to mitigate climate change motivates restorative and protective action; however, scientific understanding of land-atmosphere interactions is restricted by our limited continuous observations of gaseous fluxes. Many wetlands are small in spatial scale and embedded in forested landscapes. Yet, little is known about how the relative sheltering of forests affects net carbon (C) and energy balance. Here, we analyze coterminous USGS and Ameriflux eddy covariance flux tower observations over three years in two shrub fens in Northern Wisconsin, one more sheltered (US-ALQ) than the other (US-Los). Unsurprisingly, the open site showed higher overall wind speeds. This should have implications for atmospheric fluxes in wetlands as wind-forced processes are essential in promoting gas exchange over water. While both sites had similar half-hourly net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) during daytime, there were significant differences in nighttime NEE, as well as in net radiation partitioning in early spring and late summer. Sensible heat (H) fluxes were smaller at the sheltered fen except for the months of July-September. In contrast, latent heat (LE) fluxes were higher in every month except July. Additionally, sheltered fen ecosystem respiration had a weaker linear correlation with air temperature (R: 0.08 versus 0.57 for the open fen). Our work suggests that canopy sheltering does not cause significant differences in half-hourly NEE during the day, but rather the largest differences such as lower CO2 emissions occur at nighttime due to higher variance at very low wind speeds. Sheltering also influenced direction of air flow, mean wind speeds in day versus night, energy balance, and sensible and latent heat fluxes. We discuss implications of these findings for wetland restoration.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kimberly Wickland

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

kpwick@usgs.gov

303-541-3072

## Related Content

#### Kimberly Wickland

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

kpwick@usgs.gov

303-541-3072

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - wisconsin

View All **
EXHIBIT 4.13




---



##### 



Twelfth Supplemental Indenture Company New Subsidiary Guarantors Existing Subsidiary Guarantors Trustee
 WITNESSETH:
 Indenture 1 4 Notes
       2




---



##### 



Definitions
  Agreement to Guarantee
 Ratification of Indenture; Twelfth Supplemental Indenture Part of Indenture
 Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 Trustee Makes No Representation
 Counterparts
 Effect of Headings
 Conflict with TIA
 3




---



##### 



Severability
 No Third Party Beneficiaries
 remainder of page left intentionally blank
 4




---



##### 



Company:
CASCADES INC.By:
    /s/ Robert F. HallName:
    Robert F. HallTitle:
    Vice President, Legal Affairs and
Corporate SecretaryNew Subsidiary Guarantors:
NORAMPAC EXPORT SALES CORP.
7251637 CANADA INC.
CASCADES TENDERCO INC.By:
    /s/ Robert F. HallName:
    Robert F. HallTitle:
    Secretary or Assistant Secretary




---



##### 



Existing Subsidiary Guarantors:
CASCADES PAPERBOARD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CASCADES CANADA INC.
CASCADES FINE PAPERS GROUP INC.
CASCADES TRANSPORT INC.
CONFERENCE CUP LTD.
DOPACO, INC.
DOPACO CANADA, INC.
GARVEN INCORPORATED
KINGSEY FALLS INVESTMENTS INC.
RABOTAGE LEMAY INC.
SCIERIE LEMAY INC.
6265642 CANADA INC.By:
    /s/ Robert F. HallName:
    Robert F. HallTitle:
    Secretary or Assistant SecretaryCASCADES AUBURN FIBER INC.
CASCADES DELAWARE LLC
CASCADES SPG SALES INC.
CASCADES FINE PAPERS GROUP (USA) INC.
CASCADES MOULDED PULP, INC.
CASCADES PLASTICS INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  ARIZONA INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  IFC DISPOSABLES
       INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  NEW YORK INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  NORTH CAROLINA
       INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  OREGON INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  PENNSYLVANIA INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  SALES INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  TENNESSEE INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  WISCONSIN INC.
CASCADES TISSUE GROUP  MARYLAND LLC
CASCADES USA INC.
W.H. SMITH PAPER CORPORATION
CASCADES ENERGY INITIATIVE INC.
CASCADES BOXBOARD U.S., INC.
CASCADES BOXBOARD GROUP  CONNECTICUT
       LLC
CASCADES ENVIROPAC HPM LLC




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ Louise PaulName:
    Louise PaulTitle:
    Assistant SecretaryDOPACO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: Dopaco Pacific LLC
       Its General PartnerBy:
    /s/ Michael GuerraName:
    Michael GuerraTitle:
    SecretaryDOPACO PACIFIC LLCBy:
    /s/ Michael GuerraName:
    Michael GuerraTitle:
    SecretaryNORAMPAC DELAWARE LLC
NORAMPAC THOMPSON INC.
NORAMPAC FINANCE US INC.
NORAMPAC HOLDING US INC.
NORAMPAC LEOMINSTER INC.
NORAMPAC NEW YORK CITY INC.
NORAMPAC SCHENECTADY INC.
NORAMPAC INDUSTRIES INC.By:
    /s/ Lucie-Claude LalondeName:
    Lucie-Claude LalondeTitle:
    Secretary, Assistant Secretary orAssistant Clerk




---



##### 



Trustee:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLONBy:
    /s/ Lesley DaleyName:
    Lesley DaleyTitle:
    Assistant Vice President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - (-)connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2020(1)

social mediaUSGS ShakeAlert

Technical Announcement        July 12, 2017        New Warning System Identifies Flash Drought Quickly
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FREDERICK W. SMITH, JR.,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 369, 2022

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 93007368DI (N)

§

§ 

§

Submitted: October 31, 2022

Decided: December 6, 2022

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion 

to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be 

affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s order, dated September 26, 2022, 

denying the appellant’s motion purporting to seek correction of a clerical mistake 

under Superior Court Criminal Rule 36. As the Superior Court determined, the 

appellant received credit for the time that he served before his adjudications because 

the court made the sentences effective as of the date that the appellant was taken into 

custody. Moreover, it is unlikely that the Superior Court did not consider the results 

of the psychiatric evaluation that it ordered before the August 31, 2021 sentencing;
2

in any event, the appellant’s contention that it did not does not establish a basis for 

relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 36.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
Christopher Ryan MULLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5045

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Hartland  Investments,  Inc.on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2001 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Yarek Bartosz,  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Yarek Bartosz
-----------------
Yarek Bartosz

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
January 15, 2004