alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| Signature                    |   | Title                                                |   | Date                |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/ Chang H. Ahn             |   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer            |   | March      31, 2010 |
| Chang      H. Ahn            |   |                                                 |   |                |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/      Tae Heum Jeong      |   | Chief      Financial Officer, Secretary and Director |   | March      31, 2010 |
| Tae      Heum Jeong          |   |                                                 |   |                |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/      Freddie Ann Hoffman |   | Director                                             |   | March      31, 2010 |
| Freddie      Ann Hoffman     |   |                                                 |   |                |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/David      McIntosh       |   | Director                                             |   | March      31, 2010 |
| David      McIntosh          |   |                                                 |   |                |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/      Charles Beever      |   | Director                                             |   | March      31, 2010 |
| Charles      Beever          |   |                                                 |   |                |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/      Kwang Soo Cheong    |   | Director                                             |   | March      31, 2010 |
| Kwang      Soo Cheong        |   |                                                 |   |                |
|                         |   |                                                 |   |                |
| /s/      Y. Michele Kang     |   | Director                                             |   | March      31, 2010 |
| Y.      Michele Kang         |   |                                                 |   |                |

----
Gary Lee ROCHE, DOC #S40816, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1747

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
-----------------------------------------

I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ADA-ES, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer 's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer 's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer 's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2006


/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
-----------------------
Name: Mark H. McKinnies
Title: CFO
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00296-CR

Vincent Trevino GOMEZ Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR12346

Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of conviction is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED December 28, 2022.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Doell

Filters

              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - california(3)
              - hawaii(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(2)

Presentations and Events        July 29, 2004        PubTalk 7/2004 — Secrets in Stone

publication        June 30, 2021        Geologic and geophysical maps of the Newfoundland Mountains and part of the adjacent Wells 30' x 60' quadrangles, Box Elder County, Utah

publication        January 1, 1984        Geomagnetic paleointensities from excursion sequences in lavas on Oahu, Hawaii

Historical        December 1, 1995        Rubens coil in the Rock Magnetics Laboratory in Menlo Park, California

Photography  Tarpaper Shacks in Menlo Park, California

Photography  Interior of Rock Magnetics Laboratory in the Tarpaper Shack (room 40)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUDAN ZHANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70530

Agency No. A088-294-739

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2014** 

Pasadena, California

Before: HAWKINS and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK,*** District

 Judge.

 

Petitioner Sudan Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of

an order, issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), dismissing her

FILED

OCT 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable John W. Sedwick, United States District Judge for the

District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
appeal from an immigration judge’s ("IJ") decision denying her application for

asylum and protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). The REAL

ID Act governs this case. Reviewing for substantial evidence the agency’s adverse

credibility determination, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010),

we deny the petition for review.

1. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination,

which the BIA affirmed. For example, the IJ observed that Petitioner’s demeanor

changed to one of "confusion and indecisiveness" when asked about her abortion

certificate. "We give ‘special deference’ to a credibility determination that is based

on demeanor." Jibril v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 1129, 1137 (9th Cir. 2005) (internal

quotation marks omitted). The IJ identified several inconsistences between the

narrative in Petitioner’s asylum application and her testimony, including

inconsistencies about her parents’ knowledge of her relationship and about her

boyfriend’s presence when she conducted pregnancy tests. Although the IJ need

not rely only on inconsistences that "go to the heart of" Petitioner’s claim, those

inconsistencies in fact do go to the central question whether her abortion was

forced, so we accord them "great weight." Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1046–47. In the

absence of credible testimony, Petitioner’s asylum claim fails. Farah v. Ashcroft,

348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

2
2. Because Petitioner’s CAT claim rests on the same testimony that the IJ

and the BIA found not credible, and because no other evidence in the record

supports the argument that she is more likely than not to be tortured if returned to

China, her CAT claim also fails. Id. at 1157.

DENIED.

3
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 22, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01324-CV No. 05-14-01325-CV IN RE DONALD GENE BLANTON, Relator Original Proceeding from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 23078-86, 23592-86 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce FitzGerald, and Justice Francis Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamu s contending that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress in his 2005 trial. A grand jury indi cted Donald Gene Blanton on two charges: (1) possession of co caine in an amount less than one gram and (2) tampering with evidence. Blanton v. State, No. 05-05-01060-CR, 2006 WL 203661 5 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 21, 2006, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for public ation). The case was tried to a jury. The jury convicted him of both offenses and assess ed an enhanced punishment of twenty years in the possession case and life in the tampering case. Id. This Court affirmed the conviction. Id. Relator’s petition represents an attempt to co llaterally attack his criminal conviction. While the courts of appeals have concurrent ma ndamus jurisdiction with the court of criminal appeals in some post-conviction proceedings, Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805, 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (forensic DNA testi ng), only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction in–2– cases collaterally attack ing a final judgment of conviction of a felony. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). The intermediate courts of appeals have no original jurisdic tion over petitions for habeas co rpus relief in connection with criminal proceedings. T EX
. G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(d) (West 2004) (limiting habeas corpus jurisdiction of intermediate courts of appeals to civil matters); T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 11.05 (West 2005) (granting original jurisdiction in cases seeking writs of habeas corpus in criminal cases to the cour t of criminal appeals, districts courts , and county courts). Because we lack jurisdiction over this original proceeding, we DISMISS the petition.

141324F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 712 

To extend the authorization of the Highlands Conservation Act through 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. 

SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. 

LANCE, and Mr. DENT) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Highlands Conservation 

Act through fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HIGHLANDS CONSERVATION 

4 ACT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF LAND CONSERVATION PROJECTS

6 IN THE HIGHLANDS REGION.—Section 4(e) of the High7 lands Conservation Act (Public Law 108–421; 118 Stat. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 712 IH

1 2377) is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2024’’. 

3 (b) EXTENSION OF FOREST SERVICE AND USDA 

4 PROGRAMS IN THE HIGHLANDS REGION.—Section 5(c) of 

5 the Highlands Conservation Act (Public Law 108–421; 

6 118 Stat. 2378) is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and in7 serting ‘‘2024’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
10.48a





SECOND
AMENDMENT TO


6%
PROMISSORY NOTES





SECOND AMENDMENT TO 6% PROMISSORY
NOTES, is dated as of April 16, 2009; made by and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, with its principal offices located at 14301 North 87th Street,
# 310, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (the “Company”) and Egani, Inc., an Arizona
corporation, (the “Lender”) with a mailing address of 8260 East Raintree Drive,
Scottsdale, AZ 85260.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Original
Notes.





WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender are
parties to those certain 6% Promissory Notes, dated March 6, 2008; April 28,
2008; and September 18, 2008, all as amended (collectively,
the “Original Notes”), pursuant to which the Company has borrowed, in the
aggregate, the amount of $43,900 from the Lender;





WHEREAS, the Original Notes provided
that the Maturity Dates shall be April 16, 2009; and





WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender
have agreed to amend Section 1.4 of the Original Notes; and





WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the Original Notes, the Company and the Lender hereby approve
the amendment of the Original Notes as set forth herein.





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:





1. By their
respective execution of this SECOND AMENDMENT, the Company and the
Lender agree that Section 1.4 of each of the Original Notes is hereby amended to
read in its entirety as follows: “Maturity Date” shall mean the date on which
the Company receives demand for payment in writing from the Lender;
and





2.  Except as
expressly provided herein, the Original Notes shall continue in full force and
effect.





3. This
AMENDMENT may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, which, taken
together, shall be deemed an original and shall constitute a single SECOND
AMENDMENT.





4. IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Lender have caused this SECOND AMENDMENT to
be executed as of the date first written above




DELTA
      MUTUAL, INC.
              
              EGANI,
      INC.(COMPANY)
              
              (LENDER)By:
              /s/
      Martin G. Chilek
              
              By:
              /s/
      Daniel R. PeraltaMartin
      G. Chilek
              
              
              Daniel
      R. PeraltaSr.
      Vice President
              
              
              President
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NANNACO, Inc., a Texas corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steve Careaga,
Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Executive Officer
Date: August 26, 2005


/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 26, 2005

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NANNACO, Inc. and will be retained by Nannaco, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 31.2

e-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mary A. Grace,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of e-Smart Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 20, 2007



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Mary A. Grace      
|    |  | Mary A. Grace,         
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Marc BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1058

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment the order revoking Mr. Baker's probation. However, because the order of revocation erroneously indicates that Mr. Baker pleaded guilty to violating his probation when in fact he was found in violation after an evidentiary hearing, we remand this case for the trial court to correct the scrivener's error. *See**Turner v. State*, 873 So.2d 480, 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Angela DEBOSE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3940

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF O2 WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      13,294,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,770,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,237,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            65,426,000
<PP&E>                                       7,355,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,602,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,937,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,978,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,870,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,937,000
<SALES>                                     94,647,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            94,647,000
<CGS>                                       66,761,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,761,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,818,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,242,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,174,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   465,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (10,639,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              6,377,000
<CHANGES>                                    6,148,000
<NET-INCOME>                               (23,164,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.19)


</TABLE>