alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(20)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(30)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - documents_file(3)
              - documents_file-149220(3)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(9)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(13)
              - (-)colorado(6)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(23)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(4)
              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)

staff profileSamuel Heller

staff profileSam A Johnstone

staff profileCrista L Straub, PhD

staff profileDavid A Brostuen

staff profileGabriel B Senay, Ph.D.

staff profileRay Postolovski
Damion DYKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2778

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018

Damion Dykes, Malone, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. OF SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metaline Contact Mines (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
L. Howell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: August 7, 2006

                                       By: /s/ Richard L. Howell
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Richard L. Howell
                                           President & Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(21)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_other_news(8)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(8)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - (-)idaho(3)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(3)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(47)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(11)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 1, 2020        Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Monthly Update: July 1, 2020

Featured Films and Shorts        July 18, 2016        Inside USGS, No. 6, Ken Pierce, Heavy Breathing of Yellowstone Caldera

Featured Films and Shorts        November 19, 2020        Yellowstone Volcano Observ: Overview, Monitoring, Hazards, Results
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00765

- CV

DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. d/b/a Dollar General, Appellant

v.

Esiquio ESPINOZA and Ida V. Espinoza Jr., Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Misty Dawn Espinoza, Deceased; Liliana Valdez, as Next of Friend for D’Anthony Michael Blades; Victor Blades, as Administrator of the Estate of Clarence A. Blades, Jr. and on Behalf of Clarence A Blades Sr.; and Choroland I. McQueen, Indiv idually

, Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2009

- CI

- 16363 Honorable Larry Noll , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 2, 2011

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

By order of this court, oral argument in this case was set for January 26, 2011. However,

on January 21, 2011, appellees filed a notice of nonsuit of all their claims in the trial court, with a

courtesy copy filed in this court. In response, a ppellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal , and

requested that we assess costs against appellees

. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appell ees

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 3.4 ( stating that04

- 10

- 00765

- CV

- 2

- in civil cases, court of appeals may, for good cause, tax costs in contravention of general rules

governing costs ).

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ardent Health
Services LLC (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David T. Vandewater, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ David T. Vandewater
                                        ------------------------------
                                        David T. Vandewater
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 26, 2004
STATE EX REL. Jimmy L. BARTIE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1651

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

Denied. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X, § 5.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1296
In Re: PATRICK J. MUHAMMAD, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (8:05-mc-00484) Submitted: August 17, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick J. Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Patrick J. Muhammad appeals the order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland disbarring Muhammad from practicing law before that court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In Re: Muhammad , No. 8:05-mc-00484 (D. Md. Apr. 5, 2007). We deny as moot the pending motions for an emergency stay of the district court’s disbarment order and to expedite the adjudication of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
DEERFIELD BEACH OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David R. THOMAS and Thomas G. Simota, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3472

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(15)
              - science_science(23)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(55)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(54)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(112)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(102)
              - multimedia_image-141776(9)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(91)
              - multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(47)
              - multimedia_video-149196(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(22)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - documents_file(70)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(63)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(28)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - (-)south dakota(4)

## By Year

Reference Materials        December 18, 2018        LCMAP Workshop Welcome

Reference Materials        December 18, 2018        Lessons learned using Landsat Analysis Ready Data (ARD) in LCMAP

Reference Materials        December 18, 2018        LCMAP Workshop: Validation

Reference Materials        December 19, 2018        Introducing 10 New LCMAP Products
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE**

 

GE Consumer Finance, Inc. (the “Servicer”)hereby certifies as of December 31, 2007 as follows:

 

1.                                       The undersigned has reviewed, for theperiod beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2007 (the “ReportingPeriod”): (a) the activities of the Servicer as they related to theSubservicing Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2006, between theServicer and General Electric Capital Corporation (the “SubservicingAgreement”) and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the SubservicingAgreement.  The performance by theServicer of its obligations under the Subservicing Agreement has been made by persons under the directsupervision of the undersigned.

 

2.                                       To the best knowledge of the undersigned,based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the SubservicingAgreement, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theSubservicing Agreement in all material respects for the Reporting Period.

 

This report is deliveredpursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 
|   | GE CONSUMER FINANCE, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                      |   |
|   | By:                       | /s/ Robert Green |   |
|   | Name:                     | Robert Green |
|   | Title:                    | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                           |  |  |  |

 

 

----
Billy SWIFT, et al. v. HYDRIL COMPANY and Hydril LLC

NO. 2018-CC-1460

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 20, 2018

Denied.
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No.
333-129294) and the Registration Statement of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on
Form S-3 (Registration Statement No. 333-152640) of our report dated March 10,
2009 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), relating to the financial
statements of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and our report dated March 10, 2009
relating to internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.








/s/ Parente Randolph,
LLC


New York,
New York


March 24,
2009
STATE EX REL. Travis RICHARDSON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1221

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. State ex rel. Richardson v. State, 15-1125 (La. 10/17/16), 202 So.3d 480.
OFFKEOFTHE **ATTORNEY** QENERALOFTEXAS **AUSTIN**

opl!n1onti.04~76 MI CollpBnea8loa

for ail&&q aoa48wilp **tmel46** by Qbuiff aa6 **GaaMablor** of Bill .C6ua8y iarta4N44nor en6 rolonyoe6m.

### 778

APPROVED **OPINION** 

### ~HwIl7uu 

# GZJ BY-
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the annual Report of Hitor Group, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10 K for the year ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  [exhibit32002.gif] _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  May 18, 2012
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merci, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009(the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: November 10, 2009 /s/ Jose Acevedo Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99(d)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2003-1 (the receivables) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of December 31, 2003 and for the period of March 13, 2003 to December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented, as of December 31, 2003 and for the period of March 13, 2003 to December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

February 28, 2004

Chicago, Illinois

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of December 31, 2003 and for the period of March 13, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2003-1 has been conducted by Household Credit Card Services, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

   /s/ Margaret Sprude                       				

Margaret Sprude						

Chief Financial Officer- 				

Household Credit Card Services					

 

 

February 28, 2004                                 				

Date
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 27, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12105

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 88-04045-CR-4-WS-WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EARNEST R. STALEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 27, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Earnest Ray Staley appeals, pro se, the district court’s partial denial of his
motion for a reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Finding

Staley eligible for relief under Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, the

district court reduced Staley’s sentence to the low-end of his amended guideline

range, but denied his request to reduce his sentence further, finding that United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not

apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings.

Staley argues that Booker’s remedial holding, rendering the guidelines

advisory, applies in § 3582(c)(2) proceedings, thus authorizing the district court to

reduce his sentence below the amended guideline range. Staley urges us to follow

the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Hicks, 472 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir.

2007), holding that Booker already rejected, without exception, the government’s

proposal to apply the guidelines as advisory in one context, but mandatory in

another. Staley additionally argues that the district court must apply the

Sentencing Guidelines that are in effect at the time of resentencing, and, therefore,

since the Sentencing Guidelines are currently advisory, the district court must

consider the guidelines as advisory.

We review “a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on a subsequent change in the sentencing

guidelines, for abuse of discretion.” United States v. Brown, 332 F.3d 1341, 1343

2
(11th Cir. 2003). However, in the § 3582(c)(2) context, we review “de novo the

district court’s legal conclusions regarding the scope of its authority under the

Sentencing Guidelines.” United States v. White, 305 F.3d 1264, 1267 (11th Cir.

2002). We also review “de novo questions of statutory interpretation.” United

States v. Maupin, 520 F.3d 1304, 1306 (11th Cir. 2008).

This Court has recently rejected Staley’s argument that the district court has

the authority to apply Booker in a § 3582 resentencing. United States v. Melvin,

__ F.3d __ , 2009 WL 236053 at *3 (11th Cir. Feb. 3, 2009) (holding "that Booker

and Kimbrough do not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings" and that "Booker and

Kimbrough do not prohibit the limitations on a judge's discretion in reducing a

sentence imposed by § 3582(c)(2) and the applicable policy statement by the

Sentencing Commission."). Therefore, the decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

3
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Bekem Metals, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, James
Gunnell, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: April 15, 2005                                  /s/ James Gunnell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     James Gunnell,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer