alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****Exhibit 34.2**
** **

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

 General ElectricCapital Corporation:

 

We have examined management’sassessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that General Electric Capital Corporation,(the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving credit card receivables,accounts receivable and asset based lending receivables (the Platform), as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.Management has determined that criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii) and 1122(d)(1)(iv) are applicable to the activities it performs with respectto the Platform, and that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the primary servicing servicesprovided by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backedtransactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about theCompany’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December31, 2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 26, 2013

 
 **
Gilda WOODS v. WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, L.L.C., The Coca-Cola Company a.k.a. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company a.k.a. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., and Jonathan Burden

No. 2018-C-1263

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. CHARLES**

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

*568In this trip and fall case, the underlying issue is whether two cases of drinks left in the beverage aisle of a grocery store by a distributor created an unreasonable risk of harm, leading to a finding of liability as found by the trial court here, or whether it was an open and obvious condition, which would lead to an opposite result. I would grant and docket the defendant's application in this matter to explore whether the trial court erred in delivering what the court of appeal deemed to be a "compressed" jury instruction regarding the factors used to determine whether a condition is open and obvious. *See**Broussard v. State, through Office of State Bldgs., Div. of Admin.* , 12-1238 (La. 4/5/13), 113 So.3d 175, 184.
Ed Ricardo DESTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 4, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Dennis Earl WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-942 4D18-978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Opinion filed August 30 , 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ __ ____ No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 24 6

- CR

_____ __ ___ LAKESHA LASHAWN BARNES , Appellant
V.
THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court Taylor County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 6730 A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Lakesha Lashawn Barnes has filed a n untimely notice of appeal in this cause

. She attempts to appeal from her convictions for the offense s of possession of methamphetamine and tampering with evidence

. We dismiss the appeal.
The documents on file in th is appeal indicate that Appellant’s sentences were imposed on May 1 6 , 201 7

. P ursuant to Rule 26.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure , a notice of a ppeal is due to be filed either (1) within thirty days after the date that sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or (2) if the defendant2 timely files a motion for new trial, within ninety days after the date that sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed
with the clerk of the trial court. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(c)(1 ) . The documents on file
in this court re flect that Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district
cl erk’s office on July 2 9 , 2019

— 804 days after one sentence was imposed and the other one was suspended

. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State
, 918 S.W.2d 519 , 522

– 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108
, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).
On J uly 2 9 , 2019, w hen th e appeal w as filed in this court
, we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue

. Appellant has filed a response
, but she has not show n grounds upon which this appeal may proceed

. 1
W e dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

August 30, 2019 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Stretcher , J., and Wright, S.C.J. 2 Willson, J., not participating.

1 We note that , in her response, Appellant indicates that her court

- appointed attorney failed to pursue an appeal on her behalf. Appellant is mistaken; the convictions that Appellant attempts to appeal in this cause were timely appealed and pursued by A ppellant’s court

- appointed attorney. See Barnes v. State , No. 11

- 17

- 00133

- CR, 2 019 WL 1966852 , at *1

– 2 (Tex. App.

— Eastland May 2, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)

. 2 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
L.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. OF SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metaline Contact Mines (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard L. Howell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2006


                                        By: /s/ Richard L. Howell
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard L. Howell
                                            President & Chief Executive Officer
Anthony HOLLEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3529

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 9, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Petitioner's motion to expedite is denied as moot.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2020273EN.01000101.xml

| 18.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9759 – Nexi/Intesa Sanpaolo (Merchant Acquiring business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 273/01)

On 26 June 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9759. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9759. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(300)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(299)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(33)
              - multimedia_image-141771(33)
              - (-)multimedia_video(34)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(28)
              - connect_social_media(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(31)

Podcasts        June 10, 2012        USGS CoreCast: Landslide Hazards

Podcasts        July 31, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part I

Podcasts        August 18, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part 2

Podcasts        January 12, 2012        What's in Our Water?

Podcasts        October 14, 2009        Streamgages: The Silent Superhero

Podcasts        June 15, 2011        Emerging Contaminants

video        December 17, 2012        Diamonds and Dusty Pages

Podcasts        October 26, 2008        Earthquakes? Don't Freak Out--ShakeOut!

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Podcasts        August 18, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: San Juan Islands

Podcasts        July 30, 2012        Volcano Hazards

Podcasts        March 11, 2009        Radar is for the Birds

Featured Films and Shorts        December 16, 2013        Hazards: Geomagnetic Storms

Podcasts        February 10, 2010        Why Some Public-Supply Wells are More Vulnerable to Contamination Than Others

Podcasts        March 26, 2009        USGS Crews Measure Historic Flooding in Fargo, ND

Photography  Wind Turbines

Photography  Hoary Bat Victim

Photography  Wind Turbines

Photography  Wind Turbine

Photography  Wind Turbine Blade

video        November 11, 2008        How Science Helps Communities Survive Earthquakes

Photography  Bison in Winter

Photography  Bison at Yellowstone National Park

Photography  Bison Cow and Calf

Podcasts        March 14, 2012        Advancing ARMI: In Search for Chytrid Fungus

Photography        May 7, 2007        Public Wells

Photography        November 13, 2002        Public Wells

Photography  Pliocene Lignite Coal from BEN Village

Photography  Exposing Pliocene Lignite Bed Near a BEN Village

Photography  Bat with Radio Transmitter

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
**Exhibit 31.1[For Series 2005-1, 2005-2 and 2005-3]**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Ravi Ramanujam, Vice President of RFS Holding, L.L.C., certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of GE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, thedistribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee bythe servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4.                                       Based upon my knowledge and upon the annualcompliance statement included in the report and required to be delivered to thetrustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar,agreement; and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilledits obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.                                       The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the poolingand servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas.

 

March 26,2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Ravi  Ramanujam |
|--------|---------------------|
|   |
|   | Name:               | Ravi  Ramanujam |
|   | Title:              | Vice  President, and as the senior officer in  charge of securitization |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)science_education(4)
              - science_science(20)
              - products_data(34)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(71)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_image(16)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(6)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(6)
              - multimedia_video(26)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(12)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149245(4)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(4)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new york(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - utah(2)

## By Year

Education        October 12, 2018        Earth As Art 1

Education        October 12, 2018        Earth As Art 2

Education        October 15, 2018        Earth As Art 4

Education        March 23, 2020        Eyes on Earth Episode 20 - Mapping Alaska's Permafrost
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137683 & (21) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 137683 

 COA: 288723 

Oakland CC: 2008-221695-FH 

DEVON HOWARD,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted to 

determine whether the trial court followed the standards set forth in MCR 6.201(C)(2) 

and People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994), in granting an in camera review of 

privileged materials. The proceedings in the Oakland Circuit Court are stayed pending 

the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of 

Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the 

appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear. 

p1125 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 26, 2008 

Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 99917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29051]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: December 10, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 52 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2025-413 and K2025-411.

Christopher Doyle,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-29051 Filed 12-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(29)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)
              - multimedia_video(11)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - (-)hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

National News Release        September 7, 2016        Declining Bird Community on Kauai Island Reveals Threat of Changing Environmental Conditions
Jerry GALLION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)connect_locations(1)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)

## By Year

              - 2023(1)
              - (-)2020(1)

locationJohn Wesley Powell Center for Earth System Analysis and Synthesis