alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------



                                      13
<PAGE>


                                 CERTIFICATION


     I, Richard DeLeo, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
     Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect
     of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWMBS,
     Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2003-3T1;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
     whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
     report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
     required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
     reports is included in these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
     servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
     upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
     agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer
     has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
     upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
     conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
     Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
     reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
     Bank of New York, as Trustee and Litton Loan Servicing LP.


     Date: March 25, 2004


                                       /s/ Richard DeLeo
                                       -----------------
                                           Richard DeLeo
                                           Senior Managing Director



                                      14
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

Podcasts        April 3, 2008        How many counties are there in the United States?

Podcasts        October 10, 2012        ShakeOut Drill: Preparing for Earthquakes

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
Willie Frank HUNTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2719

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        April 13, 2017        Up in the Air to Look Deep Underground
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT
      10.11

    

      Translation
        from the German language

      


      


      Agreement

      on
        the principles of cooperation between

      Tri
        Ion Wassertechnik and NuCon Inc.

      


      


      Both
        sides agree to cooperate on the basis of already gathered experience and
        existing contacts.

      


      Tri
        Ion
        is ready and capable to offer on a turn-key basis water purification plants
        and
        absorbers.

      


      The
        export price list based on the conditions ex work shall be applied.

      


      Tri
        Ion
        shall provide marketing support in form of brochures and data
        carriers.

      


      Tri
        Ion
        shall provide: certificates, data sheets and tariff numbers.

      


      Tri
        Ion
        shall submit a reference list understandable for customers.

      


      NuCon
        shall use contacts in Russia in order to establish clients’ contacts and
        initiate business.

      


      NuCon
        shall submit once a month a status report on the activities
        implemented.

      


      NuCon
        shall receive a commission of 20% of the business arranged.

      


      During
        the validity of these principles Tri Ion shall provide NuCon with a monthly
        expense allowance of 150.00 Euro.

      


      Tri
        Ion
        is ready to visit with potential customers relevant reference projects in
        Germany, primarily in the area Nordrhein-Westfalen.

      


      These
        principles of cooperation shall be examined and modified by both sides end
        of
        August / beginning of September 2006.

      


      Moscow
        /
        Ratingen, 8 February 2006.

       

      
        
          	
                  /s/
                    U.
                    Kromozinski

                	
                  /s/
                    Valerij
                    A. Lebedew / Alexander Stepanenko

                
	
                  U.
                    Kromozinski

                	
                  Valerij
                    A. Lebedew / Alexander

                
	 	
                  Stepanenko

                
	
                  Tri
                    Ion Wassertechnik

                	
                  NuCon
                    Inc.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 800017

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### CHEYENNE L. SEWELL Aviati on Ordinance Air man ( E

- 3 )
,

U

. S

. Navy Appellant

______________________ ___ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander Robert P. Monahan
, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: C ommand er, Navy Region Mid

- Atlantic, Norfolk, VA

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Co mmander

Anthony P. Sham , J AGC, USN

. For Appellant : Lieutenant Daniel E. Rosinski , JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 2 6 June 2018

_________________________ Before H UTCHISON , S AYEGH , and H IN E S , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
H. R. 78 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4110 Almeda 

Road in Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘George Thomas ‘Mickey’ Leland Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE THOMAS ‘‘MICKEY’’ LELAND POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4110 Almeda Road in Houston, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘George Thomas ‘Mickey’ Leland 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George Thomas ‘Mickey’ Leland Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1




                           E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


            In connection with the Quarterly Report of e-Smart Technologies,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of e-Smart
Technologies, Inc.

Date:  May 17, 2004


/s/  Mary A. Grace
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Melissa HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Coordination of Media Interviews

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(1)
              - california(2)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2022        PubTalk-06/2022 - Keeping Tabs on the Volcanoes of the Last Frontier
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arvana Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arnold Tinter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Arnold Tinter


Arnold Tinter


Chief Financial Officer


May 15, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. RASSAN JOHNSON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 484 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 25th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Billy TYNER,, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida,, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 99(e)

Independent Accountants'Report

The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I (the receivables) has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003 (the Agreement), as supplemented by the Series 2003-2 Series Supplement, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. HSBC Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,management's assertion thatthe servicing of the receivables has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation,successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation,as Servicer,in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented, as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2004is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.



/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2005



Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented by the Series 2003-2 Series Supplement.











|/s/ Steve Smith
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date
/s/ Margaret Sprude
Margaret Sprude
Chief Financial Officer -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Credit Card ServicesMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
**EXHIBIT 34.2**

** **

** **

** **

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

General Electric CapitalCorporation:

 

We haveexamined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that General Electric Capital Corporation, (the Company) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securitiestransactions for which the Company acted as servicer involving credit card receivables, accounts receivable and asset based lendingreceivables (the Platform), as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. Management has determined that criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii),1122(d)(1)(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(vi) are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, and that all otherservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the primary servicing services provided by the Company withrespect to the Platform. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securitiesdefined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance basedon our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December31, 2011 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 26, 2012
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crops

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_science(96)
              - products_data(87)
              - products_maps(20)
              - products_publications(704)
              - products_software(3)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(64)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(59)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(5)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(132)
              - multimedia_image-141771(119)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(4)
              - multimedia_image-141776(4)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(107)
              - multimedia_video-149194(40)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(7)
              - documents_file(12)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149216(3)
              - documents_file-149224(8)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(7)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - north carolina(1)

## By Year

Infographics        April 1, 2024        Syr Darya River Basin

Infographics        March 19, 2024        PFAS Fate Transport Diagram

Infographics        October 21, 2022        Charlotte and Monroe, North Carolina
Marhlau BELIZAIRE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Marhlau Belizaire, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Natalia Costea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
William Larry SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D17-1205 1D17-1206 (Consolidated for disposition)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 31, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions to vacate Appellant's convictions under section 322.34(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2016), and adjudicate him guilty of the lesser included offense of driving without a *916valid driver's license. *See**Williams v. State* , 244 So.3d 356, 2018 WL 1833396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.
LOREMAR CORP., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0576

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 <LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE COMPANY AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 INCLUDED IN THE 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         254,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,218
<PP&E>                                          55,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,868
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (94,294)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (94,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (94,294)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>