alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                    AGREEMENT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2001


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                 SERIES 2001-12


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., the
Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2001-12,
do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the
preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv D26
Pablo ESTRADA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_video(10)
              - multimedia_video-149194(9)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - (-)california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

publication        July 7, 2023        Crop water productivity from cloud-Based landsat helps assess California’s water savings

publication        July 30, 2019        Characterizing crop water use dynamics in the Central Valley of California using landsat-derived evapotranspiration

publication        January 28, 2016        Hyperspectral narrowband and multispectral broadband indices for remote sensing of crop evapotranspiration and its components (transpiration and soil evaporation)

publication        October 1, 2022        Using Landsat and MODIS satellite collections to examine extent, timing, and potential impacts of surface water inundation in California croplands☆

publication        August 14, 2014        Hydrologic models and analysis of water availability in Cuyama Valley, California

publication        September 18, 2014        Integrated hydrologic model of Pajaro Valley, Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, California

Presentations and Events        October 23, 2018        Linking Remote Sensing & Waterfowl Behavior Data

How to's and trainings        December 14, 2006        PubTalk 12/2006 - Mojave

Presentations and Events        September 26, 2019        PubTalk 09/2019 — Bats in the West

Presentations and Events        April 18, 2019        PubTalk 04/2019 - California's Ecosystems

Presentations and Events        July 25, 2019        PubTalk 07/2019 — Taking the Pulse of Our Planet

Presentations and Events        March 25, 2021        PubTalk 3/2021 - A Jaguar's Field of Dreams

Presentations and Events        August 25, 2016        Public Lecture Series — The New Eyes in the Sky

Presentations and Events        June 22, 2017        PubTalk 6/2017 — Effects of Climate Change: A Scientific Path Forward

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2017        2017 August Evening Public Lecture — Roving on Mars

Presentations and Events        February 22, 2018        PubTalk 2/2018 — USGS Cascades Volcano Observatory
Ervin MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2163

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 3140

_____________________________
E RIC T IWIAN L EVINE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Gary L. Bergosh , Judge

. September 10, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender and Tyler Kemper Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
March 7, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 7th Street, SW, Room PL-400 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

This letter is to petition for an extention of Exemption 7504B from 14 CFR 121.434(c)(1)(2) for 

Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. All conditions and requirements of the existing Exemption remain the 

same. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (901) 348-4385. 

Sincerely, 

Captain Walt Trevathan 

Interim Manager, Flight Standards 

Captain Walt Trevathan 

Interim Manager, Flight Standards 

Pinnacle Airlines 

1689 Nonconnah Blvd., Suite 118 

Memphis, TN 38132
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

P. 0. Box 12248 F1|Fn .„

Supreme Court Building rniiRT of appeal- Austin, Texas 78711 court of appeal

John T. Adams, Clerk FFB07 1994

February 2, 1994 MELANIE KEETOjm

CLERK, '."*;j4s_ Mr. Gary W. Sibley

3624 Oak Lawn Avenue, Ste. 100

Dallas, TX 75219

Mr. Robert T. Baskett

Burleson, Pate & Gibson, L.L.P.

2414 N. Akard Street, Ste. 700

Dallas, TX 75201-1748

Mr. Charles M. Bradshaw

P. 0. Box 802049

Dallas, TX 75380-2049

RE: Case No. D-3869

Style: WILLFRED MENTIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF WILLFRED

MENTIS, JR. AND WARREN MENTIS, MINOR CHILDREN

v. MICHAEL JOHN BARNARD

No. 89-3482-G in the 134th District Court, Dallas County

No. 05-91-00780-CV in the Fifth Court of Appeals

Dear Counsel:

Today, the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion/s in the

above referenced cause.

Enclosed is the judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas as said judgment

appears in the Minutes of this Court. This is the judgment that will issue in

mandate form to the lower court if no motion for rehearing is filed or if a filed

motion for rehearing is overruled.

Respectfully yours,

JOHbM". ADAMS,/CLERK

Peggy(Xfrtfyefie1d,

Chief Deputy Clerk

cc: Ms. Melanie Keeton, Clerk

Mr. Bill Long

Hon. James A. Baker

Honorable Anne Ashby Packer
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. D-3869

WILLFRED MENTIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF WILLFRED

MENTIS, JR. AND WARREN MENTIS, MINOR CHILDREN, PETITIONER

MICHAEL JOHN BARNARD, RESPONDENT

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR TO THE

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, having heard this cause on writ of error to

the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, and havingconsidered the appellate record and

the argument of counsel, is of the opinion that the judgment of the courtof appeals should

be reversed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court's opinion, that:

1) The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed;

2) The cause is remanded to the District Court of

Dallas County, Texas, for further proceedings in

conformity with the opinion of this Court;

3) Willfred Mentis, Individually and as Next Friend

of Willfred Mentis,Jr. and Warren Mentis, Minor

Children, shall recover from Michael John

Barnard, who shall pay, the costs in this Court

and in the court of appeals.
A copyof this judgment and of the Court's opinion is certified to the court of appeals

and to the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for observance.

(Opinion of the Court delivered by Justice Doggett)

(Dissenting Opinion by Justice Cornyn joined in part

by Justice Spector)

February 2,1994

**********
Guy SHEROUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1723

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350

The undersigned hereby
certify that the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d) and that information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:                   |  | /s/ BRENT M. BOYLES                                                              
|                      |  | Brent M. Boyles                                                                  
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                            
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ MICHAEL I. WILLIAMS                                                          
|                      |  | Michael I. Williams                                                              
|                      |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
|                     
|Dated: March 18, 2009

This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 USC Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Brett A. FOURNIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 23, 2018 Rehearing Denied February 27, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Brett Fournier, Bowling Green, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Louis DEROSA, Appellant, v. Michael MASELLA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3957

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - (-)science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        What is declination?

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

faq        June 30, 2017        Why are amphibian populations declining?

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

faq        June 30, 2017        What is the United States doing about amphibian deformity and decline issues?

faq        July 7, 2017        Why measure the magnetic field at the Earth's surface? Wouldn't satellites be better suited for space-weather studies?

faq        July 31, 2017        What do the different north arrows on a USGS topographic map mean?

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical International Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Karim Menassa, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|\s\ Karim Menassa                        
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|Karim Menassa                            
|President and Principal Executive Officer
|                                         
|August 13, 2004                          

---
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Loyd WILLIAMS.

No. 4660.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

May 11, 1953.

Edwin Langley, U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Old., for appellant.

H. Duane Stratton, Muskogee, Old., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 30, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31034

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RANDALL M. BRAZZEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:06-CR-50023

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Randall M. Brazzel appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. The

district court imposed a non-guidelines sentence of 36 months in

prison, which was nine-months above the upper end of the advisory

guidelines range of 21 to 27 months calculated in the presentence

report.

Brazzel argues first that the district court erred by sua

sponte imposing a sentencing above the guidelines range without

first providing notice of its intent to do so. In support of his
No. 06-31034

-2-

argument he relies on the reasoning of Burns v. United States,

501 U.S. 129 (1991), and FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(h). His argument is

foreclosed by United States v. Mejia-Huerta, 480 F.3d 713, 720-23

(5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Apr. 18, 2007) (No.

06- 1381).

Brazzel also argues that his 36-month sentence was

unreasonable. The district court’s sentencing colloquy shows

that the court considered Brazzel’s particular characteristics

and circumstances and the need for the sentence to reflect the

seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and

to provide just punishment and adequate deterrence for further

offenses. The court’s comments and written statement of reasons

show that the court was aware of the correctly calculated

guidelines range and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing

disparities. Brazzel fails to show that the district court did

not account for a factor that should have received great weight,

gave significant weight to an irrelevant factor, or committed a

clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. See

United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707-09 (5th Cir. 2006).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
# C_2020016EN.01000301.xml

| 17.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/3

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 16/03)

Decision partially granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation numbers | Authorised uses | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2020)7 | 10 January 2020 | chromium trioxide EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0 | Doosan Electro-Materials Luxembourg SARL, 19 Rue de Bitbourg, L-1273 Luxembourg, Luxembourg | REACH/20/13/0 | Use in industrial formulation of a chromium trioxide solution below 0,1 % weight by weight concentration for the passivation of copper foil used in the production of lithium ion batteries (LiB) for motorised vehicles | 10 January 2032 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| Doosan Energy Solution Kft, Váci út 76, 1133 Budapest, Hungary | REACH/20/13/1 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation numbers

Authorised uses

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2020)7

10 January 2020

chromium trioxide EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0

Doosan Electro-Materials Luxembourg SARL, 19 Rue de Bitbourg, L-1273 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

REACH/20/13/0

Use in industrial formulation of a chromium trioxide solution below 0,1 % weight by weight concentration for the passivation of copper foil used in the production of lithium ion batteries (LiB) for motorised vehicles

10 January 2032

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

Doosan Energy Solution Kft, Váci út 76, 1133 Budapest, Hungary

REACH/20/13/1

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

---
Eric Orlando FOWLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioner's motion to stay the proceedings in the trial court is denied as moot.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 9, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128511 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

ROBERT HILL, SHIRLEY HILL, TIMOTHY Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan CARLSON, RANDALL KOLODZIEJSKI, Robert P. Young, Jr.
 

LINDA KOLODZIEJSKI, WILLIAM Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices
 GLASSON, BEVERLY GLASSON, DAVID 

ABRAHAM, KRISTIN ABRAHAM, DENNIS 

D. MARLOWE, DENNIS HIGHT, TRACY 

HIGHT, TED DOBEK, CAROLYN KUPIEC, 

FREDERICK CROSS, MICHELLE CROSS, 

SANDRA POWERS, DANIEL G. OLIVARES, 

FRANCESCO SIMONE, PAMELA SIMONE, 

GARY POTAPSHYN, GERALD KOWALSKI, 

and FRANK VITALE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 128511 

 COA: 259706 

Macomb CC: 2000-001823-CZ 

CITY OF WARREN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. Among the issues to be considered, the Court of 

Appeals shall consider whether Pohutski v City of Allen Park, 465 Mich 675 (2002), 

affects the class certification issue in this case. Pohutski held that § 7 of the 

governmental tort liability act, MCL § 691.1407, does not permit a trespass-nuisance 

exception to governmental immunity, but ruled that this holding would be applied only to 

cases brought on or after April 2, 2002. In light of Pohutski, are issues relating to 

putative plaintiffs unnamed as of April 2, 2002 sufficiently disparate from issues relating 

to plaintiffs who were named as of April 2, 2002, such that certification of a single class 

containing both groups of plaintiffs would be inappropriate under MCR 3.501(A)(1)? 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal. 

s1102 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 9, 2005 

Clerk
David Allen LASSITER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3420

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 29, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.