alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-41373 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CARLOS ARTURO HERNANDEZ MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-671-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointe d to represent Carlos Arturo Hernandez Mejia h a s m o ved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 7 38 (1967), a nd United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th C ir. 2011). Hernandez Mejia has not filed a response. We h ave reviewed counse l ’ s b r i e f a nd the r elevant p ortions of t he record reflected therein. W e concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

no nonfrivolous issu e f o r a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s m otion for U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-41373 Document: 00512278436 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013No. 12-41373

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-41373 Document: 00512278436 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29450]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[256A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

Indian Gaming; Approval of the Tribal-State Class III Gaming 
Compact Amendment Between the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs 
Reservation of Oregon and the State of Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Amendment to the 
Amended and Restated (Highway 26) Tribal-State Compact for Regulation 
of Class III Gaming between the Confederated Tribes of The Warm Springs 
Reservation of Oregon and the State of Oregon, which governs the 
operation and regulation of class III gaming activities.

DATES: The Amendment takes effect on December 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, [email protected]; (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Amendment makes changes to the scope of gaming and adds 
technical regulations to support those changes. The Amendment is 
approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-29450 Filed 12-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```
Joseph ADAMS v. GEORGIA GULF LAKE CHARLES, LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-C-1272

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29735]

[[Page 102177]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
495 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-576, K2025-574.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29735 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
George Chester PARIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2976)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CHARLES WILLIAM BUNNELL II, AKA 

Charles Bunnell II,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-1598

D.C. No.

2:14-cr-00119-DGC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2024

**

Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Charles William Bunnell II appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 36-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of his 

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument, see Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2), and we therefore deny 

Bunnell’s request for oral argument.

FILED

MAY 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-1598

Bunnell contends the district court erred by considering the seriousness of 

his underlying offense, and by relying on inaccurate, prejudicial facts contained in 

a report. We need not resolve the parties’ dispute as to the standard of review that 

applies to these claims because we conclude that the court did not err under any 

standard. 

The record shows that the district court did not consider any impermissible 

factors. Rather, its discussion of the underlying offense was part of its proper 

consideration of Bunnell’s overall criminal history and poor performance on 

supervised release. See United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 

2007). Moreover, Bunnell’s speculation that the district court may have relied on 

erroneous facts in a report is insufficient to undermine the sentence. See United 

States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 576 F.3d 929, 937 (9th Cir. 2009) (defendant must 

show his sentence “was demonstrably based on false or unreliable information”).

Finally, we disagree with Bunnell’s assertion that this case must be 

remanded for the district court to clarify the basis for the sentence. The record 

makes clear the court relied only on permissible sentencing factors and reasonably 

determined that a 36-month sentence was warranted to protect the public, provide 

deterrence, and sanction Bunnell’s breach of the court’s trust. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3583(e); Simtob, 485 F.3d at 1062-63.

AFFIRMED.
E.M., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 4, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report
 TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
  DELAWARE
 1-12733
(Commission File Number)
    
    41-1746238
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 27175 HAGGERTY ROAD, NOVI, MICHIGAN 48377
 (248) 675-6000
 NOT APPLICABLE
  o  o  o  o




---



##### 



Section 2  Financial Information
 Item 2.05 Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
    Section 9  Financial Statements and Exhibits
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 d.
    
    Exhibits.99.1
    
    Press Release dated October 13 , 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  TOWER AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
               RegistrantDate: October 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Christopher T. Hatto

          Christopher T. Hatto
          Chief Accounting Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit no.
    
    Exhibit description99.1
    
    Press Release dated October 13 , 2005.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Mitrokostas, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, CIT Capital Trust I
          Securities-Backed Series 2003-9 Trust (the "Trust") and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust
          filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
          annual report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          pooling and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.



Date: March 26, 2004


         /s/ Paul Mitrokostas
---------------------------------------
Paul Mitrokostas, Senior Vice President


                                      7


<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Rinker Group Limited, an Australian corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

TheAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005**(the “Report”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  May 23, 2005 |                |
|---------------------------|---------------------|
|                      |                |
|                      | /s/  Tom Burmeister |   |
|                      | Name:               | Tom  Burmeister |
|                      | Title:              | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                           |                     |  |  |

 

----

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Rinker Group Limited, an Australian corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

TheAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005**(the “Report”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  May 23, 2005 |                 |
|---------------------------|----------------------|
|                      |                 |
|                      | /s/  David V. Clarke |   |
|                      | Name:                | David  V. Clarke |
|                      | Title:               | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                           |                      |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                       |  | /s/    JOHN J.
SHERMAN                 
|Date: December 1, 2008 |  | John J. Sherman Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jose Francisco CRUZ, Appellant, v. Gilberto HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

No. 3D18-407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 20, 2018

Jose Francisco Cruz, in proper person.

Gilberto Hernandez, in proper person.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*489Affirmed. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a) ("After service of the initial brief ... the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.").
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of Universal Communication
Systems, Inc.(the "Company"), certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     controls; and

     6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 15, 2003

/s/ Michael J. Zwebner
-------------------------------
Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL GAS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Richard Achron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
RICHARD ACHRONRichard AchronChief Financial OfficerMarch 13, 2006
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Vistas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heung Hung Lee, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Heung Hung LeeHeung
      Hung LeeChief
      Financial Officer





May
15, 2009