alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5615 

To reinstate the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2016 

Mr. GRAYSON (for himself, Ms. LEE, and Ms. BROWN of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reinstate the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom From Fear 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF BAN ON SEMIAUTOMATIC AS7 SAULT WEAPONS. 

8 Notwithstanding section 110105 of the Violent Crime 

9 Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 

10 103–322), sections 110102 and 110106 of such Act are 

11 hereby re-enacted into law, except that, in lieu of the mat12 ter to be inserted by the amendment made by section 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5615 IH

1 110102(c)(1) of such Act, the matter to be inserted shall 

2 be ‘‘(q), or (v) of section 922’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel R. Peralta,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




May
      20, 2009
            
            
            /s/
      Daniel R. PeraltaDaniel
      R. PeraltaChief
      Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Allen Jamel ROBINSON

NO. 2018-KH-0756

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Robinson v. State, 15-1970 (La. 1/13/17), 206 So.3d 867.
Christopher BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Johanna O'NEILL, Appellant, v. The FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 25, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m. EST, Wednesday, December 18, 2024.

# PLACE: 

CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) will hold this meeting to consider the following matters:
      - Final Rule—Real-Time Public Reporting Requirements and Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; and
      - Final Rule—Regulations to Address Margin Adequacy and to Account for the Treatment of Separate Accounts by Futures Commission Merchants.       ( print page 101570)      

                        The agenda for this meeting will be available to the public and posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov.*                         Members of the public are free to attend the meeting in person, or have the option to listen by phone or view a live stream. Instructions for listening to the meeting by phone and connecting to the live video stream will be posted on the Commission's website.                    

In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's website.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

                        (                        *Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.)                    

Dated: December 11, 2024.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-29636 Filed 12-12-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
FOR PUBLICATION



### JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT No . 22-90006

ORDER

Filed November 15, 2023

ORDER

MURGUIA , Chief Judge:

Complainant, a pro se litigant

, has filed a complaint of judicial misconduct against a district judge . Review of this complaint is governed by the Rules for Judicial

- Conduct and Judicial

- Disability Proceedings (“Judicial

- Conduct Rules”), the federal statutes addressing judicial conduct and disability, 28 U.S.C. § 351 et seq ., and relevant prior decisions of the Ninth Circuit Judicial Council. In accordance with these authorities, the names of the complainant and the subject judge shall not be disclosed in this order. See Judicial -Conduct Rule 11(g)(2).2 I N R E C OMPLAINT OF J UDICIAL M I SCONDUCT

The Judicial -Conduct Rules provide a remedy if a federal judge “has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 351(a). A chief judge may dismiss a complaint if, following review, he or she finds it is not cognizable under the statute, is directly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling, or is frivolous or lacks sufficient evidence to raise an inf erence of misconduct. See 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(i)

- (iii). Ju dicial misconduct proceedings are not a substitute for the normal appellate review process, and may not be used to seek reversal of a judge’s decision, to obtain a new trial, or to request reassignment to a different judge. This misconduct complaint arises out of an attorney d isciplinary matter. In the misconduct complaint, the complainant alleges that the district judge “made a gross error in his decision to affirm the Bar’s suspension” and that the district judge refused to consider evidence. These allegations are related to the merits and must be dismissed on that ground. See 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(ii); In re Complaint of Jud. Misconduct, 838 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 2016) (dismissing allegations that a distric t judge and magistrate judge made various improper rulings as merits related); Judicial -Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(B). Complainant also alleges that the district judge violated hi s due process rights by improperly acting as a prosecutor in lieu of the State Bar. A review of the record reveals that the disciplinary proceedings were conducted pursuant to the local rules of the district court and the district judge explained that the district court did not have appellate jurisdiction over the State Bar’s decisions

. Initiating reciprocal attorney disciplinary proceedings is not improper. See In re Kramer , 282 F.3d 721, 724 (9th Cir. 2002) (findingI N R E C OMPLAINT OF J UDICIAL M ISCONDUCT 3

the district court's imposition of reciprocal attorney discipline proceedings based on a state's disciplinary adjudication was not an abuse of discretion) ; see also 9th Cir. R. 46

- 2(c). Because complainant provides no objectively verifiable evidence of misconduct in this matter, this allegation must be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(iii); Judicial -Conduct Rul e 11(c)(1)(D).

DISMISSED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

slideshow        December 22, 2022        Desert, aquatic, prairie, forest, riparian, tundra, and sagebrush plants

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery

Posters        July 14, 2014        Geologic Map of Mars

Posters        December 31, 1998        Mapping Shipping Hazards in San Francisco Bay, 1997-1998
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL GAS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Richard Achron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







| | RICHARD ACHRONRichard Achron
Chief Financial Officer
September 12, 2006
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

















---
SCWC-29953

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STEVEN SCHAEFER,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

(CR. NO. 5P104-00072 (LC04-072))

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

APRIL ESTHER SCHAEFER, aka APRIL ESTHER PAIVA,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

(CR. NO. 05P104-00169 (LC04-169))

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NOS. 29953 and 29954)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants Steven Schaefer’s and

April Esther Schaefer’s application for writ of certiorari filed

on September 19, 2011 is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 19,2011.

Hayden Aluli for petitioner/

defendant-appellant Steven

Schaefer on the application

Mimi Dejardins for

petitioner/defendant-appellant

April Schaefer on the

application

Shaylene Iseri-Carvalho for

respondent/plaintiff-appellee

State of Hawai#i on the response

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29953

19-OCT-2011

08:20 AM
**Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Nathan L. Grass,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Maine & MaritimesCorporation (the registrant);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on our evaluation;

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves Management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Dated: March 16, 2007                       |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/ NATHAN L. GRASS                              |   |   |
| Nathan L. Grass  Interim Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
Wachovia Asset Securitization Issuance, LLC (formerly Wachovia Asset Securitization, Inc.), Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-HE1 I, John M. Gordon, a Vice President in the Asset Backed Services, Treasury Activities Department of Wachovia Bank, National Association, certify that: 1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K, and all monthly current reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the Wachovia Asset Securitization 2003-HE1 Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the Indenture Trustee by the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement; and 5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure as set forth in the Servicing Agreement, that is included in these reports. Date: March 26, 2007 /s/  John M. Gordon Name: John M. Gordon Title:   Vice President
Richard Lee ELLWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Richard Lee Ellwood, Zephyrhills, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Gerber, C.J., Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.
Jeremiah Benjamin STANLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3411

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Robin B. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD

No. 2018-OB-0467

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Reconsideration denied.
In the INTEREST OF A.S., a child.

S.B., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3267

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin G. Chilek,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.





/s/ Martin G. ChilekMartin
      G. ChilekChief
      Financial Officer





August 6,
2009
Marie J. PIERRE, Appellant, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 20, 2018

Marie J. Pierre, in proper person.

Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PLLC and Christopher DelBene (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Ramos v. Ventures Tr.*, 157 So.3d 455, 456-57 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ("In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed."); *Emaminejad v. Ocwen Loan Servicing*, LLC, 156 So.3d 534, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ("All of the challenges made by the Borrower basically rest on this Court's review of the evidence and arguments made at trial, neither of which can be done in the absence of a transcript. Based upon what is available in the record, and without proof of anything from the trial to the contrary, we affirm").
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(15)
              - science_science(23)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(55)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(54)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(112)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(102)
              - multimedia_image-141776(9)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(91)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(47)
              - multimedia_video-149196(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(22)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - documents_file(70)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(63)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(28)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(11)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(70)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(12)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south dakota(8)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        December 31, 1997        1997 NSLRSDA 14 minutes

Presentations and Events        December 31, 2000        2000 NASA TERRA Press Conference Releasing Data From The Satellite

Presentations and Events        December 31, 1999        1999 NASA EOS TERRA Satellite Pre Launch Press Conference

Presentations and Events        December 31, 1992        1992 December Don Lauer First All Hands

Presentations and Events        October 31, 2016        GEO XIV Plenary 2017

Presentations and Events        November 30, 2016        CEOS Plenary 2017

Presentations and Events        May 31, 2017        High Density Digital Tape (HDDT) Landsat Data Recovery

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish