alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Data Access        April 12, 2017        Hazard Exposure Reporting and Analytics (HERA)

Podcasts        July 12, 2010        USGS Hydrologic Investigation of West Africa's Congo River (part two)

Podcasts        January 26, 2010        USGS Hydrologic Investigation of West Africa's Congo River (part one)
Monica COUGHLIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Richard Brian ORTH, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellant to comply with this court's September 28, 2018, order to show cause.

LaROSE, C.J., and KELLY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
C.H., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Antony PINEDA, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1329 L.T. NO.: 17-5706

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2018

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

Upon consideration of respondent Anthony Pineda's motion for appellate attorneys' fees, it is ordered that said motion is conditionally granted and remanded to the trial court for a determination that the respondent is entitled to fees under Section 768.79, Florida Statutes.

EMAS, LOGUE and LUCK, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**DANIEL J. THOMAS**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§ 1350**

 

I, Daniel J. Thomas, of Concentra OperatingCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

March 25, 2004
Exhibit 10.1(c)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P.
    
    AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. II
    
    AAA Master Fund LLC
    
    Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P.
    
    Legion Strategies LLC
    
    Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
    
    Global Futures Fund LTD.
    
    Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD.
   CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
 By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & Director
 AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.By:
    
    /s/ Anthony AnnunziatoPrint Name:
    Anthony A. Annunziato
EXHIBIT
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the quarterly report of China Yingxia International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ren
Hu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Ren
Hu
 Chief
Financial Officer
  November
14, 2008
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Yingxia International, Inc.and will be retained by China Yingxia
International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Maurice E. CLIMES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of habeas corpus is denied.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Northrop Grumman Executive Health Plan Matrix




	 	 	 
	Plan Feature	 	Benefit
	Eligibility

	 	Employee + Spouse & Dependents

	Medical Plan

	 	Premium PPO Plan administered by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield

	Coverage

	 	100% coverage, for all eligible plan expenses

	Annual Deductible

	 	No annual deductible

	Co-payment/Co-insurance

	 	No co-payments/No co-insurance

	Preventive Care Coverage

	 	100% coverage for routine physicals, immunizations, and other
eligible services as determined by the Plan.

	Prescription Drug Coverage

	 	Covered under Medical Plan

	Annual Deductible

	 	No annual deductible

	Coverage — retail 30-day supply

	 	100% coverage, when network pharmacy is utilized

	Coverage — mail order 90-day supply

	 	100% coverage, when network pharmacy is utilized

	Vision and Hearing Coverage

	 	$500 vision/ $500 per year per plan year per covered individual;
hearing expenses are covered at 100% for exam, hearing aids and
hearing aid repair

	Acupuncture and Acupressure

	 	20 visits (combined) — per person, per plan year

	Chiropractic Care

	 	40 visits per benefit plan year

	Physical Therapy

	 	50 visits per benefit plan year (in and out-of-network combined)

	Speech Therapy

	 	50 visits per benefit plan year (in and out-of-network combined)

	Occupational Therapy

	 	50 visits per benefit plan year (in and out-of-network combined)

	Mental Health Coverage

	 	Mental health is 100% covered (in and out-of-network combined)

	Inpatient treatment must be pre-authorized by Value Options

	 	Unlimited office visits (in and out-of-network); maximum for
substance abuse is three courses of treatment (in- and out-of-network
combined)

	Mental Health Maximums

	 	Combined Lifetime Limits — included in $2 million per person Medical
lifetime maximum

	Health Plan Lifetime Maximums

	 	$2,000,000.00 per covered individual, including mental health benefits

	Dental Plan

	 	Premium PPO Plan administered by Delta Dental

	Annual maximum

	 	$4,000 per person — per benefit plan year

	Coverage

	 	100% coverage, for all eligible plan expenses up to annual maximum

	Annual Deductible

	 	No annual deductible

	Co-payment/Co-insurance

	 	No co-payment/No co-insurance

	 	 	 
	Plan Feature	 	Benefit
	Eligibility

	 	Employee

	Life Insurance Coverage

	 	Company-paid life insurance 3x Annual base salary up to a maximum of
$2 million

	Accidental Death & Dismemberment (AD&D) Coverage

	 	Company-paid accidental death & dismemberment insurance — 6 x Annual
base salary up to a maximum of $1 million

	Long-Term Disability (LTD)

	 	Company-paid basic LTD benefit of 75% of monthly base salary, up to a
maximum monthly benefit of $25,000

	Executive Physicals

	 	$2,000/year allowance for executive physical







Effective July 1, 2008
ERNST & YOUNG	**Ernst & Young LLP** 	      Phone: (305) 358-4111
Suite 3900	www.ey.com

200 South Biscayne Boulevard	

Miami, Florida 33131-5313

	

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

To Lennar Partners, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included herein, that Lennar Partners, Inc. (the Company) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during the year ended December 31, 2003. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the       American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,            on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We      believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our                    examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with             specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion, that the Company complied with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 2003, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 
**Ernst & Young LLP**
February 27, 2004

0402-0515825                                                     A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
Exhibit 99(e)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2003-2 (the receivables) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of December 31, 2003 and for the period March 13, 2003 to December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented, as of December 31, 2003 and for the period March 13, 2003 to December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

February 28, 2004

Chicago, Illinois

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of December 31, 2003 and for the period of March 13, 2003 to December 31, 2003, the servicing of credit card receivables owned by Household Affinity Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2003-2 has been conducted by Household Credit Card Services, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated February 18, 2003, as supplemented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

     /s/ Margaret Sprude                     				

Margaret Sprude						

Chief Financial Officer- 				

Household Credit Card Services					

 

 

February 28, 2004                                 				

Date
STATE EX REL. Francis WINCHESTER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0005

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. MARY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* *103828 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 730 

To define urban rodent control for purposes of clarifying the control of 

nuisance mammals and birds carried out by the Wildlife Services program 

of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and by the private 

sector, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. MULVANEY (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. GUTHRIE, 

Mr. FINCHER, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. HANNA, Mr. KING of 

Iowa, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. 

CAMPBELL, and Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To define urban rodent control for purposes of clarifying 

the control of nuisance mammals and birds carried out 

by the Wildlife Services program of the Animal and 

Plant Health Inspection Service and by the private sector, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pest Elimination Serv5 ices Transparency and Terminology Act’’ or the ‘‘PESTT 

6 Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 730 IH

1 SEC. 2. URBAN RODENT CONTROL DEFINED. 

2 Title I of the Rural Development, Agriculture, and 

3 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1988 (Public Law 

4 100–202; 101 Stat. 1329–331) is amended in the last pro5 viso under the heading ‘‘ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH IN6 SPECTION SERVICE—SALARIES AND EXPENSES’’ (7 U.S.C. 

7 426c), by striking ‘‘Animal Damage Control activities’’ at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘Animal Damage Control activities, 

9 and the term ‘urban rodent control’ means efforts to di10 rectly control any mammal in the order Rodentia in a loca11 tion that is not an airport or in a rural area (as defined 

12 in section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 

13 1490))’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF WILDLIFE SERVICES 

15 PROGRAM OF THE ANIMAL AND PLANT 

16 HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE. 

17 Not later than October 1, 2013, the Comptroller Gen18 eral of the United States shall submit to the Committee 

19 on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the 

20 Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the 

21 Senate a report that— 

22 (1) identifies activities carried out by the Wild23 life Services program of the Animal and Plant 

24 Health Inspection Service that can be carried out by 

25 entities with appropriate expertise and capacity in 

26 the private sector; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 730 IH

1 (2) prioritizes the activities conducted by the 

2 Wildlife Services program that— 

3 (A) are vital to the protection of public 

4 health and safety and agricultural production; 

5 and 

6 (B) can be performed by the entities re7 ferred to in paragraph (1); and 

8 (3) recommends ways, including any necessary 

9 changes to Federal statutes, to avoid duplicative 

10 work being conducted by the Wildlife Services pro11 gram and the private sector. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARYL T. HAYDEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 187 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARYL T. HAYDEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 188 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(15)
              - multimedia_video(12)
              - multimedia_video-149194(12)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)california(37)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - oregon(13)
              - south dakota(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(17)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        July 28, 2016        July Public Lecture — USGS CalVO: It's not just earthquake country!

Presentations and Events        April 28, 2011        PubTalk 4/2011 - Predictable Earthquakes

Presentations and Events        April 27, 2023        PubTalk-04/2023: Gravity Never Sleeps - Landslide Science and Risk Reduction

Presentations and Events        July 30, 2015        PubTalk 7/2015 — The Giant Cascadia Earthquake of January 26, 1700

Presentations and Events        April 23, 2015        PubTalk 04/2015—"Fearfully Grand" Eruptions: Lassen Peak, CA, 1914-17

Presentations and Events        June 30, 2005        PubTalk — Tsunamis

Presentations and Events        October 26, 2017        2017 Oct. Public Lecture — Global Trends in Mineral Commodity Supplies

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Current page            2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6804** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GERALD EUGENE MICHAEL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cr - 00379

- CCE

- 1; 1:14

- cv - 00026

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : September 17, 2015 Decided: September 23, 2015

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Gerald Eugene Michael, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gerald Eugene Michael seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1 ) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

“ reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. ” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies rel ief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently revie wed the record and conclude that Michael has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                               EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United State Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of CNB Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

               (1)  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                    ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
                    requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
                    of 1934; and

               (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Thomas F. Rokisky
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Thomas F. Rokisky
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     May 12, 2003



                                       24