alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00659- CV

T. T., App ellant

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 250 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 13- 0018 03, H ONO RAB LE AMY CLARK MEACH UM, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant T.T. appea ls from the trial court’s order terminating his pare ntal rig hts to his son, T.T. See Tex. Fam. Code §§ 161.001(1)( E), .001(2), .007(a)

. Appellant’s court-a ppointed 1
counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, concluding that the appea l is frivolous

an d wi thout merit. See Anders v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); see also Taylor v. T ex a s Dep’ t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. , 160 S.W .3d 641, 646-4 7 (T ex . App.—Austin 2005,
p e t. d e n ie d ) ( a

p p ly in g A n d e r s p r o c e d u r e in a p p e a l f r o m te r mi n a ti o n o f p a r e n ta l r ig h ts )

. T h e b r ie f me e ts the require ments of Anders by prese nting a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord and demonstrating why there are no arg

uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Taylor , 160 S.W .3d
at 646-47. Appellant was provided with a copy of counsel ’s b ri ef an d wa s advised of his rig ht to examine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed.
Although the termination order also terminated the pare ntal rig hts of the c hild’s mother, 1 she is not a par

ty to this appeal.The pa rties ar e fa

miliar with the fac ts, procedur al history , and applica ble standar ds of revie w. Acc ording ly , we will not rec ite them here

. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. We have revie wed the rec ord and counsel’s brief and ag ree that the appea l is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the rec ord that might arg uably support the appea l. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); Anders , 386 U.S. at 741-44; Taylor , 160 S.W .3d at 646-47. We aff irm the trial court’s order of termination and g rant c ounsel’s motion to withdraw as a ttorney of re cord.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ David Pury ear , J ustice
Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pury ear and Goodwin
Affir med Filed: Mar ch 18, 2015

2
Stephen F. THORNTON, Appellant, v. Beverly A. ROHLFS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-90

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Marianne ALBERGO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATIONS
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  (i)
    
    the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for
the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date: November 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Richard S. ZimanRichard S. ZimanChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Arden Realty, Inc.
Danny WILSON v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-00053-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: August 15, 2018 Closed: October 18, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28808]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neurobiology of Pain and Itch.
    Date: January 6, 2025.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Anne-Sophie Marie Lucie Wattiez, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-4642, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 3, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-28808 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Joseph P. LOPINTO, III, Sheriff of the Parish of Jefferson (as Successor in Office to Harry Lee) and Jefferson Law Enforcement District v. PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. and Swager Communications, Inc.

NO. 2018-CC-1339

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant.
B.D., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kayla H. McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Lovett v. State*, 781 So.2d 466, 467 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; *Price v. State*, 816 So.2d 738, 741 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard W. McCullough                          |   | October 27, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |   |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer               |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                               |   | October 27, 2010 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |

----
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 18, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-751

Lower Tribunal No. 09-12210

________________

Noelia E. Valdes,

Appellant,

vs.

Central Mortgage Company,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John W. 

Thornton, Jr., and Oscar Rodriguez-Fonts, Judges.

Law Offices of Richard G. Chosid, and Richard G. Chosid (Lighthouse 

Point), for appellant.

Brock & Scott, PLLC, and Shaib Y. Rios (Fort Lauderdale), for 

appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arvana Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zahir Dhanani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Zahir Dhanani


Zahir Dhanani


Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2010
STATE EX REL. Joseph HILLIARD, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1413

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 14, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Mary POSS, Wife, Appellant, v. David M. POSS, Sr., Husband, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2472

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 23, 2018

Laura E. Keene of Beroset & Keene, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Kenneth M. Jayne, Pensacola, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wolf and Ray, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-151007) on Form S-3 of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. of our reports dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (signed) KPMG LLP Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 2009
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE**

 

GE Consumer Finance, Inc. (the “Servicer”)hereby certifies as of December 31, 2009 as follows:

 

1.             The undersigned has reviewed, for the period beginningJanuary 1, 2009 and ending December 31, 2009 (the “ReportingPeriod”): (a) the activities of the Servicer as they related to theSubservicing Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2006, between theServicer and General Electric Capital Corporation (the “SubservicingAgreement”) and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the SubservicingAgreement.  The performance by theServicer of its obligations under the Subservicing Agreement has been made bypersons under the direct supervision of the undersigned.

 

2.             To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on myreview of the Servicer’s performance under the Subservicing Agreement, theServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Subservicing Agreementin all material respects for the Reporting Period.

 

This report is deliveredpursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

----

 
|   | GE  CONSUMER FINANCE, INC. |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   | By:                        | /s/  Mark Begor |
|   | Name:  Mark Begor          |
|   | Title: President           |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(40)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - south dakota(7)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(94)
              - (-)2023(40)
              - 2022(15)
              - 2021(10)

staff profilePhilip J. Brown

staff profileMicah Mayle, Ph.D. Candidate

staff profileAnjana K Shah

staff profileMegan Shoda

staff profileJohn Wesley Powell Center 

staff profileDarcy K.  McPhee, PhD.

staff profileKurtis Nelson

staff profileKimberly Casey, Ph.D.

staff profileLaurence G Miller

staff profileRichard Webb

staff profileSandra Eberts

staff profileAlisha Yee Chan

staff profileDavid A Saad

staff profileMatthew Miller

staff profileDiego Pedreros

staff profileClaire R Tiedeman

staff profileJim Reilly

staff profileG Gray Tappan

staff profileSuming Jin, Ph.D.

staff profileMichelle Knuppe

staff profileRoss A. Salerno, Ph.D.

staff profileJoseph Gambogi

staff profileRyan Reker

staff profileCole Krehbiel

staff profileRobert F Stallard

staff profileJohn Barron, Ph.D.

staff profileBrian Sauer

staff profileCharles G Groat

staff profileCaleb L Geister

staff profileRicardo McClees-Funinan

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
Neelam T. UPPAL, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(22)
              - products_data(1)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(32)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(19)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_other_news(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(9)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - north carolina(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

map        January 1, 1987        Investigations of land subsidence and earth fissures near the Salt-Gila aqueduct, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona: Altitudes of the tops of the consolidated rocks, surficial geology, and land subsidence in the Florence quadrangle
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Clarence LEONARD, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 495 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-576, K2025-574.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29735 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Neftali DEJESUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

Neftali DeJesus, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Smith v. State*, 21 So.3d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ("It is well-settled that when a court determines whether an allegation is conclusively refuted by the record, it may rely on the sworn testimony the defendant has given in a plea colloquy. Any allegations that contradict those answers should not be entertained. As long as the defendant's sworn testimony at the plea colloquy is specific enough to refute the allegations made in a post-plea motion, it may form the basis for a determination that the allegation is conclusively refuted by the record.") (citations omitted), *See also* *Alfred v. State*, 71 So.3d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("A defendant is bound by his sworn answers during a plea colloquy ...."); *Terrell v. State*, 9 So.3d 1284, 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("The defendant is [ ] bound by his sworn answers during the colloquy.").
Darryll MACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1964

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

Darryll Mack, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Randy ANDERSON

NO. 2017-KO-1913

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.

CRICHTON, J., recused.