alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1


 





 


CURRENT DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION PROGRAM


As of May 7,
2008


 


1.               Annual Retainer:  $90,000
- Paid in quarterly installments in arrears at the end of each quarter in cash
or, if the director so elects, in deferred stock units to be distributed at a
later date designated by the director.


 


2.               Annual Deferred Stock Award: 
$145,000 – Awarded to incumbent directors, who are nominated for
re-election at the next shareholders’ meeting in May, on the day the
Compensation Committee grants equity awards to management in early February on
the closing price per share of this Corporation’s common stock on the date the
Compensation Committee approves the awards in the form of deferred stock units
(with vesting of such deferred stock units to occur on the first anniversary of
the annual meeting occurring in the year of grant) and which are distributed
either in a lump sum six months after termination of service as a director or,
if the director so elects, in annual installments beginning at least six months
following termination of service as a director.


 


3.               Committee Chair Fees: 
Currently, the annual amount of committee chair fees, which are paid
quarterly in arrears, are as follows: 
Audit (currently John Dasburg) - $25,000, Compensation (currently Larry
Graev) - $20,000, Nominating and Governance (currently Glen Nelson) - $20,000, Investment
and Capital Markets (currently Blythe McGarvie) - $20,000 and Risk (currently
Tom Hodgson) - $20,000.


 


4.               Lead Director:  
Effective November 2, 2006, the Board established the position of Lead
Director of the Board and agreed that the Lead Director (currently John
Dasburg) will be paid $25,000 per year (payable in arrears in quarterly
installments as of the last business day of each quarter).
Exhibit 31.1


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
-----------------------------------------

I, Michael D. Durham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ADA-ES, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer 's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer 's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer 's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer 's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer 's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer 's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2006





/s/ Michael D. Durham
-----------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President and CEO
Francisco X. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. Maria Guadalupe VALERIO and Antonio Ortega, Appellees.

No. 3D17-1731

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2018

Yinet Pino P.A., and Yinet Pino, Miami; A. Fiallo Law Office, and Arnaldo Fiallo, for appellant.

Cristobal D. Padron & Assoc. P.A., and Cristobal D. Padron, Hialeah, for appellees.

Before SALTER, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.

*ON MOTION FOR REHEARING*

LOGUE, J.

Upon consideration of Appellant Francisco X. Martinez's Motion for Rehearing, we withdraw this Court's opinion issued June 27, 2018, based on the Supreme Court of Florida's opinion in *Simmonds v. Perkins*, 247 So.3d 397 (Fla. 2018), and substitute the following opinion in its stead.1

*520Appellant sought review of the entry of an order dismissing his paternity petition under *Tijerino v. Estrella*, 843 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) ("A putative father does not have standing to seek to establish paternity of a child, where the child was born into an intact marriage, and where the married woman and her husband object to the paternity action."), without first conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he had standing to maintain the petition. This Court affirmed.

In *Simmonds*, the Supreme Court of Florida disapproved *Tijerino* and unequivocally opined that "the presumption of legitimacy is rebuttable," and "does not bar an action to prove paternity at the outset." *Simmonds*, 247 So.3d at 403. Rather, to maintain a paternity petition where the presumption of legitimacy is in question, one must establish standing to bring the action; meaning "the biological father of a married woman's children has the right to bring an action to establish his parental rights as the father as long as he has 'manifested a substantial and continuing concern for the welfare of the children.' " *Id.* at 401, 402 (quoting *Kendrick v. Everheart*, 390 So.2d 53, 61 (Fla. 1980) ).

Accordingly, we withdraw this Court's opinion issued June 27, 2018, grant Appellant's Motion for Rehearing, and reverse and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

1

The Supreme Court of Florida's opinion in *Simmonds* issued on June 28, 2018. On July 2, 2018, this Court issued an order directing the parties to address the impact of *Simmonds*. Appellees Maria Guadalupe Valerio and Antonio Ortega filed a Confession of Error in response.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crops

Filters

              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(11)
              - alaska(19)
              - arizona(24)
              - arkansas(15)
              - california(62)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(5)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(16)
              - idaho(9)
              - illinois(7)
              - indiana(14)
              - iowa(19)
              - kansas(13)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(8)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(19)
              - massachusetts(5)
              - michigan(11)
              - minnesota(12)
              - mississippi(16)
              - missouri(10)
              - montana(10)
              - nebraska(21)
              - nevada(6)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - (-)north carolina(5)
              - north dakota(21)
              - ohio(5)
              - oklahoma(15)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(49)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(20)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(13)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1994        Effects of agricultural land-management practices on water quality in northeastern Guilford County, North Carolina, 1985-90

publication        January 1, 1991        Effects of land-management practices on sediment yields in northeastern Guilford County, North Carolina

publication        January 1, 1979        Winter feeding habits of quail in longleaf-slash pine habitat

publication        January 1, 2011        Overview and status of the witchweed (striga asiatica) eradication program in the Carolinas

Infographics        October 21, 2022        Charlotte and Monroe, North Carolina
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Arends, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marchex, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



|                      |  |        |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2011 |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICHAEL A.
ARENDS
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Michael A. Arends       
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-13824) and the relatedProspectus, and on Form S-8 (No. 333-122665) pertaining to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 General Stock Incentive Plan of MediciNova, Inc,, of our reports dated February 9, 2007 with respect to (1) the consolidated financial statements ofMediciNova, Inc., and (2) MediciNova Inc.’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MediciNova, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

February 14, 2007
V.P., Father of T.P. and M.P., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3583

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

Lara A. Mason of Mason Law Firm, P.A., Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellant.

Ward Metzger, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Joanna Summers Brunell and Thomasina F. Moore, Guardian Ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 04-2605 TRY ANG AND SOKUNTHEA MEAN, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on December 1, 2005 is corrected as follows: On page 11, line 19, change "2002" to "2000"
Danny LAROCCO, DOC #T85761, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4945

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**Certification of the Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18of the United States Code**

 

The undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of Axcelis Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation,hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 oftitle 18 of the United States Code (as implemented by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) as follows:

 

This Form 10-Qquarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andthe information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certification as of May 12, 2010.

 
|     | /s/ STEPHEN G. BASSETT                                                                     |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                       |
|     | Stephen G. Bassett                                                                         |
| * * | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of Axcelis Technologies, Inc.* |

 

1

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        October 12, 2023        USGS partners with six states to map critical mineral potential with cutting-edge data
Exhibit 35.3



ANNUAL COMPLIANCE
CERTIFICATE



GE Capital Retail Bank (the “Servicer”)
hereby certifies as of December 31, 2013 as follows:



| | 1. | The undersigned has reviewed, for the period beginning January 1, 2013 and ending December 31, 2013 (the “Reporting
Period”): (a) the activities of the Servicer as they related to the Sub-Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2008
(as amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Servicing Agreement”), between the Servicer and General
Electric Capital Corporation and (b) the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement. Such review of the activities
of the Servicer and the performance by the Servicer of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement has been made by persons under
the direct supervision of the undersigned.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Servicing Agreement,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects for the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This report is delivered pursuant
to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.











| | GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK          
| | --------------------------------
| |                                 
| | By:                             
| | Name:   Michael Lagnese         
| | Title:     Senior Vice President
Exhibit 99.2  -  Management Assertion as to compliance with minimum
		 servicing standards for the year ended December 31, 2005


Wachovia Corporation
NCO572
201 South Coflege Street, 17th Floor
Charlotte Plaza Building
Charlotte, NC 28244


					WACHOVIA



		Management Assertion


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Wachovia Bank, National
Association (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers, relating to its servicing of asset securitizations, pursuant to
the respective Servicing Agreements for the Wachovia Asset Securitization
Inc. (WASI) Trust 2003 HE-1 (the Trust), except for minimum servicing
standards I.2, I.4, III.3, III.4, III.6, V.3. and V.4, which are
inapplicable to the servicing of the WASI Trust. As of and for this
same period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $25 million,
respectively.

/s/  John Gordon			3/15/06
Asset Backed Services			Date
John Gordon

/s/  Walter Davis			3/15/06
Retail Credit Products and Businesses	Date
Walter Davis
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)colorado(2)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(2)

staff profileSharon K Taylor, DVM, PhD

staff profileHeidi Leathers-Miller
David Michael FUNKEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
M.S.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. In the Interest of: K.A.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3486

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The Appellee's motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely is granted, and this appeal is dismissed.

KHOUZAM, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 35.3**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE**

 

General Electric Capital Corporation (the “Servicer”)hereby certifies as of December 31, 2007 as follows:

 

1.                                       The undersigned has reviewed, for theperiod beginning January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2007 (the “ReportingPeriod”): (a) the activities of the Servicer as they related to theAmended and Restated Service Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2006, betweenthe Servicer and GE Money Bank (the “Agreement”) and (b) theServicer’s performance under the Agreement. The performance by the Servicer of its obligations under the Agreementhas been made by persons under the direct supervision of the undersigned.

 

2.                                       To the best knowledge of the undersigned,based on my review of the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement, theServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects for the Reporting Period.

 

This report is deliveredpursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 
|   | GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL  CORPORATION |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |   |
|   | By:                                   | /s/ Robert Green |   |
|   | Name:                                 | Robert Green |
|   | Title:                                | Vice President |
|        |                                       |  |  |  |

 

 

----
Jackie Joseph NICHOLAS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1907

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:      November 24, 2009   |   |  By: /s/ Karim      Menassa                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |   |  Name: Karim      Menassa                                                                                                         |
|                                            |   |  Title: President      and Principal Executive Officer and Interim Secretary and      Principal Accounting Officer |
July
      9,
      2007

    


    


    


    Bill
      Glaser

    uKarma
      Corporation

    520
      Broadway, Suite 350

    Santa
      Monica, CA 90401

    


    RE:
      Amendment
      to Option Agreement dated January 17, 2005

    


    Dear
      Bill:

    


    Reference
      is made to the Option Agreement (the “Option”) between us dated January 17, 2005
      relating to 3 million shares of uKarma Corporation owned by me (the “Shares”).
      This confirms our agreement that Section 1 of the Option is amended so that
      the
      purchase price is changed from $.20 per share to One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)
      in the aggregate for all of the Shares.

    


    Except
      as
      amended above, all of the other terms and conditions of the Option shall remain
      in full force and effect.

     

    
      	
              Very
                truly yours,

            	 
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	 	 
	
              
Fred
              Tannous
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the annual report of SR Telecom Inc., a corporation existing under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the "Company"), on Form 20-F
for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David L. Adams, Sr. Vice-President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

|/s/DAVID L. ADAMSDavid L. Adams
Sr. Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                        | 

April
21, 2004

1

---