alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tommie MCCLENNEY Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1811

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Anthony HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3517

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 1, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 6, 2018

Anthony Houston, Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(5)
              - colorado(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - hawaii(19)
              - idaho(8)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - kentucky(2)
              - maine(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(9)
              - nevada(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(28)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(18)

## By Year

Center News        January 25, 2023        Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds geologic mapping in South Carolina
99.1

Fairbanks Capital Corp.

Agreement:  See Schedule of Agreements

Dated:  See Attached Schedule

Annual Statement as to Compliance

In accordance with the applicable section in each of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreements specified:

i. a review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended
      December 31, 2003 and of performance under this Agreement has been
      made under such officers' supervision; and
ii. To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review,
      the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this
      Agreement throughout such year.

February 6, 2004

BY: /s/: Matt Hollingsworth
Matt Hollingsworth
Chief Operating Officer
Fairbanks Capital Corp.



3815 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, UTAH  84115-4412
P.O. Box 65250, Salt Lake City, UTAH 84165-0250
Telephone (801) 293-1883, Facsimile (801) 293-1297




Schedule of Agreements

Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Fairbanks Capital
Corp., as Servicer, CDC Mortgage Capital Inc., as Unaffiliated Seller,
and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee - Pooling and
Servicing Agreement - CDC Mortgage Capital Trust 2002-HE3
11/01/2002

Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Fairbanks Capital
Corp., as Servicer, CDC Mortgage Capital Inc., as Unaffiliated Seller,
and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee - Pooling and
Servicing Agreement - CDC Mortgage Capital Trust 2003-HE1
03/01/2003
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merci, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September  30, 2007 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: August 19, 2008 /s/ Jose Acevedo Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(3)
              - (-)2023(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - 2021(2)
              - 2020(1)
              - 2019(2)

staff profileCharles Walker, Ph.D.
Lamark Dewayne ROWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
TERRANCE LAMAR JACKSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF I F FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1406

Opinion filed August 24, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original
Jurisdiction

.

Terrance Lamar Jackson, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinb erg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

LEWIS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40102

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

LYNNSEY DAWN CUMMINGS ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 693

Filed: October 2, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction

, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
Lynnsey Dawn Cummings pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent

to deliver (methamphetamine) , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(a)(1)(A) . The district court sentenced
Cummings to a unified term of eight years, with three years determinate

, and retained
jurisdiction. After Cummings completed a p eriod of retained jurisdiction, upon recommendation
of program staff at the South Boise Women’s Correctional Center, the district court relinquished
jurisdic tion and executed the underlying sentence. Cummings filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35
motion for reduction of her sentence, which the district court denied. Cummings now appeals,
contending the district court abused its discretion by relinquishing jurisdic tion.
We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to
relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district2 court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102
Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594,

596

- 97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered

the information before it and deter mined that probation was not appropriate. Cummings has
failed to show that the district court abused its discretion, and we therefore affirm the order
relinquishing jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Richard J. DeVries, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc. and Mark D. Wolfe, Interim Chief
Financial Officer of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
          which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
          period ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc..
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 13, 2005

| |  | /s/ Richard J. DeVries
Richard J. DeVriesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Mark D. Wolfe
Mark D. WolfeInterim Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Alan CLAYCOMB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2803

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 4, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 102182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29823]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 899 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-625, K2025-624.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29823 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Mayra HERRERA, Appellant, v. Louis LIONELLI, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Alan Jay Braverman and Jillian Kratish of the Law Offices of Alan Jay Braverman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Troy William Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020243EN.01001701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/17 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9867 – Allianz/BBVA Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 243/09)

1.

On 15 July 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020243EN.01001701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Allianz SE (‘Allianz’, Germany), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | BBVA Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A. (‘BASR’, Spain), controlled by BBVA Seguros S.A., de Seguros y Reaseguros (‘BBVA’, Spain). |

Allianz acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of BASR.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Allianz: The Allianz group is a global financial services provider active predominantly in relation to life and non-life insurance and asset management, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for BASR: The non-life (and non-health) general insurance business of BBVA in Spain and the existing household insurance line of BBVA in Portugal. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020243EN.01001701-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9867 – Allianz/BBVA Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020243EN.01001701-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020243EN.01001701-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
German E. DELATORRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-872

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018

German E. Delatorre, Okeechobee, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5612 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Marine Lance 

Corporal Squire ‘Skip’ Wells Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2016 

Mr. TOM PRICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP

of Georgia, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. LEWIS, 

Mr. WOODALL, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, 

Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, and Mr. GRAVES of Georgia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, 

as the ‘‘Marine Lance Corporal Squire ‘Skip’ Wells Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARINE LANCE CORPORAL SQUIRE ‘‘SKIP’’ 

4 WELLS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5612 IH

1 Marietta, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Marine Lance Corporal Squire ‘Skip’ Wells Post Office 

3 Building’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

7 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marine Lance Cor8 poral Squire ‘Skip’ Wells Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Just i ces

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

d1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

138792

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138792 COA: 289324 Oakland CC: 2002-183849-FC NORMAN EDWARD FOX, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders

and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 7/2/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES ALTON FORD, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 95-6366

(D. Ct. No. CIV-95-894-C)

(W. D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court dismissing pro se petitioner’s

petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner

appeals on the ground that the district court erred in refusing to grant the writ of habeas

corpus under the circumstances of this case. We decline a certificate of appealability.
- 2 -

Petitioner’s claims for post-conviction relief all relate to his alleged right to have

his federal sentence run concurrently with state sentences and related alleged right to be

incarcerated in a federal facility. None of these claims challenge the validity of the

federal detainer that has been placed on defendant. We therefore agree with the district

court that petitioner is not entitled to relief and that the petition for a writ of habeas

corpus was properly denied. Under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), we are required to examine the appeal

of the denial of a petition for habeas corpus to determine whether it alleges sufficient

denial of constitutional rights. This petition for a writ of habeas corpus clearly does not

sufficiently allege any denial of a constitutional right. Lennox v. Evans, No. 96-6041,

1996 WL 343632 (10th Cir. 1996). We therefore decline the certificate of appealability. 

Appeal DISMISSED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
Unassociated Document

 

    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    


    Description
      of Board Fees

    


    Non-employee
      directors receive $1,000 for each Board meeting attended, $1,000 for each
      committee meeting attended, $500 for each board meeting of the Company’s
      subsidiary, Mariner Finance, LLC, attended, and $250 for each meeting of First
      Mariner Bank’s Loan Committee attended. The members of the Audit Committee
      receive $2,000 for each Audit Committee attended. Directors also receive a
      yearly grant of stock options to purchase 500 shares of common stock and are
      granted stock options to purchase 100 shares of common stock for each committee
      meeting they attend.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate

                          -----------------------------
                                February 21, 2006



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

               PREFERREDPLUS,PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Thomas J. Bogert, the Vice President-Manager of The Bank of New
York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such capacity
that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all material
respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the "Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities
Intermediary for each series of trust certificates listed in the attached
schedule.




                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BANK OF NEW YORK


                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bogert
                                        ------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas J. Bogert
                                    Title: Vice President


<PAGE>


                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series TWC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CMT-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCNA-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1
PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3
INDEXPLUS Trust 2003-1



                                       2