```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 102016-102019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29620]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 102016]]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2024-2661; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00269-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 
2015-02-14, which applies to all Airbus SAS Model A318 series 
airplanes; A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 
airplanes; A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and 
A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. AD 
2015-02-14 requires repetitive inspections for cracking, damage, 
correct installation, and correct adjustment of the main landing gear 
(MLG) door hinge and actuator fittings on the keel beam, corrective 
actions if necessary, and revision of the existing maintenance or 
inspection program, as applicable. Since the FAA issued AD 2015-02-14, 
a new design of the MLG door keel beam hinge and actuator fitting was 
developed. This proposed AD would continue to require the actions 
specified in AD 2015-02-14, add an optional terminating action, and 
revise the applicability, as specified in a European Union Aviation 
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by 
reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe 
condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 31, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow 
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2024-2661; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The 
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For EASA material identified in this proposed AD, contact 
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 
8999 000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may 
find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
     You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 206-231-3195.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dowling, Aviation Safety Engineer, 
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-
231-3667; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed 
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2024-2661; 
Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00269-T'' at the beginning of your 
comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the 
proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include 
supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the 
closing date and may amend the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in 
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to 
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The 
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal 
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily 
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public 
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial 
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that 
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to 
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted 
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing 
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as 
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public 
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Tim 
Dowling, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-231-3667; email: 
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which 
is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public 
docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA issued AD 2015-02-14, Amendment 39-18081 (80 FR 11096, 
March 2, 2015) (AD 2015-02-14), for all Airbus SAS Model A318 series 
airplanes; A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 
airplanes; A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and 
A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 series 
airplanes. AD 2015-02-14 was prompted by MCAI originated by the 
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Union. EASA issued AD 2012-
0118, dated July 4, 2012 (EASA AD 2012-0118) (which corresponds to FAA 
AD

[[Page 102017]]

2015-02-14), to correct an unsafe condition.
    AD 2015-02-14 requires repetitive inspections for cracking, damage, 
correct installation, and correct adjustment of the main landing gear 
(MLG) door hinge and actuator fittings on the keel beam; corrective 
actions if necessary; and revision of the existing maintenance or 
inspection program, as applicable. The FAA issued AD 2015-02-14 to 
detect and correct cracking on the MLG door hinge fitting and actuator 
fitting on the keel beam, which could lead to in-flight detachment of 
an MLG door, possibly resulting in injury to persons on the ground and/
or damage to the airplane.

Actions Since AD 2015-02-14 Was Issued

    Since the FAA issued AD 2015-02-14, EASA superseded AD 2012-0118, 
dated July 4, 2012, and issued EASA AD 2024-0097R2, dated July 12, 2024 
(EASA AD 2024-0097R2) (referred to after this as the MCAI) to correct 
an unsafe condition on certain Airbus SAS Model A318-111, -112, -121, -
122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, -
133, -151N, -153N, and -171N airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -
215, -216, -231, -232, -233, -251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, and -
273N airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, 
-232, -251N, -251NX, -252N, -252NX, -253N, -253NX, -271N, -271NX, -
272N, and -272NX airplanes. Model A320-215 airplanes are not 
certificated by the FAA and are not included on the U.S. type 
certificate data sheet; this proposed AD therefore does not include 
those airplanes in the applicability.
    The MCAI states that Airbus SAS Model A318-111, A318-112, A318-121, 
A318-122; Model A319-111, A319-112, A319-113, A319-114, A319-115, A319-
131, A319-132, A319-133; Model A320-211, A320-212, A320-214, A320-215, 
A320-216, A320-231, A320-232, A320-233; Model A321-111, A321-112, A321-
131, A321-211, A321-212, A321-213, A321-231, and A321-232 airplanes are 
commercially known as current engine option (CEO) airplanes.
    The MCAI states that Airbus SAS Model A319-151N, A319-153N, A319-
171N; Model A320-251N, A320-252N, A320-253N, A320-271N, A320-272N, 
A320-273N; Model A321-251N, A321-251NX, A321-252N, A321-252NX, A321-
253N, A321-253NX, A321-271N, A321-271NX, A321-272N, and A321-272NX 
airplanes are commercially known as new engine option (NEO) airplanes.
    The MCAI states that after EASA AD 2012-0118 was issued, a new 
design of the MLG door keel beam hinge and actuator fitting was 
certified for in-service embodiment through Airbus mod 165315 for CEO 
airplanes. The MCAI states that the applicability is expanded to 
include the NEO airplanes, which are subject to the same unsafe 
condition.
    The FAA is proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking on the 
MLG door hinge fitting and actuator fitting on the keel beam, which 
could lead to in-flight detachment of an MLG door, possibly resulting 
in injury to persons on the ground and/or damage to the airplane.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2024-2661.

Explanation of Retained Requirements

    Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the 
requirements of AD 2015-02-14, this proposed AD would retain all the 
requirements of AD 2015-02-14. Those requirements are referenced in 
EASA AD 2024-0097R2, which, in turn, is referenced in paragraph (g) of 
this proposed AD. Paragraph (i) of this proposed AD does restate the 
requirement of paragraph (k) of AD 2015-02-14, as EASA AD 2024-0097R2 
only cancels Task 533154-02-1 of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS 
Part 2-Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitations Items (DT ALI), 
Revision 01, dated April 4, 2012; Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 
Airworthiness Limitation Items, Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 
10, dated October 2009; or Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness 
Limitation Items, Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 11, dated 
September 2010. However, it does not require removal from the 
maintenance or inspection program for certain airplanes. This proposed 
AD would require removal of this task.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2024-0097R2 specifies procedures for repetitive detailed 
visual, high frequency eddy current (HFEC), and ultrasonic inspections 
of the MLG door actuator fittings on the keel beam. Corrective actions 
include replacement of the affected MLG door actuator fitting, and 
repair of the bush migration, the wear marks underneath bolt head, and 
other damages on left and right sides of the airplane.
    EASA AD 2024-0097R2 specifies procedures for repetitive detailed 
visual and HFEC inspections of the MLG door hinge fittings on the keel 
beam. Corrective actions include replacement of the MLG door hinge 
fitting, and repair of the bush migration, wear marks underneath bolt 
head, and other damages left and right sides of the airplane.
    EASA AD 2024-0097R2 also specifies procedures for modifying the 
actuator and hinge fittings at the MLG door for the following parts: 
MLG actuator fittings, hinge fittings, and connecting plates between 
Frame (FR) 42 and FR 43; accomplishment of this modification terminates 
the repetitive inspections.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested 
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by 
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to 
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it 
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and 
material referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after 
determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to 
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2015-02-14, 
add an optional terminating action, and revise the applicability by 
adding NEO airplanes and removing airplanes with a certain 
modification. This proposed AD would also require accomplishing the 
actions specified in the material described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would 
affect 1,766 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed 
AD:

[[Page 102018]]

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                  Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost           Parts cost     Cost per product       operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections....................  20 work-hours x $85 per              $0   $1,700, per         $3,002,200, per
                                  hour = $1,700, per                        inspection cycle.   inspection
                                  inspection cycle.                                             cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      Estimated Costs for Optional Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Cost per
                  Action                                Labor cost                 Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modify the actuator and hinge fittings at   82 work-hours x $85 per hour =             $52,000          $58,970
 MLG door.                                   $6,970.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any fitting replacement 
that would be required based on the results of any required actions. 
The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft that might 
need a fitting replacement:

                 Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
38 work-hours x $85 per hour = $3,230.          $6,742           $9,972
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost 
estimates for the repairs specified in this proposed AD.
    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this 
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost 
impact on affected individuals. The FAA does not control warranty 
coverage for affected individuals. As a result, the FAA has included 
all known costs in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2015-02-14, Amendment 39-18081 
(80 FR 11096, March 2, 2015); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2024-2661; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-
00269-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive 
(AD) by January 31, 2025.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2015-02-14, Amendment 39-18081 (80 FR 11096, 
March 2, 2015) (AD 2015-02-14).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes identified in 
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD, certificated in any 
category, as identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency 
(EASA) AD 2024-0097R2, dated July 12, 2024 (EASA AD 2024-0097R2).
    (1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
    (2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 
airplanes.
    (3) Model A319-151N, -153N, and -171N airplanes.
    (4) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 
airplanes.
    (5) Model A320-251N, -252N, -253N, -271N, -272N, and -273N 
airplanes.
    (6) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 
airplanes.
    (7) Model A321-251N, -251NX, -252N, -252NX, -253N, -253NX, -
271N, -271NX, -272N, and -272NX airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks on the main landing 
gear (MLG) door hinge

[[Page 102019]]

fitting and actuator fitting on the keel beam. The FAA is issuing 
this AD to detect and correct cracking on the MLG door hinge fitting 
and actuator fitting on the keel beam. The unsafe condition, if not 
addressed, could lead to in-flight detachment of an MLG door, 
possibly resulting in injury to persons on the ground and/or damage 
to the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (j) of this AD: Comply 
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in 
accordance with, EASA AD 2024-0097R2.

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024-0097R2

    (1) Where EASA AD 2024-0097R2 refers to ``16 May 2024 [the 
effective date of the original issue of this AD],'' this AD requires 
using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where EASA AD 2024-0097R2 refers to ``18 July 2012 [the 
effective date of EASA AD 2012-0118],'' this AD requires using April 
6, 2015 (the effective date of AD 2015-02-14).
    (3) Where EASA AD 2024-0097R2 specifies to ``contact Airbus for 
approved repair instructions and, within the compliance time 
specified therein, accomplish those instructions accordingly,'' 
replace that text with ``all repairs must be done before further 
flight using a method approved by the Manager, International 
Validation Branch, FAA; or the European Union Aviation Safety Agency 
(EASA); or SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If 
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized 
signature.''
    (4) Where paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2024-0097R2 describes an 
airplane that has been inspected per ``ALI task 533154-03-2, 533154-
04-2 or 533154-10-1, or in accordance with the instructions of 
inspection SB 1 (at any Revision) or inspection SB 2 (at any 
Revision),'' replace that text with ``ALI task 533154-03-2, 533154-
04-2 or 533154-10-1, or in accordance with the instructions of 
Airbus SB A320-53-1195 or SB A320-53-1325 at any Revision, as 
applicable, or Airbus SB A320-53-1196 or SB A320-53-1326 at any 
Revision, as applicable.''
    (5) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 
2024-0097R2.

(i) Retained Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision, With Added 
Airplanes and Compliance Time

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD 
2015-02-14 with added airplanes and compliance time. At the 
applicable time specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (2) of this AD: 
Revise the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to 
remove Task 533154-02-1 of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 
2-Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitations Items (DT ALI), Revision 
01, dated April 4, 2012; Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness 
Limitation Items, Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 10, dated 
October 2009; or Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitation 
Items, Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 11, dated September 
2010. The actions required by this AD take precedence over Task 
533154-02-1 of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALS Part 2-Damage 
Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT ALI), Revision 01, dated 
April 4, 2012; Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitation 
Items, Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 10, dated October 2009; 
and Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitation Items, 
Document AI/SE-M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 11, dated September 2010.
    (1) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (2), (4), and 
(6) of this AD: After the effective date of AD 2015-02-14 and before 
further flight after doing the initial inspections required by 
paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(3), (5), and (7) 
of this AD: After the effective date of this AD and before further 
flight after doing the initial inspections required by paragraph (g) 
of this AD.

(j) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the material referenced in EASA AD 2024-0097R2 
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD 
does not include that requirement.

(k) Additional AD Provisions

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve 
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as 
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the 
International Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the 
person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD and email to: 
[email protected].
    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2015-02-14 are approved as 
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of EASA AD 2012-0118 that are 
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International 
Validation Branch, FAA; or the European Union Aviation Safety Agency 
(EASA); or Airbus SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If 
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized 
signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by 
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, if any material contains procedures or 
tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be 
done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not 
identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that 
are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods 
in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program 
without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and 
tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back 
in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to 
procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(l) Additional Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Tim Dowling, 
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-231-3667; email: 
[email protected].

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the material listed in this 
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following material was approved for IBR on [DATE 35 DAYS 
AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL RULE].
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2024-0097R2, 
dated July 12, 2024.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) For EASA AD 2024-0097R2 identified in this AD, contact EASA, 
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 
8999 000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may 
find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (5) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., 
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material 
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
    (6) You may view this material at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability 
of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected].

    Issued on December 11, 2024.
Suzanne Masterson,
Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-29620 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```