alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Motive, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Scott L. Harmon, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Paul M. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ SCOTT L. HARMON    
|Scott L. Harmon        
|Chief Executive Officer



November 5, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ PAUL M. BAKER      
|Paul M. Baker          
|Chief Financial Officer



November 5, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the Report.
**Exhibit 15.3**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Joint Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Nos.333-139459 and 333-139459-01) of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. — PETROBRAS and Petrobras InternationalFinance Company — PIFCo of our reports dated February 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of PETROBRAS and its subsidiaries and the consolidated financial statements ofPIFCo and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and for the two years in the period endedDecember 31, 2005, included in this Joint Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December31, 2006.                                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young   Auditores Independentes S/S      Rio de Janeiro, RJ — Brazil
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of G2 Companies,  Inc., on Form 10-Q for
the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Yarek Bartosz,  Chief Executive
Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Yarek Bartosz
-----------------
Yarek Bartosz

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
January 15, 2004
Linell FEAGIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1795

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6449

ARTHUR FOSTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER,

Attorney General for South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (6:05-cv-00620-GRA)

Submitted: September 20, 2006 Decided: October 17, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Foster seeks to appeal the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and finding that equitable

tolling was not warranted. This order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Foster has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL, LLC and Rubicon, LLC v. PRAXAIR, INC.

No. 2018-CC-1532

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM

Writ granted. Considering the unique circumstances presented, it is ordered that the trial judge be recused. The case is remanded to the district court for random re-allotment of the case to another judge.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket

CRICHTON, J., would deny.
Derrick GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018

Derrick Graham, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kurt Bordian, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

| | By:    | /s/ Kurt Bordian       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 13, 2009      
| |        |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-20-00067-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: D-1-GN-19-003751

Style: Kim Coogan

v. Office of the Attorney General

Date motion filed*: December 4, 2020

Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw

Party filing motion: Adam Arthur Biggs

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sarah Beth Landau 

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Lloyd, and Landau

Date: December 10, 2020
#### S. M. MASTERS, an Individual Trading as S. M. Masters Lumber Company, Appellant, v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation.

No. 14685.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

May 12, 1953.

David F. Crossen, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Leahy & Leahy and Fred J. L. Schuler, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.
Bandy B. PEOPLES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4119

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 07, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
V.M., The Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Report of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) DIEPHOLZ


K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Dated: November  11,  2009


/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”)  DIEPHOLZ

K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November  11,  2009


/s/ Charles Smith

Charles Smith
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November  11,  2009


/s/ Charles Smith

Charles Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Dated: November  11,  2009




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NIKHIL JHAVERI, an individual and

ELA JHAVERI, an individual,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-56201

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-04426-MWFPLA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 9, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Nikhil Jhaveri and Ela Jhaveri seek review of the district court’s

order granting appellee ADT Security Services, Inc.’s motion for judgment on the

pleadings. Plaintiffs allege that the district court failed to consider relevant state

law precedent, and erred in not granting plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. 

FILED

JUL 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
-2-

We review the district court’s order de novo. We affirm in part, reverse and

remand.

In granting ADT’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, the district court

found that plaintiffs alleged a breach only of ADT’s contractual duties, and did not

demonstrate that ADT breached a duty arising outside the parties’ agreement. We

agree with the district court that, to the extent plaintiffs seek a remedy for a breach

of contract, that remedy is limited to the liquidated damages provision in the

parties’ agreements. However, reading the complaint in the light most favorable to

the plaintiffs, they allege negligence independent of the contract, just as a patient

can sue a doctor for negligence even though the patient and doctor also have a

contractual relationship. See Erlich v. Menezes, 21 Cal.4th 543, 551 (1999). 

Even if plaintiffs’ original complaint had not alleged a duty independent of

the contract, plaintiffs sought leave to amend their complaint. We agree with the

plaintiffs that the district court erred in denying this request. A district court

should grant leave to amend even if no request to amend the pleading was made,

unless it determines that the pleading could not possibly be cured by the allegation

of other facts. Lacey v. Maricopa County., 693 F.3d 896, 926 (9th Cir. 2012). 

Plaintiffs claim that their proposed amendments allege that ADT violated a duty

independent of the parties’ contract, such as the exercise of reasonable care in
-3-

hiring. We make no determination that plaintiffs’ proposed amendments would

pass muster under Rule 12(b)(6) or survive a motion for summary judgment. We

hold only that, under the particular circumstances of this case, plaintiffs’ proposed

amended complaint is not frivolous and that leave to amend should have been

granted.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael F. Emerson Chief Executive Officer of visionGATEWAY, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors:

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Dated:  October 19, 2006


/s/ Michael F. Emerson
------------------------------------------
Michael F. Emerson.
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Rochelle DRIESSEN, Appellant, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1191

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018

Rochelle Driessen, in proper person.

Walter J. Harvey, Miami-Dade County School Board Attorney, and Mary C. Lawson, Assistant Miami-Dade County School Board Attorney, for appellee The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Before SALTER, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption

                    On December 20, 2017, by Executive Order 13818, the President declared a national emergency with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world and, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*), took related steps to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.                

The prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on December 20, 2017, must continue in effect beyond December 20, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2024-29593

Billing code 3395-F4-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Wednesday, December 18, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. (ET).

PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. The Commission will consider whether to approve the 2025 Final 
Budget and Accounting Support Fee for the Public Company Accounting 
Oversight Board

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: December 11, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-29635 Filed 12-12-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Andre MCPHERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3507

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 13, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Carol J. Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, CRENSHAW, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1   SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (Chief Executive Officer)   I, Robert M. Howe III, President and Chief Executive Officer of eTelcharge.com (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: November 14, 2008 /s/ Robert M. Howe III Robert M. Howe III President and Chief Executive Officer     This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Exhibit 32.2    SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (Chief Financial Officer)   I, Robyn Priest, Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of eTelcharge.com (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: November 14, 2008 /s/ Robyn Priest Robyn Priest Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer     This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.