alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
-----------------------------------------

I, Michael D. Durham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment #1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB of
ADA-ES, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer 's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer 's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer 's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer 's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: July 25, 2006

/s/ Michael D. Durham
-----------------------
Name: Michael D. Durham
Title: President and CEO
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I,William J. Fox, certifythat:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of Lehman ABS Corporation, on behalf of Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,Ford Motor Company Note-Backed Series 2003-6 Trust****(the“Trust”);

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, the information in thesereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicinginformation required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports isincluded in these reports; and

 

4.     I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing, orsimilar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance reviewrequired under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, theDepositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust NationalAssociation, as Trustee.

 

Date: March 31, 2010

 

 
| By:    | /s/ William J. Fox           |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | William J. Fox               |
| Title: | Chief Financial  Officer and |
|   | Executive Vice  President    |

 

1

----
Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David R. SLANTON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2985

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Mirtha MORALES, Appellant, v. MERFE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellee.

No. 3D18-650

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sharmon TRAWICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2468

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - utah(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        May 18, 2015        Atmospheric Release of BPA May Reach Nearby Waterways

National News Release        October 17, 2016        Where Does it Go? New Method Evaluates Fate of Methane Released into Streams

Infographics        March 19, 2024        PFAS Fate Transport Diagram

Infographics        October 1, 2023        #ClimateCryptids: Bigfoot

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - Spanish version

Infographics        November 15, 2022        Ox Bel Ha Infographic - English Version

National News Release        July 8, 2014        USGS Release: Large Rivers in U.S. are Becoming Less Acidic

National News Release        March 11, 2014        Amazon Carbon Dynamics: Understanding the Photosynthesis-Climate Link

National News Release        February 26, 2024        USGS provides easy access to Colorado River science with new online portal
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41067 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JESUS CORTES-CAMPOS,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16 -CR- 465 -1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Cortes

Campos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cortes-Campos ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 7, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41067 Document: 00513866502 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2017No. 16

- 41067

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41067 Document: 00513866502 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/07/2017
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - (-)commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 15, 2015        Resilience Potential of Coral Reefs in the Mariana Islands
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6**  **472**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KENNETH J. JOHNSON , a/k/a K

- 9 , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2 : 0 7

- cr - 0 0 924

- DCN

- 3 ; 2 :1 2

- cv - 0 3337

- DCN )

Submitted : June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Kenneth J. Johnson , Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr. , Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina ; Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Colu mbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth J. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appeal able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion st ates a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and d ismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-110479, 333-112587, 333-114546, 333-121234, 333-143004 and 333-144820) and (Form S-3 No. 333-119795 and 333-131085) of ADA-ES, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 10, 2008 relating
to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADA-ES, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
|                                       
|Denver, Colorado                       
|March 10, 2008
# C_2020331EN.01001301.xml

| 7.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2020/C 331/09)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Silicon | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1077 of 1 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review under Article 11(2) and a partial interim review under Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
  (OJ L 179, 5.7.2016, p. 1) | 6.7.2021 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Silicon

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1077 of 1 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review under Article 11(2) and a partial interim review under Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(OJ L 179, 5.7.2016, p. 1)

6.7.2021

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

---
# C_2020400EN.01000901.xml

| 24.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2020/C 400/06)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 1.10.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.10.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ANF/*8ABDE (special condition to ANF/07.) |
| Species | Anglerfish (Lophiidae) |
| Zone | 8a, 8b, 8d and 8e |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 21/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

1.10.2020

Duration

1.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

ANF/*8ABDE (special condition to ANF/07.)

Species

Anglerfish (Lophiidae)

Zone

8a, 8b, 8d and 8e

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

21/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. '1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL GAS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Jim Glavas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









| | /s/ Jim Glavas
Jim Glavas
Chief Executive Officer
August 27, 2004
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Antwan T. MANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-245

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Antwan T. Mann appeals his judgment and sentence for felony battery. Mann contends that the trial court erred in continuing the case to trial without holding a hearing or entering an order to determine his competency after his public defender filed a suggestion of mental incompetency to stand trial. The State concedes error. We agree and remand for the trial court to conduct a retroactive competency evaluation.

It is reversible error for a trial court to continue with criminal proceedings without making a competency determination where it has reasonable grounds to believe that a defendant is incompetent to proceed. *See* *Carrion v. State*, 859 So.2d 563, 565 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("[T]he trial judge had been presented with reasonable grounds to question the mental competency of Mr. Carrion at a pretrial stage. Once having come to this conclusion, he was required by the rule to follow the prescribed procedure and to hold a competency hearing."). The Fourth District Court has explained the appropriate procedure after a case has been remanded for a trial court to make a retroactive determination of competency:

> Thus, on remand, if the court can make a *nunc pro tunc* finding as to appellant's competency based upon the existence of evaluations performed contemporaneous with trial and without relying solely on a cold record, and can do so in a manner which abides by due process guarantees, then it should do so and enter a corresponding written order.

*Baker v. State*, 221 So.3d 637, 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) ; *accord* *Holland v. State*, 185 So.3d 636, 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court for entry of a nunc pro tunc order finding Holland competent to stand trial."). In making this determination, "[t]he parties may agree to the use of the previous evaluators' written reports, which shall be filed with the court and placed in the record." *Sheheane v. State*, 228 So.3d 1178, 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). If the trial court determines that Mann was competent at the time of trial, it must enter a nunc pro tunc written order without altering his judgment. *See* *Zern v. State*, 191 So.3d 962, 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). "If the trial court finds that [the defendant] was incompetent or that a retrospective determination is not possible in this case, it must hold a new trial, as long as [the defendant] is and remains competent on remand." *Id.*

We therefore remand this case for the trial court to make a retroactive competency *1133determination consistent with this opinion.

REMANDED.

SAWAYA, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Longwei Petroleum Investment
Holding Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,
2008 (the "Report"), I, Cai Yongjun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15
> (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
> respects, the Company's financial position and results of
> operations.

/s/Cai YongjunCai
Yongjun, Chief Executive Officer

February 13,
2009