alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEMPORARY 

REVISION 

CRJ200 

BOMBARDIER 

CL-600-2819 

AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS 

TEMPORARY REVISION 2A-56 

The contents of this Temporary Revision have been approved by the Chief, Engineering (or designate), National Aircraft Ce

Canada 

Date May 25. 2012 Signed .._.R-"-e'-'-m!.J:y_,_K~n_._,o""e'-'-!rr'----------

FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Insert this Temporary Revision (TR) 2A-56 facing page 2A-5, in Part 2 of the Maintenance R

DESCRIPTION: 

Airworthiness Requirements 

Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the RECORD OF TEMPORARY REV

of the MRM Part 2. 

Keep this Temporary Revision until normal revision service incorporates this information into 

Manual. 

This Temporary Revision is issued to add new CMR TASK NUMBERS C27-40-103-02, C2

C27-40-103-04. 

Part 2 of Maintenance Requirements Manual 

Appendix A - Certification Maintenance Requirements 
TEMPORARY 

REVISION 

TASK 

NO. 

C27 - 40- 103- 02 

C27 -40-103-03 

C27 - 40-103-04 

CRJ200 

BOMBARDIER 

CL-600-2819 

AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS 

TEMPORARY REVISION 2A-56 

TASK DESCRIPTION 

Special Detailed Inspection of the HSTA primary spur gear 

EFFECTIVITY: 

P/N 601 R92305-7 (P/N 8396-5) 

NOTE: 

Return HSTA to vendor for required inspection. 

Functional Check of the HSTA torque limiter 

EFFECTIVITY: 

P/N 601 R92305-7 {P/N 8396-5) 

NOTE: 

Return HSTA to vendor for required functional check. 

Operational Check (ground maintenance test) of the horizontal stabilizer trim control unit 

PHASE-IN: 

Do the initial operational check within 500 Flight Hours from the issue date of TR 2A-56 (Jun 04/12} 

Airworthiness Requirements 

Part 2 of Maintenance Requirements Manual 

Appendix A - Certification Maintenance Requirements 

IN

1 0000 

1 0000 

1200
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 60172

**____________ Courtney R. Logan,**  Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus **Mississippi Department of Corrections; Haley Barbour, former governor; Nathan Burlcain; John Doe,**  warden **; Timothy Jones,**  assistant district attorney **; Ricky Banks,** sheriff of Leflore County **; Trina Burris,** Mississippi Department of Corrections **; John Zimmermann,**  assistant district attorney Tennessee **,** Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:21

- CV

- 35

**______________________________** Before **Wiener ,**  **Elrod ,**  and **Engelhardt ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
For at least the fifth time, Courtney Logan challenges the legality of his extraditions between the states of Tennessee and Mississippi. See Logan v. State , 311 So. 3d 724 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)

. This court has twice “warned

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 17, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-60172 Document: 00516713833 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2023No. 22

- 60172

2 Logan that submitting frivolous or repetitive filings challenging his
extra dition could subject him to sanctions.” In re Logan , No. 21

- 60156, 3 (5th Cir. May 5, 2021) (citing In re Logan , No. 15

- 60658, 1

- 2 (5th Cir. Nov. 20, 2015)). In fact, in order to get around his three strikes which would otherwise have prevented him from ra ising this claim, Logan paid the filing fee for this

case. Like his previous attempts to challenge his extraditions in state and federal court, Courtney’s present filing is frivolous and wholly without merit. This appeal shall be dismissed and Logan is ag ain WARNED that any future frivolous, repetitive, or otherwise abusive filings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction will subject him to additional and progressively more severe sanctions, including monetary sanctions and further restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.
DISMISSED. Case: 22-60172 Document: 00516713833 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2023
# CI2020083EN.01000101.xml

| 13.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 83/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/399, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/398 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(2020/C 83 I/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/399 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/398 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address before 1 June 2020:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  OJ L 78, 13.3.2020, p. 44.

(3)  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  OJ L 78, 13.3.2020, p. 1.

---
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of ColombiaGoldfields Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, I certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: 

(1) 

the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Colombia Goldfields Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) 

the information contained in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Colombia Goldfields Ltd.. 

| By:/s/ J. Randall Martin                           Name:J. Randall MartinTitle:Vice Chairman and Chief      Executive OfficerDate:March 27, 2009 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merci, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: August 19, 2008 /s/ Jose Acevedo Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

How to's and trainings        July 6, 2015        PRMS Solar Table Module

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin

How to's and trainings        December 14, 2006        PubTalk 12/2006 - Mojave
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(11)
              - (-)multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - (-)puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Science Animations        September 29, 2017        Image of the Week - Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

Presentations and Events        May 18, 2022        Landslides triggered by Hurricane Maria: Assessment of an extreme event in Puerto Rico

Presentations and Events        November 12, 2020        Climate Adaptation to Support Amphibian Conservation in U.S. Caribbean
L.I., Father of A.K.R., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby LEWIS

No. 2018-KH-1406

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - (-)multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(16)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(19)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(15)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(180)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - (-)pennsylvania(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(112)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        April 24, 2014        River and Ridge

Animated GIF        December 31, 2016        Chester County, Pennsylvania Land Change Animation
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  Timothy      J. Olphie                                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Timothy      J. OlphiePrincipal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerJanuary      9, 2009 |   |   |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40507

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NICOLAS WILFREDO GODOY-GALAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1832-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Nicolas Wilfredo GodoyGalan raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. 

Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we 

held that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does 

not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include the 

asserted age-differential requirement. He also raises an argument that he 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40507 Document: 00513307922 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 15-40507

2

concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 

781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1011 (2015), which held that the 

Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic 

definition of “sexual abuse of minor.” The motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40507 Document: 00513307922 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Ken Martin Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  September 19, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Raouf Y. Halim, Chief Executive Officer of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  |  | /s/RAOUF Y. HALIMRaouf Y. Halim Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
November 30, 2007

---



QuickLinks
STATE EX REL. Donald Ray MAGEE, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1213

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Thomas* , 08-2912 (La. 10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Weimer, J., recused.