75862 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

1On March 7, 2012, at 77 FR 13493, EPA 

determined that the bi-state Charlotte Area attained 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by its applicable 

attainment date of June 15, 2011, and that the Area 

was continuing to attain the ozone standard with 

monitoring data that was currently available. 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Expiration/ 

Revocation 

date 

* * * * * 

Sheep, meat byproducts ......... 0.02 12/31/16 

* * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–31067 Filed 12–21–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0327; FRL–9763–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and Designation 

of Areas for Air Quality Planning 

Purposes; South Carolina; 

Redesignation of the CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North CarolinaSouth Carolina 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

Moderate Nonattainment Area to 

Attainment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to 

approve a request submitted on June 1, 

2011, from the State of South Carolina, 

through the South Carolina Department 

of Health and Environmental Control 

(SC DHEC), to redesignate the portion of 

York County, South Carolina that is 

within the bi-state Charlotte-GastoniaRock Hill, North Carolina-South 

Carolina ozone nonattainment area 

(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘bi-state 

Charlotte Area,’’ or ‘‘Area’’) to 

attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The bi-state Charlotte Area 

consists of Cabarrus, Gaston, Lincoln, 

Mecklenburg, Rowan, Union and a 

portion of Iredell County (Davidson and 

Coddle Creek Townships) in North 

Carolina; and a portion of York County 

in South Carolina, including the 

Catawba Indian Nation reservation 

lands (hereafter referred to as ‘‘the York 

County Area’’). EPA’s approval of the 

redesignation request is based on the 

determination that South Carolina has 

met the criteria for redesignation to 

attainment set forth in the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act). Additionally, EPA is 

approving a revision to the South 

Carolina State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) to include the 1997 8-hour ozone 

maintenance plan for the York County 

Area that contains the new 2013 and 

2022 motor vehicle emission budgets 

(MVEBs) for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) for 

the years 2013 and 2022. EPA will take 

action on the North Carolina submission 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone redesignation 

request and maintenance plan for its 

portion of the bi-state Charlotte Area in 

a separate action. EPA did not receive 

comments on the November 15, 2012, 

proposed rulemaking. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be 

effective on December 26, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0327. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane 

Spann or Sara Waterson of the 

Regulatory Development Section, in the 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Spann may be reached by phone at (404) 

562–9029, or via electronic mail at 

spann.jane@epa.gov. Ms. Waterson may 

be reached by phone at (404) 562–9061, 

or via electronic mail at 

waterson.sara@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. What is the background for the actions? 

II. What are the actions EPA is taking? 

III. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

IV. What are the effects of these actions? 

V. Final Action 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for the 

actions? 

On June 1, 2011, South Carolina made 

a submission to EPA requesting 

redesignation of the York County Area 

to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS and approval of the South 

Carolina SIP revision containing a 

maintenance plan for the York County 

Area. In an action published on 

November 15, 2012 (77 FR 68087), EPA 

proposed approval of South Carolina’s 

plan for maintaining the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS and the NOx and VOC 

MVEBs for the York County Area as 

contained in the maintenance plan. At 

that time, EPA also proposed to approve 

the redesignation of the York County 

Area to attainment.1 Additional 

background for today’s action is set 

forth in EPA’s November 15, 2012, 

proposal. 

The MVEBs, specified in kilograms 

per day (kg/day), included in the 

maintenance plan are as follows: 

TABLE 1—YORK COUNTY PORTION OF

THE BI-STATE CHARLOTTE AREA

NOX AND VOC MVEB 

[kg/day] 

2013 2022 

NOX Emissions: 

Base Emissions ........ 7,924 4,011 

Safety Margin Allocated to MVEB ...... 3,348 7,357 

NOX Conformity 

MVEB ................. 11,272 11,368 

VOC Emissions: 

Base Emissions ........ 2,846 1,939 

Safety Margin Allocated to MVEB ...... 853 1,297 

VOC Conformity 

MVEB ................. 3,699 3,236 

In its November 15, 2012, proposed 

action, EPA noted that the adequacy 

public comment period on these MVEBs 

(as contained in South Carolina’s 

submittal) began on October 28, 2011, 

and closed on November 28, 2011. No 

comments were received during the 

public comment period. 

As stated in the November 15, 2012, 

proposal, this redesignation addresses 

the York County Area’s status solely 

with respect to the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS, for which designations were 

finalized on April 30, 2004. See 69 FR 

23857. Effective July 20, 2012, EPA 

designated a portion of York County 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 75863 

(excluding the Catawba Indian Nation 

reservation lands) as nonattainment for 

the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This 

rulemaking does not address 

requirements for the portion of York 

County that was designated 

nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. Requirements for the 

portion of York County that was 

designated nonattainment for the 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS will be addressed 

in the future. 

EPA reviewed ozone monitoring data 

from ambient ozone monitoring stations 

in the bi-state Charlotte Area from 

2009–2011. These data have been 

quality-assured and are recorded in Air 

Quality System (AQS). The 3-year 

average of the annual fourth highest 

daily maximum 8-hour average (i.e., 

design values) for 2008–2010 and 2009– 

2011 are summarized in Table 2. The 

design values demonstrate that the bistate Charlotte Area continues to meet 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA has 

also reviewed preliminary monitoring 

data for 2012, which indicate that the 

bi-state Charlotte Area continues to 

attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

TABLE 2—DESIGN VALUE CONCENTRATIONS FOR THE BI-STATE CHARLOTTE AREA FOR THE 1997 8-HOUR OZONE

NAAQS 

[Parts per million] 

Location County Monitor ID 

Annual mean concentrations 3-Year design values 

2008 2009 2010 2011 2008–2010 2009–2011 

Lincoln County Replacing 

Iron Station.

Lincoln .............. 37–109–0004 0 .079 0.065 0.072 0.077 0.072 0.071 

Garinger High School ..... Mecklenburg ..... 37–119–0041 0 .085 0.069 0.082 0.088 0.078 0.079 

Westinghouse Blvd ......... Mecklenburg ..... 37–119–1005 0 .073 0.068 0.078 0.082 0.073 0.076 

29 N at Mecklenburg Cab 

Co..

Mecklenburg ..... 37–119–1009 0 .093 0.071 0.082 0.083 0.082 0.078 

Rockwell .......................... Rowan .............. 37–159–0021 0 .084 0.071 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.075 

Enochville School ............ Rowan .............. 37–159–0022 0 .082 0.073 0.078 0.078 0.077 0.076 

Monroe Middle School .... Union ................ 37–179–0003 0 .08 0.067 0.071 0.073 0.072 0.070 

II. What are the actions EPA is taking? 

In today’s rulemaking, EPA is 

approving: (1) South Carolina’s 1997 

8-hour ozone maintenance plan (such 

approval being one of the CAA criteria 

for redesignation to attainment status) 

for the York County Area, including 

MVEBs; and, (2) South Carolina’s 

redesignation request to change the legal 

designation of the portion of York 

County in the bi-state Charlotte 

nonattainment area from nonattainment 

to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. The maintenance plan is 

designed to demonstrate that the York 

County Area (as part of the bi-state 

Charlotte Area) will continue to attain 

the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS through 2022. 

EPA’s approval of the redesignation 

request is based on EPA’s determination 

that South Carolina meets the criteria 

for the York County Area for 

redesignation set forth in CAA, sections 

107(d)(3)(E) and 175A, including EPA’s 

determination that the York County 

Area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. EPA’s analyses of South 

Carolina’s redesignation request, and 

maintenance plan are described in 

detail in the November 15, 2012, 

proposed rule. See 77 FR 68087. EPA 

did not receive any comments, adverse 

or otherwise, on the November 15, 2012, 

proposed rule to redesignate the South 

Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte 

Area to attainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. 

Consistent with the CAA, the 

maintenance plan that EPA is approving 

also includes 2013 and 2022 MVEBs for 

NOX and VOC for the York County Area. 

In this action, EPA is approving these 

NOX and VOC MVEBs for the purposes 

of transportation conformity. For 

required regional emissions analysis 

years involving 2013 and prior to 2022, 

the applicable budgets will be the new 

2013 MVEBs. For required regional 

emissions analysis years that involve 

2022 or beyond, the applicable budgets 

will be the new 2022 MVEBs. 

III. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

EPA has determined that the York 

County Area (as part of the bi-state 

Charlotte Area) has attained the 1997 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS and has also 

determined that all other criteria for the 

redesignation of the York County Area 

from nonattainment to attainment of the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS have been 

met. See CAA section 107(d)(3)(E). One 

of those requirements is that the York 

County Area has an approved plan 

demonstrating maintenance of the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is also 

taking final action to approve the 

maintenance plan for the York County 

Area as meeting the requirements of 

sections 175A and 107(d)(3)(E) of the 

CAA. EPA is also approving the new 

NOX and VOC MVEBs for the years 2013 

and 2022 as contained in South 

Carolina’s maintenance plan for the 

York County Area because these MVEBs 

are consistent with maintenance of the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Area. 

The detailed rationale for EPA’s 

findings and actions are set forth in the 

November 15, 2012, proposed 

rulemaking and in other discussion in 

this final rulemaking. 

IV. What are the effects of these 

actions? 

Approval of the redesignation request 

changes the legal designation of the 

portion of York County in the bi-state 

Charlotte Area from nonattainment to 

attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. EPA is modifying the 

regulatory table in 40 CFR 81.341 to 

reflect a designation of attainment for 

the county. EPA is also approving, as a 

revision to the South Carolina SIP, the 

State’s plan for maintaining the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS in the York 

County Area through 2022. The 

maintenance plan includes contingency 

measures to remedy possible future 

violations of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS, and establishes NOX and VOC 

MVEBs for the years 2013 and 2022 for 

the York County Area. 

V. Final Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the redesignation and change the legal 

designation of the portion of York 

County in bi-state Charlotte Area from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Through 

this action, EPA is also approving into 

the South Carolina SIP the 1997 8-hour 

ozone maintenance plan for the York 

County Area, which includes for this 

Area the new NOX MVEB for 2013 and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
75864 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

2022 for the York County Area of 11,272 

kg/day and 11,368 kg/day, respectively. 

The VOC MVEB for 2013 and 2022 for 

the York County Area are 3,699 kg/day 

and 3,236 kg/day, respectively. 

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), 

EPA finds there is good cause for this 

action to become effective immediately 

upon publication. This is because a 

delayed effective date is unnecessary 

due to the nature of a redesignation to 

attainment, which relieves the Area 

from certain CAA requirements that 

would otherwise apply to it. The 

immediate effective date for this action 

is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(1), which provides that 

rulemaking actions may become 

effective less than 30 days after 

publication if the rule grants or 

recognizes an exemption or relieves a 

restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which 

allows an effective date less than 30 

days after publication as otherwise 

provided by the agency for good cause 

found and published with the rule. The 

purpose of the 30-day waiting period 

prescribed in section 553(d) is to give 

affected parties a reasonable time to 

adjust their behavior and prepare before 

the final rule takes effect. Today’s rule, 

however, does not create any new 

regulatory requirements such that 

affected parties would need time to 

prepare before the rule takes effect. 

Rather, today’s rule relieves the State of 

various requirements for the York 

County Area. For these reasons, EPA 

finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(3) for this action to become 

effective on the date of publication of 

this action. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, redesignation of an 

area to attainment and the 

accompanying approval of the 

maintenance plan under CAA section 

107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the 

status of geographical area and do not 

impose any additional regulatory 

requirements on sources beyond those 

required by state law. A redesignation to 

attainment does not in and of itself 

impose any new requirements, but 

rather results in the application of 

requirements contained in the CAA for 

areas that have been redesignated to 

attainment. Moreover, the Administrator 

is required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by State law. For these 

reasons, these actions: 

• Are not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Are not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Are not significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Are not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and, 

• Do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the redesignation for the 

York County Area does have Tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because it may have substantial 

direct effects on the Catawba Indian 

Nation as the Tribe’s reservation lands 

are within the York County Area for the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. As such, 

today’s final action to redesignate the 

York County Area to attainment for the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS includes the 

Catawba Indian Nation reservation 

lands. Accordingly, EPA and the 

Catawba Indian Nation consulted on 

this redesignation prior to today’s final 

action. EPA’s consultation on this and 

other ozone SIP matters for the York 

County Area with the Catawba Indian 

Nation commenced on October 14, 

2011, and concluded on October 31, 

2011. EPA further notes that today’s 

action is not anticipated to impose 

substantial direct costs on Tribal 

governments or preempt Tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by February 25, 2013. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control. 

Dated: December 13, 2012. 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart PP—South Carolina 

■ 2. Section 52.2120(e) is amended by 

adding a new entry ‘‘1997 8-hour ozone 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 75865 

Maintenance Plan for the South 

Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte 

Area’’ at the end of the table to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED SOUTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Provision State effective 

date EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

1997 8-hour ozone Maintenance Plan for the South 

Carolina portion of the bistate Charlotte Area.

June 1, 2011 .... 12/26/12 [Insert citation of 

publication].

Applicable to the 1997 8-hour ozone boundary in York 

County only (Rock Hill-Fort Mill Area Transportation Study 

Metropolitan Planning Organization Area). 

PART 81—[AMENDED] 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 4. In § 81.341, the table entitled 

‘‘South Carolina-1997 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS (Primary and Secondary)’’ is 

amended under ‘‘Charlotte-GastoniaRock Hill, NC–SC’’ by revising the 

entries for ‘‘York County (part) Portion 

along MPO lines’’ to read as follows: 

§ 81.341 South Carolina. 

* * * * * 

SOUTH CAROLINA—1997 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS 

[Primary and secondary] 

Designated area 

Designation a Category/Classification 

Date 1 Type Date 1 Type 

*******

Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC–SC: 

York County (part) Portion along MPO lines .... This action is effective 12/26/12 ... Attainment. 

*******

a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

1This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–30956 Filed 12–21–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0751; FRL- 9763–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and Designation 

of Areas for Air Quality Planning 

Purposes; Kentucky; Redesignation of 

the Kentucky Portion of the 

Huntington-Ashland, WV–KY–OH 1997 

Annual Fine Particulate Matter 

Nonattainment Area to Attainment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to 

approve a request submitted on 

February 12, 2012, by the 

Commonwealth of Kentucky, through 

the Kentucky Energy and Environment 

Cabinet, Division for Air Quality (DAQ), 

to redesignate the Kentucky portion of 

the tri-state Huntington-Ashland, West 

Virginia-Kentucky-Ohio fine particulate 

matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area 

(hereafter referred to as the 

‘‘Huntington-Ashland Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’) 

to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The Huntington-Ashland 

Area is composed of Boyd County and 

a portion of Lawrence County in 

Kentucky; Lawrence and Scioto 

Counties and portions of Adams and 

Gallia Counties in Ohio; and Cabell and 

Wayne Counties and a portion of Mason 

County in West Virginia. EPA’s 

approval of the redesignation request is 

based on the determination that 

Kentucky has met the criteria for 

redesignation to attainment set forth in 

the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). EPA is 

approving a revision to the Kentucky 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) to 

include the 1997 Annual PM2.5

maintenance plan for the Kentucky 

portion of the Huntington-Ashland 

Area. EPA is also approving the on-road 

motor vehicle insignificance finding for 

direct PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) 

for the Kentucky portion of the 

Huntington-Ashland Area. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be 

effective on December 26, 2012 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0751. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with