alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Mendy Marsh,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 13, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                             METALINE CONTACT MINES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. OF SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metaline Contact Mines (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John W.
Beasley, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                            By:   /s/   John W. Beasley
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  John W. Beasley
                                                  Secretary, Treasurer & Chief
                                                  Financial Officer
                                                  May 15, 2006
Leeann J. GALEA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Matthew J. KROL, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3021

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied. Dismissed.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  | Medical International Technology, Inc. |                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                   |                                          |   |
| Date: February 17, 2011      | By:                                    | /s/ Karim Menassa                   |   |
|                                                  |                                   | Karim Menassa                                 |   |
|                                                  |                                   | President and Principal Executive Officer     |   |
|                                                  |                                   | Interim Secretary and Chief Financial Officer |   |
Shane BURNETT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. TARGET CORPORATION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1375

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL GAS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Jim Glavas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







| | JIM GLAVASJim Glavas
Chief Executive OfficerMarch 9, 2007
| | ---------------------------------------------------------



















---
Exhibit 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     I, Michael F. Emerson, Chief Executive Officer of visionGATEWAY, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, based on my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated: December 22, 2004


/s/ Michael F. Emerson
Michael F. Emerson
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to visionGATEWAY and will
be retained by visionGATEWAY and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Steven KOGAN, Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, a foreign corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation and successor through merger to The American Tobacco Company, a foreign corporation, Philip Morris USA Inc., a foreign corporation, and Lorillard Tobacco Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Lance V. Oliver and Sara O. Couch of Motley Rice, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, SC, John Hutchins Pinder, VI, Kent G. Whittemore, and Erin W. Lohmiller of The Whittemore Law Group, P.A., St. Petersburg, Bruce H. Denson of Bruce H. Denson, P.A., St. Petersburg, and Howard M. Acosta of the Law Offices of Howard M. Acosta, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Scott M. Edson of King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, and William L. Durham, II of King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellee R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

David M. Menichetti and Geoffrey J. Michael of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C., and Stephanie S. Sankar of Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Kansas City, MS, for appellee Philip Morris USA Inc.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Michael PETERS

NO. 2018-KK-1417

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Crichton, J.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I previously wrote separately to spotlight the importance of compliance with *Boykin v. Alabama* , 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) and La. C.Cr.P. art. 556.1, *see* *State v. Trahan* , 16-2083 (La. 4/16/18), 241 So.3d 286, and I reiterate those concerns here. In response to the state's minute entries associated with defendant's three guilty pleas to misdemeanor DWI in Mississippi, which do not indicate whether defendant was advised of his *Boykin* rights in accordance with *State v. Jones* , 404 So.2d 1192 (La. 1981) (per curiam), defendant testified that neither the judge who accepted the pleas nor the lawyer who negotiated the plea agreements ever advised him of any of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty. I would grant defendant's writ application to examine whether defendant's sworn denial constitutes "affirmative evidence showing an infringement of his rights or a procedural irregularity in the taking of the plea" sufficient to shift the burden back to the state to produce a perfect *Boykin* transcript. *See* *State v. Carlos* , 98-1366, pp. 6-7 (La. 7/7/99), 738 So.2d 556, 559.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0267 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. DAVID LOUIS TRENK,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 1 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2021

01/25/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0267
Earnest D. BOLTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 12, 2018 Rehearing Denied November 7, 2018

Earnest D. Bolton, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Rowe, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Sylvester SHULER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1752

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - (-)science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2976)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        What is declination?

faq        June 30, 2017        Why are amphibian populations declining?

faq        June 30, 2017        What is the United States doing about amphibian deformity and decline issues?

faq        July 7, 2017        Why measure the magnetic field at the Earth's surface? Wouldn't satellites be better suited for space-weather studies?

faq        July 31, 2017        What do the different north arrows on a USGS topographic map mean?
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

Interviews        August 30, 2009        The Water Beneath Our Feet: New Study on California's Central Valley Groundwater Level Decline

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin

Interviews        March 3, 2011        New model gives insight to the potential future of the Pacific walrus

Interviews        April 17, 2012        Press Conference: USGS World Estimate for Conventional Oil and Gas Resources

Interviews        September 6, 2011        Stranger than Fiction: The Secret Lives of Freshwater Mussels

Interviews        January 5, 2010        Public Lecture: Flight from Extinction: Helping Whooping Cranes Survive

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**910 TP 14-00128** 
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF BRENDA BERNIER, PETITIONER,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NIRAV R. SHAH, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENT.

NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES, INC., BUFFALO (DIANA M. STRAUBE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATHLEEN M. TREASURE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County [Henry J. Nowak, Jr., J.], entered January 22, 2014) to review a determination of respondent. The determination denied petitioner’s request for a modular wheelchair ramp.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to review respondent’s determination made after a fair hearing denying her a modular wheelchair ramp. Respondent determined that the ramp did not meet the definition of durable medical equipment (DME) pursuant to 18 NYCRR 505.5 (a) (1). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence ( see generally Matter of Coffey v D’Elia , 61 NY2d 645, 648; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights , 45 NY2d 176, 179-180). In addition, “[a]n agency’s interpretation of its regulations must be upheld unless the determination is irrational and unreasonable” ( Matter of Taher v Novello , 278 AD2d 809, 810, lv denied 96 NY2d 712 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Elcor Health Servs. v Novello , 100 NY2d 273, 280; Matter of Gaines v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal , 90 NY2d 545, 548-549), and we conclude that respondent’s determination that ramps do not fit within the definition of DME is rational. DME is equipment that is “primarily and customarily used for medical purposes” and that is “generally not useful to a person in the absence of an illness or injury” (18 NYCRR 505.5 [a] [1] [ii], [iii]). We agree with respondent that ramps may be useful to people, generally, even in the absence of an illness or injury. We have considered petitioner’s**-2- 910 TP 14-00128** 

remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(43)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - (-)kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer
ERNST&YOUNG
Ernst & Young
725 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5418

Report on Management's Assertion on
Compliance with the Specified Minimum Servicing
Standards Set Forth in the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.


We have examined management's assertion, included in
the accompanying report titled Report of Management,
that IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (the Bank) complied
with the servicing standards identified in Exhibit A
to the Report of Management (the "specified minimum
servicing standards") as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during the year
ended December 31, 2003. Management is responsible for
the Bank's compliance with those specified minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards
established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the specified minimum servicing standards and
performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Bank's compliance with the
specified minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the
Company complied with the aforementioned specified
minimum servicing standards during the year ended
December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP
January 23, 2004
EXHIBIT 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


         We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated January 31, 2006
regarding the consolidated balance sheets of Service 1st Bancorp and Subsidiary
as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended, in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.


/s/ VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP
----------------------------------------

Laguna Hills, California
March 29, 2006


                                      105