alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2976)
              - (-)products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

Software Release        August 31, 2023        Scale-dependent population drivers inform avian management in a declining saline lake ecosystem.

Software Release        June 7, 2023        Modeling widespread declines in walleye recruitment following zebra mussel invasion in Minnesota lakes

Software Release        February 7, 2024        Aquaculture and Irrigation Water Use Model 2.0 Software

Software Release        August 26, 2012        Central Valley Hydrologic Model (CVHM)
Jerome I. TILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018

Jerome I. Tillman, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Teddy CHESTER

NO. 2018-KK-1562

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
Pleadro J. SCOTT, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D18-1169

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 99

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-B Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_/s/ Dale G. Rettinger   

Dale G. Rettinger

Chief Financial Officer

___July 23, 2003_________
**Exhibit10.427**

 

ASSIGNMENT OFPURCHASE AGREEMENT

 

For good andvaluable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged, the undersigned, INLAND REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., anIllinois corporation, (“Assignor”) hereby assigns to INLAND WESTERN BAKERSFIELDCALLOWAY, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, (“Assignee”) all of itsright, title and interest in that certain Purchase Agreement (the “PurchaseAgreement”) dated September 2, 2004 by and between Assignor, as Buyer, andDonahue Shriber Realty Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, as Seller,for purchase and sale of certain real property commonly known as Plaza atRiverlakes, Bakersfield, California (the “Property”).

 

By executionhereof by Assignee, Assignee hereby accept the assignment and assumes all ofthe obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement.

 

ThisAssignment is effective as of October 21, 2004.

 
| ASSIGNOR: |   | INLAND REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC.         |
|-----------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|      |   |                                          |
|      |   | By:                                           | /s/ [ILLEGIBLE] |
|      |   |                                          | SR VP |
|      |   |                                          |   |
| ASSIGNEE: |   | INLAND WESTERN BAKERSFIELD   CALLOWAY, L.L.C. |
|      |   |                                          |   |
|      |   | By:                                           | Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust,  Inc. |
|      |   |                                          |   |
|      |   | By:                                           | /s/ Valerie Medina |
|      |   | Its:                                          | Asst. Secretary |
|           |        |                                               |  |  |  |  |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - (-)science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Research        October 8, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning – Fine-Tuning for Best Alerts

Research        May 29, 2020        The Blind Zone of Earthquake Early Warning

Research        March 9, 2022        Earthquake Early Warning - Overview

Research        March 20, 2018        Volcano Hazards Preparedness Resources

Research        November 13, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning Seismic Station Adjustment Terms - Annemarie Baltay

Research        March 6, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning

Project        March 14, 2016        Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) Support

Activity        October 16, 2018        ShakeAlert

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

State News Release        January 23, 2018        ShakeAlert: The Path to West Coast Earthquake Early Warning: How a Few Seconds Can Save Lives and Property — Public Lecture

Topic        February 2, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning: Vital for City Transit

Activity        September 29, 2020        Monitoring for Subduction Zone Science

Project        November 9, 2021        Probabilistic Forecasting of Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Earthquake Effects in the Coastal Zone
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edwin FERNANDEZ, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3977

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileBob Klaver, PhD
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(6)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(11)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        August 21, 2018        Image of the Week - One Year Ago: Eclipse Darkens Nebraska
#### BURGESS BATTERY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.

No. 11436.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 26, 1953.

Decided March 5, 1953.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 3, 1953.

Affirming judgment, 101 F.Supp. 812.

Mr. Howard H. Darbo, Chicago, Ill., pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Clarence M. Fisher, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. E. L. Reynolds, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint in an action under Section 21 of the Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1071, 60 Stat. 435, and Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, in which the appellant sought to have the court authorize the registration on the Principal Register, under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052, 60 Stat. 428, as a trade-mark for batteries, of a design consisting of alternate black and white stripes of indefinite size and extent. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court. Burgess Battery Co. v. Mar-zall, 101 F.Supp. 812.

Affirmed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.
Luis LA-CASSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-768

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Luis La-Casse, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

*ON CONFESSION OF ERROR*

PER CURIAM.

In *La-Casse v. State*, 223 So.3d 1129, 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), this Court reversed the trial court's order precluding Luis La-Casse from filing any further *pro se* post-conviction pleadings in lower court case number F04-29879, and remanded for entry of a Show Cause Order "to provide La-Casse the opportunity to demonstrate why an order precluding *pro se* filings should not be entered." On remand, on October 12, 2017, the trial court entered a Show Cause Order.

In November 2017, La-Casse filed a timely response to the Show Cause Order. La-Casse later filed an amended response. For reasons that are unclear in the record, the trial court entered two separate orders "mooting" both La-Casse's response and amended response to the Show Cause Order. Indeed, the trial court docket does not reflect that the trial court, on remand, ever *508issued an order determining whether La-Casse should be precluded from further *pro se* filings in lower court case number F04-29879.

Based on the record before us and the State's proper and commendable confession of error that the trial court incorrectly mooted La-Casse's responses to the Show Cause Order, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court should consider La-Casse's amended response to the trial court's October 12, 2017 Show Cause Order, and adjudicate whether La-Casse should be precluded from further *pro se* filings in lower case number F04-29879. This Court expresses no opinion on that issue.

Reversed and remanded.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L I O N E L I R V I N G , a . k. a . , M o, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 30149 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 4 - c r - 0 5 3 5 0 - RBL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R ona l d B . L e i ght on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry15, 2013 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , B E A , an dN G U Y E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Li o n e l I rv i n g ap p e a l s f

r o m th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s o r d e rd e n y i n g h i s 1 8 U . S. C. § 3582( c ) ( 2) m ot i on f

orr e duc t i on of

s e nt e nc e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 16 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 30149 2 I rvi ng c ont e nds tha the i s e nt i t l e d t o as e nt e nc e r e duc t i on ba s e d on the r e tr oa c t i ve a m e ndm e nt s t o the S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s tha tl ow e r e d the pe na l t i e s f or cr ac k cocai ne offens es . W e r evi ew de no vo w hether the di stri ctcourthad ju r is d ic tio n to m o d if

yad e f e n d a n t’s s e n te n c e u n d e r1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . See U ni te d States v . L e ni e ar , 5 7 4 F .3 d6 6 8 , 6 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . I rv in g is n o t e lig ib le f oras e nt e nc e r e duc t i on be c aus e hi s s e nt e nc e w a s ba s e d on the pa rt i e s ’ s t i pul a t i on i n a bi nd i ng pl eaagre em entun der F eder al R ul e of C ri m i nal P roce du re 11 (c )( 1)(C ), a nd not“ on as e nt e nc i ng r a nge tha tha s s ubs e que nt l ybe e n l ow e r e d bythe S e n te n c in g C o m m is s io n ,” a s r e q u ir e db ys e c tio n 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . See Fre em an v. U ni ted States , 131 S . C t . 2685, 2695- 96 ( 2011) ( S ot om a y or , J . , c onc urr i ng) . T he pl eaagre em entdo es no tca l l for I rvi ng t o b e s ent ence d w i thi n a part i cul ar G u id e lin e s s e n te n c in g r a n g e , n o ris a n ys u c h G u id e lin e s r a n g e e x p r e s s lyu s e din th e a g r e e m e n t o re v id e n t f r o m th e a g r e e m e n t its e lf . Se e id. at26 97 -98. T here fore , the di s tr i c tc ourtl a c ke d j ur i s di c t i on t o m odi f yI rvi ng’ s s e nt e nc e unde rs e c t i on 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . Se e U

n ite d S ta tes v . A u s tin , 67 6 F . 3d 92 4, 93 0 (9th C i r. 20 12 ). AF F I RME D.
# C_2020055EN.01000301.xml

| 18.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/3

---

Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

(2020/C 55/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/214 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (3), concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above‐mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should continue to apply to those persons. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2020, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

Council of the European Union

| General Secretariat |
| --- |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Article 8a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, of the list of designated persons and entities.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 45, 18.2.2020, p. 5.

(3)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - (-)kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        March 19, 2021        Earth As Art 1

Featured Films and Shorts        March 19, 2021        Earth As Art 1 (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        October 11, 2019        Earth as Art 6

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - (-)wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2023(1)

staff profileDavid A Saad
99.2

OCWEN Company Logo Here


Ocwen Federal Bank FSB
Compliance Certification Year Ended December 31, 2003
New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2003-2

The undersigned Officer of Ocwen Federal Bank FSB (the "Servicer")
confirms that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during
the calendar year ending on December 31, 2003 and of the performance of
the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March
1, 2003 for the New Century Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2003-2(the "Servicing Agreement") has been made under
his supervision.  Except as noted on the Management Assertion on
Compliance with USAP, to the best of the undersigned Officer's
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
of its obligations as set forth in the Servicing Agreement.


March 12, 2004

BY: /s/: Scott W. Anderson
Scott W. Anderson
Senior Vice President


Ocwen Federal Bank FSB