alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF


TITLE
      18,
      UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of ETELCHARGE.COM, INC., a Nevada corporation (the
      "Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of
      ETELCHARGE.COM, INC. on Form 10-QSB for the second quarter of 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:





(1)  the
      10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ETELCHARGE.COM,
      INC.





Dated: November
      13, 2006    ETELCHARGE.COM, INC.








/s/
      Carl O. Sherman__


Carl
      O.
      Sherman


Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Michelle R. Sherman


Michelle
      R. Sherman


Chief
      Financial Officer
Tammie HEINRICH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3613

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of prohibition is denied.
# c c.

'The qucct~on peser.kd ?or the oomldarntlcn 0S t&L* orfice 15 ttlcthtz the f.33 ownnrs tbould sualify3s a sotor .fuc;;

diotrtbutor

uu69r t&n -%xtuto in orcer to rooe:oe ;rayrmtoi'the roytlt7 9R thisnantlar, and use tbo aistlllnte

reoeltcd 8s rvyaltypaymnt ti zotorlzod fan !asplccents

or mv?rGitp." X4tutf38,



### :'ootlcn

1 (a), :rticla 70653, venacn'o atnnotxtac

SiYil defirmu "dFsrrlbutoP pi 23tOf 3aol 08 follows: - *~:l.stributor* chailmxm end includg ,rrCryi)crsoa 1% 

### tas .-tate

woo **ref:ooa,** aamrxoturts, ~rodwoo, . blaado c.r

cotcpouada

sxcor -cW1, **or** ln coy ot!icr sttnncr **SCQUiXWJ Or**  **pOSWSWS ’**  **p4tOr :uCi**  Xnd CXkCtI til-St

**ISdO** sf tte snw ti ttis .txte; 635 it Still lllao inolule -wry perxoa in'taiaXate who 8!1lpe, tmrtd or Ir.portu

ncy 

### wtor fuel fnto thle .**txtc** an3 cake the riret saie 0: "lqa 14 tkio .&&c."
.._i .Zactioa2 oi ?rold

;;otor :‘uel tax ..ewLzaes and ides a tax upw tho miirat sale* or r&or fuel, aud provides that tbc Itax aball acurw on 8ueh *first a&P. 'mt1on 1 lo) oi the Act dotkos *zetcm fuela,mid we ah&l ost)trmB,

ror jwrposesof w10 oginion,

## ttiat t&z so-cxlle6 dfrrtillate,

prorluaeC.~ec~a

rps rsll uador tbo cl:ousstaacaa and la the wanor outlined in ftnar letter,porecssos

ru;h phyolosl ua6 o:aaaical

.xtfdbutcs ax would brff it sdfkir. thin deficition 0r '%at0rml*.

,. . .. - 

# c

## -,.;.

. . . . 1933 , 3.0 4

- . fr03; thle ccsxiusL:n

;

. . -

. .

. . .

-- - -.

: .

_ 1
.- . - : . . . ,... ; . - l . _ - - 2. -

-. . ..fJ . c ..: . : +A _ _ ~._

. . . . : ;so. f ...-. ..:- . . : . . . . :~~y+tr:; ‘._ ;.,. -1 ‘;. __ . -2 .. .. . . -. .’
. : ‘. ‘.“.’ I - .
.. ..% tiffi
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Richard C. Carlson,certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of ProUroCareMedical Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)             disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

(a)             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)            any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  | March 30, 2007 |                    | /s/ Richard C. Carlson |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|   | By:            | Richard C. Carlson      |
|   |           | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                |                         |                        |        |  |

 

----
Damion Jordan SHEAROD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Dylan Davon KNIGHTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of appellant to comply with this court's order of July 20, 2018, requiring the filing of an initial brief.

BLACK, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Martha HINCHCLIFFE v. Edna Binabon SIAOTONG, Shelter General Insurance Company, and Progressive

NO. 2018-C-1113

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - (-)news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

newsletter        September 30, 2004      Sound Waves Newsletter - September 2004

newsletter        February 27, 2009      Sound Waves Newsletter - January-February 2009

newsletter        November 1, 2018      Sound Waves Newsletter - October-November 2018

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
Ralph GOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2241

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 18, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 30, 2018

Ralph Golden, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1485
SUROVELL, JACKSON, COLTEN & DUGAN, PC, Plaintiff, THOMAS A. SMITH, Defendant - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee, and DAY INVESTMENTS, a/k/a Walter Douglas Day; DOUGLAS DAY, a/k/a Walter Douglas Day, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexand ria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-875-A) Submitted: September 17, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996 Before HALL, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Thomas A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Marion Elizabeth Erickson, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. IRS , No. CA-95-875-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 1996). Because the issues are not complex, we deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of EMPS Research Corporation, on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Louis Naegle, Principal Executive Officer and Jennifer Preece,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.



Date: March 29, 2004                                    /s/ Louis Naegle
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Louis Naegle, Principal
                                                      Executive Officer



Date: March 29, 2004                                    /s/ Jennifer Preece
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Jennifer Preece, Principal
                                                      Financial Officer
Denise BATTLES, DOC #R62614, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(8)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(3)
              - (-)kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(3)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(47)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(11)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        March 19, 2021        Earth As Art 1

Featured Films and Shorts        March 19, 2021        Earth As Art 1 (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        October 11, 2019        Earth as Art 6

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change
#### HAYDEN v. UNITED STATES.

No. *1*1758.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

May 1, 1953.

*927Ralph Skilken and Harold L. Shellen-berger, Dayton, Ohio, for appellant.

Ray J. O’Donnell, U. S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this case was convicted on both counts of a two-count indictment charging violation of section 2314, Title 18, U.S.C.A., and was sentenced to five years imprisonment on each count, the sentences “to run concurrently”.

The record brought up by appellant for consideration on appeal contains no evidence relating to the substantive offense charged in the second count of the indictment. A court of review assumes that the evidence sustains the verdict where no transcript of the testimony is included in the record on appeal. Manning v. United States, 8 Cir., 31 F.2d 911; Cholacoff v. United States, 6 Cir., 10 F.2d 503; Thomas v. United States, 8 Cir., 188 F.2d 6; United States v. Bent, 8 Cir., 175 F.2d 397; Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427, 52 S.Ct. 417, 76 L.Ed. 524.

Inasmuch as the appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment on each count of the indictment, *the sentences to run*concurrently, even if there were manifest error as to his conviction on the first count, which we do not mean to indicate, he would suffer no prejudice from the five-year sentence on the second count for the reason that the assumption is that there was substantial evidence to support his conviction on that count, and no error relating thereto appears in the record.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the judgment of conviction and sentence on the second count be affirmed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00490

- CV

Marco Kreussel v. Gabriela Ibarra
On Appeal from the 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2018

- CI

- 18956

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment and dismisses the case. The Court orders the judgment VACATED and the case is DISMISSED consistent with i ts opinion

. The supersedeas bond filed by Western Surety Company is released and all obligations
t hereon are discharged

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the appellant.
We further order this decision certified below fo r observance.
October 15 , 20 20
Pauline Moss RODOCK v. Brad Allen POMMIER

NO. 2018-CJ-1522

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Stay denied. Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              12,705
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     4,332
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         20,405
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                            207,308
<ALLOWANCE>                                          2,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     258,767
<DEPOSITS>                                         220,337
<SHORT-TERM>                                         5,335
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  2,648
<LONG-TERM>                                          5,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            10,547
<OTHER-SE>                                           9,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     258,767
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     14,196
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    1,039
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       119
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    15,354
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   5,689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,412
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                8,942
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      6,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           2,330
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,330
<EPS-BASIC>                                           2.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.22
<LOANS-NON>                                          1,570
<LOANS-PAST>                                           368
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        287
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     4,646
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2,451
<RECOVERIES>                                            56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    2,281
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 2,141
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                140


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Dinosaurs and Fossils

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)

## By Location

              - montana(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - (-)south dakota(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        February 11, 2024        Eyes on Earth Episode 112 - Landsat in Popular Media
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of 649.com Inc. on form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Glusing, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 10, 2004                                /s/ Mark Glusing
---------------------------------                -------------------------------
(Date)                                           Mark Glusing
                                                 President, Director


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
Joseph and Rhonda TIPTON, Appellants, v. OLD DOMINION INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2276

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.