alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_publications(4)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - (-)ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(19)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(16)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(19)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(15)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(2)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(180)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(2)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new york(2)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(112)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - (-)virginia(6)
              - washington(1)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

              - 2022(4)

Photography        July 20, 2016        Coarse Diabase

Photography  USGS Maps Virginia's Underground Faults

Photography  USGS Maps Virginia's Underground Faults

Photography  USGS Maps Virginia's Underground Faults

Photography  USGS Maps Virginia's Underground Faults

Infographics        August 13, 2021        2011 Virginia Earthquake - Infographic
H. R. 588 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To provide for donor contribution acknowledgments to be displayed at the Vietnam 

Veterans Memorial Visitor Center, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vietnam Veterans Donor 

Acknowledgment Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. DONOR CONTRIBUTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AT THE VIETNAM 

VETERANS MEMORIAL VISITOR CENTER. 

Section 6(b) of Public Law 96–297 (16 U.S.C. 431 note) is 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4) by striking the ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 

(2) in paragraph (5)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’; and 

(B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by inserting at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) notwithstanding section 8905(b)(7) of title 40, United 

States Code— 

‘‘(A) the Secretary of the Interior shall allow the 

Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. to acknowledge 

donor contributions to the visitor center by displaying, 

inside the visitor center, an appropriate statement or credit 

acknowledging the contribution; 

‘‘(B) donor contribution acknowledgments shall be displayed in a form approved by the Secretary of the Interior 

and for a period of time commensurate with the level 

of the contribution and the life of the facility; 

‘‘(C) the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund shall bear 

all expenses related to the display of donor acknowledgments; 

‘‘(D) prior to the display of donor acknowledgments, 

the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc. shall submit 

to the Secretary for approval, its plan for displaying donor 

acknowledgments; 

‘‘(E) such plan shall include the sample text and types 

of the acknowledgments or credits to be displayed and 

the form and location of all displays; 

‘‘(F) the Secretary shall approve the plan, if the Secretary determines that the plan— 

‘‘(i) allows only short, discrete, and unobtrusive 

acknowledgments or credits; 
H. R. 588—2 

‘‘(ii) does not permit any advertising slogans or 

company logos; and 

‘‘(iii) conforms to applicable National Park Service 

guidelines for indoor donor recognition; and 

‘‘(G) if the Secretary of the Interior determines that 

the proposed plan submitted under this paragraph, does 

not meet the requirements of this paragraph, the Secretary 

shall— 

‘‘(i) advise the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 

Inc. not later than 30 days after receipt of the proposed 

plan of the reasons that such plan does not meet 

the requirements; and 

‘‘(ii) allow the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, 

Inc. to submit a revised donor recognition plan.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Joseph S. PAUL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1299

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

Joseph S. Paul, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Ross S. MCCAA v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1335

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. MARTIN**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a *1044successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - (-)other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

General        November 13, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning Seismic Station Adjustment Terms

Podcasts        November 18, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 9 – Famine Early Warning

Podcasts        August 7, 2008        Kasatochi Volcano Erupts Explosively

Podcasts        March 20, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 92 – EROS 50th: The Library and Science Support
Mack Reed TEDDER, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1579

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
OLEM/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Final Site*** Apirl 2016 

PCE FORMER DRY CLEANER Atlantic, Iowa

Cass County

 Site Location:

Atlantic, Iowa is a community in northeastern Cass County, about 75 miles west of Des Moines, Iowa and 45 miles 

northeast of Council Bluffs, Iowa. The site is located on 7th Street at the location of a former dry cleaning facility. 

 Site History:

The site is a former dry cleaning facility that operated at this location during the 1960s. In 1974, the Iowa Department 

of Transportation (IDOT) leased the site as a materials testing laboratory. The former dry cleaning and IDOT

laboratory facility no longer exist at this location. Based on the historical aerial photographs of the site, the building 

was razed between 1982 and 1994. The area is now occupied by a bank. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

The ground water plume associated with the site is comprised of chlorinated solvents, including but not limited to: 

tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE) and degradation products. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

The ground water plume extends to the municipal water supply system that consists of several down-gradient wells

that are at risk of becoming contaminated. Nine active municipal wells serve the 7,475 citizens of Atlantic, Iowa. One

municipal well has been taken off line due to contamination. Vapor intrusion impacts are under evaluation. 

 Response Activities (to date):

The city of Atlantic has disconnected one municipal well from the municipal system; it is currently being pumped 

continuously to the city wastewater treatment plant to help protect the nine other municipal wells from PCE 

contamination. The owners of the business on the site have installed a vapor mitigation system. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Iowa initially referred the site to the EPA for evaluation under the Superfund Removal Program. The site 

requires short-term and long-term response actions and listing on the NPL will allow for a proper and timely 

investigation of the nature and extent of contamination and remediation of the site. Other federal and state cleanup 

programs were evaluated, but are not viable options at this time. The EPA received a letter of support for placing this 

site on the NPL from the city of Atlantic and the Atlantic Municipal Utilities. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(20)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(30)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - documents_file(3)
              - documents_file-149220(3)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(9)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - california(4)
              - (-)colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 22, 2022         Six Ways the USGS Celebrates Earth Day Everyday

Featured Story        April 18, 2022        From the Seafloor to Outer Space, USGS is on the Case
## UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

MORONGO CASINO COGENERATION FACILITY

PROPOSED PART 71 TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT RENEWAL

RECORD OF INDEX

– JULY 2016

INDEX # RECORD SECTION OR ITEM DATE OF ITEM

P roposed Draft Permit

1.1 Proposed Draft Permit (MO

- ROP 15

- 01) July 29, 2016

Public Notice and Supporting Documents

1.2 Public Notice July 29, 2016

1.3 Summary Sheet July 29, 2016

1.4 Statement of Basis (SOB) July 29, 2016

Part 71 Title V Permit Applications

1.5 Morongo Part 71 Renewal Application MAR 2015 March 20, 2015

1.6 Application Clarification and PTE Calculation March 7, 2016
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**ANNUALCOMPLIANCE REPORT**

** **

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. BankTrust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate BackedTrust Certificates, Ford Motor Company Note-Backed Series 2003-6 Trust****(the “Trust”), certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kin respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporationin respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of theTrust;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, the information inthose reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the distributioninformation required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholdersby the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement forinclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

 

4.     I am responsible for reviewing theactivities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similaragreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, theTrustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

 

Date: March 31, 2010

 

 
| /s/ David J. Kolibachuk              |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| David J.  Kolibachuk, Vice President |

 

----
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1500 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 36 ) ll-C-6 2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/5/20081:51:28PM

Sheet 36 of 343P. 2

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

RESEARC H TRIANGL E PARK . N C 2771 1 OFFIC E O F AI R QUALIT

Y PLANNIN G AN D STANDARD S 

### AP R 

### 2 4 TM John Schweitze

r Composite s Institut e 144 1 Whit e Street Ann Arbor , Michiga

n 4810 4 

# * W* ^ Dea r John : Enclose d i s acopy ofth e mos t recen t Maximu mAchievabl e Contro l Technolog y (MACT ) floor

database . Th e majo

r chang e fromth e previou s version s i s th e additio n o f facilitie s tha t w e hav e estimate d to hav e th e potenti d t o emi t majo r quantities . Pleas e note tha t onl y resi n operation s ar

e analyze d i n thi s database . I n addition , w e ar e considerin g other subcategorization/analysi s approache s whic h woul d giv e differen t MAC T floor

results . I f you hav e an y question s or

comments , pleas e call (91 9 54 1 2383 ) or sen d m e electroni c mai l (strum.madeleine@epamail.epa.gov) . Sincerely , Madeleine Stru

m Environmenta

l Enginee r Coating s an d Consume

r Product s Grou

p Enclosur e



# 1P. 3
DocketNo . A - <#- £ 2 _ Subcategor

y II- C The enclosure s wit

h thi s documen

tar e identica l t o th e enclosures wit

h docke titem II - C - % \



# -2 -
Exhibit 99

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the managing general partner of PDC 2002-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Partnership (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

_/s/ Dale G. Rettinger   

Dale G. Rettinger

Chief Financial Officer

___July 23, 2003_________
Presidential Documents

100717 

Federal Register 

Vol. 89, No. 240 

Friday, December 13, 2024 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of December 11, 2024 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption 

On December 20, 2017, by Executive Order 13818, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world and, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), took related steps to deal with 

the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, 

and economy of the United States. 

The prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that 

have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, 

continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the 

national emergency declared on December 20, 2017, must continue in effect 

beyond December 20, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 with 

respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

December 11, 2024. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29593 

Filed 12–12–24; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PRESDOCBIDEN.EPS</GPH>
The order also transfers appellant’s claims against Matt Armstrong and Van Foster to

1

Hutchinson County. However, in her notice of appeal, appellant states only that she wishes to appeal

from the dismissal order.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00746-CV

Betty Ann Newby, Appellant

v.

Judy Flanders, Meryle Barnett, Jeff Brain, Charles Gillingham, Pete Loftis,

Tom Edmonds, Chris Coffman, David Willard, Henry

Veach, and Larry Byrd, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN401552, HONORABLE PATRICK O. KEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court signed its order dismissing appellant’s claims against the above named

appellees (the “Borger Defendants”) on August 26, 2004. Appellant filed a motion to have her 1

claims against the Borger Defendants reinstated on September 29 and filed her notice of appeal from

the order on November 24, 2004. Having carefully reviewed the record, including all orders of

dismissal and appellant’s notice of nonsuit against several defendants, it appears that the August 26

order is not a final and appealable order because appellant’s claims against several defendants remain

alive in the trial court. Specifically, appellant named as defendants Jack Young, Larry Foster,
Appellant referred to Coleman as a defendant in a September 29 motion to reinstate the 2

Borger Defendants, but it is not clear whether she properly named him as a defendant.

Biscoe is named as a defendant in an order signed on May 14, 2004, severing appellant’s 3

claims against numerous defendants(referred to in the order as the “Travis County Defendants”) into

trial court cause number GN401552. Again, it is not clear whether appellant properly named him

as a defendant.

We further note that it does not appear that the claims against Armstrong and Foster, which 4

were transferred to Hutchinson County by the same orderfrom which appellant seeks to appeal now,

were severed into a new cause separate from the claims remaining in Travis County.

2

Kenneth Coleman, and Sam Biscoe, and those putative defendants have not been dismissed or 2 3

nonsuited from the cause. Nor has appellant sought and obtained an order severing the dismissal 4

of the Borger Defendants from the existing cause.

Based on our examination of the record, it appearsthat claims are yet pending against

several defendants, and thus the order dismissing appellant’s claims against the Borger Defendants

is not a final order from which appeal may be taken. See Park Place Hosp. v. Estate of Milo, 909

S.W.2d 508, 510 (Tex. 1995) (“All parties and all issues before the trial court must be disposed of

before a summary judgment becomes final and appealable.”). We therefore dismiss the appeal for

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: February 17, 2005