alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification**
I, James W. McGinley, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratosInternational, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
1

 

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: September 14, 2004 /s/ James W. McGinley        James W. McGinley   President and Chief Executive Officer  
2
# U n i te d S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-3027 September Term, 2021 1: 17-c r-002 33-TNM-1 Filed O n: August 24, 20 22 United Sta tes o f

Am erica, App ellee
v . T hom as Je nkins,

App ellant
ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Pillard, Rao , an d W alker, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l w as co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the m em oran da of law and f act f iled b y

the pa rties. T he court has det ermin ed tha t th e issue s prese nte d o ccasion no ne ed for an op inion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 3 6. Upon con siderat ion o f the foregoing, an d th e reque st for app ointm entof

cou nsel, it is ORDERED tha t ap pellan t’s request for ap poin tm entof cou nsel b e d enie d. It is FURTHER ORDERED and A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s A pril 18, 20 22 orde r den y ing app ellant ’s mo tion for com passio nat e rele ase be af f irmed . A ppe llant h as notsho w n th at t he district cou rt ab used its discret ion in de nying his m otion . S ee United Sta tes v. Lo ng, 99 7 F.3 d 3 42, 35 2 (D.C. Cir. 20 21). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution

# U n i te d S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-3027 September Term, 2021
of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
Harry Hiram ORTIZ, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3756

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FREDERICK W. SMITH, JR.

,

Defendant Below

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Appellee. §

§ No. 369 , 202 2

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr

. ID No. 930 07368DI (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: October 31 , 202 2

Decided : December 6 , 20 22

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN , and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion

to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be

affirmed on the basis of th e Superior Court’s order, dated September 26, 2022,

denying the appellant’s motion purporting to seek correction of a clerical mistake

under Superior Court Criminal Rule 36. As the Superior Court determined, the

appellant received credit for the time that he served before his adju dications because

the court made the sentences effective as of the date that the appellant was taken into

custody. Moreover, it is unlikely that the Superior Court did not consider the results

of the psychiatric evaluation that it ordered before the Augus t 31, 2021 sentencing ;2

in any event, the appellant’s contention that it did not does not establish a basis for

relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 36.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the m otion to a ffirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superio r Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, J r.

Justice
Exhibit 99.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1 (the “Trust”) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”):
 
 1.           The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement.
 
 
 
 By:
/s/ David J. KolibachukName:
David J. KolibachukTitle:
Vice PresidentDated:
March 23, 2015
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Coconino Sandstone

Filters

              - products_publications(13)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(10)
              - new mexico(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

publication        September 1, 1963        Hypervelocity impact of steel into Coconino Sandstone

publication        January 1, 1962        Water in the Coconino sandstone for the Snowflake-Hay Hollow area, Navajo County, Arizona

publication        January 1, 1979        Water budget and mathematical model of the Coconino Aquifer, southern Navajo County, Arizona

publication        January 1, 1962        Ground water in the Wupatki and Sunset Crater National Monuments, Coconino County, Arizona

Historical        December 31, 1975        Aerial view of Meteor Crater, color, Coconino County, Arizona

publication        January 1, 1980        Map showing ground-water conditions in the Canyon Diablo area, Coconino and Navajo Counties, Arizona - 1979

publication        January 1, 1962        Water-supply possibilities at Capitol Reef National Monument, Utah

publication        January 1, 1979        A study of global sand seas

publication        January 1, 1960        First natural occurrence of coesite

publication        August 1, 2017        Geochemical characterization of groundwater discharging from springs north of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, 2009–2016

publication        October 1, 2002        Generalized hydrogeology and ground-water budget for the C Aquifer, Little Colorado River Basin and parts of the Verde and Salt River Basins, Arizona and New Mexico

publication        January 1, 1953        Stratigraphy and structure of the Miners Mountain area, Wayne County, Utah

publication        January 1, 1978        Map showing ground-water conditions in the Kaibito and Tuba City areas, Coconino and Navajo counties, Arizona, 1978

publication        January 1, 1978        Map showing ground-water conditions in the House Rock area, Coconino County, Arizona-- 1976
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

Nos. 06-1720, 06-2228 YVETTE LOCKHART-BEMBERY, Plaintiff, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v . DANIEL SAURO, Defendant, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, TOWN OF WAYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROBERT IRVING, in his capacity

as Chief of the Wayland Police Department,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on August 9, 2007, is amended as follows: Page 1, line 13: change "attorney's" to "attorneys'" Page 9, footnote 4, line 3: remove "he" before "[Sauro]" Page 20, penultimate line: change "attorney's" to "attorneys'"
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No.DA 22-0555 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEPHANIE LYNN LEDOUX, Defendant and Appellant. GRANT Pursuant

to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant

is given anextension

of time until December 21, 2022, to prepare,file, and servethe Appellant's opening brief.

--r L11/15/2022Case Number: DA 22-0555
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-11440

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Plaintiff - Counter Defendant -

 Appellee Cross Appellant

VERSUS

JOHN J WALKER; MADELINE E WALKER; 

 RICHARD J WALKER; DAVID M WALKER

Defendants - Counter Claimants - 

 Appellants Cross Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:92-CV-2635-P)

December 17, 1997

Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

AFFIRMED. See Fifth Circuit Rule 47.6.
**Exhibit 21**

**Subsidiaries of the Company**

**(Maine & Maritimes Corporation)**

Maine Public Service Company, a Maine corporation 

Maine & NewBrunswick Electrical Power Co, Ltd, a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Maine Public Service Company 

Energy Atlantic, LLC, a Maine limited liabilitycompany, currently inactive 

The Maricor Group, formerly Maine & Maritimes Energy Services Company, a Maine corporation 

The Maricor Group New England, Inc., formerly RES Engineering, Inc., a wholly-owned Massachusetts subsidiary of The Maricor Group 

The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd, formerly Maricor Ltd., a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of The Maricor Group 

Mecel Properties Ltd, a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of The Maricor Group, Canada Ltd 

Maricor Properties Ltd, a Canadian corporation, 50% owned by Maine & Maritimes Corporation 

Cornwallis CourtDevelopments Ltd., a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Maricor Properties
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

A&R LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, INC., §

§

Defendant/Counterclaimant Below, §

Appellant, § No. 117, 2016

§

v. § Court Below: Court of 

§ Chancery of the State of 

FdG LOGISTICS LLC, § Delaware

§

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Below, § C.A. No. 9706-CB

Appellee, §

§

and §

§

FdG ASSOCIATES LP, DAVID S. §

GELLMAN, JAMES E. BEDEKER, §

CYNTHIA M. BRANKIN, STEVEN R. §

BRANTLEY, NORMAN C. BUCK, JOHN P. §

CISZEK, ROBERT N. DOTSON, PAUL §

GARBER, MICHAEL J. HOGAN, JEREMY §

K. LOHRENS, ANDREW J. MANTEY, §

JEFFREY J. O’CONNOR, BRIAN R. § 

REICHERT, LEEANNE RICE, STEPHEN W. §

ROBINSON, PAUL D. SWEEDEN and §

RICHARD THOMPSON, §

§

Additional Counterclaim-Defendants Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: September 28, 2016

Decided: September 30, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and 

SEITZ, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc. 
2

O R D E R

This 30th day of September 2016, it appears to the Court that the judgment 

of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons 

assigned in its well-reasoned decision dated February 23, 2016.

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is hereby AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. 

Chief Justice

 

1

FdG Logistics LLC v. A&R Logistics Holdings, Inc., 131 A.3d 842 (Del. Ch. 2016).