Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 34215 

Cheese articles Appendix 1 Appendix 2 

Sum of 

Appendix 

1&2 

Tokyo R. Uruguay R. Grand total 

ITALIAN-TYPE CHEESES, MADE FROM COW’S MILK, 

(ROMANO MADE FROM COW’S MILK, REGGIANO, 

PARMESAN, PROVOLONE, PROVOLETTI, SBRINZ, 

AND GOYA—NOT IN ORIGINAL LOAVES) AND 

CHEESE AND SUBSTITUTES FOR CHEESE CONTAINING, OR PROCESSED FROM, SUCH ITALIANTYPE CHEESES, WHETHER OR NOT IN ORIGINAL 

LOAVES (D–NOTE 21) ................................................ 6,377,637 1,142,910 7,520,547 795,517 5,165,000 13,481,064 

Argentina ................................................................... 3,890,321 235,162 4,125,483 367,517 1,890,000 6,383,000 

EU–25 ....................................................................... 2,487,316 894,684 3,382,000 .................... 2,025,000 5,407,000 

Romania .................................................................... .................... 0 0 .................... 500,000 500,000 

Uruguay .................................................................... .................... 0 0 428,000 750,000 1,178,000 

Other Countries ........................................................ .................... 13,064 13,064 .................... .................... 13,064 

SWISS OR EMMENTHALER CHEESE OTHER THAN 

WITH EYE FORMATION, GRUYERE-PROCESS 

CHEESE AND CHEESE AND SUBSTITUTES FOR 

CHEESE CONTAINING, OR PROCESSED FROM, 

SUCH CHEESES (GR–NOTE 22) ............................... 5,208,248 1,443,066 6,651,314 823,519 380,000 7,854,833 

EU–25 ....................................................................... 3,944,099 1,207,895 5,151,994 393,006 380,000 5,925,000 

Switzerland ............................................................... 1,230,651 188,836 1,419,487 430,513 .................... 1,850,000 

Other Countries ........................................................ 33,498 46,335 79,833 .................... .................... 79,833 

CHEESE AND SUBSTITUTES FOR CHEESE, CONTAINING 0.5 PERCENT OR LESS BY WEIGHT OF 

BUTTERFAT (EXCEPT ARTICLES WITHIN THE 

SCOPE OF OTHER TARIFF-RATE QUOTAS PROVIDED FOR IN THIS SUBCHAPTER), AND MARGARINE CHEESE (LF–NOTE 23) ............................... 1,837,206 2,587,702 4,424,918 1,050,000 0 5,474,908 

EU–25 ....................................................................... 1,837,206 2,587,701 4,424,907 .................... .................... 4,424,907 

Israel ......................................................................... .................... 0 0 50,000 .................... 50,000 

New Zealand ............................................................. .................... 0 0 1,000,000 .................... 1,000,000 

Other Countries ........................................................ .................... 1 1 .................... .................... 1 

SWISS OR EMMENTHALER CHEESE WITH EYE 

FORMATION (SW–NOTE 25) ..................................... 15,319,360 6,977,971 22,297,331 9,557,945 2,620,000 34,475,276 

Argentina ................................................................... .................... 9,115 9,115 70,885 .................... 80,000 

Australia .................................................................... 209,698 0 209,698 290,302 .................... 500,000 

Canada ..................................................................... .................... 0 0 70,000 .................... 70,000 

EU–25 ....................................................................... 10,961,475 5,515,353 16,476,828 4,003,172 2,420,000 22,900,000 

Iceland ...................................................................... 149,999 0 149,999 150,001 .................... 300,000 

Israel ......................................................................... 27,000 0 27,000 .................... .................... 27,000 

Norway ...................................................................... 3,159,885 495,425 3,655,310 3,227,690 .................... 6,883,000 

Switzerland ............................................................... 763,050 921,055 1,684,105 1,745,895 200,000 3,630,000

Other Countries ........................................................ 48,253 37,023 85,276 .................... .................... 85,276 

TOTAL: CHEESE ARTICLES ........................... 62,531,089 25,369,554 87,900,653 22,764,145 24,921,000 135,585,788 

TOTAL: CHEESE & NON-CHEESE ................. 67,152,497 42,612,927 109,765,434 22,764,145 24,921,000 157,450,569 

[FR Doc. 2014–13900 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No.FAA–2014–0380; Notice No. 25– 

555–SC] 

Special Conditions: Bombardier 

Aerospace, Models BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11; Limit Engine Torque 

Loads 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the Bombardier Aerospace 

Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500– 

1A11 airplanes. These airplanes have 

novel or unusual design features as 

compared to the state of technology 

envisioned in the airworthiness 

standards for transport category 

airplanes. These design features include 

engine size and the potential torque 

loads imposed by sudden engine 

stoppage. The applicable airworthiness 

regulations do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for this 

design feature. These special conditions 

contain the additional safety standards 

that the Administrator considers 

necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by the 

existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: The effective date of these 

special conditions is June 16, 2014. We 

must receive your comments by July 31, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified 

by docket number [FAA–2014–0380] 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow 

the online instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Send comments to Docket 

Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 

20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take 

comments to Docket Operations in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
34216 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except federal holidays. 

• Fax: Fax comments to Docket 

Operations at 202–493–2251. 

Privacy: The FAA will post all 

comments it receives, without change, 

to http://www.regulations.gov/, 

including any personal information the 

commenter provides. Using the search 

function of the docket Web site, anyone 

can find and read the electronic form of 

all comments received into any FAA 

docket, including the name of the 

individual sending the comment (or 

signing the comment for an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement can be 

found in the Federal Register published 

on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478), 

as well as at 

http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/. 

Docket: Background documents or 

comments received may be read at 

http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. 

Follow the online instructions for 

accessing the docket or go to the Docket 

Operations in Room W12–140 of the 

West Building Ground Floor at 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Freisthler, FAA, Airframe and 

Cabin Safety Branch, ANM–115, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1119; facsimile 

425–227–1232. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

substance of these special conditions 

has been subject to the public comment 

process in several prior instances with 

no substantive comments received. The 

FAA therefore finds that good cause 

exists for making these special 

conditions effective upon publication. 

Comments Invited 

We invite interested people to take 

part in this rulemaking by sending 

written comments, data, or views. The 

most helpful comments reference a 

specific portion of the special 

conditions, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. 

We will consider all comments we 

receive on or before the closing date for 

comments. We may change these special 

conditions based on the comments we 

receive. 

Background 

On December 10, 2009, Bombardier 

Aerospace applied for a type certificate 

for their new Models BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11 series airplanes (hereafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘CSeries’’). 

The CSeries airplanes are swept-wing 

monoplanes with an aluminum alloy 

fuselage sized for 5-abreast seating. 

Passenger capacity is designated as 110 

for the Model BD–500–1A10 and 125 for 

the Model BD–500–1A11. Maximum 

takeoff weight is 131,000 pounds for the 

Model BD–500–1A10 and 144,000 

pounds for the Model BD–500–1A11. 

Type Certification Basis 

Under the provisions of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, 

Bombardier Aerospace must show that 

the CSeries airplanes meet the 

applicable provisions of part 25, as 

amended by Amendments 25–1 through 

25–129 thereto. 

If the Administrator finds that the 

applicable airworthiness regulations 

(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards 

for the CSeries airplanes because of a 

novel or unusual design feature, special 

conditions are prescribed under the 

provisions of § 21.16. 

Special conditions are initially 

applicable to the model for which they 

are issued. Should the type certificate 

for that model be amended later to 

include any other model that 

incorporates the same or similar novel 

or unusual design feature, the special 

conditions would also apply to the other 

model under § 21.101. 

In addition to the applicable 

airworthiness regulations and special 

conditions, the CSeries airplanes must 

comply with the fuel vent and exhaust 

emission requirements of 14 CFR part 

34 and the noise certification 

requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the 

FAA must issue a finding of regulatory 

adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92– 

574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’ 

The FAA issues special conditions, as 

defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance 

with § 11.38, and they become part of 

the type-certification basis under 

§ 21.17(a)(2). 

Novel or Unusual Design Features 

The CSeries airplanes will incorporate 

the following novel or unusual design 

features: 

The size, configuration, and failure 

modes of jet engines have changed 

considerably from those envisioned by 

14 CFR 25.361(b) when the engine 

seizure requirement was first adopted. 

Engines have become larger and are now 

designed with large bypass fans capable 

of producing much larger and more 

complex dynamic loads. Relative to the 

engine configurations that existed when 

the rule was developed in 1957, the 

present generation of engines are 

sufficiently novel or unusual to justify 

issuance of special conditions to 

establish appropriate design standards 

for the CSeries airplanes. 

Discussion 

The limit engine torque load imposed 

by sudden engine stoppage due to 

malfunction or structural failure (such 

as compressor jamming) has been a 

specific requirement for transport 

category airplanes since 1957. In the 

past, the design torque loads associated 

with typical failure scenarios have been 

estimated by the engine manufacturer 

and provided to the airframe 

manufacturer as limit loads. These limit 

loads were considered simple, pure 

torque static loads. 

It is evident from service history that 

the engine failure events that tend to 

cause the most severe loads are fan 

blade failures, and these events occur 

much less frequently than the typical 

‘‘limit’’ load condition. 

The regulatory authorities and 

industry have developed a standardized 

requirement in the Aviation Rulemaking 

Advisory Committee (ARAC) forum. 

The technical aspects of this 

requirement have been agreed upon and 

have been accepted by the ARAC Loads 

and Dynamics Harmonization Working 

Group. The special conditions outlined 

below reflect the ARAC 

recommendation. The ARAC 

recommendation includes 

corresponding advisory material, which 

is considered an acceptable means of 

compliance to these special conditions. 

These special conditions contain the 

additional safety standards that the 

Administrator considers necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to 

that established by the existing 

airworthiness standards. 

Applicability 

As discussed above, these special 

conditions are applicable to the Model 

BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 

(CSeries) airplanes. Should Bombardier 

Aerospace apply at a later date for a 

change to the type certificate to include 

another model incorporating the same 

novel or unusual design feature, the 

special conditions would apply to that 

model as well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on two 

model series of airplanes. It is not a rule 

of general applicability. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 34217 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the type 

certification basis for Bombardier 

Aerospace Model BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11 (CSeries) airplanes. 

Limit Engine Torque Loads 

In lieu of § 25.361(b) the following 

special conditions apply: 

1. For turbine engine installations, the 

engine mounts, pylons, and adjacent 

supporting airframe structure must be 

designed to withstand 1g level flight 

loads acting simultaneously with the 

maximum limit torque loads imposed 

by each of the following: 

(a) Sudden engine deceleration due to 

a malfunction that could result in a 

temporary loss of power or thrust, and 

(b) The maximum acceleration of the 

engine. 

2. For auxiliary power unit (APU) 

installations, the power unit mounts 

and adjacent supporting airframe 

structure must be designed to withstand 

1g level flight loads acting 

simultaneously with the maximum limit 

torque loads imposed by each of the 

following: 

(a) Sudden APU deceleration due to 

malfunction or structural failure; and 

(b) The maximum acceleration of the 

APU. 

3. For engine supporting structure, an 

ultimate loading condition must be 

considered that combines 1g flight loads 

with the transient dynamic loads 

resulting from: 

(a) The loss of any fan, compressor, or 

turbine blade; and separately 

(b) Where applicable to a specific 

engine design, any other engine 

structural failure that results in higher 

loads. 

4. The ultimate loads developed from 

the conditions specified in paragraphs 

3(a) and 3(b) of these special conditions 

are to be multiplied by a factor of 1.0 

when applied to engine mounts and 

pylons, and multiplied by a factor of 

1.25 when applied to adjacent 

supporting airframe structure. 

5. Any permanent deformation that 

results from the conditions specified in 

paragraph 3 must not prevent continued 

safe flight and landing. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 6, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13923 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0986; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AGL–25] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Bois Blanc Island, MI 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule, correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error 

in the legal description of a final rule 

published in the Federal Register of 

May 22, 2014, that establishes Class E 

airspace at Bois Blanc Island Airport, 

Bois Blanc Island, MI. The legal 

description noted incorrectly the 

airport’s state and geographic 

coordinates. 

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 

24, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul 

Garza, Jr., Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321– 

7654. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On May 22, 2014, a final rule was 

published in the Federal Register 

establishing Class E airspace at Bois 

Blanc Island Airport, Bois Blanc Island, 

MI (79 FR 29323), Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0986. Subsequent to publication, 

the FAA found the document showing 

the wrong state and geographic location 

in the legal description. It should read 

Bois Blanc Island Airport, MI, (lat. 

45°45′59′′ N., long. 084°30′14′′ W.), 

instead of Bois Blanc Island Airport, 

MO, (lat. 38°20′52′′ N., long. 93°20′43′′ 

W.) This action makes the correction. 

Final Rule Correction 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, in the 

Federal Register of May 22, 2014, (79 

FR 29323) FR Doc. 2014–11382, the 

state and geographic coordinates in the 

airspace designation regulatory text on 

page 29324, column 2, line 1, are 

corrected as follows: 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

AGL MI E5 Bois Blanc Island, MI 

[Corrected] 

■ Remove Bois Blanc Island Airport, 

MO, (lat. 38°20′52′′ N., long. 93°20′43′′ 

W.) and add in its place Bois Blanc 

Island Airport, MI, (lat. 45°45′59′′ N., 

long. 084°30′14′′ W.) 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 6, 

2014. 

Christopher L. Southerland, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14049 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Parts 744 and 758 

[Docket No. 140530464–4464–01] 

RIN 0694–AG20 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR): Addition of Certain Persons to 

the Unverified List (UVL) and Making a 

Correction 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) is amending the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) by 

adding twenty-nine (29) persons to the 

Unverified List (the ‘‘Unverified List’’ or 

UVL). The 29 persons are being added 

to the UVL on the basis that BIS could 

not verify their bona fides because an 

end-use check could not be completed 

satisfactorily for reasons outside the 

U.S. Government’s control. In addition, 

this rule reinserts a requirement for 

exporters to file an Automated Export 

System (AES) record for all exports 

subject to the EAR involving persons 

listed on the UVL following that 

provision’s inadvertent removal from 

the EAR. 

The UVL contains the names and 

addresses of foreign persons who are or 

have been parties to a transaction, as 

that term is described in the EAR, 

involving the export, reexport, or 

transfer (in-country) of items subject to 

the EAR, and whose bona fides BIS has 

been unable to verify through an enduse check. There is a suspension of 

license exceptions for exports, 

reexports, and transfers (in-country) 

involving a party or parties to the 

transaction who are listed on the UVL, 

and a requirement for exporters, 

reexporters, and transferors to obtain 

(and keep a record of) a UVL statement 

from a party or parties to the transaction 

who are listed on the UVL before 

proceeding with exports, reexports, and 

transfers (in-country) involving items 

subject to the EAR, but where the item 

does not require a license. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES