alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - (-)news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(2)
              - massachusetts(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        February 23, 2023        Volcanic explosion penetrates both upper atmosphere and upper crust around the globe

Technical Announcement        September 2, 2015        What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory

Science Snippet        September 18, 2023        Can oceans store more CO2 to help with climate change?

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON LAWRENCE REIGLE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 642 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
NEW LIVING WORD SCHOOL v. The DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, a Department of the Executive Branch of the State of Louisiana and John White, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Department of Education

NO. 2018-CC-0898

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(4)
              - (-)2023(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - 2020(1)

staff profileRay Postolovski
Renan VIART-SOTOLONGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1411

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. Craycraft*, 704 So.2d 593, 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that a warrant was not necessary for officers' second "entry" into a property where exigent circumstances made the officers' first entry lawful, the evidence seized during the second entry was observed during the first entry, and "[t]he second 'entry' was clearly part of one continuous episode.")
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Posters        August 30, 2022        September Public Lecture Flyer, 2022
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Bobby John RYAN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3402

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(5)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - (-)michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(5)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

State News Release        March 29, 2016        Media Advisory: USGS Goes Airborne to Define What Minerals Lie Beneath the Upper Midwest
#### BEE JAY PRODUCTS, Inc.; Joseph Berko-witz and Reuben Berkowitz, individually and as officers of Bee Jay Products, Inc.; Universal Manufacturing Company, a corporation; Reuben Berkowitz and Bertha Berkowitz, individually and as officers of Universal Manufacturing Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 4581.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

May 14, 1953.

F. W. James, Evanston, 111., for petitioners.

John W. Carter, Jr., Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C. (W. T. Kelley, General Counsel, and Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BRATTON, HUXMAN, and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Gay Games, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 10 Cir., 204 F.2d 197, the order of the Commission is affirmed and judgment will be entered enforcing such order in accordance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c).
# C_2020029EN.01001301.xml

| 28.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9674 — Vodafone Italia/Telecom Italia/INWIT JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 29/12)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Vodafone Group plc (‘Vodafone Group’, United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

Vodafone Group plc (‘Vodafone Group’, United Kingdom),

| — | Telecom Italia S.p.A. (‘Telecom Italia’, Italy), |
| --- | --- |

—

Telecom Italia S.p.A. (‘Telecom Italia’, Italy),

Vodafone Group and Telecom Italia acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane S.p.A. (‘INWIT’, Italy).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | for Vodafone Group: operator of mobile and fixed telecommunication networks and provider of telecommunication services in a number of countries, including Italy, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Vodafone Group: operator of mobile and fixed telecommunication networks and provider of telecommunication services in a number of countries, including Italy,

| — | for Telecom Italia: operator of mobile and fixed telecommunication networks and provider of telecommunication services in a number of countries, including Italy, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Telecom Italia: operator of mobile and fixed telecommunication networks and provider of telecommunication services in a number of countries, including Italy,

| — | for INWIT: operator of passive mobile telecommunications infrastructure in Italy. |
| --- | --- |

—

for INWIT: operator of passive mobile telecommunications infrastructure in Italy.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9674 — Vodafone Italia/Telecom Italia/INWIT JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III 

No. CR-13-443

JOE JONES

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered January 15, 2014

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN 

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[CR-2008-258]

HONORABLE RALPH WILSON, JR., 

JUDGE 

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW

GRANTED

RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge

This is a no-merit appeal from a probation revocation. Joe Jones pleaded guilty to 

fleeing, a Class “D” felony, and was sentenced to sixty months’ probation. The State filed a 

petition to revoke Jones’s probation alleging that, among other violations, he had failed to 

pay his fines, costs, and fees as directed. The circuit court revoked his probation and 

sentenced him to seventy-two months’ suspended imposition of sentence.

In compliance with Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and 

Court of Appeals, Jones’s attorney brings a no-merit appeal and a motion asking to be 

relieved as counsel. The motion to withdraw is accompanied by a brief, including both a 

discussion of all matters in the record that might arguably support an appeal and a statement 

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 42
2 

as to why counsel considers the points to be incapable of supporting a meritorious appeal. 

Jones has not exercised his right to file pro se points for reversal. 

The State needs to show only one violation of probation in order to sustain a 

revocation. Phillips v. State, 101 Ark. App. 190, 272 S.W.3d 123 (2008). Here, the 

Crittenden County Sheriff’s Office Collector, Amy Peyton, testified that her office had not 

received any payments from Jones. This was sufficient for the court to find that Jones 

violated his probation by failing to pay all fines, costs, and probation fees. From our review 

of the record and the brief presented to us, we find that counsel has complied with the 

requirements of Rule 4-3(k)(1) and hold that there is no merit to this appeal. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the revocation is affirmed. 

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. 

HARRISON and GRUBER, JJ., agree. 

C. Brian Williams, for appellant. 

No response.

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 42
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(12)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-37(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(13)
              - colorado(6)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - (-)maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(23)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(2)

staff profilePhillip Goodling

staff profileMichael E Wieczorek
Christopher Michael ARGUELLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Kimberly A. Reece, Assistant Public Defender, Pensacola, for, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Makar, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Hartland  Investments,  Inc.on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I Gust Kepler,  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Gust Kepler
---------------
Gust Kepler

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
January 15, 2004
Natalie WILLIAMSON, Appellant, v. Franklin WILLIAMSON, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-487

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2018

Natalie Williamson, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed as moot.

LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
STATE EX REL. Joseph GRAY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0125

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Gray v. State, 14-2659 (La. 10/23/15), 177 So.3d 333.
Rickie E. WILDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 2, 2018

Rickie E. Wilder, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant's notice, filed February 20, 2018, is untimely and ineffective to invoke the Court's jurisdiction to review the "Order Denying Defendant's Appeal," rendered September 26, 2017. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c). Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby dismissed.

Osterhaus and Winsor, JJ., concur; Makar, J., concurs with opinion.

I concur, noting that Appellant's remedy, if any, is by petition for belated review filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1579** 

ZHENLU ZHANG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION; NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION; J. C. MIL LER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( 8:08

- cv
- 01716

- DKC )

Submitted : October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Bef ore MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Zhenlu Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. J.C. Miller, THOMPSON & HINE, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Larry Robert Seegull, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Jason Daniel M edinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; C. Dennis Southard, IV, THOMPSON & HINE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zhenlu Zhang appeals the distric t court’s order denying his motion for leave to file a Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 60(b)

motion for reconsideration and a motion for sanctions after the
imposition of a pre

- filing injunction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, w e affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Zhang v. Science

& Tech

. Corp. , No. 8:08

- cv
- 01716

- DKC (D. Md. Apr. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo re the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lissa A. Goldenstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of Argonaut Technologies, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Argonaut Technologies, Inc. Date: May 12, 2005By:
    
    /s/ LISSA A. GOLDENSTEINName:
    
    Lissa A. GoldensteinTitle:
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(6)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - (-)news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(5)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - (-)nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(5)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

State News Release        January 24, 2023        Media Alert: The USGS Announces Low-Level Helicopter Flights in Nevada

State News Release        December 13, 2022        Media Alert: Low-Level Helicopter Flights to Image 3-Dimensional Geology in Nevada and California
Kristina Leightner WOOLF, Petitioner, v. Anthony M. WOOLF, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1899

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

A. Richard Troell and William L. Ketchersid of Ward & Ketchersid, P.A., Destin, for Petitioner.

Anthony M. Woolf, pro se, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Ray, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 558 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 558

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 55 South Pioneer Boulevard in Springboro, Ohio, as the ``Richard 
                `Dick' Chenault Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2015

Mr. Chabot (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Renacci, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. 
Tiberi, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Jordan, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Wenstrup, 
 Mr. Latta, Mr. Turner, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Ms. Fudge, and Mr. Joyce) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 55 South Pioneer Boulevard in Springboro, Ohio, as the ``Richard 
                `Dick' Chenault Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD ``DICK'' CHENAULT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 55 South Pioneer Boulevard in Springboro, Ohio, shall be 
known and designated as the `` Richard `Dick' Chenault Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard 
`Dick' Chenault Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```