alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Filters

## By Location

              - alaska(13)
              - arizona(6)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(6)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(4)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - (-)north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(34)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(343)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - utah(5)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

Center News        March 19, 2020        LCMAP Promises New Insight on Land Surface Change
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Coleman, Willis and Bray Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

HAMPTON ROADS ADMIRALS and AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. v. Record No. 2128-94-1 AUGUST 8, 1995

PATRICK CAVANAGH

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION Kevin E. Mooney (Robert W. McFarland; Mark S. Davis; McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, on briefs), for appellant. Patrick Cavanagh, pro se .

The award of the commission is modified and affirmed. 1. The commission's holding that the question of maximum medical recovery was not an issue in the claim is supported by the record. While the employer protested what it termed an ex parte determination of compensable disability, it expressly acknowledged "that the time for requesting a review of such determination has already passed." This supports the commission's determination that the issue of compensability was

conceded.

2. We find no abuse of discretion in the commission's determination that the proper measure of average weekly wage was not the allowances paid temporarily during the try-out period,

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - but the average weekly wage of a player who made the team. The parties agreed that this was the proper approach. The deputy commissioner correctly determined that the average weekly wage was $277.77, to which should be added a weekly housing allowance of $46.15, making a total average weekly wage of $323.92. The commission erred in adding to that figure a meal allowance of $18 per day ($126 per week). The uncontradicted evidence established that the meal allowance was paid only during the try-out period, as the alternative to a wage. It was not paid during the regular season, once payment of a regular wage began. This case is remanded to the commission for entry of an award based upon an average weekly wage of $323.92. Modified, affirmed and remanded

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARK NEWNAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-0916

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; James W. McCann, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562015CF003221AXXXXX.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. 

Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Mario Alberto Briones , Appellant

No. 06

- 20

- 00077

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 76th District Court of Camp County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. CF

- 19

- 01959 ). Memorandu m Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We n ote that the appellant, Mario Alberto Briones , has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 16, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
F. Russo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Peter F. Russo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Peter F. Russo
                                       President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2006
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Mendy Marsh, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:November 10, 2009
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ James M. Trimble                         |   | June 30, 2011 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------|
| James M. Trimble                                   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                         |   | June 30, 2011 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |

----
Marita HUTCHINSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4350

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 9, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal is granted in circuit court case numbers 12-11028-CFANO and 12-1314-CFANO. This order shall serve as a timely notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence, the latter imposed April 13, 2015. Within twenty days the trial court shall consider appellant's eligibility for appointment of appellate counsel, provided appellant files within ten days a motion in the circuit court requesting same accompanied by a financial affidavit, and shall enter an order thereupon, with a copy to appellant and a copy to this court.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, accompanied by any order of indigency that may have been entered by the circuit court, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29310]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) 
will hold a public meeting via Microsoft Teams on Wednesday, January 8, 
2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alec Johnston, Office of National 
Public Liaison, at (202) 317-4299, or send an email to 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a public meeting 
via Microsoft Teams of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, January 8, 
2025, at 12:30 p.m. EDT. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide 
continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the 
IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is 
an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax 
administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund 
fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be 
the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information 
returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS 
electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive 
observations about current or proposed policies, programs, and 
procedures, and suggest improvements. Please call or email Alec 
Johnston to confirm your attendance. Mr. Johnston can be reached at 
202-317-4299 or [email protected]. Should you wish the ETAAC to 
consider a written statement, please call 202-317-4299 or email: 
[email protected].

    Dated: December 5, 2024.
John A. Lipold,
Designated Federal Official, Office of National Public Liaison, 
Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-29310 Filed 12-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - maryland(2)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(3)
              - 2023(1)
              - 2022(1)
              - 2021(2)
              - 2020(1)
              - 2019(2)

staff profileSteven Hak

staff profileMatthew G Pajerowski

staff profileAndrew E LaMotte
WORLDWIDE REALTY INVESTMENT CORP., JJ Realty, LLC, Children of America Sterling, LLC, Children of America Wilmington, LLC, Children of America Warrenton, LLC, Children of America Crofton, LLC, Children of America Chestnut Hill, LLC, And JAP3 Holdings, LLC, Appellants, v. James Anthony PERRETTY, III and Jeanne Linskey Perretty, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1699

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Kraig S. Weiss and Paul K. Silverberg of Silverberg & Weiss, P.A., Weston, for appellants.

Lydia A. Worden and Jennifer E. Reisler of Beaulieu-Fawcett Law Group, P.A., Delray Beach, for appellee Jeanne Linskey Perretty.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Levine, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 701 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 701

   To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 directing the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission to add a particular class of 
 securities to those exempted under such Act to provide a deadline for 
                              such action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2013

 Mr. McHenry (for himself, Mr. Schweikert, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Garrett, and 
 Mr. David Scott of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend a provision of the Securities Act of 1933 directing the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission to add a particular class of 
 securities to those exempted under such Act to provide a deadline for 
                              such action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RULEMAKING DEADLINE FOR EXEMPTING CERTAIN SECURITIES.

    Section 3(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77c(b)(2)) 
is amended by striking ``The Commission'' and inserting ``Not later 
than October 31, 2013, the Commission''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021220EN.01008601.xml

| 9.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/86

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Extension of the term of Community plant variety rights for the species asparagus and the species groups flower bulbs, woody small fruits and woody ornamentals’

(COM(2020) 36 final — 2021/0019 (COD))

(2021/C 220/12)

| Referral | European Parliament, 11.2.2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Article 118 and Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 24.3.2021 |
| Plenary session No | 559 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 262/0/14 |

Referral

European Parliament, 11.2.2021

Legal basis

Article 118 and Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

24.3.2021

Plenary session No

559

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

262/0/14

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 559th plenary session of 24 and 25 March 2021 (meeting of 24 March), by 262 votes with 14 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 24 March 2021.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---
CROSSTEX ENERGY SERVICES, LP, Cross Tex Lig, LLC, and Crosstex Processing Services, LLC v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1122

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
Araceli MARQUEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merci, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: May 13, 2011  /s/ Jose Acevedo Principal Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(11)
              - connect_staff_profiles(94)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(118)
              - 2023(50)
              - 2022(65)
              - 2021(33)
              - 2020(4)
              - 2019(13)

staff profileArthur Merschat

staff profileJoe Blahovec

staff profileJeffrey R Irwin

staff profileNeal J Pastick, PhD

staff profileMichael Budde

staff profileJeff Clauson

staff profileMatthew Rigge

staff profileDouglas Kent

staff profileKristi Sayler

staff profileEric D. Anderson, Ph.D.

staff profileNeil M Dubrovsky

staff profileChristopher Woody

staff profileJames LeNoir

staff profileTerry Sohl

staff profileAndrew Klose, Ph.D.

staff profileBenjamin J Drenth, Ph.D.

staff profileKelly D. Thomson, PhD

staff profileGrace  C Walker

staff profileDean Gesch, Ph.D.

staff profileMichelle Bouchard

staff profileJeffrey J Danielson

staff profileUSGS Library

staff profileLauren Edgar, Ph.D.

science explorer topicMapping What’s Under Our Feet

staff profileAmanda R Whaling

staff profileDanielle A Olinger

staff profileHelen W. Dow, Ph.D.

staff profileCrista L Straub, PhD

science explorer topicMineral Commodities

staff profileRichard Blakely

#### Pagination

-  First page« First 
-  Previous page‹‹ 
-                Page            1 
-                Current page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 13, 2012

h0410 

# Order

April 13, 2012

143811

THE ESTATE OF THELMA L. DeGOEDE, by VELLA TRADER, Personal Representative, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143811 COA: 296129 Kalamazoo CC: 2008-000191-CZ COMERICA BANK, f/k/a INDUSTRIAL STATE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 30, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN

, J. ( dissenting ).

I would grant leave to appeal to determine whether in applying the statute of limitations to the certificates of deposit at issue, the Court of Appeals should have separately considered plaintiff’s claims for the principal and the in terest accrued under

the certificates.