alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Principal Financial Officer

I, Michael A. Arends, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marchex, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: March 14, 2018

 

|                                                                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /S/     MICHAEL A. ARENDS                                                                 |
| Michael A. Arends

Chief Financial Officer and member of the Office of the CEO

(Principal Financial Officer) |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6673

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TODD ANTONIO FOSTER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-402-A, CA-98-218-AM) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Todd Antonio Foster, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Todd Antonio Foster seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Foster , Nos. CR-93-402-A; CA-98- 218-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Jean MESLER and Carol Tabaka, Appellants, v. ISLA MERITA HOMEOWNERS' CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION II, INC., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation and Susan Pikus, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3820

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 18, 2018

Ryan M. Tables of the Tables Law Group, P.A. and Andrew J. Smallman of Gilbert & Smallman, PLLC, Hollywood, for appellants.

Richard A. Sachs of Glazer & Sachs, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Isla Merita Homeowners' Condominium Association, II, Inc.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Conner and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        July 12, 2017        New Warning System Identifies Flash Drought Quickly

Podcasts        November 18, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 9 – Famine Early Warning

Podcasts        August 7, 2008        Kasatochi Volcano Erupts Explosively

Podcasts        March 20, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 92 – EROS 50th: The Library and Science Support

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1579

ZHENLU ZHANG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; COMPUTER SCIENCES 

CORPORATION; NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC 

ADMINISTRATION; J. C. MILLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-01716-DKC)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zhenlu Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. J.C. Miller, THOMPSON & HINE, 

LLP, Washington, D.C.; Larry Robert Seegull, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, 

Baltimore, Maryland; Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; C. Dennis Southard, IV, 

THOMPSON & HINE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Zhenlu Zhang appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for leave to file a Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 60(b) 

motion for reconsideration and a motion for sanctions after the 

imposition of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. See Zhang v. Science 

& Tech. Corp., No. 8:08-cv-01716-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 23, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7685

MARLON CANADY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RODERIC L. TUELL, Building Manager, Unit Manager, employed at 

Sussex One State Prison, sued individually and official 

capacity; BENJAMIN T. ULEP, Doctor, employed at Sussex One 

State Prison, sued individually and official capacity; EDDIE 

PEARSON, Warden, employed at Sussex One State Prison, sued 

individually and official capacity; VANCAMP, Sergeant (Male), 

employed at Sussex One State Prison, sued individually and 

official capacity; GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Warden, employed at 

Wallens Ridge state Prison, sued individually and official 

capacity; M. STANFORD, Medical Administrator, employed at 

Wallens Ridge state Prison, sued individually and official 

capacity; DANIEL MILLER, Doctor, employed at Wallens Ridge 

state Prison, sued individually and official capacity; SABRINA 

LOGAN, Sergeant (female), employed at Sussex One State Prison, 

sued individually and official capacity; JERRY D. OATES, 

United Manager, employed at Sussex One State Prison, sued 

individually and official capacity,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, sued 

individually and official capacity; LOGAN, Sergeant (female), 

employed at Sussex One State Prison, sued individually and 

official capacity; JANE DOE, Medical Administrator, employed 

at Sussex One State Prison, sued individually and official 

capacity; J. D. OATES, United Manager, employed at Sussex One 

State Prison, sued individually and official capacity; K. 

LAMB, Correctional Officer, employed at Wallens Ridge state 

Prison, sued individually and official capacity; FRED 

SCHILLINGS, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections 
2

Medical Health Services, sued individually and official 

capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00420-REP-RCY)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marlon Canady, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Marlon Canady seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing some, but not all, of his claims raised under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The order Canady seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we deny Canady’s motion for appointment of counsel 

and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE EX REL. Jerrod Dewayne JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1201

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 3:42 PM

To: 'XOinnovation@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Hightower, Gerald CTR (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - XO Innovations

Dear Mr. Amaya:  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

0344).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed UAS

operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).  

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed‐set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/7/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
Melvin E. ANDUJAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        February 6, 2024        Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI) - Characterizing Wetland Habitat and Hydrology
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 662 

To prohibit United States contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on 

Climate Change and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. LATTA, Mrs. BLACK, 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. DUNCAN

of South Carolina, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. LONG, Mr. POSEY, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. 

DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. MCKINLEY, and Mr. STOCKMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the United Nations 

Framework Convention on Climate Change. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 662 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBU2 TIONS TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL 

3 ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE UNITED NA4 TIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLI5 MATE CHANGE. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, no funds made available to any Federal de8 partment or agency may be used to make assessed or vol9 untary contributions on behalf of the United States to or 

10 for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 

11 (IPCC) or the United Nations Framework Convention on 

12 Climate Change (UNFCCC). 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The prohibition on use of 

14 funds contained in subsection (a) applies with respect to 

15 funds made available for fiscal year 2014 and subsequent 

16 fiscal years. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Russell HARABURDA, DOC #S39871, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1292

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Eli M. WILLIAMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Duneen H. SEYMOUR, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0924

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
D.B. and K.S. v. K.S.B.

2150850

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Kenneth R. Raines and W. Lee Webb of Raines Law Firm, Fairhope, for appellants.

Michael E. Mark, Mobile, for appellee.

*After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court*

PITTMAN, Judge.

This court affirmed, without an opinion, the judgment of the Baldwin Juvenile Court awarding K.S.B. custody of her daughter. *D.B. v. K.S.B.* (No. 2150850, Feb. 3, 2017), 241 So. 3d 669 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017) (table). This court's judgment *764has been reversed, and the cause remanded, by the Alabama Supreme Court. *Ex parte D.B.*, 255 So.3d 755 (Ala. 2017). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court's opinion, the judgment of the juvenile court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for the entry of a judgment consistent with the supreme court's opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Thompson, P.J., and Thomas, Moore, and Donaldson, JJ., concur.
Clemmie SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-899

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
M.J., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-81

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(8)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(3)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(3)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - (-)north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(47)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(11)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        October 5, 2018        Image of the Week - Hurricane Florence

Featured Films and Shorts        April 2, 2020        Image of the Week — An Early Spring via Satellite

Featured Films and Shorts        April 13, 2023        Climate Science Champions Season 3: Adam Terando, Research Scientist

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness
PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT, as the Assignee and Subrogee of All South Consulting Engineers, LLC v. FIRST MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY and All South Consulting Engineers, LLC

NO. 2018-CC-1229

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.
# C_2020131DE.01002401.xml

| 22.4.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 131/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 131/24

---

Berichtigung der Veröffentlichung eines Antrags auf Eintragung eines Namens nach Artikel 50 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1151/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über Qualitätsregelungen für Agrarerzeugnisse und Lebensmittel

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 26 vom 27. Januar 2020
  )

(2020/C 131/12)

Auf Seite 8, Punkt 3.2 Absatz 2 Satz 2:

Anstatt:

„Er enthält nach vollständiger Trocknung maximal 30 g Trockenmasse je 100 g Käse und mindestens 45 g Fett je 100 g Käse.“

muss es heißen:

„Er enthält maximal 30 g Trockenmasse je 100 g Käse mit einem Fettgehalt von mindestens 45 g in 100 g Trockenmasse.“

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(8)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(12)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(10)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - (-)florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(3)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        February 1, 2000        Florida Everglades
STATE EX REL. Stanley WALDRON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-2110

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. BERNARD**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.