alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
      OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Russo, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934;
      and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ Peter
              F.
              RussoPeter
                F. Russo
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer




November
      9, 2007
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anthony R. Harvey, Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                               



| | By:    | /s/ Anthony R. Harvey  
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | ANTHONY R. HARVEY      
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | January 25, 2007       



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
J-A01036-18

____________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

 Appellee

v.

ANDREW LAWRENCE COOPER 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1436 EDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence December 9, 2016

in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County 

Criminal Division at No.: CP-46-CR-0006238-2015

BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., OTT, J., and PLATT*, J.

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT BY PLATT, J.: FILED JULY 24, 

2018

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

I concur in the learned Majority’s decision that the evidence admitted at 

trial was sufficient to support the charges of which Appellant was convicted 

with respect to his father, Lawrence Cooper. 

However, I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s decision that there 

was insufficient evidence to support Appellant’s conviction of aggravated 

assault against his mother, Sara Cooper. Viewing the evidence admitted at 

trial in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as we must under our 

standard of review, there was sufficient evidence to support Appellant’s

second count of aggravated assault. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment 

of sentence in its entirety.
J-A01036-18

- 2 -

A person is guilty of the crime of aggravated assault when he “attempts 

to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury intentionally, 

knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference 

to the value of human life;” [or] “attempts to cause or intentionally or 

knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon[.]” 18 

Pa.C.S.A. § 2702(a)(1), (4); see also Commonwealth v. Fortune, 68 A.3d 

980, 986 (Pa. Super. 2013) (en banc), appeal denied, 78 A.3d 1089 (Pa. 2013)

(concluding that evidence was sufficient to prove appellant took substantial 

step toward inflicting serious bodily injury where he pointed gun at victim, 

threatened to kill her, and did not do so because she fled).

Here, the evidence is clear that Appellant, with the intent to “take 

everybody out[,]” in an effort to avoid attending his parole hearing, took a 

substantial step towards those ends when he placed guns and ammunition 

throughout the house, and threatened his mother that if she did not comply 

with his demand that she leave, she would be first. (Trial Court Opinion, 

6/26/17, at 3). As the trial court aptly noted, “[t]aking [Appellant] at his own 

words, he intended to kill [his parents] and police officers and took substantial 

steps in furtherance of his intention.” (Id. at 11).

In the totality of the circumstances, the judge, sitting as fact finder, was 

free to find that Appellant took a substantial step toward inflicting bodily injury 

to his mother with a deadly weapon. See Fortune, supra at 986-87. 

Therefore, I would conclude that Appellant’s conviction, in full, was supported 

by sufficient evidence, and would affirm the judgment of sentence.
J-A01036-18

- 3 -

Accordingly, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.
**Exhibit 16.1**

 

[EideBailly LLP Letterhead]

 

 

March  29,2006

 

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have been furnished with a copy of thedisclosures included in Item 9 of Form 10-K to be filed by South Dakota SoybeanProcessors.  We agree with the statements made in those disclosuresinsofar as they relate to our Firm.

 

 
|  /s/ Eide Bailly LLP |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Eide Bailly LLP           |
| Sioux Falls, SD           |

 

----
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40564 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICKI JOYCE WYLIE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-148-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 9, 1999 Before BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Vicki Wylie (“Wylie”) appeals from her sentence following her guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Wylie’s sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred by applying the enhancement provision of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5). She argues that there is insufficient evidence to show that she used or possessed a firearm “in connection with” a felony drug offense. We haveNo. 98-40564 -2- reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we conclude that the district court did not err by applying § 2K2.1(b)(5). See United States v. Condren , 18 F.3d 1190, 1195- 1200 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony R. Harvey, Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Copper
  Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ Anthony R. Harvey  
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | ANTHONY R. HARVEY      
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 20, 2006      



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00878-CR

NO. 03-11-00879-CR

NO. 03-11-00880-CR

NO. 03-11-00881-CR

NO. 03-11-00882-CR

NO. 03-11-00883-CR

NO. 03-11-00884-CR

Austin Bounds, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

NOS. C-1-CR-11-210691, C-1-CR-11-210692, C-1-CR-11-500477, C-1-CR-11-500478,

C-1-CR-11-500479, C-1-CR-11-500775, & C-1-CR-11-500776

THE HONORABLE CARLOS HUMBERTO BARRERA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Austin Bounds seeks to appeal from judgments of conviction for seven

misdemeanor offenses: one charge of possession of a penalty 3 controlled substance in an amount

of less than 28 grams, see Health & SafetyCode Ann. § 481.117 (West 2010); one charge of failure

to identify, see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.02 (West 2011); three charges of theft of $500 or more

but less than $1500, see id. § 31.03(a), (e)(3) (West Supp. 2011); and two charges of theft of $50 or

more but less than $500, see id. § 31.03(a), (e)(2)(A)(i). In each of these cases, the trial court has
certified that this is a plea bargain case and Bounds has no right of appeal. Accordingly, the appeals

are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 27, 2012

Do Not Publish

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71094-71095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24902]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9029-6]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 10/03/2016 Through 10/07/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
EIS No. 20160231, Draft, FTA, IL, Chicago Red Line Extension, Comment 
Period Ends: 11/30/2016, Contact: Mark Assam 312-353-4070.
EIS No. 20160232, Final, NPS, BR, AZ, Long-Term Experimental and 
Management Plan (LTEMP) for the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam, Review 
Period Ends: 11/14/2016, Contact: Katrina Grantz 801-524-3635.

    The U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and the 
Department of the Interior's National Park Service are joint lead 
agencies for the above project.

EIS No. 20160233, Final, USMC, CA, Santa Margarita River Conjunctive 
Use Project, Review Period Ends: 11/14/2016, Contact: Kristin Thomas 
760-725-9741.

    The U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Department of the Interior's 
Bureau of Reclamation are joint lead agencies of the above project.

EIS No. 20160234, Draft, DOC, PRO, Programmatic--South Region of the 
Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network, Comment Period Ends: 12/12/
2016, Contact: Genevieve Walker 571-665-6134.
EIS No. 20160235, Final, NMFS, MA, Amendment 18 to the Northeast 
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 11/14/2016, 
Contact: John Bullard 978-281-9343.

[[Page 71095]]

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20160236, Final, FAA, OR, ADOPTION--Military Readiness 
Activities at Naval Weapons System Training Facility Boardman, Contact: 
Paula Miller 202-267-7378.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) has adopted the U.S. Navy's FEIS # 20150355, filed 
with the USEPA 12/28/2015. FAA was a cooperating agency on the project. 
Recirculation of the document is not necessary under Section 1506.3 of 
the CEQ Regulations.

    Dated: October 11, 2016.
Karin Leff,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-24902 Filed 10-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(14)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        February 6, 2024        Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI) - Characterizing Wetland Habitat and Hydrology

Topic        June 4, 2017        South Atlantic Water Science Center Drought Monitoring
A.G., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-329

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018

A.G., a juvenile, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08245

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

08245\08245_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

08245\08245_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08245\08245_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08245\08245_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 08245\08245_PARTA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08245\08245_PARTB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08245\08245_PARTC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08245\08245_PARTD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08245\08245_PARTH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_Block Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_Block Diagram.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_D3-1 Diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_D3-1 Diagram.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08245\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08245_PEARL EPA-Model.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 10, 2015

s0603 

# Order

Clerk June 10, 2015

150523

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150523

COA: 316220

Alger CC: 2011

- 001963

- FH

REBECCA ADELE WILDER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARK RICHARDSON AND ARTHUR

RICHARDSON,

 Respondents

 v.

ERIC J. RICHARDSON,

 Petitioner

 PAUL PEFFLEY, 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 899 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Intervenor
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. A N TH O N Y SCO TT RI CH A RD S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 30036 D . C . N o . 6 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 0 0 8 - D WM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na D ona l d W . M ol l oy , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , a n dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . A ntho ny S cottR i char ds appeal s f rom the 16 8-m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rd is tr ib u tio n o f

c h ildp o rn o g r ap h y , in v i o l a t i o n o f

1 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 2 A ( a ) ( 2 ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 30036 2 R i char ds cont ends thathi s s ent ence i s unrea sonabl e bec ause i tw as grea t er than n ec es saryt o acc om pl i sh the st atut ory purpo se s of s ent enci ng w hen con si dere d i n l i gh tof hi s s i gn i fi cantm ent alheal th i ss ues. T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ct c o u rt c a r e f

u llyc o n s id e r e dh is m e n ta l c o n d itio n a n de m o tio n a l s ta te a s p a rt o f its a n a ly s is o f

th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c to r s , a n dp r o v id e daw e llr e a s o n e da n dth o r o u g h e x p la n a tio n f o rth e s e n te n c e im p o s e d . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t p r o c e du r a llye rr , a n dth e s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le u n d e rth e to ta lity o f th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7); see a l so U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 1-93 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.