alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 50906

CLIFTON DELMAR JACKSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
DETECTIVE SMITH; JEFF D. KELLY; AMADEO ORTIZ , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CV

- 532

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Clifton Delmar Jackson, Texas prisoner # 1729942, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. By moving to proceed IFP , Jackson is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor,
117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 7, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-50906 Document: 00512621754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2014No. 13

- 50906

Jackson asserted that the defendants had failed to comply with a state court order that certain seized property be returned to him. However, none of the arguments i n his IFP motion address the district court’s conclusion that
there has been no deprivation of due process if a m eaningful state remedy for the loss of property is available. See Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984); Brewster v. Dretke, 587 F.3d 764, 768 (5th Cir. 2009). Jackson does contest the district court’s finding that his appointed attorney, Jeff Kelly , was not a state actor for purposes of § 1983 liability. T he district court correctly found that Kelly was not a state actor and that claims of legal malpractice may
not b e brought in a § 1983 proceeding. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 324

- 25 (1981); O’Brien v. Colbath, 465 F.2d 358, 359 (5th Cir. 1972). For these reasons, Jackson has not shown that his appeal involves any arguably meritorious issue. His motion to proceed IFP is denied. See Howard v . King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it
is dismissed. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 20 2 n.24; 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.
T he district court’s dismissal of Jackson ’s § 1983 complain t and our dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for purposes of § 1915(g ). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385

- 87 (5th Cir. 1996).
Jackson is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g ). MOTION TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

2 Case: 13-50906 Document: 00512621754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2014
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of Benacquista Galleries, Inc. (the"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, James Price, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|/s/ James Price
-------------------
James Price
Chief Executive Officer
Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer


Date: January 5, 2005
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(61)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(1)
              - florida(6)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - (-)montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(1)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 5, 2017        Return of the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear
Marcus B. HARRIS, a/k/a Marzug Al-Hakim, Appellant, v. Martye S. GATTIE and Beverly C. Taviere, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4142

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tommy BROOKS, individually and as administrator of the estate of Rita Kay Brooks, deceased v. ALABAMA SALVAGE AUCTION CO. et al.

1150843

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 17, 2019

Order 

Clerk

April 17, 2019

159196(86)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 159196

v COA: 338311

Macomb CC: 2016-000810-FC

MICHAEL ZARAN-IKIEL GARRETT, Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file a pro per 

supplement to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The pro per supplement 

submitted on February 28, 2019, is accepted for filing.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
     I, David A. Slack, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratosInternational, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Dated: March 26, 2004 /s/ David A. Slack    David A. Slack
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 606 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 815 County Road 23 in Tyrone, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Christopher Scott Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 606 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST CHRISTOPHER SCOTT POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 815 County Road 23 in Tyrone, 

5 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Spe6 cialist Christopher Scott Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Christopher 

11 Scott Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-QSB/A  of  HiEnergy
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended  January 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Bogdan C. Maglich,  Chief Executive  Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /S/ B. C. MAGLICH
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Bogdan C. Maglich
                                      Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
                                      April 21, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


<PAGE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5567 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require that all Federal 

Direct Stafford Loans, Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, 

and Federal Direct PLUS Loans have the same rates of interest. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2016 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

that all Federal Direct Stafford Loans, Federal Direct 

Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, and Federal Direct PLUS 

Loans have the same rates of interest. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Interest 

5 Rate Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTEREST RATES. 

7 Section 455(b)(8) of the Higher Education Act of 

8 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(8)) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5567 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and be2 fore July 1, 2016,’’ after ‘‘2013,’’; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘and be4 fore July 1, 2016,’’ after ‘‘2013,’’; 

5 (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and 

6 (F) as subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively; and 

7 (4) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(E) REVISED RATES FOR GRADUATE AND

10 PROFESSIONAL FDSL.—Notwithstanding the 

11 preceding paragraphs of this subsection, for 

12 Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loans 

13 issued to graduate or professional students, for 

14 which the first disbursement is made on or 

15 after July 1, 2016, the applicable rate of inter16 est shall be determined under subparagraph 

17 (B)— 

18 ‘‘(i) by substituting ‘2.05’ for ‘3.6’; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(ii) by substituting ‘8.25’ for ‘9.5’. 

21 ‘‘(F) REVISED RATES FOR FEDERAL DI22 RECT PLUS LOANS.—Notwithstanding the pre23 ceding paragraphs of this subsection, for Fed24 eral Direct PLUS Loans, for which the first 

25 disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2016, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5567 IH

1 the applicable rate of interest shall be deter2 mined under subparagraph (C)— 

3 ‘‘(i) by substituting ‘2.05’ for ‘4.6’; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(ii) by substituting ‘8.25’ for 

6 ‘10.5’.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 77 (Monday, April 21, 2008)]
[Corrections]
[Page 21415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-7475]



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / 
CORRECTIONS

[[Page 21415]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Nutrition Service


Child Nutrition Programs-Income Eligibility Guidelines

Correction

    In notice document E8-7475 beginning on page 19186 in the issue of 
Wednesday, April 9, 2008, make the following correction:
    On page 19187, in the table, in the ninth column titled ``Monthly'' 
under the heading ``Hawaii'', in the sixth row ``3,359'' should read as 
``3,539''.

[FR Doc. Z8-7475 Filed 4-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(6)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(24)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(15)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(6)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(11)
              - utah(1)
              - (-)washington(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        January 7, 2015        Oso Landslide Computer Simulations
#### TEPLER v. FRICK et al.

No. 208, Docket 22611.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 8, 1953.

Decided May 1, 1953.

Frederic A. Johnson, William M. Kunstler and Michael J. Kunstler, New York City, for appellant.

Willkie, Owen, Farr, Gallagher & Walton, New York City, Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Chicago, 111., and Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for Ford C. Frick, Chicago National League Ball Club and Cleveland Baseball Co., ap-pellees.

Shearman & Sterling & Wright, New York City, Willard M. L. Robinson, New York City, and Winston, Strawn, Black & Towner, Chicago, 111. (John A; Wilson and Macllburne Van Voorhies, New York City, of counsel), for Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., ap-pellee.

Thayer & Gilbert, New York City, Harold A. Segall, New York City (Edgar C. Morrison, New York City, of counsel), for Philip K. Wrigley, appellee.

*507Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 The plaintiff is a baseball pitcher who overworked his arm in 1944, while pitching for a minor league club in Tennessee. His verbose complaint purports to allege five claims or causes of action, one based apparently on negligence and four on violation of the anti-trust laws. The claim founded on negligence is obviously barred by limitations whether the applicable statute be that of Tennessee or of New York. The treble damage claims founded on the theory that organized baseball violates the antitrust laws fail completely to show any proximate causal relation between the alleged violations and the injury to plaintiff’s arm. See Monopsony in Manpower: Organized Baseball Meets the Antitrust Laws, 62 Yale L.J. 608, note 165. Judge Edelstein dealt with the case briefly but adequately and we are content to affirm on his opinion, 112 F.Supp. 245.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(15)
              - science_science(23)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(55)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(54)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(112)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(102)
              - multimedia_image-141776(9)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(91)
              - multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(47)
              - multimedia_video-149196(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(22)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - documents_file(70)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(63)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(28)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - (-)south dakota(3)

## By Year

slideshow        August 23, 2023        Images from the 50th anniversary celebration at USGS EROS

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - 1990s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Pecora - 1970s
Patricia MEYERS v. BOSSIER CASINO VENTURE, INC., d/b/a Margaritaville Resort Casino and Otis Elevator Company

NO. 2018-CC-1253

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-274298

NO. 2018-BA-1656

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 12, 2018

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner is immediately eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of twenty-four months. The probationary period shall commence from the date petitioner, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. During the probationary period, petitioner shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the consent agreement executed by him with the Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

**CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.**
STATE of Louisiana v. Chadrick CARTER

NO. 2017-KP-1866

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Endeavour International Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, William L.Transier, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ William L. Transier |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| William L. Transier     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

May 12, 2008

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Endeavour International Corporationand will be retained by EndeavourInternational Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Cash W. PAWLEY, Sr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. David A. EINHORN, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0663

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(19)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(26)
              - florida(7)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - (-)maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        May 5, 2020        Timing is Everything: Fish, Wildlife, and Timing of Life Events