alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
Richard Anthony PERSAUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - (-)news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        January 6, 2009        Simulated groundwater declines in Central Arkansas

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Shallow Aquifer

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Deep Aquifer

Science Snippet        May 6, 2024        Trout, beavers, drought, and a “precious” frog

Science Animations        August 27, 2013        Water-level Change in the High Plains Aquifer System

Science Snippet        April 12, 2022        History of Lake Powell Written in Sediment

Science Snippet        December 29, 2022        Historic changes in water quality or lake surface elevation and their impact on endangered adult suckers in the Klamath Basin

Science Animations        March 10, 2020        Importance of Cattails in Wetlands

Science Snippet        July 16, 2020        USGS Scientists are Busy as a Bee
#### UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Julius ROSENBERG and Ethel Rosenberg, Petitioners-Appellants.

No. 290, Docket 22759.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 5, 1953.

Decided June 5, 1953.

See also 204 F.2d 688.

Emanuel H. Bloch, John F. Finerty, New York City, for appellants.

J. Edward Lumbard, Jr., U. S. Atty., New York City, for appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order, D.C., 109 F.Supp. 108, affirmed and stay of execution denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

February 10, 2006
EXHIBIT 10.12

Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") has entered into an agreement with each of the following persons, which is substantially identical, except as
set forth below, to the Form of Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 1-31650):

|Najabat H. Bajwa  
|------------------
|Simon Biddiscombe 
|Kurt F. Busch     
|Ron Cates         
|Raouf Y. Halim    
|Gerald J. Hamilton
|Thomas J. Medrek  
|Wayne K. Nesbit   
|Thomas A. Stites  
|Preetinder S. Virk

The
multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and the multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment
Agreement for the other persons is two.

---



QuickLinks
Stephen RABOW, Appellant, v. Kimberly MCCLURE, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 11, 2018

Stephen Rabow, pro se.

Dana J. Watts, Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - (-)science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Research        October 8, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning – Fine-Tuning for Best Alerts

Research        May 29, 2020        The Blind Zone of Earthquake Early Warning

Research        March 9, 2022        Earthquake Early Warning - Overview

Research        March 20, 2018        Volcano Hazards Preparedness Resources

Research        November 13, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning Seismic Station Adjustment Terms - Annemarie Baltay

Research        March 6, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning

Project        March 14, 2016        Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) Support

Technical Announcement        July 12, 2017        New Warning System Identifies Flash Drought Quickly

Activity        October 16, 2018        ShakeAlert

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        February 2, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning: Vital for City Transit

Activity        September 29, 2020        Monitoring for Subduction Zone Science

Project        November 9, 2021        Probabilistic Forecasting of Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Earthquake Effects in the Coastal Zone
Order entered August 25 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00697
- CR
ALLEN MAURICE LITTLE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 0951721
- Y



### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lang Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we set aside the trial court’s restitution order and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine the proper amount of restitution

. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, including the new written restitution order, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the record of the restitution hearing is received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Class I Areas for NPRM on three power plants, Arizona Regional Haze FIP

Apache, Cholla, Coronado

AEPCO Apache (9 areas)

chir•Chiricahua NM

chrw•Chiricahua Wilderness

gali•Galiuro

gila•Gila

maza•Mazatzal

moba•Mount Baldy

sagu•Saguaro

sian•Sierra Ancha

supe•Superstition

APS Cholla (13 areas)

care•Capitol Reef

gali•Galiuro

gila•Gila

grca•Grand Canyon

maza•Mazatzal

meve•Mesa Verde

moba•Mount Baldy

pefo•Petrified Forest

pimo•Pine Mountain

sagu•Saguaro

sian•Sierra Ancha

supe•Superstition

syca•Sycamore Canyon

SRP Coronado (16 areas; Bosque del Apache omitted)

band•Bandelier

chir•Chiricahua NM

chrw•Chiricahua Wilderness

gali•Galiuro

gila•Gila

grca•Grand Canyon

maza•Mazatzal

meve•Mesa Verde

moba•Mount Baldy

pefo•Petrified Forest

pimo•Pine Mountain

sagu•Saguaro

sape•San Pedro Parks

sian•Sierra Ancha

supe•Superstition

syca•Sycamore Canyon

Full list for the three power plants (17 areas; Bosque del Apache omitted)

band•Bandelier

care•Capitol Reef

chir•Chiricahua NM

chrw•Chiricahua Wilderness

gali•Galiuro

gila•Gila

grca•Grand Canyon

maza•Mazatzal

meve•Mesa Verde

moba•Mount Baldy

pefo•Petrified Forest

pimo•Pine Mountain

sagu•Saguaro

sape•San Pedro Parks

sian•Sierra Ancha

supe•Superstition

syca•Sycamore Canyon
bosq•Bosque del Apache
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1862

___________

Roy E. Cheatham, *

*

Appellant. *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri

St. Louis University, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 17, 1998

Filed: January 11, 1999

___________

Before BEAM, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Roy E. Cheatham appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in

favor of St. Louis University. Having carefully reviewed the record in connection with

the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court correctly granted summary

judgment. This appeal involves the application of simple and well-settled principles.

Extensive discussion would serve no useful precedential purpose. We therefore affirm

the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Dustyn Maurice GRAHAM, DOC #T51578, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4928

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)arkansas(1)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)
              - 2022(1)

staff profileAmanda R Whaling
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5051 September Term, 2021 1: 22-c v -000 53-UNA Filed O n: May2, 202 2 Frederick Om oyuma Silv er,

App ellant
v . Ant ony J. Blinke n, Un ited Sta tes S ecreta ry of Sta te a nd Xav ier Bece rra, Se cretary of the Depa rtme nt o f

Health an d Hum an Services, App ellees
ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Rogers and T ate l, Circuit Jud ges, an d S ent elle, S enio r Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder f iled Ja nua ry 25 , 202 2, b e a f

f irmed . A ppe llant co nte nds tha t th e d istrict court sh ould ha v e grante d h im leave to am end his co mp laint p rior to d ismissal, butthe stat ute con tains no such requireme nt, see 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(e )(2)(B)( ii), and the district co urt’s sua spo nte dism issal w as without prejud ice, se e Ciralskyv. CIA, 35 5 F.3 d 6 61, 67 1 (D.C. Cir. 20 04) (obse rv ing thata d ismissal withoutpreju dice ty pically does n ot p rev enta p laintif f f rom correcting the com plaint ’s defects a nd f iling a new lawsuit). More over, app ellantha s notsuggested any possib le am end me nts t o h is com plainttha t cou ld en title h im t o relief , nor h as h e ide ntif ied a ny barrier to h im f iling an am end ed com plaintin th e f utu re. Finally , ap pellan t ha s forfeited an y argume nt re garding the me rits of the district co urt’s dispo sition o f

his A PA cla ims. Se e Unite d S tate s ex rel. T otte n v. Bom bard ier Corp., 380 F.3d 48 8, 4 97 (D.C. Cir. 2004 ) (“Ordinarily , argum ent s tha t pa rties do no t m ake on app eal a re de em ed to h ave bee n waiv ed. ”).

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5051 September Term, 2021
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
Dennis A. BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

Dennis A. Barnes, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- COSTAR III, LLC Under Contract No. N62477-00-D-0085 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 56479
Joseph J. D'Erasmo, Esq.

Joseph J. D'Erasmo & Associates Rockville, MD Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Stephen Tobin, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CLARKE The parties have entered into a Release and Settlement ofClaims dated 1June 2015 andjointly request that the Board enterjudgment in the above-referenced appeal. Accordingly, it is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' stipulation, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award in the amount of$12,251.81. Appellant has waived CDA interest. Dated: 16 June 2015

Administrati e Judge Armed Serv es Board ofContract Appeals I concur I concur

# ~/**</aik------_~**

# ____ _ MARK N. STEMPLER RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 56479, Appeal of COSTAR III, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
CHLORINATED PARAFFIN PRODUCTS SOLD TO RUBBER INDUSTRY

CPAR 70

 ESTIMATED OTHER MIX (5 MM kg/yr)

 CUSTOMER PERSONNEL EXPOSURE POINT WHEN DUMPING BAGS

 RELEASE POINT (DISPOSAL OF EMPTY BAGS WITH RESIDUE)

CPAR

STORAGE

(RUBBER)

FORMULATION

MIXING

RUBBER PRODUCT

PROCESSING

RUBBER PRODUCT 

SALES

(0.5 MM kg CPAR/yr)

X

PRODUCT SOLD FOR

RUBBER PRODUCTS 

MANUFACTURING

(0.5 MM kg/yr)

A

1

1
RUBBER INDUSTRY
Exhibit 4



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the use in this Annual
Report on Form 40-F and the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-162139), Form S-8 (No. 333-148673), Form S-8 (No. 333-124617), Form F-10/A (No. 333-120383), Form F-10/A (No. 333-124641),
Form F-10/A (No. 333-148960), Form F-10/A (No 333-152153), Form F-10/A (No. 333-152459), Form F-10/A (No. 333-157617), and Form
F-10/A (No. 333-169536) of InterOil Corporationof our report
dated March 16, 2012 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is Exhibit 2 to this Form 40-F.



|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers | 
|-------------------------- | 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers     | 
|Sydney, Australia          | 
|March 16, 2012             |
----

----

**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  January 16, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                    | By:    | /s/                  *James                  Price                                     * |
|                                    |   | James                  Price                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                    |   | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
BANCO DE LOS TRABAJADORES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Ricardo Rene Cortez MORENO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
A.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2778

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Natalia Costea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE 1st BANCORP

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 REGARDING ANNUAL
           REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Service 1st Bancorp, a California corporation
("Bancorp"), does hereby certify that:

1.       Bancorp's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
         2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended; and

2.       Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Bancorp.


Dated:  March 28, 2006                 /s/ JOHN O. BROOKS
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John O. Brooks
                                       Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  March 28, 2006                 /s/ ROBERT E. BLOCH
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert E. Bloch
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Service 1st Bancorp and will be retained by Service 1st Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                      108