alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020377EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/16 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10023 — Hellman & Friedman/Carlyle/Vantage)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 377/12)

1.

On 30 October 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020377EN.01001601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners IX, L.P. (‘HFCP IX’, USA) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The Carlyle Group, Inc. (‘Carlyle’, USA) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Vantage Holdings Ltd. (‘Vantage’, Bermuda) |

HFCP IX and Carlyle acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Vantage. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for HFCP IX: a private equity fund; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Carlyle: a private equity firm; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Vantage: US and Bermuda insurance and reinsurance provider. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020377EN.01001601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10023 — Hellman & Friedman/Carlyle/Vantage

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020377EN.01001601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020377EN.01001601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Antonio FONG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Natalia Costea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. DiGuilio*, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).
Appeal From Berkeley County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Jane Roe, as parent and na tural guardian of Judy Roe, James Roe, and Joyce Roe, M inor Children Under the Age of Eighteen, (18), Petitioners,

v.

Daniel Bibby Sr. and Mich elle Bibby, Defendants,

of Whom Michelle Bibby is the Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002500

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI T O THE COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion No. 27652 Heard November 5, 2015 – Filed August 10, 2016

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Eric M. Poulin, of Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners.

Eugene P. Corrigan, III and J.W. Nelson Chandler, both of Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decisio n in Roe v. Bibby , 410 S.C. 287, 763 S.E.2d 645 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTRED GE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Just ice Jean H. Toal, concur.
Bruce A. FORNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-120

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John L. MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-708

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 24, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Solomon David ROBERTS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 02, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Deshawn J. BOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth As Art 2

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - (-)arizona(6)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(5)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(1)
              - kansas(6)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - south dakota(18)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(5)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Education        October 15, 2018        Earth As Art 4

Featured Films and Shorts        June 26, 2013        Earth.Science.Art Project

Satellite imagery        October 4, 2014        Cloud Lightning

Satellite imagery        March 28, 2009        Desert to Forest

Presentations and Events        January 5, 2021        Gearing up for Landing Day—USGS Mars Rover Team (Dr. Ken Herkenhoff)

Presentations and Events        March 25, 2021        PubTalk 3/2021 - A Jaguar's Field of Dreams
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Filters

              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(11)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - south dakota(8)

## By Year

              - 2024(22)
              - (-)2023(12)
              - 2022(5)
              - 2021(1)

location  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

staff profileKurtis Nelson

staff profileDiego Pedreros

staff profileG Gray Tappan

staff profileSuming Jin, Ph.D.

staff profileMichelle Knuppe

staff profileRyan Reker

staff profileCole Krehbiel

staff profileBrian Sauer

staff profileJennifer Rover

staff profileJesslyn Brown

staff profileRay Postolovski
David MEDINA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2791

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES MAURICE CANNAVO, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 119 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Nancy A. PORFIDO LORENZ, Appellant, v. George LORENZ, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, Appellant, v. RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-2539

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 27, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Quamayne J. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
THE SALVATION ARMY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Richard N. PETROCELLI, as Successor Trustee, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO. 2D18-3855

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JAN 10, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-11441

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:10-cr-60316-WJZ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DARRYL STANLEY PAXTON, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(January 10, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court convicted Darryl Stanley Paxton, Jr., on pleas of guilty,

made pursuant to a plea agreement, to all counts of a 15-count indictment: Counts
1 through 6, wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; Counts 7 through 10,

fraudulent use of a Social Security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C.

§ 408(a)(7)(B); and Counts 11 through 15, money laundering, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1957(a). The court then sentenced Paxton to concurrent prison terms of

84 months on Counts 1 through 6 and 11 through 15 and 60 months on Counts 7

through 10. The court imposed the 84 months’ sentences at the bottom third of 1

the Guidelines sentence range, 78 to 97 months.

Paxton now appeals the sentences he received on Counts 1 through 6 and 11

through 15 on the ground that they are procedurally unreasonable, to-wit: the

district court improperly enhanced the U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 base offense level (for the

19 U.S.C. § 1343 offense) by two levels pursuant to special offense characteristic

§ 2B1.1(b)(10)(C)(i) on the ground that he used a fictitious name to obtain bank

loans and lines of credit rather than an actual name.2

Paxton’s claim that the challenged sentences are procedurally unreasonable

fails because Paxton, in pleading guilty, admitted that he used a valid Social

 As part of Paxton’s sentences on Counts 1 through 6 and 11 through 15, the district 1

court ordered Paxton to make restitution in the stipulated amount of $ 1,519,856. 

 In determining the 78-97 months Guidelines sentence range, the district court, adopting 2

the probation office’s determination, fashioned three groups: Counts 1-6, 7-10, and 11-15, and

then grouped these groups together. The guidelines for Counts 1-6 embodied the special offense

characteristic at issue here and thus provided the highest offense level in the case—for Counts 1-

6 and 11-15.

2
Security number to obtain certain loans; the admission was contained in the factual

basis for his pleas of guilty. In short, the court appropriately applied the two-level

enhancement provided by § 2B1.1(b)(10)(C)(i). United States v. Auguste, 392

F.3d 1266, 1268 (11th Cir. 2004); accord United States v. Williams, 355 F.3d 893,

898-900 (6th Cir. 2003). Paxton’s sentences on Counts 1-6 and 11-15 are

accordingly

AFFIRMED.

3
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5601 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the label 

of any drug containing an opiate to prominently state that addiction 

is possible. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2016 

Ms. KUSTER (for herself and Mr. WALBERG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require the label of any drug containing an opiate to 

prominently state that addiction is possible. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carl’s Law’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5601 IH

1 SEC. 2. LABELING REQUIREMENT TO ALERT ALL CON2 SUMERS OF OPIATES THAT ADDICTION IS 

3 POSSIBLE. 

4 (a) MISBRANDING.—Section 502 of the Federal 

5 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(dd) If it is a drug containing an opiate (as defined 

8 in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) unless 

9 the label prominently states that the drug contains an opi10 ate and addiction is possible.’’. 

11 (b) DELAYED APPLICABILITY.—The amendment 

12 made by subsection (a) applies beginning on the date that 

13 is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00527

- CV

LAWRENCE SOMMER , Appellant

V.
CATAMOUNT PROPERTIES 2018, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002

- 02040

- 2021

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Molberg

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to withdraw his appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

210527f.p05 /Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LAWRENCE SOMMER, Appellant

No. 05

- 21

- 00527

- CV V.

CATAMOUNT PROPERTIES 2018, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002

- 02040

- 2021. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg, Justices Goldstein and

Smit h participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Catamount Properties 2018, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Lawrence Sommer.

Judgment entered this 19 th day of July, 2021.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 240 (Friday, December 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 101014-101015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29340]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

Notice of Board Meeting

DATES: December 19, 2024 at 10 a.m. ET.

ADDRESSES: Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-
202-599-1426, Code: 454 381 790#; or via web: https://www.frtib.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Weaver, Office of External 
Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Board Meeting Agenda

Open Session

1. Approval of the November 21, 2024, Board Meeting Minutes

[[Page 101015]]

2. Monthly Reports
    (a) Participant Report
    (b) Investment Report
    (c) Legislative Report
3. Quarterly Reports
    (d) Vendor Risk Management
4. 2025 Board Calendar Review

Closed Session

5. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(10).

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).

    Dated: December 9, 2024.
Dharmesh Vashee,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-29340 Filed 12-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 692 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 692

  To provide protection for certain Federal employees with respect to 
implementation of the June 15, 2012, memorandum from Janet Napolitano, 
Secretary of Homeland Security, regarding the exercise of prosecutorial 
discretion with respect to individuals who came to the United States as 
                               children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2013

 Mr. Barletta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide protection for certain Federal employees with respect to 
implementation of the June 15, 2012, memorandum from Janet Napolitano, 
Secretary of Homeland Security, regarding the exercise of prosecutorial 
discretion with respect to individuals who came to the United States as 
                               children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Department of Homeland 
Security Personnel Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO REFUSE TO CARRY OUT UNLAWFUL 
              PROVISIONS OF THE MEMORANDUM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
adverse personnel action, including employee termination, may be taken 
against a protected individual which is based, in whole or in part, on 
the refusal of such individual to carry out a provision of the 
memorandum described in subsection (b) that has been determined by the 
Congress to be in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
    (b) Memorandum Described.--This Act applies with respect to the 
June 15, 2012, memorandum from Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland 
Security, regarding the exercise of prosecutorial discretion with 
respect to individuals who came to the United States as children.
    (c) Protected Individuals.--For purposes of this Act, the term 
``protected individual'' means an individual employed in or under any 
of the following:
            (1) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
            (2) U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
            (3) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
    (d) Adverse Actions Include Denial of Benefits.--The personnel 
actions prohibited by this Act include the withholding or denial of a 
promotion, an increase in pay, or other similar benefit.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth As Art 2

Filters

              - science_education(6)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(10)
              - multimedia_audio(15)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(12)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_image(221)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(204)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(49)
              - multimedia_video-149194(23)
              - multimedia_video-149195(20)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149222(2)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - (-)other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)

## By Year

General        October 16, 2019        Earth As Art 6

General        September 10, 2020        March 30, 2016 - Earth as Art 4: A Fusion of Science and Art

General        August 13, 2018        Earth As Art Image Gallery

General        September 10, 2020        May 23, 2011 - Landsat Images on Display at the Library of Congress

General        September 10, 2020        June 11, 2012 - Vote for Your Favorite Landsat Image!

General        August 14, 2018        Educational Products in the USGS Store
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - (-)maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        January 28, 2016        Will it rise or will it fall? Managing the complex effects of urbanization on base flow