100738 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

proposed development of the Class E 

airspace at the Ottawa Executive Airport 

located in Zeeland, MI, believed that the 

development of a Class Echo airspace 

around Ottawa Executive Airport (Z98), 

will be greatly beneficial to the airport 

and its surrounding airports. They felt 

that since there is currently no 

published instrument procedures, it is 

unsafe for even instrumental rated pilots 

to attempt to navigate around the 

airport. It was also stated that Z98 

should receive an AWOS system to 

ensure weather safety for pilots 

operating from the airport. They also, 

believed that the establishment of a 

Class E airspace would prove greatly 

beneficial to Ottawa Executive Airport. 

The other commenter expressed their 

support for the proposed development 

of Class E airspace at the Ottawa 

Executive Airport located in Zeeland, 

MI. Expressed that the change will 

significantly improve the safety of IFR 

operations at Z98. The 6.4-mile radius 

seems reasonable as the boundary for 

the airspace as this will establish safer 

approaches and departures under 

instrument operations. Also, stated that 

Z98, would be a great alternative as an 

airport with instrument procedures, if a 

pilot were not interested in entering the 

neighboring Class C and D airports. 

Commenter felt this would improve 

airport traffic and benefit the local 

economy. However, they would 

consider Z98 to obtain an AWOS/ASOS 

for METAs as an extra precaution, while 

this airport is developing a Class E. 

Overall, this proposal would be efficient 

in improving the safety and efficiency at 

the Ottawa Executive Airport in 

Zeeland, Michigan. The FAA only 

considers airports for Class E airspace 

establishment to support instrument 

flight rule operations at an airport. 

Incorporation by Reference 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order JO 7400.11, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

which is incorporated by reference in 14 

CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This 

document amends the current version of 

that order, FAA Order JO 7400.11J, 

dated July 31, 2024, and effective 

September 15, 2024. FAA Order JO 

7400.11J is publicly available as listed 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. These amendments will be 

published in the next update to FAA 

Order JO 7400.11. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11J lists Class A, 

B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic 

service routes, and reporting points. 

The Rule 

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 

establishes Class E airspace extending 

upward from 700 feet above the surface 

to within a 6.4-mile radius of Ottawa 

Executive Airport, Zeeland, MI. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore: (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 5–6.5.a. This airspace action 

is not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11J, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated July 31, 2024, and 

effective September 15, 2024, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL MI E5 Zeeland, MI [Establish] 

Ottawa Executive Airport, MI, SD 

(Lat. 42°49′02′′ N, long. 85°55′41′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of the Ottawa Executive Airport. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on December 

5, 2024. 

Martin A. Skinner, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29317 Filed 12–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

Docket No. FAA–2024–1347; Airspace 

Docket No. 23–AWP–47 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Amendment of United States Area 

Navigation Routes Q–1 and Q–902, 

Very High Frequency Omnidirectional 

Range Federal Airway V–495, and Jet 

Route J–502. Also, the Revocation of 

Jet Route J–589 and the Establishment 

of United States Area Navigation Route 

T–487 and Canadian Area Navigation 

Route T–895 in Northwestern United 

States. 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects a 

typographical error in the final rule 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 24, 2024, amending United 

States Area Navigation (RNAV) Route 

Q–1, Canadian RNAV Route Q–902, 

Very High Frequency Omnidirectional 

Range (VOR) Federal Airway V–495, 

and Jet Route J–502; revoking Jet Route 

J–589; and establishing United States 

RNAV Route T–487 in Northwestern 

United States. This action corrects a 

typographical error in the regulatory 

text for Q–902 and T–487. 

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC 

December 26, 2024. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 100739 

1HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR 200.54(c) allow an 

exception to the requirement in 24 CFR 200.54(b) 

for certain projects involving low-income housing 

tax credit syndication proceeds, historic tax-credit 

syndication proceeds, New Markets Tax Credits 

proceeds, and funds provided by a grant or loan 

from a Federal, State, or local government. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of the Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), all 

comments received, this final rule, and 

all background material may be viewed 

online at www.regulations.gov using the 

FAA Docket number. Electronic 

retrieval help and guidelines are 

available on the website. It is available 

24 hours each day, 365 days each year. 

FAA Order JO 7400.11J, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/ 

publications/. You may also contact the 

Rules and Regulations Group, Office of 

Policy, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 600 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington DC 20597; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven Roff, Rules and Regulations 

Group, Office of Policy, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 

Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 

DC 20597; telephone (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of the airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it corrects an 

error of incorrect coordinates in a 

previously published regulatory text. 

History 

The FAA published a final rule for 

Docket No. FAA–2024–1347 in the 

Federal Register (89 FR 84812; October 

24, 2024) that amended Q–1, Q–902, V– 

495, and J–502. The action also revoked 

J–589 and established T–487 and T–895. 

Subsequent to publication, the FAA 

identified the coordinates listed in the 

regulatory text for the route point 

DISCO are incorrect. This action 

corrects that error. 

Correction to Final Rule 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, Amendment 

of United States Area Navigation Routes 

Q–1 and Q–902, Very High Frequency 

Omnidirectional Range Federal Airway 

V–495, and Jet Route J–502. Also, the 

revocation of Jet Route J–589 and the 

establishment of United States Area 

Navigation Route T–487 and Canadian 

Area Navigation Route T–895 in 

Northwestern United States, published 

in the Federal Register on October 24, 

2024 (89 FR 84812), is corrected as 

follows: 

FR Doc. 2024–24590, on page 84814, 

the coordinates listed for the route point 

DISCO in the regulatory text for Q–902 

and T–487 are revised to read (lat. 

48°22′35.81′′ N, long. 123°09′30.60′′ W) 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 9, 

2024. 

Richard Lee Parks, 

Manager(A), Rules and Regulations Group. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29299 Filed 12–12–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Part 200 

[Docket No. FR–6423–F–02] 

RIN 2502–AJ72 

Disbursing Multifamily Mortgage 

Proceeds: Permitting Mortgagees To 

Disburse Mortgage Proceeds With 

Mortgagor-Provided Funds 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing 

Commissioner, Department of Housing 

and Urban Development (HUD). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: When funds provided by a 

mortgagor to a mortgagee are not fully 

disbursed with the initial advance of the 

insured mortgage proceeds, this final 

rule permits mortgagees to disburse up 

to 1 percent of the mortgage amount 

initially endorsed for insurance before 

requiring that the funds provided by the 

mortgagor be disbursed in full. This 

change to HUD’s requirements removes 

unusual and burdensome mortgage 

servicing practices that may result from 

pooling mortgages into mortgage-backed 

securities guaranteed by the 

Government National Mortgage 

Association prior to the funds provided 

by the mortgagor being disbursed in full. 

This final rule adopts HUD’s August 6, 

2024, proposed rule with only minor, 

non-substantive revisions. 

DATES: Effective January 13, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Margaret Lawrence, Deputy Director, 

Office of Multifamily Production, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 

6134, Washington, DC 20410, telephone 

202–431–7397 (this is not a toll-free 

number). HUD welcomes and is 

prepared to receive calls from 

individuals who are deaf or hard of 

hearing, as well as individuals with 

speech or communication disabilities. 

To learn more about how to make an 

accessible telephone call, please visit 

https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/ 

telecommunications-relay-service-trs. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

24 CFR 200.54 and Ginnie Mae 

Guaranteed Mortgage-Backed Securities 

Mortgagees seeking to originate a 

Federal Housing Administration (FHA)- 

insured mortgage regulated pursuant to 

24 CFR part 200, subpart A, must 

comply with the project completion 

funding requirements in 24 CFR 200.54. 

These requirements provide that a 

mortgagor must deposit funds with its 

mortgagee that are sufficient, when 

added to the proceeds from the FHAinsured mortgage, to assure completion 

of planned multifamily or healthcare 

facility project work and to pay the 

initial service charge, carrying charges, 

and legal and organization expenses 

incident to the construction of the 

project. Typically, 24 CFR 200.54(b) 

requires that the funds deposited by the 

mortgagor with the mortgagee 

(mortgagor-provided funds) must be 

disbursed in full for project work, 

material, and incidental charges and 

expenses (collectively, ‘‘project-related 

expenses’’) before the mortgagee may 

disburse any mortgage proceeds. HUD 

requires that mortgagees disburse the 

mortgagor-provided funds in full before 

disbursing any mortgage proceeds as a 

basic risk measure.1

For most mortgages regulated 

pursuant to 24 CFR part 200, subpart A, 

the mortgagor-provided funds are 

disbursed in full to pay for projectrelated expenses with the initial 

advance of the insured mortgage 

proceeds at the time the insured 

mortgage is endorsed. For certain 

mortgages, however, the amount of 

mortgagor-provided funds exceeds the 

amount of project-related expenses due 

at the time the insured mortgage is 

endorsed. Where the mortgagorprovided funds are not fully disbursed 

at the time the insured mortgage is 

endorsed, the mortgagor-provided funds 

are fully disbursed through subsequent 

disbursements by the mortgagee, usually 

with the mortgagor-provided funds 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES