alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECORD OF CONTACT WITH OUTSIDE PARTY TO 

DISCUSS ISSUES RELATED TO 

INFORMAL RULEMAKING

AGENCY KEEPING 

RULEMAKING DOCKET

Employment and Training Administration/Office of 

Apprenticeship, Department of Labor

TITLE OF RULE Apprenticeship Programs; Equal Employment Opportunity, 

RIN 1205-AB59

STAGE OF RULEMAKING Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Issued, Comment Period Open

DATE OF DISCUSSION: 

November 18, 2015

NATURE OF DISCUSSION: 

PHONE X MEETING __ 

Party(ies)/Title(s)/Organization(s) Present or Represented

NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION

James Redstone U.S. House of Representatives, Education and Workforce Majority Staff

John Martin U.S. House of Representatives, Education and Workforce Majority Staff

Department of Labor Representatives Participating

NAME TITLE

Eric Seleznow Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA)

John Ladd Administrator, Office of Apprenticeship, ETA

Franchella Kendall Division Chief, Office of Apprenticeship, ETA

Jim Foti Office of Apprenticeship, ETA

Daniel Zeitlin Senior Legislative Officer – Office of Congressional 

and Intergovernmental Affairs

Liz Weiss Office of Assistant Secretary for Policy

Keir Bickerstaffe Counsel for Interpretation and Advice , Office of the 

Solicitor/Office of Civil Rights and Labor Management 

(SOL/CRLM)

Jennifer Frey Attorney, SOL/CRLM

Tambra Leonard Attorney SOL/CRLM

Karin Moll Regulatory Analyst, Office of Policy Development and 

Research, ETA

Description of Factual Materials or Information Presented

DOL representatives provided a general summary of the NPRM, including reasons for the proposed rule, 

attempts to modernize and streamline the existing rule, and highlighting several other main proposals as set 

forth in the published rulemaking documents. Outside parties raised the following issues: impact on 

expansion of apprenticeship into new industries; timeline for a final rule, recruitment and affirmative action 

requirements for apprenticeship program sponsors; Office of Apprenticeship technical assistance to support 

compliance, cost/benefit analysis; and utilization analysis and goal-setting. DOL representatives listened to 

these issues and concluded the call by urging parties to submit written comments if they wanted their input 

to be considered in developing the final rule.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - products_publications(12)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        March 13, 2023        Bipartisan Infrastructure Law helps map critical mineral resources in New Mexico
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Jimmy Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Jimmy Wang



 Jimmy Wang,

 Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2004
James J. TAGLIA, as Trustee FOR the R. VICTOR TAGLIA 2010 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, Sun West Acquisition Corporation, Petitioner, v. John Gary GRUBBS and Sun West Acquisition Corporation, Nominal Defendant, Respondents.

Case No. 2D17-4480

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6336** 

DAVID FITZGERALD LIGHTNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, United States Bureau of Prisons Warden; R. COSGRO, Supervisory Chaplain; T. ROBINSON, Chaplain; WALTERS, Chaplain; JOHN DOE, Statutory Agent Officer; JANE DOE, Statutory Agent Officer , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. James C. Turk , Senior Distric t Judge. ( 7:14

- cv
- 00019

- JCT

- RSB )

Submitted : June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court ’ s
order construing his complaint as an action pursuant to Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403
U.S. 388 (1971) , an d denying relief. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Lightner v. Zych , No.

7:14

- cv
- 00019

- JCT

- RSB (W.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2014)

. * We dispense
with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* To the extent Lightner argues the court erred in not allowing him to seek injunctive relief under the Administrative Procedures Act, Lightner’s subsequent transfer to another facility moots this claim.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11324

Conference Calendar

 

RAPHAEL FOLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

COUNTY OF DALLAS, OFFICER JANE

DOE, OFFICER JOHN DOE,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-2490-X

- - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raphael Foley, prisoner # 96015889, appeals the dismissal of

his civil rights complaint as frivolous. He has also filed a

motion to amend his brief. The motion is hereby GRANTED. The

district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Foley’s

complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) on the basis that it

is duplicative and is therefore frivolous. Wilson v. Lynaugh,

878 F.2d 846, 849-50 (5th Cir. 1989). 
No. 96-11324

-2-

This appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2. We caution Foley that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Foley is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous. 

MOTION GRANTED. APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delta Mutual, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
G. Chilek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                  /s/ Martin Chilek
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Martin G. Chilek
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

November 16, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Page 32
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 66

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to take actions to ensure 
     that not fewer than 2 air traffic controllers are on duty and 
  physically situated within the air traffic control room or tower of 
 certain airports at all times during periods of airfield operations, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to take actions to ensure 
     that not fewer than 2 air traffic controllers are on duty and 
  physically situated within the air traffic control room or tower of 
 certain airports at all times during periods of airfield operations, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Minimum Staffing of Air Traffic 
Controllers Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM STAFFING OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall take such 
actions as may be necessary to ensure that, at a covered airport, not 
fewer than 2 air traffic controllers are on duty and physically 
situated within the airport's air traffic control room or tower at all 
times during periods of airfield operations.
    (b) Covered Airport.--In this section, the term ``covered airport'' 
means an airport in the United States at which scheduled commercial air 
carrier operations are provided regularly.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(15)
              - science_science(23)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(55)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(54)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(112)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(102)
              - multimedia_image-141776(9)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(91)
              - multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(47)
              - multimedia_video-149196(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(22)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - documents_file(70)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - (-)documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(63)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(28)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - (-)south dakota(1)

## By Year

Strategic Plan        December 3, 2018        2016 EROS Center High Priority Goals Statement
Johnston HAYWOOD, DOC #R46512, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 27, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Rafael TARAMONA, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
First Amendment to Schlumberger 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.



 Exhibit 10.6 
 SCHLUMBERGER 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 (As Established Effective January 17, 2008) 

First Amendment 
 Schlumberger
Limited, a Netherlands Antilles corporation, having heretofore adopted the Schlumberger 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, as established effective January 17, 2008 (the “Plan”), and having reserved the right under Section 12 thereof to
amend the Plan, does hereby amend the second sentence of Section 2(b) of the Plan, effective as of April 17, 2008, as follows: 
 “All decisions and selections made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be made by a majority of its members; provided, however, that the Committee may delegate its authority to grant awards hereunder to the
chairperson of the Committee or any other member of the Committee to act in his or her absence, subject to such terms, conditions and limitations as the Committee may prescribe in its discretion.”
Antonio Q. CONNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 9, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

As it appears that the proceedings in the circuit court relative to the petitioner's motion for postconviction relief are progressing, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cf. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). This denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a new petition for writ of mandamus if the postconviction court has not entered a final order on the motion within 90 days of the date of this order, provided that the petitioner is unrepresented by counsel in the postconviction proceeding.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
32 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)   In connection with
the Annual Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO
and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   [exhibit32hitor10k123109002.gif]  _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  April 14, 2010
Claude T. BOWEN, Appellant, v. TOUCH BLUE SR54 OAKGROVE, LLC; Carl R. Meyers, Jr.; Jessica Breummer-Madych-Meyers; Little Italy's Meatballs, LLC ; Little Italy's Family Restaurant and Catering, LLC; and Chicago's Little Italy, LLC, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2517

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Bankshares Inc., respectively, certify that, to the best of each such
individuals knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pioneer Bankshares Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification
is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required
by law.



/s/ THOMAS R. ROSAZZAThomas R. RosazzaPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 13, 2009



/s/ LORI G. HASSETTLori G. HassettVice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 13, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Pioneer Bankshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Melissa Linda KOZAK, Appellant, v. Ruston Maslen Abrams GROSSE, Appellee.

No. 4D18-0935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 18, 2018]

Christopher R. Bruce and Charles J. Thompson of Bruce Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ruston Maslen Abrams Grosse, Delray Beach, pro se.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Nathaniel Raheem CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3587

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Sean LUCEY and Lucey Corp., Appellants, v. Deepak KRISHNAMOORTHY, Abdul Hafiz Hyath Mohammed, Gopi Chandran, Hema Chandran, Rachna Birla, Vignesh Birla, Raj Kamalnathan, and Venkata Jakkula, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

Kathleen S. Lucey of Law Office of Kathleen S. Lucey, Saint Petersburg, for Appellants

William J. Schifino, and John A. Schifino of Burr & Forman, LLP, Tampa, for Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BLACK and ATKINSON, JJ., and CASE, JAMES, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Wesley Dale Knight

, * From the 70th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. A

- 37,4 40

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00 3 4 4

- CR * March 14, 2013

State of Texas, * Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the

trial court is in all thin gs affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 668 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 668

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2013

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, to require 
that annual budget submissions of the President to Congress provide an 
    estimate of the cost per taxpayer of the deficit, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT IN BUDGET SUBMISSION WITH RESPECT TO THE COST 
              PER TAXPAYER OF THE DEFICIT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) redesignating paragraph (37) (relating to the list of 
        outdated or duplicative plans and reports) as paragraph (39); 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(40) in the case of a fiscal year in which the budget is 
        projected to result in a deficit, an estimate of the pro rata 
        cost of such deficit for taxpayers who will file individual 
        income tax returns for taxable years ending during such fiscal 
        year.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 747 

To amend the Military Selective Service Act to require the registration of 

women with the Selective Service System in light of the Department 

of Defense elimination of the rule excluding women from direct ground 

combat assignments in the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2013 

Mr. RANGEL (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Military Selective Service Act to require the 

registration of women with the Selective Service System 

in light of the Department of Defense elimination of 

the rule excluding women from direct ground combat 

assignments in the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 747 IH

1 SECTION 1. NONDISCRIMINATION IN APPLICATION OF 

2 MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRA3 TION REQUIREMENT FOR CITIZENS AND CER4 TAIN RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) APPLICABILITY TO ALL CITIZENS AND RESI6 DENTS WITHIN SPECIFIED AGE RANGE.—Section 3(a) of 

7 the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 453(a)) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in the first sentence— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘male’’ both places it ap11 pears; and 

12 (B) by inserting ‘‘or herself’’ after ‘‘him13 self’’; and 

14 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘he con15 tinues’’ and inserting ‘‘the alien continues’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of 

18 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Antrawn D. PRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1317

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 8, 2018]

Antrawn D. Price, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed. See**Harrison v. State* , 765 So.2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (finding that where appellant fails to show that his sentence would be different had he been sentenced under the prior version of the *769statute, his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claim fails).

Warner, May and Levine, JJ., concur.