alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion filed March 21, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-18-00175-CR

___________

DOMINIQUE GREEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 27329A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Based upon an open plea of guilty, the trial court convicted Appellant, 

Dominique Green, of the third-degree felony offense of injury to a child. The trial 

court assessed Appellant’s punishment at confinement for six years. We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The 

motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously 

examines the record and applicable law and concludes that this appeal is frivolous 

and without merit. Counsel has provided Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy 
2

of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of the reporter’s record. Counsel advised 

Appellant of her right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief.

Counsel also advised Appellant of her right to file a petition for discretionary review 

in order to seek review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX.R. APP. P. 

48.4, 68. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. 

State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the 

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.

1

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial 

court.

PER CURIAM

March 21, 2019

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.2

Willson, J., not participating.

 1

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merci, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: August 19, 2008  /s/ Jose Acevedo President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 803
          - [Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0393]
          - RIN 0910-AF86

### Correction

In proposed rule document E9-19683 beginning on page 42203 in the issue of Friday, August 21, 2009 make the following correction:

                    On page 42204, in the first column, under the                     **DATES**                     section, in the first line, “November 19, 2009” should read “Submit written or electronic comments on the proposed rule by November 19, 2009”.                 

[FR Doc. Z9-19683 Filed 8-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HiEnergy Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bogdan
C. Maglich, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


December 17, 2004                       /s/ Bogdan C. Maglich
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Bogdan C. Maglich,
                                        Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                        Treasurer and Chief Scientific Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer)


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBISIDIARIES**

 

Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Registrant, our percentage ownership in each subsidiary and the total number of active subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned by each subsidiary as of December 31, 2007.

 

|                                |   | % Ownership |   | U.S.   |   | Non-U.S. |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------|--------|--------|--------|----------|
|                                |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Kaznickel, LLP, Kazakhstan          |   | 100%        |   | 0      |   | 0        |
|                                |   |        |   |   |   |     |
| Kazakh Metals, Inc., BVI            |   | 100%        |   | 0      |   | 1        |
| Kyzyl Kain Mamyt LLP, Kazakhstan(1) |   |        |   |   |   |     |

 

(1)  Kazakh Metals, Inc. owns a 100% interest in Kyzyl Kain Mamyt LLP.
January 22, 2010 V; EMBRAER GCF-0088/2010-1/2 civiDiwcn

TP/mvro

Embraor

Empresa BrasilCira

dc ■'.■:.on in!". S.A.

Au Bngadolro Fana Lima. 2.170

12227-901 -S.J. dos Campos SP

Brazil

Phono: (55 12)3927-7717

Fax: (55 12)3927-1104

US Department of Transportation pc'17S

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Petition for Exemption on Behalf of Operators of the Embraer EMB-145,

ERJ 170, and ERJ 190 series from certain Flight Data Recorder and

Cockpit Voice Recorder Requirements; Docket Number FAA-2009-1247

Gentlemen:

In our letter dated December 23, 2009 (GCF-2194/2009), we failed to provide some of

the information required by 14 CFR 11.81. The additional information is below.

Contact Information

Embraer

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170

PC179

12227-901 Sao Jose dos Campos, SP

Brazil

Phone: 55-12-3927-3543

Fax: 55-12-3927-1184

Summary for Publication in the Federal Register

Embraer petitions for an exemption from the requirements of part 26 for the Embraer

EMB-135BJ based on the fact that the passenger capacity and the payload of this

model is below the thresholds specified in 14 CFR part 26. The EMB-135BJ is subject

to comply with 14 CFR part 26 because it is derivative model of the EMB-145 series,

whose other models are above the thresholds.
GCF-0088/2010-2/2 EMBRAER

Operation Outside the United States

Embraer has no need to operate outside the United States under this exemption.

Best Regards,

>ergio Augusto Vierna de Carvalho /?<.

^worthiness Manager

c.c: ANAC

FAA-Transport Airplane Directorate
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAURICE CORNELL CAMPBELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-17353

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-01419-WBSGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Maurice Cornell Campbell, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from

the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging he

suffered food poisoning because defendants acted with deliberate indifference to

FILED

DEC 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

health and safety in handling and preparing prison food. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the decision to grant summary

judgment. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We may

affirm on any ground supported by the record. Olsen v. Idaho St. Bd. of Med., 363

F.3d 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

Summary judgment on Campbell’s deliberate indifference claim was proper

with respect to each defendant. As to defendants Arndt, Rodriguez, and Ruller,

Campbell failed to controvert evidence that they properly addressed substantiated

sanitation issues of which they were aware. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825,

844 (1994) (“prison officials who actually knew of a substantial risk to inmate

health or safety may be found free from liability if they responded reasonably to

the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted”). As to defendants Haytorne

and Hague, Campbell failed to present sufficient evidence of causation between the

alleged violations and any food-borne illness. See Harper v. City of Los Angeles,

533 F.3d 1010, 1026 (9th Cir. 2008).

Campbell did not raise his evidentiary argument until his reply brief, so we

do not consider it. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999);
Campbell also failed to object to the magistrate judge’s evidentiary

1

ruling below. See Smith, 194 F.3d at 1052.

3

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991). Nor do we consider claims 1

raised in his notice of appeal but not argued in his opening brief. See Abebe v.

Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1207–08 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-105832 of Georgia Bancshares, Inc. on FormS-8 of our report dated February 4, 2004, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedules of Georgia Bancshares,Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the two years ended December 31,2003 and 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GeorgiaBancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 
| /s/ Abbott, Jordan & Koon, LLC    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| ***Abbott, Jordan  & Koon, LLC*** |
| Manchester, Georgia                   |
| March 29, 2005                   |

 

1

----
## Holcim/US EPA Meeting September 20, 2011

List of Attendees: HOL CIM: Erika Guerra Jason Morin William Bumpers US EPA: Nichole Distefano Gary Gorski Gina McCarth y Janet McCabe Peter Tsirigotis A meeting was held today to discuss general issues surrounding the National Emission Standar ds for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portlan d Cement Manufacturing Industry , and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
  **SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of IJJ
        Corporation (the
“Company”) for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ *Report* ”),
        I,
        Kevin L. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  September
                  21,
                  2005
                By:
                /s/ Kevin
                  L.
                  MillerKevin
                  L. MillerChief Financial
                  Officer
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that
        appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to IJJ
        Corporation. and
        will
        be retained by IJJ
        Corporation. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
# C_2021362EN.01017101.xml

| 8.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/171 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/171

---

P9_TA(2020)0146

Amendment of the EU-Moldova Common Aviation Area Agreement (accession of Croatia) ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 June 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (07048/2015 — C9-0195/2019 — 2015/0035(NLE))

(Consent)

(2021/C 362/30)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (07048/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (07048/2015),

| — | having regard to the draft Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (07047/2015), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (07047/2015),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0195/2019), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0195/2019),

| — | having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0083/2020) |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0083/2020)

| 1. | Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Moldova. |
| --- | --- |

2.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00192-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1276234W

Before Pittman, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

RONDAL DURAY JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Rondal Duray Johnson attempts to appeal his March 

2012 conviction for aggravated robbery and related twenty-five-year sentence. 

Because we have no jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant pled guilty to aggravated robbery, a firstdegree felony, and true to a sentence-enhancement allegation in exchange for a 

twenty-five-year sentence. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.42(c), 29.03(a)(2), (b). On 

March 30, 2012, the trial court convicted and sentenced him in accordance with the 

bargain. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. His notice of appeal was 

therefore due by April 30, 2012, but he did not file it until May 16, 2019. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.2(a) (providing that a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of 

sentencing absent a timely motion for new trial). Thus, Appellant’s notice of appeal 

was filed more than seven years too late. See id.; Taylor v. State, No. 02-19-00059-CR, 

2019 WL 1574984, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 11, 2019, no pet.) (per curiam) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication).

We informed Appellant by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over 

this appeal because his notice of appeal was untimely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 

26.2(a). We stated that the appeal would be subject to dismissal absent a response 

showing grounds for continuing it. Appellant responded to our letter, but his 

response does not allege grounds giving us jurisdiction over an out-of-time appeal.
3

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to 

vest this court with jurisdiction over an appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. The Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that without a timely filed notice of 

appeal, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Because Appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal too late, we dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Taylor, 2019 WL 1574984, 

at *1.

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: July 25, 2019
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/31 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 CERTIFICATION OF CUSTODIAN
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of KNW Networks, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlen L. Roepke, Sole Officer Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: August 14, 2003
 by
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Marlen L. Roepke
 Marlen L. Roepke
 Officer/Director
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - (-)news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        March 6, 2023        Building maps to help geothermal energy and greater sage-grouse coexist in Nevada’s sagebrush country

Featured Story        October 14, 2015        Birds in the Bakken: Oil Development Can Affect Critical Habitat

Infographics        March 2, 2022        Discover Ecosystems