alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0024. CONTRAVIOUS GRIER v. THE STATE.

Contravious Grier was convicted of rape and other crimes. Following the denial

of his motion for new trial, Grier appealed to this Court, and we affirmed his

convictions. Grier v. State, 290 Ga. App. 59 (658 SE2d 827) (2008). Grier later filed

an extraordinary motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. He then appealed

directly to the Supreme Court, which transferred the case here. However, an order

denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by application for

discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App.

327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this direct

appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 07, 2017

09/07/2017
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(87)
              - science_faqs(12)
              - science_science(562)
              - products_data(327)
              - products_maps(82)
              - products_publications(3046)
              - products_software(11)
              - products_web_tools(36)
              - multimedia_audio(224)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(213)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(11)
              - multimedia_before_after(30)
              - multimedia_image(1326)
              - multimedia_image-141769(111)
              - multimedia_image-141770(16)
              - multimedia_image-141771(734)
              - multimedia_image-141772(18)
              - multimedia_image-141774(7)
              - multimedia_image-141775(141)
              - multimedia_image-141776(81)
              - multimedia_image-141783(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(215)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(21)
              - multimedia_video(600)
              - multimedia_video-149194(179)
              - multimedia_video-149195(233)
              - multimedia_video-149196(42)
              - multimedia_video-149197(65)
              - multimedia_video-149198(46)
              - multimedia_video-149225(4)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141785(1)
              - documents_file(1062)
              - documents_file-149203(2)
              - documents_file-149204(8)
              - documents_file-149206(2)
              - documents_file-149208(2)
              - documents_file-149209(1)
              - documents_file-149210(2)
              - documents_file-149213(4)
              - documents_file-149214(19)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - documents_file-149217(2)
              - documents_file-149218(4)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - documents_file-149220(17)
              - documents_file-149222(990)
              - documents_file-149224(6)
              - news_news-149245(47)
              - news_news-149246(9)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(40)
              - news_news-149249(19)
              - news_news-149250(44)
              - news_newsletters(26)
              - news_other_news(286)
              - (-)connect_locations(2)
              - connect_social_media(8)
              - connect_staff_profiles(159)
              - other_basic-37(19)
              - other_basic-42(245)
              - other_basic-43(1)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

              - 2023(1)
              - 2020(1)

location  Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

locationJohn Wesley Powell Center for Earth System Analysis and Synthesis
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        September 10, 2015        Megathrust Quake Faults Weaker and Less Stressed than Thought
Bernd H. STILLER a/k/a Bernd Stiller, individually and as trustee of the Bernd H. Stiller and Hilda Stiller Trust Agreement UTD, dated March 21, 2005; Hilda Stiller, individually and as trustee of the Bernd H. Stiller and Hilda Stiller Trust Agreement UTD, dated March 21, 2005, Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as trustee FOR the CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-6CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-6CB; Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-484

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018.

James R. Ackley of Law Offices of James R. Ackley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Weinstein Law, P.A., Hollywood; and Marian Kennady of Van Ness Law Firm, PLC, Deerfield Beach, for Appellee The Bank of New York Mellon.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Demetrice WILLIAMS

No. 2017-KP-1465

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. BERNARD**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
STATE of Louisiana v. Terry Wayne MAYS

NO. 2018-KH-1320

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Mays v. State, 17-0323 (La. 4/6/18), 239 So.3d 281.
Exhibit 31.2

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Careaga, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nannaco, Inc.
("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

February 22, 2005

/s/ Steve Careaga
-----------------
Steve Careaga
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 1

Bank of America







Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance

with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 2, 2004

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the mortgage division of Bank of America, N.A. (the "Company"), has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $340,000,000 and $270,000,000 respectively.



|Kevin M. Shannon          |  | H. Randall Chestnut         
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Kevin M. Shannon          |  | H. Randall Chestnut         
|President                 |  | Senior Vice President       
|Consumer Real Estate      |  | Bank of America, N.A.       
|Bank of America, N.A.     |  |                             
|                          |  |                             
|Aashish Kamat             |  | Gary K. Bettin              
|Aashish Kamat             |  | Gary K. Bettin              
|Senior Vice President and |  | Senior Vice President and   
|Managing Director         |  | National Servicing Executive
|Bank of America, N.A.     |  | Bank of America, N.A.       
|                          |  |                             
|J. Mark Hanson            |  |                             
|J. Mark Hanson            |  |                             
|Senior Vice President     |  |                             
|Bank of America, N.A.     |  |                             
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 
|                          | 











USA
Janice CLABORNE and Sheryl Jones, et al. v. The HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1250

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 29, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11326

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL HERRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

No. 02-11327

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAZARO HERRERA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CR-352-2-D

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
No. 02-11326 c/w

No. 02-11327

-2-

Raul Herrera and Lazaro Herrera, Jr., pleaded guilty to one

count of conspiracy to possess 500 grams of methamphetamine. The

Herreras argue that the district court abused its discretion when

it denied their motions to withdraw their guilty pleas, that

their guilty pleas were based upon an oral promise that the

Government would recommend a two-offense-level downward departure

if all the defendants charged in the indictment pleaded guilty,

and that the Government breached its oral promise.

The oral promise was not discussed at the plea hearing. See

FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e)(2) (2002); Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S.

257, 261-62 (1971); United States v. Coscarelli, 149 F.3d 342,

345 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc). The record supports the district

court’s finding that, even if the Government had made the oral

promise, that promise was not part of the plea bargain discussed

and accepted by the parties and the court at the plea hearing and

that the Herreras’ pleas were not involuntary based upon an

unkept promise. The district court’s determination that, in

light of the totality of the circumstances, the Herreras were not

entitled to withdraw their pleas was not an abuse of discretion. 

See United States v. Grant, 117 F.3d 788, 789 (5th Cir. 1997);

United States v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). Nor

have the Herreras established a breach of their plea agreements. 

See United States v. Saling, 205 F.3d 764, 766 (5th Cir. 2000). 
No. 02-11326 c/w

No. 02-11327

-3-

The district court’s denial of the Herreras’ motions to

withdraw their guilty pleas and their guilty-plea convictions are

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5615 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5615

         To reinstate the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2016

Mr. Grayson (for himself, Ms. Lee, and Ms. Brown of Florida) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reinstate the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom From Fear Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF BAN ON SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

    Notwithstanding section 110105 of the Violent Crime Control and Law 
Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-322), sections 110102 and 
110106 of such Act are hereby re-enacted into law, except that, in lieu 
of the matter to be inserted by the amendment made by section 
110102(c)(1) of such Act, the matter to be inserted shall be ``(q), or 
(v) of section 922''.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(8)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(3)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(3)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - (-)puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(47)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(11)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 665 

To allow certain Indonesian citizens to file a motion to reopen their asylum 

claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. 

SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. HOLT) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To allow certain Indonesian citizens to file a motion to 

reopen their asylum claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indonesian Family 

5 Refugee Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOTION TO REOPEN ASYLUM CLAIMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subparagraphs 

8 (B) and (C) of section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)) and section 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 665 IH

1 240(c)(7) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(7)), and not2 withstanding any other provision of law on motions to re3 open removal or deportation proceedings, an alien may file 

4 one motion to reopen an asylum claim during the 2-year 

5 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act 

6 if the alien— 

7 (1) is a citizen of Indonesia; 

8 (2) entered the United States after January 1, 

9 1997, and before November 30, 2002; 

10 (3) filed an application for asylum that was de11 nied asylum based solely upon a failure to meet the 

12 1-year application filing deadline; 

13 (4) is not subject to the safe third country ex14 ception under section 208(a)(2)(A) of the Immigra15 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)(A)); 

16 and 

17 (5) is not subject to a bar from seeking asylum 

18 under section 208(b)(2) of the Immigration and Na19 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(2)). 

20 (b) APPLICATION FROM ABROAD.—The motion to re21 open referred to in subsection (a) may be filed in the 

22 United States or from outside the United States. 

23 (c) RETURN OF APPLICANTS ABROAD.—An alien who 

24 meets the requirements under subsection (a) may be ad25 mitted or otherwise authorized to enter the United States 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 665 IH

1 solely to prosecute a motion to reopen under this section 

2 or otherwise to pursue relief under this section. Hearings 

3 pursuant to this section may be held in the United States 

4 or abroad, with the alien appearing in person or by video 

5 phone or similar device. 

6 (d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act, the 

7 terms used in this Act shall have the same meanings given 

8 such terms in section 101(a) of the Immigration and Na9 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)). 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report
of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





|/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) DIEPHOLZ
        K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        Chairman of the Board of Directors
        Dated: May 20, 2013
        
        
        /s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) DIEPHOLZ
        K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        Chief Executive Officer
        Dated: May 20, 2013
        
        
        /s/ Charles Smith
        Charles Smith
        Chief Financial Officer
        Dated: May 20, 2013
        
        
        /s/ Charles Smith
        Charles Smith
        Principal Accounting Officer
        Dated: May 20, 2013
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.