alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - (-)new jersey(1)
              - virginia(15)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1998        The Toms Canyon structure, New Jersey outer continental shelf: A possible late Eocene impact crater
TITAN AMERICA, LLC, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Montravia I. RAMSLEY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2420

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Zoties ALLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 5337

_____________________________
D ANIEL T APPEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Le on County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

. July 19, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_________ ____________________2 Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, and Crystal M. Frusciante of The Frusciante Law Firm, P.A. , Sunrise
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - hawaii(9)
              - (-)pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(1)

## By Year

Animated GIF        December 31, 2016        Chester County, Pennsylvania Land Change Animation
STATE EX REL. Philip A. GERACI v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1180

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF VERNON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

*694Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - (-)alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(10)
              - colorado(4)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(4)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(2)

staff profileCaitlyn Florentine, Ph.D.

staff profileJamey Jones
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50169 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. STEPHEN PROVENCIO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CV-487 USDC No. 1:03-CR-70-3
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Stephen Provencio, federal inmate # 28915-180, appeals the denial ofhis motion for 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief, in which he challenged his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute 3, 4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine. The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on whether United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005),No. 05-50169

2 applied retroactively to Provencio’s § 2255 motion. The Government moves for summary affirmance in lieu offiling a briefor for an extension oftime to file an appellate brief should the court deny its motion for summary affirmance. Booker does not apply retroactively to Provencio’s § 2255 motion. See United States v. Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604-05 (5th Cir. 2005). Provencio’s argument that the district court violated his due process rights when it denied him a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility is outside the scope of the district court’s grant of a COA, and this court has already denied a COA on this issue. See Lackey v. Johnson, 116 F.3d 149, 151 (5th Cir. 1997). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED; the Government’s motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief is DENIED.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 25, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Maine & Maritimes
Corporation as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 included in this Form 10-K, into the Companys previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-103749 and 333-151489).



|                               |  |                           
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------
|/S/ CATURANO AND COMPANY, P.C.
|                               | 
|                               |  | CATURANO AND COMPANY, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts

March 25, 2010
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 621 

To prohibit funding for the Environmental Protection Agency to be used 

to implement or enforce a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gases, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2013 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. LATTA, 

Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, and Mrs. BLACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding for the Environmental Protection Agency 

to be used to implement or enforce a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Affordable 

5 Energy Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 621 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR CAP-AND-TRADE 

2 PROGRAM FOR GREENHOUSE GASES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, no funds appropriated or otherwise available 

5 for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

6 Agency may be used to implement or enforce— 

7 (1) a cap-and-trade program; or 

8 (2) any statutory or regulatory requirement 

9 pertaining to emissions of one or more greenhouse 

10 gases from stationary sources that is issued or be11 comes applicable or effective after the date of enact12 ment of this Act, including— 

13 (A) any such requirement under section 

14 111 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411) or 

15 part C of title I of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7470 

16 et seq.); and 

17 (B) any such permitting requirement 

18 under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et 

19 seq.). 

20 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

21 (1) The term ‘‘cap-and-trade program’’ means 

22 any regulatory program established after the date of 

23 enactment of this Act that provides for the sale, auc24 tion, or other distribution of a limited amount of al25 lowances that permit the emission of one or more 

26 greenhouse gases. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 621 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘greenhouse gas’’ includes, with 

2 respect to a cap-and-trade program under subsection 

3 (a)(1) or a requirement under subsection (a)(2), any 

4 of the following: 

5 (A) Carbon dioxide. 

6 (B) Methane. 

7 (C) Nitrous oxide. 

8 (D) Sulfur hexafluoride. 

9 (E) Hydrofluorocarbons. 

10 (F) Perfluorocarbons. 

11 (G) Any other anthropogenic gas des12 ignated as a greenhouse gas for purposes of 

13 such cap-and-trade program or such require14 ment. 

15 (3) The term ‘‘stationary source’’ has the 

16 meaning given such term in section 111(a)(3) of the 

17 Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7411(a)(3)). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Achron, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report of North American Natural Gas, Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition Rules contained in SEC Release No. 33-8238;
3. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
4. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction);

1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: |  | November 29, 2005 |  | /s/Richard Achron                         
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|      |  |                   |  | Richard Achron
Principal Financial Officer



---
Mark Allen BIR, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4431

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 26, 2018

Mark Allen Bir, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Eric Salvatore Giunta, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Anthony SCRIMA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Anthony Scrima, Miami, pro se.

No response required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert J. Palmisano, Chief Executive Officer of IntraLase Corp., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Annual Report of IntraLase Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and



(2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of IntraLase Corp.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert J. Palmisano              
|                     |  | Robert J. Palmisano                  
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(19)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - (-)virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 18, 2022        From the Seafloor to Outer Space, USGS is on the Case
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115242) pertaining to the SiRF TechnologyHoldings, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., of our report dated February 27, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

February 27, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(37)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - (-)louisiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

National News Release        January 23, 2015        Culprit Identified in Decline of Endangered Missouri River Pallid Sturgeon
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - (-)science_science(5)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_publications(13)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(20)
              - arizona(22)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(27)
              - colorado(20)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(3)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(3)
              - guam(2)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - missouri(4)
              - montana(5)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(7)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(6)
              - (-)new york(5)
              - north carolina(4)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(23)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(5)
              - virginia(10)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(9)

## By Year

Program        March 10, 2016        Long Island-New Jersey (LINJ) Coastal Drainages Study Overview

Program        June 2, 2017        Long Island Precipitation and Recharge

Program        May 10, 2017        Long Island Groundwater Budget

Program        June 3, 2017        Hydrologic Cycle

Project        August 1, 2018        Mineville, Eastern Adirondacks – Geophysical and Geologic Studies
Eric ELLINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2543

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Opinion issued June 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00287-CV

———————————

DOV K. AVNI A/K/A DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, Appellant

V.

DAVID ALAN NEWMAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-22875

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Dov K. Avni a/k/a Dov Avni Kaminetzky, proceeding pro se, has 

filed an “Unopposed Motion to Withdraw His 1st Amended Notice of Appeal” of 

the sanctions order, signed by the trial court on March 16, 2016, because he states 

that he no longer wants to prosecute this appeal and instead will file a bill of review 
2

to challenge that order. We construe appellant’s motion, which contains a certificate 

of conference stating that appellee’s counsel is not opposed to this motion, as an 

unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2),

42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale.
Joseph A. MUSA and Mary Ann Musa, Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE OF UPLAND MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A., Appellee.

No. 1D18-749

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council