alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w11



 





Exhibit 10.11




QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP

PHANTOM UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT




	 	 	 
	     Participant:
	 	 
	 	 	 





	 	 	 
	     Number of Phantom Units:
	 	 
	 	 	 





	 	 	 
	     Date of Grant:
	 	 
	 	 	 





     1. Under the terms and conditions of the Quicksilver Gas Services LP 2007 Equity
Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
Quicksilver Gas Services LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), grants to the
Participant named above the number of Phantom Units set forth above. Terms not defined in this
Agreement have the meanings set forth in the Plan.



     2. One-third (1/3rd) of the Phantom Units will become vested on the first
business day coinciding with or following each of the first three anniversaries of the Date of
Grant (the “Vesting Dates”), provided that the Participant has remained an employee of the Company
or its Affiliates through each such Vesting Date (and further provided that in no event will the
Participant become entitled to settlement of a fraction of a Unit).



     3. Notwithstanding the Vesting Dates described above, in the event of a Change in
Control while the Participant is employed by the Company or an Affiliate or in the event that the
Participant terminates employment with the Company or its Affiliates by reason of disability (as
determined by the Committee in good faith) or death, the nonvested Phantom Units will immediately
become 100% vested. If the Participant terminates employment with the Company and its Affiliates
for any reason other than such disability or death, any nonvested Phantom Units will be forfeited
immediately.



     4. Each vested Phantom Unit will entitle the Participant to receive a lump sum cash
payment equal to the Market Value per Unit determined as of the date the Phantom Units become
vested. Payment will be made as soon as practicable following the date the Phantom Units become
vested, but in no event later than 10 days after such date. In no event will payment be made later
than March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Phantom Units become
vested.



     5. The Participant will have none of the rights of a unitholder of the Partnership
with respect to any Units underlying the Phantom Units, including the right to vote such Units or
receive any distributions that may be paid thereon. Furthermore, nothing herein will confer upon
the Participant any right to remain in the employ of the Company or an Affiliate.



     6. The Participant hereby accepts and agrees to be bound by all the terms and
conditions of the Plan and this Agreement. Any amendment to the Plan will be deemed to be an
amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the Plan amendment is applicable hereto; provided,
however, that no amendment will adversely affect the rights of the Participant under this Agreement
without the Participant’s consent.



ACCEPTED:




	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	Signature of Participant
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - (-)products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(12)
              - alaska(114)
              - arizona(60)
              - arkansas(18)
              - california(212)
              - colorado(74)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(7)
              - florida(68)
              - georgia(16)
              - guam(5)
              - hawaii(29)
              - idaho(67)
              - illinois(21)
              - indiana(12)
              - iowa(28)
              - kansas(43)
              - kentucky(10)
              - louisiana(37)
              - maine(19)
              - maryland(28)
              - massachusetts(10)
              - michigan(32)
              - minnesota(48)
              - mississippi(17)
              - missouri(25)
              - montana(61)
              - nebraska(35)
              - nevada(53)
              - new hampshire(10)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(47)
              - new york(45)
              - north carolina(29)
              - north dakota(30)
              - ohio(14)
              - oklahoma(26)
              - oregon(91)
              - pennsylvania(24)
              - (-)puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(14)
              - south dakota(45)
              - tennessee(26)
              - texas(58)
              - u.s. virgin islands(4)
              - utah(47)
              - vermont(11)
              - virginia(41)
              - washington(60)
              - west virginia(20)
              - wisconsin(39)
              - wyoming(89)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2004        Potential causes for amphibian declines in Puerto Rico

publication        March 29, 2022        A biological condition gradient for coral reefs in the US Caribbean Territories: Part I. Coral narrative rules

publication        December 31, 2017        Occupancy and abundance of Eleutherodactylus wightmanae and E. brittoni along elevational gradients in west-central Puerto Rico

publication        June 30, 2021        Estimated water withdrawals and use in Puerto Rico, 2015

publication        January 15, 2016        Hydrologic conditions in the South Coast aquifer, Puerto Rico, 2010–15

publication        June 1, 2016        Change in numbers of resident and migratory shorebirds at the Cabo Rojo Salt Flats, Puerto Rico, USA (1985–2014)

publication        January 1, 1991        Conservation of the yellow-shouldered blackbird Agelaius xanthomus, an endagered West Indian species
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020116EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/18 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9811 – Franklin Resources, INC./Legg Mason, INC.)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 116/08)

1.

On 1 April 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020116EN.01001801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Franklin Resources, INC. (‘Franklin Resources’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Legg Mason, INC. (‘Legg Mason’, USA). |

Franklin Resources acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Legg Mason.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Franklin Resources provides investment management and related services to retail, institutional and high-net-worth investors. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Legg Mason provides investment management and related products and services to institutional and individual clients. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020116EN.01001801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9811 – Franklin Resources/Legg Mason

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020116EN.01001801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020116EN.01001801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 11009

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16

- cv
- 00690

- RDP

MARNIKA LEWIS, ANTOIN ADAMS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, MARIKA COLEMAN, JOHN ROGERS, PRISCILLA DUNN, JUANDALYNN GIVAN, LOUISE ALEXANDER, WILLIAM MUHAMMAD, RODGER SMITHERMAN, OLIVER ROBINSON, ALABA MA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, MARY MOORE,
Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

versus GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, in thei r Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, STATE OF ALABAMA, THE,

Case: 17-11009 Date Filed: 08/10/2020 Page: 1 of 32 BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, MAYOR OF BIRMINGHAM, in his official Cap acity as Mayor of Birmingham.,
Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

_______ _________________ ( August 10, 2020 )
Before WILSON , JORDAN , Circuit Judges , and CONWAY , ∗ District Judge

. PER CURIAM: This panel’s opinion in Lewis v. Governor of Alabama , 896 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2018) , was vacated for rehearing en banc, 914 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2019) . On rehearing, the en banc court addressed the employee

- plaintiffs’ Article III standing to sue the Alabama Attorney General for Act No. 2016

- 18’s alleged violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Ame ndment. Lewis v. Governor of
Ala

. , 944 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir. 2019) (en banc). It held that the “plaintiffs lack Article III standing to bring their equal

- protection claim against the Alabama Attorney General,” and therefore did not consider the clai m’s merits. Id. at 1306.
The en banc court affirmed the panel opinion in part and remanded to the panel

.

∗ Honorable Anne C. Conway, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 17-11009 Date Filed: 08/10/2020 Page: 2 of 33 Id. For the reasons given in the en banc opinion , we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claim s against the Alabama Attorney General for lack of jurisdiction. That reasoning applies equally to the plaintiffs’ standing to sue the State of Alabama, so we affirm the district court’s dismissal there too. And for the reasons we gave in the panel opinion

— with which the en banc court expressed no disagreement

— we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the City of Birmingham
from the suit

. See Lewis , 896 F.3d at 12 91

. AFFIRMED. Case: 17-11009 Date Filed: 08/10/2020 Page: 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Release: Declines and Slow Recovery in Little Brown Bat Populations Predicted

slideshow        June 5, 2023        What’s Invasive Where You Live?

Historical        March 8, 2018        Location of maximum land subsidence in U.S. Levels at 1925 and 1977.

slideshow        October 24, 2022        Examples of USGS Bat Research
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50942 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES LEBRON CHAMPION, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CR-10-3

- - - - - - - - - - March 2, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Lebron Champion appeals from the district court’s order denying release pending his trial on charges including attempted murder for hire, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(a)(1)(C), 1513(a)(1)(B), and 1958, and use of intimidation to prevent communication of information to law enforcement officers, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3). Given the serious nature of the numerous charges facing him and the quality and nature of his overseas ties, Champion has not shown that the district court was clearly2

erroneous in its factfinding or abused its discretion in ordering him detained pending trial. See United States v. Rueben , 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992). The detention order is AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(22)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(32)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(19)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_video(16)
              - multimedia_video-149194(7)
              - multimedia_video-149195(8)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_other_news(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)arizona(1)
              - california(1)

## By Year

Historical        December 31, 1972        Harrison 'Jack' Schmitt with the American Flag and Earth (Apollo 17)
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a)	the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the Annual Period Ended December 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. Zawadzki John A. Zawadzki 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   April 15, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MIGUEL MENCHACA-HERNANDEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-55617

D.C. Nos. 3:14-cv-00067-AJB

3:12-cr-02268-AJB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2014** 

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

 Miguel Menchaca-Hernandez challenges only the length of sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because Menchaca-Hernandez has been released

FILED

NOV 25 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
from custody and is not subject to an additional term of supervised release, we

dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Verdin, 243 F.3d 1174, 1178 (9th

Cir. 2001); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). 

DISMISSED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - connect_social_media(4)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(22)
              - 2023(12)
              - (-)2022(5)
              - 2021(1)

social mediaUSGS Earth Resources Observation Science (EROS) Center

social mediaUSGS Earth Resources Observation Science (EROS) Center

social mediaUSGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

social mediaEarth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center News

Science Theme        October 31, 2022      On the Ground
# C_2020349EN.01000501.xml

| 20.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1516, and Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them

(2020/C 349/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1516 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 (3) imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the abovementioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 and in Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should continue to apply to those persons.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for essential needs or specific payments in accordance with Article 5 of that Regulation.

The persons concerned may submit a request to obtain the Council's statement of reasons for including them on the above-mentioned list. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The persons concerned may at any time submit a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above. In this regard, the attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list according to Article 6(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 and Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. In order for requests to be considered at the next review, they should be submitted by 15 July 2021.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 25.

(2)  OJ L 348, 20.10.2020, p. 14.

(3)  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual report of Knobias, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. Key Ramsey,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  April 15, 2005                            By: /s/ E. KEY RAMSEY
                                                    ------------------
                                                 E. Key Ramsey
                                                 Chief Financial Officer