alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/John BallardJohn Ballard, President

February 19, 2007
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - products_publications(12)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(6)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(11)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        November 20, 2020        Using Landsat and Machine Learning to Map Urban Change
Ana Cristina Nordeste BRAATHEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1161

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
Gregory Roman DADY, Appellant, v. Maryana Pavlyshyn DADY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(5)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(2)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - missouri(5)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(5)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(4)

## By Year

State News Release        May 10, 2023        Media Alert: The USGS and agencies from four states announce low-level airplane flights in the Central Great Plains
Gianni PASSINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 11, 2018

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Melynda L. Melear, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Report of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”)
        Diepholz
        K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        Chairman of the Board of Directors
        Dated: May 15, 2018
        /s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        Chief Executive Officer
        Dated: May 15, 2018
        /s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz;
        Chief Financial Officer
        Dated: May 15, 2018
        /s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
        K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz;
        Principal Accounting Officer
        Dated: May 15, 2018
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
STATE EX REL. Terry Glen HILL v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1303

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Hill v. State, 16-0284 (La. 8/4/17), 223 So.3d 1141.
^B iT(. 

Brian Priester ^. iouQOTi'.J' 

President & Publisher "r^ M ' JUk ^ | J . L IX ^ ^^^ . 

Deliverin g customers . 

Drivin g results . 

February/, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

I am writing to support Sun Country Airline's appeal to retain its slot at Reagan National Airport 

(Sun Country slot exemption Docket No. FAA-2012-0089). As you know Sun Country has been 

operating a direct flight from Lansing to Washington, D.C. since April of 2011. This route 

provides much needed direct service between Michigan's State Capital to our nation's capital. 

The fact that it is a necessary route is evidenced by the fact that 48,000 passengers have safely 

used it since last April. For my organization it provides the best possible service to Gannett 

Corporate headquarters. I, as well as many people on my staff, have flown the Sun Country 

flight over the past ten months. 

I understand the current ruling stems from prior precedence, but it appears to me that there is 

an alternate solution through the exemption rule. Neither Sun Country nor the Capital Region 

International Airport did anything wrong in the process and it seems to me unfair to penalize the 

airline and our market at this stage. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Priester 

President/Publisher 

bBriester@lsj.coin | Phone: 517-377-1001 | Fax:517-377-8890 

Switchboard: 517.377.1000 | News: 517.377.1112 | Advertising: 517.377.1141 | Circulation: 800.234.1719 

120 East Lenawe e Street C j Lansing, MI 48919 

GANNEn
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6440

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRY L. ADAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00064-LO-1; 1:17-cv-00042-LO)

Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry L. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry L. Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion as time-barred. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adams has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)science_education(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(2)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new york(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - south dakota(15)
              - utah(2)

## By Year

Education        October 15, 2018        Earth As Art 5
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cascading Hazards

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(11)
              - science_science(46)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(127)
              - multimedia_image-141771(119)
              - multimedia_image-141773(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(6)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(112)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(29)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(31)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - (-)connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(32)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

social mediaCascades Volcano Observatory News
Dominique CATHOLIC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2440

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition, docketed June 21, 2018, is transferred to case 2D17-5117 as an amended petition. Case 2D18-2440 is dismissed as a duplicate to case 2D17-5117.

MORRIS, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# C_2020242EN.01002301.xml

| 22.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/23

---

Notice of request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a contracting entity – Extension of the period for adoption of implementing acts

(2020/C 242/06)

On 8 April 2019 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

This request, made by Lietuvos energija UAB, concerns production and wholesale of electricity in Lithuania. The relevant notices were published on page 28 of OJ C 316 of 20 September 2019 and on page 9 of OJ C 53 of 17 February 2020 and on page 27 of OJ C 202 of 16 June 2020. The prolonged deadline was 10 July 2020.

Pursuant to the fourth subparagraph of paragraph 1 to Annex IV of Directive 2014/25/EU, the deadline may be extended by the Commission with the agreement of those having made the request for exemption concerned. Given the current context and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemics, and with the agreement of Lietuvos energija UAB (now Ignitis), the period available to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended until 31 July 2020.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 101553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29461]

[[Page 101553]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-46-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 84; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Voestalpine High Performance Metals LLC d/b/a Voestalpine 
Specialty Metals; (Specialty Metal Products); Houston, Texas

    On August 12, 2024, voestalpine High Performance Metals LLC 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board for its facilities within FTZ 84, in Houston, Texas.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (89 FR 67061, August 19, 2024). On 
December 10, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: December 10, 2024.
Camille R. Evans,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-29461 Filed 12-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
Exhibit 4.19

SR TELECOM INC.
RESTATED 1998 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN

Amendments to the Restated 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (in effect as of the 19th day of April 2001) have been approved by the Board
of Directors of the Corporation as of February 12th, 2003, subject to approval of the Shareholders and the Toronto Stock Exchange. These amendments have been integrated with the
remnant of the Plan to form the Restated 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, the text of which is as follows:

1.     Establishment of the Plan



2.     Granting of Options



1

---



3.     Purchase Price



4.     Exercise Schedule



5.     Method of Exercise



2

---



6.     Lapse of Options



7.     Stock Exchange Listing



8.     Option Agreements



9.     Non-Transferability



3

---



10.   Loans



11.   Modifications



12.   Final Provisions



4

---





QuickLinks
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJVEER MUTTI, a.k.a. Rajpal Singh,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70711

Agency No. A097-744-673

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Rajveer Mutti, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

MAR 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-70711

BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964

(9th Cir. 2002). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review any challenge to the BIA’s October 4, 2011,

order denying Mutti’s motion to reopen because Mutti’s petition is not timely as to

that decision. See Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 557 n.6 (9th Cir. 2004).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mutti’s motion to reconsider

because he failed to show any error of fact or law in the BIA’s denial of his motion

to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); see also Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d

988, 996-97 (9th Cir. 2008). We reject Mutti’s contentions that the BIA failed to

fully consider his arguments and evidence or to adequately explain its decision. 

See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
STATE EX REL. Leroy CHATMAN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0445

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

*681Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Shelley B.
Thunen, Chief Financial Officer of IntraLase Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report of IntraLase Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2) the information
contained in such Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of IntraLase Corp.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Shelley B. Thunen                               
|                    |  |  |  | Shelley B. Thunen                                   
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer