alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020362EN.01000301.xml

| 28.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/3

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 362/03)

Decision granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2020) 7104 | 21 October 2020 | Chromium trioxide
  EC No 215-607-8, CAS No 1333-82-0 | ThyssenKrupp Rasselstein GmbH Koblenzer Str. 141, 56626 Andernach, Germany. | REACH/20/15/0 | Passivation of tin-plated steel | 7 years from the date of adoption of this Decision | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |
| REACH/20/15/1 | Electrolytic chromium coating of steel | 31 December 2028 |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2020) 7104

21 October 2020

Chromium trioxide

EC No 215-607-8, CAS No 1333-82-0

ThyssenKrupp Rasselstein GmbH Koblenzer Str. 141, 56626 Andernach, Germany.

REACH/20/15/0

Passivation of tin-plated steel

7 years from the date of adoption of this Decision

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

REACH/20/15/1

Electrolytic chromium coating of steel

31 December 2028

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        July 6, 2015        PRMS Solar Table Module

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Bismarck, North Dakota - A1B Scenario

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Phoenix, Arizona - B1 Scenario

How to's and trainings        December 14, 2006        PubTalk 12/2006 - Mojave

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Washington / Baltimore Area - A2 Scenario
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Proxim Corporation

Certification of Principal Executive
Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


As of the date hereof, I, Franco Plastina,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Proxim Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This written
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit accompanying such Report and shall not
be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ FRANCO PLASTINA                      
| |                                          
| | Franco Plastina                          
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)            

Date: November 10, 2003
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofPacific Vegas Global Strategies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Kwan Sin Yee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                | /s/ KWAN SIN YEE        |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                |                    |
|                | Kwan Sin Yee            |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |
| March 31, 2010 |                    |

 

----
Christopher COLLIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 21, 2018

Christopher Collier, Graceville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the February 22, 2018, judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2017-CF-773 in the Circuit Court in and for Hernando County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41193

Summary Calendar

 

ROGERS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

November 21, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In Jackson v. Apfel, 120 S. Ct. 2657 (2000), the Supreme

Court granted Rogers Lee Jackson’s petition for a writ of

certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to this

court for further consideration in light of its decision in Sims

v. Apfel, 120 S. Ct. 2080 (2000), which rejected the view that a

social security claimant must exhaust issues in a request for

review by the Appeals Council in order to preserve judicial

review of those issues. Jackson appeals from a judgment

affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

denying his claim for disability insurance benefits, 42 U.S.C. §
No. 98-41193

-2-

405(g). He contends that the Commissioner failed to apply the

correct legal standards and that his decision was not supported

by substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties, and we conclude that the district court

was without jurisdiction to entertain Jackson’s claim of hearing

loss because he did not raise the issue before the Administrative

Law Judge (ALJ), thus failing to exhaust his administrative

remedies. See Dominick v. Bowen, 861 F.2d 1330, 1332 (5th Cir.

1988). 

In this appeal, Jackson does not argue whether substantial

evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision vis-a-vis his

claims of right-eye blindness and a foot injury. Accordingly,

Jackson abandons these issue. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Finally, Jackson’s challenges the adequacy of the ALJ’s

notice to Jackson of his rights to representation and to review

the evidence to be utilized in deciding his disability claim are

refuted by the record. Nor does the hearing transcript support

his challenge to the adequacy of the de novo administrative

hearing before the ALJ. See Carrier v. Sullivan, 944 F.2d 243,

245 (5th Cir. 1991) (hearing held adequate where ALJ reminded

claimant that he could be represented by counsel and questioned

claimant extensively about his condition, treatment which he had

received, medication he was taking, as well as his daily

routines, and how his illness had affected them).

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

Interviews        August 30, 2009        The Water Beneath Our Feet: New Study on California's Central Valley Groundwater Level Decline

Interviews        March 3, 2011        New model gives insight to the potential future of the Pacific walrus

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...

Interviews        April 17, 2012        Press Conference: USGS World Estimate for Conventional Oil and Gas Resources

Interviews        September 6, 2011        Stranger than Fiction: The Secret Lives of Freshwater Mussels

Interviews        January 5, 2010        Public Lecture: Flight from Extinction: Helping Whooping Cranes Survive

Interviews        April 6, 2010        Public Lecture: Wandering Wildlife: Tracking movement, migrations and mileage, from wolves to wading birds
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 679 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the service in the 

reserve components of certain persons by honoring them with status 

as veterans under law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. WALZ (for himself, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

LATHAM, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. RAHALL) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the 

service in the reserve components of certain persons by 

honoring them with status as veterans under law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor America’s 

5 Guard-Reserve Retirees Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF STATUS UNDER LAW BY HONORING 

7 CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COM8 PONENTS AS VETERANS. 

9 (a) VETERAN STATUS.— 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 679 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 38, United 

2 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 

3 107 the following new section: 

4 ‘‘§ 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who 

5 performed service in the reserve compo6 nents 

7 ‘‘Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of 

8 title 10 to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for 

9 age, would be entitled under such chapter to retired pay 

10 for nonregular service shall be honored as a veteran but 

11 shall not be entitled to any benefit by reason of this sec12 tion.’’. 

13 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec14 tions at the beginning of such chapter is amended 

15 by inserting after the item relating to section 107 

16 the following new item: 

‘‘107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in the reserve components.’’. 

17 (b) CLARIFICATION REGARDING BENEFITS.—No 

18 person may receive any benefit under the laws adminis19 tered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason 

20 of section 107A of title 38, United States Code, as added 

21 by subsection (a). 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


John R. Valaas, Chief Executive Officer, and Roger A. Mandery, Chief Financial
Officer, of First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.   the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
     2004 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

2.   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2004

                                        By /s/ John R. Valaas
                                           ----------------------------
                                           John R. Valaas
                                           President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                        By /s/ Roger A. Mandery
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Roger A. Mandery
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Nicholas Ferris, Chief Executive Officer of J-Pacific Gold Inc.(the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
Date: July 14, 2004
/s/ Nicholas Ferris Chief Executive OfficerJ-Pacific Gold Inc.
ST. CHARLES SURGICAL HOSPITAL, LLC and Center for Restorative Breast Surgery, LLC v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY d/b/a/ Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana, Inc., and HMO Louisiana, Inc.

NO. 2018-CC-1118

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - (-)science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Research        October 8, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning – Fine-Tuning for Best Alerts

Research        May 29, 2020        The Blind Zone of Earthquake Early Warning

Research        March 9, 2022        Earthquake Early Warning - Overview

Research        March 20, 2018        Volcano Hazards Preparedness Resources

Research        November 13, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning Seismic Station Adjustment Terms - Annemarie Baltay

Research        March 6, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning

Project        March 14, 2016        Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) Support

Posters        August 30, 2022        September Public Lecture Flyer, 2022

Activity        October 16, 2018        ShakeAlert

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        February 2, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning: Vital for City Transit

Activity        September 29, 2020        Monitoring for Subduction Zone Science

Project        November 9, 2021        Probabilistic Forecasting of Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Earthquake Effects in the Coastal Zone
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ending March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      |                    |   |   |   |   |
|-----------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:  | /s/ James Crane         |   |   |   |   |
|      | James Crane             |   |   |   |   |
|      | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
STATE EX REL. Joel RILEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1302

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Barrett R. BEASLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018

Barrett R. Beasley, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*776The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00134

- CV
IN INTEREST OF I.S.F .P., A CHILD
From the 451st Judicial District Court , Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 13

- 028 Honorable Bill R. Palmer , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 17, 2018
DISMISSED On May 30, 2018, we dismissed this appeal for appell ant’s failure to file a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file their notice of appeal in a timely manner. Appellants filed a motion for rehearing requesting this appeal be reinstated on the docket of this court, which we granted. On August 30, 2018, we reinstated the appeal and set the deadline for appellants’ brief as October 1, 2018. Further, we advised appellants that failure to file appellants’ brief by October 1, 2018 would result in dismissal of this appeal. On October 1, 2018, appellants did not file their brief. Instead, appellants filed a motion for extension of time requesting an additional forty

- five to sixty days in which to file their brief. Appellant’s motion is DENIED. This appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8.
PER CURIAM