alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(27)
              - products_data(10)
              - products_maps(5)
              - products_publications(93)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(94)
              - multimedia_video-149194(70)
              - multimedia_video-149195(17)
              - multimedia_video-149196(6)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_other_news(5)
              - connect_staff_profiles(13)
              - other_basic-42(4)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - (-)california(1)
              - florida(1)
              - georgia(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - montana(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(3)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        April 3, 2015        Contrails
Corry MENCY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0979

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 30, 2018

Corry Mency, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Lewis, and Rowe, JJ., concur.
**CE** **RTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Viridax Corporation (the “ Company ” )
      on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ” ),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.





Signature:
              Title
              Date/s/
                  Richard C. Honour
              .
              President
              August
                  13, 2007Richard
                  C. Honour




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or
      otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall
      not
      be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
      or
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
      it
      by reference.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required
      by
      section 906, has been provided to the Company will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(5)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_publications(17)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(1)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)montana(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - utah(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 18, 2022        From the Seafloor to Outer Space, USGS is on the Case
Damien Delon JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 26, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ~

PricewaterhouseCoopers **LLP
214 N. Tryon Street

Suite 3600

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone (704) 344 7500 

Facsimile (704) 344 4100
**Report of Independent Accountants

 

 

 

To the Board of Directors andShareholder 
of Bank of America, N.A. 

We have examined management's assertion about compliance by the  mortgage division of Bank of America, N.A. (the "Company"), an operating division of Bank of America, N.A., with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, included in the accompanying management  assertion (see Exhibit 1). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 
***PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 2, 2004*******
Kenneth L. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lamont J. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2240

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Lamont J. Davis, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur
Joseph R. WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 16, 2018

Joseph R. Watts, Milton, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - (-)news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        June 16, 2017        USGS: High Plains Aquifer Groundwater Levels Continue to Decline

Technical Announcement        May 14, 2015        Preliminary Wind Energy Impacts Assessment Methodology Released

Technical Announcement        December 16, 2022        DARPA Announces Winners of Artificial Intelligence  Competition to Aid Critical Minerals Assessments

Technical Announcement        January 30, 2017        Shrinking Number of Long-term Monitoring Sites Could Hamper Scientists’ Ability to Measure Recovery of Impaired Streams

Infographics        March 2, 2022        Discover Ecosystems
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Filters

              - science_education(69)
              - science_science(68)
              - products_data(15)
              - products_publications(88)
              - products_web_tools(4)
              - multimedia_audio(43)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(43)
              - multimedia_before_after(9)
              - multimedia_image(588)
              - multimedia_image-141769(105)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(264)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(17)
              - multimedia_image-141783(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(198)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(12)
              - multimedia_video(125)
              - multimedia_video-149194(9)
              - multimedia_video-149195(66)
              - multimedia_video-149196(15)
              - multimedia_video-149197(28)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(961)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(2)
              - documents_file-149220(3)
              - documents_file-149222(954)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(57)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(4)
              - connect_staff_profiles(31)
              - other_basic-42(33)

## By Location

              - south dakota(3)

## By Year

slideshow        August 23, 2023        Images from the 50th anniversary celebration at USGS EROS

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - Late 1970s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - Building Dedication

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - Late 1980s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - 1980s Landsat

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - 1990s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - 2000s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - 2010s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - Early 1980s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Pecora - 1970s

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Pecora 16

slideshow        September 23, 2021        EROS History Project - Chernobyl
M.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2306

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 10, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The juvenile defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred by not finding procedural prejudice when it conducted a *Richardson*1 hearing to address an alleged discovery violation by the State. The trial court initially ruled that the State had inadvertently committed a discovery violation by not producing the property receipt for evidence which had been impounded at the scene. However, the transcript of the adjudicatory hearing demonstrates that after a subsequent sidebar conference, the court determined that the "document was provided in discovery. So there's no violation." The ruling that no violation occurred moots any inquiry into whether there was procedural prejudice.

Affirmed.

1

*Richardson v. State*, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).
EXHIBIT 10.534 EXECUTION COPY AMENDMENT TO INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment to that certain Insurance and Risk Management Services Agreement dated as of January 1, 2004 ("Services Agreement") made between INLAND RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.("Service Provider"), an Illinois corporation, and  INLAND WESTERN RETAIL REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. ("Business Manager"), an Illinois corporation, is made as of November 15, 2007 by the parties to the Services Agreement. In consideration of the agreements to be made herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Section 2.2 of the Services Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and in lieu thereof the following is inserted: "2.2  The Business Manager and Service Provider acknowledge that the Services to be provided by Service Provider hereunder are to be provided on a non-exclusive basis such that Business Manager shall be permitted to employ other parties to perform any one or more of the Services and that Service Provider shall be permitted to perform any one or more of the Services to other parties." 2. Section 3.3 of the Services Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and in lieu thereof the following is inserted: "3.3 At any time during the Initial Services Term or during an Additional Services Term, the Business Manager shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, without cause, by providing not less than one hundred eighty (180) days prior written notice to Service Provider of any election to terminate and specifying the effective date of such termination." 3. Section 3.4 of the Services Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words "sixty (60)" set forth therein and in lieu thereof inserting the words "thirty (30)". 4. Section 3.5 of the Services Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence thereof in its entirety and in lieu thereof the following is inserted: "If at any time during the Initial Services Term or any Additional Services Term the REIT has had a Change of Control, as hereinafter defined, Service Provider shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, without cause, upon not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice to Business Manager." In all other respects the Services Agreement remains in full force and effect.  1   INLAND WESTERN RETAIL REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. By: Its:  INLAND RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. By: Its:                             [Signature Page to Amendment to Insurance and Risk Management Services Agreement] Endnotes    2
# C_2020370EN.01003401.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/34

---

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR THE OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE IT SYSTEMS IN THE AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/34)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.eulisa.europa.eu/About-Us/Finance

---
Dedrick D. STRAGHN, Esq., Appellant, v. Clemente C. WINKE, Jr., and Concrete Cutting Experts, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 11, 2018]

Dedrick D. Straghn, Delray Beach, for appellant.

Peter B. Weintraub of Weintraub & Weintraub, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee Clemente C. Winke, Jr.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Taylor, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Joseph Lee DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, James R Morris, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GlobalSCAPE, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:November 10, 2010
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 90-8598

UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS
JAMES EDWARDS EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(April 9, 1992) ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion December 18, 1991, 5th Cir. 1991, __ F.2d __)
Before WISDOM, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED. The panel reversed the appellant's conviction on count 1 because his argument that insufficient evidence supported that conviction was itself insufficient to justify a reversal of his conviction. The trial court's instruction as to the felonious nature of the defendant's earlier conviction (a conviction to which he had stipulated) took away no fact-finding2

1 United States v. Vidaure , 861 F.2d 1337, 1340 (5th Cir. 1988), cert.denied , 489 U.S. 1088 (1989). responsibilities from the jury. This Court has written that the judge's obligation to submit questions of fact to the jury does not require that the judge submit all issues regarding elements of an offense to the jury. Rather, . . . the pertinent inquiry in determining whether an issue should be submitted to the jury is whether that issue depended upon the probative value of the evidence. . . . There are issues which do not depend on the probative value of the evidence, and should, therefore, be decided by the judge, not the jury. 1 The trial judge properly found, and instructed the jury, as to the elements of Evans's earlier conviction. A retrial of count 1 will not violate the appellant's constitutional rights under the double jeapordy clause.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David J. Foster, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report of
Argonaut Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Argonaut Technologies, Inc.

Date: November 12, 2004


                              By:  /s/ DAVID J. FOSTER
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                              Name:  David J. Foster
                              Title: Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer