alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NORTHERN JACKSONVILLE ENTERPRISE, LLC d/b/a Lanier Manor Care Center; Brightsnfcare, LLC d/b/a Carestrong ; ES, LLC ; Millennium Management, LLC; and Eli Strohli, Petitioners, v. Anna R. BUFFINGTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shirley Jewell Blackwell, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3190

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 6, 2018

Thomas A. Valdez of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa and Lars Bodnieks of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Miami, for Petitioners.

Bryan S. Gowdy and Daniel Mahfood of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See**Caldwell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.* , 980 So.2d 1226, 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) ; *McClellan v. Florida Parole Comm'n* , 959 So.2d 827 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). We will rule on Respondent's motion for sanctions by separate order.

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000529 05-SEP-2013 10:11 AM
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(8)
              - alaska(71)
              - arizona(32)
              - arkansas(3)
              - california(93)
              - colorado(30)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(6)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - florida(12)
              - georgia(10)
              - hawaii(30)
              - idaho(21)
              - illinois(10)
              - indiana(8)
              - iowa(8)
              - kansas(10)
              - kentucky(4)
              - louisiana(10)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(12)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - michigan(6)
              - minnesota(11)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(14)
              - montana(17)
              - nebraska(9)
              - nevada(28)
              - (-)new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(12)
              - new york(13)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(3)
              - ohio(4)
              - oklahoma(4)
              - oregon(59)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(11)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(13)
              - tennessee(6)
              - texas(11)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(21)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(19)
              - washington(24)
              - west virginia(2)
              - wisconsin(19)
              - wyoming(24)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 2001        Nonlinear inversion of borehole-radar tomography data to reconstruct velocity and attenuation distribution in earth materials

publication        December 31, 2011        Demonstration/validation of the Snap sampler passive groundwater sampling device
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 100517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29287]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Small Business: Health Services and Systems C.
    Date: January 6, 2025.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Tara Roshell Earl, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1007C, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
402-6857 [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 9, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-29287 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Jarred CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1515

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with
the Amended Annual Report of Hitor Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ken Martin, CEO
and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.    [exhibit321231082nd002.gif] _______________________________ Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  October 1, 2009
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11056

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JERRY MICHAEL CHANCE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-146-ALL-A

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Michael Chance appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to commit bank fraud

and fraud in relation to social security cards in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 371. He argues that the district court erred in

determining the loss attributable to him as a result of the

conspiracy under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1. He argues that although he

helped his coconspirators to repair their poor credit, he did not

participate in or benefit from the purchases the coconspirators

made with their new good credit. The losses sustained by the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-11056

-2-

creditors who extended credit to Chance’s coconspirators were

reasonably foreseeable to Chance. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)

& comment. (n.2). Because Chance did not present any rebuttal

evidence at the sentencing hearing demonstrating the information

in the Presentence Report (PSR) was untrue, the district court

was entitled to adopt the information in the PSR without further

inquiry. See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d 322, 329 (5th

Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          74,134
<SECURITIES>                                       925
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                      2,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,512
<PP&E>                                           1,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,405
<SALES>                                         12,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,159
<CGS>                                            5,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,327)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of KNW Networks, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlen L. Roepke, Sole Officer Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 14, 2004  by











/s/ Marlen L. Roepke


Marlen L. Roepke


Officer/Director
STATE of Louisiana v. Monroe WILSON

No. 2017-K-2087

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Louisiana Revised Statutes 40:967(F)(1)(a), in effect at the time the defendant was sentenced, required the imposition of a $50,000 fine. It appears from the transcript of the testimony that the trial judge was under the impression that she had no option but to impose the fine as statutorily provided. However, as we found in *State v. Dorthey* , 623 So.2d 1276, 1280-81 (La. 1993), the trial judge retained "the option, indeed the duty, to reduce such sentence to one that would not be constitutionally excessive." Therefore, I would grant defendant's writ application to remand the matter back to the trial court for further proceedings, including possible resentencing, subject to the trial court's determination as to whether imposition of the $50,000 fine on this defendant is constitutionally excessive.
***EXHIBIT 31***

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Gilbert Burciaga, certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Providence Resources, Inc.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 15, 2007  

 

/s/ Gilbert Burciaga

Gilbert Burciaga 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - (-)alabama(1)
              - alaska(11)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(70)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(12)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(8)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        May 8, 2024        Hydrologic Instrumentation Research and Operations Chief Recruitment Information Session
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, the  undersigned  officer of ReliaStar Life
Insurance  Company of New York (the  "Company")  hereby  certifies  that, to the
officer's knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                      By  /s/ David A. Wheat
March 29, 2005                           ---------------------------------------
--------------                                David A. Wheat
   Date                                       Director, Senior Vice President
                                                and Chief Financial Officer
#### CHAMPION SPARK PLUG CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter SANDERS, Defendant, and Samuel Sanders & Harry Sanders, doing business as The Perfect Recondition Spark Plug Company, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 267, Docket 22645.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 6, 1953.

Decided May 6, 1953.

Elliott L. Biskind, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Ward, Crosby & Neal, New York City (Wilber Owen and Carl F. Schaffer, Toledo, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order and judgment affirmed in open court.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(5)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(24)
              - district of columbia(56)
              - florida(1)
              - guam(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(50)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - new hampshire(6)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(13)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(2)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - vermont(5)
              - virginia(32)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(12)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

Data Visualization        May 17, 2023        USGS Science in the American Territories

Topic        December 6, 2018        Real-time and Historical Data
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(20)

## By Location

              - colorado(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - south dakota(13)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(22)
              - 2023(12)
              - 2022(5)
              - 2021(1)

staff profileDanika F Wellington, Ph.D.

staff profileJeffrey R Irwin

staff profileNeal J Pastick, PhD

staff profileChristopher Barber, PhD

staff profileMichael Budde

staff profileJeff Clauson

staff profileKristi Sayler

staff profileChristopher Woody

staff profileTerry Sohl

staff profileAndrew Klose, Ph.D.

staff profileDean Gesch, Ph.D.

staff profileChristopher J Crawford, Ph.D.

staff profileJeffrey J Danielson

staff profileJoe Blahovec

staff profileMichelle Bouchard

staff profilePete Doucette

Science CenterEarth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center 

staff profileTimothy A. Glynn

staff profileDavid A Brostuen

staff profileGabriel B Senay, Ph.D.

staff profileBob Klaver, PhD

Science SupportLandsat Missions
Jorge O. ACOSTA, Appellant, v. Natalie ACOSTA, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 19, 2018.

Jorge O. Acosta, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Darius AUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1206

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2016

a0321 

# Order

Clerk March 29, 2016

151290 & (23)(24)(30)(31)(32)(33)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151290

COA: 325503

Jackson CC: 82

- 029906

- FC

MICHAEL DARNELL HARRIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to accept amended brief is GRANTED in part,

only to the extent that the brief submitted w ith the motion is accepted for filing. The

application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment

is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion s to amend MCR 6.502(G), to correct

jurisdictional defects, to remand for a hearing, to stay proceedings, to appoint counsel,

and to hold claims in abeyance are DENIED.
STATE EX REL. Francis BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1347

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. LANDRY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period *582as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Marcos CARDONA, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3892

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

Marcos Cardona Jr., Perry, pro se.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.