alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5883 

To lower the Federal tax on the earnings of American companies with foreign 

operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To lower the Federal tax on the earnings of American 

companies with foreign operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Tax for Repatri5 ation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOWERING OF FEDERAL TAX ON EARNINGS OF 

7 OVERSEAS AMERICAN COMPANIES. 

8 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that American 

9 companies with foreign operations are accumulating earn10 ings totaling as much as one trillion dollars, not repatriVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:26 Jan 02, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5883.IH H5883

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5883 IH

1 ated to the United States due to corporate income taxes 

2 as high as 35 percent. As a result of this penalty, U.S. 

3 companies invest their earnings in foreign countries with 

4 little to no consequence. However, if invested internally, 

5 these funds could spur the development of U.S. jobs, cap6 ital assets, research, and more. Whereas most developed 

7 countries, such as Germany, the United Kingdom, and 

8 France all have a tax on corporate profits earned inter9 nationally ranging from 0 percent to 2 percent, the United 

10 States has not followed this lead. Therefore, the Congress 

11 must adopt legislation lowering the Federal tax on earn12 ings of American companies with foreign operations to 5 

13 percent. Implementation of this change has the ability to 

14 raise Federal tax revenue by $50 billion, helping to fund 

15 the trillion dollar stimulus. 

16 (b) AMERICAN JOBS CREATION ACT OF 2004 ELIMI17 NATION.—The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 allows 

18 American companies with foreign operations a one-time 

19 tax break on earnings, decreasing the Federal tax from 

20 35 percent to 5.25 percent. The ‘‘Fair Tax for Repatri21 ation Act’’ would lower this tax from 5.25 percent to 5 

22 percent permanently. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5883 IH

1 SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATION OF THE FAIR TAX FOR REPATRI2 ATION ACT. 

3 The United States Department of the Treasury will 

4 be responsible for administrating and enforcing the Fed5 eral tax on earnings of American companies with foreign 

6 operations. The Federal tax for U.S. corporations earning 

7 profits abroad will be a flat 5 percent. 

8 SEC. 4. ENACTMENT DATE. 

9 This bill shall go into effect 90 days after passage. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - (-)connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2020(1)

social mediaUSGS ShakeAlert

Posters        August 30, 2022        September Public Lecture Flyer, 2022
# W A S A T C H



# Clean Air Coalition

**August 3, 2010**

**Mr. Nick Parsons Environmental Engineer, US EPA**  **OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG EPA Denver (Region 8)** 

Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505

**Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this m atter.** 

**As you know, there has been much recent work to qua ntify the air emissions from oil & gas field**  **activities as part of the Four Corners Air Quality Task Force and the WRAP Oil & Gas Workgroup. This**  **body of work also includes inventories of best pra ctices.** 

**As you also know, regional ozone is a emerging & di fficult problem. There is great need for regulator**  **y attention to reduction of oil & gas field emissions**  **, for control of ozone forming pollutants, and haza rdous**  **air pollutants. An awareness of the renewable ener gy potential of already disturbed lands could also**  **be leveraged into a contribution to the Climate Change**  **solution.**

**One recurring item is the lack of suitable aggregat ion of emissions in permitting. Some operators are**  **skilled at partitioning emissions in ways that mini mize requirements for pollution control, or maintai**  **n grandfathered status on obsolete equipment.** 

**New technology to visualize VOC emissions should be utilized to discover leaks, recent experience in**  **Wyoming indicates that there are large amounts of u n-inventoried emissions that can mitigated when**  **recognized.**

**Good operators are at a disadvantage when others ar e not required to follow best practices.** 

**Please use this opportunity to aggressively improve the rules; and the implementation and enforcement**  **of these better rules. Please be cognizant of the eme**  **rging issues around shale gas, oil shale & tar sand s**  **development.**

**Peace, Kathy Van Dame, Policy Coordinator** 

**Wasatch Clean Air Coalition**

**1148 East 6600 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84121**  **(801)261-5989 dvd.kvd@juno.com**
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(20)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(30)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - (-)documents_file(3)
              - documents_file-149220(3)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(9)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - (-)colorado(3)
              - kansas(2)
              - south dakota(70)

## By Year

Supporting material        October 10, 2018        Internship: High Performance Computing for the Advancement of Earth...

Supporting material        October 10, 2018        Internship: Development of a secondary ionization time-of-flight...

Supporting material        October 10, 2018        Internship: Yellowstone National Park Integrated Studies
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|    |  |                              |  |             
|--- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------
|    |  | Name                         |  | Jurisdiction
|    |  |                             
|1.  |  | Marchex Adhere PPC, Inc.     |  | Utah        
|    |  |                             
|2.  |  | eFamily.com, Inc.            |  | Utah        
|    |  |                             
|3.  |  | Marchex Connect NA, Inc.     |  | Delaware    
|    |  |                             
|4.  |  | Marchex Paymaster, LLC       |  | Delaware    
|    |  |                             
|5.  |  | goClick.com, Inc.            |  | Delaware    
|    |  |                             
|6.  |  | Marchex Adhere SSC, LLC      |  | Delaware    
|    |  |                             
|7.  |  | MDNH, Inc.                   |  | Delaware    
|    |  |                             
|8.  |  | MDNH CAH, Inc.               |  | Delaware    
|    |  |                             
|9.  |  | MDNH CA Corporation          |  | Nova Scotia 
|    |  |                             
|10. |  | MDNH International, Ltd.     |  | Ireland     
|    |  |                             
|11. |  | Marchex Voice Services, Inc. |  | Pennsylvania
Kenyatta MIMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2903

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 24, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(29)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - (-)north carolina(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(3)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 6, 2011        Groundwater Awareness Week is March 6-12

Podcasts        September 5, 2011        Responding to Hurricanes, Floods and Droughts in North Carolina
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of eTelcharge.com,  Inc.(the  "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl O.
Sherman Sr.,  Chief  Executive  and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d)); and
         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Carl O. Sherman Sr.
------------------------------------
CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIALOFFICER

January 8, 2004
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN11** 

lionomblo R. 5. Yroho **county AuQitor**  oregg Couaf hlgvlev, Texas

mar Sir: opinion lo. O-6624
Re: Should

perty and **to keep** 

st TOU further ask the tollovlng **ques-**

‘ If% Court is authorlrod to employ a psrson to take and mlntain such 

### inventory and ouch person performa 

### l ntlrelJ dlffsnnt duties or no of?lclal &tier pertalnlng to an inventory - vtat lr the duty, If any, of 

### a county **auditor** vlth nspect to 

# l gproval of 

### varrant for payment oi such employed

### Irrtio1o 1651,nov1roaCivil utatutu 

### of Toxw, tier It pbr 

### dutr to 

### ‘800 to 

### the rtriat onhroommt of the bv gov

### l n d a g OeueT f bAn008î.

Ooneaally*poxking, purdut tftus~navm$d 

### k to utlrQ 

### yeursol?, first, thst t 

### b ia l



### uoh
ga dl a p er?o mln & oor t a lnd?a iOD 

### P.-a @T w hlr oontmot l 

### aployment vlth tho CUmlaiors 

### l OCaQ, t&t rcoh dutlor mu Ln the dlrcbarp of “OeuntY Ia thir rospeot vo point out that the tom omaaty burlnor*- o heu ld

b e givenl 

### broad and llboralcautruotion mo l e aet te defwt the plrpoao of the lav. And it 1s hold that the Corlrl 

### lenors*Cart bar irpllod

### l uthorltqto do vhat 

### may be necerury in the 

### exorulroof tho dutlor **or** 

### povoraoon?omud upon them. (City 

### Batlow Eak v. ?nrldlo Cntnty, 26 S. Y. 7751 Olonn vr 

### Dal&r County Bolr d’ Am Irlaal Lmoa Dirtriot, 275 8. W. 137). **Hovevor,** la regard to tho partloular rltuatla la quostlon, ve 

### hvo ruled that 

### 8uoh t y p e l 

### ? apleynont a8 aontraotod for 18 authorlrod 

### w l&v; thoreten, pur duty 

### in thlr nspeat 18 a8 fellovrr A8 Art10101661, Revi8edCivil Strtutor of Tua8, provldor that 

### rll urmntr 

### en the 

### couatJ tru8uror, l 

### xcopt arrant8 for jum ronloo, mmt bo c@untonlgneQ b 

### remod~, ln tho oroat you dotemimct 

### da tho aoumq rradltor, pur 

### t ruoh employoolr net dlr**oharglng tho**  **duties for**  

### vhlch ho la eaplryodto porfom as per 

### your quoetloa,

vould be for 

### yau to mfuro to oowtomlgn varrantr a tho county troarunr 

### kssued to 

### maah omployoo.

TnutLng the r0mgOing 

### ?ullrumvere **your** 

### queetlen, vo mu Teun vary tryiy, ATTORHHY

aIt3muL O? TnAa

Robert 

### L. ktti8oxv, Jr.



### Aul8hnt
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10145

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUMBERTO CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-196-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Humberto CruzRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 6, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10145 Document: 00515064654 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2019
No. 19-10145

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10145 Document: 00515064654 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2019
Clenton MURPHY, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3026

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of habeas corpus is denied.
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302





I, Marlen L. Roepke , certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Austin Chalk Oil & Gas, Inc. .;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: August 17, 2004  by











/s/ Marlen L. Roepke


Marlen L. Roepke


Secretary/Director
Tetra Tech, Inc.

10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340

Fairfax, VA 22030

phone 703-385-6000

fax 703-385-6007

DATE: August 31, 2009

TO: 316(b) Record

FROM: Kelly Meadows, Tetra Tech

SUBJECT: Information for Harbor Generating Station

EPA conducted a site visit to two facilities owned by the Los Angeles Department of 

Water and Power (LADWP): Scattergood and Haynes. During these site visits, LADWP 

provided documents relating to a third facility, Harbor Generating Station. These 

documents are also being provided in the record.

 Evaluation of the Harbor Generating Station With Respect to the Environmental 

Protection Agency's 316(b) Rules for Existing Facilities

 Addendum to Evaluation of the Harbor Generating Station With Respect to the 

Clean Water Act Section 316(b) Requirements: Providing a Current Assessment 

of Alternative Technologies and Operational Measures

 Harbor Generating Station Clean Water Act Section 316(b) Impingement 

Mortality and Entrainment Characterization Study

 Harbor IM&EC Study Appendices

MEMORANDUM

10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340

, 2009

316(b) Record

Kelly Meadows, Tetra Tech

Information for Harbor Generating Station

conducted a site visit to two facilities owned by the Los Angeles Department of 

Water and Power (LADWP): Scattergood and Haynes. During these site visits, LADWP 

provided documents relating to a third facility, Harbor Generating Station. These 

re also being provided in the record.

Evaluation of the Harbor Generating Station With Respect to the Environmental 

Protection Agency's 316(b) Rules for Existing Facilities

Addendum to Evaluation of the Harbor Generating Station With Respect to the 

Water Act Section 316(b) Requirements: Providing a Current Assessment 

of Alternative Technologies and Operational Measures

Harbor Generating Station Clean Water Act Section 316(b) Impingement 

Mortality and Entrainment Characterization Study

udy Appendices

1

conducted a site visit to two facilities owned by the Los Angeles Department of 

Water and Power (LADWP): Scattergood and Haynes. During these site visits, LADWP 

provided documents relating to a third facility, Harbor Generating Station. These 

Evaluation of the Harbor Generating Station With Respect to the Environmental 

Addendum to Evaluation of the Harbor Generating Station With Respect to the 

Water Act Section 316(b) Requirements: Providing a Current Assessment 

Harbor Generating Station Clean Water Act Section 316(b) Impingement
APPEUAtfT ^nwe of tems



### "Tut ftPPellAirr fotfs th No<Q3'l'3'OOS05~cR Couer of eniMtrtAL fiPPeflLs o-f Texd s APPEALS Morion To lyasteno JUN 2 22015 

### COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JUN 26 2015

~~ Abel Acosta, Clerk ttetm<>e ue Oo nor 

### Mfl(/E flecks To fl COPY \mc\MHB UEdE 

## #T £teiv>£A/T5 UMfT q^rj/ **,,« ^ra, ^
99.1

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2003-2
Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates

The undersigned, Richard Cimino, President, Loan Servicing
of New Century Mortgage Corporation (the "Servicer"), in its
capacity as Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of March 1, 2003 (the "Pooling And
Servicing Agreement') between New Century Mortgage Securities,
Inc., as Depositor, the Servicer as Master Servicer and Deutsche
Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, does hereby certify
pursuant to Section 3.20 of the Pooling and servicing Agreement
that as of the date given below:


i. a review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year
      ended December 31, 2003 and of its performance under the Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision,
      and
ii. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
      has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement throughout such year.


IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name as of this 10th
day of March, 2004.



BY: /s/: Richard Cimino
Richard Cimino
President, Loan Servicing
B.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(15)
              - alaska(202)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(108)
              - arkansas(13)
              - california(289)
              - colorado(100)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(18)
              - district of columbia(10)
              - florida(39)
              - georgia(23)
              - guam(3)
              - hawaii(376)
              - idaho(41)
              - illinois(19)
              - indiana(17)
              - iowa(16)
              - kansas(23)
              - kentucky(12)
              - louisiana(23)
              - maine(13)
              - maryland(28)
              - massachusetts(20)
              - michigan(19)
              - minnesota(24)
              - mississippi(12)
              - missouri(36)
              - montana(51)
              - nebraska(20)
              - nevada(65)
              - new hampshire(3)
              - new jersey(14)
              - new mexico(26)
              - new york(35)
              - north carolina(22)
              - north dakota(7)
              - ohio(8)
              - oklahoma(8)
              - oregon(76)
              - pennsylvania(15)
              - puerto rico(23)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(19)
              - south dakota(473)
              - tennessee(13)
              - texas(29)
              - u.s. virgin islands(4)
              - utah(40)
              - (-)vermont(4)
              - virginia(59)
              - washington(69)
              - west virginia(6)
              - wisconsin(25)
              - wyoming(79)

## By Year

Data Release        July 27, 2020        Principal facts of gravity data collected in and around the eastern Adirondack highlands, northern New York

publication        October 17, 2009        A method for creating a three dimensional model from published geologic maps and cross sections

map        January 1, 2011        Bedrock geologic map of Vermont

Featured Story        April 18, 2022        From the Seafloor to Outer Space, USGS is on the Case