alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

H. A. RIOS,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 12-16325

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-01446-LJO-JLT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 12, 2014** 

San Francisco, California

Before: REINHARDT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS, District

Judge.

*** 

FILED

FEB 21 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable William K. Sessions, III, District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.
Petitioner Terrance Lamont Moore (“Moore”) appeals from the district

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse and remand. Because

the parties are familiar with the history of the case, we will not recount it here.

We review de novo a district court’s decision to grant or deny a

petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. United States v.

Lemoine, 546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Because Moore’s claim goes to the execution of the restitution order,

specifically improper delegation, he properly brought his petition under § 2241,

and he did not waive his argument by failing to challenge the restitution order

before the sentencing court either on direct appeal or under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See

Ward v. Chavez, 678 F.3d 1042, 1044–45 (9th Cir. 2012); Lemoine, 546 F.3d at

1047–50. 

After the district court entered judgment, we held that “a sentencing court

must consider the defendant’s financial resources in setting a restitution payment

schedule, and, if the defendant is unable to pay restitution immediately, the court

cannot simply order ‘immediate’ repayment and leave the details of the actual

payment schedule to the BOP.” Ward, 678 F.3d at 1052. Further, because an

improper payment schedule deprives the Bureau of Prisons of authority to collect

2
restitution payments through the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, the

imposition of a deficient restitution order was not harmless error. Id. at 1051.

We therefore reverse the district court’s ruling and remand for consideration

of the restitution order under Ward. 

REVERSED and REMANDED. 

3
CENTERPIECE PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Jennifer V. Davis, Marcus L. Davis, Kissimmee Bay Community Association, Inc c/o Florida Association Management, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-1917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

CERITIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350

I, Luke C. Zouvas, attorney at law, stood and served as Custodian/Trustee of this Corporation, as of December 31, 2002, with the resulting powers of Sole
Interim Officer and Director. In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, dated March 6, 2003. I hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



Certification
Dated: September 10, 2003

| |  | /s/ LUKE C. ZOUVAS
Luke C. Zouvas
Custodian/Trustee as
Sole Interim Officer/Director
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 62 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 

date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2013 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release date for certain nonviolent offenders, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Prison Bureau 

5 Nonviolent Offender Relief Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OF7 FENDERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3624 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 62 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘at the early 

2 release date provided in subsection (g), if applicable, 

3 or otherwise’’ after ‘‘A prisoner shall be released by 

4 the Bureau of Prisons’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(g) EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT

7 OFFENDERS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, the Bureau of Prisons, pursuant to a good time pol9 icy, shall release from confinement a prisoner who has 

10 served one half or more of his term of imprisonment (in11 cluding any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) 

12 if that prisoner— 

13 ‘‘(1) has attained the age of 45 years; 

14 ‘‘(2) has never been convicted of a crime of vio15 lence; and 

16 ‘‘(3) has not engaged in any violation, involving 

17 violent conduct, of institutional disciplinary regula18 tions.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Xpention  Genetics,  Inc.  (formerly
Bayview  Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  September 15, 2006


/s/ David Kittrell
---------------------------------------
David Kittrell, CEO and CFO
Bryce KENNEDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1292

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 12, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 829 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-537, K2025-535.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29207 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Technical Announcement        July 12, 2017        New Warning System Identifies Flash Drought Quickly

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(Formerly Pultronex  Corporation),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Brian Fisher,  Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 22, 2005


/s/ Brian Fisher
Brian Fisher
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

TANCREDI WILLIAM CALABRESE,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2706 Disciplinary Docket No 3

File No. C4-20-165

Attorney Registration No. 315687

(Fayette County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2020, in the absence of a response to this 

Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary 

suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and it is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by 

this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County shall 

enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s clients or 

fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and

4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze 

such accounts pending further action.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to 

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 

208(f)(6), are specifically preserved.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to 

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.
Jamie M. COFFEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
# C_2020370EN.01004401.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/44

---

EUROPEAN GNSS AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/44)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.gsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/annual-accounts-2019.pdf

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - new york(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - west virginia(1)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        February 19, 2021        Chesapeake Bay Watershed boundary, USA
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(11)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - other_basic-37(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        January 30, 2018        Landsat in Action - Minnesota Lakes with Leif Olmanson

Presentations and Events        September 14, 2022        Landslide susceptibility in Minnesota: Insight from landslide inventory mapping and lidar change detection

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 667 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 667

    To redesignate the Dryden Flight Research Center as the Neil A. 
  Armstrong Flight Research Center and the Western Aeronautical Test 
          Range as the Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2013

  Mr. McCarthy of California (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Smith of 
Texas, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Hall, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Jordan, 
 and Mr. Schiff) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To redesignate the Dryden Flight Research Center as the Neil A. 
  Armstrong Flight Research Center and the Western Aeronautical Test 
          Range as the Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF DRYDEN FLIGHT RESEARCH CENTER.

    (a) Redesignation.--The National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center in Edwards, 
California, is redesignated as the ``NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight 
Research Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the flight research 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF WESTERN AERONAUTICAL TEST RANGE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) Western Aeronautical Test Range in California is 
redesignated as the ``NASA Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the test range referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``NASA 
Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 16
 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 Company Report
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
  /s/ Tom S. DonovanTom S. DonovanChief Financial Officer
IRVIN B. GREEN & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. AGIC, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 2D17-4492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeffery NELSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KP-0349

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing *682of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Renaldo Dimitri REEVES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 22, 2018

Renaldo Dimitri Reeves, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.