alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Ralph Braun, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this amended annual report of Form 20-F/A of J-Pacific Gold Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, andfor, the periods presented in the report;
4.	The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgeneral accepted accounting principles;c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.	Disclosed in this report and change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and5.	The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company's internal control over financial reporting.Dated Dec 21, 2007
/s/ Ralph Braun J-Pacific Gold Inc.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(15)
              - science_science(23)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(55)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(54)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(112)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(102)
              - multimedia_image-141776(9)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(91)
              - multimedia_video-149194(8)
              - multimedia_video-149195(47)
              - multimedia_video-149196(11)
              - multimedia_video-149197(22)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - documents_file(70)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(63)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(28)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(6)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)south dakota(1)

## By Year

Interviews        July 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 97 – EROS 50th: Earth As Art Bonus
# C_2020380EN.01000601.xml

| 11.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/6

---

Annual report on EU Joint Undertakings for the 2019 financial year

(2020/C 380/06)

The European Court of Auditors will publish its annual report for the 2019 financial year on EU Joint Undertakings together with their replies on 12 November 2020.

The report can be consulted directly or downloaded, on 12 November 2020, at the European Court of Auditors’ website:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/JUS_2019/JUS_2019_EN.pdf

The following link to an overview of the annual report and related documents will become active at the same time: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=54396

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 2, 2022

.

________________ No. 3D21

- 1944 Lower Tribunal No. 21

- 3035 SP

________________ 

### Tower Imaging, LLC, etc. , Appellant,

vs. 

### State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , Appellee. An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Michael G. Barket , Judge. Daly & Barber, P.A., Christina M. Kalin, Matthew C. Barber and John C. Daly (Plantation) , for appellant. Akerman, LLP , Marcy Levine Aldrich and Nancy A. Copperthwaite , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS, and BOKOR , JJ.
PER CURIAM.2 ON CONFESSION OF ERROR Tower Imaging, LLC, d/b/a Blackfin Medical (as assignee of Rebecca Jeznach) (“Bla c kfin”), appeals the trial court’s order granting State Farm
Mutual Automobile Insurance Com pany’s (“State Farm”) motion to transfer
the case based on forum non - conveniens . Blackfin claims that the motion to transfer was not based on any supporting evidence presented by State Farm and further claims that the trial court erred by requiring Blackf in to pay the transfer fee. State Farm responds and confesses error in both respects. Upon review of the record, we agree. See Miracle Chiropractic & Rehab Ctr. v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co. , 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1078 (Fla. 4th DCA May 12, 2021).
R eversed and remanded.
STATE of Louisiana v. Randy C. MARSHALL

NO. 2018-KO-0067

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth As Art 2

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(6)
              - california(9)
              - colorado(5)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(1)
              - kansas(6)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - (-)pennsylvania(2)
              - south dakota(18)
              - tennessee(1)
              - utah(5)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Education        October 15, 2018        Earth As Art 4

Satellite imagery        April 24, 2014        River and Ridge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-95-52)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The district court order was filed December 4, 1998.

2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Blagrove seeks to appeal the district court’s order

construing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994)

as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Blagrove, No. CR-95-52 (E.D. Va. Dec.

7, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(3)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - california(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new york(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(54)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 30, 2010        GEOSMIN in South Carolina Water's, What is it?
Kenneth BOGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3233

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Angela Marie WYNN, Appellant, v. William W. PICKAVANCE, III, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-809

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 29, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond CASADAY

NO. 2018-KO-0700

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
STATE EX REL. Earl BELL v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1174

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry *1036his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(10)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(19)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(6)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(9)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(26)
              - arizona(16)
              - california(94)
              - colorado(7)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(71)
              - idaho(4)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(4)
              - maine(4)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(3)
              - mississippi(4)
              - montana(6)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(7)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(5)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(6)
              - north dakota(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(4)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(91)
              - texas(6)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - utah(4)
              - (-)virginia(9)
              - washington(15)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2020        USGS End of Year Accomplishments 2020

Featured Films and Shorts        March 1, 2020        USGS Florence Bascom Geoscience Center - Who we are

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2012        2012 Landsat Top Ten Loop

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness

How to's and trainings        June 1, 2017        TopoView - A look at version 2.1

Presentations and Events        March 15, 2018        Projecting Climate Change Impacts on Wetland-Dependent Birds - YouTube

Presentations and Events        August 31, 2018        Course Corrections to Address Gender Harassment in Science

Featured Films and Shorts        January 27, 2017        NMIC - 2017 Mineral Commodity Summaries Release
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the amended Annual Report of Hitor Group, a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10 K for the year ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report ) I Ken Martin, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Ken Martin Ken Martin, CEO, CAO Dated:  September 27, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual
Report of Vican Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”),
I, Chene Gardner, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April __, 2014



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ CHENE GARDNER                                                                    
|Chene Gardner
        Chief Financial Officer
        and principal executive officer
#### Samuel DE DEION v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 4662.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

May 5, 1953.

Clay Buchanan, Albuquerque, N. M., and Fred R. Walker, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Maurice Sanchez, U. S. Atty., and Edward E. Triviz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Albuquerque, N. M., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and KNOUS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellee, appellant consenting thereto.
July 1, 2015

Mr. Jean-christophe D. E. Dick

Visual Nitro

1307 19st Apartment 1A

Santa Monica, CA 90404

Dear Mr. Dick:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21, Subpart H; §§ 45.23, 91.103, 91.109, 91,119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203(a) and (b), 

91.401−91.417 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 5, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Visual Nitro into the public 

docket (No. FAA−2015−1290), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kurt Bordian, Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Copper Corp.
(the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ Kurt Bordian       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | February 19, 2008      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Victor RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1848

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.