alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CI2020182EN.01000201.xml

| 2.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 182/2

---

Information from the Commission concerning the non-application of certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698 by the Netherlands

COVID-19 outbreak

(Regulation (EU) 2020/698 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 2020 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the COVID-19 outbreak concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations and the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation (OJ L 165, 27.5.2020, p. 10))

(2020/C 182 I/02)

Notification by: the Netherlands

In conformity with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698, the Netherlands informed the Commission on 28 May 2020 that it has decided not to apply certain provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2020/698.

Provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698 that the Netherlands has decided not
  to
  apply:

| — | Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1);

| — | Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 51).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50326

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROSALINO-SALGADO-SILVER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:12-CR-1037-1

Before DeMOSS, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Rosalino Salgado-Silver (Salgado) appeals the 85-month sentence 

imposed after he pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after 

deportation. The sentence was within the properly calculated guideline range; 

it is presumed reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th 

Cir. 2006). 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-50326 Document: 00512551998 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2014
No. 13-50326

Salgado says that his sentence is too severe because illegal reentry is not 

violent and because his convictions were unreasonably double counted by being 

used to increase both his offense level and his criminal history score. As he 

concedes, his double-counting argument is foreclosed. See United States v. 

Duarte, 569 F.3d 528, 529-30 & n.12 (5th Cir. 2009). And his mere 

disagreement with the sentence does not rebut the presumption of 

reasonableness. See United States v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). 

Salgado merely asks this court to substitute his assessment of the sentencing 

factors for the district court’s assessment, which is contrary to the deferential 

review dictated by Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Salgado fails 

to show that his sentence was unreasonable or an abuse of discretion. See Gall, 

552 U.S. at 46, 51; Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 351 (2007). The 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-50326 Document: 00512551998 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2014
EXHIBIT 12.1

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

The following table sets forth our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed changes for the periods indicated. Prior to June 30, 2003, we were a wholly
owned subsidiary of Conexant Systems, Inc.

|                                                                                 |  | Year Ended September 30, |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | -------
|
|
|Earnings:                                                                        |  |                          |        
|Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |  | $                        | (21,803
|Add: Fixed charges                                                               |  |                          | 4,368  
|                                                                                 |  |                          |        
|                                                                                 |  | $                        | (17,443
|                                                                                 |  |                          |        
|Fixed Charges:                                                                   |  |                          |        
|Interest expense                                                                 |  | $                        | 2,241  
|Interest portion of rental expense                                               |  |                          | 2,127  
|                                                                                 |  |                          |        
|                                                                                 |  | $                        | 4,368  
|                                                                                 |  |                          |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)                                            |  |                          |       
|                                                                                 |  |                          |        

---

---



QuickLinks
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kurt Bordian, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Copper
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            



| | By:    | /s/
      Kurt Bordian 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | KURT BORDIAN           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 14, 2008      





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

GUADALUPE RAMOS-AGUILAR, a.k.a.

Vicente Aguilar Barrajas, a.k.a. Alberto 

Lemus, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 17-10124 

 17-10126 

D.C. Nos. 4:16-cr-01124-RCC

 4:13-cr-00693-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018**

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Guadalupe Ramos-Aguilar appeals the 

aggregate 58-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and his admission that 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-10124 & 17-10126 

he violated the terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramos-Aguilar first contends that the district court procedurally erred by 

failing to address his arguments in support of a downward variance. The court did 

not plainly err. See United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th 

Cir. 2010). The court considered Ramos-Aguilar’s individualized circumstances 

and mitigating arguments, explaining that his motive argument was not “a good 

one,” and that deterrence was an important consideration. It was not required to 

say more. See United States v. Petri, 731 F.3d 833, 842 (9th Cir. 2013) (district 

court need not “detail its evaluation of every assertion made to support 

[defendant’s] argument during sentencing” as long as it makes clear that the 

parties’ arguments have been heard and a reasoned decision made).

Ramos-Aguilar also contends that his sentence is substantively 

unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. 

Autery, 555 F.3d 864, 871 (9th Cir. 2009). The court considered Ramos-Aguilar’s 

mitigation arguments and determined that they were insufficient to warrant the 

significant downward variance he sought in light of how quickly he returned to the 

United States. The below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light 
3 17-10124 & 17-10126 

of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. 

See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2)The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Robert J. AdamsonRobert J. AdamsonChairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive OfficerMarch 5, 2004
March 7th 2012

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

RE: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Secondary Aluminum

Production, Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2010-0544.

Dear Ms. Boyd,

The Aluminum Association and its members are requesting a thirty day extension of the 

comment period for the proposed Secondary Aluminum Production rule. The complexity in the 

proposed rule compared to the previous rule, coupled with the fact that items have been added to 

the docket as of February 28th 2012, have resulted in the need for industry discussion and 

consensus building in order to generate useful comments to EPA. We believe that a complete 

analysis will not be complete by March 30th 2012. We are requesting an additional 30 day 

extension in order to complete a full review of the proposed rule.

In particular, the industry has begun the process of analyzing information added to the docket on 

February 28

th

, including EPA’s redlined comparative analysis of the original rule and the 

proposed revisions. Test data on which EPA is basing proposed revisions to Group I 

Uncontrolled furnace testing requirements was shared with industry at that time as well, and full 

review is required to assess the proposed action.

Thank you for your time and consideration in addressing this important issue. Please contact my 

office (703-358-2981 or Cjohnson@aluminum.org) with questions or for further information.

 

Sincerely,

Charles D. Johnson

VP, Environment Health & Safety
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - (-)products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(7)

## By Year

Data Access        December 7, 2018        Areas of Land Subsidence in California

Interactive Map        July 16, 2021        The Mojave River:  Lifeblood of the Desert

Data Access        December 18, 2018        San Antonio Creek Valley Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        December 19, 2018        Drought & Groundwater in California

Data Access        November 7, 2018        Mojave Groundwater Data

Data Access        December 10, 2018        Lower Colorado River Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        January 31, 2019        Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Borrego Valley

Infographics        March 2, 2022        Discover Ecosystems
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - (-)science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        What is declination?

faq        June 30, 2017        Why are amphibian populations declining?

faq        June 30, 2017        What is the United States doing about amphibian deformity and decline issues?

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer

faq        July 7, 2017        Why measure the magnetic field at the Earth's surface? Wouldn't satellites be better suited for space-weather studies?

faq        July 31, 2017        What do the different north arrows on a USGS topographic map mean?
Daniel Scott LYNDS, DOC# C00343, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center

Filters

              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(13)
              - arizona(6)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(6)
              - georgia(3)
              - hawaii(1)
              - iowa(2)
              - kansas(4)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(34)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(343)
              - tennessee(2)
              - (-)texas(3)
              - utah(5)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

Center News        October 21, 2019        Aerial Photo Scan Reveals Rare Image of Two Airplanes in Flight

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change

Featured Films and Shorts        December 12, 2018        Image of the Week - Lake Meredith’s Return
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 100474-100475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29282]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ25-1-000]

City of Anaheim, California; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on November 25, 2024, City of Anaheim, California 
submits tariff filing per 35.28(e): City of Anaheim 2025 TRBAA and 
Gross Load Update to be effective 1/1/2025.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov). From 
the Commission's Home Page on the internet, this information is 
available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on 
eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or 
downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket 
number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket 
number field.

[[Page 100475]]

    User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's 
website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202-
502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at 
[email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at 
[email protected].
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link 
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail 
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in 
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 27, 2024.

    Dated: December 6, 2024.
Carlos D. Clay,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-29282 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```