Affirmed and Opinion F iled February 13, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00557-CR ARIEL DANIEL ERIVES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-85054-2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Smith, Kennedy, 1 and Rosenberg 2 Opinion by Justice Rosenberg Ariel Daniel Erives appeals his convi ction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Erives pleaded guilty, and the trial court found him guilty and assessed his punishment at eighteen years of imprisonment. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

1 Justice David Schenck was originally a member of this panel. Justice Nancy Kennedy succeeded Justice Schenck on this panel when hi s term expired on December 31, 2022. 2 The Hon. Barbara Rosenberg, Justice, Assigned. This case was submitted without oral argument. At the time this case was submitted, Justic e Leslie Osborne was a member of the panel. After her resignation, Justice Rosenberg was designated to sit on the panel a nd participated in the decision of this case. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.1.–2– Erives’s attorney filed a motion to w ithdraw supported by a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of th e record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meet s requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to Erives . The State filed a letter response, acknowledging receipt of counsel’s Anders brief and stating it had no points with which to respond. This Court advised Erives of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appella nt has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s briefs. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). Erives was indicted for the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 29.03. He waived his right to a jury trial, pleaded guilty pursuant to an “ope n plea” without an agreement as to the punishment he would receive, agreed to the trial court accepting his plea by broadcast on closed-circuit teleconferencing, and waived his right to appeal his plea of guilt, but not with respect to his punish ment. The record shows Erives signed a written plea agreement that included admoni shments. And the trial court orally–3– admonished him during the plea hearing, including an admonishment as to the deportation consequences of his plea. Th e trial court found Erives guilty based on his plea and the evidence, and it assessed his punishment at eighteen years of imprisonment. See P ENAL §§ 12.32, 29.03(b). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s briefs. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 826–27 (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably and substantively support the appeal. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court's judgment.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47
210557F.U05 /Barbara Rosenber g/ BARBARA ROSENBERG JUSTICE, ASSIGNED–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ARIEL DANIEL ERIVES, Appellant

No. 05-21-00557-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-85054- 2019. Opinion delivered by Justice Rosenberg. Justices Smith and Kennedy participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date , the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered February 13, 2023