alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MARY E. GLOVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND

ON BEHALF OF OTHER SIMILARLY

SITUATED FORMER AND CURRENT

HOMEOWNERS IN PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C., A NEW

JERSEY DEBT COLLECTOR,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 334 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

(1) Does Act 6, §502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute

establishes, against any statutorily defined “person” collecting statutorily

prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?

The Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DISMISSED as moot.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(27)
              - products_data(10)
              - products_maps(5)
              - products_publications(93)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(15)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(9)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(2)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(94)
              - multimedia_video-149194(70)
              - multimedia_video-149195(17)
              - multimedia_video-149196(6)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - news_other_news(5)
              - connect_staff_profiles(13)
              - other_basic-42(4)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(16)
              - (-)california(9)
              - colorado(2)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - guam(1)
              - hawaii(67)
              - idaho(4)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(102)
              - virginia(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Photography        April 25, 2018        Changes in Earth's Gravity Reveal Changes in Groundwater Storage

Photography        October 12, 2017        Earth movers on Big Sur landslide, October 12, 2017

Photography        March 29, 2022        Mountain Pass REE mine in California

Photography        March 29, 2022        Mountain Pass mine in California

Photography        November 16, 2018        Collecting geophysics data at Pinnacles National Park

Photography        November 23, 2015        Jared Kluesner displays a 3D view of seismic data

Photography        August 8, 2016        Model of reservoirs underneath Long Valley Caldera

Photography        October 3, 2000        Map of volcanic ash fall as a result of eruptions from Yellowstone,...

Photography        January 22, 2016        Long Valley Caldera range-front faults terminate at the caldera bou...
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT  27.1

ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE



THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q,
FOR THE THREE  MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>              0001111853
<NAME>             ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
<CURRENCY>         US$

<S>                                <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-2000         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>               APR-01-2000         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-2000         JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1                   1
<CASH>                             2,537               2,537
<SECURITIES>                           0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                     54,790              54,790
<ALLOWANCES>                      (3,044)             (3,044)
<INVENTORY>                            0                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0                   0
<PP&E>                         2,751,491           2,751,491
<DEPRECIATION>                  (199,112)           (199,112)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 2,651,585           2,651,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             78,970              78,970
<BONDS>                        1,120,330           1,120,330
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0                   0
<PREFERRED>                       50,000              50,000
<COMMON>                               0                   0
<OTHER-SE>                     1,428,776           1,428,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   2,651,585           2,651,585
<SALES>                                0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  92,856             182,534
<CGS>                                  0                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    (49,623)            (96,786)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     770               1,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                18,770              36,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   25,198              50,686
<INCOME-TAX>                           0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               25,198              50,686
<DISCONTINUED>                         0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0                   0
<CHANGES>                              0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                      25,198              50,686
<EPS-BASIC>                         0.37                0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.37                0.74



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6579

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND HAMPTON PUTZE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-91-151, CA-96-3-3)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Hampton Putze, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Putze, Nos. CR-91-151, CA-96-3-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 28,

1996). We further note that Appellant's failure to challenge the

alleged sentencing errors at his sentencing hearing waived the

right to raise any such claims either on appeal or pursuant to this

collateral attack. United States v. Grubb, 11 F.3d 426, 440 (4th

Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Jackson, 974 F.2d 57, 60 (7th

Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 977 (1993). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  442,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    223,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               696,517
<PP&E>                                       1,374,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,296,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,866,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,044
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,296,264
<SALES>                                     11,451,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       10,288,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,163,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,209,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (39,230)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,098,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,098,565)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,098,565)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5623 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5623

 To authorize the award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Chaplain 
(First Lieutenant) Joseph Verbis LaFleur for acts of valor during World 
                                War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 5, 2016

Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Fleming, and Mr. Graves of 
  Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Chaplain 
(First Lieutenant) Joseph Verbis LaFleur for acts of valor during World 
                                War II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED SERVICE CROSS 
              TO CHAPLAIN (FIRST LIEUTENANT) JOSEPH VERBIS LAFLEUR FOR 
              ACTS OF VALOR DURING WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Authorization.--Notwithstanding the time limitations specified 
in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time 
limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 
who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the 
Distinguished Service Cross under section 3742 of that title to 
Chaplain (First Lieutenant) Joseph Verbis LaFleur for the acts of valor 
referred to in subsection (b).
    (b) Acts of Valor Described.--The acts of valor referred to in 
subsection (a) are the actions of Chaplain (First Lieutenant) Joseph 
Verbis LaFleur while interred as a Prisoner of War by Japan from 
December 30, 1941, to September 7, 1944.
                                 <all>
```
Jonathan Lee Miles THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
John EBERHARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - (-)science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Research        October 8, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning – Fine-Tuning for Best Alerts

Research        May 29, 2020        The Blind Zone of Earthquake Early Warning

Research        March 9, 2022        Earthquake Early Warning - Overview

Research        March 20, 2018        Volcano Hazards Preparedness Resources

Research        November 13, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning Seismic Station Adjustment Terms - Annemarie Baltay

Research        March 6, 2019        Earthquake Early Warning

Project        March 14, 2016        Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) Support

Activity        October 16, 2018        ShakeAlert

Research        October 7, 2022        Planetary Defense

Topic        February 2, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning: Vital for City Transit

Activity        September 29, 2020        Monitoring for Subduction Zone Science

Project        November 9, 2021        Probabilistic Forecasting of Earthquakes, Tsunamis, and Earthquake Effects in the Coastal Zone

Interviews        July 6, 2010        Science for a Dangerous Planet
STATE EX REL. Phil Anthony DEES v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1438

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, relator's guilty plea waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. *State v. Crosby* , 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow *1041circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 598 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to give members of the United States 

Capitol Police the option to delay mandatory retirement until age 60. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2013 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to give members 

of the United States Capitol Police the option to delay 

mandatory retirement until age 60. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPTIONAL DELAY IN MANDATORY RETIRE4 MENT AGE FOR MEMBERS OF CAPITOL PO5 LICE. 

6 (a) CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—The sec7 ond sentence of section 8335(c) of title 5, United States 

8 Code, is amended to read as follows: ‘‘At the request of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 598 IH

1 such a member, the Capitol Police Board shall exempt the 

2 member from automatic separation under this subsection 

3 until that member becomes 60 years of age, so long as 

4 the member undergoes a physical examination during the 

5 6-month period which ends on the day the member turns 

6 57 years of age and, on the basis of the examination, 

7 meets appropriate physical fitness criteria (as determined 

8 by the Board in consultation with the Chief of the Capitol 

9 Police and the exclusive representative of the Capitol Po10 lice under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, with 

11 respect to collective bargaining).’’. 

12 (b) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM.— 

13 The second sentence of section 8425(c) of title 5, United 

14 States Code, is amended to read as follows: ‘‘At the re15 quest of such a member, the Capitol Police Board shall 

16 exempt the member from automatic separation under this 

17 subsection until that member becomes 60 years of age, 

18 so long as the member undergoes a physical examination 

19 during the 6-month period which ends on the day the 

20 member turns 57 years of age and, on the basis of the 

21 examination, meets appropriate physical fitness criteria 

22 (as determined by the Board in consultation with the 

23 Chief of the Capitol Police and the exclusive representative 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 598 IH

1 of the Capitol Police under chapter 71 of title 5, United 

2 States Code, with respect to collective bargaining).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Eddie MOULTRIE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1447

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 13, 2018

Eddie Moultrie, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*407The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Osterhaus and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Daniel JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 30, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5627 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5627

To adopt the monarch butterfly as the national butterfly of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 5, 2016

  Mr. Ribble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To adopt the monarch butterfly as the national butterfly of the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The monarch butterfly is almost certainly the most 
        widely recognized of all butterflies in the United States.
            (2) The monarch butterfly population is widely distributed 
        across the United States, from Maine to Hawaii.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT AND ADOPTION OF THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY AS THE 
              NATIONAL BUTTERFLY.

    (a) In General.--The insect commonly known as the ``monarch 
butterfly'' (Danaus plexippus) is adopted as the national butterfly of 
the United States.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or the adoption of 
the monarch butterfly as the national butterfly of the United States 
shall be construed or used as a reason to alter, change, modify, or 
otherwise affect any plan, policy, management decision, regulation, or 
other action by the Federal Government.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the annual report of SR Telecom Inc., a corporation existing under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the "Company"), on Form 20-F for the
year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Pierre St-Arnaud, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

|/s/PIERRE ST-ARNAUDPierre St-Arnaud
President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                          | 
|April 21, 2004                                                            | 

69

---



QuickLinks
H. R. 5816 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To extend the authorization for the United States Commission on International 

Religious Freedom. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY. 

The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 is amended— 

(1) in section 207(a) (22 U.S.C. 6435(a)), by striking ‘‘2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2015’’; and 

(2) in section 209 (22 U.S.C. 6436), by striking ‘‘September 

30, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendments made by this Act shall take effect as if enacted 

on December 10, 2014. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Gwendolyn MERCER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3045

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.