alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30855

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PERCY FRANKLIN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:98-CR-207-10

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Percy Franklin, federal prisoner # 01161-748, appeals from the district

court’s order denying him relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and the crack

cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. Franklin was convicted of

conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and powder cocaine.

Franklin contends that the district court erroneously found that his 20-

year sentence was the minimum mandatory sentence for his offense because, he

argues, the murders committed by the conspiracy were found not reasonably

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 29, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 29, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 08-30855 Document: 00511016221 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/29/2010
No. 08-30855

2

foreseeable to him when he was sentenced. The Government contends that

Franklin waived any entitlement to § 3582(c)(2) relief because the Federal Public

Defender appointed to represent Franklin sat on the committee that determined

Franklin was ineligible for such relief.

The Government’s waiver argument is unavailing. Moreover, the district

court’s finding that Franklin previously had incurred a felony drug conviction

raised his mandatory minimum sentence to 20 years of imprisonment. See

21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). Because Franklin was sentenced to the minimum

mandatory 20-year term, he was ineligible for an adjustment pursuant to the

crack cocaine guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1)).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 08-30855 Document: 00511016221 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/29/2010
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40332 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MARCOS GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-B-94-95-1
- - - - - - - - - - December 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marcos Gonzalez appeals his convictions for possession with intent to distribute approximately 576 kilograms of cocaine and attempting to conduct a financial transaction with the proceeds of an unlawful activity. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance and that his conviction violates the Double-Jeopardy Clause because of a civil forfeiture of real property prior to his trial.No. 95-40332 -2- We have reviewed Gonzalez's contentions and the record, and we find no reversible error as to the district court's denial ofthe motion for a continuance. Gonzalez did not raise the doublejeopardy issue in the court below. A double-jeopardy defense to prosecution must be raised prior to trial, or it is waived. See United States v. Moore , 958 F.2d 646, 650 (5th Cir. 1992) citing F ED . R. C RIM . P. 12(b), (f). Assuming, arguendo , that Gonzalez had standing to raise the double-jeopardy defense, he waived the issue by not raising it in the district court. AFFIRMED.
Tyrell A. DERONVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
New Peer Review Record Comment for Entry New Peer Review Record Comment for Entry245535,Document PEER Document PEER Document PEER 

REVIEW PLAN REVIEW PLAN245535.PDF

Sci-Inv-HISA-ISI-Public-Comments Comments Comments 08/19/2012 05:33 PM

To: Stan Barone, Sci-Inv-HISA-ISI-Public-Comments

A new comment has been added to record number 245535, document title PEER 

REVIEW PLAN 245535.PDF.

Name: Tom Neltner

Email Address: tneltner@pewtrusts.org

Affiliation: Pew Health Group

Comment: N-Methylpyrrolidone is used to make food

packaging per 21 CFR 176.300, 21 CFR

177.1655 and 21 CFR 177.2440. I may

also be used on food handling equipment

or other packaging if a firm has found

it to be generally recognized as safe.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(20)
              - products_data(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(30)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - documents_file(3)
              - documents_file-149220(3)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(4)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(9)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(1)
              - (-)colorado(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        July 22, 2021        Down to Earth: Complexities of Geology Affect Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse Hazard
Michael JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-0085

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00574-CR

Kevin John FARESE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 223808

Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 19, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
STATE EX REL. Kenneth W. LAVIGNE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0935

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

Denied.
Denise A. JARDIN ROTOLANTE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Roger F. ROTOLANTE, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - (-)louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        June 23, 2014        Morphology, ecology and biogeography of *Stauroneis pachycephala* P.T. Cleve (Bacillariophyta) and its transfer to the genus *Envekadea*

Featured Films and Shorts        April 26, 2021        EarthShots — Satellite Images of Environmental Change
ickering

Parraguirre Douglas Kitta demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the parties' arguments, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 679, 818 P.2d at 851, 853; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbons

Cherry 

### cee--at t , J. Hardesty , J. , J.
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Kenneth Dale Sisco Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA (0) 1947A
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION




The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1 (the “Trust”) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”):





1.           The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.





2.           Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement.











By:
/s/ David J. KolibachukName:
David J. KolibachukTitle:
Vice PresidentDated:
February 8, 2013
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-461218

NO. 2018-BA-1469

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of one year. Should petitioner commit any misconduct during the period of probation, her conditional right to practice may be terminated or she may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

**CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.**

Crichton, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

I write separately to note that for those initially declined admission for character and fitness concerns, a demonstrated effort of rehabilitative work weighs heavy in reconsideration for admission to this noble profession. *See**In re: Committee on Bar Admissions CFN-461218* , 17-0867 (La. 6/16/17), 221 So.3d 835 (Crichton, J., additionally concurring, stating that petitioner's "unacceptable conduct" demonstrates a "lack of proper character and fitness to practice law in the State of Louisiana"). Since this Court's 2017 denial of petitioner's previous application for admission, petitioner has diligently devoted time and effort to personal and professional development and established good moral character. Consequently, I wholeheartedly agree with the Court's decision to grant this petitioner conditional admission, subject to a probationary period of one year.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Michael L. Canning, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Walter D. Amaral, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of SiRF Technology
Holdings, Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 2, 2006 |  |  |  | /S/    MICHAEL L.
CANNING                                         
|                    |  |  |  | Michael L. Canning President and Chief Executive Officer          
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 2, 2006 |  |  |  | /S/    WALTER D.
AMARAL                                           
|                    |  |  |  | Walter D. Amaral Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NANNACO, Inc., a Texas corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Andrew DeVries,
Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss.1350), that to their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew DeVries
---------------------------
Andrew DeVries
Principal Executive Officer
February 23, 2004


/s/ Andrew DeVries
---------------------------
Andrew DeVries
Principal Financial Officer
February 23, 2004


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to NANNACO, Inc. and will be retained by NANNACO, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]



                                       32
# C_2020259EN.01001001.xml

| 7.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/10

---

Notice from the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

(2020/C 259/04)

In accordance with Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC of 14 September 2009 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products (1), Denmark hereby notifies its undertaking to maintain specific stocks.

| 1. | The level of the specific stocks that Denmark undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The level of the specific stocks that Denmark undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.

| 2. | The undertaking applies to the period from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The undertaking applies to the period from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021.

| 3. | The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:






  — | Motor gasoline |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:

—

Motor gasoline

| — | Gas/diesel oil |
| --- | --- |

—

Gas/diesel oil

| 4. | The stocks will be owned and held by the central Danish stockholding entity, Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre (FDO). |
| --- | --- |

4.

The stocks will be owned and held by the central Danish stockholding entity, Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre (FDO).

---

(1)  OJ L 265, 9.10.2009, p. 9.

---
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Chadwick S. Parson, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4.            I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

5.            The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, that is included in these reports. 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association.

 

 

By:      /s/ Chadwick S. Parson                       

Name:  Chadwick S. Parson

Title     Managing Director and President   

Structured Obligations Corporation

(senior officer in charge of securitization
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 642 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 642

 To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 
     Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special 
consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of 
             section 207 of the Public Health Service Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2013

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make clear that an agency outside of the Department of Health and 
     Human Services may not designate, appoint, or employ special 
consultants, fellows, or other employees under subsection (f) or (g) of 
             section 207 of the Public Health Service Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health and Human Services Hiree 
Clarification Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL CONSULTANTS AND FELLOWS FOR THE PUBLIC 
              HEALTH SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 207(f) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 209(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``This subsection and subsection (g) do not authorize the designation, 
appointment, or employment of any special consultant, fellow, or other 
employee by an agency outside of the Department of Health and Human 
Services.''.
    (b) Technical Corrections.--Section 207(h) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 209(h)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``subsection (f)'' and inserting 
        ``subsection (g)''; and
            (2) by striking ``subsection (e)'' and inserting 
        ``subsection (f)''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to special consultants, fellows, and other employees appointed 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# 03^s'-6oi^'^ File at County Clerk's Office. Instructions for Tenant: Schedule thetrial bycalling the County Courts atLaw Offices (512) 854-9241 or(512) 854-9249. File the completed, signed form in the CountyClerk's Office. Senda copytothePlaintiff/Landlord bycertified mail return receipt requested, fax, orpersonal delivery. 

# t ame ofPlaint ndld 

# 'miMmm^i Cause No: m w__ 

## In County Court at Law, #_J_ Travis County, Texas 

# ?A-C\l-I5-Mlll m Name ofDefendant/ffena,

To: 

### Tenant's Notice ofTrial Setting 

### 23$ 

# fc Print name ofPTaintifVL&ndlor The trial of this case is set on this date: month / day / year and at this time: Ire 

# r- "f! o •t3 »•. o o? O 

### OK * .m a 

### The trial will take place in CountyCourtat Law #1 or#2, both located on the second floor ofthe Heman Marion Sweatt Civil Courthouse, 1000 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas 78701.



## RECEIVED four Signature Your Printed Name Your full Address: 

## Phone Number (£$.) W2D Fax Number. ( ) - (ifavailable)

Certificate ofService 

### Icertify thata complete copy ofthis document was delivered to Plaintiff/Landlord's agentof record on this date by: (Check one.) 

### • Certified mail, return receipt requested (Bring receipt stamped with dateofmailing and green return receipt card tocourt.) 

### • Fax, to fax #C J- (Bring fax confirmation to court.) 

### • Hand delivery (Bring signed acknowledgment ofdelivery from Plaintiff/Landlord to court.) 

# • Your Signature Tenant's Notice of Trial Setting, September 2011 Date Page 1 of 1

# OS'lC-onnf-w File at County Clerk's Office.

use No: 

# to-DMC-MO/H In County Court atLaw, # / Travis County, Texas 

## Motion for Appointed Attorney
am the Defendant/Tenant in this case. cannot afford to hire an attorney. 

### Ifiled this appeal by filing an Affidavit ofInability to Pay Cost ofAppeal or File AppeatjBpnd.^. v0 & rc\ 

## 3 « a ° 

# &% * <p en 

### respectfully ask the Court to appoint an attorney to represent me in this appeal of my eviction.



## KECEMED 

## ^ 1 62m Your Signature: 

# YourPrintedName: l{\ SuliPjflff)) Address: %$, 

# City:QJUMU/Il State:TX Zip Code: ^HO Phone Number Certificate ofService 

### I certify that a complete copy of this document was delivered to the Plaintiff/Landlord's agent of record on this date by: (Check one.) 

### • Certified mail, return receipt requested 

### • Fax, to fax # ( ) - • Hand delivery 

# • Your Signature Date

Tenant's Motion for Appointed Attorney, September 2011 Page 1 of 1