alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - (-)news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Release: Declines and Slow Recovery in Little Brown Bat Populations Predicted

Featured Story        March 6, 2023        Building maps to help geothermal energy and greater sage-grouse coexist in Nevada’s sagebrush country

Featured Story        October 14, 2015        Birds in the Bakken: Oil Development Can Affect Critical Habitat

slideshow        June 5, 2023        What’s Invasive Where You Live?

slideshow        October 24, 2022        Examples of USGS Bat Research
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(5)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(4)

## By Location

              - alaska(12)
              - arizona(8)
              - california(17)
              - colorado(5)
              - connecticut(3)
              - delaware(3)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(8)
              - georgia(4)
              - hawaii(13)
              - idaho(3)
              - kansas(4)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(2)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(6)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(3)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(3)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - (-)new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(47)
              - texas(5)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(11)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        April 8, 2024        USGS Northeast Region: The Short Story

Featured Films and Shorts        April 22, 2021        We are the Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program

Featured Films and Shorts        April 22, 2021        We are the Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program (AD)

Featured Films and Shorts        September 30, 2017        USGS Hurricane Preparedness
Exhibit
32.1





REGENOCELL
THERAPEUTICS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report
of RegenoCELL Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Good Buddy’s Coffee Express, Inc.)
(the “Company”) on Form 10 K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, James F. Mongiardo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                      James F. MongiardoJames
      F. MongiardoChief
      Executive OfficerandChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      30,
2009
Fipronil Task Force and EPA Registration Review meetings October 2014

- July 2 0 15

The Fipronil Task Force (FTF) met with EPA on October 30, 2014 to discuss the health effects data needs and the ecological and fate data needs for registration review, including data required in the registration
review DCI issued in March 2013.

• Meeting s ign

- in sheet s attached

EPA and the FTF discussed the health effects data needs in a teleconference on July 16, 2015, and the upcoming registration review risk assessments.

• FTF Participants: Jeff Birk and Damien Fages (BASF)

• EPA participants: Tom Myers, Cathryn Britton, Garland Waleko
Markus D. LANIEUX v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-1410

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 5, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ;

*1039*State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Grethel VARELA ESTEVEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Juan Jeronimo RIVERO NAJERA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00884

- CR

The STATE of Texas, Ap pellant

v.

Abraham Jose AVILA VASQUEZ

,

Appellee

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13928CR

Honorable Dennis Powell , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pursuant to article 44.01(a)(1) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the State has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order quashing the information. See T EX

. C ODE
C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 44.01(a)(1). In its notice of appeal, it requests that this court stay the proceedings in the trial court pending this appeal pursuant to ar ticle 44.01(e). See id . art. 44.01(e) (providing that “[t]her State is entitled to a stay in the proceedings pending the disposition of an appeal under Subsection (a) or (b) of this article”). We GRANT the State’s motion to stay and stay all proceedings in the trial court pending the disposition of this appeal.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of February, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Daniel George JAKEWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-543

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(11)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(70)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(12)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(2)
              - montana(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(8)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
# L_2021104DE.01005501.xml

| 25.3.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 104/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 104/55

---

Berichtigung des Standpunkts (EU) Nr. 1/2021 des Rates in erster Lesung im Hinblick auf den Erlass einer Verordnung des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Rechte und Pflichten der Fahrgäste im Eisenbahnverkehr Vom Rat angenommen am 25. Januar 2021

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 68 vom 26. Februar 2021
  )

Seite 17, Artikel 22 Absatz 3:

Anstatt:

„(3)   In Bahnhöfen, die nicht mit Personal ausgestattet sind, stellen Eisenbahnunternehmen und Bahnhofsbetreiber sicher, dass im Einklang mit den in Artikel 20 Absatz 1 genannten Zugangsregeln ...“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   In Bahnhöfen, die nicht mit Personal ausgestattet sind, stellen Eisenbahnunternehmen und Bahnhofsbetreiber sicher, dass im Einklang mit den in Artikel 21 Absatz 1 genannten Zugangsregeln ...“

Seite 46, Entsprechungstabelle, Spalte „Diese Verordnung“, letzte Zeile:

Anstatt:

„Anhänge IV“

muss es heißen:

„Anhang IV“

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4267** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KEBRAE ODERO BROWN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00019

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : September 30, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Reversed and remanded by un published per c uriam opinion
. Stephen Clayton Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kebrae Odero Brown pled guilty to possessing a firearm after having been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006), reserving his right to appeal the issue of whether his prior state conviction s w ere punishable by more than one year of imprisonment. The offense s in question

w ere prior North Carolina conviction s for possession of burglary tools and attempted breaking and entering ; for eac h of these offenses Br own faced a maximum possible sentence of ten months under North Carolina law. Brown appealed, arguing that neither of his prior convictions w as “punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year” under the Supreme Court’s d ecision in Carrachuri

Rosendo v. Holder , 130 S. Ct. 2577 (2010) . We recently held that, when deciding whether a North Carolina conviction is a predicate offense for sentencing enhancement purposes, the Controlled Substance Act’s inclusion of offenses “pun ishable by imprisonment for more than one year” refers to the maximum sentence that the defe ndant in question could have received, not the sentence that could have been imposed on a defendant with a more severe criminal history or one subject to an aggrava ted
sentence. United States v. Simmons , 649 F.3d 237 , 241 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc) . Thus, because neither of Brown’s underlying3 North Carolina convictions w as punishable by a term exceeding one year, Brown’s conduct that formed the basis for his federal conviction

— possessing a firearm

— did not violate § 922(g). Accordingly, we reverse Brown’s conviction and remand for further proceedings. **∗** The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
REVERSED AND REMANDED

**∗** This disposition conveys no criticism of either the Government or the district court, both of which dut ifully applied circuit precedent at the time of Br own ’s prosecution and sentencing that was later reversed by Simmons
. See United States v. Harp , 406 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2005).
# C_2020370EN.01001901.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/19

---

EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/19)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/documents/annual-accounts/

---
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3095

___________ William Bradford, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Michelle Whitworth, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 7, 2007 Filed: September 17, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. William Bradford, a detainee at the Missouri Sexual Offender Treatment Center, appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against Michelle Whitworth , a registered nurse. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Senty-Haugen v. Goodno , 462 F.3d 876, 885 (8th Cir. 2006), cert. denied , 127 S. Ct. 2048 (2007) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that Nurse Whitworth’s decision to place restrictions on Bradford for refusing to obey certain rules was a professiona l decision entitled to deference, seeYoungberg-2- v. Romeo , 457 U.S. 307, 323-25 (1982); and that Bradford was provided adequate procedural protections, see Senty-Haugen , 462 F.3d at 887-88 (due process requirements are flexible and specific to each situation; most important mechanisms for ensuring due process are notice of factual basis leading to deprivation and fair opportunity for rebuttal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Christopher Lamont DOUGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3678

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 23, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - (-)science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - (-)products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(7)

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        What is declination?

faq        June 30, 2017        Why are amphibian populations declining?

faq        June 30, 2017        What is the United States doing about amphibian deformity and decline issues?

faq        July 7, 2017        Why measure the magnetic field at the Earth's surface? Wouldn't satellites be better suited for space-weather studies?

faq        July 31, 2017        What do the different north arrows on a USGS topographic map mean?

Data Access        December 7, 2018        Areas of Land Subsidence in California

Interactive Map        July 16, 2021        The Mojave River:  Lifeblood of the Desert

Data Access        December 18, 2018        San Antonio Creek Valley Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        December 19, 2018        Drought & Groundwater in California

Data Access        November 7, 2018        Mojave Groundwater Data

Data Access        December 10, 2018        Lower Colorado River Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        January 31, 2019        Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Borrego Valley
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5855 

To require a report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities within the 

Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require a report on procurement supply chain 

vulnerabilities within the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON PROCUREMENT SUPPLY CHAIN 

4 VULNERABILITIES. 

5 (a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

7 of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Serv8 ices of the Senate and the House of Representatives a re9 port on how sole source suppliers of components to the 

10 Department of Defense procurement supply chain create 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5855 IH

1 vulnerabilities to military attack, terrorism, natural dis2 aster, industrial shock, financial crisis, or geopolitical cri3 sis, such as an embargo of key raw materials or industrial 

4 inputs. 

5 (b) MATTERS COVERED.—The report required by 

6 subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

7 (1) A list of the components in the Department 

8 of Defense procurement supply chain for which there 

9 is a supplier that controls over 50 percent of the 

10 global market. 

11 (2) A list of parts of the supply chain where 

12 there is inadequate information to ascertain whether 

13 there is a single source supplier of components. 

14 (3) The Secretary’s recommendations on which 

15 single source suppliers create vulnerabilities, as well 

16 as recommendations on how to reduce those 

17 vulnerabilities. 

18 (c) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by sub19 section (a) may be classified. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
 
 The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes
        Trust LT 2003-1 (the “Trust”) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”):
 
 1.  The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement, with the exception of the timing
        of distribution of proceeds disclosed on the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm attached as Exhibit 99.2 to the Annual Report.
 
 
 
 By:
          /s/ William H HallName:
          William H HallTitle:
          Vice PresidentDated:
          March 28, 2019