Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Notices 102107 

11See Order, 82 FR at 24098. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Industeel Belgium S.A ................ 2.52 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these final results of review to 

parties in this review within five days 

after public announcement of the final 

results or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Industeel in these final results of 

review for which Industeel did not 

know that the merchandise it sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Upon publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, the following cash 

deposit requirements will be effective 

for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date of the final 

results of this administrative review, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for 

Industeel will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in 

the final results of this review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recently completed period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the producer has been 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

this proceeding, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 5.40 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation for this proceeding.11

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a violation 

subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 10, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of Issues 

Comment 1: Industeel’s Reported Section 

232 Duties 

Comment 2: Adjustments under the 

Transaction Disregarded Rule 

Comment 3: Industeel’s Reported 

Merchandise Processing Fee and Harbor 

Maintenance Fee 

Comment 4: Correction of Certain 

Ministerial Errors and Adjustment to 

Certain Costs 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–29603 Filed 12–16–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–054] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is amending the 

final results of the countervailing duty 

administrative review of certain 

aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) to 

correct a ministerial error. The period of 

review (POR) is January 1, 2022, 

through December 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable December 17, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Natasia Harrison or Harrison Tanchuck, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1240 or 

(202) 482–7421, respectively. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
102108 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Notices 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative; 2022, 89 FR 88957 (November 

12, 2024) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum (IDM). 

2See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error 

Allegation,’’ dated November 13, 2024. 

3See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19, 

2018); see also Certain Aluminum Foil from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With the Amended Final 

Determination in the Countervailing Duty 

Investigation, and Notice of Amended Final 

Determination and Amended Countervailing Duty 

Order, 85 FR 47730 (August 6, 2020) (collectively, 

Order). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Analysis of Ministerial 

Error Allegations,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice (Ministerial Error Analysis Memorandum). 

5See Final Results, 89 FR at 88958. 

6Commerce finds the following companies to be 

to be cross-owned with Five Star: Jiangsu 

Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. 

(Jiangsu Dingsheng), Dingsheng Aluminum 

Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd. 

(Dingsheng HK), Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (Dingsheng IE), Hangzhou Teemful 

Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Teemful), Inner Mongolia 

Liansheng New Energy Material Co., Ltd. or Inner 

Mongolia Liansheng New Energy Material JointStock Co., Ltd. (Liansheng), Inner Mongolia Xinxing 

New Energy Material Co., Ltd. or Inner Mongolia 

Xinxing New Material Co., Ltd. (Xinxing), 

Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd. 

(Dingsheng Group), Hangzhou Dingcheng 

Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Dingcheng); Luoyang 

Longding Aluminum Co., Ltd. (Longding); Walson 

(HK) Trading Co., Limited (Walson HK); Dingheng 

New Materials Co., Ltd. (Dingheng) and Thai Ding 

Li New Materials Co., Ltd. (Ding Li), (collectively, 

Dingsheng Respondents). Walson HK, Dingheng 

and Ding Li were listed separately in Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 38021 (June 12, 

2023) (Initiation Notice). See Dingsheng 

Respondents’ Letter, ‘‘Hangzhou Five Star 

Affiliation Response,’’ dated August 25, 2023 

(Dingsheng Respondents AQR) at Exhibit A.1. 

7Unchanged from Final Results. 

8As discussed in the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce finds the following companies to be to 

be cross-owned with Zhongji HK: Jiangsu Zhongji 

Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (Zhongji) (FKA 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock Co., 

Ltd.); Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co., 

Ltd. (Jiangsu Huafeng); Shantou Wanshun New 

Material Group Co., Ltd. (Shantou Wanshun) (FKA 

Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., 

Ltd.); Anhui Zhongji Battery Foil Science & 

Technology Co., Ltd. (Anhui Zhongji) (FKA Anhui 

Maximum Aluminium Industries Company 

Limited); and Sichuan Wanshun Zhongji 

Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. (Sichuan Wanshun). 

Anhui Zhongji, Anhui Maximum Aluminium 

Industries Company Limited, Jiangsu Huafeng, 

Zhongji, and Shantou Wanshun Package Material 

Stock Co., Ltd. were listed separately in the 

Initiation Notice. 

9This net countervailable ad valorem subsidy 

rate reflects an entered value adjustment (EVA). See 

Final Results IDM at Comment 3. 

10See Appendix for a list of the non-selected 

companies under review. 

11The non-selected company rate reflects Five 

Star’s ad valorem net countervailable subsidy rate 

and Zhongji HK’s amended ad valorem net 

countervailable subsidy rate without the EVA, 

which is 28.35 percent. See Final Results IDM at 

Comment 3; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Amended 

Final Results Calculation of Subsidy Rate for NonSelected Companies Under Review,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with sections 751(a)(1) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), on 

November 12, 2024, Commerce 

published its final results in the 

countervailing duty administrative 

review of aluminum foil from China.1

On November 13, 2024, the Aluminum 

Association Trade Enforcement Working 

Group and its individual members 

(collectively, the petitioners) timely 

alleged that Commerce made a 

ministerial error in the Final Results.2

No party submitted rebuttal comments. 

Scope of the Order 3

The product covered by the scope of 

the Order is aluminum foil from China. 

A full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Final Results 

IDM. 

Ministerial Errors 

Section 751(h) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as 

an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or 

other arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any similar 

type of unintentional error which the 

Secretary considers ministerial.’’ 

Commerce finds that the purported error 

alleged by the petitioners constitutes a 

ministerial error within the meaning of 

19 CFR 351.224(f).4 Specifically, we 

committed a ministerial error with 

regard to the calculation of mandatory 

respondent Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination 

Materials Co., (HK) Limited’s (Zhongji 

HK’s) input supplier company sales 

denominators, and consequently, the 

subsidy rate calculations performed in 

connection with Zhongji HK’s affiliated 

input supplier company sales 

denominators. For a complete 

discussion of this alleged error, see the 

Ministerial Error Analysis 

Memorandum. 

In accordance with section 751(h) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are 

amending the Final Results.5

Specifically, we are amending the net 

subsidy rate for Zhongji HK. The revised 

net subsidy rate is provided in the table 

below. As a result of amending the net 

subsidy rate for Zhongji HK, we are also 

amending the rate for the non-selected 

companies, which is the average of the 

average of the rates calculated for two 

mandatory respondents, as provided in 

the table below. 

Amended Final Results of Review 

As a result of correcting the 

ministerial errors described above, 

Commerce determines the following net 

countervailable subsidy rates for the 

period January 1, 2022, through 

December 31, 2022: 

Company 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.6 .............. 7 29.90 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination 

Materials Co., (HK) Limited 8 .................................. 9 25.24 

Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review 10 ................ 11 29.13 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these 

amended final results within five days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protections (CBP) 

shall assess, countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

amended final results of this review. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of 

these amended final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce also intends to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown for the companies 

subject to this review, effective 

November 12, 2024, the date of 

publication of the Final Results in the 

Federal Register. For all non-selected 

companies, CBP will continue to collect 

cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the most recent 

company-specific or all-others rate 

applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposits, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Notices 102109 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2022– 

2023, 89 FR 65596 (August 12, 2024) (Preliminary 

Results ),and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

62322, 62326 (September 11, 2023). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated December 9, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022– 

2023 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 

Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China, 

the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India 

and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

48390 (July 25, 2016) (Order). 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 1. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

amended final results of the review in 

accordance with sections 751(h) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.224(e). 

Dated: December 10, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

1. Alcha International Holdings Limited 

2. Baotou Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

3. Gra ̈nges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

4. Guangxi Baise Xinghe Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

5. Hunan Suntown Marketing Limited 

6. Jiangyin Dolphin Pack Ltd. Co. 

7. Luoyang Longding Aluminium Industries 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Shandong Yuanrui Metal Material Co., Ltd. 

9. Shanghai Huafon Aluminium Corporation 

10. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., 

Ltd. 

11. Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials 

Co., Ltd. 

12. SNTO International Trade Limited 

13. Suntown Technology Group Corporation 

Limited 

14. Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Foil Co. Ltd. 

15. Yangtai Jintai International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

16. Yantai Donghai Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

17. Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. 

18. Zhejiang Zhongjin Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–29600 Filed 12–16–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–878] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Dongkuk Coated Metal Co., Ltd. 

(Dongkuk) and certain companies not 

selected for individual examination 

made sales of subject merchandise in 

the United States at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) July 1, 2022, through June 30, 

2023. In addition, Commerce 

determines that Hyundai Steel Company 

(Hyundai) did not make sales of subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below NV during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable December 17, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jaron Moore or William Horn, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3640 or (202) 482–4868, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 12, 2024, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

corrosion-resistant steel products 

(CORE) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) and invited interested parties to 

comment.1 This administrative review 

covers 11 exporters and/or producers of 

the subject merchandise,2 of which we 

selected Dongkuk and Hyundai as 

mandatory respondents. On December 

9, 2024, Commerce tolled the deadline 

to issue the final results in this 

administrative review by 90 days.3

Accordingly, the deadline for these final 

results is now March 10, 2025. For a 

summary of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise covered by this 

Order is CORE from Korea. For a full 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by parties in the case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues addressed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is provided 

in the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade/gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on comments received from 

interested parties regarding our 

Preliminary Results, we made certain 

changes to the preliminary weightedaverage dumping margin calculation for 

Dongkuk,6 as well as the preliminary 

weighted-average dumping margin 

assigned to the companies not selected 

for individual examination. 

Rates for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

individual companies not selected for 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which we did not 

individually examine in an 

administrative review. Section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a 

preference to avoid using rates which 

are zero, de minimis, or based entirely 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1