alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subsidiaries of Providence Resources, Inc.

** **

** **

** **

| ** **              | ** ** | **Providence Resources, Inc.**                              | ** **                                                      | ** **                                               |
|-------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **              | ** ** | ** **                                                  | ** **                                                      | ** **                                               | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** |
| ** **              | ** ** | ** **                                                  | **PRE Exploration, LLC** (formerly Providence Exploration, LLC) | ** **                                               |   | ** ** |
| ** **              | ** ** | ** **                                                  | ** **                                                      | ** **                                               | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** |
| ** **              | ** ** | ** **                                                  | ** **                                                      | ** **                                               | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** |
| **PDX Drilling I, LLC** | ** ** | **PRT Holdings, LLC**

(formerly Providence Resources, LLC) | ** **                                                      | **Comanche County Pipeline, LLC** 

(90% ownership) |

** **

** **

** **

 

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50850 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GUADALUPE ALEJANDRA HERNANDEZ

- DELUNA, also known as Guadalupe Alejandra Hern d andez

- Deluna , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 833

- 2

Before DAVIS , JONES, and HIGGINSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Alejandra Hernandez

Deluna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Unite d States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez

- Deluna h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50850 Document: 00513080607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 50850

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

no nfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-50850 Document: 00513080607 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
Darryl Donnell BOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4325

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James HERY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Guy LEWIS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JANUARY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
0
572
Glen Howard Alexander
BELL
27TH
50,758
RICK MORRIS

When a defendant pleads guilty to a felony and the punishment assessed does notexceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appealmust state that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect, or that the substance of the appeal was raisedby written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal.  Tex.R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3).  Appellant's notice of appeal does not comply with this rule and fails to conferjurisdiction on this Court.  Whitt v. State, No. 03-00-00194-CR (Tex. App.--Austin April 19, 2001,no pet. h.); see also Cooper v. State, No. 1100-99, slip op. at 6-8 (Tex. Crim. App. April 4, 2001)(voluntariness of appeal).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

				Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed:   June 7, 2001 

Do Not Publish

0
572
Glen Howard Alexander
BELL
27TH
50,758
RICK MORRIS

When a defendant pleads guilty to a felony and the punishment assessed does notexceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appealmust state that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect, or that the substance of the appeal was raisedby written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal.  Tex.R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3).  Appellant's notice of appeal does not comply with this rule and fails to conferjurisdiction on this Court.  Whitt v. State, No. 03-00-00194-CR (Tex. App.--Austin April 19, 2001,no pet. h.); see also Cooper v. State, No. 1100-99, slip op. at 6-8 (Tex. Crim. App. April 4, 2001)(voluntariness of appeal).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

				Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed:   June 7, 2001 

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS   We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-87358) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of
MSN Holdings, Inc. and the MSN Holdings, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan of
Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2004,
except with respect to the matters discussed in Note 19, as to which the date
is March 3, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 2003.  /s/
Ernst & Young LLP  Fort Lauderdale, Florida March 4, 2004
Restricted Share Right Grant Letter for Robert M. Buchan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 ALLIED NEVADA GOLD CORP. 
 RESTRICTED SHARE RIGHT GRANT LETTER 
  

			
	To:	  	Robert M. Buchan
	Date:	  	July 3, 2007

  

 This notice is to evidence that you have been granted 300,000 Restricted Share Rights in the following amounts and on the following terms: 
  

			
	 Number of Restricted
 Share Rights awarded
	 	 Date(s) of expiry of applicable
 Restricted Period(s) (vesting dates)

		
	 100,000
	 	July 3, 2008
		
	 100,000
	 	July 3, 2009
		
	 100,000
	 	July 3, 2010

 This notice serves as a Restricted Share Right Grant Letter under section 3.06 of the Allied Nevada Gold Corp.
Inc. (“Allied Nevada”) Restricted Share Plan (the “Plan”). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this
Restricted Share Right Grant Letter and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall govern. 
 Vesting of your Restricted Share Rights evidenced by this Restricted
Share Right Grant Letter shall be subject to the terms of the Plan, the resolutions of the Board approving the grant and the administrative rules passed by the Committee under the Plan. 
 If you wish to defer the vesting of your Restricted Share Rights, you may do so in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the resolutions of the Board approving the grant and the administrative rules of the Committee
under the Plan. 
 The Plan and the Restricted Share Rights granted to you hereunder are subject to the approval of the shareholders of Allied Nevada. In the
event such approval is not obtained, your Restricted Share Rights to acquire Allied Nevada common shares issued from treasury will be replaced by equivalent rights to acquire the same number of Allied Nevada common shares to be purchased in the
market by an independent trustee. The purchase will be funded by Allied Nevada and the terms of the replacement rights will be based substantially on the same terms and conditions as the Restricted Share Rights granted hereunder and the
corresponding Plan. Your rights to acquire common shares purchased in the market by the trustee, shall be subject to the same 60 days prior election deferral feature as outlined in the Plan. 
 Dated this 3rd day of July, 2007. 
  

			
	ALLIED NEVADA GOLD CORP.
		
		 	  

	Name:	 	Scott Caldwell
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectre Industires, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine-months ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian S. Grant; the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 21, 2003

Ian S. Grant

/s/ Ian S. Grant				Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer
Donald Earl JAMES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2825

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2020289EN.01000201.xml

| 1.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/2

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9910 – Mapfre Group/Santander Group/Popular Seguros JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 289/02)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Mapfre S.A., and its subsidiaries (‘Mapfre Group’, Spain), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mapfre S.A., and its subsidiaries (‘Mapfre Group’, Spain),

| — | Banco Santander, S.A., and its subsidiaries (‘Santander Group’, Spain), |
| --- | --- |

—

Banco Santander, S.A., and its subsidiaries (‘Santander Group’, Spain),

| — | Popular Seguros – Companhia de Seguros, S.A. (‘Popular JV’, Portugal), controlled by the Santander Group. |
| --- | --- |

—

Popular Seguros – Companhia de Seguros, S.A. (‘Popular JV’, Portugal), controlled by the Santander Group.

Mapfre Group and Santander Group acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Popular JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Mapfre Group: insurance and reinsurance activities across 45 countries, including Portugal, Spain and other countries in Europe and worldwide, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Mapfre Group: insurance and reinsurance activities across 45 countries, including Portugal, Spain and other countries in Europe and worldwide,

| — | for Santander Group: retail banking, corporate banking, investment banking, asset management and treasury across Europe, as well as in the United States, Latin America and Asia, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Santander Group: retail banking, corporate banking, investment banking, asset management and treasury across Europe, as well as in the United States, Latin America and Asia,

| — | for Popular JV: the provision of non-life insurance in Portugal. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Popular JV: the provision of non-life insurance in Portugal.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9910 – Mapfre Group/Santander Group/Popular Seguros JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 229-64301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL GAS, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report), I, Jim Glavas, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofhe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





JIM GLAVASJim GlavasChief Executive and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 12, 2007








































---
Arnell ELLIOTT, Margaret E. Elliott, as Trustee of the Margaret E. Elliott Family Trust Dated April 10, 2009, Francisco Hernendez, Pareen S. Kanji, Shamshu G. Kanji, Cyndi D. Martin, et al., Appellants, v. ALTAMONTE SPRINGS ACQUISITION, LLC., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2

                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

     I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,
Ford Motor Company Note-Backed Series 2003-6 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
          servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporation in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report
          of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
          such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
          based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
          Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.



Date: March 29, 2004


       /s/ David J. Kolibachuk
--------------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President


                                       8
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6069

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD M. PATTERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-60)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard M. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard M. Patterson appeals the district court’s orders

denying his request for “a transcript of the return of the

indictment hearing” and of a “transcript of the grand jury” and

motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s orders find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.

Patterson, No. CR-97-60 (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2002; Nov. 6, 2002). We

also note that to the extent that Patterson seeks a transcript of

sealed grand jury testimony, he has failed to demonstrate the

“strong showing of particularized need” necessary to justify

disclosure under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3). United States v. Sells

Eng’g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 443 (1983). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2020123EN.01000101.xml

| 16.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9731 – ASE/Asteelflash)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 123/01)

On 11 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9731. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9731. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection withthe report of ProUroCare Medical Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB forthe period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Carlson,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Richard B. Thon, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(a)            the report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard C.  Carlson  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Richard C.  Carlson      |
| Chief Executive  Officer |
| March 31,  2007     |

 

 
| /s/ Richard. B.  Thon    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Richard B. Thon          |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
| March 31,  2008     |   |   |
|                          |        |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ROBERT J. ADAMSONRobert J. Adamson
Chief Executive Officer and President
March 28, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---

QuickLinks
September 25, 2014.



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KINGS RIVER TRAIL AS SOCIATION, INC. AND KINGS RIVER VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIO N, INC. , Appellants

NO. 14

- 12

- 00967

- CV V.

PINEHURST TRAIL HOLD INGS, L.L.C. , Appellee

________________________________

PINEHURST TRAIL HOLD INGS, L.L.C. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01008

- CV V.
KEVIN DONNELLAN, MICHAEL DOLE, OLLIE DOLE, CARROLL KITE,

JOAN KITE, GARY LEVI CKY, EDWARD MILLER, SHIRLEY MILLER, ROBERT MORGAN, SYLVI A MORGAN, JOHN PING, MARSHA PING, JAMES POLK, DEBRA PO LK, TERRY RAATZ, LINDA RAATZ, DOUGLAS SMITH, PAMELA SMITH, SIDNEY SMITH, RUTH S MITH, JOSEPH ZOLMAN, MARCEY ZOLMA N, DARIN LASATER, KR ISTI LASATER, KINGS RIVER TRAIL AS SOCIATION, INC., AND KINGS RIVER VILLAG E COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIO N, INC., Appellees

________________________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by KINGS RIVER TRAIL ASSOCIATION, I NC. and KINGS RIVER VILLAG E COMMUNITYASSOCIATION, INC. We order that the motion be denied, and that the court’s former judgment of July 24, 2014 be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s O pinion of July 24, 2014, withdrawn.

Cause No. 14

- 12

- 00967

- CV, an appeal fro m the judgment sign ed, July 25, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspect ed the record and find no error in the judgment . W e order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order that each party shall pay its own costs incurred b y reason of this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Cause No. 14

- 12

- 01008

- CV, an appeal from the judgment sign ed, July 25, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order that each party shall pay its own costs incurred by reason of this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.