alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
c c. 

'The qucct~on peser.kd ?or the oomldarntlcn 0S 

t&L* orfice 15 ttlcthtz the f.33 ownnrs tbould sualify 3s 

a sotor .fuc;; diotrtbutor uu69r t&n -%xtuto in orcer to 

rooe:oe ;rayrmt oi'the roytlt7 9R this nantlar, and use 

tbo aistlllnte reoeltcd 8s rvyalty paymnt ti zotorlzod 

fan !asplccents or mv?rGitp." 

X4tutf38, 

:'ootlcn 1 (a), :rticla 70653, venacn'o atnnotxtac SiYil 

defirmu "dFsrrlbutoP pi 23tOf 3aol 08 follows: 

- *~:l.stributor* chailmxm end includg ,rrCry i)crsoa 1% tas .-tate woo ref:ooa, aamrxoturts, ~rodwoo, . 

blaado c.r cotcpouada sxcor -cW1, or ln coy ot!icr sttnncr 

SCQUiXWJ Or pOSWSWS’p4tOr :uCi Xnd CXkCtI til-St ISdO 

sf tte snw ti ttis .txte; 635 it Still lllao inolule 

-wry perxoa in'taia Xate who 8!1lpe, tmrtd or 

Ir.portu ncy wtor fuel fnto thle . txtc an3 cake the 

riret saie 0: "lqa 14 tkio .&&c." 

.._i 

.Zactioa 2 oi ?rold ;;otor :‘uel tax ..ew Lzaes and ides 

a tax upw tho miirat sale* or r&or fuel, aud provides that tbc 

Itax aball acurw on 8ueh *first a&P. 

'mt1on 1 lo) oi the Act dotkos *zetcm fuela, mid we 

ah&l ost)trmB, ror jwrposes of w10 oginion, ttiat t&z so-cxlle6 

dfrrtillate, prorluaeC.~ec~a rps rsll uador tbo cl:ousstaacaa and 

la the wanor outlined in ftnar letter, porecssos ru;h phyolosl 

ua6 o:aaaical .xtfdbutcs ax would brff it sdfkir. thin deficition 

0r '%at0r ml*. 

, 
. . .. - 

c 
-,.;. 

. . . . 

1933 , 3.0 4 

- . 

fr03; thle ccsxiusL:n 

; 

. . - 

. . 

. . . 

-- 

- -. 

: . 

_ 1 

.- 

. - 

: . . . ,... ; 

. - l . _- - 

2. - 

-. . 

..fJ . 

c 

..: . : +A _ _ 

~._ 

. . . . : ;so. 

f . . 

.-. ..:- . . 

: . . . . 

:~~y+tr:; ‘._ ;.,. -1 ‘;. __ . 

-2 .. . . . . -. .’ 

. 

: ‘. ‘.“.’ I 

- . 

. . ..% tiffi
****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Nicholas Ferris, Chief Executive Officer of J-Pacific Gold Inc.(the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
Date: June 27, 2007
/s/ Nicholas Ferris Chief Executive OfficerJ-Pacific Gold Inc.
*

The Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge of the United States Court of

International Trade, sitting by designation.

**The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2426

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Southern

* District of Iowa.

Aaron Jorge Diaz, * 

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: May 11, 2004

Filed: May 17, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,*

 Judge of the United

States Court of International Trade.

___________

FAGG, Circuit Judge.

Aaron Jorge Diaz pleaded guilty to receiving child pornography. At

sentencing, the district court** increased Diaz’s offense level by four under U.S.S.G.
-2-

§ 2G2.2(b)(3) (increase required if child pornography “portrays sadistic or

masochistic conduct or other depictions of violence”). 

On appeal, Diaz contends his images of child pornography were not sadistic,

masochistic, or depictions of violence within the meaning of § 2G2.2(b)(3). We

disagree. We have defined the term sadism as the infliction of pain on a love object

to obtain sexual release, and as delight in physical or mental cruelty. United States

v. Wolk, 337 F.3d 997, 1008 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v. Parker, 267 F.3d 839,

847 (8th Cir. 2001). We have defined violence as the exertion of physical force to

injure or abuse. Id. The images in this case depict the sexual penetration of a minor

girl by an adult male with his penis, a young boy performing fellatio on an adult male,

an adult male performing anal sex on a minor girl, prepubescent girls performing

fellatio on an adult male, a group of adolescent boys ejaculating on a grimacing

prepubescent boy, and an adolescent male performing anal sex on a young boy. We

conclude the images are sadistic or depictions of violence within the meaning of §

2G2.2(b)(3). See Parker, 267 F.3d at 847; United States v. Hall, 312 F.3d 1250,

1261-63 (11th Cir. 2002) (images showing vaginal or anal penetration of a

prepubescent minor by either an adult male or a foreign object is sadistic within the

meaning of § 2G2.2(b)(3)); United States v. Lyckman, 235 F.3d 234, 238-39 (5th Cir.

2000) (when pornographic image shows an adult male engaging in sexual intercourse

with a young girl, the conduct shown is sufficiently painful, coercive, abusive, and

degrading to qualify as sadistic or violent under § 2G2.2(b)(3)); United States v.

Canada, 110 F.3d 260, 264 (5th Cir. 1997) (same). 

Diaz also argues the Government did not show he intended to receive the

sadistic or masochistic images. Diaz did not raise this issue in the district court, and

appellate review of the issue is foreclosed by Diaz’s plea agreement. Besides, we

have already held that § 2G2.2(b)(3) has no express intent element and that we will

not read one into it. Wolk, 337 F.3d at 1008.

We thus affirm Diaz’s sentence. 

______________________________
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - (-)products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(7)

## By Year

Animated GIF        December 31, 2018        Data Science: Lake Mead Water Level Decline Visualization

Animated GIF        July 5, 2022        Carbonate Budget Animation

Data Access        December 7, 2018        Areas of Land Subsidence in California

Interactive Map        July 16, 2021        The Mojave River:  Lifeblood of the Desert

Data Access        December 18, 2018        San Antonio Creek Valley Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        December 19, 2018        Drought & Groundwater in California

Data Access        November 7, 2018        Mojave Groundwater Data

Data Access        December 10, 2018        Lower Colorado River Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        January 31, 2019        Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Borrego Valley
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Derogatory Geographic Names

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(10)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        September 8, 2022        What is Secretary’s Order 3404 and the DOI Derogatory Geographic Names Task Force?

faq        September 8, 2022        Does the Board on Geographic Names (BGN) decide what is derogatory or offensive?

faq        September 8, 2022        How did the Secretary’s Order 3404 Derogatory Geographic Names Task Force reach a final decision on replacement names?

faq        March 21, 2022        What criteria did the Derogatory Geographic Names Task Force apply to select replacement names under Secretary’s Order 3404?

faq        September 8, 2022        Are the decisions of the Board on Geographic Names (BGN) on the replacement names final? How can a Tribe participate in the renaming process if they were not able to take part in the Consultations or comment period?

faq        September 8, 2022        What words are considered “Derogatory” under Secretary’s Orders 3404 and 3405?

faq        September 8, 2022        How will the name changes be used by states and private mapping companies?

faq        September 8, 2022        Do Secretary’s Orders 3404 and 3405 affect street names or street signs?

faq        September 8, 2022        Was Secretary’s Order 3404 limited to only those geographic features on federal lands?

faq        September 8, 2022        How were states involved in the process to respond to Secretary’s Order 3404?
Exhibit 3.1(a)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           CLAMSHELL ENTERPRISES, INC.

     The undersigned, President and Secretary of Clamshell Enterprises, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby certify:

     That the Board of Directors of the Corporation by unanimous written consent
dated the 14th day of February, 2001, adopted a resolution to amend the original
articles of incorporation as follows:

     First: Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended
            to read as follows:

     "FOURTH: The Corporation shall be authorized to issue the following shares:

         CLASS             Number of Shares              Par Value
         -----             ----------------              ---------

         Common              50,000,000                    $.001
         Preferred            5,000,000                    $.01

     The Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more series at the discretion
     of the Board of Directors. In establishing a series, the Board of Directors
     shall give to it a distinctive designation so as to distinguish it from the
     shares of all other series and classes, shall fix the number of shares in
     such series, and the preferences, rights and restriction thereof."

     Second: The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to
vote on an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 1,927,700. The said
amendment has been consented to and approved by a majority of the stockholders
holding at least a majority of each class of stock outstanding and entitled to
vote thereon.

     Third: This Amendment shall be effective upon filing.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its President, James Charles and its Secretary,
Richard Starke this 14th day of February, 2001.

                                         /s/ James Charles
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             James Charles, President


                                         /s/ Richard Starke
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             Richard Starke, Secretary
Joshua Daniel QUARTIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking Appellant's community control and the resulting judgment and sentence following an open plea. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a clerical error in the order to reflect that Appellant admitted to violating Condition 16 of his community control.1 The order presently under review shows a Condition 24 violation, which was never alleged.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of community control consistent with this opinion.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1

The affidavit of violation alleged a Condition 15 violation. However, this too appears to be a clerical error as the factual allegations contained in this paragraph of the affidavit alleging the violation are substantively consistent with a violation of Condition 16 of community control for Appellant failing to remain at his approved residence during specified times.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1992

BRAD R. JOHNSON; ELCI WIJAYANINGSIH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ABBY POPE; ELIZABETH BILETH; WINFORD BARR; THOMAS G. WALKER; 

JONATHAN D. CARROLL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00078-BO)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brad Johnson, Elci Wijayaningsih, Appellants Pro Se. Lee Perla,

Paul Andrew Allulis, Richard Farber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brad R. Johnson and Elci Wijayaningsih appeal the district 

court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the 

Appellees and dismissing their 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2012) action 

seeking to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Johnson v. Pope, No. 7:13-cv-00078-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mihir K. Taneja    
|Mihir K. Taneja        
|Chief Executive Officer

February 22, 2010
Randal Thomas ROSADO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2920

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL JOSEPH EDMONDSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-1298

September 3, 2021

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge.

Michael Joseph Edmondson, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Zink v. State, 951 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); 

Curi v. State, 36 So. 3d 853 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Ubilla v. State, 8 

So. 3d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Jones v. State, 988 So. 2d 1109 

(Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Cala v. State, 854 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2003); Bynes v. State, 854 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Spikes 
2

v. State, 851 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Rodriguez v. State, 826 

So. 2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

BLACK, SLEET, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# CI2020234EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 234/1

---

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission

(2020/C 234 I/01)

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (1), Article 36(2), provides that the European Food Safety Authority’s ‘Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Executive Director, shall draw up a list to be made public of competent organisations designated by the Member States which may assist the Authority, either individually or in networks, with its mission.’

The list was first drawn up by EFSA’s Management Board on 19 December 2006, and since then is:

| (i) | updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)); and |
| --- | --- |

(i)

updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)); and

| (ii) | made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published. |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published.

This respective information is available on the EFSA website, at the following locations:

| (i) | the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 29 June 2020 – (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/83rd-management-board-web-meeting); and |
| --- | --- |

(i)

the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 29 June 2020 – (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/83rd-management-board-web-meeting); and

| (ii) | the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg

EFSA will keep this Notice updated, specifically regarding the provided website links.

For more information please contact Cooperation.Article36@efsa.europa.eu

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004 of 23 December 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 with regard to the network of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s mission, (OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 64), as last amended.

---
# C_2020088EN.01000101.xml

| 17.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9703 — SCP/real)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 88/01)

On 4 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9703. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9703. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---