alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10266 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NATIVIDAD SILVA, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-131-G

- - - - - - - - - - January 6, 1998 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Natividad Silva, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel; that the Government unlawfully interfered with his ability to interview witnesses; that Counts 4 and 6 of the indictment were multiplicitous; that the indictment was insufficient to put him on notice of the true nature of theNo. 97-10266 -2- offense charged in Count 6; and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction under Count 6. Silva’s ineffective-assistance claims are without merit. He contends that counsel was ineffective in failing to provide the sentencing court with advance notice of Silva’s request for an evidentiary hearing. Because counsel was nevertheless permitted to present evidence on Silva’s behalf at sentencing, Silva has failed to demonstrate any prejudice resulting from the alleged deficiency, and his claim fails. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Silva’s remaining ineffective-assistance claims, raised for the first time on this appeal, are subject at most to plain-error review. See United States v. McPhail , 112 F.3d 197, 199 (5th Cir. 1997). All of his contentions involve factual questions which this court will not address for the first time on appeal and which, by their nature, do not rise to the level of obvious

error. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas , 70 F3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). Silva’s contention that the Government unlawfully interfered with his ability to interview witnesses is likewise unavailing. Even if it is assumed that his claim is a constitutional one so as to be cognizable in a § 2255 motion, Silva makes no connection between the claim and the voluntary nature of his guilty plea. Inasmuch as he fails to do so, the claim is waived by his guilty plea. See Taylor v. Whitley , 933 F.2d 325, 327 (5th Cir. 1991).No. 97-10266 -3- Silva’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge is also waived by his guilty plea. See United States v. Broome , 628 F.2d 403, 405 (5th Cir. 1980); see also Kelley v. Alabama , 636 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (5th Cir. 1981). Silva’s challenges to the indictment are procedurally barred. United States v. Shaid , 937 F.3d 228, 232 (5th Cir. 1991)(en banc). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Arthur AVERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5642 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5642

 To provide adequate resources for the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
                and the VALOR Officer Safety Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2016

Ms. Duckworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide adequate resources for the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
                and the VALOR Officer Safety Initiative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Counterterrorism Enhancement Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. DOMESTIC TERROR PREVENTION.

    (a) FBI Funding.--For fiscal year 2017, an additional $175,000,000 
are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General for 
personnel, training, and equipment by the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation needed to counter both terrorism, including domestic and 
foreign threats.
    (b) VALOR Initiative.--For fiscal year 2017, an additional 
$15,000,000 are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General 
for an Officer Robert Wilson III memorial initiative to be administered 
by the Bureau of Justice Programs on Preventing Violence Against Law 
Enforcement Officer Resilience and Survivability (VALOR).
    (c) Civil Rights Division.--For fiscal year 2017, an additional 
$30,000,000 are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General 
for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice.
    (d) Community Relations Service.--For fiscal year 2017, an 
additional $11,000,000 are authorized to be appropriated to the 
Attorney General for personnel and training to respond to hate crimes 
by the Community Relations Service of the Department of Justice.
    (e) Firearms Trafficking.--Section 924 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by striking subsection (h) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(h) Whoever knowingly transfers or receives a firearm, knowing or 
having reasonable cause to believe that such firearm will be used to 
commit a Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 
2332b(g)(5)), a crime of violence (as defined in subsection (c)(3)), or 
a drug trafficking crime (as defined in subsection (c)(2)) shall be 
imprisoned not more than 15 years, fined in accordance with this title, 
or both.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

February 18, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6715
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CALVIN RICO ROSEMOND, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-02-435) Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 2, 2004 Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Rico Rosemond, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Calvin Rico Rosemond appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for discovery. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rosemond , No. CR-02-435 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 5, 2004 & entered Apr. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO THE


1994 STOCK PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF ALLIEDSIGNAL INC.


 


The 1994 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of AlliedSignal Inc. (the “Plan), is hereby amended effective June 1, 2007, by amending and restating the first sentence of Paragraph 2 to read in its entirety as follows:


“The Plan shall be administered by the Corporate Governance and Responsibility Committee or any successor thereto (the ‘Committee’) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the ‘Board’).”


The
    Plan is further amended effective June 1, 2007, by adding a new subparagraph
    (d) to Paragraph 13 which shall read in its entirety as follows:  


“(d)  The Committee may provide that all or any part of a grant of Options or Restricted Shares may, subject to the prior consent of the Committee, be transferred to one or more of the following classes of donees: a family member; a trust for the benefit of a family member; a limited partnership whose partners are solely family members; or any other legal entity set up for the benefit of family members. For purposes of this paragraph (d), a family member means the director transferring the Options or Restricted Shares and/or such director’s spouse, children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, siblings, nieces, nephews and grandnieces and grandnephews, including adopted, in-laws and step family members.  For purposes of paragraph 9, a transferred Option may be exercised by the transferee to the extent that the director would have been entitled had the Option
not been transferred. 


Options may be exercised during the lifetime of the director only by the director or by the director's guardian or legal representative, unless the Committee permits a transfer pursuant to the preceding paragraph.”
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, David A. Slack, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratosInternational, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Dated: March 15, 2004 /s/ David A. Slack    David A. Slack
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - (-)hawaii(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(2)
              - north carolina(5)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 26, 2008        Dramatic Developments at Kilauea Volcano
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5612 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5612

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, as the ``Marine Lance 
          Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2016

   Mr. Tom Price of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. 
Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Lewis, 
 Mr. Woodall, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. 
Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Allen, Mr. David Scott of 
  Georgia, and Mr. Graves of Georgia) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, as the ``Marine Lance 
          Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARINE LANCE CORPORAL SQUIRE ``SKIP'' WELLS POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2886 Sandy Plains Road in Marietta, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Marine Lance Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine 
Lance Corporal Squire `Skip' Wells Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Michael Aaron ANDERSON, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4871

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 3, 2018

Michael Aaron Anderson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Based on Appellee's confession of error, the Order of Dismissal is vacated and this cause is remanded for further proceedings. *See**Jackson v. McDonough* , 28 So.3d 61 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Wolf, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1


 


July 13, 2007


 





	
             
 	
            Re:
 	
            Amendment to SHPI Employment Agreement
 





 


Dear David:


 


I refer to the Employment Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, between SHPI and yourself. Upon execution of this letter, the following Section 2.4 will supersede Section 2.4 of the Agreement as follows:


2.4       Termination Other Than For Cause. Notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement, Corporation may effect a Termination Other Than For Cause at any time upon giving written notice to Employee of such termination. Upon any Termination Other Than For Cause, Employee shall promptly be paid all accrued salary, bonus compensation to the extent earned, vested deferred compensation (other than pension plan, profit sharing plan and stock option plan benefits which will be paid in accordance with the applicable plan), any benefits under any plans of the Corporation in which Employee is a participant to the full extent of Employee’s rights under such plans (other than pension plan, profit sharing plan and stock option plan benefits which will be paid in accordance with the applicable plan), accrued
vacation pay and any appropriate business expenses incurred by Employee in connection with his duties hereunder, all to the date of termination, with the exception of salary and medical benefits which shall continue for a period of twelve (12) months, so long as Employee complies with the provisions of Sections 5 through 8. In the event of a merger, acquisition, or substantial sale of Corporation’s controlling shares wherein the Corporation is no longer the controlling entity, if Employee is not offered an equivalent position, Employee shall be entitled to severance pay and medical benefits for a period of twelve (12) months, so long as Employee complies with the provisions of Sections 5 through 8.


Except as otherwise modified herein, the terms of your Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This letter agreement and the Employment Agreement contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and supersede in all respects any and all prior oral or written agreements or understandings. 


 


If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, please indicate by executing a copy of this letter, whereupon this letter shall become a binding agreement with SHPI.


 


Sincerely,


 





	
             
 	
            /s/ Jeffrey Soinski   
 





Jeffrey Soinski


President & CEO


 


Agreed to and accepted by:


 





	
            /s/ David A. Green   
 





David A. Green
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Special Topics: Drug discovery for Neurodevelopmental Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         January 10, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lai Yee Leung, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1011D, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-8106,                         *leungl2@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 6, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-29159 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3085

___________

Eric Khounlo, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Southern

* District of Iowa.

John Deere Credit; R. Steven Brubaker, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 4, 2010

Filed: June 9, 2010

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Eric Khounlo appeals the district court’s1

 order dismissing his pro se

employment-discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Khounlo’s appeal must

be dismissed: his brief does not identify any alleged error by the district court or

provide a relevant statement of issues or facts, and therefore it presents nothing for our

review. See Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 87 F.3d 1025, 1026 (8th Cir. 1996) (per

curiam) (dismissing pro se appeal where brief did not present statement of issues or

1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. 
identify any basis for alleged error). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we also

deny the pending motion to strike as moot. 

______________________________

-2-
J.D., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D18-1358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 9, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.