alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WHITING v. HUNTER, Warden.

No. 4602.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

May 4, 1953.

Eugene A. Steinman, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Charles H. Rooney, Asst. Dist. Atty., Topeka, Kan. (Eugene W. Davis, U. S. Atty., and Robert H. Bingham, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for ap-pellee.

Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and PICKETT, United States Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, refusing to entertain appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Appellant was tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio on an indictment containing nine counts, charging violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 338a [now § 876] in that he wilfully and with intent to extract money threatened to injure and with the intent to extract money deposited in the United States Post Office letters containing threats to injure the person of the addressee. The first eight counts of the indictment were dismissed. Appellant was found guilty on the ninth count and was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.

Thereafter appellant filed a motion in the sentencing court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate the judgment on the ground that the ninth count failed to state an offense which would support a conviction. Relief was denied and on appeal the Sixth Circuit affirmed. See Whiting v. United States, 181 F.2d 643. Appellant thereafter filed a second motion in the sentencing *472court under Section 2255, which the court refused to entertain. He thereupon instituted this action predicating his right to maintain it on the assertion that the remedy under Section 2255 was inadequate and ineffective to raise the questions presented here.

An analysis of his petition in this case clearly shows that the grounds urged herein are the same that were urged under his motion in the sentencing court. It would serve no useful purpose to analyze the complaint to support this assertion. It is now well established that the remedy afforded by Section 2255 is exclusive unless for some reason the remedy by motion is inadequate to test the legality of the prisoner’s detention and that one may not by-pass the remedy afforded thereby or after his rights have been exhausted thereunder1 and that is what appellant seeks to do in this proceeding.

Affirmed.

1

. Mills v; Hunter, 10 Cir., 204 F.2d 468.
Jackie Lamont NEWKIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Richard J. DeVries, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc. and Mark D. Wolfe, Interim Chief
Financial Officer of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
          2005 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
          period ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Pavilion Bancorp, Inc..
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 8, 2005

| |  | /s/ Richard J. DeVries
Richard J. DeVriesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Mark D. Wolfe
Mark D. WolfeInterim Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - kansas(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Education        July 5, 2018        Declination of the Earth 1590-1990

Education        September 21, 2023        Southwestern and Northwestern Pond Turtle Pottery by Kaili Gregory

Education        September 15, 2023        Lizzy's Northern Bobwhite

Education        June 21, 2023        Lepidoptera Research Collection

Podcasts        July 31, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part I

Podcasts        March 13, 2012        Climate Connections: Questions from Glacier National Park, MT (Ep 4)

Education        May 19, 2022        USGS Scientists Explain How Aquifer Compaction is Measured

Podcasts        March 14, 2012        Advancing ARMI: In Search for Chytrid Fungus

Podcasts        April 20, 2011        Climate Connections: Visiting Students in North Carolina (Episode 1)

Podcasts        August 18, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part 2

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(50)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Podcasts        February 5, 2013        Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater
Victoria DICKERSON v. N.I.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0749

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
J.M.D., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.