alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020053EN.01001101.xml

| 17.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/11

---

Notice of a request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity

(2020/C 53/11)

On 13 December 2019 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 14 December 2019.

This request, made by SJ AB, concerns activities relating to the provision of railway passenger transport in Sweden.

Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that ‘contracts intended to enable an activity mentioned in Articles 8 to 14 to be carried out shall not be subject to this Directive if the Member State or the contracting entities having introduced the request pursuant to Article 35 can demonstrate that, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted; nor shall design contests that are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographic area be subject to this Directive’. The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of Directive 2014/25/EU is without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.

The Commission is allowed a period of 130 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 6 July 2020.

According to Article 35(5) of Directive 2014/25/EU, further requests concerning the same activity in Sweden submitted before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).

---
Docket No. FAA-2012-0996
# C_2020347EN.01000401.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9388 — Clearlake Capital Group/Francisco Partners Management/Perforce Software Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 347/04)

On 19 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9388. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9388. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
.· 

DALLAS CouNTY JuoGE CLAY LEwis JENKINS 

April 13, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Depatiment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington. DC 20590 

Dear Secretary F oxx, 

On behalf of thousands of American workers here in Texas and across the country, I want to thank you for your 

recent action and strongly urge the Administration to open consultations with Qatar and the United Arab 

Emirates (UAE) so that we can address the subsidies and other unfair state support that those countries are 

funneling into their government-owned airlines. 

As you know, Qatar Airways, Etihad A irways and Emirates Airline have received a whopping $42 billion in 

direct subsidies and other government benefits over the last decade alone, in direct violation of our Open Skies 

agreements. You also know how vital our a irline industry is to this country: It he lps drive nearly $1.5 trillion in 

U.S. economic activity, it directly employs 580,000 people, and it supports a total more than II million jobs 

across the U.S. A healthy airline industry is particularly impotiant here in N01th Texas where American 

Airlines is the second largest employer, with Dallas I Fort Wotih International serving as the carrier's biggest 

hub. 

If our airlines are forced to cut back on international routes, they will be forced to trim domestic service too, and 

fewer flights mean fewer jobs. In fact, every roundtrip international flight that our a irlines lose to the 

government-owned Gu lf carriers comes at a cost of more than 800 U.S. jobs. That cost is simply too high a price 

to pay. 

On a personal note, I was in Rome last month with my family. My last night there we stayed at the Hilton at the 

airport. Half the flight attendants and pilots in the executive lounge were from the above three airlines. The 

Hilton is connected by a 500 meter skybridge to the airport as are the parking lots for locally based travelers. All 

of the e lectronic advettising along that skybridge was switching between ads for these three carriers. These 

carriers are serious about gaining market share. So be it, but let's have a level playing field. 

The Open Skies agreements provide for consultations and I strongly urge the Administration to exercise its right 

to call for them and also to seek a freeze on new flights into the U.S. by the Gulf airlines while those 

consultations go forward. American workers deserve a level playing field. 

Respectfully, 

Dallas County Administration Building 

clay.jenkins@dallascounty.org 

Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 653-7949 
CLAY LEWIS JENKINS 

DALLAS COUNTY JUDGE 

411 ELM STREET 

DALLAS, TX 75202 

510-150507-011 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary ofTransportation 

US De partment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

en 

en 

<( 

...J 

0 

1-

(/) 

a: 

u: 

. .. <>r}~~~~

11 {1..~...=5'==-'~ :J "'-ltlt<I Y I IO'MS 

02 1R $ 00.48° 

0002010651 MAYO' 201 5 

: MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 75202 

Ill' I, 111\ I•Jull' t•l• 11 1! 11 11 jl 1111" .11,111 'It• ln•l• till II 1!•1
STATE of Louisiana v. Troy STEPHENSON

NO. 2017-K-2090

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jessie James OFFORD

No. 2018-KH-1190

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. LANDRY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies.

*1206La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Genovese, J., recused.
Danielle Julia HALFON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5265

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lyndal WILKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4388

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000386 17-DEC-2015 02:30 PM
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen Linehan,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Multi-asset Execution Trustand Capital One Master Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the ExchangeAct periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and exceptas disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, First Data Resources,Inc. and REMITCO, LLC.

Date: March 28, 2007
|                           |   | By:    |   | /s/ Stephen Linehan |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------|
|                      |   | Name:  |   | Stephen Linehan     |
|                      |   | Title: |   | President           |
| Capital One  Funding, LLC |   |   |   |                |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY

v.

GREATER NORTHERN CAPITAL 

INVESTMENT GROUP, DEPARTMENT OF 

COURT RECORDS, CURRENT 

OCCUPANT/TENANT, COMMONWEALTH 

OF PENNSYLVANIA, MUNCIPALITY OF 

PENN HILLS, PENN HILLS SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, ALCOSAN, OAKMONT WATER, 

WILKINSBURG-PENN JOINT, SCW 

INVESTMENTS, INC., SOUTH 

ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT, RAYCO 

SAUNDERS

PETITION OF: RAYCO SAUNDERS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 147 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and Application for Stay are DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch Depositor,
Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance
by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar standards
based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling or
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date:  March 29, 2005                             /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                   President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(188)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2005)
              - (-)products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(228)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(15)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

Software Release        April 23, 2019        Coupled-Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System

Software Release        April 1, 2024        Landsat QA ArcGIS Pro Toolbox

Software Release        March 20, 2019        COAWST Modeling System v3.4

Software Release        August 27, 2020        Ash3D provides forecasts of ash clouds and ashfall.

Software Release        March 9, 2022        climb8: An R package for querying and joining climate or meteorological data with USGS hydrologic data

Software Release        December 5, 2021        PHREEQC Version 3

Software Release        March 14, 2018        Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Model (WEBMOD)
#### NICOL v. JOHNSTON.

No. 11171.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 11, 1953.

Decided May 7, 1953.

Miss Jessie P. Grandy, - Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Godfrey L. Munter, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, PROCTOR and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of appellee (defendant) in an action for damages for alleged wrongful sale of real estate in Alexandria, Virginia, to which appellee had legal title, but which appellant claimed was held in trust for herself and others. Among defenses pleaded in bar was a final, judgment of the Corporation Court of Alexandria, Virginia, between the same parties, involving the same property. Upon the pleadings and record .the District Judge held said judgment to be res judicata, and entered judgment accordingly. We agree with that ruling.

Affirmed.
Pablo IBARRIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., as Trustee, et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO. :2D18-2993

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - (-)news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - california(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        January 6, 2009        Simulated groundwater declines in Central Arkansas

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Shallow Aquifer

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Deep Aquifer

Science Animations        August 27, 2013        Water-level Change in the High Plains Aquifer System

Featured Story        March 6, 2023        Building maps to help geothermal energy and greater sage-grouse coexist in Nevada’s sagebrush country

Featured Story        October 14, 2015        Birds in the Bakken: Oil Development Can Affect Critical Habitat

Science Animations        March 10, 2020        Importance of Cattails in Wetlands
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5821 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5821

To expand the boundary of Fort Frederica National Monument in the State 
                  of Georgia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2014

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand the boundary of Fort Frederica National Monument in the State 
                  of Georgia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fort Frederica National Monument 
Boundary Expansion Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. FORT FREDERICA NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA.

    (a) Maximum Acreage.--The first section of the Act of May 26, 1936 
(16 U.S.C. 433g) is amended by striking ``two hundred and fifty acres'' 
and inserting ``525 acres''.
    (b) Boundary Expansion.--
            (1) In general.--The boundary of the Fort Frederica 
        National Monument in the State of Georgia is modified to 
        include the land generally depicted as ``Proposed Acquisition 
        Areas'' on the map entitled ``Fort Frederica National Monument 
        Proposed Boundary Expansion'', numbered 369/127,249, and dated 
        November 2014.
            (2) Availability of map.--The map described in paragraph 
        (1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the 
        appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
            (3) Acquisition of land.--The Secretary of the Interior may 
        acquire the land and interests in land described in paragraph 
        (1) by donation or purchase with donated or appropriated funds 
        from willing sellers only.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectre Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian S. Grant, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ian S. Grant

Ian. S. Grant

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

September 16, 2003