alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SABAL CHASE HARMONY HOUSING LLC d/b/a SABAL CHASE APTS.,

Appellant,

v.

TOKIO MARINE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2107

[January 31, 2019]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth 

Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Janet Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

56-2018-CA-000355AXXHC.

Stephen A. Marino, Jr. and Arya Attari Li of Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, 

P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Elizabeth K. Russo and Paulo R. Lima of the Russo Appellate Firm, 

P.A., Miami; and Simon, Reed & Salazar, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.87




 



Lender Agreement







This Lender Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between OrangeHook, Inc. ("OrangeHook"), a Florida corporation with headquarter offices at 319 Barry Ave. S., Ste. 300, Wayzata, MN 55391 and Donald Miller ("Miller") of [*] FL (collectively, the "Parties") on June 9, 2017 ("Effective Date").







The Parties agree as follows:







1.       Miller is originating a loan of $500,000 to OrangeHook as of the Effective Date (the "Loan").


2.       In consideration for the Loan, OrangeHook agrees to pay Miller interest on the Loan in an amount equal to 20 basis points per day of the outstanding principal balance of the Loan beginning on the Effective Date and ending on the date the Loan is repaid in full. The principal balance of the Loan, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, will be paid by OrangeHook to Miller no later than August 4, 2017.


3.       The terms of this Agreement may be amended by the Parties through mutual written agreement of the Parties.







Agreed to and Accepted By:







OrangeHook, Inc.


 












/s/      David C. Carlson                                                         


           David C. Carlson


Title:  CFO


 












/s/       Donald Miller                                                              


            Donald Miller
Terry T. RAWLS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020317EN.01002101.xml

| 25.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/21

---

Special Report No 19/2020

‘Digitising European Industry: an ambitious initiative whose success depends on the continued commitment of the EU, governments and businesses’

(2020/C 317/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 19/2020 ‘Digitising European Industry: an ambitious initiative whose success depends on the continued commitment of the EU, governments and businesses’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website (http://eca.europa.eu).

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Errol VICTOR, Sr.

NO. 2016-KO-1516

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Endeavour International Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, William L. Transier, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ William L. Transier

William L. Transier
Co-Chief Executive Officer
 May 6, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Endeavour International Corporation and will be retained by Endeavour International Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 15, 2007)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z7-15181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: US Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Assistance, 
Washington, DC 20549-0213.
    Extension: Rule 13e-3 (Schedule 13E-3), OMB Control No. 3235-0007, 
SEC File No. 270-1.

Correction

    In notice document E7-15181 beginning on page 43670 in the issue of 
Monday, August 6, 2007, make the following correction:
    On page 43670, in the second column, the document heading is 
corrected to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. Z7-15181 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00894

- CV Melody Ann MCLEHANY , Appellant

v. Scott Scott Mitchell BROWN , Appellee
From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. 12382B Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2014
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION On January 16, 2014, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On January 17, 2014, appellant was ordered to provide written proof to this court by January 27, 2014 that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been m ade to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. The order stated that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed04

- 13

- 00894

- CV
for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 37.3(b). Appellant failed to respond to within the time provided. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id

. PER CURIAM

- 2

-
##### 



Exhibit 10.24
 ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 Purpose.
  Definitions.
 Board
 Committee provided, however
 Common Shares
 Company
 Company Group
 Disability
 Fair Market Value




---



##### 



Key Employee
 LTIP Award
 Performance Criteria
 Performance Goals
 Performance Period
 Performance Period Percentage
 Percentage Achievement of Performance Goals
    
    Performance Period PercentageLess than 80%
    
    
    0
    %80%
    
    
    50
    %100%
    
    
    100
    %120% or greater
    
    
    150
    %
 e.g.
 Plan
 Securities Act
 -2-




---



##### 



Selected Performance Criteria
 Target LTIP Award
 Common Shares Available Under the Plan.
 Number of Common Shares Available for Delivery
 Share Counting Rules
 LTIP Awards.
 Grant of Awards
 Determination of Performance Percentage
 Time and Form of Payment
 Termination of Employment due to Death or Disability
 -3-




---



##### 



st nd rd
 Transferability of LTIP Awards
 Administration.
    Adjustment for Recapitalization.
  -4-




---



##### 



General Provisions.
 Compliance with Legal Requirements
 Compliance with Laws
 No Right to Continued Employment
 Rights and Privileges as a Shareholder
 Withholding Obligations provided, however
 -5-




---



##### 



Amendment and Termination of the Plan
 Key Employee Rights
 Funding
 Titles and Headings
 Governing Law
 Effective Date
 -6-
1

Filed 12/30/13 P. v. R omero CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LAWRENCE ROME RO,

Defendant and Appellant. E058691

(Super.Ct.No. FVA012334)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Michael A. Smith,

Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice

pursuant t o art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Neil Auwarter, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant Lawrence Romero appeals after the trial court denied h is

petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.126, known as the Three Strikes2

Reform Act of 2012 (Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2012))

. 1

Defendant filed a notice of appeal on May 8, 2013. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGR OUND

On October 5, 2000, defendant was convicted of petty theft with a prior. (§ 666.)

The trial court found that defendant had two prior strike convictions. (§§ 1170.12,

subd s

. (a)

- (d)

, 667, subd s

. (b)

- (i).) On July 9, 2001, the court sentenced him t o state

prison for 25 years to life.

On Decem

ber 28, 2012, defendant filed an in pro

. per

. petition for resentencing

under section 1170.126. The court denied the petition on the ground that defendant’s

prior strike conviction for committing a lewd act o n a child (§ 288, subd. (a)) made him

ineligible for resentencing under section 1170.126, subdivision (e)(3).

ANALYSIS

After the notice of appeal was filed, this court appointed counsel to represent

defendant. Counsel has filed a brief under the authorit y of People v. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493], setting forth a statement of the case, a brief statement of the facts, and identifying

two potential arguable issue s : whether defendant was previously convicted of the offense

of committing a lewd act on a child (§ 288, subd. (a)), and whether such conviction made

him ineligible for resentencing under section 1170.126.

1 All further statutory references will be to the Penal Code, unless otherwise

noted.3

Defendant was offered an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which

he has not done. Under People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have conducted an

independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

HOLLENHORST

Acting P. J.

We concur:

KING

J.

MILLER

J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  453,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    406,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               917,668
<PP&E>                                       1,503,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,641,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,734,394
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,406
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,641,515
<SALES>                                      4,988,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        4,519,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,519,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               791,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (343,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (343,993)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (343,993)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 30, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued November 4, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective October 30, 2024.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-28664 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - (-)news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - mississippi(2)
              - nebraska(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Science Animations        January 6, 2009        Simulated groundwater declines in Central Arkansas

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Shallow Aquifer

Science Animations        December 2, 2010        The Mississippi Embayment - Declining Water Levels in a Deep Aquifer

Technical Announcement        June 16, 2017        USGS: High Plains Aquifer Groundwater Levels Continue to Decline

Technical Announcement        May 14, 2015        Preliminary Wind Energy Impacts Assessment Methodology Released

Science Animations        August 27, 2013        Water-level Change in the High Plains Aquifer System

Technical Announcement        December 16, 2022        DARPA Announces Winners of Artificial Intelligence  Competition to Aid Critical Minerals Assessments

Technical Announcement        January 30, 2017        Shrinking Number of Long-term Monitoring Sites Could Hamper Scientists’ Ability to Measure Recovery of Impaired Streams

Science Animations        March 10, 2020        Importance of Cattails in Wetlands
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2






                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") of UTEK Corporation (the "Registrant"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael
O. Sullivan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                                   /s/ Michael O. Sullivan
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Name: Michael O. Sullivan
                                                   Date:  August 13, 2002
___________ No. 96-2907

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Rebecca L. Oates, * * Appellant. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the

------------------- * Western District of Missouri. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee, * * v. * * Rebecca L. Oates, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 2, 1996 Filed: January 3, 1997

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Rebecca L . Oates pleaded guilty to illegally possessing food stamps and conspi ring to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b) an d 21 U.S.C. § 846, and was sentenced to concurrent 51-mont h prison terms and five years supervised release. The district cour t subsequently reduced Oates’s sentence to time served. Oates later violate d her release conditions and was sentenced upon re vocation to concurrent 36- month prison terms. She appeals.

### On r emand, the district court should also reconsider th e 1 

### co ncurrent sentence on the food-stamp conviction, as tha t conviction was a Class D felony subject to a maximum prison term of five years, and the maximum term for a Class D felony upo n re vocation of supervised release is two years. See 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b); 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a)(4), 3583(e)(3).
-2- Oates ar gues that the district court failed to consider the polic y statements addressing revocation of supervised r elease in Chapter 7 of the Sentencing Guidelines. The provisions in Chapter 7 are merely advisory an d do not have binding e ffect. United States v. Carr , 66 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). Nevertheless, district courts must consider thes e provis ions before imposing sentence, as 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) direct s district courts resentencing an offender after revocation of supervise d release to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), which in turn requires, among other things, that the court consider any applicable policy statements. U nited States v. Hensley , 36 F.3d 39, 41-42 (8th Cir. 1994). We believe remand is required here, because it is not clear whethe r the district court considered the Chapter 7 policy statements. See id

. The court did not indicate that it relied on any statutory or Guidelines provision in imposing sentence, and neither the revocation-hearin g transcript nor the district court docket sheet i ndicates whether the court

cons idered the probation officer’s Guidelines worksheet and sentencin g recommendation.

If th e district court in fact considered the policy statements i n sentencing Oates, it may simply say so and reimpose sentence. Otherwise, the court should consider the policy statements along with other sentencin g factors and, in the exercise of its discretion, then impose the sentence it finds proper, up to and including the statutory maximum terms o f imprisonment. 1

Accordingly, we remand to the district court for resentencing.

### -3- A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2021257EN.01000401.xml

| 1.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/4

---

Corrigendum to Publication of an application for approval of a non-minor amendment to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 398 of 23 November 2020
  )

(2021/C 257/03)

On page 29, point 3.6 Specific rules concerning labelling of the product the registered name:

for:

‘Münchener Bier’ or ‘Münchner Bier’,

read:

‘Münchener Bier’ or ‘Münchner Bier’.

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Johnathan P. SIMS

NO. 2018-KH-1173

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.