alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
  **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
  **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
  **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, N. Larry McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 /s/
      N. Larry McPhersonN.
      Larry McPhersonChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      11, 2005
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 13
- 00710
- CV

K. L. M., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, NO. C
- 12
- 0051
- CPS, THE HONORABLE J AY K. W EATHERBY, JUDGE PRES IDING

O R D E R
PER CURIAM

Appellant K. L. M

. filed her notice of appeal on October 22, 2013 . The appellate record was complete November 12, 2013 , making appellant = s brief due December 2, 2013

. On December 11, 2013 , counsel for appel lant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief

.

A mendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a), available

at http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/MiscDocket/12/12903200.pdf (providing 180 days fo r court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order counsel to file appellant = s brief
no later than December 23 , 2013 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be held in con tempt of court.It is ordered on December 13, 2013

.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020412EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10048 — Mazda Motor Corporation/Mazda Motor Manufacturing de Mexico)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 412/13)

1.

On 19 November 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020412EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Mazda Motor Corporation (‘Mazda’, Japan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Mazda Motor Manufacturing de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (‘MMVO’, Mexico). |

Mazda acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of MMVO. Pre-transaction, MMVO was jointly controlled by Mazda and Sumitomo Corporation.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Mazda: It is active in the manufacturing and sale of passenger cars and commercial vehicles. Its principal products are four-wheeled vehicles, gasoline reciprocating engines, diesel engines, and automatic and manual transmissions for vehicles, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for MMVO: It is primarily active in the manufacturing and sale of Mazda branded vehicles in the Americas. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020412EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10048 — Mazda Motor Corporation/Mazda Motor Manufacturing de Mexico

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020412EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020412EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Sareel POINDEXTER

No. 2016-K-1868

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

WEIMER, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., would grant
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020289EN.01000401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/4 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9895 – KKR/Waves UK Divestco)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 289/03)

1.

On 18 August 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020289EN.01000401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, US), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Waves UK Divestco Limited (‘Waves’, UK), controlled by Coty Inc. |

KKR acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Waves.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for KKR: global investment firm offering investing in a broad range of alternative asset funds and other investment products to investors and providing capital markets solutions for the firm, its portfolio companies and other clients, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Waves: developing, marketing, manufacturing and distributing professional and retail hair products and nail products. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020289EN.01000401-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9895 – KKR/Waves UK Divestco

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020289EN.01000401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020289EN.01000401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Endeavour International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, William L. Transier, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ William L. Transier
---------------------------
William L. Transier
Co-Chief Executive Officer

November 5, 2004



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Endeavour International Corporation and will be retained
by Endeavour International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Shawn HAMLETT, DC# C01227, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Troy Kelvin CURRY-PENNAMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0379

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Arnold S. ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-83

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
H.S., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - products_publications(5)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(141)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(78)
              - arkansas(24)
              - california(314)
              - colorado(93)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(9)
              - florida(87)
              - georgia(22)
              - (-)guam(5)
              - hawaii(55)
              - idaho(85)
              - illinois(21)
              - indiana(13)
              - iowa(30)
              - kansas(53)
              - kentucky(10)
              - louisiana(44)
              - maine(21)
              - maryland(35)
              - massachusetts(12)
              - michigan(33)
              - minnesota(49)
              - mississippi(23)
              - missouri(26)
              - montana(75)
              - nebraska(44)
              - nevada(62)
              - new hampshire(10)
              - new jersey(23)
              - new mexico(61)
              - new york(48)
              - north carolina(35)
              - north dakota(40)
              - ohio(15)
              - oklahoma(33)
              - oregon(109)
              - pennsylvania(26)
              - puerto rico(11)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(17)
              - south dakota(59)
              - tennessee(28)
              - texas(68)
              - u.s. virgin islands(9)
              - utah(58)
              - vermont(11)
              - virginia(48)
              - washington(82)
              - west virginia(20)
              - wisconsin(43)
              - wyoming(105)

## By Year

publication        May 15, 2024        Post-Typhoon Mawar population counts of the endangered yǻyaguak (Mariana swiftlet) on Guam

publication        January 1, 2003        Impacts of the Brown Tree Snake: Patterns of Decline and Species Persistence in Guam's Avifauna

publication        October 27, 2015        Genetic structure, diversity, and interisland dispersal in the endangered Mariana Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus guami)

publication        October 30, 2017        Passive restoration following ungulate removal in a highly disturbed tropical wet forest devoid of native seed dispersers

publication        January 1, 1992        Was disease involved in the decimation of Guam's avifauna?
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical International Technology, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michel Bayouk, Secretary and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.









/s/ 
 Michel Bayouk


Michel
Bayouk


Secretary
and Principal Accounting Officer





February
7, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4760 ROBERT CARBAJAL, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-233) Submitted: March 10, 2000 Decided: March 24, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Owaiian M. Jones, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Nicholas S. Altimari, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Robert Carbajal appeals the district court's order revoking hissupervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four months imprisonment. Carbajal contends that there was insufficient evidence to findthat he participated in a bank robbery, a Grade A violation of supervised release under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual§ 7B1.1(a)(1) (1994). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.The district court had only to find by a preponderance of the evidence that Carbajal had violated a condition of his supervised release. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West Supp. 1999). We review thecourt's decision for an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Copley , 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). "The burden of showing something by a `preponderance of the evidence' . . . simply requires the trier of fact to believe that the existence of a fact is more probable than its nonexistence before [he] may find in favor of the party whohas the burden to persuade the [judge] of the fact's existence." Concrete Pipe & Prods., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust , 508 U.S. 602, 622 (1993) (quoting In re Winship , 397 U.S. 358, 371- 372 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)).We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Carbajal participated in a bank robbery. The fact that Carbajal was acquitted at trial of the bank robbery charges is not relevant b ecause of the different standards of proof. See, e.g. , United States v. Morgan , 942 F.2d 243, 246 (4th Cir. 1991) (noting that preponderance of evidence standard is less demanding than proof beyond a reasonable doubt). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Barbara ALTOMARE and Richard Altomare, Appellants, v. BOCAIRE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-3363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 27, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gabriel ESPINOSA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. D.H. GRIFFIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D18-1301

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96962-96963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28530]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12414-01-R9]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Sundance Power Plant

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated November 6, 2024, denying a petition dated June 27, 
2024, from Sierra Club. The Petition requested that the EPA object to a 
Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permit issued by the Pinal County 
Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) to the Arizona Public Service 
Company Sundance Power Plant (``APS Sundance''), an electricity 
generating station located in Casa Grande, Arizona.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Valladolid, EPA Region 9, 
(415) 947-4103, [email protected]. The final Order and 
Petition are available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Sierra Club

[[Page 96963]]

dated June 27, 2024, requesting that the EPA object to the issuance of 
operating permit number V20690.R02, issued by PCAQCD to APS Sundance in 
Casa Grande, Arizona. On November 6, 2024, the EPA Administrator issued 
an order denying the petition. The Order explains the basis for the 
EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than February 4, 2025.

    Dated: November 26, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2024-28530 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(47)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(1)
              - florida(6)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(1)
              - (-)utah(2)
              - washington(1)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 30, 2017        A Record of Change: Science and Elder Observations on the Navajo N.

Featured Films and Shorts        February 21, 2010        The Heat is On: Desert Tortoises and Survival (Full video)
Keldrice Deshine LEGREE, Sr., DOC #H19555, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3932

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The ESTATE OF Jesse Clarence BROWN, Sr. v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE

NO. 2018-OC-0719

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied. In the absence of an order of remand, this court lacks jurisdiction over a case removed to federal court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - (-)products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(15)
              - idaho(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - (-)oregon(9)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(8)

## By Year

publication        January 11, 2022        Alert optimization of the PLUM earthquake early warning algorithm for the western United States

publication        July 28, 2022        Real-time earthquake detection and alerting behavior of PLUM ground-motion-based early warning in the United States

publication        August 26, 2020        Developing post-alert messaging for ShakeAlert, the earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States of America

publication        December 1, 2017        Earthquake Early Warning ShakeAlert System: Testing and certification platform

publication        April 8, 2020        Earthquake early warning ShakeAlert 2.0: Public rollout

publication        September 8, 2021        Effect of fixing earthquake depth in ShakeAlert algorithms on performance for intraslab earthquakes

publication        March 10, 2021        Commentary: The role of geodetic algorithms for earthquake early warning in Cascadia

publication        August 29, 2014        ShakeAlert—An earthquake early warning system for the United States west coast

publication        March 10, 2021        Expected warning times from the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system for earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(53)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(7)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(9)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(7)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - (-)nevada(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

Photography  Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog