UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on July 1, 2013

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN – DOCKET DOT-OST-2007-26805 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken by the Department official indicated (no additional 

confirming order will be issued in this matter).

Applicant: JOINT STOCK COMPANY “AEROFLOT-RUSSIAN AIRLINES” (Aeroflot)

Date Filed: June 28, 2013

Relief requested: Exemption under 49 USC § 40109 to permit Aeroflot to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of 

persons, property, and mail between a point or points in Russia, on the one hand, and Atlanta, Bangor, Boston, Cleveland, 

Columbus (Ohio), Dallas/Ft. Worth, Denver, Detroit, Honolulu, Houston, Huntsville, Las Vegas, Minneapolis, 

Philadelphia, Portland (Oregon), and Toledo, on the other hand.

1

 

Date and citation of last action: July 8, 2011, in this Docket.

2

Applicant representatives: Don H. Hainbach and Jason E. Maddux, 202-776-3970

DOT analyst: Brett D. Kruger, 202-366-8025

Responsive pleadings: None

DISPOSITION

Action: Approved.

Action date: June 28, 20133

Effective dates of authority granted: June 28, 2013, through June 28, 2014.

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity): The Annexes to the 1994 U.S.-Russian Federation Air Transport 

Agreement.4

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations of our standard 

foreign air carrier exemption conditions (attached), the codeshare conditions previously imposed on Aeroflot, and to the 

otherwise-applicable terms, conditions, and limitations of Aeroflot’s foreign air carrier permit (Order 86-5-75).

Action taken by: Paul L. Gretch, Director Office of International Aviation

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with 

Department policy; (2) the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed operations; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with 

 1 We note that under the Agreement, Aeroflot may serve Cleveland, Denver, Detroit, Las Vegas, Minneapolis, and Philadelphia as the 

marketing carrier on a code-share-only basis. 2 The applicant’s previous exemption authority to serve the subject markets expired when the applicant failed to seek timely renewal. 

Our approval of its present request does not serve to insulate the applicant from any enforcement action which may be taken by the 

Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings.

3 On June 28, 2013, we orally granted the exemption authority requested by the applicant. Our action here serves to confirm our oral 

approval. We acted on the application without awaiting expiration of the 15-day answer period with the consent of all parties served. 4 On February 14, 2013, the United States and the Russian Federation agreed, ad referendum, to revised Annexes to the U.S.-

Russia Air Transport Agreement and stated that, pending their entry into force, the respective aeronautical authorities intend to

implement the provisions of those Annexes on the basis of comity and reciprocity.
the public interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major regulatory action under the Energy Policy and 

Conservation Act of 1975. To the extent not granted or dismissed, we denied all requests in the referenced Docket. We may amend, 

modify, or revoke the authority granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR 

§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of issuance of this Notice. This action was effective when taken, 

and the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
Appendix

Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier applicant(s) shall:

(1) Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective authorization from its homeland for such operations, 

and it has filed a copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2) Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration, the Transportation Security 

Administration, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning security, including, but not limited to, 

14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and 36 and 49 CFR Part 1546 or 1550, as applicable. To assure compliance with all applicable 

U.S. Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service (including 

charter flights) from a foreign airport that would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States, contact its 

International Industry Representative (IIR) (formerly referred to as International Principal Security Inspector) to advise 

the IIR of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security Administration has determined that security is 

adequate to allow such airport(s) to be served;

(3) Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the 

commencement of any operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the form of a completed OST 

Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards 

Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be filed with that office);

(4) Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with operational safety requirements at least equivalent to 

Annex 6 of the Chicago Convention;

(5) Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of its Government for international air services;

(6) Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 

CFR Part 203, concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7) Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 

1605(a), but only with respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any court or other tribunal in the 

United States that are: (a) based on its operations in international air transportation that, according to the contract of 

carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for 

which the contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b) based on a claim under any international 

agreement or treaty cognizable in any court or other tribunal of the United States. In this condition, the term 

"international air transportation" means "international transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that 

all States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the purpose of this definition;

(8) Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or terminate all flights to/from the United States in its

homeland;

(9) Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter 

data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with 

the Department's rules governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and limitations required by the public interest as may be 

prescribed by the Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all 

applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder is not in compliance with the conditions imposed 

above. Moreover, this authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit Department approval under Title 

49 of the U.S. Code.

12/2007