Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 236 / Monday, December 9, 2024 / Notices 97589 

12For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

1See Organic Soybean Meal from India: 

Preliminary Results, Preliminary Intent to Rescind, 

in part, and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2023, 89 FR 48147 

(June 5, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Preliminary Results. 

3See Organic Soybean Meal from India: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 87 FR 29737 (May 16, 

2022) (Order). 

4See Preliminary Results PDM at 3. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Bona Fide 

Sales Analysis for Shri Sumat Industries Pvt. Ltd.,’’ 

(June 5, 2024); see also Preliminary Results PDM at 

4–5. 

will instruct CBP to assess that 

importer’s (or customer’s) entries of 

subject merchandise without regard to 

antidumping duties in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For entries that 

were not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by RZBC during this 

review, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the 

antidumping duty assessment rate for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 156.87 

percent).12

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

final results of this administrative 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act: (1) for RZBC the cash deposit 

rate will be the margin listed above; (2) 

for previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which they were 

reviewed; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted- average dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 156.87 

percent); and (4) for all non- Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during the POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the final results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 3, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Whether to Incorporate 

Verification Minor Corrections in the 

Final Results 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–28858 Filed 12–6–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–901] 

Organic Soybean Meal From India: 

Final Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that Shanti 

Worldwide (Shanti) made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

November 2, 2021, through April 30, 

2023. Additionally, we are rescinding 

the review with respect to Shri Sumati 

Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Sumati), because 

we find that they did not make bona 

fide sales during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable December 9, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah Keith, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0264. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 5, 2024, Commerce published 

the preliminary results of the 2021–2023 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on organic 

soybean meal from India.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results.2 No interested 

parties submitted comments; thus, no 

decision memorandum accompanies 

this notice. The Preliminary Results are 

hereby adopted as the final results of 

this review. Commerce conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is organic soybean meal from India. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Order is provided in the Preliminary 

Results.4

Recission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that we intended to rescind this review 

with respect to Sumati for which we 

preliminarily found that Sumati did not 

make a bona fide sale of organic 

soybean meal during the POR.5 No party 

filed comments with respect to this 

preliminary finding. Therefore, we are 

rescinding the administrative review 

with respect to this company. 

Final Results of the Review 

We determine the following estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period November 2, 2021, through 

April 30, 2023. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
97590 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 236 / Monday, December 9, 2024 / Notices 

6See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

7See 19 CFR 352.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping 

Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). 

8For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

9See Order. 

Exporter/producer 

Weightaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Shanti Worldwide ........................ 18.80 

Disclosure 

Because Commerce received no 

comments on the Preliminary Results, 

we have not modified our analysis. 

Consequently, there are no calculations 

to disclose in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b) for these final results. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. If the 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 

0.50 percent), upon completion of the 

final results, Commerce intends to 

calculate importer-specific assessment 

rates on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for each 

importer’s examined sales to the total 

entered value of those sales. Where we 

do not have entered values for all U.S. 

sales to a particular importer, we will 

calculate an importer-specific, per-unit 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total quantity of those sales.6

To determine whether an importerspecific, per-unit assessment rate is de 

minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an 

importer-specific ad valorem ratio based 

on estimated entered values. Where the 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties.7

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Shanti for 

which it did not know that the 

merchandise it sold to the intermediary 

(e.g., reseller, trading company, or 

exporter) was destined for the United 

States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

such entries at the all-others rate if there 

is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.8

For the company for which we are 

rescinding this review, we will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). 

Commerce intends to issue these 

rescission instructions to CBP no earlier 

than 35 days after the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will equal to the dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this review for each respondent (except, 

if that rate is de minimis, then the cash 

deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding in which they were 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review or a prior 

segment of the proceeding but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 3.07 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.9 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties, and/or an increase in the amount 

of antidumping duties by the amount of 

the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the final results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: December 2, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28757 Filed 12–6–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–421–817] 

Melamine From the Netherlands: Final 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

melamine from the Netherlands is 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1