alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                        SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO
                        --------------------------------

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sun & Surf, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for the  period  ending  October  31,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin
L.  Miller,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



                                                          /s/ Kevin L. Miller
                                                         --------------------
                                                         Kevin L. Miller
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         February 6, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting,  the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section  906, has been  provided to Sun & Surf,  Inc. and
will be  retained  by Sun & Surf,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

[FIRST REPUBLIC BANK LETTERHEAD]

March 30, 2003

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attn: Corporate Trust Services-
Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2002-FRB1

Greenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc.
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, CT 06830
Attn: General Counsel

Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc.
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, CT 06830
Attn: Mortgage Finance Department



| |  |  | RE: First Republic Bank Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2002-FRB1;
Officers Certificate of the Servicer
| |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with
respect to the above-referenced offering, the undersigned officer of First
Republic Bank (as Servicer) hereby certifies as to the following:



| | 1. |  | a review of the activities of the Servicer and its performance
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the preceding fiscal
year since the inception of the trust has been made under the direct
supervision of the undersigned officer; and                                                                               
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the applicable
period, and there has been no known default in the fulfillment of the
Servicers material obligations throughout such period.

| |                                  
| | ---------------------------------
| | Very truly yours,                
|
| | FIRST REPUBLIC BANK,
as Servicer 
|
| | /s/ Cathy Myers                  
| |                                  
| | Cathy Myers
Senior Vice President
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. T he H onor abl e W i l e yY . D ani e l , S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f or ** the D i s tr i c tof

C ol or a do, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A,

P l ai nt i ff - A pp el l ee , v . J AME S P AU L L E WI S , J r . , AK A S e a l A, A K A J a m e s P . L e w is , J r .,

D e f e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 55618 D . C . N o s. 8 : 1 0 -cv -0 0 2 6 1 -C JC

8: 04 -c r- 00 01 6-C JC -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C orm a c J . C a rne y , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M ay8, 2013 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: P R E G E R S O N and F IS H E R , C i rc ui tJudg es , and D A N IE L , D i stri ct Judg e. ** J a m e s P . L e w i s appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2255 mo t i o n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § § 1 2 9 1 a n d2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED MA Y17 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

N otw i ths t a ndi ng hi s c ouns e l ’ s s e nt e nc i ng pr e di c t i on, the pl e aa gr e e m e nt , the prosec ut or, and the di stri ctcourtful l y i nform ed L ew i s thathe coul d b e s ent ence d to th e s ta tu to rym a x im u m o f 3 0 y e ar s a n dth a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt r e ta in e du ltim a te d is c r e tio n in s e n te n c in g L e w is to an yr e a s o n ab le s e n te n c e w ith in th a t m a x im u m . B ec ause L ew i s w as ful l y app ri se d o f hi s s ent enci ng expo sure , and h i s r es po nses du ri n g th e p l ea co l l o q u y m an i fest edh i s u n d erst an d i n g o f su ch ex p o su re, L ew i s’ c la im th a t h is p le aw a s in v o lu n tarydu e to in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l f

a ils . Se e W om ac k v . D e l P apa , 4 9 7 F .3 d9 9 8 , 1 0 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . B e c aus e “ the m ot i on a nd the f i l e s a nd r e c or ds of

the c a s e c onc l us i ve l ys how th a t th e p r is o n e ris e n title dto n o r e lie f ,” th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g L e w is ’ m o tio n w ith o u t an e v id e n tiaryh e ar in g . 2 8 U .S .C . § 22 55 (b). AF F I RME D.
2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6249

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RALPH D. DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:07-cr-00254-TSE-1; 1:10-cv-00747-TSE)

Submitted: July 30, 2012 Decided: August 6, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan Leonard Briggs, SQUIRE SANDERS & DEMPSEY, LLP, Washington, 

D.C. for Appellant. Patrick Cashman, Michael J. Durham, 

Jonathan Stewart Keim, Steven C. Parker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ralph D. Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Austin Chalk Oil & Gas, Ltd.
      ("Austin Chalk") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Darrel Figg, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Austin
      Chalk, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition
      and result of operations of Austin Chalk.




Dated: September
      9, 2005


by  /s/
        Darrel Figg
 Darrel
        Figg
 President
   CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO


18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Austin Chalk Oil & Gas, Ltd.
        ("Austin Chalk") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Marlen Roepke, Secretary/Treasurer, and Chief Financial  Officer
        of
        Austin Chalk, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
   (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition
        and result of operations of Austin Chalk.
  Dated: September
        9, 2005
 by /s/
            Marlen L. Roepke
 Marlen
            L.
            Roepke
 Secretary
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - (-)news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer

newsletter        September 30, 2004      Sound Waves Newsletter - September 2004

newsletter        February 27, 2009      Sound Waves Newsletter - January-February 2009

newsletter        November 1, 2018      Sound Waves Newsletter - October-November 2018

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 **SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO**
  I,
Clifford Pope, Chief Executive Officer of IJJ Corporation., certify
that :
  1.  I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IJJ Corporation;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 ****February
      24, 2005, effective as of February 15, 2005
    By:
    /s/ 
      Clifford PopeClifford PopeChief
      Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5573 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5573

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to shorten the exclusivity 
     period for brand name biological products from 12 to 7 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2016

Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mr. Cummings, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Doggett, 
and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to shorten the exclusivity 
     period for brand name biological products from 12 to 7 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Price Relief, Innovation, and 
Competition for Essential Drugs Act'' or the ``PRICED Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY PERIOD FOR BRAND NAME BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 351(k)(7)(A) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 262(k)(7)(A)) is amended by striking ``12 years'' and 
inserting ``7 years''.
    (b) Conforming Changes.--Paragraphs (2)(A) and (3)(A) of section 
351(m) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(m)) is amended 
by striking ``12 years'' each place it appears and inserting ``7 
years''.
    (c) Applicability.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act 
apply only with respect to a biological product for which the reference 
product (as such term is used in section 351 of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262)) is licensed under subsection (a) of such 
section on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Company
(Maine & Maritimes Corporation)

Maine
Public Service Company, a Maine corporation

Maine &
New Brunswick Electrical Power Co, Ltd, a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Maine Public Service Company

Energy
Atlantic, LLC, a Maine limited liability company, currently inactive

The
Maricor Group, formerly Maine & Maritimes Energy Services Company, a Maine corporation

The
Maricor Group New England, formerly RES Engineering, Inc., a wholly-owned Massachusetts subsidiary of The Maricor Group

The
Maricor Group, Canada Ltd, formerly Maricor Ltd., a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of The Maricor Group

Maricor
Properties Ltd, a Canadian corporation

Mecel
Properties Ltd, a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Maricor Properties

Cornwallis
Court Developments Ltd, a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Maricor Properties

Maricor
Technologies, Inc., a Maine corporation

---



QuickLinks
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000421 17-NOV-2016 08:29 AM
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - (-)products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - california(1)
              - hawaii(3)

## By Year

Software Release        August 31, 2023        Scale-dependent population drivers inform avian management in a declining saline lake ecosystem.

Software Release        June 7, 2023        Modeling widespread declines in walleye recruitment following zebra mussel invasion in Minnesota lakes

Software Release        February 7, 2024        Aquaculture and Irrigation Water Use Model 2.0 Software

B-roll        June 7, 2023        Timelapse of Halema‘uma‘u eruption, Kīlauea volcano — June 7-9, 2023

B-roll        March 10, 2021        Kīlauea summit — webcam time-lapse

B-roll        January 5, 2023        KWcam at Kīlauea's summit captures eruption within Halemaʻumaʻu crater

B-roll        May 9, 2023        Bird Collisions: Current Science and Future Opportunities

B-roll        April 15, 2014        Polar Bear - POV Cams (Spring 2014)

B-roll        August 18, 2019        Time-lapse video of bluff erosion on Barter Island, Alaska

Software Release        August 26, 2012        Central Valley Hydrologic Model (CVHM)
Served: February 12, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 1 2 th day of February , 2014

Essential Air Service at

CLOVIS, NEW MEXICO

Under 49 U.S. C. § 47131 et seq. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 1996

- 1902



### NOTICE EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS

By O rder 2014

- 1

- 10, issued on January 14, 2014, the Department requested proposals for

Essential Air Service (EAS) at Clovis, New Mexico, with proposals due no later t han

February 12, 2014. On February 12, 2014, SeaPort Airlines, Inc . requested a one

- week

extension to the deadline.

We will grant the extension request. Proposals for Clovis, New Mexico are now due

February 19, 2014.

KEVIN D. SCHLEMMER

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division

An electronic version of this document is available at

http://www.regulations.gov U N

I T E D S

T A T E S O F A

M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T

I O

N
Pamela Joyce WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5041

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.