alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin S. Little, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin S. Little                  
|Kevin S. Little                      
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 13, 2009
Exhibit 21.1

MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of subsidiaries of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. as of
December 27, 2009:



|                                          |  |                                         
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Subsidiary:                               |  | State or Other Jurisdiction ofSubsidiary
|Medical Staffing Holdings, LLC            |  | Delaware                                
|Medical Staffing Network, Inc.            |  | Delaware                                
|MSN-Illinois Holdings, Inc.               |  | Illinois                                
|Medical Staffing Network of Illinois, LLC |  | Illinois                                
|Medical Staffing Network Assets, LLC      |  | Illinois                                
|InteliStaf Holdings, Inc.                 |  | Delaware                                
|InteliStaf Group, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                                
|InteliStaf Healthcare, Inc.               |  | Delaware                                
|InteliStaf of Oklahoma, LLC               |  | Oklahoma                                
|InteliStaf Partners No. 1, LLC            |  | Delaware                                
|InteliStaf Partners No. 2, LLC            |  | Delaware                                
|InteliStaf Healthcare Management, LP      |  | Delaware
Order filed, May 28, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00348-CV

____________

WILLIAM B. HARRISON, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL, Appellant

V.

HARRISON INTEREST, LTD AND DANIEL J. HARRISON III, 

INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-82117

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 11, 2015. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order My-Thuy Cieslar, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 4.13

                                    FORM OF
                           TERM SHEET FOR PURCHASE OF
                       OUTSTANDING DEBENTURES (VERSION 1)
                       ----------------------------------

TRANSACTION:          Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
                      "Company"), has negotiated the settlement of all its
                      outstanding obligations to Cornell Capital Partners, LP
                      and its affiliates ("Cornell"). As part of this
                      settlement, Cornell will assign up to $1,200,000 of the
                      Company's 5% secured convertible debentures (the
                      "Debentures") to Investors

BUYER:                Accredited investors (the "Investors")

TO BE ASSIGNED:       Up to $1,200,000 with a minimum of $50,000
                      per Investor

REVISED TERMS         Simultaneous with the assignment of the Debentures,
                      the Company is prepared to amend certain terms of the
                      Debentures as follows:

                      o  Investors shall waive the past due payments of
                         principal and interest on the Debentures and extend the
                         maturity date to January 15, 2008

                      o  Company shall have the right to redeem the Debentures,
                         without penalty, subject to Investors' conversion
                         rights

                      o  Interest shall accrue until maturity date at 16.0% per
                         annum in cash or stock at Company's discretion.

                      o  Conversion price of $0.025 per share

                      o  Shares issued upon conversion will be issued without
                         restrictive legend.

CLOSING DATE:         As soon as possible, but not later than July 31, 2007

I/we hereby purchase $_______ of Fittipaldi Logistics, Inc. secured convertible
debentures, to be assigned by Cornell.

PURCHASER:     _____________________________
BY:            _____________________________
PRINTED NAME:   ___________________
TITLE (if any): ___________________
TAX ID or SS#:  ___________
DATE:           ___________2007
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of *Austin
Chalk Oil & Gas, Inc.* a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlen L.
Roepke, (
Officer Director of the Company, on March 31, 2005), certify, pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:
 
 
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
May 15, 2005  by
 
 
 
 /s/
Marlen L. Roepke
 Marlen L.
Roepke
 Secretary/Director
**Exhibit 5****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Phil E. Mulacek, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of InterOil Corporation (the ***“issuer”***); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) for the issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the issuer’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 28, 2008 /s/ Phil E. Mulacek   Phil E. Mulacek   Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Sade HICKMAN

NO. 2017-K-2035

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.
1400 North Hurstbourne Parkway 

louisville, KY 40223 

502.329.3000 Tel 

January 15, 2014 

VIA Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov 

Docket Operations, M-30 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Room W12-140 

West Building Ground Floor 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 

RE: Docket Number FAA-2013-0944 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

United Parcel Service Co. (UPS) agrees with the minimum qualification requirements of a relief 

pilot stated in the proposed interpretation, namely, "the part 121 SIC qualification requirements 

except for the recency requirements in paragraph§ 121.439 (three takeoffs and landings within 

90 days)." 

However, UPS believes the proposed interpretation should permit the following: 

A relief pilot who meets or exceeds the requirements of§ 121.432(a), specifically, one 

who is fully qualified to act as pilot in command of that operation, should be permitted to 

assume the responsibilities of the assigned second in command (SIC) of an operation that 

requires three or more pilots during any phase of flight. 

Finally, we encourage the Federal Aviation Administration to address differences in 

requirements for airlines with an Advanced Qualification Program. 

Sincerely, 

UNITED P~EL,SER~C~ 

~~~ 

Christopher Williams 

Director of Operations
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Vegas Global Strategies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kwan Sin Yee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                | /s/ KWAN SIN YEE        |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                | Kwan Sin Yee            |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |
| March 28, 2013 |                    |

 

----
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020358EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/7 |

---

PASSENGER NAME RECORDS (PNR)

Updated list of Member States who have decided the application of the PNR Directive to intra-EU flights as referred to in Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime [(\*1)](#ntr*1-C_2020358EN.01000701-E0001)

(If a Member State decides to apply this Directive to intra-EU flights, it shall notify the Commission in writing. A Member State may give or revoke such a notification at any time. The Commission shall publish that notification and any revocation of it in the Official Journal of the European Union)

(2020/C 358/07)

The Member States that have notified the Commission of the application of the PNR Directive in intra-EU flights are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Belgium, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bulgaria, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Czechia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Germany, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Estonia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Greece, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Spain, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | France, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Croatia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Italy, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Cyprus, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Latvia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Lithuania, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Luxembourg, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hungary, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Malta, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Netherlands, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Poland, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Portugal, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Romania, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Slovakia, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Finland, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sweden, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | United Kingdom. |

---

[(\*1)](#ntc*1-C_2020358EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ C 196, 8.6.2018, p. 29](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2018_196_R_TOC).

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40825 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIPE VALENTIN SALDANA-ALMANZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-1751-ALL 

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Felipe Valentin Saldana-Almanza (“Saldana”) pleaded guilty

to one count of being found in the United States after

deportation following conviction for an aggravated felony, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court

sentenced Saldana to 57 months’ imprisonment and three years’

supervised release. 

Saldana argues, for the first time on appeal, that the

sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are
No. 03-40825

-2-

unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. 

 Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow the precedent set in

Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself

determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal

quotation and citation omitted). 

Saldana also argues that a conflict exists between the

district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence and the written

judgment because the written judgment contains a condition of

supervised release prohibiting the possession of a dangerous

weapon, but at the sentencing hearing, the court did not mention

this prohibition. For the reasons set forth in United States

v. Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 934, 937-38 (5th Cir. 2003), we

conclude that the district court’s omission of the dangerousweapon prohibition during the oral pronouncement of sentence

did not create a conflict with the sentence set forth in the

judgment. 

AFFIRMED.
Ronald NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3687

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-10-00464-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

ISAIAS GUTIERREZ RAMIREZ, Appellants,

v.

ROSE BARNETT AND JERRY BARNETT, Appellees.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On September 23, 2010, this appeal was abated to allow the parties the 

opportunity to finalize settlement. This case is before the Court on an agreed motion to 

lift abatement and vacate the trial court’s judgment in accordance with the parties’ 

settlement agreement. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the 
2

disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties 

request this Court to vacate the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial 

court with instructions to dismiss the case with prejudice in accordance with the parties’ 

settlement agreement.

The agreed motion to lift abatement and vacate the trial court’s judgment in 

accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement is GRANTED. The appeal is hereby 

REINSTATED. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court=s judgment without regard to the 

merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the case with 

prejudice in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(2)(B). 

Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent 

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

13th day of January, 2011.
STATE of Louisiana v. Javone MARTIN

NO. 2018-KH-1362

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
STATE EX REL. Courtney WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0934

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Exhibit 10.2.2
 ®   ®
 Amendment ® Custodian ® Trustee Unallocated Bullion Account Agreement
   ® ® Trust ® ® Shares
   ® ® ® ®
    -1-




---



##### 



[Signature Page Follows]
 -2-




---



##### 



HSBC Bank USA, National AssociationBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ D. Rousos

D. RousosTitle:
    
    Authorised SignatoryThe Bank of New York, not in its individual
capacity, but solely as trustee of the
streetTRACKS® Gold TrustBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Andrew Pfeifer

Andrew PfeiferTitle:
    
    Vice President
 [Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to
streetTRACKS ® Gold Trust Unallocated Bullion Account Agreement]
 -3-
## F - 34 

# Pumps

## F - 35 Figure 51: 107393 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Water Pump 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 

### Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation John Deere Model 4045DF150 80 BHP 

### Figure 52: Cecert 19 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Appication: Water Pump 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 150 250 350 450 550 

### Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation Perkins Model T6.3544 145 BHP

## F - 36 Figure 54: Cecert 21 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Water Pump 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 150 250 350 450 550 Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation Sun Model UN4105T 115 BHP 

### Figure 53: Cecert 20 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Water Pump 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 150 250 350 450 550 

### Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation "Sun Model 4105T 98 BHP"

## F - 37 Figure 55: Cecert 31 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Water Pump 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 150 250 350 450 550 650



### Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation John Deere Model 4045DF150B 80 BHP 

### Figure 56: Cecert 47 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Production Pump 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 

### 50 100 150 200 250 

### Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation Detroit Diesel Model 8V71

## F - 38 

## Figure 57: R38 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: Drilling Rig Pump
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 

### Temperature (C)Percent Operation 

### 2001 Caterpillar Model 3508 1480 BHP, Turbo, AC/AC 

## Figure 58: R38 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: Drilling Rig Pump
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 

### Temperature (C)Percent Operation 

### 2001 Caterpillar Model 3508 1480 BHP, Turbo, AC/AC

## F - 39 

## Figure 59: R38 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: Drilling Rig Pump
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500



### Temperature (C)Percent Operation 2001 Caterpillar Model 3508 1480 BHP, Turbo, AC/AC 

## Figure 60: 108758 Engine Exhaust Temperature

Application: Drilling Pump 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0100 150 200 250 300 350 400



## Temperature (C)Percent Operation 

### Detroit Diesel Model 8V-71 240 BHP