alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      35.1**

**1123      - Servicer Compliance Statement**

| (a) | A                review of SLC’s servicing activities during the period covered by the                trust’s report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006                (the “Reporting Period”) and of SLC’s performance under the servicing                agreements has been made under my                supervision. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | To                the best of my knowledge, based on such review, SLC has fulfilled                all of                its servicing obligations under the servicing agreements in all material                respects throughout the Reporting                Period. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        RAPTOR NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Raptor Networks Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas M. Wittenschlaeger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 19, 2007                          /s/ Thomas M. Wittenschlaeger
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Thomas M. Wittenschlaeger
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               (principal executive officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Junior J. BATISTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1352

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00428-CV

IN RE ROY A.J. DONLEY RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petitions for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that the petitions should be dismissed. Accordingly, relator’s petitions

for writ of mandamus are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 21, 2011

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Process Waste Water Treatment

This information is claimed as 

“CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 

INFORMATION”
April 10, 2012

Mr. David O’Donnell Director of Operations Sapphire Aviation, Inc.

1500 Perimeter Road, Suite A5

West Palm Beach, FL 33406

Dear Mr. O’Donnell:

This is in response to your January 27, 2012 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2012- 0073) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administra tion on behalf of Sapphire Aviation, Inc. (Sapphire) for an exemption from § 119.71(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Sapphire to hire a chief pilot for their part 135 Air Carrier Operation.

The FAA reviewed your petition and determined an exemption is not required. A certificate holder may request a deviation as per 14 CFR Part 119.71(f) to employ a person who does not meet the appropriate airmen experience requirements, managerial experience requirements, or supervisory experience requirements of this section with the assigned Certificate Holding District Office (CHDO). In addition further guidance may be found in FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 2, Chapter 2, Section 3, Paragraph 2-153(E), Information Needed in the Management Deviation Request.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Shante JOHNSON, DOC #Q18188, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3461

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020415EN.01001501.xml

| 1.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9922 — GHO/MIC/Envision)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 415/08)

On 3 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9922. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9922. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 580 

To enhance the energy security of United States allies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2013 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

WESTMORELAND, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Ohio, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. LATTA, Mr. BARLETTA, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. 

RENACCI, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To enhance the energy security of United States allies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expedited LNG for 

5 American Allies Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF EXPORTATION OF NAT7 URAL GAS TO UNITED STATES ALLIES. 

8 Section 3(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 717b(c)) is amended— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 580 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘For purposes’’; 

2 (2) by striking ‘‘nation with which there is in 

3 effect a free trade agreement requiring national 

4 treatment for trade in natural gas’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘foreign country described in paragraph (2)’’; and 

6 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(2) A foreign country described in this paragraph 

8 is— 

9 ‘‘(A) a nation with which there is in effect a 

10 free trade agreement requiring national treatment 

11 for trade in natural gas; 

12 ‘‘(B) a member country of the North Atlantic 

13 Treaty Organization; 

14 ‘‘(C) subject to paragraph (3), Japan; and 

15 ‘‘(D) any other foreign country if the Secretary 

16 of State, in consultation with the Secretary of De17 fense, determines that exportation of natural gas to 

18 that foreign country would promote the national se19 curity interests of the United States. 

20 ‘‘(3) The exportation of natural gas to Japan shall 

21 be deemed to be consistent with the public interest pursu22 ant to paragraph (1), and applications for such expor23 tation shall be granted without modification or delay 

24 under that paragraph, during only such period as the 

25 Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security, signed at 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 580 IH

1 Washington January 19, 1960, and entered into force 

2 June 23, 1960 (11 UST 1632; TIAS 4509), between the 

3 United States and Japan, remains in effect.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply with 

6 respect to applications for the authorization to export nat7 ural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 

8 U.S.C. 717b) that are pending on, or filed on or after, 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-~---------------------------..__,__.Iii 

Sam Azad 

City Manager 

Mark Lovin 

Director of Aviation 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

A ! city of p bl M . I A" ue o emona 1rport 

-p; i' PUEBLO 31201BryanCircle,Ste.200 III ::-::;{._":": ;·:-,·C\!T o~: Pueblo, co 8100 I 

~~ ·-: .~·;:;,~5.:..:,=;-lt': •Phone (719) 553-2760 

~ colorado :·~·r''Y- -'-~ \·-;.;;:,: •• Fax (719) 553-2761 - v.J:"-...:.. :J.- .::1,.-;,iJi\J 

DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION 

March 23,2015 

7'll::; .-)I ·- ~ '·- i.: ... " Q r-\ " t !'· I· ··s·. !.} ..... '" 

. -= ~ -- :,.....,...- --· -~- - --~~---

Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer; 

In response to the recent bid, Docket DOT -OST -1999-6589, for Great Lakes Airlines to provide essential air 

service at Pueblo Memorial Airport, and in compliance with provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012" (Public Law No. 112-95), the City of Pueblo is prepared to 

contribute to the awarded airline subsidy 2.5% of the requested $1,776,448 assistance, or $44,411 for service 

years 2015-2016. 

Thank you. 

--::et~~ Sam Azad, City Manager 

City of Pueblo 

:'
Hector VALDES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 7
 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 Company Report
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Phil E. MulacekPhil E. MulacekChief Executive Officer
Scottie Bernard JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 31, 2018

Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Julie Comerford Wells, Assistant Public Defender, Milton, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*425The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Luis R. BOSCHETTI, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LB CAPITAL COLLECTIONS, LLC, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Cu 2+ N H 3 N H 3 N H 3 N H 3 Cl 2 Copper(2+), tetraammine-, dichloride CASRN10534-87-9 PMNSubstance
STATE of Louisiana v. Alcus A. SMITH

NO. 2017-KO-1643

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

*482Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant in part.
## Gering Convention & 

## VisitorsBureau
November5, 2014 Mr. Michael F. Martin US Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. Martin: On behalfofthe Gering Convention 

### & Visitors Bureau, Gering's destination marketing organization, we enthusiastically submit this letter in support ofWestern Nebraska Regional Airport Board of Directors and their recommendation ofAerodynamics Inc. (ADI) to provide essential air service to Scottsbluff, Gering and Western Nebraska. In Gering, tourism is big business and visitors' expenditures are avital part ofour local and regional economies. The Gering Civic Center, Western Nebraska's premier multi-function conference and event facility, serves 60,000+ visitors and customers ayear hosting state, regional and national conventions, meetings and events. Connectivity via reliable and essential air service is akey component in Gering's success in attracting conferences, bringing delegates, speakers and exhibitors to Gering, Scottsbluff and Western Nebraska now and in the future. ADI's bid and proposal to provide a50-passengerflight to Denver International Airport twice aday (Monday through Friday) and once aday on Saturday and Sunday effectively meets our communities needs and provides the essential airservice equipment and schedules to support, enhance and grow ourthriving tourism industry. Gering, Scottsbluff and Western Nebraska's businesses, individuals and the municipalities are committed to the public-private partnerships necessary to insure that ADI and their essential air service are successful. The Gering Convention &Visitors Bureau and our local tourism industry strongly supports Western Nebraska Regional Airport's recommendation Aerodynamics, Inc. to the US Department ofTransportation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 

# KCLVlcv N**~-5-tv~** Karla Niedan-Streeks, Executive Director Representing the Board of Directors Gering Convention 

### &Visitors Bureau

1050 M Street* Gering, Nebraska69341-2811

----------- 308.436.6886 www.VisitGering.com karla@visitgering.com
# C_2020082EN.01000501.xml

| 12.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/5

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2020/C 82/05)

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 of 7 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
  (OJ L 322, 8.12.2015, p. 21) | 9.12.2020 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 of 7 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(OJ L 322, 8.12.2015, p. 21)

9.12.2020

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

1

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

2

(3)   The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40340 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD LEE LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-94-CV-223

- - - - - - - - - - October 29, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronald Lee Lewis appeals the district court’s denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Lewis argues that the indictment to which he pleaded guilty did not state an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 531(a) because the indictment failed to allege that Lewis intended to defraud someone other than the security issuer. Assuming, arguendo , that such is an essential element of the offense, the indictment was not constitutionally insufficientNo. 96-40340 - 2 - under the maximum-liberality analysis espoused in United States v. Fitzgerald , 89 F.3d 218, 221-22 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Lewis’s motion. Lewis’s motions to expedite, to amend his brief, and to view the sealed sentencing recommendation all are DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carol Dore-Falcone                           
|Carol Dore-Falcone                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Desert climate and soils

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(10)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(3)
              - idaho(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - (-)nevada(2)
              - new mexico(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(5)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

Featured Films and Shorts        February 21, 2010        The Heat is On: Desert Tortoises and Survival (Full video)

staff profileSeth Munson, Ph.D.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 25, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00292

- CV

Barton Food Mart, Inc., Appellant

v.

Nejla Botrie, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, G OODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l cou rt on April 27, 2017. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs rel ating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.