alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(4910-1 ."., "_m-"' ")lm~",,;s,","(" DHARTM[NT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration

RJN 2120-AA64 14CFR Part 39 

## Ie,:: - 

## :'::3--1 (Docket No. F.t\...o\-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-120-AD] 

### II 

## ,)(8 Nll"l-\U._ 

# .,;S,~ ." / 

## .8/0, 

# vi'

. • •• . ""'''"l-GI<X. Alrworthmess Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP Model Gulfstream 100 Anplane ",

## 6'8 A - ><l1JA ~-.'" and Model Astra SPX and i125 Weshvind Astra Airplanes -9J,". 7"'" !.C4, "" .•••.•..••• -J AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe produc listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from 

### AflM-1- "1TlN-'io'SN L

# CA-- n / l"f'J.-J1~ 0U11>iG SYMlIQI.;



## * 

# , * 

# " * * Incomplete closure ofthe MED [main enlry dObr] may be followed by innight opening ofthe door. As aresult, the MED and the adjacent fuselage structure may be damaged during opening and landing impact. Damage to the left engine by flying debris and objects may also occur. mandatory continuing airworthiness infom1a~ion(MeAl) originated by an aviation



### fl~- \\X) NITIAl-"'S'1 

# 1.1 ,,111' '" 1 .~ I 

# \17 511c The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition .ounNGsn,!1QI. product. The MeAT describes the unsafe condition as: authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

described inthe MeAl. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed 1\0 by {insert dale 30days after date

# orpublication inthe FEDERAL REGISTER].
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1381

ASRAT AWOKE CHERU,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A75-334-557)

Submitted: December 3, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Asrat Awoke Cheru, Petitioner Pro Se. Raymond Smith, IMMIGRATION

& NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Arlington, Virginia; Emily Anne Radford,

Terri Leon-Benner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Cheru does not challenge the denial of his application for

withholding from removal.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Asrat Awoke Cheru, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s decision denying

asylum and withholding from removal. For the reasons discussed

below, we deny the petition for review.

The decision to grant or deny asylum relief is conclusive

“unless manifestly contrary to the law and an abuse of discretion.”

8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000). We have reviewed the immigration

judge’s decision and the administrative record and find the record

supports the conclusion that Cheru failed to establish past

persecution or a well founded fear of persecution. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.13(a) (2004) (stating that the burden of proof is on the

alien to establish his eligibility for asylum); INS v.

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992). Because the decision in

this case is not manifestly contrary to law, we cannot grant the

relief Cheru seeks.*

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - colorado(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(5)
              - 2023(1)

Animated GIF        December 31, 2018        Data Science: Lake Mead Water Level Decline Visualization

staff profileSharon K Taylor, DVM, PhD

staff profileHeidi Leathers-Miller

Animated GIF        July 5, 2022        Carbonate Budget Animation

staff profileSteven M Matsuoka

staff profileNicholas J Van Lanen, PhD

staff profileShannon Brewer, PhD

staff profileBarbara Martin
Jean C. HOLYBRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3807

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Report of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”) DIEPHOLZ



K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Dated: May 11, 2010





/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”)  DIEPHOLZ



K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 11, 2010





/s/ Charles Smith



Charles Smith

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 11, 2010





/s/ Charles Smith



Charles Smith

Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: May 11, 2010




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 21
 Nabors Industries, Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Significant Subsidiaries
 SubsidiaryNabors Drilling Canada ULCNabors Drilling International LtdNabors Drilling International II LtdNabors Drilling USA, LPNabors Drilling Limited (Canada)Nabors Holding CompanyNabors Industries Inc.Nabors International Finance IncNabors International Holdings LtdNabors Malta Holding Company Ltd.Nabors International Management LtdNabors CanadaRyan Energy Technologies Inc.Oak Leaf Investments IncNabors Diamond Holdings, IncNabors Well Services CoYellow Deer Investments CorpNabors Global Holdings LtdNabors Hungary KftMaple Leaf Holdings Ltd.Ramshorn Investments, Inc.Nabors Blue Shield Ltd.
Raul PARRILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin

Regional Administrator (3RA00)

US. Envi rt>timenhil Protection AgencyReg.ii )l1 Ill

1650 Arch Sired

I’m Iade.lphia PA I 9 103—2023Dear Mr. Garvin:

Pursuant to section I S I (a US) ut the Clean Air Act this is a request br a I \:etr attainment date

extension to July 20, 20 I 6I br the Cecil County, Maryland portion of the Philadelphia Nonattainment

Area (Philadelphia — Wilmington — Atlantic City. PA — DE — MD — NJ) ozone nonatlainment area,which is classified as marginal lbr the 2005 K—hour ozone national ambient air quality standard(NAAQS). By this letter, L am certilying that:

I) The Philadelphia Nonattainment Area has complied with all requirements and commitments

pertaining to the area in the applicable ozone implementation plan; and

2) The Philadelphia — Wilmington — Atlantic City, PA-DE-MD-NJ 200K ozone NAAQS

nonattainment area’s Fourth—highest daily tnaxiinum K—hour average monitored value (luring the2014 0/Âme season is 0.075 ppm or less. Attached is the letter certifying that our ozone data inthe Air Quality System is complete. qual:tv —assured ambient air quality monitoring daia 11w theattainment year 2014 ozone season.

Maryland would appreciate your taking action on this request as soon as possible. II’ you would like to

discuss this lltrther pleise call inc at 410—537—3255.

Sincerely,

-

George (Tad) S. Ahurti, Jr., Direcbor

Air and Radi at ott Manageitient Ad in in istration

Attachment‘Although the final “implementation of the ZOOS National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach,

Attainment Deadlines and Revocation 01 the 1997 O,nne Standards forTranspnrtation Conformity Purposes” rule t7 FR 30160) Se the attainment dateas December 31° of lhe attatnmeol year (2015 far marginal areast, on December 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the District ofColumbia C,rcuitvacated this portion of the regulations. Therefore, consistent with the Phase 1 rulefnrimplementatinn of the 1997 o7one NAAQSattainment timeframes run from the date that are designations and nonattainment classifications (by operation of law) became eftechve.

s— t(ecyclect I :ipci www.mde.maryland.gov ITY llscrs t-S0fl-73-22S

vi: tA:tryl:ttsd Relay Sc’r ice
**Exhibit99.2**

 

Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

 

 

Capital One Bank

11013 West Broad Street

Glen Allen, Virginia 23060

 

And

 

The Bank of New York, as Trustee

101 Barclay Street, Floor 8 West

Corporate Trust Administration—Asset Backed Securities Unit

New York, NY  10286

 

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying *Report of Management on Compliance*, that Capital One Bank(the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Capital One Financial Corporation,complied in all material respects with the requirements of Sections 3.1,3.4(a), 3.4(b), and 5.2 of Asset Pool 1 Supplement dated as of October 9, 2002to the Indenture dated as of October 9, 2002 and Sections 4.02 and 4.03 of theTransfer and Administration Agreement dated as of October 9, 2002 regarding theCapital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust, 2002-CC Class A Notes (collectivelythe “Agreements”), which were filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K on November 12, 2002,for the year ended December 31, 2004. Management is responsible for the Bank’s compliance with thoserequirements.  Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Bank’s compliance basedon our examination.

 

Our examinationwas conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the U.S.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with those requirementsand performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances.  We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Bank’s compliance with specified requirements.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Bank complied with theaforementioned Sections of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2004is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 
| /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|---------------------------|
| Ernst & Young LLP     |

 

 

March 18, 2005

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 9310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-20224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558


New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds; Bacitracin Zinc

Correction

    In rule document 97-28015 beginning on page 55161, in the issue of 
Thursday, October 23, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 55161, in the third column, in the EFFECTIVE DATE section, 
``October 15, 1997'' should read ``October 23, 1997''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
J. C. MILES and Willie L. Miles Individually and on Behalf of their Mother Mattie Parker Myles (Deceased) v. HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1 OF TANGIPAHOA PARISH, d/b/a North Oaks Health System

NO. 2018-C-0703

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., recused.
Debra Denise WREN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Russell CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------

                                      11
<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-25
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-25


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (the "Master Servicer") and do hereby
further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

         (i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
         preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
         under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

         (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12
### P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1865 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews


# Document

Number: 

# 33 ) IV-E-2 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:28AM

Sheet 33 of 105P. 2 

# RECOR D O F COMMUNICATIO N
I O ICf T' SUBJEC T g j PHON E CAL L Q t • OTHE R(SPECIFY ) 

# A-83-2 7 IV-E-2 1 (Recor d o f

ite m checke d above ) FROM : DAT E l . TIM E I 

# 4i'.'$A*y. MMAR YO P COMMUNICATIO N rsT T" * nr»T > •» te 1 , .T I SUMMAR YO P COMMUNICATIO N 

### H

# j anr u'wiw.in u \^-X ScJe 

## *^-Q 

# Sf c
•;•,• - .. . ••' i?¥.:•'*•••••••.•'- .:'-<C%'&i: • ©i: : ••

• ^ ••••'•':•'•>. 1 •••• • .••r^"ift-. « '-wr;-. • . ^ • •."• : - : 1 . ••'•..'.•••••vi-: • • • •••••ii-;«;.':.'\,.;-.i";-^eE»sii c-.^»«^-.J:-.7 , •,-..•:.*. - ••••..?.-.•>•:?>«.-..,';>:»•> . • • . •

- I •••:$Z

'.. V - '

...••.: ;i-v.<i?- : *3K:pS?'-.; : • . iifi'i 1 . '•'^ifVv-iS'.'ffiM:-' • • ••':•'-»&•
CONCLUSIONS . ACTIO N TAKE N O R REQUIRE D ^^^-QVWLAJUvysX^ J * i - , < , - t

-- 1

INFORMATIO N COPIE S TO : 

# \Oa^ A " 7?^«YSV W 5 3

EP A Fon n 1300 4 (7-72 ) HKPLACK S KP AH Q FOR M saoo. * WHIC H MA YB C USK O UNTI L SUPPL YI S EXHAUSTCO .
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003979

30-JUN-2015

08:46 AM
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(50)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Photography        March 14, 2016        Mysterious Fossils from the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater and Beyond

Illustrations        June 1, 2023        Chesapeake Bay Meteorite impact Crater

Infographics        January 27, 2022        Map showing the location of the Atlantic Subsurface Stratigraphic Initiative study area in Maryland and Virginia.
WHITBURN, LLC, and Barry Haught, individually, Appellants, v. EAGLE PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Justin BAILEY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel JUNIOR, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Dore-Falcone, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Carol Dore-Falcone                           
|Carol Dore-Falcone                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 23, 2009



33
George HANKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jessie DYSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1088

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
STATE EX REL. Brian S. BAKER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1166

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). His remaining claims are repetitive and/or unsupported. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 930.4 and 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, John A. Zawadzki, certify that:

1.  	I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and;

2.  	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  	[Not applicable];

4.  	[Not applicable]; and

5.  	[Not applicable];

Date: April 4, 2006
By:    /s/ John A. Zawadzki
	President and Chief Executive Officer