alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13****Certifications**I, Phil E. Mulacek, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of InterOil Corporation (the ***“issuer”***); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the issuer’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  March 31, 2006 /s/ Phil E. Mulacek   Phil E. Mulacek   Chief Executive Officer
Juan PARRA, Appellant, v. CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, and Gallagher Bassett Services, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.22

March 23, 2005

Stephen P. Harrington
President
Touchstone Resources USA, Inc.
111 Presidential Boulevard, Suite 165
Bala Cynwyd, PA  19004

Dear Steve:

      Trident Growth Fund L.P. ("Trident") hereby agrees to extend the due date
of Touchstone Resource USA, Inc.'s ("Touchstone") $2,100,000 Convertible
Promissory Note from March 23, 2005 to a date no later than March 24, 2006 (the
"Note Extension"). In addition, Trident agrees to waive the Cash Interest
Coverage, the Cash Flow Coverage, the Current Ratio and the Registration
Requirements to a date no later than March 24, 2006 (the "Requirement Waivers").
In consideration for the above Note Extension and Requirement Waivers,
Touchstone will issue to Trident a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase
100,000 shares of Touchstone's common stock at $1.20 per share. These Warrants
shall have the same terms and conditions as the Warrants issued in the original
loan transaction.

      If the above corresponds with our agreement, please execute the
acknowledgement below as evidence of your agreement.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            TRIDENT GROWTH FUND, L.P.
                                            BY: TRIDENT MANAGEMENT LLC,
                                                GENERAL PARTNER

                                            BY:/s/ Scotty Cook
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Scotty Cook, Authorized Member

Agreed and Accepted
This 23rd day of March, 2005

TOUCHSTONE RESOURCES USA, INC.

BY: /s/ Stephen P. Harrington
    --------------------------------
    Stephen P. Harrington, President
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5816 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the authorization for the United States 

Commission on International Religious Freedom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5816 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in section 207(a) (22 U.S.C. 6435(a)), by 

5 striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’; and 

6 (2) in section 209 (22 U.S.C. 6436), by striking 

7 ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 

8 30, 2015’’. 

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

11 as if enacted on December 10, 2014. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Reji Tyre-Jamal SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 24, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD B. SPENCER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

W. M. KOKOL, Physician at SATF,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 16261

D.C. No. 1:17

- cv

- 01561

- LJO

- BAM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’ Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Edward B. Spencer appeals pro se from the distri ct

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. W e review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Hamilton v.

* Thi s disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILE D

DEC 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 16261

Brown , 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011 ). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Spencer’s action because Spencer

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendant was deliberately indifferent

to Spencer ’s health condition

. See Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1057

- 60 (9th

Cir. 2004 ) (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of

and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence,

or a dif ference of opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to

deliberate indifference) ; Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors , 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th

Cir. 2001) (district court need not accept as true allegations that contradict matters

properly subject to judicial notice or by exhibit )

.

Spencer’s request to take judicial notice, set forth in his opening brief, is

denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020437EN.01001901.xml

| 18.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/19

---

Notification of the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (’Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of Diamond Transmission Partners RB Limited and Diamond Transmission Partners Galloper Limited as transmission system operators in the United Kingdom

(2020/C 437/08)

Following the United Kingdom regulatory authority’s final decisions of 20 March 2019 and 7 October 2019 regarding the certification of Diamond Transmission Partners RB Limited and Diamond Transmission Partners Galloper Limited as Ownership Unbundled Transmission System Operators (Article 9 of the Electricity Directive), United Kingdom has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of these companies as Transmission System Operators operating in the United Kingdom in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive of the European Parliament and the Council.

Any additional information can be obtained at the following address:

| Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) |
| --- |
| 10 South Colonnade |
| Canary Wharf |
| E14 4PU London |
| UNITED KINGDOM |

Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem)

10 South Colonnade

Canary Wharf

E14 4PU London

UNITED KINGDOM

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)**

 

I, Anthony G. Petrello, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Nabors Industries Ltd.;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

 
| Date:   April 1, 2013 | /s/   Anthony G. Petrello                         |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Anthony   G. Petrello                             |
|                       | Chairman,   President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Maryland Department of the Environment

Air and Radiation Management Administration

Mobile Sources Control Program

Baltimore Nonattainment Area MOBILE6 Modeling Emission Analysis

Rate of Further Progress Runs

Baltimore Area

Step Modeling Scenario VOC NOx Remarks

1 2002 RFP Base-Year Inventory 70.6 177.1 All 2002 control programs in place, 2002 VMT

2 2002 RFP Adjusted Year Inventory 101.9 211.1 CAA Off, 7.8 RVP, 1990 I/M, 2002 Eval Yr & 2002 VMT

3 2008 RFP Adjusted Year Inventory 92.8 188.5 CAA Off, 7.8 RVP, 1990 I/M, 2008 Eval Yr & 2002 VMT

4 2009 RFP Adjusted Year Inventory 92.5 188.0 CAA Off, 7.8 RVP, 1990 I/M, 2009 Eval Yr & 2002 VMT

7 2008 Projected Emission Inventory 41.2 106.8 All 2008 control programs in place

8 2009 Projected Emission Inventory 38.7 97.0 All 2009 control programs in place

9 2010 Projected Emission Inventory 36.3 85.5 All 2010 control programs in place

2008 RFP Analysis

2008 Non-Creditables (Step 2 minus Step 3) 9.1 22.6

2008 Adjstd Base-Year minus Non-Creditables 83.7 165.9

2008 Target Emissions (w/15% Reductions) 71.1 141.0

2008 Target Emissions (w/18% Reductions) 68.6 136.1

2008 Projctd Emissions (14% Projctd VMT Growth) 41.2 106.8

Notes:

Emission modeling performed with PPSuite system designed for the state of MD, using the SHA-Count data to compute VMT

U.S. EPA's latest model MOBILE6.2 is built into the PPSuite system for producing the emission factors

Prepared by: MDE's Mobile Sources Control Program, Phone (410) 537-4183 January 26, 2007
John H. SCOTT, Appellant, v. Melissa M. SCOTT, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2713

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5867 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project involving the Gibson Dam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2014 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project involving the Gibson Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING GIBSON DAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the require7 ments of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy 

9 Regulatory Commission project numbered 12478–003, the 

10 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may, at the reVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:53 Dec 20, 2014 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5867.IH H5867

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5867 IH

1 quest of the licensee for the project, and after reasonable 

2 notice and in accordance with the procedures of the Com3 mission under that section, extend the time period during 

4 which the licensee is required to commence construction 

5 of the project for a 6-year period that begins on the date 

6 described in subsection (b). 

7 (b) DATE DESCRIBED.—The date described in this 

8 subsection is the date of the expiration of the extension 

9 of the period required for commencement of construction 

10 for the project described in subsection (a) that was issued 

11 by the Commission prior to the date of enactment of this 

12 Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

13 806). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2019

No. 04-19-00514-CR

George LUCIO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-2556-CR-A

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted. We order 

appellant’s brief due November 15, 2019.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
### Process Diagram for Benzenepropanol, 1-benzoate All units in kg/batch Benzenepropanol, 1-benzoate abbreviated as "NCS" for "New Chemical Substance"



## Batch Reactor 14 kg Tin Oxide Catalyst 6806 kg Benzoic Acid (reactant) 7817 kg 3

- Phenyl

- 1

- propanol (reactant) 318 kg Isoalkanes C7

- C8 (solvent)



## Non

- contact Condenser

Phase Separator

1002 kg Water 4 kg Misc. Organics To Waste Water Treatment



## Storage Tank

Batch Distillation 204 kg NCS 7 kg Benzoic Acid 12 kg Unidentified Organics 6 kg Benzyl Benzoate 91 kg 3

- PPB

12700 kg NCS 48 kg Unidentified Organics 12 kg Benzyl Benzoate 

## Storage Recycle to Reactor Next Batch



### Shipping Containers: 55 gal lon Drums 

### 400 gallon Totes 533 kg NCS 3 kg Unidentified Organics 15 kg Unidentified Tin Species Heel is left in Distillation Vessel until next charge 

## Non

- contact heat exchanger (product cooler)

Cleaning Loss: All Process Equipment and Piping cleaned up to four times annually using steam and water. NCS + Misc. Organics loss from each cleanup = 118 kg , Total water/steam used = 56,715 kg,. Sent to Waste Water Treatment on - site. Release Point #1

Release Point #2

Process Sampling Loss: Each batch will be sampled in reaction and distillation steps. Material from samples will be incinerated on

- site. Sample materials account for up to 0.225 kg per reactor batch and 0.225 kg per distillation batch. Release Point #3 Light Components Cut

Product Cut

Distillation Heel 

## Storage

Concentrated Distillation Bottoms Disposal The heel left in the distillation vessel is to be disposed of as a waste once annually. This is esimated to be a total of 551 kg per year to be incinerated on site. Release Point #4 318 kg Isoalkanes C7

- C8 Continuous Recycle to Reactor

To Incinerator

To Incinerator To Waste Water Treatment
exv10w8



 





Exhibit 10.8




From SuccessFactors April 3, 2001

To Aaron Luen Au



Dear Luen:



I am pleased to offer you the position of Director of Engineering for SuccessFactors.com,
reporting directly to Lars Dalgaard. This letter shall serve to confirm the terms of your
employment. If the terms discussed below are acceptable to you, please sign this confirmation
letter where indicated and return it to me. I have enclosed a copy of the letter for your records.





Salary: Your annual base salary shall be $130,000 per year, paid on the
15th and last day of each month.




Sign up bonus: You will be paid a sign up bonus of $5,000 30 days after contract start.




Performance Bonus: You will also be eligible for a performance bonus depending on
launching the V4 product release as agreed in the original scope document and its successful
sale at regular price by our sales force to one large customer (min. 500 seat license, with
opportunity of 5,000 SEATS). The target date is June 15, 2001. If the terms are fulfilled later
than that the bonus will be due upon that date. The bonus will be $12,500.




Stock Options: It will be recommended to the Board of Directors that you receive a stock
option grant for about 1% of the company shares of SuccessFactors.com Common Stock at an
exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of the grant.




Stock Vesting: Upon commencement of your employment, options will vest over a four (4)
year period. Vesting begins after the first 12 months of
continuous employment. Details of the
stock option plan will be included in your option paperwork.




401(k) Plan: You will be eligible to participate in the SuccessFacfors.com 401(k). This
is a non-matching, tax deferred, retirement investment option.




Health Benefits: Participation in SuccessFactors.com Medical and Dental insurance plans
are included, with the Company paying 100% of your Dental premium and 100% of Medical under HMO
(employee only) and $17.50/month under PPO (employee only). Dependent coverage is provided as a
payroll deduction. You may elect to have this deduction be “pre-tax”.




Vacation Days: You will be given 15 days of paid personal time off per year in addition
to paid company holidays.




Start Date.

Your employment will commence on April 5, 2001


I am excited to have you join our team. If there are any aspects of our offer which you would like
clarified please let me know. This offer is open through April 5, 2001





	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,

 	 
	/s/ Lars Dalgaard
 	 
	Lars Dalgaard 	 
	President/CEO

SuccessFactors
Murad AYESH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 1, 2018

David S. Molansky, Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, FERNANDEZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

*367Appellant, Murad Ayesh ("Ayesh"), appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his post-conviction motion and on appeal, Ayesh argues that defense counsel was ineffective because he misadvised Ayesh regarding the impact of his plea on future employment, and therefore, his guilty plea should be vacated. Because loss of employment is a collateral consequence and not a direct consequence of the plea, we affirm the trial court's order.

It is well-established that a defendant must only be made aware of the direct consequences of his or her plea. *See* *State v. Partlow*, 840 So.2d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 2003). The distinction between direct and collateral consequences of a plea " 'turns on whether the result represents a definite, immediate and largely automatic effect on the range of the defendant's punishment.' " *Major v.State*, 814 So.2d 424, 431 (Fla. 2002) (quoting *Zambuto v. State*, 413 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) ). However, neither " 'the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral consequence of a plea to criminal charges.' " *State v. Rodriguez*, 990 So.2d 600, 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (quoting *Simmons v. State*, 611 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) ).

Because the impact of a plea on current or future employment is a collateral consequence of the plea, as it does not affect a defendant's range of punishment in any manner, we find that it is insufficient to render a plea involuntary and therefore does not provide a basis to vacate a plea. *See* *Murphy v. State*, 868 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (finding that trial court "correctly concluded that the loss of employment was a collateral consequence of Murphy's plea"). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order denying Ayesh's post-conviction motion.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5881 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5881

 To require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit to 
  the Congress a report on adoption disruption and dissolution in the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2014

 Mr. Stivers (for himself and Ms. Bass) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit to 
  the Congress a report on adoption disruption and dissolution in the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing American Families 
Everywhere (SAFE Kids) Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON ADOPTION DISRUPTION AND DISSOLUTION.

    Within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Congress a 
written report that--
            (1) describes the extent of adoption disruption and 
        dissolution in the United States, and the efforts by State and 
        local governments and private child welfare agencies to prevent 
        the disruption and dissolution;
            (2) recommends legislation to define adoption disruption 
        and adoption dissolution, to prevent adoption disruption and 
        adoption dissolution, and require State and local governments 
        and child welfare agencies to track and report on disrupted or 
        dissolved adoptions; and
            (3) sets forth legislative options to prepare prospective 
        adoptive parents for adoption and to support adoptive parents 
        after an adoption.
                                 <all>
```