alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of DynaResource, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ K.W. (“K.D.”)
      DIEPHOLZ
              
              K.W. (“K.D.”) Diepholz
              Chairman
      of the Board of Directors
              Dated:
      July 31, 2009
              
              
              /s/
      K.W. (“K.D.”)  DIEPHOLZ
              
              K.W.
      (“K.D.”) Diepholz
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Dated:
      July 31, 2009
              
              
              /s/
      Charles Smith
              
              Charles
      Smith
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Dated:
      July 31, 2009
              
              
              /s/
      Charles Smith
              
              Charles
      Smith
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
              Dated:
      July 31, 2009




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(29)
              - multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(26)
              - florida(7)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - (-)north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Podcasts        April 20, 2011        Climate Connections: Visiting Students in North Carolina (Episode 1)
# C_2020133EN.01000201.xml

| 24.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/563, and in Regulation (EU) No 401/2013, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/562 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma

(2020/C 133/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/563 (2), and in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/562 (4) concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Myanmar/Burma, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4b of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 1 February 2021, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 12 of Decision 2013/184/CFSP and Article 4i(4) of Regulation (EU) No 401/2013.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 75.

(2)  OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 25

(3)  OJ L 121, 3.5.2013, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 23

---
Manuel MEDINA, Appellant, v. Melisa MEDINA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3599

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020432EN.01000201.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9962 — Mylan/Aspen’s EU Thrombosis business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 432/02)

On 15 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9962. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9962. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
----

**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States  Code) I, Douglas MacQuarrie, President of PMI Ventures Ltd. (the "Company")  hereby certify, to my knowledge, that: 

 The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended  December 31, 2003 ("Report") fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of the operations of the Company. 

/s/ “Douglas MacQuarrie”   Name: Douglas MacQuarrie   Title: Chief Executive Officer 

 Dated: June 23, 2004 

 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed  as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

----
Exhibit
32.1





REGENOCELL
THERAPEUTICS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report
of RegenoCELL Therapeutics, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10K for the
period ending December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, James F. Mongiardo, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
            James F. MongiardoJames
      F. MongiardoChief
      Executive OfficerandChief
      Financial OfficerApril
      30, 2010
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134809 & (29) (30) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. SUZANNE M. BAILEY, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Clyde Justices Richard Bailey, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134809 COA: 278049 Oakland CC: 02-045523-NH MAHMOOD A. KHALID, M.D. and KHALID & ASSOCIATES, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to ap peal the June 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Cour t. The motion for stay is DENIED.

l0914 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14, 2007

Clerk
Subject: Meeting with CEMEX

Date: July 25, 2011

Participants:

CEMEX UESPA

Regina Henry Barrett Parker

Kevin Kelley Candace Sorrell

Mauricio Naranjo Jeff Ryan

Pat Hennessy Bill Grimley

Ray Merrill

Peter Westlin

Steve Fruh

Keith Barnett

Peter Tsirigotis

On July 25 , a meeting was held with CEMEX

.

The meeting covered monitoring and measurement issues related to CEMEX and the 2010

Portland cement rule.
Exhibit 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
    AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
    AMENDED
    ®
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
                  
       *
    
    The originally executed copy of this Certification will be
    maintained at the Sponsors offices and will be made
    available for inspection upon request.  **
    
    The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Lowe is signing in his
    capacity as an officer of World Gold Trust Services, LLC,
    the Sponsor of the Registrant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Coordination of Media Interviews

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(11)
              - multimedia_video-149194(10)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        June 17, 2014        For Real: Positive Progress-Federal Progress
# C_2020428EN.01000601.xml

| 11.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9735 — Amex/GBT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 428/06)

On 9 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9735. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9735. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Transport



## Passenger Rights

• Information Campaign

2013

- 2015

• Presenter: Pedro Garcia

- Gracia

DG MOVE

– Unit D4

• Passenger rightsTransport 

### EU INSTITUTIONS (LEGISLATORS)

2Transport 

## PASSENGERS RIGHTS & The EU

• The EU is the first

– and only

- integrated area with

passenger rights rules covering all modes of transport

• AIR ( 1991 ) ; Sp ecific law for disabled passengers

( 2007 )

• RAIL ( 2007 ) ; SHIP ( 2010 ) ; BUS & COACH ( 2011 )

Passengers in the EU enjoy a minimum set of rights:

non

- discrimination, information , assistance and

compensation

3Transport 

### PASSENGERS 

## RIGHTS AWARENESS

It is not enough adopting legislation at EU level

but raising passenger rights awareness

• Only 34 % of travellers are aware of their

rights

• 2010 : each person travelled 12

, 869 km

• 2011 : Europeans made > 1 billion holiday

trips

4Transport 

### FIRST PASSENGERS RIGHTS CAMPAIGN

2009

Campaign

Poster

5Transport 

### 2010

- 12 AIR & RAIL

CAMPAIGN

• YOUR PASSENGER RIGHTS AT

HAND

• 1 st Organised Campaign

• 2 years duration

• Several actions : website

, posters,

leaflets

, videos, passenger rights ambassador

, etc

...

6Transport 

## Passenger R ights Poster E xample

- 1

7Transport 

## Passenger Rights Poster Example

- 2

8Transport 

## Passenger Rights Poster Example

- 3

9Transport 

### Passenger Rights Poster Example

- 4

• 20000 posters to be displayed in transport hubs until 2015

10Transport 

## Passenger Rights Poster Example

- 5

• 1 million leaflets to be distributed until 2015

11Transport 

## Building partnerships . A reason to

display posters?

1. L aw obligation to inform passengers

2. 20 years of collaboration

3. Regular Official meetings in Brussels

4. Learn from experience

5. Listen to all actors involved

6. Rights go local

12Transport



## Thank you

• Your Passenger Rights :

• ec.europa.eu/

passenger

- rights

• Europe Direct : 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11

• European Consumer Centre :

• ec.europa.eu/

consumers

/ ecc

13
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date: March 27, 2006                         /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                President
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DO UG L AS L E E HO RN, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. L A R R Y C A R T E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 15432 D . C . N o . 0 4 - C V - 0 2 0 1 4 - S MM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona S t e phe n M . M c N a m e e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D ou gl as L ee H orn, an A ri zona st at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e nta w a r di ng $33, 311. 56 i n a tt orne y ’ s f e e s a nd c os t s t o D e f

e nda nt L e v in e p u r s u a n t to 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 8 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . 

# FI LED DE C 29 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD S/ Res ea r ch 08- 15432 2 § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f

o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . Mi l lerv. L . A . C ou nt y B d. of E du c. , 8 2 7 F . 2 d6 1 7 , 6 1 9 (9 th C i r. 1 9 8 7 ). W e v acat e an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. W e v a c a te th e ju d g m e n t a w a r d in g a tto rn e y ’s f e e s a n dc o s ts b e c au s e th e r e is no i ndi c a t i on i n the r e c or d tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtc ons i de r e d H orn’ s pr o s e s t a tus a n df in a n c ia l r e s o u r c e s . Se e i d. at62 0, 62 1 (re qu i ri ng di stri ctcourt s t o con si der a pl a i nt i f f’ s pr o s e s t a tus i n de t e rm i ni ng w he the rt o a w a r d a tt orne y ’ s f e e s t o a defe nd antun der 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 8, and t o con si der the pl ai nt i ff’ s f i nanci al re source s i n d et erm i ni ng the am ou ntof the aw ar d). T h e p a rtie s s h a ll b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.
Beth DALTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2850 CASE NO.: 2D18-3310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
On March 19, 2009, the defendant moved for an extension of time in which to 1

respond to Mr. Pourbabai’s objections to Magistrate Judge Facciola’s Second Report. The Court

will deny that motion because it concludes that no further briefing is necessary.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

BEN POURBABAI, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1554 (PLF)

)

RAY LAHOOD, Secretary, )

United States Department of Transportation, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Ben Pourbabai’s objections to

Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola’s Second Report and Recommendation of February 20, 2009

(the “Second Report”). In the Second Report, Magistrate Judge Facciola recommends that this 1

Court grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Counts II, III, IV and V of

Mr. Pourbabai’s Amended Complaint on the ground that those claims – all under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended – are barred by the doctrines of issue and claim preclusion. 

See Second Report at 2. 

When a party files written objections to any part of the magistrate judge’s

recommendation with respect to a dispositive motion, the Court considers de novo those portions

of the recommendation to which objections have been made, and “may accept, reject, or modify

the recommended disposition[.]” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). 
2

Having reviewed de novo not only the Second Report (and in particular those

portions to which Mr. Pourbabai objects) but also the complicated procedural history of Mr.

Pourbabai’s case, all of the parties’ previous filings and the relevant case law, the Court

concludes that the Second Report reaches the correct result. Thus, the Court will adopt and

approve the Second Report and grant judgment for the defendant on Counts II, III, IV and V of

Mr. Pourbabai’s Amended Complaint. As the Court previously dismissed or transferred all of

Mr. Pourbabai’s other claims, see Pourbabai v. Mineta, Civil Action No. 04-1554, Order at 1-2

(D.D.C. Sept. 27, 2007), the Court will also dismiss this case in its entirety.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued this same day.

SO ORDERED. 

/s/ 

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: March 25, 2009
BLUE RAY'Z HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, LLC, Appellant, v. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION and E.R. Reeves Corp., d/b/a All Seasons Air Conditioning, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-3374

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.