alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Desert climate and soils

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(5)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - (-)arizona(10)
              - california(14)
              - colorado(3)
              - idaho(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(4)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(5)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(5)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)
              - 2023(1)

Podcasts        September 26, 2021        USGS Outstanding in the Field: Biocrusts (Ep. 9)

Featured Films and Shorts        February 21, 2010        The Heat is On: Desert Tortoises and Survival (Full video)

Featured Films and Shorts        July 30, 2017        A Record of Change: Science and Elder Observations on the Navajo N.

Presentations and Events        August 17, 2022        Temporal changes in rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for debris flows in a recovering burned area

publication        October 15, 1950        Dispersion of copper from the San Manuel copper deposit, Pinal County, Arizona

staff profileKaj Williams, Ph.D.

Presentations and Events        March 25, 2021        PubTalk 3/2021 - A Jaguar's Field of Dreams

staff profileSeth Munson, Ph.D.

Project        September 18, 2023        New Tools for Modern Land Management Decisions

Presentations and Events        September 22, 2020        Hydrography Updates for USFS Southwestern Region in AZ and NM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5810 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5810

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 11, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude certain cotton 
            futures contracts from coverage under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CONTRACTS FROM COVERAGE 
              UNDER UNITED STATES COTTON FUTURES ACT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c)(1) of the United States Cotton 
Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``except that any cotton futures contract'' 
        and inserting the following: ``except that--
                    ``(A) any cotton futures contract''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) any cotton futures contract that permits 
                tender of cotton grown outside of the United States is 
                excluded from the coverage of this paragraph and 
                section to the extent that the cotton grown outside of 
                the United States is tendered for delivery under the 
                cotton futures contract.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to cotton futures

              

 contracts entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merci, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Jose Acevedo, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: November 12, 2008  /s/ Jose Acevedo Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Mark H. McKinnies, as Chief Financial Officer of ADA-ES, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mark H. McKinnies
|Name:                 |  | Mark H. McKinnies      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | March 28, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              97,826
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       58,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   195,194
<PP&E>                                             177,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                      62,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     353,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              264,445
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        562,750
<COMMON>                                           221,729
<OTHER-SE>                                        (723,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       353,765
<SALES>                                            880,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   880,868
<CGS>                                              870,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,246,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (391,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (413,749)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6691

GEORGE CLEVELAND, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:17-cv-02922-RBH)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter 

or amend a prior order dismissing Cleveland’s notice of removal of his state court 

proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Cleveland v. South Carolina, No. 8:17-cv-02922-RBH (D.S.C. May 7, 

2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Jerome BANES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 25, 2018

Jerome Banes, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Gayla Grant and Eric Salvatore Giunta, Assistant General Counsels, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because Petitioner seeks a belated appeal of an order entered in a civil proceeding, the petition for belated appeal is denied. *See**Powell v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.* , 727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Wolf, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
# C_2020049EN.01000601.xml

| 13.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9416 — Bolloré Group/M7 Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 49/06)

On 5 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9416. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9416. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Providence Resources, Inc. for the quarterly period endedSeptember
 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gilbert
 Burciaga, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
 that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November14,
 2008

/s/
 Gilbert Burciaga

Gilbert
 Burciaga

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This
 certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
 required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
 Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this
 report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and
 furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



40
Exhibit 21.0

List of Subsidiaries

Registrant: Jefferson Bancshares, Inc.



|                                     |  |                      |  |                                      
|------------------------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                         |  | Percentage Ownership |  | Jurisdiction orState of Incorporation
|                                     |  |                     
|Jefferson Federal Bank               |  | 100%                 |  | United States                        
|                                     |  |                     
|State of Franklin Statutory Trust II |  | 100%                 |  | Delaware                             
|                                     |  |                     
|Jefferson Federal Bank               |  |                      |  |                                      
|                                     |  |                     
|Subsidiaries                         |  | Percentage Ownership |  | Jurisdiction orState of Incorporation
|                                     |  |                     
|State of Franklin Real Estate, Inc.  |  | 100%                 |  | Tennessee
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00092

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I .D.C.,

A CHILD

From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. CV315

- 17

ORDER

The Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Judgment in this case were issued on
November 28, 2018. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment terminating Appellant’s
parental rights to I.D.C. Appellant then filed a mot ion to alter or amend judgment and a
motion to amend or supplement his motion to alter or amend judgment. We granted
Appellant’s motion to supplement and denied his motion to alter or amend judgment

that we construe d as a motion for rehearing under Rule 49.1 of the Rules of Appellate

Procedure. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1.In re I.D.C. Page 2

Appellant has now filed a document he entitles “Objection.” It is unclear what
relief Appellant seeks other than a reversal of our opinion in this case, which request we
will deny.
Appellant also appears to reiterate his request to have a criminal conviction
overturned and a judgment in a se parate termination proceeding reversed. We also deny
this request.
Appellant’s remedy from an unfavorable judgment in this Court is to file a petition

for revie w with the Texas Supreme Court.
We deny Appellant’s motion entitled “Objection.”

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Neill Motion denied Order issued and filed March 6, 2019
**-~---------------------------..__,__.Iii**
Sam Azad City Manager Mark Lovin Director of Aviation

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer ! city of p bl M . I A" 

## A ue o emona 1rport -p; i' 

# PUEBLO 31201BryanCircle,Ste.200



# III ::-::;{._":": ;·:-,·C\!T**o~:** Pueblo, 

### co 8100 I

# ~~ ·-:

# .~·;:;,~5.:..:,=;-lt':**•Phone** (719) 553-2760

### ~ colorado

### :·~·r''Y-**-'-~** \·-;.;;:,: •• Fax (719) 553-2761

- v.J:"-...:.. 

### :J.- .::1,.-;,iJi\J DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION

March 23,2015 7'll::; .-)I ·-**~** '·- i.:
... " Q " !'· 

# ··s·. r-\ t I· !.}

..... '"

. -=**~** -- :,.....,...- --·**-~-** -**--~~---** Chief, Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Schlemmer; In response to the recent bid, Docket DOT-OST-1999-6589, for Great Lakes Airlines to provide essential air service at Pueblo Memorial Airport, and in compliance with provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012" (Public Law No. 112-95), the City of Pueblo is prepared to contribute to the awarded airline subsidy 2.5% of the requested $1,776,448 assistance, or $44,411 for service years 2015-2016. Thank you.

# --::et~~ Sam Azad, City Manager City of Pueblo

:'
STATE EX REL. Chad M. COOPER v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1634

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied. The document request is subject to the provisions of the Public Records Law. See, e.g., R.S. 44:31.
Power of Attorney



 EXHIBIT 4.94 
 Power of Attorney 
 I, Wang Lei Lei, a PRC citizen whose ID number is 110103197304020437, hereby irrevocably
authorize Ms. Su Yingqi to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 Ms. Su Ying Qi are authorized to, on my behalf,
exercise all the voting rights as a shareholder of Beijing Lei Ting Wan Jun Network Technology Company Limited (“the Company”) by laws and by articles of association in shareholders meeting of the Company with all powers, including but not
limited to, sale or transfer of all or part of the shares in the Company, assignment and appointment of the directors and general manager of the Company as an authorized representative. 
 The above-mentioned authorization and attorney are based on the following assumptions: Ms. Su Ying Qi is an employee of Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co.,
Ltd. approves of such authorization and attorney. Once Ms. Sun Ying Qi is no longer employed by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. or Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. gives a written notice of replacing its attorney, I
shall forthwith recall the attorney and authorization herein and appoint/authorize other employees assigned by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. to exercise all the voting rights owed by a shareholder of the Company in the shareholders
meeting on our behalf. 
 The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years from the execution date unless the Business Operation Agreement among Beijing Lahiji
Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing Lei Ting Wan Jun Network Technology Company Limited, Wang Lei Lei and I is terminated before expiry whatsoever. 
  

			
	Wang Lei Lei
		
	Signature:	 	  
	
	Date: 16 January, 2006

  

 1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with this Annual Report of Mortgagebrokers.com Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Haditaghi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Alex Haditaghi*

ALEX HADITAGHIChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Dated: March 31, 2005

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Jacques ARMAND, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Ginou Armand AMISY, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1230

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Earth

Filters

              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(8)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(2)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(13)
              - colorado(6)
              - delaware(2)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - (-)iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(4)
              - michigan(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - south dakota(23)
              - texas(1)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(4)
              - west virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileBob Klaver, PhD