alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 63-001-HLW; ASLBP No. 09-892-HLW-CAB04]

                    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in the above-captioned ASLBP No. 09-892-HLW-CAB04 proceeding is hereby reconstituted by designating Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III to serve as Presiding Officer in place of Administrative Judge Paul S. Ryerson, who retired from Federal service on November 30, 2024.[1] 

                    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-filing rule.                     *See*10 CFR 2.302.                

Rockville, Maryland

Dated: December 3, 2024.

Edward R. Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

# Footnotes

1.                             Judge Ryerson was appointed as an Administrative Judge on the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel in 2008. Since 2012, he has served as the Panel's Associate Chief Administrative Judge. In all his adjudicatory and leadership roles, Judge Ryerson served with surpassing distinction.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-28773 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Michael ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1157

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1

                             tds (TELEMEDICINE) INC.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18.U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Roger Coomber, the Chief Executive Officer of tds
(Telemedicine) Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this Certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

-     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the
9th day of June 2003.


                                        /s/ Roger Coomber
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Roger Coomber
                                        Chief Executive Officer
David King DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daisy RICHARDS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James E. Hurd, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v. James E. RISH, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3013

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 31, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 31, 2018

George V. Matlock, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James E. Rish, pro se, Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant appeals a Final Judgment entered in Appellee's favor on several claims, including unjust enrichment, arising from an unenforceable oral contract for the sale of real property. We agree with Appellant that the trial court's determination that equity did not compel repayment of funds paid to Appellee is unsupported by the evidence. *See* *Golden v. Woodward* , 15 So.3d 664, 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that an unjust enrichment action exists to prevent " 'the wrongful retention of a benefit, or the retention of money or property of another, in violation of good conscience and fundamental principles of justice or equity' " (citation omitted) ); *see also* *Cole Taylor Bank v. Shannon* , 772 So.2d 546, 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (applying the competent, substantial evidence standard of review in reviewing a trial court's ruling in favor of a defendant in an unjust enrichment *693action). We, therefore, reverse the Final Judgment on the issue of unjust enrichment and remand with directions that the trial court enter judgment in Appellant's favor on that claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,370
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,470
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,370
<SALES>                                          6,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,707
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,671)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,671)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.016)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.016)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(25)
              - multimedia_audio(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_video(28)
              - multimedia_video-149194(25)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_news-149250(4)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - virginia(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        September 26, 2023        National Preparedness Month Spotlight on Earthquakes [Part 4]

Featured Films and Shorts        September 27, 2023        Prince William Sound Landslide Hazards Project Overview

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 2020        USGS End of Year Accomplishments 2020
Robin TOLER v. CABLE LOCK FOUNDATION REPAIR a/k/a Olshan Foundation Repair

Roger D. Anderson, Terri T. Anderson, and Theresa Leuschner v. Laborde Construction Industries, LLC, Catamount Constructors, Inc., LMK Baton Rouge Construction, LLC and The Standard of Baton Rouge, LLC

NO. 2018-CC-1111

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.
# C_2020332EN.01000401.xml

| 8.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2020/C 332/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 10.9.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 10.9.2020-31.12.2020 |
| Member State | European Union (All Member States) |
| Stock or Group of stocks | WIT/N3NO. |
| Species | Witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) |
| Zone | NAFO 3NO |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 16/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

10.9.2020

Duration

10.9.2020-31.12.2020

Member State

European Union (All Member States)

Stock or Group of stocks

WIT/N3NO.

Species

Witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus)

Zone

NAFO 3NO

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

16/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7160

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID CORNELL SPENCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

Chief District Judge. (5:07-cr-00289-FL-1; 5:09-cv-00161-FL)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Cornell Spence, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Cornell Spence seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Spence has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1948

In Re: EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:04-cr-00126-NCT-1; 1:08-cv-00261-NCT-PTS)

Submitted: May 24, 2011 Decided: June 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Lavon McNeill, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Lavon McNeill petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. Our review of the district 

court’s docket reveals that the district court denied McNeill’s

motion on March 25, 2011. Accordingly, because the district 

court has recently adjudicated McNeill’s Rule 59(e) motion, we 

deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant McNeill’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13-621V

(E-Filed: June 13, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

LATASHA GEORGE, * UNPUBLISHED

* 

 Petitioner, * Special Master

* Hamilton-Fieldman

v. * 

* Decision on Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * 

HUMAN SERVICES, * 

* 

Respondent. * .

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Damon L. Beard, Townsley Law Firm, Lake Charles, LA, for Petitioner,

Gordon E. Shemin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION1(ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,

2

the 

undersigned issued a decision on March 24, 2014. On June 13, 2014, the parties filed a 

stipulation concerning attorneys’ fees and costs in this matter. The parties’ stipulation 

requests a total payment of $47,500.00, representing total attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Pursuant to General Order #9, Petitioner stated that she has not incurred any reimbursable 

costs in pursuit of her claim. 

 

1

The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States 

Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 

Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 

3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within 

which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party (1) that is trade 

secret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that 

are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be available to 

the public. Id.

2

The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa-10 et seq. (2006). 
2

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a 

reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems 

reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the amount of $47,500.00, 

in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, 

Damon L. Beard, Esq. 

In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of 

the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment 

in accordance herewith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL GAS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Jim Glavas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







| | JIM GLAVASJim Glavas
Chief Executive Officer
September 12, 2006
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

















---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2016 

Mr. NEWHOUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12569, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

9 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

10 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:32 Jun 16, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5483.IH H5483

emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5483 IH

1 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

2 under that section, extend the time period during which 

3 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

4 the project for up to three consecutive 2-year periods from 

5 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

6 by the Commission. 

7 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

8 period required for commencement of construction of the 

9 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall 

11 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its expira12 tion and the first extension authorized under subsection 

13 (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002)**        In connection with the annual report onFrom 10-K ofNorthrim BanCorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the yearended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph M.Schierhorn, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify as the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 ofthe United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods    indicated.Date: March 13, 2006/s/ Joseph M. SchierhornJoseph M. SchierhornSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jason REZENDES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0648

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Damian David SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

Damian David Santiago, Indiantown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Damian David Santiago appeals the final order entered by the trial court granting in part and denying in part his motion seeking post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order in all aspects, except one. The trial court erred in modifying Santiago's sentence without holding a resentencing hearing.

Santiago was sixteen years old at the time he committed his offenses. He entered a plea to the offense of second-degree murder with a firearm and was sentenced to a term of thirty-five years' imprisonment. He filed a post-conviction motion arguing that, due to his status as a juvenile offender, his sentence was unconstitutional and, thus, he was entitled to receive judicial review of his sentence as well as a full resentencing hearing. The trial court granted the motion in part, amended the sentencing documents to allow for a juvenile sentence review hearing, but denied the request for a resentencing hearing based upon the conclusion that the sentence was not unconstitutional because it was not a de facto life sentence. The court erred in so ruling because the constitutionality of a juvenile offender's lengthy term-of-years sentence is not solely dependent on whether a de facto life sentence has been imposed. *See* *Peterson v. State*, 193 So.3d 1034, 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), *rev. denied*, SC16-1211, 2017 WL 2705649 (Fla. June 23, 2017) (holding that a term-of-years sentence, which does not afford a non-homicide juvenile offender a meaningful opportunity for early release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation, violates the Eighth Amendment, requiring resentencing); *accord* *Tarrand v. State*, 199 So.3d 507 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). We have also held that it is error to modify a juvenile defendant's sentence to allow for a review hearing without also holding a resentencing hearing. *See* *Katwaroo v. State*, 237 So.3d 446 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's ruling amending the sentencing documents to provide for a judicial review hearing, but reverse and remand for the court to conduct a full resentencing hearing. We also certify conflict with *Pedroza v. State*, 244 So.3d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) which certified conflict with *Katwaroo* and *Tarrand*.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions. CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

ORFINGER, PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.