alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 9th 

day of July, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Melvin Wayne Richardson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00234-CR

Trial Court No. F06-62371-N

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Melvin Wayne Richardson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 3rd day of September, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5626 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5626

    To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 
  requirement for 3 months of retroactive coverage under the Medicaid 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 5, 2016

Mr. Mullin (for himself and Mr. Guthrie) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 
  requirement for 3 months of retroactive coverage under the Medicaid 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 3-MONTH RETROACTIVE COVERAGE UNDER THE 
              MEDICAID PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) State plan requirements.--Section 1902(a)(34) of the 
        Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(34)) is amended by 
        striking ``in or after the third month before the month in 
        which he made application'' and inserting ``in or after the 
        month in which the individual made application''.
            (2) Definition of medical assistance.--Section 1905(a) of 
        the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) is amended by 
        striking ``in or after the third month before the month in 
        which the recipient makes application for assistance'' and 
        inserting ``in or after the month in which the recipient makes 
        application for assistance''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to medical assistance with respect to individuals whose 
eligibility for such assistance is based on an application for such 
assistance made (or deemed to be made) after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - (-)products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

Software Release        August 31, 2023        Scale-dependent population drivers inform avian management in a declining saline lake ecosystem.

Software Release        June 7, 2023        Modeling widespread declines in walleye recruitment following zebra mussel invasion in Minnesota lakes

Software Release        February 7, 2024        Aquaculture and Irrigation Water Use Model 2.0 Software

Podcasts        July 31, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part I

Podcasts        March 13, 2012        Climate Connections: Questions from Glacier National Park, MT (Ep 4)

Podcasts        March 14, 2012        Advancing ARMI: In Search for Chytrid Fungus

Podcasts        April 20, 2011        Climate Connections: Visiting Students in North Carolina (Episode 1)

Podcasts        August 18, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part 2

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology

Software Release        August 26, 2012        Central Valley Hydrologic Model (CVHM)
Exhibit 32.1   Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven P. Grimes as Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and James W. Kleifges as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Name:Steven P. GrimesChief Executive Officer, President,
Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:February 26, 2010Name:James W. KleifgesChief Accounting OfficerDate:February 26, 2010
William AYERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1736

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT  32

                              BLUE MOON GROUP, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Moon Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Muzio, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/  MICHAEL MUZIO
--------------------
Michael Muzio
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
 (Principal Executive Officer)

November 12, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10266

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NATIVIDAD SILVA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-131-G

- - - - - - - - - -

January 6, 1998

Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Natividad Silva, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel; that the Government unlawfully interfered

with his ability to interview witnesses; that Counts 4 and 6 of

the indictment were multiplicitous; that the indictment was

insufficient to put him on notice of the true nature of the
No. 97-10266

-2-

offense charged in Count 6; and that the evidence was

insufficient to support his conviction under Count 6.

Silva’s ineffective-assistance claims are without merit. He

contends that counsel was ineffective in failing to provide the

sentencing court with advance notice of Silva’s request for an

evidentiary hearing. Because counsel was nevertheless permitted

to present evidence on Silva’s behalf at sentencing, Silva has

failed to demonstrate any prejudice resulting from the alleged

deficiency, and his claim fails. Strickland v. Washington, 466

U.S. 668, 687 (1984). 

Silva’s remaining ineffective-assistance claims, raised for

the first time on this appeal, are subject at most to plain-error

review. See United States v. McPhail, 112 F.3d 197, 199 (5th

Cir. 1997). All of his contentions involve factual questions

which this court will not address for the first time on appeal

and which, by their nature, do not rise to the level of obvious

error. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70 F3d 21, 23 (5th

Cir. 1995).

Silva’s contention that the Government unlawfully interfered

with his ability to interview witnesses is likewise unavailing. 

Even if it is assumed that his claim is a constitutional one so

as to be cognizable in a § 2255 motion, Silva makes no connection

between the claim and the voluntary nature of his guilty plea. 

Inasmuch as he fails to do so, the claim is waived by his guilty

plea. See Taylor v. Whitley, 933 F.2d 325, 327 (5th Cir. 1991).
No. 97-10266

-3-

Silva’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge is also waived

by his guilty plea. See United States v. Broome, 628 F.2d 403,

405 (5th Cir. 1980); see also Kelley v. Alabama, 636 F.2d 1082,

1083-84 (5th Cir. 1981). Silva’s challenges to the indictment

are procedurally barred. United States v. Shaid, 937 F.3d 228,

232 (5th Cir. 1991)(en banc). Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
Sabine Maria FRANCISCO, Guardian for Anneliese Jain Francisco, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. Tia Anneliese FRANCISCO, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3326, 2D18-2596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Scott L. SORENSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3991

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Henry HOLLINESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 99263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28992]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than December 26, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to [email protected]:
    1. Oliver Beaman Triplett, IV, George Beaman Triplett, Olivia 
Triplett Harrell, and the Bank of Forest Employee Stock Ownership 
Trust, all of Forest, Mississippi; as a group acting in concert, to 
retain voting shares of First Forest Corporation, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of Bank of Forest, both of Forest, 
Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Benjamin McDonough,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-28992 Filed 12-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 31


I, Karen Christensen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ,and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
 of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2003-3.

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing agreement or similar agreement, for inclusions in
these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
 agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement: and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche
Bank National Trust Company, the Trustee.

Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc.

By: /s/: Karen Christensen
   Name: Karen Christensen
   Title: EVP
   Date: March 15, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**
 
 **PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Michael Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SPECTRE INDUSTRIES, INC. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SPECTRE INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
  ****By:
/s/ Michael YoungName: Michael YoungTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
[Cite as State ex rel. Spates v. Donnelly , 2015-Ohio-111.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101840

STATE EX REL. LAVELLE A. SPATES

RELATOR

vs.

HONORABLE MICHAEL P. DONNELLY

RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 478632 Order No. 479930

RELEASE DATE: January 9, 2015FOR RELATOR

Lavelle A. Spates, pro se #641-474 Trumbull Correctional Camp P.O. Box 640 Leavittsburg, Ohio 44430

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Justice Center - 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J.:{¶1} Lavelle A. Spates has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Spates seeks an

order from this court that requires Judge Michael P. Donnelly to render a ruling with regard to a

“motion for an order to establish paym ent plan for court costs” filed in State v. Spates , Cuyahoga

C.P. Nos. CR-11-552263 and CR-13-571384. Judge D onnelly has filed a motion for summary

judgment, which we grant for the following reasons.

{¶2} Attached to Judge Donnelly’s motion for summa ry judgment is a copy of a judgment

entry, journalized on September 19, 2014, which de monstrates that a ruling has been rendered

with regard to Spates’s motion to establish a payment plan for court costs. Thus, the complaint

for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common

Pleas , 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723 (1996); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman , 6 Ohio St.3d 5,

450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).

{¶3} In addition, Spates’s complaint for a writ of mandamus is defective. Spates’s

complaint failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45( B)(1)(a), which requires that his complaint

contain a sworn affidavit that speci fies the details of his claim. State ex rel. Hopson v.

Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 135 Ohio St.3d 456, 2013-Ohio-1911, 989 N.E.2d 49;

State ex rel. Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 123 Ohio St.3d 124,

2009-Ohio-4688, 914 N.E.2d 402. Spates has also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A),

which mandates that he pr ovide this court with a sworn affida vit that contains a description of

each civil action or appeal of a civil action filed in the previous five years in any state or federal

court. State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnell , 126 Ohio St.3d 511, 2010-Ohio-4726, 935 N.E.2d

830. Finally, Spates has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C)(1), which ma ndates that he file

a statement setting forth his inmate account “for each of the preceding six months, as certified by

the institutional cashier.” State ex rel. Castro v. Corrigan , 129 Ohio St.3d 342,2011-Ohio-4059, 952 N.E.2d 497.

{¶4} Accordingly, we grant Judge Donnelly’s motion for summary judgment. Costs to

Judge Donnelly. Costs waived. Th e court directs the clerk of cour ts to serve all parties with

notice of this judgment and the date of en try upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶5} Writ denied.

_____________________________________________ KENNETH A. ROCCO, JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., and EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Petition for Exemption 

East Fountain Enterprises 

LLC Regarding the Flight of 

a DJI Phantom Vision + 

UAS

East Fountain Enterprises LLC

20205 Beaver Dam Rd

Lewes, DE 19958

www.EastFountain.com

Morgan East

Owner/Partner

Morgan@EastFountain.com

302-396-1590

Timothy Lafontaine

Owner/Partner

Tim@EastFountain.com

302-344-4503
We propose to safely operate the DJI Phantom Vision + UAS, hereafter referred to 

as the “Phantom”, to conduct aerial photography and videography under controlled 

circumstances for homeowners, realtors, home builders, home contractors, and/or home 

inspectors for real estate marketing and the inspection of home exteriors.

Attached is a complete spec Sheet (Spec Sheet.PDF). The Phantom weighs less 

than 3 lbs, has a max speed of 15 m/s (33.54 mph), uses GPS and compass navigation 

(with live readings of airspeed, elevation, and position) to a ground based remote 

monitoring system, and has an electronic power supply. It's operating frequency is 5.728 

GHz-5.85 GHz with a communication distance of CE Compliance: 400m; FCC 

Compliance: 800m. 

Regarding safety and “lost-link”, the Phantom has an automated pilot control 

system that will maintain its stability and return it to the original launch position safely 

with a predictable, precoordinated flight maneuver. The Phantom will be flown, in 

accordance with the AMA, at least 25 feet away from any person or established flight 

line. Also, only Morgan East and Timothy Lafontaine (whom both have over 20 hours of 

flight time with the Phantom) will be permitted to operate the Phantom.

By using the Preflight Guidlines in the DJI Pilot Training Guide 

http://goo.gl/JsnmEM and the attached AMA Safety Code (AMA Safety Code.PDF) we 

are confident in our ability to fly safely during daylight hours with a limitation of no less 

than 400 ft distance to a cloud ceiling and not within 3 miles of an airport while being 

confined to our clients property (by permission obtained prior to flight) with a flight 

ceiling of 200 ft. We will also operate as a two man team. One spotter and one pilot 

while maintaining VLOS of the Phantom at all times. Right of way will always be 

yielded to any manned aircraft that enters shared space. We request an exemption to the 

necessity of a pilot certification due to the constrictions of the flight space in use (clients 

property boundary with a 200ft ceiling)

Relief is requested from:

14 CFR Part 21 ss H Airworthiness Certificates

14 CFR Part 36 Noise standards

14 CFR Part 61 Requirement for a Pilot Certificate

14 CFR Part 91.119 Altitude Restrictions

14 CFR Part 91.121 Altimeter Settings

14 CFR Part 91.405 Maintenance Required

14 CFR Part 91.407 Operation After Maintenance 

14 CFR Part 91.409 Inspections

14 CFR Part 91.417 Maintenance Records