xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020440EN.01006001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/60 |

---

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions – SME Strategy

(2020/C 440/11)

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | Rapporteur: | Eddy VAN HIJUM (NL/EPP), Member of the Council of Overijssel province | | Reference documents: | Annual report on European SMEs. Research & Development and Innovation by SMEs Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An SME Strategy for a sustainable and digital Europe COM(2020) 103 final | |

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

THE EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | recognises the importance of small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU economy, as they account for 99,8 % of all companies in the non-financial business sector, two thirds of total employment, and 56,4 % of the total value added generated by the non-financial business sector [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0001); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | understands that the transition to a sustainable and digital economy cannot take place without the commitment of the entrepreneurs and business families who own and manage the 25 million SMEs in Europe and underlines the need to help SMEs grasp new opportunities, respond robustly to a changing business environment and, in so doing, create sustainable growth and jobs and strengthen Europe’s long-term competitiveness in these transitions; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 3. | supports the EU in promoting a level playing field for SMEs by reducing the regulatory burden, improving access to the Single Market and increasing the availability of financial services; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 4. | emphasises that the region or municipality is the natural habitat of SMEs, which functions as an ecosystem where SMEs engage in networks tying them to their supportive infrastructure, including labour markets, educational and research institutes, buyers and suppliers, financial and business services, chambers of commerce and industry and local and regional authorities; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5. | warmly welcomes, therefore, the Commission’s 10 March 2020 communication An SME Strategy for a sustainable and digital Europe, and shares its stated objectives of reducing the administrative and regulatory burden for SMEs, improving the access to finance, as well as its commitment to encouraging SMEs to engage in the transition to sustainability and digitalisation; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 6. | realises that since the presentation of the SME Strategy, the world has changed significantly. The economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to strongly impact all regions and SMEs in Europe. But the crisis should also be seen as an historic opportunity to align the economic recovery with the standards of the Green Deal, sustainability and digitalisation, which must be integral to any SME strategy. A recovery plan for SMEs must be delivered with local and regional authorities in the lead, to be responsive to the diverse needs of SMEs and the varying economic and institutional conditions across Europe. EU recovery measures will be most efficient if synchronised with regional and national initiatives and compatible with local ecosystems. Coordination and an exchange of best practice is therefore crucial; |

Addressing all SMEs

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 7. | believes, therefore, that the SME Strategy, despite including relevant priorities and measures, lacks a vison to fully address the diverse needs of SMEs. Such a vision should place strong emphasis on ensuring a level playing field for SMEs in a completed and deepened Single Market and should encourage integration and complementarity between measures on all levels of government, including a strong regional dimension to ensure a place-based approach tailored to the needs of local SMEs; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 8. | shares the Commission’s view on diversity amongst SMEs, but believes, however, that this diversity is insufficiently operationalised in the proposed measures. The strategy of the Commission primarily focuses on start-ups, scale-ups and high-tech SMEs. Although these groups are crucial for growth and innovation, this does not mean that traditional and family firms are passive followers; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 9. | deplores the Commission’s characterisation of ‘traditional firms’, when referring to the established and embedded SMEs, the ‘grown-ups’ of the SME community. These embedded firms will be a stabilising force for local economies and communities in the current crisis and create long-term sustainable growth; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 10. | recognises the strong links between SMEs and their host regions; especially the grown-ups which are locally embedded and strive for long-term survival. Often, but not always, these firms are family-owned and are more inclined to take social responsibility, because their social capital is tied to their local reputation. Their owners, managers and employees can become ambassadors for the sustainability transition and participate in structural collaborations with regional and local authorities; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 11. | urges the Commission to develop policies addressing the needs of family businesses in Europe, including succession and transgenerational entrepreneurship. Even though family businesses play an important role in our economy, policymakers pay them scant attention. This blind spot remains despite the recent remarks of President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and earlier initiatives. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 12. | stresses that family-owned firms are the most common enterprise, accounting for around 70 % of all firms in Europe [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0002). The ownership structure defines, to a large extent, how and by whom an SME is managed, as well as the business and investment strategy of the firm. This ownership perspective, however, is largely missing within existing SME policies; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 13. | calls upon the Commission to continue and expand the support of statistical surveys in the Competitiveness of SMEs programme (COSME). To enable researchers and statistical agencies to fully capture the diverse ownership structures of Europe’s SMEs and analyse important international and interregional differences. In this regards, considers it necessary to ensure that data is collected in a way that takes into account gender issues; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 14. | highlights that family firms are disproportionally concentrated in regions close to the European average in terms of gross domestic product and that these regions are facing a ‘middle-income trap’ [(3)](#ntr3-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0003). According to the seventh Report on Cohesion, growth has been slower in these middle-income regions, compared to leading regions and regions coming from a disadvantaged position; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 15. | stresses that SME policies should place more priority on involving established SMEs and addressing their needs including adaptation to new technologies, business transfers, internationalisation, access to finance and professionalisation of management and reporting. Existing one-stop-shops strongly embedded in regional ecosystems should be used as access points for providing locally accessible services for SMEs, including advice on a wide range of programmes, measures and funding instruments originating from the EU, national and regional level; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 16. | invests in strong regional ecosystems to be firmly connected on a European level by international knowledge exchange between SMEs and between regional governments, in particular by means of interregional investment in innovation. Welcomes the smart specialisation strategies and initiatives such as the S3 Platform, the Vanguard Initiative and various collaboration projects among the European Entrepreneurial Regions (EER), which have proven their value and deserve continued support, including the establishment of a specific financing framework to drive them; |

Capacity building for digitalisation and sustainability

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 17. | notes the Commission’s plan to strengthen the European Resource Efficiency Knowledge Centre and the plan to appoint dedicated sustainability advisers within the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 18. | is concerned that these European initiatives are not anchored within the regional infrastructure for SMEs. A positive exception is the Commission’s support of a dense network of up to 240 Digital Innovation Hubs (DIH); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 19. | highlights that SMEs active in the ICT sector can function as digital enablers in a regional setting by facilitating the growing group of digitally dependent SMEs. The digitalHUB Aachen is an example of such an initiative [(4)](#ntr4-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0004); calls for promoting the creation of more SME Alliances for Artificial Intelligence in strategic value chains; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 20. | urges SMEs to operate in a more energy-efficient way, reduce their energy consumption, boost the production and use of renewable energy and embrace a circular production process in order to reduce costs and build a competitive and sustainable economy. However, SMEs, and micro-enterprises, should not incur a disproportionate share of the costs associated with the sustainability transition, nor should SMEs be exposed to unfair competition from third countries with lower environmental standards. In this regard, considers that a carbon border adjustment mechanism should be foreseen to make sure that there will be no unfair competition from third countries; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 21. | emphasises that the human capital agenda for SMEs, including programmes for green and digital skills, should not only be catered to workers but also to entrepreneurs, owners and managers, calls for the Commission’s revised Skills Agenda for Europe to adequately take account of these concerns. These entrepreneurs, owners and managers do not only decide on strategic priorities, but also shape the learning environment within their firms; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 22. | proposes that training take place in a peer-to-peer setting with a mediating role for the regional triple helix infrastructure. It is of crucial importance that entrepreneurs, owners, managers and employees of SMEs have access to lifelong learning programmes at universities, vocational schools, other vocational training institutions and field labs. A comprehensive human capital agenda for SMEs that also factors in gender issues can strengthen both highly innovative regions and regions facing a brain drain; |

Reducing the regulatory and administrative burden and improving market access

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 23. | calls upon the Commission to improve its SME test during the impact assessment of proposed regulations, in line with the ‘think small first’ principle. A good SME test includes a differentiated cost-benefit analysis for SMEs and large companies as well as between different sizes and classes of SMEs, ample opportunities for stakeholder consultation, quantification of impact and strong oversight by the Regulatory Scrutiny Board; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 24. | welcomes the Commission’s initiative to develop an EU Start-up Nations Standard which has ambition to make Europe the most attractive start-up and scale-up continent. At the same time, it underlines the need to involve all levels of government in the initiative; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 25. | urges the Commission to adopt a more SME-friendly approach to ensure regulatory measures function as stimuli for innovation and do not hamper the activities of SMEs, as often happens with cross-border operations. This will lead to greater resilience and competitiveness instead of additional burden and compliance costs associated with international trade. In order to encourage SMEs to start reaping the benefits of fair free trade agreements, whilst also remaining sensitive to the risk of unfair competition from exports from third countries with less stringent environmental requirements, barriers need to be reduced in innovative and cost-efficient ways, for example through web-based, interactive tools such as a Rules of Origin Calculator for SMEs, or mechanisms for identifying product emissions (such as carbon border adjustment or ‘passports’); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 26. | is pleased with the continuation of regulatory fitness screening in the Fit for the Future platform. However, the role of the Committee of the Regions & SMEs needs to be enhanced compared to its predecessor, the REFIT platform. Many regulations affecting SMEs are implemented at the sub-national level and regulatory density, gold plating and issues with proportionality and subsidiarity are more visible at the bottom of the pyramid; in this regard, stresses that the Commission will also focus on removing red tape where it comes to cross-border cooperation, to make sure exchange of personnel between border regions is easily possible, also for short periods of time; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 27. | calls upon the Commission to actively consult SMEs and interest groups representing a wide variety of business models, including social economy enterprises, during impact assessments and regulatory screening of EU legislation. A positive regulatory environment for social entrepreneurship will improve the survival rate of social impact start-ups, encourage social innovation and promote corporate social responsibility, bringing us closer to the realisation of the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 28. | believes reducing barriers for SMEs related to the certification framework of the EU Cyber Security Act, including standards and technical specifications, is a necessary condition for SMEs to participate in the digital single market and for an innovative, sustainable and inclusive digital Europe that invests in data sharing and digital trust; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 29. | urges the Commission to ensure the implementation of SME friendly public procurement measures proposed in the 2014 public procurement directives, including the divide or explain principle, the reduced turnover requirements and the implementation of electronic solutions such as the European Single Procurement Document and E-Certis. Calls upon the Commission to develop a roadmap for the realisation of its ‘once only’ principle in the public procurement process, thereby reducing administrative burdens and increasing transparency; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 30. | underlines that local and regional authorities are actively working to improve SME access to public procurement whilst also promoting innovation and meeting societal challenges as launching customers. The city of Valladolid, the winner of a 2019 European Enterprise Promotion award, has developed a guide for SME-friendly public procurement, which can serve as an example [(5)](#ntr5-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0005); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 31. | wishes to invest in cross-border collaboration for the benefit of SMEs, including the integration of labour markets, cross-border business-to-business relations and cooperation between governments, knowledge institutions and SME support centres on both sides of the border. LRAs should play a particular role in such cross-border cooperation, because they are best placed to judge which measures are appropriate to boost their local economy and can quickly identify obstacles to cross-border cooperation. The SME strategy should provide the political support for LRAs to take prompt and decisive action here; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 32. | also intends to invest in interregional collaboration for SMEs and in cooperation between governments, knowledge institutions and support centres for SMEs in island and outermost regions; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 33. | expects that business transfers will be an urgent challenge in the coming years due to Europe’s ageing population. In Central and Eastern Europe, specifically, a large cohort of founders started their firm after 1989 and are now ready to hand over control to the second generation; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 34. | is aware of the risks during a business succession and therefore welcomes the Commission’s proposed measures on facilitating business transfer by developing a framework to support and promote business transfers across the EU; |

Access to finance

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 35. | draws the attention to the fact that more than 60 % of SMEs are not paid on time which is one of the main causes of SME bankruptcies. Therefore calls for the proper implementation of the Late Payment Directive and welcomes the proposed monitoring and enforcement tool. It stresses that SMEs should not bear the burden of late payments by large corporations and governments; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 36. | wants to stress that regional development agencies can contribute to the regional financial system, not only through participation in high-risk projects but also by securing the continuity of embedded firms, including their contribution to the human capital of a region. The European Investment Bank Group should recognise the beneficial societal impact of these embedded firms and prioritise their continuity with special equity financing instruments; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 37. | welcomes the integration of funds and the simplification of procedures in the InvestEU programme. However, urges that SME accessibility to financing should not be limited to the special window for SMEs but should also be a major priority in the other three windows; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 38. | worries about the debt levels of SMEs in Europe, especially of local SMEs situated in isolated and small-scale markets, such as those in the island and outermost regions. Policies aimed at improving SME access to equity financing should be strengthened at all levels of government, thereby reducing the unsustainable levels of debt financing. This concern is even greater when taking into account micro-enterprises that are unable to access financing through the financial system; |

Governance

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 39. | underlines that regional SME strategies are the responsibility of local and regional governments in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 40. | takes note of a stronger mandate for the SME Envoy network to govern the EU SME policies; calls upon national envoys to increase their interaction with regional authorities and other territorial actors; suggests that annual exchanges be organised between the EU SME Envoy and CoR members to take stock of the implementation of the SME Strategy at regional and local level; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 41. | stresses that pan-European, cross-border and interregional collaboration, knowledge exchange and learning are important elements of a coordinated European approach to EU policy implementation, which should be encouraged, facilitated and supported by EU programmes; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 42. | calls on to the Commission to improve the horizontal coordination of the SME strategy, thereby enhancing the impact of the strategy on the allocation of the European Structural and Investment Funds in the 2021-2027 period; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 43. | asks the Commission to ensure an increasing number of SMEs will benefit from EU funding, as funding for specific SME programmes such as COSME (EUR 2,3 billion in the 2014-2020 period) are modest in comparison to the European Structural and Investment Funds (EUR 460 billion). In direct and shared management programmes, such as the ERDF, regions successfully ensure the budget is programmed for the purpose of SMEs. Urges the Commission to develop specific programme lines and initiatives for SMEs in the Framework Programmes, such as Horizon Europe, and to make it easier for SMEs to access existing programmes of this kind; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 44. | highlights the vital importance of the ESIF in financing the sustainability transition and points out that the Committee of the Regions has called for 30 %, rather than 25 % as currently provided for, of all funding of the Structural Funds to be earmarked for Green Deal priorities; |

The road to SME recovery from COVID-19

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 45. | highlights that as a consequence of social distancing measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the transition of SMEs to digitalisation with a level playing field is even more urgent and crucial for their survival and for Europe’s overall strategic competitiveness; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 46. | draws attention to the European Commission’s capacity to react during the pandemic by designing programmes to support SMEs and to preserve employment, such as the SURE scheme. SMEs in the agrifood, services and tourism sector, which are among those which have suffered most during the pandemic, need flexible mechanisms to enable them to survive after the crisis, as the employment rate in Europe is closely linked to the survival of these businesses; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 47. | recognises the opportunities for significant progress on the sustainability transition arising from the restructuring, taking account of the size of firms and sectors affected by the crisis. This progress has to be supported with investment incentives for SMEs seizing the opportunities of green technologies and circular business models; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 48. | urges the Commission to monitor whether the impact of emergency support measures does not undermine its ambition to create a level playing field for SMEs. Moreover, calls upon the Commission to review the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the already increased levels of geopolitical instability; the disruption of trade flows and supply chains will potentially lead to the reshoring of economic activity, especially in the case of systemically important infrastructure including the medical products sector, and may offer opportunities and challenges for SMEs and regions. SMEs facing liquidity problems may be inclined to accept offers from strategic buyers, risking unwanted foreign interference in the economy; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 49. | expects the Commission to act prudently when the interests of SMEs and the European economy are harmed in these areas, for example as they did by temporarily modifying the state aid rules. Local and regional authorities will remain vigilant and will continue to share information amongst each other and with higher level authorities, to enable shared learning on a proportional response to this unprecedented situation; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 50. | emphasises that the Commission must be sensitive to the interests of SMEs who currently do not have strong ties with the financial system because they are largely self-financed. Some of these firms are experiencing abrupt liquidity issues and urgently need repayable and/or non-repayable loans for the first time in their existence. This primarily affects micro-enterprises, but may also impact larger family-owned enterprises; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 51. | calls upon the Commission to give regional authorities access to European funding under the Recovery Package, in order to kick-start the economic recovery. Local and regional authorities are in the best position to assess the needs of SMEs adjusting to a post-pandemic economy; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 52. | stresses that the goal of making businesses more financially stable and resilient should remain a top priority of policy makers at all levels; warns against the excessive reliance of proposed SME support measures on debt instruments. |

Brussels, 14 October 2020.

The President of the European Committee of the Regions

Apostolos TZITZIKOSTAS

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0001)  See Annual report on European SMEs (2019).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0002)  Statistical research supported by the COSME programme has determined the share of family businesses in non-financial business in Denmark (60 %), Finland (70 %), the Netherlands (71 %) and Poland (92 %).

[(3)](#ntc3-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0003)  Based on statistics from the Netherlands, regions with higher concentrations of family businesses are close to the European average regarding GDP (Eurostat, 2017; CBS, 2017).

[(4)](#ntc4-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0004)  https://aachen.digital/

[(5)](#ntc5-C_2020440EN.01006001-E0005)  https://blogs.ec.europa.eu/promotingenterprise/files/2020/02/2020\_PublicPROCUREMENTfosSME-GUIDANCEforCAuthorities.pdf

---