alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020335EN.01000301.xml

| 9.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9379 — Umicore/Cattierite Holdings Coöperatief)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 335/02)

On 25 November 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9379. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9379. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ronald N. Baird, President and CEO of Id-Confirm Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Id-Confirm Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Altus Explorations Inc.

Dated: February 22, 2005

/s/ Ronald N. Baird				Ronald N. Baird
President and CEO (Principal Executive Officer)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5520 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 

the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 

conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2016 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

SALMON, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. GALLEGO, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, and Ms. 

SINEMA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal 

land owned by the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes 

of economic development by conveyance of the Federal 

reversionary interest to the City. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Udall Park Land Ex5 change Completion Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5520 IH

1 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of 

2 Tucson, Arizona. 

3 (2) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘non-Fed4 eral land’’ means the approximately 172.8-acre par5 cel of City land identified in the patent numbered 

6 02–90–0001 and dated October 4, 1989, and more 

particularly described as lots 3 and 4, S1⁄2NW1 7 ⁄4, 

8 sec. 5, T.14S., R.15 E., Gila and Salt River Merid9 ian, Arizona. 

10 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of the Interior. 

12 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTER13 EST IN LAND LOCATED IN TUCSON, ARIZONA. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi15 sion of law, the Secretary shall convey to the City, without 

16 consideration, the reversionary interests of the United 

17 States in and to the non-Federal land for the purpose of 

18 unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land to enable 

19 economic development of the non-Federal land. 

20 (b) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—As soon as practicable 

21 after the date of enactment of this Act, the exact legal 

22 descriptions of the non-Federal land shall be determined 

23 in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary. 

24 (c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

25 Secretary may require such additional terms and condiVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:15 Jun 21, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5520.IH H5520

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5520 IH

1 tions to the conveyance under subsection (a), consistent 

2 with that subsection, as the Secretary considers appro3 priate to protect the interests of the United States. 

4 (d) COSTS.—The City shall pay all costs associated 

5 with the conveyance under subsection (a), consistent with 

6 that subsection, including the costs of any surveys, record7 ing costs, and other reasonable costs. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE EX REL. Bryan Clayton ROBERTS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0880

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, *133unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Crichton, J., recused.
Melissa Margaret BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kevin Frost, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Filtering Associates,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
    within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
    is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
    of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
    business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
    fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
    issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
    internal control over financial reporting.


Date: May 11, 2005




/s/ Kevin Frost
-----------------------
Kevin Frost, Chief Executive Officer
Ronald BRAUN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

Ronald W. Braun, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED, without prejudice to Appellant filing a legally sufficient petition for writ of mandamus. *See**Williams v. State* , 189 So.3d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ; *Farmer v. State* , 927 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

ORFINGER, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 13.2****Grupo TMM, S.A.B.****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**      I, Juan Fernandez Galeazzi, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo TMM, S.A.B. (the “Company”),hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:      1. the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, to whichthis statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: July 16, 2007         /s/ Juan Fernandez Galeazzi   Juan Fernandez Galeazzi   Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - science_science(13)
              - products_data(7)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_audio(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(44)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_video(56)
              - multimedia_video-149194(30)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

## By Year

map        June 20, 2019        Geostatistical estimation of the bottom altitude and thickness of the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - science_science(13)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_audio(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(44)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_video(56)
              - multimedia_video-149194(30)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149216(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Presentations (PowerPoint)        January 14, 2020        Meta-analysis of Global Crop Water Productivity of Irrigated Croplands
Exhibit 5



Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



In connection with
the report of InterOil Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Phil
E. Mulacek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 7, 2013 | 
|------------------- | 
|                    | 
|                    |
Charles W. GETTYS, Jr. and Tammy Abide v. William G. GETTYS, Floellen Sanchez-Rickard, Victoria Foght Virga and Michael Virga

NO. 2018-C-0992

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1

DeGolyer and MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

June 26, 2006

Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.
Av. República do Chile, 65/1702
Rio de Janeiro
Brazil 20035-900

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the references to DeGoyler and MacNaughton as
set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20F of Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A. (Petrobras) for the year ended December 31, 2005, under the
heading Item 4INFORMATION ON THE COMPANYExploration,
Development and ProductionReserves. We prepared estimates, as
of December 31, 2005, of the proved crude oil, condensate, and
natural gas reserves and the oil equivalent of 83 fields with
interests owned by Petrobras. These estimates were prepared in
accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 410(a)
(1)(13) of Regulation SX of the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission. The fields are located in Brazil and
offshore from Brazil. The volumes of proved reserves estimated, as of
December 31, 2005 are 8,365 million barrels of oil and condensate,
6,602,233 million cubic feet of marketable gas, and 9,468 million
barrels of oil equivalent. These estimates and the fields evaluated
are those contained in our report entitled Letter Report as of
December 31, 2005 on Reserves of Certain Properties in Brazil with
interests owned by Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.

| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | Very truly yours,            
| | /s/  DeGoyler and MacNaughton
| | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Marlon CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020029EN.01001401.xml

| 28.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9712 – Mitsubishi/Wallenius Wilhelmsen/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 29/13)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC’, Japan), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC’, Japan),

| — | Wallenius Wilhelmsen Inland Services Holding AS (‘WWS’, Norway), belonging to Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA (Norway). |
| --- | --- |

—

Wallenius Wilhelmsen Inland Services Holding AS (‘WWS’, Norway), belonging to Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA (Norway).

MC and WWS acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a joint venture (‘JV’) incorporated in Thailand, which will engage in finished vehicle logistics in Thailand.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | for MC: develops and operates business across several industries including environmental and infrastructure business, industrial finance, energy, metals, machinery, chemicals and foods, |
| --- | --- |

—

for MC: develops and operates business across several industries including environmental and infrastructure business, industrial finance, energy, metals, machinery, chemicals and foods,

| — | for WWS: provides logistics solutions to manufacturers of cars, trucks and heavy equipment. WWS belongs to Wallenius Wilhelmsen, which is a provider of shipping and vehicle logistics, managing the distribution of cars, trucks, rolling equipment and breakbulk to customers all over the world. |
| --- | --- |

—

for WWS: provides logistics solutions to manufacturers of cars, trucks and heavy equipment. WWS belongs to Wallenius Wilhelmsen, which is a provider of shipping and vehicle logistics, managing the distribution of cars, trucks, rolling equipment and breakbulk to customers all over the world.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9712 – Mitsubishi/Wallenius Wilhelmsen/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
# C_2020284EN.01000501.xml

| 28.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9925 – Lactalis Nestlé produits frais/Certain assets of Parmalat)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 284/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | B.S.A (France), |
| --- | --- |

—

B.S.A (France),

| — | Nestlé S.A (Switzerland), |
| --- | --- |

—

Nestlé S.A (Switzerland),

| — | Lactalis Nestlé produits frais ‘LNPF’ (France). |
| --- | --- |

—

Lactalis Nestlé produits frais ‘LNPF’ (France).

B.S.A and Nestlé acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of part of LNPF.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.

2.

| — | B.S.A. is the parent company of the Lactalis group which is mainly active in the production and marketing of milk and dairy products, |
| --- | --- |

—

B.S.A. is the parent company of the Lactalis group which is mainly active in the production and marketing of milk and dairy products,

| — | Nestlé S.A, is the parent company of an international group, which is mainly active in the food industry. Nestlé is primarily involved in the production, marketing and sale of a large variety of food and beverage products, including dairy products. |
| --- | --- |

—

Nestlé S.A, is the parent company of an international group, which is mainly active in the food industry. Nestlé is primarily involved in the production, marketing and sale of a large variety of food and beverage products, including dairy products.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9925— Lactalis Nestlé produits frais/Certain assets of Parmalat

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Shelley B.
Thunen, Chief Financial Officer of IntraLase Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report of IntraLase Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2) the information
contained in such Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of IntraLase Corp.



|                    |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 3, 2006 |  | /s/ Shelley B. Thunen                               
|                    |  | Shelley B. Thunen                                   
|                    |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer