alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020251EN.01000901.xml

| 31.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/9

---

Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1137, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1130, concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(2020/C 251/06)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annexes II and IV to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1137 (2), and in Annex III to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1130 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2016/44, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 15 May 2021, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C. |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| Belgique/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C.

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

Belgique/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 17(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 and Article 21(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44, of the list of designated persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

(2)  OJ L 247, 31.7.2020, p. 40.

(3)  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 247, 31.7.2020, p. 14.

---
#### DARLING & COMPANY, Appellant, v. John DE ADDIO, Appellee.

No. 11738.

United States Court óf Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 16, 1953.

Duncan & Thomas, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Motz, Morris, Wilson &. Quine, Akron, Ohio, and McConnell, Blackmore, Cory & Burke, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

' Before ALLEN, MARTIN, ' and r Mc-ALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause .coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed in accordance with the reasons set forth by the District Court in its opinion filed, 112 F.Supp. 166, denying á motion for a new trial.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135657 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135657 

 COA: 280312 

Genesee CC: 81-030384-FC 

CHARLES O. MCINTOSH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Genesee Circuit Court’s orders of August 31, 

2006 and June 15, 2007, and we REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for 

consideration of the merits of the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment filed on 

December 27, 2005. Under the circumstances of this case, the motion filed by the 

defendant on September 2, 2005 did not constitute a motion for relief from judgment 

under subchapter 6.500. Accordingly, the Genesee Circuit Court erred in treating the 

defendant’s December 27, 2005 motion for relief from judgment as a successive motion 

under MCR 6.502(G). 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

p0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
Lewis P. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-522

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard -Baltimore MD 21230 

MDE 410-537-3000 - 1-800-633-6101 

Martin O'Malley Shari 1. Wilson 

Governor Secretary 

Anthony G. Brown Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Lieutenant Governor Deputy Secretary 

September 17, 2010
 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin
 

Regional Administrator (3RAOO)
 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

The purpose of this letter is to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

# 10-07 concerning (1) Maryland's document titled "Revision to Maryland's Transportation 

Conformity State Implementation Plan" that contains commitments required by federal law, and 

(2) Maryland's Conformity Regulations .01 -.09 under COMAR 26.11.26. 

The last effective date of amendments to COMAR 26.11.26 was June 30, 2008 as indicated in 

the Maryland Register Final Action Notice in the enclosed binder. The Proposed Action for that 

regulatory action and an Errata requested by EPA (published on July 7, 2008) have been 

enclosed as well. 

This SIP submittal of a comprehensive version of COMAR 26.11.26 as a SIP revision replaces 

previous submittals of SIP Revisions #98-14, #03-02, #06-07 and the #06-07 supplement 

submitted on August 4, 1998, January 29, 2003, February 5, 2007 and July 8, 2008, 

respectively. The Department is hereby withdrawing those SIP submittals from further 

consideration by EPA as SIP revisions. 

If you have any questions concerning this SIP submittal, please feel free to call me at (410) 537­

3084 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management 

Administration, at (410) 537-3255. 

·1L 

STW:dhr 

Enclosures 

Recycled Paper TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(15)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(20)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(18)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(135)
              - multimedia_video-149194(103)
              - multimedia_video-149195(14)
              - multimedia_video-149197(8)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(13)
              - other_basic-42(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)
              - other_basic-45(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Center News        May 10, 2022        Curiosity Blogs |  Sols 3466-3468: Sliding Into the Weekend Like...
(4910-1 ."., "_m-"'

" )lm~",,;s,","("

DHARTM[NT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

RJN 2120-AA64

14 CFR Part 39

Ie,:: - :'::3--1

(Docket No. F.t\...o\-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-120-AD]

II ,)(8

Nll"l-\U._ .,;S,~

." /

.8 /0, vi'

. • •• . ""'''"l-GI<X.

Alrworthmess Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP Model Gulfstream 100 Anplane ", 6'8 A -

><l1JA ~-.'"

and Model Astra SPX and i125 Weshvind Astra Airplanes -9J,". 7"'"

!.C4, "".•••.•..••• -J

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the produc

listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from

AflM-1-

"1TlN-'io'SN

L CA--

n /

l"f'J.-J1~

0U11>iG SYMlIQI.;

*

,

* * " *

Incomplete closure of the MED [main enlry dObr] may be followed by innight opening of the door. As a result, the MED and the adjacent fuselage

structure may be damaged during opening and landing impact. Damage to

the left engine by flying debris and objects may also occur.

mandatory continuing airworthiness infom1a~ion (MeAl) originated by an aviation

fl~- \\X)

NITIAl-"'S'1

1.1 ,,111' '" 1

.~ I

\ 17 511c

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition .ounNGsn,!1QI.

product. The MeAT describes the unsafe condition as:

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

described in the MeAl.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed 1\0 by {insert dale 30 days after

date or publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER].
Jon Webster HAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2455

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Ervin J. FINDLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 12.3

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Juan Fernández Galeazzi, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo TMM, S.A. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:
June 30, 2004

| |  |                                                                          
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JUAN FERNANDEZ GALEAZZIJuan Fernández Galeazzi
Chief Financial Officer

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40871 Conference Calendar

RONNIE LEE MILLSAP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNIDENTIFIED WILSON, Warden, Gurney Unit, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-631

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronnie Lee Millsap, Texas prisoner #667855, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights complaint. On January 9, 1997, Chief Judge Politz ordered Millsap’s appeal held in abeyance for thirty days pending payment of the docketing fee or filing an affidavit for leave to proceed IFP on appeal pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). TheNo. 96-40871 - 2 - documentation submitted by Millsap did not comply with the requirements imposed by the PLRA because he did not submit information regarding his prison trust-fund account for the required six-month period. See § 1915(a), (b). On April 3, 1997, Judge Jones ordered the appeal held in abeyance for thirty days pending Millsap’s payment of the $105 filing fee or compliance with the PLRA. The order specified that Millsap should “file a certified statement by the custodian of the prisoner’s trust fund account for the six-month period immediately preceding the date of the filing of the notice of appeal, August 23, 1996.” The order cautioned Millsap that a failure to comply within the thirty-day period would result in a dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. The financial information submitted by Millsap does notcomply with the PLRA: it provides no information about his trustfund activity in the six months preceding the filing of his notice of appeal, August 23, 1996. Accordingly, Millsap’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3. Should Millsap wish to reinstate his appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing fee to the clerk of the district court within thirty days from the date of this order. Millsap’s motion entitled “motion, advisory to the court,” which is construed as a request to supplement his appellate brief and to supplement the record on appeal, is DENIED as moot.No. 96-40871 - 3 -
MOTIONS DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Faulk, Scott {OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

John Puaoi <john_puaoi@yahoo.com> 

Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:08 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Kalaupapa EAS 

Dear Department of Transportation, 

'• __ : ; ' ' . -. ; ~ ... 

'·~ ·._) 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, 

and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, 

frequent, flights, multiple islands and ease of booking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, 

Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.).lt is important that we have a safe, stable & affordable service to 

Kalaupapa. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. 

Sincerely, 

John Puaoi 

1
# C_2020197EN.01000301.xml

| 12.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/3 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Notice to importers concerning the application of the Registered Exporter System within the framework of the Overseas Association Decision (2020/C 197/03) By virtue of Council Decision 2013/755/EU ( 1 ) on the association of the overseas countries and territories (‘OCTs’) with the European Union (‘Overseas Association Decision’ – OAD), the European Union grants trade preferences to the OCTs. Annex VI of that Decision concerns the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation. Council Decision (EU) 2019/2196 ( 2 ), of 19 December 2019, totally replaced the text of Annex VI, with a date of application starting on 1 January 2020. As from 1 January 2020, in accordance with Article 21 (General Requirements) and Article 26 (Statement on origin and information for cumulation purpose) of Annex VI of the OAD, preferential tariff treatment is granted at import in the European Union only on presentation of a statement on origin made out, either by a registered exporter, or by any exporter where the total value of the originating products consigned does not exceed EUR 10 000. As from 1 January 2020, certificates of origin EUR.1 issued by the competent authorities in an OCT before 1 January 2020, or origin declarations made out by an exporter in an OCT before 1 January 2020 are not valid proofs of origin to grant the benefit of the preferential tariff treatment of the OAD in the European Union. For the application of the system of registered exporters (the REX system), an OCT has to comply with the two pre-requisites laid down in Articles 36 and 39 of Annex VI of the OAD. An OCT which does not have fulfilled the two pre-requisites is not able to apply the REX system, and as a consequence is not in a position to benefit from the OAD preferential tariff treatment until it has fulfilled the two pre-requisites. In order to comply with the obligation of publication under Article 37 of Annex VI of the OAD, detailed information about the dates of application of the REX system by all OCTs is available on the Europa Website ( 3 ). The operators are encouraged to consult this website on a regular basis to check whether and when the OCTs are able to apply the REX system. ( 1 )  OJ L 344, 19.12.2013, p. 1. ( 2 )  OJ L 337, 30.12.2019, p. 1. ( 3 )  https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/calculation-customs-duties/rules-origin/general-aspects-preferential-origin/arrangements-list/generalised-system-preferences/the_register_exporter_system_en

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave Climates

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_data(3)
              - products_publications(20)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(4)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(11)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(7)
              - multimedia_image-141772(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_other_news(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(2)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

Photography        July 11, 2019        Brian Miller at Wind Cave National Park

Photography        March 22, 2018        Cave diving scientists

Photography        March 11, 2021        Boulder Ice Cave Glacier 1932 and 1988

Photography        June 1, 2016        USGS Research Ecologist Jeff Lovich gets ready to release a male desert tortoise

Photography        December 31, 1985        Packrat at its midden

Photography        December 31, 1985        Packrat midden

Photography        March 17, 2018        USGS in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005313 31-JUL-2015 07:48 AM
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - north carolina(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

Podcasts        July 31, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part I

Podcasts        March 13, 2012        Climate Connections: Questions from Glacier National Park, MT (Ep 4)

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin

Podcasts        March 14, 2012        Advancing ARMI: In Search for Chytrid Fungus

Podcasts        April 20, 2011        Climate Connections: Visiting Students in North Carolina (Episode 1)

Podcasts        August 18, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part 2

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding
Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008
(the "Report"), I, Wang Junping, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1)
The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.  /s/Wang JunpingWang Junping, Chief Financial
Officer February
13, 2008