alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kristal RYAN, Appellant, v. Robert RYAN, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2440

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 8, 2018]

Dave K. Roy of Roy & Associates, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Andrew A. Harris of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Tana R. Sachs Copple of Copple Sachs Copple, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

Gross, J.

On May 4, 2017, the father filed a supplemental petition for relocation pursuant to section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2017).

The petition was served on the mother on May 17, 2017, and she was required to file a response "within 20 days after service of [the] petition to relocate." § 61.13001(3), Fla. Stat. (2017). She obtained a lawyer, who filed a notice of appearance on May 26, 2017. The response was due on June 6; on that day the mother's lawyer filed a motion for enlargement of time, requesting an additional 20 days to respond to the petition. The motion was never ruled upon.

On June 15, the presiding judge recused herself and the case was reassigned to Judge Miller. Five days later, the father moved for an order allowing relocation due to the mother's failure to object.

On June 27, the mother filed an objection to the petition, which argued that "good cause" existed for the court not to enter a default judgment. The objection documented various reasons, including the hospitalization of the mother's lawyer and the sudden illness of the lawyer's daughter.

*273Two days later, the trial court entered its final judgment granting relocation "without an evidentiary hearing due to the other party's failure to file an objection." The court noted that the mother's response was untimely and determined "that the relocation is in the best interests of the children based upon the undisputed pleadings." The court adopted the time-sharing schedule and post-relocation transportation arrangements contained within the petition and attached a relocation parenting plan.

Section 61.13001(3)(d) provides that where a parent fails to timely file a response objecting to a petition to relocate, the court shall enter an order granting the petition "absent good cause."

Here, "good cause" existed to preclude entry of the relocation judgment despite the former wife's untimely response to the petition. The mother timely obtained a lawyer. The delay in filing was entirely the fault of the lawyer, who provided documentation for excuses beyond his control. The statute allows a court to act expeditiously when one parent puts up no roadblock to relocation. Where, through filings in the court file, a parent indicates an intention to participate in the relocation process, the law frowns on defaults and encourages a noticed hearing where both sides can present their positions and the trial judge may consider children's best interests. *See**Vaelizadeh v. Hossaini* , 174 So.3d 579, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

As we did in *Vaelizadeh* , we reverse the relocation judgment, treat the judgment as a non-final order granting temporary relocation, and remand for a hearing consistent with section 61.13001.

Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Eric Dewayne YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NOTE
      (“the Note”)

    


    Power3
      Medical Products, Inc., a New York corporation (the “Company”) for value
      received hereby promises to pay Ira
      L. Goldknopf
      (“Payee”) on or before March 30, 2006, (“Maturity Date”); the principal amount
      of
      eighteen thousand one hundred thirty-five dollars ($18,135.00)
(“Principal”).

    


    Should
      the Principal not be repaid as of March 30, 2006 interest of 6 % per year on
      any
      unpaid Principal amount will be earned by the Payee until such time as all
      of
      the Principal amount is repaid. This Note may be repaid at any time prior to
      March 30, 2006 without interest or penalty. 

    


    In
      no
      event shall interest contracted for, charged or received hereunder, plus any
      other charges in connection herewith which constitute interest, exceed the
      maximum interest permitted by applicable law. The amounts of such interest
      or
      other charges previously paid to the holder of the Note, if any, in excess
      of
      the amounts permitted by applicable law shall be applied by the holder of the
      Note to reduce the principal of the indebtedness evidenced by the Note, or,
      at
      the option of the holder of the Note, be refunded. To the extent permitted
      by
      applicable law, determination of the legal maximum amount of interest shall
      at
      all times be made by amortizing, prorating, allocating and spreading in equal
      parts during the period of the full stated term of the loan and indebtedness,
      all interest at any time contracted for, charged or received from the Maker
      hereof in connection with the loan and indebtedness evidenced hereby, so that
      the actual rate of interest on account of such indebtedness is uniform
      throughout the term hereof.

    


    Notices,
      payments, requests, and other communications to the respective parties hereunder
      shall be in writing, and shall be deemed received when delivered personally,
      by
      facsimile, or first class certified mail, return receipt requested and postage
      prepaid, as follows:

    


    If
      to the
      lender:

    


    Ira
      L.
      Goldknopf

    3400
      Research Forest Parkway 

    Woodlands,
      Texas 77381

    


    If
      to the
      Company:

    


    Power3
      Medical Products, Inc.

    3400
      Research Forest Parkway 

    Woodlands,
      Texas 77381

    


    This
      Note
      is governed by and is to be construed in accordance with the law of the State
      of
      Texas.

     

    
      	Payee	 	Power3
              Medical Products, Inc.	 	Date
	
               

              /s/ Ira L. Goldknopf 

                

              
Ira L. Goldknopf	 	
              /s/ John P. Burton

              
                

              
By: John P. Burton	 	September 30, 2006
	 	 	
              Its:
                CFO
Michael TRICKETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020412EN.01000101.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 412/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9940 — AAUK2/MUL/Ballyhoura Wind/CCWFL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 412/01)

On 28 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9940. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9940. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
LOGO









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-92044) of Petrobras International Finance Company (PIFCO) of our report dated February 13, 2003 with respect to the financial statements for the two years ended December 31, 2002 of PIFCO, which appears in
Amendment No. 1 to the 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2004.



LOGO



PrirewaterhouseCoopers

Auditores Independentes



Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil

July 26, 2004
# CI2020183EN.01000101.xml

| 3.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 183/1

---

Information from the Commission concerning the non-application of certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698 by Poland

COVID-19 outbreak

Regulation (EU) 2020/698 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 2020 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the COVID-19 outbreak concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations and the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation (OJ L 165, 27.5.2020, p. 10)

(2020/C 183 I/01)

Notification by: Poland

In conformity with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698, Poland informed the Commission on 29 May 2020 that it has decided not to apply certain provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2020/698.

Provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698 that Poland has decided not to apply:

| — | Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1);

| — | Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(1) concerning the time limits for the periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers under Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2);

| — | Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 5(2) concerning the validity of roadworthiness certificates under Directive 2014/45/EU.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2014/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 51).

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Richard Nathaniel MILLER

NO. 2018-CI-1345

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(11)

## By Location

              - alabama(12)
              - alaska(114)
              - arizona(60)
              - arkansas(18)
              - california(212)
              - colorado(74)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(7)
              - florida(68)
              - georgia(16)
              - guam(5)
              - hawaii(29)
              - idaho(67)
              - illinois(21)
              - indiana(12)
              - iowa(28)
              - kansas(43)
              - kentucky(10)
              - louisiana(37)
              - maine(19)
              - maryland(28)
              - massachusetts(10)
              - michigan(32)
              - minnesota(48)
              - mississippi(17)
              - missouri(25)
              - montana(61)
              - nebraska(35)
              - nevada(53)
              - new hampshire(10)
              - new jersey(18)
              - new mexico(47)
              - new york(45)
              - north carolina(29)
              - north dakota(30)
              - ohio(14)
              - oklahoma(26)
              - oregon(91)
              - pennsylvania(24)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(14)
              - south dakota(45)
              - tennessee(26)
              - texas(58)
              - u.s. virgin islands(4)
              - utah(47)
              - (-)vermont(11)
              - virginia(41)
              - washington(60)
              - west virginia(20)
              - wisconsin(39)
              - wyoming(89)

## By Year

publication        August 2, 2021        Effects of winter ticks and internal parasites on moose survival in Vermont, USA

publication        January 1, 2005        Effects of hunting on survival of American woodcock in the Northeast

publication        January 23, 2021        Habitat use as indicator of adaptive capacity to climate change

publication        May 17, 2021        Moose habitat selection and fitness consequences during two critical winter tick life stages in Vermont, United States

publication        September 14, 2021        Modeling moose habitat use by age, sex, and season in Vermont, USA using high-resolution lidar and national land cover data

publication        July 7, 2021        Juvenile moose stress and nutrition dynamics related to winter ticks, landscape characteristics, climate-mediated factors and survival

publication        April 17, 2019        Drought forecasting for streams and groundwaters in northeastern United States

publication        December 12, 2019        Chronic and episodic acidification of streams along the Appalachian Trail corridor, eastern United States

publication        February 23, 2018        Artificial light at night confounds broad-scale habitat use by migrating birds

publication        January 1, 2002        Mercury on the move during snowmelt in Vermont

publication        January 1, 2011        Comparisons of watershed sulfur budgets in southeast Canada and northeast US: New approaches and implications
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5887 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5887

  To repeal the provisions of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
 Appropriations Act, 2015, which amended the Federal Election Campaign 
Act of 1971 to establish separate contribution limits for contributions 
      made to national parties to support Presidential nominating 
   conventions, national party headquarters buildings, and recounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2014

  Mr. Kilmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the provisions of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
 Appropriations Act, 2015, which amended the Federal Election Campaign 
Act of 1971 to establish separate contribution limits for contributions 
      made to national parties to support Presidential nominating 
   conventions, national party headquarters buildings, and recounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF SEPARATE CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR CERTAIN 
              CONTRIBUTIONS MADE TO NATIONAL COMMITTEES OF POLITICAL 
              PARTIES.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 101 of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2015 is repealed, and any provision of law amended 
by such section shall be restored as if such section had not been 
enacted into law.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Consolidated and 
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
# CI2020369EN.01000101.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 369/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 369/1

---

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission

(2020/C 369 I/01)

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (1), Article 36(2), provides that the European Food Safety Authority’s ‘Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Executive Director, shall draw up a list to be made public of competent organisations designated by the Member States which may assist the Authority, either individually or in networks, with its mission.’

The list was first drawn up by EFSA’s Management Board on 19 December 2006, and since then is:

| (i) | updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)); and |
| --- | --- |

(i)

updated regularly, on the basis of proposals from EFSA’s Executive Director, taking account of reviews or new designation proposals from the Member States (in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004, Article 2(4) (2)); and

| (ii) | made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published. |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

made public on EFSA’s website, where the latest updated list of competent organisations is published.

This respective information is available on the EFSA website, at the following locations:

| (i) | the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 15 October 2020 – https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/84th-management-board-web-meeting; and |
| --- | --- |

(i)

the latest amendment to the list of competent organisations by EFSA’s Management Board on 15 October 2020 – https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/84th-management-board-web-meeting; and

| (ii) | the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

the updated list of competent organisations – http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/partnersnetworks/scorg

EFSA will keep this Notice updated, specifically regarding the provided website links.

For more information please contact Cooperation.Article36@efsa.europa.eu

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2230/2004 of 23 December 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 with regard to the network of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s mission (OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 64), as last amended.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - (-)massachusetts(1)
              - montana(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2017        Cenote Bang
Quentin HENRY, et al. v. GREATER OUACHITA WATER COMPANY

NO. 2018-CC-0949

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
**EXHIBIT 31**

I, Nora Coccaro certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Providence Resources, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 16, 2007 

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**38**

----