alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer of Universal Communication
Systems, Inc.(the "Company"), certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     controls; and

     6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 17, 2003

/s/ Michael J. Zwebner
-------------------------------
Michael J. Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer
#### McINTOSH v. UNITED STATES.

No. 14431.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 29, 1953.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1953.

*546No appearance entered on behalf of appellant.

Frank B. Potter, U. S. Atty., and Lester L. May, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Cavett S. Binion, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

Before HOLMES, BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On April 22, 1952 the appellant was adjudged guilty of violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, and sentenced to^ imprisonment for a period of five years. No appeal was taken within ten days after entry of the judgment as permitted by Rule 37(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. There appears in the record, an order of the District Court allowing the defendant to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to this Court filed on January 3, 1953. The notice of appeal appearing in the record is marked filed March 16, 1953. No appeal having been taken within the time prescribed by Rule 37(a) (2), this Court is without jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed. See *Huff*v. United States, 5 Cir., 192 F.2d 911.

Appeal dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - (-)south dakota(3)

## By Year

Podcasts        February 9, 2020        Eyes on Earth Episode 16 – Predictive Modeling

Podcasts        September 25, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 104 – EROS 50th: Alumni and Friends, Part 2

Podcasts        March 21, 2022        Eyes on Earth Episode 70 - ECOSTRESS and Aquatic Ecosystems
# C_2020340EN.01000701.xml

| 13.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/7

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9927 — MVM/iCR)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 340/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | MVM Magyar Villamos Művek Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság (‘MVM’, Hungary), |
| --- | --- |

—

MVM Magyar Villamos Művek Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság (‘MVM’, Hungary),

| — | innogy Česká republika a.s. (‘iCR’, Czechia). |
| --- | --- |

—

innogy Česká republika a.s. (‘iCR’, Czechia).

MVM acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of iCR.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | MVM is a state-owned vertically integrated energy group with a portfolio that covers the entire Hungarian energy system. MVM is involved in heat generation, electricity trading, gas trading and storage, transmission system operation, wholesale and retail supply of gas and electricity, district heating, and telecommunication services, |
| --- | --- |

—

MVM is a state-owned vertically integrated energy group with a portfolio that covers the entire Hungarian energy system. MVM is involved in heat generation, electricity trading, gas trading and storage, transmission system operation, wholesale and retail supply of gas and electricity, district heating, and telecommunication services,

| — | iCR is active in the electricity and gas retail business in the Czech Republic, combined with generation, wholesale, distribution and some additional non-core activities. |
| --- | --- |

—

iCR is active in the electricity and gas retail business in the Czech Republic, combined with generation, wholesale, distribution and some additional non-core activities.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9927 — MVM/iCR

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Uranerz Energy
Corporation, (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) that:

| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Date: March 12, 2010

| | /s/
      Benjamin Leboe          
| | ----------------------------------
| | Benjamin Leboe                    
| | Chief Financial Officer, Principal
| | Financial and Accounting Officer  









The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Jr.,****Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  August 12,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Salvatore R.  DeFrancesco, Jr. |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Salvatore R.  DeFrancesco, Jr.,    |
|                                   |   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   |

 

46

----
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

March 29, 2004


        Management Report on Internal Control over the administration of
      the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2001-6 (the "Owner Trust")

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank") is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over its Administration
of the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner
Trust ("Administration" of the Owner Trust), which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper Administration of the Owner Trust. The
Bank's internal control system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions
are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to Administration of the Owner Trust. Further, because of
changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its internal control over
its Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003 in relation to the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained effective internal
control over the Administration of the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2003,
based on the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Keith Schuck
-------------------------
Keith Schuck
Senior Vice President/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Patricia Garvey
-------------------------
Patricia Garvey
Senior Vice President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5600 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 

a pilot program to provide access to magnetic EEG/ 

EKG-guided resonance therapy to veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5600 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Hero Left Un3 treated Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) Magnetic EEG/EKG-guided resonance ther7 apy has successfully treated more than 400 veterans 

8 with post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain 

9 injury, military sexual trauma, chronic pain, and 

10 opiate addiction. 

11 (2) Recent clinical trials and randomized, pla12 cebo-controlled, double-blind studies have produced 

13 promising measurable outcomes in the evolution of 

14 magnetic EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy. 

15 (3) These outcomes have resulted in escalating 

16 demand from returning warriors and veterans who 

17 are seeking access to this treatment. 

18 (4) Congress recognizes the importance of initi19 ating innovative pilot programs that demonstrate the 

20 use and effectiveness of new treatment options for 

21 post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain in22 jury, military sexual trauma, chronic pain, and opi23 ate addiction. 
3 

•HR 5600 EH

1 SEC. 3. MAGNETIC EEG/EKG-GUIDED RESONANCE THERAPY 

2 PILOT PROGRAM. 

3 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Veterans Af4 fairs shall carry out a pilot program to provide access to 

5 magnetic EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy to treat 

6 larger populations of veterans suffering from post-trau7 matic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, military sex8 ual trauma, chronic pain, or opiate addiction. 

9 (b) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall carry out the 

10 pilot program under subsection (a) at not more than two 

11 facilities of the Department of Veteran Affairs. 

12 (c) PARTICIPANTS.—In carrying out the pilot pro13 gram under subsection (a), the Secretary may not provide 

14 access to magnetic EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy 

15 to more than 50 veterans. 

16 (d) DURATION.—The Secretary shall carry out the 

17 pilot program under subsection (a) for a 1-year period. 

18 (e) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

19 of the termination of the pilot program under subsection 

20 (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Vet21 erans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 

22 Senate a report on the pilot program. 

23 (f) NO AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—No 

24 additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to 

25 carry out the requirements of this section. Such require-
4 

•HR 5600 EH

1 ments shall be carried out using amounts otherwise au2 thorized. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5600 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry 

EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy to veterans. out a pilot program to provide access to magnetic
March 7 th 2012

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243

- 02

RE: National Emissions Standards for Haz ardous Air Pollutants: Secondary Aluminum Production, Docket ID Number EPA

– HQ

– OAR

– 2010

- 0544

. Dear Ms. Boyd,

The Aluminum Association and its members are requesting a thirty day extension of the comment period for the proposed Secondary Aluminum Pr oduction rule. The complexity in the proposed rule compared to the prev ious rule, coupled with the fact that items have been added to the docket as of February 28 th 2012 , have resulted in the need for industry discussion and

consensus building in order to generate useful comments to EPA. W e believe that a complete analysis will not be complete by March 30 th 2012. We are requesting an additional 30 day extension in order to complete a full review of the proposed rule.

In particular, the industry has begun the process of analyzing information added to the docket on February 2 8 th

, including EPA’s redlined comparative analysis of the original rule and the proposed revisions. Test data on which EPA is basing proposed revisions to Group I Uncontrolled furnace testing requirements was shared with industry at that time as well, and full review is required to assess the proposed action.

Thank you for your time and consideration in addressing this important issue. Please contact my office (703

- 358

- 2981 or Cjohnson@aluminum.org ) with questi ons or for further information.

Sincerely,

Charles D. Johnson VP, Environment Health & Safety
# C_2020055EN.01000701.xml

| 18.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/7

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(2020/C 55/07)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/212 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/211 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012. The grounds for designation of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 16 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, before 1 March 2020, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 34 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP and Article 32(4) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, of the list of designated persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 147 1.6.2013, p. 14.

(2)  OJ L 43 I, 17.2.2020, p. 6.

(3)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 43 I, 17.2.2020, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Adamson                            
|Robert J. Adamson                                
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|March 13, 2009