alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff

Illustrations        December 18, 1997        Io Galileo SSI Color Mosaic
Exhibit 32

                           Section 1350 Certification

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Fenton Graham Marketing,
Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

      To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 3, 2004


                          By:  /s/ J.P. Schrage
                             ---------------------------------------------
                             J.P. SCHRAGE
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFER
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ending September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      |                                                  |   |   |   |   |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|  By: | /s/ Cai Yongjun                                       |   |   |   |   |
|      | Cai Yongjun                                           |   |   |   |   |
|      | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |   |   |
Ashley Dominic LAWRENCE v. Patricher SCHEXNAYDER and Government Employees Insurance Company

NO. 2018-CC-1296

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and assigns reasons.

I would grant plaintiff's writ application, finding the court of appeal erred in dismissing Eugenia Chatman's claims as prescribed on the ground the amending petition adding her as a plaintiff did not relate back to plaintiff Ashley Lawrence's original timely-filed petition.

In *Giroir v. S. Louisiana Med. Ctr., Div. of Hosps* ., 475 So.2d 1040 (La. 1985), this court held:

> [A]n amendment adding or substituting a plaintiff should be allowed to relate back if (1) the amended claim arises out of the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth in the original pleading; (2) the defendant either knew or should have known of the existence and involvement of the new plaintiff; (3) the new and the old plaintiffs are sufficiently related so that the added or substituted party is not wholly new or unrelated; (4) the defendant will not be prejudiced in preparing and conducting his defense.

475 So.2d at 1044. I find Ms. Lawrence's amended petition filed on behalf of her mother, Ms. Chatman, clearly satisfies the four factors set forth in *Giroir* .

First, there is no dispute Ms. Chatman's claims arise out of the same occurrence as the accident described in Ms. Lawrence's original petition. Second, defendants have long been aware of Ms. Chatman's existence and involvement in the accident as Ms. Chatman's counsel sent a letter of representation to GEICO shortly after the accident, which included a copy of the accident report identifying all plaintiffs as occupants of the vehicle at the time of the accident. Further, according to Ms. Chatman, GEICO acknowledged her claims and requested updates on medical treatment and costs, and engaged in settlement negotiations. Given the defendants' obvious awareness and familiarity with Ms. Chatman's claims, and considering the district court found the addition of Ms. Chatman as a party would not disturb the case management schedule or the trial date, I find defendants would not be prejudiced in defending Ms. Chatman's claims, thus satisfying the fourth factor of *Giroir* . The real dispute in this case centers on whether the third *Giroir* factor is satisfied. In my view, Ms. Chatman, who is Ms. Lawrence's mother, is sufficiently related to Ms. Lawrence such that Ms. Chatman is not a wholly new or unrelated party. For these *1201reasons, I would grant plaintiff's writ application.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Chapter 11 Cases

LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-13797-SMG

LPT, LLC, Case No. 21-15537-SMG

LIBERTY POWER MARYLAND, LLC, Case No. 21-15539-SMG

LIBERTY POWER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LLC, Case No. 21-15540-SMG

Debtors. (Jointly Administered under

 / Case No. 21-13797-SMG)

SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Monica Arellano, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing 

agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned cases.

On July 18, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused 

the following documents to be served via first-class mail on one (1) confidential party not included 

herein, pursuant to USPS forwarding instructions:

• Debtors’ Expedited Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Rejection or 

Termination of All Remaining Executory Customer Contracts in the State of Texas, 

(II) Authorizing and Directing the Orderly Transition of Such Customer Contracts 

to the “Provider of Last Resort” in Texas, and (III) Setting a Bar Date for the Filing 

of Claims Related Thereto (Docket No. 716) with [Customized] Exhibit A

• Notice of Hearing re: Expedited Motion to Reject Executory Contract in the State of 

Texas, (II) Authorizing and Directing the Orderly Transition of Such Customer 

Contracts to the "Provider of Last Resort" in Texas, and (III) Setting a Bar Date for 

the Filing of Claims Related Thereto Filed by Debtor Liberty Power Holdings, LLC 

(Battista, Paul) (716) (Docket No. 717)

[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 745 Filed 07/22/22 Page 1 of 2
Furthermore, on July 18, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of 

Stretto caused the following document to be served via first-class mail on seven (7) confidential 

parties not included herein, pursuant to USPS forwarding instructions:

• [Customized] Order Granting Debtors’ Expedited Motion for Entry of an Order (I) 

Authorizing the Rejection or Termination of All Remaining Executory Customer 

Contracts in the State of Texas, (II) Authorizing and Directing the Orderly Transition 

of Such Customer Contracts to the “Provider of Last Resort” in Texas, and (III) 

Setting a Bar Date for the Filing of Claims Related Thereto (Docket No. 729)

Dated: July 22, 2022 /s/ Monica Arellano 

 Monica Arellano

 STRETTO

 410 Exchange, Suite 100

 Irvine, CA 92602

 Telephone: 800-634-7734

 Email: Monica.Arellano@stretto.com

Case 21-13797-SMG Doc 745 Filed 07/22/22 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.04
                                                                       Peekskill




July 6, 2007

David Berman
Gang Realty, LLC
c/o Decorative Product Source, Inc.
1 Coates Drive, Suite 5
Goshen, NY 10924

                                   Subject:  Exercise  of  Option  to  Renew for
                                   period  of  five  (5) years ending August 31,
                                   2013

                                   Premises:  PEEKSKILL,  New  York,  1010-1016
                                   Howard  Street  (Approximately  7,090  square
                                   feet  as  described  in  Schedule  A  of  the
                                   September  1,  1998  Lease  Agreement)

                                   Lease  History:

                                        a.   Assumption  (and  Modification)
                                             of  Lease  dated September 30, 2003
                                             (the  "Assumption  of  Lease
                                             Agreement")

                                        b.   Lease dated  September  1,  1998
                                             (the  "Lease  Agreement")

Dear Mr. Berman:

With  regards  to  the above Lease Agreement and amendments and/or modifications
thereto,  by and between Gang Realty, LLC ("Landlord") and The RAL Supply Group,
Inc.  ("Tenant"), Tenant hereby exercises its option to renew for five (5) years
terminating on August 31, 2013 pursuant to paragraph 1.3 of the referenced Lease
Agreement  and  amendments  and/or  modifications  thereto.

Landlord  hereby  accepts  Tenant's  exercise  of  its  option  to renew for the
aforementioned  five  (5)  years  terminating on August 31, 2013, the same as if
said  option  were exercised in accordance with the terms of the Lease Agreement
and  amendments  and/or  modifications  thereto.

The  validity of the Lease Agreement and amendments and/or modifications thereto
shall  be  governed  by  the  laws  of  the  State  of  New  York.


<PAGE>
All  other  terms  and  conditions  of  the  aforementioned  Lease Agreement and
amendments  and/or  modification  thereto shall remain in full force and effect.

If  this  agrees  with  your  understanding,  kindly  sign  below.

Sincerely,                              Agreed and Accepted:

The RAL Supply Group, Inc.              Gang Realty, LLC
f/k/a RAL Purchasing Corp.

By: /s/ William Pagano                  By: /s/ David Berman
    ------------------------------          ----------------------------------
    William Pagano, Executive VP            David Berman, Managing Member
                                            (President)


                                       2
STATE EX REL. Richard LAY v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0736

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
EFC HOLDINGS LLC, and Red Rainbow, LLC, Appellants, v. Benjamin BLANCO, Whitewater Bay Development, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 29, 2013

NO. 03-12-00829-CV

John Rady, Appellant

v.

Elizabeth Boulton; Sand Canyon Corporation; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for 

Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-3, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-3; and 

American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to file a brief or to respond to this 

Court’s notice, and, accordingly, has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE

considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. It 

FURTHER appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs relating to 

this appeal, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
AAM-12-364-E

May 29, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10108A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0727 

Mr. Steven A. Darr 

Chief Inspector 

Signature Engines, Inc. 

4760 Airports Road 

Cincinnati, OH 45226 

Dear Mr. Darr: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10108. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 8, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Signature Engines, Inc. (Signature Engines), for an extension of Exemption 

No. 10108. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

allows Signature Engines, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover 

its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Signature Engines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10108 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Signature Engines are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Signature Engines part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10108 to July 31, 2014, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7589

DAVID M. WASANYI, Pharm.D.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GEORGE TRENT, Superintendent PCC,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00225-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Wasanyi, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David M. Wasanyi appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen 

his closed 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Wasanyi v. Trent, No. 5:20-

cv-00225-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2021). We deny Wasanyi’s motion to appoint 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2020394EN.01000101.xml

| 19.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9999 — BlackRock/Koninklijke Vopak/US Gulf)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 394/01)

On 12 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9999. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9999. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Michael F. BRANDES a/k/a Michael Brandes, Stephanie M. Brandes a/k/a Stephanie Brandes, William Brandes, and Unknown Tenant in Possession of the Subject Property, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D17-2664

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 2, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
^oT-osT-l^^-2fcOS 

0fieat Adi ^ /lodim^ 

u ; CO 

To members of the Montana EAS Task Force: 

First of all, we would like to thank each of you for allowing us the opportunity to provide 

an explanation of our proposed EAS Bid. We certainly heard your views loud and clear. 

Pursuant to our Friday morning conversation with John Rabenberg advising us you voted 

6 to 1 in support of Gulfstream's bid and its proposed Billings service pattern; We are 

hereby providing notice we are filing schedule changes Tuesday January IS* that become 

Effective February 10, 2011. This will expedite a return to the Hub of your choice for the 

six communities who voted for service to Billings. Miles City will continue to be served 

one stop to Denver. 

This accelerated schedule change should also help in a seamless transition for the 

anticipated Gulfstream- Billings service patterns. 

We obviously will continue to serve each of you to the best of our ability until such time 

as the DOT makes their final selection and the new carrier can initiate service. 

We wish each of you and your communities much success. 

Kindest Regards, 

Great Lakes Airlines 

1022 Airport Parkway • Cheyenne, W 820dli4 (307) 432-7000 • Fax (307) 432-7001
The ESTATE OF Richard KAROLEWSKI, BY AND THROUGH Wayne Anthony KAROLEWSKI, Personal Representative, Appellant, v. PALM GARDEN OF TAMPA, LLC, Palm Garden Healthcare Holdings, LLC ; Palm Healthcare Management, LLC; and Michele L. Forney (as to Palm Garden of Tampa), Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-1101

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.4  CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, James W. Kleifges, certify that: 1. I have read this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., and 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.  /s/ James W. KleifgesBy:James W. KleifgesChief Accounting OfficerDate:March 5, 2010
Printiss Lavon GARLIN, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2511

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 23

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

The Board of Directors

Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-117724 and 333-117723) of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Albany, New York

April 20, 2005
# CI2020249EN.01000101.xml

| 29.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 249/1

---

Adoption of amendments to the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

The College of Eurojust has adopted on 24 July 2020 amendments to Eurojust’s Rules of Procedure (1). Those amendments are attached to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1114 of 23 July 2020 (2).

For the College of Eurojust,

Ladislav HAMRAN

President of Eurojust

---

(1)  Approved by the Council by Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/2250 of 19 December 2019 (OJ L 336, 30.12.2019, p. 309) and adopted by the College on 20 December 2019 (OJ L 50, 24.2.2020, p. 1.).

1

(2)  OJ L 244, 29.7.2020, p. 13

2

---
STATE EX REL. Kenwin PAIGE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1224

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied.