alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(4)
              - products_publications(41)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - (-)virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        July 13, 2023        Investigation of Drivers of Harmful Algal Blooms on Lake Anna, Virginia

Project        July 13, 2023        Investigation of Drivers of Harmful Algal Blooms on the Shenandoah River, Virginia

Project        August 24, 2010        Virginia Coastal Plain Aquifer Analysis

Project        September 20, 2016        Clinch River Water Quality and Mussel Health
STATE EX REL. Renil ESCOBAR-RIVERANO. v. STATE of Louisiana

2017-KH-0107

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

NOT CONSIDERED. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
# C_2020370EN.01004601.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/46

---

INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2019

(2020/C 370/46)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://europa.eu/!fh47BJ

---
Atul PATEL, Ranjan Patel, husband and wife, and Atul & Ranjan Family Trust, Appellants, v. PENINSULA BOYNTON PROPERTY, LLC, a Florida corporation, Practical Elements, Inc., a Florida corporation, Mark Pordes, individually, Federico Drada, individually, and Adam Kaufman, individually, Appellees.

No. 4D18-577

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 4, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 7, 2014

NO. 03-12-00126-CV

Green Tree Servicing, LLC, Appellant

v.

ICA Wholesale, Ltd. d/b/a A-1 Homes, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 25, 2011. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment awarding 

damages and attorney’s fees to ICA-Wholesale, Ltd. d/b/a/ A-1 Homes and renders judgment

that ICA-Wholesale, Ltd. d/b/a/ A-1 Homes take nothing on its claims again Green Tree 

Servicing, LLC. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and 

the court below.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.76

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made by and between
Proxim Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and Richard J.
Tallman ("Executive"). The Company and Executive are parties to an Employment
Agreement of October 27, 2003 (the "Agreement"), and they now wish to amend the
Agreement in certain respects. Accordingly, the Company and Executive now agree
as set forth below.

      1. Section 2a of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following: "While employed hereunder, Executive shall serve as the
Company's Senior Vice President, Administration and General Counsel. In such
position, Executive shall have such duties and authority, as shall be determined
from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the "CEO")".

      2. Executive's "Base Salary", as set forth in Section 3 of the Agreement,
shall be increased to $240,000 per annum.

      3. Executive's "Target Bonus", as set forth in Section 4 of the Agreement,
shall not be less than 60% of his Base Salary.

Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of
the date(s) set forth below.

EFFECTIVE AS OF JUNE 15, 2004

                                       /s/ Richard J. Tallman
                                       --------------------------
                                       Richard J. Tallman

                                       PROXIM CORPORATION

                                       By: /s/ Franco Plastina
                                          ------------------------

                                       Its: Chief Executive Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 31 2 . PAUL PORTER v . THE STATE.

Pau l Po rt e r wa s co nv i ct ed o f arm ed ro b b ery an d s ev eral o t h er o ffen s es

. On

Ap ri l 22

, 2 0 1 4

, t h e t ri al co urt en t ered an o rd er d en y in g h i s m o t i o n fo r a n ew t ri al

. On

J u n e 1

, 2 0 1 5 , Po rt er fi led a n o t i ce o f ap peal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

To b e t i m el y , a n o ti ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l e d w i t h i n 30 day s o f en t ry o f t h e

o rd er s o u g h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a

n o t i ce o f ap p eal is an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co nfer ju ri s d i ct i o n o n t h is Co u rt

. Ro w l a n d v

. St a t e , 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6) (1 9 9 5 ). Po rt er’ s n o t i ce o f

ap p eal i s u n t i m el y , as i t was fi l ed m o re t h an o n e y ear aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e s eek s

t o ap p eal . Acco rd i n gl y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Becau s e Po rt er i s rep res en t ed b y co u n sel

, h e i s i n fo rm ed o f th e fo l l o wi n g in

acco rd an ce wi t h Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , su p ra at 8 7 5-8 7 6 : Th i s ap p eal h as b een d i s m i s s ed

b ecau s e y o u fai l ed t o fi l e a t i m el y n ot i ce o f ap p eal

. If y o u st il l wi s h t o ap p eal

, y o u

m ay pet it i o n t h e t ri al co urt fo r l eav e t o fi l e an o u t -o f-t i m e ap peal

. If t h e t ri al co u rt

g ran t s y o u r req u es t

, y o u wi l l h av e 3 0 d ay s fro m t h e en t ry o f t h at ord er t o fi l e a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal referen ci n g y o u r co n v i ct i o n

. If t h e tri al co u rt den i es y o ur req u es t

, y o u wi l l

h av e 3 0 d ay s fro m t h e en t ry o f t h a t o r d e r t o fi l e a n o ti ce o f ap p eal referen ci n g t h e

d en ial o f y o u r req u es t fo r an o ut -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. Th e Cl erk o f Co u rt i s d i rect ed t o s en d a co p y of t h i s ord er t o Po rt er an d t o h i s

at t o rn ey , an d t h e l at t er al s o i s d i rect ed t o s en d a co py t o Po rt er. September 03, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/03/2015
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

128914 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128914 

 COA: 252513 

Calhoun CC: 2003-001012-FC 

CURTIS RODERICK HOFFMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - products_publications(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - (-)new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

publication        April 7, 2020        Rio Grande transboundary integrated hydrologic model and water-availability analysis, New Mexico and Texas, United States, and northern Chihuahua, Mexico

publication        January 1, 1961        Availability of ground water in the Gallup area, New Mexico
#### UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Julius ROSENBERG and Ethel Rosenberg, Petitioners-Appellants.

No. 291, Docket 22760.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 9, 1953.

Decided June 11, 1953.

See also 200 F.2d 666; 204 F.2d 688.

Emanuel H. Bloch, New York City, and Professor Malcolm Sharp, for appellants.

J. Edward Lumbard, Jr., U. S. Atty., New York City, James B. Kilsheimer III and Robert Martin, Asst. U. S. Attys., of counsel, for appellee.

*689Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Having examined the record we are satisfied that the trial judge committed no error of law and made findings of fact which the evidence amply supports. See United States v. Johnson, 327 U. S. 106, 66 S.Ct. 464, 90 L.Ed. 562; United States v. On Lee, 2 Cir, 201 F.2d 722. The order is affirmed. The motion for stay of execution is denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: BOU

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image(5)
              - multimedia_image-141771(5)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

Photography        January 22, 2016        Long Valley Caldera range-front faults terminate at the caldera bou...

Photography        March 9, 2011        Boulder Geomagnetic Observatory

Photography        September 29, 2009        Boulder Geomagnetic Observatory

Photography  Boulder Geomagnetic Observatory

Photography        August 31, 2009        Boulder Geomagnetic Observatory
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 26, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51671

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR RICARDO ESCOBEDO, also known as Ricardo Escobedo

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-180-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hector Ricardo Escobedo appeals the 18-month prison term imposed

following his conviction of one charge of illegal reentry into the United States.

Escobedo argues that his sentence is unreasonable under United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), because the district court improperly weighted

certain sentencing factors and failed to give an adequate explanation for its

choice of sentence. He also challenges this court’s application of a rebuttable
No. 06-51671

2

presumption of reasonableness to a sentence, such as his, that falls within the

defendant’s guidelines range. 

These arguments lack merit. The record shows that the district court gave

adequate, proper reasons for its choice of a sentence within the pertinent

guidelines range. See United States v. Nikonova, 480 F.3d 371, 376 (5th Cir.

2007), petition for cert. filed (May 21, 2007) (06-11834); United States v. Mares,

402 F.3d 511, 518-19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 828 (2005). Escobedo’s

challenge to the presumption of reasonableness is unavailing. See Rita v. United

States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554

(5th Cir. 2006). 

Escobedo has shown no error in the judgment of the district court.

Consequently,the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED,

the Government’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MINORITY TELEVISION PROJECT,

INC.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees, 

and

LINCOLN BROADCASTING

COMPANY,

Intervenor.

No. 09-17311

D.C. No. 3:06-cv-02699-EDL

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 

35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any

court of the Ninth Circuit.

FILED

NOV 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
J.K., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0600

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CROSSTEX ENERGY SERVICES, LP, Crosstex Lig, LLC and Crosstex Processing Services, LLC v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-1140

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5882 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5882

   To make an Income Tax that is a flat 15 percent for all American 
                               citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2014

 Mr. Stockman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make an Income Tax that is a flat 15 percent for all American 
                               citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flat Tax Rate Act''.

SEC. 2. TAX RATE.

    The Federal Income Tax Rate shall be 15 percent for all U.S. 
citizens.
            (1) The citizen's annual income or current economic 
        standing shall not matter.
            (2) All individuals shall pay a flat rate of 15 percent on 
        all income, except in cases where the individual or individuals 
        comply with the exemptions listed in section 3.

SEC. 3. EXEMPTIONS TO TAX RATE.

    The exemptions of the tax shall include:
            (1) There shall be a $10,000 deduction for those filing 
        singly, and a $20,000 deduction for couples filing jointly.
            (2) For each child, up to the age of 18, there shall be a 
        $3,000 deduction.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020046EN.01000301.xml

| 11.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9698 — Platinum Equity Group/Biscuit International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 46/03)

On 29 January 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9698. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9698. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28793]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20610 and #20611; SAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE 
Disaster Number NY-20016]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe (FEMA-4818-DR), dated 
November 1, 2024.
    Incident: Severe Storm and Flooding.

DATES: Issued on December 3, 2024.
    Incident Period: August 8, 2024 through August 10, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: January 31, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: August 1, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, dated November 1, 2024, 
is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to January 31, 2025.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-28793 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
Jamie Pearl JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-869

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 7, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of InterOil Corporation (the issuer);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) for the issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  March 30, 2009
    /s/ Phil E. MulacekPhil E. MulacekChief Executive Officer