99832 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Notices 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ 

dated May 30, 2024 (Substantive Response). 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on May 1, 2024,’’ dated June 21, 2024. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Laminated Woven Sacks from Vietnam,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 89 

FR 35073 (May 1, 2024). 

2See Laminated Woven Sacks from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 753 (June 4, 

2019) (Order). 

3The domestic interested parties are Polytex 

Fiber LLC and ProAmpac Holdings Inc. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Interested Party Notice Of Intent To 

Participate,’’ dated May 10, 2024. 

5See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, 

‘‘Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ 

dated May 30, 2024 (Substantive Response). 

6 Id. 

7See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

initiated on May 1, 2023,’’ dated June 21, 2024. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Laminated Woven Sacks from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no 

substantive responses from any other 

interested parties, including the 

Government of Vietnam, and no 

interested party requested a hearing. On 

June 21, 2024, Commerce notified the 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

that it did not receive an adequate 

substantive response from respondent 

interested parties, and that Commerce 

would conduct an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order,5 pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)–(C). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

LWS. For a complete description of the 

scope of the Order, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues discussed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

as the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNotices/ListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines 

that revocation of the Order would 

likely lead to continuation or recurrence 

of countervailable subsidies at the 

following net countervailable subsidy 

rates: 

Company 

Subsidy 

Rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

Duong Vinh Hoa Packaging 

Company Limited ................ 3.02 

Xinsheng Plastic Industry Co., 

Ltd ....................................... 198.87 

All Others ................................ 3.02 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these final results and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218. 

Dated: September 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Editorial Note: This document was 

received for publication by the Office of the 

Federal Register on December 6, 2024. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–29055 Filed 12–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–823] 

Laminated Woven Sacks From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 

Results of Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on Laminated Woven Sacks 

(LWS) from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

DATES: Applicable December 11, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Luke Caruso, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2081. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

After Commerce initiated the sunset 

review 1 of the Order,2 pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), domestic 

interested parties 3 timely submitted 

complete notices of intent to participate 

in,4 and adequate substantive responses 

regarding, the review.5 The domestic 

interested parties claimed domestic 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the 

domestic like product in the United 

States.6 Commerce did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested party, nor was a 

hearing requested. On June 21, 2024, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive adequate substantive 

responses from respondent interested 

parties.7 As a result, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is laminated woven sacks.. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Notices 99833 

9 Id. 

1See Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the 

Republic of South Africa and Ukraine: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 11175 (March 14, 

2018) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 89 FR 15157 (March 1, 2024). 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 1, 2024. 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 

38867 (May 8, 2024) (Initiation Notice). 

5 Id., 89 FR 38871. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review,’’ dated November 6, 2024. 

7See, e.g., Dioctyl Terephthalate from the 

Republic of Korea: Rescission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 24758 

(April 24, 2023); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from the Federal Republic 

of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 88 FR 4154 

(January 24, 2023). 

8See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review is contained 

in the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.9 A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be directly accessed 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail are weighted-average 

margins up to a weighted-average 

margin of up to 292.61 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of sunset review in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: September 5, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Editorial Note: This document was 

received for publication by the Office of the 

Federal Register on December 6, 2024. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–29054 Filed 12–10–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–823–816] 

Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod From 

Ukraine: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2023– 

2024 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon 

and alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from 

Ukraine for the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2023 through February 29, 

2024. 

DATES: Applicable December 11, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brittany Bauer, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3860. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 14, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on wire rod from Ukraine.1 On 

March 1, 2024, Commerce published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the Order.2 On April 1, 2024, 

Commercial Metals Company and Nucor 

Corporation (collectively, the 

petitioners) submitted a timely request 

that Commerce conduct an 

administrative review of the Order.3 On 

May 8, 2024, Commerce published in 

the Federal Register its notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the Order, in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i).4

This review covers subject 

merchandise exported and/or produced 

by the following six companies: (1) 

ArcelorMittal Steel Kryvyi Rih; (2) 

Public Joint Stock Company Yenakiieve 

Iron and Steel Works; (3) PrJSC 

Electrometallurgical Works 

Dneprospetsstal; (4) PJSC Dneprovsky 

Iron & Steel Integrated Works; (5) 

Metinvest Holding LLC; and (6) Variant 

Agro Build Ltd.5 On May 10, 2024, we 

placed on the record U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) data for entries 

of wire rod from Ukraine during the 

POR, showing no reviewable POR 

entries for any company listed in the 

Initiation Notice. 

On November 6, 2024, Commerce 

notified all interested parties of its 

intent to rescind the instant review 

because there were no reviewable, 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise by any of the companies 

subject to this review during the POR, 

and we invited interested partes to 

comment.6 We did not receive any 

comments. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is 

Commerce’s practice to rescind an 

administrative review of an AD order 

when there are no reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which liquidation is suspended.7

Normally, upon completion of an 

administrative review, the suspended 

entries are liquidated at the AD 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.8 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct CBP 

to liquidate at the AD assessment rate 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1