alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

) Application of ) ) JetBlue Airways Corporation ) Docket OST-2013-0051 ) For a Statement of Authorization ) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 212 Code-sharing ) )

SUPPLEMENT TO THE APPLICATION OF JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
FOR A STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION

Communications with respect to this document should be directed to:

James G. Hnat Jonathan B. Hill
Executive Vice President & J. Parker Erkmann
General Counsel Dow Lohnes PLLC Robert C. Land 1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW
Associate General Counsel & Suite 800
Senior Vice President for Govern ment Washington, DC 20036 Affairs (202) 776-2000 JetBlue Airways Corporation jhill@dowlohnes.com 27-01 Queens Plaza North perkman@dowlohnes.com Long Island City, NY 11101 (718) 709-3089

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

March 27, 2013BEFORE THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

) Application of ) ) JetBlue Airways Corporation ) Docket OST-2013-0051 ) For a Statement of Authorization ) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 212 Code-sharing ) )

SUPPLEMENT TO THE APPLICATION OF JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
FOR A STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION

On March 14, 2013 JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) filed an A pplication of JetBlue

Airways Corporation for a Statement of Authoriza tion (the “Application”) that contemplated that

JetBlue will place Qatar Airways’ q. c.s.c. (“Qatar”) “QR” designator code on certain JetBlue’s flights

as provided in the Codeshare Agreement between Qata r and JetBlue. JetBlue wishes to clarify its

request for authority. Specifically, JetBlue requests that it be au thorized to display Qatar’s QR*

designator code on flights operated by JetBlue between points in the United States and between U.S.

points and points in third countries. In a ddition, pursuant to the Department’s Notice In the Matter of

Blanket Notification of Code-Share Serv ice to Open-Skies Partner and Points, dated February 9,

2009, JetBlue gives blanket notice of code share service displayi ng the “QR” designator code on

flights operated by JetBlue between all U.S. points and between U.S. points and points in any Open

Skies country.
# C_2020123EN.01000401.xml

| 16.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9507 – Salini Impregilo/Astaldi)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 123/04)

On 7 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9507. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9507. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)

## By Year

faq        July 6, 2017        Could magnetic reversals be caused by meteorite or comet impacts?

Reference Materials        October 1, 2018        Report of the IAU Working Group
Exhibit 99.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Partners Trust Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)	the Form 10-K of the Company for the Year Ended December 31, 2002, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Steven A. Covert   

Steven A. Covert

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 6, 2003
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
LC GERACI, LLC, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 6.1
 Grupo TMM and Subsidiaries
Computation of Earnings per Share (IFRS & U.S. GAAP)
 December 31,(In thousands dollars except ratio data)
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003
    
    2002Shares at the end of period
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137Yearly weighted average shares
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137IFRS:Net Loss from continuing operations
    
    
    (40,945
    )
    
    
    (23,871
    )
    
    
    (109,362
    )
    
    
    (126,551
    )
    
    
    (48,141
    )Net Income from discontinued operations......
    
    
    111,362
    
    
    
    199,363
    
    
    
    9,470
    
    
    
    41,931
    
    
    
    4,980Net Income (Loss) Attributable to equity
holders of the Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
    
    
    69.908
    
    
    
    171,304
    
    
    
    (102,547
    )
    
    
    (86,662
    )
    
    
    (42,609
    )Loss per share from continuing operations
    
    
    (0.719
    )
    
    
    (0.419
    )
    
    
    (1.920
    )
    
    
    (2.222
    )
    
    
    (0.846
    )Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    
    
    1.955
    
    
    
    3.500
    
    
    
    0.166
    
    
    
    0.736
    
    
    
    0.087Earnings (Loss) per share Attributable to
equity holders of the Grupo TMM, S.A.B
    
    
    1.227
    
    
    
    3.007
    
    
    
    (1.800
    )
    
    
    (1.521
    )
    
    
    (0.748
    )U.S.GAAPNet Loss from continuing operations
    
    
    (35,812
    )
    
    
    (8,313
    )
    
    
    (114,232
    )
    
    
    (153,730
    )
    
    
    (57,759
    )Net Income from discontinued operations
    
    
    111,362
    
    
    
    119,931
    
    
    
    (1,561
    )
    
    
    106,660
    
    
    
    68,407Net Income (Loss) Attributable to equity
holders of the Grupo TMM, S.A.B.
    
    
    75,550
    
    
    
    111,618
    
    
    
    (115,793
    )
    
    
    (47,070
    )
    
    
    10,648Loss per share from continuing operations
    
    
    (0.629
    )
    
    
    (0.146
    )
    
    
    (2.005
    )
    
    
    (2.698
    )
    
    
    (1.014
    )Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    
    
    1,955
    
    
    
    2,105
    
    
    
    (0.027
    )
    
    
    1.872
    
    
    
    1.201Earnings (Loss) per share
    
    
    1,326
    
    
    
    1,959
    
    
    
    (2.032
    )
    
    
    (0.826
    )
    
    
    0.187
STATE EX REL. Matthew RICHCREEK v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1312

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Robert Jeffery FLETCHER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jose GOMEZ-CORTES, M.D., Appellant, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4280

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 24, 2018

Sean M. Ellsworth of Ellsworth Law Firm, P.A., Miami Beach, for Appellant.

Nicholas A. Merlin, Senior Attorney, Agency for Health Care Administration, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*357Appellant contends that the Agency for Health Care Administration erred when it denied his motion to vacate without affording him an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual question of whether he received sufficient notice of AHCA's final orders. We agree. *See**Reich v. Dep't of Health* , 868 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(2)
              - products_publications(24)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - (-)pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        January 1, 2017        Hydrologic Effects of Pymatuning Earthquake

Research        February 28, 2018        Freshwater Mussel Physiology
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

ERVIN RONALDO MALDONADOGOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50145

D.C. No. 3:15-cr-02824-H

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017** 

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

 Ervin Ronaldo Maldonado-Gomez appeals from the district court’s

judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea

FILED

APR 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952,

960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Maldonado-Gomez first contends that the district court failed to calculate the

Guildeline range correctly because it bypassed the issue of whether he was entitled

to a minor role adjustment, and instead considered the minor role factors in its

variance analysis. The record belies this argument. The court denied a minor role

adjustment based on the facts of Maldonado-Gomez’s case. The court’s

subsequent consideration of some of the facts asserted in support of the minor role

adjustment to grant downward departures totally six levels was not improper. See,

e.g., United States v. Ramos-Medina, 706 F.3d 932, 941 (9th Cir. 2013) (“[A] court

may consider acceptance of responsibility separately in imposing a sentence, even

if the court determined that the defendant did not qualify for a formal adjustment

on those grounds under the Guidelines.”).

Maldonado-Gomez next contends that the court’s minor role analysis was

flawed because the court did not compare him to his co-participants in the offense

and did not consider the five factors enumerated in the commentary to the minor

role Guideline. However, the record demonstrates that the district court properly

compared Maldonado-Gomez to his co-participants in the offense and considered

the factors enumerated in the Guideline and the totality of the circumstances, to

2 16-50145
determine whether Maldonado-Gomez was “substantially less culpable than the

average participant.” See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A), (C); United States v.

Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016); see also Carty, 520 F.3d at 992

(district judges are presumed to know the law and need not “tick off” all of the

sentencing factors). Moreover, in light of the circumstances of the offense, the

district court did not clearly err in concluding that Maldonado-Gomez was not a

minor participant. See Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d at 523. 

AFFIRMED.

3 16-50145
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(91)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(24)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - (-)oregon(3)
              - south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 22, 2016        Framework for Evaluating Multi-Species Climate Change Vulnerability

Presentations and Events        March 9, 2015        Climate Vulnerability Assessment for Threatened Bull Trout

Presentations and Events        June 11, 2019        Tribal Resources for Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 16
- 00147
- CR
DAMIAN PAUL SPENCER HAFLEY , Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 20th District Court Milam County, Texas Trial Court No. CR 24,290

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Clerk of the Court received a document from Appellant Damian Hafley that
the Court is treati ng as a notice of appeal of his conviction for criminal non

- support. Hafley’s document complains about this conviction and eighteen

- month sentence and indicates a desire to appeal the conviction. The Clerk has received a copy of Hafley’s “judgment adjud icating guilt” from the District Clerk of Milam County. That judgment reflects an eighteen

- month sentence for
criminal non

- support.Hafley v. State Page 2

Because this Court lacks jurisdiction of an appeal from a district court in Milam County, which is within the territorial jurisdiction of the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX

. G OV ’ T

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 22.220(a), 22.201(g, k) (West Supp. 2015)

.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opini on delivered and filed May 19 , 2016 Do not publish [CR25]
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification By Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003), I, Walter Thomas Price III, Co-Chairman, President and Director of Price Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Walter Thomas Price IIIWalter Thomas Price IIICo-Chairman, President and DirectorApril 2, 2007




E-2
DATE: November 1 , 2022

The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been

appealed to the Supreme Court:

1

. Markquall Antwoine Canada

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1 105

- 21

- 3

Opinion rendered by Judg e Humphreys on

August 30 , 2022

2

. Jaquan Ramone Brown

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0722

- 21

- 3

Opinion rendered by Judge Friedman on

September 6, 2022

3

. Shemon Devonte Clayton

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1246

- 21

- 3

Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on

September 13, 2022

4

. Shemo Devonte Clayton, a/k/a, etc.

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1247

- 21

- 3

Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee on

September 13, 2022The following cases in which the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been

disposed of by th e Supreme Court:

1

. Kionne L. Pulley, s/k/a, etc.

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1203

- 20

- 3

Opinion rendered by Judge AtLee

on December 28, 2021

Refused (220070)

2. Gabriel Seth Worsham, etc.

v. Kathleen Bonnie Crispin Worsham, etc., et al.

Record No. 0663

- 21

- 3

Opinion rendered by Judge Raphael

on January 11, 2022

Refused (220142)

3. C. Ray Davenport, Commissioner, etc.

v. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company

Record No. 0285

- 21

- 3

Opinion rendere d by Judge Humphreys

on January 18, 2022

Refused (220117)

4. Horacio Eugenio Sobol

v. Christine Marie Sobol

Record No. 0459

- 21

- 4

Opinion rendered by Judge Russell

on January 25, 2022

Petition for appeal w ithdrawn as case settled ( 220160 )

5

. Rodney Massie

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0282

- 21

- 4

Opinion rendered by Judge Russell

on February 8, 2022

Refused ( 220143 )