alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jimmy Wang, certify that:

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: March 16, 2004 | /s/ Jimmy Wang

 Principal Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------
**ATTACHMENT 3 Premanufacture Notice (PMN) Form and Instructions** 

**EPA Form 7710**
**- 25**  [For electronic copies of the PMN Form and Instructions, see http://epa.gov/oppt/newchems/pubs/pmnforms.htm and follow the appropriate links.]
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) AND18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Vegas GlobalStrategies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Raymond Chou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 31, 2005     |   | /s/ RAYMOND CHOU |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|------------------|--------|
|   | Raymond Chou            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Troy SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-206

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 3, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

NO. 2018-CC-1373

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.
Leon WOODS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Trial Readiness for Rare Diseases.                    

*Date:*                         March 6, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alumit Ishai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Grants Management and Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Suite 1E504, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-5819,                         *alumit.ishai@nih.gov.*
      ( print page 100517)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

 Dated: December 6, 2024.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-29160 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Donald OSTERBYE, Former Husband, Appellant, v. Karen CROSS f/k/a Karen Osterbye, Former Wife, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3014

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 31, 2018

William E. Whitlock III of William E. Whitlock III, PLLC, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Linda A. Bailey, Rachel H. Borntreger, and Hunter J. Hendrix of Law Office of Linda Bailey, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Wetherell, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
A99A2224.

#### ANTHONY v. THE STATE.

(522 SE2d 677)

Decided September 17, 1999.

*Ellis R. Garnett,*for appellant.

*Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted of two counts of child molestation. This appeal followed the denial of his motion for new trial. *Held:*

1. The 13-year-old victim (15 years old at the time of trial) testified that defendant committed acts which constitute the crimes charged. This evidence is sufficient to authorize the jury’s finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of two counts of child molestation. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560). And while aspects of the victim’s testimony may appear to vary, these matters were for the jury to consider — not this Court. *Howard v. State,*227 Ga. App. 5, 8 (6) (a) (488 SE2d 489). See *Berry v. State,*268 Ga. 437 (1), 438 (490 SE2d 389).

The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for new trial.

2. Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of the victim’s out-of-court statement concerning the acts which constitute the crimes charged, arguing that this statement was not admissible under the child hearsay statute, OCGA § 24-3-16, because the trial court did not consider the statement’s reliability under the test set out in *Gregg v. State,*201 Ga. App. 238, 240 (3) (b) (411 SE2d 65). This argument is without merit.

*Gregg v. State,*supra, does not prescribe a fixed test for weighing a statement’s reliability for admission into evidence under OCGA § 24-3-16. The victim’s trial testimony in the case sub judice was sufficient under *Sosebee v. State,*257 Ga. 298 (357 SE2d 562), to afford the trial court an opportunity to weigh the indicia of reliability — a finding which is implicit under the trial court’s admission of the victim’s out-of-court statement. *Letlow v. State,*222 Ga. App. 339, 343 (3) (474 SE2d 211); *Roberson v. State,*214 Ga. App. 208, 210 (5) (447 SE2d 640).

The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of the victim’s out-of-court statement concerning the acts which constitute the crimes charged.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson, C. J., and Phipps, J., concur.*
Exhibit 99.2



Report Of Independent
 Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors
Structured Obligations Corporation
 New York, New York

We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2003-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1 for the year ended December 31, 2017.  Depositor's management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2017.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2003-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.

/s/ RubinBrown LLP



Kansas City, Missouri



March 29, 2018





---
Reginald A. KIT, Jr., Appellant / Petitioner(s), v. Ashley GARBER, Appellee / Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3301

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JIMMY KIMBROUGH,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1367

LT Case No. 2009-CF-21037-AX

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/ 

Decision filed November 22, 2022 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County, 

Charles G. Crawford, Judge. 

Jimmy Kimbrough, Bushnell, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EVANDER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 100556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29200]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 822 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-530, K2025-528.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29200 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# C_2020048EN.01000201.xml

| 12.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9205 — IBM/Red Hat)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 48/02)

On 27 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9205. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9205. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARL MERTON IRONS, II,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellant.

No. 05-15275

D.C. No. CV-04-00220-LKK

Eastern District of California, 

Sacramento

ORDER

Before: REINHARDT, NOONAN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

The parties are ordered to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 25 pages,

within 28 days from the date of this order. The supplemental briefs shall discuss

the constitutionality of the standards that Congress has set forth in the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. §

2254(d)(1). Specifically, the parties should discuss, in light of Marbury v.

Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), and City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S.

507, 536 (1997), whether AEDPA unconstitutionally prescribes the sources of

law that the Judicial Branch must use in exercising its jurisdiction or

unconstitutionally prescribes the substantive rules of decision by which the federal

courts must decide constitutional questions that arise in state habeas cases. The

FILED

MAY 18 2005

CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

parties should consider whether, under the separation of powers doctrine or for

any other reason involving the constitutionality of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), this

court should decline to apply the AEDPA standards in this case. 

This court also certifies the above question to the Attorney General of the

United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2403(a). The Attorney General is permitted 

to intervene and file a brief, not to exceed 25 pages, within 28 days from the date

of this order. If the panel determines that further oral argument would be of

assistance, it will schedule such argument and inform the parties, the Attorney

General, and any amici at that time. This court also invites interested parties to

request leave, within 14 days from the day of this order, to file amicus curiae

briefs. Should leave be granted, such parties shall have 21 days from the date

thereof to file briefs of not more than 20 pages.

Judge Fernandez does not join in this order.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: H.B. A/K/A

H.A.F., JR.. A MINOR

PETITION OF: H.F., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 383 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - (-)news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        May 6, 2024        Trout, beavers, drought, and a “precious” frog

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer

Science Snippet        April 12, 2022        History of Lake Powell Written in Sediment

Science Snippet        December 29, 2022        Historic changes in water quality or lake surface elevation and their impact on endangered adult suckers in the Klamath Basin

Science Snippet        July 16, 2020        USGS Scientists are Busy as a Bee

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                 AND TREASURER

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HiEnergy Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger
W.A. Spillmann, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: October 12, 2006                  /s/ Roger W.A. Spillmann
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Roger W.A. Spillmann,
                                        Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                        and Treasurer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NU-LITE ELECTRICAL WHOLESALERS, LLC v. AXIS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC d/b/a RSB Electric, Brunt Construction, Inc. and Mid-Continent Casualty Company

NO. 2018-C-0914

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.