alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Michael L. Canning, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Geoffrey Ribar, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of SiRF Technology
Holdings, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/    MICHAEL L.
CANNING                                       
|                        |  |  |  | Michael L. Canning President and Chief Executive Officer        
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/    GEOFFREY RIBAR                                           
|                        |  |  |  | Geoffrey Ribar Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jonathan B. BLUNTSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2018

Jonathan B. Bluntson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Roberts, Ray, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
# C_2020301EN.01001501.xml

| 11.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/15

---

Special Report 14/2020

‘EU development aid to Kenya’

(2020/C 301/11)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 14/2020 ‘EU development aid to Kenya’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanover Compression Limited
Partnership (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John
E. Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/S/ JOHN E. JACKSON
--------------------------------
Name: John E. Jackson

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 29, 2004

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Denise LEAVITT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Mallory MOLTER, as personal representative of the Estate of Danny E. Molter, deceased, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 2D17-2174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

Richard Barton Ray of Paster & Ray, P.A., Bradenton, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Andrea M. Johnson of Law Office of Andrea M. Johnson, P.A., Bradenton, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

KELLY, Judge.

Denise Leavitt appeals from the probate court's order overruling her objections to the final accounting and inventory filed by Mallory Molter as personal representative of the estate of Danny E. Molter and the order striking what she characterized as a petition for declaratory judgment, to quiet title, to construe the will, and to remove and surcharge the personal representative. Ms. Molter, as personal representative, cross-appeals from the portion of the order approving the accounting and inventory but requiring her to file a supplement. We affirm without comment the issues raised in Ms. Leavitt's appeal. As to the cross-appeal, we reverse the portion of the probate court's order requiring the personal representative to file a supplement to the inventory and accounting.

In the cross-appeal, Ms. Molter argues that the probate court erred when it required the estate to file a supplement to its final accounting and inventory to include the decedent's collection of firearms as estate assets. We agree with Ms. Molter that Ms. Leavitt waived this issue because she did not timely object to the omission of the firearms. Florida Probate Rule 5.401(a) states that "[a]n interested person may object to the petition for discharge or final accounting within 30 days after the service of the later of the petition or final accounting on that interested person." Because an objection was not timely filed it was waived. Accordingly, it was error for the probate court to order the supplement. On remand, the probate court should strike that provision of its order. In all other respects the order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

SLEET and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-4878. Beth Ann FARAGHER; Nancy Ewanchew, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,

v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, Bill Terry; David Silverman, Defendants-Appellees. Feb. 4, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Cour t for the Southern District of Florida (No. 92-8010-CIV-SH); Shelby Highsmith, Judge. Before, HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLA T, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circu it Judges, and KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge. BY THE COURT: The judgment of the district court is hereby REINSTATED and AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Maurice R. Taylor, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2005 of ProUroCare Medical Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

(b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  | March 30, 2006 |                    | /s/ Maurice R. Taylor |   |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | By:                 | Maurice R. Taylor       |
|   |                | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                     |                         |                       |        |  |

 

----
Bruce ZIPPER, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D17-2444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Sidney John HANDY

NO. 2018-KO-1234

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied; untimely. See La.S.Ct. Rule X, § 5(a).
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-87358 and Form S-8 No. 333-153352) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of MSN Holdings, Inc. and the Medical Staffing NetworkHoldings, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 2008. 

 

West Palm Beach, Florida 

March 12, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - products_publications(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(16)
              - alaska(141)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(78)
              - arkansas(24)
              - california(314)
              - colorado(93)
              - connecticut(5)
              - delaware(9)
              - florida(87)
              - georgia(22)
              - guam(5)
              - hawaii(55)
              - idaho(85)
              - illinois(21)
              - indiana(13)
              - iowa(30)
              - kansas(53)
              - kentucky(10)
              - louisiana(44)
              - maine(21)
              - maryland(35)
              - massachusetts(12)
              - michigan(33)
              - minnesota(49)
              - mississippi(23)
              - missouri(26)
              - montana(75)
              - nebraska(44)
              - nevada(62)
              - new hampshire(10)
              - new jersey(23)
              - new mexico(61)
              - new york(48)
              - north carolina(35)
              - north dakota(40)
              - ohio(15)
              - oklahoma(33)
              - oregon(109)
              - pennsylvania(26)
              - puerto rico(11)
              - (-)rhode island(2)
              - south carolina(17)
              - south dakota(59)
              - tennessee(28)
              - texas(68)
              - u.s. virgin islands(9)
              - utah(58)
              - vermont(11)
              - virginia(48)
              - washington(82)
              - west virginia(20)
              - wisconsin(43)
              - wyoming(105)

## By Year

publication        April 17, 2019        Drought forecasting for streams and groundwaters in northeastern United States

publication        February 23, 2018        Artificial light at night confounds broad-scale habitat use by migrating birds
Noni Jamil STINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2675

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 12, 2018

Noni Jamil Stinson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. *See**Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n* , 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Wolf, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 33.2



LOGO

Report of Management on Assessment of Compliance

with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1. First Data Resources, LLC, through its affiliate
REMITCO, LLC (jointly, the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of and for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2011 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria applicable to it under the
Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Section 229.1122(d)  all servicing criteria except for the criteria set forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii),
1122(d)(4)(iv) (except with respect to the servicing of transactions on the remittance payment platform relating to the opening, listing, and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party pursuant to
the agreements between the Asserting Party and Capital One Services, LLC, together with its affiliates, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (formerly known as Capital One Bank) and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (the Transaction
Agreements)), and 1122(d)(4Xv)-(xv) (such criteria, after giving effect to the preceding exceptions, the Applicable Servicing Criteria), With respect to Item 1122(d)(4)(iv), the Asserting Partys responsibility is
limited to the opening, listing, and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party as required and pursuant to the Transaction Agreements, and the Asserting Party does not take responsibility for any
other matters.

2. The Asserting Party used the Applicable Servicing Criteria to assess its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria;

3. The Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2011, and for
the Reporting Period with respect to the opening, listing, and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party as required and pursuant to the Transaction Agreements;

4. Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Partys assessment of
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period.



|                                           |  |                
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|First Data Resources, LLC and REMITCO, LLC
|                                           | 
|By:                                        |  | LOGO           
|Name:                                      |  | Tim Rosenthal  
|Title:                                     |  | SVP, Operations

February 13, 2012



LOGO

©2011 First Data Corporation. All Rights Reserved. All trademarks, service marks and trade names
referenced in this material are the property of their respective owners.
Ralph STOREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3094

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
W & T OFFSHORE, L.L.C. v. TEXAS BRINE CORPORATION and Texas Brine Company, L.L.C.

Texas Brine Company, L.L.C. v. W & T Offshore, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-C-0950

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Granted.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of *789New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 8th day of October, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand-Eighteen.

John Tarlton Olivier Clerk of Court

/s/

Deputy Clerk of Court
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT 10.40.3


                              AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

This Amendment and Waiver (the "Agreement") is made as of September 15, 2003 by
and between HiEnergy Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
and Yocca Patch & Yocca, LLP, a California limited liability partnership (the
"Holder").

         WHEREAS, the Company has issued Holder, and Holder continues to hold,
promissory notes nos. 1 in the original principal amount of $46, 718.40; 2 in
the original principal amount of $147,146.81; 3 in the original principal amount
of $41,667.39; and 4 in the original principal amount of $8,537.48 (collectively
herein called the "Notes"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to extend the maturity date
of the Notes to January 15, 2004.

         NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable considerations, receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

              1.     The Company hereby confirms that the obligations under the
                     Notes are valid and continue in full force as expressly
                     amended in the Agreement. The Notes are only amended to the
                     extent expressly set forth in the Agreement.

              2.     The Maturity Date of the Notes shall be January 15, 2004,
                     subject to acceleration.

              3.     The Maturity Date of the Notes shall also accelerate
                     automatically and without notice in the event any person or
                     group acquires or offers to acquire more than 50% of the
                     voting power of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the Agreement to be
executed by duly their respective authorized persons.

         HIENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By:   /s/ Bogdan C. Maglich
      ----------------------------------
         Bogdan C. Maglich, CEO



         YOCCA PATCH & YOCCA, LLP

By:   /s/ Nicholas J. Yocca
      ----------------------------------
         Nicholas J. Yocca, Partner
14910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

'..

Airworthiness Direct~ves; Emptesa Brasileira.dr Aeronautica S.A (EMBRAJt:R) MQ

EMS· no, ·120ER, ·120FC, .120QC, and-120RJT Airplanes

AGENCY: federal Aviation Administration (Frl), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

RIN 2120·AA64

14 CFR Part 39 '''',Ar /0

:~s •••_

(Docket No. FAA-2009-0715; Directorate Ideltifi'er 200S-NM-211·AD,; Amendme:, ;' -II'

39-*-**""; AD ·"""'*-**-**1 ~ \ I

:0•••

·7 8[0

'''OUT''''' •••• OQI.

SOl·' .

]""","~sy~_

SUMMARY: We are adopting a riew airworthin,ess directive (AD) for the products lis ~

above. This AD res.tiltsfrom mandatory continuing,airworthiness information (MeAl) ~

originated by an aviation authority of another cobtry to identify a,npcorrect an unsa~ C-..<; .... OOl

condition on an aviation product. TheMCAI delcribes the unsafe conditi~~as: i-~~'-

-It"has been found 'the occurrence of corrOSIOn on the AuxIliary :"Te

Power Urn: ~APU) mounting rod.sthft cou~dcau~e the APU'rod to ,..,..,.'''''''''_

break, affectmg the APU support stnicture 'integnty.

I ~~ •• <u~

APU support structure failure could result in IOSjof power of the APU and possible 10 ~.,~

of-control Ofthe,airplane. We are issuing'this AIDto require adions to correct the unsa rou".~"~OOI.

condition 6n these products.

DATES.: This AD becomes effective [INSERT fATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF ~T'

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTeR].

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAL ALE COP'ii
[4910-]J-;ft;~

ACTION: Final rule.

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

-,---- IIIO<ITl>OO $.••••..",.

AN,,;,- I

~ru~ C.a.-..-.-

~l/o,(?O

14 CFR Part 39 -.T'N';U'''a<><.

[Docket .No. FAA-1009-0715; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-21 I-AD; Amendm ~(~, lGI<A.TUIIl!:_1J IU{31 {1-0 . Q,n.lJ..

39_*'f***; AD 2010-**-**] 'i ',f~.;z.r.-//'D

-...-,.". •• !<>I..

R1N 2120-AA64 •

Airwortbiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautlca S.A. (EMBRAER) Mode Me.

~,

EMB-120, -120ER, -120FC, -120QC, and -120RT Airplanes

I

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (lAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

SUl\fMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lisf~~

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

~"

""",TIN<; sy,,1lOl.

~-

~"

f'ICI/111tG s •••• eo<-

~.T"""

.

~"

• • • • • • •

APU support structure failure could result in loss of power of the APU and possible 10s

of control of the airplane. We are issuing this kto require actions to correct the unsa~

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe!

I -i , ••-m-.=-,,_-,-O"-' -

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

It has been found the occurrence of corrosion on the Auxiliary Power Unit

(APU) mounting rods that could cause the APU rod to break, affecting the

APU support structure integrity.

condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF