alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) will hold a public meeting via Microsoft Teams on Wednesday, January 8, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Alec Johnston, Office of National Public Liaison, at (202) 317-4299, or send an email to                         *publicliaison@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a public meeting via Microsoft Teams of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, January 8, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. EDT. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive observations about current or proposed policies, programs, and procedures, and suggest improvements. Please call or email Alec Johnston to confirm your attendance. Mr. Johnston can be reached at 202-317-4299 or                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*                     Should you wish the ETAAC to consider a written statement, please call 202-317-4299 or email:                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

Dated: December 5, 2024.

John A. Lipold,

Designated Federal Official, Office of National Public Liaison, Internal Revenue Service.

[FR Doc. 2024-29310 Filed 12-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code I, Richard C.E. Durrant, Executive Vice President of Stratos International,
Inc., certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October
31, 2004 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and (2) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stratos
International, Inc. Date: December 14, 2004 /s/ Richard
C.E. DurrantRichard C.E. DurrantExecutive Vice President
 1
EXHIBIT 13.2

Grupo TMM, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo TMM, S.A.B. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2011, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2012



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez
|Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez    
|Chief Financial Officer
Kayla DAVIS, Appellant, v. Brandon HILL, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1447

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - (-)multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - hawaii(3)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        November 9, 2023        Graph of GPS line-length across the Mauna Loa summit, 2022–2023

Charts or Graphs        April 23, 2023        Timeseries: tiles - Changes in U.S. water use from 1985 to 2015

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2010        Well-withdrawal footprint map, Azraq Oasis, Jordan

Charts or Graphs        April 28, 2023        Uncertainties: trend - Change in forest area compared to 35-year mean (1985-2020)

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 1995        Paleomagnetic secular variation curve for the past two thousand years

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Bismarck, North Dakota - A1B Scenario

Charts or Graphs        August 25, 2014        Map of June 27th flow in Kīlauea's ERZ

Charts or Graphs        December 31, 2013        Land subsidence in the San Joaquin Valley, California, 1926–70

Charts or Graphs        December 30, 2014        Small-scale map of Kīlauea's ERZ lava flow

Charts or Graphs        March 20, 2017        Karst landscapes are more prone to have land subsidence and sinkholes.

Charts or Graphs        September 21, 2023        Designing and Creating More Diversity in Team Building

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Phoenix, Arizona - B1 Scenario

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Land-Cover Modeling - Washington / Baltimore Area - A2 Scenario
Maitland STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1932

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 4, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00194

- CR

Damian Lamon Murkledove

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No . 4

o f Tarrant County (1197207D )

May 15, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

Dissent by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there wa s no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Sue Walker

___________________ Justice Sue Walker
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - (-)news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(1)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        July 6, 2015        PRMS Solar Table Module

newsletter        September 30, 2004      Sound Waves Newsletter - September 2004

newsletter        February 27, 2009      Sound Waves Newsletter - January-February 2009

newsletter        November 1, 2018      Sound Waves Newsletter - October-November 2018

How to's and trainings        December 14, 2006        PubTalk 12/2006 - Mojave
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of Providence Resources, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Nora Coccaro, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, and City of 

Houston v. David B. Wilson 

Appellate case number: 01-15-00687-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-39706

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris

Appellee, David B. Wilson, has filed an “Emergency Motion to Dismiss, and 

Alternatively, to Refer Enforcement of Mandamus to Trial Court.” The motion is DENIED.

On August 7, 2015, appellants, Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, 

and City of Houston, filed a notice of interlocutory appeal of a July 28, 2015 trial court order that 

grants appellee David B. Wilson’s “Application for Writ of Mandamus” and orders the City 

Secretary to “count and certify to the Houston City Council the number of valid signatures 

contained in the petition submitted by [Wilson] . . . .” This Court generally has jurisdiction only 

over appeals from final judgments unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal. See CMH 

Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447–48 (Tex. 2011); Paulsen v. Yarrell, 455 S.W.3d 192, 195

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.) (citing Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 392 S.W.3d 88, 

92 (Tex. 2012)); see also, e.g., TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West 2015) 

(authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders).

Accordingly, appellants are hereby notified that the Court may dismiss this appeal for 

want of jurisdiction unless appellants file a written response to this notice, providing a detailed 

explanation, citing relevant portions of the record, statutes, rules, and case law to show that this 

Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Any response must be filed 

within 10 days of the date of this notice. You must respond in writing even if you have 

previously claimed that this Court has jurisdiction over your appeal.
If a meritorious response is not received in the form described above by the deadline, the 

Court may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction without further notice.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd

Date: August 19, 2015
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Candente Resource Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|Date:  June 15, 2005 | Signed:  /s/  Peter de Visser
Peter de Visser
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |                                                                      
|                     |                                                                      
|                     |                                                                      
|                     |                                                                      
|                     |
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50635

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS PATINO, JR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-226-1

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Following his conviction by a jury, Defendant-Appellant Luis Patino, Jr.,

appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He raises

two contentions on appeal, one as to his sentence and the other as to his

conviction.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 25, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50635

2

Patino contends that the district court committed clear error in sentencing

him when it overruled his objection to a two-level increase in his offense level

that was based on his leading role in the offense. The trial record and the

presentence report (PSR) show that Patino forbade his common law wife and

codefendant, Gloria Rayos, from dealing with male customers, that Rayos gave

the proceeds of her sales to Patino, that Patino kept Rayos from leaving him by

threatening to expose her as a fugitive, and that Patino dealt with the couple’s

drug supplier. This evidence renders plausible the court’s finding that Patino

managed Rayos and exercised a leading or organizing role in the criminal

conduct. See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d 322, 330 (5th Cir. 1998). The

district court committed no clear error in sentencing Patino. 

Patino also contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him on

either count. Patino does not contend that the evidence, if believed, failed to

establish any element of either crime. Rather, he argues that the testimony was

“factually insubstantial.” This argument is merely an assertion that the

testimony of Rayos and other witnesses was not worthy of belief because it was

uncorroborated. It was exclusively for the jury to decide whether the witnesses

were credible, and the witnesses’ credibility is not an issue on appeal. United

States v. Johnson, 381 F.3d 506, 508 (5th Cir. 2004); Brainin v. United States,

317 F.2d 69, 69 (5th Cir. 1963). As the jury was entitled to believe the witnesses,

the evidence was sufficient to allow the jury to find that the government proved

all the elements of the offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Kay,

513 F.3d 432, 452 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 42 (2008). 

Patino’s conviction and sentence are, in all respects, 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01991]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8169]

Easing the Ban on Imports From Burma

SUMMARY: The Deputy Secretary of State has determined, pursuant to 
authority delegated by the Secretary of State, that it is in the 
national interests of the United States to waive the prohibitions 
described in section 3(a) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 
2003 (Pub. L. 108-61), as amended (``BFDA''), which requires the 
President to prohibit the importation of any article that is a product 
of Burma into the United States, and which the President implemented in 
section 3 of Executive Order 13310 (July 28, 2003). In conjunction with 
this waiver determination, the Department of the Treasury's Office of 
Foreign Assets Control issued General License (No. 18) on November 16, 
2012 authorizing imports into the United States of any article that is 
a product of Burma, subject to limitations set forth therein.
    This step is in the national interest of the United States because 
it supports those in the Burmese government that have instituted 
important reforms since early 2011 and encourages the government to 
make further progress. The waiver of the import ban responds to the 
Government of Burma's continued reforms and efforts to address U.S. 
core concerns, including the release of political prisoners, and other 
steps on human rights and national reconciliation.

DATES: Effective Date: November 15, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Marshall Klein, Senior Sanctions 
Officer, Economic & Business Affairs, Office of Sanctions Policy and 
Implementation, 202-647-9452.

    Dated: January 16, 2013.
Jose W. Fernandez,
Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2013-01991 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
```