# 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

, Interim Report 39 : Analysis of PFOA in Groundw ater Samples Collected at the Former Sludge Incorporation Area (FSIA) located in Decatur, AL

, in

November/December 2012

Study Title

Analysis of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur Phase 3

Site- Related Monitoring Program



### Data Requirement
EPA TSCA Good Laboratory Practice Standards 40 CFR Part 792



### Study Director

Jaisimha Kesari P.E., DEE

Weston Solutions, Inc.

1400 Weston Way

West Chester, PA 19380

Pho ne: 610

- 701

- 3761



### Author

Susan Wolf

3M Environmental Laboratory



### Interim Report Completion Date

Date of signing



### Performing Laboratory

3M Environmental Health and Safety Operations

Environmental Laboratory 3M Center, Bldg 260

- 05 -N- 17

Maplewood, MN 55144



### Project Identification

GLP10

- 01

- 01 -39



### Total Number of Pages

71



### Testing Cert #2052.01 The testing reported herein meet the requirements of ANSI/ ISO/IEC 17025:2005 “General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories”, in accordance with the A2LA Testing Certificate # 2052.01. Testing that complies with this International Standard also meets principles of ISO 9001:2000.

### This page has been reserved for specific country requirements.GLP10-01-01 ; Interi m Repor t 3 9 Analysi s o f PFO A i n Groundwate r Sample s Forme r Sludg e Incorporatio n Are a (FSIA) ; Decatur

, A L



### GL P COMPLIANC E STATEMEN T

Repor t Title : GLP10-01-01

, Interi m Repor t 39

. Analysi s o f PFO

A i n Groundwate r Sample s Collecte d

a t th e Forme r Sludg e Incorporatio n Are a (FSIA ) a t Decatur

, AL

, i n November/Decembe r 201 2

Study : Analysi s o f Perfluorooctanoi c Aci d (PFOA ) i n Groundwater

, Soi l an d Sedimen t fo r th e 3 M

Decatu r Phas e 3 Site-Relate d Monitorin g Program

.

Thi s analytica l phas e wa s conducte d i n complianc e wit h Toxi c Substance s Contro l Ac t (TSCA ) Goo d

Laborator y Practic e (GLP ) Standards

, 4 0 CF R 792

, wit h th e exception s liste d below :

• Thes e ar e environmenta l sample s wher e ther e i s n o specifi c tes t substance

, n o specifi c tes t syste m an d n o dosin g o

f a tes t system

.

• Th e referenc e substance s hav e no t bee n characterize d unde r th e GLP s an d th e stabilit y unde r storag e condition s a

t th e tes t sit e hav e no

t bee n detennine d unde r GLPs

.



# TO jp/fe w ^/B

Gar y Hohjfenife'in

, Sponso r Representativ e Dat e

JaisimP>a4<eSari

, P.E.

, DEE

, Stud y Directo r

Pag e 3 o f 7 1GLP10-01-01 ; Interi m Repor t 3 9 Analysi s o f PFO A i n Groundwate r Sample s Forme r Sludg e Incorporatio n Are a (FSIA) ; Decatur

, A L



### QUALIT Y ASSURANC E STATEMEN T

Repor t Title : GLPl0-01-01

, Interi m Repor t 39

. Analysi s o f PFO

A i n Groundwate r Sample s Collecte d

a t th e Forme r Sludg e Incorporatio n Are a (FSIA ) a t Decatur

, AL

, i n November/Decembe r 201 2

Study : Analysi s o

f Perfluorooctanoi c Aci d (PFOA ) i n Groundwater

, Soi l an d Sedimen t fo r th e 3 M

Decatu r Phas e 3 Site-Relate d Monitorin g Program

.

Thi s repor

t an d th e accompanyin g dat a wer e audite d b y th e 3 M Environmenta l Laborator y Qualit y Assuranc e Uni t (QAU)

, a s indicate d below

. Th e finding s wer e reporte d t o th e principa l investigato r (P.I.)

, laborator

y managemen t an d stud y director

.

Inspectio n Date s Phas e Dat e Reporte d t o Inspectio n Date s Phas e Testin g Facilit y Managemen t Stud y Directo r

12/27-28/1 2 Dat a / Interi m Repor

t 1/25/1 3 1/23/1 3



### QA U Representativ e 

## 7- 3 

## 0//. 3

jat e

Pag e 4 o f 7 1

# T ABLE OF 

# C ONTENTS

GLP Compliance Statement

...................................................................................................................... 3

Quality Assurance Statement

.................................................................................................................... 4

Table of Contents

................................................................................................ ....................................... 5

List of Tables

................................................................................................ .............................................. 6

1 Study Information

................................................................................................ ................................ 8

2 Summary

................................................................................................ ............................................. 9

3 Introduction

................................................................................................ ........................................ 10

4 Test & Control Substances

.............................................................................................................. 11

5 Reference Substances

..................................................................................................................... 11

6 Test System

................................................................................................ ...................................... 11

7 Method Summary

............................................................................................................................. 12

7.1 Methods

............................................................................................................................ 12

7.2 Sample Collection

............................................................................................................. 12

7.3 Sample Preparation

.......................................................................................................... 12

7.4 Analysis

............................................................................................................................. 12

8 Analytical Results

.............................................................................................................................. 14

8.1 Calibration

......................................................................................................................... 14

8.2 System Suitability

............................................................................................................. 14

8.3 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

.............................................................................................. 14

8.4 Continuing Calibration

...................................................................................................... 14

8.5 Blanks

................................................................................................ ................................ 14

8.6 Lab Control Spikes (LCSs)

.............................................................................................. 15

8.7 Analytical Method Uncertainty

......................................................................................... 15

8.8 Field Matrix Spikes (FMS)

................................................................................................ 16

### 9 Data Summary and Discussion

....................................................................................................... 16

10 Conclusion

................................................................................................ ......................................... 25

11 Data/Sample R etention

.................................................................................................................... 25

12 Attachments

................................................................................................ ...................................... 25

13 Signatures

................................................................................................ ......................................... 26



# L IST OF 

# T ABLES

Table 1. Summarized PFOA Results (FSIA Groundwater, Decatur, AL, Nov/Dec 2012)

................... 10

Table 2. Sample Description Key Code.

................................................................................................ 12

Table 3. Instrument Parameters.

............................................................................................................ 13

Table 4. Liquid Chromatography Conditions.

........................................................................................ 13

Table 5. Mass Trans itions.

...................................................................................................................... 13

Table 6. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ).

...................................................................................................... 14

Table 7. Laboratory Control Spike Recovery.

........................................................................................ 15

Table 8. Analytical Method Uncertainty.

................................................................................................ . 15

Table 9. Field Matrix Spike Levels.

......................................................................................................... 16

Table 10. DAL GW 130R 121130

.......................................................................................................... 17

Table 11. DAL GW 130S 121130

........................................................................................................... 17

Table 12. DAL GW 130L 121130

........................................................................................................... 17

Table 13. DAL GW 131R 121205

.......................................................................................................... 17

Table 14. DAL GW 131S 121204

........................................................................................................... 18

Table 15. DAL GW 131L 121205

........................................................................................................... 18

Table 16. DAL GW 133R 121205

.......................................................................................................... 18

Table 17. DAL GW 133S 121205

........................................................................................................... 18

Table 18. DAL GW 133L 121205

........................................................................................................... 19

Table 19. DAL GW 134R 121205

.......................................................................................................... 19

Table 20. DAL GW 134S 121205

........................................................................................................... 19

### Table 21. DALGW 134L 121205

............................................................................................................ 19

Table 22. DAL GW 135R 121205

.......................................................................................................... 20

Table 23. DAL GW 135S 12120 5

........................................................................................................... 20

Table 24. DAL GW 135L 121205

........................................................................................................... 20

Table 25. DAL GW 136S 121130

........................................................................................................... 20

Table 26. DAL GW 136L 121130

............................................................................................................ 21

Table 27. DAL GW 137S 121205

............................................................................................................ 21

Table 28. DAL GW 137L 121205

............................................................................................................ 21

Table 29. DAL GW 138S 121205

............................................................................................................ 21

Table 30. DAL GW 138L 121205

............................................................................................................ 22

Table 31. DAL GW CW26C 12 1205

....................................................................................................... 22

Table 32. DAL GW CW26L 121205

........................................................................................................ 22

Table 33. DAL GW 140R 121130

........................................................................................................... 22

Table 34. DAL GW 141R 121130

........................................................................................................... 23

Table 35. DAL GW 142R 121130

........................................................................................................... 23

Table 36. DAL GW 145R 121204

........................................................................................................... 23

Table 37. Trip Blank

................................................................................................ ................................ 24

Table 38. Rinseate Blanks

...................................................................................................................... 24



# A

TTACHMENTS

Attach ment A: Protocol Amendment 39 (General Projec t Outline ) 27

Attach ment B:Representative Chromatograms and Calibration Curve 34

Attach ment C: Analytical Me thod - ES -8- 044.1 47

Attach ment D: Protocol Amendment Deviation 70

## 1 **Study Information**

Sponsor

3M Company

Sponsor Representative

Gary Hohenstein 3M EHS Operations 3M Building 224

- 5W

- 03 Saint Paul, MN 55144

- 1000 Phone: (651) 737

- 3570

Study Director

Jaisimha Kesari, P.E., DEE Weston Solutions, Inc. West Chester, PA 19380 Phone: (610) 701

- 3761 Fax: (610) 701

- 7401 j.kesari@westonsolutions.com

Study Location

Testing Facility

3M EHS Operations 3M Environmental Laboratory Building 260

- 5N

- 17 Maplewood, MN 55106

Study Personnel

William K. Reagen, Ph.D., 3M Laboratory Manager Cleston Lange

, Ph.D., Principal A nalytical Investigator. ( clange@mmm.com ); phone (651)

- 733

- 9860

Susan Wolf

, 3M Analyst Chelsie Grochow, Analyst Kelly Ukes, Analyst

Study Dates

Study Initiation: March 8 , 2010 Interim Report 39 Experimental Termination : December 23, 2012 Interim Report Completion: Date of Interim Report Signing

Location of Archives

All original raw data and the analytical report have been archived at the 3M Environmental Laboratory according to 40 CFR Part 792. The test substance and analytical reference standard reserve samples are archived at the 3M Environmental Laboratory according to 40 CFR Part 792

## 2 **Summary**

The 3M Environmental Laboratory received groundwater samples from w ells located at the Former Sludge Incorporation Area (FSIA) in Decatur, AL for perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) analysis under 3M project GLP10

- 01

- 01 -39

. A total of seventy

- five sample bottles were prepared for thirty

- one different sampling locations. Due to dry condition, samples were not collected from four of the spe cified sampling locations; DAL GW 136R, DAL GW 137R, DAL GW 138R, and DAL GW 143R

. Samples

were collected November 30

- December 5 , 2012 by Weston Solutions personnel . The samples were received at the 3M Environmental Laboratory on December 7 , 2012 at ambient conditions

.

The 3M Environmental Laboratory prepared sample containers for thirty

- one sampling locations. For each sampling location, a minimum of two sample bottles were prepared (primary sample and a field sample duplicate). The 3M Environmental Laboratory has demonstrated in previous sampling at the FSIA, that Environmental Laboratory Method ETS -8- 044.1 is appropriate for the given sample matrix, based on acceptable recoveries of target analyte field matrix spikes (FMS). Therefore, for this

sam pling event, a field matrix spike sample was prepared for six of the twenty

- seven sampling
locations collected. In addition, a trip blank set containing Milli

- QTM water and appropriate trip blank spikes were prepared

, as well as two equipment rinseate blan ks

. The equipment rinseate blanks did not have FMS samples prepared for determination of PFOA recovery

.

All of the samples were prepared and analyzed for PFOA following 3 M Environmental Laboratory

Method ETS -8- 044. 1. Many of the groundwater samples required dilution to attain PFOA

concentrations w ithin the range of the curve, in some instances up to 100

- fol d dilution were required

. The average measured PFOA concentrations are summarized in Table 1. The equipment rinseate blanks and trip blank w ere be low the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.02 40 ng/mL, indicating adequate control of sample contamination during shipping and sample collection

. The PFOA

concentration results for all groundwater samples ranged over four orders of magnitude from 0.3 39 ng/mL to 3 08 0 ng/mL. The analytical uncertainty was estimated at ± 19 %.

### Table 1. Summarized PFOA Results ( FSIA Groundwater, Decatur, AL, Nov/Dec 2012 )

Sample ID Avg. PFOA

Concentration (ng/ mL ) Relative

Percent

Difference

DAL G W 130R 121130 7 70 4.9 %

DAL GW 130S 121130 1 48 1.4 %

DAL GW 130L 121130 49.8 1 1 %

DAL GW 131R 121205 1 630 4.9 %

DAL GW 131S 121204 2 4.1 0.0 %

DAL GW 131L 121205 77.3 3 .4 %

DAL GW 133R 121205 67.4 6.5 %

DAL GW 133S 121205 314 2.9 %

DAL GW 133L 121205 380 0. 0 %

DAL GW 134R 121205 1 380 0 .0 %

DAL GW 134S 121205 14. 4 6.3 %

DAL GW 134L 121205 437 1.8 %

DAL GW 135R 121205 3 080 1.3 %

DAL GW 135S 121205 24.3 3.7 %

DAL GW 135L 121205 189 2.7 %

DAL GW 136 S 121130 94.6 1.8 %

DAL GW 136L 121130 81.8 2 .3 %

DAL GW 137S 12 1205 0. 602 5.8 %

DAL GW 137L 121205 0.3 39 5.9 %

DAL GW 138S 121205 1 55 1.3 %

DAL GW 138L 121205 0. 447 8.3 %

DAL GW CW26C 121205 351 1.4%

DAL GW CW26L 121205 624 1.3%

DAL GW 140R 121130 1 20 2.5 %

DAL GW 141R 121130 1. 87 1.6 %

DAL GW 142R 121130 46.1 2.4 %

DAL GW 145R 121204 56.0 1.3 % Trip Blank s (Milli

- QTM Water) < 0. 02 40 N/A

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 3 9 Equipment rinseate blanks : DAL GW 1 31S and DAL GW 1 4 5R < 0. 02 40 N/A

N/A: not applicable The analytical uncertainty for PFOA was estimated at ± 19 %.



## 3 **Introduction**

This analytical study was conducted as part of the Phase 3 En vironmental M onitoring and A ssessment

P rogram for the 3M facility located in Decatur, Alabama. The objective of the overall program is to gain information regarding concentrations of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in various environmental med ia such as groundwater, soils and sediments that are associated with and near the Decatur facility. This analytical study was conducted to analyze ground water samples collected from various well s located at the Former Sludge Incorporation Area (FS IA ) in Decatur, AL for PFOA in an effort to characterize regional groundwater conditions.

The 3M Environmental Laboratory prepared sample bottles ( 25 0 mL high

- densi ty polyethylene ) which

were shipped to Decatur, AL Weston personnel prior to field sampling. S ample bottle sets for each groundwater sampling location included a field sample and field sample duplicate. A field matrix spike

### sample was prepared for six of the twenty

- seven sampling locations collected. Each empty container for groundwater sampling was marked with a “fill to here” line to produce a final sample volume of 20 0 mL. Containers designated for field matrix samples were fortified with an appropriate ma trix spike solution containing PFOA prior to being sent to the field for sample collectio n. See section 8.8 of the report for field matrix spike levels

.

S ample s were prepared and analyzed according to the procedure defined in 3M Environme ntal Laboratory method ETS -8- 044. 1 “ Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perf luorinated Compound s i n Water by High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Direct Injection Analysis”.

Table 1 summarize s the average PFOA concentrations for the duplicate ground water samples

collected

, the trip blank, and equipment rinseate blank sample s. Tables 10 -38 summarize the individual sample results and the associated FMS recoveries

. All results for the quality control samples prepared and analyzed with the samples are reported and discussed elsewhere in this report.



## 4 **Test & Control**  **Substance s** 

Th ere was not a test substance or control substances in the classic sense of a GLP study. This study was purely analytical in nature.



## 5 **Reference Substances**

The analytical reference substances used for this study are listed below.

Reference

Substance PFOA

( Branched and Linear isomers ) PFOA

( Branched and Linear isomers )

Chemical Name Perfluorooctanoate Perfluorooctanoate

Chemical Formula 

### C 7 

### F 15 

### COO - 

### C 7 

### F 15 

### COO Identifier CAS # 335

- 67 -1 CAS # 95328

- 99 -7

Use FMS Reference Standard Target Analyte

, LCS

, and FMS

Reference Standard

Source Sigma Aldrich Wellington

Expiration Date 07/27/2016 03/17/2014

Storage Conditions Ambient Frozen

Chemical Lot Number MKBD4574V TPFOA0311

TCR Number TCR11

- 0029 TCR11

- 0042, TCR12

- 0027

Physical Description Powder Liquid

Purity 96.8% >97%



## 6 **Test System**

There was not a test system for this study in the classic sense of a GLP study. This study was conducted for analysis of ground water samples collected from wells located in Decatur, AL by Weston Solutions, Inc. personnel

. Samples for this study are “real world” environmental samples.

### Table 2

. Sample Description Key Code.

String Number String Descriptor Example

**Example DAL**  **GW 131R**  **0 121205** 

**1 Sample**  **Location DAL**  **= Decatur, Alabama** 

**2 Well ID**  **Examp le:**  **131**

**3 Well Level**  **R = Residuum**  **shallow water**

**- bearing zone** 

**L = Bedrock water**

**- bearing zo**  **ne**

**S = Epikarst**  **middle water**

**- bearing zone** 

**4 Sampling Date**  **121205**

**– December 5**  **, 2012**

**5 Sample Type**  **0=primary sample**

**DB =duplicate sample** 

**FMS = Field Matrix Spike**



## 7 **Method Summary**

7.1 Methods
Analysis for all analytes was completed following 3M Environmental Laboratory method ETS -8- 044. 1

“ Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds In Water by High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Direct Injection Analysis”.



## 7.2 Sample Collection

Samples were collected in 25 0 mL Nalgene TM 

### ( high

- density polyethylene) bottles prepared at the 3M Environmental Laboratory. Sample bottles associated with GLP10

- 01

- 01 -39 were returned to the

laborator y at ambient conditions on December 7, 2012

. Samples were stored refrigerated at th e laboratory after receipt. A set of laboratory prepared Trip Blank and Trip Blank field matrix spikes were

sent with the sample collection bottles.



## 7.3 Sample Preparation

Sa mples were prepared by removing an aliquot of the well mixed sample and placing it in an autovial for analysis.

Samples that required dilution were prepared by diluting 1mL of sample with 9 mLs of Milli

- QTM water (dilution 1:10). Samples requiring a 1:100 dilution were prepared by diluting 0.1 mL of sample with 9.9

mLs of Milli

- QTM water.



## 7.4 Analysis

All study samples and quality control samples were analyzed for PFOA using high performance liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Detailed instrument parameters, the liquid chromatography gradient program, and the specific mass transitions analyzed are described in the raw data hard copies placed in the final data packet, and are briefly described below in Table 3

, Table 4

and Table 5

.

### Table 3 . Instrument Parameters

.

Instrument Name ETS Buster

Analytical Method Followed ETS

- 8

- 044.1

Analysis Date 12/21/12

Liquid Chromatograph Agilent 1100

Guar d column Betasil C18 (4.6 mm X 100 mm), 5 μ

Analytical column Betasil C18 (4.6 mm X 100 mm), 5 μ
Injection Volume 10 μ L

Mass Spectrometer Applied Biosystems API 4000

Ion Source Turbo Spray

Electrode Turbo ion electrode

Polarity Negative

Software Analy st 1. 6.1



### Table 4. Liquid Chromatography Conditions

.

**Step**

**Number Total Time**  **(min) Flow Rate**  **(** μ

**L/min) Percent A** 

**(2 mM ammonium acetate) Percent B** 

**(Methanol)**

ETS

- 8

- 044.1 Analysis

0 0 .0 750 90.0 10.0

1 0.5 750 90.0 10.0

2 4.0 750 70.0 30.0

3 6.0 750 70.0 30.0

4 11.0 750 20.0 80.0

5 13.0 750 20.0 80.0

6 13.5 750 10.0 90.0

7 16.0 750 10.0 90.0

8 16.5 750 90.0 10.0

9 19.0 750 90.0 10.0



### Table 5. Mass Transitions.

**Analyte Mass Transition** 

**Q1/Q3 Referen**  **ce Material**

**Structure**

**PFOA 413/369** 

**Linear + Branched**  **413/219**

**413/169**

Dwell time was 100 msec for each transition. The individual transitions were summed to produce a “total ion chromatogram” (TIC), which was used for quantitation.

## 8 **Analytic al Results** 

8.1 Calibration

All s amples were analyzed against a n external standard calibration curve. Calibration standards were prepared by spiking known amounts of the stock solutio n containing PFOA into Milli

- QTM water . A total of fifteen spiked standards ranging from 0.025 0 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL (nominal) were prepared and analyz ed. A quadratic, 1/x weighted, calibration curve of the peak area counts was used to fit the data

for PFOA . The data were not forced through zero during the fitting process. Calculating the standard concentrations using the peak area confirmed accuracy of each curve point. Each curve point was quantitated using the overall calibration curve and reviewed for accuracy. Method calibration accuracy requirements of 100±25% (100±30% for the lowest curve point) were met. The correlation coefficient (r) was greater than 0.995 for PFOA

.



## 8.2 System Suitability

A calibration standard was analyzed four times at the beginning of the analytical sequence to demonstrate overall system suitability. T he acceptance criteria of less than or equal to 5% relative standard deviation (RSD) for peak area and retention time criteria of less than or equal to 2% RSD was

met for PFOA

.



## 8.3 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

The LOQ for this analysis is the lowest non

- zero calibration standard in the curve that meets linearity and accuracy requirements and for which the area counts are at least twice those of the appropriate
blanks. The nominal LOQ for all analytes can be found in Table 6

.

Table 6

. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

.

**Analysis Date (s)**  **PFOA**

**LOQ, ng/mL (1)** 

12/21/12 0.02 40

(1) Analytical LOQ without sample dilution factor s applied.



## 8.4 Continuing Calibration
During the course of each analytical sequence, continuing calibration verification samples (CCVs) were analyzed to confirm that the instrument response and the initial calibration curve were still in control. All

CCVs met method criteria of 100% ± 25 % for PFOA.



## 8.5 Blanks

Three types of blanks were prepared and analyzed with the samples: procedural blanks , trip blanks

, and equipment rinseate blanks

. Procedural blank result s were reviewed and used to evaluate method performance and to determine the LOQ for PFOA

. Trip blanks reflect the shipping and sample collection

condit i ons the sample bottles and samples experience. Equipment rinseate blanks are aqueous samples that reflect the efficiency of equipment cleaning in the field between different sample collections to ensure no cross contamination of samples from the equipment.

## 8.6 Lab Contro l Spikes (LCSs)

Low, mid , and high

- level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in triplicate with each preparation set. LCSs were prepared by spiking known amounts of the analyte into 1 0 mL of laboratory

Milli

- QTM water

, to produce the desired concentration. The spiked water samples were then analyzed in the same manner as the samples

. The method acceptance criteria, average of LCS s at each level

should be within 100% ± 20% with an RSD ≤20 %, were met for PFOA

. All LCS samples were used in

the determination of method uncertain ty in section 8.7.

The following calculations were used to generate data in Table 7 for laboratory control spikes :

100% * ion Concentrat Spike ion Concentrat Calculated Recovery Percent LCS

=

100% * recovery LCS average replicates LCS deviation standard RSD LCS%

=



### Table 7. Laboratory Control Spike Recovery

.

ETS -8- 044.1

Analyzed 12/21 /12 **PFOA (Branched**  **and Linear isomers )** 

**Lab ID Spiked** 

**Concentration (ng/mL)**  **Calculated**

**Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

LCS

- 121220

- 1 0.477 0.459 96.1

LCS

- 121220

- 2 0.477 0 .448 93.9

LCS

- 121220

- 3 0.477 0.462 96.9

Average ± %RSD 95.6 % ± 1.6 %

LCS

- 121220

- 4 4.77 4.84 102

LCS

- 121220

- 5 4.77 4.90 103

LCS

- 121220

- 6 4.77 4.89 103

Average ± %RSD 103 % ± 0.56 %

LCS

- 121220

- 7 28.7 26.3 91.6

LCS

- 121220

- 8 28.7 24.7 86.1

LCS

- 121220

- 9 2 8.7 25.2 87.9

Average ± %RSD 88.5 % ± 3.2 %



## 8.7 Analytical Method Uncertainty
Analytical uncertainty is based on historical QC data that is control charted and used to evaluate method accuracy and precision. The method uncertainty is calculated following E TS

- 12

- 012.2. The standard deviation is calculated for the set of accuracy results (in %) obtained for the QC samples. The

method uncertainty is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation by a factor of 2, which corresponds to a confidence level of 95%.

Table 8 . Analytical Method Uncertainty.

Analyte Method Standard Deviation Method Uncertainty

PFOA ETS

- 8

- 044.1 9.51 ± 19 %

## 8.8 Field Matrix Spikes (FMS)

A field matrix spike w as c ollected at six sampling locations to verify that the analytical method is applicable to the collected matrix. Field matrix spikes were generated by adding a measured volume of field sample to a container spiked by the laboratory with the target analytes prior to shipping sample containers for sample collection. Field matrix spike recoveries within method acceptance criteria of 100±30% confirm that “unknown” components in the sample matrix do not significantly interfere with the extraction and analysis of the analytes of interest. Field matrix spike concentrations must be 50% of the sample concentration to be considered an appropriate field spike. Field matrix spikes are presente d in

section 9 of this report.

Table 9 . Field Matrix Spike Levels.

100%*

on Concentrat Spike Dup.) Sample Field & Sample Field:ion Concentrat Average FMS ofion Concentrat (Sample Recovery FMS −

=



## 9 **Data Summary and Discussion**

The tables below summarize the sample results and field matrix spike recoveries for the sampling locations as well as the Trip Blanks and rinseate blanks

. Results and average values are rounded to three significant figures according to EPA rounding rules. Because of rounding, values may vary slightly

from thos e listed in the raw data.

Field matrix spike recoveries meeting the method acceptance criteria of ± 30%, demonstrate that the

method was appropriate for the given matrix and their respective quantitative ranges

. All laboratory control samples and field matrix spike samples met method acceptance criteria.

Sampling Location (Well ID) Sp ike Level PFOA, ng/mL

137S , 141R FMS 1.92

1 31S, 143R FMS 20.2

1 30S, 136S, 145R FMS 101

Trip Blank Low 1.92

Mid 20.2 High 101

### Table 10

. DAL GW 130R 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 001 DAL

- GW

- 130R

- 0

- 121130 751

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 002 DAL

- GW

- 130R

- DB

- 121130 789

**Average Concentration (ng/mL)**  **± %RPD**  **770 ng/mL**  **± 4**  **.9%**

Samples diluted 1:100



### Table 11

. DAL GW 130S 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 003 DAL

- GW

- 130S

- 0

- 121130 147 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 00 4 DAL

- GW

- 130S

- DB

- 121130 149 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 005 DAL

- GW

- 130S

- FMS

- 121130 221 72.3

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 148**  **ng/mL ±**  **1.4%**

NA = Not Applicable Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 12

. DAL GW 130L 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID D**  **escription Concentration**  **(ng/mL)**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 006 DAL

- GW

- 130L

- 0

- 121130 47.1

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 007 DAL

- GW

- 130L

- DB

- 121130 52.4

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 49.8**  **ng/mL ±**  **11%**

Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 13

. DAL GW 131R 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 008 DAL

- GW

- 131R

- 0

- 121205 1590

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 009 DAL

- GW

- 131R

- DB

- 121205 1670

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 1630**  **ng/mL ±**  **4.9 %** 

Samples diluted 1:100

### Table 14

. DAL GW 131S 121204

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 010 DAL

- GW

- 131S

- 0

- 121204 24.1 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 011 DAL

- GW

- 131S

- DB

- 121204 24.1 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 012 DAL

- GW

- 131S

- FMS

- 121204 40.7 82.2

**Average Concentration (ng/mL)**  **± %RPD**  **24.1 ng/m L**  **± 0.0%** 



### Table 15

. DAL GW 131L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 013 DAL

- GW

- 131L

- 0

- 121205 78.6

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 014 DAL

- GW

- 131L

- DB

- 121205 76.0

**Aver age Concentration (ng/mL)**  **± %RPD**  **77.3 ng/m**  **L ±**  **3 .4%** 

Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 16

. DAL GW 133R 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 015 DAL

- GW

- 133R

- 0

- 121205 69.6

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 016 DAL

- GW

- 133R

- DB

- 121205 65.2

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 67.4**  **ng/m L**  **± 6.5**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 17

. DAL GW 133S 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 017 DAL

- GW

- 133S

- 0

- 121205 309

GL P10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 018 DAL

- GW

- 133S

- DB

- 121205 318

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 314**  **ng/m L**  **± 2.9**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:10

### Table 18

. DAL GW 133L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 019 DA L

- GW

- 133L

- 0

- 121205 380

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 020 DAL

- GW

- 133L

- DB

- 121205 380

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 380 ng/m**  **L ±**  **0.0%**

Sample s diluted 1:10



### Table 19

. DAL GW 134R 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 021 DAL

- GW

- 134R

- 0

- 121205 1380

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 022 DAL

- GW

- 134R

- DB

- 121205 1380

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 1380**  **ng/m L**  **± 0**  **.0%**

Samples diluted 1:100



### Table 20

. DAL GW 134S 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Descripti**  **on Concentration**  **(ng/mL)**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 023 DAL

- GW

- 134S

- 0

- 121205 14.8

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 024 DAL

- GW

- 134S

- DB

- 121205 13.9

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 14.4 ng/m**  **L ±**  **6.3%**



### Table 21

. DAL GW 134L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Descri**  **ption Concentration**  **(ng/mL)**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 025 DAL

- GW

- 134L

- 0

- 121205 441

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 026 DAL

- GW

- 134L

- DB

- 121205 433

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 437**  **ng/m L**  **± 1.8**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:100

### Table 22

. DAL GW 135R 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 027 DAL

- GW

- 135R

- 0

- 121205 3060

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 028 DAL

- GW

- 135R

- DB

- 121205 3100

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 3080**  **ng/m L**  **± 1.3 %** 

Samples diluted 1:100



### Table 23

. DAL GW 135S 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 029 DAL

- GW

- 135S

- 0

- 121205 24.7

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 030 DAL

- GW

- 135S

- DB

- 121205 23.8

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 24.3**  **ng/m L**  **± 3.7**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 24 . DAL GW 135L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 031 DAL

- GW

- 135L

- 0

- 121205 191

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 032 DAL

- GW

- 135L

- DB

- 121205 186

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 189**  **ng/m L**  **± 2.7**  **%**

Sam ples diluted 1:10



### Table 25 . DAL GW 136S 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 035 DAL

- GW

- 136S

- 0

- 121130 95.4 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 036 DAL

- GW

- 136S

- DB

- 121130 93.7 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 037 DAL

- GW

- 136S

- FMS

- 121130 196 100

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 94.6 ng/m**  **L ± 1.8**  **%**

NA = Not Applicable Samples diluted 1:10

### Table 26 . DAL GW 136L 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 0 38 DAL

- GW

- 136L

- 0

- 121130 80.8

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 039 DAL

- GW

- 136L

- DB

- 121130 82.7

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 81.8**  **ng/m L**  **± 2 .3**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 27

. DAL GW 137S 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (**  **ng/mL) %Recovery** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 042 DAL

- GW

- 137S

- 0

- 121205 0.619 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 043 DAL

- GW

- 137S

- DB

- 121205 0.584 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 044 DAL

- GW

- 137S

- FMS

- 121205 2.02 74.0

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 0.602**  **ng/m L**  **± 5.8**  **%**

NA = Not Applicable



### Table 28 . DAL GW 137L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 045 DAL

- GW

- 137L

- 0

- 121205 0.349

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 046 DAL

- GW

- 137L

- DB

- 121205 0.329

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 0.339**  **ng/m L**  **± 5.9 %** 



### Table 29

. DAL GW 138 S 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 049 DAL

- GW

- 138S

- 0

- 121205 154

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 050 DAL

- GW

- 138S

- DB

- 121205 156

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 155**  **ng/m L**  **± 1.3 %** 

Samples diluted 1:10

### Table 30

. DAL GW 138 L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 051 DAL

- GW

- 138L

- 0

- 121205 0.428

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 052 DAL

- GW

- 138L

- DB

- 121205 0.465

**Average Concentration (ng/mL )**  **± %RPD**  **0.447 ng/m L**  **± 8.3 %** 



### Table 31 . DAL GW CW26C 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 053 DAL

- GW

- CW26C

- 0

- 121205 353

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 054 DAL

- GW

- CW26C

- DB

- 121205 348

**Average Concentration ( ng/mL)**  **± %RPD**  **351 ng/m**  **L ± 1.4**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:10 0



### Table 32 . DAL GW CW26L 121205

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 055 DAL

- GW

- CW26L

- 0

- 121205 628

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 056 DAL

- GW

- CW26L

- DB

- 121205 620

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 624 ng/m**  **L ± 1.3**  **%**

Samples diluted 1:100



### Table 33 . DAL GW 140 R 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 057 DAL

- GW

- 140R

- 0

- 121130 121

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 058 DAL

- GW

- 140R

- DB

- 121130 118

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 120**  **ng/m L**  **± 2.5 %** 

Samples diluted 1:10

### Table 34 . DAL GW 14 1R 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 059 DAL

- GW

- 141R

- 0

- 121130 1.88 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 060 DAL

- GW

- 141R

- DB

- 121130 1.85 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 061 DAL

- GW

- 141R

- FMS

- 121130 3.27 73.3

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 1.87 ng/m**  **L ± 1.6**  **%**

NA = Not Applicable



### Table 35 . DAL GW 14 2 R 121130

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)** 

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 062 DAL

- GW

- 142R

- 0

- 121130 46.6

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 063 DAL

- GW

- 142R

- DB

- 121130 45.5

**Average Concentration (ng/mL) ±**  **%RPD 46.1**  **ng/m L**  **± 2.4 %** 

Samples diluted 1:10



### Table 36 . DAL GW 14 5R 121204

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 067 DAL

- GW

- 145R

- 0

- 121204 55.6 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 068 DAL

- GW

- 145R

- DB

- 121204 56.3 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 069 DAL

- GW

- 145R

- FMS

- 121204 143 86.2

**Average Concentrati on (ng/mL)**  **± %RPD**  **56.0 ng/m**  **L ±**  **1.3 %** 

NA = Not Applicable Samples diluted 1:10

### Table 37 . Trip Blank

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID Description**  **Concentration (ng/mL)**  **%Recovery**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 072 DAL

- GW

- TRIP01

- 0

- <0.0240 NA

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 0 73 DAL

- GW

- TRIP01

- LS

- 1.67 87.2

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 074 DAL

- GW

- TRIP01

- MS

- 17.1 84.7

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 075 DAL

- GW

- TRIP01

- HS

- 89.8 88.9

NA = Not Applicable Sample GLP10

- 01

- 01 -39- 075 diluted 1:10



### Table 38 . Rinseate Blanks

**PFOA**

**3M LIMS ID**  **Description Concentration**  **(ng/mL)**

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 070 DAL

- GW

- 131S

- RB

- 121204 <0.0240

GLP10

- 01

- 01

- 39

- 071 DAL

- GW

- 145R

- RB

- 121204 <0.0240

## 10 **Conclusion**

Laboratory control spikes and field m atrix spikes were used to determine the analytical method accuracy and precision for PFOA

. A nalysis was successfully completed following 3M Environme ntal Laboratory method ETS -8- 044. 1 described herein.



## 11 **Data/Sample Retention**

All remaining sample s and associated project data (hardcopy and electronic) will be archived acc ording to 3M Environmental Laboratory standard operating procedures.



## 12 **Attachments**

Attachment A: Protocol Amendment 39 (General Project Outline) Attachment B: Representative Chromatograms and Calibration Curves

Attachment C : Analytical Method – ETS -8- 044. 1

Attachment D: Protocol Amendment DeviationGLP10-01-01 ; Interi m Repor t 3 9 Analysi s o f PFO A i n Groundwate r Sample s Forme r Sludg e Incorporatio n Are a (FSIA) ; Decatur

, A L



### 13 Signatures

Clesto n Lange

, Ph.D.

, 3 M Principa l Analytica l Investigato r Dat e

Willia m K

. Reagen

, Ph.D.

, 3 M Environmenta l Laborator y Manage r Dat e

Gar y Hohenstelh

, 5l\/j^ponso r Representativ e Dat e

Jaisimh a Kesari

, Stud y Directo r Dat e

Pag e 2 6 o f 7 1

# A TTACHMENT 

# A: P ROTOCOL 

# A MENDMENT

# A TTACHMENT 

# B: R EPRESENTATIVE 

# S AMPLE 

# C HROMATOGRAMS AND


# C ALIBRATION 

# C URVE 

# ( S 

# )Sample Name: "b121221a020" Sample ID: "12011-30-11" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "10 ng/mL FC std in Milli Q Water" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 20Sample Type: StandardConcentration: 9.58 ng/mLCalculated Conc: 10.1 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/21/2012Acq. Time: 7:07:05 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 7537839 countsHeight: 1.89e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e6

Intensity, cps14.3914.28Sample Name: "b121221a028" Sample ID: "Solvent Blank" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "Milli Q Water TN12-0421" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 28Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: < 0Acq. Date: 12/21/2012Acq. Time: 9:47:59 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: Base To BaseRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 3846 countsHeight: 1.51e+003 cpsStart Time: 14.3 minEnd Time: 14.4 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e4

Intensity, cps14.7416.5314.5716.3515.7315.4714.2914.0213.1613.6612.7112.45Sample Name: "b121221a029" Sample ID: "LCS-121220-1" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "0.5ppb LCS" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 29Sample Type: QCConcentration: 0.477 ng/mLCalculated Conc: 0.459 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/21/2012Acq. Time: 10:08:07 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: Base To BaseRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 378366 countsHeight: 1.02e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.005000.001.00e41.50e42.00e42.50e43.00e43.50e44.00e44.50e45.00e45.50e46.00e46.50e47.00e47.50e48.00e48.50e49.00e49.50e41.00e51.05e5

Intensity, cps14.3814.7314.2716.5616.3815.0815.9614.2013.6513.3213.19Sample Name: "b121221a032" Sample ID: "LCS-121220-4" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "5ppb LCS" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 32Sample Type: QCConcentration: 4.77 ng/mLCalculated Conc: 4.84 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/21/2012Acq. Time: 11:08:20 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 3732312 countsHeight: 9.76e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e5

Intensity, cps14.3814.2714.72*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 1 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:44 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a035" Sample ID: "LCS-121220-7" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "30ppb LCS" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 35Sample Type: QCConcentration: 28.7 ng/mLCalculated Conc: 26.3 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 12:08:37 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 17716446 countsHeight: 4.17e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e63.8e64.0e6

Intensity, cps14.3814.27Sample Name: "b121221a042" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-070" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-131S-RB-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 42Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: < 0Acq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 2:29:21 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: Base To BaseRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 647 countsHeight: 7.01e+002 cpsStart Time: 14.4 minEnd Time: 14.4 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e47.5e4

Intensity, cps14.7516.5616.5014.9916.3515.9415.4514.4113.9912.7513.3012.32Sample Name: "b121221a044" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-072" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-TRIP01-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 44Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: < 0Acq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 3:09:36 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: Base To BaseRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 3986 countsHeight: 1.36e+003 cpsStart Time: 14.3 minEnd Time: 14.4 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e47.5e4

Intensity, cps14.7216.5616.4516.3215.0915.4614.3614.2913.9713.6613.3612.7912.6912.35Sample Name: "b121221a046" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-074" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-TRIP01-MS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 46Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 17.1 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 3:49:49 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 12233804 countsHeight: 3.65e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e6

Intensity, cps14.37*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 2 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:45 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a048" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-001" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-130R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 48Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 751. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 4:29:59 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 5694236 countsHeight: 1.38e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e51.0e61.1e61.1e61.2e61.2e61.3e61.3e61.4e6

Intensity, cps14.3714.2614.72Sample Name: "b121221a053" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-003" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-130S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 53Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 147. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 6:10:36 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 10635188 countsHeight: 2.68e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e62.3e62.4e62.5e62.6e6

Intensity, cps14.3714.26Sample Name: "b121221a055" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-005" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-130S-FMS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 55Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 221. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 6:50:53 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 15272774 countsHeight: 3.87e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e63.8e6

Intensity, cps14.3714.27Sample Name: "b121221a056" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-006" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-130L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 56Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 47.1 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 7:11:01 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 3633572 countsHeight: 9.54e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e5

Intensity, cps14.3714.2614.70*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 3 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:45 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a058" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-008" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-131R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 58Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 1590. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 7:51:10 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 11417422 countsHeight: 2.84e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e62.3e62.4e62.5e62.6e62.7e62.8e6

Intensity, cps14.3814.26Sample Name: "b121221a060" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-010" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-131S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 60Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 24.1 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 8:31:23 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 16453854 countsHeight: 3.83e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e63.8e6

Intensity, cps14.3714.26Sample Name: "b121221a062" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-012" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-131S-FMS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 62Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 40.7 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 9:11:37 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 3153660 countsHeight: 8.79e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e5

Intensity, cps14.3714.2614.73Sample Name: "b121221a066" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-013" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-131L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 66Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 78.6 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 10:32:05 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 5943586 countsHeight: 1.49e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e51.0e61.1e61.1e61.2e61.2e61.3e61.3e61.4e61.4e61.5e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.26*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 4 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:45 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a068" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-015" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-133R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 68Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 69.6 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 11:12:19 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 5292067 countsHeight: 1.40e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e51.0e61.1e61.1e61.2e61.2e61.3e61.3e61.4e61.4e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a070" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-017" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-133S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 70Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 309. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 11:52:27 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 20168309 countsHeight: 4.72e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e63.8e64.0e64.2e64.4e64.6e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a072" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-019" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-133L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 72Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 380. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 12:32:39 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 23635269 countsHeight: 5.30e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e63.8e64.0e64.2e64.4e64.6e64.8e65.0e65.2e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a074" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-021" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-134R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 74Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 1380. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 1:12:52 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 10060837 countsHeight: 2.49e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.6 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e62.3e62.4e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.26*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 5 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:45 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a079" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-023" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-134S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 79Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 14.8 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 2:53:26 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 10718618 countsHeight: 2.62e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e62.3e62.4e62.5e62.6e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a081" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-025" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-134L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 81Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 441. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 3:33:40 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 3412857 countsHeight: 8.75e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e5

Intensity, cps14.3614.2514.69Sample Name: "b121221a083" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-027" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-135R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 83Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 3060. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 4:13:57 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 20015702 countsHeight: 4.64e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e63.6e63.8e64.0e64.2e64.4e64.6e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a085" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-029" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-135S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 85Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 24.7 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 4:54:09 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 1940543 countsHeight: 4.99e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e44.0e46.0e48.0e41.0e51.2e51.4e51.6e51.8e52.0e52.2e52.4e52.6e52.8e53.0e53.2e53.4e53.6e53.8e54.0e54.2e54.4e54.6e54.8e55.0e5

Intensity, cps14.3614.2514.70*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 6 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:46 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a087" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-031" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-135L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 87Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 191. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 5:34:23 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 13498132 countsHeight: 3.26e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a092" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-035" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-136S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 92Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 95.4 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 7:15:07 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 7143167 countsHeight: 1.83e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e6

Intensity, cps14.3614.25Sample Name: "b121221a094" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-037" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-136S-FMS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 94Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 196. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 7:55:27 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 13776659 countsHeight: 3.59e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e54.0e56.0e58.0e51.0e61.2e61.4e61.6e61.8e62.0e62.2e62.4e62.6e62.8e63.0e63.2e63.4e6

Intensity, cps14.3514.25Sample Name: "b121221a095" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-038" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-136L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 95Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 80.8 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 8:15:34 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 6103782 countsHeight: 1.51e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e51.0e61.1e61.1e61.2e61.2e61.3e61.3e61.4e61.4e61.5e61.5e6

Intensity, cps14.3514.25*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 7 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:46 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a097" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-042" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-137S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 97Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 0.619 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 8:55:49 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 504434 countsHeight: 1.36e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e47.5e48.0e48.5e49.0e49.5e41.0e51.1e51.1e51.2e51.2e51.3e51.3e51.4e51.4e5

Intensity, cps14.3514.6814.2516.5416.1715.4615.16 16.09Sample Name: "b121221a099" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-044" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-137S-FMS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 99Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 2.02 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 9:36:01 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 1590503 countsHeight: 4.11e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e44.0e46.0e48.0e41.0e51.2e51.4e51.6e51.8e52.0e52.2e52.4e52.6e52.8e53.0e53.2e53.4e53.6e53.8e54.0e5

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.68Sample Name: "b121221a100" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-045" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-137L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 100Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 0.349 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 9:56:11 PMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: Base To BaseRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 292103 countsHeight: 7.79e+004 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.4 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e47.5e48.0e4

Intensity, cps14.3514.6914.2516.5516.3415.0715.6116.0613.8913.8113.5312.6812.7712.0012.49Sample Name: "b121221a105" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-049" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-138S-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 105Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 154. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/22/2012Acq. Time: 11:36:51 PMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 11125507 countsHeight: 2.84e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e62.3e62.4e62.5e62.6e62.7e62.8e6

Intensity, cps14.3514.25*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 8 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:46 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a107" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-051" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-138L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 107Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 0.428 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 12:17:18 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 354657 countsHeight: 9.28e+004 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e47.5e48.0e48.5e49.0e49.5e4

Intensity, cps14.3514.6914.2416.5116.5814.9716.2815.7515.4714.1213.7613.0612.56Sample Name: "b121221a109" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-053" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-CW26C-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 109Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 353. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 12:57:37 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 2748038 countsHeight: 7.27e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.2 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e5

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.68Sample Name: "b121221a111" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-055" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-CW26L-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 111Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 628. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 1:37:53 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 4798153 countsHeight: 1.27e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.005.00e41.00e51.50e52.00e52.50e53.00e53.50e54.00e54.50e55.00e55.50e56.00e56.50e57.00e57.50e58.00e58.50e59.00e59.50e51.00e61.05e61.10e61.15e61.20e61.25e6

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.68Sample Name: "b121221a113" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-057" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-140R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 113Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 121. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 2:18:08 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 8901520 countsHeight: 2.30e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e6

Intensity, cps14.3514.24*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 9 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:47 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a118" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-059" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-141R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 118Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 1.88 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 3:59:02 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.4 minArea: 1487095 countsHeight: 4.02e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.02.0e44.0e46.0e48.0e41.0e51.2e51.4e51.6e51.8e52.0e52.2e52.4e52.6e52.8e53.0e53.2e53.4e53.6e53.8e54.0e5

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.67Sample Name: "b121221a120" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-061" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-141R-FMS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 120Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 3.27 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 4:39:19 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 2549795 countsHeight: 6.45e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e5

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.67Sample Name: "b121221a121" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-062" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-142R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 121Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 46.6 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 4:59:29 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 3599738 countsHeight: 9.84e+005 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.05.0e41.0e51.5e52.0e52.5e53.0e53.5e54.0e54.5e55.0e55.5e56.0e56.5e57.0e57.5e58.0e58.5e59.0e59.5e5

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.68Sample Name: "b121221a123" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-067" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-145R-0-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 123Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 55.6 ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 5:39:44 AMModified: YesProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ManualRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 4264516 countsHeight: 1.11e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.005.00e41.00e51.50e52.00e52.50e53.00e53.50e54.00e54.50e55.00e55.50e56.00e56.50e57.00e57.50e58.00e58.50e59.00e59.50e51.00e61.05e61.10e6

Intensity, cps14.3514.2414.67*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 10 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:47 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013Sample Name: "b121221a125" Sample ID: "GLP10-01-01-39-069" File: "b121221a.wiff"Peak Name: "PFOA" Mass(es): "413.000/369.000 Da,413.000/219.000 Da,413.000/169.000 Da"Comment: "DAL-GW-145R-FMS-" Annotation: ""Sample Index: 125Sample Type: UnknownConcentration: N/ACalculated Conc: 143. ng/mLAcq. Date: 12/23/2012Acq. Time: 6:19:58 AMModified: NoProc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - MQ IIINoise Percentage: 50Base. Sub. Window: 1.00 minPeak-Split. Factor: 10Report Largest Peak: NoMin. Peak Height: 0.00 cpsMin. Peak Width: 0.00 secSmoothing Width: 3 pointsRT Window: 30.0 secExpected RT: 14.4 minUse Relative RT: NoInt. Type: ValleyRetention Time: 14.3 minArea: 10392394 countsHeight: 2.93e+006 cpsStart Time: 14.1 minEnd Time: 14.5 min12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min0.01.0e52.0e53.0e54.0e55.0e56.0e57.0e58.0e59.0e51.0e61.1e61.2e61.3e61.4e61.5e61.6e61.7e61.8e61.9e62.0e62.1e62.2e62.3e62.4e62.5e62.6e62.7e62.8e62.9e6

Intensity, cps14.3414.24*** Buster J2930203Batch Name: b121221a.dabData printed by STWPage 11 of 11Printing Time: 11:06:47 AMPrinting Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2013b121221a.rdb (PFOA): "Quadratic" Regression ("1 / x" weighting): y = -4.38e+003 x^2 + 7.88e+005 x + 1.78e+004 (r = 0.9993)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95Concentration, ng/mL0.02.0e64.0e66.0e68.0e61.0e71.2e71.4e71.6e71.8e72.0e72.2e72.4e72.6e72.8e73.0e73.2e73.4e73.6e73.8e74.0e74.2e74.3e7

Area, countsWorkstation: W0119058Batch Name: b121221a.dab*Data printed by KJUPage 1 of 1Printing Time: 12:44:28 PMPrinting Date: Wednesday, December 26, 2012

# A TTACHMENT 

# C: A NALYTICAL 

# M ETHOD 

# ( S 

# )

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 2 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 1 Scope and Application

This method describes the direct injection analysis of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) from water matrices using high

- performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). The method is generally applicable but not limited to the measurement of perfluoroalkyl sulfonamides and perfluorinated alkyl acids (PFAAs) such as perfluorosulfonic acids (PFSAs) and perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) (Table 1). Water samples containing heavy particulate may require preparation by an alternate method such as ETS -8- 154

“ Determination of Perfluorinated Acids, Alcohols, Amides, and Sulfonates In Water By Solid Phase Extraction and High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry ”. The method is applicable to both external standard and internal standard calibration 1



### .

Table 1. Representative Tar get Analytes

**Acronym Analyte**  **Chemical Abstract Services Registry Number (CASRN)** 

PFBA (C4 Acid) Perfluorobutanoic acid 375

- 22

- 4

PFPeA (C5 Acid) Perfluoropentanoic acid 2706

- 90

- 3

PFHxA (C6 Acid) Perfluorohexanoic acid 307

- 24

- 4

PFHpA (C7 Acid) Perfluoroheptanoic acid 375

- 85

- 9

PFOA (C8 Acid) Perfluorooctanoic acid 335

- 67

- 1

PFNA (C9 Acid) Perfluorononanoic acid 375

- 95

- 1

PFDA (C10 Acid) Perfluorodecanoic acid 335

- 76

- 2

PFUnA (C11 Acid) Perfluoroundecanoic acid 2058

- 94

- 8

PFDoA (C12 Acid) Perfluorododecanoic acid 307

- 55

- 1

PF TrD A (C1 3 Acid) Perfluorotridecanoic acid 72629

- 94

- 8

PFBS (C4 Sulfonate) Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid 375

- 73

- 5

PFHS (C6 Sulfonate) Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 355

- 46

- 4

PFOS (C8 Sulfonate) Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 1763

- 23

- 1

FBSA (C4 Sulfonamide Perfluorobutanesulfonamide 30334

- 69

- 1

FOSA (C8 Sulfonamide) Pefluorooctanesulfonamide 754

- 91

- 6



### The Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) is the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) that meets Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) that are developed based on the intended use of this method.

Method Flexibility – This is a performance

- based method and may be generally applied to the determination of perfluorinated compounds in water matrices when analysis batch quality

c ontrol ( QC ) criteria are met 2



### . Each set of samples are prepared in an analysis batch with
calibration standards, LCS s, blanks, and continuing calibration check standards analyzed on the same instrument during a time period that begins and ends with the analysis of the appropriate continuing calibration check standards. The laboratory is permitted to modify the LC column, mobile phase composition, LC conditions, and MS/MS conditions. Method modifications should be considered to improve method performance or to meet data quality objectives for the study. In all cases where method modifications are implemented, the batch

1 The method is supported by validation with internal standard calibration for C4

- C13 PFCAs, C4, C6, and C8 PFSAs, and C8 perfluoroalkane sulfonamide in laboratory control samples under 3M method validation E11

- 0667.

2 Guidance for establishing method QC Criteria based on a.) FDA May 2001, “Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical

Method Vali dation”, b.) EPA Method 537, and c.) European Commission: Guidance for Generating and Reporting Methods of Analysis in Support of Pre

- registration Data Requirements for Annex II (Part A, section 4) and Annex III
(Part A,section 5) of Directive 91/414, SANCO/3029/99 rev. 4 (11/07/00).

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 3 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis analytical QCs ( section 9) must be completed and pass QC acceptance criteria ( section 13 ) if the data from the analytical batch are to be reported

.



## 2 Method Summary

Water samples are analyzed as neat aqueous sample or as solvent diluted aqueous samples by direct injection using LC/ MS/MS. Samples containing heavy particulate may not be suitable for analysis by this method. Samples containing suspended particulate should be centrifuge d or filtered prior to removing a sample aliquot or diluting with solvent

. The water sample is mixe d well prior to removing an aliquot or diluting, if necessary, with ASTM Type I water, HPLC water, other suitable water, or solvent (methanol).

Quantitation is by stable isotope internal standard calibration in laboratory reagent water. All perfluorinat ed compounds ( PFC s) target analyte concentrations of perfluorosulfonic acids (PFSAs) and perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) are reported as anions and corrected for

their salt or free acid forms. Alternatively, quantitation may be performed by external

st andard calibration.

This is a performance

- based method. Method uncertainty for each target analyte is determined for each analytical batch using multiple laboratory control spikes at multiple concentrations. This method also requires that the precision and accuracy for each sample be determined using field matrix spikes to verify that the method is applicable to each sample

matrix.

Calibration standards for PFUnA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, and FOSA have been found to be

un stable for more than 2 days in 100% water. Samples requiring analysis for these compounds by this method should be diluted 1:1 with methanol and analyzed against a calibration curve prepared in 1:1 synthetic groundwater:MeOH.



## 3 Definitions

3.1 Analysis Batch

A set of study samples that are prepared with calibration standards, laboratory control samples, and procedural blanks , and analyzed on the same instrument during a time period that begins and ends with the analysis of the appropriate continuing calibration check

standards.



## 3.2 Analytical Sample

A portion of a laboratory sample prepared for analysis.



## 3.3 Calibration Standard

A solution prepared by spiking a known volume of the Working Standard (WS) into a predete rmined amount of ASTM Type I, HPLC grade water, or other suitable water (i.e. matrix water), and analyzed according to this method. Calibration standards are used to calibrate the instrument response with respect to analyte concentration.



## 3.4 Laboratory Duplicate Sample (LDS, or Lab Dup)

A laboratory duplicate sample is a separate aliquot of a sample taken in the analytical laboratory that is analyzed separately with identical procedures. Analysis of LDSs compared to that of the first aliquot give a measure of the precision associated with laboratory procedures, but not with sample collection, preservation, or storage procedures.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 4 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 3.5 Field Blank (FB)/Trip Blank (TB)

ASTM Type I, HPLC grade water, or other suitable water, placed in a sample container in the laboratory and treated as a sample in all respects, including exposure to samp ling site conditions, storage, preservation and all analytical procedures. The purpose of the TB is to determine if test substances or other interferences are present in the field environment. This sample is also referred to as a Trip Blank.



## 3.6 Field Duplicate Sample (FDS, Field Dup)

A sample collected in duplicate at the same time from the same location as the sample. The

FDS is handled under identical circumstances and treated exactly the same throughout field and laboratory procedures. Analysis of the FDS compared to that of the first sample gives a measure of the precision associated with sample collection, preservation and storage, as well as with laboratory procedures.



## 3.7 Field Matrix Spike (FMS)

A sample to which known quantities of the target analyte s , ISs and SRSs are added to the sample bottle in the laboratory before the bottles are sent to the field for collection of aqueous samples. A known, specific volume of sample must be added to the sample container without rinsing. This may be accomplished by making a “fill to this level” line on the outside of the sample container. The FMS is analyzed to ascertain if any matrix effects, interferences, or stability issues may complicate the interpretation of the sample analysis.



## 3.8 Trip Blank Matrix Spike ( T BMS )

An aliquot of ASTM Type I, HPLC grade water, or other suitable water, to which known quantities of the target analytes , ISs and SRSs are added in the laboratory prior to the shipment of the collection bottles. The TBMS is analyzed exactly like a study sample to help determine if the method is in control and whether a loss of analyte or analytical bias could be

attributed to sample holding time, sample storage and/or shipment issues. A low and high

TBMS are appropriate when expected sample concentrations are not known or may vary.



## 3.9 Internal Standard (IS)

A compound added to each study sample, calibration standard, laboratory control samples, and procedural blanks at a consistent level (typically around 1 ng/mL). T he internal

standard (s) are stable isotope labeled versions of the target analyte s . The area count ratio of the target analyte to the internal standard is used for calibration. Surrogate ISs are applied when stable isotope ISs of target analytes are unavailable. A surrogate IS is not necessar ily

a stable isotope labeled version of the target analyte, but is treated as an internal standard for quantitation.



## 3.10 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)

An aliquot of control matrix to which known quantities of the target analytes , ISs and SRSs (when applicabl e) are added in the laboratory at the time when samples are aliquotted . At

least three levels (two levels for SRSs) in triplicate are included, one generally at the low end of the calibration curve and one near the mid range and the upper end of the curve. The LCSs are analyzed exactly like a laboratory sample to determine whether the stability of the

standards . LCSs should be prepared each day samples are aliquoted

.


## 3.11 Laboratory Matrix Spike (LMS)

A laboratory matrix spike is an aliquot of a sample to which known quantities of target analytes , ISs and SRSs (when applicable) are added in the laboratory. The LMS is analyzed exactly like a laboratory sample to determine whether the sample matrix contributes bias to the analytical results. The endogenous concentrations of the analytes in the sample matrix must be determined in a separate aliquot and the measured values in the LMS corrected for these concentrations. LMSs are optional for analysis of aqueous samples.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 5 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 3.12 Laboratory Sample

A portion or aliquot of a sample received from the field for testing.



## 3.13 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for an analytical batch is the lowest concentration that can be reliably quantitated within the specified limits of precision and accuracy. The LLOQ is generally selected as the lowest non

- zero standard in the calibration curve that meets method acceptance criteria. The LLOQ for each target analyte is established for each analysis batch

as the lowest calibration standard with area counts at least twice that of the average area counts of the procedural blanks.

The upper limit of quantitation (ULOQ) for an analytical batch is the highest concentration that can be reliably quantitated within the specified limits of precision and accuracy. The highest standard in the calibration curve that meets method acceptance criteria is defined as the

ULOQ.



## 3.14 Method /Procedural Blank

An aliquot of control matrix that is treated exactly like a laboratory sample including exposure to all glassware, equipment, solvents, and reagents that are used with other laboratory samples. The method blank is used to determine if test substances or other interferences are present in the laboratory environment, the reagents, or the apparatus.



## 3.15 Sample

A sample is an aliquot removed from a larger quantity of material intended to represent the original source material.



## 3.16 Stock Standard Solution (SSS)

A concentrated solution of a single

- analyte prepared in the laboratory with an assayed reference compound.



## 3.17 Surrogate Internal Standard

An IS that is not necessarily a stable isotopically labeled target analyte, but is treated as an internal standard for quantitation. Surrogate ISs are used when isotopically labeled

counter parts of the target analyte are not commercially or re adily available.



## 3.18 Surrogate Recovery Standard (SRS)

An isotopically labeled standard , not used as an internal standard, that is added to each sample and appropriate QC sample as a means to evaluate the method performance for a chemical class of compounds (e .g., PFSAs, PFCAs)

.


## 3.19 Working Standard (WS)

A solution of several analytes prepared in the laboratory from SSSs and diluted as needed to prepare calibration standards and other required analyte solutions.



## 4 Warnings and Cautions

4.1 Health and Safety

The acute and chronic toxicity of the standards for this method have not been precisely determined; however, each should be treated as a potential health hazard. The analyst should wear gloves, a lab coat, and safety glasses to prevent exposure to chemicals that might be present.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 6 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis The laboratory is responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and a current awareness of local regulations regarding the handling of the chemicals used in this method. A reference file of material safety data sheets (MSDS) should be available to all personnel involved in these analyses.



## 4.2 Cautions

The analyst must be familiar with the laboratory equipment and potential hazards including, but not limited to, the use of solvents, pressurized gas and solvent lines, high voltage, and

vacuum systems. Refer to the appropriate equipment procedure or operator manual for

additional information and cautions.



## 5 Interferences

During sample preparation and analysis, major potential contaminant sources are reagents and glassware. All materials used in the analyses shall be demonstrated to be free from interferences under conditions of analysis by running method blanks.

Parts and supplies that contain Teflon® should be avoided or minimized due to the possibility of interference and/or contamination. These may include, but are not limited to: wash bottles,

Teflon ® 

### lined caps, autovial caps, HPLC parts, etc.

The use of disposable micropipettes or pipettes to aliquot standard solutions is recommended to make calibration standards and matrix spikes.



## 6 Instrumen tation, Supplies, and Materials

6.1 Instrumentation

Analytical balance capable of reading to 0.0001g

HPLC/MS/MS or HPLC/MS system, as described in Section 10

.


## 6.2 Supplies and Materials

Sample collection bottles

— HDPE (e.g., NalgeneTM) wide

- mouth bottles with screw cap.

Note: Do not use fluorinated or Teflon® bottles or lined caps.

Coolers or boxes for sample shipment.

15

- mL and 50

- mL disposable polypropylene centrifuge tubes.

Class A pipettes and volumetric flasks, various.

2 mL HPLC auto vial s

Disposable pipettes, polypropylene or glass as appropriate

Centrifuge capable of spinning 15

- mL and 50

- mL polypropylene tubes at 3000 rpm.



## 7 Reagents and Standards

Note: Suppliers and catalog numbers are for illustrative purposes only. Equivalent performance may be ach ieved using chemicals obtained from other suppliers. Do not use a lesser grade of chemical than those listed.



## 7.1 Chemicals

Water – Milli

- Q, HPLC grade, or other suitably appropriate sources

Calcium Acetate - A.C.S. Reagent Grade

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 7 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis Magnesium Acetate - A.C.S. Re agent Grade

Methanol – HPLC grade

Ammonium Acetate – A.C.S. Reagent Grade



## 7.2 Representative Target Analytes, ISs, and SRSs

PFBA, Heptafluorobutyric Acid, (C 4 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFPeA , Nonafluoropentanoic Acid (C 5 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFHxA, Perfluorohexanoi c Acid (C 6 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFHpA, Tridecafluoroheptanoic Acid, (C 7 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFOA, Ammonium perfluorooctanoate, (C 8 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFNA, Heptadecafluorononanoic Acid, (C 9 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFDA, Nonadecafluorodecanoic Acid (C 10 

### Per fluorinated Acid)

PFUnA, Perfluoroundecanoic Acid, (C 11 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFDoA, Perfluorododecanoic Acid, (C 12 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

PFTrDA, Perfluorotridecanoic Acid, (C 13 

### Perfluorinated Acid)

FBSA, Perfluorobutanesulfonamide

FOSA, Perfluorooctanesulfo nylamide

PFBS, Potassium Perfluorobutane sulfonate

PFHS, Perfluorohexanesulfonate

PFOS, Potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate

PFOA [1,2, 3, 4

- 13 

### C], 13 

### C 4 

### - isotopically labeled perfluorooctanoic acid (SRS)

PFOS [1,2, 3, 4

- 13 

### C], 13 

### C 4 

### - isotopically labeled Perfluorooctanesulfonate (SRS)

PFUnA [1,2

- 13 

### C], 13 

### C 2 

### - isotopically labeled Perfluoroundecanoic acid (SRS)

A custom mix of ISs in a methanolic solution containing ([1,2,3,4

- 13 

### C 4 

### ]PFBA, [1,2

- 13 

### C 2 

### ]PFHxA, [1,2,3,4 ,5,6,7,8

- 13 

### C 8 

### ]PFOA, [1,2,3,4,5 ,6,7,8,9

- 13 

### C 9 

### ]PFN A, [1,2

- 13 

### C 2 

### ]PFDA, [1,2 ,3,4,5,6,7 - 13 

### C 7 

### ]PFUnA, [1,2

- 13 

### C 2 

### ]PFDoA, [1,2 ,3 - 13 

### C 3 

### ]PFHS, [1,2,3,4 ,5,6,7,8

- 13 

### C 8 

### ]PFOS

, and [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 

### C 8 

### ]PFOSA (Wellington Laboratories, Guelph, ON) in combination with added ([1,2,3,4 ,5

- 13 

### C 5 

### ]PFPe A

, ([1,2,3,4

- 13 

### C 4 

### ]PFHpA, and [ 18 

### O 2 

### ]PFBS can be used to prepare a stock IS solution. Alternatively, individual stable isotope ISs can be used to prepare a stock

IS mixture.

Other ISs can be applied.



## 7.3 Reagent Preparation

2 mM A mmonium acetate solution (Analysis)

— Weigh 0.3 g of A mmonium acetate and dissolve in 2.0 L of reagent water.

Synthetic Groundwater (containing 25 ppm Ca and Mg)
– Weigh 0.61 g of Calcium Acetate and 0.92 g of Magnesium Acetate and dissolve in 6.0 L of reagent water.

Note: Alternative volumes may be prepared as long as the ratios of the solvent to solute ratios

are maintained.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 8 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 7.4 Stock Standard Solution (SSS) and Working Standard Solution Preparation

The following standard preparation procedure serves as an example. Weighed amounts and final volumes may be changed to suit the needs of a particular study. For example, μL volumes may be spiked into volumetric flasks when diluting stock solutions to appropriate

levels.

100 μg/mL target analyte SSSs

— Weigh out 10 mg of analytical standard **(corrected for**

**percen t salt**  **, acid [ETS -4-**  **031] and purity**  ) and dilute to 100 mL with methanol or other
suitable solvent, in a 100 mL volumetric flask. Transfer to a 125 mL LDPE bottle or other suitable container. Prepare a separate solution for each analyte. Expiration dates and storage conditions of stock solutions should be assigned in accordance with laboratory standard operating procedure. An example of purity and salt correction is given below for

PFOS.



### salt of weight moclecular anion of weight molecular factor correction salt

=

9275.0 538 499 factor correction )salt (K PFOS

== +



### 10 mg C 8 

### F 17 

### S0 3 - 

### K + 

### with purity 90% = 8.35 mg C 8 

### F 17 

### S0 3 – 

### (10 mg*0.90*0.9275=8.35 mg)

10 μg/mL (10,000 ng/mL) mixed working standard

— Add 5.0 mL each of the 100 μg/mL SSSs to a 50 mL volumetric flask and bring up to volume with solvent.

1 μg/mL (1,000 ng/mL) mixed working stan dard

— Add 0.5 mL of the 100 μg/mL SSSs to a 50 mL volumetric flask and bring up to volume with solvent.

0.1 μg/mL (100 ng/mL) mixed standard

— Add 0.05 mL of the 100 μg/mL SSSs to a 50 mL volumetric flask and bring up to volume with solvent.

Storage Conditi ons

— Store all SSSs and working standards in accordance with laboratory standard operating procedure or in a refrigerator at 4°±2°C for a maximum period of 6 months from the date of preparation.



## 7.5 Calibration Standards

Calibration can be performed by IS or external calibration. Using the working standards described above, prepare calibration solutions in ASTM Type I water, HPLC water, other
suitable water, or a mixture of solvent and water using the information in Table 2 as a guideline. Note: Volumes of wa ter or water/solvent mixtures and working standards may be adjusted to meet the data quality objectives addressed in the general project outline. Calibration levels other than those listed below can be prepared as needed.

For the quantitation of PFOA and PFOS, reference materials of certified mixed linear and branched isomer are preferred. Alternately, reference materials of primarily linear isomers of PFOA and/or PFOS may be used, however, when quantitating with predominantly linear
reference standards, additional LCS samples containing both linear and branched isomers of PFOA and PFOS are required 3



### .

7.5.1 Internal Standard (IS) and Surrogate Recovery Standard (SRS)

For IS calibration, stable isotope internal standards of each target analyte or appropriate surrogate ISs should be spiked at the same level in all calibration standards. Once the calibration standards have been prepared as stated above in Section 7.5, all calibration standards are spiked with a separate internal standard spiking solution. Typically the

3 A report summarizing an assessment of the use of reference standards containing certified linear and branched isomers of
PFOA/PFOS can be found in 3M report E11

- 0560.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 9 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis concentration of the internal standard is consistent with the internal standard concentration expected in the samples being prepared, usually 1 ng/mL. The concentration of the internal standard spiking solution is typically 2 μg/ mL. A separate zero point or method blank is typically prepared at the same time as the calibration standards, using the same solution used to prepare the standards (ASTM Type I water, HPLC water, other suitable water, or a solvent/water mixture), and is spiked with the internal standard at the same concentration as the calibration curve, typically at 1 ng/mL.

If the sample s being analzyed w ere pre

- spiked with SRSs , the calibration curve prepared in

Section 7.5 is spiked with a separate SRS spiking solution. Typically, the sample bottles are spiked with a SRS at 0.1 ng/mL. The final calibration curve must consist of at least six calibration points after analysis. The following table provides an example of spike

concentrations and volumes used to achieve a multi

- point extracted calibration curve with internal standard and surrogate standard.

Table 1 lists recommended stable isotope internal standards for several PFSA and PFCA target compounds. A custom mix of isotopically labeled target analytes in a methanolic solution containing ([1,2,3,4

- 13 

### C 4 

### ]PFBA, [1,2

- 13 

### C 2 

### ]PFHxA, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 

### C 8 

### ]PFOA, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

- 13 

### C 9 

### ]PFNA, [1,2,3,4,5,6

- 13 

### C 6 

### ]PFDA, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7

- 13 

### C 7 

### ]PFUnA, [1,2

- 13 

### C 2 

### ]PFDoA, [ 1,2,3

- 13 

### C 3 

### ]PFHS, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 

### C 8 

### ]PFOS, and [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 

### C 8 

### ]FOSA (Wellington Laboratories, Guelph, ON) in combination with added ([1,2,3,4 ,5

- 13 

### C 5 

### ]PFPe A

, ([1,2,3,4

- 13 

### C 4 

### ]PFHp A , and [ 18 

### O 2 

### ]PFBS can be used to prepare a stock IS solution. Alternative sources of certified stable isotope labeled target analytes are applicable. Alternatively, individual stable isotope ISs can be used to prepare a stock IS mixture. The table below lists the recommended stable isotope ISs and SRSs applied in the method. Other stable isotope ISs and SRSs of target analytes not listed in the table may be used if supported by validation and/or analysis batch QCs meeting method acceptance criteria (e.g., [ 13 

### C 2 

### ]- PFOA) . The same internal standard should be used for a given analyte throughout the entire project/study. Note: some of the compounds listed below are appropriate to use as surrogate ISs when a stable isotope IS of a target analyte is not available. Generally,
surrogate isotopically labeled PFCAs are used for PFCAs, and surrogate i sotopically labeled

PFSA s are used for PFSAs.

Table 2 provides examples of spike concentrations and volumes used to achieve a multi

- point

calibration curve with ISs and SRSs

.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 10 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis Table 1 . Stable Isotope PFCAs and PFSAs used for ISs and SRSs

Compound Name Synonym or Acronym Analytical Purpose Reference Standard

Source

13 C 4 - Perfluorobutanoic acid [1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFBA IS for PFBA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 4 - Perfluoro pentanoic acid [1,2,3,4 ,5

- 13 C 5 ]PFPe A IS for PFPeA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 2 - Perfluorohexanoic acid [1,2

- 13 C 2 ]PFHxA IS for PFHxA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 4 - Perfluoro hept anoic acid [1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFHp A IS for PF HpA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 8 - Perfluorooctanoic acid [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 C 8 ]PFOA IS for PFOA and [1,2,3,4

13 C 4 ]PFOA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 9 - Perfluorononanoic acid [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

- 13 C 9 ]PFNA IS for PFNA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 6 - Perfluorodecanoic acid [1,2,3,4,5,6

- 13 C 6 ]PFDA IS for PFDA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 7 - Perfluoroundecanoic acid [1,2,3,4,5,6,7

- 13 C 7 ]PFUnA IS for PFUnA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 2 - Perfluorododecanoic acid [1,2

- 13 C 2 ]PFDoA IS for PFDoA, *PFTA Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

18 O 2 - Ammonium Perfluorobutane sulfonate [ 18 O 2 ]PFBS IS for PFBS RTI International
(Individual)

13 C 3 - Ammonium Perfluorohexane sulfonate [ 1,2,3

- 13 C 3 ]PFHS IS for PFHS Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 8 - Sodium Perfluorooctane sulfonate [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 C 8 ]PFOS IS for PFOS and
PFOS[1,2,3,4 13 C 4 ], Wellington Labs

(Mix or Individual)

13 C 8 - Perfluorooctanesulfonamide [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 C 8 ]FOSA IS for FOSA Wellington Labs (mix)

RTI International
(Individual)

13 C 4 - Perfluorooctanoic acid [1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFOA SRS for all PFCAs : C4

- C8 Wellington

13 C 2 - Perfluoroundecanoic acid [1,2

- 13 C 2 ]PFUnA SRS for all PFCAs C9

- C13 Wellington

13 C 8 - Perfluorooctane sulfonate [1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFOS SRS for all PFSA s: C4,
C6, and C8 Wellington

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 11 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis Table 2 . Example Preparation of Calibration Curve with ISs and SRSs

**Sample Description Concentration**  **of WS, μ**  **g/mL Volume of** 
**WS,** μ **L Volume of IS**  **(2 μ**  **g/mL),** μ **L Concentration of**  **Surrogate, μ**  **g/mL Volume of**  **Surrogate,** μ **L Volume of ASTM Type I**  **Water, or**

**other suitable solvent**  **(1) , mL** 

0.025 ng/mL curve point 0.10 25 50 0.20 12.5 100

0.030 ng/mL curve point 0.10 30 50 0.20 15 100

0.04 ng/mL curve point 0.10 40 50 0.20 20 100

0.05 ng/mL curve point 0.10 50 50 0.20 25 100

0.1 ng/mL curve point 0.10 100 50 0.20 50 100

0.25 ng/mL curve point 0.10 250 50 0.20 125 100

0.5 ng/mL curve point 1.0 50 50 0.20 250 100

1 ng/mL curve point 1.0 100 50 0.20 500 100

2.5 ng/mL curve point 10.0 25 50 10.0 25 100

5.0 ng/mL curve point 10.0 50 50 10.0 50 100

10.0 ng/mL curve point 10.0 100 50 10.0 100 100

25.0 ng/mL curve point 10.0 250 50 10.0 NA 100

50.0 ng/mL curve point 10.0 500 50 10.0 NA 100

75.0 ng/mL curve point 10.0 750 50 10.0 NA 100

100 ng/mL curve point 10.0 1000 50 10.0 NA 100

N/A - Not Applicable (1) Samples requiring analysis for PFUnA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, and FOSA should be analyzed against a calibration curve prepared in 1:1 synthetic groundwa ter:MeOH.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 12 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 8 Sample Collection and Bottle Preparation

Sample collection bottles are prepared by 3M Environmental Laboratory (or subcontract supplier) personnel for shipment at ambient temperature to the collection site. Typically, four separate collection bottles are associated with a single collection site: sample, field duplicate sample, low field matrix spike, and high field matrix spike. Alternatively, the sample and field duplicate sample may contain SRSs in lieu of additional target analyte low field matrix spike and target analyte high field matrix spike samples. Depending on the scope of the project, additional replicates of the field sample and field matrix spikes may be added. Also, it is not

uncommon for additional mid

- level field matrix spikes to be collected if the expected sample concentrations are truly unknown or could span a large concentration range.

High

- density polyethylene (HDPE) wide

- mouth Nalgene bottles are used for the sample collection containers. (Volumes of the bottles may vary depending on how much sample is required to meet data quality objectives.) Sample collection volumes are project specific and based on data quality objectives. The Nalgene bottles do not require any pretreatment prior to use. Typically, placement of a sample bottle volumetric “fill to here” line is done by using a sample bottle marker template. Alternatively, bottles may be weighed prior to bottle preparation and weighed again after samples have been collected.

All bottles should be clearly labeled to indicate its intended use as a sample, field sample duplicate, low field matrix spike, high field matrix spike, sample/SRS field matrix spike, field duplicate sample/SRS field matrix spike, trip blank, or trip blank matrix spike. If each location has different designated spike levels, the label should also clearly indicate the sample location designation. Generally, a set of bottles for a given collection site are prepared then grouped together in plastic bags for organizational purposes. For each sample collection event, at least one set of trip blank and trip blank matrix spikes are prepared.

Bottle preparation should be documented in a Note to File or on a sample preparation worksheet and should include the following information: date prepared, total number of bottles prepared, number of sample sites, the standard identification numbers and spike volumes used to prepare spiked bottles, the “fill to here” volume, and any other pertinent information needed for reconstructibility of the data. The Note to File will be included in the final data package for the project.

Samples are collected in the field and shipped to the laboratory at ambient temperature.



## 8.1 Field Matrix Spike Sample (FMS)

Field matrix spike samples are a requirement of the method. A FMS sample is defined as a QC sample to which known quantities of appropriate target analytes are added to the sample bottle in the field or in the laboratory before the bottles are sent to the field. The sample and field duplicate sample may contain appropriate SRSs in lieu of target analyte FMS samples. Sample quantities are determined vol umetrically or gravimetrically. A known, specific volume or weight of sample is added to the sample container without rinsing. Volumetric sample measurements may be acquired by a laboratory applied “fill to this level” line on the outside of the sample container. Target analyte FMS samples should be spiked at approximately 0.5

- 10 times the expected analyte concentration in the sample. If the expected range of analyte concentrations is unknown, multiple spikes at varying levels may be prepared to increase the likelihood that a spike at an appropriate level is made. Typically a low and a high target analyte spike are prepared for each sampling location. In those instances where SRSs are to be used in lieu of target analyte FMS samples, the sample and field duplicate sample are spiked at approximately 2

- 5 times the target LOQ. The FMS is analyzed to ascertain if matrix effects or sample holding time contributes bias to the analytical results. For the sample bottles designated for matrix spikes, an appropriate volume of matrix spiking solution is added to the empty bottle prior to sampling. The volume of spike solution added should produce the desired final concentration of target analytes once the bottle is filled with sample to the “fill to here line”. The matrix spiking solution(s) should be prepared in a suitable solvent and contain all of the appropriate target analytes, ISs, and SRSs. The target analyte matrix spiking solution is often the same as the working standards used to create the calibration standards. An example of a bottle spike is given below.

“Fill to here” volume = 200 mL (A 250 mL Nalgene bottle is used)

Desired Field Spike Concentration = 0.25 ng/mL

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 13 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 500 μ L of a 0.1 μ g/mL spiking solution (containing the target analytes) is added to the bottle and the bottle cap promptly sealed.



## 8.2 Internal Standard and Surrogate Recovery Standard

If analysis of a surrogate recovery standard (SRS) is included in the project objectives, an appropriate volume of a surrogate standard solution is added to all the bottles prior to sampling and SPE. Typically sample bottles are spiked with surrogate recovery standards at a final desired spike concentration of 0.1 ng/mL.

If quantitation by internal standard (IS) is included in the project objective, an appropriate volume of internal standard solution is added to all the bottles prior to sampling and SPE . Typically sample bottles are spiked with internal standard at a final desired spike concentration of 1 ng/mL.

For the trip blank, the SRS spike and IS spike i s added to the bottle and then ASTM Type I water (HPLC grade reagent water or other suitable water may used) is added to the “fill to here” line. The bottle is capped and sealing tape may be placed around the outer edge of the cap. Trip blank matrix spikes are prepared by adding the appropriate volume of target analyte spiking solution, IS, and SRS spiking solutions and filling the bottle to the desired volume with the appropriate water and capping and sealing the cap.



## 9 Quality Control and Data Quality Objectives

9.1 Data Quality Objectives

This method and required quality control samples is designed to generate data accurate to ±30% with a targeted LOQ of 0.025 ng/mL. Any deviations from the quality control measures spelled out below will be documented in the raw data and footnoted in the final report.



## 9.2 Method/Procedural Blanks

The method/procedural blank is zero point calibration standard (which includes ISs) analyzed in a regular basis with each analysis batch. At a minimum, method blanks are analyzed prior to instrument calibration, prior to the analysis of CCV samples, after every 10 sample injections, and at the end of the analytical run.

The mean area count or area ratios when using internal standard calibration, for each analyte in the method

blanks m ust be less than 50% of the area count counts or area ratios when using internal standard calibration, of the LOQ standard. The standard deviation of the area counts, or area ratios when using internal standard calibration, of these method blanks should be calculated. A specific %RSD acceptance criteria is not specified but is assessed on an analytical batch basis. If the mean area counts or area ratios when using internal standard calibration, of the method blanks exceed 50% of the LOQ standard, then the LOQ must be raised to

the first standard level in the curve that meets criteria. Method blanks may be eliminated if technical justification can be provided (e.g. the procedural blank was analyzed after an unexpectedly high level sample). If any procedural blanks are removed from the LOQ determination, document in the raw data and report as appropriate. Laboratory Sample Replicates / Field Duplicate Sample

Typically, samples are collected in duplicates in the field. The relative percent difference (RPD) of duplicate samples should be ≤20% for the precision of sample preparation and analysis to be considered in control. Replicate samples not meeting the ≤20% RPD criteria are flagged and reported as outside of QC acceptance

criteria.



## 9.3 Laboratory Matrix S pikes (LMSs)

LMSs may be performed in lieu of FMSs if FMSs have previously been performed for the sample matrix. Additionally, LMSs may be performed in lieu of FMSs for a sample matrix if the FMS levels were not appropriate for determining spike recoveries relative to endogenous levels of target analytes and appropriate SRSs. Generally, each sample location represents a different sample and sample matrix. LMSs are prepared for each sample and analyzed to determine the matrix effect on spike recovery efficiency of each target analyte and appropriate SRSs. LMSs should be prepared at a minimum of one level and in duplicate. LMS concentrations should be prepared at approximately 0.5

- 10 times the endogenous concentration or approximately 4

- 10 times the LOQ concentration of each target analyte.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 14 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis Lab matrix spike recoveries should fall within ± 30% of expected values. Sample data with LMS recovery outside of ±30% but within ±50% of the expected value are flagged and reported as outside of QC acceptance

criter ia. Data with LMS recovery outside of ±50% of the expected value are reported as NR, where NR is defined as “Not Reportable” data outside of QC acceptance criteria.



## 9.4 Lab Control Sample

Lab control spikes are prepared for each analysis batch to determine method accuracy and precision. LCSs should be prepared at three levels in triplicate for each target analyte and at a minimum of two levels in triplicate for appropriate SRSs. Low lab control spikes should be prepared at a concentration in the range of

a pproximately four to ten times higher than the targeted lower LOQ, the mid lab control spikes should be prepared at a concentration near the mid

- point of the calibration curve and the high lab control spikes at approximately 80% of the upper LOQ. For each target analyte and SRSs, the percent relative standard deviation (method precision) for each control spike level must be less than or equal to 20% and the average recovery (method accuracy) for each control spike level must be 80

- 120%. Sample data for target analytes outside of the laboratory control spike acceptance criteria will be handled as follows:

If the average recovery of a spiking level falls outside method acceptance, but at least 67% (6 out of 9 ) o f LCS samples are within 20 % of their respective nominal value (33% of the QC samples, not all replicates at the

same concentration, may be outside 20% of nominal value), the average recovery will be flagged as outside method acceptance criteria. All LCS samples will be control charted as per ETS -4- 02 6. If the average recovery of one of the spiking levels exceeded the analytical method uncertainty as determined by ETS

- 12

- 012, that analytical batch uncertainty will be expanded for that particular study.

If more than 67% of the LCS samples fail to meet method acceptance criteria, the data will not be reported.

Calibration standards consisting of mixed branched and linear isomer PFOS/PFOA are preferred. However, for PFOS/PFOA target analytes, if the calibration standards are comprised of predominantly linear isomers only, at least one level of triplicate LCSs should be prepared using PFOS/PFOA which contains a mix of linear and branched isomers. These LCSs will be used to demonstrate quantitative equivalency (or quantitative bias) of the isomeric mix when using a predominantly linear standard for calibration. The mixed linear and branched

isomer PFOS/PFOA LCSs recoveries should fall within ± 30% of expected values. Alternatively, in lieu of mixed branched and linear isomer PFOS/PFOA LCSs, mixed branched and linear isomer PFOS/PFOA TBMSs may be applied to demonstrate method accuracy and precision.



## 9.5 Field Matrix Spikes (FMSs) / Surrogate Recovery Standards (SRSs)

FMSs are prepared for each sampling location and analyzed to determine the matrix effect and sample holding time on the spike recovery of each target analyte and/or appropriate SRS. Generally, each sample location represents a different sample and sample matrix.

FMSs are QC samples to which known quantities of appropriate target analytes are added to the sample bottle in the laboratory before the bottles are sent to the field. Typically a low and a high target analyte FMS are prepared for each sampling location. The sample and field duplicate sample may contain appropriate SRSs in lieu of target analyte low field matrix spike and target analyte high field matrix spike samples.

Field matrix spike method acceptance criteria are recoveries within ±30% of the expected value. If FMS recovery (target analyte or SRS spike) is outside of ±30% of the expected value or could not be assessed because the FMS (target analyte) was spiked at an inappropriate level, the sample result is reported as follows:

1.) If target analyte FMS recovery could not be assessed because the FMS's were at an inappropriate level, then Laboratory Matrix Spikes (LMS) may be substituted. If LMS recoveries are within ±30% the data are reportable and flagged to indicate that the FMS spikes levels were inappropriate.

2.) If multiple target analyte FMS's were prepared on a sample and the closest FMS level to the reported sample meets the ±30% acceptance criteria but additional FMS's are outside the ±30% acceptance range, the data are reportable and flagged to indicate that while there were failing FMS’s, the uncertainty will not be expanded since the most appropriate spike level passed.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 15 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 3.) If the target analyte FMS recoveries are outside of the ±30% acceptance range but at least 30 acceptable historical reportable FMS sample results are available, the data may be reported but flagged with an expanded uncertainty and as not meeting FMS criteria.

4.) Sample data with FMS recovery outside of ±30% but within ±50% of the expected value are flagged and reported as outside of QC acceptance criteria with an expanded uncertainty.

5.) If FMS recovery is outside of ±50%, the sample result is reported as NR, where NR is defined as “Not Reportable” due to noncompliant QC results.

The targeted fortification levels should be at least 50% of the endogenous level and less than 10 times the

e ndogenous level to be used without justification to determine the statement of accuracy for analytical results.

Note: It is possible for bottles utilized for Field Matrix Spike samples to be under

- filled or over

- filled during sample collection. Since this scenario will effect the actual concentration of the FMS sample (surrogate and internal standard concentrations will also be effected, if used), it is important that any obvious under

- filling or

over

- filling of sample bottles be documented in the data package and taken into account in the FMS , ISs, or

SRSs recovery calculations. Samples over

- filled or under

- filled by more than 10% will be require recalculation of the FMS, ISs, and SRS true values.

The average of the sample and the field duplicate should be used to calculate the recovery.



## 10 Procedures

10.1 Water Sample Preparation

This method is applicable to water samples. Samples containing heavy particulate may not be suitable for analysis by this method. Samples containing suspended particulate should be centrifuge prior to removing a sample aliquot, or filtered.

• Thoroughly mix sample before removing a n aliquot and placing in a labeled autovial.

• Dilute sample, if necessary, with ASTM Type I water , HPLC water, other suitable water , or solvent (methanol)

.

• L ab control spikes are prepared for each analysis batch to determine method accuracy and precision. LCSs should be prepared at three levels in triplicate for each target analyte and at a minimum of two levels in triplicate for appropriate SRSs. Low lab control spikes should be prepared at a concentration in the range of approximately four to ten times higher than the targeted lower LOQ, the mid lab control spikes should be prepared at a concentration near the mid

- point of the calibration curve and the high lab control spikes at approximately 80% of the upper LOQ. For IS quantitation, stable isotope internal standards of each target analyte or appropriate surrogate ISs should be spiked at the same level as the samples being analyzed, in all LCSs

.

• If LCSs are being prepared us ing synthetic groundwater, allow the LCSs samples to equilibrate for a

minimum of 4 hours before aliquoting for analysis or diluting with solvent (methanol).



## 11 Sample Analysis - LC/MS/MS

11.1 Instrument Setup

Note: In this example, an Applied Biosystems Sciex API 4000 (API 5000 or API 5500) Tandem Mass Spectrometer (LC/MS/MS) is used. Other brands/models of LC/MS/MS instruments as well as single quadrupole mass spectrometers (LC/MS) may be used as long as the method acceptance criteria are met. Brand names, suppliers, part numbers, and models are for illustrative purposes only. Equivalent performance may be achieved using apparatus and materials other than those specified here, but demonstration of equivalent performance that meets the requirements of this method is the responsibility of the laboratory. The operator must optimize and document the equipment and settings used.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 16 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis Establish the LC/MS/MS system and operating conditions equivalent to the following:

Mass Spec: Applied Biosystems API 4000, API 5000, or API 5500

Ion Source: Turbo Ion Spray (ABS)

Mode: Electrospray Negative

Scan Type: MRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring)

Computer: Dell DHM

Software: Windows 2000 or Windows XP, Analyst 1.4.2 or higher versi ons

HPLC: Agilent Series 1100,1200, or 1290

Agilent Quaternary Pump

Agilent Vacuum Degasser

Agilent Autosampler

Agilent Column Oven

Note: One or more C18 HPLC analytical columns (2.1 mm x 100 mm, 5 μ m or 2.1 mm x 50 mm, 5 μ m) may be

attached on

- line after the purge valve and before the sample injection port to retard and separate any residue contaminants that may be in the mobile phase and/or HPLC system.

HPLC Column: Betasil C18, 4.6mm x 100mm, 5 μ m (ThermoElectron Corporation)

Column Temperature: 35 ° C

Inje ction Volume: 5μL

Mobile Phase (A): 2mM Ammonium Acetate in ASTM Type I water (See 7.3)

Mobile Phase (B): Methanol

Table 3

. Liquid Chromatography Gradient Program

.

**Step**

**Number Total Time**  **(min) Flow Rate**  **(** μ

**L/min) Percent A** 

**(2 mM ammonium**  **acetate) Percent B** 

**(Methanol)**

0 0 750 97.0 3.0

1 2.0 750 97.0 3.0

2 14.5 750 5.0 95.0

3 15.5 750 5.0 95.0

4 16.5 750 97.0 3.0

5 20.0 750 97.0 3.0



### Note: Other HPLC gradients may be used as long as the method criteria and project data quality objectives are

met.

It may be necessary to adjust the HPLC gradient in order to optimize instrument performance. Columns with different dimensions (e.g. 2.1mm x 30mm) and columns from different manufacturers (Keystone Betasil C18 etc.) may be used.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 17 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis Table 4 Suggested MRM Transitions for Target Analytes, Surrogates, and Internal Standards

Analyte Analyte Description Mass Transition

Q1 (amu) Mass Transition

Q3 (amu)

PFBA (C4 Acid) Target 213 169

PFPeA (C5 Acid) Target 263 219

PFHxA (C6 Acid) Target 313 269, 119

PFHpA (C7 Acid) Target 363 319, 169

PFOA (C8 Acid) Target 413 369, 219, 169

PFNA (C9 Acid) Target 463 419, 169, 219

PFDA (C10 Acid) Target 513 469, 269, 219

PFUnA (C11 Acid) Target 563 519, 269, 219

PFDoA (C12 Acid) Target 613 569, 169, 319

PFTA (C13 Acid) Target 663 619, 369, 319

FBSA (C4 Sulfonamide) Target 298 78

FOSA (C8 Sulfonamide) Target 498 78

PFBS (C4 Sulfonate) Target 299 99, 80

PFHS (C6 Sulfonate) Target 399 99, 80

PFOS (C8 Sulfonate) Target 499 80, 99, 130

[1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFBA IS for PFBA 217 172

[1,2 ,3,4,5

- 13 C 5 ]PFPe A IS for PFPeA 268 223

[1,2

- 13 C 2 ]PFHxA IS for PFHxA 315 270

[1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFHpA IS for PFHpA 367 322

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 C 8 ]PFOA IS for PFOA 421 376

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

- 13 C 9 ]PFNA IS for PFNA 472 427

[1,2,3,4,5,6

- 13 C 6 ]PFDA IS for PFDA 519 474

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7

- 13 C 7 ]PFUnA IS for PFUnA 570 525

[1,2

- 13 C 2 ]PFDoA IS for PFDoA and PFTA 615 570

[ 18 O 2 ]PFBS IS for PFBS 303 84

[ 1,2,3

- 13 C 3 ]PFHS IS for PFHS 402 80

[1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFOS IS for PFOS 503 80

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

- 13 C 8 ]FOSA IS for FOSA 507 80

[1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFOA Surrogate (C4

- C8 Acids) 417 372

[1,2,3,4

- 13 C 4 ]PFOS Surrogate(Sulfonates, FOSA) 503 80

[1,2

- 13 C 2 ]PFUnA Surrogate (C9

- C13 Acids) 565 520



### Multiple transitions for monitoring the analytes is an option. The use of one daughter ion is acceptable if data sensitivity and selectivity is achieved and provided that retention time criteria are met to assure adequate specificity. While the daughter ions may be chosen at the discretion of the analyst, mass transition 99 is suggested for PFOS. Quantitation may be performed using the total ion chromatogram (TIC, or summed MRMs) for a given analyte. For example, the PFOA TIC would sum all three of the monitored transitions. Use of the suggested primary ion is recommended. Retention times may vary slightly, on a day

- to

- day basis, depending on the batch of mobile phase and the gradient, column, guard column(s) used etc. Drift in retention

times is acce ptable within an analytical run, as long as the drift continues through the entire analysis and the standards are interspersed throughout the analytical run.



## 11.2 Calibration Curve

Quantitation is by internal standard or external standard calibration. Calibration standards may be prepared in ASTM Type I, HPLC water, other suitable water, or a solvent/water mixture. If internal standard calibration does not meet calibration acceptance criteria, external calibration can be applied. See Table 1 for

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 18 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis recom mended application of available internal standards. Quantitation of PFOA and PFOS is by summed analyte

- specific mass transitions.

Analyze the standard curve prior to each set of samples. If internal standards were added to the calibration standards area ratios are used to generate the calibration curve. The standard curve may be plotted using a

linear regression (y = mx + b), weighted 1/x or unweighted, or by quadratic fi t (y = ax 2 

### + bx + c), weighted 1/x or unweighted

, using suitable software

. The mathematical method used to calculate the calibration curve should be applied consistently throughout a study. Any change should be thoroughly documented in the raw data.

High and/or low points may be excluded from the calibration curves to provide a better fit over the range appropriate to the data or because they did not meet the pre

- determined acceptance criteria. Low

- level curve points should also be excluded if their area counts (or area ratio if quantitating by IS) are not at least twice that

of the ave rage area counts (or area ratio if quantitating by IS) of method and/or solvent blanks. The coefficient of determination (r 2 

### ) value for the calibration curve must be greater than or equal to 0.990 (or a correlation
coefficient (r) of 0.995). Each point in the curve must be within ± 25% of the theoretical concentration with the exception of the LLOQ, which may be within ± 30%. Justification for exclusion of calibration curve points will be noted in the raw data. A minimum of 6 points will be used to construct the calibration curve.

If the calibration curve does not meet acceptance criteria, perform routine maintenance or prepare a new standard curve (if necessary) and reanalyze.



## 11.3 Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV)

Continuing calibration verifications (CCV) are analyzed to verify the accuracy of the calibration curve. Analyze

a mid

- range calibration standard, one of the same standards used to construct the calibration curve, at a minimum after every tenth sample, not including solvent blanks, with a minimum of one per sample set. Calibration verification injections must be within ± 25% to be considered acceptable. The calibration curve and the last passing CCV will then bracket acceptable samples. Multiple CCV levels may be used. Samples must be bracketed by passing CCVs or the calibration curve and a passing CCV to be reportable.



## 11.4 System Suitability

A minimum of three system suitability samples should be injected at the beginning of each analytical run, prior

to th e analysis of the calibration curve. Typically these samples are at a concentration near the mid

- level of the calibration curve and are repeated injections from one autosampler vial. It is suggested that the system suitability injections have area counts or area ratios when using internal standard calibration, with a target RSD of ≤5% and a target retention time RSD of ≤2%. There is no defined acceptability limit on these results as the

%RSD value is dependent on the number of MRM transitions being monitored in the LC/MS/MS run or time period. Ultimately, any effects on these parameters for the System Suitability samples will also be evident on all standards and QC samples analyzed as part of the analysis batch. Any effect of system suitability is incorp orated within QC acceptance criteria. 4



## 11.5 Sample Analysis and QCs

For each analysis batch, the instrument analysis run sequence should include an initial calibration curve, samples, FDSs, interspersed blanks, interspersed CCVs, appropriate QCs (i.e., LCSs, LMSs, FMSs, TBMSs, and TBs), and a final CCV or calibration curve bracketing samples and appropriate QCs

Inject the same volume (between 5 - 100μL) of each standard, analytical sample and blank into the instrument (unless an on

- instrument sample dilution is desired).

Samples containing analytes that are quantitated above the concentration of the highest standard in the curve should be further diluted and reanalyzed.

4 3M Environmental Laboratory study E08

- 0096 evaluated the effect on these results as a function of the number of MRMs being monitored.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 19 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 12 Data Analysis and Calculations

The chromatography analysis software will typically calculate the amount of target analyte in the sample extracts using the established calibration curve.

Calculate the percent recovery of the LCS using the following equation:



### 100%*

) mL ng (ion Concentrat Spike ) mL ng (ion Concentrat LCS

recovery LCS% =

Calculate the percent recovery of the LMS using the following equation:

100%*

) mL ng ( ion Concentrat Spike ) mL ng ( Sample of ion Concentrat -) mL ng ( ion Concentrat LMS
recovery % LMS

=



### For samples fortified with known amounts of analyte prior to extraction, use the following equation to calculate the percent recovery.



### 100 (ng/mL) added Analyte (ng/mL) sample in found analyte Average- (ng/mL) found analyte Total Recovery × =



## 13 Analysis Batch Method Performance Criteria

Any method performance parameters that are not achieved must be considered in the evaluation of the data. Nonconformance to any specified parameters must be described and discussed in the final report if the Technical Manager (non

- GLP study) or Study Director (GLP study) chooses to report the data.

If criteria listed in this method performance section are not met, maintenance may be performed on the system and samples reanalyzed, or other actions taken as appropriate. Document all actions in the raw data.

If data are to be reported when performance criteria have not been met, the data must be footnoted on tables and discussed in the text of the report.



## 13.1 System Suitability – Analysis Batch

A minimum of three system suitability samples should be injected at the beginning of each analytical run. These samples are run prior to the calibration curve. It is suggested that the system suitability injections have area counts with a target RSD of ≤5% and a target retention time RSD of ≤2%. There is no defined acceptability limit on these results as the %RSDs are dependent on the number of MRM transitions being monitored in the LC/MS/MS run or time period. Any effect of system suitability is incorporated in the QC acceptance criteria.



## 13.2 Calibration and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) – Analysis Batch

Calibration Curve: The coefficient of determination (r 2 

### ) value for the calibration curve must be greater than or equal to 0 .990 corresponding to a correlation coefficient (r) = 0.995. Each point in the curve must be within

± 25% of the theoretical concentration with the exception of the LLOQ, which may be within ± 30%.

CCV Performance: The calibration standards that are interspersed throughout the analytical sequence are evaluated as continuing calibration verifications in addition to being part of the calibration curve. The accuracy

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 20 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis of each curve point must be within 25% of the theoretical value ( within 30% for lowest curve point ) . Samples that are bracketed by CCVs not meeting these criteria must be reanalyzed.

Limits of Quantitation (LOQ): The lower LOQ (LLOQ) is the lowest non

- zero active standard in the calibration curve; the peak area of the LLOQ must be at least 2X that of the average area counts for all prepared procedural blank(s). By definition, the measured value of the LLOQ must be within 30% of the

theoretical value.

Demonstration of Specificity: Specificity is demonstrated by chromatographic retention time (within 4% of standard) and the mass spectral response of unique ions.



## 13.3 Blanks – Method/Procedural Blanks and Trip

Method/ Procedural Blanks: Multiple procedural blanks should be interspersed throughout the analysis batch and the analytical sequence. At a minimum, method blanks are analyzed prior to instrument calibration, prior to the analysis of CCV samples, after every 10 sample injections, and at the end of the analytical run.

The mean area counts (or area ratios when using IS calibration) for each analyte must be less than 50% of the area count of the LOQ standard. If the area counts of the procedural blanks exceed 50% of the LOQ standard,

then the LOQ must be raised to the first standard level that meets criteria.

Trip Blank: A t rip blank of ASTM Type I water (or lab equivalent) is prepared in a sample container in the laboratory and treated as a sample, including exposure to shipping, sampling site conditions, storage, preservation and all analytical procedures. The trip blanks results for each analyte are included with the

repo rted sample results.



## 13.4 Data Accuracy and Precision – Analysis Batch

Lab Control Spikes: The average recovery at each LCS level for each target analyte and appropriate SRS

should be within 80

- 120% and the percent relative standard deviation of the recoveries must be less than or equal to 20%. If the average recovery of a spiking level falls outside method acceptance, but at least 67% (6

out of 9 ) o f LCS samples are within 20 % of their respective nominal value (33% of the QC samples, not all replicates at the same concentration, may be outside 20% of nominal value), the average recovery will be flagged as outside method acceptance criteria. All LCS samples will be control charted as per ETS

- 12

- 012. If the average recovery of one of the spiking levels exceeded the analytical method uncertainty as determined by

ETS

- 12

- 012, that analytical batch uncertainty will be expanded for that particular study. The average recovery

at each LCS level for mixed branched/linear isomer PFOA and PFOS should be within 70

- 130% and the percent relative standard deviation of the recoveries must be less than or equal to 20%.

Field Duplicates: The relative percent difference (RPD) of duplicate samples should be less than 20% for the precision of sample preparation and analysis to be considered in control. Replicate samples not meeting the 20% RPD criteria are flagged and reported as outside of QC acceptance criteria.

Field Matrix Spikes: FMS acceptance criteria are recoveries within ±30% of the expected value for each target analyte and appropriate SRS. Sample data with FMS recovery outside of ±30% but within ±50% of the expected value are flagged and reported as outside of QC acceptance criteria. Data with FMS recovery outside of ±50% of the expected value are reported as NR, where NR is defined as “Not Reportable” data outside of QC acceptance criteria. If FMS recovery could not be assessed because FMSs were at an inappropriate level, then Laboratory Matrix Spikes (LMSs) may be substituted. If LMS recoveries are within

±30% for each target analyte and SRSs the data are reportable but flagged as not meeting the FMS method acceptance criteria.



## 13.5 Analytical Method Uncertainty

Analytical method uncertainty for each target analyte and SRS is determined with control charted historica l analysis batch LCS data for the method and reported with each analysis batch. 5 

### Uncertainty determinations

5 Method uncertainty based on INTERNATIONAL ANS/ISO/IED STANDARD 17025 reference (GUM, Guide to the Expression of

Uncert ainty in Measurement). Method application demonstrated in ETS

- 12

- 012, citing references: a.) EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, “Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement,” Second Edition; Editors: S.L.R. Ellison, M. Rosslein, and A. Williams

. b.)Georgian, Thomas, “Estimation of Laboratory Analytical Uncertainty Using Laboratory Control Samples,” Environmental Testing &

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 21 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis are based on INTERNATIONAL ANS/ISO/IED STANDARD 17025 reference (GUM, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) and described in ETS -12- 012 . At least thirty data points are required for determining analytical method uncertainty. The method uncertainty is defined as 2x the standard deviation of the percent recoveries of the pooled lab control spikes. While all LCS data points are control charted, only the most recent fifty data points are used for determining the method uncertainty.

When less than thirty LCS data points have been generated for a given analyte, the analysis batch LCSs are used to determine the data uncertainty. If FMSs meet the ±30% recovery criteria at a level appropriate to the endogenous level, and the LCS meet the ±20% recovery criteria, then the uncertainty of the data is determined

as within 100±20%.

Analysis batch sample data with FMS recovery outside of ±30% but within ±50% of the expected value are flagged and reported as outside of QC acceptance criteria with expanded uncertainties. Data with FMS recovery outside of ±50% of the expected value are reported as NR, where NR is defined as “Not Reportable” data outside of QC acceptance criteria. If FMS recovery could not be assessed because FMSs were at an inappropriate level, then Laboratory Matrix Spikes (LMSs) may be substituted. If LMS recoveries are within ±30% for each target analyte and appropriate SRSs the data are reportable but flagged as not meeting the FMS method acceptance criteria with uncertainties of ±30%. If FMS do not meet the ±30% recovery criteria, and historical FMS data does not exist, the analytical uncertainty is evaluated on a sample

- by -s ample basis, the data may be reported with expanded uncertainty and are flagged.



## 13.6 Quantitation of PFOA/PFOS – Analysis Batch

Calibration standards consisting of mixed branched and linear isomer PFOS/PFOA are preferred. Quantitation is performed by integrating the linear and branched isomers together. Alternately, the linear and branched isomers can be integrated separately, applying the appropriate true value to each calibration curve

po int for each isomer. The LCS and samples are then quantitated by integrating the linear and branched isomers separately (requires separate analytical results files) and quantitating the resulting peak against the

linear or branched calibration curve

. The results from both integrations are then summed to produce the final result. Integrating the linear and branched isomers separately may be helpful for those samples where the linear/branched ratios do not closely match those of the reference standards.

Ho wever, for PFOS/PFOA target analytes, if the calibration standards are comprised of predominantly linear isomers only t he method requires the addition of LCS s of mixed branched/linear isomer PFOS/PFOA. The purpose of including these LCSs is to demonstrate quantitative equivalency (or quantitative bias) of the isomeric mix when using a predominantly linear PFOS or PFOA standard for calibration. Alternatively, in lieu of mixed branched and linear isomer PFOS/PFOA LCSs, mixed branched and linear isomer PFOS/ PFOA TBMSs may be applied to demonstrate method accuracy and precision.

An alternate method of quantitation can be performed whereby only the linear isomer of PFOS/PFOA is integrated and used for generating the calibration curve. The LCS and samples are then quantitated by integrating the linear and branched isomers separately (requires separate analytical results files) and quantitating the resulting peak against the linear calibration curve. The results from both integrations are then summed to produce the final result. Integrating the linear and branched isomers separately reduces the on

column concentration for those samples that contain both linear and branched isomers of PFOA/PFOS. This ensures that the concentration detected is within the a range of the calibration curve that is comparable regardless of whether the calibration curve was generated using predominantly linear isomers of PFOS/PFOA or linear plus branched isomers of PFOS/PFOA.



## 14 Pollution Prevention and Waste Management

Waste generated when performing this method will be disposed of appropriately. The original samples will be archived at the 3M Environmental Laboratory in accordance with internal procedures.

Analysis, November/December 2000. c.)Taylor, B.N. and CE. Kuyatt, NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994 Edition: “Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results.”d.)Adams, T.M., “A2LA Guide for the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Testing”, July 2002.

### ETS -8- 044. 1 Page 22 of 22 Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Wate r by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

## 15 Records

Each data package generated for a study must include all supporting information for reconstruction of the data. Information for the data package must include, but is not limited to the following items: study or project number, sample and standard prep sheets/records, instrument run log (instrument batch records, instrument

ac quisition method, summary pages), instrument results files, chromatograms, calibration curves, and data

calculations.



## 16 Affected Documents

None.



## 17 Revisions

Revision

Number Summary of Changes

1 Section 1

. Included the use of internal standard calibration by this method.

Section 2. Included the use of internal standard calibration by this method. Included the
use of a solvent/water mixture when analyzing for PFUnA, PFDoA, PFTrDA, and FOSA.

Section 3

. Added definitions for internal standard, surrogate internal standard, and
surrogate recovery standard.
Section 6.Removed the details regarding the instrument parameters to section 10 of the

method

. Section 7. Updated reference standards to include internal standards and surrogates.
Changed concentration levels for working standards and included the use of internal

standards and surrogates.
Section 8. Inserted a new section on sample bottle preparation.

Se ction 9 Quality Control. This section was previously section 10 in ETS -8- 044.0. Updated

QC criteria to be consistent with method ETS -8- 154.4.

Section 10 Procedures . This section was previously section 8 (Sample Handling) in E TS -8-
044.0. Added detail regarding the preparation of LCSs. Included the use of methanol as a

dilution solvent.

Section 11 Samp le Analysis

. This section was previously section 10 in ETS -8- 044.0.
Included the details regarding the instrument parameters.
Section 12 Data Analysis and Calculations. This section was previously section 11 in ETS

8- 044.0. Removed the equation for calculating the analytes concentration, indicating that
this is done by the instrument software.
Section 13 Method Performance. This section was previously section 12 in ETS -8- 044.0.
Updated QC criteria to be consistent with ETS -8- 154.4. Added information on the
determination of analytical method uncertainty and quantitation of PFOA/PFOS.
Section 14 Pollution Prevention. This section was previously section 13 in ETS -8- 044.0.
Section 15 Records. This section was previously section 14 in ETS -8- 044.0.

Section 16 Affected Documents. This section was previously section 15 in ETS -8- 044.0.
Section 17 Revisions. This section was previously section 16 in ETS

- 8

- 044.0.

# A TTACHMENT 

# D: D EVIATION 

# ( S 

# )GLP10-01-01 ; Interi m Repor t 3 9 Analysi s o f PFO A i n Groundwate r Sample

s Forme r Sludg e Incorporatio n Are a (FSIA) ; Decatur

, A L



## RECOR D O F DEVIATION/NONCONFORMANC E

/. identification

stud y / Projec t No

. GLPlO-01-01-3 9 Date(s ) o f Occurrence : 11/30/12-12/5/1 2 Documen t Number : GLP10-01-01 ; Protoco l Amendmen t #3 9

Deviatio n typ e • SO P • Equipmen t Procedur e • Metho d (Checl < one ) • Protoco l B GP O • Other : 

### //. Description

(attach

extra pages as needed)

Metho d Requirements :

1

. Protoco l Amendmen t 3 9 addresse d an d documente d th e Genera l Projec t Outlin e (GPO ) fo r thi s samplin g

even t I n th e GP O i t wa s state d tha t th e 3 M Environmenta l La b wil l receiv e an d analyz e groundwate r sample s collecte d fro m a n expecte d thirty-on e groundwate r well s 

### Actua l procedure/process :

1

. Du e t o dr

y conditions

, fou r o f th e expecte d samplin g location s wer e no t collected

.

///

. Actions

Taken

(such as amendment

issued, SOP

revision, etc.)



### Correctiv e Actio n ( • Ye s 0 No

) Reference :

Acceptabilit y o f th e nonconformin g work :

1

. Sectio n 2 o f th e repor t indicate s th e location s tha t wer e no t collecte d du e t o th e wel l bein g dry

.

Actions : • Haltin g o f Wor k • Clien t Notificatio n • Wor k Recal l • Withholdin g o f Repor t



### 0 Other : Deviatio n wil l b e note d i n fina l report

. Projec t Lead/PA I Approval : Susa n Wol f

Stud y Directo r (i f GLP) :

Sponso r Approva l (fo r GL P protoco l deviations) : N A Date:.

Date : N A

Technica l Reviewe r (optional) : N A Date : N A

Laboratory

Technical

Dirgctor Approval:

^^^^ ^ Date :

ly. Authorization

to Resume

Work

Wliere fialting of wor/c occurred, resumption

of wor/c must first be approved

by Laboratory

Management 

### Laborator y Departmen t Manage r Approval : N A Date : N A

Deviation

No.
(assigned

by Study Director or Team Leader at the end of study or project)

Attachmen t A ETS-4-008. 7 Pag e 1 o f 1

Documentatio n o f Deviation s an d Contro l o f Nonconformin g Testin g

Pag e 7 1 o f 7 1