alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John B. Carrington, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofWebsense, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 6, 2004 |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
|                       | By:    | /s/ JOHN B.  CARRINGTON |   |
|                       |   | John B.  Carrington |
|                       |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-50177

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Martin Diaz-Nunez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:23-CR-2198-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Martin Diaz-Nunez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty 

plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326. For the first time on appeal, Diaz-Nunez challenges the application 

of the enhanced penalty range in § 1326(b) as unconstitutional because it 

permits a defendant to be sentenced above the statutory maximum of 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 27, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-50177 Document: 38-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2024
No. 24-50177

2

§ 1326(a) based on the fact of a prior conviction that was neither alleged in 

the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He has filed 

an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief correctly 

conceding that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 

523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th 

Cir. 2019). He raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review.

Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., 

Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Diaz-Nunez’s motion is 

GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 24-50177 Document: 38-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2024
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41133 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. IGNACIO AMARO-MENDEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-680-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ignacio AmaroMendez has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Amaro-Mendez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 19, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Exhibit 34.3

LOGO



KPMG

KPMG LLP

1601 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members Regulus Group LLC:

We have examined managements assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for
remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2010. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management is
responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our
examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for
the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing
criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG
LLP

February 11, 2011

KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership, the U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Competitive Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henri Hornby, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/ Henri Hornby

Henri Hornby, Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

March 30, 2007
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-41141 Summary Calendar

LOUIS LEON WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; HENRY PATTERSON, Sheriff, Liberty County Jail; TIM NEW, Community Education Centers, Liberty County Jail; MEDICAL STAFF, Liberty County Jail; UNIDENTIFIED CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Correction Officers Liberty County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 1:10-CV-544 U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary17 , 20 13 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 11-41141 Document: 00512116928 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2013No. 11-41141

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Louis Walters , Texas prisoner # 1714211, filed the instant interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit alleging that he was given inadequate m e dical care at the Liberty County Jail. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion. The interlocutory order is immediately appealable. See Robbins v. Maggio , 750 F.2d 405, 413 (5th Cir. 198 5). Walters’s case, however, d o e s n o t raise complex legal or factual issues. Additionally, his pleadings indicate that he has the ability to present his case adequately, and there is no indication that he would be unable to investigate adequately. Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Walters’s request for counsel. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212, 213 (5th Cir. 1982). Because he has not shown that exceptional circumstances warrant the appointment of counsel, the motion is denied. See Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock Cnty., Tex. , 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1 991). Walters also contends that the conditions of confinement were inhumane because he was deprived of necessary medications and that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. Because the district court has not entered a final, appealable order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation dismissing those claims, this court does not have jurisdiction over them. See Donaldson v. Ducote , 373 F.3d 622, 624 (5th Cir. 200 4). The order denying appointment of counsel is AFFIRMED. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. The appeal is DISMISSED in part.

Pur sua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. 2 Case: 11-41141 Document: 00512116928 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/17/2013
# C_2020422EN.01002101.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/21

---

Corrigendum to Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9675 — Apollo Capital Management/Lopesan Group/IFA Faro Hotel/IFA Buenaventura Hotel)

(This text replaces and annuls that published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 419 of 4 December 2020, p. 13
  )

(2020/C 422/13)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9723 – Showa Denko K.K./Hitachi Chemical Company)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 February 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9723. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9723. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                            33562
<SECURITIES>                     201027
<RECEIVABLES>                    242544
<ALLOWANCES>                      30000
<INVENTORY>                      172713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 619846
<PP&E>                           383007
<DEPRECIATION>                    19227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3245794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             73315
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                           1454
<OTHER-SE>                      3171025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3245794
<SALES>                          266126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 266126
<CGS>                            156444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1038339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  40538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 5264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (881005)
<INCOME-TAX>                       3410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (884415)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    (884415)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.06)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employee Benefits Security Administration

          - 29 CFR Part 2560
          - RIN 1210-AB24

### Correction

In rule document Z8-31188 beginning on page 17 in the issue of Friday, January 2, 2009 make the following correction:

                    On page 17, in the second column, in the                     **DATES**                     heading, March 3, 2008 should read March 3, 2009.                

[FR Doc. Z8-31188 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2021064DE.01001101.xml

| 24.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 64/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 64/11

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der Einleitung eines Antidumpingverfahrens betreffend die Einfuhren von Kabeln aus optischen Fasern mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 316 vom 24. September 2020
  )

(2021/C 64/07)

Seite 10, Nummer 2 Absatz 2 Ziffer ii:

Anstatt:

| „ii) | Kabel für den Unterwassereinsatz. Kabel für den Unterwassereinsatz sind Kabel aus optischen Fasern mit Kunststoffisolierung, die einen Kupfer- oder Aluminiumleiter enthalten und in denen die Fasern in einem oder mehreren Metallmodulen liegen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„ii)

Kabel für den Unterwassereinsatz. Kabel für den Unterwassereinsatz sind Kabel aus optischen Fasern mit Kunststoffisolierung, die einen Kupfer- oder Aluminiumleiter enthalten und in denen die Fasern in einem oder mehreren Metallmodulen liegen.“

muss es heißen:

| „ii) | Kabel für den Untersee-Einsatz. Kabel für den Untersee-Einsatz sind Kabel aus optischen Fasern mit Kunststoffisolierung, die einen Kupfer- oder Aluminiumleiter enthalten und in denen die Fasern in einem oder mehreren Metallmodulen liegen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„ii)

Kabel für den Untersee-Einsatz. Kabel für den Untersee-Einsatz sind Kabel aus optischen Fasern mit Kunststoffisolierung, die einen Kupfer- oder Aluminiumleiter enthalten und in denen die Fasern in einem oder mehreren Metallmodulen liegen.“

---
# C_2020301EN.01002101.xml

| 11.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/21

---

Corrigendum to Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9913 – Hella/Minth/JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 298 of 8 September 2020
  )

(2020/C 301/13)

On page 4, in the first paragraph:

for:

‘This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Hella Holding International GmbH (“Hella”, GERMANY), controlled by Hella GmbH & Co. KGaA, |
| --- | --- |

—

Hella Holding International GmbH (“Hella”, GERMANY), controlled by Hella GmbH & Co. KGaA,

| — | Minth Investment Co. (“Minth”, CAYMAN ISLANDS), controlled by Minth Group Limited, |
| --- | --- |

—

Minth Investment Co. (“Minth”, CAYMAN ISLANDS), controlled by Minth Group Limited,

| — | Hella Minth Jiaxing Automotive Parts Co. Ltd (“JV”, CHINA).’, |
| --- | --- |

—

Hella Minth Jiaxing Automotive Parts Co. Ltd (“JV”, CHINA).’,

read:

‘This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Hella Holding International GmbH (“Hella”, GERMANY), controlled by Hella GmbH & Co. KGaA, |
| --- | --- |

—

Hella Holding International GmbH (“Hella”, GERMANY), controlled by Hella GmbH & Co. KGaA,

| — | Minth Investment Co. (“Minth”, CHINA), controlled by Minth Group Limited, |
| --- | --- |

—

Minth Investment Co. (“Minth”, CHINA), controlled by Minth Group Limited,

| — | Hella Minth Jiaxing Automotive Parts Co. Ltd (“JV”, CHINA).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

Hella Minth Jiaxing Automotive Parts Co. Ltd (“JV”, CHINA).’.

---
Exhibit 7.1
 Grupo TMM, S.A.B. and Subsidiaries
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES UNDER IFRS
 December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Historical ratio:Fixed charges:Interest costs and amortization on debt discount or premium
in all indebtedness
    
    
    91,338
    
    
    
    55,616
    
    
    
    60,036
    
    
    
    96,037
    
    
    
    89,317Portion of rent expense representative of interest factor (A)
    
    
    25,720
    
    
    
    22,683
    
    
    
    16,663
    
    
    
    28,246
    
    
    
    22,568Fixed charges
    
    
    117,058
    
    
    
    78,299
    
    
    
    76,699
    
    
    
    124,283
    
    
    
    111,885Earnings:Pretax income from continuing operations
    
    
    95,534
    
    
    
    (29,193
    )
    
    
    (68,760
    )
    
    
    (85,892
    )
    
    
    (65,659
    )Less:Minority interest
    
    
    507
    
    
    
    160
    
    
    
    509
    
    
    
    4,188
    
    
    
    2,655Equity investee (income) loss
    
    
    329
    
    
    
    1,006
    
    
    
    511
    
    
    
    752
    
    
    
    885Fixed charges
    
    
    117,058
    
    
    
    78,299
    
    
    
    76,699
    
    
    
    124,283
    
    
    
    111,885Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    86
    
    
    
    345Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    8,352
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings
    
    
    203,404
    
    
    
    47,940
    
    
    
    6,919
    
    
    
    33,537
    
    
    
    43,031Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.74
    
    
    
    (N/A
    )(B)
    
    
    (N/A
    )(B)
    
    
    (N/A
    )(B)
    
    
    (N/A
    )(B)
 
 (A)
    
    The Company considered one-third of the rent expense as imputed interest factor.(B)
    
    Due to the registrants loss in 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, the ratio of earning to fixed
charges was less than 1:1. The registrant must generate additional earnings of $ 30.4 million,
$69.8 million, $ 90.7 million, and $68.9 million respectively to achieve a coverage ratio of
1:1. 100