alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

NO. 03-14-00570-CR

ERIC BYRON CRAYTON § IN THE THIRD 

VS. § DISTRICT COURT OF 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPEALS OF TEXAS 

SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

 Now comes the State of Texas, Appellee in the above styled and numbered 

cause, and moves for an extension of time of 31 days to file Appellee’s brief, and 

for good cause would show the following: 

I.

 Appellant was convicted by a jury of Tampering with Physical Evidence on 

August 11, 2014 in the 207th District Court of Comal County. The jury then 

sentenced Appellant to 35 years confinement in the institutional division of the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal 

and filed his brief with the Court on February 2, 2015. The State’s brief is currently 

due on April 3, 2015. 

II.

 Mr. Clayten Hearrell is handling this appeal for the State. Since the Court 

granted the First Motion for Extension, Mr. Hearrell had a trial involving 

aggravated robbery in early March. He had oral argument before the Court in 03-

ACCEPTED

03-14-00570-CR

4759355

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/3/2015 1:27:02 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/3/2015 1:27:02 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

13-00347-CR on March 25, 2015. He had a trial involving Possession of a

Controlled Substance at the end of March, and beginning on April 6th, he will have

a juvenile murder jury trial expected to last two weeks. Although he has performed

additional research, Mr. Hearrell has not yet had an opportunity to complete the 

State’s brief in this case, and in light of the foregoing, the State respectfully 

requests that the Court grant him a 31-day extension to file the Appellee’s Brief. 

This is the second extension sought by Appellee.

III.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State’s counsel 

respectfully requests an extension of 31 days, until May 4, 2015, so that an 

adequate response may be made to Appellant’s brief. This extension is not 

requested for purposes of delay but so that justice may be done. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley

Joshua D. Presley SBN: 24088254

preslj@co.comal.tx.us

Comal Criminal District Attorney’s Office 

150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307

New Braunfels, Texas 78130

Ph: (830) 221-1300 / Fax: (830) 608-2008
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua D. Presley, Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas, 

Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Second Motion to 

Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief has been delivered to Appellant ERIC 

BYRON CRAYTON’s attorney of record in this matter:

Richard E. Wetzel

wetzel_law@1411west.com

1411 West Avenue

Suite 100

Austin, TX 78701

Attorney for Appellant on Appeal

By electronically sending it to the above-listed email address through 

efile.txcourts.gov e-filing service this 3

rd

day of April, 2015.

 /s/ Joshua D. Presley

 Joshua D. Presley
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5564 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5564

   To require that the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
National Park Service, create a program to help ensure that youth from 
   urban areas have access to National Parks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2016

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require that the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
National Park Service, create a program to help ensure that youth from 
   urban areas have access to National Parks, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Parks for America's 
Children Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO NATIONAL PARKS FOR URBAN YOUTH.

    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park 
Service, shall create a program to help ensure that youth from urban 
areas have access to National Parks. The program shall include--
            (1) an advertising strategy aimed at urban youths;
            (2) transportation programs to help ensure urban youth have 
        better access to National Parks;
            (3) partnerships with urban schools to teach basic outdoor 
        skills and basic nature and biology; and
            (4) a grant program to help ensure that urban youth can 
        afford the attendance and lodging fees at National Parks.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - (-)news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        May 6, 2024        Trout, beavers, drought, and a “precious” frog

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

Science Snippet        April 12, 2022        History of Lake Powell Written in Sediment

Science Snippet        December 29, 2022        Historic changes in water quality or lake surface elevation and their impact on endangered adult suckers in the Klamath Basin

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

Science Snippet        July 16, 2020        USGS Scientists are Busy as a Bee

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin
November 16, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 16th day of November, 2016.

10-15-00390-CR	DAVID MINNIEAR v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF NAVARRO COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. C35884-CR – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

THOMAS E. KIRALY



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350



I, Thomas E. Kiraly, of Concentra Operating
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



August 9, 2005



/s/ THOMAS E. KIRALYThomas E. KiralyExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Juan Francisco VEGA and Jamaal Ali Bilal, Appellants, v. Mike CARROLL, Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.20

SR TELECOM INC.
RESTATED DIRECTORS' SHARE COMPENSATION PLAN

1.     Purpose of the Plan



2.     Definitions



1

---





3.     Administration of the Plan



4.     Calculation of Compensation



5.     Fixation of Selected Percentage



6.     Payment of Quarterly Compensation



The
election of the Selected Percentage may be made only once in respect of any financial year of the Corporation, pursuant to Section 5 herein, and may not be changed
during such year.

7.     Issuance of Common Shares



8.     Number of Shares Issuable Under the Plan



2

---



9.     Decisions of the Board



10.   Amendment or Discontinuance of Plan



11.   Government Regulation



12.   Rights as a Shareholder



13.   Approvals



3

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1381

ASRAT AWOKE CHERU, Petitioner,
versus JOHN ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A75-334-557) Submitted: December 3, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Asrat Awoke Cheru, Petitioner Pro Se. Raymond Smith, IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Arlington, Virginia; Emily Anne Radford, Terri Leon-Benner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Cheru does not challenge the denial of his application for withholding from removal. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Asrat Awoke Cheru, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s decision denying asylum and withholding from removal. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for review. The decision to grant or deny asylum relief is conclusive “unless manifestly contrary to the law and an abuse of discretion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000). We have reviewed the immigration judge’s decision and the administrative record and find the record supports the conclusion that Cheru failed to establish past persecution or a well founded fear of persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2004) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish his eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992). Because the decision in this case is not manifestly contrary to law, we cannot grant the relief Cheru seeks. * Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5794 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, 

Missouri, as the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5794 EH

1 SECTION 1. SGT. ZACHARY M. FISHER POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in 

4 Chesterfield, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fish10 er Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5794 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostM. Fisher Post Office’’. in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary al Service located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road
## NO. 12-08-00280-CR NO. 12-08-00281-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S

§ IN RE: LEROY CA MPBELL, RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEE DING § MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM L e ro y Campb e ll s e e ks an “ e me rg e nc y wr it o f m and amus ” c omp la ini ngthat Ris sie Ow e ns , Cha ir pe rs on of the Te xas D e pa

rtme nt o f C ri min a l Just ic e —Pa ro le Di vis ion , h a s fa ile d to gra nt h im pr op e r j a il t ime c re dit . We de ny the pe tit ion s. This court' s power to issue writs is defined by S ec t i on 22.221 of the Te x as Gove rnment Code. Section 22.221 g rants courts of appea ls the authority to issue (1) writs of mandamus and other writs nece ssary

to enforc e their jurisdiction; (2) writs of m andamus ag ainst a judg e of a district or county court in the c ourt of appea ls district; and ( 3) writs of ha beas c orpus under

specific ally

define d circ umstances i n v o l v i ngcontempt orde rs in civil case s. SeeT EX
. G OV ' T C ODE ANN . § 22.221 (Ve rnon 2004). We a re not a uthorized to iss ue wr its of mandamus ag ainst the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice or its officia ls, and C ampbell has not claimed or shown that the re lief re quested is nece ssary to enfor ce the jurisdiction of our cour t. Accordingly , Campbell’s petitions for writ of mandamus ar e dism issed for want of ju risdiction

. Opinion delivere d J une 25, 2008. P an elconsi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J. (DO N OT PUBL I SH)
# C_2020303EN.01000301.xml

| 14.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/3

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2020/C 303/03)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 316

The following text is added after the explanatory note to subheading 7320 90 30:

| ‘7323 | Table, kitchen or other household articles and parts thereof, of iron or steel; iron or steel wool; pot scourers and scouring or polishing pads, gloves and the like, of iron or steel: |
| --- | --- |

‘7323

Table, kitchen or other household articles and parts thereof, of iron or steel; iron or steel wool; pot scourers and scouring or polishing pads, gloves and the like, of iron or steel:

This heading includes storage tins/boxes made of sheet steel in different sizes and shapes (cylindrical, rectangular, star-shaped, etc.) with a matching lid, which are printed with various motifs. These tins/boxes have the objective characteristics of household articles (including its small size, decorative design, plain interior etc.) and mainly serve for storing food (biscuits, cakes, gingerbread, sugar etc.) or small items in the household.

Examples of tins to be classified in heading 7323:

Image 1
  Image 2

Image 3

However, tins which include consumer information about the contained goods, (brand/logo, quantity, dietary information etc.) are to be classified under heading 7310.

Examples of tins to be classified under heading 7310:

Image 4

’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

## By Year

MOUs        June 3, 2005        MOU between the USGS and Clean Beaches Council
Exhibit 10.1

Exhibit 10.1 - Executive Officer Compensation

     The Temecula Valley Bank Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the
Executive Officer Compensation Committee, approved an increase in the annual
base compensation of Scott Word, Senior Loan Officer, from $189,000 to $196,600,
effective July 1, 2007.
# C_2021506EN.01024301.xml

| 15.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 506/243 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 506/243

---

P9_TA(2021)0151

European Defence Fund ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 April 2021 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 (06748/1/2020 — C9-0112/2021 — 2018/0254(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)

(2021/C 506/44)

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the Council position at first reading (06748/1/2020 — C9-0112/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Council position at first reading (06748/1/2020 — C9-0112/2021),

| — | having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 12 December 2018 (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 12 December 2018 (1),

| — | having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2018)0476), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2018)0476),

| — | having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

| — | having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A9-0120/2021), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A9-0120/2021),

| 1. | Approves the Council position at first reading; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position; |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

4.

| 5. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

5.

---

(1)  OJ C 110, 22.3.2019, p. 75.

(2)  Text adopted of 18.4.2019, P8_TA(2019)0430.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crops

Filters

              - (-)science_education(5)
              - science_science(96)
              - products_data(87)
              - products_maps(20)
              - products_publications(704)
              - products_software(3)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(64)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(59)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(5)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(132)
              - multimedia_image-141771(119)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(4)
              - multimedia_image-141776(4)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(107)
              - multimedia_video-149194(40)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(7)
              - documents_file(12)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149216(3)
              - documents_file-149224(8)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(7)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

## By Year

Education        July 24, 2020        LCMAP Change Stories: Crops Give Way to Concrete

Education        November 2, 2020        Eyes on Earth Episode 37 – Insuring West Africa’s Crops

Education        March 24, 2022        Innovations

Education        March 23, 2022        Societal Benefits

Education        November 8, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 8 – Assessing America’s Cropland
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Early Warnings and Alerts

Filters

              - (-)products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(15)
              - (-)idaho(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - oregon(9)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(8)

## By Year

publication        August 26, 2020        Developing post-alert messaging for ShakeAlert, the earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States of America
James Michael MEEKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2884

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.