alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SECTION 3

Emission Inventory Requirements for the

Northern and Southern New Jersey

PM2.5 Redesignation/Maintenance Plan Demonstration

Checklist2 

## Emission Inventory Requirements for

PM2.5 Redesignation /Maintenance Plan Demonstration Checklist

A. PM2 .5 Attainment Year Inventory Requirements

1. Select a calendar year which shows violation

- free data and develop an emissions

inventory based on that year for the PM2.5 nonattainment area . This is considered as

the attainment year inventory.

Yes, s ee Sectio n 1 of EPA’s TSD

, NJDEP submitted 2007 inventory which will be

used as a surrogate inventory for the 2008 inventory.

2. Emissions are based on annual emissions for annual PM2.5, SO2, NOx, NH3** and

VOC**

.

Yes, t he SIP includes PM2.5, SO2 and NOx emissions. VOC and NH3 emissions

are NOT required because the se pollutants are NOT considered to have

significant impact in causing PM2.5 nonattainment.

3. Provide an explanation on how the point, area, nonroad mobile and onroad mobile

source inventory are developed.

Yes, for the 2007 Attainment Year Inventory see Section 1 of EPA’s TSD.

B. Projection Inventory and PM2.5 Maintenance Plan Demonstration Requirements

1. Emissions should be proj ected from the attainment year to at least 10 years into the

future. Provid e summary of controlled emissions for point, area, nonroad and onroad

mobile sources

. This is the endpoint/10

- year inventory.

Yes, this information was provided for the end year inventory 2025. See Section

2.

2. At a minimum, e missions should be projecte d to a midpoint year between the

attainment year and the endpoint /1 0

- year inventory. This is the interim

inventory. P rovide summary of controlled emissions for point, area, nonroad and

onroad mobi le sources for the PM2.5 nonattainment area for the interim year inventory.

Yes, s ee Section 2 of EPA’s TSD

.

3. State must provide a demonstration which shows that the interim and 10

- year projected

inventory emissions (with future controls) will not exceed the attainment inventory3 emission levels. Provide summary of emissions for 10

- year projected and interim year

point, area, nonroad mobile and onroad mobile sources.

Yes, s ee Section 2 of EPA’s TSD

.

4. Provide an explanation on how the point, area, nonroad mobile and onroad mobile

source projection inventories are developed.

Yes, see Section 2 of EPA’s TSD

.

5. If the endpoint/10

- year projected and interim year inventory emissions are lower than

the attainment year inventory, the State must show the total emission credits the control

program that will reduce emi ssions from the attainment year level to a level that is

below the attainment inventory level

.

Yes, section Section 2 of EPA’s TSD

.
Antwaune BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
A. Jay Cristol, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 7, 2020.

Case 20-19014-AJC Doc 17 Filed 10/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 20-19014-AJC Doc 17 Filed 10/07/20 Page 2 of 2
ACCEPTED 03-14-00629-CV 4788470 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/7/2015 12:44:07 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
IN RE: Jules B. LEBLANC III

NO. 2018-OB-1523

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status,

IT IS ORDERED that Jules B. LeBlanc III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 8201, be and he hereby is transferred to disability inactive status. All disciplinary proceedings against respondent shall be deferred until such time as he resumes active status.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order shall be effective immediately.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 100554-100555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29199]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 821 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 100555]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-529, K2025-527.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29199 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 32



Corporate Responsibility for Financial Reports.



I, Mary W. Patterson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that to my knowledge this

quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trans-Century Resources, Inc. as of and for

the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with

the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of

Trans-Century Resources, Inc.



Date:  July 25, 2005



By:  /s/ Mary W. Patterson

---------------------

Mary W. Patterson

Chief Executive Officer







I, Mary W. Patterson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that to my knowledge this

quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Trans-Century Resources, Inc. as of and for

the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with

the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of

Trans-Century Resources, Inc.



Date:  July 25, 2005



By:  /s/ Mary W. Patterson

-------------------

Mary W. Patterson

Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - products_publications(25)
              - (-)news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - louisiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)missouri(1)
              - montana(4)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(3)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

National News Release        January 23, 2015        Culprit Identified in Decline of Endangered Missouri River Pallid Sturgeon
John M. PRICE, II v. Kellie Vercher PRICE

NO. 2018-00913

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7637

RICHARD DOUGLAS MURRAY, SR.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

EDWARD J. RUDLOFF, Administrator, Eastern

Regional Jail; JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner,

Department of Corrections; BARBRA WHITE,

Nursing Director Prime Care Medical; GLEN

STOTLER, President, Morgan County Commission,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CA-04-103-3)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Douglas Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tracey Brown

Eberling, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Charles

Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS,

Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, SHUMAN, MCCLUSKEY

& SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Michael Douglas

Lorensen, BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, PLLC, Martinsburg,
- 2 -

West Virginia; Debra MH McLaughlin, Berkeley, West Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard Douglas Murray, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Murray that failure to timely

file specific objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Murray failed to file

specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to specifically object will waive appellate

review. See Page v. Lee, 337 F.3d 411, 416 n.3 (4th Cir. 2003);

see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Collins, 766

F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). Murray has waived appellate

review by failing to file specific objections after receiving

proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Murray’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm the judgment of the district

court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Lana and Britt THERIOT v. ARCHER CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

NO. 2018-C-0843

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Neah Power Systems, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Paul Abramowitz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By:
              
              /s/
                  Paul AbramowitzPaul
                  AbramowitzPresident
                  and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                  19, 2007
JOHN D. ANDREOPOULOS, P.A., a Florida professional association, Petitioner, v. STEVEN J. GLAROS, P.A., a Florida professional association; Pantaleo Gadaleta, an individual; and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...

Infographics        March 2, 2022        Discover Ecosystems
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4815-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-4815-DR), dated September 11, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued November 14, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 11, 2024.

Union County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-28599 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Terry COLLINS, Appellant / Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee / Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1440

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of RSV  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2004 (the  "Report")
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we,
Gerard R. Kunic, President, and Robert B. Kastan, Treasurer/Controller, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/Gerard R. Kunic                           /s/Robert B. Kastan
------------------------------               -----------------------------------
Gerard R. Kunic                              Robert B. Kastan
President                                    Treasurer/Controller



December 29, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) of Innovaro, Inc. (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright  
|Name: Carole R. Wright
|Date: August 10, 2010
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1227 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-100-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Xavier Arsenio JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1854

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 7, 2018

Robert Wesley, Public Defender and Robert Thompson Adams, IV, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary denial of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant filed a facially sufficient motion asserting that he was incompetent to proceed when he entered a plea in 2012. The post-conviction court summarily denied the motion based upon court minutes from separate cases from 2016, determining that Appellant's competency had been restored. These records do not conclusively refute Appellant's contention that he was incompetent in 2012.

Accordingly, we remand with instructions that the lower court either grant the relief, afford to Appellant an evidentiary hearing on his claim, or attach different records that conclusively refute the claim.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.