alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


     

    Amendment
      to Employment Agreement

    


    This
      Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Agreement”) is
      entered into on the 15 day of July 2007 by and between David Ben-Yair, an
      individual residing at 11 Borchov street, Givatayim, Israel (“Employee”),
      and
      TraceGuard Technologies Ltd., an Israeli company with offices located at 6
      Ravnitzy Street, Petach Tikva, Israel (the “Company”).
      Each
      of the Employee and the Company may be referred to herein as a “Party” and
      collectively as the “Parties”.

    


    
      	WHEREAS,	
              the
                Parties entered into an Employment Agreement, dated July 6, 2006,
                (the
                “Agreement”); and

            


    

    


    
      	WHEREAS,	
              the
                Parties wish to amend the Agreement as described
                below;

            


    

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the Parties’ mutual covenants and other good and
      valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
      acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

    


    	1. 
              	
            Section
              5.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in it entirety
              as follows: “5.2 Special Bonus. For each twelve (12) month period
              commencing June 1, 2007, Employee will be entitled to a special bonus
              equal to up to 3 times the Gross Salary, as determined by the Company’s
              CEO in his sole discretion.”

          


    


    	2. 
              	
            Section
              5.9 of the Agreement shall be amended by adding the following sentence
              immediately at the end thereof: “In addition, Employee shall be issued
              180,000 RSU’s which shall vest on June 1, 2008; provided, however, that in
              the event that Employee’s employment is terminated for any reason other
              than for Cause, then Employee shall be entitled to the pro rata portion
              of
              such RSU’s from the period beginning on June 1, 2007. The RSUs shall be
              subject to the terms of the TraceGuard Technologies, Inc. (the “Parent”)
              2006 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan, and a Restricted Stock Units
              Agreement to be entered into between the Parent and the Employee.”
              

          


    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREFORE, the undersigned have signed this Agreement on the date first
      written above.

    


     

    
      	TraceGuard
              Technologies Ltd. 	 	
              David
                Ben-Yair

            
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	
              /s/
                Dr. Ehud
                Ganani                          
                

            	 	
              /s/
                David
                Ben-Yair                             
                

            
	 	
              Name:
                Dr. Ehud Ganani

            	 	 
	 	
              Title:
                CEO
Tremaine Latroy BAILEM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D18-3361

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(89)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(26)
              - florida(7)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - (-)wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        December 30, 2022        Monthly update of activity at Yellowstone Volcano for Jan 1, 2023

Featured Films and Shorts        July 5, 2017        Return of the Yellowstone Grizzly Bear

Featured Films and Shorts        January 1, 2022        Recap of Yellowstone's 2021 activity and December's monthly update
EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    AGREEMENT
      REGARDING PREFERRED SHARES

     

    


    This
      Agreement Regarding Preferred Shares, dated as of July 20, 2007, is made by
      and
      between Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) and Leo William Long
      (the “Holder”), in connection with all shares of the Company’s preferred stock
      (the “Preferred Shares”) held by the Holder and that certain agreement dated as
      of January 12, 2005 between the parties. 

    


    Whereas,
      the parties desire to modify the rights of the parties in connection with the
      Preferred Shares and the terms of the Preferred Shares;

    


    Now,
      therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained
      herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and
      intending to be legally bound the parties agree as follows:

     

    
      	 	1.	The agreement between the parties dated as of January
              12,
              2005 is hereby terminated.


      	 	 	 


      	 	
              2.

            	
              Notwithstanding
                anything to the contrary in the agreements between the parties pursuant
                to
                which the Holder purchased or acquired the Preferred Shares, including
                the
                Certificate of Designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Holder
                hereby agrees to forever waive any and all rights to dividends on
                the
                Preferred Shares, including with respect to any previously accrued,
                accumulated or deferred dividends.

            


    

    


    Dated:
      July 20, 2007

    


    


    
      	
              Company:

               

              Sparta
                Commercial Services, Inc.

               

              By:  /s/
                Anthony L. Havens  

                  Anthony
                L. Havens, CEO

            	
              Holder:

               

               

               

              /s/
                Leo William Long  

              Leo
                William Long
Torsor TOUSSAINT v. BATON ROUGE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER and XYZ Insurance Company

NO. 2018-C-1107

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.
Michael David WEISER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Department of Corrections, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-915

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020415EN.01001301.xml

| 1.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9950 — Clearlake Capital Group/TA Associates Management/Ivanti Software)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 415/06)

On 6 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9950. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9950. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Dan WESNER, d/b/a Fish Tales, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JMS MARINAS, LLC, d/b/a Maximo Harborage Marina, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2890

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE EX REL. Rodney HAMILTON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1176

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Hamilton v. State, 15-1916 (La. 12/16/16), 208 So.3d 357.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5869 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5869

   To make an interstate act to conceal a homicide a Federal offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make an interstate act to conceal a homicide a Federal offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Lynnette's Law''.

SEC. 2. CONCEALMENT OF HOMICIDE.

    Chapter 51 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1123. Concealment of homicide
    ``Any person who, in violation of section 1111, 1114, 1116, or 1121 
of this title, in an interstate act conceals or attempts to conceal a 
homicide shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for 
life.''.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1460

HEATHER C. HOFFMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED , Defendant

- Appellee , and SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT HOLDING COMPANY LLC, f/k/a Time Warner Cable Inc. , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 9:18

- cv
- 0114 5

- RMG

- MGB )

Submitted : September 24, 2019 Decided: September 26, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Heather C. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Kendrick Bell, ROBINSON, GRAY, STEPP & LAFFITTE, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Heather C. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint alleging illegal rate increases for cable television and internet service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the d istrict court. Hoffman v. Charter Comm c’ns , Inc. , No. 9:18

- cv
- 01145

- RMG

- MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not a id the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - products_publications(50)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2024(1)

staff profileJ. Wright Horton, Jr., Ph.D.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5340 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues collected 

from passengers as aviation security fees are used to help finance the 

costs of aviation security screening by repealing a requirement that 

a portion of such fees be credited as offsetting receipts and deposited 

in the general fund of the Treasury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2016 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. DOLD, and Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues collected from passengers as aviation security fees 

are used to help finance the costs of aviation security 

screening by repealing a requirement that a portion of 

such fees be credited as offsetting receipts and deposited 

in the general fund of the Treasury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5340 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding for Aviation 

3 Screeners and Threat Elimination Restoration Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘FASTER Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT REGARDING CREDITING 

6 AND DEPOSIT OF A PORTION OF AVIATION 

7 SECURITY FEES. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—Subsection (i) of section 44940 of title 

9 49, United States Code, is repealed. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (d)(4) 

11 of such section is amended by striking ‘‘, other than sub12 section (i),’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
KPMG LLP

Suite 2300

401 South Tryon Street

Three First Union Center 

Charlotte, NC 28202-1911

 

Independent Accountant's Report

 

The Board of Directors

Wachovia Bank National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that the Commercial Real Estate Servicing Division of Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas (MBAs) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American   Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence   about the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

 

March 10, 2004
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


John R. Valaas, Chief Executive Officer, and Roger A. Mandery, Chief Financial
Officer, of First Mutual Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), each certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     1.   the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
          2004 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
          or 78o(d)); and

     2.   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 13, 2004

                                                By /s/ John R. Valaas
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   John R. Valaas
                                                   President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                                By /s/ Roger A. Mandery
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Roger A. Mandery
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020029EN.01000401.xml

| 28.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/4

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 29/04)

| Member State | Greece |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Athens – Kozani – Kastoria
  Thessaloniki – Limnos – Ikaria |
| Period of validity of the contract | July 1st 2020 – June 30th 2024 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 61 days after the day of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority |
| Directorate-General for Air Transport |
| Air Transport and International Affairs Division |
| Section II |
| GR-166 10 |
| GREECE |

Member State

Greece

Routes concerned

Athens – Kozani – Kastoria

Thessaloniki – Limnos – Ikaria

Period of validity of the contract

July 1st 2020 – June 30th 2024

Deadline for submission of tenders

61 days after the day of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority

Directorate-General for Air Transport

Air Transport and International Affairs Division

Section II

GR-166 10

GREECE

Tel. + 30 2109973154 or 8916307

Fax + 30 2108947132

Website: www.hcaa.gr

---
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 04 87 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 10 - SW - 0 56 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**