# 3Dream Studios STRATEGIC VISUAL MARKETING



### December 1, 2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: 

### Exemption Request Section 333 ofthe FAA

### Redorm Act ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part

### 21; 14 D.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151 (a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91' .407(a) (1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a)&(b) Dear Sir orMadam, 

### I am seekingtwo 333 exemptions ifpossible with this one petition. One for myself, David W. Keesee, and one for my company 3Dream Studios, LLC. If

### you can only issue one 333 exemptionperpetition, then pleasejustissue for 3Dream Studios, LLC. If

### youhave any questions, feel free to call me at 918-615-9515. Sincerely,

David W. Keesee President and CEO

771 1 E 1 11TH ST. STE 1 25 TULSA, OK 741 33 91 8.394. 771 1 WWW.30REAMSTUOIOS.COM

::30 A"'IMATED VIRTU"-- TOURS • MARKETING ° CAPITAL FUNDRL\ISI"'G lt--.TERACTI'vE PRESENTATIONS 0 VIDEO**COMf',IUNICATIO~.JS** • VVEB

### David W. Keesee and 3Dreain Studios, LLC 7711 E.111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

November28, 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJerseyAve, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Exemption Request Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91. 7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151 (a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a)&(b)

Dear Sir or Madam, I, David W. Keesee, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 11, to requestthat I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios LLC, an ownerand operator ofa small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") listed below so that I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC, may operate my small ultra-lightweight unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") commercially in airspace regulated bythe Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). As described herein I, David W. Keesee, am an experienced pilot in flying hobby airplanes as well as multi-rotorcraftfor recreational purposes. I have added a high grade quad-copter1 UAS to my inventory equipped with a HD Camera with intentfor aerial videography/cinematography/ photographyto enhance academic community awareness for those individuals and companies unfamiliarwith the geographical layoutofthe Northeastern Oklahoma/GreaterTulsa area, as well as occasional video projects around the United States also augmenting real estate listing photos/videos; following exemption and approval bythe FAA. Thereby enhancingtheir academic research experience forthe Northeastern Oklahoma/GreaterTulsa area. I have flown RC aircraftfor overten (10) years. Committed to safety with each flight. My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC's, exemption request would permitoperation of ultralightweight, unmanned (piloted by remote control with FPV systems) and comparatively inexpensive UAS in tightly controlled and limited airspace. Predetermined in areas awayfrom general public, airports, heliports and vehiculartrafficfor communityvideos, and within property boundaries for Individual homeowner real estate listingvideos/photos. Currently, similar lightweight, remote controlled UAS's are legally operated by unmonitored amateur hobbyists with no safety plan or controls in place to prevent

1 OJI Phantom 2 and Inspire 1 quad-copterspecifications



### 1

### ,, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition
catastrophe. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, have personally instilled safety protocols and controls to avoid and prevent public hazard, as well as manned aircraft hazards/catastrophe. This will acttofurther safety protocols exclusive to lightweight UAS's specific to real estatevideo and photography usage as I, David 

### W. Keesee, record flight data and other Information gained through permitted flight operations to share with the FAA through any required FAA reports to assist with future protocol and safety regulation. Granting my, David 

### W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', request comports with the Secretary of Transportation's (FAA Administrator's) responsibilities and authorityto notonly integrate UAS's intothe national airspace system, butto "

... establish requirements forthe safe operation ofsuch aircraft systems [UAS's] in the national airspace system" under Section 333(c) ofthe Reform Act specifictothe use of UAS's for real estate/Realtor purposes. Further I, David 

### W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, will conduct myoperations in compliance with the protocols described herein or as otherwise established by the FAA. For the reasons stated below I, David 

### W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, respectfully request thegrantof an exemption allowing meto operate ultra-lightweight, remote controlled UAS's for academic community awareness to benefit/stimulate attraction to the Northeastern Oklahoma/GreaterTulsa area and to enhance real estate listingvideos/photos for homeowners and commercial real estate projects or capital fundraising projects who cannot afford expensive manned aircraftfor the same purpose. Both of which will promote local economic growth through increased employmentand increased tax base. Both with public safety in mind by keeping heavier manned aircraft containing combustiblefuel that poses potential public hazard. Contact Information: David 

### W. Keesee- President 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 

### E. 111th Street, Ste 125 Tulsa, OK 74133 Business: Mobile: 918-615-9515 918-640-5259 Email: David@3DreamStudios.com

II The Specific Sections ofTitle 14ofthe Code of Federal Regulations from Which David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC requests exemption are: 14CFR 21 14C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14CFR 61.113 (a) 

### & (b); 14C.F.R. 91, etseq. 14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 409 (a) (2); and, 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b).

2David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

Ill The extentofrelief David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios seeks and the Reason he seeks such relief. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, submitthis application in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95§§ 331-334 seeking relieffrom any currently applicable FARs operatingto prevent me, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, contemplated commercial cinematic, academic and otherflight operations within the national airspace system. The Reform Act in Section 332 provides forsuch integration ofcivil unmanned aircraftsystems intoour national airspace system as it is in the public's interestto do so. My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', ultra-lightweight UAS meets the definition of"small unmanned aircraft" as defined in Section 331 and thereforethe integration of my ultra-lightweight UAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. Iwould like to operate my ultra-lightweight UAS priorto the time period bywhich the Reform Act requires the FMto promulgate rules governing such craft. Thereby, providing direct experience and valuable information forformal regulation that can be administered uniformlyto all real estate related UAS aerial video and photography. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determiningthe types of UAS's that may operate safely in our national airspace system. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and overall capabilities ofthe UAS's, Whetherthe UAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas; and, Whetherthe UAS will be operated by line ofsight. 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each ofthese items reflect in favor ofan exemption for me, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios. My UAS utilizes four {4) counter-rotating propellers for balance, control and stability. My UAS is equipped with GPS and auto return safetytechnology. Weighing less than seven (7) pounds (far belowthe maximum 55 pound limit); including camera with gimbal. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, consider safety as foremost with each flight. Mysmall unmanned aircraft is designed to hover in place via GPS and operate in less than a 24 knot (15 mph) wind. For safety, stability and fear offinancial loss Iwill notfly in winds exceeding 16 kph (10 mph). Built in safety systems include a GPS modethatallows my UAS to hover in place when radio controls are released. With three modes to choose from, I utilizethe GPS Modefor aerial videography/photography. This is the safest, most reliable and stable modeto prevent accident and hazard. When pilot communication is lost UAS,**G~S** Mode includes safe circle for operation, position hold, self-leveling, altitude**comman~,** GPS, return to homefeature, and failsafe control to return home or land in the event ofcommunication interruption between RC transmitter and UAS, being designed to slowly descend to pointoftakeoff. I do notoperate my UAS nearairports, Hospitals nor Police heliports, and do not operate near areas where general public is within fiftyto one hundred {50-100) yards depending on location, conditions and weather. I am constantly on alertfor any manned aircraft Airplanes/Police/Medical helicopters, etc.) and prepared to land/abort immediatelyto the nearest and safestground pointshould a manned aircraft approach my location or I suspect manned aircraft may approach near my location. My UAS is capable ofvertical and horizontal operations, and are flown only within my line ofsightof me, as the remote control pilot. Utilizing battery power ratherthan combustible fuels, flights generally last between five (5) tofifteen (15) minutes, with an altitude under four hundred {400) feet. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, utilize a fresh fullycharged batterywith each flight as a safety precaution; full flighttime limitfor each battery is up to fifteen (15) minutes as tested. I do notoperate

';) ,)David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

my UAS ator below manufacture recommend minimum charge levels foroperation; preferringto remain well within a safe operating range to insure adequate communication between radio control and UASto eliminate potential for crash, loss ofcontrol or hazard. Reserve batteries are at hand with each exercise to insure replacementfor sufficient safe level ofoperation. I do not believe in taking risk that maycause a crash that could create hazard to the public/property/manned aircraft, and have nodesire to lose an investment. I have clocked numerous practice flights in remote areas as a hobbyistsimulating flights forfuture commercial use to gain familiarization with the characteristics ofthis specific UAS's performance under differenttemperature and weather conditions. I also practice computerized simulated flights to maintain adequate skills and response reflex time. All forthe sake ofsafety. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, am extremely cautious when operating of my UAS/ultra-lightweight unmanned aircraft and will not "create a hazard to users ofthe national airspace system orthe public." 112 P.L. 95 §333 (b). Given the small size and weight of my UAS itfalls well within Congress's contemplated safetyzone when it promulgated the Reform Act and the corresponding directiveto integrate UAS's intothe national airspace system. David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios' UAS, used in hobbyflight, has a demonstrable safety record and does not pose any threattothe general public or national security.

IV How David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios' requestwill benefitthe publicas a whole: Aerial photography/videographyforgeographical awareness and for real estate marketing has been around fora longtimethrough manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget real estate companies and average homeownersthe expense ofsuch aerial photography/videography is cost prohibitive. Only large companies and high end Realtors or luxury homeowners can afford to absorb such expense. Depriving non-luxury homeowners and tower budget Realtors from avaluable marketing tool. Manned aircraft pose a threatto the publicthrough potential catastrophic crashes. Each resulting in loss of life. Each with combustible fuel that exploded and burned on impact; My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', UAS pose no such threatsince size and lack ofcombustible fuel alleviates any potential threattothe public. Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public's interestto integrate commerciallyflown UAS's intothe national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. Granting my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', exemption request furthers the public interesrthrough academic/visual awareness ofthegeographical benefits in and aroundthe Northeastern Oklahoma/ GreaterTulsa area. My ultra-lightweight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. The consequence of my ultra-lightweight UAS crashing is far less than afull size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic devastation to the public. The public's interest is furthered by minimizing ecological and crash threat by permitting aerial video/photo capture through my batteryoperated ultra-lightweight UAS's. Permitting me, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, to immediatelyflywithin national airspace furthers economic growth. Granting myexemption request substantially furthers the economic impactfor the Northeastern Oklahoma/GreaterTulsa communityfor companies lookingto relocate or build in the Northeastern
4David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E.111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

Oklahoma/GreaterTulsa area as well as individuals lookingto relocate for career advancementthrough academic and geographical awareness. Both ofwhich serve as a stimulus tothe community.

V Reasons why David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios exemption will notadversely affectsafety or howthe exemption will provide a level ofsafety at least equal to existing rule: My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', exemption will notadversely affect safety. Quite the contrary, forthe reasons stated permitting me, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, to log moreflight time in FAA controlled airspace, with communication with the FAA.

• My UAS weighs less than 7 pounds complete with a small ultra-lightweight high definition (HD camera; • I onlyoperate my UAS below400feet (well within the 400foot permissible ceiling set bythe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012; • My UAS will only operate for up to 15 minutes perflight. I land my UAS priorto manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery power; • I pilot my UAS through remote controi/FPV only by line ofsight and mostoften have a second spotter person alongside 

### me; • My UAS has GPS, a flightsafety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if communication with the remote control pilot is lost; • I activelyanalyze flight data and othersources of informationto constantly updateand enhance safety protocols; • I only operate in reasonably safe environments that are strictlycontrolled, are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas; • I conduct extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol, duringwhich safetycarries primary importance; • Ialways obtain all necessary permissions priorto operation; and, I have procedures in place to abortflights in the event ofsafety breaches or potential danger. My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', safety protocols provide a level ofsafety equal to or exceeding existing rules. It is importantto notethat absentthe integration ofcommercial UAS into our national airspace system, helicopters are the primary means ofaerial video and photographyfor community awareness and real estate. While the safety record ofsuch helicopters is remarkably astounding, there has been incident's involving loss of lifeas.well as extensive property damage; it is far saferto operate a battery powered ultra-lightweight UAS.

• First, the potential loss of life is diminished because UAS's carry no people on board and I onlyoperate my UAS in specific areas awayfrom mass populations. • Second, there is nofuel on board a UAS and thus the potential forfire or explosions is greatly diminished. • Third, the small size and extreme maneuverabilityof my UAS allow meto remotely pilot awayfrom and avoid hazards quickly and safely.

5

### David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

• Lastly, given its small size and weight, even when close enough to capture amazing images, my UAS need not be so close to the objects they are focused on through the technology and use of post editing software allowing pan and zoom. Accordingly, my UAS has been experimentally operated for familiarization/competency and will continue to operate at and above current safety levels.



### VI. ASummary the FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: 

### A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like. 14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR§ 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of

### my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my UAS meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level ofsafety pursuant to Section 333 ofthe Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraftfrom the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. §44701 (f)) and Section 333 ofthe Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permitthe FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration ofthe weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximityto areas such as airports and dense populations. My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', current and projected UAS's meetor exceed each ofthe elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation ofan aircraftwithout an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated bythe FARs, this Regulation is Inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraftflight manual in the aircraft. As there are no on board pilots or passengers, and given the size ofthe UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level ofsafety will be achieved by maintaining a safety/flight manual delineating areas ofwhere safety can be defined.9The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738,9299, 9299A, 9565,95658, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827. 14 C. F. R. § 91.121 regarding altimetersettings is inapplicable insofar as my UAS utilizes electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor. 4 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides forthe carrying ofcivil aircraft certifications and registrations. They are inapplicable forthe same reasons described above. The equivalent level ofsafety will be achieved by maintaining any such required certifications and registrations by me, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC. 

### B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking ofthe Aircraft. Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. My UAS are, by definition, unmanned. They therefore do not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, two-inch lettering is difficultto place on such small aircraftwith dimensions smallerthat minimal letteringDavid W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E.111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition
requirement. Regardless, I will mark its UASs in the largest possible lettering by placingthe word "EXPERIMENTAL" on its fuselage as required by 14C.F.R. §45.29 (f) so that Ithe pilot, David W. Keesee oranyone assisting me as a spotter with the UAV will see the markings. The FAA has previously issued exemptions tothis regulation through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 10167, 10167Aand 10700. C. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to non-commercial operations. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, can achieve an equivalent level ofsafetyas achieved bycurrent Regulations because my UAS does notcarry any pilots or passengers. Further, while helpful, a pilot license will not ensure remote control piloting skills. The risks attended tothe operation of my UAS is far less than the risk levels inherent in thecommercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. §61, et seq. Thus, allowing me, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC, to operate my UAS and meet and exceed current safety levels in relation to 14C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b). D. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes. 14C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudesforthe operation ofcivil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at loweraltitudes in certain conditions. My UAS will never operate atan altitude greaterthan 400AGL; safely belowthe standard of400 AG

### L. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, will however operate my UAS in safe areas awayfrom public and traffic, providing a level ofsafety at least equivalent to or belowthose in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher level ofsafetywill be achieved. E. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections. The above-cited Regulations require, amongst otherthings, aircraft owners and operators to "have [the] aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart Eofthis partand shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) ofthis section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part43 ofthis chapter

..." These Regulations onlyapplyto aircraftwith an airworthiness certificate. They will not, therefore, apply to my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', UAS. However, as a safety precaution I inspect my UAS before and after each flight. A Summary the FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness Certificates, Manuals and the Like. 14C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR§ 91.203(a)(1). The size, weightand enclosed operational area of my UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, UAS meets an equivalent level ofsafety pursuantto Section 333 ofthe Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraftfrom the airworthiness certificate requirement under both theAct (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 ofthe Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permitthe FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration ofthe weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximityto areas such as airports and dense populations. My UAS meets or exceeds each ofthe elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits theDavid W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition
operation ofan aircraftwithout an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in theform contemplated bythe FARs, this regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraftflight manual in the aircraft. As there are no pilots or passengers, and given the size ofthe UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level ofsafety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The FAA has previously issued exemptions tothis regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738,9299,9299. A 9565,95658, 10167, maintenance program that involves regular software updates and curative measurefor anydamaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level ofsafety will be achieved. In summary, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC seeks an exemption from thefollowing Regulations: 14C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 14C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.109; 14C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. §91.121; 14C.F.R. § 91.151 (a); 14C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and (b); 14C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1 ); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a) (2); and, 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', small unmanned vehicle/lightweight unmanned aircraftvehicle in communityawareness and real estate operations, and to develop economic platformsfor real estate to enhance the experience ofthose seeking to relocate to the Northeastern Oklahoma/GreaterTulsa area. Currently, area awareness and realestate aerial videography/photography relies primarily on the use of larger aircraft running on combustible fuel. Posing potential risk to the public. Granting my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', requestfor exemption will reduce current risk levels and thereby enhance safety. My UAS craft does notcontain potentially explosive fuel, is smaller, lighterand more maneuverablethan conventional real estate video and photographic aircraftwith much less flighttime. Further, I operate at lower altitudes and in controlled airspace eliminating potential public risk flying to and from established airfields. I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC, have been informally analyzingflight information and will compile safety protocols and the implementation ofa flight operations manual for real estate usage that exceeds currently accepted means and methodsforsafe flight. Formal collection of information shared with the FAA will enhance the FAA's internal effortsto establish protocols forcomplying with the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012. There are no personnel on board my, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', UAS and therefore the likelihood of death orserious bodily injury is significantly diminished. My, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios', operation of my UAS, weighing less than 7 pounds and traveling at lowerspeeds within limited areas will provide an equivalent level ofsafety as that achieved under current FARs. Accordingly, I, David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC, respectfully request thatthe FAA grant myexemption request and am willingto cooperate in sharing information to benefitthe FAA, safety of manned aircraft, and the general public at large. Respectfully Submitted,

# ~w.(~ David W. Keesee- President, 3Dream Studios LLC, 7711 E.111th Street, Ste 125-Tulsa, OK 74133


### 8

### David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. lllth Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

Phantom 2 Specifications 

# .1/J**.,$,~.~ .~**  

# Tr· 

# - 

# ' :.**~**

Aircraft Operating environment temperature Power consumption Supported Battery Weight (including the battery) Take-off weight Hovering Accuracy (Ready to Fly) Max Yaw Angular Velocity Max Tilt Angle Max Ascent 

### I Descent Speed 

# IMax Flight Speed

# ~heelbas,_e_.---·---- 1 

### 2.4GHz Remote Controller 

# lOperating Frequency 5.6W
DJI Intelligent battery 

### lOOOg :sl300g Vertical: 0.8m: Horizontal: 2.5m

35" 6m/s 

### l5m/s (Not Recommended) 350mm

2.4GHz ISM 

### lOOOm 97dBm 

# I**:~:~:::::::~::::~**

# .,..) I Working Current/Voltage 100 mA@6V 

# I Battery 4 AA Batteries 

# In! ---·------ 1 

### DJIIntelligent Battery 

# l Type 

## l Capacity 3S LiPo Battery 5200mAh. ll.lV 

### ! 1 Charging environment range 

### 1. Discharging environment**ra~g._e** __ 0"( to 40>( 

# I

. _______ _j

### David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition 

# INSPIRE 1 SP_ECS

AIRCRAFT
Model Weight (Battery Included) Hovering Accuracy (GPS mode)
Max Angular Velocity T600 2935 g Vertical: 0.5 m Horizontal: 2.5 m Pitch: 300°/s Yaw: 150°/s Max Tilt Angle 35° Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 4 m/s Max Speed 22 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max Service Ceiling Above SeaLevel4500 m (Software altitude limit: 120m above takeotTpoint) !vlaxWind Speed Resistance 10 rn/s Max FlightTime Approximately 18 minutes Motor Model DJI 35lOH Propeller Model DJl 1345T Indoor Hovering OperatingTemperature Range Diagonal Distance Dimensions Power Spectral Density Enabledby default -10° to 40° C 559to 581 mm 438x45lx301 mm 9.06mW/MHz



### 10

## • David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition 

# CAMERA

Name Model Total Pixels Effective Pixels Image Max Size ISO Range Electronic Shutter Speed FOV (Field ofView) CMOS
Lens

Still Photography Modes

Video Recording Modes X3 FC350 12.76M 12.4M 4000x3000 100-3200 (video) I00-1600 (photo) 8s- 1/8000s 94° Sony EXMOR 1/2.3" 20mm (35mm fonnat equivalent)f/2.8 focus at oo 

### 9 Elements in9 groups Anti-distortion Single shoot Burst shooting: 3/517 frames Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 bracketed frames at 0.7EV Bias Time-lapse UHD (4K): 4096x2l60p24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30 FHD: 1920x1080p24/25/30/48/50/60 HD: 1280x720p24/25/30/48/50/60 Max Bitrate ofVideo Storage 60 Mbps Supported File Formats Supported SD Card Types FAT32/exFAT Photo: JPEG, DNG Video: MP4/MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264) Micro SD Max capacity: 64 GB. Class lO 

### or UHS-1 rating required. Operating Temperature Range0° to 40° C 

# CHARGER
Model AI4-IOOP1A Voltage 26.3 V Rated Power 1

### 00W 

## BATTERY (OPTIONAL)
Name Model Capacity Voltage Battery Type Enerf,ry Net Weight Intelligent Flight Battery TB48 5700mAh 22.8V LiPo 6S 

### 129.96Wh 670g

11

## • David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E.111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition
Operating Temperature Range-10° to 40° C

· Less than 3 months: -20 to 45° C Storage Temperature Range M th' "' th

.

# ,,o t 28

# o c
, ore an_, mon s.**~-** 

### o Charging Temperature Range 0° to 40° C Max Charging Power 180 W 

# DJI GO APP
Mobile Device System Requirements iOS 8.0 orlater, Android 4.1.2 or later 

## * Compatible with iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + Cellular. iPad mini 2, iPadmini 2Wi-Fi +Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi-Fi

### + Cellular, iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi +Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone Supported Mobile 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus. Devices 

## *Compatible with Samsungtabs 705c, Samstmg S6, Samstmg S5. Samsung NOTE4, SamsungNOTE3, Google Nexus 9, Google Nexus 7 II, 

### Ascend Mate7, NubiaZ7 mini. SONYZ3 EXPERlA, MI 3, MI PAD

.*Supportfor additional Android devices available as testing anddevelopment continues. 

# GIMBAL
Model Operating Current ZENMUSE X3 Station 750 

### rnA Motion: 900 rnA Angular Vibration Range±0.03° Mounting Detachable Controllable Range
Mechanical Range Pitch: -90° to+ 30° Pan: ±320° Pitch: -125° to +45° Pan:±330° Pitch: 120°/s Max Controllable Speed Pan: 1800/s 

# REMOTE CONTROLLER
Name Operating Frequency

Maximum Transmitting Distance
EIRP Video Output Port Cl 922.7-·927.7 MHz (Japan Only)**5.725~5.825** 

### GHz**2.400~2.483** 

### GHz Up to 5 

### km or 3.1 miles (unobstructed, free ofinterference) when FCC compliant Up to 3 5 km 

### or2.1 miles (unobstructed, free ofinterference) whenCE compliant 10dBm@900m, 13dBm@5.8G, 20dBm@2.4G USB, mini-HDMl



### 12

## • David W. Keesee and 3Dream Studios, LLC 7711 E. 111th Street, Ste 125,Tulsa, OK 74133 Section 333 Exemption Petition

Power Supply Charging Dual User Capability \'lobile Device Holder \1ax Mobile Dev1ce Width Output Power Operating Temperature Range Storage Tempemture Range Chargmg Temperature Range Battery Built-in battery DJl charger Host-and-Slave connection Tablet or Phone 170mm 

### 9W -10° to 40" 

### C Less than 1 months: -20° to 45'-' C !\;[ore than 1 months 22° to 28° 

### C 0-40"

# c 6000 mAh LiPo 2S 

## BATTERY (STANDARD)

Name i\lodel Capaoty Voltage Battery Type Energy Net \,\'eight Intelligent Fhght Bsttery TB47 4500 mAh 22.2 

# v LiPo 6S l:-hgh voltage battery 99.9 Wb 

### 570 g Operating Temperature Range-l 0° to 

### 40c C Storage Temperature Range Less than 

### 3 months -20° to 45° 

### C l\fore than 3 months 

### 22" C to 28" C Chargmg Temperature Range 0° tt) 4<)0 C Max Charging Power 180\V 

## VISION POSITIONING Velocity Range Altitude Range 

### Below 8 m/s (2m above ground) 

### 5-500 em Operating EnvironmentBrightly 

### lit (lux 15) pattemed surfaces Operating Range 0-250 em