alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Benedict Emesowum v. Zone One Auto Storage and Milam Street Auto Storage Inc. d/b/a Fast Tow Wrecker

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00472

- CV

Trial court case number: 1045789

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 3 of Harris County

Appellant, Benedict Emesowum, has filed a “Motion to Strike Brief of Amreit Uptown Park, LP and Motion for Order to Cease Unrequested Interference,” requesting that we strike the appellee’s brief filed by Amreit Uptown Park, LP and that we order Amreit Uptown Park, LP to pay appellant “all expenses incurred due to writing this

mo tion.” We grant the motion in part and deny in part.

After appellant’s vehicle was towed, he requested a hearing to determine whether the towing company had probable cause to tow his vehicle

. See T EX

. O CC

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 2308.452, 2308.458 (West 2012 ). At the hearing, the Justice Court determined that Amreit Uptown Park, who had been added as a defendant in the case, was not a proper party. The Justice Court therefore ordered Zone One Auto Storage and Milam Street Auto Storage Inc. d/b/a Fast Tow Wrecker to pay $300 in attorney’s fees to Amreit Uptown Park.

Appellant appealed from the Justice Court’s ruling. See T EX

. O CC

. C ODE A NN

. § 2308.459 (West 2012 ). On June 2, 2014, the County Court at Law informed the attorney for Amreit Uptown Park that Amreit Up town Park should not have been at the trial. The County Court at Law further found probable cause existed to tow appellant’s

vehicle.

This appeal followed. In his notice of appeal, appellant specifically stated that “Amreit Uptown Park was wrongly includ ed in this suit . . .” and requested that this Court “refrain from including them [sic] in the notice for appeal to avoid unnecessary time and expense on their part.” Further, appellant’s brief does not contest any issues related to Amreit Uptown Park; as noted in Amreit Uptown Park’s brief, “[a]ppellantdoes not make any complaint in his brief about the action of the trial court of denying

relief against Amreit Uptown Park, LP.”

No other party filed a notice of appeal. Accordingly, Amreit Uptown Park is not adverse to appellant in this appeal and is not an appellee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3.1(c) (defining appellee as “a party adverse to an appellant”) , 25.1(c) (“The appellate court may not grant a party who does not file a notice of appeal more favorable relief than did the trial court except for just cause.”)

. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion insofar as it requests that we strike Amreit Uptown Park’s b rief, and we strike said brief. Nevertheless, we deny the motion to the extent appellant requests that we order Amreit Uptown Park, LP to “pay to Appellant all expenses incurred due to writing this motion.”

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 23, 2014
#### ATLANTIC FREIGHT LINES, Inc. v. SUM-MERFIELD, Postmaster General.

No. 11437.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 23, 1953.

Decided April 2, 1953.

Edward Dumbauld, Uniontown, Pa., for appellant.

Joseph M. Howard, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen., with whom Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., Ross O’Donoghue and William R. Glendon, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee. William E. Kirk, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at the time the brief, was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a motor carrier competing with the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, sought an injunction to restrain the Postmaster General from issuing a postage stamp .in commemoration of the 125th anniversary of the Railroad’s incorporation. The District Court rightly dismissed the complaint. “It is by now clear that neither damage nor loss of income in consequence of the action of Government, which is not an invasion of recognized legal rights, is in itself a source of legal rights in the absence of constitutional legislation recognizing it as such.” Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co., 310 U.S. 113, 125, 60 S.Ct. 869, 875, 84 L.Ed. 1108.

Affirmed.
Area

Rich McLaughlin 

t

o

:

Jesse Pritts 03/18/2011 08:47 AM

Basin 3 had a planned drainage area of 1.1 acres. FYI.

-- 

Richard A. McLaughlin, Ph.D.

Professor and Extension Specialist 

Department of Soil Science

Box 7619

100 Derieux Street

North Carolina State University

Raleigh, NC 27695

919-515-7306 office

919-215-5090 cell

http://go.ncsu.edu/richmclaughlin web

http://go.ncsu.edu/estcworkshops training
Lawon Gortez DALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5633

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - (-)documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - (-)news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)
              - utah(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        May 6, 2024        Trout, beavers, drought, and a “precious” frog

Science Snippet        April 12, 2022        History of Lake Powell Written in Sediment

Science Snippet        December 29, 2022        Historic changes in water quality or lake surface elevation and their impact on endangered adult suckers in the Klamath Basin

Science Snippet        July 16, 2020        USGS Scientists are Busy as a Bee

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Jimmy Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/Jimmy WangChief Executive Officer

November 16, 2005
Brian Keith SAMUEL, DOC #H38159, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(33)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(10)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - (-)washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Project        January 5, 2017        National Parks North Coast and Cascades Network Critical Loads

Research        October 23, 2018        Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of iron from dust and volcanic ash- John Crusius

Project        September 7, 2022        Quillayute River Temperature

Project        January 3, 2004        Lake Whatcom

Project        October 30, 2017        Ecological Stressors - Rocky Coastlines, Mangroves, Marshes, Droughts, and Storms

Project        January 1, 2011        Lake Roosevelt-Upper Columbia River

Project        December 21, 2017        Glaciers and Snowpack
Amendment No. 2 to 2003 Stock Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.27 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 M-WAVE, INC. 
 2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
             , 2007 
 1. Purpose of Amendment. The purpose
of this Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the M-Wave, Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan. 
 2. Amendment to Section 3. The Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of Section 3 thereof and replacing said sentence
with the following: 
 “The number of shares of common stock, par value of $.005, of the Company (“Stock”) for which Awards may be
granted under the Plan shall not exceed, at any date, 6,000,000 shares.” 
 3. Miscellaneous. 
 (a) Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware,
and construed in accordance therewith without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law. 
 (b) Entire
Instrument. This Amendment, together with the Plan, shall be read together as one instrument. Except as expressly amended pursuant to this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 (c) Titles and Subtitles; Construction. The titles of the Section of this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and are
not to be considered in construing this Amendment. 
 *        *        *
Sidney D. REYNOLDS, DOC # T40873, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report ofKnightsbridge Resources Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end ofDecember 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Ron Schmitz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 20thday of August, 2007.                                                                                                                  
|   

RON SCHMITZRon SchmitzChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 17188 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16

- cr - 00152

- MSS

- JSS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CERO CASTRO CAJADO, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (October 30, 2017) Before TJOFLAT , JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges. PER CURI AM:

Case: 16-17188 Date Filed: 10/30/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cero Cajado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (196 7). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Cajado’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Cajado’s conviction s and
sentence s are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 16-17188 Date Filed: 10/30/2017 Page: 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - (-)south carolina(1)

## By Year

Podcasts        July 27, 2011        Climate Connections: Questions from North and South Carolina
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1,
1999 TO MAY 10, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-10-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE ABOVE PERIOD WAS FILED WITH HOTEL RESERVATIONS
NETWORK INC. REGISTRATION STATEMENT. REGISTRATION NO. 333-90601.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served through ECF on the debtor’s attorney or by U.S. First Class 

pre-paid Mail on the pro se debtor on the same day filed with the Court.

Submitted by:

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQ, STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806, MIRAMAR, FL 33027, (954) 443-4402

RE: ADNIEL LEON CASE NUMBER: 21-10751-AJC

TRUSTEE'S NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY FOR CONFIRMATION AND RECOMMENDATION

The Trustee reviewed this case and found the following deficiencies remain unresolved from the Trustee’s letter 

requesting documents and prior deficiencies and thus objects as follows (If this case is dismissed, this 

deficiency is an objection to reinstatement until all documents are received or all issues are addressed): 

WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AND/OR DOCUMENTS REQUESTED MUST BE 

RECEIVED BY 5PM AT LEAST FIFTEEN DAYS (NOT INCLUDING HOLIDAYS) PRIOR TO THE 

CONFIRMATION HEARING TO AVOID DISMISSAL. Please note documents that were not timely 

filed/received by the trustee may not be considered as there is not sufficient time for an additional review of this 

case. Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to “re-sending” documents. The Trustee 

reserves the right to raise additional objections UNTIL all documents are timely provided to the Trustee and 

reviewed for possible issues raised and additional documents needed. 

The debtor or debtor’s attorney must appear at the confirmation hearing even if they pre-hear with the 

Trustee. The debtor may be dismissed for failure to fund the plan if they are delinquent in payments. 

The Court may dismiss this case if no one appears to represent the debtor at the confirmation hearing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF THE DEBTOR(S) OBJECTS TO THE TRUSTEE'S RECOMMENDATION, THE 

DEBTOR'S ATTORNEY MUST CONTACT THE TRUSTEE'S OFFICE AND SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY 

BEFORE 2PM THE LAST BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO THE CONFIRMATION HEARING TO SEEK A 

RESOLUTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEBTOR. 

===============================================================================

Recommendation for May 25, 2021 hearing. All amendments and documents for the May 25, 2021

hearing were due as of May 7, 2021. (Call the Trustee's case administration department prior to "resending" documents)

1A Plan served 4/27

If counsel for the debtor(s) appears at confirmation, confirms service, and agrees on the record:

If Motion to Waive Granted, Confirm 1A Plan (100% Plan)

Case 21-10751-AJC Doc 30 Filed 05/17/21 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Austin Chalk Oil & Gas, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlen L. Roepke, (Sole Officer Director of the Company, on June 30, 2004), certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: August 17, 2004  by











/s/ Marlen L. Roepke


Marlen L. Roepke


Secretary/Director
Jerry BELL v. LAKE PROVIDENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Billy Coleman, Lynn Thom, Rosie Larry, Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc.

NO. 2018-CC-1249

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - (-)news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

              - maryland(2)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

National News Release        February 18, 2015        Conowingo Dam Above 90 Percent Capacity For Sediment Storage

National News Release        February 10, 2015        Virginia Earthquake Aftershocks Identify Previously Unknown Fault Zone
STATE of Louisiana v. Timmy W. DOUCET

NO. 2018-K-0077

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied.