alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Daunte OATS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D15-5169

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 3, 2018

Candice Kaye Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Gainesville, and Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Daunte Oats raises two issues on appeal: whether the trial court failed to conduct a competency hearing and whether Florida's 10-20-Life statute is unconstitutional as applied to juveniles. We affirm as to the second issue, but reverse and remand as to the first because it appears no competency hearing occurred. As the State concedes, a determination was made that reasonable grounds existed that Oats was not competent to proceed, but that no competency hearing occurred. We therefore reverse *1266and remand for the trial court to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency evaluation; if one cannot be done, Oats is entitled to a new trial. *See, e.g.* , *Brooks v. State* , 180 So.3d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1921

_____________________________

RUBY STEPHENS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

April 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Ruby Stephens, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_web_tools(1)

## By Location

              - american samoa(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(5)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - connecticut(7)
              - delaware(24)
              - district of columbia(56)
              - florida(1)
              - guam(1)
              - illinois(1)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(6)
              - maryland(50)
              - massachusetts(7)
              - new hampshire(6)
              - new jersey(8)
              - new york(9)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - pennsylvania(13)
              - (-)puerto rico(2)
              - rhode island(6)
              - south carolina(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(2)
              - vermont(5)
              - virginia(32)
              - washington(3)
              - west virginia(12)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

Data Visualization        May 17, 2023        USGS Science in the American Territories

Topic        December 6, 2018        Real-time and Historical Data
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Dinosaurs and Fossils

Filters

              - science_faqs(7)
              - products_publications(9)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(5)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Photography        April 1, 2020        USGS paper models collection
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - products_publications(30)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - (-)north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

State News Release        July 27, 2015        Breeding Bird Distribution Affected by Wind Turbines in the Dakotas
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of APW Ltd. (n/k/a BQX Ltd.) (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended February 28,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard D. Carroll, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Richard D. Carroll
---------------------------
Richard D. Carroll
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J.
Palmisano, Chief Executive Officer of IntraLase Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report of IntraLase Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2) the information
contained in such Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of IntraLase Corp.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 3, 2006 |  | /s/ Robert J. Palmisano              
|                    |  | Robert J. Palmisano                  
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-19-00249-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 19-339023

Style: Anthony Mottin

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: November 23, 2020

Type of motion: Rehearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justice Hightower

Date: April 20, 2021
KHOA VU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2635

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S.
Bank Trust National Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Ford Motor Company Note-Backed Series 2003-6 Trust (the Trust), certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by
Lehman ABS Corporation in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of the Trust;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or
similar agreement for inclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my knowledge, except as
disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2011



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ David J. Kolibachuk            
|David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00079-CV

Tiffany Ann Aliano, Appellant

v.

Joseph William Burks, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-13-003836, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Tiffany Ann Aliano filed her notice of appeal on February 8, 2016. We

notified her that she was required to make a written request and arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and the reporter’s record within ten days from his receipt of our letter. The clerk’s record

from the trial court was due to be filed in this Court on March 8.

On March 28, this Court notified Aliano that no clerk’s record had been filed due to

her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The Court’s

notice requested that Aliano make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report

regarding this appeal by April 7. In addition, the notice informed Aliano that her appeal was subject

to dismissal if she did not comply with our instructions. To date, Aliano has not filed a status report

or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If the trial court’s clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without

payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, Aliano has not established that she is

entitled to proceed without payment of costs, see Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing procedure for

establishing indigence on appeal), and she has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s

fee for preparing the clerk’s record. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: May 25, 2016

2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanover Compression Limited
Partnership (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Lee E. Beckleman, as Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Lee E. BeckelmanName: Lee E. BeckelmanTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 22, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
S.C.B., a Child, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2627

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 7, 2018

Daniel Wehking, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, 5th District, Casselberry, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the July 9, 2018 judgments and sentences rendered in Case Nos. 2018-CJ-001002-A, 2018-CJ-001116-A, 2018-CJ-001120-A, and 2018-CJ-001489-A, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Danny PEREZ, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D18-0948

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10531.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit

Argued Oct. 16,1952.

Reargued March 2, 1953.

Decided May 29, 1953.

*509Leavenworth Colby, Washington, D. C. (James R. Browning, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., James P. McCormick, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for the United Slates.

Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment of the district court awarding maintenance and damages to a seaman who was injured in the course of his employment on an army dredge. D. C.E.D.Pa.1951, 97 F.Supp. 172. Since that judgment this court decided Mandel v. United States, 3 Cir., 1951, 191 F.2d 164, affirmed sub nom. Johansen v. United States, 1952, 343 U.S. 427, 72 S.Ct. 849, 96 L.Ed. 1051. We held that the benefits available to a seaman on a public vessel of the United States under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq., are exclusive and preclude an action under the Public Vessels Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 781 et seq.

The libelant’s original position was that the Mandel case was incorrectly decided. Since the Supreme Court affirmed this court, that argument goes by the board. So the libelant now endeavors to avoid the consequences of that decision on the ground that the dredge in question was not a “public vessel” but was “employed as a merchant vessel”, and that he therefore is entitled to sue the United States under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq. This effort cannot succeed. The dredge was owned and operated by the United States Army. It was performing a public function in deepening the Schuylkill River pursuant to a Congressional appropriation for river and harbor improvement. The operations were under the supervision of military personnel of the engineers corps. In all respects the dredge was a public vessel performing a public service and was not employed as a merchant vessel. The appropriate references are The Western Maid, 1922, 257 U.S. 419, 42 S.Ct. 159, 66 L.Ed. 299; O. F. Nelson & Co. v. United States, *9*Cir., 1945, 149 F.2d 692, 698; Bradey v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 742.

The judgment of the district court will be reversed and the case remanded with directions to dismiss the libel.
Form of Restricted Share Right Grant Letter under the Allied Nevada Gold Corp.



 Exhibit 10.3 
 ALLIED NEVADA GOLD CORP. 
 RESTRICTED SHARE RIGHT GRANT LETTER 
  

			
	To:	  	·
	Date:	  	·

  

 This notice is to evidence that you have been granted · Restricted Share Rights in the following amounts and on the following terms:

  

			
	 Number of Restricted
 Share Rights awarded
	 	 Date(s) of expiry of applicable
 Restricted Period(s) (vesting dates)

		
	 Ÿ
	 	Ÿ
		
	 Ÿ
	 	Ÿ
		
	 Ÿ
	 	Ÿ

 This notice serves as a Restricted Share Right Grant Letter under section 3.06 of the Allied Nevada Gold Corp.
Inc. (“Allied Nevada”) Restricted Share Plan (the “Plan”). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this
Restricted Share Right Grant Letter and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall govern. 
 Vesting of your Restricted Share Rights evidenced by this Restricted
Share Right Grant Letter shall be subject to the terms of the Plan, the resolutions of the Board approving the grant and the administrative rules passed by the Committee under the Plan. 
 If you are a Canadian resident and wish to defer the vesting of your Restricted Share Rights, you may do so in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the resolutions of the Board approving the grant and the
administrative rules of the Committee under the Plan. 
 Dated this · day of ·, 2007. 
  

			
	ALLIED NEVADA GOLD CORP.
		
		 	  

	Name:	 	Scott Caldwell
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
Kristina Leightner WOOLF, Appellant, v. Anthony M. WOOLF, Appellee.

No. 1D18-267

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - (-)products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - (-)other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(7)

## By Year

General        May 1, 2019        Adjustable Declination Compasses

General        May 1, 2019        Magnetic Declination Varies Considerably Across The United States

General        May 1, 2019        Method #1

General        May 1, 2019        Method #2

Data Access        December 7, 2018        Areas of Land Subsidence in California

General        September 10, 2020        Will the Antelope Still Roam? Pronghorn at Risk in the Southwest

General        April 18, 2019        Desert Tortoise Diseases

Interactive Map        July 16, 2021        The Mojave River:  Lifeblood of the Desert

General        December 20, 2019        Vulnerability Assessment of Coral Reefs

General        September 10, 2020        Warmer Waters Could Impact Sport Fishing in Wisconsin

Data Access        December 18, 2018        San Antonio Creek Valley Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        December 19, 2018        Drought & Groundwater in California

Data Access        November 7, 2018        Mojave Groundwater Data

Data Access        December 10, 2018        Lower Colorado River Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        January 31, 2019        Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Borrego Valley
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7251

GEORGE GRANT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus CAPTAIN BRYANT; MS SWANEY, Kitchen Supervisor of Anderson County Detention Center; JOEY PRESTON, County Administrator; DAVID CRENSHAW, Sheriff; COUNTY OF ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:07-cv-00278-GRA) Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Grant, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: George Grant, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. Bryant , No. 0:07-cv-00278-GRA (D.S.C. Aug. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED