alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARAMJIT SINGH,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 74266 Agency No. A205

- 243

- 560

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 14, 2016 ** Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Paramjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Conventi on Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 21 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 74266

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. W e review f or substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act , Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010) , and we r eview de

novo due process claims, Zet ino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse cr edibility determination
based on inconsistencies as to the length of Singh’s first detent ion and the amount his father paid a smuggler to bring him to the United States , as well as on the
omission from Singh’s father’s affidavit of Singh’s first detention , beating, and subsequent hospitalizat ion

. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determina tion was
reasonable under th e “totality of circumstances”). T he explanations Singh raise d
before the BIA do not compel a contrary result , s ee Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000) , and we lack jurisdiction to consider the contentions Singh raises for the first time in his opening brief, s ee Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (requiring administrative exhaustion of legal claims)

. We reject Singh’s contention that the IJ applied the wrong legal standard. In the absence of credible testimony, Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims3 13

- 74266

fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of S ingh’s CAT claim
because it was based on the same evidence found not credible and the record does not otherwise compel the finding that it is more likely than not Singh would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to
India. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048

- 49. Finally, we reject Singh ’s contentions that the IJ violated his due process rights

. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d at 1046 (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part .
### New Peer Review Record Comment for Entry **New Peer Review Record Comment for Entry 245535**  **, Document PEER** 

**Document PEER Document PEER**  **REVIEW PLAN REVIEW PLAN** 

**245535 .**  **PDF Sci-**  **Inv -**  **HISA -**  **ISI -**  **Public -**  **Comments Comments**  **Comments 08/19/2012 05:33 PM**  **To: Stan Barone, Sci-Inv-HISA-ISI-Public-Comments**  A new comment has been added to record number 24553 5, document title PEER REVIEW PLAN 245535.PDF. Name: Tom Neltner Email Address: tneltner@pewtrusts.org Affiliation: Pew Health Group Comment: N-Methylpyrrolidone is used to make food packaging per 21 CFR 176.300, 21 CFR 177.1655 and 21 CFR 177.2440. I may also be used on food handling equipment or other packaging if a firm has found it to be generally recognized as safe.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7837

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHEMIKA ALFRIDA PARSON WILLIAMS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:17-cr-00211-TMC-1, 8:19-cv-00777-

TMC)

Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 17, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shemika Alfrida Parson Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Hollingsworth Flynn, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Leesa Washington, Assistant 

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shemika Alfrida Parson Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying 

relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
STATE of Louisiana v. Traveyon BLACKLEDGE

NO. 2018-K-0433

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5851 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5851

  To designate Veterans Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday in 
                               November.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate Veterans Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday in 
                               November.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Our Veterans By Exercising 
The Right To Vote On Veterans Day Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF ELECTION DAY AS A LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY.

    Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(a) The following are legal public holidays:
            ``New Year's Day, January 1.
            ``Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., the third Monday in 
        January.
            ``Washington's Birthday, the third Monday in February.
            ``Memorial Day, the last Monday in May.
            ``Independence Day, July 4.
            ``Labor Day, the first Monday in September.
            ``Columbus Day, the second Monday in October.
            ``Veterans Day, the Tuesday after the first Monday in 
        November.
            ``Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November.
            ``Christmas Day, December 25.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 100558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29198]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 820 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-528, K2025-526.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-29198 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Racheal JENKINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3351

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
From: Mohan Nagavedu [mnagavedu@aqmd.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:28 PM

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Cc: Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Chrome Source Test Reports

‐ 1 of 3

Attachments: A and Z Grinding_2000.pdf; Accu Chrome_2008.pdf; Aircraft X

‐ ray

Labs_2001.pdf; All Fast Fastenings_2002.pdf; Andres Technical

Plating_2007.pdf; Brite Plating_2008.pdf; Chrome Tech Inc_2002.pdf; Classic

Plating_2002.pdf; CPPG, Inc_2007.pdf; Crown_2002.pdf

Hi Lucy / Phil

Please see attached the scanned summaries and evaluations for the reports, from the list you

provided. Due to the size I am sending in separate e

‐ mails

. Also, we are working on compiling more

current reports for source tests at the same facilities. Once that has been accomplished, I will forward

those to you in the same manner. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Mohan Nagavedu

Supervising Air Quality Inspector

909

‐ 396

‐ 3739

909

‐ 396

‐ 3342 fax

MNagavedu@AQMD.Gov

Complied by Eric Padilla

===========================================

P. Eric Padilla

Air Quality Engineer

SCAQMD, Source Test Engineering

21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765

(909)396

‐ 2265

(909)396

‐ 2099 Fax

epadilla@aqmd.gov

===========================================
# C_2020349EN.01002101.xml

| 20.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/21

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2020/C 349/12)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 1.10.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 1.10.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | POL/*8ABDE (special condition to POL/07.) |
| Species | Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) |
| Zone | 8a, 8b, 8d and 8e |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 25/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

1.10.2020

Duration

1.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

POL/*8ABDE (special condition to POL/07.)

Species

Pollack (Pollachius pollachius)

Zone

8a, 8b, 8d and 8e

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

25/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Vertical Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Stephen M. Watters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vertical Health Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Health Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                                            
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 31, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen M. Watters
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Stephen M. Watters, Chief Executive
Officer



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Vertical Health Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thaddeus Shalek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vertical Health Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by
Vertical Health Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                     |  |                                         
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 31, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thaddeus Shalek
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                     |  | Thaddeus Shalek, Chief Financial
Officer
Terry NORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020424EN.01003201.xml

| 8.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/32

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2020/C 424/06)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will expire.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (2).

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 of 7 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
  (OJ L 322, 8.12.2015, p. 21) | 9.12.2020 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2272 of 7 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(OJ L 322, 8.12.2015, p. 21)

9.12.2020

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 12.3.2020, p. 5

(2)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(3)  The measure will expire at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

---
Hugo PEDRIEL, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TIMOTHY BEY, a/k/a TIMOTHY DORTCH, ) JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-275 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 6, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce Kyle, Judge. Timothy Bey, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); Johnson v. State, 974 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2008); Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003); State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); Harris v. State, 818 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TORULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Pacific Vegas Global Strategies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Raymond Chou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | March  31, 2006                        |   | /s/  RAYMOND CHOU |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
|   | Raymond  Chou  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
STICKY HOLSTERS, INC., and Michael J. Christoff, Petitioners, v. Albert J. WAGNER, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-47

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
B.H., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed December 17, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00667-CV

____________

ARTHUR F. PRESTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ARTHUR F. 

PRESTON TRUST UTA DATED MARTCH 1, 1988, Appellant

V.

STEPHANIE ANN PRESTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-11-12525 CV

ABATEMENT ORDER

On December 12, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion to abate the appeal to permit the 

parties to effectuate a settlement. The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the following 

order.

The court ORDERS the appeal abated until March 14, 2014. The appellate deadlines in 

this case are suspended until the abatement period has ended.
If the parties are successful in their settlement negotiations, the court ORDERS the 

parties to file a motion to dismiss the appeal, other dispositive motion, or a motion for 

additional time to file the dispositive motion, within ten days from the conclusion of the 

abatement period. If no settlement agreement is reached, appellant shall file his brief at the end 

of the abatement period.

The appeal is ABATED, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active 

docket until March 14, 2014, at which time the appeal will be reinstated. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party. Any party may also 

file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion at any time. Any party may also 

file a motion to extend the abatement period to finalize a settlement. 

PER CURIAM

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: District of Columbia

Filters

              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(46)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(104)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(21)
              - multimedia_image-141771(20)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(11)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_social_media(2)
              - connect_staff_profiles(4)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

              - california(5)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        February 25, 2020        Lidar Surface Water in Stormwater Network; Updated DC Watersheds

Presentations and Events        April 13, 2023        2022 Blotchy Bass Syndrome Biosurveillance Project

Presentations and Events        April 27, 2017        Using Drought Forecasts to Improve Natural Resource Management

Presentations and Events        March 22, 2007        PubTalk 3/2007 — Impact!

Presentations and Events        May 21, 2015        Hydrography Webinar Series - Session 2

Presentations and Events        July 30, 2015        PubTalk 7/2015 — The Giant Cascadia Earthquake of January 26, 1700

Presentations and Events        March 9, 2015        Climate Vulnerability Assessment for Threatened Bull Trout

Presentations and Events        November 17, 2016        PubTalk 11/2016 — Ecological Stressors

Presentations and Events        January 25, 2018        PubTalk 1/2018 — ShakeAlert: Path to West Coast EQ Early Warning

Presentations and Events        January 26, 2023        PubTalk-01/2023: Building a National Volcano Early Warning System (NVEWS) for the Future

Presentations and Events        September 22, 2022        PubTalk-09/2022 - You Can be Powered by ShakeAlert®️ - Earthquake Early Warning for All!