alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020257EN.01000201.xml

| 5.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/2

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9901 – GIG Solar/Siemens/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 257/02)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | GIG Solar Holdco, LLC (‘GIG Solar’, USA), an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Macquarie Group Limited and together with its subsidiaries, (‘Macquarie’), |
| --- | --- |

—

GIG Solar Holdco, LLC (‘GIG Solar’, USA), an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Macquarie Group Limited and together with its subsidiaries, (‘Macquarie’),

| — | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (‘Siemens’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (‘Siemens’, Germany),

| — | MSS Energy Holdings, LLC (‘JV’, USA). |
| --- | --- |

—

MSS Energy Holdings, LLC (‘JV’, USA).

GIG Solar and Siemens acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over a newly created joint venture.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

| — | for GIG Solar: GIG Solar is a green infrastructure company; Macquarie is a global provider of banking, financial, advisory, investment, and funds management services, |
| --- | --- |

—

for GIG Solar: GIG Solar is a green infrastructure company; Macquarie is a global provider of banking, financial, advisory, investment, and funds management services,

| — | for Siemens: Siemens’ main areas of business activity are electrification, automation and digitalisation, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Siemens: Siemens’ main areas of business activity are electrification, automation and digitalisation,

| — | for the JV: origination, development, delivery and financing of ‘energy as a service’ projects in the USA. |
| --- | --- |

—

for the JV: origination, development, delivery and financing of ‘energy as a service’ projects in the USA.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9901 – GIG Solar/Siemens/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
STATE of Louisiana v. Kenyon FIELDS

NO. 2018-KH-0289

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Fields v. State, 11-0891 (La. 3/14/16), 186 So.3d 646.
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Richard B. Thon,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006of ProUroCare Medical Inc.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)          disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

(a)          allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date:  | March 30, 2007 |                    | /s/ Richard B. Thon |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | By:            | Richard B. Thon         |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                |                         |                     |        |  |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Reserve  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2003 (the  "Report")
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we,
Richard  A.  Sinewe,  President,  and  Robert B.  Kastan,  Treasurer/Controller,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/Richard A. Sinewe                            /s/Robert B. Kastan
----------------------------------------        --------------------------------
Richard A. Sinewe                               Robert B. Kastan
President                                       Treasurer/Controller


December 23, 2003
Bob HENRIQUEZ, as Property Appraiser, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. J.P. MORGAN TREASURY TECHNOLOGIES CORP., f/k/a Chase Treasury Technologies Corp., Doug Belden, as Hills. County Tax Collector, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 23

- 1921

_____________________________
R UBY S TEPHENS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. April 25, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , C.J., and B ILBREY and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Ruby Stephens, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina Piotrowski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Christopher BACHMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1723

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 5, 2018

Rachael E. Reese, O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Christopher Bachman appeals a "Final Order" denying almost all of his seventeen claims for postconviction relief raised pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The circuit court issued the order after holding an evidentiary hearing.

One of the arguments Mr. Bachman asserts on appeal is that the court erred by not addressing one of his claims for relief. The claim alleged that defense counsel failed to object to certain improper and prejudicial arguments by the State.

Mr. Bachman is indeed correct that the court's order did not address the second of two claims that were labeled "Ground Six" in his motion. Rather than forming a basis to reverse the order, however, the lack of a ruling on this claim deprives this court of jurisdiction. *See**Hanner v. State* , 228 So.3d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (dismissing where "[o]n appeal, Appellant argues that the postconviction court erred by failing to address all of the claims in his motion"). "It is well-settled that an order disposing of some, but not all of the claims in a motion for postconviction relief is not an appealable final order." *Lake v. State* , 53 So.3d 1125, 1126 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). *See also* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(8)(C) ("The order issued after the evidentiary hearing shall resolve all the claims in the motion ...."). We therefore dismiss this appeal without prejudice to Mr. Bachman's ability to file a future appeal after the circuit court has ruled on all of his claims.

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4484

_____________________________

BENNIE HENDERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

February 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufrano, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Ashely B. Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# C_2020082EN.01000201.xml

| 12.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9733 — ENGIE/Mirova/Predica/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 82/02)

On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9733. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9733. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF R.W.

NO. 2017-CK-1996

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and docket.
interdomletter.htm


    Exhibit
      10.1

    July
      9,
      2007

    


    Interdom
      Partners

    Commercial
      Cartage, Inc.

    Pride
      Logistics, L.L.C.

    c/o
      Interdom Partners

    11800
      S.
      75th Avenue

    Suite
      2N

    Palos
      Heights, IL 60463

    Attention:  Richard
      K. Rudie

    


    Dear
      Rick:

     

    Reference
      is hereby made to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of June 6,
      2007
      by and among Comtrak Logistics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Hub City
      Terminals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Interdom Partners, a general
      partnership organized under the laws of Illinois, Commercial Cartage, Inc.,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the “Company”), Pride Logistics, L.L.C., an Illinois
      limited liability company, and the other parties signatory thereto (the
“Agreement”).  Each capitalized term used but not defined
      herein has the meaning assigned thereto in the Agreement.

     

    Purchasers
      and Sellers hereby agree to terminate the Agreement as of the date hereof in
      accordance with Section 11.1(a) of the Agreement.

     

    Please
      acknowledge your agreement with the above by executing this letter where
      indicated below.

     

    COMTRAK
      LOGISTICS, INC.

     

    By: 
      /s/ David P. Yeager

     

    Title:  CEO

     

    


     

    HUB
      CITY
      TERMINALS, INC.

     

    By:  /s/
      David P. Yeager

     

    Title:  CEO

     

    


     


    
      
              

                  
      
      

                        
    

        
        

      

      
        
        

        
        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    


     

    


     

    Acknowledged
      and agreed.

     

    INTERDOM
      PARTNERS

     

    By:           Interdom,
      Inc.

    Its:           General
      Partner

     

    By:           /s/
      Richard K. Rudie


                            
      Richard
      K. Rudie, President

     


    COMMERCIAL
      CARTAGE, INC.

     

    By:           /s/
      Richard K. Rudie

                   
      Richard K. Rudie, President

     

     

    PRIDE
      LOGISTICS, L.L.C.

     

    By:           Bogfid,
      Inc.

     

    By:           /s/
      Richard K. Rudie

                Richard
      K. Rudie, President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: DED

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_maps(1)
              - multimedia_image(26)
              - multimedia_image-141771(26)
              - multimedia_video(57)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(4)
              - multimedia_video-149197(9)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)

## By Location

## By Year

Research        July 20, 2018        Deadhorse (DED)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(5)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - colorado(2)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(6)
              - 2023(3)
              - 2022(9)
              - 2021(6)

staff profileSharon K Taylor, DVM, PhD

staff profileHeidi Leathers-Miller

staff profileSteven M Matsuoka

staff profileNicholas J Van Lanen, PhD

science explorer topicDisease and Contaminants

staff profileBarbara Martin
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         51,092
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  96,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,127
<PP&E>                                         135,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                 55,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,297
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    393,650
<COMMON>                                       221,729
<OTHER-SE>                                     (504,889)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,787
<SALES>                                        751,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               751,667
<CGS>                                          550,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  929,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (185,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (195,235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            tds (TELEMEDICINE), INC.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18.U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Simon A.M. Leatham, the Chief Financial Officer of tds
(Telemedicine), Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this Certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

-     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

-     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the
28th day of April 2003.


                                        /s/ Simon A.M. Leatham
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Simon A.M. Leatham
                                        Chief Financial Officer
### The State of TexasAppellee/ s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00372

- CR

Andres Ramon JUAREZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0936B Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In an “Open Plea to the Court,” appellant pled nolo contendere to aggravated robbery. The trial court’s judgment also indicates appellant’s plea was an “open plea to the court.” I n accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), the trial court signed a certification of defendant ’ s right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). The certification states that the underlying case “ is a plea

- b argain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal ” and “ the defendant has waived the right of appeal. ” However, on May 15, 2014, the trial court granted appellant’s Request for Permission to Appeal His Conviction. In his May 21, 2014, pro se notice o f appeal, appellant notes he was granted permission to appeal.

On May 30, 2014, Mr. Ross A Rodriguez, appellant’s retained trial counsel, filed a Motion to Withdraw As Attorney, stating he has not been retained to represent appellant on appeal. The mot ion

is GRANTED.

The reporter’s record is due no later than August 26, 2014. Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the reporter’s record is filed. If appellant desires representation on appeal, he is encouraged to retain new counsel at the earl iest possible date.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court

on this 9th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Terrell NIX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-405

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.