Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-570-093]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: On November 25, 2024, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in 
                        *New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's (Commerce) third remand redetermination pertaining to the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of refillable stainless steel kegs (kegs) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period of investigation (POI) January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final determination in that investigation, and that Commerce is amending the final determination and the resulting antidumping duty (AD) order with respect to the dumping margin for certain respondents eligible for a separate rate, 
                        *i.e.,*
                         Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Master), Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Jingye), and Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Ulix). The merchandise exported by these three exporters is included in the amended AD order.
 DATES: Applicable December 5, 2024.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 24, 2019, Commerce published its 
                    *Final Determination*
                     in the LTFV investigation of kegs from China.[1]
                    
                     On December 16, 2019, Commerce subsequently published the AD order on kegs from China.[2]
                    
                     New American Keg, d/b/a American Keg Company appealed Commerce's 
                    *Final Determination.* On March 23, 2021, the CIT remanded the 
                    *Final Determination*
                     to Commerce, ordering Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) its selection of the Malaysian surrogate labor data over the Brazilian surrogate labor data to value factors of production (FOPs) for labor; and (2) whether Guangzhou Ulix is eligible for a separate rate.[3]
                    
                     In the 
                    *First Redetermination,*
                     Commerce determined that “Malaysian data does not constitute the best available information for valuing Ningbo Master's labor FOPs because it is linked to forced labor.” [4]
                    
                     Commerce further determined that “based on the information on the record, {it}selected the Mexican labor {surrogate value (SV)} from {Conference Board's International Labor Comparisons (ILC)} as the best information available to value Ningbo Master's labor FOPs” and “inflated the Mexican labor SV from ILC to the {POI using Brazilian inflator} and recalculated Ningbo Master's margin.” [5]
                    
                     In the 
                    *First Redetermination,*
                     Commerce also examined certain evidence requested by the CIT and determined that Guangzhou Ulix remained eligible for a separate rate.[6] On September 13, 2022, the CIT remanded the 
                    *First Redetermination*
                     and ordered Commerce to reconsider or further explain: (1) the use of the Mexican surrogate labor data inflated with Brazilian consumer price index (CPI) when the Brazilian surrogate labor data are available on the record; and (2) the evidence in the administrative record that supports granting Guangzhou Ulix a separate rate.[7]
                    
                     In the 
                    *Second Redetermination,*
                     after filing the 
                    *First Redetermination*
                     and requesting a voluntary remand, Commerce acknowledge that it was improper to inflate the Mexican labor wage rate from the ILC using Brazilian CPI.[8]
                    
                     Notwithstanding, Commerce continued to determine that the Mexican labor wage data are superior to the Brazilian labor wage data and, in order to achieve an accurate calculation, Commerce re-opened the record and placed on the record data from the International Labour Organization (ILO).[9]
                    
                     Consequently, in the 
                    *Second Redetermination,*
                     Commerce used the Mexican wage rate from the ILO data for 2018 (contemporaneous with the POI) and recalculated Ningbo Master's margin accordingly.[10]
                    
                     In the 
                    *Second Redetermination,*
                     Commerce also determined that Guangzhou Ulix has met its burden for a separate rate status.[11] On January 31, 2024, the CIT remanded the 
                    *Second Redetermination,*
                     holding that Commerce abused its discretion in reopening the record to use Mexican ILO wage data, because Commerce made no showing that the Brazilian wage information on the record was inaccurate or otherwise unsuitable for the calculation of Ningbo Master's margin.[12]
                    
                     In its third final remand redetermination, Commerce used the Brazilian labor SV from 2016, inflated to the POI, and recalculated Ningbo Master's margin.[13]
                    
                     On November 25, 2024, the CIT sustained Commerce's third final remand redetermination.[14] Timken Notice In its decision in 
                    *Timken,*[15]
                    
                     as clarified by 
                    *Diamond Sawblades,*[16]
                    
                     the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not “in harmony” with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a “conclusive” court decision. The CIT's November 25, 2024, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT 
                    ( print page 99227)
                    that is not in harmony with Commerce's 
                    *Final Determination.*
                     Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
                    *Timken.* Amended Final Determination Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its 
                    *Final Determination*
                     with respect to the following exporter-producer combinations: Exporter
Producer
Weighted
                             average dumping 
                             margin 
                             
                                (percent 
                                *ad valorem*)
Cash deposit rate (adjusted for subsidy
                             offsets) 
                             
                                (percent 
                                *ad valorem*)Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd
Ningbo Major Draft Beer Equipment Co., Ltd
4.23
17
                             3.96Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd
Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd
4.23
3.96Guangzhou Ulix Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd
Guangzhou Jingye Machinery Co., Ltd
4.23
3.96
 Amended Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to section 735(a)(4) of the Act, Commerce “shall disregard any weighted average dumping margin that is 
                    *de minimis*
                     as defined in section 733(b)(3) of the Act” [18]
                    
                     and pursuant to section 735(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce shall “issue an antidumping duty order under section 736” of the Act when the final determination is affirmative. In the 
                    *Final Determination,*
                     the exporter-producer combination identified above for respondent Ningbo Master received a zero percent margin. As a result of this amended final determination, in which Commerce calculated an estimated weighted-average dumping margin above 
                    *de minimis*
                     for the exporter-producer combination identified above for Ningbo Master, Commerce is hereby including entries of subject merchandise that were produced by Ningbo Major Draft Beer Equipment Co., Ltd., and exported by Ningbo Master International Trade Co., Ltd., within the 
                    *Order.*
                     However, Commerce recently revoked the 
                    *Order*
                     effective December 16, 2024.[19] Cash Deposit Requirements Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for Ningbo Master. Because Guangzhou Jingye and Guangzhou Ulix have a superseding cash deposit rate, 
                    *i.e.,*
                     there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative review,[20]
                    
                     Commerce will not issue revised cash deposit instructions for those companies. This notice will not affect the current cash deposit rate for these companies. However, as stated in the 
                    *Order Revocation,*
                     in accordance with section 751(c)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), Commerce intends to instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation of the merchandise subject to the 
                    *Order*
                     entered, or withdrawn from the warehouse, on or after December 16, 2024.[21] Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 4, 2024. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part,*84 FR 57010 (October 24, 2019) (
                        *Final Determination*). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the Federal Republic of Germany and the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders,*84 FR 68405 (December 16, 2019) (
                        *Order*). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 21-30 (CIT March 23, 2021). Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 21-30 (CIT March 23, 2021), dated July 7, 2021 (
                        *First Redetermination*). Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 22-106 (CIT September 13, 2022). Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 22-106 (CIT September 13, 2022), dated November 10, 2022 (
                        *Second Redetermination*). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *Id.* Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 24-11 (CIT January 31, 2024). Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 24-11 (CIT January 31, 2024), dated March 25, 2024. Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See New American Keg*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 20-00008, Slip Op. 24-129 (CIT November 25, 2024). Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See Timken Co.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (
                        *Timken*). Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (
                        *Diamond Sawblades*). Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part,*84 FR 57005 (October 24, 2019), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5 for the export subsidy rate. Back to Citation
 18.
    
                         Section 733(b)(3) of the Act defines a 
                        *de minimis*
                         dumping margin as “less than 2 percent ad valorem or the equivalent specific rate for the subject merchandise.” Back to Citation
 19.
    
                         
                        *See Refillable Stainless-Steel Kegs from Mexico and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Sunset Reviews and Revocation of Orders,*89 FR 92095, 92096 (November 21, 2024) (
                        *Order Revocation*). Back to Citation
 20.
    
                         
                        *See Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022,*89 FR 25564 (April 11, 2024) (Commerce denied separate rate eligibility for Guangzhou Jingye and Guangzhou Ulix and treated them as part of the China-wide entity.). Back to Citation
 21.
    
                         
                        *See Order Revocation,*89 FR 92095-96. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-28946 Filed 12-9-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P