alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Warren DAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 30, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin S. Little, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2)The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Kevin S. LittleKevin S. Little
  Chief Financial Officer
  March 5, 2004
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Professional Management Consulting Services, Inc.) ASBCANo. 60435 ) Under Contract No. FA4417-14-P-0221 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: Eden Brown Gaines, Esq. Brown Gaines, LLC White Plains, MD APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF Air Force ChiefTrial Attorney Lawrence M. Anderson, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have settled this appeal and havejointly moved the Board to dismiss. Accordingly the appeal ofProfessional Management Consulting Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 60435, is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 25 April 2016



## c ive Judge Armed Se ices Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60435, Appeal of Professional Management Consulting Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha II, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  (the  "Report"),
I, Robert L. Smith, Chief  Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Robert L. Smith
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
February 7, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6558

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAHKEEM LEE MCDONALD, a/k/a Hitman, a/k/a Big Keem,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cr-00229-MOC-DCK-12)

Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rahkeem Lee McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6558 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rahkeem Lee McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction pursuant to § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 

132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. McDonald, No. 3:14-cr-00229-MOC-DCK-12

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6558 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2020358EN.01000301.xml

| 26.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1556, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

(2020/C 358/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1556 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 (3).

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes continue to fulfil the criterion set out in Decision 2010/638/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea and should therefore remain subject to the measures, as renewed by Decision (CFSP) 2020/1556.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 1284/2009, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation before 30 June 2021, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10.

(2)  OJ L 355, 26.10.2020, p. 3.

(3)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p. 26.

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6037** 

KEVIN TERRY DOTSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

WARDEN OF KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv
- 00529

- JLK

- RSB )

Submitted : May 11, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kevin T erry Dotson, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Terry Dotson seeks to appeal the district court ’ s
order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice
of appeal was no t timely filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
November 7, 201 4. The notice of appeal was filed on January 5,

2015. * Because Dotson failed to file a timely notice of appeal
or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. A pp. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 12, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 100558)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 817 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-525, K2025-523.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-29195 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2020344EN.01001601.xml

| 16.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/16

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 344/15)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Crotone – Turin and vice versa
  Crotone – Venice and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 February 2021 to 31 January 2023 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)
  Air transport development and licensing department





  Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALIA |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Crotone – Turin and vice versa

Crotone – Venice and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 February 2021 to 31 January 2023

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air transport development and licensing department

Viale Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Roma

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596515

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

| Website: | http://www.mit.gov.it
  http://www.enac.gov.it |
| --- | --- |

Website:

http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the quarterly  report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  we,George  Suzuki,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and Ken Inouye, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  May 13, 2004                      s/George Suzuki
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          George Suzuki, Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  May 14, 2004                      s/Ken Inouye
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Ken Inouye, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020366EN.01000301.xml

| 30.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9979 — Brookfield/Simon/JCPenney)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 366/03)

On 27 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9979. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9979. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Henryk KWIATKOWSKI, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SCHECHER GROUP, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 09, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00213

- CV

In re Jose Guadalupe Vasquez

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. 8(a ).

_______________________ ___________________

Chari L. Kelly , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: April 20 , 2022
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) BAE Systems Southeast Shipyards Mayport LLC ) ) Under Contract No. N00024- lO-C-4406 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ASBCA No. 59876 Robert E. Korroch, Esq. William A. Wozniak, Esq.

Williams Mullen Norfolk, VA Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Anthony K. Hicks, Esq.

Trial Attorney The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 22 August 2017

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe**A~ed** Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59876, Appeal ofBAE Systems Southeast Shipyards Mayport LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 233 V

Filed: December 19, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

GINA BECK

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Joseph Alexander Vuckovich, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC , for
petitioner.

Linda Sara Renzi , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On February 15, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain

- Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) as

a result of her March 8, 2015 influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccination . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 N ational Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).On December 17, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “ concluded that petitioner suffered GBS following a flu vaccine within the Table time period, and there is not a preponderance of the medical evidence that petitioner’s GBS was due to a factor unrelated to the

vaccination .” Id. at 5 . Respondent further agrees that petitioner experienced sequelae

of her GBS for more than six months and that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5529 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize 

additional grant activities for Hispanic-serving institutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5529 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accessing Higher Edu3 cation Opportunities Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED GRANT ACTIVITIES. 

5 Subsection (b) of section 503 of the Higher Edu6 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1101b(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through 

8 (16) as paragraphs (9) through (18), respectively; 

9 and 

10 (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(7) Student support programs, which may in13 clude counseling, mentoring, and other support serv14 ices, designed to facilitate the successful advance15 ment of students from four-year institutions to 

16 postbaccalaureate doctoral degree granting programs 

17 that prepare students for health care occupations as 

18 such occupations are described in the most recent 

19 edition of the Occupational Outlook Handbook pub20 lished by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

21 ‘‘(8) Developing or expanding access to dual or 

22 concurrent enrollment programs and early college 

23 high school programs.’’. 

24 SEC. 3. FUNDING. 

25 (a) AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

26 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out part A of 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5529 RFS 

1 title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

2 1101 et seq.), as amended by this Act, $107,795,000 for 

3 fiscal year 2016. 

4 (b) ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS NOT PERMITTED.— 

5 Section 422 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 

6 U.S.C. 1226a) shall not apply to further extend the dura7 tion of the authority under subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS