alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 34.2**

Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FirstData Resources. Inc. andREMITCO LLC

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SECRegulation AB Servicing Criteria, that First Data Resources, Inc. and itsaffiliate, REMITCO LLC (jointly, First Data) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for the remittance payment platform as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, except for 1122 (d)(l)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(vii),1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii) and (v)-(xv), which First Data hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect tothe servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible forFirst Data’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about First Data’s compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance withstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about First Data’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactionsand securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of theservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether FirstData processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, ourprocedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by First Data during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurredeither prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balancesor amounts calculated or reported by First Data during the period covered bythis report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on First Data’s compliancewith the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat First Data complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2006, for the remittance payment platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

February 26, 2007

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  224,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,808
<INVENTORY>                                    233,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               460,815
<PP&E>                                         821,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,391,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          744,833
<BONDS>                                        481,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,391,564
<SALES>                                        351,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,843
<CGS>                                          327,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,494)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,494)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE of Louisiana v. Corey SCOTT

NO. 2017-K-1743

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Big Data Analysis

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(10)
              - arizona(7)
              - california(33)
              - colorado(1)
              - district of columbia(1)
              - hawaii(12)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(2)
              - minnesota(3)
              - (-)montana(3)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(2)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(22)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1978        Chemical and mineralogical evaluation of soils, Hanging Woman Creek EMRIA site, Big Horn County, Montana

Featured Films and Shorts        November 1, 2019        Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Monthly Update: November 1, 2019

Featured Films and Shorts        November 19, 2020        Yellowstone Volcano Observ: Overview, Monitoring, Hazards, Results
## STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION



### HEARING CERTIFICATION This certifies in accordance with the provisions of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51.102 that the following actions ~vere taken regarding the proposed adoption of R.C.S.A. section 22a-174-44, concerning adhesives and sealants: 

## 1) 2) The public hearing was held on October 16, 2007 as announced in the notice of hearing (copy attached); In accordance with the notice, materials were available for review in each Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) in Connecticut; 

### 3) Copies of the notice were mailed to the directors of the air pollution control agencies in New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts along with a copy to the Director of the Air Management Division of Region I of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and 4)The notice of hearing was published in four area newspapers as follows: News~ A~ Date Comaecticut Post 43 September 11, 2007 Hartford Courant 42 September 11, 2007 New London Day 41 September 11, 2007 The Register Citizen 44 September 11, 2007

Date eau o~r Management

(Printed on Recycled Paper ) 79 Elm Street ° Hartford, CT 06106-5127

http://www.ct.go~qdep Atl Eqttal Opporttmity Entployer
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.03 N 77.49 W Meters AGL
Bessie J. HALL v. LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

NO. 2018-C-0836

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

Denied.
Virgil O'Keith STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 5, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Brian MADACSI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Phil Miranda LUNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4073

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10(c)



Amendment to Wells Fargo & Company Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”)


Section 2(P) of the DCP is amended effective July 1, 2017 to read in full as follows: 


(P) Plan Administrator. “Plan Administrator” of the Plan is the Director of
Human Resources, the Director of Compensation and Benefits, and the Head of
Enterprise HR Consulting of the Company, each of whom, acting individually, may take action as the Plan Administrator.
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141762) and Amendment No. 414 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) March 31, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 7, 2017, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 4, 2017
Exhibit 23.1        Consent of
Abbott, Jordan & Koon, LLC

---

EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-105832 of
Georgia Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 4, 2004, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Georgia Bancshares,
Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the two years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Georgia Bancshares, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Abbott, Jordan &
Koon, LLC

Abbott, Jordan &
Koon, LLCManchester, Georgia March 23, 2004
The Department of Defense received one comment on DMDC 17 "Continuous Evaluation Records for 

Personnel Security" (Docket ID DOD-2014-OS-0115). The Department appreciates the information 

Equifax provided regarding how the Department can structure the program to ensure compliance with 

the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The comment outlines how the Department can work with 

consumer reporting agencies to obtain, use, and share consumer reports and identifies permissible 

purposes for obtaining the consumer reports in accordance with the FCRA. In review of the comment 

received, the Department determined that no changes are needed to the SORN. DoD will comply with 

the Fair Credit Reporting Act in maintaining records under this SORN, as applicable.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5372 

To provide for the continuation of the United States Digital Service, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2016 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself, Mr. POLIS, Mr. KIND, and Mr. MCNERNEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the continuation of the United States Digital 

Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Digital 

5 Service Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF UNITED STATES DIGITAL SERV7 ICE. 

8 The President shall continue to operate, for fiscal 

9 years 2017 through 2026, the United States Digital Serv10 ice, as such program operated using funds made available 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5372 IH

1 under the ‘‘Information Technology Oversight and Re2 form’’ account in division E of the Consolidated Appro3 priations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114–113). 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave climate

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - (-)tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        December 19, 2014        Simulated effects of increased groundwater withdrawals in the Cave Springs area, Hixson, Tennessee
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(68)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(3)

## By Location

              - (-)florida(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oregon(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(3)

## By Year

Podcasts        August 23, 2019        Outstanding in the Field (Ep 4): Amphibian Surveys – Call of the Frog
Wednesday, April 30 , 2014

US Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140 1200 New

Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 2059 0
To Whom It May Concern: Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. is requesting an extension to the exemption from Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 137.53(c)(2). This exemption is based on being in the public’s best interest to not jettison spray loads over congested areas and the ability to show an equivalent level of safety with not installing a jettison system. Thank you very much for your attention to this. If you need any additional information, or have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,

Michael O. Rosolina Flight Operations Manager

– Aerial Application Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. P.O. Box 7 Bridgew ater, VA 22812 Phone: (540) 828

- 6070 Fax: (540) 828

- 4031 mrosolina@dynamicaviation.com
Anthony Michael GAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5047

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2020369EN.01000101.xml

| 3.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/1

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 15 March 2019 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40411 Google Search (AdSense)

Rapporteur: Croatia

(2020/C 369/01)

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, for the purposes of this case, the relevant product markets are the market for online search advertising and the market for online search advertising intermediation.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, for the purposes of this case, the relevant geographic market for online search advertising is national in scope.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that, for the purposes of this case, the relevant geographic market for online search advertising intermediation is EEA-wide in scope.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Google has held a dominant position in the market for online search advertising intermediation between at least 2006 and 2016.

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the Exclusivity Clause in contracts with All Sites Direct Partners constituted an abuse of Google's dominant position in the EEA-wide market for online search advertising intermediation within the meaning of Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the Premium Placement and Minimum Google Ads Clause constituted an abuse of Google's dominant position in the EEA-wide market for online search advertising intermediation within the meaning of Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement.

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the Authorising Equivalent Ads Clause constituted an abuse of Google's dominant position on the EEA-wide market for online search advertising intermediation within the meaning of Article 102 of the TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement.

8.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment that all the above mentioned conducts constitute a single and continuous infringement as described in the draft decision.

9.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment as regards the duration of the infringement as described in the draft decision.

10.

The Advisory Committee requests the Commission to take into account the observations made during the meeting.

11.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
gfgi_ex1015.htm


Exhibit 10.15


 


ADDENDUM TO NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 27TH 2012







         THIS AMENDMENT TO THE NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered as of the 27th of February 2012, by and among Game Face Gaming, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Company") and  Corporate Debt Consultants LLC, a New York LLC with an address at 2071 Flatbush Avenue, Suite 166 Brooklyn, NY 11234 (the “Holder”).




 


7.           Registration Rights. If at any time the Company proposes to register any of its common stock under the Act, whether as a result of an offering for its own account or the account of others, excluding any registrations to be effected on Forms S-4 or S-8 or other applicable successor Forms, the Company shall, at such time, promptly give Holder written notice of such proposed registration and offer Holder the opportunity to include the shares of common stock issued in connection with the Agreement dated February 27, 2012 in such registration statement (a “Piggy Back Registration”). The Company shall include in any such registration statement all of the common stock that Holder requests to be registered.  In addition, the  Holder may no later than 45 days after the completion of a raise of capital of no less than $2,000,000, notify the Company of his Demand  that the shares be registered. If such Demand is made, the Company will file with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-1 covering the resale of all of the Common Stock owned  by the Holder (a “Demand Registration”).  In the event that Form S-1 is unavailable for a Demand Registration, the Company shall use such other form as is available for such a registration. The Company shall use its best efforts to have the Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC as soon as practicable prior to the 90th day following the Filing Deadline.  All expenses incurred in connection with registrations, filings or qualifications, including, without limitation, all registration, listing and qualifications fees, printers and accounting fees, and fees and disbursements of counsel for the Company shall be paid by the Company.


 


 




 





	Agreed: 	 	Agreed:	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Game Face Gaming, Inc. 	 	Corporate Debt Consultants LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Felix Elinson                                        	 	/s/Alex Englard                                           	 
	Felix Elinson, CEO	 	Managing Member
To the Board of Directors of Lennar Partners, Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion about Lennar Partners, Inc.'s (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as applicable to the special servicing of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum-servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche
February 15, 2002
**Exhibit 23.2****Consent of Torto Wheaton Research**We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “10-K”) to be filed by Trizec Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) and anyreference to industry data and statistics in the United States commercial office property marketthat we prepared and which the Company is using in the 10-K, including, but not limited to, thereferences to our company under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of FinancialCondition and Results of Operations—Executive Summary” of the 10-K, and the incorporation byreference of such industry data and statistics in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-3(Registration Nos. 333-116898 and 333-115132), Post-Effective Amendments No. 1 to the RegistrationStatements on Form S-11 on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-84876 and 333-84878), Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 333-87548 and 333-106514) and any future registrationstatements that may be filed by the Company which incorporates by reference the 10-K.Dated:March 14, 2006 Torto Wheaton Research, an unincorporated business unit of CB RichardEllis, Inc., a Delaware corporation /s/ KenO'Brien Name:  Ken O'Brien
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- MATRITECH, INC. -- EXHIBIT 4.3 TO FORM 8-K


    EXHIBIT
      4.3

    


    ELECTION
      REGARDING PAYMENTS DUE JULY 13, 2007

    ON
      15% SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

    DATED
      JANUARY 13, 2006 AND DATED JANUARY 22, 2007

    


    


    The
      undersigned Holder hereby elects to have Matritech, Inc. defer to August 13,
      2007 all payments due to the Holder on July 13, 2007 with respect to the 15%
      Secured Convertible Promissory Notes dated January 13, 2006 and the Series
      B 15%
      Secured Convertible Promissory Notes dated January 22, 2007.

    


    


    


    
      
        


        
          	 	
                  Holder:
                    ______________________

                  


                  


                  By:__________________________

                  Name:________________________

                  Title:_________________________

                  Date:_________________________