alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - (-)documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Animated GIF        December 31, 2018        Data Science: Lake Mead Water Level Decline Visualization

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer

Animated GIF        July 5, 2022        Carbonate Budget Animation

Brochures        October 17, 2019        Powell Center 2019 Seminar: NASA’S GRACE SATELLITE: WHAT IT CAN AND...
##### 



Exhibit 10.26 First Amendment to the Trizec Properties, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan WHEREAS, Trizec Properties, Inc. (the Company) has adopted the Trizec Properties, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan); and WHEREAS, Section 8.1 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended by the Board of
Directors of the Company (the Board), and the Board has approved and adopted this amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the Company amends the Plan, effective August 3, 2004, in the following
respects: 1. Section 4.5(c) shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following: Interest. Each Account shall be increased or decreased by the Interest credited
to such Account since the prior Determination Date as though the balance of that Account
had been invested in the applicable Valuation Funds chosen by the Participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the
Company, this 3rd day of August, 2004. TRIZEC PROPERTIES, INC./s/ Ted R. JadwinName:
    Ted R. JadwinTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
# C_2020132EN.01000301.xml

| 23.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9786 – RIL/BP/RBML JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 132/03)

On 17 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9786. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9786. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - (-)science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - north carolina(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        What is declination?

faq        June 30, 2017        Why are amphibian populations declining?

faq        June 30, 2017        What is the United States doing about amphibian deformity and decline issues?

faq        July 7, 2017        Why measure the magnetic field at the Earth's surface? Wouldn't satellites be better suited for space-weather studies?

faq        July 31, 2017        What do the different north arrows on a USGS topographic map mean?

Podcasts        July 31, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part I

Podcasts        March 13, 2012        Climate Connections: Questions from Glacier National Park, MT (Ep 4)

Podcasts        March 14, 2012        Advancing ARMI: In Search for Chytrid Fungus

Podcasts        April 20, 2011        Climate Connections: Visiting Students in North Carolina (Episode 1)

Podcasts        August 18, 2008        Tribal Canoe Journey for Troubled Sea: Part 2

Podcasts        August 16, 2011        A Study in Stream Ecology
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

p0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148091(17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148091

COA: 315805

Oakland CC: 2012-243481-FH

WILLIE JAMES MARSHALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 28, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
**EXHIBIT 23.0**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

The Board of DirectorsWillow Financial Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-87214, 333-110464 and 333-128185)on Forms S-8 of Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary(the Company) of our reports dated September 28, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated statements of financial condition of the Company as ofJune 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2007 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30,2007, which reports appear in the June 30, 2007 annual report onForm 10-K/A of the Company.
| /s/ KPMG LLP               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |   |   |
| October 16, 2007      |   |   |

 

----
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   May 15, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(6)
              - (-)products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(47)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - (-)new mexico(3)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

map        June 15, 2023        Potentiometric surface map of the Southern High Plains aquifer in the Cannon Air Force Base area, Curry County, New Mexico, 2020

map        July 12, 2011        Estimated 2008 groundwater potentiometric surface and predevelopment to 2008 water-level change in the Santa Fe Group aquifer system in the Albuquerque area, central New Mexico

map        July 16, 2014        Estimated 2012 groundwater potentiometric surface and drawdown from predevelopment to 2012 in the Santa Fe Group aquifer system in the Albuquerque metropolitan area, central New Mexico
Pacific InterMedia, Inc.                                           Annual Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
                 -----------------------------------------------

I, Lyle Pearson, Chief Executive Officer of Pacific InterMedia, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended August 31, 2003 (the "Report")
of the Registrant, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: December 8, 2003

/s/ Lyle Pearson
----------------

Lyle Pearson
Chief Executive Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 55 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a study on the 

use of contractors for intelligence activities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

A BILL 

To require the Director of National Intelligence to conduct 

a study on the use of contractors for intelligence activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rightsizing Activities 

5 of Intelligence Non-Governmental Contractors Act of 

6 2015’’ or ‘‘RAINC Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 55 IH

1 SEC. 2. DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE STUDY ON 

2 THE USE OF CONTRACTORS IN THE CONDUCT 

3 OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. 

4 (a) STUDY.—The Director of National Intelligence 

5 shall conduct a study to ascertain the extent to which con6 tractors are used in the conduct of intelligence activities 

7 and the type of information to which such contractors are 

8 exposed or have access. 

9 (b) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2015, 

10 the Director of Intelligence shall submit to Congress a re11 port containing— 

12 (1) the results of the study conducted under 

13 subsection (a); and 

14 (2) a plan for reducing by 25 percent the num15 ber of contractors to the intelligence community with 

16 top secret security clearances that are engaged in in17 telligence activities (including intelligence analysis). 

18 (c) REDUCTION OF CONTRACTORS.—Not later than 

19 December 31, 2016, the Director of National Intelligence 

20 shall reduce the number of contractors to the intelligence 

21 community with top secret security clearances that are en22 gaged in intelligence activities (including intelligence anal23 ysis) as of the date of the enactment of this Act by 25 

24 percent. 

25 (d) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DEFINED.—In this 

26 section, the term ‘‘intelligence community’’ has the meanVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:01 Jan 10, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H55.IH H55

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 55 IH

1 ing given the term in section 3(4) of the National Security 

2 Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Pensacola Aviation Center, LLC, 

Complainant 

v. 

Pensacola International Airport, 

City of Pensacola, FL 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

FAA Docket No. 16-12-12 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant to the Rules of Practice, 

§16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management 

Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before 

March 2, 2015. 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director, Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December ct , 2014, I served via certified mail a true copy of 

the FAA's Notice of Extension of Time, addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

Tel: (516) 364-1095 

Fax: (516) 364-0612 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Eric Smith, Esq. 

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP 

Fifth A venue Place 

120 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2700 

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 

Tel: (412) 577-5223 

Fax: (412) 765-3858 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Aoalysis, (AC0-1 00) 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Aoalysis
NUMBER 13-08-00382-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

JUAN MUNGIA, AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF 

CONCEPCION MUNGIA, DECEASED, AND

JOSE SEGURA, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants,

v.

DETAR HOSPITAL NAVARRO, DR. PETER 

PAUL ROJAS, AND RONDA MASCIARELLI, Appellees. 

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Juan Mungia, as surviving spouse of Concepcion Mungia, deceased,

and Jose Segura, individually, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th

District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 08-1-66727-A. Appellants have
2

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have executed a settlement

agreement. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request,

no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 23rd day of July, 2009.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41349 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JULIES KEVIN YANCEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:97-CR-13-1

- - - - - - - - - -
January 15, 1999

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julies Kevin Yancey has appealed the district court’s denial

of credit on his sentence upon a conviction of possessing a

c ontrolled substance, on grounds that he accepted responsibility

for the offense. S ee U.S.S.G. § 3E1. 1. The district court held

that Yancey was not entitled to the adjustment because he committed

unadjudicated drug offenses after he had been arrested for the

offense of conviction.No. 97-41349 -2-

Yancey contends that the district court err ed by relying on

the presentence report (PSR) to establish his culpability relative

to the subsequent offenses. We hold that “the district court’s

reliance on the PSR was not clearly erroneous,” because Yancey

“failed to present any evidence to support his objection to the

court’s reliance on the information set forward in the PSR.” See

United States v. Vital
, 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
".

'1-r<-{-lo

--

n u.s.GQ\IERNMENT •••• NTING OffiCE 'n\;. l~_~" I

OFFICIAL FILE COpy

DATES: We must receive commcnts on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

."'DURESSES: You may ~d comments by any of the fo\lQwiug methods:

DAYS AFfER DATE OF PUBLICATION L~ THE FEDERAL REGISTERJ.

condition as: I

It has been reponed during opetationa.l checks tha1 some faillll'e:5of lhc

Escape Slide· •• installed on the forward passenger and b-ice door

h.a..-eoccu!TCd which ~vcnt.ed Ih<:doof from opcTling.

and con=t an unsafe condition on an aviarioo producI. The MeAl d~bes the unS<lfe

The proposed AD would require actions t!>alare intended to address the unsafe condition

InfOl'TTlarioo(MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of anolheT country 10 idemif:.'

• •• [T]his condition· •• could delay an emeTgel\CYevacuation and

incn::a.sethe chance of injury 10piWimgen lInd flight crew· •.•.

described in the MeAl.

t;5led above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

1491~13·PI

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaldng(NPRM).

AGENCY: Fe~kral Avialion Administration (FAA). DOT.

SUI'rIM A.RY~We propose 10 adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the produclS

ERJ \70 and ERJ '90 Airplanes

Airworthinas Directives; Empresa Brasileira de AetUI1aulica S.A. (EMBRAER) Modd

RJN 11lO-AA64

/3/0

lDvc:kd No. FAA-l.IG- ••••.••·; Dlncton,le IdItIlIliRu lOIG-NM47-AD]

14 eFR hrt39

DEPA.RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OI,mVllINI

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89)

100\'1.\5 ""un

".

~5.'S1VI.uN

"OfH'AS ~NL,LIlOli

"LV

",,,-stv,,,~

100,,-" ""un

S3J,~.~~n~NO

\IlV

OISr;-rvU'N

~="

]~V

D1'''S1VI.IINI

'100"",, ""'U'IOll

".

D1'""VIJ.IN

'O""A' ~NLJJ\O~

~~V

~V'jl~

10'"~A'm<'''''''

\I.I.V

O,,,slVU' ••

"lO""'A, ""WIG

a.l\'o