alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

s0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

137028 & (101)(102)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137028 COA: 271164 Oakland CC: 2004-194664-FH CRAIG GORDON BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 22, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for remand and to lift stay are DENIED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
SAMEH MOHAMMED S. OSMAN a/k/a

SAMEH OSMAN, Appellant,

v. WHITBURN LLC and NEWPORT

PROPERTIES, INC., Appellees.
No. 2D23-1977
February 16, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the County Court for Pasco County; Kent Compton, Judge. Jan T. Govan of Govan Law Group, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellant. Erik De L'Etoile of De L'Etoile Law Firm, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Whitburn LLC. Matthew D. Wolf of Ivanov & Wolf, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellee Newport Properties, Inc. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Edward L. WEBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 6, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of SiRF Technology Holdings, Inc., on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Michael L. Canning, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Geoffrey Ribar, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of SiRF Technology
Holdings, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 27, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    MICHAEL L.
CANNING                                       
|                        |  |  |  | Michael L. Canning President and Chief Executive Officer        
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 27, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    GEOFFREY
RIBAR                                           
|                        |  |  |  | Geoffrey Ribar Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

IN RE:

CHANCE & ANTHEM, LLC, CASE NO. 18-16248-MAM

Chapter 7

Debtor.

___________________________________/

ROBERT C. FURR, not individually but as

Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of the Debtors,

Plaintiff,

v. ADV. NO. 22-01032-MAM

GEORGE MALER and JERI MALER,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on February 25, 2022.

Case 22-01032-MAM Doc 7 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 2
THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration of the Agreed Motion to Extend 

Time to Respond to Complaint [ECF # 6]filed by George Maler and Jeri Maler. The Court, having 

considered the motion and being fully advised of its premises, grants the motion. Accordingly, it 

is

ORDERED that the Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint is granted. 

George and Jeri Maler shall have until March 22, 2022 to respond to the complaint.

###

Submitted by:

BRIAN K. MCMAHON, P.A.

1401 Forum Way, 6th Floor

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Tel (561)478-2500

Fax (561)478-3111

briankmcmahon@gmail.com

Attorney McMahon shall provide a copy of this order to all interested parties and file a certificate 

of service. 

Case 22-01032-MAM Doc 7 Filed 02/25/22 Page 2 of 2
Rodolfo SIMPSON, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PALMS OF BEACH PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOC, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0012

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
# C_2020295EN.01000401.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2020/C 295/04)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 18.8.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 18.8.2020–31.12.2020 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/1N2AB. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | --- |
| Reference number | 11/TQ123 |

Date and time of closure

18.8.2020

Duration

18.8.2020–31.12.2020

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/1N2AB.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Zone

Norwegian waters of 1 and 2

Type(s) of fishing vessels

---

Reference number

11/TQ123

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Dynamic Response Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Melissa K. Rice, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Dynamic Response Group, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dynamic Response Group, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 20, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Melissa K. Rice                                        
|                      |  |  |  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
### MDE MARYLAND**DEPARTM~,._.J** OF THE ENVIRONMENT AIR AND RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

Name (please print) 

# NL

-



### .,

,. PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 

### Lead (Pb)**Infr~structure** 

### SIP December 5, 2012 Signature



# I 

# Oil! Organization or Affiliation Address 

### Do You Wish To Testify? 

### How did you find out about this hearing? 

# E-. 

# Az**£/\J()~** 

# 7 l
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(194)
              - products_data(114)
              - products_maps(6)
              - products_publications(708)
              - products_software(2)
              - products_web_tools(5)
              - multimedia_audio(11)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(5)
              - multimedia_image(98)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(79)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(14)
              - multimedia_slideshow(16)
              - multimedia_video(38)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(15)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(6)
              - documents_file-149220(6)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(11)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(25)
              - news_other_news(17)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(12)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - (-)other_basic-42(13)

## By Location

              - maryland(1)

## By Year

General        September 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Accomplishments for 2008

General        September 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Watershed Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2014

General        September 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Watershed Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2016

General        September 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Watershed Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2018

General        September 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Watershed Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2017

General        September 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Watershed Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2015

General        September 26, 2022        Chesapeake Bay Maps

General        July 15, 2020        Technical Support for Assesment for the of The Chesapeake Bay and The Chesapeake Bay Watershed

General        July 20, 2020        Chesapeake Bay Program - Water Quality and Quantity

General        January 20, 2021        USGS Chesapeake Bay Highlights for FY2020

General        November 30, 2018        Quantifying and explaining patterns in nutrient and sediment export from urban streams within the Chesapeake Bay watershed

General        February 16, 2022        Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership Tools Developed in Cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey

General        December 10, 2021        USGS Chesapeake Accomplishments for 2021
John NORFLEET, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0620

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2018

John Norfleet, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Ray, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
J~~~ ED STqT

~

S 

w 

p ~ ~ o Q 

0 

+TqC PROZ~G~ 2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JUL 2 2 2013 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

On May 30, 2013 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of the Mobile In Situ Object Counting System 

(ISOCS) Large Container Counter (MILCC) unit. This is a non-destructive assay (NDA) system for 

quantifying radiological contents of contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) waste containers used by 

the Central Characterization Program (CCP) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). With this 

letter, EPA approves the MILCC to be used to characterize waste at LANL-CCP subject to the 

limitations of its calibration and our report. 

In the LANL-CCP baseline inspection report (Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-88), EPA identified the 

addition of a new NDA system as a Tier I change, which requires EPA approval prior to 

implementation. According to the requirements of 40 CFR 194.8 (b), DOE requested approval of the 

MILCC for CH TRU waste as a Tier 1 change to the LANL-CCP CH baseline approval. 

EPA conducted an on-site evaluation of the LANL-CCP MILCC on June 4-5, 2013. EPA's inspection of 

the MILCC included an examination of the procedures, a review of the calibration records, a 

demonstration of the MILCC, replicate measurements run at EPA's request, and an examination of 

Batch Data Reports generated by the MILCC. EPA's inspection report (Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-176) 

for the MILCC is enclosed and will be placed in the Agency's public docket. 

EPA has determined that the MILCC used by LANL-CCP is adequate for the characterization of CH 

TRU waste in 55-gallon drums, standard waste boxes and corrugated metal boxes at LANL-CCP. This 

approval made one minor change to the Tier 2 requirements for LANL-CCP, specifically for the MILCC 

system which is in bold in Table 1 of the enclosed report. Changes to the approved components of the 

MILCC system at LANL-CCP must follow the tiering requirements described in the updated tiering 

table contained in this report. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422 or 

Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

'-, ~"~ p IA,.,- 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

cc: Electronic Distribution 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ EM 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Tom Morgan, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO 

Ed Gulbransen, CCP 

Trais Kliphius, NMED 

Jon Edwards, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA HQ 

Site Documents
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5522 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require that 

civil investigative demands be appealed to courts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2016 

Mr. PEARCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to require that civil investigative demands be appealed 

to courts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMANDS TO BE AP4 PEALED TO COURTS. 

5 Section 1052 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

6 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5562) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)— 

8 (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting after 

9 ‘‘shall state’’ the following: ‘‘with specificity’’; 

10 and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5522 IH

1 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(14) MEETING REQUIREMENT.—The recipient 

3 of a civil investigative demand shall meet and confer 

4 with a Bureau investigator within 30 calendar days 

5 after receipt of the demand to discuss and attempt 

6 to resolve all issues regarding compliance with the 

7 civil investigative demand, unless the Bureau grants 

8 an extension requested by such recipient.’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (f)— 

10 (A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as 

11 follows: 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days 

13 after the service of any civil investigative demand 

14 upon any person under subsection (c), or at any 

15 time before the return date specified in the demand, 

16 whichever period is shorter, or within such period ex17 ceeding 45 days after service or in excess of such re18 turn date as may be prescribed in writing, subse19 quent to service, by any Bureau investigator named 

20 in the demand, such person may file, in the district 

21 court of the United States for any judicial district 

22 in which such person resides, is found, or transacts 

23 business, a petition for an order modifying or setting 

24 aside the demand.’’; and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5522 IH

1 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘at the 

2 Bureau’’; and 

3 (3) in subsection (h)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—’’ ; and 

5 (B) by striking paragraph (2). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Steven OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1457

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28656]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4829-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

South Carolina; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4829-DR), dated September 29, 
2024, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 21, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of South Carolina is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 29, 2024.

    Kershaw County for Public Assistance, including direct Federal 
assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).
    Lancaster County for Public Assistance, including direct Federal 
assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-28656 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-11177

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE RUELAS-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-101-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Ruelas-Martinez appeals the 66-month, below-guidelines prison 

term imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegally reentering the 

United States after removal. Raising one issue, Ruelas-Martinez argues that 

his indictment did not allege a conviction occurring before his removal and 

that, for this reason, his prison term, imposed under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), was in 

excess of the statutory maximum permitted under § 1326(a) and violated his 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 12, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-11177 Document: 00514638970 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2018
No. 17-11177

2

due process rights. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for 

summary affirmance and, alternatively, seeks an extension of time to file its 

brief.

As the Government argues and as Ruelas-Martinez concedes, the only 

issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 

U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 

2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). 

Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s 

alternative motion for an extension of time to file its brief is DENIED.

 Case: 17-11177 Document: 00514638970 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/12/2018
John T. EARLY, III, et al. Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 08, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.