alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5546 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5546

 To preempt State laws preventing a major city from regulating firearm-
  related conduct in the city that occurs in or affects interstate or 
                           foreign commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2016

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To preempt State laws preventing a major city from regulating firearm-
  related conduct in the city that occurs in or affects interstate or 
                           foreign commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREEMPTION OF STATE LAWS PREVENTING A MAJOR CITY FROM 
              REGULATING FIREARMS-RELATED CONDUCT IN THE CITY THAT 
              OCCURS IN OR AFFECTS INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE.

    (a) In General.--If a law or rule of a major city, pertaining to 
conduct in the city that is in relation to firearms and that occurs in 
or affects interstate or foreign commerce, conflicts with the 
constitution, or a law or regulation, of the State in which the city is 
located, the former shall control.
    (b) Definitions.--In subsection (a):
            (1) Firearm.--The term ``firearm'' has the meaning given in 
        section 921(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code.
            (2) Major city.--The term ``major city'' means a city that 
        has a population of at least 500,000 inhabitants, as determined 
        by the most recent decennial population census conducted by the 
        Bureau of the Census.
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the 50 States, the 
        District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin 
        Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American 
        Samoa.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Melvin MIGUEL

NO. 2018-KK-0711

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 538-436, Division F; Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2018-K-0233.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit-"It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
August 31, 2016

Mr. Ryan P. Marlow
Alaska Aerial Media 7960 Upper OMalley Road Anchorage, AL 99507

Re: FAA-2015-0173

Dear Mr. Marlow:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and
have determined that we will con tinue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov , we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (T ier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federa l Register for public comments, if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final deci sion on your petition as s oon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
Darrin ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1317

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Manuel WALTERS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0717

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Robert James INTERIAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2329

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 12, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00872

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C. M. S, A CHILD,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- PA

- 01181 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On February 7 , 201 9 , appellant’s appointed counsel filed a n amended Anders brief. Appointed counsel attached a certificate of counsel to his brief, stating he provided a copy of his

brief and “a letter advising [P.G.B.] of her right to examine the entire appellate record for the purpose of filing a pro se brief.” However, t h e statement provided by appointed counsel does not constitute proof to this court that he supplied appellant with a form motion to allow appellant pro se access to the appellate record.

In Kelly v. State , the C ourt of C riminal A ppeals specifically stated that in Anders cases, in addition to appointed counsel’s other duties, counsel must provide appellant with a form motio n for purposes of requesting the record and inform appellant that “in order to effectuate his right to review the appellate record pro se, should he choose to invoke it, he must sign and date the motion and send it on to the court of appeals within ten day s of the date of the letter from appellate counsel.” 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Moreover, c ounsel must “notify the court of appeals, in writing ” that he has supplied the appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record and the court’s mailing address. Id.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant’s appointed counsel to file in this court on or before

Fe bruary 19, 2019 , proof that : (1) he has supplied appellant wit h a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record ; (2) advised appellant of this court’s mailing address ; and (3) advised appellant that should s he desire access to the record for purposes of filing a pro se brief,

s he must sign, date, and send the motion for access to the record to this court within ten days of

the date of her letter.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Jus ticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTL E

, Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 20776 and # 20777; NEW YORK Disaster Number NY-20019]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative Rural disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of New York dated  November 25, 2024. *Incident:*
                         Remnants of Tropical Storm Debby.
 DATES: Issued on November 25, 2024. *Incident Period:*
                         August 8, 2024 through August 10, 2024. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         January 24, 2025. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         August 25, 2025.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area, applications for disaster loans may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Franklin, St. Lawrence. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.625Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.813Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250*For Economic Injury:*Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 207768 and for economic injury is 207770. The States which received an EIDL Declaration are New York. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2024-28240 Filed 12-2-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5591 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

810 N US Highway 83 in Zapata, Texas, as the ‘‘Zapata Veterans 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2016 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 810 N US Highway 83 in Zapata, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Zapata Veterans Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZAPATA VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 810 N US Highway 83 in Za6 pata, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Za7 pata Veterans Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5591 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Zapata Veterans Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Carlos E. CORTINA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Linda ROTH, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-1474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
T.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2 Resignation Letter of Conrad Huss



Exhibit 10.2

 

To the Board of Directors of Harrison Vickers & Waterman, Inc.: 

 

 

Please be advised that, effective immediately, I hereby resign from all my positions as an Officer and Director of Harrison Vickers & Waterman, Inc., a Nevada corporation. 

 

This Resignation may be executed and delivered by electronic signature and delivery. 

 

Very truly yours,

 

/s/ Conrad Huss

Conrad Huss 

 

August 14, 2017
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officerand Interim Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Interim Chief Financial Officer of VIA NET.WORKS, Inc.(the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the datehereof:

 

(a) the Form 10-Q of theCompany for the period ended September 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b) the information containedin the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Rhett S.  Williams           |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Rhett S.  Williams               |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer         |
|   | November 10,  2003               |
|   |                             |
|   | /s/ Matthew  W. Gough            |   |
|   | Matthew W.  Gough                |
|   | Interim  Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 10,  2003               |
|        |                                  |        |  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Carole R. Wright, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |                 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------
|/s/ Carole R. Wright
|Name:                |  | Carole R. Wright
|Date:                |  | August 8, 2005  



Page 36 of 36
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas Schaedler, the Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ Douglas Schaedler
|Name:                 |  | Douglas Schaedler
|Date:                 |  | May 7, 2009
Carlos BAUTISTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-944

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John Calvin FRITZ, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. James Louis FRITZ, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2023(1)

Center News        June 21, 2022        Past and Future Celebrations of Carolyn Shoemaker's Life and Legacy

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.
## Caddi s Insuranc eServices , LL C Arbitrario n an d Consulrin g Service s Februar y7 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e SE Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 

# Ui lfr e' 3 

# P 5 b

RE : Su n Countr ySlo t Exemption , Docke tNumbe rFAA-2012-008 9

Thi s lette ri s bein g writte n i n suppor to fSu n Countr yAirlines ' reques t fo ra n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limi t fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA) . Th e propose d slot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 tha t wer e awarde d t o Su n Country , fo rservic e fro m Minneapoli s (MSP ) an d Lansing , Michiga n (LAN ) t o DCA . Du e t o a Januar y6 , 201 2 U S Cour to fAppeal s ruling , th e DO Torde rwa s vacate d an d Su n Countr ywil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airpor t an d DCA . Su n Country' s reques t i s fo ron e dail yslo t durin g eac h o fth e 100 0 an d 110 0 hours . Thi s woul d enabl e Su n Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s presen tservice s an d avoi d th e injuriou s resul t o fth e Cour t o fAppeal' s order . I a m th e retire d CE O o fMichiga n Miller s Mutua l Insuranc e Compan yan d presentl yru n a smal l busines s i n th e Lansing , Michiga n area . I hav e bee n ver yactiv e i n ou rcommunity , servin g o fnumerou s civi can d charitabl e boards . I ca n readil yattes ttha tth e negativ e Impac t o fth e Court' s rulin g wil l b e significant . Th e communit ywelcome d thi s servic e fro m Michigan' s capita l cit yt o th e nation' s capita l afte ryear s o f effort s t o fin d direc tservic e withou tsuccess . Th e en d resul t wa s significan t utilizatio n o fthi s servic e b y th e region . Thi s i s th e onl ydirec tservic e t o Washingto n D C i n ou rstat e outsid e o fDetroit . Thi s servic e i s essentia l t o th e continue d economi cgrowt h o fth e Greate rLansin g Regio n an d i t i s crucia l -tha t th e FA

Atak e th e step s neede d t o allow.continue d service...I.urg e y_gyx.imniediat e approva l ofjhi s exemptio n request . Sincerely , 

# ^At^^^-^^m^^i^c^ ^ Richar d A . Rasmusse n

Richar d A . Raimusscn , CPCU , AR c ARIAS-U S Certifie d Arl.irnm r 152 WClu b Cours e Df . Bath , M l 'iSSn S I'hone : 5)7-282-771 1 Email : rr.isimissen06@v.ihno.c<">i n
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
TriMedia Entertainment Group, Inc. (the "Company") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christopher Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


January 28, 2008,                   By:  /s/Christopher Schwartz
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Christopher Schwartz
                                         Co-Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Co-Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Leah SIMMS, Terri Leigh Jones, Tonya Sue Chavis, and Leslie Anderson-Adams, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION and Jonathan Zachem, Secretary, in his official capacity, and Department of Management Services, and DMS Secretary, Erin Rock, in her official capacity, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3974

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
LIMBACH FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; Harper Limbach, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; Gregory Andriotis, individually, and as employee of Limbach Facility Services, LLC, and Harper Limbach, LLC, Petitioners, v. Jordan M. SCHERER, individually; Brooke N. Scherer, individually; Jordan M. Scherer, as parent and legal guardian of Mallory H. Scherer, individually, a minor; and Jordan M. Scherer, as personal representative of the Estate of Logan A. Scherer, a deceased minor, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-1087

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Bryan P. DIXON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4618

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.