alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF MAINE 

0FFJCE OF THE GovERNOR 

1 STATE HOUSE STATION 

AUGUSTA, MAIN"E 

04333-0001 

Paul R. LePage 

GOVERNOR 

July 1, 2013 

Bob Perciasepe, Acting Administrator 

USEPA Headquarters 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 1101A 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: 	 State Concurrence with listing the Keddy Mill Site in Windham, Maine, on the National Priorities 

List 

Dear Mr. Perciasepe: 

Due to the scope of contamination and potential clean-up cost at the former Keddy Mill Site in 

Windham, Maine, the State of Maine concurs with EPA's proposed listing of this Site on the 

National Priorities List, provided EPA continues to exclude from the site that is listed the adjacent 

parcel owned by the SD Warren Company, d.b.a SAPPI Fine Paper. This listing will provide 

needed federal resources under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and 

Liability Act of 1980 (aka Superfund Program) to investigate and remediate threats to local citizens 

from the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heavy metals and other hazardous substances at the 

site. We trust that you will continue to work closely with area businesses and residents, the Maine 

DEP, and other interested parties to develop cost-effective approaches to these efforts. 

If you have further questions, please contact Patricia Aha, Commissioner at the Department of 

Environmental Protection at 207-287-2812. 

Sincerely 

?o.-A.a. L~ Paul R. LePage 


Governor 


CC: 	 Patricia W. Aha, Commissioner, Maine DEP 


Curt Spalding, EPA Region 1Administrator 


Melanie Loyzim, BRWM Director, Maine DEP 


PHONE, (207) 2117·3';31 fV<>ice) TTY USERS CALL 711 	 FAX, (207) 2R7·1034 

"'" ''. maine.go'
CTRL-a to begin

ESC to stop

6.72

6.72

6.74

6.74

6.73

6.72

6.72

6.72

6.74

6.74

6.73 V

116°F

Continuous temperature and flow display
6.11

6.13

6.15

6.14

6.14

6.13

6.12

6.14

6.14

6.13

6.13 V

38.3 ft/s

s temperature and flow display
Massena West Pretest 

Anemometer Data

4/24/13

47.91142346 Vd Desired velocity in Duct in Method 14 room (ft/sec)

1.416666667 Dn Diameter of a roof monitor nozzle (ft)

1.229 Dd Diameter of a duct at sampling location (ft)

4.508533333 Vm Average velocity of the air stream in roof vents for 36hr period before test (ft/sec)

3.074 Vm Average velocity of the air stream in roof vents for 36 hr period before test (mph)

* To use, enter the new average Vm from anemometers 

Date: 4-24-13 TF MW and the spreadsheet automatically recalculates a new 

A = 0.29 desired duct velocity.

B = 0.22

Preliminary adjustment of velocity

delta P across entire traverse AVG = 0.601

Ts = 540 R

Vs = KpCp(sqrt delta P avg) X sqrt (Ts/Ps X Ms) Ps = 29.75 + 0.22 = 29.97

Ms = 28.84

Vs = (85.49)(0.84)(sqrt 0.601) X sqrt (540 / (29.97)(28.84)) Kp = 85.49

Cp = 0.84

Vs = 46.9 ft/sec
Arthur Lee AVERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
James Bernard KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3515

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
K. M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2438

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020254DE.01002801.xml

| 3.8.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 254/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 254/28

---

Berichtigung der Mitteilung der Kommission — Änderung des Befristeten Rahmens für staatliche Beihilfen zur Stützung der Wirtschaft angesichts des derzeitigen Ausbruchs von COVID-19

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C164 vom 13. Mai 2020
  )

(2020/C 254/10)

Seite 13, Randnummer 37 zur Einfügung von Abschnitt 3.11 in den Befristeten Rahmen C(2020) 1863, Abschnitt 3.11.6. Randnummer 75 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Unter außergewöhnlichen Umständen und unbeschadet der Fusionskontrolle dürfen solche Beihilfeempfänger eine Beteiligung von mehr als 10 % an vor- oder nachgelagerten Unternehmen in ihrem Geschäftsfeld erwerben — jedoch nur dann, wenn die Übernahme erforderlich ist, um die Rentabilität des Empfängers oder des Zielunternehmens zu erhalten, und sofern kein anderer Käufer zur Verfügung steht.“

muss es heißen:

„Unter außergewöhnlichen Umständen und unbeschadet der Fusionskontrolle dürfen solche Beihilfeempfänger eine Beteiligung von mehr als 10 % an vor- oder nachgelagerten Unternehmen in ihrem Geschäftsfeld erwerben — jedoch nur dann, wenn der Beteiligungserwerb erforderlich ist, damit der Beihilfeempfänger rentabel bleibt.“

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DEBRA ABRAM, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 278 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
# C_2020148EN.01000401.xml

| 5.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9793 – Permira/Sneakers Maker) –

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 148/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Permira Holdings Limited (‘Permira’, Channel Islands), |
| --- | --- |

—

Permira Holdings Limited (‘Permira’, Channel Islands),

| — | Sneakers Maker SpA (‘Sneakers Maker’, Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

Sneakers Maker SpA (‘Sneakers Maker’, Italy).

Permira will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of Sneakers Maker.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Permira: is a private equity business engaged in the provision of investment management services to a number of investment funds. Permira controls a number of portfolio companies active in a variety of sectors, including in footwear and apparel such as Dr Martens and Reformation, |
| --- | --- |

—

Permira: is a private equity business engaged in the provision of investment management services to a number of investment funds. Permira controls a number of portfolio companies active in a variety of sectors, including in footwear and apparel such as Dr Martens and Reformation,

| — | Sneakers Maker: is a holding company that owns the entire share capital of Golden Goose S.p.A., a manufacturer and supplier of luxury footwear and apparel. |
| --- | --- |

—

Sneakers Maker: is a holding company that owns the entire share capital of Golden Goose S.p.A., a manufacturer and supplier of luxury footwear and apparel.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9793 – Permira/Sneakers Maker

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Tommy Watkins HAYDEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5048

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of South DakotaSoybean Processors, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, Rodney G. Christianson andMark Hyde, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) andController (Principal Accounting Officer), respectively, of the Company,certify, individually and not jointly pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of December 31, 2006 (the last date of the periodcovered by the Report).

Dated: April 2, 2007
|        | By     | /s/ Rodney Christianson                  |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Rodney G. Christianson                   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                  |
|   |   |                                     |
|   | By     | /s/ Mark Hyde                            |
|   |   | Mark Hyde                                |
|   |   | Controller, Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(53)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(6)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - (-)nevada(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

Photography  Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7211

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KARL E. MOORE, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:02-cr-00217-RAJ-JEB-1; 2:07-cv-00463-RAJ)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 16, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karl E. Moore, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Karl E. Moore, Sr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Darius BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-920

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Patrick Napolean HIGH

NO. 2018-OK-1131

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Cedrick Centell JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2806

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(13)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(2)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(9)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(30)
              - colorado(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - district of columbia(2)
              - florida(5)
              - hawaii(18)
              - idaho(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - massachusetts(2)
              - mississippi(4)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(3)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - (-)puerto rico(3)
              - south carolina(1)
              - south dakota(14)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(5)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        August 30, 2021        Reducing Flood Risks by Restoring Coral Reefs

Presentations and Events        November 12, 2020        Climate Adaptation to Support Amphibian Conservation in U.S. Caribbean

Featured Films and Shorts        August 30, 2021        Reducing Flood Risks by Restoring Coral Reefs (AD)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5801 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to include 

a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2014 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself and Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100 word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account5 ability Through Transparency Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100 WORD SUMMARY TO 

7 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

8 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5801 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and in2 serting ‘‘;’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(4) the internet address of a summary of not 

8 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

9 in plain language, that shall be posted on the inter10 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern11 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

12 known as regulations.gov);’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 589 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 589

To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to prevent the sale of bone 
        marrow and umbilical cord blood, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2013

   Mr. Young of Florida (for himself and Ms. Matsui) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to prevent the sale of bone 
        marrow and umbilical cord blood, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ORGAN TRANSPLANT ACT TO PREVENT 
              THE SALE OF BONE MARROW AND UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD.

    Paragraph 1 of section 301(c) of the National Organ Transplant Act 
(42 U.S.C. 274e(c)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(as defined in section 379A-1 of the 
        Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 274l-1))'' after ``bone 
        marrow''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, a cord blood unit (as defined in 
        section 2(g) of the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 
        2005 (42 U.S.C. 274k note)),'' after ``skin or any subpart 
        therof''.
                                 <all>
```
****
 ****
 **CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
 
 I,Marlen
      L. Roepke,
      certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of *Austin
Chalk Oil & Gas, Inc.* .;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and
 
 c)
      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)
      all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated:
May 15, 2005  by
 
 
 
 /s/
Marlen L. Roepke
 Marlen L.
Roepke
 Secretary/Director
Jason CAISSIE v. STATE of Mississippi

2016CT-00973-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: August 2, 2018 Closed: October 11, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 05, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 05, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0336. FREDDY ALMONTE A/K/A FREDDIE ALMONTEL v. 1865 MILFIELD CIR LLC. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 21A09606
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - (-)nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

publication        January 1, 1980        Planning and design of studies for river-quality assessment in the Truckee and Carson River basins, California and Nevada

How to's and trainings        June 30, 2019        Surveying Indirect Measurements with GNSS