alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - products_publications(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(15)
              - arizona(1)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(19)
              - colorado(2)
              - florida(10)
              - (-)georgia(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maryland(1)
              - missouri(3)
              - montana(2)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(9)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - virginia(1)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

publication        November 1, 2023        National- to continental-scale governmental geophysical efforts for critical mineral mapping, USA

Featured Films and Shorts        October 11, 2019        Earth as Art 6
Stephen E. WESLEY and Kathy Gunn Wesley v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC.

NO. 2018-CC-1226

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 29, 2018

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 106,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,334
<INVENTORY>                                   136,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              257,338
<PP&E>                                        352,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                179,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,170,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         237,364
<BONDS>                                       648,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    231,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,170,102
<SALES>                                       886,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              886,014
<CGS>                                         653,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 653,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             38,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                29,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (2,083)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.39


</TABLE>
Ronald HERNDON v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS

NO. 2017-CI-1185

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing *1301that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Frank P. ROSSOTTO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOC., as Trustee, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3664

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
wstc-ex101_293.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE

TO THE

WEST CORPORATION NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

WHEREAS, West Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), maintains the West Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of March 27, 2013 and amended by Amendment Number One dated as of April 24, 2013, Amendment Number Two dated as of January 29, 2014, Amendment Number Three dated as of July 30, 2014 and Amendment Number Four dated as of January 26, 2017 (the “Plan”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VIII of the Plan, the Company has the authority to amend the Plan;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) among Mount Olympus Holdings, Inc., Olympus Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company dated as of May 9, 2017, the Company has agreed to change the notional investment alternatives for Participants (as defined in the Plan) with respect to Employer Matching Contributions (as defined in the Plan); and

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee, as Plan Administrator, has authorized an amendment of the Plan to memorialize the changes mandated by the Merger Agreement and approved by the Board of Directors effective May 9, 2017.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of May 9, 2017, as follows:

1.The second sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

“All Employer Matching Contributions shall be designated to be invested in Common Stock and shall remain hypothetically invested in Common Stock; provided, however, that all Employer Matching Contributions made on or after May 9, 2017 shall be made in notional cash, unless and until such amounts are notionally invested in percentages as may be elected by the Participant, in hypothetical investment options, the value of which shall track one or more Measurement Funds.”

***

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent effective as of June 22, 2017. 

 


	
 
	
WEST CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Jan D. Madsen

	
 
	
Name:
	
 
	
Jan D. Madsen

	
 
	
Title:
	
 
	
Chief Financial Officer




 

2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6691

GEORGE CLEVELAND, III , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 8:17

- cv
- 02922

- RBH )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4 , 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
George Cleveland, III , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Cleveland, III, appeals the distri ct court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend a prior order dismissing Cleveland’s notice of removal of his state court proceeding . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. Cleveland v. South Carolina , No. 8:17

- cv
- 02922

- RBH (D.S.C. May 7, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PATRICIA S. BOBROWSKI

VERSUS

JOSEPH R. BOBROWSKI

NO. 2023 CW 0596

July 21, 2023

In Re: Patricia S. Schiltz ( Bobrowski), applying for

supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, 

Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2019- 12635. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, Ji. 

WRIT DENIED. 

a

Penzato, J., concurs and would decline to exercise

supervisory jurisdiction. The criteria set forth in Herlitz

Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 

396 So. 2d 878 ( La. 1981) ( per curiam) are not met. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

3 tad-yo

D PUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
STATE of Louisiana v. Brandon BELL-BRAYBOZ

NO. 2018-KH-1010

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that petitioner sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R- X § 5(b).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 23, 2021

No. 04-21-00288-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C. G., ET AL.

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-00062

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights 

which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal 

is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The clerk’s record was due July 22, 2021, but was not 

filed. On July 23, 2021, the district clerk filed a notification of late record, requesting an 

extension until July 30, 2021 to file the record. After consideration, we GRANT the 

district clerk’s request for an extension of time and ORDER the district clerk to file the 

clerk’s record in this court by July 30, 2021. The district clerk is reminded that strict 

deadlines exist with regard to disposal of appeals dealing with termination of parental 

rights. Further extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
March 23 , 2015

Mr. Toby Barnett

Barnett Associates Real Estate Team

1027 State Ave, Suite 102

Marysville, WA 98270

Dear Mr. Barnett :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 15 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of Barnett Associates Real

Estate Team into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0102 ) , but we are unable to process your

request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed ). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of

the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the publi c interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Katherine DECKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-3493.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1981.

John P. McAdams, Peter W. Zinober, Tampa, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Stephen F. Hanlon, Levine, Freedman, Hirsch & Levinson, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Frank E. Hamilton, III, Hamilton & Douglas, Tampa, Fla., amicus curiae for Judith A. Petersen.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 17, 1980, 5 Cir., 1981, 632 F.2d 1221).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCH-ETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
# C_2020400EN.01000701.xml

| 24.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/7

---

Special Report 24/2020

‘The Commission’s EU merger control and antitrust proceedings: a need to scale up market oversight’

(2020/C 400/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 24/2020 ‘The Commission’s EU merger control and antitrust proceedings: a need to scale up market oversight’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
**(ii)
        Exhibit 32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**1)** **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SearchHelp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Bozsnyak,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


(b)
              Date: April 10, 2007
            
            /s/
              William BozsnyakWilliam
              BozsnyakChief Executive Officer




The
      foregoing certification accompanied the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filing
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information
      only. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof, regardless
      of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of
      this
      written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
      and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha IV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

February 18, 2005
GREENFIELD ADVISORS, LLC v. Camilo K. SALAS III and Salas & Co., L.C.

NO. 2018-CC-0990

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., recused.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(37)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(6)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - (-)louisiana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

Photography        May 1, 2017        High stakes, big questions in marsh grass die-back
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28679]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4834-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4834-DR), dated October 11, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 4, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of October 11, 2024.

    Palm Beach County for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris 
removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], 
including direct federal assistance under the Public Assistance 
program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-28679 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Afor the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,Rodney G. Christianson and James A. Seurer, the Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal AccountingOfficer), respectively, of the Company, certify, individually and not jointlypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31,2005 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).

 

Dated: May 30, 2006

 
|   | By     | /s/ Rodney  Christianson |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Rodney G. Christianson        |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |   |                          |
|   |   |                          |
|   | By     | /s/ James Seurer         |   |
|   |   | James A. Seurer               |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
# C_2020347EN.01001301.xml

| 19.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/13

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10003 — DWS/Vertex Bioenergy)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 347/11)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | DWS Alternatives Global Limited (‘DWS’, United Kingdom), ultimately controlled by Deutsche Bank AG (‘DB’, Germany), |
| --- | --- |

—

DWS Alternatives Global Limited (‘DWS’, United Kingdom), ultimately controlled by Deutsche Bank AG (‘DB’, Germany),

| — | Vertex Bioenergy, S.L. (‘Vertex’, Spain), ultimately controlled by Trilantic Capital Partners (‘Trilantic’, the US). |
| --- | --- |

—

Vertex Bioenergy, S.L. (‘Vertex’, Spain), ultimately controlled by Trilantic Capital Partners (‘Trilantic’, the US).

DWS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Vertex. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for DWS: an asset management company with a wide investment portfolio, which includes investments in infrastructure assets in Europe, |
| --- | --- |

—

for DWS: an asset management company with a wide investment portfolio, which includes investments in infrastructure assets in Europe,

| — | for Vertex: a producer of bioethanol with facilities in Spain and France. In connection with its bioethanol production, Vertex also produces dried distillers grains with solubles (or DDGS), carbon dioxide, corn oil, and electricity. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Vertex: a producer of bioethanol with facilities in Spain and France. In connection with its bioethanol production, Vertex also produces dried distillers grains with solubles (or DDGS), carbon dioxide, corn oil, and electricity.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10003 — DWS/Vertex Bioenergy

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---