alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1)    |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|  /s/                                         |                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |                                                   |
| Name:                                   | Walter Merschat                                   |
| Title:                                  | President and Chairman of the              Board  |
|                                              | (Principal                Executive Officer)           |
|                          |                                                   |
| /s/                                               |                                                   |
|                                              |                                                   |
| Name:                                   | Joseph J. McQuade                                 |
| Title:                             | Chief Financial Officer                           |
|                                              | (Principal                Financial Officer       |
|                                              | and                Principal Accounting Officer)  |

----
# C_2020309EN.01000701.xml

| 18.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/7

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9951 – PSPIB/Tishman Speyer/Espace Lumière)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 309/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Tishman Speyer Crown Equities 2007 L.L.C. (‘Tishman Speyer’, USA), |
| --- | --- |

—

Tishman Speyer Crown Equities 2007 L.L.C. (‘Tishman Speyer’, USA),

| — | Public Sector Pension Investment Board (‘PSPIB’, Canada), |
| --- | --- |

—

Public Sector Pension Investment Board (‘PSPIB’, Canada),

| — | SCI Espace Lumière (‘Target’, France). |
| --- | --- |

—

SCI Espace Lumière (‘Target’, France).

Tishman Speyer and PSPIB acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of the Target.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Tishman Speyer: ownership, development, fund management and operating of commercial and residential real estate in the United States, Europe, Latin America and Asia, |
| --- | --- |

—

for Tishman Speyer: ownership, development, fund management and operating of commercial and residential real estate in the United States, Europe, Latin America and Asia,

| — | for PSPIB: management of a diversified global portfolio including stocks and bonds, and investment of net contributions to pension funds under its management in private equity, real estate, infrastructure, natural resources and private debt, |
| --- | --- |

—

for PSPIB: management of a diversified global portfolio including stocks and bonds, and investment of net contributions to pension funds under its management in private equity, real estate, infrastructure, natural resources and private debt,

| — | for Target: ownership of a commercial real estate property, Espace Lumière, located in Paris, France. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Target: ownership of a commercial real estate property, Espace Lumière, located in Paris, France.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9951 – PSPIB/Tishman Speyer/Espace Lumiere

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
## 1

OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS &JSTlN GROVER SELLERS . ATTORNEY GENERAL .

Hon.Jean Dey County Attorney Henderson County Athens, Tex8.s Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-7237 Re: Whether school write insurance late& matter
quest as follows:

“I will information. "First:

f the"school-Board ndependent School r.a Junior College

itations c basis of departmental opinions

that it is contrary to public r'ustee to vrite Insurance as an insurance the school district end consequently e lawfully expended for such purposes. vish to be understood as holding that a 3.3not recover on such a policy of insurance in case of a loss, If it vere Illegally vrltten by the trustee as agent, because in that case the Insurance ,compenywould be estopped to deny the invalidity of the acts of Its agent. We simply hold that the trustee has no right to makesuch a contract110%Jcon Day- Sogo 2 

## 135

. .

with his Board of !i$ustees snd that the Board vould not be authorize~.dto pay the premLun3on such a policy vrl.ttcn,by the trustee as agent of the Insurance company, Weencloce hcrewith our opinions Nos. o-878, 0-2758 and 6-6280 for detailed information.Article 16, Section 40, of our State constitution, reads in part aa follows;

“Noperson shall hold or exercise, at, ihe se.metime,smore than one civil office of emolument,

. . 34 Texas Jurisprudence, p. 349, referring to the above conotltut%onal provision, states:

...

“The constitution applies only to offices, of emolument. ~Emolumsnt~meansa pecuniary profit, gain or advsntage; hence the sameperson mayhold two civil offices, where no pay, compensation or pecuniary gain attaches to one of them, provided they are not incompatible.” Amemberof the Board of Trustees of an independent school. district, created under the general. laws does not receive any~co;npensation therefor. Bee Article 2775.

you do not state in your letter under what Act the independent school dlstrlct was created nor do you state mAer what Act the Junior College vns created, nor do you state vhether the trustee would receive a&ycompensation from either source. Trustees of Junior Collegea croated under Article 281rh, Section 4, receive no compensation,

The facts will In all likelihood roveal thnt the trustee will receive no compensation from either the indepgndent school district or the Junior College district. The trusteo would not’ be disqualified unless he received compensation from both of said schools as we can see no Incompatibility i
.

.Hon. Jeen DFYY- paSo 3

,

in the holain:: of both offices at the sametime. Very truly your3 ATThNEYCZNE~L OFTEXAS I Wm.J. PetiAz WJF:BT Assistant

.,'

.
# C_2020263EN.01000201.xml

| 11.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9889 – ERGO/SDHS/Taishan Property & Casualty Insurance)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 263/02)

On 31 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9889. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9889. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Travis Turell DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1840

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Gerald ARCENEAUX v. Mark Joseph TURNER, et al.

NO. 2018-C-0877

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40825 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FELIPE VALENTIN SALDANA-ALMANZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1751-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Felipe Valentin Saldana-Almanza (“Saldana”) pleaded guilty to one count of being found in the United States after deportation following conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court sentenced Saldana to 57 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. Saldana argues, for the first time on appeal, that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) areNo. 03-40825 -2- unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation and citation omitted). Saldana also argues that a conflict exists between the district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment because the written judgment contains a condition of supervised release prohibiting the possession of a dangerous weapon, but at the sentencing hearing, the court did not mention this prohibition. For the reasons set forth in United States v. Torres-Aguilar , 352 F.3d 934, 937-38 (5th Cir. 2003), weconclude that the district court’s omission of the dangerousweapon prohibition during the oral pronouncement of sentence did not create a conflict with the sentence set forth in the judgment.
AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NEAPOLEON JWAN FREEMAN, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5023

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00327-EJD, Judge Edward J. 

Damich.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R 

Neapoleon Jwan Freeman, Sr. moves for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis. 

Freeman is incarcerated. Pursuant to the Prisoner 

Litigation Reform Act of 1995, this court may not authorize the prosecution of an appeal by a prisoner without the 

prepayment of fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A prisoner is no 

longer afforded the alternative of proceeding without 

Case: 14-5023 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 04/02/2014
2 FREEMAN v. US

payment of filing fees, but must, in time, pay the $505

filing fee in its entirety. When funds exist, an initial 

partial payment must be made consisting of 20% of the 

greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account or (b) the average monthly balance in the 

prisoner’s account for the six-month period immediately 

preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(b)(1). Thereafter, the prisoner is required to make 

monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(b)(2). The agency with custody of the prisoner 

must forward payments from the prisoner’s account each 

time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the 

$505 filing fee is paid in full. Id. 

By separate letter, the custodian of Freeman’s prison 

account is being directed to make the necessary arrangements to forward the filing fee to the court.

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is denied.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-5023 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 04/02/2014
# C_2020110EN.01000101.xml

| 2.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9709 – Eni/CDP Equity/GreenIT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 110/01)

On 13 February 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9709. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9709. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Kevin L. CHRISTY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3233

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 3, 2018

Kevin L. Christy, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The "petition for writ of prohibition habeas corpus, ad prosequendum, mandamus and/or discharge" is denied on the merits. *See* Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 (providing that the period for speedy trial without demand runs from the date of arrest, and the period for speedy trial upon demand runs from the date of the indictment or information). Here, even though Petitioner was incarcerated on other charges, the arrest warrant related to this case was not executed until August 28, 2018. Thus, the speedy trial period had not begun to run as Petitioner filed the demand for and notice of expiration of speedy trial and motion to discharge before that date.

Makar, Osterhaus, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of June 5, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Ideal Power Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and R. Daniel Brdar (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have agreed to amend that certain Employment Agreement between the Company and Executive, dated January 8, 2014, as amended (the “Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined, and the parties hereto agree, that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Agreement as set forth herein in order to remove references to Executive’s former role as Chairman of the Board of the Company; and
WHEREAS, capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Company hereby agree as follows:
1.Amendment of Recitals. The first recital of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirely to read as follows: 
“WHEREAS, Company wishes to retain the services of Executive, and Executive wishes to render services to Company, as its Chief Executive;”
2.Amendment of Section 2. The last paragraph of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.
3.Approval of Amendment. By their signatures below, the Company and Executive hereby adopt this Amendment.
4.Necessary Acts. Each party to this Amendment hereby agrees to perform any further acts and to execute and deliver any further documents that may be necessary or required to carry out the intent and provisions of this Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby.
5.Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed in all respects by the internal laws of the State of Texas, without reference to principles of choice of law.
6.Continued Validity. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
7.Facsimile; Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile or other electronic means and in any number of counterparts by the parties hereto, all of which together shall constitute one instrument.
[Signature page follows]




1








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement effective as of the Effective Date.
	
						
	 
	 
	 
	R. Daniel Brdar

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Dated:
	6/5/2017
	 
	 /s/ Dan Brdar

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	IDEAL POWER INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Dated:
	6/5/2017
	 
	By:
	 /s/ Timothy Burns
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Name:
	Timothy Burns
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer








2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Colorado

Filters

              - science_education(4)
              - science_science(322)
              - products_data(639)
              - products_maps(724)
              - products_publications(6899)
              - products_software(6)
              - products_web_tools(18)
              - multimedia_audio(42)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(39)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(2)
              - multimedia_image(634)
              - multimedia_image-141769(6)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(560)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141773(7)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(21)
              - multimedia_image-141776(26)
              - multimedia_image-204460(4)
              - multimedia_image-207195(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(15)
              - multimedia_stereogram(14)
              - multimedia_video(171)
              - multimedia_video-149194(77)
              - multimedia_video-149195(29)
              - multimedia_video-149196(6)
              - multimedia_video-149197(17)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - multimedia_webcam(4)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(4)
              - documents_file(38)
              - documents_file-149204(2)
              - documents_file-149208(1)
              - documents_file-149210(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - documents_file-149216(2)
              - documents_file-149218(3)
              - (-)documents_file-149219(1)
              - documents_file-149220(23)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - news_news-149245(33)
              - news_news-149246(3)
              - news_news-149247(1)
              - news_news-149248(18)
              - news_news-149249(7)
              - news_news-149250(8)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_locations(8)
              - connect_social_media(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(211)
              - other_basic-37(9)
              - other_basic-42(51)
              - other_basic-43(1)
              - other_basic-44(1)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)

## By Year

Methods, protocols, and procedures        February 9, 2023        Energy and Minerals Research Facility Draft Environmental Assessment
# C_2020415EN.01000901.xml

| 1.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10023 — H&F/Carlyle/Vantage)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 415/02)

On 24 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10023. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10023. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---