alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 33.2**

REPORT ON ASSESSSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH SEC REGULATION AB CRITERIA

First DataResources, Inc. through its affiliate REMITCO, LLC (jointly, the “AssertingParty”) is responsible for assessing compliance for the servicing oftransactions on the remittance payment platform relating to the opening,listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxesserviced by the Asserting Party as of and for the 12 month period endingDecember 31, 2006, (the “ReportingPeriod) with the servicing criteria set forth in the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB Section229.1122(d), except for the criteria set forth in Sections229.1122(d)(l)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv),1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii) and (v)-(xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded arenot applicable to the servicing of the transactions as set forth in agreementsbetween Capital One Services, Inc., together with its affiliates, Capital OneBank and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and the Asserting Party in so far as itrelates to the opening, listing and depositing of remittance payments mailed topost office boxes serviced by the Asserting Party (the “Applicable ServicingCriteria”) for the Reporting Period.

The AssertingParty has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria by theAsserting Party for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the AssertingParty has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria for the servicing of transactions relating to the opening, listing anddepositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by theAsserting Party as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registeredpublic accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment ofcompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Periodas set forth in this assertion.
| First Data Resources, Inc. |   | REMITCO LLC      |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                       |   |             |
|                       |   |             |
| By:                        |   | /s/ David Bailis |   | By: |   | /s/ Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | David Bailis     |   |   |   | Scott Dickey |
|                       |   | President        |   |   |   | President |
|                       |   |             |   |   |   |   |
|                       |   |             |   |   |   |   |
| February 26, 2007          |   |             |   |   |

 

----
Jeremy M. CARTER, Appellant, v. MARK I. GRUMET REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 9, 2007, and Community 8 Properties, LLC, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3817

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 22, 2018]

Jeremy M. Carter, Estill, South Carolina, pro se.

Dane T. Stanish of the Law Offices of Dane Stanish, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee Mark I. Grumet Revocable Trust.

Joseph J. Huss and Joshua J. Shore of Krinzman Huss & Lubetsky, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Community 8 Properties, LLC.

Per Curiam.

Appellant appeals the trial court's order dismissing his complaint. He raises three issues on appeal, but we reverse on only one. Over the course of two years, appellant unsuccessfully tried to serve process on the defendants. Eventually, he resorted to service by publication, which the trial court quashed for being improper. The trial court then dismissed the complaint for failure to serve process despite appellant's pending motion to amend his complaint.

A trial court has no discretion to deny a plaintiff's first amendment to a complaint before a responsive pleading has been served. *Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum* , 912 So.2d 561, 568 (Fla. 2005). Rather, a party is entitled to "amend a pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served ...." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(a). Because appellant had an absolute right to amend his complaint before a responsive pleading was served, the trial court erred in dismissing the action. *See**Boca Burger* , 912 So.2d at 567. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to allow appellant to amend his complaint.

*Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.*

Taylor, Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 22481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09120]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and following 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Appliance 
Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee's (ASRAC) charter 
is being renewed.
    The Committee will provide advice and recommendations to the 
Secretary of Energy on matters concerning the DOE's Appliances and 
Commercial Equipment Standards Program's (Program) test procedures and 
rulemaking process.
    Additionally, the renewal of the ARSAC has been determined to be 
essential to conduct business of the Department of Energy's and to be 
the in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Department of Energy, by law and agreement. The 
Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the rules and regulations in 
implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Cymbalsky, Designated Federal 
Officer at (202) 287-1692.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 16, 2014.
Amy Bodette,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-09120 Filed 4-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00733-CV

In re MTG Management, Inc. and Guy Oliver

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators MTG Management, Inc., and Guy Oliver filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus seeking to have this Court order the trial court to vacate its order compelling the 

production of MTG’s general ledger. Relator MTG has informed this Court that it elected to

produce the general ledger at issue and that the dispute is now moot. We agree and, therefore, 

dismiss this mandamus proceeding as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8; see also Heckman v. 

Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012) (explaining that “a case becomes moot if, 

since the time of filing, there has ceased to exist a justiciable controversy between the parties,”

meaning that “the court’s action on the merits cannot affect the parties’ rights or interests”); In re 

Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (noting that case becomes moot 

if controversy ceases to exist between parties “at any stage of the legal proceedings”); Valley 

Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. 2000) (concluding that discovery 

dispute “became moot when” party “complied with the trial court’s discovery order”); In re 

Smith Cnty., 521 S.W.3d 447, 454-55 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2017, orig. proceeding) (denying 
2

mandamus petition as moot because granting requested relief would have no practical effect and 

would “only amount to an advisory opinion”).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Filed: December 2, 2022
Thomas SPAHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1071

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
P. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 18 ) II-B- 3
Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200810:22:18 AM

Sheet 18 of 147P. 2 

## A-qo-3 7 

## IT-B- 3

* **•* * \ UN1TE 0 STATE S ENVIRONMENTA

L PROTECTIO

N AGENC Y ^SSQyll WASHINGTON , D.C . 2044 0 

# < i ••twrt ' 

## M I 9 «_ , 1

1 V / S ! ; - ,
• Sir - :•! j MEMORANDU M ,TH E W^INISTRATO R TO : Willia m G . Rosenber g J ^ , . , SUBJECT : Top-Dow n BAC T
A s yo u know , w e hav e bee n explorin g way s to improv e th e Bes tAvailabl e Contro l Technolog y proces s t o ensur e tha tcost-effectiv e technolog y determination s ar e made . Gettin g inpu tfro m partie s wh o ar e intereste d an d affecte d - pul p and paper , independen t power , electri c utilities , natural gas , environmentalist s and stat e and loca l environmenta l agenc y representative s —ha s bee n aver y useful , timel y and informativ e process . Afte rconsiderin g al l th e informatio n tha twa s presente d t o me , I hav e decide d thatth e curren ttop-dow n BAC T polic y i s workin g reasonabl y wel l and doe s no twarrantimmediat e action . Nevertheless , BAC T improvement s shoul d b e identifie d an d ca n bes tb e considere d 

### a s par to f ou rongoin gcomprehensiv e revie wo f th e Ne wSourc e Revie wprogram . I twa s i n thi s revie w o f

th e Ne w Sourc e program thatlarge rconcern s wer e expressed , an d thu s i n reconsiderin g th e overal l proces s w e ar e likel y t o fin d th e greates topportunitie s t o reduc e transactio n cost s whil e maintainin g environmenta l benefits . I understan d thatyou rOffic e ha s alread y conducte d on e roundtabl e meetin g wit h th e man y partie s concerne d wit h improvin g th e Ne w Sourc e Revie w process . I hav e decide d tha t you roffic e shoul d explor e th e possibilit y o f convenin g a formal regulatory negotiation , involvin g al l th e relevan tparties . Th e reg-neg process , whic h OA Ruse d s o effectivel y o n pas tclea n ai rrulemakings , look s lik e a n effectiv e mean s t o reconcil e th e divergen tview s o f partie s affecte d b y BAC T an d othe rNe w Sourc e Revie w requirements . Sinc e a ne w Administrato rwil l shortl y b e i n office , I as ktha tth e ai rstaf

f conduc tth e requisit e consultation s an d prepar e th e material s necessar y t o mov e forward , lookin g fo ran earl y chanc e t o brie f

th e incomin g team . I appreciat e you reffort s t o improv e th e BAC T process , and am confiden tthatthi s decisio n t o conside rBAC T a s on e elemen to f a n overal l effor tt o improv e anjl^treamlin e th e Ne w Sourc e Performanc e Revie w i s th e bes tcourse,o f actio n fo rindustry , /h e public , states , an d th e environment .

Ptintad on Recycled

Paper
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(6)
              - products_publications(30)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - (-)north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Project        February 29, 2024        A targeted annual warning system (TAWS) for identifying aberrant declines in greater sage-grouse populations

Project        August 21, 2023        Modeling Songbird Density-Habitat Relationships to Predict Population Responses to Environmental Change Within Pinyon-juniper and Sagebrush Ecosystems

Project        August 16, 2016        Pesticides in the Prairie Pothole Region

Project        May 6, 2016        Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative: Rocky Mountain Region

Research        September 16, 2022        Prioritizing Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems Tool (PReSET):    A USGS-facilitated Decision-support Tool for Sagebrush Ecosystem Conservation and Restoration Actions

Project        June 26, 2018        The pollinator library: a decision-support tool for improving national pollinator conservation efforts
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - colorado(2)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(5)
              - 2023(1)

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Release: Declines and Slow Recovery in Little Brown Bat Populations Predicted

staff profileSharon K Taylor, DVM, PhD

staff profileHeidi Leathers-Miller

staff profileSteven M Matsuoka

staff profileNicholas J Van Lanen, PhD

slideshow        June 5, 2023        What’s Invasive Where You Live?

staff profileShannon Brewer, PhD

staff profileBarbara Martin

slideshow        October 24, 2022        Examples of USGS Bat Research
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concentra
Operating Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Kiraly, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas E. Kiraly

Thomas E. Kiraly

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

May 13, 2003
# C_2020057EN.01000101.xml

| 20.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9704 — Gilde/Proman/Agilitas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 57/01)

On 13 February 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9704 — Gilde/Proman/Agilitas. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9704 — Gilde/Proman/Agilitas. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Frantz CHARITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3298, 2D18-3296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the consolidated
statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets of Mediacom
Communications Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,024
<SECURITIES>                                     9,796
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                       774
<INVENTORY>                                     13,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         847,438
<DEPRECIATION>                               (185,054)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,285,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,285,059
<SALES>                                        244,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,513
<CGS>                                           83,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (95,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (95,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.17)


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(26)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - (-)oklahoma(1)
              - texas(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Vegas Global Strategies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kwan Sin Yee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                | /s/ KWAN SIN YEE        |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                | Kwan Sin Yee            |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |
| March 28, 2013 |                    |

 

----