alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Apri l 8 , 201 0

Kevi n Adam s Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division ^-- , Offie e o f Aviatio n Analysi s ^ U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n c i 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E T j Washington , D C 2059 0 • ; Dea r Mr . Adams , Th e recen t

lette r o f Islan dAi r

regardin g ou r

servic e t o Karlu k

contain s severa l fals e statement s that

mus t b e correcte do n th e record . Th e languag e note di n poin t on e o f Islan dAir' s lette r

cam e directl y fro mth e DOT' s ow n Order , an dServan t wa s merel y confirmin g th e understanding . Islan dAi r claim s tha t

i f Servan t i s servin g Larse n Bay , wh y can' t it als o serv e nearb y Karlu k whic h i s o n th e sam e schedule dflight? Servan t file daschedul e t o Larse n Bay t o provid e neede dtraffi c support for th e Karlu k

Service . Whe n th e aircraf t necessar y for th e Karlu k

operatio n wa s lost . Servan t cancelle dit s propose dservic e t o Larse n Bay a s well . Ther e i s n o conflic t o r inconsistenc y i n it s curren t servic e pattern . A s note di n ou r

lette r o f Marc h 18 , Servan t

i s workin g har dt o locat e asuitabl e replacemen t

STO L aircraf

t for Karlu k service. A t

thi s poin t w e d o no t

hav e afir mdat e for servic e restoration . W e d o no t understan dIslan dAir' s poin t abou t whe n servic e coul db e restore dbecaus e i n th e meantim e Islan dcontinue s t o b e subsidize dan di s th e onl y carrie r

servin g Karluk . I n th e wors t cas e scenari o for

Servant , Islan dAi r

get s exactl y what

it requeste dfor

subsidy , an dget s t o operat e durin g th e peak seaso n befor e goin g int o winte r

service. Th e mos t outlandis h statemen t

mad e b y Islan dAi r

i s that th e los s o f

ou r Islande r wa s someho w relate dt o a

n overal l plan t o abando n servic e a t Karlu k eve n befor e it

began . Bot h th e ton e an dth e conten t of th e lette r ar e false , an dreall y ad dnothin g t o th e issu e o f maintainin g Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t Karlu k a t th e lowes t

cos t possible . Respectfull y submitted , We s Osowski Genera l Manage r Servan t Ai r Inc .
W.C., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-0900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(91)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(4)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - (-)news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

State News Release        September 22, 2015        New Tools and Knowledge to Aid in Columbia Plateau Groundwater Management
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134113 Michael F. Cavanagh 

(38) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

MICHAEL SCHILS, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 134113 

 COA: 274664 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000262-CZ 

WASHTENAW COMMUNITY HEALTH 

ORGANIZATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 24, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

l1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 

### ★ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
---

Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350

---



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350

I, Luke C. Zouvas, attorney at law, stood and served as Custodian/Trustee of this Corporation, as of December 31, 2002, with the resulting powers of Sole
Interim Officer and Director. In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, dated March 6, 2003. I hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



Certification
Dated: September 10, 2003

/S/
LUKE C. ZOUVAS
Luke C. Zouvas
Custodian/Trustee as
Sole Interim Officer/Director

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 12.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Javier Segovia Serrano, certify that:      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo TMM, S.A.B.;      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. [Reserved] [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8618; 34-52492];     c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and      5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andDate:July 16, 2007         /s/ Javier Segovia Serrano   Javier Segovia Serrano   Chief Executive Officer
Jerterris Demontrace LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                                             US

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                    1.4494
<CASH>                                                          1,279,966
<SECURITIES>                                                    4,231,044
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                5,970,659
<PP&E>                                                          2,136,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    215,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  8,986,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             982,267
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                           33,209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      7,923,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    8,986,453
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  136,799
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              119,392,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (119,255,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (119,255,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (119,255,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      (5.050)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (3.183)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5521 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5521

  To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to authorize 
private parties to compel the Bureau to seek sanctions by filing civil 
                    actions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2016

  Mr. Messer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to authorize 
private parties to compel the Bureau to seek sanctions by filing civil 
                    actions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reigning In of Governmental 
Hostility To Sovereignty at the CFPB Act of 2016'' or the ``RIGHTS at 
the CFPB Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE PARTIES AUTHORIZED TO COMPEL THE BUREAU TO SEEK 
              SANCTIONS BY FILING CIVIL ACTIONS; ADJUDICATIONS DEEMED 
              ACTIONS.

    Section 1053 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 
U.S.C. 5563) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Private Parties Authorized To Compel the Bureau To Seek 
Sanctions by Filing Civil Actions.--
            ``(1) Termination of administrative proceeding.--In the 
        case of any person who is a party to a proceeding brought by 
        the Bureau under this section, to which chapter 5 of title 5, 
        United States Code, applies, and against whom an order imposing 
        a cease and desist order or a penalty may be issued at the 
        conclusion of the proceeding, that person may, not later than 
        20 days after receiving notice of such proceeding, and at that 
        person's discretion, require the Bureau to terminate the 
        proceeding.
            ``(2) Civil action authorized.--If a person requires the 
        Bureau to terminate a proceeding pursuant to paragraph (1), the 
        Bureau may bring a civil action against that person for the 
        same remedy that might be imposed.
    ``(g) Adjudications Deemed Actions.--Any administrative 
adjudication commenced under this section shall be deemed an `action' 
for purposes of section 1054(g).''.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - (-)idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        June 11, 2019        Tribal Resources for Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments

Presentations and Events        March 11, 2021        Managing Post-Fire, Climate-Induced Vegetation Transitions

Presentations and Events        March 7, 2018        Yellowstone Volcano Observatory Scientists Host Facebook Live Event
# C_2020366EN.01000201.xml

| 30.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9986 — KPS Capital Partners/Garrett Motion)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 366/02)

On 26 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9986. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9986. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
(107 So. 295)

No. 25463.

#### FABACHER v. ROUPRICH et al.

(Feb. 1, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Husband and wife <§»85(l).

Married woman *held*not liable on note in payment for cows, where debt evidenced thereby was not for her separate estate nor one for which she might have bound herself without her husband’s authority, and where proof was that she was not a public merchant or in any business whatever.

2. Sequestration <3=>I7.

Where writ of sequestration was dissolved merely as an incident of decision of case on its merits, attorney fees for dissolving writ are not allowable.

Appeal from Twenty-Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson; Hamilton N. Gautier, Judge.

Suit by Albert Fabaeher against Mrs. B. Rouprich and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

John E. Fleury, of Gretna, for appellant.

A. T. Higgins, of New Orleans, for appellees.

O’NIELL,

C. J.

[1] This is a suit on a promissory note given by the defendants, Mrs. B. Rouprich and her two sons, in part payment for a herd of cows that they bought from the plaintiff. He has appealed from a judgment rejecting his demand and dismissing the suit. Mrs. Rouprich was a married woman, and the two sons were minors when they signed the note. She was not authorized by her husband, ánd they were not emancipated. Plaintiff knew, when he accepted the note, that Mrs. Rouprich was married, and that her sons were both minors. He does not dispute that the judgment in favor of the two sons is correct. The theory on which he seeks to hold Mrs. Rouprich liable on the note was that she was a public merchant when she signed the note. -The proof is that she was not a public merchant, or in any business whatever, for that matter. It seems to be conceded that the debt was not her separate debt, or one for which she might have bound herself without being authorized by her husband.

[2] Appellees have answered the appeal and asked for damages for the dissolution of a writ of sequestration that was issued in the case. The writ was dissolved merely as an incident of the decision of the case on its merits. In such case attorneys’ fees are not allowed for dissolving a conservatory writ.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-67584-03

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation (as depositor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
Dated as of October 1, 2001 providing for, inter alia, the issuance of ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2001-7)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

363886007
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois  60602
(Address of principal executive offices)

60602
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248)  643-2530

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends Item 14 of the original
Form 10-K which was filed on March 26, 2002


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in order to provide
statements of the monthly distributions to investors on November 27, 2001, and 	December 26, 2001.  The term sheet, computational materials, and an opinion letter
issued by Mayer, Brown & Platt with respect to tax matters and legality were filed on
Form 8-K on October 29, 2001.  The Underwriting Agreement, Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, and Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement were filed on Form 8-K on
November 13, 2001.

Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 are not filed herewith since documents were not received at least
three business days prior to the due date of this report.  The documents will be included in the
Form 10-K/A to be filed within 30 days of the receipt of such documents.



				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Agent for the Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of  ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation, Registrant


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	May 21, 2002