alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Kenneth D. Hart, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of New Peoples
Bankshares, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including it
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

           b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

           c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

           a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

           b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:   March 29, 2004                      /s/ KENNETH D. HART
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Kenneth D. Hart
                                            President & Chief Executive Officer
John NOONAN, Appellant, v. STETSON UNIVERSITY, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kavon M. GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael ELMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-950

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 3, 2018

Michael Elmer, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This court issued an order on August 10, 2018, directing Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him in view of his having instituted numerous repetitive, meritless proceedings in this court. *See**State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999). We have reviewed Appellant's response and determined it does not provide a legal basis to justify withholding imposition of sanctions.

Appellant is hereby prohibited from filing any pro se filings in this Court challenging his conviction and sentence imposed in Leon County case number 1995-CF-3305. The Clerk of this Court is directed to not accept any filings in this case unless they are signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. Additionally, we find this appeal is a frivolous proceeding brought before this Court by a state prisoner. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). We direct the clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution or facility within the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures pursuant to department rules.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Osterhaus and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20852 and #20853; CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE Disaster Number SD-20009]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

      ( print page 97693)    

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (FEMA-4842-DR), dated November 1, 2024.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storm, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.                    

# DATES:

Issued on December 3, 2024.

*Incident Period:*                         July 13, 2024 through July 14, 2024.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         January 20, 2025.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         August 1, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, dated November 1, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damage as a result of this disaster to January 20, 2025.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Alejandro Contreras,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-28817 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
STATE EX REL. John BURKS, III v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 17-KH-1763

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in *787La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, C. Todd Asbury, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of New Peoples Bankshares, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2005

 

/s/ C. Todd Asbury

C. Todd Asbury

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Anthony VAUGHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Bryan Clayton ROBERTS

NO. 2018-KH-0234

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Roberts v. State, 17-0880 (La. 9/28/18).

CRICHTON, J., recused.
# C_2020102EN.01000201.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.9547 – Johnson & Johnson/Tachosil)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 102/02)

On 25 March 2020, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+ 32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.9547 – Johnson & Johnson/Tachosil, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
# C_2020335EN.01001101.xml

| 9.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/11

---

Corrigendum to Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9895 — KKR/Waves UK Divestco)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 327 of 5 October 2020
  )

(2020/C 335/09)

Publication (2020/C 327/02) on page 2 is to be considered null and void.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  1-900  Jackpot,  Inc.
(Formerly Pultronex Corporation),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Joseph Batty,  Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 22, 2005


/s/ Joseph Batty
Joseph Batty
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 99220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Oregon; Wallowa-Whitman National 
Forest Travel Management Plan; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Wallowa-Whitman National Forest is withdrawing its notice 
of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the 
Wallowa-Whitman Travel Management Project. The original notice of 
intent was published in the Federal Register on May 3, 2007, and the 
notice of availability for the draft EIS was published on June 19, 
2009. The Wallowa-Whitman National Forest's decision to withdraw the 
notice of intent is based on prioritization of agency resources toward 
forest plan revision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this notice 
should be directed to Wallowa-Whitman Forest Supervisor, Shaun 
McKinney, at [email protected] or (503) 273-2413.
    Individuals who use telecommunications devices for the hearing 
impaired may call 711 to reach the Telecommunications Relay Service, 24 
hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays.

JoLynn Anderson,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2024-28920 Filed 12-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
```
# C_2020086EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9719 — FFHL/OMERS/Riverstone)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 86/01)

On 25 February 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9719. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9719. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Kenneth ADAMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0858

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5569 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5569

 To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to repeal the 
 authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to restrict 
                  arbitration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2016

 Mr. Stutzman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to repeal the 
 authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to restrict 
                  arbitration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT ARBITRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1028 of the Consumer Financial Protection 
Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5518) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents under section 1(a) 
of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 1028.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020048EN.01002201.xml

| 12.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/22

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9748 — KKR/Dentix Health Corporation)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 48/13)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, United States),

| — | Dentix Health Corporation, S.L.U. (‘Dentix Health Corporation’, Spain) |
| --- | --- |

—

Dentix Health Corporation, S.L.U. (‘Dentix Health Corporation’, Spain)

KKR acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Dentix Health Corporation.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for KKR: global investment firm which offers a broad range of alternative asset funds and other investment products to investors and provides capital markets solutions for the firm, its portfolio companies and other clients, |
| --- | --- |

—

for KKR: global investment firm which offers a broad range of alternative asset funds and other investment products to investors and provides capital markets solutions for the firm, its portfolio companies and other clients,

| — | for Dentix Health Corporation: provider of dental care services, through a network of more than 370 fully owned and operated clinics across Spain, Italy, Portugal, Colombia, Chile, Mexico and the United Kingdom. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Dentix Health Corporation: provider of dental care services, through a network of more than 370 fully owned and operated clinics across Spain, Italy, Portugal, Colombia, Chile, Mexico and the United Kingdom.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9748 — KKR/Dentix Health Corporation

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---