alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020023EN.01000101.xml

| 23.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8988 — Energizer/Spectrum Brands)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 23/01)

On 18 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8988. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8988. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
COURT OF APPEALS 

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00434-CR 

SHONDA LEE MOXLEY APPELLANT

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- 

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NO. 1417154D 

---------- 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

---------- 

On July 20, 2015, in the sentencing hearing in trial court cause number 

1414818D, the trial court granted Appellant Shonda Lee Moxley’s plea in bar and 

barred further prosecution of charges in trial court cause number 1417154D, the 

underlying cause in this appeal. But approximately three months later, the trial 

court convicted her in the underlying cause of felony theft and sentenced her to 

four years’ confinement upon her plea of true to the enhancement paragraph. 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 
2 

Appellant mailed a notice of appeal less than two weeks later. Before this court 

received the notice of appeal, however, the trial court vacated Appellant’s 

conviction and sentence in the underlying cause pursuant to an agreed motion to 

vacate based on the prior order granting the plea in bar. 

We notified Appellant in writing of our concern that we lack jurisdiction in 

this appeal because the conviction has been vacated,2 and, in an abundance of 

caution, we also noted that if she were trying to appeal from the order granting 

the plea in bar, we likewise lack jurisdiction.3 We stated that this appeal could be 

dismissed absent a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We 

have received no response. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.4 Appellant’s 

appeals from the judgments in trial court cause number 1414818D and a third 

trial court cause number, 1412917D, remain pending.5

 2See, e.g., Dunno v. State, No. 02-13-00246-CR, 2013 WL 5303642, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 19, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication) (noting that when trial court vacates judgment, it moots appeal from 

that judgment). 

3See Hilburn v. State, 946 S.W.2d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, 

no pet.) (citing Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)); 

see also Bradley v. State, Nos. 02-14-00218-CR, 02-14-00219-CR, 02-14-00220-

CR, 2014 WL 3029220, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 3, 2014, no pet.) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication). 

4See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 

5See Moxley v. State, Nos. 02-15-00432-CR, 02-15-00433-CR (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth filed Nov. 18, 2015). 
3 

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DO NOT PUBLISH 

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) 

DELIVERED: March 3, 2016
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declassified

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(7)
              - products_publications(2)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - california(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - south dakota(5)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        December 31, 1966        Declassified satellite imagery of the Forbidden City in Beijing, China

Podcasts        February 19, 2008        Will declassified satellite imagery be digitized?

Podcasts        October 14, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 5 – Declassified Data at EROS

Project        July 13, 2018        USGS EROS Archive - Declassified Data - Declassified Satellite Imagery - 1

Project        July 13, 2018        USGS EROS Archive - Declassified Data - Declassified Satellite Imagery - 3

Project        July 13, 2018        USGS EROS Archive - Declassified Data - Declassified Satellite Imagery - 2

Education        October 2, 2019        Eyes on Earth Episode 5 - Declassified Data at EROS

publication        July 12, 2008        Declassified Intelligence Satellite Photographs

publication        January 1, 1998        Declassified intelligence satellite photographs

Project        June 30, 2021        Declassified Satellite Imagery - 3 Data Dictionary

Project        June 30, 2021        Declassified Satellite Imagery - 2 (2002) Data Dictionary

Project        June 30, 2021        Declassified Satellite Imagery -1 (1996) Data Dictionary

Podcasts        April 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 93 – EROS 50th: Film Scanning

Featured Films and Shorts        July 20, 2021        Image of the Week - Cold War Craters in Nevada

Center News        August 29, 2019        EROS’ Declassified Film Repository Reveals Land Use Changes After Calamities

Featured Films and Shorts        September 2, 2020        Image of the Week - Time Travel by Permafrost

Activity        April 3, 2023        Eyes on Earth Episode 93 – EROS 50th: Film Scanning

Featured Films and Shorts        August 19, 2023        USGS EROS: Celebrating 50 Years of Excellence

Presentations and Events        December 31, 1997        1997 NSLRSDA 14 minutes

Presentations and Events        May 26, 2022        PubTalk-05/2022 - Using Military Remote Sensing Technology to Support Federal Civil Agency Science: Sunk Cost, Well Spent

Before/After Image        October 15, 2021        Cold War Craters

Presentations and Events        July 27, 2017        USGS Public Lecture: Warm Ice—Dynamics of Rapidly Changing Glaciers
kura-ex102_266.htm



Exhibit 10.2

***Text Omitted and Filed Separately 

with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Confidential Treatment Requested 

Under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) 

and 240.24b-2

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT

This FIFTH AMENDMENT TO PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into as of May 24, 2017 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Kura Oncology, Inc. (“Licensee”) having the address set forth in Article 12 of the Agreement (as defined below), and the Regents of the University of Michigan, a constitutional corporation of the state of Michigan (“Michigan”).

RECITALS

A.Licensee and Michigan are parties to that certain Patent License Agreement, dated December 22, 2014, as amended on March 3, 2015, July 22, 2015, September 29, 2016 and February 1, 2017 (the “Agreement”).

B.The Parties have decided to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Licensee and Michigan hereby agree as follows:

1.Defined Terms.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same meanings that are ascribed to them in the Agreement.

2.Article 1.  Article 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to insert a new Section 1.11A as follows:

“1.11A “[...***...]” means [...***...].”

3.Section 3.1(f).  Section 3.1(f) of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete subparagraphs (4), (5) and (6) in their entirety and replace them with the following:

“(4) $[...***...];

(5) $[...***...];

(6) $[...***...]; and” 

 

4.Section 3.2.  Section 3.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace “$2,715,000” with “$2,100,000”.

5.Continuing Effect.  All references to the “Agreement” in the Agreement shall hereinafter refer to the Agreement as further amended by this Amendment.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  Sections or other headings contained in this Amendment are for reference purposes only and 

*** Confidential Treatment Requested

 

 



shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Amendment; and no provision of this Amendment shall be interpreted for or against any party because that party or its legal representative drafted the provision.

6.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts with the same force and effect as if each of the signatories had executed the same instrument.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.


	
Kura Oncology, Inc.
	
 
	
Regents of the University of Michigan

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Heidi Henson
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Kenneth J. Nisbet

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
	
Heidi Henson
	
 
	
Name:
	
Kenneth J. Nisbet

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
	
CFO
	
 
	
Title:
	
Assoc. V.P. for Research U-M Tech Transfer




 

 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2386

In Re: JILL PARRISH,

Debtor.

------------------------------------

JILL PARRISH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

WILLIAM P. MILLER,

Party-in-Interest,

ANITA JO TROXLER,

Trustee.

No. 14-2387

In Re: JILL HEDGECOCK PARRISH,

Debtor.

------------------------------------
2

JILL PARRISH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM P. MILLER, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ANITA JO TROXLER,

Trustee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00856-CCE; 1:14-cv-00916-CCE; 14-10681)

Submitted: May 15, 2015 Decided: May 29, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jill Parrish, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela P. Keenan, KIRSCHBAUM, 

NANNEY, KEENAN & GRIFFIN, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert 

Edmunds Price, Jr., UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATOR, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Jill Parrish appeals the district court’s orders dismissing 

her appeals from the bankruptcy court’s orders granting a 

creditor relief from the automatic stay in her bankruptcy case 

and denying her request for a hardship discharge. The 

bankruptcy court subsequently dismissed the underlying 

bankruptcy case on an unrelated basis and Parrish has not 

appealed that dismissal. Because the bankruptcy case has been 

dismissed, this court cannot afford Parrish any effective 

relief. See In re Stadium Mgt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st 

Cir. 1990) (“Absent a stay, the court must dismiss a pending 

appeal as moot because the court has no remedy that it can 

fashion even if it would have determined the issues 

differently.”). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and dismiss these appeals as moot. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - (-)products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(58)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - arkansas(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(3)
              - (-)texas(1)

## By Year

map        June 21, 2016        Changes between early development (1930–60) and recent (2005–15) groundwater-level altitudes and dissolved-solids and nitrate concentrations In and near Gaines, Terry, and Yoakum Counties, Texas
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Anhui Guo, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  amendment  to annual  report on Form  10-KSB of the
     Zeolite Exploration Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     report; and

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



Date:  August 3, 2006
                                                          /s/  Anhui Guo
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Anhui Guo
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David M. Otto, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TechAlt, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter  (the  registrant's  fourth  fiscal  quarter in the case of an quarterly
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


December 21, 2005                       /s/ David M. Otto
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David M. Otto
                                      Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - (-)connecticut(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileSarah Y. Murphy, Ph.D.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay

Filters

              - products_publications(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(105)
              - district of columbia(33)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(3)
              - kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(240)
              - (-)massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(4)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(16)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(69)
              - north carolina(12)
              - ohio(2)
              - pennsylvania(120)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(214)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(60)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

publication        February 19, 2019        The mighty Susquehanna—extreme floods in Eastern North America during the past two millennia

publication        January 1, 1988        Distribution patterns during winter and fidelity to wintering areas of American black ducks

publication        July 1, 1969        Errors in using modern stream-load data to estimate natural rates of denudation
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

Historical        December 31, 1967        Eruptions from drill rods during research drilling in Yellowstone National Park, 1967–1968
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of The Liquid Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 15, 2006

/s/ Stephen G. Murphy
Stephen G. Murphy, CFO
Thomas ANDERSON, et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al.

Thomas Anderson, et al. v. City of New Orleans, et al.

Thomas Anderson, et al. v. City of New Orleans, et al.

NO. 2018-C-0904

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Andrew LEVY and Cheryl White Levy, Appellants, v. STARVIEW INVESTMENTS, LLC, CTS Property Holdings, LLC, and Boylston Creek, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2616

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 16, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.