alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cascading Hazards

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_faqs(11)
              - science_science(46)
              - products_data(5)
              - products_maps(3)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(127)
              - multimedia_image-141771(119)
              - multimedia_image-141773(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(6)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(112)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(29)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(31)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - multimedia_webcam(1)
              - multimedia_webcam-141786(1)
              - news_news-149245(5)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_news-149250(3)
              - news_other_news(9)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(32)
              - other_basic-42(5)

## By Location

              - oregon(1)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Featured Story        April 25, 2024        Preparing for volcano hazards: Where is the world’s largest lahar evacuation drill held?

Featured Story        May 18, 2017        Ever Vigilant: USGS Marks the 37th Anniversary of Mount St. Helen's Eruption and the 35th Anniversary of the Cascades Volcano Observatory

Featured Story        June 21, 2017        USGS publishes a new blueprint that can help make subduction zone areas more resilient
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28860]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of Notice: December 9, 2024

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 51 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2025-344 and K2025-342.

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,
Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-28860 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), of Dynamic Response Group, Inc. (the Company), I, Melissa K. Rice, Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 16, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Melissa K. Rice                                                        
|                        |  |  |  | Melissa K. Rice Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Cite as 2014 Ark. 496



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE CHILD SUPPORT COMMITTEE Opinion Delivered November 20, 2014

PER CURIAM Circuit Judge Mackie Pierce of Little Rock and Circuit Judge Craig Hannah of Searcy are reappointed to the Supreme Court Child Support Committee for four-year terms to expire on November 30, 2018. The court thanks them for their continued service.
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 558 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 55 South Pioneer Boulevard in Springboro, 

Ohio, as the ‘‘Richard ‘Dick’ Chenault Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 558 EH

1 SECTION 1. RICHARD ‘‘DICK’’ CHENAULT POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 55 South Pioneer Boulevard in 

5 Springboro, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘ Richard ‘Dick’ Chenault Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Richard ‘Dick’ 

11 Chenault Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 558 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostChenault Post Office Building’’. in Springboro, Ohio, as the ‘‘Richard ‘Dick’ al Service located at 55 South Pioneer Boulevard
# C_2020325EN.01002301.xml

| 2.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/23

---

Special Report 20/2020

‘Combatting child poverty – Better targeting of Commission support required’

(2020/C 325/13)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 20/2020 ‘Combating child poverty – Better targeting of Commission support required’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
ATR INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. COMMUNITY BUILDERS AND CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1908

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Written Statement of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the principalfinancial officer of VIA NET.WORKS, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a) the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended March 31,2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ray Walsh               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Ray Walsh                   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|   | June 2, 2005           |
|   |                        |
|   | /s/ Piet Boersma            |   |
|   | Piet Boersma                |
|   | Principal financial officer |
|   | June 2, 2005           |

 

----
Z.T., mother of E.L.F., II and Z.A.T., minor children, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5552 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5552

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to establish an 
 exemption from a rule or regulation to regulate payday loans, vehicle 
   title loans, or other similar loans for certain States and Indian 
                    tribes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2016

  Mr. Tipton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to establish an 
 exemption from a rule or regulation to regulate payday loans, vehicle 
   title loans, or other similar loans for certain States and Indian 
                    tribes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accounting for Consumer Credit and 
Encouraging State Solutions Act of 2016'' or the ``ACCESS Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. STATE AND TRIBAL PAYDAY LOAN REGULATION 5-YEAR EXEMPTION.

    Section 1022 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 
U.S.C. 5512) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) State and Tribal Payday Loan Regulation 5-Year Exemption.--
            ``(1) In general.--With respect to a final rule or 
        regulation issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
        Protection to regulate payday loans, vehicle title loans, or 
        other similar loans, if a State or a federally recognized 
        Indian tribe requests, in writing, for the Bureau to provide 
        the State or tribe with a waiver from such rule or regulation, 
        the Bureau shall grant a 5-year waiver to such State or tribe, 
        during which such rule or regulation shall not apply within 
        such State or land held in trust for the benefit of such 
        federally recognized Indian tribe.
            ``(2) Extension of waiver.--A State or a federally 
        recognized Indian tribe receiving a waiver under paragraph (1) 
        shall have the right to an unlimited number of 5-year 
        extensions of such waiver, which shall be granted upon the 
        request, in writing, for such waiver by the State or tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

16294

Vol. 63, No. 63

Thursday, April 2, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

RIN 1018--AE83

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife

and Plants; Proposed Reclassification

From Endangered to Threatened

Status for the Mariana Friut Bat From

Guam, and Proposed Threatened

Status for the Mariana Fruit Bat From

the Commonwealth of the Northern

Mariana Islands

Proposed rule document 98-7836 was

inadvertently published in the Rules

and Regulations section of the issue of

Thursday, March 26, 1998, beginning on

page 14641. It should have appeared in

the Proposed Rules section.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crops

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(11)
              - alaska(19)
              - arizona(24)
              - arkansas(15)
              - california(62)
              - colorado(19)
              - connecticut(2)
              - delaware(5)
              - florida(14)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(16)
              - idaho(9)
              - illinois(7)
              - indiana(14)
              - iowa(19)
              - kansas(13)
              - kentucky(3)
              - louisiana(8)
              - maine(3)
              - maryland(19)
              - massachusetts(5)
              - michigan(11)
              - minnesota(12)
              - mississippi(16)
              - missouri(10)
              - montana(10)
              - nebraska(21)
              - nevada(6)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(9)
              - new york(4)
              - north carolina(5)
              - north dakota(21)
              - ohio(5)
              - oklahoma(15)
              - oregon(5)
              - pennsylvania(7)
              - puerto rico(7)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(49)
              - tennessee(7)
              - texas(20)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(13)
              - vermont(2)
              - virginia(6)
              - washington(10)
              - wisconsin(10)
              - wyoming(14)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 12, 2020        Climate Adaptation to Support Amphibian Conservation in U.S. Caribbean
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(3)
              - connecticut(1)
              - delaware(105)
              - district of columbia(33)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(3)
              - indiana(3)
              - (-)kentucky(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(240)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - michigan(4)
              - minnesota(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - new hampshire(2)
              - new jersey(16)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(69)
              - north carolina(12)
              - ohio(2)
              - pennsylvania(120)
              - rhode island(1)
              - south carolina(4)
              - south dakota(1)
              - tennessee(2)
              - vermont(1)
              - virginia(214)
              - washington(2)
              - west virginia(60)
              - wisconsin(2)

## By Year

publication        February 23, 2021        Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: A history of change
S & I INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0387

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020340EN.01000101.xml

| 13.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9955 — PSP/Aviva/20 Station Road)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 340/01)

On 7 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
11-2223-cv Cherry v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth. 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 

# SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 9 thday of July, two thousand twelve.
PRESENT: AMALYA L. KEARSE, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges.

_____________________________________ Chris Cherry, Plaintiff-Appellant , v. 11-2223-cv New York City Transit Authority, Defendant-Appellee

.

_____________________________________ FOR APPELLANT: Chris Cherry, pro se , Brooklyn, N.Y. FOR APPELLEE: Kristen Nolan, New York City Transit Authority, Brooklyn, N.Y. Appeal from an order of the United States Di strict Court for the Eastern District of New York (Johnson, J.).

### 2 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREEDthat the order of the district court is AFFIRMED , and the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED

. Chris Cherry, pro se , appeals from the district court’s memorandum and order, dated April 8, 2011, denying his motion to re-open, which was construed by the district court as a motion seeking relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case. Cherry does not advance any coherent argument on appeal as to why the district court erred in refusing to grant his motion. See LoSacco v. City of Middletown , 71 F.3d 88, 93 (2d Cir. 1995) (noting that while “appellate courts generally do not hold pro se litigants rigidly to . . . formal briefing standards,” “we need not manufacture claims of error for an appellant proceeding pro se ”). We note only that while Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) permits a “court [to] relieve a party . . . from a final judgment” under certain circumstances, a claim that a judgment should be set aside because of “newly discovere d evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b),” or “misconduct by an opposing party” must be made “no more than a year after the entry of the judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), (c). Cherry’s motion to re-open was filed more than seven years after the judgment against him was entered. Accordingly, the order of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED , and the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED

. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**SECTION 302CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Cameron Mackenzie, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VIANET.WORKS, Inc. (“VIA”);

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for VIA and have:

 

a)                                      designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to VIA, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluated the effectiveness of VIA’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                                      disclosed in this report any change in VIA’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during VIA’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, VIA’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.                                       VIA’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to VIA’s auditors andthe audit committee of VIA’s board of directors:

 

a)                                      allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect VIA’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)                                     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in VIA’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 12, 2004 |
|------------------------------|
| /S/ CAMERON MACKENZIE        |   |
| Cameron Mackenzie            |
| Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----