08/19/2011 11.01 FAX 2024935142 FAA . DMS 

D^;pARTMEMT OF 

' --^rir-f opV^'n^'^jM^ LRN'TTED SlAif-S OF AMIiRICA /^{J Q J n 

•••''-•- '-' -"•-"-•- DFPARTMtiNTOFTRANSPORATTON 

vnu iiir -n / •! - n OftiCF. OF HEARINGS ijcr/i»^ 

(21001/ooe 

RECE/VED 

20lf 

DOCKET 

In ihe MLHllor of KAA DOCIO:']" NO CPlONMOOl 0 

CORP0R.MF. AIR FAA CASK NO 200SNM700126 

CORFORATIi: Am^S MOTION TO DISMISS 

OR, IN THE .\LTEKNATIVE, FOR A JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 

COMES NOW tlie Respondent. Corpordlc Air, and lespectfully moves lliib couit 

Uj dismiss TUC ('.'nmplaint filed again.si iL in this ninner. Tn support thcrtul', the 

Ke.spondent submits the Ibllowing; 

1. Tlie F/\A Hied it.s Complaint in this mailer on or about October 6; 2010. 

2. (n the Complaint, the FAA makes uumcruus allegations in the body of the 

Complaint regarding Corporrtlo Air, JredFx, and various shipments. 

3. However, the Complaint does not contain any langnago that actually alleges 

any violations of the Federal Aviation Regulations by Cori^oraLt; Air. 

4. The Complaint, in Section ITT, paragraph 1, U.sis the sections nf the CFR that 

were violated, but clearly states, "By reason of The ft>regoing facts and 

circumstances, FedEx violated the fnllov-ing sections ol' the Federal .\viation 

KegnlaLions../' 

3. The Complaint fLiithcT states, in Section III, paragraph 2, ''bcdEx is liable for 

a civil penalty not tn exceed $50,000 for each violation of the Department of 

Transportation Ma7ardous Materials Regulations." 

6. While the Complaint docs, in its prayer at the conclusion, rtjqucsl a civil 

penalty against Corporate Air in the amount ol"545.000, the Cojnplaint does 

not comply with the requirements of H CFR 13.20S(c), in that it fails to .•set 

Page 1 of ? 
08/19/201 1 11 01 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS 0002/00 6 

forth "any regulation allegedly violated by the respondent, and the proposed 

civil penalty in sufilcienl det^iil to provide notice of any factual or legal 

allegation and proposed civil penalty." 

7. The Complaint fails to even allege any violation of the regulations by 

Corporate Air and therefore. Tails to provide Coi-poratc Ak with any noticC; or 

any detail whatsoever, of the factual or legal allegations against it. 

WIIERTFORT:.; PREMISES CONSIDERED, Corporate Air moves that the case 

against it be dismissed. 

Rcspccrfiilly submitted this 18^'' day of August, 2011. 

Cynthia Chandlcr-'SliclL Senior Counsel 

Corporate /\ir 

3620 Hacks Cros.-; Road 

Building B, 3"^ Floor 

Memphis, IN 3812:$ 

901-434-8361 

901-434-8283 fax 

cynthia-chandler-snellu'/'.redex.com 

Paue 2 of 3 
08/19/201 1 110 1 FAX 20^4935142 FAA - QMS [2)003/006 

CHRllFCATE OF SERVICE 

T hereby ccrtily that the foregoing has been sei^'cd via FedEx I'riority Overnight 

on this 1 it'^ day of August. 2011. to the following: 

The Honorable Rjchard C. Good'.viji 

Office of Hearings. M-20 

1200 Ne^v Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Duilding Ground Flour. Rm E12-320 

Wa.shington, DC 20590 

202-366-2139 

Federal Aviation. Adniiitistratinn 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington. DC 20591 

Attn. Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright T^uildirig, Suite 2W1000 

Kyle Lomazow. !• A A Attorney 

I-A A Office of T(egionaT Counsel 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

425-227-1847 

^ymEiTCKSiKlT^Sncll 

Page 3 of 3