alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0337

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEVEN JUSTIN HEDRICK,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until September 11, 2024 to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 28 2024

08/28/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0337
STATE of Louisiana v. Edmond D. SPENCER

NO. 2018-KH-1230

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in *148this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5520 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5520

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2016

 Ms. McSally (for herself, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
   Salmon, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Gallego, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, and Ms. Sinema) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Udall Park Land Exchange Completion 
Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Tucson, 
        Arizona.
            (2) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 172.8-acre parcel of City land identified in 
        the patent numbered 02-90-0001 and dated October 4, 1989, and 
        more particularly described as lots 3 and 4, S\1/2\NW\1/4\, 
        sec. 5, T.14S., R.15 E., Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN LAND LOCATED IN 
              TUCSON, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, the 
reversionary interests of the United States in and to the non-Federal 
land for the purpose of unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land 
to enable economic development of the non-Federal land.
    (b) Legal Descriptions.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the exact legal descriptions of the non-Federal 
land shall be determined in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions to the conveyance under subsection 
(a), consistent with that subsection, as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
    (d) Costs.--The City shall pay all costs associated with the 
conveyance under subsection (a), consistent with that subsection, 
including the costs of any surveys, recording costs, and other 
reasonable costs.
                                 <all>
```
STATE EX REL. John STEWART v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0850

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted. Relator was serving a 20-year sentence for an armed robbery committed with a firearm in Ascension Parish when he became eligible for supervised release after diminution of sentence pursuant to 1995 La. Acts 1099. At that time, he was transferred from Dixon Correction Center to the Orleans Justice Center based on an outstanding warrant for first degree murder in Orleans Parish. There, he was arrested for first degree murder, and he made his first appearance in Magistrate Court.

Prior to his transfer to the Orleans Justice Center, relator became aware of the detainer placed on him, and he filed a motion to quash in which he contended the state failed to timely prosecute him for first degree murder. Possibly confusing relator with another John Stewart with a different birthdate who had pleaded guilty to theft under docket number 412-793, the district court sent relator a letter, dated June 3, 2016, and signed by "Sec B", informing him that his motion to quash "was improper" because he had already pleaded guilty to theft. This letter, which was not signed by the district court judge, does not constitute a ruling on relator's motion to quash, *cf.* La.C.C.P. art. 1911(A) ("Except as otherwise provided by law, every final judgment shall contain the typewritten or printed name of the judge and be signed by the judge."), and does not comport with La.C.Cr.P. arts. 3 and 17. Accordingly, we grant relator's application to remand to the district court judge to review and rule upon relator's motion to quash (which was incorrectly filed under docket number 412-793) in which he contends the state has not timely prosecuted him for first degree murder. The district court is directed to rule on relator's motion to quash within 30 days of this order and to provide this court with proof of compliance in the form of a written and signed ruling.

In addition, the court of appeal previously granted relator's writ application in *1291part to transfer relator's challenge of the validity of the arrest warrant and his arrest for first degree murder to the Magistrate Court for consideration within 30 days of the court of appeal's ruling. *State v. Stewart* , 17-0190 (La. App. 4 Cir. 3/13/17) (unpub'd). Relator claims that he has been mistaken for the John Stewart who previously pleaded guilty to theft in docket number 412-793 (with a different date of birth and social security number) and who is, in fact, the person for whom the arrest warrant was issued. Because the Magistrate Court has not complied with the court of appeal's ruling, we also grant the application to order the Magistrate Court to conduct a contradictory hearing (in magistrate number 575153, section M2), at which relator is represented by counsel, on relator's claim he was wrongfully arrested. The Magistrate Court is directed to conduct this contradictory hearing within 14 days of this order and to furnish this court with proof of compliance in the form of a minute entry.

**REMANDED**
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


1) SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of EchoMetrix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Greene, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      July 28, 2010
              /s/
      Jeffrey GreeneJeffrey
      GreeneChief
      Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification accompanied the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filing
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.  It is being reproduced herein for
information only.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2020365EN.01000101.xml

| 29.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9960 — KKR/Elsan)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 365/01)

On 22 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9960. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9960. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John Ballard, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/John Ballard



 John Ballard,

 President and Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2004
Ariel M. MORALES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Erika M. URBANIK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D18-1406

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.

Remanded.
Aero Air, LLC.

Portland-Hillsboro Airport

2050 NE 25th Avenue

Hillsboro, OR 97124

Ph: 503.640.3711

Fax: 503.640.1093

www.aeroair.com

December 16, 2016

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Ref: Exemption 11898, Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015-0057

Dear Sir / Mam:

Aero Air, LLC, the parent company of Corsair Two, LLC, requested and received exemption 11898, 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0057 to allow Aero Air to conduct ferry flights with one engine 

inoperative on its DC-7/DC-7B aircraft (registration Nos. N401US, N6353C, and N838D) to a base for the 

purpose of repairing that engine without obtaining a special flight permit for each flight. 

This exemption is currently slated to expire July 31, 2017. Aero Air requests that this exemption be 

renewed beginning May 1, 2017 in order to facilitate the use of this exemption during the 2017 fire 

season without interruption. Not having this exemption in place could place undue time constraints on 

relocating an aircraft for repair during the middle of the fire season. Granting this exemption will allow 

for the most expeditious means of locating an aircraft with one inoperative engine to the best location 

to perform the engine change without the need to wait for the FAA to issue a ferry permit. Should this 

need arise on a weekend or after hours significant hours can be saved thereby allowing the aircraft to

return to fire fighting duties in a timely manner. The ability to quickly return the aircraft to fire fighting 

capability will enhance the ability to save State lands and property from potential loss to fire. . The 

conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety for this exception remain unchanged for the 

previous submittal.

A denial of this exemption would not be in the public interest for economic and environmental reasons. 

Any delay in returning the aircraft to service due to extended periods of time it may take to acquire a 

ferry permit from the FAA extends the risk for fire loss on State lands and potential real property 

destruction. These options negatively impact the American taxpayers’ bill for fire protection of State 

Land areas.

Please contact me at Aero Air should you have any additional questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Kevin McLoughlin

Director of Production/ Air Tanker Operations

Aero Air, LLC
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      |                                                  |   |   |   |   |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|  By: | /s/ Cai Yongjun                                       |   |   |   |   |
|      | Cai Yongjun                                           |   |   |   |   |
|      | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |   |   |
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION 

In re: 

CARLA GONZALEZ VARELA 

Debtor. 

_____________________________________/

Case Number 21-21000-AJC 

Chapter 7 

DEBTOR’S MOTION TO REDEEM COLLATERAL OF 

SYNCHRONY BANK/BRANDSMART 

 Debtor, CARLA GONZALEZ VARELA, by and through undersigned counsel, 

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 722 and Rule 6008 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, files 

this Motion to Redeem Collateral of Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart, and avers: 

1. The Debtor filed this case as a Chapter 7 on November 19, 2021.

2. The Trustee conducted the meeting of creditors on December 21, 2021. 

3. Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart holds a lien against the Debtor’s appliances, which 

consists of 1 Refrigerator, 1 Stive and 1 Microwave (the “Appliances”), account number ending 

in 8856. The secured debt at the time this case was filed was $5,056.00. 

4. The Debtor believes that the Appliances are in fair condition and the replacement 

value of the Appliances is $1,000.00. Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart’s lien in the collateral is well 

in excess of the replacement value of the Appliances. 

5. The Debtor seeks an order allowing the redemption of the Appliances for the 

replacement value of $1,000.00 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 722. The Debtor will tender that sum to 

Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart within 30 days of entry of an order granting this motion in 

exchange for a satisfaction of its lien rights. During which time, Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart 

may not seek replevin of the Appliances. 

Case 21-21000-AJC Doc 14 Filed 12/28/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2. In re: Carla Gonzalez Varela

Case No. 21-21000-BKC-AJC 

WHEREFORE, the Debtor seeks the relief sought in this motion and for any other relief 

deemed just and proper in the circumstances. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent, via 

CM/ECF to the Chapter 7 Trustee and the Office of the United States Trustee, on December 28, 

2021 and via US Mail to all parties listed below. 

- Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart, POB 965036, Orlando, FL 32896 

- Synchrony Bank, Attn: Brian Doubles – CEO and President, 170 West 

Election Road, Suite 125, Draper, UT 84020 via Certified Mail

- Synchrony Bank/Brandsmart, POB 965060, Orlando, FL 32896 

- Synchrony Bank c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC., POB 

41021, Norfolk, VA 23541 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 9011-4(B) 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am 

admitted to the Bar of the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and I am in compliance with the 

additional qualifications to practice in 

this Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-

1(A). 

KINGCADE & GARCIA, P.A 

Counsel for the Debtor 

Kingcade Building 

1370 Coral Way ▪ Miami, Florida 33145-2960 

WWW.MIAMIBANKRUPTCY.COM

Telephone: 305-285-9100 ▪ Facsimile: 305-285-9542 

/s/ Timothy S. Kingcade 

□ Timothy S. Kingcade, Esq., FBN 082309 

□ Wendy Garcia, Esq., FBN 0865478 

X Jessica L. McMaken, Esq., FBN 580163

Case 21-21000-AJC Doc 14 Filed 12/28/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


1) SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of EchoMetrix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erica Zalbert, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      30, 2010
                  /s/
      Erica ZalbertErica
      ZalbertChief
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification accompanied the Annual Report on Form 10-K filing
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.  It is being reproduced herein for
information only.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2020375EN.01004501.xml

| 6.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/45

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8130 — Imerys/Alteo certain assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 375/06)

On 28 October 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8130. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8130. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
EX PARTE B.P.

1160510 (2150676 2150710)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.