alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Robert A. Morrison IV, the President and Chief Executive Officer of id-Confirm, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of id-Confirm, Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of id-Confirm, Inc.

Date: November 14, 2005
| /s/ Robert A. Morrison IV |
|---------------------------|

Robert A. Morrison IV

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020331EN.01001501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/15 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9960 — KKR/Elsan)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 331/11)

1.

On 29 September 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020331EN.01001501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Elsan Holding SAS (‘Elsan’, France) |

KKR acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Elsan.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for KKR: global investment firm, which offers a broad range of alternative asset funds and other investment products to investors and provides capital markets services for the firm, its portfolio companies and third parties. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Elsan: French hospital care group, which operates clinics throughout France. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020331EN.01001501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9960 – KKR/Elsan

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020331EN.01001501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020331EN.01001501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6148

ANDREW A. MORRISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JUAN ARRISUENO,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA99-2718-PJM)

Submitted: June 30, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew A. Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Evan Blumenfield,

KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrew A. Morrison appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action. We have reviewed the district

court’s order dismissing the action and find no reversible error.

See Morrison v. Arrisueno, No. CA-99-2718-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 27,

1999; & Feb. 3, 2000); see also Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106

(1976); Miltier v. Beorn, 896 F.2d 848, 851 (4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Neurobiology of Pain and Itch.                    

*Date:*                         January 6, 2025.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne-Sophie Marie Lucie Wattiez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive  Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4642,                         *anne-sophie.wattiez@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 3, 2024. 

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst,  Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-28808 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN RE: Christopher G. YOUNG

NO. 2018-B-0798

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the report and recommendation of the hearing committee, and the responses filed by the parties thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that Christopher G. Young, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22189, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.

Weimer, J., would deny.

Hughes, J., would deny.
Kimberly L. ROBINSON, Secretary of Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana v. MANTLE OIL & GAS, LLC

NO. 2018-C-0852

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Longwei Petroleum Investment Holding Limited. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|      |                                                                 |   |   |   |   |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:  | /s/ Michael Toups                                                    |   |   |   |   |
|      | Michael Toups                                                        |   |   |   |   |
|      | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |   |   |   |
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN11 

lionomblo R. 5. Yroho 

county AuQitor 

oregg Couaf 

hlgvlev, Texas 

mar Sir: opinion lo. O-6624 

Re: Should 

perty and to keep 

st TOU further ask the tollovlng ques- 

‘If% Court is authorlrod to employ a psrson to take and mlntain such inventory and ouch 

person performa l ntlrelJ dlffsnnt duties or no 

of?lclal &tier pertalnlng to an inventory - 

vtat lr the duty, If any, of a county auditor 

vlth nspect to l gproval of varrant for payment 

oi such employed 
Irrtio1o 1651, nov1roa Civil utatutu of Toxw, tier 

It pbr dutr to ‘800 to the rtriat onhroommt of the bv govl nda g OeueT fb An008î. Ooneaally *poxking, purdut 

tftus~navm$d k to utlrQ yeursol?, first, thst t b 

ia l uoh 

g a d la p er ?o mln& oor ta ln d?a iOD 

P.-a 

w hlr oontmot @T l aployment vlth tho CUmlaiors 

l OCaQ, t&t rcoh dutlor mu Ln the dlrcbarp of “OeuntY 

Ia thir rospeot vo point out that the tom omaaty burlnor*- 

o heuld b e g iven l broad and llboral cautruotion mo l e aet te 

defwt the plrpoao of the lav. And it 1s hold that the Corlrl lenors* Cart bar irpllod l uthorltq to do vhat may be necerury 

in the exorulro of tho dutlor or povora oon?omud upon them. 

(City Batlow Eak v. ?nrldlo Cntnty, 26 S. Y. 7751 Olonn vr 

Dal&r County Bolr d’ Am Irlaal Lmoa Dirtriot, 275 8. W. 137). 

Hovevor, la regard to tho partloular rltuatla la quostlon, ve 

hvo ruled that 8uoh ty p e l? apleynont a8 aontraotod for 18 authorlrod w l&v; thoreten, pur duty in thlr nspeat 18 a8 fellovrr A8 Art1010 1661, Revi8ed Civil Strtutor of Tua8, provldor 

that rll urmntr en the couatJ tru8uror, l xcopt arrant8 for 

jum ronloo, mmt bo c@untonlgneQ b 

remod~, ln tho oroat you dotemimct da 

tho aoumq rradltor, pur 

t ruoh employoo lr net dlroharglng tho duties for vhlch ho la eaplryod to porfom as per 

your quoetloa, vould be for yau to mfuro to oowtomlgn varrantr 

a tho county troarunr kssued to maah omployoo. 

TnutLng the r0mgOing ?ullr umvere your queetlen, 

vo mu 

Teun vary tryiy, 

ATTORHHY aIt3muL O? TnAa 

Robert L. ktti8oxv, Jr. 

Aul8hnt
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: DED

Filters

              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - (-)arizona(3)
              - california(7)
              - connecticut(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - rhode island(1)
              - vermont(1)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        December 31, 1923        1923 Survey of the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River in Arizona

Presentations and Events        March 25, 2021        PubTalk 3/2021 - A Jaguar's Field of Dreams

Presentations and Events        September 22, 2020        Hydrography Updates for USFS Southwestern Region in AZ and NM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 12, 2019

No. 04-18-00872-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C. M. S, A CHILD,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-PA-01181

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 7, 2019, appellant’s appointed counsel filed an amended Anders brief. 

Appointed counsel attached a certificate of counsel to his brief, stating he provided a copy of his 

brief and “a letter advising [P.G.B.] of her right to examine the entire appellate record for the 

purpose of filing a pro se brief.” However, the statement provided by appointed counsel does not 

constitute proof to this court that he supplied appellant with a form motion to allow appellant pro 

se access to the appellate record. 

In Kelly v. State, the Court of Criminal Appeals specifically stated that in Anders cases, in 

addition to appointed counsel’s other duties, counsel must provide appellant with a form motion 

for purposes of requesting the record and inform appellant that “in order to effectuate his right to 

review the appellate record pro se, should he choose to invoke it, he must sign and date the 

motion and send it on to the court of appeals within ten days of the date of the letter from 

appellate counsel.” 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Moreover, counsel must 

“notify the court of appeals, in writing” that he has supplied the appellant with a form motion for 

pro se access to the appellate record and the court’s mailing address. Id. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant’s appointed counsel to file in this court on or before 

February 19, 2019, proof that: (1) he has supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se 

access to the appellate record; (2) advised appellant of this court’s mailing address; and (3)

advised appellant that should she desire access to the record for purposes of filing a pro se brief, 

she must sign, date, and send the motion for access to the record to this court within ten days of 

the date of her letter. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
K.J.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section
1350  of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of
the  United  States  Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
purpose.

     The  undersigned,  who  are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer,  respectively, of North Georgia Community Financial Partners, Inc. (the
"Company"),  hereby  each  certify  as  follows:

     The  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the "Report"), which
accompanies  this  Certificate,  fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and all information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

This  13th  day  of  August  2003.


/s/ David J. Lance
------------------
David  J.  Lance,  Chief  Executive  Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Rhonda C. Massengill
------------------------
Rhonda  C.  Massengill
(Principal Accounting Officer)


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided toNorth Georgia Community Financial
Partners,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  the  Company  and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


                                      -16-
<PAGE>
Deoclecio SAMPAIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4349

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(58)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - georgia(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - (-)texas(1)

## By Year

Supporting material        July 13, 2023        Citizen Science Call-to-Action Flyer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Companys Administrative Trustee certifies as follows:



| | (a) | This report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in this Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/ Edward J. Woodard, Jr., CLBB
|                     |  | Edward J. Woodard, Jr., CLBB,   
|                     |  | Administrative Trustee
### NUM BER 1 3 - 0 8 - 0 0 3 8 2 - CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ JUA N M UNGIA , AS SURVI VI NG SPOUS E OF CONCEPCI ON M UNGIA , DECEASED, A ND JOSE SEGU RA, IND IVIDU A LLY, A pp ellan ts , v. DETA R HOSPI TA L NA VA RRO, DR. PE TER PA ULR OJAS, A ND R OND A M ASCIA REL LI, A pp ellees

.

____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On ap pe al f rom th e 2 4th D istrict Co urt of Vict oria Co un ty , T exas .

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ______ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B efo re Ju st ic es Y añ ez , R od rigu ez, an d Be na v ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan ts, Ju an M ung ia, as su rv iv ing sp ouse of Con cepc ion M ung ia, dec eased , and J ose Seg ura, i ndi v idu all y , per fected an appeal f ro m a j udg ment ent ered by the 24th Di s t ri ctCo u rto f

V ic t o ri a Co u n ty, T e xa s , in c a u s e n u m b e r 08 -1 -6 6 7 2 7 -A

. A p p e ll a n t s h a ve2

filed a mot ion to dis mis s t he appe al on g ro unds that the p arti es hav e execut ed a settl ement agreem ent . Appe llants request th at th is Court dismiss the app eal. The Cou rt , h a ving co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e and appel lan ts’ moti on to dis mis s t he appe al, i s o f the opi nio n tha t t he moti on s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 1(a). A ppe llants’ mo tion to dismiss is g rante d, an d the app eal is hereb y DISMISSED. In ac cordance w it h the ag re ement of the par ti es, costsare t axed ag ain st the p arty i ncur ri ng same. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1( d)

. Hav ing dismi ss ed the appeal a t app ell ants ’ re q uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 23rd day

of Jul y , 200 9.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 7, 2017        How does carbon get into the atmosphere?

faq        April 12, 2019        Does Landsat Level-1 data processing include atmospheric correction?

faq        April 15, 2022        Why does my Landsat Collection 2  Surface Temperature product have missing data?

faq        June 29, 2017        How does acid precipitation affect marble and limestone buildings?

Records        September 18, 2019        1983 G. Ohrig, M. Matson, D.F. McGinnis, and S.R. Schneider of the Nat