alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PCA and EPA-ISIS-cement meeting 

Emission Intensities and Controls

January 20, 2010

1:00pm

Call in # 919-541-4154

EPA

Elineth Torres

Ravi Srivastava

Keith Barnett

Tom Walton

Samudra- contractor with EPA

Mike Laney- contractor with EPA

Jim Staudt – contractor with EPA

PCA

Ty Wilson

Ed SullivanDan _________ - Contractor with PCA

Stu Sessions – Contractor with PCA

D Roark -GCC

Agenda

Discussion based on PCA comments –Appendices 11 and 12

- We are not going to cover comments on benefit analysis- but comments are being 

looked by the Benefit people

- ISIS will be the model to be used for the promulgation of the NESHAP and for 

benefit analyses together with some air quality analysis

o Projections have been updated- units and demand

- EPA will be scheduling a call for Jan 27 at 3:00pm for discussion on import modeling

- EPA to receive comments from PCA on running ISIS

o Per Stu Sessions and Ty Wilson – Environomics just finished evaluation of 

model, PCA reviewing the comments. EPA should expect to receive PCA 

comments by the end of Jan 2010

- EPA to received data to update AVC functions per PCA comment –Appendix 13 

page 15

o Ty and Ed- are in the process of finalizing a statement with aggregate data

from PCA’s Benchmarking Survey- data will be CBI
- EPA to receive recommendation on which transportation cost reference to use in ISIS 

– Appendix 13 page 38

o Stu- will get with Ed’s team and will get back to EPA with recommendation

- Appendix 11 page 5- Emission Intensities (ton pollutant/on clinker)

o PCA to revise emission intensities for NOx (by kiln type and perhaps state) and 

SO2 (by kiln type and state). EPA to provide tables of emission intensities –input 

spreadsheet

o Can PCA provide baseline SO2 emissions- data derived from PCA's Labor 

Energy Survey

- Appendix 11 page 7 -SO2 removal performance
o Is the report that specifies SO2 removal performance from PCA’s consultant 

available for EPA review? 

 Bob? /Dan? / Cristal? –from vendors information

o Can we get real performance (emissions) and control efficiency for the 5 kilns 

with wet scrubbers?

 Years of scrubbers being installed? 

- Appendix 12 page 3

o EPA needs background materials that back-up control performance assumptions 

used by PCA
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(4)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(3)
              - (-)news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - colorado(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(3)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)

## By Year

Center News        October 4, 2018        New coral reef study to begin at Buck Island National Park Service unit on St. Croix
# C_2020402EN.01000501.xml

| 25.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9968 — TOTAL/Ørsted UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 402/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | TOTAL S.E. (“TOTAL”, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

TOTAL S.E. (“TOTAL”, France),

| — | A portfolio of Ørsted Sales (UK) Limited and Ørsted Power Sales (UK) Limited's business-to-business contracts for the retail supply of gas and electricity and other related assets (“Ørsted UK”, UK), controlled by Ørsted A/S. |
| --- | --- |

—

A portfolio of Ørsted Sales (UK) Limited and Ørsted Power Sales (UK) Limited's business-to-business contracts for the retail supply of gas and electricity and other related assets (“Ørsted UK”, UK), controlled by Ørsted A/S.

TOTAL acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Ørsted UK.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of assets.

2.

| — | for TOTAL: it is engaged in every sector of the oil and gas industry, including upstream (hydrocarbon exploration, development and production) and downstream (refining, petrochemicals, specialty chemicals, trading and shipping of crude oil and petroleum products and marketing), |
| --- | --- |

—

for TOTAL: it is engaged in every sector of the oil and gas industry, including upstream (hydrocarbon exploration, development and production) and downstream (refining, petrochemicals, specialty chemicals, trading and shipping of crude oil and petroleum products and marketing),

| — | for Ørsted UK: business-to-business contracts for the retail supply of gas and electricity and other related assets. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Ørsted UK: business-to-business contracts for the retail supply of gas and electricity and other related assets.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9968 — TOTAL/Ørsted UK

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 536 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 536

   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve 
   waivers under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 
   Security Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt 
        certain retirement communities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 2015

  Mr. Womack introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve 
   waivers under the Medicaid Program under title XIX of the Social 
   Security Act that are related to State provider taxes that exempt 
        certain retirement communities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Provider Tax Administrative 
Simplification Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDER TAX RULE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CONTINUING CARE 
              RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES.

    In the case of a State that has a provider tax that does not apply 
to continuing care retirement communities or life care communities (as 
such terms are used for purposes of section 1917(g) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(g)) that have no beds that are certified 
to provide medical assistance (as such term is defined under section 
1905(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a))) under title XIX of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) or that do not provide services 
for which payment may be made under such title, the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services shall approve a waiver under section 
433.68(e)(2)(iii) of title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
regardless of whether the Secretary determines that the State satisfies 
the requirements of section 433.68(e)(2)(iii)(B) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Sibship reconstruction for inferring mating systems, dispersal and effective population size in headwater brook trout (*Salvelinus fontinalis*) populations      

      January 1, 2011    

Brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis populations have declined in much of the native range in eastern North America and populations are typically relegated to small headwater streams in Connecticut, USA. We used sibship reconstruction to infer mating systems, dispersal and effective population size of resident (non-anadromous) brook trout in two headwater stream channel networks in Connecticut. Brook trout were captured via backpack electrofishing using spatially continuous sampling in the two headwaters (channel network lengths of 4.4 and 7.7 km). Eight microsatellite loci were genotyped in a total of 740 individuals (80–140 mm) subsampled in a stratified random design from all 50 m-reaches in which trout were captured. Sibship reconstruction indicated that males and females were both mostly polygamous although single pair matings were also inferred. Breeder sex ratio was inferred to be nearly 1:1. Few large-sized fullsib families (>3 individuals) were inferred and the majority of individuals were inferred to have no fullsibs among those fish genotyped (family size = 1). The median stream channel distance between pairs of individuals belonging to the same large-sized fullsib families (>3 individuals) was 100 m (range: 0–1,850 m) and 250 m (range: 0–2,350 m) in the two study sites, indicating limited dispersal at least for the size class of individuals analyzed. Using a sibship assignment method, the effective population size for the two streams was estimated at 91 (95%CI: 67–123) and 210 (95%CI: 172–259), corresponding to the ratio of effective-to-census population size of 0.06 and 0.12, respectively. Both-sex polygamy, low variation in reproductive success, and a balanced sex ratio may help maintain genetic diversity of brook trout populations with small breeder sizes persisting in headwater channel networks.

 

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

## Related Content

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### Benjamin H Letcher

##### Ecologist

Eastern Ecological Science Center

bletcher@usgs.gov

413-863-3803

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Jefferson Hill-Spruce Brook
                  -  Kent Falls Brook
                  - Connecticut

View All **
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as added byss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934; and
2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

|Date: August 12, 2003 | By:/s/Salvatore R. DeFrancesco       
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Salvatore R. DeFrancesco             
|                      | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(18)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - (-)arkansas(1)
              - california(26)
              - florida(7)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Science Animations        January 6, 2009        Simulated groundwater declines in Central Arkansas
Make Model Weight Max Speed Type

Lockheed Martin Indago 4.85 lbs 20 m/s 44.7387 MPH Rotorcraft - 4 rotors DJI Phantom 3 2.82192 lbs 16 m/s 35.7910 MPH Rotorcraft - 4 rotors Inspire 1 (T600) 6.69103 lbs22 m/s 49.2126 MPH Rotorcraft - 4 rotors S900 18.0779 lbs 16 m/s 35.7910 MPH Rotorcraft - 6 rotors S1000 24.2508 lbs20 m/s 44.7387 MPH Rotorcraft - 8 rotors Sensefly eBee Ag 1.56000 lbs25 m/s 55.9234 MPH Fixed Wing - 1 rotor
Darrell YATES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2577

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is denied.
STATE EX REL. Kevin HAYES v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1158

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. As to his request for DNA testing, relator fails to make the required showing. La.C.Cr.P. art. 926.1 ; *cf.* *State v. Debrow* , 13-1814 (La. 5/23/14), 138 So.3d 1229.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow *1289circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

IN RE:

RESOLUTION A MENDING

REGULATION X RULE 10.1

– NEW

SOURCE REVIEW RESOLUTION NO 200 9

- 03

WHEREAS , California Health and Safety Code sections 40000, 40001, 40702, 40716,
40910, and 42300 authorize the Feather River Air Quali ty Management District to adopt, amend or repeal rule s and regulation s ; and

WHEREAS, the District Board has determined that a need exists to amend Regulation X, Rule 10.1 in order to be approved into the State Implementation Plan a nd to address comments from the California Air Recourses Board as noted in their program evaluation of the District; and

WHEREAS, the District Board has determined that a need exists to amend Regulation X, Rule 10.1 in order to separate and distinguish st ate and federal requirements; and

WHEREAS , there is no indication at this time that Regulation X, Rule 10.1 is written in such a manner that the persons affected by it could not easily understand it; and

WHEREAS , the proposed Regulation X, Rule 10.1 is i n harmony with, and not in conflict with or contradictory to, existing statutes, court decisions, or State or federal regulations (Health and Safety Code Section 40727(b)(4)); and

WHEREAS, the proposed Regulation X, Rule 10.1 duplicates state laws or regu lations concerning the attainment or maintenance of state and federal air quality standards and the duplicative requirements are necessary in order to execute the powers and duties imposed upon the District (Health and Safety Code Section 40727(b)(5)) ; and

WHEREAS

, the District Board recognizes that Regulation X, Rule 10.1 implements and makes specific federal requirements under Title I of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 and the state requirement for a no net increase program (Health and Safety Code Section 40727(b)(6)); and

WHEREAS, the District Board has made the required findings of authority, necessity, clarity, consistency, non

- duplication, and reference;

WHEREAS

, this R esolution

, and the R egula tion set forth herein

, was adopted after proceedings held in accordance with provisions of chapters 6 and 6.5 of part 3 of division 26 of the California Health and Safety Code (commencing with section 40700)

, and a duly noticed public hearing was held on O ctober 5 , 200 9 to consider the amending of Regulation X, Rule

10.1

– New Source Review ; and
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              69
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    69
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               50
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9840
<OTHER-SE>                                       (3435)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9581
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 of Magnus International Resources Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Graham Taylor, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 			   			Dated: November 13, 2006                                                  /s/ Graham Taylor                                                                                                                              Graham Taylor, President, CEO, Chief			                                                                                            Financial Officer and Director (Principal			                                                                                            Executive Officer and Principal Financial			                                                                                            Officer)
STATE of Louisiana v. Joshua Michael MITCHELL

NO. 2017-KO-1890

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 31, 2018

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Corrections]
[Page 45014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X97-50825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 135

[Docket No. 28743; Amendment No. 135-70]
RIN 2120-AG22


Commercial Passenger-Carrying Operations in Single-Engine 
Aircraft Under Instrument Flight Rules

Correction

    In rule document 97-20641 beginning on page 42364 in the issue of 
Wednesday, August 6, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 42364, in the first column, in the first line of the DATES 
section ``May 3, 1998'' should read ``May 4, 1998''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jeffrey D. Thomas, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K  of Ambassadors Group, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 
| Date:   April 27, 2012 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
|                        | By:    | /s/   Jeffrey D. Thomas |
|                        | Name:  | Jeffrey   D. Thomas |
|                        | Title: | President   and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 29, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00829

- CV

John Rady, Appellant

v.

Elizabeth Boulton; Sand Canyon Corporation; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2006

- 3 , Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006

- 3; and

American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOO DWIN

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to file a brief or to respond to this

Court’s notice , and, accordingly, has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE

considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. It

FURTHER appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs relating to

this appeal, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below

for observance.