---

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

[   ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION
12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2014

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

[   ] SHELL COMPANY PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report N/A

For the transition period fromN/AtoN/A

Commission file number 000-55032

KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC.(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable(Translation of Registrants
name into English)

British Columbia, Canada(Jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

7773 - 118A Street, North Delta, British Columbia V4C 6V1(Address of principal executive offices)

James R. Bond, CEO 7773 - 118A StreetNorth
Delta, British Columbia V4C 6V1 Telephone: 250.764.3618 Email: bond@kelsotech.com(Name,
Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact
Person)

Copy of communications to: Bernard Pinsky Clark
Wilson LLPSuite 900  885 West Georgia Street Vancouver, British
Columbia, V6C 3H1, Canada Telephone: 604.687.5700 Facsimile:
604.687.6314

---

- ii -

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act.

|Title of Class | Name of each exchange on which registered
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------
|Not Applicable | Not Applicable                           

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act.

Common Shares Without Par Value(Title of
Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act.

Not Applicable(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report.

45,246,752 common shares without par value outstanding
on December 31, 2014. There were no Class A non-cumulative preference shares
outstanding on December 31, 2014.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [   ] YES     [X]
NO

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [   ]
YES      [X] NO

Note  Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]
YES      [   ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). 
NOT APPLICABLE TO THE
REGISRANT AT THIS TIME     [   ] YES     
[   ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [   ]
    Accelerated filer [   ]
    Non-accelerated filer [X]


Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP [   ]
    International Financial Reporting Standards as
      issued
    Other [   ]by the International Accounting Standards Board
      [X]


If Other has been checked in response to the previous
question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant
has elected to follow.[   ] ITEM 17     
[   ] ITEM 18

---

- iii -

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
[   ] YES      [X] NO

Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the
JOBS Act), Kelso Technologies Inc. is classified as an Emerging Growth
Company. Under the JOBS Act, Emerging Growth Companies are exempt from certain
reporting requirements, including the auditor attestation requirements of
Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Under this exemption, the companys
auditor will not be required to attest to and report on managements assessment
of the companys internal controls over financial reporting. The company is also
exempt from certain other requirements, including the requirement to adopt
certain new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards
would apply to private companies. The company will remain an Emerging Growth
Company for up to the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth
anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities pursuant
to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933,
although it will lose that status earlier if revenues exceed US$1 billion, or if
the company issues more than US$1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three
year period, or the company will lose that status on the date that it is deemed
to be a large accelerated filer.

---

- i -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|                           |                                                             |                                                            | Page
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ----
|FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | 3                                                          
|PART I                     |                                                             |                                                            | 3   
|Item 1.                    | Identity of
      Directors, Senior Management and Advisers | 3                                                         
|                           | A.                                                          | Advisers                                                   | 4   
|                           | B.                                                          | Auditors                                                   | 4   
|Item 2.                    | Offer Statistics
      and Expected Timetable               | 4                                                         
|Item 3.                    | Key
      Information                                       | 4                                                         
|                           | A.                                                          | Selected Financial Data                                    | 4   
|                           | B.                                                          | Capitalization and Indebtedness                            | 6   
|                           | C.                                                          | Reasons for the Offer and Use
      of Proceeds            | 6   
|                           | D.                                                          | Risk Factors                                               | 6   
|Item 4.                    | Information on our
      Company                            | 12                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | History and Development of Our
      Company               | 12  
|                           | B.                                                          | Business Overview                                          | 18  
|                           | C.                                                          | Organizational Structure                                   | 26  
|                           | D.                                                          | Property, Plants and Equipment                             | 26  
|Item 5.                    | Operating and
      Financial Review and Prospects          | 27                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | Operating Results                                          | 28  
|                           | B.                                                          | Liquidity and Capital Resources                            | 31  
|                           | C.                                                          | Research and Development,
      Patents and Licenses, etc. | 33  
|                           | D.                                                          | Trend Information                                          | 33  
|                           | E.                                                          | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements                             | 33  
|                           | F.                                                          | Tabular Disclosure of
      Contractual Obligations        | 33  
|Item 6.                    | Directors, Senior
      Management and Employees            | 34                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | Directors and Senior Management                            | 34  
|                           | B.                                                          | Compensation                                               | 36  
|                           | C.                                                          | Board Practices                                            | 38  
|                           | D.                                                          | Employees                                                  | 41  
|                           | E.                                                          | Share Ownership                                            | 41  
|Item 7.                    | Major Shareholders
      and Related Party Transactions     | 42                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | Major Shareholders                                         | 42  
|                           | B.                                                          | Related Party Transactions                                 | 42  
|Item 8.                    | Financial
      Information                                 | 43                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | Financial Statements and Other
      Financial Information | 43  
|                           | B.                                                          | Significant Changes                                        | 44  
|Item 9.                    | The Offer and
      Listing                                 | 45                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | Offer and Listing Details                                  | 45  
|                           | B.                                                          | Plan of Distribution                                       | 46  
|                           | C.                                                          | Markets                                                    | 46  
|                           | D.                                                          | Selling Shareholders                                       | 46  
|                           | E.                                                          | Dilution                                                   | 46  
|Item 10.                   | Additional
      Information                                | 46                                                        
|                           | A.                                                          | Share Capital                                              | 46  
|                           | B.                                                          | Memorandum and Articles of
      Association               | 47  
|                           | C.                                                          | Material Contracts                                         | 47  
|                           | D.                                                          | Exchange Controls                                          | 48  
|                           | E.                                                          | Taxation                                                   | 48  
|                           | F.                                                          | Dividends and Paying Agents                                | 50  
|                           | G.                                                          | Statement by Experts                                       | 51  
|                           | H.                                                          | Documents on Display                                       | 51  

---

- ii -

|         | I.                                                                                  | Subsidiary Information                                                        | 51
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --
|Item 11. | Quantitative and Qualitative
      Disclosures About Market Risk                    | 51                                                                           
|Item 12. | Description of
      Securities Other than Equity Securities                        | 52                                                                           
|Part II  |                                                                                     |                                                                               | 52
|Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend
      Arrearages and Delinquencies                               | 52                                                                           
|Item 14. | Material Modifications to the
      Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds. | 52                                                                           
|Item 15. | Controls and
      Procedures                                                       | 53                                                                           
|Item 16. | [Reserved]                                                                          | 54                                                                           
|         | A.                                                                                  | Audit Committee Financial
      Expert                                        | 54
|         | B.                                                                                  | Code of Ethics                                                                | 54
|         | C.                                                                                  | Principal Accountant Fees and
      Services                                  | 54
|         | D.                                                                                  | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit
      Committees.             | 55
|         | E.                                                                                  | Purchases of Equity Securities
      by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers. | 55
|Part III |                                                                                     |                                                                               | 56
|Item 17. | Financial
      Statements                                                          | 56                                                                           
|Item 18. | Financial Statements                                                                | 56                                                                           
|Item 19. | Exhibits                                                                            | 56                                                                           

---

- 3 -

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These
statements relate to future events or future financial performance. In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as
estimate, project, believe, anticipate, intend, expect, plan,
predict, may, should, potential, or continue, the negative thereof or
other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Kelso
Technologies Inc. to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements.

There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements
will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements in this annual report speak only as to the date
hereof, or such other date as may be indicated herein. Except as required by
applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States and Canada,
the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to
conform these statements to actual results.

In this annual report, unless otherwise stated, all dollar
amounts are expressed in United States dollars ($). The financial
statements and summaries of financial information contained in this annual
report are also reported in United States dollars unless otherwise stated. All
such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), unless expressly stated
otherwise.

As used in this annual report, the terms we, us and our
refer to Kelso Technologies Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Kelso
Technologies (U.S.A.) Inc. and of Kelso Innovative Solutions Inc. (collectively
the Company).

PART I

|Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and
      Advisers
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

The directors and the senior management of the Company are as
follows:

Name and Office Held
    FunctionJames R. Bond Director, President
      and Chief Executive Officer
    As President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Bond is
      responsible for strategic planning and operations, as well as managing our
      relations with the Companys legal advisers, regulatory authorities and
      the investment community; as a director, Mr. Bond participates in
      management oversight and helps to ensure compliance with the Companys
      corporate governance policies and standards.William Troy Director and Audit
      Committee Member
    As an independent director, Mr. Troy supervises the
      Companys management and helps to ensure compliance with our corporate
      governance policies and standards.Neil Gambow Director and Chief
      Operating Officer
    As a director, Mr. Gambow supervises the Companys
      management and helps to ensure compliance with the Companys corporate
      governance policies and standards. As COO Mr. Gambow is responsible for
      the daily operations of the Companys plant in Bonham, TX as well as the
      development and engineering of the Companys products.Peter Hughes Director and Audit
      Committee Member
    As an independent director, Mr. Hughes supervises the
      Companys management and helps to ensure compliance with the Companys
      corporate governance policies and standards.Anthony Andrukaitis Director and
      Executive Vice President Business Development
    As a director, Mr. Andrukaitis supervises the Companys
      management and helps to ensure compliance with the Companys corporate
      governance policies and standards. As Vice President Business Development
      Mr, Andrukaitis will take an active management role in pursuing growth of
      business opportunities, including mergers and acquisitions.


---

- 4 -

Name and Office Held
    FunctionPhil Dyer(1)Director and
      Audit Committee Member
    As an independent director, Mr. Dyer supervises the
      Companys management and helps to ensure compliance with the Companys
      corporate governance policies and standards.Richard Lee Chief Financial
      Officer
    As our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Lee is responsible
      for the management and supervision of all of the financial aspects of the
      Companys business.


|(1) | Mr. Dyer was appointed to the Board of
      Directors of the Company on January 2, 2015.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The business address for our directors and officers is 7773 -
118A Street, North Delta, British Columbia, Canada V4C 6V1.

|A. | Advisers
|-- | --------

The Companys legal advisers are Clark Wilson LLP with a
business address at 900  885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada V6C 3H1.

Auditors

The Companys current auditors are Smythe Ratcliffe LLP,
Chartered Accountants, with a business address at 700  355 Burrard Street,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 2G8. Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered
Accountants, are members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British
Columbia and are registered with both the Canadian Public Accountability Board
and the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Smythe Ratcliffe
LLP, Chartered Accountants were first appointed as the Companys auditors on
November 16, 2009.

|Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|------- | ---------------------------------------

Not Applicable.

|Item 3. | Key Information
|------- | ---------------

|A. | Selected Financial
Data
|-- | -----------------------

Prepared In Accordance With IFRS

The following table summarizes selected financial data for the
Company for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and for the four months
ended December 31, 2012 and, and for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2012 and
2011. prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB). Effective December 31, 2012, we changed our
fiscal year end from August 31st to December 31st. The information in the table
was extracted from the detailed financial statements and related notes included
in this annual report and should be read in conjunction with such financial
statements and with the information appearing under the heading, Item 5 
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects beginning at page 27 below.

---

- 5 -

Selected Financial Data

Statements of Income (Loss)
      Data
    Year ended December 31, 2014
      (audited) ($)
    Year ended December 31, 2013
      (audited) ($)
    Four months ended December 31,
      2012 (audited) ($)
    Year ended August 31, 2012
      (audited) ($)
    Year ended August 31, 2011
    (audited) ($)Revenues
    23,816,809
    13,131,387
    2,830,778
    2,233,807
    1,326,024Gross Profit
    10,924,325
    5,305,207
    893,171
    560,373
    319,962Net (Loss)/Income and
      Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
    4,025,781
    2,456,636
    10,988
    (1,276,827
    (1,463,869)Basic and Diluted
      (Loss)/Earnings per Share
    0.09
    0.06
    0.00
    (0.04)
    (0.05)


Statement of Financial Position
      Data
    As at December 31, 2014
      (audited) ($)
    As at December 31, 2013
      (audited) ($)
    As at December 31, 2012
      (audited) ($)
    As at August 31, 2012
      (audited) ($)
    As at August 31, 2011
    (audited) ($)Assets
    20,696,182
    9,283,388
    4,319,482
    2,689,346
    2,506,527Current Liabilities
    4,097,256
    486,147
    283,042
    763,773
    263,404Shareholders
      Equity/(Deficiency)
    16,598,926
    8,797,241
    4,036,440
    1,925,573
    2,243,123Common
      Shares
    22,141,417
    18,086,144
    16,073,471
    14,495,094
    13,359,242(Deficit)/Retained Earnings
    (7,918,089)
    (11,507,420)
    (13,964,056)
    (13,975,044)
    (12,437,039)Outstanding Common Shares
    45,246,752
    43,020,326
    39,990,583
    36,659,583
    33,006,283


Prepared In Accordance With Canadian GAAP

The following table summarizes selected financial data for the
Company for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 prepared in accordance with
Canadian GAAP. The information in the table was extracted from the detailed
financial statements and related notes for these financial periods which are
available under the Companys profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com in Canada
and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov in the United States, and should be read in
conjunction with such financial statements. The audited annual financial
statements for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 prepared and presented in
accordance with Canadian GAAP and the financial information in such financial
statements and in the tables below is presented in Canadian dollars.

Selected Financial Data

Statements of
      Income (Loss) Data
    As at
      August 31, 2010 (audited) (Canadian Dollars)Revenues
    190,844Gross Profit
    40,214Net (Loss)/Income and Comprehensive
      (Loss)/Income
    (307,915)Basic and Diluted (Loss)/Earnings per Share
    (0.02)


---

- 6 -

Statement of
      Financial Position Data
    As at
      August 31, 2010 (audited) (Canadian Dollars)Assets
    510,587Current Liabilities
    381,714Shareholders Equity/(Deficiency)
    128,873Common Shares
    10,369,150(Deficit)/Retained
      Earnings
    (10,958,983)Outstanding Common Shares
    21,778,383


|B. | Capitalization and
  Indebtedness
|-- | ---------------------------------

Not applicable.

|C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of
      Proceeds
|-- | -----------------------------------------------

Not applicable.

|D. | Risk Factors
|-- | ------------

Due to our size and the nature of our activities, we will
always be exposed to some business risks. This section discusses the material
risks facing our Company.

Our operations and financial performance are subject to the
normal risks applicable to railroad equipment supply companies and are subject
to various factors which are beyond our control. Risk areas include that our
Companys products involve detailed proprietary and engineering knowledge and
specific customer adoption criteria, hence factors may exist that could cause
actual results to be materially different than those anticipated by management.
These may include that our Company may be unsuccessful in raising any additional
capital for needs that may arise; our Company may not have sufficient capital to
develop, produce and deliver new orders; customer orders that are placed may be
cancelled; products may not perform as well as expected; markets may not develop
as quickly as anticipated or at all; or that the productive capacity of our
Company may not be large enough to handle market demand. Should one or more of
these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions
prove incorrect, then actual results may vary materially from those described in
forward-looking statements. These risk factors are described in more detail
below.

Risks Relating to the Business

The Companys products involve detailed proprietary and
engineering knowledge and specific customer adoption criteria. If the Company is
not able to effectively protect its intellectual property or cater to specific
customer adoption criteria, its business may suffer a material negative impact
and may fail.

The success of the Company will be dependent on the Companys
ability to protect and develop our technology. The Company has obtained patents
for its external constant force spring pressure relief valves (each, an
EPRV) (Patent No. 5,855,225) and a manway securement system trademarked
the Kelso Klincher® (the KKM) (Patent No. US 7,104,722 B2); however,
the Company does not have a patent for its Kelso Tiger Tube - Eduction
Technology eduction tube (the ETS) technology. The patent for the ETS
technology expired several years ago, although the Company does hold
manufacturing, sale and technology rights. The Company has also obtained
trademarks for its product names, particularly Kelso Klincher® (issued on
January 29, 2013under number 4,282,652)and has filed a trademark
application for its Kelso Tiger Tube. The Company has also filed a patent
application under a Non-Publication Request for its Bottom Outlet Valve
(BOV) design and its Vacuum Relief Valve (VRV). A
Non-Publication Request keeps the patent filing private until the patent is
issued. Patent applications filed under a Non-Publication Request only provide
protection in the U.S. and not internationally. See Information on our Company
 History and Development of our Company  Three Year History  2013 for
additional information on Non-Publication Request. See Information on our
Company  Business Overview  Key Products for additional details regarding
EPRVs, KKMs and ETS.

---

- 7 -

If the Company is unable to secure trademark and patent
protection for our intellectual property in the future, or that protection is
inadequate for future products, the business may be materially adversely
affected. Further, there is no assurance that our railroad equipment products,
including the Companys EPRVs, KKMs and ETS or other aspects of the business do
not or will not infringe upon patents, copyrights or other intellectual property
rights held by third parties. Although we are not aware of any such claims, we
may become subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time relating to
the intellectual property of others in the ordinary course of our business. If
we are found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may
be enjoined from using such intellectual property, and we may incur licensing
fees or be forced to develop alternatives. In addition, we may incur substantial
expenses and diversion of management time in defending against these third-party
infringement claims, regardless of their merit. Successful infringement or
licensing claims against us may result in substantial monetary liabilities,
which may materially and adversely disrupt our business

Further, the Association of American Railroads (the
AAR) has specific adoption criteria that must be met before the
Companys products can be utilized by customers in the railroad industry. The
Company has been successful in obtaining AAR approvals for its key products;
however, there is no guarantee that the Companys products will continue to meet
AAR standards and adoption criteria as they evolve or that new products
developed by the Company will receive AAR approval. In addition, certain
customers may have specific adoption criteria beyond what is required by the
AAR, and there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to cater to these
specific adoption criteria. The Companys failure to meet AAR and customer
adoption criteria could have a material negative impact on the Companys ability
to obtain purchase orders and generate revenue.

The Company may have insufficient capital in the future to
meet production demands and continue its operations.

Although the Company was profitable and had a positive working
capital in the amount of $12,868,325 as at December 31, 2014, the Company may,
from time to time, report a working capital deficit. The Company reported net
income and comprehensive income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 of
$4,025,781, December 31, 2013 of $2,456,636 and for the four months ended
December 31, 2012 of $10,988 and net loss and comprehensive loss of $1,276,827
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. To maintain its activities, the
Company may require additional funds which may be obtained either by the sale of
securities or obtaining debt financing. There is no assurance that the Company
will be successful in obtaining such additional financing; failure to do so
could result in the inability of the Company to develop new products, meet
production and delivery demands and continue its operations.

The Company has a limited operating history and may not
achieve its growth objectives.

The Company has a limited history of earnings. The Company is
subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any
business enterprise which is transitioning from product development to
profitable operations, including the risk that it will not achieve its growth
objectives. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully
complete its financing and development plans or operate profitably over the
short or long term. The Company is dependent upon the good faith and expertise
of management to identify, develop and operate commercially viable product
lines. No assurance can be given that the Companys efforts will result in the
development of additional commercially viable product lines or that the
Companys current product lines will prove to be commercially viable in the
long-term. If the Companys efforts are unsuccessful over a prolonged period of
time, the Company may have insufficient working capital to continue to meet its
ongoing obligations and its ability to obtain additional financing necessary to
continue operations may also be adversely affected. Even if the Company is
successful in developing one or more additional product lines, there is no
assurance that these product lines or its existing product lines will be
profitable.

---

- 8 -

Markets for the Companys products may not develop as
quickly as anticipated or at all.

Markets for the Companys products may not develop as quickly
as anticipated, or at all, resulting in the Company being unable to meet its
revenue and production targets. This may have a material negative impact on the
Company, particularly if the Company has incurred significant expenses to cater
to increased market demand and such market demand does not materialize.

Competition may affect the Companys ability to acquire
additional market share or to maintain revenue at current and projected
levels.

Although the Company has patents, trademarks and other
protections in place to protect the proprietary technology on which the
Companys business is dependent, competitive products may be developed in the
future. Competition could adversely affect the Companys ability to acquire
additional market share or to maintain revenue at current and projected levels.

Customer orders that are placed may be cancelled.

Although the Company makes efforts to ensure customers are
satisfied with the Companys products, there is a risk that customers may cancel
purchase orders before they are filled. This may have a material negative impact
on the Company, particularly if the Company has already ordered the component
parts required to assemble the finished products for that order or if the
Company has assembled the required finished products. The negative impact may be
mitigated by the Companys ability to utilize the component parts and finished
products to satisfy other purchase orders, but there is no guarantee that the
Company will able to mitigate the risk of loss to the Company from cancelled
orders in this manner.

The Company is dependent on a limited number of customers.

Although the Company is optimistic about its future as a
railroad equipment supplier, the Company is dependent upon a limited number of
customers for a significant portion of its revenue. In particular, the Company
is dependent on two major US corporations as customers. The sales to these two
customers (Customer A and Customer B) exceeded 10% of the Companys revenues
during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the four months ended
December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2014 the Company had
$23,816,809 of revenue of which sales of $14,997,197 were from Customer A and
sales of $3,180,348 were from Customer B. During the year ended December 31,
2013, the Company had $13,131,387 of revenue of which sales of $8,782,478 were
from Customer A and sales of $3,409,289 were from Customer B. During the four
months ended December 31, 2012, the Company had $2,830,778 of revenue of which
sales of $872,778 were from Customer A and sales of $1,558,429 were from
Customer B. Although Customers A and B have displayed a pattern of consistent
timely payment of accounts owing, there is no guarantee that sales to these
customers will continue at current levels or that these customers will continue
to satisfy their payment obligations to the Company in a timely manner. The
Company does not have any formal agreements for long term, large-scale purchase
orders with these customers and only sells to them based on purchase orders
received. The Company expects that a limited number of customers will continue
to represent a substantial portion of its sales for the foreseeable future. The
loss of any of these customers could have a material negative impact upon the
Company and its results of operations.

Products may not perform as well as expected.

There is a risk that the Companys products may not perform as
well as expected, which may result in customer complaints, returned products,
product recalls and/or loss of repeat customers. Any one of these effects may
have a material negative impact on the Companys ability to generate revenue and
continue operations. The Company maintains product liability insurance and
commercial general liability insurance at levels which the Company believes are
adequate based on the Companys customer base and revenue from product sales.
However, the amount of the Companys insurance coverage may not be sufficient to
cover future products claims. In 2014, the Companys product liability insurance
premiums were $241,366 for up to $2,000,000 of aggregate product liability
insurance coverage and up to $1,000,000 of coverage per incident. In 2014, the
Companys commercial general liability insurance premiums were $88,138 for up to
$2,000,000 aggregate coverage and $1,000,000 of coverage per incident.

---

- 9 -

There may be a shortage of parts and raw materials.

The Company currently has approximately three to five suppliers
in the United States for each of the component parts and raw materials required
to assemble the Companys finished products. There is a risk that the Company
may face a shortage of parts and raw materials in the future if the Companys
suppliers are unable to support current or increased customer demand for the
Companys products. This could have a material negative impact on the Company,
its revenues and continued operations.

The productive capacity of the Company may not be large
enough to handle market demand.

The Companys current production facilities may not be large
enough to handle market demand for the Companys products if market demand is
beyond projected levels. The Company may not have sufficient capital to fund
increased production at its existing facilities or to add new production
facilities, and even if the Company did have sufficient funds for these
purposes, the turnaround time to increase production may not be fast enough to
meet market demand. This may have a material negative impact on the Companys
ability to maintain existing customers and expand its customer base, and its
ability to generate revenue at current and projected levels.

The Companys research and development efforts may not
result in commercially viable products.

The Companys efforts to research and develop new products for
the railroad industry and to develop applications for the Companys products in
other industries, such as the trucking industry, may not result in commercially
viable products or applications. This may have a negative impact on the Company
as its current products may cease to be best-available technology and the
Company would not have a replacement or alternative product offering. Also, this
may result in the Companys investment into such research and development being
a loss.

The Company may face uninsurable or underinsured
risks.

In the course of development and production of railroad
equipment products, certain risks, and in particular, destruction of production
facilities by a natural disaster, acts of terrorism, acts of war or patent
infringement may occur. It is not always possible to fully insure against such
risks and the Company may decide not to take out insurance against such risks as
a result of high premiums or other reasons. Should such liabilities arise, they
could reduce or eliminate any future profitability and result in increasing
costs and a decline in the value of the securities of the Company. Of the above
listed risks only an act of war is truly uninsurable. The Company maintains
commercial general liability insurance for claims up to $2,000,000 in aggregate
and $1,000,000 per incident, as well as product liability insurance for claims
up to $2,000,000 in aggregate and $1,000,000 per incident. Although the Company
believes that the insurance policies currently in place adequately insure the
Company given the size of its customer base and revenues from product sales,
there is a risk that the Companys insurance coverage may not be sufficient to
cover future products claims.

The raw materials used by the Company for its products are
subject to price fluctuations.

Many of the materials used in our Companys products are
commodity raw materials such as steel and rubber. These raw materials can be
subject to significant price fluctuations. A steep rise in the price of such raw
materials may have an adverse effect on the pricing of our products and our
operating results. As our Company does not have any purchase agreements with
customers, we are able to mitigate the risks associated with price fluctuations
in our raw materials by adjusting the pricing of our products accordingly.
However, there is no guarantee that customers will continue to purchase our
products if prices are adjusted due to the fluctuation in the price of raw
materials.

---

- 10 -

Risks Relating to Management

The success of the Companys business depends substantially
on the continuing efforts of its senior executives, and its business may be
severely disrupted if the Company loses their services.

The future success of the Company heavily depends upon the
continued services of its senior executives and other key employees. In
particular, the Company relies on the expertise and experience of its Chief
Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and
Chief Operating Officer (COO) and of the CEO of Kelso Technologies
(U.S.A.) Inc. (Kelso USA) and Kelso Innovative Solutions Inc.
(Kelso Innovative). The Company relies on the industry expertise and
experience of its senior executives, and their working relationships with the
Companys employees, customers and relevant regulatory authorities. If one or
more of the Companys senior executives were unable or unwilling to continue in
their present positions, the Company might not be able to replace them easily or
at all. If any of the Companys senior executives joins a competitor or forms a
competing company, the Company may lose clients, suppliers, key professionals,
technical know-how and staff members.

Because executive management is free to devote time to other
ventures, shareholders may not agree with their allocation of time.

The Companys executive officers and directors devote the
majority of their time to the management and operation of the Companys
business. Management is not however, contractually required to manage or direct
the Company as their sole and exclusive function and they may have other
business interests and engage in other activities in addition to those relating
to the Company. This includes rendering advice or services of any kind to and
creating or managing other businesses, including other businesses in the
railroad industry. The Companys executive officers and directors are required
by law to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of
the Company and to disclose any interests, which they may have in any project or
opportunity of the Company. If a conflict of interest arises, at a meeting of
the board of directors of our Company (the Board), any director with a
conflict is required to disclose their interest in the matter and to abstain
from voting on such matter.

The board of directors may change the Companys operating
policies and strategies without prior notice to shareholders or shareholder
approval and such changes could harm the Companys business and results of
operations, and the value of the Common Shares.

The Board has the authority to modify or waive certain of the
Companys current operating policies and strategies without prior notice and
without shareholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to the
Companys current operating policies and strategies would have on the Companys
business, operating results and value of the Common Shares. However, such
changes could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position
or otherwise.

The Articles of the Company contain provisions indemnifying
its officers and directors against eligible penalties.

The Articles of the Company contain provisions with respect to
the indemnification of our officers and directors against all eligible
penalties, being a judgment, penalty or fine awarded or imposed in, or an amount
paid in settlement of, an eligible proceeding. An eligible proceeding means a
legal proceeding or investigative action, whether current, pending, threatened
or completed, in which a director, former director or alternate director of the
Company (each, an eligible party) or any of the heirs and legal
personal representatives of the eligible party, by reason of the eligible party
being or having been a director or alternate director of the Company: is or may
be joined as a party; or is or may be liable for or in respect of a judgment,
penalty or fine in, or expenses related to, the proceeding.

Since many of the Companys officers and directors are
located in Canada, it may be difficult to enforce any United States judgment for
claims brought against the Companys officers and directors.

The Company has been organized under the laws of the Province
of British Columbia, Canada. Although the Companys assets are located in the
United States, many of the Companys officers and directors are residents of
Canada. While a cross border treaty exists between the United States and Canada
relating to the enforcement of foreign judgments, the process of such is
cumbersome and in some cases has prevented the enforcement of judgments. As a
result, while actions may be brought in Canada, it may be impossible to affect
service of process within the United States on the Companys officers and
directors or to enforce against these persons any judgments in civil and
commercial matters, including judgments under United States federal securities
laws. In addition, a Canadian court may not permit an original action in Canada
or enforce in Canada a judgment of a United States court based on civil
liability provisions of United States federal securities laws.

---

- 11 -

The Companys business reputation and relationship with
customers and suppliers may be negatively impacted by the actions of former
directors and officers of the Company.

In April 2010, a new management team was appointed by the
Company. The Company believes that the new management team has improved the
Companys business reputation and gained the confidence of the railroad and
investment community by making deliveries on time and satisfying payment
obligations on time, which was not always the case before the Companys current
management came on board. Although the Company and its current management team
strive to make deliveries and payments on time and to operate the business of
the Company in a manner which maintains the Companys business reputation and
the confidence of the railroad and investment community, there is a risk that
the actions of the Companys current and former directors and officers, and in
particular their failure to make certain deliveries and payments on time, may
negatively impact the Companys current and future business reputation and
relationships with customers and suppliers, including the risk that certain
prospective customers and suppliers may not do business with the Company due to
the actions of the Companys former management team.

Risks Relating to the Common Shares

If the Companys business is unsuccessful, its shareholders
may lose their entire investment.

Although shareholders will not be bound by or be personally
liable for the Companys expenses, liabilities or obligations beyond their total
original capital contributions, should the Company suffer a deficiency in funds
with which to meet its obligations, the shareholders as a whole may lose their
entire investment in the Company.

The Common Shares are subject to the price volatility of
publicly traded securities.

In recent years, the securities markets in the United States
and Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the
market prices of securities of many companies have experienced wide fluctuations
in price, which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance,
underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. There can be no
assurance that continual fluctuations in price will not occur. It may be
anticipated that any quoted market for the Common Shares will be subject to
market trends generally, notwithstanding any potential success of the
Company.

The Common Shares have limited liquidity and shareholders
may be unable to sell their shares.

The Company is publicly traded on both the Toronto Stock
Exchange and NYSE Markets Exchange. There is currently a limited market for the
Common Shares and the Company can provide no assurance to investors that a
liquid market will develop. If a market for the Common Shares does not develop,
shareholders may not be able to resell the Common Shares that they have
purchased and they may lose all of their investment. Public announcements
regarding the Company, changes in government regulations, conditions in the
Companys market segment and changes in earnings estimates by analysts may cause
the price of the Common Shares to fluctuate substantially.

Investors interests in the Company will be diluted and
investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share if the Company
issues additional shares or raise funds through the sale of equity securities.

The Companys constating documents currently authorize the
issuance of an unlimited number of Common Shares without par value and an
unlimited number of Preferred Shares, of which 5,000,000 are designated as
Series 1 Shares. If we are required to issue any additional shares or enter into
private placements to raise financing through the sale of equity securities,
investors interests in the Company will be diluted and investors may suffer
dilution in their net book value per share depending on the price at which such
securities are sold. If the Company issues any such additional shares, such
issuances also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting
power of all other shareholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a
change in control of the Company.

---

- 12 -

As a foreign private issuer the Company will not be subject
to U.S. proxy rules.

As a foreign private issuer, the Company will be exempt from
the rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(United States) related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements.

|Item 4. | Information on our Company
|------- | --------------------------

|A. | History and Development of Our
    Company
|-- | ------------------------------------------

The Company was incorporated as Kelso Resources Ltd. pursuant
to the Company Act (British Columbia) on March 16, 1987. On July 21,
1994, the Company changed its corporate name to Kelso Technologies Inc. The
Company is currently organized pursuant to the Business Corporations Act
(British Columbia) (BCBCA) which replaced the Company Act
(British Columbia) in 2004.

The Companys registered office is located at Suite 800  885
West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3H1. The Companys
corporate head office is located at 7773  118A Street, North Delta, British
Columbia V4C 6V1. The Companys head office telephone number is (250) 764-3618.

In February 2007, the Company replaced its original Articles
with new Articles to reflect the adoption of the BCBCA. On May 13, 2010, the
Company consolidated its share capital on the basis of one new Common Share in
the capital of the Company for seven old Common Shares. This consolidation was
approved by a special resolution of the shareholders of the Company passed
February 5, 2010. At its annual general and special meeting held on June 5,
2013, the Company obtained shareholder approval of certain amendments to the
Articles of the Company to include, among other things, advance notice
provisions. Advance notice provisions provide a framework whereby the Company
can fix a deadline for submission of director nominations by shareholders prior
to any annual or special meeting of shareholders and can set forth the
information regarding director nominees that a shareholder must include in their
notice to the Company for such notice to be in proper written form.

The Common Shares have been publicly traded on the Toronto
Stock Exchange (the (TSX) under the symbol KLS since May 22, 2014,
prior to which the Common Shares traded on the TSX Venture Exchange
(TSXV). The Common Shares have traded on the NYSE Markets Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol KIQ since October 14, 2014, prior to which
the Common Shares traded on the U.S. OTCQX over the counter market (OTCQX
International) under the symbol KEOSF.

The Company operates in conjunction with its two wholly-owned
subsidiaries Kelso USA and Kelso Innovative. The Company owns 100% of the voting
securities of each of its subsidiaries. Neither subsidiary has a class of
restricted securities. Kelso USA was incorporated on August 3, 2005 in the State
of Nevada. Kelso Innovative was incorporated on June 20, 2012 in the State of
Nevada. Kelso USA is the operational arm of the Company and Kelso Innovative
focuses on industrial designs and distribution plans for the Companys KKM
system for applications for the roadway trucking and trailer market.

General Development of the Business

General

The Company is a railroad equipment supplier that produces and
sells proprietary tank car service equipment used in the safe loading, unloading
and containment of hazardous materials during transport. Products are
specifically designed to provide economic and operational advantages while
reducing the potential effects of human error and environmental harm during the
transport of hazardous materials.

---

- 13 -

The Company currently offers approximately 52 products. The key
products that the Company offers include a series of 47 types of EPRVs for
pressure management; 4 types of KKMs; and 1 ETS product that address the
technical requirements of load and unload operations and the containment of
hazardous commodities during transport. See Key Products below for a
description of the Companys key products and Markets for the revenue
generated from each key product. In addition to current product offerings, Kelso
Innovative, the Companys wholly-owned product development enterprise, has been
working on new products to add to the Companys catalogue by incorporating
customer feedback into product development decisions.

The Company recruited and appointed a new executive management
team in April 2010 at which time a commercial business plan was established. In
accordance with this strategic plan, the new management team has since
consolidated the Companys share capital on the basis of one new Common Share
for seven old Common Shares; accessed new equity development capital;
established a new production infrastructure whereby the Company believes it has
a strong supply chain which provides services and technology to produce the
products necessary to satisfy customer purchase orders and fluctuating demand;
secured required regulatory approvals; secured product liability insurance;
implemented educational marketing initiatives; and grown sales and distribution
of products to North American rail tank car manufacturers and retrofit/repair
businesses. The Companys revenues over the last eight quarters were as follows:
$6,751,794 for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, $5,936,597 for the quarter
ended September 30, 2014, $5,648,384 for the quarter ended June 30, 2014,
$5,480,034 for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, $4,901,356 for the quarter
ended December 31, 2013, $3,555,829 for the quarter ended September 30, 2013,
$2,660,140 for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 and $2,014,062 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2013. The Companys net income over the last eight quarters were
as follows: net income of $762,321 for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, net
income of $959,039 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, net income of
$1,080,846 for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, net income of $1,223,575 for the
quarter ended March 31, 2014, net income of $2,205,609 for the quarter ended
December 31, 2013, net income of $10,646 for the quarter ended September 30,
2013, net income of $160,664 for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 and net income
of $79,972 for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The Company also believes that
the management team has improved the Companys business reputation and gained
the confidence of the railroad and investment community by making deliveries on
time and satisfying payment obligations on time, which was not always the case
before the Companys current management came on board.

The Company believes that it continues to build a quality brand
in the railroad industry based on its reputation to create, develop, engineer
and reliably supply technology and product solutions that address the demanding
technology criteria of our railroad customers. The Company brings new technology
to the railroad industry which has historically been slow to develop.
Specifically, the Company designs products that are aimed at reducing the risks
associated with transport of HAZMAT in the railroad industry, and the Company
attempts to solve problems that have been persistent in the market for years.
For example, the Companys BOV design is a response to numerous industry
requests to develop a better bottom outlet valve, and the Company believes its
BOV design is an improvement on the standard bottom outlet valves. Two years
ago, the Company asked several key customers about their needs. Several of these
customers, including Trinity Industries, Inc. and Potash Corporation of
Saskatchewan Inc., asked the Company when it was going to design a bottom outlet
valve. Due to its AAR committee work, the Company also knew that the existing
bottom outlet valves had leak problems and corrosion issues. When the Company
announced its BOV design, several companies including E. I. du Pont de Nemours
and Company and Tesoro Corporation volunteered to do the service trial. In the
past four years, the Company believes that it has successfully gained the
railroad industrys confidence, approval and their willingness to adopt its
products as evidenced by increased revenues from sales and by AAR approvals and
certifications for the Companys products. There is no guarantee that the
Companys customers who have inquired about BOVs or that the companies who have
volunteered to do the BOV service trials will purchase the Companys BOV
products.

Three Year History

2012

In March 2011, the Company received its Class F certification
for its production facilities in Bonham, Texas from the AAR. This is a formal
approval from the AAR based on on-site audits by AAR representatives. In order
to have approved products in the railroad industry, companies must adhere to the
AAR Manual of Standards and Rec. Practices  Section C Part III 
Specifications for Tank Cars M-1002 (2007)(M-1002) which sets out
recommended practices for design, manufacture and operation of railroad tank
cars. Within M-1002, there are specifications for facility classifications for
work on various parts of tank cars. Class F certification allows the facility to
design, manufacture and service valves on rail tank cars. The Companys Class F
certification expires on March 3, 2017.

---

- 14 -

In January 2012, the Company reported that its EPRV and KKM
were specified by several HAZMAT customers for installation on new rail tank
cars scheduled to be built in 2012 and that these transactions were expected to
be valued at approximately $3,000,000. However, the KKM transactions did not
materialize because additional improvements to the design of the safety latch
system on the KKM were necessary based on the results of KKM service trials.
This modification delayed the actual entry of the KKM into customer service, but
the Company has not missed any deliveries for the KKM because the Company has
not received any orders for the KKM as of the date of this filing. See Business
Overview  Markets for a summary of actual revenue generated by product line.

In February 2012, the Company reported that it received
additional purchase orders for its EPRVs in excess of $1,000,000. Accordingly,
revenue from the Companys EPRV product line for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2012 was put in excess of $4,000,000. See Business Overview 
Markets for a summary of actual revenue generated by product line. The key to
this business activity was that two of the four major tank car manufacturers
(OEMs) designated the Companys EPRV as recommended standard equipment
on a series of their railroad tank cars used primarily for ethanol and crude oil
transport. The two OEMs that designated the Companys EPRV as recommended
standard equipment were Trinity Industries, Inc. (Trinity) and American
Railcar Industries, Inc. (ARI). This designation is significant because
the Company is listed as standard and not optional equipment for tank cars
destined for crude oil and ethanol service. Trinity is the number one tank car
manufacturer in North America, while ARI is the number three tank car
manufacturer in North America.

In June 2012, the Company reported that the high performance
attributes of a new extension of its EPRV product line, the JS75XL, were
successfully verified by an independent engineering test lab in Columbus, Ohio
as required by the railroad industry. These high performance attributes include
exceeding the industry standards by 5-10% in terms of standard cubic feet per
minute and rate of pressure, as well as higher flow rates. The Company also
believes that its JS75XL has lower costs of ownership and maintenance when
compared to competitors products based on replacement order and cost
information provided to the Company by valve and tank car repair shops.
Specifically, the Company has been advised by certain repair shops that the
level of valve replacement parts being ordered for competitors products is
higher than the level of replacement parts being ordered for the Companys
products. Also, these repair shops have advised the Company that the cost to
overhaul or repair the Companys valves is lower than the comparable costs for
competitors valves. The Company believes that a larger number of the valve and
tank repair shops customers use competitors products more than the Companys
products on the basis that the competitors products have been on the market
longer and as such there are a larger number of the competitors products
already in these customers tank cars. The Company believes that when valve and
tank repair shop customers seek to repair or replace valves and other parts in
their tank cars, they tend to either repair the existing parts or replace them
with the same product they already use due to the reduced paperwork required
compared to replacing the part with a different product, unless they have been
sold on another product, such as the Companys valves, through marketing
initiatives or unless they have some other specific reason to try a different
product such as the Companys product. Accordingly, the Company believes that in
these cases the repaired competitors products are older than the still
functioning products that the Company has sold. Although the Company believes
the information provided by these repair shops to be reliable, there is no
guarantee that this information is accurate or reliable. The JS75XL is one of a
number of high performance EPRV products that the Company created to distinguish
the enhanced performance capacity of its EPRV products above all other
competitive products. On June 20, 2012, Kelso Innovative was incorporated.

In August 2011, the Company reported that its high performance
specifications for its new EPRV, the JS75XH/27, were successfully performance
tested and confirmed by an independent engineering test lab in Denver, Colorado
as required by the railroad industry. These high performance specifications
include exceeding the industry standards by 5-10% in terms of standard cubic
feet per minute and rate of pressure, we well as higher flow rates and lower
costs of ownership and maintenance when compared to competitors products. The
JS75XH/27 joined the JS75XL/5 as the second new EPRV that the Company created to
establish new high-performance specifications that meet the new regulatory
standards in development for a number of critical HAZMAT applications. The
JS75XL/5 meets the new regulatory criteria for insulated/jacketed rail tank cars
while the JS75XH/27 meets the new regulatory goals for Package 1 and 2 rail tank
cars designed for demanding applications in the transport of crude oil and
ethanol.

---

- 15 -

On September 4, 2012, the Company provided notice that it
changed its financial year end from August 31st to December
31st. On September 28, 2012, the Company closed a non-brokered
private placement for gross proceeds of US$1,197,000 by issuing 1,995,000 units
at a price of US$0.60 per unit. Each unit consists of one Common Share and
one-half of one share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder
to purchase one additional Common Share at a price of US$0.80 per share until
September 28, 2014. All the securities issued in connection with this private
placement were subject to a four-month and a day hold period which expired on
January 29, 2013. The Company paid 8% percent finder's fees ($91,414) where
applicable in accordance with TSXV policies and guidelines in connection with
the private placement.

In October 2012, the Company reported that it received
regulatory approval from the AAR for its new heavy-duty, high performance EPRV
known as the JS75XH/27 that was successfully tested by independent sources in
August 2011. The JS75XH/27 is fully qualified to be commercially utilized in
numerous heavy duty HAZMAT applications that include the transport of crude oil
and ethanol. The Company also received its Class D (which includes Class F)
certification under M-1002(1) for its EPRV and manway production
facilities in Bonham, Texas from the AAR. The Companys AAR Class D
certification allows the facility to design, manufacture and service valves on
rail tank cars as well as perform welding operations on tank car structures. The
first shipments of the JS75XH/27 to OEM customers commenced during April 2012.
The Company also reported that it has applied for AAR M-1003  Specification
for Quality Assurance(M-1003) certification and has tailored all
of its quality assurance programs and processes to that standard. M-1003 is a
quality assurance standard specifically related to the railroad industry and is
the railroad equivalent to ISO 9000 standards. A supplier must have M-1003
certification to be approved to produce valves and certain other service
equipment for tank cars, and a failure to maintain this certification will
prevent a manufacturer from shipping products because the certification is a
prerequisite for customers to install units on a tank car. If units are
installed on a tank car from a non-approved supplier, the units must be removed
the next time the tank car is emptied or face substantial fines. The M-1003
certification is enforced by audits from the United States Federal Railroad
Administration (the FRA) and AAR. The Company received its M-1003
approval certificate in January 2013. The principal differences between M-1002
and M-1003, both of which are facility certifications, is that M-1002 is
required for the building and maintenance of tank car parts whereas M-1003 is a
quality assurance standard. As of April 2013, pursuant to AAR Circular Letter
CPC-1260, the AAR required all facilities that do tank car work to have an
approved M-1003 certificate or to have applied for an M-1003 certificate before
the AAR Circular Letter CPC-1260 effective date. Prior to the effective date of
AAR Circular Letter CPC-1260, M-1003 certification was not required in order for
the Company to sell its products. The Company received its M-1003 certification
prior to the effective date of AAR Circular Letter CPC-1260. In addition, the
Company has obtained the requisite AAR approval numbers for its EPRVs. The AAR
does not provide approval numbers for manways or eduction tubes.

|(1) | In March 2011, the Company received its Class F
      certification for its production facilities in Bonham, Texas from the AAR.
      This is a formal approval from the AAR based on on-site audits by AAR
      representatives. In order to have approved products in the railroad
      industry, companies must adhere to the AAR Manual of Standards and Rec.
      Practices  Section C Part III  Specifications for Tank Cars M-1002
      (2007)(M-1002) which sets out recommended practices for
      design, manufacture and operation of railroad tank cars. Within M-1002,
      there are specifications for facility classifications for work on various
      parts of tank cars. Class F certification allows the facility to design,
      manufacture and service valves on rail tank cars. The Companys Class F
      certification expires on March 3, 2017
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In November 2012, the Company acquired all proprietary and
manufacturing rights from the James Wilson Company of Houston, Texas for their
ETS product line for US$65,000. ETS are used in the loading and unloading of
highly corrosive chemicals from rail tank cars and road tank trailers.
Hydrochloric acid is the largest application for the ETS and a key chemical in
hydraulic fracturing and oil sands processing. Growth of production output in
the petroleum, natural gas and oil sands industries has fueled increases in
demand for new chemical rail tank cars in 2013 and 2014 a market of interest for
Kelso. The Companys ETS is marketed as the Kelso Tiger Tube and sold to the
Companys OEM, retrofit and repair customers in conjunction with its EPRV that
has been specifically designed for the rigors of acid handling and transport.
Kelso Innovative manages the design elements of the ETS. Also in November 2012,
the Company expanded its production facility in Bonham, Texas bringing the total
to 47,600 square feet (41,600 square feet of leased premises and 6,000 square
feet of owned premises). The Bonham leased facility is dedicated to the
assembly, testing and certification of up to 400 EPRV per week on a single shift
basis.Production capacity can be scaled upward when required. The key
significance of Bonham, Texas is that it is within a 250 mile radius of the
Companys largest customers.

---

- 16 -

In December 2012, the Company reported that it increased
production capacity at the leased premises to 450 EPRV per week including its
JS75XH (carbon steel) and JS75XHS (stainless steel) EPRVs that meet the new
industry benchmark for tank cars in the ethanol and crude oil sectors. These
valves flow at 30,060 scfm which is in excess of the 27,000 scfm minimum flow
rate desired by AAR and federal regulators.

2013

In March 2013, the Company announced that it entered into a
joint sales and marketing agreement with Bulk Tank Inc. (BTI), a
trucking industry supplier, whereby BTI and the Company would market each
others products to their respective customer bases. BTI is the number one
supplier by sales volume and quality for pressure differential trailers in the
trucking industry. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company agreed to market
BTIs products in the rail industry in the United States, Canada and Mexico and
BTI agreed to pay the Company a fee equivalent to any mark-up charged to its end
customers on sales brought to BTI by the Company upon payment by such end
customers, and the parties agreed that all orders for BTI product would be
placed directly with BTI and that the Company would not take possession of the
goods at any time. The mark-up payable to the Company is typically 30% of the
selling price which is determined by BTI. Amounts are payable each quarter that
the product has shipped. The term of the agreement is for one year ending March
12, 2014, which term may be automatically renewed for additional one year terms,
subject to earlier termination. The agreement may be terminated by providing at
least 30 days notice prior to the end of the initial or any subsequent term. As
of the date of this filing, the Company has been paid $11,384 for sales of BTIs
products. The Company does not believe that this agreement is material. Also in
March 2013, the Company reported that it received AAR approval (AAR Approval
Number 079002) for a new 75 PSI pressure relief valve that has the highest flow
rating for this pressure rating and mounting size. The new JS75XL fits a 3 tank
car nozzle with a 6 1⁄2 nominal mounting bolt circle and has a flow rating of
4,099 scfm. It can also be mounted inside the protective housing on new tank
cars.

In May 2013, the Company reported that it successfully
completed independent testing of its KKM. This evaluation was the last stage of
qualification of the KKM for railroad use and confirmed that the KKM is a
leading technology product when compared to similar legacy technology products
currently in use in the industry. The Company is ready for commercial production
of its KKMs, and upon receiving orders will move the KKM into commercial
production at its production facility in Bonham, Texas.

In June 2013, the Company reported that it has filed a patent
application for a new BOV design for use on new rail tank cars and retrofits of
existing rail tank cars. The patent application was filed on June 3, 2013 under
a Non-Publication Request which keeps the patent filing private until the
patent is issued. The final patent is expected to take two or more years to be
granted, and if granted, to have a lifespan of 17 years from the date of grant.
Also in June 2013, the Company received its M-1003 certification.

In September 2013, the Company reported that its new JS330 EPRV
for pressure tank cars had been successfully pressure and flow tested and
confirmed by an independent AAR approved engineering test facility in Colorado.
Our JS330 is a derivative of our existing EPRV patent and meets the performance
specifications and regulatory requirements for pressure tank cars. It is
designed for demanding applications in the transport of pressurized commodities
such as propane and anhydrous ammonia. A patent application is in process. Kelso
has applied to the Association of American Railroads for an application number
and service trial approval. It is anticipated that the service trial will
commence in mid 2015 and be completed in two years.

In October 2013, the Company reported that the Tank Car
Committee (TCC) of the AAR has cleared the KKM for unrestricted
commercial use. The Company agreed to continue to report on those KKM units in
the original FST for a one year period using the FST format, and to keep the TCC
apprised of all commercial KKM installations in terms of number of units and in
what service they are being used.

---

- 17 -

In November 2013, the Company reported that it had reviewed the
performance characteristics of its KKM with loading terminal operators and
management at the Bakken Oil Fields in North Dakota. The review confirmed that
there are several compelling economic advantages and arguments for the
commercial adoption of the KKM. See Key Products for additional information on
the economic advantages and arguments for the commercial adoption of the KKM.
Also in November 2013, the Company reported that it intends to commence
construction of its new production facility in Bonham, Texas in December 2013.
Construction on this new facility began in February, 2014. The new facility will
be approximately 44,000 square feet and is expected to be completed in June of
2014. The facility is expected to cost approximately US$2,400,000 which the
Company plans to fund through its internal capital resources. The Company also
reported that effective December 13, 2013, its headquarters in the United States
was moved to 2777 Finley Road, Suite 15, Downers Grove, IL 60515.

In December 2013, the Company reported that the SEC completed
its review of the Companys Registration Statement on Form 20-F and that the
Company became registered as a reporting issuer under the United States
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

2014

In February 2014, the Company reported that it has filed a
patent application for a new externally mounted dual rating pressure relief
valve (DPRV) design for use on new rail tank cars and retrofits of
existing rail tank cars that are in Packaging Groups 1 & 2 (US Bureau of
Explosives designations) which include all tank cars carrying crude oil and
ethanol as well as other flammable chemicals. In general terms, in an accident
involving fire, the DPRV is intended to lower its operating pressure rating to a
level that will keep the valve open in order to evacuate the tank car in less
than 100 minutes as required by AAR recommendations. The Company believes, based
on managements knowledge of current industry standards and other products on
the market that the DPRV is a significant change compared to currently available
technology, and that the DPRV will provide economic advantages to the impact of
the expense of retrofits facing the railroad industry. The patent has been filed
under a non-Publication Request which keeps the patent filing private until
the patent is issued. This has been done for competitive reasons. The Company
expects the DPRV to enter the AAR approval process shortly after the prototypes
are completed, which management expects to be done in May 2014. The final patent
is expected to take two years or more to be granted and to carry a 17 year life
starting from the date the patent is granted.

In March 2014, the Company reported that it has formed a
strategic business and engineering alliance with SafeRack Loading Rack
Technologies (SafeRack) with the goal of incorporating the Companys
KKM technology as part of a new generation of high-capacity crude oil loading
terminal systems designed and provided by SafeRack. The Company believes that
SafeRack is the leading expert in crude oil and liquid natural gas loading
terminal engineering, procurement and construction services for the railroad and
trucking industries based on the knowledge of management of the Company of such
industries. Under this arrangement, the Company and SafeRack have developed and
tested a fully functional loading arm adaptor that fits both the KKM and hinged
6 and 8 eye-bolt manway currently in service on tank cars in North America. The
Company and SafeRack are also educating HAZMAT shippers on the economic
advantages and operational benefits for the commercial adoption of the KKM. The
Company does not believe that its arrangement with SafeRack is material.

In April 2014, the Company declared an annual cash dividend of
US$0.01 per share on outstanding common shares of the Company as of the record
date of April 15, 2014. The dividend was paid on April 30, 2014.

On May 22, 2014 the common shares of the Company commenced
trading on the TSX under the trading symbol KLS.

On June 4, 2014 the shareholders of the Company re-approved a
shareholder rights plan pursuant to an agreement between the Company and
Computershare Trust Company of Canada dated February 3, 2011.

On June 4, 2014 the shareholders of the Company approved the
Companys 10% rolling stock option plan.

---

- 18 -

On July 1, 2014 the Company occupied the new 44,000 sq. ft.
manufacturing facility in Bonham, TX. Production was fully consolidated in the
new facility as of September 30, 2015. The 6,000 sq. ft. facility adjacent to
the new manufacturing facility and previously used for manufacturing is now a
product development and customer training center.

On October 8, 2014 the Company filed a patent application for
the VRV. Service trials for the VRV are expected to start in 2015. The VRV valve
design applies the constant force spring technology used in all of our pressure
relief valves. The patent application was filed on under a Non-Publication
Request which keeps the patent filing private until the patent is issued. The
final patent is expected to take two or more years to be granted, and if
granted, to have a lifespan of 17 years from the date of grant.

On October 14, 2014 the common shares of the Company commenced
trading on the NYSE under the trading symbol KIQ.

In November, 2014 the Company increased engineering manpower in
November by 40% to increase the speed of product development.

On December 2, 2014 the Company received its first commercial
100 tank car unit train order featuring both the pressure relief valve and one
bolt manway.

On December 4, 2014 the AAR approves JS165H high-flow pressure
release valve for commercial applications after completing its two year field
trials.

Capital Expenditures

The Company completed the construction of a new 44,000 square
foot assembly plant in Bonham, Texas. The new building cost approximately
US$2,700,000 and was completed in June of 2014. This building was financed
through internal growth. The Company has no other capital expenditures planned
at this time nor does it have any divestitures planned.

Takeover Offers

The Company is not aware of any indication of any public
takeover offers by third parties in respect of our common shares during our last
financial year or current financial year.

|B. | Business Overview
|-- | -----------------

The Company is a railroad equipment supplier that produces and
sells proprietary tank car service equipment used in the safe loading, unloading
and containment of hazardous materials during transport. Products are
specifically designed to provide economic and operational advantages while
reducing the potential effects of human error and environmental harm during the
transport of hazardous materials.

The Company currently offers approximately 52 products. The key
products that the Company offers include a series of 47 types of EPRVs for
pressure management; 4 types of KKM manway securement systems; and 1 ETS product
that address the technical requirements of load and unload operations and the
containment of hazardous commodities during transport. Products are proprietary
and patent protected and designed for use on applications on railroad tank cars
but can be modified for use in other markets such as trucking. The Company has
obtained patents for its EPRV (Patent No. 5,855,225) and KKM (Patent No. US
7,104,722 B2), but the patent for the Companys ETS technology has expired. The
Company has filed patent applications under non-Publication Requests for a new
BOV design and for the DPRV. The DPRV is being developed at the request of the
Rail Supply Institute (RSI) and AAR. It is designed to meet the latest tank car
pressure relief valve mathematical model that is the standard for sizing
pressure relief valves on rail tank cars. Recent modifications to this model
indicate that the latest pressure relief valves no longer meet the tank car
specification for emptying a full tank car in 100 minutes when exposed to a
fire. The DPRV will meet this requirement under the new criteria for
performance. It will ultimately replace our JS75XH which is the standard in the
industry for crude oil and ethanol. The DPRV is designed to fit both new car and
meet retrofit requirements should they be placed in effect by regulators in the
coming 12 months. See Information Concerning our Company  History and
Development of our Company  Three Year History. See Risk Factors  Risks
Relating to the Business for additional information on patents for the
Companys product. See Key Products below for a description of the Companys
key products. In addition to current product offerings, Kelso Innovative, the
Companys wholly-owned product development enterprise, receives feedback from
key customers on new products to add to the Companys catalogue and considers,
and where appropriate incorporates, this customer feedback into product
development decisions. The Company does not have any agreements with its
customers in this regard.

---

- 19 -

The Company recruited and appointed a new executive management
team in April 2010 at which time a commercial business plan was established. In
accordance with this strategic plan, the new management team has since
consolidated the Companys share capital on the basis of one new Common Share
for seven old Common Shares; repaired Kelsos business reputation; gained the
confidence of the railroad and investment community; accessed new equity
development capital; established a modern state-of-the-art production
infrastructure; secured required regulatory approvals; secured product liability
insurance; implemented educational marketing initiatives; and steadily grown
sales and distribution of products to key North American rail tank car
manufacturers and many retrofit/repair businesses.

The Company continues to build a quality brand in the railroad
industry based on its reputation to create, develop, engineer and reliably
supply best technology product solutions that address the demanding technology
criteria of our railroad customers. In less than three years, the Company has
successfully gained the railroad industrys confidence, approval and their
willingness to adopt its products.

The Common Shares are publicly traded on the TSX under the
trading symbol KLS and on the NYSE under the trading symbol KIQ.

The Company operates in combination with its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Kelso USA and Kelso Innovative. Kelso USA is the operational arm
of the Company, while Kelso Innovative focuses on engineering industrial designs
and distribution plans for the Companys KKM system for applications in the
roadway trucking and trailer market.

Markets

The Companys principal markets are the United States and
Canada. The Company distributes its products directly to its customers from the
Companys production facilities in Bonham, Texas.

The Companys key products are the ETS, the KKM and the EPRV.
Each of these key products is at the commercial production stage. The Company,
through Kelso Innovative, continues to work on the development of new products
and on finding new and economic applications for its existing products,
including, for example, applications for the Companys products in the trucking
industry.

The Companys total revenue for the past three financial years
is attributable by key product and by geographic region as follows:

Year Ended
    Total
      Revenue (audited)
    Key
      Product
    Geographic JurisdictionETS
      (unaudited)
    KKM
      (unaudited)
    EPRV
      (unaudited)
    United
      States (unaudited)
    Canada (unaudited)August 31, 2012
    $2,233,807
    Nil (0%)
    Nil (0%)
    $2,233,807
      (100%)
    $2,233,807
      (100%)
    Nil (0%)December 31, 2012(1)
    $2,830,778
    Nil (0%)
    Nil (0%)
    $2,830,778
      (100%)
    $2,830,778
      (100%)
    Nil (0%)December 31, 2013
    $13,131,387
    $64,975 (0.5%)
    Nil (0%)
    $13,066,412
      (99.5%)
    $13,131,387
      (100%)
    Nil (0%)December 31, 2014
    $23,816,809
    $46,097 (0.2%)
    $151,027 (0.6%)
    $23,569,460
      (99.2%)
    $22,875,589
      (96%)
    $941,220 (4%)


|(1) | On December 31, 2012, the Company
      changed its financial year end from August 31stto December
      31st. The financial information in this row is for the four
      months ended December 31, 2012.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|

---

- 20 -

Business Model

The business model of the Company is focused on the industrial
design and engineering development of qualified commercial products based on the
Companys patents, proprietary rights and specific adoption criteria established
by its clientele. The resulting products are marketed, produced and distributed
to the Companys OEM, repair and retrofit customers in the railroad industry.

The Companys primary goal is to build large profitable revenue
streams from its products. Management plans to reinvest profits into the
expansion of the Companys business to grow earnings to levels that maintain
financial health without further external funding; improve returns on
investment; allow for the payment of dividends; and allow the corporate value to
increase on behalf of the Companys shareholders. However, there is no guarantee
that the Company will be successful in achieving these goals.

The relevance of the Companys products is opportune as the
Company believes the railroad industry is entering a boom period due to the
rapid growth of crude oil shipments in North America. This has led to increased
demand for rail tank cars in crude oil service, as documented by numerous
sources such as the AAR, Progressive Railroading and Railway Age
magazines and the Railway Supply Institute. The Company believes that the
railroad industry has not meaningfully re-engineered load/unload and containment
systems for hazardous materials in over 70 years. The Company also believes that
social liabilities, environmental sensitivities and worker safety issues have
increased government pressure and spurred new regulations in both Canada and the
United States. The Company believes that this may prompt the transportation
industry to adopt new technologies at a much quicker pace which would provide
the Company with a solid foundation on which to grow a sustainable, profitable
business. Pictures of manways from the 1930s show the existing manway design
has not changed. The current helical spring PRVs date back to the 1940s when
original patents were issued.

New additions to the M-1002 and Federal Regulations (CFR 49) in
the US have been mostly driven by need to improve safety, protect the
environment form accidental spills. The recent tragic accidents at Lac Mégantic,
Quebec and in Alabama have further driven regulations to improve safety all
around as evidenced by the emergency regulations issued by Transport Canada and
the FRA. The Company believes that these tragic accidents have put increased
pressure on the railroad industry to redesign and possibly retrofit the DOT111
tank cars. The AAR Tank Car Committee has approximately 42 active task groups to
address safety, environmental/social concerns of which Kelso is active on
six.

The Company believes the key components of the Companys
business model include:


    experienced executive management, including directors and
      officers with several years of business experience as described under
      Directors and Senior Management;
    focused strategic plans that are achievable, flexible and
      sustainable;
    access to development capital through reputable public
      company governance;
    corporate branding as a reliable supplier of high-quality
      railroad equipment;
    exceptional customer service;
    industrial engineering capability for product solutions
      based on customers specific criteria;
    growth of a next generation equipment catalogue through
      in-house product development that moves away from historical products to
      significantly different technology;
    acquisition of new or established products that can grow
      new markets under our management;
    marketing initiatives that promote awareness of our
      products being best available technology as evidenced by increasing
      revenue from sales of the Companys products and adoption rates for the
      Companys products in the marketplace;
    reliable order base from customers to fuel predictable
      profitable business growth; and
    production infrastructure and capacity that can supply
      demand.


Although still a small enterprise, the Company believes that it
is at the forefront of technology development for the railroad industry because
it has developed products using new technology which are designed to address
current industry and customer demand and which replace products that are based
on technology which was developed in some cases over 80 years ago. The Companys
business model is focused on becoming a leader in the design and supply of new
technologies aimed at worker safety and the safe handling and containment of
hazardous materials in transportation systems.

---

- 21 -

Key Products

The Company currently offers approximately 52 products. The key
products that the Company offers, as summarized below, include a series of 47
types of EPRVs for pressure management; 4 models of the KKM manway securement
system; and 1 ETS product that address the technical requirements of load and
unload operations and the containment of hazardous commodities during transport.
Products are designed for use on applications on railroad tank cars but can be
modified for use in other markets such as trucking. The Company has patent
protection for its EPRV and KKM. See Risk Factors  Risks Relating to the
Business. In addition to current product offerings, Kelso Innovative has been
working on new products to add to the Companys catalogue by incorporating
customer feedback into product development decisions.

External Constant Force Spring Pressure Relief Valves (EPRV)

Over the past decade Kelso has been involved in the
development, regulatory approval, marketing and manufacture of EPRVs that are
designed for railroad tank cars that carry hazardous and nonhazardous
commodities. The Company currently has approximately 47 versions of EPRVs in its
product line, including a number of high-performance EPRVs. As required, the
Companys series of EPRVs have received AAR approval based on service trials and
physical testing. The Company believes that its series of EPRVs are best
available technology products and proprietary to the Company. The Company
believes they have a number of significant competitive advantages that include:

| | high barrier to entry for competitors due to our patent
      rights and the years of testing required by the AAR to gain regulatory
      approvals;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | the only high flow valve in market that is totally
      external, which limits exposure to chemicals or other corrosive substances
      transported in the tank car (the Company believes that its EPRV is the
      only high flow valve in the market that is totally external based on the
      Companys knowledge of the products offered by other high flow valve
      manufacturers in what is a small market compared to other valve markets,
      and based on the Companys knowledge that there is only one other valve on
      the market that meets the high-flow requirement (a minimum flow of 27,000
      scfm@75psi) which valve is an external helicalspring valve sold by Fort
      Vale Manufacturing; there may be other manufacturers of external high flow
      valves that the Company is not aware of);
| | technological improvement over older valve systems as it
      eliminates the helical coil spring, the internal valve stems and spring
      guide tube;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | the introduction of multiple springs, thus preventing the
      disruptions that occur with existing single-spring designs that become
      completely inoperable when the single spring fails;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | increased valve reliability due to little or no contact
      with HAZMAT;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | uses flat gasket seal which is more tolerant to
      contamination;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | low profile provides for better roll-over safety; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | external design allows complete inspection during
      loading.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

See Information on the Company  Business Overview 
Competitive Conditions below.

Kelso Klincher® Manway (KKM)

The Company holds the patent rights for a new manway technology
trademarked as the Kelso Klincher®. The Company believes the KKM is a
technology change for the railroad industry where the return on investment and
arguments for customers adoption of the KKM are compelling. The Company
believes they include:



---

- 22 -

| | one bolt-and-strap design eliminates eye-bolt problems
      and possible leaks due to crushed gaskets (the strap system design applies
      uniform force on the gaskets when they are drawn together to secure the
      lid, whereas the eye-bolts point load the gasket at each eye-bolt location
      which can crush the gasket during securement which is proven by use of
      pressure-sensitive tape to illustrate the gasket stress under an eye-bolt
      compared to gasket stress with our strap system; the absence of eye-bolts
      on the Companys KKM is obvious simply by looking at pictures of the old
      and new manways; since the Companys KKM does not have eye-bolts the
      Company has eliminated them as a problem; the Company has gasket test data
      from a manway gasket supplier that shows point loading a gasket yields
      gasket stress that can crush a gasket under an eye-bolt; the manway gasket
      suppliers testing shows that the Companys system applies uniform gasket
      stress that cannot crush a gasket due to uniform loading of the gasket);
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | eliminates lid deformation and nozzle distortion due to
      the over-torque of eye-bolts (when eye-bolts are over-torqued, the result
      can be a bent eye-bolt slot ear on the lid which renders the lid
      inoperative at that eye-bolt location, which can also pull on the eye-bolt
      attachment bracket on the nozzle and build up stress which will pull the
      nozzle out of round and make it difficult to seal the lid onto the nozzle;
      the Companys KKM does not have ears to bend as there are no eye-bolts;
      nozzle distortion is usually caused by the tank car sagging over time,
      causing the nozzle to go egg-shaped due to the forces on it; the nozzle is
      uniformly round and is easily distorted, so the Companys KKM has a large
      stiffening ring on the top of the nozzle that reinforces the nozzle and
      adds significant strength which can resist the impact of forces generated
      when the tank car sags);                                                                                                                                   
| | eliminates relaxation of gaskets under eye-bolt location
      (the strap system uniformly loads the gasket; current AAR recommended
      practice for securing an eye-bolted manway (AAR Pamphlet 34) includes
      applying torque to each eye-bolt in 25% increments to allow the gasket to
      react to the point loading referenced above; gaskets, however, actually
      move under each eye-bolt location as they are flexible and can stretch or
      deform slightly as torque is applied to the eye-bolt, and they need time
      to relax so they can allow the spread of the gasket forces before they
      next torque application is made);                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | reduces eye-bolt nuts loosening in transit due to
      vibration and improper cross-bolting technique, which can result in a
      $5,000 fine imposed by FRA for every loose eye bolt (loose eye-bolts have
      many causes including: failure by employees to tighten, improper torque
      procedure, damaged eye-bolt (all eye-bolts use SAE thread), vibration,
      etc.), much of which is due to employees not following procedures; we
      believe that our single-bolt design reduces the employee inputs from 24-32
      (per AAR Pamphlet 32) down to one which is hard to bypass, and we believe
      that our design substantially reduces the risk of errors due to employee
      error; our single bolt uses an ACME thread which is very resistant to
      loosening by vibration as it is based on bolted designs used in ships
      which have terrible vibration problems rather than an SAE thread which is
      used for eye-bolts);                                                                                                                                                    
| | standard AAR-approved gasket retention method with
      currently used hard and soft gaskets;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | ACME Thread on T-Bolt virtually eliminates loosening due
      to vibration (this type of thread is typically used on ships where
      vibrations are constant; this is a well-known design feature of ACME
      threads and the Companys field experience has verified this feature; the
      Company has not had any incidents where the ACME threaded component has
      loosened, whereas the eye-bolts on existing manways loosen routinely);                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | rigid collar at top of nozzle reduces risk of nozzle or
      lid distortion;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | much faster opening and closing operation with one bolt
      management system, considering the industry recommended practice generally
      takes approximately 25 to 35 minutes as documented in AAR Pamphlet 34
      whereas the KKM procedure takes approximately 5 minutes;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | increases daily terminal loading capacity up to 32%, thus
      increasing revenues of terminal operations that are paid by the volume of
      oil loaded and shipped (confirmed by loading terminal operators and
      management at the Bakken Oil Fields);                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | uniform load on the gasket prolongs service life as
      evidenced by field service experience;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | reduces possible release of hazardous commodity in a
      roll-over accident by moving threaded closing mechanism below the plane of
      the lid;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | ease of operation with lightweight hinged lid;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | no eyebolts to kick at tank car inspection (it is
      standard practice for an FRA field inspector to inspect for loose
      eye-bolts on a manway by climbing on top of a tank car, standing in the
      center of the manway and actually kicking each eye-bolt to see if it is
      loose; since the Companys KKM does not have eye-bolts there is nothing
      for the field inspector to kick; the Companys tee-bolt is protected by a
      handle and cannot be kicked as it is not accessible to the foot of the
      inspector); and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | the KKM comes in 4 models which include various levels of
      stainless steel construction for corrosion prevention to meet specific
      customer needs.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

---

- 23 -

Kelso Tiger Tube - Eduction Technology (ETS)

The Kelso Tiger Tube ETS is a long-hose device used in the
loading and unloading of highly corrosive chemicals from rail and road tank
cars. It is constructed of specialty materials and has been specifically
designed for the rigors of acid handling and transport.

Production and Services

The Company operates three production facilities totaling
approximately 91,600 square feet in Bonham, Texas. The Company is fully
qualified and certified to produce products for the railroad industry. It has
been granted the required certifications for its production facilities from the
AAR.

Location to supply chains and customers is a critical factor in
the Companys production strategy in order to reduce distribution costs of
inbound components and shipping costs associated with outgoing finished
products. Bonham, Texas is within approximately 250 miles of the Companys main
customers. The Company controls assembly, testing, certification and shipping
processes for its products. Production output can be scaled upwards when
required with minimal investment.

The Companys policy is that all parts and workforce must be
sourced in the United States or Canada when possible. The Company utilizes
assembly production techniques to produce finished products. The Company
believes that cast and fabricated components of the Companys products are being
sourced from expert certified suppliers because AAR regulations require the
Company to certify that each major supplier meets the Companys QA requirements
which are driven by M-1002 and M-1003. This is a matter of record as the Company
must have an AAR B1 form on file showing the supplier is approved by the
Company. The Company requires that the suppliers have current equipment and that
the suppliers employees have proper training certifications, including
certifications for welding. Having a current AAR Form B1 for each major supplier
is an audit item for the Companys M-1003 certification. Suppliers of major
metal components must provide mill certificates per AAR M-1003 for the materials
proving they are sourced from US or Canadian suppliers or other locations
approved by the Company. The Company believes that by using certified suppliers,
the Company minimizes expensive capital layouts for manufacturing equipment and
certified human resource expertise, which in turn reduces the Companys
financial risks due to fabrication and casting errors.

Cost control and minimization is paramount to the Companys
production strategy as is the plant location relative to customers to reduce
distribution costs. The Company believes it has engaged individuals with
extensive production expertise with the overall goal of attaining economic,
effective and efficient assembly operations. The Companys internal audit
requirements require that individuals performing critical operations for
component parts must have demonstrated a minimum of five years experience with
similar production procedures.

Marketing

The Companys marketing professionals work directly with users
of its products and the businesses that build, retrofit and repair railroad and
trucking rolling stock. There are two key market segments for the Companys
products. The largest and most demanding is the rail tank car manufacturers, or
OEMs, that produce new tank cars. The other is the railroad retrofit and repair
market. Both market segments continue to be developed by the Company, but
management has been making decisions about the operating matters of the Company
based on the OEM market as OEMs constitute the largest portion of the Companys
customer base. Management has established key strategic relationships with the
Federal Railroad Administration of the United States (FRA) and Transport Canada,
both of which have requested that the Company participate in and present at FRA
and Transport Canada training seminars throughout North America. The Company is
a member of the AAR, Chlorine Institute, Canadian Rail Supply, the Canadian
Association of Railway Suppliers and Railway Supply Institute (RSI) and
management has established key strategic relationships with other influential
members of the railroad community including the FRA and Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). These key strategic relationships have
resulted in the Company coordinating its actions with FRA and PHMSA
representatives, and working especially with the FRA to ensure its products meet
regulations and provide better technology. The Company believes that it is well
connected to the Safety and HAZMAT sections of the Class I railroads, such as
BNSF Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, Canadian National Railway and Canadian
Pacific Railway, by virtue of the Company meeting with the Safety and HAZMAT
security representatives for the Class I railroads. The Company has provided
valves and manways to install on most of their training cars, and the Company
joins them on customer and first-responder training sessions at their request.

---

- 24 -

The Company has also implemented educational marketing
initiatives whereby the Company sends representatives and speakers to industry
seminars and trade shows and to customer sponsored training seminars specific to
customer locations.

The Company believes that its marketing initiatives deliver a
steady flow of new orders from customers. Lead times from order point to
delivery date can range from one to 36 months. The Company has set its 2015
future sales targets based on railroad industry input at $36,000,000. However,
there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to reach its future sales
targets.

Research and Development

A key cornerstone of the Companys ability to sustain business
growth lies in its ability to create new commercial products. The Companys
research, development and engineering initiatives are conducted through Kelso
Innovative. Kelso Innovative is dedicated to the creation of new patented
products that better serve the modern challenges of the domestic and
international markets for the transport of HAZMAT via rail and road. Kelso
Innovative works closely with HAZMAT stakeholders designing products that
involve detailed proprietary and engineering knowledge and specific industry
adoption criteria. Many of these new products have significant industrial market
prospects. They are expected to be successfully developed, introduced and
adopted commercially over the upcoming years. The Company expects the products
to be approved by the AAR in time for sales in 2016. Testing and development
costs are not material. However, there is no guarantee that such products will
have significant market prospects or that they will be successfully developed,
introduced and adopted commercially. The Companys pressure relief valve for
high-pressure tank cars designed to carry liquefied compressed gas is currently
in testing and applications have been made to AAR for service trials. The
Companys BOV and vacuum relief valve are currently in the prototype stage with
an AAR application that is expected to begin service trials later in 2015. The
DPRV is being developed at the request of the RSI and AAR. It is designed to
meet the latest tank car pressure relief valve mathematical model that is the
standard for sizing pressure relief valves on rail tank cars. See Business
Overview.

Specialized Skill and Knowledge

The Company relies on the specialized skills of management,
employees and consultants in the areas of product development and assembly,
business development and public company management. In particular, the Company
believes that it has engaged individuals with extensive production expertise and
railroad industry experience with the overall goal of attaining economic,
effective and efficient assembly operations. The Company believes it has engaged
individuals with extensive production expertise because its internal hiring
standards require that individuals performing critical operations for component
parts must have demonstrated a minimum of five years experience with similar
production operations. The Company has also engaged a management team with
extensive experience managing public companies. See Directors, Senior
Management and Employees. The loss of any of these individuals could have an
adverse effect on the Company. See Risk Factors.

Competitive Conditions

The Company is an innovator in the design and supply of
railroad service equipment and uses patented technology to develop proprietary
commercial products. As at the date of this filing, the Companys main
competitors are Midland Manufacturing of Chicago, Illinois, and Union Tank Car
Company of Chicago, Illinois. Several new competitors including Fort Vale and
Girard Equipment have appeared as a result of the prospect of a large retrofit
market in crude oil and ethanol tank cars. These companies are new to the market
and face the prospect of lengthy service trials before their offerings are
approved. The Company considers the products developed by these competitors to
be legacy technology when compared to the Companys products. For example, the
Company believes its EPRV product line has advantages over the internal pressure
valve products offered by competitors as described under Key Products, and ESI
Inc., an independent firm based in Aurora, Illinois, which reviewed the
Companys KKM against competitive products determined that the Companys KKM was
the best available manway in its report dated May 6, 2013 titled Hazard
Analysis Kelso Technologies Klincher® Manway. Competitive products may be
forthcoming in the future but could be conditional based on their designs and
may have to undergo lengthy service trials and applications to gain regulatory
approvals from the AAR. This process could take two to three years to achieve,
giving the Company a significant advantage. The Company holds patent rights to
certain of its products and technologies. The Company takes its patent rights
seriously and intends to vigorously defend any infringements on the Companys
patents.

---

- 25 -

The ability of the Company to compete for and acquire
production contracts for its products in the future will depend on a number of
factors, including the Companys ability to continue to offer best available
technology, competitive pricing, timely delivery of purchase orders and strong
customer service.

Raw Materials/Components

The Company has three to five suppliers in the United States
for each component part of its products, and sources parts directly from these
suppliers based on the suppliers ability to satisfy the purchase order within
the specified timeframe. The Company assembles the components at its production
facilities in Bonham, Texas to develop its finished products which are then
shipped directly to the Companys customers. The parts used to assemble the
Companys products are generally available from a variety of suppliers at prices
which are within the Companys budget for such parts. Most materials used to
assemble the Companys products are commodity raw materials such as steel and
rubber. These materials are subject to price fluctuations which the Company
believes have historically been modest based on commodity prices for these
materials. As Company does not have any long term contracts with its suppliers,
it is able to mitigate the effects of such price fluctuations by adjusting
product pricing based on the price of commodity raw materials at the time a
purchase order is placed. See Risk Factors for a discussion of the risk
factors associated with price fluctuation for raw materials.

Intangible Properties

The Companys intangible property, particularly its
intellectual property rights, plays an important role in securing the Companys
competitive advantage. The Company holds the patents for its EPRV technology
(Patent No. 5,855,225 which expires January 29, 2016) and for its KKM (Patent
No. US 7,104,722 B2 which expires in 2023), and has a trademark for its Kelso
Klincher® Manway (Registration Number 4,282,652) and has filed a trademark
application for its Kelso Tiger Tube products. The Company does not have a
patent for its ETS technology. The Company applied for a patent on June 3, 2013
under a Non-Publication Request for its new BOV, on January 6, under a
non-Publication Request for its new DPRV2014 and on October 8, 2014 for its
new VRV under a non-Publication Request. The granting of the final patents for
the BOV, VRV and DPRV are expected to take two or more years, and if granted,
are expected to have a lifespan of 17 years from the date of grant. See
Information on our Company  History and Development of our Company  Three
Year History  2013 for additional information on Non-Publication Request.

These patents and trademarks are critical to the Companys
success as they provide a significant advantage to the Company over its
competitors. See Risk Factors for a discussion of risk factors relating to the
Companys intellectual property and competition.

Seasonality/Cycles

The cyclical nature of the Companys business reflects the
cyclical nature of business in the railroad industry. Generally, the first
quarter is the quietest for the Company and others in the railroad industry,
while the third and fourth quarters are the busiest. The quiet first quarter is
attributable, in large part, to this being the time of the year when companies
in the railroad sector are planning their development and purchase needs for the
year, while the delivery of products tends to happen in the third and fourth
quarter.

Economic Dependence

The Companys business is substantially dependent on Patent No.
5,855,225 for the Companys EPRV technology which expires in January 29, 2016
and Patent No. US 7,104,722 B2 for its KKM technology which expires in 2023. See
Material Contracts.

---

- 26 -

Although the Company is optimistic about its future as a
railroad equipment supplier, the Company is dependent upon a limited number of
customers for a significant portion of its revenue. The Company does not have
any formal agreements for long term, large-scale purchase orders from its
existing customers; however, the Company believes that it maintains good
relationships with its customers to maintain its status as a preferred supplier
of EPRV, KKM and 1 ETS product. The Company is a preferred supplier for Trinity
and ARI as evidenced by the Companys EPRV becoming recommended standard
equipment on a series of their railroad tank cars used primarily for ethanol and
crude oil transport. Trinity is the number one tank car manufacturer in North
America, while ARI is the number three tank car manufacturer in North America.
This designation is significant because the Company is listed as standard and
not optional equipment for tank cars of Trinity and ARI destined for crude oil
and ethanol service by these customers.

The Company currently services all five of the OEM producers of
rail tank cars. Purchase orders from these and other customers continue to be
submitted to the Company for its products. The Companys purchase orders are
subject to the general terms and conditions imposed by the Company. The general
terms and conditions provide that all payments from customers are due and
payable 30 days from the date of invoice, provided however, that the Company has
the right to require payment before shipment or payment via letter of credit in
the event that the Company determines the buyer is delinquent in payment or will
exceed its credit limit. Orders in process are subject to cancellation charges
as determined by the Company. The extent of work performed at the time of
cancellation will govern the amount of the charge.

Employees

As at December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately 42
employees (December 31, 2013  approximately 35 employees), including employees
of its subsidiaries. The largest group of employees works at the Companys
production facilities in Bonham, Texas and the remainder work in Chicago,
Illinois and North Delta, British Columbia.

Reorganizations

In April 2010, the Company completed a reorganization of its
management team. In connection with this reorganization, in May 2010, the
Company completed a consolidation of its Common Shares on the basis of seven old
Common Shares for one new Common Share.

Government Regulations

The railroad transportation industry is highly regulated by
governments. In both the United States and Canada, governments regulate, among
other things, transportation of HAZMAT and rail safety. The primary regulatory
body in the United States for the railroad transportation industry is U.S.
Department of Transportation and its Federal Railroad Administration, and in
Canada is Transport Canada.The Company endeavours to develop all of its
products and operate its business in compliance with all applicable government
regulations and testing requirements. The Company certifies its products on an
ongoing basis in accordance with AAR guidelines and government regulations. As
the Company assembles its products rather than manufactures them, the Company is
not subject to any environmental regulations other than the standard water and
sewage regulations.

|C. | Organizational
Structure
|-- | ------------------------

We have two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Kelso USA and Kelso
Innovative. The Company owns 100% of the voting securities of each of its
subsidiaries. Neither subsidiary has a class of restricted securities. See
Information on our Company  History and Development of Our Company.

|D. | Property, Plants and
  Equipment
|-- | --------------------------------

The Company operates three production facilities totaling
approximately 91,600 square feet in Bonham, Texas (leased premises of
approximately 41,600 square feet and owned premises of approximately 50,000
square feet). The Company also operates an administration office in Downers
Grove, Illinois. The Company is fully qualified and certified to produce
products for the railroad industry. It has been granted the required
certifications for its production facilities from the AAR. See Business
Overview for additional information regarding our facilities, including a
discussion of the productive capacity and extent of utilization of our
facilities and products produced. To the best of our knowledge, there are no
environmental issues that may affect our utilization of our assets.

---

- 27 -

As at December 31, 2014, the total carrying value for our
property, plant and equipment was $3,396,922 (December 31, 2013: $329,249), the
breakdown of which is as follows: land - $12,558 (December 31, 2013: $12,558),
buildings - $2,859,616 (December, 2013: $194,642), leasehold improvements -
$23,850 (December 31, 2013: $27,655), production equipment - $490,172 (December
31, 2013: $79,068), and vehicles - $10,726 (December 31, 2013: $15,326).

At the time of this filing, the Company has no new plans for
further acquisition or construction of new buildings as management feels that
our current space will handle all capacity issues in the year.

|Item 4A. | Unresolved Staff Comments
|-------- | -------------------------

Not applicable

|Item 5. | Operating and Financial Review and
      Prospects
|------- | --------------------------------------------------

The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014
(Fiscal 2014),December 31, 2013 (Fiscal 2013), the four
months ended December 31, 2012 (the Transition Period) and the fiscal
years ended August 31, 2012 (Fiscal 2012) and August 31, 2011
(Fiscal 2011), and of our results of operations for the four months
ended December 31, 2011 (the Comparative Period) should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included in this
annual report in accordance with Item 8  Financial Information. Our financial
statements for Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013, the Transition Period, the Comparative
Period, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 (collectively, the Reported
Periods) were prepared in accordance IFRS.

In April 2010 a new management team was brought in to help
rejuvenate the Company which at that time was in poor financial health and had
few business opportunities. Revenues for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010
were CDN$190,844. Since then revenues have grown steadily, Fiscal
2011-$1,326,024; Fiscal 2012-$2,233,807; Transition Period-$2,830,778; Fiscal
2013-$13,131,387 and Fiscal 2014-$23,816,809. At the same time the gross profit
margin has also increased 24% for Fiscal 2011; 25% for Fiscal 2012; 31.5% for
the Transition Period; 40.4% for Fiscal 2013 and 46% for Fiscal 2014. Revenues
have grown steadily due to the increasing demand from crude oil suppliers for
new tanker cars with which to move their product. This demand has caused OEM
manufacturers to increase their production of tanker cars. Management expects
this increased demand to continue for several years as the debate over pipelines
carries on. Our gross profit has increased due to economies of scale and also
due to a product mix that sees the industry ordering stainless steel EPRVs in
an attempt to reduce the corrosive effect of the sulphur content of the crude
oil that is being transported. The margins on stainless steel EPRVs are better
than the margins on the conventional carbon steel model. Our administrative
costs were $240,025 per month for Fiscal 2013 and have since risen to $389,285
(excluding share-based payments) per month for Fiscal 2014. These costs have
risen due to an increase in the number of employees the Company has (Fiscal
2013-35 people, Fiscal 2014-42 people) and the general costs associated with an
expanding business. Management believes that these costs will continue to grow
with the expanding staff that will be required for expected expanded future
demand. There have been no unusual or infrequent events that have affected the
Company directly with the exception of the increased demand for more tank cars
as a result of the crude oil industry and the numerous accidents in Canada and
the USA. These accidents have brought the whole railroad industry under scrutiny
and leads management to believe that all invested parties will be taking future
steps to increase their safety and environmental images which management
believes will result in more business for the Company.

See Item 17  Financial Statements and the notes to the
financial statements enclosed herewith for a discussion of the significant
accounting policies and significant estimates and judgments required to be made
by management.

---

- 28 -

|A. | Operating Results
|-- | -----------------

The financial results for the Reported Periods are indicative
of an industrial railroad equipment supply company transitioning from a product
development organization to a profitable business enterprise that distributes
commercial products from a high production infrastructure that can reliably
supply to a heavily regulated railroad industry. The growth in revenues,
corresponding expenses and resulting earnings reflect the Companys successful
progress in the execution of its business plan. The steady growth of sales and
distribution of our products to the larger OEM segment of the rail tank car
industry began in April 2012. Financial results reflect the costs and
investments associated with ongoing product development and the expansion of our
production capacity (including equipment, lease costs, training and qualifying
human resources) in advance of higher profitable sales levels. The strategic
plan for commercialization has also required the Company to make considerable
ongoing investments in production infrastructure; industrial engineering and
testing; railroad regulatory filings; liability insurance; and new market
initiatives. The majority of these costs are written off in the period when they
occur and reflect in the reported profitability of the Company in the period in
which they were incurred.

The Company has recently expanded quite rapidly due to the
added demand generated from the crude oil sector. Revenues have grown steadily
from $1,326,024 in Fiscal 2011 to $2,830,778 in our four month Transition Period
to $13,131,387 in Fiscal 2013 to $23,816,809 in Fiscal 2014. Our product pricing
has stayed fairly consistent but our volume of units sold has increased from
period to period. The greatest increase in units sold has been realized in
Fiscal 2014 as the OEM manufacturers have been receiving orders from crude oil
producers for more hazardous tanker cars to move their product. The Company
believes that this demand is growing and there is a change in orders to produce
EPRVs in stainless steel rather than carbon steel based on purchase orders the
Company has received. The Company has started to see more orders for stainless
steel EPRVs in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2014. This is evidenced by the gross
profit increase to 40.4% for Fiscal 2013 and 46% in Fiscal 2014. The margin on
stainless steel valves is better than the margin on the conventional carbon
valve. As revenue has grown over the Reported Periods so have our gross profit
margins. In Fiscal 2011 our margin was 24%; Fiscal 2012-25%; Transition
Period-31.5% ; Fiscal 2013-40.4% and Fiscal 2014-46%. Our margins have grown due
to economies of scale and also due to the recent change in the mix of EPRVs
that we are selling to a higher priced EPRV for the crude oil business. Our
administrative costs have increased recently due to the added demand for our
products. For Fiscal 2011 , Fiscal 2012, Fiscal 2013 and the Transition Period
our monthly overhead costs were approximately $98,000 $147,000, $240,000 and
$59,500 respectively. With the increased demand for our products our monthly
overhead has increased to approximately $389,285 (excluding share-based
payments) for Fiscal 2014. As previously stated this is due in large part to
added staffing requirements as well as the added administrative costs for our
expanding business. Our net income or loss is a result of the previous factors
as we have no extraordinary gains or losses for any of the periods being
discussed. The Company first showed a small profit for the Transition Period
($10,988) and showed significantly increased profits for Fiscal 2013
($2,456,636) and Fiscal 2014 ($4,025,781). Prior to these reporting periods the
Company had been incurring losses.

Although business and profitability has improved significantly
during the Reported Periods, management cautions that the infrastructure of the
railroad industry poses many challenges to the development and adoption of our
products. Economic and regulatory uncertainty could have a material effect on
our current or future business including financial condition and results of
operations. The Company is still in the early stages of implementing its
commercial business plan hence there are financial risks inherent in the
Companys business plans. This includes a lack of assurance that a profitable
market for the Companys industrial products will continue to develop. Other
risk factors may include the adverse effects of raw material costs; competition;
and environmental and regulatory issues if government regulations change in the
future. See Risk Factors.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2013

For Fiscal 2014, the Company reported net income of $4,025,781
($0.09 per share) against revenue of $23,816,809 compared to a net income of
$2,456,636 ($0.06 per share) against revenue of $13,131,387 for the year ended
December 31, 2013. The Companys gross profit percentage has increased to 46% as
a result of greater sales of stainless steel EPRVs in Fiscal 2014. Financial
results are in line with business development budgets established by
management.

---

- 29 -

Net income and comprehensive income for Fiscal 2014 was
$4,025,781 after deductingnon-cash working capital items. In accordance with
IFRS, reported income includes items not involving cash. These include
amortization of $161,408, share based payments (Black-Scholes) of $417,401 and
deferred income tax of $832,171.

Factors in the reported income for Fiscal 2014 include expenses
of $128,806 (Fiscal 2013-$157,397) related to the lease costs of production and
headquarter facilities in Downers Grove, Illinois and Bonham, Texas; and
on-going industrial product design and development costs of $440,600 (fiscal
2013-253,308). The Company started the current fiscal year with two engineers in
this division but added two more engineers in Fiscal 2014. This has added to our
design and development costs.

Other key costs include production infrastructure; human
resource education; and marketing related expenses for products that have not
yet seen sales results. For Fiscal 2014 salaries and benefits stayed constant at
$245,430 (Fiscal 2013 - $245,409). The Company employs five administrative
people in this area as compared to four for the comparative period. Executive
management contract fees have stayed constant between Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal
2014 at $540,000 per year. In addition, the Company paid a bonus to three senior
operating officers totaling $694,767 for Fiscal 2014 and $269,434 for Fiscal
2013. This bonus was pursuant to each officers management contract. The
Companys consulting fees have risen to $460,680 for Fiscal 2014 (Fiscal 2013 -
$339,552). During Fiscal 2014 the Company retained one investor relations party,
one administrative support person and one web-site/communications consultant. In
addition this account includes transfer agent and filing fees which rose due to
our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and due to the listing
of the Companys common shares on the TSX in Canada and on the NYSE.

Business growth expenses included marketing costs of $571,990
(Fiscal 2013 - $371,687) and related travel costs of $290,400 for Fiscal 2014
(Fiscal 2013 - $223,019). The Companys marketing efforts have increased
substantially as reflected in our increased sales. For Fiscal 2014 the Company
employed five full time marketing people whereas for most of Fiscal 2013 the
Company employed three people in this capacity. Travel costs have risen with the
added marketing efforts as the Companys sales people are constantly travelling
around the United States.

Share based expenses declined due to the grant of fewer share
purchase options during Fiscal 2014. Share based expenses for Fiscal 2014 were
$417,401 as compared to $743,756 during Fiscal 2013.

Accounting, audit and legal fees are a key cost component in
the access to capital resources and administration functions of a publicly
listed industrial company. Costs for these professional services were $225,481
for Fiscal 2014 (Fiscal 2013 - $167,929).

The Companys products are used for the safe management of
hazardous materials and require product liability insurance. Premiums are
established by the number units of our products being used in the transport
industry. As the Companys business grows so will the insurance costs. Total
insurance costs for product liability, general commercial and health insurance
for Fiscal 2014 were $626,704 (Fiscal 2013 - $372,402).

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Four Months
Ended December 31, 2012

For Fiscal 2013, the Company reported net income of $2,456,636
($0.06 per share) against revenue of $13,131,387 compared to a net income of
$10,988 (Nil per share) against revenue of $2,830,778 for the four months ended
December 31, 2012. The Companys gross profit percentage has increased to 40.4%
as a result of greater sales of stainless steel EPRVs in the latter part of
Fiscal 2013. Financial results are in line with business development budgets
established by management.

Positive cash flow from operations for Fiscal 2013 was
$2,456,636 before deduction of non-cash working capital items. In accordance
with IFRS, reported income includes items not involving cash. These include
amortization of $71,731 and share based payments (Black-Scholes) of $743,756
which were offset in part by deferred income tax recovery of $832,171.

Factors in the reported income for Fiscal 2013 include expenses
of $157,397 (Transition Period - $49,868) related to the lease costs of
production and headquarter facilities in Lisle, Illinois and Bonham, Texas; and
on-going industrial product design and development costs of $253,308 (Transition
Period - $36,802). The Company started the current fiscal year with only one
engineer in this division but added another engineer in June of 2013. This has
added to our design and development costs.

---

- 30 -

Other key costs include production infrastructure; human
resource education; and marketing related expenses for products that have not
yet seen sales results. As our business is expanding so have our administrative
salaries and benefits. For Fiscal 2013 salaries and benefits rose to $245,409
(Transition Period - $58,876). The Company employs four administrative people in
this area as compared to two for the comparative period. Executive management
contract fees have risen from $146,727 in the Transition Period to $809,392 in
Fiscal 2013. This rise is due to previously negotiated management contracts for
the three senior operating officers of the Company. Fees for the Transition
Period were $12,500 per month for each of the three senior operating officers.
For Fiscal 2013 the fees were $12,500 for the first three months of the
reporting period and $15,000 for the next nine months. In addition the Company
paid a bonus to three senior operating officers totaling $269,434. This bonus
was pursuant to each officers management contract. The Companys consulting
fees have risen to $339,552 for Fiscal 2013 (Transition Period - $74,083).
During Fiscal 2013 the Company had retained two investor relations parties, one
administrative support person and one web-site/communications consultant. In
addition this account includes transfer agent fees as well as a one-time payment
to a recruitment specialist.

Business growth expenses included marketing costs of $371,681
(Transition Period - $114,845) and related travel costs of $223,019 for Fiscal
2013 (Transition Period - $41,006). The Companys marketing efforts have
increased substantially as reflected in our increased sales. For Fiscal 2013 the
Company employed three full time marketing people whereas for most of Transition
Period we employed only one person in this capacity. Travel costs have risen
with our added marketing efforts as our sales people are constantly travelling
around the United States.

Share based payments rose dramatically due to the granting of
share purchase options during Fiscal 2013 to $743,756 as compared to $167,656
for the Transition Period when the charge was only for the vesting of
consultants options.

Accounting, audit and legal fees are a key cost component in
the access to capital resources and administration functions of a publicly
listed industrial company. Costs for these professional services were $167,929
for Fiscal 2013 (Transition Period - $66,414).

The Companys products are used for the safe management of
hazardous materials and require product liability insurance. Premiums are
established by the number units of our products being used in the transport
industry. As our business grows so will our insurance costs. Total insurance
costs for product liability, general commercial and health insurance for Fiscal
2013 were $372,402 (Transition Period - $81,724).

Four Months Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year
Ended August 31, 2012

For the Transition Period, the Company reported net income of
$10,988 (Nil per share) against revenue of $2,830,778 compared to a net loss of
$1,276,827 ($0.04 per share) against revenue of $2,233,807 for Fiscal 2012. The
Company saw its gross profit margin increase to 31.6% for the Transition Period
as compared to 25% for the year ended August 31, 2012. Our margin improved due
to a more efficient operation at our assembly plant in Bonham, Texas and better
prices on component parts due to the Company having more than one supplier for
each part in our assembly process. Financial results are in line with business
development budgets established by management.

Positive cash flow from operations for the Transition Period
was $194,159. In accordance with IFRS, reported income includes items not
involving cash. These include amortization of $15,515 and share based payments
(Black-Scholes) of $167,656.

As these two reporting periods cover different time frames it
is more beneficial to examine different cost components on a monthly basis.
Factors in the reported income for the Transition Period include expenses of
$29,406 ($7,351 per month) (Fiscal 2012 - $117,617, $9,801 per month) related to
the lease costs of production and headquarter facilities in Lisle, Illinois and
Bonham, Texas. Monthly costs dropped as we vacated a small rented location
during the Transition Period. On-going industrial product design and development
costs of $36,802 ($9,200 per month) as compared to Fiscal 2012-$155,073 ($12,922
per month) were incurred. The expense for 2012 was higher as we not only had one
engineer being charged to this account but the Company incurred a one-time
charge of $26,250 to a Colorado engineering firm for work on our Manway
Securement System.

---

- 31 -

Other key costs include production infrastructure; human
resource education; and marketing related expenses for products that has not yet
seen sales results. The growth of business, human resources, marketing, sales
and production operations for fiscal 2012 reflects in administrative salaries
and benefits costs of $58,876 ($14,719 per month) as compared to Fiscal
2012-$146,983 ($12,248 per month). For both periods the Company employed three
administrative people and the increase is monthly increase is due to pay raises.
Management fees rose from $32,707 per month ($392,490 in Fiscal 2012) in Fiscal
2012 to $36,682 per month for the Transition Period. This is due to escalating
fees per previously mentioned management contracts. Consulting and investor
relations fees of $74,083 ($18,520 per month) for the Transition Period remained
very close to the Fiscal 2012 monthly rate of $17,717. Throughout both periods
the Company retained one administrative support consultant, one
web-site/communications consultant and three to four investor relations
consultants at various times.

Business growth expenses included marketing costs of $114,845
($28,711 per month) as compared to $197,066 ($16,422 per month) for Fiscal 2012.
These costs rose due to an increase in our business volume and we expanded our
sales force by one additional person. Travel costs rose on a monthly basis from
$8,347 per month for Fiscal 2012 to $10,252 for the Transition Period as a
result of an expanded marketing program.

Accounting, audit and legal fees are a key cost component in
the access to capital and administration functions of a publicly listed
industrial company. The change of the fiscal year end to December
31st required additional audit and legal expenditures. Costs for
these professional services were $66,414 (Fiscal 2012 - $97,708) for the
Transition Period.

Our products are used for the safe management of hazardous
materials and require product liability insurance. Premiums are established by
the number units of our products being used in the transport industry. As our
business grows so will our insurance costs which are based on anticipated
revenue streams. Insurance costs for the Transition Period were $81,724 compared
to $31,397 for Fiscal 2012.

Share-based payments rose to $167,656 for the Transition Period
from $71,132 for Fiscal 2012. These figures are a result of the granting of
share purchase options. For the Transition Period there were approximately twice
the number of options granted (310,000 options) as were granted in Fiscal 2012
(150,000 options).

|B. | Liquidity and Capital
  Resources
|-- | ---------------------------------

The Companys primary source of revenue is from new rail tank
car builders and retrofit/repair customers. The Company is confident that the
demand for our current EPRV products and new KKM technology will continue to
improve in future periods. Indicators in the rail industry suggest that the
demand for new tank car builds will grow steadily during 2015 and growth in that
area should provide us with steady growth in sales revenue. As such management
expects that the demand on our liquidity and capital resources will increase in
a material way in the short term. The Company is very fortunate to have
negotiated very favorable payment terms with its largest customers and this will
ease some of the added burden on our liquidity and capital resources.

As at the end of Fiscal 2014 there were no material commitments
for capital expenditures. During 2014 the Company completed the construction of
a new 44,000 square foot building for a cost of $2,700,000.

The Company plans to generate the necessary capital resources
to finance operations by way of the sales of its products, and the exercise of
warrants and incentive stock options. During 2014 the Company raised $3,340,433
from the exercise of 1,431,426 share purchase warrants and $714,840 from the
exercise of 795,000 share purchase options, If the Company is unsuccessful in
generating adequate capital resources from one or more of the anticipated
sources and is unable to replace any shortfall with capital resources from
another source, the Company may not be able to meet its future financial
obligations and its operations may be adversely affected.

---

- 32 -

Management takes all necessary precautions to minimize risks
however additional risks could affect the future performance of the Company.
They include that the Company's products are new entries to the railroad
industry and involve detailed proprietary and engineering knowledge and specific
customer adoption criteria, hence factors that could cause actual financial
results to be materially different include that we may be unsuccessful in
raising any additional capital needs that may arise; we may not have sufficient
capital to develop, produce and deliver new orders; product development may face
unexpected delays; orders that are placed may be cancelled; product may not
perform as well as expected; markets may not develop as quickly as anticipated
or at all; or that the construction or other plans for plants run into permit,
labor or other problems. See Risk Factors.

In the past, the Company has raised funds through private
placement financings and through the exercise of options and warrants.
Currently, the Company relies primarily on revenue generated through operations.
Although the Company has been successful in raising funds and funding itself in
the past, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to do so in the
future.

December 31, 2014 Compared to December 31,
2013

At December 31, 2014 the Company had cash and cash equivalents
in the amount of $9,895,463; accounts receivable of $2,850,180; prepaid expenses
of $58,432 and inventory of $4,161,506 compared to cash and cash equivalents in
the amount of $4,462,531; accounts receivable of $1,259,340; prepaid expenses of
$71,696 and inventory of $2,139,750 at December 31, 2013.

The working capital position of the Company at December 31,
2014 was $12,868,325 which includes $709,954 due to related parties compared to
a working capital position of $7,447,170 which includes $284,847 due to related
parties at December 31, 2013.

Total assets grew to $20,696,182 at December 31, 2014 up from
$9,283,388 at December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2014, the Company had no
interest bearing long-term liabilities or debt.

December 31, 2013 Compared to December 31,
2012

At December 31, 2013 the Company had cash and cash equivalents
in the amount of $4,462,531; accounts receivable of $1,259,340; prepaid expenses
of $71,696 and inventory of $2,139,750 compared to cash and cash equivalents in
the amount of $1,421,053; accounts receivable of $1,055,778; prepaid expenses of
$88,506 and inventory of $1,188,467 at December 31, 2012.

The working capital position of the Company at December 31,
2013 was $7,447,170 which includes $15,413 due to related parties compared to a
working capital position of $3,470,762 which includes $12,247 due to related
parties at December 31, 2012.

Total assets grew to $9,283,388 at December 31, 2013 up from
$4,319,482 at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2013 the Company had no
interest bearing long-term liabilities or debt.

December 31, 2012 Compared to August 31, 2012

At December 31, 2012 the Company had cash on deposit in the
amount of $1,421,053; accounts receivable of $1,016,129; HST receivable of
$39,649; prepaid expenses of $88,506 and inventory of $1,188,467 compared to
cash on deposit in the amount of $2,582; accounts receivable of $877,526; HST
receivable of $26,577; prepaid expenses of $82,999; and inventory of $1,196,465
at August 31, 2012.

The working capital position of the Company at December 31,
2012 was $3,470,762 which includes $12,247 due to related parties compared to a
working capital position of $1,422,376 which includes $16,362 due to related
parties at August 31, 2012.

Net tangible assets grew to $4,036,440 at December 31, 2012 up
from $1,925,573 at August 31, 2012. At December 31, 2012 the Company had no
interest bearing long-term liabilities or debt.

---

- 33 -

The Company received new equity capital in the amount of
$1,578,377 from a non-brokered private placement, net of costs, and the exercise
of warrants during the Transition Period. In addition the Company received
$353,846 for the exercise of share purchase warrants at December 31, 2012 but
issued the shares after the year end.

|C. | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses,
      etc.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------

A key cornerstone of the Companys ability to sustain business
growth lies in its ability to create new commercial products. The Companys
research, development and engineering initiatives are conducted through Kelso
Innovative. Kelso Innovative is dedicated to the creation of new patented
products that better serve the modern challenges of the domestic and
international markets for the transport of HAZMAT via rail and road. Kelso
Innovative works closely with HAZMAT stakeholders designing products that
involve detailed proprietary and engineering knowledge and specific industry
adoption criteria. Many of these new products have significant industrial market
prospects. They are expected to be successfully developed, introduced and
adopted commercially over the upcoming years. See Business Overview,
Intangible Properties, Economic Dependence and Risk Factors above for a
discussion of the Companys patents and licenses.

The Company has spent the following amounts on research in
recent years: $440,600 during Fiscal 2014, $253,308 during Fiscal 2013, $36,802
during the Transition Period, $155,073 during Fiscal 2012, and $110,922 during
Fiscal 2011.

|D. | Trend Information
|-- | -----------------

The Company is currently experiencing rapid growth in sales and
profitability due to the increasing demand placed on the railroad industry as a
result of developments in the oil and gas transportation business. The
controversy over pipelines has helped our business immensely and we expect the
demand to remain high for years to come. The Company expects to generate revenue
of approximately $36,000,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015 and expects
its margins to remain around 46% which would be consistent with recent financial
reporting periods. The Companys gross revenue for the year ended December 30,
2014 was $23,816,809. The Company is not aware of any events that may materially
affect our business with the exception of the ever growing interest by OEM
producers and shipping companies in our KKM system. The Company is expecting to
receive significant orders in 2015. This is expected to generate greater
revenues and increase our margins. There is no guarantee, however, that revenues
will increase or that expectations in this regard will be met. See Risk
Factors. Currently the Company is capable of meeting the expected increase in
demand.

|E. | Off-Balance Sheet
  Arrangements
|-- | --------------------------------

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements
that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resource that
is material to investors.

|F. | Tabular Disclosure of Contractual
      Obligations
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------

The Company does not have any contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2014 relating to long-term debt obligations, capital (finance)
lease obligations, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations or other
long-term liabilities reflected on our latest balance sheet as at December 31,
2014.

|G. | Safe Harbour
|-- | ------------

Not applicable.

---

- 34 -

|Item 6. | Directors, Senior Management and
      Employees
|------- | ------------------------------------------------

|A. | Directors and Senior
  Management
|-- | ---------------------------------

The following table sets forth the name, office held, age, and
functions and areas of experience in the Company of each of our directors,
senior management, and certain significant employees:

Name
    Position(s) Held
      with Company
    Principal Business
    Activities and Other Principal DirectorshipsJames R. Bond
    Director, President and
      CEO
    President of Bondwest
      Enterprises Inc. a private company specializing in public company
      management, corporate finance, entrepreneurial management and business
      development since 1988.Richard Lee
    CFO
    CFO of the Company since
      April 8, 2010 and self-employed businessman.William Troy
    Director and Audit
      Committee Member
    BusinessmanNeil Gambow
    Director, COO, CEO of
      Kelso USA and CEO of Kelso Innovative
    CEO of Kelso Innovative
      from June 21, 2012 to Present; President and CEO, Kelso USA from
      November 2007 to present; President, Nexnine LLC a consultancy
      business since November 2006.Peter Hughes
    Director and Audit
      Committee Member
    Self-employed businessman.
      Director of Broome Capital Inc. (BCP.P  TSXV) and Naturally Splendid
      Enterprises Ltd. (NSP  TSXV).Anthony Andrukaitis
    Director, Executive Vice
      President Business Development
    Independent Business
      Consultant; Chief Operations Officer of Trinity Industries, Inc.
      (holding company providing products and services to industrial,
      energy, transportation, and construction sectors) from July 2004 to
      March 2009.Phil Dyer(1)
    Director and Audit
      Committee Member
    Businessman. President of
      LegacyTexas Bank Plano, Texas from November 1996 to January of 2015.
      Former mayor of Plano, TX, having served from 2009 to 2013.


|(1) | Mr. Dyer was appointed to the Board of Directors of the
      Company on January 2, 2015
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

James R. Bond (61 years)  President, CEO and
Director

Mr. Bond has been director President and CEO of the Company
since April 7, 2010.Mr. Bond is the President of Bondwest Enterprises
Inc., a Canadian company established in 1988 that specializes in corporate
architecture, financial networking, entrepreneurial management, strategic
business development and distress turnarounds. Over the past 35 years he has
served in advisory, consulting, executive management, director and corporate
officer roles in numerous private and public companies conducting business in
the technology, manufacturing and processing industries.

Richard Lee (59 years)  CFO

Mr. Lee has been our CFO since April 8, 2010. Mr. Lee is a
graduate of the University of British Columbia with a Bachelors degree in
Commerce. In addition he is a Certified Management Accountant having obtained
his designation in 1991. Mr. Lee spent more than 25 years working for public
accounting firms or for companies that trade on recognized stock exchanges. He
has gained a wealth of experience in corporate finance, acquisitions and
accounting while working with and for listed public companies trading in Canada
as well as registered with the SEC in the United States.

William Troy (73 years)  Director

Mr. Troy has been a director of the Company since November 21,
2005 and is a member of our Audit Committee. My. Troy has 35 years of business
experience including operating and managing several multi-modal transportation
companies in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Most recently he was owner and
CEO of a major northwest regional trucking company that provided agricultural and liquid trucking
contract services for several Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Troy has a B.A. and an
M.B.A. from the University of Oregon.

---

- 35 -

Neil Gambow (69 years)  Director, CEO Kelso USA and CEO
Kelso Innovative

Mr. Gambow has been a director of the Company since December
  28, 2009. Mr. Gambow has served as CEO of Kelso Innovative (engineering
  industrial designs and distribution plans for patented Kelso Klincher) since
  June 21, 2012 and as President and CEO of Kelso USA (sales and marketing of
  pressure relief valves and manways) since November 2007. Mr. Gambow is the
  former President of Midland Manufacturing, a subsidiary of the Dover
  Corporation, a US Fortune 500 company. Midland produces valves and valve-related
  products for the North American rail tank car market. He is a key executive for
  Kelso responsible for the business development of the technologies of the
  company. Mr. Gambow is based in Chicago, Illinois and is focused on the growth
of sales, marketing and production operations.

Peter Hughes (53 years) - Director

Mr. Hughes has been a director of the Company since October 4,
2010 and is a member of our Audit Committee. Mr. Hughes has 25 years business
experience including senior-level executive and director positions in both
private and public companies specializing in pharmaceuticals, alternative energy
and mining. Mr. Hughes has built industrial and resource companies from the
ground up and has obtained regulatory and exchange approval for numerous
reporting issuers. His experience includes corporate structuring, technology
assessments, proprietary protection, public and private financings, negotiating
property agreements, and public company management. He has also worked with
National Research Council of Canada providing alternative energy companies with
market intelligence and strategic planning. Mr. Hughes has a Bachelor of Science
from UBC and completed the Canadian Securities Course and Directors &
Officers Program. Mr. Hughes currently serves as President, CEO and a director
of Broome Capital Inc., a capital pool company listed on the TSXV and as a
director of Naturally Splendid Enterprises Ltd., a company listed on the TSXV.

Anthony Andrukaitis (60 years)  Director

Mr. Andrukaitis has been a director of the Company since August
24, 2011 and was a member of the Audit Committee until January 2, 2015. Mr.
Andrukaitis was appointed Executive Vice President Business Development of the
Company on January 2, 2015. Mr. Andrukaitis has served as Chief Operations
Officer of Trinity Industries, Inc. (Holding company providing products and
services to industrial, energy, transportation, and construction sectors) July
2004  March 2009. Mr. Andrukaitis has over 25 years of senior corporate
management experience in finance, accounting, strategic planning, business
development and turn-around activities. He was the Chief Operations Officer of
Trinity Rail and former President of Trinity Tank Car, Inc., both subsidiaries
of Trinity Industries of Dallas, Texas. Prior to that, he was the President and
CEO of GATX Terminals Corporation of Chicago, IL. Mr. Andrukaitis is a CPA and
holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Illinois
and Master of Business Administration degree from DePaul University.

Phil Dyer (63 years)  Director

Mr. Dyer has been a director of the Company since January 2,
2015 and is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Dyer held the position of
President of the LegacyTexas Bank, Plano Texas, from November 1996 to January of
2015. Mr. Dyer is also the former mayor of Plano, Texas having served from 2009
to 2013. Mr. Dyer holds a Bachelors degree from the University of Texas and an
MBA from East Texas State University.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our directors
and senior management listed above.

---

- 36 -

|B. | Compensation
|-- | ------------

During Fiscal 2014, the Companys directors and members of its
administrative, supervisory or management bodies received compensation for
services, as follows:

Name and Principal
      Position
    Year Ended
    Salary
      ($)
    Option
      based Awards ($)
    All other
      compensation ($)
    Total
    compensation ($)James R. Bond Director,
      President and CEO
    December 31, 2014
    $179,986
    N/A
    $231,589
    $411,575Richard Lee CFO
    December 31, 2014
    $179,986
    N/A
    $231,589
    $411,575Neil Gambow Director, COO, CEO
      Kelso USA and CEO Kelso Innovative
    December 31, 2014
    $179,986
    N/A
    $231,589
    $411,575William Troy Director
    December 31, 2014
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/APeter Hughes Director
    December 31, 2014
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/AAnthony Andrukaitis
      Director, Executive Vice President Business
      Development
    December 31, 2014
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/APhil Dyer Director
    December 31, 2014
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A


|(1) | Mr. Dyer was appointed to the Board of Directors of the
      Company on January 2, 2015.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Employment Agreements

The Company entered into an employment agreement with James R.
Bond effective January 1, 2014 with regards to his employment as the President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The agreement is for a 36-month
term. The agreement provides for a severance clause of twelve months notice for
termination. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Bond a
base salary of $15,000 per month for the term of the agreement. Mr. Bond is
eligible to receive a bonus based on the performance of the Company.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Richard
Lee effective January 1, 2014 with regards to his employment as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company. The agreement is for a 36-month term. The
agreement provides for a severance clause of twelve months notice for
termination. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Lee a
base salary of $15,000 for the term of the agreement. Mr. Lee is eligible to
receive a bonus based upon the performance of the Company.

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Neil
Gambow effective January 1, 2014 with regards to his employment as the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Kelso USA . The agreement is for a 36-month term.
The agreement provides for a severance clause of twelve months notice for
termination. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Gambow
a base salary of $15,000 per month for the term of the agreement. Mr. Gambow is
eligible to receive a bonus based upon the performance of the Company.

Stock Option Plan

Pursuant to the policies of the TSX, the Company is required to
adopt stock option plan prior to granting incentive stock options and,
accordingly, the Company has adopted a stock option plan (the Option Plan).
The purpose of the Option Plan is to ensure that the Company is able to provide
an incentive program for directors, officers, employees and persons providing
services to the Company (the Optionee) that provides enough flexibility in the
structuring of incentive benefits to allow the Company to
remain competitive in the recruitment and maintenance of key personnel.

---

- 37 -

The maximum aggregate number of common shares that may be
reserved for issuance pursuant to the Option Plan shall be a rolling number of
common shares equal to 10% of the total issued and outstanding common shares of
the Company from time to time. Any common shares in respect of which previously
granted options have been exercised shall not be deducted from the number of
common shares reserved for issuance under the Option Plan and shall again be
available for grant under the Option Plan. In addition, the aggregate number of
common shares which may be reserved for issuance pursuant to the Option Plan or
any other share compensation arrangement (pre-existing or otherwise) to any one
participant under the Option Plan within a one-year period shall not exceed 5%
of the common shares (on a non-diluted basis) outstanding at the time of the
grant. The maximum number of common shares which may be issued to insiders
within any one year period under the Option Plan or under any other share
compensation arrangement taken together shall not exceed 10% of the common
shares outstanding from time to time.

The exercise price of any option granted under the Option Plan
  is to be determined from time to time by the Board but in any event shall be no
  lower than the last closing price of the Companys shares before the grant of
  options. The Board, or a committee appointed for such purposes, also has the
  authority under the Option Plan to determine other terms and conditions relating
  to the grant of options, including any applicable vesting provisions. Options
  issued to any Optionee providing investor relations services to the Company must
  vest (and not otherwise be exercisable) in stages over a minimum of twelve
  months with no more than one quarter of the options vesting in any three month
  period, and will expire within a maximum of thirty days after the Optionee
ceases to be employed by the Company.

The term of options granted under the Option Plan shall not
exceed ten years from the date of grant, and all options granted under the
Option Plan are not transferable other than by will or the laws of dissent and
distribution. If an Optionee ceases to be an Oprionee for any reason whatsoever
other than death or termination for cause, each option held by such Optionee
will cease to be exercisable the earlier of 90 days following the termination
date (being the date on which such Optionee ceases to be an Optionee) and the
original expiry date of such option. If an Optionee dies, the legal
representative of the Optionee may exercise the Optionee's options within one
year after the date of the Optionee's death but only up to and including the
original option expiry date.

If at any time the expiry of the term of an option should be
determined to occur either during a period in which the trading of common shares
by the Optionee is restricted under the insider trading policy or other policy
of the Company or within ten business days following such a period, then the
expiry date (and the option term) of such option shall be automatically extended
to the tenth trading day following the date the relevant black-out period or
other trading restriction imposed by the Company is lifted, terminated or
removed.

The Directors and Senior Management are eligible to participate
in the Option Plan. The Company does not provide any financial assistance to
participants in order to facilitate the purchase of common shares under the
Option Plan. The Board can amend the terms of the Option Plan, provided that,
among other things, no such amendment may be made that would increase the
maximum aggregate number of common shares available for issuance as options or
that would affect the terms of any previously granted stock option unless the
Company receives shareholder approval for such amendment in accordance with the
policies of the TSX.

Option-Based Awards

The following table sets forth the share-based awards or
option-based awards for each of directors and officers of the Company
outstanding as at December 31, 2014:

---

- 38 -

Name
    Option Based
    AwardsNumber of
      securities underlying unexercised options
      (#)
    Option
      exercise price ($)
    Option expiration
      date
    Value of
      unexercised in-the-money options
    ($)(1)James R. Bond(1)
    300,000 100,000
      100,000
    CAD$0.24 CAD$0.58
      $1.45
    June 2, 2015 July
      22, 2016 March 31, 2017
    CAD$1,956,000
      CAD$618,000 $443,000Richard Lee(1)
    230,000 100,000
      100,000
    CAD$0.24 CAD$0.58
      $1.45
    June 2, 2015 July
      22, 2016 March 31, 2017
    CAD$1,499,600
      CAD$618,000 $443,000Neil Gambow(1)
    100,000 200,000
    CAD$0.58 $1.45
    July 22, 2016 March
      31, 2017
    CAD$618,000 $866,000William Troy(1)
    100,000 100,000
    CAD$0.24 $1.45
    October 4,2015 March
      31, 2017
    CAD$652,000 $443,000Peter Hughes(1)
    15,000 150,000
    CAD$0.58 $1.45
    July 22, 2016 March
      31, 2017
    CAD$92,700 $664,500Anthony Andrukaitis(1)
    100,000 50,000
    CAD0.58 1.45
    August 24, 2016
      March 31, 2017
    CAD618,000 221,500Phil Dyer(2)
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
N/A


|(1) | Value is calculated based on the difference between the
      market value of the securities underlying the options as at December 31,
      2014being CAD$6.76 and the exercise price of the option. The quoted share
      price is in CAD dollars and has been converted to US dollars using the
      Bank of Canada rate on December 31, 2014 of USD 1.1601 [CAD
  0.8620].
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Mr. Dyer was appointed to the Board of Directors of the
      Company on January 2, 2015.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

Except as disclosed above with respect to James R. Bond,
Richard Lee and Neil Gambow, we have no plans or arrangements in respect of
remuneration received or that may be received by our directors and senior
management in respect of compensating such person in the event of termination of
employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control, etc.) or
a change in responsibilities.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefits

We have not set aside or accrued any amounts to provide
pension, retirement or similar benefit for our directors or senior management
during Fiscal 2014.

|C. | Board Practices
|-- | ---------------

Term of Office

Each director of the Company holds office until the next annual
general meeting of the Company or until his successor is elected or appointed,
unless his office is earlier vacated in accordance with the articles of the
Company or the provisions of the BCBCA. Each member of our senior management is
appointed to serve at the discretion of our Board, subject to the terms of the
employment agreements described above.

Service Contracts

See Employment Agreements and Termination and Change of
Control Benefits above for particulars of certain directors service contracts
with the Company and its subsidiaries, as applicable. Other than as disclosed
herein, the Company does not have any service contracts with directors which
provide for benefits upon termination of employment.

---

- 39 -

Committees

The Company currently has three standing committees, the audit
committee, the corporate governance and nominating committee and the
compensation committee.

Audit Committee

The current members of the audit committee are Peter Hughes
(Chairman), William Troy and Phil Dyer. Mr. Andrukaitis resigned from the Audit
Committee on January 2, 2015 at which time Mr. Dyer was appointed. As defined in
National Instrument 52-110  Audit Committees of the Canadian Securities
Administrator, William Troy, Peter Hughes and Phil Dyer are independent meaning
that they have no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company that
could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of their
independent judgment. They are also financially literate, meaning that they have
the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a
breadth of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the
breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be
raised by our financial statements.

We have adopted a charter for our audit committee. The audit
committee is responsible for review of both interim and annual financial
statements for the Company. For the purposes of performing their duties, the
members of the audit committee have the right at all times, to inspect all the
books and financial records of the Company and any subsidiaries and to discuss
with management and the external auditors of the Company any accounts, records
and matters relating to the financial statements of the Company. The audit
committee members meet periodically with management and annually with the
external auditors. Our audit committee has the overall duties and
responsibilities to:

| | review the financial reporting process to
      ensure the accuracy of the financial statements of the Company;                                    
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | assist the Board to properly and fully
      discharge its responsibilities;                                                                       
| | strengthen the role of the Board by
      facilitating in depth discussions between directors, management and
      external auditors;             
| | evaluate the independent auditor's
      qualifications, performance and independence;                                                             
| | facilitate the independence of the independent
      auditor;                                                                                      
| | assess the processes relating to the
      determination and mitigation of risks and the maintenance of an effective
      control environment; and
| | review the processes to monitor compliance with
      laws and regulations.                                                                        

Compensation Committee

The principal purpose of the Compensation Committee is to
implement and oversee compensation policies approved by the Board. The duties
and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include, without limitation,
the following:

|a) | to recommend to the Board compensation policies and
      guidelines for the Company; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|b) | to review and approve corporate goals and objectives
      relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and, in light
      of those goals and objectives, to recommend to the Board the annual
      salary, bonus and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the Chief
      Executive Officer and to approve compensation for all other designated
      officers of the Company, after considering the recommendations of the
      Chief Executive Officer, all within the human resources and compensation
      policies and guidelines approved by the Board.

The Company has adopted a formal written mandate for the
Compensation Committee. The mandate provides that the committee shall consist of
at least three members of the Board, all of whom shall be independent in
accordance with applicable legal requirements, including currently the
requirements published by the Canadian Securities Administrators under NP 58-201
"Corporate Governance Guidelines" and the applicable NYSE rules. The current
members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Hughes, Troy and
Andrukaitis.

All members of the Compensation Committee have direct
experience which is relevant to their responsibilities as Compensation Committee
members. All of the members of the Compensation Committee have or have had
senior level executive and director positions in both private and public
companies, and therefore have a good understanding of how compensation works and how to motivate staff. All of the
members have good financial understanding which allows them to assess the costs
versus benefits of compensation plans. The members combined experience in the
resource sector provides them with the understandings of the Companys success
factors and risks which is very important when determining the metrics for
measuring success.

---

- 40 -

The Board appoints the members of the Compensation Committee
for the ensuing year at its organizational meeting held in conjunction with each
annual general meeting of the Companys Shareholders. The Board may at any time
remove or replace any member of the Compensation Committee and may fill any
vacancy in the committee.

The Compensation Committee meets regularly each year on such
  dates and at such locations as the Chair of the Compensation Committee
  determines. The Compensation Committee has access to such officers and employees
  of the Company and to such information respecting the Company and may engage
  independent counsel or advisors at the expense of the Company, all as it
  considers to be necessary or advisable in order to perform its duties and
responsibilities.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The purpose of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee is to provide a focus on corporate governance that will enhance
corporate performance, and to ensure on behalf of the Board and Shareholders
that the Corporations corporate governance system is effective in the discharge
of its obligations to the Corporations shareholders.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also has the
responsibility of proposing nominees for director. The Committee considers the
competencies and skills that the Board as a whole should possess, the
competencies and skills of existing Board members and the competencies and
skills of proposed new Board members. The Committee members utilize their
extensive knowledge of the industry and personal contacts to identify potential
nominees that possess the desired skills and competencies.

The duties and responsibilities of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee include, without limitation, the following:

|a) | Develop and monitor the Companys overall approach to
      corporate governance issues and, subject to approval by the Board,
      implement and administer this process.                        
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b) | Advise the Board or any of the committees of the Board of
      any corporate governance issues which the Committee determines ought to be
      considered by the Board or any such committees.   
|c) | Review with the Board, on a regular basis, but not less
      than annually, the terms of reference for the Board, each committee of the
      Board, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer.
|d) | Review with the Board, on a regular basis, the methods
      and processes by which the Board fulfils its duties and responsibilities,
      including without limitation:                         

| | i.   | the size of the Board;                                                                                                                  
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | ii.  | the number and content of meetings;                                                                                                     
| | iii. | the annual schedule of issues to be presented to the
      Board at its meetings or those of its committees;                            
| | iv.  | material which is to be provided to the directors
      generally and with respect to the meetings of the Board or its
      committees;
| | v.   | resources available to the directors; and                                                                                               
| | vi.  | the communication process between the Board and
      management.                                                                       

|e) | Review and, as necessary, authorize a committee or an
      individual director to engage separate independent counsel and/or advisors
      at the expense of the Company in appropriate circumstances.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|f) | Make recommendation to the Board regarding changes or
      revisions to the Boards Corporate Governance Guidelines;                                                                                   
|g) | Evaluate and make recommendations to the Board concerning
      the appointment of directors to the committees and the selection of Board
      committee chairs;                                       
|h) | Annually evaluate and report to the Board on the
      performance and effectiveness of the Board and its
  committees;                                                                                 

---

- 41 -

|i) | Annually, in conjunction with the Chief Executive
      Officer, evaluate the performance of the Companys management (other than
      the Chief Executive Officer). Conduct an annual review of succession
      planning and report its findings and recommendations to the
  Board;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|j) | Evaluate and lead the Boards annual review of the Chief
      Executive Officers performance; and                                                                                                                                                                                    
|k) | Annually review and evaluate its
  performance.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

The Corporation has adopted a formal written mandate for the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The mandate provides that the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall consist of at least three
directors, all of whom will be "independent directors" in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including currently the requirements published by
the Canadian Securities Administrators under NP 58-201 "Corporate Governance
Guidelines" and the applicable NYSE MKT rules. Each member will have skills
and/or experience which are relevant to the mandate of the Committee. The
current members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are Messrs.
Hughes, Troy and Andrukaitis

The Board appoints the members of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee for the ensuing year at its organizational meeting held in
conjunction with each annual general meeting of the Shareholders of the
Corporation. The Board may at any time remove or replace any member of the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and may fill any vacancy in the
committee.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee meets
regularly each year on such dates and at such locations as the Chair of the
committee determines. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has
access to such officers and employees of the Corporation and to such information
respecting the Corporation and may engage independent counsel and advisors at
the expense of the Corporation, all as it considers to be necessary or advisable
in order to perform its duties and responsibilities.

|D. | Employees
|-- | ---------

As at December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately 42
employees, including employees of its subsidiaries. The largest group of
employees works at the Companys production facilities in Bonham, Texas and the
remainder work in Chicago, Illinois and North Delta, British Columbia.There has been no significant change in the number of employees since
December 31, 2014. As at the date of this filing, the Companys employees are
not unionized and all employees are full-time. As at December 31, 2013, the
Company had approximately 35 employees, including employees of its subsidiaries
(December 31, 2012 - 30).

|E. | Share Ownership
|-- | ---------------

As of December 31, 2014, our directors and senior management
beneficially owned the following common shares and stock options of the
Company:

Name and
      Office Held
    Number of Common Shares Owned and Percent of Total
      Outstanding Common Shares
    Options
    Owned# of
      Shares
    % of
    Class(1)James R. Bond
      Director, President and CEO
    1,042,500 (2)
    2.29%
    500,000(2)William Troy
      Director
    1,014,531(3)
    2.24%
    200,000(3)Neil Gambow
      Director, COO CEO Kelso USA and CEO Kelso Innovative
    367,169(4)
    0.81%
    300,000(4)Peter Hughes
      Director
    1,000(5)
    0.002%
    165,000(5)


---

- 42 -

|Name and
      Office Held                                                                 | Number of Common Shares Owned and Percent of Total
      Outstanding Common Shares | Options
  Owned
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
|
|
|# of
      Shares                                                                          | % of
  Class(1)                                                                   
|
|Anthony Andrukaitis
      Director and Executive Vice President Business
      Development | 129,500(6)                                                                         | 0.28%          
|
|
|Phil Dyer(7)Director                                                                       | N/A                                                                                | N/A            
|
|Richard Lee
      CFO                                                                      | 23,900(8)                                                                          | 0.05%          
|

|(1) | Based on 45,246,752 common shares issued and outstanding
      as at December 31, 2014.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Mr. Bond holds 267,500 common shares directly; 625,000
      common shares indirectly through Bondwest Enterprises Inc., a company
      owned and controlled by Mr. Bond; and 150,000 common shares jointly with
      Serena Sardar, Mr. Bonds spouse; and he also holds 500,000 stock options
      exercisable into Common Shares that are not included in the
  total.
|(3) | Mr. Troy also holds 200,000 stock options exercisable
      into Common Shares that are not included in the total.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(4) | Mr. Gambow also holds 300,000 stock options which are
      exercisable into Common Shares, on a one-for-one basis.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(5) | Mr. Hughes holds 165,000 stock options exercisable into
      Common Shares that are not included in the total.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(6) | Mr. Andrukaitis holds 150,000 stock options exercisable
      into Common Shares that are not included in the total.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(7) | Mr. Dyer was appointed to the Board of Directors of the
      Company on January 2, 2015.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(8) | Mr. Lee holds 430,000 stock options which are exercisable
      into Common Shares, on a one-for-one basis.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

The voting rights attached to the common shares owned by our
directors and senior management do not differ from those voting rights attached
to shares owned by people who are not directors or senior management of the
Company.

|Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party
      Transactions
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------

|A. | Major Shareholders
|-- | ------------------

To the best of our knowledge, there are no persons or company
who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction
over, securities carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to any
class of voting securities of the Company.

The voting rights of our major shareholders do not differ from
the voting rights of holders of our common shares who are not our major
shareholders.

As at December 31, 2014, the registrar and transfer agent for
the Company reported that there were 45,246,752 common shares of the Company
issued and outstanding. Of these, 41,477,109 were registered to Canadian
residents (13 recorded shareholders), 3,708,215 were registered to residents of
the United States (26recorded shareholders) and 11,428 were registered
to residents of other foreign countries (1 recorded shareholders).

To the best of our knowledge, the Company is not directly or
indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any foreign government
or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly, except as
disclosed in the above table regarding our major shareholders.

There are no arrangements known to us, the operation of which
may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

|B. | Related Party
Transactions
|-- | --------------------------

For Fiscal 2014, management fees for our Company were
$1,243,763 (Fiscal 2013-$809,392;Transition Period- $146,727; Fiscal 2012 -
$392,490; Fiscal 2011 - $258,193). As at December 31, 2014, amounts due to
related parties, which are unsecured and have no interest is $709,954 (2013-
$203,847) consisting of $694,767 (2013 -$269,434) for management bonus payment
due not later than five months after the year end and $15,187 (2013 - $15,413)
for reimbursement of expenses to a director of the Company. These expenses are
due on demand.

---

- 43 -

Share based payments (calculated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model) were Nil for Fiscal 2014 ($340,000 for Fiscal 2013; Transition
Period - $Nil; Fiscal 2012 - $17,071All related party transactions during Fiscal
2014, Fiscal 2013, the Transition Period, and Fiscal 2012 were in the normal
course of operations and were measured at their fair value.

Other than as disclosed in this annual report and the financial
statements attached hereto and other than in the ordinary course of business,
since the beginning of our preceding three financial years, there have been no
transactions or loans between the Company and:

|(a) | enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or
      more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common
      control with, the Company;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(b) | associates, meaning unconsolidated enterprises in which
      we have a significant influence or which have significant influence over
      the Company;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(c) | individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest
      in the voting power of the Company that gives them significant influence
      over the Company, and close members of any such individuals
  family;                                                                                                                                                                                        
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(d) | key management personnel, that is, those persons having
      authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the
      activities of the Company, including directors and senior management of
      the Company and close members of such individuals families; and                                                                                                                
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(e) | enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting
      power is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person described in (c) or
      (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence,
      including enterprises owned by directors or major shareholders of the
      Company and enterprises that have a member of key management in common
      with the Company.

Compensation

For information regarding compensation for our directors and
senior management, see Item 6.B. Compensation.

Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

|Item 8. | Financial Information
|------- | ---------------------

|A. | Financial Statements and Other Financial
      Information
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars
and are prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, the application
of which, in our case, conforms in all material respects for the periods
presented with the United States generally accepted accounting principles.

The following financial statements and notes thereto are filed
with and incorporated herein as part of this annual report:

|(a) | audited consolidated financial statements for the year
      ended December 31, 2014 including: independent auditors report by Smythe
      Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, consolidated statements of financial
      position as at December 31, 2014 and 2013, consolidated statements of
      operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash
      flows for the years December 31, 2014 and 2013, four months ended December
      31, 2012 and year ended August 31, 2012; and                                                                                                                 
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(b) | audited consolidated financial statements for the year
      ended December 31, 2013 including: independent auditors report by Smythe
      Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, consolidated statements of financial
      position as at December 31,2013 and 2012, changes in equity for the year
      ended December 31, 2013, four months ended December 31, 2012 and year
      ended August 31, 2012, consolidated statements of operations and
      comprehensive loss and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013,
      four months ended December 31, 2012 and years ended August 31, 2012 and
      2011; and

---

- 44 -

|(c) | audited consolidated financial statements for the four
      months ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended August 31, 2012,
      including: independent auditors report by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered
      Accountants, consolidated statements of financial position, consolidated
      statements of changes in equity, consolidated statements of operations and
      comprehensive loss, consolidated statements of cash flows ; and                          
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(d) | audited consolidated financial statements for the years
      ended August 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011, including: independent
      auditors report by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants,
      consolidated statements of financial position, consolidated statements of
      changes in equity, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
      loss, consolidated statements of cash flows, and notes to consolidated
      financial statements.

These financial statements can be found under Item 17.
Financial Statements below.

Export Sales

All sales are domestic to the US.

Legal Proceedings

There have not been any legal or arbitration proceedings,
including those relating to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings,
those involving any third party, and governmental proceedings pending or known
to be contemplated, which may have, or have had in the recent past, significant
effect the Companys financial position or profitability.

Also, there have been no material proceedings in which any
director, any member of senior management, or any of our affiliates is either a
party adverse to the Company or its subsidiaries or has a material interest
adverse to the Company or its subsidiaries.

Policy on Dividend Distributions

On April 2, 2014, the Company announced the declaration of an
annual cash dividend of $0.01 per share payable in cash on April 30, 2014 to
shareholders of record at the close of business on April 15, 2014 (the 2014
Annual Dividend).

The Companys Board of Directors may give consideration on an
annual basis to the payment of future dividends. The amount of any future annual
dividends will be determined based on a number of factors that may include the
results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and future
prospects of the Company. The Board is, however, under no obligation to declare
dividends and the declaration of dividends is wholly within their discretion.
Further, the Companys Board of Directors may cease declaring dividends or may
declare dividends in amounts that are different from those previously declared.

Significant Changes

We are not aware of any significant change that has occurred
since December 31, 2014 that has not been disclosed in this annual report.

---

- 45 -

|Item 9. | The Offer and Listing
|------- | ---------------------

|A. | Offer and Listing
Details
|-- | -------------------------

Price History

Full Financial Years (five most recent full financial years)

The annual high and low market prices of our common shares for
the five most recent full financial years on the TSX and NYSE were as follows:

Year Ended
    TSX(1) (Canadian dollars, $)
    NYSE(2) (U.S. dollars, $)High
    Low
    High
    LowDecember 31, 2014
    7.32
    3.11
    6.73
    2.77December 31, 2013
    3.46
    0.58
    3.33
    0.5875December 31, 2012(3)
    0.68
    0.51
    0.66
    0.528August 31, 2012
    0.72
    0.485
    0.72
    0.488August 31, 2011
    0.78
    0.155
    0.7386
    0.0097August 31, 2010
    0.27
    0.015
    0.2215
0.0097


Note:

|(1) | The common shares of the Company were listed for trading
      on the TSX on May 22, 2014 prior to which they traded on the
  TSXV.                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The common shares of the Company were listed for trading
      on the NYSE on October 14, 2014 prior to which they traded on theOTCQX
      International under the symbol KEOSF.                                  
|(3) | Effective December 31, 2012, the Company changed the
      fiscal year end from August 31 to December 31. Information in this row is
      for the four month period from September 1, 2012 to December 31,
    2012.

Full Financial Quarters (two most recent full financial
years)

The high and low market prices of our common shares for each
full financial quarter for the two most recent full financial years on the TSX
and NYSE were as follows:

Quarter Ended
    TSX(1) (Canadian dollars, $)
    NYSE(2) (U.S. dollars, $)High
    Low
    High
    LowDecember 31, 2014
    6.98
    5.61
    6.24
    5.03September 30, 2014
    7.15
    5.22
    6.54
    4.81June 30, 2014
    7.32
    4.80
    6.73
    4.13March 31, 2014
    4.68
    3.01
    4.20
    2.77December 31, 2013
    3.46
    1.95
    3.33
    1.92September 30, 2013
    2.39
    0.97
    2.30
    0.9246June 30, 2013
    1.06
    0.83
    1.03
    0.832March 31, 2013
    0.95
    0.58
    0.914
0.5875


|(1) | The common shares of the Company were listed for trading
      on the TSX on May 22, 2014 prior to which they traded on the
  TSXV.                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The common shares of the Company were listed for trading
      on the NYSE on October 14, 2014 prior to which they traded on the OTCQX
      International under the symbol KEOSF.

Most Recent 6 Months

The high and low market prices of our common shares for each
month for the most recent six months on the TSX and NYSE were as follows:

---

- 46 -

Month Ended
    TSX(1)
      (Canadian dollars, $)
    NYSE
        (2)
    (U.S. dollars, $)High
    Low
    High
    LowDecember 31, 2014
    6.95
    6.12
    6.21
    5.25November 30, 2014
    6.98
    6.36
    6.24
    5.54October 31, 2014
    6.84
    5.61
    5.96
    5.03September 30, 2014
    6.47
    5.22
    5.96
    4.81August 31, 2014
    6.98
    6.20
    6.49
    5.80July 31, 2014
    7.15
    6.10
    6.54
    5.60


|(1) | The common shares of the Company were listed for trading
      on the TSX on May 22, 2014 prior to which they traded on the
  TSXV.                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The common shares of the Company were listed for trading
      on the NYSE on October 14, 2014 prior to which they traded on the OTCQX
      International under the symbol KEOSF).

Transfers of Common Shares

Our common shares are in registered form and the transfer of
our common shares is managed by our transfer agent, Computershare Investor
Services Inc. with transfer facilities in Vancouver and Toronto.

Computershare Trust Company, Denver, Colorado, serves as
co-transfer agent and co-registrar for the Companys shares in the US.

Requests for information should be directed to Computershare
Investor Services Inc., 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto,
Ontario Canada M5J 2Y1. Telephone 1 800 564 6253 (toll free in Canada and the
United States) between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time or 514
982 7555 (international direct dial).

|B. | Plan of
Distribution
|-- | --------------------

Not applicable.

|C. | Markets
|-- | -------

The Common Shares are publicly traded on the TSX under the
symbol KLS, and on the NYSE under the symbol KIQ.

|D. | Selling
Shareholders
|-- | --------------------

Not applicable.

|E. | Dilution
|-- | --------

Not applicable.

|F. | Expenses of the
Issue
|-- | ---------------------

Not applicable.

|Item 10. | Additional Information
|-------- | ----------------------

|A. | Share Capital
|-- | -------------

Not applicable.

---

- 47 -

|B. | Memorandum and Articles of
    Association
|-- | ------------------------------------------

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference from our Registration Statement on Form 20-F filed on filed on August
29, 2013, as amended on October 23, 2013, November 21, 2013 and December 3,
2013.

|C. | Material Contracts
|-- | ------------------

There are no other contracts, other than those disclosed in
this annual report and those entered into in the ordinary course of the
Companys business, that are material to the Company and which were entered into
in the most recently completed fiscal year or which were entered into before the
most recently completed fiscal year but are still in effect as of the date of
this annual report:

|1. | The Companys patent for the EPRV is in good standing
      until January 29, 2016. The patent abstract describes the EPRV as a
      pressure relief valve for releasing fluid through a vent in a railway tank
      car, tank trucks and similar vessels. A valve disc is normally biased in a
      closed position by a plurality of constant- force springs of laminated
      steel tapes on drums supported on upright angle brackets symmetrically
      arranged around a valve seat. The pressure at which the valve opens is
      determined by a pre-selection of the number of springs, laminated tapes
      per spring and the restoring force of each tape. See Business
      Overview.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | On May 26, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement
      with Barry LaCroix whereby the Company acquired Manhole Cover Patent No.
      US 7,104,722 B2 from Mr. LaCroix and related technology and intellectual
      property in consideration for CDN$40,000 and the grant of a 5% royalty on
      gross sales of the manhole covers sold under the auspices of the patent in
      favour of Mr. LaCroix on the terms and conditions set out in the
      agreement. This patent expires 2023.                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|3. | The Company has a shareholder rights plan pursuant to an
      agreement between the Company and Computershare Trust Company of Canada
      dated February 3, 2011. This plan was re-approved by the shareholders of
      the Company on June 4, 2014 and by the TSX as part of the Companys
      approval for the listing of its common shares. A copy of the shareholder
      rights plan is available under the Companys profile on SEDAR at
      www.sedar.comin Canada on EDGAR at www.sec.govin the
      United States.                                                                                                                                                                         
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|4. | The Company has a 10% rolling stock option plan which was
      last approved by the shareholders of the Company on June 4, 2014. A copy
      of the Option Plan is available under the Companys profile on SEDAR at
      www.sedar.comin Canada on EDGAR at www.sec.govin
      the United States.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|5. | Effective January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an
      employment agreement with James R. Bond, the President and CEO of the
      Company. The agreement is for a 36-month term. The agreement provides for
      a severance clause of twelve months notice for termination. Pursuant to
      the agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Bond a base salary of
      $15,000 per month for the term of the agreement. Mr. Bond is eligible to
      receive a bonus on the performance of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                                        
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|6. | Effective January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an
      employment agreement with Richard Lee, the CFO of the Company. The
      agreement is for a 36-month term. The agreement provides for a severance
      clause of twelve months notice for termination. Pursuant to the
      agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Lee a base salary of $15,000
      per month for the term of the agreement. Mr. Lee is eligible to receive a
      bonus on the performance of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|7. | Effective January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an
      employment agreement with Neil Gambow, the President and CEO of Kelso USA.
      The agreement is for a 36-month term. The Agreement provides for a
      severance clause of twelve months notice for termination. Pursuant to the
      agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Gambow a base salary of
      $15,000 per month for the term of the agreement. Mr. Gambow is eligible to
      receive a bonus on the performance of the
Company.                                                                                                                                                                                        

---

- 48 -

|8.  | On November 28, 2012, the Company acquired all
      proprietary and manufacturing rights from the James Wilson Company of
      Houston, Texas for their eduction tubes, currently marketed as the Tiger
      Tube, for US$65,000. The Company intends to trademark the product as the
      Kelso Tiger Tube. To support the Companys activities, Jim Wilson has
      agreed to serve as a consultant to the Company and will receive a fee of
      $6,500 per month for 24 months. In addition the Company will pay a 7%
      royalty from sales over the duration of the consulting
agreement.                                                                                                                                                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|9.  | On November 28, 2012, the Company entered into a
      consulting agreement with James Wilson for client consulting services
      regarding the engineering, design, manufacture and sale of eduction tubes
      and all matters relating to eduction tubes. The agreement is for a
      24-month term and at the sole discretion of the Company can be renewed for
      up to three six-month periods. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has
      agreed to pay Mr. Wilson a monthly fee of $6,500 in consideration for a
      minimum of 80 hours per month devoted to the affairs of the Company. The
      agreement is the result of the sale and purchase agreement between the
      Company and James Wilson Company dated as at November 28, 2012.
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10. | On November 1, 2012, the Company entered into a lease
      with Bonham Associates Management Ltd. (BAML) whereby BAML agreed
      to lease a 41,600 square foot facility to the Company in Bonham, Texas for
      $$8,667 per month for a period of 13 months, with an option to renew for
      an additional 12 months at the same monthly rate.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|11. | On February 28, 2014, the Company entered into a renewal
      lease with BAML whereby BAML agreed to lease a 41,000 square foot facility
      in use by the Company in Bonham, Texas for $$8,667 per month for a period
      of 6 months with an option to renew monthly for an additional 12
      months.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

|D. | Exchange Controls
|-- | -----------------

There are no government laws, decrees or regulations in Canada
which restrict the export or import of capital or which affect the remittance of
dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common
shares. Any remittances of dividends to United States residents and to other
non-residents are, however, subject to withholding tax. See Taxation below.

|E. | Taxation
|-- | --------

Certain Canadian Federal Income Taxation

We consider that the following general summary fairly describes
the principal Canadian federal income tax consequences applicable to a holder of
our common shares who is a resident of the United States, who is not, will not
be and will not be deemed to be a resident of Canada for purposes of the
Income Tax Act (Canada) and any applicable tax treaty and who does not
use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, his, her or its common shares in
the capital of the Company in connection with carrying on a business in Canada
(a non-resident holder).

This summary is based upon the current provisions of the
Income Tax Act (Canada), the regulations thereunder (the
Regulations), the current publicly announced administrative and
assessing policies of the Canada Revenue Agency and the Canada-United States Tax
Convention as amended by the Protocols thereto (the Treaty). This
summary also takes into account the amendments to the Income Tax Act
(Canada) and the Regulations publicly announced by the Minister of Finance
(Canada) prior to the date hereof (the Tax Proposals) and assumes that
all such Tax Proposals will be enacted in their present form. However, no
assurances can be given that the Tax Proposals will be enacted in the form
proposed, or at all. This summary is not exhaustive of all possible Canadian
federal income tax consequences applicable to a holder of our common shares and,
except for the foregoing, this summary does not take into account or anticipate
any changes in law, whether by legislative, administrative or judicial decision
or action, nor does it take into account provincial, territorial or foreign
income tax legislation or considerations, which may differ from the Canadian
federal income tax consequences described herein.

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended
to be, and should not be construed to be, legal, business or tax advice to any
particular holder or prospective holder of our common shares, and no opinionor representation with respect to the tax consequences to
any holder or prospective holder of our common shares is made. Accordingly,
holders and prospective holders of our common shares should consult their own
tax advisors with respect to the income tax consequences of purchasing, owning
and disposing of our common shares in their particular circumstances.

---

- 49 -

Dividends

Dividends paid on our common shares to a non-resident holder
  will be subject under theIncome Tax Act (Canada) to withholding tax at a
  rate of 25% subject to a reduction under the provisions of an applicable tax
  treaty, which tax is deducted at source by the Company. The Treaty provides that
  the Income Tax Act (Canada) standard 25% withholding tax rate is reduced
  to 15% on dividends paid on shares of a corporation resident in Canada (such as
  the Company) to residents of the United States, and also provides for a further
  reduction of this rate to 5% where the beneficial owner of the dividends is a
  corporation resident in the United States that owns at least 10% of the voting
shares of the corporation paying the dividend.

Capital Gains

A non-resident holder is not subject to tax under the Income
Tax Act (Canada) in respect of a capital gain realized upon the disposition
of a common share of the Company unless such share represents taxable Canadian
property, as defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada), to the holder
thereof. Our common shares generally will be considered taxable Canadian
property to a non-resident holder if:

| | the non-resident holder;                                                                                  
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | persons with whom the non-resident holder did
      not deal at arms length; or                          
| | the non-resident holder and persons with whom
      such non-resident holder did not deal at arms length,

owned, or had an interest in an option in respect of, not less
than 25% of the issued shares of any class of our capital stock at any time
during the 60 month period immediately preceding the disposition of such shares.
In the case of a non-resident holder to whom shares of the Company represent
taxable Canadian property and who is resident in the United States, no Canadian
taxes will generally be payable on a capital gain realized on such shares by
reason of the Treaty unless the value of such shares is derived principally from
real property situated in Canada.

United States Federal Income Taxation

The following is a general discussion of United States federal
foreign income tax matters under current law, generally applicable to a U.S.
Holder (as defined below) of our common shares who holds such shares as capital
assets. This discussion addresses the material United States federal income tax
consequences but does not address consequences peculiar to persons subject to
special provisions of federal income tax law, such as those described below as
excluded from the definition of a U.S. Holder. In addition, this discussion does
not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences. See Certain Canadian
Federal Income Tax Consequences above.

The following discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), Treasury Regulations, published
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rulings, published administrative
positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or
all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a
retroactive basis, at any time. In addition, this discussion does not consider
the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed
legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive
basis, at any time. No assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with such
statements and conclusions, or will not take, or a court will not adopt, a
position contrary to any position taken herein.

Holders and prospective holders of common shares should
consult their own tax advisors with respect to federal, state, local, and
foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our common
shares.

---

- 50 -

U.S. Holders

As used herein, a U.S. Holder includes a holder of
less than 10% of our common shares who is a citizen or resident of the United
States, a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United
States or of any political subdivision thereof, any entity which is taxable as a
corporation for U.S. tax purposes and any other person or entity whose ownership
of our common shares is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business in the United States. A U.S. Holder does not include persons subject to
special provisions of federal income tax law, such as tax-exempt organizations,
qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real
estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers,
non-resident alien individuals or foreign corporations whose ownership of our
common shares is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business in the United States and shareholders who acquired their shares through
the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation.

Distributions

The gross amount of a distribution paid to a U.S. Holder will
generally be taxable as dividend income to the U.S. Holder for U.S. federal
income tax purposes to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles.
Distributions which are taxable dividends and which meet certain requirements
will be unqualified dividend income and taxed to U.S. Holders at a maximum
U.S. federal rate of 15%. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated
earnings and profits will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to
the extent of the U.S. Holders tax basis in the common shares and, to the
extent in excess of such tax basis, will be treated as a gain from a sale or
exchange of such shares.

Capital Gains

In general, upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of
common shares, a U.S. Holder will generally recognize a capital gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between
the amount realized on the sale or other distribution and the U.S. Holders
adjusted tax basis in such shares. Such gain or loss will be U.S. source gain or
loss and will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S.
Holders holding period of the shares exceeds one year. If the U.S. Holder is an
individual, any capital gain will generally be subject to U.S. federal income
tax at preferential rates if specified minimum holding periods are met. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

Foreign Tax Credit

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has had withheld from distributions)
Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of our common shares may be
entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax
credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more
advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States federal
income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the
taxpayers income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis
and generally applies to all foreign income taxes paid by (or withheld from) the
U.S. Holder during that year. There are significant and complex limitations
which apply to the tax credit, among which are an ownership period requirement
and the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share
of the U.S. Holders United States income tax liability that the U.S. Holders
foreign source income bears to his or its worldwide taxable income. In
determining the application of this limitation, the various items of income and
deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules
govern this classification process. There are further limitations on the foreign
tax credit for certain types of income such as passive income, high
withholding tax interest, financial services income, shipping income, and
certain other classifications of income. The availability of the foreign tax
credit and the application of these complex limitations on the tax credit are
fact specific and holders and prospective holders of our common shares should
consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.

|F. | Dividends and Paying
  Agents
|-- | -----------------------------

Not applicable.

---

- 51 -

|G. | Statement by
Experts
|-- | --------------------

Not applicable.

|H. | Documents on
Display
|-- | --------------------

Additional information, including the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements, press releases and other required filing documents are
available under the Companys profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com in
Canada, on EDGAR at www.sec.gov in the United States and on the Companys
website at www.kelsotech.com. Copies of such documents may also be viewed
by appointment during normal business hours at our registered and records office
being the offices of Clark Wilson LLP, 800  885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver,
British Columbia, Canada V6C 3H1 during normal business hours.

|I. | Subsidiary
Information
|-- | ----------------------

The Company operates in conjunction with its two wholly-owned
subsidiaries Kelso USAand Kelso Innovative. The Company owns 100% of the
voting securities of each of its subsidiaries. Neither subsidiary has a class of
restricted securities. Kelso USA was incorporated on August 3, 2005in
the State of Nevada. Kelso Innovative was incorporated on June 20, 2012 in the
State of Nevada.

|Item 11. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
      About Market Risk
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Financial instruments are agreements between two parties that
result in promises to pay or receive cash or equity instruments. The Company
classifies its financial instruments as follows: cash is classified as a
financial asset at FVTPL, accounts receivable is classified as loans and
receivables, and due to related parties and accounts payable are classified as
other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost. The carrying
value of these instruments approximates their fair values due to their short
term to maturity.

The Company has exposure to the following risks from its use of
financial instruments:

| | Credit risk;       
|- | -------------------
| | Liquidity risk; and
| | Market risk.       

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial
instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to
discharge an obligation. Cash is placed with a major Canadian financial
institution and the Companys concentration of credit risk for cash and maximum
exposure thereto as at December 31, 2014 was $9,895,463 (December 31, 2013 -
$4,462,531).

With respect to its accounts receivable, the Company assesses
the credit rating of all customers and maintains provisions for potential credit
losses, and any such losses to date have been within managements expectations.
The Companys credit risk with respect to accounts receivable and maximum
exposure thereto as at December 31, 2014 was $2,850,180 (December 31, 2013 -
$1,259,340). The Companys concentration of credit risk for accounts receivable
with respect to Customer A (see note 15 to audited annual financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2014) as at December 31, 2014 was $987,819
(December 31, 2013 - $342,650), while Customer B was $305,730 (December 31, 2013
 $638,777).

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will be unable to
meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Companys approach to
managing liquidity risk is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will have
sufficient liquid funds to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and
stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to
the Companys reputation. At December 31, 2014, the Company had $9,895,463 (December 31, 2013 - $4,462,531) of cash to settle current
liabilities with the following due dates: accounts payable of $2,412,302
(December 31, 2013 - $201,300); management bonus payable of $694,767 (Fiscal
2013-$269,434); taxes payable of $975,000 (Fisal 2013-$Nil) and; due to related
party balance of $15,187 (Fiscal 2013-$15,413). All payables are due within a
year.

---

- 52 -

Market Risk

The significant market risks to which the Company is exposed
are interest rate risk and currency risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future
cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. The
Companys cash consists of cash held in bank accounts that earn interest at
variable rates. Due to the short-term nature of this financial instrument,
fluctuations in market rates of interest do not have a significant impact on the
estimated fair value or future cash flows.

Currency Risk

The Company is exposed to currency risk to the extent
expenditures incurred or funds received and balances maintained by the Company
are denominated in Canadian dollars (CAD). The Company does not manage
currency risk through hedging or other currency management tools.

As at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Companys
net exposure to foreign currency risk is as follows (in USD):

As at December 31, 2014
    As at December 31, 2013Net Assets
    $5,696,267
$3,256,557


Based on the above, assuming all other variables remain
constant, a 10% weakening or strengthening of the USD against the CAD would
result in approximately $570,000 (December 31, 2013 - $330,000) foreign exchange
loss or gain in the consolidated statements of operations.

Other Price Risk

Other price risk is the risk that the future cash flows of a
financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market prices, other than
those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk. The Company is not
exposed to other price risk.

See Item 17. Financial Statements.

|Item 12. | Description of Securities Other than Equity
      Securities
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.

PART II

|Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and
      Delinquencies.
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------------

None.

|Item 14. | Material Modifications to the Rights of
      Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company has a shareholder rights plan pursuant to an
agreement between the Company and Computershare Trust Company of Canada dated
February 3, 2011. This plan was re- approved by the shareholders of the Company
on June 4, 2014 and by the TSX as part of its approval of the
listing of the common shares of the Company. The purpose of the shareholder
rights plan is to: (a) ensure, to the extent possible, that all holders of the
Common Shares of the Company and the Board have adequate time to consider and
evaluate any unsolicited bid for the Common Shares; (b) provide the Board with
adequate time to identify, develop and negotiate value-enhancing alternatives,
if considered appropriate, to any such unsolicited bid: (c) encourage the fair
treatment of the Companys securityholders in connection with any takeover bid
made for the Common Shares; and (d) generally to assist the Board in enhancing
shareholder value. One right as been issued in respect of each issued Common
Share of the Company.

---

- 53 -

At its annual general and special meeting held on June 5, 2013,
the Company obtained shareholder approval of certain amendments to the Articles
of the Company to include provisions for: (i) uncertificated shares; (ii)
conversion of fractional shares into whole shares in accordance with the
  Business Corporations Act (British Columbia); (iii) participation in
shareholders meetings by telephone and other communication mediums; (iv)
flexibility to the board of directors to make certain alterations to the
Companys authorized share structure by way of directors resolution as opposed
to the Company having to incur the additional costs of obtaining shareholder
approval; and (v) allowing for change of the Companys name by directors
resolution instead of by an ordinary resolution of the shareholders of the
Company. In addition shareholders approved the adoption of advance notice
provisions. Advance notice provisions provide a framework whereby the Company
can fix a deadline for submission of director nominations by shareholders prior
to any annual or special meeting of shareholders and can set forth the
information regarding director nominees that a shareholder must include in their
notice to the Company for such notice to be in proper written form.

|Item 15. | Controls and Procedures
|-------- | -----------------------

|A. | Disclosure Controls and
  Procedures
|-- | ------------------------------------

As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 under
the Exchange Act, our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer evaluated the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F. Based on this evaluation,
these officers concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual
Report on Form 20-F, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These disclosure controls and procedures
include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the
Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2014, the end of our fiscal year. Management based
its assessment on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework (COSOFramework) published by The Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations (COSO 2013). Managements assessment included evaluation of
such elements as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial
reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and our overall
control environment.

---

- 54 -

Based on our assessment, management has concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective, as of the end of the
fiscal year, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
reporting purposes in accordance with International Accounting Standards Board
(IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Because the Company is an emerging growth company as defined
in the United States Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, the Company
will not be required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the
United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for as long as the Company remains an
emerging growth company, which may be for as long as five years following its
initial registration in the United States.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, whether any changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal
year have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. Based on the evaluation we
conducted, our management has concluded that no such changes occurred during the
period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F.

This annual report does not include a report of managements
assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation
report of the companys registered public accounting firm due to a transition
period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly
public companies.

|Item 16. | [Reserved]
|-------- | ----------

|A. | Audit Committee Financial
  Expert
|-- | ----------------------------------

Our board of directors has determined that Peter Hughes
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A(b) of
Form 20-F, and is independent as the term is defined by Nasdaq Marketplace
Rule 5605(a)(2).

|B. | Code of Ethical Conduct
|-- | -----------------------

The Company adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on
August 1, 2014, which was amended and adopted by the Board of Directors on March
23, 2015 that applies to all of the Companys directors and employees, including
the Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The
full text of the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available
under the Companys profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com in Canada, on EDGAR
at www.sec.gov in the United States and on the Companys website at
www.kelsotech.com.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees. This category includes the fees for the
audit of our financial statements and the quarterly reviews of interim financial
statements. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters
that arose during or as a result of the audit or the review of interim financial
statements and services in connection with Securities and Exchange Commission
filings.

Audit-Related Fees. This category includes assurance and
related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or
review of the financial statements that are not reported under Audit Fees, and
describes the nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under this
category.

---

- 55 -

Tax Fees. This category includes the fees for
professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning,
and describes the nature of the services comprising the fees disclosed under
this category.

All Other Fees. This category includes products and
services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported
under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees or Tax Fees.

Our current independent public accountants provided audit and
other services during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2013:

December
    
    
    December31, 2014
    
    
    31, 2013($)
    
    
    ($)Audit Fees
    
    60,000
    
    
    58,000Audit-Related Fees
    
    2,500
    
    
    12,320Tax Fees
    
    N/A
    
    
    N/AAll Other Fees
    
    N/A
    
    
    N/ATotal Fees
    
    62,500
    
    
    70,320


Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee pre-approves all services provided by our
independent auditors. All of the services and fees described under the
categories of Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other
Fees were reviewed and approved by the audit committee before the respective
services were rendered, and none of such services were approved by the audit
committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

The audit committee has considered the nature and amount of the
fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, and believes that
the provision of the services for activities unrelated to the audit is
compatible with maintaining the independence of Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered
Accountants.

|C. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit
      Committees.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

Not Applicable.

|D. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and
      Affiliated Purchasers.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not Applicable.

|F. | Change in Registrants Certifying
  Account
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Not applicable.

|G. | Corporate Governance
|-- | --------------------

Not applicable.

|H. | Mine Safety Disclosure
|-- | ----------------------

Not applicable.

---

- 56 -

PART III

|Item 17. | Financial Statements
|-------- | --------------------

Financial Statements filed as part of the annual
report:

The following financial statements and notes thereto are filed
with and incorporated herein as part of this annual report:

Audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2014 including: independent auditors report by Smythe Ratcliffe
LLP, Chartered Accountants, consolidated statements of financial position as at
December 31, 2014 and 2013, consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for the years
December 31, 2014 and 2013, four months ended December 31, 2012 and year ended
August 31, 2012.Financial Statements.

Item 18.

See Item 17. Financial Statements.

|Item 19. | Exhibits
|-------- | --------

Exhibit No.
    Description(3)
    Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws3.01
    Certificate of Incorporation(1)3.01a
    Certificate of Name Change(1)3.01b
    Notice of Articles(1)3.01c
    Articles(1)(4)
    Securityholder Rights4.01
    Shareholders Rights Plan dated February 3,
      2011(1)(10)
    Material Contracts10.01
    Professional Services Agreement with Bondwest
      Enterprises Inc. dated January 1, 2014(4)10.02
    Professional Services Agreement with Richard
      Lee dated January 1, 2014(4)10.03
    Professional Services Agreement with Neil
      Gambow dated January 1, 2014(4)10.04
    Stock Option Plan(1)10.05
    Lease Agreement with Bonham Associates
      Management Ltd. dated November 1, 2012(1)10.06
    Sale and Purchase Agreement with James Wilson
      Company dated November 28, 2012(1)10.07
    Consulting Agreement with James Wilson dated
      November 28, 2012(1)10.08
    Agreement with Barry LaCroix for Patent No. US
      7,104,722 B2 dated May 26, 2010(1)10.09
    Notice of Recordation of Assignment Document
      for US Patent No. 7104722(1)10.10
    Notice of Recordation of Assignment Document
      for US Patent No. 5855225(1)11
    Code of Business Conduct and Ethics12.1
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
      pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200212.2
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
      pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


---

- 57 -

Exhibit No.
    Description13.1
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200213.2
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(21)
    Subsidiaries21.01
    List of Subsidiaries(1)(99)
    Additional Exhibits99.1
    Audited annual financial statements for the
      year ended December 31, 2014(4)99.1
    Audited annual financial statements for the
      year ended December 31, 2013(3)99.1
    Audited annual financial statements for the
      four months ended December 31, 2012 (2)99.2
    Audited annual financial statements for the
      year ended August 31, 2012(1)99.3
    Audited annual financial statements for the
      year ended August 31, 2011(1)


|(1) | Incorporated by reference from the applicable exhibit to
      our registration statement on Form 20-F filed on August 29,
2013.                          
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Incorporated by reference from the applicable exhibit to
      our registration statement on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 2 filed on
      November 21, 2013.
|(3) | Incorporated by reference from the applicable exhibit to
      our Form 6-K filed on March 31, 2014.                                                      
|(4) | Incorporated by reference from the applicable exhibit to
      our Form 20F filed on March 31, 2014.                                                      

---

- 58 -

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized
the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

KELSO TECHNOLOGIES INC.By:
    /s/
      James R. BondJames R. BondPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 31, 2015By:
    /s/
      Richard LeeRichard LeeChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)Date: March 31, 2015


---