alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Re: One Last Question on Fenamidone ; commodity definitions Alexandra LaMay to: Andrew Ertman 09/22/2011 03:12 PM Cc: Matthew Lloyd, Barbara Madden, Bernard Schneider
HED is amending the tolerance recommendations for fenamidone contained in the 7/20/11 Human Health Risk Assessment from : Grain, cereal, group 15, except rice.........................................................0.1 pp m Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, forage...............................0.3 pp m Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, hay..................................0.5 pp m Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, stover ...............................0.5 pp m Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, straw ...............................0.5 pp m
to read as follows: Grain, cereal, group 15, except rice.........................................................0.1 pp m Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except rice...........................0.5 pp m Alexandra LaMay, Biologist Risk Assessment Branch VII, Health Effects Division OPP, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention U.S. Environmental Protection Agency LaMay.Alexandra@epa.gov 703-605-0658
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’SCERTIFICATE

 

CAPITAL ONE BANK

 

----

 

CAPITAL ONE MASTER TRUST

 

----

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative ofCapital One Bank, as Servicer (the “Bank”), pursuant to the Amended andRestated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1993, asamended and restated as of August 1, 2002 (as amended and supplemented, the “Agreement”),among the Bank, as Servicer, Capital One Funding, LLC, as Transferor, and TheBank of New York, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             The Bank is, as of the date hereof, theServicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate havetheir respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who isduly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver thisCertificate to the Trustee.

 

3.             A review of the activities of the Servicerduring the calendar year ended December 31, 2005, and of its performance underthe Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

 

4.             Based on such review, the Servicer has, tothe best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligationsunder the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph5 below.

 

5.             The following is a description of eachdefault in the performance of the Servicer’s obligations under the provisionsof the Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:

 

None.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 16th day of March, 2006.

 

 
|   | CAPITAL ONE BANK, |
|--------|-------------------|
|   |  as Servicer |
|   |              |
|   | By:               | /s/ Steve Richter |   |
|   | Name:             | Steve Richter |
|   | Title:            | Director of Corporate  Accounting and Reporting |

 

1

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(24)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        October 22, 2020        100 Years of Service to Migratory Bird Conservation in North America

Presentations and Events        December 7, 2020        Bird Banding Lab, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service—Centennial Presentation
**EXHIBIT 31.2(a)**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)**

 

I, William Restrepo, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Nabors Industries Ltd.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

 

 
| Date: March 29,   2018 | /s/ WILLIAM RESTREPO        |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                        | William Restrepo            |
|                        | *Chief   Financial Officer* |

 

----
Morocco Lavan LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4927

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Erik REED, a/k/a Erik David Reed, Appellant, v. Aubrey MORESI, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Beatriz PEREZ v. HAI NGUYEN

NO. 2018-CJ-1274

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Eleventh Court of Appeals Mandate

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT OF BROWN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on December 22, 2016, the

cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Nelson Carl Thomas

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-14-00355-CR and

35th District Court Case No. CR22754

The State of Texas

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

 “This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed."

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the HON. JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief

Justice of our said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland, on

June 7, 2017.

SHERRY WILLIAMSON, CLERK

By: Myrna McGough, Deputy

FILE COPY
U.S

.Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration February 26 , 2015

Mr. David Stape Manager, Regulatory Compliance Delta Air Lines , Inc. Post Office Box 20706 Atlanta, GA 30320-6000 I Dear Mr. Stape: Exemption No. 60341 800 Independence Ave

. . S W Wash inglon

. 0 C

. 2059 1

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-8428

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 6034 , as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

### The Basis for Our Decision By letter dated February 2 , 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Delta Air Lines , Inc. (Delta) for an extension of Exemption No. 6034 , as amended. That exemption from§§ 121.317(a) and 25.79l(a) ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) allows Delta to operate its McDonnell Douglas MD-90 aircraft with
" No Smoking" signs that are always illuminated, provided Delta operates those aircraft in a manner that continues to prohibit smoking on board the affected aircraft at all times. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal R egister because the requested extension of Exemption 6034, as amended, would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Delta. 

### Our Decision The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6034 , as amended, remains valid with respect to this extension and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 1 06(t) , 40113 and 44701 ; which the FAA
AFS-15-507-EAdministrator has delegated to me, Delta Airlines, Inc. is granted an extension to its exempti on f rom 

### §§ 121.317(a) and 25.79 1 (a) that allows Delta to operate its McDonnell Doug la s MD-90 aircraft with "No Smoking" signs that are always illuminated , provided De lta operates tho se aircraft in a manner that continues to prohibit s moking on board the affected aircraft at all times. 

### The Effect of Our Decision Our decision ex t ends the t e rmination date of Exemption No. 6034, as amended, to February 28 , 2017 , un less sooner superseded or r esc inded. ' Sincerely,

John Barbagallo Acting Deputy D irector, Flight Standards Service 

### 2
Frank SHURTI, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FRANZEFI, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2988

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Harry WARREN, Sr. and Tommy Warren, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1724

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michael G. HILL, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Michelle F. Hill and Torey Pines Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-4423

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020280EN.01000201.xml

| 25.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9447 – Hitachi/ABB (Power Grid Division))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 280/02)

On 28 May 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9447. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9447. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha V, Inc.. ("Tabatha") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Micheal
      Forster, President, Chief Executive Officer of Tabatha and the sole member
      of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition
      and result of operations of Communicate.






/s/Micheal
        Forster
 Micheal
        Forster




Chief
      Executive Officer




February
      13, 2005








CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha V, Inc.. ("Tabatha") on Form
        10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Kathleen Forster, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer of Tabatha
        V and the sole member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition
        and result of operations of Communicate.
   /s/Kathleen
          Forster
 Kathleen Forster
  Chief Financial
        Officer
  February
        13, 2005
Robert Earl BRUMBLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Firepond, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Kristi L. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

                                    /s/ Kristi L. Smith
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Kristi L. Smith
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: September 12, 2003
Order entered July 9, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00001
- CV
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant
V. VICKI LYNN ROGERS, I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF CARL ROGER S, NATALIE ROG ERS AND COURTNEY DUG AT, Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 10
- 03294
- E 

### O RDER
W e GRANT court reporter Vikki Ogden’s July 8, 2015 extension request and ORDER
the record be filed no later tha n August 31, 2015

. Because the reporter’s record was first due February 2, 2015, we caution Ms. Ogden that failure to timely file the record may result in an order that she not sit as a court reporter until the record is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk of thi s Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Mark Greenberg, Presiding Judge of County Court at Law No. 5; Ms. Ogden; and counsel for all parties.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28900]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board hereby gives notice of the scheduling of 
a teleconference of the National Science Board/National Science 
Foundation Commission on Merit Review (MRX) for the transaction of 
National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: The MRX meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 11, 
2024, from 4:00 p.m.-4:30 p.m. Eastern.

PLACE: This meeting will be via videoconference through the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda is: Commission Chair's remarks 
about the agenda; Discussion of final guidance; Vote for approval of 
final guidance; and Commission Chair's closing remarks.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, [email protected], 703/292-7000. Meeting information and 
updates may be found at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Ann E. Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-28900 Filed 12-4-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
Exhibit



        
Exhibit 10.4



FIRST AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR
INCENTIVE RESTRICTED SHARE PLAN OF
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL NEW YORK CITY REIT, INC.
 
WHEREAS, American Realty Capital New York City REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Employee and Director Incentive Restricted Share Plan (the “Plan”);
 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may at any time amend the Plan; and
 
WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, effective as of August 8, 2017:


		
	1.
	The definition of “Advisory Agreement” in Section 1.2 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with:




 “‘Advisory Agreement’ shall mean that agreement dated November 15, 2015, by and among the Company, the Advisor and New York City Operating Partnership, L.P., as may be amended from time to time.”


		
	2.
	The definition of “Fair Market Value” in Section 1.2 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with:




 “‘Fair Market Value’ means with respect to Shares: 


		
	(i)
	If the Shares are listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, their Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for the Shares, or the mean between the high bid and low asked prices if no sales were reported, as quoted on such system or exchange (or, if the Shares are listed on more than one exchange, then on the largest such exchange) for the date the value is to be determined (or if there are no sales or bids for such date, then for the last preceding business day on which there were sales or bids), as reported in The Wall Street Journal.




		
	(ii)
	If the Shares are regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, or if there is no secondary trading market for the Shares, their Fair Market Value shall be the Company’s estimated net asset value per Share, calculated pursuant to the valuation guidelines adopted by the Board and published by the Company.”




		
	3.
	Section 6.1 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 






        
Exhibit 10.4





“Automatic Grant.  Without further action of the Board or the Committee, Non-Employee Directors shall receive an Award of a number of Restricted Shares equal to the quotient of (A) 30,000 divided by (B) the Fair Market Value of a Share as of the Grant Date of such Award, and such Award shall be made on each of (i) the date of such Non-Employee Director’s initial election to the Board and (ii) the date of each annual stockholders’ meeting of the Company thereafter and, in each case, notwithstanding Section 5.1(c), each such date will be the Grant Date of such Award.”
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has approved the amendment to the Plan as set forth herein and authorized the undersigned officer of the Company to execute this amendment and the undersigned has caused this amendment to be executed this 8th day of August, 2017.




HEALTHCARE TRUST, INC.
    
By:  /s/ Edward M. Weil, Jr.                
Name: Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Title: Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
2501, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. PRICE BUSTER MATTRESS, LLC and Price Buster Mattress Florida, LLC, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Case No. 5D17-580

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed August 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied September 28, 2018

Dennis F. Fairbanks, Melbourne, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Michael E. Dujovne and David J. Volk of Volk Law Offices, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

2501, LLC ("Landlord"), filed two separate complaints against Price Buster Mattress, LLC ("Tenant"), alleging breach of a commercial lease. The parties stipulated that in the first suit,1 Landlord sought to recover for Tenant's alleged breach of lease through the date of filing of the first complaint-August 5, 2014. In the second suit,2 Landlord sought to recover through the date of filing of the second complaint-November 4, 2015. The two suits were consolidated and tried together. The issues at trial revolved around which party breached the lease agreement and when Landlord retook possession of the premises. The trial court ultimately found that Tenant breached the lease, but that Landlord *729retook possession of the property on June 6, 2014, and thereafter failed to mitigate its damages.

Landlord appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in finding that it retook possession of the premises. Tenant cross-appeals, contending that the Landlord was, in fact, the breaching party and that the trial court erred in its determination of when Landlord retook possession. Tenant also argues that the trial court erred in not separating the two cases in the final judgment.

We affirm both appeals because competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's determinations that Tenant breached the lease but that Landlord retook possession of the premises on June 6, 2014. However, we agree with Tenant that even though the cases were consolidated for trial, Tenant is entitled to a judgment separating the two cases for damages purposes, as well as a determination as to which party was the prevailing party in each case. *See**OneBeacon Ins. Co. v. Delta Fire Sprinklers, Inc.*, 898 So.2d 113, 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ("[C]onsolidated cases do not lose their individual identities as distinct, separately filed causes of action."); *cf.**CDI Contractors, LLC. v. Allbrite Elec. Contractors, Inc.*, 836 So.2d 1031, 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (remanding for trial court to enter separate judgments for damages, interest, attorney's fees, and costs on separate but consolidated cases; ordering trial court on remand to "apportion (if possible) the fees attributable" to the separate cases).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1

Brevard County Circuit Court case number 05-2014-CA-37148.

2

Brevard County Circuit Court case number 05-2015-CA-048128.
Daylan BRADSTREET v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden

NO. 2018-KH-1161

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.