alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28719]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-1464]

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Navinta 
LLC

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Navinta LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplementary Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before 
February 4, 2025. Such persons may also file a written request for a 
hearing on the application on or before February 4, 2025.

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all 
comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into 
the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier 
comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon 
submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. 
Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously 
available for public view on https://www.regulations.gov. If you have 
received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully 
submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on October 14, 2024, Navinta LLC, 1499 Lower Ferry Road, 
Ewing, New Jersey 08618-1414, applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Levomethorphan..........................    9210  II
Levorphanol.............................    9220  II
Remifentanil............................    9739  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled 
substances for validation purposes as part of the Food Administration 
approval process before distributing to their customers. No other 
activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration.

Matthew Strait,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-28719 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit
10(bbb)





This letter
agreement shall describe the basic terms of our mutual understanding pursuant
to which DC Associates (“DC”) will license to NeoStem, and its successors (“NeoStem”)
executive office space and related services pursuant to its rights to do so
under its lease with the landlord for the subject premises.


	
  Commencement Date:

  	
  November 1, 2006

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Term:

  	
  Month to month

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Terminable:

  	
  By either party on 30 days prior written notice

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Location:

  	
  420 Lexington Avenue

  Suite 450

  New York, New York 10170

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Offices:

  	
  Four furnished inner offices and three desks in
  common space and use of conference room and other common space as per
  provided floorplan plus separate work space mutually agreeable to both parties
  as well as the name on the door and the hall.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Monthly Fee:

  	
  $9,500 which includes the cost of telephone,
  internet, photocopier, scanner, fax, coffee and soft drinks, mail usage,
  hosting of e-mail, shared receptionist and use of conference room(s). NeoStem
  will pay for office supplies in the amount of $500 monthly.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Monthly Cash Payment Due:

  	
  First business day of each month during the term.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Agreed and Accepted:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  DC Associates

  	
  NeoStem, Inc.

  
	
  By: 

  	
  \s\Michael Crow

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  \s\Robin Smith

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Michael Crow

  Title: Chief Executive Officer

  Date: October    , 2006

  	
  Name: Robin L. Smith

  Title: Chief Executive Officer

  Date: October    , 2006
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the
Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Clifford M. Gross, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                      |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------
|/s/ Clifford M. Gross
|Name:                 |  | Clifford M. Gross, Ph.D.
|Date:                 |  | May 6, 2008
Arial ZENO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0599

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Juan Carlos FERNANDEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Yanitsi FERNANDEZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1772

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - (-)science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

faq        July 6, 2017        Could magnetic reversals be caused by meteorite or comet impacts?

Featured Films and Shorts        July 17, 2014        USGS Gave NASA the Right Stuff
| **** |
|------|

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ReliaStar Life Insurance Company of New York (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| March 23, 2006

  | By:    | /s/    David A. Wheat                                                                             |   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

          |   | David A. Wheat

Director, Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |   |

 

 

 

 

----
Kirk T. SHIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Cave Climates

Filters

              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(2)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(4)
              - (-)california(3)
              - colorado(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - iowa(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - montana(3)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(8)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        September 26, 2019        PubTalk 09/2019 — Bats in the West

Photography        June 1, 2016        USGS Research Ecologist Jeff Lovich gets ready to release a male desert tortoise

Presentations and Events        July 26, 2018        PubTalk 7/2018— Extreme acid mine drainage at Iron Mountain California
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         313,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,831
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,200
<PP&E>                                          48,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 503,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,209
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                     455,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   503,852
<SALES>                                         46,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,021
<CGS>                                           25,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (973)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,854)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (32,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (32,354)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.71)


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00147-CV

SHATARA WRIGHT, Appellant

V.

MICHAEL STEPHEN PAYNE, Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 462nd District Court

of Denton County (16-02115-211)

November 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Wallach

Concurrence by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
STATE EX REL. Bernard GRANT v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-1942

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See *State ex rel. Grant v. State* , 15-1461 (La. 9/16/16), 201 So.3d 251.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(68)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - (-)news_other_news(3)

## By Location

              - california(2)
              - colorado(2)
              - delaware(1)
              - (-)florida(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)

## By Year

Center News        July 5, 2022        Can coral restoration reverse long-term declines in coral reef growth?

Center News        September 1, 2004        Manatee Population Rising in Some Regions, Likely Stalled or Declining in Others

Center News        November 1, 2018        The Development and Demise of Florida’s Coral Reefs
Case 21-17904-MAM Doc 9 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 3
Case 21-17904-MAM Doc 9 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 3
Case 21-17904-MAM Doc 9 Filed 08/16/21 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        RAPTOR NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Raptor Networks Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas M. Wittenschlaeger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 31, 2009                              /s/ Thomas M. Wittenschlaeger
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Thomas M. Wittenschlaeger
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (principal executive officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7704

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM F. KINCAID, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-89- 98-HM, CA-94-2559-AMD) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William F. Kincaid, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is stamped September 30, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on October 1, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: William Kincaid, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Kincaid , Nos. CR-89-98- HM; CA-94-2559-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1998). * We deny Kincaid’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020048EN.01002001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/20 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9681 — Inflexion/ICG /Marston)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 48/12)

1.

On 4 February 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020048EN.01002001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Inflexion Private Equity Partners LLP (‘Inflexion’ United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Intermediate Capital Group (‘ICG’, United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Marston Corporate Limited (‘Marston’, United Kingdom). |

Inflexion and ICG acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Marston.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Inflexion: private equity firm with a range of investors from large institutions to individuals, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for ICG: asset manager, active in the structuring and provision of mezzanine finance, leveraged credit and private equity in Europe, Asia Pacific and the USA, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Marston: transportation and debt enforcement service provider in the United Kingdom. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020048EN.01002001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9681 — Inflexion/ICG /Marston

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020048EN.01002001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020048EN.01002001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2020030EN.01000501.xml

| 29.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9658 — Daiwa Securities Group/Aquila Holding/Aquila Capital Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 30/03)

On 22 January 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9658. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9658. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---