alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
Certification I, Phillip A. Harris, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stratos International, Inc. for the period
ended January 31, 2005. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants third fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 17, 2005
    
    /s/ Phillip A. HarrisPhillip A. Harris
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2020361EN.01000101.xml

| 27.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9937 — BC Partners/Sofima/IMA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 361/01)

On 19 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9937. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9937. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Companys
Administrative Trustee certifies as follows:



| | (a) | This report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in this Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                       
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ John H. Gayle     
|                     |  |  |  | John H. Gayle,        
|                     |  |  |  | Administrative Trustee
Exhibit 4.5


 


[LETTERHEAD OF COMPANIA MINERA ANTAMINA S.A.]


 


July 17, 2007


 


British Columbia Securities Commission


Alberta Securities Commission


Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission


The Manitoba Securities Commission


Ontario Securities Commission


Autorité des marchés financiers


New Brunswick Securities Commission


Nova Scotia Securities Commission


Prince Edward Island Securities Office


Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador


Yukon Registrar of Securities


Northwest Territories Registrar of Securities


Nunavut Registrar of Securities


Toronto Stock Exchange


New York Stock Exchange


United States Securities and Exchange Commission


 


Dear Sirs:


 


	
  Re:

  	
  Teck Cominco Limited

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Consent of Expert

  	
   

  



 


In connection with the offer to purchase of Teck Cominco Limited  for all of the outstanding common shares of Aur Resources
Inc.  dated July 17, 2007 (the “Offer
to Purchase”), I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
references to my involvement in the preparation of the mineral reserve and
mineral resource estimates for Antamina (the “Estimates”) and to the use of the
Estimates, or portions thereof, in the following instances:


 


(a)                                  In  Teck Cominco Limited’s  Annual
Information Form dated February 26, 2007 (the “AIF”) under the heading “MINERAL
RESERVES AND RESOURCES – Mineral Reserves at December 31, 2006”; and


 


(b)                                 In the AIF under the
heading “MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES – Mineral Resources at December 31, 2006”.


 


I also consent to the use of my name and references to the Estimates,
or portions thereof, and to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of
information derived from the Estimates in the Offer to Purchase and the
registration statement on Form F-8 filed with the United States Securities
Exchange Commission on July 17, 2007 of Teck Cominco Limited (the
“Registration Statement”).


 

















 


I have read the Offer to Purchase and the Registration Statement of
Teck Cominco Limited and have no reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from
the Estimates or that are within my knowledge as a result of the preparation of
the Estimates.


 


 


Yours truly,


 


/s/ DAN GURTLER


 


Dan Gurtler, AIMM


 


2
1 NO. 03- 14 -00570- CR

ERIC BYRON CRAYTON § IN THE THIRD

VS. § DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPEALS OF TEXAS

SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes the State of Texas, Appellee in the above styled and numbered

cause, and moves for an extension of time of 31 days to file Appellee’s brief, and

for good cause would show the following:

I.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of Tampering with Physical Evidence on

August 11, 2014 in the 207 th District Court of Comal County

. The jury then

sentenced Appellant to 35 years confinement in the institutional division of the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal

and filed his brief with the Court on February 2, 2015 . The State’s brief is currently

due on April 3, 2015.

II.

Mr. Clayten Hearrell is handling this appeal for the State. Since the Court

granted the First Motion for Extension, Mr. Hearrell had a trial involving

aggravated robbery in early March. He had oral argument before the Court in 03- ACCEPTED

03-14-00570-CR

4759355

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/3/2015 1:27:02 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2

13

- 00347

- CR on March 25, 2015. H e h a d a t r i a l i n v o l v i n g P o s s e s s i o n o f a

C o n t r o l l e d S u b s t a n c e a t t h e e n d o f M a r c h

, a n d b e g i n n i n g o n A p r i l 6 t h

, h e w i l l h a v e

a j u v e n i l e m

u r d e r j u r y t r i a l e x p e c t e d t o l a s t t w o w e e k s

. A l t h o u g h h e h a s p e r f o r m e d

a d d i t i o n a l r e s e a r c h

, Mr. Hearrell has not yet had an opportunity to complete the

State’s brief in this case

, and in light of the foregoing, the State respectfully

requests that the Court grant him a 3 1

- day extension to file the Appellee’s B rief.

This is the s e c o n d extension sought by Appellee.

III

.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State’s counsel

respect fully requests an extension of 3 1 days, until M a y 4

, 201 5 , so that an

adequate response may be made to Appellant’s brief. This extension is not

requested for purposes of delay but so that justice may be done.

R espectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley

Joshua D. Presley SBN: 24088254

preslj@co.comal.tx.us

Comal Criminal District Attorney ’s Office

150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307

New Braunfels, Texas 78130

Ph: (830) 221

- 1300 / Fax: (830) 608

- 20083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua D. Presley

, Assistant D istrict A ttorney for the State of Texas,

Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this S e c o n d Motion to

Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief has been delivered to Appellant ERIC

BYRON CRAYTON ’s attorney of re cord in this matter:

Richard E. Wetzel

wetzel_law@1411west.com

1411 West Avenue

Suite 100

Austin, TX 78701

Attorney for Appellant on Appeal

By electronically sending it t o t h e a b o v e

- l i s t e d e m a i l a d d r e s s through

efile.txcourts.gov e

- filing service this 3 r d day of A p r i l , 2015

.

/s/ Joshua D. Presley

Joshua D. Presley
EXHIBIT 12.1

HERBST GAMING, INC.        COMPUTATION OF RATIO EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES        (dollars in thousands) (unaudited)

|                                                         |                                    | Years Ended December 31, |      
|-------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------ | -----
|
|Income from continuing operations before income taxes(1) |                                    | $                        | 7,074
|Add:                                                     |                                    |                          |      
|                                                         | Interest expense                   |                          |      
|                                                         | Interest component of rent expense |                          |      
|                                                         |                                    |                          |      
|Earnings available for fixed charges                     |                                    | $                        | 9,216
|                                                         |                                    |                          |      
|Fixed Charges:                                           |                                    |                          |      
|                                                         | Interest expense                   |                          | $    
|                                                         | Interest capitalized               |                          |      
|                                                         | Interest component of rent expense |                          |      
|                                                         |                                    |                          |      
|Total fixed charges                                      |                                    | $                        | 2,142
|                                                         |                                    |                          |      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       |                                    |                          | 4.3  
|                                                         |                                    |                          |      

---

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 4.2


 





 


	
   

  	
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
  LLP

  
	
   

  	
  Chartered Accountants

  
	
   

  	
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
  Place

  
	
   

  	
  250 Howe Street, Suite 700

  
	
   

  	
  Vancouver, British
  Columbia

  
	
   

  	
  Canada V6C 3S7

  
	
   

  	
  Telephone +1 604 806 7000

  
	
   

  	
  Facsimile +1 604 806 7806

  



 


Consent of Independent Chartered Accountants


 


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement on Form F-8 (the “Registration Statement”) of Teck Cominco Limited
(the “Company”) of our auditors’ report dated February 26, 2007, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as at December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 and the consolidated statements of earnings, retained
earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2006, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Teck Cominco Limited as of December 31, 2006.


 


We
also consent to the references to us under the headings “Experts” and “Documents
Filed as Part of the Registration Statement” in the Registration Statement.


 


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


 


Chartered
Accountants


 


Vancouver,
Canada


July 17, 2007


 


 


PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited,
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Jessica FRIEDEBORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Joseph E. ROCHFORD, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Sean DELANEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Krishna DELANEY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2018

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - products_publications(7)
              - multimedia_image(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(6)
              - (-)delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

              - 2022(1)

Photography  Red Knots at Delaware Bay
Karmika V. RUBIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. CASA DEL MAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION NO. 3 OF ST. PETERSBURG, INC., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4258

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Appendix 10.13

Reference 18:

Gerald Gentleman Station’s Landfill Permit, pp. 2-3 , September 2009.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of meeting dates.

                    The National Science Foundation published notices in the                     **Federal Register**                     November 15, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-26634 at 89 FR 90318 and November 20, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-27057 at 89 FR 91805, concerning meetings of the Advisory Committee for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships. The meetings scheduled for Tuesday, December 10, 2024, at 12 p.m. and Friday, December 13, 2024, at 11 a.m. (ET) are cancelled.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Please contact Crystal Robinson                         *crrobins@nsf.gov*                         or 703-292-8687.                    

Dated: December 5, 2024.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer, National Science Foundation.

[FR Doc. 2024-28977 Filed 12-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2020327EN.01000201.xml

| 5.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9895 — KKR/Waves UK Divestco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 327/02)

On 16 September 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9895. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9895. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Tal Fowler BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Talbert Bass FOWLER, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KUANG

- BAO OU

- YOUNG,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
KAMALA D. HARRIS; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 15001

D.C. No. 5:20

- cv

- 09097

- VKD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21, 2021 * *

Before: WATFORD, BENNETT
, and VANDYKE
, Circuit Judges.

Kuang

- Bao Ou

- Young appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the

application of a pre

- filing order

. M oy v. United States , 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9 th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 15001

1990) . We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting Ou

- Young’s

complaint and dismissing his action
, because the claims alleged were withi n the

scope of the district court’s pre

- filing restrictions imposed on him as a vexatious

litigant

. See West v. Procunier , 452 F.2d 645, 646 (9th Cir. 1971) ( concluding that

an order refusing to authorize the filing of a complaint was a “proper exercise of

the district court ’ s authority to effectuate compliance with its earlier order”).

We reject as without merit Ou

- Young’s contentions that the dismissal of his

action was in violation of his constitutional rights or premature, or that the district

court “falsified dismissal.”

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider Ou

- Young’s renewed motion for summary reversal

(Docket Entry No. 28)

. In Docket Entry No. 25, this court denied Ou

- Young’s
renewed motions for summary reversal and ordered that no motions for

reconsid eration, clarification, or modification of the denial shall be filed or

entertained.

AFFIRMED.