### 33034 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices

land uses within the area covered by the Noise Exposure Maps. The Act requires such programs to be developed in
consultation with interested and affected parties including local communities, government agencies, airport users, and FAA personnel.

Each airport noise compatibility program developed in accordance with Part 150 is a local program, not a Federal program. The FAA does not substitute its judgment for that of the airport proprietor with respect to which
measures should be recommended for action. The FAA’s approval or disapproval of Part 150 program
recommendations is measured according to the standards expressed in
Part 150 and the Act and is limited to the following determinations:

a. The Noise Compatibility Program was developed in accordance with the provisions and procedures of Part 150;

b. Program measures are reasonably consistent with achieving the goals of reducing existing non-compatible land uses around the airport and preventing
the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses;

c. Program measures would not create an undue burden on interstate or foreign commerce, unjustly discriminate against types or classes of aeronautical uses, violate the terms of airport grant agreements, or intrude into areas preempted by the Federal Government;
and

d. Program measures relating to the use of flight procedures can be implemented within the period covered by the program without derogating safety, adversely affecting the efficient use and management of the navigable airspace and air traffic control systems, or adversely affecting other powers and responsibilities of the Administrator prescribed by law.

Specific limitations with respect to FAA’s approval of an airport noise compatibility program are delineated in Part 150, section 150.5. Approval is not a determination concerning the acceptability of land uses under Federal, state, or local law. Approval does not by itself constitute an FAA implementing action. A request for Federal action or approval to implement specific noise compatibility measures may be required. Prior to an FAA decision on a request to implement the action, an environmental review of the proposed action may be required. Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in the implementation of the program nor a
determination that all measures coveredby the program are eligible for grant-inaid funding from the FAA under applicable law contained in Title 49 U.S.C. Where federal funding is sought, requests for project grants must be submitted to the FAA Airports District Office in Romulus, Michigan.

The Willow Run Airport study contains a proposed noise compatibility program comprised of actions designed for phased implementation by airport management and adjacent jurisdictions from 2012 to the year 2018. It was requested that the FAA evaluate and approve this material as a Noise Compatibility Program as described in
section 47504 of the Act. The FAA began its review of the program on January 15, 2014 and was required by a provision of the Act to approve or disapprove the program within 180 days (other than the use of new or modified flight procedures for noise control). Failure to approve or disapprove such program within the 180-day period shall be deemed to be an approval of such

program.

The submitted program contained nine (9) proposed actions for noise abatement, noise mitigation, land use planning and program management on and off the airport. The FAA completed
its review and determined that the procedural and substantive requirements of the Act and Part 150 have been satisfied. The overall program was approved by the FAA, effective May

20, 2014.

These determinations are set forth in detail in a Record of Approval signed by the Great Lakes Airports Division Manager on May 20, 2014. The Record of Approval, as well as other evaluation
materials and the documents comprising the submittal, are available for review, upon appointment during normal business hours, at the FAA
office listed above and at the
administrative offices of the Willow Run Airport, 801 Willow Run Airport, Ypsilanti, MI 48198.

The Record of Approval will also be
available on-line at: http://www.faa.gov/ airports/environmental/airport

_noise/.

Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on May 20,

2014. John L. Mayfield, Jr., Manager, Detroit Airports District Office.

[FR Doc. 2014–13372 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Membership in the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group Aviation**  **Rulemaking Committee**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation. **ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  By Federal Register notice (See 79 FR 18757, April 3, 2014) the National Park Service (NPS) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) invited interested persons to apply to fill two openings on the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group (NPOAG) Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC). The notice invited interested persons to apply to fill one upcoming and one currently vacant seat, both representing
environmental concerns. This notice informs the public of the person selected to fill one of the vacancies, no
selection has been made for the other open vacancy representing
environmental concerns.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Keith Lusk, Special Programs Staff, Federal Aviation Administration, Western-Pacific Region Headquarters, P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009–2007, telephone: (310) 725–3808,
email: Keith.Lusk@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Background

The National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000 (the Act) was enacted on April 5, 2000, as Public Law 106–181, and subsequently amended in
the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. The Act required the establishment of the advisory group within 1 year after its enactment. The
NPOAG was established in March 2001. The advisory group is comprised of a balanced group of representatives of general aviation, commercial air tour operations, environmental concerns,
and Native American tribes. The
Administrator of the FAA and the Director of NPS (or their designees)
serve as ex officio members of the group. Representatives of the
Administrator and Director serve alternating 1-year terms as chairman of the advisory group.

In accordance with the Act, the advisory group provides ‘‘advice, information, and recommendations to
the Administrator and the Director—

(1) On the implementation of this title [the Act] and the amendments made by this title;

(2) On commonly accepted quiet aircraft technology for use in commercial air tour operations over a national park or tribal lands, which will receive preferential treatment in a given air tour management plan;

(3) On other measures that might be
taken to accommodate the interests of visitors to national parks; and

(4) At the request of the Administrator and the Director, safety, environmental,
and other issues related to commercial


### 33035 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices

air tour operations over a national park
or tribal lands.’’

Membership

The current NPOAG ARC is made up of one member representing general aviation, three members representing the commercial air tour industry, four members representing environmental concerns, and two members representing Native American interests.
Current members of the NPOAG ARC
are as follows:

Heidi Williams representing general aviation; Alan Stephen, Matt Zuccaro, and Mark Francis representing commercial air tour operators; Greg Miller, Michael Sutton, and Dick Hingson representing environmental interests with one open seat; and Rory Majenty and Martin Begaye representing
Native American tribes.

Selection

The member selected to fill the upcoming open seat representing
environmental concerns is Dick Hingson. Mr. Hingson is a current
member of the NPOAG and his term begins on the day of this Federal Register notice publication. The term of
service for NPOAG ARC members is 3

years.

Issued in Hawthorne, CA on June 2, 2014.

Keith Lusk, Program Manager, Special Programs Staff, Western-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 2014–13281 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Highway Administration**

**Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Transportation Projects** 
**in Florida**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Limitation of Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA, and other Federal Agencies.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces actions taken by the FHWA and other Federal Agencies since January 1, 2013, that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139( l )(1). The actions relate to the proposed SR 40 (from 1 mile W of SR 326 to US 17/SR 15) in Marion, Lake and Volusia Counties; SR 200/US 301 Baldwin Bypass in Duval County; PJ Adams Parkway in Okaloosa County; SR 710 (from SR 76 to Blue Heron Blvd. at I–95) in Martin and Palm Beach Counties; SR 968/SW 1st Street Bridge over Miami River (from SW 5th Avenue to SW 2nd Avenue) in Miami-Dade County; Starke Bypass US 301 (from CR 227 to CR 233) in Bradford County; Crosstown Parkway (from Manth Lane to US 1) in St. Lucie County, and St. Johns River Crossing in Clay and St. Johns Counties in the State of Florida. These actions grant licenses, permits, and approvals for the project.

**DATES :**  By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139( l )(1). A claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the listed highway projects will be barred unless
the claim is filed on or before November 6, 2014. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 150 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period still applies.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**
**, CONTACT**  **:** Mr. Benito Cunill, Environmental Coordinator, FHWA Florida Division, 545 John Knox Road, Suite 200, Tallahassee, Florida 32303; telephone:

850–553–2224; email: benito.cunill@ dot.gov. The FHWA Florida Division
Office’s normal business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Notice is hereby given that the FHWA has taken final agency action subject to 23 U.S.C. 139( l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits, and approvals for the projects listed below. The actions by the Federal agencies on a project, and the laws under which such actions were taken,
are described in the documented environmental assessment (EA) and environmental impact statement (EIS) issued in connection with the project, and in other project records for the listed projects. The EA and FEIS and
other documents from the FHWA project records for the listed projects are available by contacting the FHWA or by using the links provided below.

This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions as of the issuance date
of this notice and all laws under which
such actions were taken. Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139( l) laws generally applicable
to such actions include but are not
limited to:

1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– 4351; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].

2. Air: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401– 7671(q).

3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 [49 U.S.C. 303 and 23 U.S.C. 138].

4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and 1536]; Marine Mammal Protection Act [16 U.S.C. 1361], Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d); Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) [16 U.S.C. 703– 712]; Magnuson-Stevenson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, as amended [16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.].

5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archaeological
Resources Protection Act of 1977 (ARPA) [16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–470(II)]; Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act (AHPA) [16 U.S.C. 469–469(c)]; Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013].

6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 20009(d)– 2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 4201–4209].

7. Wetlands and Water Resources: Clean Water Act (Section 404, Section 401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251– 1377]; Coastal Barriers Resources Act (CBRA) [16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.]; Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) [16 U.S.C. 1451–1465]; Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 4601–4604]; Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)–300(j)(6)]; Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 [33 U.S.C. 401–406]; Wild and Scenic Rivers Act [16 U.S.C. 1271–1287]; Emergency Wetlands Resources Act [16 U.S.C. 3921, 3931]; Wetlands Mitigation, [23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M) and 103(b)(11)]; Flood Disaster Protection Act [42 U.S.C. 4001–4128].

8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898,
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and Enhancement of Cultural Resources; E.O. 13287 Preserve America; E.O.
13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments; E.O.
11514 Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112 Invasive Species.

The projects subject to this notice are: 1. Project Location: Marion, Lake, and Volusia Counties, SR 40. Financial Project Number 410674, 410675, and 410676. Project type: The SR 40 projectproposes improving the existing twolane roadway to a four-lane divided roadway from the beginning of the study area near Silver Springs to SE 183rd Avenue Road (Levy Hammock Road) and is called the Capacity Improvement
Area in the Environmental Assessment.