alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Numbers 333-11313-99, 333-87069-99, 333-121908,
333-155291, 333-166598, 333-184165 and 333-190104, all filed on Forms S-8 of Nabors Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 31, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Sabine Oil & Gas LLC and its subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 (which report expresses an unmodified opinion and includes an
emphasis-of-matter paragraph relating to the restatement of the 2012 consolidated financial statements as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and also includes an
other-matter paragraph disclaiming an opinion on the supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Nabors
Industries Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston,
Texas
March 30, 2015

---



QuickLinks
# C_2020293EN.01000101.xml

| 4.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9912 – Genstar/TA/Brinker)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 293/01)

On 26 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9912. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9912. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Leroy David THOMPSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-70

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,Rodney G. Christianson and Mark Hyde, the Chief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive Officer) and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer), respectively,of the Company, certify, individually and not jointly pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31,2007 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).

 
| Dated:  March 31, 2008 |   |                     |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                        |   |                     |
|                        | By     | /s/ Rodney Christianson  |
|                        |   | Rodney  G. Christianson  |
|                        |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                        |   |                     |
|                        |   |                     |
|                        | By     | /s/ Mark Hyde            |
|                        |   | Mark  Hyde               |
|                        |   | Controller               |

 

----
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 20 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

KILSON FLORES, also known

as Kilson Elkins,

Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION &

NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

No. 99-9509

(INS No. A 27-653-117)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, EBEL, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Petitioner moves for a stay of deportation pending petition for review.

This case is governed by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant

Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996. Because

petitioner’s exclusion proceedings began before April 1, 1997, and the final order

of exclusion was entered more than thirty days after IIRIRA’s date of enactment,

IIRIRA’s transitional rules apply. See Berehe v. INS , 114 F.3d 159, 161

(10th Cir. 1997).

Petitioner was found excludable because she had no valid immigrant visa

and because she had committed a controlled substance violation. “IIRIRA’s

transitional rules . . . clearly and unambiguously state that, ‘there shall be no

appeal permitted’ in the case of an alien who is deportable by reason of

committing one of the enumerated crimes” in IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(G). Id.

We lack jurisdiction to review the merits of whether petitioner is validly

excludable. See id.

The petition for review and motion for stay are DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mihir K. Taneja,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GeoPharma, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                         |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mihir K. Taneja    
|                         |  |     |  | Mihir K. Taneja        
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



27
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(35)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(2)
              - (-)news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - colorado(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - (-)nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Technical Announcement        June 16, 2017        USGS: High Plains Aquifer Groundwater Levels Continue to Decline
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc., on Form 10-QSB
      for
      the period ending November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
      Brian Fisher, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

















/s/
      Brian
      Fisher


Brian
      Fisher


President
      and Director


(Principal
      Executive Officer)








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020122EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9817 – Rhône Capital/Maxam)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 122/05)

1.

On 3 April 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020122EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Rhône Capital L.L.C. (‘Rhône Capital’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | MaxamCorp Holding, S.L. (‘Maxam’, Spain). |

Rhône Capital acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Maxam.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Rhône Capital: investment management firm, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Maxam: diversified group of companies which are primarily active in the manufacture and supply of civil explosives and initiating systems and related products, services and solutions; ammunition and defence products, services and systems; and recreational hunting and sporting products, such as cartridges and gunpowder, among others. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020122EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9817 – Rhône Capital/Maxam

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020122EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020122EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
, 

, 

e

tal Program Manager for the Department of Environmental

Conservation, being sworn, state the following:

On June 29th 2011, from 12:30-1:30 pm. in Room A, at 619 Ship Creek Avenue, Suite 249, in

Anchorage, Alaska, I presided over a public hearing held in accordance with AS 44.62.210 for

the purpose of taking testimony in connection with the adoption by reference in 18 AAC 50.030

changes being made to the State Implementation Plan. These changes include adopting byreference the Municipality of Anchorage’s revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan; MOA’s

revised “Anchorage 2007 Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventory and 2007-2023 Emission

Projections” and MOA’s revised “Analysis of Probability of Complying with the National

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide in Anchorage between 2007 and 2023”.

DATE:

Anchorage, Alaska

Thomas Turner. Program Manager

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this

day of c51-4nc ,Dt

[NOTARY SEALI Notary Public in and for the

State of AlaskaMy commission expires:

&ate ofAloska

NOTARY PUBLIC

Bin D. Dreyer
FINAL 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 00-1132 

PV (kg/yr) : 

USE: 

ENGINEER: Blouin/LMC 

SUBMITTER: Degussa-Hulx Corps. c 

CRSS : 

Chemical Category: 

Trade Name: . . -- 

VP: <1E-06 torr @25"C (est) -. . 

S-H,O: dispersible 

Phvs te: sol t) (mfr: N t; proc: dispersion,. 

Consumer Use: No 

end use: destroyed) - 

. SAT (concerns) : * 

PBT Potential: P3BlT1 

Health: 1-2 - migration to ground water = negligible; 

Exposures to humans: inhalation 

Eco: 3 - No releases to water 

CEB Drop Category: D7 

Basis: 

.z 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 1
Termination Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.79 
 Termination Agreement 
 This Agreement is executed on January 16, 2006 by and between: 
 Party A: Lahiji Vale Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”) 
 Registered Address: P.O. Box 957, Offshore Incorporation Centre, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands 
 Party B: Wang Lei Lei (hereinafter
referred to as “Party B”) 
 Address: No.1001, Building 1, Xiaoyangyibin Bystreet, Dongcheng District, Beijing 
 Whereas: 
  

	1.	The creditor and the borrower executed a Loan Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Loan Agreement I”) on August 8, 2002 and executed the Supplement Agreement to
the Loan Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Supplement Agreement to the Loan Agreement”) on September 26, 2003 and Loan Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Loan Agreement II”) on January 19, 2005.


  

	2.	Party A and Party B wish to terminate the said Loan Agreement and Supplement Agreement to the Loan Agreement. 

 Now therefore, the Parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Loan Agreement I, the Supplement Agreement to the Loan Agreement and the Loan Agreement II, which shall automatically become invalid upon
the effective date of this agreement. 

  

	2.	On the date when the Loan Agreement I, the Supplement Agreement to the Loan Agreement and the Loan Agreement II become invalid, the rights and obligations of Party A and Party B
under the Loan Agreement I, the Supplement Agreement to the Loan Agreement and the Loan Agreement II shall be terminated accordingly. 

  

	3.	This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution. 

  

	4.	This Agreement shall be governed by the PRC laws. 

  

	5.	This Agreement is made in two copies, each held by either Party. 

  

 1 








 [Execution Page] 
  

	
	Lahiji Vale Limited
	
	  

	Name:
	Title:
	
	Wang Lei Lei
	
	Signature:

  

 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(2)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - multimedia_image-141771(7)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - delaware(1)
              - nevada(1)

## By Year

              - 2024(6)
              - 2023(3)
              - (-)2022(9)
              - 2021(6)

Photography  A Mesquite Savanna Plant Community in the Sonoran Desert

Photography  Greater Sage-Grouse

Photography  Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog

Photography  Black-Bellied Salamander

Photography  Red Knots at Delaware Bay

Photography  Arizona Upland Plant Community in the Sonoran Desert

Science Theme        June 16, 2022      Listed Species and Species of Management Concern

Photography  A USGS Researcher in an Invasive Phragmites Stand, Great Lakes

Science Theme        November 14, 2022      Fish, Streams, and Water Quality
Maryland 

Department of 

the Environment 

Apri119, 2016 

Mr. Shawn Gatvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 3 

1650 Arch Street 

Mail Code: 3RAOO 

Phi1adelphia,~191 03-2029 

cvu~.vr 

Dear Admini tr~ 

Larry Hogan 

Govemor 

Boyd Rutherford 

Lieutenant Gc....ern or 

Ben Grumbles 

Secretary 

Thank you for your February 16, 2016, Jetter concerning air quality designations in Maryland for the 

2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide (S02) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The Maryland 

Department of the Environment (the Department) appreciates the opportunity to provide the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with additional technical analyses regarding the sulfur 

dioxide concentrations in the area of the Herbert A. Wagner Generating Station (Wag ner). 

The Department, in consultation with Raven Power, operator of the Wagner station, has conducted 

refi ned modeling of the 1-hour S02 emissions in the area of Wagner, and the modeling shows that 

the area is in attainment of the standard. In addition, the Sierra Club modeling that shows 

nonaUainment has significant fJaws. Please see the enclosed technical support document. 

Secretary 

cc: Janet McCabe 

Chet Wayland 

George S. (Tad) Aburn 

Enclosures
STATE EX REL. Eric BONE v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1638

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(29)
              - multimedia_image(7)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - multimedia_image-141775(3)
              - multimedia_video(11)
              - multimedia_video-149194(5)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149198(3)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(6)
              - delaware(1)
              - florida(2)
              - (-)hawaii(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

Photography        June 16, 2023        June 16, 2023 — Kīlauea summit thermal map compilation

Photography        April 8, 1984        Low lava fountains from 1984 Mauna Loa "2,900-m vents" signaled dec...

Photography        February 7, 2021        February 6, 2021 — Kīlauea

Photography        July 29, 2018        Assessing the Functional Equivalency of Hawaiian fishponds