alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Rocco B. Commisso, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of Mediacom CommunicationsCorporation; and (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.     **January 13, 2006** By: /s/ Rocco B. Commisso         **Rocco B. Commisso**Chief Executive Officer
 

 
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Mark E. Stephan, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of Mediacom CommunicationsCorporation; and (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.     **January 13, 2006** By: /s/ Mark E. Stephan         **Mark E. Stephan**Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3(iv)


                               STATE OF DELAWARE

                        OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

                        --------------------------------


         I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT OF "UTEK CORPORATION", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-FOURTH DAY
OF JULY, A.D. 2001, AT 12:30 O'CLOCK P.M.

         A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE
COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS.



                                       /s/ Harriet Smith Windsor
                                       ----------------------------------------
                     [SEAL]            Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State

3068837  8100                            AUTHENTICATION: 1259473

010357542                                          DATE: 07-24-01
H. R. 5509 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs temporary lodging facility in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ‘‘Dr. Otis Bowen Veteran House’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TEMPORARY LODGING FACILITY, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs temporary lodging facility 

in Indianapolis, Indiana, shall after the date of the enactment 

of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Otis Bowen 

Veteran House’’. Any reference to such temporary lodging facility 

in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper 

of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

Dr. Otis Bowen Veteran House. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Kingdom Koncrete, Inc. Exhibit 10.1 on 7/12/07






The Hall Group

Certified Public Accountants
















EXHIBIT 10.1










CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS










We consent to the use of our reports dated January 31, 2007 on the financial statements of Kingdom Koncrete, Inc. Corporation as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the inclusion of our name under the heading “Experts” in the Form SB-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission.




/s/ The Hall Group, CPA’s

The Hall Group, CPA’s

Dallas, Texas 







July 6, 2007
STATE of Louisiana v. Nunzio MARCHIAFAVA

NO. 2017-K-1670

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

Writ granted. The rulings of the courts below improperly focused upon defendant's alleged pre-fire conduct, upon which the state does not rely as a basis for this prosecution. Further, the court of appeal majority too narrowly construed the state's argument as briefed on appeal. The bill of information and the state's responses to defendant's motion for a bill of particulars sufficiently charge the offense of malfeasance in office-including the underlying affirmative duties in support of that allegation-based on claims concerning defendant's alleged post-fire acts. *See* *State v. Petitto* , 10-0581, p. 11 (La. 3/15/11), 59 So.3d 1245, 1252 ("[C]ivil statutes may serve as the source of the duty, the knowing and intentional violation of which may constitute [malfeasance]."); *see also* *State v. Perez* , 464 So.2d 737, 742 (La. 1985) ('To intentionally interfere with the execution of any law would be a failure to perform a duty lawfully required of them under their oath and would constitute malfeasance."). Additionally, defendant's claim of double jeopardy is premature. *See* *State v. Hall* , 12-0601 (La. 6/29/12), 91 So.3d 302. The judgments of the lower courts are reversed, defendant's motion to quash is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

**REVERSED AND REMANDED**

Hughes, J., would deny the writ.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

Subject: FW: Essential Air Service at Escanaba, MI 

From: Martin, Michael (OST) 

Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 11:37 AM 

To: 'Kelly Smith' 

Cc: brad rawson; KellyC@CharterAirTransport.com; Schlemmer, Kevin {OST); Harvey, Caitlin (OST); mtall@escanaba.org; 

nviau@deltacountymi.org 

Subject: RE: Essential Air Service at Escanaba, MI 

KellyThat's fine. I'll expect your comments then. Any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

From: Kelly Smith [mailto:ksmith@deltacountymi.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 8:29AM 

To: Martin, Michael {OST) 

Cc: brad rawson; KellyC@CharterAirTransport.com; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Harvey, Caitlin (OST); mtall@escanaba.org; 

nviau@deltacountymi .org 

Subject: Re: Essential Air Service at Escanaba, MI 

Michael, Im requesting a comment period extension for Delta County Airport (ESC) EAS until August 22, 2014. 

Please conflrm if this is possible. 

Thank you for the conversation and help yesterday. I really appreciate it. 

Kelly 

Kelly Smith 

Manager 

Delta County Airport 

3300 Airport Road 

Escanaba,MI 49829 

ksmith@deltacountymi.org 

906-786-4902 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the quarterly  report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the three month period  ended March 31, 2005,  as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on May  17,  2005  (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C./ Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  May 17, 2005                          s/Ken Inouye
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Ken Inouye, Secretary-Treasurer
Response to Comments 

Only one comment was received during the public comment period . That comment is 

reproduced below, followed by RI DEM's response . 

Comment: The coatings industry is under constant pressure to reformulate products to lower 

and lower VOC content. As a result there is a critical and urgent need for safe, effective and 

affordable exempt solvents and coating formulators need all available tools to formulate both 

lower VOC and reactivity coatings. The American Coatings Association supports 

adding Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) and Propylene Carbonate to the list of exempt 

compounds. These compounds were exempted by the US EPA based on their negligible 

contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. (David Darling, Director, Environmental Affairs, 

American Coatings Association) 

Response: RI DEM acknowledges this comment and agrees that the changes to this 

regulation are a reflection of the federal and industry standards.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas
Feil, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Capital One Multi-asset Execution Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of
New York Mellon.

Date: March 29, 2016



By:

/s/ Thomas FeilName:

Thomas Feil *Title:

PresidentCapital One Funding, LLC*  Thomas Feil is the senior officer in charge of securitization of Capital One Funding, LLC.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PRSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of GeoPharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Mihir K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mihir K. TanejaMihir K. TanejaChief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2004
Erisct Jarrod RICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 16, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(188)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2005)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(228)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(15)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - (-)news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - colorado(1)
              - missouri(1)
              - montana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - utah(2)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

National News Release        May 18, 2015        Atmospheric Release of BPA May Reach Nearby Waterways

National News Release        October 17, 2016        Where Does it Go? New Method Evaluates Fate of Methane Released into Streams

National News Release        July 8, 2014        USGS Release: Large Rivers in U.S. are Becoming Less Acidic

National News Release        March 11, 2014        Amazon Carbon Dynamics: Understanding the Photosynthesis-Climate Link

National News Release        February 26, 2024        USGS provides easy access to Colorado River science with new online portal
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5421 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5421

 To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to apply the exemption from State 
 regulation of securities offerings to securities listed on a national 
security exchange that has listing standards that have been approved by 
                            the Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2016

  Mr. Royce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to apply the exemption from State 
 regulation of securities offerings to securities listed on a national 
security exchange that has listing standards that have been approved by 
                            the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Securities Exchange 
Regulatory Parity Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF EXEMPTION.

    Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(b)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A);
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``that the Commission 
        determines by rule (on its own initiative or on the basis of a 
        petition) are substantially similar to the listing standards 
        applicable to securities described in subparagraph (A)'' and 
        inserting ``that has been approved by the Commission'';
            (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``or (B)''; and
            (4) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
1/1)]) 
 Maryland Department ofPlanning Ko.In< L EMtt. J" '

E-S_ 

~­ ­ .\Ji4.l5 SUt" F_E. 81m... UGo_ D'fMIJ S"",., 

Novnn:.:r 27. 2006 

M$. Deborah Rabin 

Rogu1>oons Coordinator. Air &. Radiation MIIIIgemonl Administntion 

),Iary\.ll:ld Depanmonl oftbe Environrnenl 

ISOO Wo..<hingtoD BoWeHId 

Suite 730 

B..ltimore. MD 21230 

o.ar Ms. Rabin; 

Thank you for .ubmlttinJI your projecl for intel&oV<"rllmOnw review. Panicipation in tbe Mlryland !oter&o~tmrn<nto! R.~i.w and 

Coordination (MIRe) pI"".... helps e""ute projecl .""""tenoy with pan.,. prOiflmS. and objectives ofStote agellCies and local 

~= 

AU MiRe 'equi,."","" ba'·e been mel in accordanc. "ith Code of Maryland Regulatio,," (COMAR 14.24.(4) and this co""ludes 

!be f.vi~w pr"".... (or !be: .bov. ",ferellCed projecl. If)'O\l Deed ....i.tance or have que. tiOJli, COntact tbe Stott Ck";ng!>ouse . ... rr 

peown noltd above aI 411)...767-4490 Of tlu"ough .-mail at br_nbuo"@mdp.i1O!~.md.u•. Thank you for )'OW cooperation WIth 

the MIRC process. 

Siocercly. 

~~ C. ~?fVvV-­ boda C. Jtn<y. J.D., D"tc!Or 

."bryland St.ote Cl••ringho"", for [nte<i0,·emmental A ..i.ta""e 

LCJ 811 

Enclo>uu(.j 

<C . K.,hI«n 81,n.0u1)'· U.S. En,,,..,,.,.,,tol P""""".. " i en.y 

J{JI 11'.", p",,.. S_ . 5 ..,"ml • /J..tkMf'f••1/,,,,-lI.'QI .:)()1 


"(<ItJ>b-' ,If). -6' Jjl)(! • F"" 410. '6 ' " $Q • Toll I'm; I " " 16: 21l • FlY V",,: .1/",.,."", R.-0 


1",..-. _ ,.I/VP "~, .,,t os
Slip Op. 09-57

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

AD HOC UTILITIES GROUP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

 - and -

USEC INCORPORATED, and UNITED STATES

ENRICHMENT CORPORATION,

 Defendant-Intervenors.

Before: Pogue, Judge

Court No. 06-00300

ORDER

[Defendant’s and Defendant-Intervenors’ motions to dismiss

granted.]

June 16, 2009

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (Nancy A. Fischer, Joshua

D. Fitzhugh, Christine J. Sohar, Kemba T. Eneas and Stephan E.

Becker) for Plaintiff Ad Hoc Utilities Group.

James M. Lyons, General Counsel, Neal J. Reynolds, Assistant

General Counsel, Office of the General Council, U.S. International

Trade Commission (Peter L. Sultan) for Defendant United States.

Steptoe & Johnson LLP (Eric C. Emerson, Sheldon E. Hochberg,

Richard O. Cunningham, Thomas J. Trendl and Alexandra E.P. Baj)

for Defendant-Intervenors USEC Inc. and United States Enrichment

Corp.

Pogue, Judge: Plaintiff Ad Hoc Utilites Group (“AHUG”), a

group of American utility companies that purchases and uses

uranium, seeks review of the International Trade Commission’s
(“ITC”) decision in Uranium From Russia, 71 Fed. Reg. 44,707 (ITC

Aug. 6, 2006) (concluding that termination of the suspended

investigation on uranium from Russia would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the

United States) and accompanying Uranium from Russia, USITC Pub.

3872, Inv. No. 731–TA–539–C (Aug. 2006). Defendant United States

and Defendant-Intervenors move to dismiss, pursuant to USCIT Rule

12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, more

specifically lack of statutory standing under 28 U.S.C. § 2631(c).

 The issues of law and fact before the court are no different

than those presented in Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United States,

Cause No. 06-229 (“AHUG”) (AHUG’s challenge to Commerce’s final

determination that termination of the suspended investigation on

uranium from Russia would likely result in continued dumping of

enriched uranium). Parties in AHUG and the case at bar are

identical, and there is no significant argument raised by Plaintiff

here that was not considered by the court in AHUG. Accordingly,

for the reasons stated in AHUG, the court grants Defendant’s and

Defendant-Intervenors’ motions to dismiss for lack of standing.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

It is SO ORDERED.

 /s/ Donald C. Pogue 

Donald C. Pogue, Judge

Dated: June 16, 2009

New York, New York
# C_2020315EN.01000101.xml

| 23.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9623 – AMG/Shell/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 315/01)

On 17 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9623. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9623. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32

                           Section 1350 Certifications

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United Stated Code), each of
the undersigned officers ofFNB Bancorp, a California corporation (the
"Company"). Does hereby certify that:

      1.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-K/A") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    Information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 6, 2007                   /s/ Thomas C. McGraw
                                          ------------------------------------
                                              Thomas C. McGraw
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 6, 2007                   /s/ David A. Curtis
                                          ------------------------------------
                                              David A. Curtis
                                              Senior Vice President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FNB Bancorp and will be retained by FNB Bancorp and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.