alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020031EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9709 — ENI/CDP Equity /GreenIT)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 31/05)

1.

On 22 January 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020031EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Eni S.p.A. (‘ENI’), Italy; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CDP Equity S.p.A. (‘CDP Equity’), Italy. |

ENI and CDP Equity acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ENI is a company active in the oil and natural gas sector; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CDP Equity is a holding company of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti Group, investing in Italian companies of major national interest with long-term perspective; |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The JV, GreenIT, is intended to be active in the production and wholesale supply of electricity from renewable sources on the Italian market. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2020031EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9709 — ENI/CDP Equity/GreenIT

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020031EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2020031EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Glendalee RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3522

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Cristina TARANTOLA, M.D., Petitioner, v. WILLIAM B. HENGHOLD, M.D., P.A., Respondent.

No. 1D18-1024

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Case 22-12527-CLC Doc 66 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 3
Case 22-12527-CLC Doc 66 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 3
Case 22-12527-CLC Doc 66 Filed 07/19/23 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - (-)u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        November 12, 2020        Climate Adaptation to Support Amphibian Conservation in U.S. Caribbean
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(3)

staff profileDaniel J Foley

staff profileItiya P Aneece

staff profilePrasad S. Thenkabail, PhD
Alvin BRATTON v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-0487

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

*909WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).

CRICHTON, J., recused.
# C_2020195EN.01000401.xml

| 10.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9716 – AMS/OSRAM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 195/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | AMS (Austria), |
| --- | --- |

—

AMS (Austria),

| — | OSRAM (Germany) |
| --- | --- |

—

OSRAM (Germany)

AMS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of OSRAM. The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 7 November 2019.

2.

| — | for AMS: providing high-performance sensing technologies in the consumer, communications, automotive, industrial and medical end-markets with a focus on three strategic pillars: optical, imaging and audio sensing, |
| --- | --- |

—

for AMS: providing high-performance sensing technologies in the consumer, communications, automotive, industrial and medical end-markets with a focus on three strategic pillars: optical, imaging and audio sensing,

| — | for OSRAM: providing lighting solutions and sensors, visualisation and light-based treatments, which include from LEDs to other semiconductor-based technologies, such as infrared emitters, lasers and sensors, to light management systems, and to traditional and speciality lamps. |
| --- | --- |

—

for OSRAM: providing lighting solutions and sensors, visualisation and light-based treatments, which include from LEDs to other semiconductor-based technologies, such as infrared emitters, lasers and sensors, to light management systems, and to traditional and speciality lamps.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9716 – AMS/OSRAM

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5452 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit individuals eligible 

for Indian Health Service assistance to qualify for health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2016 

Mr. MOOLENAAR (for himself, Mr. PAULSEN, Mrs. NOEM, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

individuals eligible for Indian Health Service assistance 

to qualify for health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR INDIAN HEALTH 

4 SERVICE ASSISTANCE NOT DISQUALIFIED 

5 FROM HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subparagraph: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5452 IH

1 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS EL2 IGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER INDIAN

3 HEALTH SERVICE PROGRAMS.—For purposes of 

4 subparagraph (A)(ii), an individual shall not be 

5 treated as covered under a health plan de6 scribed in such subparagraph merely because 

7 the individual receives hospital care or medical 

8 services under a medical care program of the 

9 Indian Health Service or of a tribal organiza10 tion.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: CoreCast

Filters

              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - (-)multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - (-)oregon(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(2)

## By Year

Podcasts        March 12, 2008        TRUE or FALSE: Portland, Oregon, has a volcano within its metropolitan area.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - arizona(1)
              - california(1)
              - connecticut(1)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - wisconsin(1)

## By Year

              - (-)2024(1)

staff profileJustin R. Nichols, Ph.D.
Reginald L. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0732

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which
this Certificate is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 In Witness Whereof,
 By:
    /s/ Peter R. ShieldsPeter R. ShieldsChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Robert C. LeahyRobert C. LeahyChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1-900 Jackpot, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  Joseph
Batty,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:


         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 12, 2007


/s/ Joseph Batty
Joseph Batty
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
Communication Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Curtis Orgill, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/ Curtis Orgill
Dated: May 20, 2005                  ------------------------------
                                          Curtis Orgill
                                          Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Australia

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(12)
              - products_data(16)
              - products_maps(2)
              - products_publications(349)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(16)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(14)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(4)
              - multimedia_image(115)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(92)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_image-204460(20)
              - multimedia_video(47)
              - multimedia_video-149194(27)
              - multimedia_video-149195(16)
              - multimedia_video-149198(2)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149220(2)
              - documents_file-149224(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(3)
              - news_news-149249(3)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - news_other_news(8)
              - other_basic-42(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Illustrations        March 18, 2024        The GAIMS Agricultural Data Mapping Platform
Decerfffoer J.2, 2015

Re: Ex parte Tyrone Mitchell/ WR-82,097-02

DEC 16 2015

Dear Clerk/

I am writing to find out what the status is on my writ of

habeas corpus filed with this court in 10/2014^.^Jj ^e^fcg&e

card showing it had been filed but have never been contacted since.

I have clearly shown that I am actually innocent. But due to the

prosecutor's office not fullfilling their duty to resolve my

issues I have been unable to receieve any relief.

I do not have the money to hire a lawyer. All I have wanted

is to have the medical examiner re-evaluate the cause of death.

Because the lawyer appointed me by the court "works for the court."

The medical examiner was not called to testify. The prosecutor

and court appointed lawyer "stipulated" to the medical examiner's

report. And used a police officer to present "certain portions"

to the jury. I did not cause the death of the person whordied!

But the Court's rely on the findings of the same court that scammed

the jury to start, with. How am I supposed to get my issue before

the courtif the court relies on the lies of- the prosecutor to decide

my issues?

I want to know if my habeas corpus is being considered as an

actual innocence claim? Thanks....

Sincerely,

Milton Tyrone Mitchell

T.DCJ. # 1811062

3001, S. Emily Dr.

Beeville, TX 78102

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 97706-97707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28828]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-NEW]

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Veterans 
Group Life Insurance

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 
this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, will

[[Page 97707]]

submit the collection of information abstracted below to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission 
describes the nature of the information collection and its expected 
cost and burden, and it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent by January 8, 2025.

ADDRESSES: To submit comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection, please type the following link into your 
browser: www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, select ``Currently under 
Review--Open for Public Comments'', then search the list for the 
information collection by Title or ``OMB Control No. 2900-NEW.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VA PRA information: Maribel Aponte, 
(202) 461-8900, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: Veterans Group Life Insurance, VA Form SGLV 8714.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-NEW. https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRASearch.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Abstract: This form will be used by the Department of Veterans 
Affairs Insurance Center (VAIC) to enable a third party to act on 
behalf of the insured Veteran/beneficiary. Many of our customers are of 
advanced age or suffer from limiting disabilities and need assistance 
from a third party to conduct their affairs. The information collected 
provides an optional service and is not required to receive insurance 
benefits.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published at 89 FR 80017, October 1, 2024.
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 12,500 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: One time.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 25,000.
    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Maribel Aponte,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration, Data 
Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-28828 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(10)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(39)
              - multimedia_image-141771(36)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(18)
              - multimedia_video-149194(4)
              - multimedia_video-149195(5)
              - multimedia_video-149198(9)
              - news_other_news(2)

## By Location

              - (-)hawaii(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption
Cornelius AKINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0408

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANGELA SPROUT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 14, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 7 2020

08/07/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0408
Torri WYCHE, Appellant, v. Roderick MCCLENDON, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2966

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied July 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Bradley Lee JENKINS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1276

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 8, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

*1282Denied. Relator fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.