alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - science_science(13)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_audio(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(44)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_video(56)
              - multimedia_video-149194(30)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

              - arizona(3)

## By Year

              - 2024(3)

staff profileDaniel J Foley

staff profileItiya P Aneece

staff profilePrasad S. Thenkabail, PhD
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

NEAPOLEON JWAN FREEM AN, SR., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5023

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13

- cv

- 00327

- EJD, Judge Edward J. Damich.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Neapoleon Jwan Freeman, Sr. moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Freeman is incarcerated. Pursuant to the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995, this court may not autho rize the prosecution of an appeal by a prisoner without the prepayment of fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A prisoner is no longer afforded the alternative of proceeding without Case: 14-5023 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 04/02/2014FREEMAN v. US 2

payment of filing fees, but must, in time, pay the $ 505 filing fee in its entirety. W hen funds exist, an initial partial payment must be made consisting of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the priso ner’s account or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the six

- month period immediately preced ing the filing of the notice of appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Thereafter, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s i ncome credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency with custody of the prisoner must forward payments from the prisoner’s account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $ 50 5 filing fee is paid in full. Id.

By separate letter, the custodian of Freeman’s prison account is being directed to make the nec essary arrang ements to forward the filing fee to the court.

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The motion is denied.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-5023 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 04/02/2014
Dealmos JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1057

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_education(5)
              - science_faqs(5)
              - science_science(341)
              - products_data(70)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2978)
              - products_software(4)
              - (-)products_web_tools(7)
              - multimedia_audio(53)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(6)
              - multimedia_before_after(3)
              - multimedia_image(130)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(106)
              - multimedia_image-141772(1)
              - multimedia_image-141774(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(10)
              - multimedia_image-141776(7)
              - multimedia_slideshow(3)
              - multimedia_video(146)
              - multimedia_video-149194(74)
              - multimedia_video-149195(32)
              - multimedia_video-149196(5)
              - multimedia_video-149197(2)
              - multimedia_video-149198(6)
              - multimedia_video-149225(6)
              - documents_file(2)
              - documents_file-149206(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - news_news-149245(21)
              - news_news-149246(4)
              - news_news-149248(27)
              - news_news-149249(4)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(3)
              - news_other_news(31)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(8)

## By Location

              - california(8)

## By Year

Data Access        December 7, 2018        Areas of Land Subsidence in California

Interactive Map        July 16, 2021        The Mojave River:  Lifeblood of the Desert

Data Access        December 18, 2018        San Antonio Creek Valley Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        December 19, 2018        Drought & Groundwater in California

Historical        March 8, 2018        Location of maximum land subsidence in U.S. Levels at 1925 and 1977.

Data Access        November 7, 2018        Mojave Groundwater Data

Data Access        December 10, 2018        Lower Colorado River Hydrologic Monitoring

Data Access        January 31, 2019        Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Borrego Valley
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Olga Young, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Emilia's Diamonds, Inc., Doing Business as Fortune Jewels, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Emiliya's Diamonds, Inc., appellant pro se.Olga Young, respondent pro se.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered October 29, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,600.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $1,800, representing the balance allegedly due pursuant to defendant's agreement to purchase plaintiff's diamond ring and wedding band. After a nonjury trial, at which plaintiff, among other things, introduced defendant's check for the $1,800 upon which defendant had stopped payment, the Civil Court awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,600. Defendant appeals.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>see</i> CCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126). </p><p>As the record supports the Civil Court's determination in favor of plaintiff, and as plaintiff has not cross-appealed from the judgment, we find that the parties were provided with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (<i>see</i> CCA 1804, 1807).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>SOLOMON, J.P., PESCE and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 01, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Richard P. MIDDLETON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Jazmin C. MIDDLETON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1783

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of certiorari is denied. Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neah Power Systems, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Stephen M.
Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:      February
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      STEPHEN M. WILSONStephen
      M. WilsonChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9907]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the Florida 
Advisory Committee (Committee) will convene on Thursday, May 24, 2012. 
The meeting will convene at 2 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 3 p.m. 
The meeting will be held at Brevard Community College, 1519 Clearlake 
Road, Building 2, Cocoa, Florida, 32922. The purpose of the meeting is 
for the Committee to discuss its ex-felon voting rights project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by June 25, 2012. 
Written comments may be mailed to the Southern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 16T126, Atlanta, 
GA, 30303. They may also be faxed to the Commission at (404) 562-7005, 
or emailed to the Commission at erodriguez@usccr.gov. Persons who 
desire additional information may contact the Southern Regional Office 
at (404) 562-7000.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Southern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this Committee 
are directed to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or may 
contact the Southern Regional Office at the above email or street 
address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, April 20, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012-9907 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








John
      R.
      Valaas, Chief Executive Officer, and Roger A. Mandery, Chief Financial Officer,
      of First Mutual Bancshares,  Inc. (the “Company”),
      each certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            the
                Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
                2007 (the
                “Form 10-Q”),
                fully
                complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  August
      9, 2007





By
/s/  John
      R.
      Valaas


John
      R. Valaas


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer








By
/s/  Roger
      A.
      Mandery


Roger
      A. Mandery


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., as Trustee, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. Tara MONTGOMERY, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Comets

Filters

              - science_faqs(1)
              - science_science(2)
              - products_publications(56)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149214(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - (-)connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

## By Year

              - 2023(1)

staff profileRandolph L Kirk, Ph.D.

Satellite imagery        August 14, 2002        Gosses Bluff
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fund American Companies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul H. McDonough Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

Date:
March 26, 2008

| |  | /s/PAUL H. MCDONOUGHPaul H. McDonough Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Neelam UPPAL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Charlene RODRIGUEZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2458

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# C_2020424EN.01002701.xml

| 8.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10007 — Telefónica/Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria/Movistar Money Colombia JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 424/02)

On 2 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10007. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10007. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Larissa KORSOUNOVA, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee, ON BEHALF OF the HOLDERS OF the ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-56 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-56, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2253

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sidney HOLMES, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The CLERK OF COURT, FOR the ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D18-0546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 20684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ACE-35]

Amendment to Class D and Class E Airspace; Salina, KS; Correction

Correction

    In rule document 98-7821, beginning on page 14344, in the issue of 
Wednesday, March 25, 1998, make the following correction:

Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 14345, in the first column, in Sec. 71.1, in the sixth 
line, ``long. 97 deg.37'35''W.'' should read ``long. 
97 deg.37'16''W.''.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32

Certifications of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Georgia Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 24, 2004 |  | By:   /s/ Ira P. Shepherd, III
         Ira P. Shepherd, III         Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 24, 2004 |  | By:   /s/ C. Lynn Gable
         C. Lynn Gable         Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2813

___________

Diane M. Cossette, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Minnesota Power & Light, an employer *

and business corporation in the State * [UNPUBLISHED]

of Minnesota; James R. Burton, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 7, 1998

 Filed: May 13, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Diane Cossette appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for

defendants on her claims filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42

U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (1994), and dismissal of her state law claims. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. 

Counts 1, 3, and 8 of Cossette’s amended complaint alleged ADA violations, and

the remaining counts asserted state law violations. Defendants moved for summary
-2-

judgment, and Cossette filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. Following a

hearing on the motions, the District Court issued an order and written judgment. Both

documents provided, "[d]efendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted as to

Counts 1 and 3 of [Cossette’s] complaint"; "[Cossette’s] motion for summary judgment

is denied"; and "[t]he Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the

remainder of [her] complaint," dismissing it without prejudice. Cossette has appealed

from that judgment.

As the District Court’s judgment did not dispose of Count 8, one of Cossette’s

ADA claims, the judgment appealed from was not a final judgment. See Otey v.

Marshall, 121 F.3d 1150, 1154 (8th Cir. 1997); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); cf. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994). Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Avi STERN, Appellant, v. Michael KORETSKY, Roseanne Koretsky, Allen M. Silk, as Trustee of the Jamie Koretsky Irrevocable Trust, and Allen M. Silk, as Trustee of the Rachael Koretsky Irrevocable Trust, Jamie Posner, Clare Posner and The Oaks at Boca Raton Property Owners Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 9, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*