alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 27, 2015 

Mr. Robert Mark 

Rupestrian CyberServices 

3644 North Stone Crest Street 

Flagstaff, AZ 86004 

Dear Mr. Mark: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 15th, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-0975), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
From: Llenza, Charles

Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 5:47 PM

Subject: DOE Re

‐ Opens the Public Comment Period for the Preliminary Technical support Documents for

Walk

‐ In Coolers and Walk

‐ in Freezers (RIN 1904

‐ AB86) [Docket No. EERE

‐ 2008

‐ BT

‐ STD

‐ 0015]

Dear Interested Parties:

On April 5, 2010, the U. S. Department of Energy (D OE) published a Notice of Public Meeting (NOPM) in

the Federal Register to announce the availability of the technical support document for walk

‐ in coolers

and freezers and a public meeting on May 14, 2010. On April 14, 2010, DOE published a correction

notice to change the date of the publ ic meeting to May 19, 2010 and extend the deadline for the

submission of comments to May 28, 2010. This email notification announces that the period for

submitting comments on the preliminary technical support document for walk

‐ in coolers and walk

‐ in

freezers is re

‐ opened from July 15, 2010 to July 30, 20 10.

DOE submitted and the Federal Register published on Thursday, July 15, 2010, a public notice reopening

the comment period to allow interested parties additional time to file their comments and data. In

addition, if you have already submitted comments but would like to provide supplementary comme nts,

all supplemental comments are welcomed. Note that the email mailbox address for submitting

comments is: WICF

‐ 2008

‐ STD

‐ 0015@ee.doe.gov

. Please feel free however, to submit comments using

any of the alternate methods specified in the Federal Register notice which can be found at the

following link:

http://edocket.acce ss.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010

‐ 17214.pdf

The close of the comment period is July 30, 2010, and no further extensions are foreseen.

Regards,

Charles Llenza

Project Manager/Engineer

US Department of Energy

(202)586

‐ 2192(work)

(202)287

‐ 1590(fax)

Charles.Llenza@ee.doe.govCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

*************************************************************************************

******

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL

INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMES ABOVE. IF THE

READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR AN EMPLOYEE OR AGENT

RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RE CIPIENT, YOU ARE

HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY

PROHIBITED. IF THIS MESSAGE CONTAINS NON

‐ PUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT ANY

CONSUMER OR CUSTOMER OF THE SENDER OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE FURTHER PROHIBITED

UNDER PENALTY OF LAW FROM USING OR DISCLOSING THE INFORMATION TO ANY THIRD PARTY BY

PROVISIONS OF TH E FEDERAL GRAMM

‐ LEACH

‐ BAILEY ACT. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE OR

ELECTRONIC MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN OR

DESTROY THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO ASSURE THAT IT IS NOT READ, COPIED, OR DISTRIBUTED BY

OTHERS.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40847

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PRESCILIANO QUIROZ-CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-1624-ALL 

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Presciliano Quiroz-Castro appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute

more than five kilograms of cocaine. Quiroz-Castro was sentenced

to the statutory minimum of ten years’ imprisonment. Through his

retained counsel, Quiroz-Castro contends, for the first time on

appeal, that the Government breached an oral plea agreement to

recommend a sentence below the mandatory minimum, pursuant to the

U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 safety valve. He contends in the alternative

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-40847

-2-

that he is entitled to relief from the sentence because his

counsel in the district court rendered ineffective assistance. 

Quiroz-Castro has filed a pro se motion for appointment of

counsel, asserting that his counsel is requesting additional

payment to continue his representation. Inasmuch as briefing in

this case is complete, the pro se motion is DENIED.

Quiroz-Castro has not shown error in his sentence, plain or

otherwise. The oral plea agreement obligated the Government to

recommend a safety-valve reduction only if Quiroz-Castro

qualified for the safety valve, and the record supports a

determination that Quiroz-Castro did not meet his burden to show

that he qualified by debriefing truthfully. See United States v.

Miller, 179 F.3d 961, 968 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v.

Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 146-47 (5th Cir. 1996). The record in

this case is not sufficiently developed to resolve on direct

appeal Quiroz-Castro’s claim that his counsel in the district

court rendered ineffective assistance. See United States v.

Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). 

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT
6.1
 Grupo TMM and Subsidiaries

Computation of Earnings per Share (IFRS & U.S. GAAP)
 December 31,(In thousands dollars except ratio data)
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Shares at the end of period
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137Yearly weighted average shares
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    56,963,137
    
    
    
    18,693,635IFRS:Net Loss from continuing operations
    
    
    (23,871
    )
    
    
    (109,362
    )
    
    
    (126,551
    )
    
    
    (48,141
    )
    
    
    (64,835
    )Net Income from discontinued operations
    
    
    199,363
    
    
    
    9,470
    
    
    
    41,931
    
    
    
    4,980
    
    
    
    77,959Net Income (Loss) Attributable to equity
holders of Grupo TMM, S. A
    
    
    171,304
    
    
    
    (102,547
    )
    
    
    (86,662
    )
    
    
    (42,609
    )
    
    
    8,925Loss per share from continuing operations
    
    
    (0.419
    )
    
    
    (1.920
    )
    
    
    (2.222
    )
    
    
    (0.846
    )
    
    
    (3.466
    )Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    
    
    3.500
    
    
    
    0.166
    
    
    
    0.736
    
    
    
    0.087
    
    
    
    4.168Earnings (Loss) per share Attributable to
equity holders of the Grupo TMM, S. A.
    
    
    3.007
    
    
    
    (1.800
    )
    
    
    (1.521
    )
    
    
    (0.748
    )
    
    
    0.477U.S.GAAPNet Loss from continuing operations
    
    
    (8,313
    )
    
    
    (114,232
    )
    
    
    (153,730
    )
    
    
    (57,759
    )
    
    
    (42,471
    )Net Income from discontinued operations
    
    
    119,931
    
    
    
    (1,561
    )
    
    
    106,660
    
    
    
    68,407
    
    
    
    60,307Net Income (Loss) Attributable to equity
holders of the Grupo TMM, S. A
    
    
    107,528
    
    
    
    (115,793
    )
    
    
    (47,070
    )
    
    
    10,648
    
    
    
    17,836Loss per share from continuing operations
    
    
    (0.146
    )
    
    
    (2.005
    )
    
    
    (2.698
    )
    
    
    (1.014
    )
    
    
    (2.271
    )Earnings per share from discontinued operations
    
    
    2,105
    
    
    
    0.027
    
    
    
    1.872
    
    
    
    1.201
    
    
    
    3.225Earnings (Loss) per share
    
    
    1,959
    
    
    
    (2.032
    )
    
    
    (0.826
    )
    
    
    0.187
    
    
    
    0.954
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY,

Appellant,

v.

NIKOLAS JACOB CRUZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1421

[September 27, 2018]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

18-1958CF10A.

Eugene K. Pettis and Debra Potter Klauber of Haliczer, Pettis & 

Schwamm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Howard Finkelstein, Public Defender, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, and 

Diane M. Cuddihy, Chief Assistant Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2020280EN.01002001.xml

| 25.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/20

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9495 – Fortenova grupa/Poslovni sistemi Mercator)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 280/08)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Fortenova grupa d.d. (Croatia, ‘Fortenova’), singular successor to Agrokor d.d. |
| --- | --- |

—

Fortenova grupa d.d. (Croatia, ‘Fortenova’), singular successor to Agrokor d.d.

| — | Poslovni sistemi Mercator d.d. (Slovenia, ‘Mercator’) |
| --- | --- |

—

Poslovni sistemi Mercator d.d. (Slovenia, ‘Mercator’)

Fortenova acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Mercator.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Fortenova’s core business activities are retail and wholesale supply of groceries and daily consumer goods, food production and supply as well as upstream agricultural activities. |
| --- | --- |

—

Fortenova’s core business activities are retail and wholesale supply of groceries and daily consumer goods, food production and supply as well as upstream agricultural activities.

| — | Mercator is the mother company of the Mercator Group, whose core activity is the retail of daily consumer goods. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mercator is the mother company of the Mercator Group, whose core activity is the retail of daily consumer goods.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9495 – Fortenova grupa/Poslovni sistemi Mercator

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_publications(45)
              - multimedia_audio(3)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(3)
              - (-)multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(8)
              - arizona(6)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(26)
              - florida(7)
              - hawaii(11)
              - idaho(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - nevada(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - north carolina(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - (-)south dakota(3)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(3)
              - wisconsin(4)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Featured Films and Shorts        March 26, 2018        FORE-SCE Land Use Model with Terry Sohl

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish

Presentations and Events        December 31, 1992        1992 December Don Lauer First All Hands
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 **

**as      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906**

**Of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|                                                                  |                                   |                            |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Dated:                November                21,                2006 |                                   | /s/ Zhao              Ming |
|                                                                  | Zhao              Ming                 |
|                                                                  | Chief                Executive Officer |

|                                                                  |                                   |                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Dated:                November                21,                2006 |                              | /s/ Jin              Xia |
|                                                                  | Jin                Xia                 |
|                                                                  | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Eddie L. WILLIAMS, Jr.

No. 2018-KH-0985

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
De Vaughan SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-1340

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Worldwide Manufacturing USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A
for the period ending September 30, 2003, (the "Report"), I, John D. Ballard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial
position and results of operations.

March 26, 2004

/s/ John D. BallardChief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5626 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to eliminate the requirement 

for 3 months of retroactive coverage under the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 5, 2016 

Mr. MULLIN (for himself and Mr. GUTHRIE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the requirement for 3 months of retroactive coverage 

under the Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 3-MONTH RETROACTIVE COV4 ERAGE UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

6 (1) STATE PLAN REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

7 1902(a)(34) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1396a(a)(34)) is amended by striking ‘‘in or after 

9 the third month before the month in which he made 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5626 IH

1 application’’ and inserting ‘‘in or after the month in 

2 which the individual made application’’. 

3 (2) DEFINITION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.— 

4 Section 1905(a) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘in or 

6 after the third month before the month in which the 

7 recipient makes application for assistance’’ and in8 serting ‘‘in or after the month in which the recipient 

9 makes application for assistance’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to medical assistance with re12 spect to individuals whose eligibility for such assistance 

13 is based on an application for such assistance made (or 

14 deemed to be made) after the date of the enactment of 

15 this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
•_, 

774 7tevn6 4--etimatiz,J czAzteL 

a_ /(" :7 eo4laioLfut 

4)d.ciet -ue-istW/t .f-AL r / i4(0-elu 

61(.02 pai 7 A f, hic,6,01,1 gtiA.6efvu 

aZott-t- aigiocete:ct, 

cia its orb 

m 

izet 

6) 

7-1-67nu/-eal -

Tifa91- 

6-(en J-fait 

i6L06(Adid14.eA alc ez ickivti -

!It 

a444) ectfnt 

WIL 

,r.b723 Aie.dedi 

Oct. ccodiat& J-ionatiod 

a 1. 09 

6eAd74- a(e-mze 

wat-bwa4 0- 

vvidujoke, cm"- ral-aott 

fu.d.aiLd thigA 
\At WcA, h_e,ete(m Wtia ott! /a_iPtLell 

ji„ L,44 ,e&( • -14at6O-21.al 

16 

eit,16C&d itaoludJa cd,eg,,e& 

dAy- to/,cu f_ccri--..e/u/u (erzaio. 

J4L 

O-602 kg OD 1 44414v14 )66t-,u Al_cyd-exi(A 

crUe/b CAL- 10-10-ce Od-eitit4 ,),g.cctd,( 

nitel4A 

.duL- 76cLat 

i

teeato /awl, /c/41-ea, ei,2-,(14°L 

Pi-AL pXt&7,-6- ) ' a-d4-66 - -Ad'41/(34'd 

144itAitnutekadO f cAfs-; I/ 4 dziA Gr-20 774,,fru, 

,ge_afwi-44, 

ole-44-614A1W 

pdzo-en'r ( 0a 4 den T/41 16("(3 

of /J*<—GPI Ais riem me/4- „4-d6-CL6-7/L 0-60 ad? 0//) 3t 

A-(41."Ctb- 

.AAirx-Mia410 /00 

Ar; )64_9 

h-AoliAA° Olue--}idceAzgzru 

,d-amIa4i, 6004 --hA/Al4 -6) 

cubt, rt-et&L) 

34, 2024' 0-to 

Acemci-na-6-L ,leff‘ 7(CtiAjetild 

'-tiLaj- Oki( /611Z-- 

e6a5/ 717LVt: 

igcAfteJL „ 
.w& Acem 0-td- 10-7a6, amL zo.e_ -zoot 

dr2occhun, JAa, 

 vb-e-eicaat zae:Ye_ nt-ftel 

,t ) pic,-r) O- ). (31/?' Z4Ctin411a CI)41 z-tu-o)dZ. 

Atca-yd Ow\ 6-ziA 0.4444-JPh/u, awl 

Gdt.4-0 nu) )2.0-QA COCe-al 

anot aAt -1--fiax,k/7074.4f7 .(A 

A-e-e)4 cY)4,U, 

Jill art eifijit it,e, IA ' a- /1/LaNbe a gz, 4-eto, 

Ined7/2/ conovidaii-dvt g .444"}<41tA -4t/bit-u 

cz-ete( Aid u e,,,f4i (lom sc9e44 I .247— 

Ca4 AO C01,0 lie Cenvl-c_. 

a e'4,60) otwe-ailui; 07.0)1/041- h-z-6-mew, 

(Loa( eid,teLaC AL4 Owl/ce-eu .2W-a-(1-00E-1/ &id? apolir 

--th) -este-L-4 fly eCeD16)/ r/ty 7.1.14v1,a1 

e-d-d-cii-Ot--- cd.a-e tddLeJ)-75-(c beiadmAke, 761d ezo Joc.ti2 AczAcd zecthk; 

.1 roil a_ .4cdliAdl f24-0.5 .thjz) 

1,0-tL( a Jet c 

•-ivz4-t da,y at/tat Joy a.6-0-id-,AL bvicm, cryt 

e6d 614(‘L OW) 4ACZL 011tb 

de,s211 14/00 CA C. di I .,(2d a_ (0 

i49t 106-641 ad 6-7/62- 
Jii,t- 0-74- CLIAAL41 

071 /74Ae6e 6L-eele e 61 e 

. _ 

;(A mu aid- .?A _ek 6-74..L te),G1.4_, 

Gip, ,eyfi du- Aca Jfkols)-y -646a i cile A di a,f,4 

,avi,06-6_etri Aoy) ../

(day(J AL 6-GA .eared. 

Wf- i ./Q) dufd- riz, ),___ 

/(9td- oppo-dun,4 ct,dcz,„&ej 

Jo „Lai, !,a' ?-61Afte ,{.04,6(At 

Aid. Vin. ,u. 

" 100,eit,/6-6d10-0 cctit-zco,u ya-u4g2td 

‘,64rt. JAIJA,zakeit-y-exlizzto, 61- e x t,c, 

oLa ,6titub: 

c-r(1-LIA 0_,X Befrw—m-cc.,L.) 

ohictits.w&tai-0 goisg 

Ocuts0 

45r s 

-S03 — 570 - 9 0:77
**EXHIBIT 3.3**

 

**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

 

**ATTACHMENTTO ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

**TO ARTICLESOF INCORPORATION OF**

**PACIFICVEGAS GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.**

 

October 14, 2005

 

4.               Thefollowing is an attachment to the Articles of Amendment to the Articles ofIncorporation of Pacific Vegas Global Strategies, Inc.:

 

Article V, Sentence One of the Corporation’s Articlesof Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

 

“The aggregate number of shares which the Corporationshall have the authority to issue is Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) sharesof common stock with no par value.”

 

----