alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 26, 2014

Mr. Lyle Panepinto

Director of Operations

Southern Seaplane, Inc.

#1 Coquille Drive

Belle Chasse, LA 70037

Dear Mr. Panepinto :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

part 141, Appendix I, section 4(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your February 10, 2014 , exemption request on behalf of Sou thern Seaplane, Inc.

into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 14

- 0086 ), but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed).

For us to consider the request any furthe r, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additi onal information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on you r request open until we

receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send

your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the

exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do no t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airports Rules Division

E nclosure
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000002407-MAY-201309:04 AM
##### 



EXHIBIT 31
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No.
1) of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp. (the Registrant or the Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    As Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the Registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedure to be designed under my supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant
(including its consolidated subsidiaries), is made known to me by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluations;c.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reportings; and
 5.
    
    As Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the Audit
Committee of the Registrants Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated: March 26, 2008
    
    /s/George SuzukiGeorge Suzuki,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - science_science(13)
              - products_data(7)
              - products_maps(1)
              - products_publications(63)
              - products_software(1)
              - multimedia_audio(47)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(44)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(3)
              - multimedia_video(56)
              - multimedia_video-149194(30)
              - multimedia_video-149195(9)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - (-)documents_file(1)
              - documents_file-149216(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(3)

## By Location

## By Year

Presentations (PowerPoint)        January 14, 2020        Meta-analysis of Global Crop Water Productivity of Irrigated Croplands
Miguel RIVERA, Appellant, v. Nyvia RIVERA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3595

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[July 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Jorge Perez DIAZ, DOC #C09898, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3040

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 13.2

Grupo TMM, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo TMM, S.A.B. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. the Companys annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year
ended December 31, 2012, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: June 12, 2013



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez
|Carlos Pedro Aguilar Mendez    
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.30

Grupo TMM, S.A.    SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Javier Serrano Segovia, the Chief Executive Officer of Grupo TMM, S.A. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that:

1.     the
Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
June 30, 2003

| |  | /s/JAVIER SEGOVIA SERRANOJavier Segovia Serrano
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5524 

To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2016 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legal Services Cor5 poration Repeal Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 The Legal Services Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 2996 

8 et seq.) is repealed. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - (-)news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - colorado(2)
              - idaho(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Science Snippet        February 23, 2023        Volcanic explosion penetrates both upper atmosphere and upper crust around the globe

Science Snippet        September 18, 2023        Can oceans store more CO2 to help with climate change?

slideshow        December 22, 2022        Desert, aquatic, prairie, forest, riparian, tundra, and sagebrush plants

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.<TABLE> <S> <C><ARTICLE>    5<MULTIPLIER>    1<CURRENCY>    U.S. DOLLARS<S>                                                      <C><PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS<PERIOD-START><FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Mar-31-2001<PERIOD-END>                                     Jun-30-2000<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1<CASH>                                                50,627<SECURITIES>                                               0<RECEIVABLES>                                              0<ALLOWANCES>                                               0<INVENTORY>                                                0<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      50,627<PP&E>                                                 2,444<DEPRECIATION>                                           366<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        61,815<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                336,651<BONDS>                                                    0<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0<PREFERRED>                                               10<COMMON>                                               6,253<OTHER-SE>                                         2,302,284<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          61,815<SALES>                                                  189<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         189<CGS>                                                      0<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        238,019<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (237,830)<INCOME-TAX>                                               0<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (237,830)<DISCONTINUED>                                             0<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0<CHANGES>                                                  0<NET-INCOME>                                       (237,830)<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.04)<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.04)</TABLE>
William J. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# C_2020229EN.01000101.xml

| 13.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9869 – EQT Fund Management/TowerBrook Capital Partners/ACPS Automotive)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 229/01)

On 6 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9869. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9869. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
PERNOD RICARD USA, LLC, f/k/a Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Ana WATSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maria de Posada, deceased, Appellee.

No. 3D17-639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Emmitt CHARLES

No. 17-KP-1828

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 21, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to the remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations *892period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
FINAL INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 00-1132 PV (kg/yr) :

USE: ENGINEER: Blouin/LMC SUBMITTER: Degussa-Hulx Corps.

c

CRSS : Chemical Category: Trade Name:

. . 

# -- VP: <1E-06 torr @25"C (est)
-. . S-H,O: dispersible Phvs te: sol t) (mfr: N t; proc: dispersion,. Consumer Use: No end use: destroyed) -



# . SAT (concerns) : * PBT Potential: P3BlT1 Health: 

### 1-2 

### - migration to ground water = negligible; Exposures to humans: inhalation Eco: 3 

### - No releases to water CEB Drop Category: D7 Basis: .z
Osman LOPEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2362

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Julian Robert BARBEAU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 16, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Anthony Jerome THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-243

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 12



HOLMES FINANCING (NO.5) PLC

04258785



ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE

2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE

LONDON NW1 3AN



I, Martin McDermott,
certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all
reports on Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of HOLMES FINANCING (NO.5) PLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided
to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and upon representations made to me by the servicer, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement; and



5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies
relating to the servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon representations made to me by the servicer.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Abbey National plc.



|                    
|--------------------
|Date: June 30, 2004 
|                    
|/s/ Martin McDermott
|Martin McDermott    
|Director
Terry ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4088

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables 2000-1 L.L.C. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001111780
<NAME>                        GREAT AMERICA LEASING RECEIVABLE 2000-1 L.L.C.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                           U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                         13,695,128
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 232,027,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,085,193)
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                224,678,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             433,421
<BONDS>                                       211,895,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    11,067,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 224,678,726
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,085,633
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 653,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,387,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,045,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,045,259
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0


</TABLE>
Nichole Marie ZUKE, Petitioner, v. Carla Dee ALLEN, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-4070

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 5, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.