T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e M a tthe w F . K e nne l l y , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** the N or the rn D i s tr i c tof I l l i noi s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H . B E R R Y , by and throu gh hi s G uardi an A d L ite m P e n n y B e rry ; e t a l., P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l ees, v . L AS VI R GE NE S UN I F I E D S C HO OL DI ST RI CT , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 08- 55693 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 4 - c v - 0 8 5 7 2 - FM C- SS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia F l or e nc e - M a r i e C oope r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 2, 2010 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : R YME R a n d WAR DL AW, C i r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n d KE NN E L L Y, D i stri ct ** Judg e. 

# FI LED MA R 11 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he L a s V i r ge ne s U ni f i e d S c hool D i s tr i c t( S c hool D i s tr i c t ) appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha ti tvi ol a t e d the pr oc e dur a l r e qui r e m e nt s of the I ndi vi dua l s w i th D i s abi l i t i e s E duc a t i on A c t( I D E A ) , 20 U . S . C . § 1400 e t s e q ., by predet erm i ni ng the pl ac em entof an aut i st i c boy, H . B . , pri or t o h i s i nd i vi du al i ze d e duc a t i on pr ogr a m ( I E P ) m e e t i ng. W e pr e vi ous l y c ons i de r e d thi s c a s e a nd r e m a nde d s o tha tthe di s tr i c tc our tc oul d m a ke f i ndi ngs r e ga r di ng the S c hool D is tr ic t’s in te n t o rs ta te o f m in d p r io rto a n d d u r in g th e I E P m e e tin g . H. B . v . L as V ir g e n e s U n ifie d Sc h . D is t. , 23 9 F . A pp ’ x 3 42 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). T he courthel d an e vi de nt i a ry he a r i ng on r e m a nd, a nd m a de f a c tua l de t e rm i na t i ons tha tw e r e vi e w f or c le a re rr o r . Se e A s h v . L a ke O s w eg o Sc h . D is t. , 9 8 0 F .2 d 5 8 5 , 5 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 2 ) . Se e i n g n o n e , w e a f

f i rm. B as ed o n testim o n y f

ro m S ch o o l D istrict rep re se n tati v es an d th e c h il d ’s m other a tthe evi dent i ary heari ng as w el l as the ent i re re cord, the di stri ctcourt foun d thatthe deci si on t o transfe r H . B . fr om hi s pri vat e pl ac em entt o the di stri ct had b ee n m ade before the m ee t i ng w as hel d. Itspec i fi ca l l y f ou nd di stri ct r e p r e s e n ta tiv e s ’ te s tim o n y ab o u t b e in g o p e n to c o n s id e r in g a lte rn a tiv e p la c e m e n ts i ncre di bl e, and fou nd cr edi bl e the m other’ s t es t i m on y thather m i ni m al p a r tic ip a tio n w a s d u e to f u tility . T h e s e f

in d in g s a r e n o t c le a r ly e rr o n e o u s . A pp l yi ng the l egal st andard endo rs ed i n o ur pri or di sposi t i on , the di stri ctcourt concl ud ed thatH . B . ’ s pl ac em entw as predet erm i ned. T hi s bei ng so, the proceduralre qu i re m ent s of the ID E A w er e vi ol at ed, and the heari ng offi ce r’ s dec i si on w as

p r o p e r ly r e v e r s e d . AF F I R ME D.