33034 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices 

land uses within the area covered by the 

Noise Exposure Maps. The Act requires 

such programs to be developed in 

consultation with interested and 

affected parties including local 

communities, government agencies, 

airport users, and FAA personnel. 

Each airport noise compatibility 

program developed in accordance with 

Part 150 is a local program, not a 

Federal program. The FAA does not 

substitute its judgment for that of the 

airport proprietor with respect to which 

measures should be recommended for 

action. The FAA’s approval or 

disapproval of Part 150 program 

recommendations is measured 

according to the standards expressed in 

Part 150 and the Act and is limited to 

the following determinations: 

a. The Noise Compatibility Program 

was developed in accordance with the 

provisions and procedures of Part 150; 

b. Program measures are reasonably 

consistent with achieving the goals of 

reducing existing non-compatible land 

uses around the airport and preventing 

the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses; 

c. Program measures would not create 

an undue burden on interstate or foreign 

commerce, unjustly discriminate against 

types or classes of aeronautical uses, 

violate the terms of airport grant 

agreements, or intrude into areas 

preempted by the Federal Government; 

and 

d. Program measures relating to the 

use of flight procedures can be 

implemented within the period covered 

by the program without derogating 

safety, adversely affecting the efficient 

use and management of the navigable 

airspace and air traffic control systems, 

or adversely affecting other powers and 

responsibilities of the Administrator 

prescribed by law. 

Specific limitations with respect to 

FAA’s approval of an airport noise 

compatibility program are delineated in 

Part 150, section 150.5. Approval is not 

a determination concerning the 

acceptability of land uses under Federal, 

state, or local law. Approval does not by 

itself constitute an FAA implementing 

action. A request for Federal action or 

approval to implement specific noise 

compatibility measures may be 

required. Prior to an FAA decision on a 

request to implement the action, an 

environmental review of the proposed 

action may be required. Approval does 

not constitute a commitment by the 

FAA to financially assist in the 

implementation of the program nor a 

determination that all measures covered 

by the program are eligible for grant-inaid funding from the FAA under 

applicable law contained in Title 49 

U.S.C. Where federal funding is sought, 

requests for project grants must be 

submitted to the FAA Airports District 

Office in Romulus, Michigan. 

The Willow Run Airport study 

contains a proposed noise compatibility 

program comprised of actions designed 

for phased implementation by airport 

management and adjacent jurisdictions 

from 2012 to the year 2018. It was 

requested that the FAA evaluate and 

approve this material as a Noise 

Compatibility Program as described in 

section 47504 of the Act. The FAA 

began its review of the program on 

January 15, 2014 and was required by a 

provision of the Act to approve or 

disapprove the program within 180 days 

(other than the use of new or modified 

flight procedures for noise control). 

Failure to approve or disapprove such 

program within the 180-day period shall 

be deemed to be an approval of such 

program. 

The submitted program contained 

nine (9) proposed actions for noise 

abatement, noise mitigation, land use 

planning and program management on 

and off the airport. The FAA completed 

its review and determined that the 

procedural and substantive 

requirements of the Act and Part 150 

have been satisfied. The overall program 

was approved by the FAA, effective May 

20, 2014. 

These determinations are set forth in 

detail in a Record of Approval signed by 

the Great Lakes Airports Division 

Manager on May 20, 2014. The Record 

of Approval, as well as other evaluation 

materials and the documents 

comprising the submittal, are available 

for review, upon appointment during 

normal business hours, at the FAA 

office listed above and at the 

administrative offices of the Willow Run 

Airport, 801 Willow Run Airport, 

Ypsilanti, MI 48198. 

The Record of Approval will also be 

available on-line at: http://www.faa.gov/ 

airports/environmental/airport_noise/. 

Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on May 20, 

2014. 

John L. Mayfield, Jr., 

Manager, Detroit Airports District Office. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13372 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Membership in the National Parks 

Overflights Advisory Group Aviation 

Rulemaking Committee 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: By Federal Register notice 

(See 79 FR 18757, April 3, 2014) the 

National Park Service (NPS) and the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

invited interested persons to apply to 

fill two openings on the National Parks 

Overflights Advisory Group (NPOAG) 

Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC). 

The notice invited interested persons to 

apply to fill one upcoming and one 

currently vacant seat, both representing 

environmental concerns. This notice 

informs the public of the person 

selected to fill one of the vacancies, no 

selection has been made for the other 

open vacancy representing 

environmental concerns. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keith Lusk, Special Programs Staff, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Western-Pacific Region Headquarters, 

P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 

90009–2007, telephone: (310) 725–3808, 

email: Keith.Lusk@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The National Parks Air Tour 

Management Act of 2000 (the Act) was 

enacted on April 5, 2000, as Public Law 

106–181, and subsequently amended in 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 

of 2012. The Act required the 

establishment of the advisory group 

within 1 year after its enactment. The 

NPOAG was established in March 2001. 

The advisory group is comprised of a 

balanced group of representatives of 

general aviation, commercial air tour 

operations, environmental concerns, 

and Native American tribes. The 

Administrator of the FAA and the 

Director of NPS (or their designees) 

serve as ex officio members of the 

group. Representatives of the 

Administrator and Director serve 

alternating 1-year terms as chairman of 

the advisory group. 

In accordance with the Act, the 

advisory group provides ‘‘advice, 

information, and recommendations to 

the Administrator and the Director— 

(1) On the implementation of this title 

[the Act] and the amendments made by 

this title; 

(2) On commonly accepted quiet 

aircraft technology for use in 

commercial air tour operations over a 

national park or tribal lands, which will 

receive preferential treatment in a given 

air tour management plan; 

(3) On other measures that might be 

taken to accommodate the interests of 

visitors to national parks; and 

(4) At the request of the Administrator 

and the Director, safety, environmental, 

and other issues related to commercial 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 110 / Monday, June 9, 2014 / Notices 33035 

air tour operations over a national park 

or tribal lands.’’ 

Membership 

The current NPOAG ARC is made up 

of one member representing general 

aviation, three members representing 

the commercial air tour industry, four 

members representing environmental 

concerns, and two members 

representing Native American interests. 

Current members of the NPOAG ARC 

are as follows: 

Heidi Williams representing general 

aviation; Alan Stephen, Matt Zuccaro, 

and Mark Francis representing 

commercial air tour operators; Greg 

Miller, Michael Sutton, and Dick 

Hingson representing environmental 

interests with one open seat; and Rory 

Majenty and Martin Begaye representing 

Native American tribes. 

Selection 

The member selected to fill the 

upcoming open seat representing 

environmental concerns is Dick 

Hingson. Mr. Hingson is a current 

member of the NPOAG and his term 

begins on the day of this Federal 

Register notice publication. The term of 

service for NPOAG ARC members is 3 

years. 

Issued in Hawthorne, CA on June 2, 2014. 

Keith Lusk, 

Program Manager, Special Programs Staff, 

Western-Pacific Region. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13281 Filed 6–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions 

on Proposed Transportation Projects 

in Florida 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Limitation of Claims 

for Judicial Review of Actions by 

FHWA, and other Federal Agencies. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces actions 

taken by the FHWA and other Federal 

Agencies since January 1, 2013, that are 

final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 

139(l)(1). The actions relate to the 

proposed SR 40 (from 1 mile W of SR 

326 to US 17/SR 15) in Marion, Lake 

and Volusia Counties; SR 200/US 301 

Baldwin Bypass in Duval County; PJ 

Adams Parkway in Okaloosa County; SR 

710 (from SR 76 to Blue Heron Blvd. at 

I–95) in Martin and Palm Beach 

Counties; SR 968/SW 1st Street Bridge 

over Miami River (from SW 5th Avenue 

to SW 2nd Avenue) in Miami-Dade 

County; Starke Bypass US 301 (from CR 

227 to CR 233) in Bradford County; 

Crosstown Parkway (from Manth Lane 

to US 1) in St. Lucie County, and St. 

Johns River Crossing in Clay and St. 

Johns Counties in the State of Florida. 

These actions grant licenses, permits, 

and approvals for the project. 

DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is 

advising the public of final agency 

actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A 

claim seeking judicial review of the 

Federal agency actions on the listed 

highway projects will be barred unless 

the claim is filed on or before November 

6, 2014. If the Federal law that 

authorizes judicial review of a claim 

provides a time period of less than 150 

days for filing such claim, then that 

shorter time period still applies. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Mr. 

Benito Cunill, Environmental 

Coordinator, FHWA Florida Division, 

545 John Knox Road, Suite 200, 

Tallahassee, Florida 32303; telephone: 

850–553–2224; email: benito.cunill@

dot.gov. The FHWA Florida Division 

Office’s normal business hours are 7:30 

a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard 

Time), Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the FHWA has taken 

final agency action subject to 23 U.S.C. 

139(l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits, 

and approvals for the projects listed 

below. The actions by the Federal 

agencies on a project, and the laws 

under which such actions were taken, 

are described in the documented 

environmental assessment (EA) and 

environmental impact statement (EIS) 

issued in connection with the project, 

and in other project records for the 

listed projects. The EA and FEIS and 

other documents from the FHWA 

project records for the listed projects are 

available by contacting the FHWA or by 

using the links provided below. 

This notice applies to all Federal 

agency decisions as of the issuance date 

of this notice and all laws under which 

such actions were taken. Pursuant to 23 

U.S.C. 139(l) laws generally applicable 

to such actions include but are not 

limited to: 

1. General: National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– 

4351; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 

U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128]. 

2. Air: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401– 

7671(q). 

3. Land: Section 4(f) of the 

Department of Transportation Act of 

1966 [49 U.S.C. 303 and 23 U.S.C. 138]. 

4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act 

[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and 1536]; Marine 

Mammal Protection Act [16 U.S.C. 

1361], Fish and Wildlife Coordination 

Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667(d); Migratory 

Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) [16 U.S.C. 703– 

712]; Magnuson-Stevenson Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act of 

1976, as amended [16 U.S.C. 1801 et 

seq.]. 

5. Historic and Cultural Resources: 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act of 1966, as amended 

[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archaeological 

Resources Protection Act of 1977 

(ARPA) [16 U.S.C. 470(aa)–470(II)]; 

Archaeological and Historic 

Preservation Act (AHPA) [16 U.S.C. 

469–469(c)]; Native American Grave 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 3001–3013]. 

6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights 

Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 20009(d)– 

2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious 

Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland 

Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C. 

4201–4209]. 

7. Wetlands and Water Resources: 

Clean Water Act (Section 404, Section 

401, Section 319) [33 U.S.C. 1251– 

1377]; Coastal Barriers Resources Act 

(CBRA) [16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.]; Coastal 

Zone Management Act (CZMA) [16 

U.S.C. 1451–1465]; Land and Water 

Conservation Fund (LWCF) [16 U.S.C. 

4601–4604]; Safe Drinking Water Act 

(SDWA) [42 U.S.C. 300(f)–300(j)(6)]; 

Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 [33 

U.S.C. 401–406]; Wild and Scenic 

Rivers Act [16 U.S.C. 1271–1287]; 

Emergency Wetlands Resources Act [16 

U.S.C. 3921, 3931]; Wetlands 

Mitigation, [23 U.S.C. 103(b)(6)(M) and 

103(b)(11)]; Flood Disaster Protection 

Act [42 U.S.C. 4001–4128]. 

8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 

Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 

Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, 

Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low Income 

Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and 

Enhancement of Cultural Resources; 

E.O. 13287 Preserve America; E.O. 

13175 Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 

11514 Protection and Enhancement of 

Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112 

Invasive Species. 

The projects subject to this notice are: 

1. Project Location: Marion, Lake, and 

Volusia Counties, SR 40. Financial 

Project Number 410674, 410675, and 

410676. Project type: The SR 40 project 

proposes improving the existing twolane roadway to a four-lane divided 

roadway from the beginning of the study 

area near Silver Springs to SE 183rd 

Avenue Road (Levy Hammock Road) 

and is called the Capacity Improvement 

Area in the Environmental Assessment. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES