alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Roberto C. JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1930

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Chesapeake Bay

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_science(194)
              - products_data(114)
              - products_maps(6)
              - products_publications(708)
              - products_software(2)
              - (-)products_web_tools(5)
              - multimedia_audio(11)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(6)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(5)
              - multimedia_image(98)
              - multimedia_image-141770(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(79)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_image-141776(14)
              - multimedia_slideshow(16)
              - multimedia_video(38)
              - multimedia_video-149194(13)
              - multimedia_video-149195(15)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(6)
              - documents_file-149220(6)
              - news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(11)
              - news_news-149250(2)
              - news_newsletters(25)
              - news_other_news(17)
              - connect_locations(1)
              - connect_social_media(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(12)
              - other_basic-37(2)
              - other_basic-42(13)

## By Location

              - delaware(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - pennsylvania(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - west virginia(1)

## By Year

Data Visualization        August 31, 2021        Endocrine Disrupting Compounds in the Chesapeake

Data Access        July 26, 2022        USGS Chesapeake Bay Studies - Data Catalog

Data Access        August 13, 2022        Geonarrative: Nontidal Network Mapper

Data Access        September 1, 2021        Habitat Vulnerability Assessment for Wintering American Black Ducks

Data Visualization        April 23, 2021        Mercury in Freshwater Fish of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed—Story Map
D.J., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-947

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Randall Earl REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1714

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 Name
    
    JurisdictionAllied World Assurance Company, Ltd
    
    BermudaAllied World Assurance Holdings (Ireland) Ltd
    
    BermudaAllied World Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited
    
    IrelandAllied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited
    
    IrelandNewmarket Administrative Services (Ireland) Limited
    
    IrelandAllied World Assurance Holdings (U.S.) Inc.
    
    DelawareAllied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc.
    
    DelawareAllied World National Assurance Company
    
    New HampshireAllied World Investment Company
    
    DelawareNewmarket Administrative Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareAllied World Reinsurance Company
    
    New JerseyDarwin Professional Underwriters, Inc.
    
    DelawareDarwin Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareDarwin National Assurance Company
    
    DelawareDarwin Select Insurance Company
    
    ArkansasVantapro Specialty Insurance Company
    
    ArkansasEvolution Underwriting Inc.
    
    DelawareAgency Marketing Services Inc.
    
    FloridaAll-South Professional Liability, Inc.
    
    FloridaRaincross Insurance Company
    
    FloridaNewmarket Administrative Services (Bermuda), Ltd
    
    Bermuda
EX PARTE Sara SMITH T, M.D., and Pediatric Clinic, L.L.C.

1160177

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARL HARRISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-97-143, CA-00-792)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* To the extent that Harrison raises claims in his informal

brief that were not presented to the district court, we note that

he cannot raise them for the first time on appeal. See Muth v.

United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Harrison seeks to appeal the district court’s orders (1)

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001); and (2) denying his motion for remission of his fine. We

have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and the district

court’s order denying his motion for remission of his fine, and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Harrison, Nos. CR-97-143; CA-00-

792 (S.D.W. Va Aug. 13 & Sept. 4, 2001).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Robin R. LANE, Esq., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES W. EHRLICH, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3575

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_publications(59)
              - products_web_tools(2)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(4)
              - (-)multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149246(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - other_basic-42(1)

## By Location

              - (-)colorado(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

slideshow        September 23, 2021        Rocky Mountain Regional Snowpack Chemistry Photo Gallery
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Superficial simplicity of the 2010 El Mayorg-Cucapah earthquake of Baja California in Mexico      

      January 1, 2011    

The geometry of faults is usually thought to be more complicated at the surface than at depth and to control the initiation, propagation and arrest of seismic ruptures1,2,3,4,5,6. The fault system that runs from southern California into Mexico is a simple strike-slip boundary: the west side of California and Mexico moves northwards with respect to the east. However, the Mw 7.2 2010 El Mayor–Cucapah earthquake on this fault system produced a pattern of seismic waves that indicates a far more complex source than slip on a planar strike-slip fault7. Here we use geodetic, remote-sensing and seismological data to reconstruct the fault geometry and history of slip during this earthquake. We find that the earthquake produced a straight 120-km-long fault trace that cut through the Cucapah mountain range and across the Colorado River delta. However, at depth, the fault is made up of two different segments connected by a small extensional fault. Both segments strike N130° E, but dip in opposite directions. The earthquake was initiated on the connecting extensional fault and 15 s later ruptured the two main segments with dominantly strike-slip motion. We show that complexities in the fault geometry at depth explain well the complex pattern of radiated seismic waves. We conclude that the location and detailed characteristics of the earthquake could not have been anticipated on the basis of observations of surface geology alone.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  -  Mexico
                  - california
                  -  Arizona

View All **
# C_2020049EN.01000201.xml

| 13.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.9569 — EssilorLuxottica/GrandVision)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 49/02)

On 6 February 2020, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No. M.9569 — EssilorLuxottica/GrandVision, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ’Merger Regulation’).

---
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Rosario, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4536.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Oh io 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2015-O HIO -4536
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v. R OSARIO , A PPELLEE . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Rosario, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4536.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

(No. 2014-1174—Submitted September 1, 2015—Decided November 4, 2015.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 101558.

__________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

__________________ Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga C ounty Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary H. McGrath, T. Allen Regas, and Fra nk R. Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

__________________
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1189

___________ Raymond L. Semler, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Donna Finch, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 21, 2009 Filed: September 28, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Raymond L. Semler appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his lawsuit raising 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state-law clai ms. Upon de novo review, seeAllen v. Purkett , 5 F.3d 1151, 1153 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Semler’s cl aims were barred by res judicata. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and r ecommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 75159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: Z8-26627]



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58895; File No.SR-NYSEArca-2008-122]


 Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change To 
Extend the Pilot Program for NYSE Arca Realtime Reference Prices 
Service

Correction

    In notice document E8-26627 beginning on page 66956 in the issue of 
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 make the following correction:
    On page 66957, in the third column, under heading III. Solicitation 
of Comments, in the last paragraph, in the second to last line 
``December 1, 2008'' should read ``December 3, 2008''.

[FR Doc. Z8-26627 Filed 12-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
STATE of Louisiana v. Edward James MCKINNEY

NO. 2018-KH-0481

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State v. McKinney, 17-1181 (La. 10/15/18), --- So.3d ----.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5343 

To require increased reporting regarding certain surgeries scheduled at 

medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2016 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. WALBERG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require increased reporting regarding certain surgeries 

scheduled at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Transparency En5 hancement Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

7 (a) REPORTS FROM DIRECTORS OF MEDICAL FA8 CILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF9 FAIRS.—Not later than 30 days after the end of each cal10 endar quarter, each director of a medical facility of the 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5343 IH

1 Department of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Sec2 retary of Veterans Affairs a report regarding the fol3 lowing: 

4 (1) With respect to surgical infections— 

5 (A) the number of patients who contracted 

6 an infection as a result of a surgery performed 

7 at such medical facility during the previous 

8 quarter; and 

9 (B) a brief summary of each such case of 

10 infection. 

11 (2) With respect to cancelled or transferred sur12 geries— 

13 (A) the number of surgeries scheduled to 

14 be performed at the medical facility during the 

15 previous quarter that were cancelled or trans16 ferred to another medical facility; 

17 (B) the reason each such surgery was can18 celled or transferred; and 

19 (C) the number of additional days each 

20 such patient had to wait for surgery because of 

21 cancellation or transfer. 

22 (b) REPORTS FROM THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS

23 AFFAIRS.—Not later than 60 days after the end of each 

24 calendar quarter, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5343 IH

1 (1) submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Af2 fairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate 

3 the reports under subsection (a) and a summary of 

4 such reports; and 

5 (2) publish on the website of the Department 

6 the summary under paragraph (1) and the reports 

7 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        3

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        4

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        5

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        6
l 2 3

5 6 7
0 u 9

11 

### 12 13 14 

### 15 16 l7 18 19 

### 20 21 22 23 24 

### 25 26 27 28 In the Matter of: 

### UNITED STATE OFAMERICA DEPARTMENT

**01'~** 

### TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### ) Felts Field Aviation, Inc. 

### ) FAA CaseNo: 

### 2015WP910090 

### ) ) Judge NotAssigned

**~--------------------** 

## ___ ) ANSWERAND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The Respondent,.through·his undersigned Counsel, responds to the numbered Paragraphs

**intheAdministratm~s:** Complaint ,as.follows:: 

### 1. Admit 2. ·Admit 3. Admit 

### 4. Deny-.

**Insuf:J:lqie1~t** infom1?tion;:tlwrdore deny. 5. 6. Admit 7. Deny- Insufficient information, therefore deny 8. Deny- Insufficient information, therefore deny

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE- ] CONLIN, MALONEY & MILLER ATTORNEYSAT LAW 421 W RIVERSlDE AVE., SUITE 911 SP0KANE,WASH1NGTON 99201 (S09\ li74-.10701 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JO 11 

### 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 

### 20 21 

### 22 23 24 

### 25 26 27 28 

### Respondentreserves tl1e right to am.end this Answer.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 'Respondent reasonably relied upon the FAA approved provider whose duty
was to monitor and advice the Respondent 

### ofthe obligations set forth in 

### 14 CFR Pari 12c and 49 CFRPart 40. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8th day of

### October, 2015.

It ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE- 

### 2 CONLIN, MALONEY & MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 42'] W. RlVERSlD"E AVE., SUITE 911 SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 9920I I 

# I1 2 3 4 5 6 

### 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 

### 15 1.6 l7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 

### 25 26 27 28 i 

## II II



## II

I I 

## I ' 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Answer and Affirmative Defense has been served via facsimile and Regular Mail, this date, to the following: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Attn: .Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 WashingtonDC,20591 (202) 267-1293
Mr. Roberi Spitzer federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Cmmsel- ANM-7 Nmihwest MountainRegion 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, WA 98057 (425) 227-1007 DATED this 8'11 day ofOctober, 2015.

Gwe11Kubik Legal Assistant to Mark Conlin

CONLIN, MALONEY & MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW ' ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE- 3 

## II 421 W, RfVERSIDE AVE., SUITE 911 SPOKANE,WASI-IINGTON 99201 (509) 624-3020

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Answer and Affirmative Defense has been served via Certified Mail, this date, to the following: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building- Suite 2W1000 Washington DC 20591
Mr. Robert Spitzer Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel- ANM-7 Northwest Mountain Region 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, WA 98057
DATED this 13th 

### day ofOctober, 2015.
Cindy 1ert Legal Assistant to Mark Conlin

ANSWERAND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE- 4
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - (-)science_science(3)
              - products_publications(28)
              - multimedia_video(3)
              - multimedia_video-149194(2)
              - multimedia_video-149195(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(3)
              - alaska(6)
              - american samoa(1)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(4)
              - california(44)
              - colorado(9)
              - florida(5)
              - georgia(5)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(8)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(3)
              - maine(1)
              - (-)maryland(3)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - mississippi(2)
              - montana(7)
              - nebraska(2)
              - nevada(3)
              - new jersey(4)
              - new mexico(6)
              - new york(3)
              - north carolina(3)
              - north dakota(6)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(4)
              - pennsylvania(2)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(2)
              - south dakota(4)
              - tennessee(2)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(3)
              - virginia(4)
              - washington(12)
              - wyoming(7)

## By Year

Research        August 26, 2016        The Eastern Box Turtle at USGS Patuxent Research Refuge, MD

Research        May 16, 2019        Restoring a native fish to Catoctin Mountain Park

Research        August 29, 2016        Endocrine Active Effects on Turtle Embryonic Development
STATE of Louisiana v. Teddy CHESTER

NO. 2018-KK-1528

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 18, 2018

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.

CLARK, J., would grant and reinstate the trial court's ruling.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
[Corrections]
[Page 41323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X98-40803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-AGL-29]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Beaver Dam, WI

Correction

    In rule document 98-19851, beginning on page 39707 in the issue of 
Friday July 24, 1998, make the following correction.


71.1  [Corrected]

    On page 39708, in the first column, under AGL WI E5 Beaver Dam, WI 
[New] the coordinates should read:

    (lat. 43 deg. 26' 45''N., long. 88 deg. 48' 36''W.)
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_science(1)
              - products_publications(17)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - (-)multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(1)
              - multimedia_slideshow(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - news_other_news(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(1)
              - american samoa(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(4)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(39)
              - (-)idaho(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - massachusetts(3)
              - north carolina(8)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(3)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

Charts or Graphs        September 25, 2022        Atmospheric water vapor and river level during June 2022 in the NE part of Yellowstone National Park