alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## 2003 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

4-14-2003 

# L a ve r dur e v . M on tgome r y
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t 02-2773

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2003

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2003 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" L a ve r dur e v . M on t g ome r y " (2003). 2003 D e cisio n s . P ape r 587. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2003/587

### PRECEDENTIAL Filed April 14, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 02-2773
KELLY LAVERDURE,

Appellant
v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY; MICHAEL D. MARINO Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 01-cv-02542) District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III

Argued: January 23, 2003 Before: NYGAARD, AMBRO and LOURIE,*

Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: April 2, 2003) Joseph A. O’Keefe, Esquire (Argued) O’Keefe & Sher 15019 Kutztown Road Kutztown, PA 19530

* Honorable Alan D. Lourie, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

### John V. Ryan, Esquire 2071 Tulpehocken Road Wyomissing, PA Attorneys for Appellant Joseph J. Santarone, Jr., Esquire John J. Hare, Esquire (Argued) Marshall, Dennehey, Warner Coleman & Goggin One Montgomery Plaza, 10th Floor Norristown, PA 19401 Attorneys for Appellee
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge : It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed April 2, 2003, be amended as follows: On page 2, line 6 of the caption following the name “Joseph J Santarone, Jr., Esquire ”, delete “(Argued) ”, and insert “(Argued) ” instead on the following line immediately after the name “John J. Hare, Esquire ”. By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: April 14, 2003 A True Copy:

Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 

### 2
# C_2020292EN.01000101.xml

| 3.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9878 – Total/EDP Comercializadora)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 292/01)

On 27 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9878. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9878. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - multimedia_image(1)
              - multimedia_image-141771(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - arkansas(1)
              - california(21)
              - colorado(3)
              - commonwealth of the northern mariana islands(1)
              - florida(2)
              - georgia(1)
              - hawaii(2)
              - idaho(3)
              - illinois(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - (-)louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(4)
              - mississippi(1)
              - montana(3)
              - nebraska(3)
              - nevada(2)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(1)
              - north carolina(2)
              - oklahoma(3)
              - oregon(4)
              - puerto rico(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(12)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - utah(1)
              - virginia(2)
              - washington(11)
              - wisconsin(2)
              - wyoming(3)

## By Year

Photography        April 1, 2017        Assessing Tallgrass Coastal Prairie in Southwest Louisiana

Presentations and Events        August 7, 2017        Developing Effective Drought Monitoring Tools for Farmers and Ranchers
Sean Patrick O'DEA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0670

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is denied.
Nicholas FOUNTAIN, DOC #H06734, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 20, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

*787Nicholas Fountain appeals the order revoking his probation and imposing an incarcerative sentence for his felony and misdemeanor offenses. We affirm the revocation of Fountain's probation and his resulting sentences without further comment; however, the trial court erroneously entered a second judgment when it imposed Fountain's sentences upon revocation. *See**Schaufler v. State*, --- So.3d ----, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1391a, 2018 WL 3040383 (Fla. 2d DCA June 20, 2018) ("Duplicative adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous, are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings." (quoting *Butler v. State*, 195 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ) ). Because the trial court initially adjudicated Fountain guilty and entered a judgment against him when it imposed his split sentences, the second judgment was unauthorized and should be stricken. *See**id.* ("[T]he circuit court only enters a judgment on a violation of probation in those instances when it withheld an adjudication of guilt, i.e., withheld judgment, at the time it originally imposed probation." (alteration in original) (quoting *Butler*, 195 So.3d at 1148-49 ) ).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Fountain's probation and his resulting sentences but remand for the trial court to vacate the second written judgment.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and LUCAS, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
## 1994 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

8-22-1994 

# B ai le y v . S n y de r
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 93-9002

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1994 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" B ai ley v . S n y de r " (1994). 1994 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 120. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1994/120

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________ NO. 93-9002

_______________
BILLIE BAILEY, Appellant

v. ROBERT SNYDER, Warden, Delaware Correctional Center

_______________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge , BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges
.

O R D E R

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court list the above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court. By the Court,
\s\ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge

Dated: August 22, 1994
# C_2020418EN.01000301.xml

| 3.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9324 — ALSO/ABC Data Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 418/03)

On 12 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9324. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9324. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Power of Attorney



 EXHIBIT 4.119 
 Power of Attorney 
 I, Chang Cheng, a PRC citizen whose ID number is 510215197307110034, hereby irrevocably authorize
Wang Lei Lei and a person (the “Appointed Person”), appointed by Beijing Dong Kui Ling Information Technology Co., Ltd. at times, to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 Wang Lei Lei and the Appointed Person are authorized to, on my behalf, exercise all the voting rights as a shareholder of Beijing Bo Xun Rong Tong Information Technology
Co., Ltd. (“the Company”) by laws and by articles of association in shareholders meeting of the Company with all powers, including but not limited to, sale or transfer of all or part of the shares in the Company and assignment and
appointment of the directors and general manager of the Company as an authorized representative. 
 The above-mentioned authorization and attorney are based
on the following assumptions: Wang Lei Lei or the Appointed Person is an employee of Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. approves of such authorization and attorney. Once Wang Lei Lei
or the Appointed Person is no longer employed by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. or Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. gives a written notice of replacing its attorney, I shall forthwith recall the attorney and
authorization herein and appoint/authorize other employees assigned by Beijing Lahiji Technology Development Co., Ltd. to exercise all the voting rights owed by a shareholder of the Company in the shareholders meeting on our behalf. 
 The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years from the execution date unless the Business Operation Agreement among Beijing Dong Kui Ling Information and Technology
Co., Ltd., Beijing Bo Xun Rong Tong Information Technology Co., Ltd. Wang Yu Tian and I is terminated before expiry whatsoever. 
  

					
	Chang Cheng
			
	Signature:	 	  
	 	
	
	Date: 24 July, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - science_faqs(4)
              - science_science(189)
              - products_data(130)
              - products_maps(16)
              - products_publications(2007)
              - products_software(7)
              - products_web_tools(8)
              - multimedia_audio(82)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(78)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(4)
              - multimedia_before_after(5)
              - multimedia_image(196)
              - multimedia_image-141769(1)
              - multimedia_image-141770(4)
              - multimedia_image-141771(145)
              - multimedia_image-141772(4)
              - multimedia_image-141774(2)
              - multimedia_image-141775(22)
              - multimedia_image-141776(16)
              - (-)multimedia_image-204460(2)
              - multimedia_slideshow(2)
              - multimedia_video(229)
              - multimedia_video-149194(87)
              - multimedia_video-149195(54)
              - multimedia_video-149196(16)
              - multimedia_video-149197(15)
              - multimedia_video-149198(13)
              - multimedia_video-149225(2)
              - documents_file(10)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - documents_file-149214(4)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149220(1)
              - documents_file-149222(1)
              - news_news-149245(2)
              - news_news-149246(2)
              - news_news-149248(5)
              - news_news-149249(2)
              - news_news-149250(7)
              - news_newsletters(2)
              - news_other_news(36)
              - connect_staff_profiles(23)
              - other_basic-37(3)
              - other_basic-42(16)

## By Location

              - hawaii(1)

## By Year

Satellite imagery        December 5, 2022        Landsat 9 Captures Mauna Loa and Kilauea Eruption

Supporting material        October 22, 2018        Internship: Examining controls on the solubility in the ocean of ...

Satellite imagery        December 4, 2015        Titan Cassini VIMS
# C_2020344EN.01000201.xml

| 16.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9282 — HCL Technologies/Certain IBM Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 344/02)

On 29 May 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9282. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9282. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         22,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,921
<CGS>                                           15,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    14
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,655
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         7,117
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          351,223
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       74
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,683
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,033,737
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,033,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,033,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,033,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.14)



</TABLE>
# C_2020344EN.01000701.xml

| 16.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9853 — HGK/Imperial Shipping Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 344/07)

On 29 June 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9853. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9853. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---