alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020031EN.01000701.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/7

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9587 — ENGIE/EDP Renovaveis/EDPR Offshore España)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 31/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | ENGIE S.A. (‘ENGIE’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

ENGIE S.A. (‘ENGIE’, France),

| — | EDP Renovaveis S.A. (‘EDPR’, Spain), belonging to the EDP group, |
| --- | --- |

—

EDP Renovaveis S.A. (‘EDPR’, Spain), belonging to the EDP group,

| — | EDPR Offshore España S.L.U. (‘EDPR Offshore España’, Spain), belonging to the EDP group. |
| --- | --- |

—

EDPR Offshore España S.L.U. (‘EDPR Offshore España’, Spain), belonging to the EDP group.

ENGIE and EDPR acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of EDPR Offshore España.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and a contribution of assets.

2.

| — | for ENGIE: An industrial company active in the fields of gas, electricity and energy services, |
| --- | --- |

—

for ENGIE: An industrial company active in the fields of gas, electricity and energy services,

| — | for EDPR: A renewable energy subsidiary of EDP Group active in developing, building and operating wind farms and solar plants worldwide, |
| --- | --- |

—

for EDPR: A renewable energy subsidiary of EDP Group active in developing, building and operating wind farms and solar plants worldwide,

| — | for EDPR Offshore España: A subsidiary of EDPR active in offshore windfarm activities worldwide. |
| --- | --- |

—

for EDPR Offshore España: A subsidiary of EDPR active in offshore windfarm activities worldwide.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9587 — ENGIE/EDP Renovaveis/EDPR Offshore España

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

CAPITAL ONE BANK

 

----

CAPITAL ONE MASTER TRUST

----

 

 

                                                Theundersigned, a duly authorized representative of Capital One Bank (the “Bank”),as Servicer, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement,dated as of September 30, 1993, as amended and restated as of August 1,2002 (as amended and supplemented, the “Agreement”), among the Bank, asServicer, Capital One Funding, LLC, as Transferor, and The Bank of New York, asTrustee, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                       The Bank is, as of the date hereof, theServicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respectivemeanings as set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.                                       The undersigned is a Servicing Officerwho is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver thisCertificate to the Trustee.

 

3.                                       A review of the activities of theServicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2002, and of itsperformance under the Agreement, was conducted under my supervision.

 

4.                                       Based on such review, the Servicer has,to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligationsunder the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.

 

5.                                       The following is a description of eachdefault in the performance of the Servicer’s obligations under the provisionsof the Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the yearended December 31, 2002, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of eachsuch default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedyeach such default and (iii) the current status of each such default:

 

None.

 

 

----

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificatethis 31st day of March, 2003.

 
|   | CAPITAL ONE  BANK |
|--------|-------------------|
|   |              | as Servicer |
|   |              |   |
|   | By:               | /s/ Thomas  A. Feil |
|   | Name:             |   | Thomas A.  Feil |
|   | Title:            |   | Director of  Capital Markets |
|        |                   |  |  |  |  |

 

----
# C_2020090EN.01000401.xml

| 19.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/4

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 90/04)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Salini Impregilo S.p.A. (‘Salini Impregilo’, Italy); |
| --- | --- |

—

Salini Impregilo S.p.A. (‘Salini Impregilo’, Italy);

| — | Astaldi S.p.A. (‘Astaldi’, Italy). |
| --- | --- |

—

Astaldi S.p.A. (‘Astaldi’, Italy).

Salini Impregilo acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Astaldi.

The concentration is accomplished in two phases: first, the acquisition of control will be accomplished through contractual rights arising from an offer submitted by Salini Impregilo to Astaldi’s controlling shareholder and, at the end of the court-supervised insolvency proceedings, by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | for Salini Impregilo: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in 10 EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in other 30 countries outside the EEA; |
| --- | --- |

—

for Salini Impregilo: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in 10 EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in other 30 countries outside the EEA;

| — | for Astaldi: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in four EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in 14 countries outside the EEA. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Astaldi: general contractor active in the market for construction services on a global scale, specifically in four EU Member States including Italy, Romania and Poland and in 14 countries outside the EEA.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9507 — Salini Impregilo/Astaldi

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
**Exhibit 34.2**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

First DataResources, LLC and 

REMITCO, LLC 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that First Data Resources LLC and itsaffiliate, REMITCO LLC (jointly, First Data) complied with the servicing criteria applicable to it under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Section 229.1122(d) — all servicing criteria except for the criteria setforth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv) (except with respect to the servicing of transactions on the remittance payment platform relating to the opening, listing, anddepositing of remittance payments mailed to post office boxes serviced by First Data pursuant to the agreements between First Data and Capital One Services, LLC, together with its affiliates, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (formerlyknown as Capital One Bank) and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (“the Platform”)), and 1122(d)(4)(v)-(xv). Management is responsible for First Data’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion about First Data’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about First Data’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all ofthe individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether First Data processed those selected transactions and performedthose selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by First Data during the period covered by this report. Our procedures werenot designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by First Data during the period covered by this report for the selectedtransactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on First Data’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that First Data complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2009 for the remittance payment platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

February 18, 2010 

Des Moines, Iowa
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Atmospheres

Filters

              - (-)science_science(1)
              - products_publications(2)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - multimedia_video-149196(1)
              - news_news-149248(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(2)
              - alaska(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - california(12)
              - colorado(3)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(3)
              - louisiana(2)
              - maine(1)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - mississippi(1)
              - (-)missouri(1)
              - montana(2)
              - new hampshire(1)
              - new jersey(2)
              - new mexico(1)
              - new york(14)
              - north carolina(1)
              - ohio(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south carolina(1)
              - texas(1)
              - utah(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(7)
              - wyoming(1)

## By Year

Research        August 29, 2016        Poisoning of Migratory Birds at Contaminated Sites
STATE of Louisiana v. Jerrod R. VEZINA

NO. 2018-KH-1314

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 28, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Alvaro S. Sanchez GOMEZ, a/k/a Alvaro Salvador Sanchez Gomez, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2273

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
LF-67 (11/21/05) 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

In re: Case No. 21-16573-LMI 

CHRISTOPHER NIMETH Chapter 13 

 Debtor / 

DEBTOR CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST

FOR CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN

 The debtor in the above captioned matter certifies as follows: 

 1. Payment of all postpetition domestic support obligations (check which paragraph 

applies). 

_x____ A. Since the filing of this bankruptcy, the debtor has not been required by 

a judicial or administrative order, or by statute to pay any domestic support obligation as 

defined in 11 U.S.C. §101(14A); or 

_____ B. The debtor has paid, either directly or to the chapter 13 trustee under the last 

filed plan, all amounts that are required to be paid under a domestic support obligation 

and that first became payable after the date of the filing of the petition if the debtor is 

required by a judicial or administrative order, or by statute, to pay such domestic support 

obligation. 

 2. The debtor has filed all federal, state and local tax returns required by law to be filed 

under 11 U.S.C. §1308 for all taxable periods ending during the four year period ending on the 

date of the filing of the petition commencing this bankruptcy case. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this Certificate is true 

and correct. 

 __________________________ 

 Debtor’s Signature

Dated: __________________________ 

 Joint Debtor’s Signature (if applicable)

Christopher Nimeth (Aug 13, 2021 10:35 EDT)

Aug 13, 2021

Case 21-16573-LMI Doc 29 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual report of Knobias,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
     Form  10-KSB/A  for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
     Susan R. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
     to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knobias, Inc. and will be retained by Knobias, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  August 31, 2006                            By: /s/ SUSAN R. WALKER
                                                    ------------------
                                                 Susan R. Walker
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - products_publications(48)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(24)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(1)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
# C_2020419EN.01001501.xml

| 4.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9675 — Apollo Capital Management/Lopesan Group/IFA Faro Hotel/IFA Buenaventura Hotel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 419/05)

On 8 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9675. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9675. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Giles E. ORCUTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to the Tenth Judicial Circuit for Polk County.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.15  


 
 

TEXAS INDUSTRIES, INC.    
    
    THREE-YEAR INCENTIVE PLAN
  adopted pursuant to the
  MASTER PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PLAN    
    


This
Three Year Incentive Plan is adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors pursuant to the Texas Industries, Inc. Master Performance-Based Incentive Plan ("Master
Incentive Plan"). This Three-Year Incentive Plan is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Master Incentive Plan. Terms not defined in this Three-Year Incentive Plan
have the same meanings as in the Master Incentive Plan. Amendments and exceptions to this Three-Year Incentive Plan may be made only in the manner provided in the Master Incentive Plan. 


1.     Performance Period  



The
three fiscal years beginning June 1, 2007 and ending May 31, 2010. 




2.     Participants  



Participants
are recommended by management of the Company and approved by the Compensation Committee. 




3.     Minimum Award Goal  



Achievement
of an Award is dependent on attainment of a three year consolidated average return-on-equity for the Performance Period ("ROE") equal to or greater than 14%. 




4.     ROE Calculation  



ROE
is the average of the net income of the Company as a percentage of the average shareholders' equity of the Company for each fiscal year in the Performance Period, based on the net income and
shareholders' equity reported to shareholders in the Company's consolidated financial statements for periods included in the Performance Period, rounded to the nearest one-tenth
(1/10) of one percent (1%). A fiscal year's "average shareholders' equity" is the average of its four fiscal quarters' shareholders' equity. A "fiscal quarter's shareholders' equity" is
the sum of its beginning and ending balances divided by two. 




5.     Award Calculation  



The
amount of an Award is based on the Company's three year average ROE for the Performance Period, and is calculated by multiplying a Participant's base salary on the last day of the Performance
Period by the applicable Award Percentage shown in the schedule in Section 6. Individuals who become Participants during the Performance Period will have their Award pro-rated in
six month increments (i. e., participation for an increment of less than six months will not be included in the calculation) for the amount of time they participated prior to the end of the
Performance Period, with a six (6) month minimum participation requirement for eligibility for payment of an Award. 








 

6.     Award Schedule  



	Three-Year Incentive Plan

For The Three Consecutive Fiscal Year Period

Ending May 31, 2010
	 
	Three-Year Average ROE
 
	 	Award Percentage

(% of Base Salary)
	 
	Less than 14%	 	0	%
	14% to less than 16%	 	50	%
	16% to less than 18%	 	70	%
	18% to less than 20%	 	100	%
	20% and above	 	140	%






        The
President and Chief Executive Officer's Award Percentage will be double that shown in the schedule above. 


2











QuickLinks


TEXAS INDUSTRIES, INC. THREE-YEAR INCENTIVE PLAN adopted pursuant to the MASTER PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PLAN
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) of UTEK Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas Schaedler, the Principal
Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Douglas Schaedler  
|Name: Douglas Schaedler
|Date: November 9, 2009
Steven Raynard ROCHELLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3486

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daniel COTTEN, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3308

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.