19812 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

§ 322.15 APHIS review of permit 

applications; denial or revocation of 

permits. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(5) APHIS may also deny a permit to 

import restricted organisms: 

(i) To a person who has previously 

failed to comply with any APHIS 

regulation, except: 

(A) A permit revoked in an 

investigation concerning that failure has 

been reinstated on appeal, at the 

discretion of APHIS; or 

(B) All measures ordered by APHIS to 

correct the failure, including but not 

limited to, payment of penalties or 

restitution, have been complied with to 

the satisfaction of APHIS. 

(ii) To a person who has previously 

failed to comply with any international 

or Federal regulation or instruction 

concerning the importation of 

prohibited or restricted foreign 

agricultural products; or 

(iii) If the application for a permit 

contains information that is found to be 

materially false, fraudulent, deceptive, 

or misrepresentative. 

* * * * * 

(e) Appealing the denial of permit 

applications or revocation of permits. If 

your permit application has been denied 

or your permit has been revoked, APHIS 

will inform you in writing, including by 

electronic methods, as promptly as 

circumstances permit and will include 

the reasons for the denial or revocation. 

You may appeal the decision by writing 

to APHIS within 10 business days from 

the date you received the 

communication notifying you of the 

denial or revocation of the permit. Your 

appeal must state all facts and reasons 

upon which you are relying to show that 

your permit application was wrongfully 

denied or your permit was wrongfully 

revoked. APHIS will grant or deny the 

appeal in writing and will state in 

writing the reason for the decision. The 

denial or revocation will remain in 

effect during the resolution of the 

appeal. 

* * * * * 

PART 360—NOXIOUS WEED 

REGULATIONS 

■ 43. The authority citation for part 360 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781– 

7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. 

■ 44. Section 360.304 is amended as 

follows: 

■ a. By revising the section heading. 

■ b. In paragraph (a)(5), by removing the 

period at the end of the sentence and 

adding the word ‘‘; or’’ in its place. 

■ c. By adding new paragraphs (a)(6) 

and (a)(7). 

■ d. In paragraph (b), introductory text, 

by removing the word ‘‘cancel’’ and 

adding the word ‘‘revoke’’ in its place. 

■ e. In paragraph (c), by removing the 

word ‘‘canceled’’ each time it appears 

and adding the word ‘‘revoked’’ in its 

place, and by removing the word 

‘‘cancellation’’ and adding the word 

‘‘revocation’’ in its place. 

The revision and additions read as 

follows: 

§ 360.304 Denial of an application for a 

permit to move a noxious weed; revocation 

of a permit to move a noxious weed. 

(a) * * * 

(6) The application for the permit 

contains information that is found to be 

materially false, fraudulent, or 

deceptive; or 

(7) APHIS may deny a permit to a 

person who has previously failed to 

comply with any APHIS regulation. 

* * * * * 

■ 45. Section 360.305 is amended as 

follows: 

■ a. By revising the section heading. 

■ b. By removing the word ‘‘canceled’’ 

each time it appears and adding the 

word ‘‘revoked’’ in its place. 

The revision reads as follows: 

§ 360.305 Disposal of noxious weeds when 

permits are revoked. 

* * * * * 

Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

April 2014. 

Kevin Shea, 

Administrator, Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08095 Filed 4–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–34–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2007–27009; Directorate 

Identifier 2007–NE–02–AD; Amendment 39– 

17820; AD 2014–07–06] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca 

S.A. Turboshaft Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are superseding 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2007–19– 

09R1 for all Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 2B1 

turboshaft engines that do not have 

modification TU157 incorporated. AD 

2007–19–09R1 required replacement of 

the hydromechanical metering unit 

(HMU) with a serviceable HMU. This 

AD requires HMU replacement; 

reduction of the compliance interval; 

and inclusion of the power turbine C2 

cycle consumption rate when 

determining compliance times. This AD 

was prompted by reports of ruptures on 

HMU constant delta pressure valves that 

have less than 2,000 hours in service. 

We are issuing this AD to prevent 

failure of the HMU, which could lead to 

damage to the engine, and damage to the 

aircraft. 

DATES: This AD is effective May 15, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact 

Turbomeca, S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; 

phone: 33 5 59 74 40 00; telex: 570 042; 

fax: 33 5 59 74 45 15. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Engine 

& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2007– 

27009; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information 

(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any 

comments received, and other 

information. The address for the Docket 

Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Document Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 

Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7742; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: james.e.gray@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to supersede AD 2007–19–09R1, 

Amendment 39–16322 (75 FR 30687, 

June 2, 2010), (‘‘AD 2007–19–09R1’’). 

AD 2007–19–09R1 applied to the 

specified products. The NPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 24, 2013 (78 FR 77614). The 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 19813 

NPRM proposed to continue to require 

HMU replacement. That NPRM also 

proposed to require reduction of the 

compliance interval; and inclusion of 

the power turbine C2 cycle 

consumption rate when determining 

compliance times. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

received no comments on the NPRM (78 

FR 77614, December 24, 2013). 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

as proposed. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 264 

engines installed on airplanes of U.S. 

registry. We also estimate that it will 

take about one hour per engine to 

comply with this AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per hour. Required parts cost 

about $5,000 per engine. Based on these 

figures, we estimate the cost of this AD 

to U.S. operators is $1,342,440. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends part 39 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing airworthiness directive (AD) 

2007–19–09R1, Amendment 39–16322 

(75 FR 30687, June 2, 2010), and adding 

the following new AD: 

2014–07–06 Turbomeca S.A.: Amendment 

39–17820; Docket No. FAA–2007–27009; 

Directorate Identifier 2007–NE–02–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective May 15, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2007–19–09R1, 

Amendment 39–16322 (75 FR 30687, June 2, 

2010). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 

2B1 turboshaft engines that do not have 

modification TU157 incorporated. 

(d) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

ruptures on hydromechanical metering unit 

(HMU) constant delta pressure valves that 

have less than 2,000 hours in service. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent failure of the 

HMU, which could lead to damage to the 

engine, and damage to the aircraft. 

(e) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(1) HMU operating hours and power 

turbine C2 cycles are known: 

(i) If on the effective date of this AD, the 

HMU C2 cycles are less than 900, then 

replace the HMU before the HMU 

accumulates 1,000 C2 cycles or 1,500 HMU 

operating hours, whichever occurs first; 

(ii) If on the effective date of this AD, the 

HMU C2 cycles are 900 or more, then replace 

the HMU within 100 HMU C2 cycles after the 

effective date of this AD; 

(iii) Thereafter, replace the HMU at every 

1,000 HMU C2 cycles or 1,500 HMU 

operating hours, whichever comes first. 

(2) HMU operating hours are known and 

C2 cycles are not known: 

(i) If on the effective date of this AD, the 

HMU operating hours are less than 1,100, 

then replace the HMU before accumulating 

1,200 HMU operating hours; 

(ii) If on the effective date of this AD, the 

HMU operating hours are 1,100 or more, then 

replace the HMU within 100 HMU operating 

hours after the effective date of this AD; 

(iii) Thereafter, replace the HMU at every 

1,200 HMU operating hours. 

(f) Definition 

For the purpose of this AD, HMU operating 

hours or C2 cycles are defined as operating 

hours or C2 cycles since new, since overhaul, 

or since incorporation of Turbomeca S.A. 

Service Bulletin (SB) No. 292 73 2105, 

Version B, dated December 16, 2010, or 

earlier version, or Turbomeca S.A. 

Mandatory SB (MSB) No. 292 73 2818, 

Version D, dated June 24, 2013, or earlier 

version. 

(g) Optional Terminating Action 

Incorporation of Turbomeca S.A. SB No. 

292 73 2157, Version C, dated July 17, 2013, 

or earlier version, is terminating action to the 

replacement and repetitive inspection 

requirements of this AD. 

(h) Credit for Previous Actions 

If you performed the actions required by 

paragraphs (e)(1) or (e)(2) of this AD using an 

earlier version of Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 

292 73 2818, Version D, dated June 24, 2013, 

you met the requirements of this AD. 

However, you must still repetitively replace 

the HMU as required by paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) 

and (e)(2)(iii) of this AD. 

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

FAA, may approve AMOCs to this AD. Use 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to 

make your request. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact James Gray, Aerospace Engineer, 

Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

phone: 781–238–7742; fax: 781–238–7199; 

email: james.e.gray@faa.gov. 

(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 

Safety Agency AD 2013–0171, dated July 30, 

2013. You may examine the MCAI in the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2007-27009-0015. 

(3) Turbomeca S.A. MSB No. 292 73 2818, 

Version D, dated June 24, 2013, Turbomeca 

S.A. SB No. 292 73 2157, Version C, dated 

July 17, 2013, and Turbomeca S.A. SB No. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
19814 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

292 73 2105, Version B, dated December 16, 

2010, which are not incorporated by 

reference in this AD, can be obtained from 

Turbomeca S.A. using the contact 

information in paragraph (j)(4) of this AD. 

(4) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Turbomeca, S.A., 40220 

Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0)5 59 74 40 00; 

telex: 570 042; fax: 33 (0)5 59 74 45 1. 

(5) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 

12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 

MA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference 

None. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

April 2, 2014. 

Colleen M. D’Alessandro, 

Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–08008 Filed 4–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Parts 510 and 558 

[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0002] 

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal 

Feeds; Withdrawal of Approval of New 

Animal Drug Applications; 

Bambermycins; Hygromycin B; 

Lincomycin; Pyrantel; Tylosin; Tylosin 

and Sulfamethazine; Virginiamycin 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is amending the 

animal drug regulations to reflect the 

withdrawal of approval of 19 new 

animal drug applications (NADAs) for 

certain Type A medicated articles and 

Type B medicated feeds. This action is 

being taken at the sponsors’ request 

because these products are no longer 

manufactured or marketed. 

DATES: This final rule is effective April 

21, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Bartkowiak, Center for Veterinary 

Medicine (HFV–212), Food and Drug 

Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9079, 

john.bartkowiak@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

following 5 sponsors have requested 

that FDA withdraw approval of the 19 

NADAs listed in the following tables 

because the products are no longer 

manufactured or marketed: 

• ADM Alliance Nutrition, Inc., 1000 

North 30th St., Quincy, IL 62305–3115: 

NADA Product name 

091–582 1 ........................................ Gilt Edge TYLAN (tylosin phosphate) Mix. 

108–484 1 ........................................ HFA Tylosin-10 Plus Sulfa (tylosin phosphate and sulfamethazine). 

110–045 1 ........................................ Good Life TYLAN 10 (tylosin phosphate) Premix. 

110–439 1 ........................................ HFA HYGROMIX 0.48 (hygromycin B) Medicated Premix. 

128–411 1 ........................................ TYLAN 5 Sulfa (tylosin phosphate and sulfamethazine) Premix. 

• Micro Beef Technologies LTD, P.O. 

Box 9262, Amarillo, TX 79105: 

NADA Product name 

138–187 1 ........................................ TYLAN 40 or 100 (tylosin phosphate). 

• Ridley USA, Inc. d/b/a Ridley Feed 

Ingredients, 1609 First Ave., P.O. Box 

110, Mendota, IL 61342: 

NADA Product name 

099–468 1 ........................................ Waynextra for Swine (tylosin phosphate). 

131–958 1 ........................................ TYLAN Sulfa-G (tylosin phosphate and sulfamethazine). 

132–136 .......................................... Ban-A-Worm II (pyrantel tartrate). 

• Provimi North America, Inc., 6531 

State Rte. 503, Lewisburg, OH 45338: 

NADA Proprietary name 

103–089 1 ........................................ TYLAN 5, 10, 20, or 40 (tylosin phosphate). 

118–814 .......................................... WORM–BAN 5 or 10 (pyrantel tartrate). 

127–508 1 ........................................ HYGROMIX 0.6 (hygromycin B). 

131–413 .......................................... FLAVOMYCIN 0.4 or 2 (bambermycins). 

133–333 1 ........................................ STAFAC 10 (virginiamycin). 

• Virbac AH, Inc., 3200 Meacham 

Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137: 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES