alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for the following insured depository institution, was charged with the duty of winding up the affairs of the former institution and liquidating all related assets. The Receiver has fulfilled its obligations and made all dividend distributions required by law. Notice of Termination of Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Termination date10334
FirsTier Bank
Louisville
CO
12/01/2024
 The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective on the termination date listed above, the Receivership has been terminated, the Receiver has been discharged, and the Receivership has ceased to exist as a legal entity. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819.) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on December 2, 2024. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2024-28456 Filed 12-4-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Crop water productivity

Filters

              - products_publications(1)

## By Location

              - alabama(1)
              - arizona(5)
              - arkansas(2)
              - california(16)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(3)
              - idaho(1)
              - illinois(2)
              - indiana(1)
              - iowa(5)
              - kansas(2)
              - louisiana(2)
              - (-)minnesota(1)
              - mississippi(5)
              - missouri(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - ohio(1)
              - oklahoma(2)
              - oregon(2)
              - puerto rico(1)
              - south dakota(25)
              - tennessee(1)
              - texas(3)
              - u.s. virgin islands(1)
              - virginia(1)
              - washington(1)

## By Year

publication        November 9, 2012        Concentrations, loads, and yields of select constituents from major tributaries of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers in Iowa, water years 2004-2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6996

LOUIS SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-00-188-5-HO)

Submitted: October 17, 2000 Decided: October 26, 2000

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Louis Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Smith v. North Carolina, No. CA-00-188-

5-HO (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2000). We deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(3)
              - products_publications(60)
              - multimedia_before_after(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(6)
              - multimedia_video-149194(3)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - (-)news_news-149245(3)
              - news_news-149248(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(2)
              - (-)arizona(3)
              - california(4)
              - colorado(2)
              - hawaii(1)
              - idaho(2)
              - kansas(1)
              - nebraska(1)
              - new jersey(1)
              - new mexico(2)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oklahoma(1)
              - oregon(1)
              - south dakota(2)
              - texas(2)
              - utah(2)
              - washington(1)
              - wyoming(2)

## By Year

State News Release        October 28, 2021        Groundwater Flow to Colorado River May Decline by a Third over Next 30 Years

State News Release        August 18, 2016        Water Levels Declining in Areas Along San Pedro River near Sierra Vista, Arizona

State News Release        September 27, 2017        Levels of Possible Human Carcinogen Declining in Most Wells in Tucson International Airport Superfund Site
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification Required Under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**
I, David A. Slack, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief FinancialOfficer of Stratos Lightwave, Inc., certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratosLightwave, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
     a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
-1-

 

     b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Dated: September 12, 2003 /s/ David A. Slack             David A. Slack         Chief Financial Officer
-2-
Elie RAPHAEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-0593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[August 23, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pacific Fuel Cell Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| Dated:  May 18, 2007 | s/Ken Inouye                                                    

Ken Inouye, Secretary-Treasurer |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
L.O., Appellant, v. J.H. and N.R., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-308

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 20-0083

____________________________________________________________________

STATE OF MONTANA, by and through the DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL 

RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION, for and on behalf of the BOARD OF 

LAND COMMISSIONERS, and THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL,

Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, 

vs.

GREENFIELDS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF 

GREENFIELDS IRRIGATIONDISTRICT,

Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Response Brief and Opening Brief on Cross-Appeal and 

good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellees/Cross-Appellants are hereby 

granted a 30-day extension of time up to and including October 22, 2020, to 

prepare, file and serve their Response Brief and Opening Brief on Cross-Appeal. 

c: Brian C. Bramblett; Barbara Chillcott; Melissa Schlichting; Jon Metropoulos; 

KD Feeback; Anita Y. Milanovich

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 15 2020

09/15/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0083
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - products_publications(12)
              - multimedia_video(1)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149194(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(4)
              - arizona(3)
              - california(24)
              - florida(1)
              - hawaii(5)
              - idaho(1)
              - (-)indiana(1)
              - iowa(1)
              - maine(1)
              - maryland(2)
              - massachusetts(1)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - north dakota(1)
              - oregon(3)
              - south dakota(2)
              - virginia(3)
              - washington(2)
              - wisconsin(3)

## By Year

Presentations and Events        April 16, 2019        Variable Warming Upper Midwest Lakes and Implications for Sport Fish
October 14, 2015

Mr. Lorenzo Lopez

2238 W. 18th Place

Chicago, ID 60608

Dear Mr. Lopez:

This is in response to your May 22, 2015, letter posted to the docket (No. FAA−2015−1875) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). You requested to conduct aerial videography, photography,

and cinematography using an unmanned aerial system.

The information you submitted did not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81. On 

July 11, 2015, the FAA sent you a letter stating that we were unable to process your request 

without further information. Specifically, we asked you to provide the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

On July 17, 2015, the FAA received additional information. The FAA has reviewed the 

information and finds that you did not provide the sections from which you seek relief, how 

granting the request would provide a level of safety and why granting the request would be in 

the public interest.

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information, please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket.
2

Sincerely,

/s/

Lirio Liu

Director, Office of Rulemaking
James WHITFIELD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1728

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied August 30, 2018

James Whitfield, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).

Wolf, Lewis, and Ray, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 236 (Monday, December 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 97706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28806]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Application and Renewal Fees Imposed on Surety Companies and 
Reinsuring Companies; Increase in Fees Imposed; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of fees imposed on surety companies and reinsuring 
companies; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, 
published a document in the Federal Register of December 2, 2024, 
adding renewal fees for Complementary and Alien Reinsurers as well as 
Admitted Reinsurer--Reinsurance Market companies and increasing the 
existing fees it imposes on and collects from surety companies and 
reinsuring companies, effective January 1, 2025. The document contained 
typographical errors effecting the dollar values.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melvin Saunders, at (304) 480-5108 or 
[email protected]; or Bobbi McDonald, at (304) 480-
7098 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of December 2, 2024, 
in FR Doc. 2024-28231, on page 95911, in ``The new fee rate schedule'' 
section should read as follows:
    (1) Examination of a company's application for a Certificate of 
Authority as an acceptable surety or as an acceptable reinsuring 
company on Federal bonds: $13,600.
* * * * *
    (3) Examination of a company's application for recognition as an 
Admitted Reinsurer: $5,000.
* * * * *
    (6) Examination of a company's application for recognition as an 
Alien Reinsurer: $5,000.
* * * * *
    (8) Examination of a company's application for recognition as a 
Complementary Reinsurer: $5,000.
* * * * *

    Dated: December 4, 2024.
Lela Anderson,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2024-28806 Filed 12-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P
```
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Mark W. Jaindl, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Harry C.
Birkhimer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Bank
Incorporated (the "Company"), each certifies in his capacity as an officer of
the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 and that to the best of his
knowledge:

          1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.





April 27, 2007                            \s\ Mark W. Jaindl
---------------                           --------------------------------------
Date                                      Mark W. Jaindl
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


April 27, 2007                            \s\ Harry C. Birkhimer
---------------                           --------------------------------------
Date                                      Harry C. Birkhimer
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer


The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Bank Incorporated and will be retained by American Bank
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Cindy TILLETT, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3494

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2020049EN.01001701.xml

| 13.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/17

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 49/16)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Trapani - Ancona and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 15 July 2020 to 14 July 2023 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) |
| Air transport development and licensing department |
| Viale Castro Pretorio, 118 |
| 00185 Roma |
| ITALIA |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Trapani - Ancona and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

From 15 July 2020 to 14 July 2023

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)

Air transport development and licensing department

Viale Castro Pretorio, 118

00185 Roma

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0644596515

Email: osp@enac.gov.it

| Website: | http://www.mit.gov.it
  http://www.enac.gov.it |
| --- | --- |

Website:

http://www.mit.gov.it

http://www.enac.gov.it

---
Mr. Bob Emory 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JUL 1 8 2013 

Southern Timberlands Environmental Affairs Manager 

Weyerhaeuser Company 

1785 Weyerhaeuser Road 

Vanceboro, North Carolina 28586 

Dear Mr. Emory: 

Thank you for your request for a 15-day extension ofthe comment period for the U.S. 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Environmental Protection Agency's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, " RFS Pathways II and Technical 

Amendments to the RFS 2 Standards." In this Notice the EPA is proposing to amend certain of the 

renewable fuels standard program regulations to facilitate the introduction of new renewable fuels as 

well as improve implementation of the program. 

We appreciate the concerns you have raised in your letter and look forward to working with interested 

stakeholders like Weyerhaeuser Company as we move to a final rulemaking. At this time, we are not 

planning to extend the comment period as requested in your letter. However, we will welcome any 

substantive comments you provide after the deadline and will add those comments to the rulemaking 

docket. We will review comments received in sufficient time before completion of the final rule and 

take substantive information into consideration during our deliberations. 

We look forward to future interactions with Weyerhaeuser Company as we move forward with the rule. 

If you have any questions, please contact Joe Sopata of my staff at 202-343-9034 or 

sopata.j oe@epa. gov. 

Christoph r Grundler, Director 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
TAB-N-ACTION, INC., dba Excellence Academy v. MONROE CITY SCHOOL BOARD

NO. 2018-C-1056

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 2018

Denied.