Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Notices 99281 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 2 89 FR 91322 and 91331 (November 19, 2024). 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–929–931 (Fourth 

Review)] 

Silicomanganese From India, 

Kazakhstan, and Venezuela 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on 

silicomanganese from India, 

Kazakhstan, and Venezuela would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on May 1, 2024 (89 FR 35247) 

and determined on August 5, 2024, that 

it would conduct expedited reviews (89 

FR 77542, September 23, 2024). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on December 4, 2024. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5567 

(December 2024), entitled 

Silicomanganese from India, 

Kazakhstan, and Venezuela: 

Investigation Nos. 731–TA–929–931 

(Fourth Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 5, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28982 Filed 12–9–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–741 and 731– 

TA–1718–1719 (Preliminary)] 

Paper File Folders From Cambodia and 

Sri Lanka 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that there is a reasonable indication that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of paper file folders from Cambodia and 

Sri Lanka, provided for in subheading 

4820.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that are 

alleged to be sold in the United States 

at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and 

imports of the subject merchandise from 

Cambodia that are alleged to be 

subsidized by the government of 

Cambodia.2

Commencement of Final Phase 

Investigations 

Pursuant to section 207.18 of the 

Commission’s rules, the Commission 

also gives notice of the commencement 

of the final phase of its investigations. 

The Commission will issue a final phase 

notice of scheduling, which will be 

published in the Federal Register as 

provided in § 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules, upon notice from 

the U.S. Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative 

preliminary determinations in the 

investigations under §§ 703(b) or 733(b) 

of the Act, or, if the preliminary 

determinations are negative, upon 

notice of affirmative final 

determinations in those investigations 

under §§ 705(a) or 735(a) of the Act. 

Parties that filed entries of appearance 

in the preliminary phase of the 

investigations need not enter a separate 

appearance for the final phase of the 

investigations. Any other party may file 

an entry of appearance for the final 

phase of the investigations after 

publication of the final phase notice of 

scheduling. Industrial users, and, if the 

merchandise under investigation is sold 

at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations have the right 

to appear as parties in Commission 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

investigations. The Secretary will 

prepare a public service list containing 

the names and addresses of all persons, 

or their representatives, who are parties 

to the investigations. As provided in 

section 207.20 of the Commission’s 

rules, the Director of the Office of 

Investigations will circulate draft 

questionnaires for the final phase of the 

investigations to parties to the 

investigations, placing copies on the 

Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS, https://

edis.usitc.gov), for comment. 

Background 

On October 21, 2024, the Coalition of 

Domestic Folder Manufacturers, 

Hastings, Minnesota, and Naperville, 

Illinois, filed petitions with the 

Commission and Commerce, alleging 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured or threatened with 

material injury by reason of subsidized 

imports of paper file folders from 

Cambodia and LTFV imports of paper 

file folders from Cambodia and Sri 

Lanka. Accordingly, effective October 

21, 2024, the Commission instituted 

countervailing duty investigation No. 

701–TA–741 and antidumping duty 

investigation Nos. 731–TA–1718–1719 

(Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of October 25, 2024 (89 

FR 85234). The Commission conducted 

its conference on November 12, 2024. 

All persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to 

participate. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to §§ 703(a) 

and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed 

and filed its determinations in these 

investigations on December 5, 2024. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5570 (December 

2024), entitled Paper File Folders from 

Cambodia and Sri Lanka: Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–741 and 731–TA–1718– 

1719 (Preliminary). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 5, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28983 Filed 12–9–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

United States Marshals Service 

[OMB Number 1105–0105] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension 

Without Change or a Currently 

Approved Collection; Comments 

Requested: Form CSO–005, 

Preliminary Background Check Form 

AGENCY: U.S. Marshals Service, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
99282 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Notices 

will submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until 

February 10, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments, 

particularly with respect to the 

estimated public burden or associated 

response time, have suggestions, need a 

copy of the proposed information 

collection instrument with instructions, 

or desire any additional information, 

please contact Assistant Chief Karl 

Slazer/Management Support Division, 

US Marshals Service Headquarters, 1215 

S Clark St., Ste. 10005, Arlington, VA 

22202–4387, by telephone at 703–740– 

2316 or by email at karl.slazer@

usdoj.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection 

(check justification or form 83): 

Extension without change or a currently 

approved collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Form CSO–005, Preliminary 

Background Check Form. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form number (if applicable): Form 

CSO–005. 

Component: U.S. Marshals Service, 

U.S. Department of Justice. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Primary: Court Security Officers/ 

Special Security Officer (CSO/SSO) 

Applicants Other (if applicable): [None] 

Abstract: The CSO–005 Preliminary 

Background Check Form is used to 

collect applicant information for CSO/ 

SSO positions. The applicant 

information provided to USMS from the 

Vendor gives information about which 

District and Facility the applicant will 

be working, the applicant’s personal 

information, prior employment 

verification, employment performance 

and current financial status. The 

information allows the selecting official 

to hire applicants with a strong history 

of employment performance and 

financial responsibility. The questions 

on this form have been developed from 

the OPM, MSPB and DOJ ‘‘Best 

Practice’’ guidelines for reference 

checking. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: An estimated 750 respondents 

will utilize the form, and it will take 

each respondent approximately 60 

minutes to complete the form. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated annual public 

burden associated with this collection is 

750 hours, which is equal to (750 (total 

# of annual responses) * 1 (60 mins). 

7. An estimate of the total annual cost 

burden associated with the collection, if 

applicable: 

TOTAL BURDEN HOURS

Activity Number of 

respondents 

Frequency 

(annually) 

Total 

annual 

responses 

Time per 

response 

(min) 

Total 

annual 

burden 

(hours) 

Ex: Survey (individuals or households) ............................... 750 1 1000 60 750 

Unduplicated Totals ...................................................... 1000 ........................ 1000 ........................ 750 

Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden: 

$14,651.00. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Darwin Arceo, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W–218, 

Washington, DC. 

Dated: December 5, 2024. 

Darwin Arceo, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2024–28954 Filed 12–9–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of the Federal Unemployment 

Tax Act (FUTA) Credit Reductions 

Applicable for 2024 

Sections 3302(c)(2)(A) and 3302(d)(3) 

of FUTA provide that employers in a 

State that has outstanding advances 

under title XII of the Social Security Act 

on January 1 of two or more consecutive 

years are subject to a reduction in 

credits otherwise available against the 

FUTA tax for the calendar year in which 

the most recent such January 1 occurs, 

if advances remain on November 10 of 

that year. Further, section 3302(c)(2)(C) 

of FUTA provides for an additional 

credit reduction for a year if a state has 

outstanding advances on five or more 

consecutive January 1 and has a balance 

on November 10 for such years. Section 

3302(c)(2)(C) provides for waiver of this 

additional credit reduction and 

substitution of the credit reduction 

provided in section 3302(c)(2)(B) if a 

state meets certain conditions. 

California, Connecticut, New York, 

and the US Virgin Islands (USVI) had 

outstanding advances on January 1 for 

two or more consecutive years and 

employers in these States were 

potentially subject to a FUTA credit 

reduction in 2024. Connecticut repaid 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES