alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Declination

Filters

              - science_science(5)
              - products_publications(68)
              - multimedia_audio(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(7)
              - multimedia_video-149194(1)
              - multimedia_video-149195(6)
              - news_news-149248(1)
              - news_other_news(3)

## By Location

              - alaska(6)
              - arizona(2)
              - california(6)
              - delaware(1)
              - (-)florida(2)
              - hawaii(4)
              - iowa(1)
              - kansas(1)
              - louisiana(1)
              - nevada(1)
              - u.s. virgin islands(3)
              - utah(1)
              - washington(3)

## By Year

Photography        December 31, 2017        Time series of Grecian Rocks coral reef

Photography        October 28, 2020        Elkhorn coral at calcification assessment station in Dry Tortugas
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 

NO. 03-12-00558-CV

Happy Jack Ranch, Inc. and Frederick J. Behrend, 

Appellants 

v.

HH&L Development, Inc; Matthew Stolhandske, Trustee; Michael Strnad, 

Appellees 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

The undersigned files this Notice of Change of Address and requests that the court’s docket in 

the above styled cause be updated accordingly: 

 Allen Cazier 

1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725 

San Antonio, Texas 78209 

 Email: cazlaw@yahoo.com 

Telephone: (210) 824-3278 

Fax: (210) 824-3937 

 All filings, correspondence and notices should be sent to this address. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 /s/ Allen Cazier 

 ALLEN CAZIER 

 State Bar No. 04037500 

 1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725 

 San Antonio, Texas 78209 

 Telephone: (210) 824-3278 

 Telecopier: (210) 824-3937 

 Email: cazlaw@yahoo.com 

ACCEPTED

03-12-00558-CV

7954043

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/23/2015 3:14:12 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/23/2015 3:14:12 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Certificate of Service

I certify that on November 23, 2015 a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on 

each person listed below.

 /s/ Allen Cazier

Allen Cazier

Kimberly S. Keller

Keller Stolarczyk, PLLC

234 West Bandera Road, #120

Boerne, Texas 78006

Pascual Madrigal

Attorney at Law

9504 N. IH-35, Suite 316

San Antonio, Texas 78233

Ted R. Cackowski

Attorney at Law

1141 N. Loop 1604 E., #105

San Antonio, Texas 78232

Matt C. Stolhandske

Attorney at LAW

1004 South St. Mary’s 

San Antonio, Texas 78205
# C_2020040EN.01003401.xml

| 6.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/34

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2020/C 40/05)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, B-1049 Brussels Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel | The People’s Republic of China
  Japan
  The Republic of Korea
  The Russian Federation
  The United States of America | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953 of 29 October 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating in the People’s Republic of China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America
  (OJ L 284, 30.10.2015, p. 109) | 31.10.2020 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel

The People’s Republic of China

Japan

The Republic of Korea

The Russian Federation

The United States of America

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953 of 29 October 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating in the People’s Republic of China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America

(OJ L 284, 30.10.2015, p. 109)

31.10.2020

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column

---
# C_2020065EN.01000101.xml

| 28.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9503 — Gardner Denver/Ingersoll Industrials)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2020/C 65/01)

On 30 January 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Brian NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-660

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Amendment No. 2 to Acuity Brands, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10(iii) A (4) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. 
 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT made as of the 26th day of June, 2007, by ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”); 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the
Company maintains the Acuity Brands, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of December 18, 2003 (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan’s Change in Control provision; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. 
 Effective June 26, 2007, Section 2(g)(iii) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the words “seventy percent (70%)” and replacing
them with the words “sixty percent (60%).” 
 2. 
 This Amendment No. 2 to the Plan shall be effective as of June 26, 2007. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	        ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Vernon J. Nagel
		 	 Vernon J. Nagel,
 Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer
STATE EX REL. Clarence DUDLEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-1424

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated at least two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5536 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5536

 To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is 
  operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 
     endorsement for the vessel Apollonia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2016

  Mr. Gibson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is 
  operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 
     endorsement for the vessel Apollonia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL ``APOLLONIA''.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the 
department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall issue a 
certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the 
vessel Apollonia (United States official number 1266527).
                                 <all>
```
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tabatha IV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mimbi Robertson, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: March 22, 2006. | /s/ MIMBI ROBERTSON |   |
|------------------------|---------------------|--------|

|   | Mimbi Robertson, President |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Communications Plans

Filters

              - science_education(1)
              - science_science(16)
              - products_data(1)
              - products_publications(15)
              - products_web_tools(1)
              - multimedia_audio(20)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(18)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(2)
              - multimedia_image(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(2)
              - multimedia_video(135)
              - multimedia_video-149194(103)
              - multimedia_video-149195(14)
              - (-)multimedia_video-149197(8)
              - multimedia_video-149198(1)
              - multimedia_video-149225(1)
              - news_news-149245(1)
              - news_news-149250(1)
              - news_other_news(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(13)
              - other_basic-42(1)
              - other_basic-43(1)
              - other_basic-45(1)

## By Location

              - maine(1)
              - maryland(1)
              - nevada(1)

## By Year

How to's and trainings        July 20, 2022        USGS Emergency Management 101: Onsite Communication and Leadership

How to's and trainings        June 30, 2019        Surveying Indirect Measurements with GNSS

How to's and trainings        November 30, 2023        Landsat: Products & Services from the USGS - Webinar, September 2023

How to's and trainings        September 30, 2016        Navigating the USGS Emergency Operations Collection Management Tool

How to's and trainings        March 17, 2023        Bander Portal: Band Inventory

How to's and trainings        August 9, 2023        FY24 Data Collaboration Announcement Webinar

How to's and trainings        October 27, 2020        Dynamic Styling for NHD and WBD REST Web Services

How to's and trainings        August 25, 2022        Monitoring Suspended Sediment and Flow along the Mississippi River: Episode 3B
John Luke HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 7, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In this appeal filed pursuant to *Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of John Luke Henry's drug offender probation and resulting sentence for dealing in stolen property. We remand only for the trial court to correct the written revocation order.

An amended violation of probation (VOP) affidavit alleged five new law violations that constituted violations of condition 5 of Henry's probation. At the VOP hearing, the State informed the court it would proceed on four of the five new law offenses as violations. After Henry admitted that he entered a plea to two of the charges (battery on a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest with violence) and had received six months in jail on them, the State informed the court it was striking the two conditions to which he did not enter a plea. Thus, only two violations remained. The trial court found Henry in *1253violation based on the new law violations and revoked his probation.

Although there were only two violations of condition 5 remaining before the trial court at the hearing, the revocation order shows four violations of condition 5. Therefore, we remand for correction of the revocation order to reflect only two violations of condition 5. *See**Allen v. State*, 228 So.3d 681, 681-82 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (remanding for correction of revocation order to conform to the oral pronouncement).

Affirmed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 97032-97033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28677]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4834-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4834-DR), dated October 11, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 23, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and

[[Page 97033]]

Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of October 11, 2024.

    Nassau County for debris removal and permanent work [Categories 
A and C-G] (already designated for emergency protective measures 
[Category B], including direct federal assistance under the Public 
Assistance program).
    Duval and St. Johns Counties for permanent work [Categories C-G] 
(already designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for 
debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and 
B], including direct federal assistance under the Public Assistance 
program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-28677 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
Timothy HANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter de Visser, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Candente Resource Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 28, 2007

|                                         |  |                     
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                                      |  | /s/  Peter de Visser
|                                         |  |                     
|Peter de Visser,
Chief Financial Officer
From: Gina McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US

To: Dmancini@omb.eop.gov, Janet McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, John 

Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Wegman.Lydia@EPA.GOV

Date: 06/14/2012 07:56 PM

Subject: ES

I spoke with Bob and he suggests that we make the following revision to the first paragraph and delete the later 

reference 

Sections 108 and 109 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment, review, and revision, as appropriate, of 

the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and welfare. The CAA requires periodic 

review of the air quality criteria – the science upon which the standards are based – and the standards themselves. 

This proposed rulemaking is being done pursuant to these statutory requirements. The schedule for this proposed 

rule is set out in a court order.
Phillip Brooks TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D17-2236 5D17-2237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed August 31, 2018 Rehearing Denied October 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.